Saturday, October 15, 2016

Politicians seem to have a Love/Hate relationship with the electorate

Yes,yes indeed...Love is Strange

White House Aide Exposes Hillary’s Darkest Moments & Psychotic Behavior

by Rebecca Diserio 
Linda Tripp, the former White House aide and friend of Monica Lewinsky whose workspace was located directly adjacent to Hillary Clinton’s second-floor West Wing office, is confirming long-reported accounts of the former First Lady’s darkest moments. Hillary’s long list of psychotic behavior, including throwing objects at Bill Clinton’s head, is now exposing just how sick the presidential candidate has always been.
Linda Tripp in 2016 (left), Hillary Clinton as First Lady (right)
Linda Tripp, who’s best known as Monica Lewinsky’s confidant during her well-known affair with former President Bill Clinton, is coming forward with new details about Hillary’s scandalous behavior in the White House.
Tripp … described what she characterized as Hillary Clinton’s significant temperament issues, including “endless screaming” and the constant use of profanity, as well as a general disdain for the U.S. electorate, the Armed Services and the honor and dignity of the institution of the American presidency, calling her public persona a “smoke and mirrors act.”  [Source: Breitbart]
Most troubling is what Tripp said about Hillary’s need to reach the presidency herself. Even back in the early 1990s, Hillary’s plan was to become president. Tripp said, “[A]s early as the first days of the Bill Clinton administration there was already talk amongst senior staff about a future Hillary Clinton presidency, a position to which Hillary Clinton believed herself entitled.” 


Linda Tripp & Monica Lewinsky (left), Bill & Hillary Clinton during their White House years (right)
Tripp said that Clinton’s method of attacking Donald Trump on temperament is positively mind-boggling for those of “us who did get a first-hand peek behind the Clinton curtain.” Tripp said, “[If voters saw the real] Hillary, they’d see a coarse, profane political operative. With no moral compass. And a complete willingness to manipulate the rule of law to her benefit. They would see a fearsome, paranoid individual with zero concern for the masses. She sees the voting block merely as a necessary evil to achieve her goals. She is a total impressive smoke and mirrors act.”
Most of us realize that Hillary is unfit to be president, but to hear that she already had contempt for the American people when she was First Lady and was already planning on becoming president is a little shocking. That means for 25 years Hillary’s one goal in life has been to be the leader of the free world, and anything that gets in her way will be eliminated.

Throwing objects at Bill’s head is one thing, but Hillary’s behavior is seen in sociopathic personalities who have zero empathy towards others. Master manipulators put on an act in public, but those like Linda Tripp, who saw the real Hillary, know that she has no business having any kind of power. She needs to retire, and Americans need to be done having the Clintons in charge of anything.

Friday, October 14, 2016

All I have to say to #Obama #Clinton
Being a Indian Outlaw 1/2 breed oh wait that technically would be 1/8th breed Patriot... Comanche/Apache/ Heinz 57... F' y'all traitors...your time has will be prosecuted for your High Crimes and Misdemeanors against the USA ...Sedition/Treason/Corruption ...when Donald Trump is sworn in as our next POTUS...ya had a hella lot of fun F'n us all...however when ya play ya must pay 'Do the Crime...Do the Time! Which do you prefer on judgement day ...tarred and feathered and run out of town or hanging for treason? 

Enjoy America singing/dancing as y'all pay for play! 

Two Newly Released Emails from Assange Implicate Hitlery in the Murder of Justice Scalia

oped: See:


Julian Assange may very well be the hero of this election and of this generation, and he may be saving the world by preventing the Wicked Witch of Benghazi from taking the throne. His bombshell email dumps are coming at such a rapid pace right now I can barely keep up with them.
Two hacked-and-leaked emails exchanged between Hitlery Chief of Goons John Podesta and Democrat Party soldier Steve Elmendorf are rumored to be a discussion of the assassination of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
Some may consider it a reach, but “wet works” is a term commonly used in the espionage field, meaning “spilling blood” or “assassination”. Cibolo Ranch, where Justic Scalia was enjoying a hunting trip, has a pool near a vineyard. There appears to be an email or two missing here that would identify exactly what the two were discussing. Maybe we are yet to see those. Good job, WikiLeaks!

Two hacked-and-leaked emails exchanged between Hitlery Chief of Goons John Podesta and Democrat Party soldier Steve Elmendorf are rumored to be a discussion of the assassination of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
Some may consider it a reach, but “wet works” is a term commonly used in the espionage field, meaning “spilling blood” or “assassination”. Cibolo Ranch, where Justic Scalia was enjoying a hunting trip, has a pool near a vineyard. There appears to be an email or two missing here that would identify exactly what the two were discussing. Maybe we are yet to see those. Good job, WikiLeaks!

Continue Reading

Rebellion Brewing at the FBI: Agency in Turmoil over Comey Corruption!

By Warner Todd Huston 
There was once a day when the FBI’s famed G-Men were celebrated on stage and screen. But these days the luster of the FBI’s star has decidedly faded especially with the decision of its director to allow the criminal activities perpetrated by Hillary Clinton to go unpunished because the director is a crass, left-wing political operative instead of a hard-nosed man of law and order. And his actions have caused a major problem among agents who still want their work to be respected. 

For Americans of a certain age, “The FBI” immediately conjures up the stirring horns of the theme song for “The FBI” TV series starring Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. The show which so proudly noted was “a Quinn Martin production” at the start of every episode had a fairly long run airing from 1965 to 1974. 

See video: 

The series was probably one of the best examples for the gravity and trust Americans once imbued into the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The show’s stars were always deadly serious, highly intelligent, and always got their man. They successfully investigated everything from theft, to espionage, murder, and fraud and the public ate it up year after year.
But that was a day when the Bureau was seen as a trusted agency that could be expected to be a dispassionate, effective investigative service. Still, the show aired during the worst of the Vietnam era just as Americans were turning away from their past explicit trust in government institutions.

The show is in stark contrast to today’s shows based on Bureaus like the FBI. Today we see such agencies as sometimes distrusted by the public and generally featuring at least one agent who turns out to be an enemy to law and justice or even the very country itself.
Hollywood aside, the FBI has had its ups and downs, certainly, but usually it found those low times due to some mishap or bad policy decisions based on matters of process by its upper management. But despite some of the worst 1970s conspiracy theories, rarely has the FBI been considered a bald-faced political actor until Director James Comey tarnished the shield by becoming a member of Hillary Clinton’s election campaign.
When Comey decided that Hillary would be let off scot free for her clear and purposeful violations of national security, he turned the FBI from a serious policing agency into a low, mean, transparent arm of the Democrat Party.

Early in September, we here at published a detailed look at much of the proof of Hillary’s crimes and concluded that Comey disgraced himself by his bald political actions to help Hillary escape justice and get elected the next president of the United States.
Suffice to say, we showed that the FBI broke its own practices to make sure that Hillary was given every out possible and Comey himself made up out of whole cloth the idea that “intent” should guide prosecution.

On that article, the very first comment posted in the comment section most encapsulates how badly Comey’s actions have harmed the agency he leads.
That comment read:
“I am going to keep saying this. The FBI is no longer a legitimate or competent law enforcement agency. The FBI has become nothing more than goons for the DNC and the Democratic Party. The FBI should now be considered a domestic corrupt terrorist organization. Due to the FBI’s corruption and political affiliation with the Democratic Party, they should no longer have jurisdiction over a single American citizen. Comey is now guilty of treason by default and association. He has violated his sworn oath and must be removed.”
Now it appears that many career agents of the FBI itself have come to agree with our commenter and these agents are on the verge of an internal revolt over their director’s naked political actions.
According to recent reports the agents and investigators involved with the Clinton case had unanimously recommended that Comey forward t0 the Department of Justice the advice to indict Hillary for her crimes. Comey, though, bent over backwards to come up with his shady “intent” reading of the law apparently sending his own agents into despair.

As Fox News reported on October 13, Comey’s move shocked his underlings.
“No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with [Director Comey’s] decision not to prosecute — it was a top-down decision,” an inside FBI source told Fox News.
“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted,” the FBI official told the cable newser. “We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”

The New York Daily News also noted how damaging the director’s decision has been to the agency.
“Veteran FBI agents say FBI Director James Comey has permanently damaged the bureau’s reputation for uncompromising investigations with his ‘cowardly’ whitewash of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private email server,” the paper reported on October 6.

In a recent interview on Washington D.C.’s WMAL radio, former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova was also thoroughly disgusted by Comey’s dishonest political decision and even called the director a “dirty cop.”
This is a big development. This means there are some great, traditional, honest people inside the FBI and DOJ who will not let this stand. They know that Comey is a dirty cop and they are disgusted. Inside the bureau I had a meeting today with a senior former FBI agent who told me this exact story. That people are starting to talk. They’re calling their former friends outside the bureau asking for help. We were asked, today, to provide legal representation for people inside the bureau and we agreed to do so. And, to former agents who want to come forward to talk.
Comey thought this was going to go away. It is not. People inside the are furious. They are embarrassed. They feel they are being led by a hack. But, more than that, they think he’s a crook. They think he’s fundamentally dishonest. They have no confidence in him. The bureau, inside, right now… is a mess.

The damage Comey did to the agency is real and deep. Not just with the general public but within the agency itself.
Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit, put it succinctly and was adamant in the pages of the Post that Comey has done lasting damage to the FBI’s reputation
“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time. I hold Director Comey responsible,” Hughes said in disgust.
But, like many supporters of Hillary Clinton, a little law breaking is nothing to worry about when the real goal is to get her into the White House.


Did the Clinton Campaign have Prior Knowledge of Scalia’s Death?

oped: See: 
And not to forget Chelsea Clinton's remarks about Scalia being out of the way!

by: Tad Cronn 
Buried in the thousands of Hillary Clinton-related documents dumped by Wikileaks is part of an email exchange between Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and lobbyist and fundraiser Steve Elmendorf.
In the email, Podesta uses the phrase “wet works.”

See video:

“Wet works” comes from the Cold War era and was a Soviet term for assassination.
The email from Podesta was sent to Elmendorf four days before conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia — whose replacement will be nominated by the next president — died in a Texas hotel room, under circumstances that some skeptics of the official version claim are suspicious.
Before we go riding off to fetch the marshal, let’s be clear.
Podesta is not being accused of involvement in anything immoral or illegal by this columnist, and certainly not a “hit” on Scalia.

Officially, there is no evidence that Scalia’s death was anything but natural.
The entire context of the email is unclear and could be related to a previous conversation, as it is short yet seems to be clearly understood by Elmendorf. We should concede at the outset that the email could be perfectly innocent, even just an inside joke or something.
That said, the email raises a question — I think it’s a fair question, given all the allegations flying around about both candidates and the general “air” of scandal hovering over this election, and it’s a question that should be answered, hopefully easily by Mr. Podesta or the Clinton campaign. That question is:

Why would Podesta use the phrase “wet works” in an email sent days before Scalia died?
In the email exchange, Podesta, in an email subject lined “Thanks” and sent February 9, 2016, 4:36 p.m., wrote to Elmendorf:
“Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.”
To which Elmendorf, in an email subject lined “RE: Thanks” and sent February 9, 2016, at 8:56 p.m., writes to Podesta:
“I am all in
“Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down”
Below is a screen capture of the document, which can also be seen at Wikileaks.

We all know the rumors surrounding the Clintons in regards to what happens to certain of their political enemies. Before this email joins those rumors, I think Podesta should answer the question publicly.

Hackers at #Anonymous Declare WAR on Hillary Clinton Campaign!

By Onan Coca 
Oh boy.

It’s time to grab the popcorn and pull up a comfy chair, folks.

Recently, CNN reporter Andrew Kaczynski went on the hunt for damaging audio/video of Donald Trump’s appearances on the Howard Stern show. (Trump and Stern are friendly; Trump has appeared on the show numerous times and said some pretty disgusting things.) When the impish hacker community learned that Kaczynski was begging the internet for some easy material, the jokesters at /pol on 4Chan began inundating him with fake information. The thread (and the prank) were soon discovered by Kaczynski who complained about the activity… which only encouraged more trolling from 4Chan, including some hacks of Kaczynski’s email account. It was at this point that the liberal Hillary support group Correct the Record (CTR) got involved. CTR threatened to use an NSA style tool called FoxAcid to find and expose the leaders of Anonymous, 4Chan, Reddit, and other online groups.

The hacker world did not take the threat as it was intended because instead of cowing to Democrat pressure, the community exploded in anger and has now launched an all-out assault on the Hillary Clinton campaign, the Obama administration, and the crony media that is allowing their corruption to continue undeterred. 

See video:

#Anonymous first pulled out emails from the WikiLeaks story that seemed to indicate that Justice Scalia’s death may not have been completely natural.

Second email at the time of Scalia death
— 0HOUR1 (@0HOUR1__) October 13, 2016 To:
I am all in
Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down
From: John Podesta []
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 4:36 PM
To: Steve Elmendorf
Subject: Thanks
Didn’t think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.
“Wet works” is a known code for assassination, in case you were wondering.
Then #Anonymous turned to the women accusing Donald Trump of sexual harassment and found some reason to be suspicious of her story.

#Anonymous saved their harshest criticism and most damning evidence of corruption for Hillary Clinton.

Folks, this is just the beginning. #Anonymous is promising that there is more to come as they excitedly await the next WikiLeaks document dump.

The 2016 campaign for the White House has already been among the most disturbing and convoluted trips the nation has ever been on, but the most interesting moments may yet be ahead of us. If #Anonymous and their friends at 4chan, Reddit, and elsewhere on the web can stay focused on the Clinton machine… it may mean the end of the Democrat Party as we know it. One thing is for sure, the relatively anonymous denizens of the Internet are not the people that Hillary Clinton should have been stirring up with just a month to go before the election, and Clinton is about to learn why.

FoxNews ABC NBC CBS CNN et al Good God STFU already!

I have had enough of this Middle School gossip...he said...she said... Yo' momma wears combat boots and my momma can beat yo' momma up!
On and on you go saying if only Donald Trump would stay off the topic of sex he could win the election...yes that is true however it is the media who keeps this going on and on and are the guilty parties in all this school yard sexual banter...and it only helps Hillary Clinton stay away from and dodge the critical issues of the day!

Remember when this same thing happened to Arnold Schwartzenegger in his run for California governor it went on and on until he just said enough I deny it and addressed the issues  the electorate wanted addressed and became governor!

My advice to Donald Trump is to just deny and attack Hillary on her record as senator,Secretary of State,her health,wikileaks damning e-mail scandals...then address jobs,security,immigration etc!

All  I have to say to all the talking head hosts and pundits is you are akin to HarperValley PTA and Peyton Place revisited!

Clinton Staffer Caught Saying He Could Grab Co-Worker’s A** And Not Get Fired

All week we’ve been hearing how terrible Trump is. Now there’s this video claiming that the Hillary campaign plays just as fast and loose. And in this case, there’s even a “sting” operation where Trump voting ballots were destroyed by the Hillary camping workers and nobody registered a complaint.
In the words of Wylie Mao, a field organizer for the Clinton campaign, who appears to be engaging in some locker room talk at a West Palm Beach bar with mixed company.
“I think that the bar of acceptable conduct on this campaign is pretty, pretty, low,” he said. He then turned to a group of women sitting at his table saying, “In order for me to be fired I’d probably have to grab Emma’s ass like twice…”
So, as Project Veritas said, please—let’s not play this holier than thou game regarding Trump and Clinton. They both have sordid histories regarding the treatment of women, and now we have a Clinton staffer saying he could sexually harass a woman and not get fired initially. It would have to be a repeat offense. Watch the video for live undercover work from the Project Veritas journalists

Project Veritas is an amazing organization headed up by a young constitutional conservative called James O’Keefe. He has been arrested and harassed for all the hard work he does uncovering corruption on the left. I urge you to visit his website to see the disgraces unfolding during this election and to donate to his work. 

Afghanistan on verge of collapse

President Barack Obama, right, listens to  Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny, left, make comments during their meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, March 15, 2016. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
It’s one of the most crucial provinces in Afghanistan – and since U.S. forces have been under President Barack Obama’s leadership, the Islamic Taliban has taken back control of nearly all of it.
Now, Helmand province is on the verge of collapse — and under Obama, U.S. forces in the region aren’t allowed to take action and help.
Hundreds of members of Afghanistan’s security forces have been killed recently fighting insurgent attacks on the main city in the country’s all-important southern province, officials said on Friday.
Abdul Majeed Akhonzada, deputy head of the provincial council, and lawmaker Sheer Muhammad Akhon put the number of soldiers and police killed in the past 10 days in and around Lashkar Gah at more than 200.
Separately, they each said 45 civilians had also been killed in the fighting, which saw Taliban militants launch attacks on at least two areas of the city earlier this week.

Akhon says 100 security forces personnel have also been wounded. Both police and soldiers fight on Afghanistan’s front lines.
Akhonzada and Akhon both say it is the worst situation the province has faced in the 15 years since the Taliban’s regime ended with the 2001 U.S. invasion.
The fighting in Lashkar Gah began on Monday with a suicide attack using a car packed with explosives that killed at least 40 people, including many police officers.
Gunmen then entered the city where fighting has continued, forcing many people to flee the city for neighboring Kandahar province, Akhon said.
He said the U.S. military was present in the city, “but they are just monitoring and doing nothing.” The Americans have a mandate to train and assist Afghan forces in most battlefield situations. U.S. military officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

The Taliban have been gradually taking over Helmand and officials have said they now control around 85 percent of the province.
Helmand is considered part of the Taliban’s heartland, along with Kandahar which was the administrative base of their five-year regime.
Helmand’s poppy crop yields opium that makes most of the world’s heroin. The value of the crop is estimated by the U.N. Office of Drugs and Crime at around $3 billion a year.
Smuggling routes out of Helmand are fiercely guarded by the Taliban as the drugs help fund their insurgency.
The Associated Press contributed to this article

Exposed! Mainstream media taking ORDERS from Hillary

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks to reporters after meeting with Senate Democrats on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, July 14, 2016. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
“It’s one of the great political phenomenons. The most powerful weapon deployed by the Clintons is the corporate media, the press,” Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump warned supporters at a rally recently.
And there’s no denying it anymore – a new report proves just how incredibly biased the mainstream media really is.
This election cycle proves the bias is worse than even the media’s harshest critics in the past ever thought possible.
Trump isn’t the only one sounding the alarm.
A damning new report shows how the deeply connected the press is to Hillary Clinton… and not just in the obvious ways, with biased left-wing reporters dominating the news industry in print, online, and on TV.

There’should an actual top-down order from industry bosses to their workers.
And it’s one that’s been delivered loud and clear in newsrooms: Push Clinton… or else.
Too incredible to believe? Don’t take our word for it.
At least three major media organizations “have now ordered their employees to destroy Trump,” Bill O’Reilly of Fox News announced this week.
“I can’t say who they are right now because I don’t have it nailed down,” he said. “But I am 100% convinced that these media organizations have actually put out that if you support Trump, your career is done here.”
O’Reilly may be a conservative voice. But he’s a fiercely independent one, and unlike the pampered media lefties fawning over Clinton, he’s nobody’s lapdog.

He’s not afraid to ask tough-but-fair questions of anyone, including Trump… and not afraid to criticize the candidate right to his face, either.
So if O’Reilly says he’s heard this, you can bet he’s not pulling that out of thin air.
Hacked emails released by WikiLeaks show how the Clinton campaign would offer exclusives and other access to puppy-dog reporters.
“We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed,” one memo said of former Politico reporter Maggie Haberman, who is now with the very same New York Times hellbent on destroying Trump.
In another instance, CNN leaked a question from a Democratic town hall debate to a Clinton friend before the event.
“From time to time I get the questions in advance,” boasted Donna Brazile, who then worked at CNN and is now acting head of the Democratic National Committee.

And of course there was the evidence just last month… when Clinton collapsed in public, and the media barely showed it.
Meanwhile, an 11-year-old lewd recording of Trump gets 24-hour coverage.
Trump himself has pointed out the obvious, telling supporters yesterday that the media is now part of the Clinton propaganda machine.
“The corporate media in our country is no longer involved in journalism. They’re a political special interest no different from any lobbyist or financial entity with a total political agenda,” he said. “And their agenda is to elect crooked Hillary Clinton at any cost, at any price, no matter how many lives they destroy. For them, it’s a war and for them, nothing at all is out of bounds.”
Trump’s been proven right before. All you have to do to see him proven right in this case is turn on the TV.
Is the media out of control? Share your thoughts, comment below.
— The Horn editorial staff

Hillary gave U.S. military secrets to foreign bankers

hillary whisper copy
Damning new secret documents prove that Hillary Clinton doesn’t just e-mail classified information carelessly from her private, homebrew server.
For the right price, she’ll blurt out national secrets to a roomful of elites on foreign soil.
Pentagon insiders are hopping mad that Clinton exposed the top secret details of their anti-terrorism program to a group of foreign bankers while bragging about her role in tracking and killing Osama bin Laden.
One of the thousands of e-mails WikiLeaks revealed includes Hillary’s security breach, which came during a November 2013 speech to bankers in Toronto.
“I was in the small group that recommended to the president that he go after bin Laden,” Clinton bragged – as if the whole country didn’t want President Barack Obama to kill the terrorist mastermind.

Then Clinton crossed the line, and broke her oath of office by giving away classified information to her big dollar audience.
She revealed that “the analysts and collectors and good old-fashioned spies” gathered information about bin Laden’s whereabouts “from cell phone conversations.”
“I will tell you,” Clinton told her foreign benefactors, that those spies began “putting this matrix together and saying, ‘This guy used to protect bin Laden. He just made a phone call. He said this in a phone call. We need to figure out where he is. Then we need to follow him.’”
The only problem? The methods used to track bin Laden were considered classified at the time.
Can Hillary Clinton be trusted with national secrets as president of the United States if she announces classified information to foreign elites? Evidently nothing is really secret to her, if the price is right.

Experts say that Hillary violated protocol, and maybe even committed treason, by signaling the exact procedures Americans use to capture terrorists. And it’s got them ready to explode.
Dan Maguire, a former Special Operations official, told Fox News the fact that intelligence agents let Clinton get by with this shows “a lack of integrity and a lack of discipline” on their part.
The Obama administration let Clinton slide for the umpteenth time – as she has on Whitewater, running the Clinton Foundation like a felonious money-laundering operation, and destroying 32,000 e-mails under subpoena.
But the Democrats put the screws to American vets, including one of the people who actually killed Osama bin Laden.

In August the Obama administration forced one of the Navy SEALs who actually helped kill bin Laden, Matthew Bissonnette, to pay $7 million to the federal government for releasing allegedly classified information without their permission in his blockbuster book No Easy Day, written under the pen name “Mark Owen.”
The political elite always play by a different set of rules than normal people, even distinguished heroes like Bissonette. After all, it was Joe Biden who told the public it was Navy SEAL Team 6 that killed Osama bin Laden, basically painting a lifelong target on them and their families. He hasn’t faced any penalty, either.
Until now, the American public debated whether U.S. spies had caught Osama bin Laden thanks to waterboarding or other sensitive surveillance tactics. Now, we know that foreign elites got the inside scoop in exchange for paying Clinton’s massive speaking fees – along with whatever additional favors they managed to wring out of her.

We wouldn’t even know about the intelligence breach were it not for the leaked e-mails, which Clinton’s campaign has not denied.
The same e-mails show Clinton telling other foreign bankers she dreams of a New World Order, where all the countries of North and South America will have “open trade and open borders.” They also show that her top advisors think Christianity is “backwards.”
The man who actually killed Osama bin Laden said Clinton didn’t play the hero’s role that she lets on when she’s collecting campaign cash from foreigners.
“We didn’t kill Osama bin Laden because of Hillary Clinton,” said Robert O’Neill, the Navy SEAL who killed the Al-Qaeda leader with a few shots to the skull on May 2, 2011. “We didn’t go for someone to win an office.”
“We went for the secretary that jumped out of the 90th floor of the trade towers on a Tuesday morning,” he said. “We went for the first responders that went into the Pentagon.’

He said that Hillary loves to take credit for the mission, but she’s never thanked the fighting men who actually put her empty words into action, put their lives on the line, and kept America safe.
“The one room she wasn’t in is when they came to thank us. We never heard a word from Hillary Clinton,” O’Neill said.
What other top secret, classified information did Hillary give foreign elites if they paid her enough? What will she do if she’s elected president?
– The Horn editorial team

Exposed – Nothing To See Here

The media continues to protect Hillary by not reporting on her corruption exposed by the latest Wikileaks revelations.

Federal Judge Overturns Obama's Unconstitutional Gun Ban
oped: See:

by:MIchael DePinto 
In the following video, Gary Franchi from the Next News Network discusses a recent article written by Sierra Marlee for Right Wing News. As we all know, Obama has a very disturbing history of attempting to violate the Second Amendment rights of law abiding Americans, especially on the heels of mass shootings… mass shootings that are ironically (or not so ironically), up over 700% under Obama’s presidency. Coincidence?
It’s always the same story with liberals and the mainstream media. Before the bodies are even cold, we can count on the media to parade liberal politicians in front of the cameras with their crocodile tears, so that anyone watching or listening gets to see or hear about every heart-wrenching and painful detail of the shooting that just took place. 
Next, the horrific details are put on a repeat cycle, and played over and over again in a loop for several days, normally at least until a new bill shows up in Congress that is intended to inch us one step closer to total gun confiscation. It's always the exact same story…  

Well, as you’re about to learn, one federal judge laid the smack down on Obama, and overturned his unconstitutional ban. Find out what the judge said… 
See video: 

Obama has a very disturbing history of attempting to violate our Second Amendment rights, especially on the heels of tragedies like Sandy Hook. As heart-wrenching and painful as it is to watch such heinous acts take place, restricting the rights of the people is never the logical answer.
Thankfully, I’m not the only one who thinks this way. A federal judge has officially moved to overturn several anti-Constitutional actions that make it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to legally purchase firearms.
The judge overturned a complete ban on publicly carrying handguns, a $1,000 tax on handgun purchases, a ban on “assault weapons,” a caliber restriction on long-guns such a rifles and a requirement to register all gun purchases with the government.

Ramona Manglona is the chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands. She had this to say about her ruling:
“The individual right to armed self-defense in case of confrontation…cannot be regulated into oblivion.”
In her conclusion, she says some things that the rest of us would like every elected official to understand about our Constitutional right to bear arms.
“…the right of armed self-defense, including in public, is subject to traditional limitations. It is not subject to elimination.”
“…it is unconstitutional regardless of the level of scrutiny applied, and the Court must strike it down.”
“…the individual’s right to carry and transport an operable handgun openly for self-defense outside the home.”
Is it too late to make this lady President?

But seriously, I could not agree more with her assessment of the Second Amendment and the important, nay, critical role in plays in the everyday lives of individual citizens.
The Second Amendment, like the rest of the Bill of Rights and Constitution, is not up for negotiation. It’s not “on the table” and we will not back down in protecting our God-given rights from greedy, power-hungry politicians who would absolutely do everything within their power to make the people of the United States subservient to the federal government.
If that sounds like “fear mongering,” all it takes is a brief look at history to prove that what I said is absolutely plausible. In fact, you don’t even need to look outside the United States to see examples of the government using fear to take the rights away from the people (in this case Native Americans) and then exerting control over them, knowing they’re powerless to stop them.
God bless this judge.
After the 2006 election, the question you heard conservatives asking over and over again was, “Did the Republicans learn anything?'
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand.


Feds to Charge Sheriff Joe Arpaio with Contempt Just Weeks from Election

by: Tim Brown

Federal prosecutors are seeking to bring charges against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio for defying orders he was given to stop immigration-enforcement operations taking place in his county.
The Associated Press reports:
PHOENIX (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department's promise to file a criminal contempt-of-court charge against the longtime sheriff of metro Phoenix comes less than a month before the 84-year-old lawman will learn whether he gets a seventh term in office. 

Sheriff Joe Arpaio will face the possibility of jail time and a clouded political future when prosecutors file a misdemeanor contempt charge against him for defying a judge's orders to end his signature immigration patrols. The charge is expected to be filed Wednesday. 

Arpaio, who didn't attend a hearing Tuesday in his contempt case, could face up to six months in jail if convicted of misdemeanor contempt.

Arpaio accused the Obama administration of attempting to sway the election in his county and said he was expecting to be exonerated of the charges.
Arpaio said on Tuesday the charges were nothing more than a final attempt by President Barack Obama to oust the sheriff from office.

"It is no coincidence that this announcement comes 28 days before the election and the day before early voting starts," Arpaio said in statement. "It is a blatant abuse of power and the people of Maricopa County should be as outraged as I am."
"My point is this was strictly a political attack on this sheriff in this campaign," Arpaio said in comments to The Arizona Republic"I am not going to surrender. I am going to fight this all the way. And I expect to be re-elected."

I tend to agree with Sheriff Arpaio. Nothing could be more blatant, especially in light of recent comments by Arpaio following GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump's claim that Barack Hussein Obama is a US citizen without any proof to confirm that and is eligible for the office of president. As I reported, Arpaio continues to advance the claim, along with forensic evidence, that Obama's multiple documents he has put out in public are fraudulent.
Arpaio acknowledge he violated the order, but has said it was not intentional. Sounds an awful like what FBI Director James Comey claimed about Hillary Clinton, only her actions actually broke the law.
Of course, the charges surprised even Arpaio's attorneys. Mel McDonald, who is defending Arpaio said, "Usually a set status conference is a meeting between the court and council to discuss legal issues. We had no clue that they were going to come here today and make the announcements that they made."

According to McDonald, Arpaio will not plead guilty to the charges.
Paul Charlton, a former U.S. attorney for the District of Arizona said, "It's unheard of" that a sheriff would be prosecuted in this manner.
"As rare as it is to have a federal judge refer the head of a law-enforcement agency for prosecution, it is even rarer that the Department of Justice would pick up that gauntlet and move forward with the charge, Charlton added.
Arpaio's opponent in the race, Paul Penzone said, "No one is above the law, and today's (Tuesday's) announcement in court epitomizes the strength of the judicial system."
Really? Well, is Mr. Penzone ok with the ineligibility of Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah and his fraudulent documents? Has Mr. Penzone been heard regarding the Democrat nominee for president, Hillary Clinton? What about the crimes of Homeland Security in violation of the Fourth Amendment or the lack of immigration enforcement by DC or releasing of tens of thousands of criminal illegal aliens back into the population rather than deporting them? Or does he think all of the people involved in these crimes are actually above the law?

According to Ktar, "Arpaio and three aides had been found in civil contempt for defying Snow's orders in a years-old racial profiling case in the spring. The sheriff's office had refused to stop targeting Latinos in patrols despite federal directives to do so."
Arpaio has been one that sought to arrest those who violated the law. For that, he should be commended, not condemned.
While the case is costing taxpayers, the reason for it is quite simple: The Obama administration will simply not follow the law when it comes to illegal aliens. The problem is not Sheriff Joe, it's a criminal administration that simply ignores the law.

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Exposed! Hillary’s ISIS-funding connection

According to her critics, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s past is a series of smokey backroom deals, shady foreign donors, and corrupt backscratching.
This may be the most outrageous example yet.
In an email to her campaign chairman John Podesta in 2014, Clinton confesses to knowing that Saudi Arabia and Qatar’s governments were giving both financial and logistic support to Islamic terror groups, including ISIS. That’s according to a recent WikiLeaks release, which published years of Podesta’s emails this week.
At the same time, Clinton’s controversial foundation was accepting millions in donations from those same governments. “Qatar has given between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and Saudi Arabia has donated upwards of $25 million dollars to the Foundation,” The Daily Caller reports.

In their 2014 exchange, Clinton admits to Podesta — then-aide to President Barack Obama — that, “While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” using another acronym for ISIS.
Via Wikileaks
Via Wikileaks 

The Clinton Foundation knew that the Saudi and Qatari princes and sultans were financing global terror, but took their money anyway and even defended the regimes.
Clinton knowingly takes cash from the same honeypot as the Islamic State — so what did these Islamic financiers get from Clinton in exchange?
Guns, bombs, and jets.
According to International Business Times, “Under Clinton’s leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation.” That’s twice the arms sales to these known terror financiers that was approved by President George W. Bush’s administration.
“In all, governments and corporations involved in the arms deals approved by Clinton’s State Department have delivered between $54 million and $141 million to the Clinton Foundation as well as hundreds of thousands of dollars in payments to the Clinton family, according to foundation and State Department records,” the IBT analysis concludes.
If that doesn’t disqualify Clinton for the presidency, what does?
— The Horn editorial team

Bill Clinton caught in underage sex scandal?!?

bill clinton
There’s been a lot of talk recently about sexual assault and presidential candidates.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign has let all sorts of accusations fly at GOP rival Donald Trump — but there’s one bombshell Clinton probably wasn’t expecting.
A new book is raising questions about former President Bill Clinton’s already sleazy sex history — and if true, these allegations could TOTALLY shake up the 2016 presidential campaign.
Bill Clinton’s disgusting past as a sexual predator is back in the limelight in a book released Monday by bestselling author James Patterson.
Patterson’s book, “Filthy Rich,” chronicles the pedophilia and sexual assault allegations against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein and his oddly close friendship with Clinton.

The “Lolita Express” was Epstein’s private jet. Clinton had taken at least 10 flights on the Lolita between 2001 and 2003, suspiciously foregoing Secret Service detail at least five of those flights, Fox news reported.
This jet soon became infamously known as one of Epstein’s favorite locations to take advantage of underage girls, and Clinton’s request to fly solo became much more suspicious, Patterson says.

This isn’t a fringe lunatic writing this, either. Patterson is one of the best-known authors in America, and the 300-page non-fiction novel has an original print run of 500,000 copies and is predicted to be a best seller.
It describes the close relationship between the two powerful men, and the injustice of the alarmingly short, 13-month sentence Epstein received following his disgusting sexual escapades and abuse accusations.
Patterson describes Epstein’s case as a “year long assault” on prosecutors, alleging they were biased and weren’t fit to be on the case. His victims attempted to appeal the leniency of the sentence, but consistently failed.
Epstein owned a private island that famously became known as “orgy island,” a place that Clinton visited numerous times between 2002 and 2005, according to the Daily Mail.

The two were such close friends, that Epstein had the former president’s email addresses and multiple phone numbers. Clinton praised Epstein for his “insights and generosity,” and legal documents revealed that Clinton owed ‘favors’ to Epstein.
Epstein even claimed to be a co-founder of the Clinton Foundation in his plea deal and received a lesser sentence for operating a sex ring with underage girls due to his charitable work with Clinton’s family foundation.
— The Horn editorial team

Payback! GOP voters move to "Dump Ryan!"

House Speaker Paul Ryan’s attempted coup of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump may have failed.
Ryan said his attack was aimed at protecting Republican control of the House. But it may cost him his own job — and his long-term ambitions.
Ryan’s announcement this week that he won’t campaign for his party’s presidential nominee, and that his fellow Republican Congressional candidates were free to abandon Trump, caused pro-Trump Republicans to suggest they may not back his re-election as speaker.
“Given the stakes of this election, if Paul Ryan isn’t for Trump, then I’m not for Paul Ryan,” Oklahoma Rep. Jim Bridenstine, said Wednesday on Twitter.
Assuming Republicans remain in control of the House after November’s elections, Ryan will need every GOP vote he can get to keep his post.
That’s far from a sure thing now.

Ryan, 46, was his party’s 2012 vice presidential candidate and many think his anti-Trump stance is meant to set up his own run for the GOP presidential nomination in 2020 or beyond.
Losing an election for the speakership could be a blow to any of these loftier political ambitions, however.
Ryan’s tactic has infuriated Republicans and conservatives in and out of Congress, especially Trump’s die-hard backers, who consider Ryan’s decision a betrayal that will weaken Trump’s chances of winning.
“I suspect whatever he said would be a no-win for unanimity” among Republicans, former New York Rep. Tom Reynolds, who led the House GOP’s campaign organization a decade ago, said Wednesday. “He’s walking on a tightrope, like any speaker up for re-election.”
On Monday, Ryan told House Republicans in a conference call that he will spend the remaining weeks until Election Day working to keep GOP control of his chamber, and do nothing to help Trump. That call came after the revelation of a 2005 video showing Trump making crude remarks about women.

Trump has since assailed Ryan with a bombardment of tweets and remarks. He said Wednesday while campaigning in Ocala, Florida, that Ryan and other Republicans are involved in a “sinister deal” against him.
Bridenstine is a conservative and a member of the House Freedom Caucus, which often bucks leadership. But he backed Ryan when the House elected him speaker last October.
California Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, who also supported Ryan then, hinted in an interview with The Associated Press that he might not favor keeping Ryan in the House’s top job.
“I never doubted he should be speaker. However, if he can’t prevent himself from panicking and helping the enemy in a situation like this, well, then we’ll find out,” Rohrabacher said Monday.

House Republicans meet after the November elections to select their nominee for speaker. Ryan would need 218 votes — a majority of the chamber’s 435 members — to become speaker when the full House votes in January.
There are currently 246 House Republicans, plus a vacant seat they seem likely to retain.
But that number will likely shrink after Election Day, with GOP moderates among the likeliest to lose. That means a greater proportion of conservatives, some of whom are hostile to established GOP leaders, and indicates that Ryan may not be able to afford losing much support.
Ryan succeeded former Speaker John Boehner, who retired last October after it became clear that opposition from conservatives within his party’s caucus meant he did not have the votes to retain his job.
Ryan’s head could be next for the chopping block.
Do you support, or oppose, Paul Ryan’s attack against Donald Trump? Comment below.
The Associated Press contributed to this article

Email Leaks Show Conservative Blogger Secretly Working for Hillary Clinton!

By Onan Coca 

Ouch. This one hurts, personally. Our circle of right-leaning bloggers is a tight-knit group and we rely on each other for help, both with stories and with spreading the word. That trust was recently violated by one of our own. Former British Conservative MP and co-founder of the conservative website Heat Street, Louise Mensch, was revealed by the WikiLeaks hack as a secret supporter of Hillary Clinton.
In an email to Clinton crony Michael Kives (which was then forwarded to Clinton’s right-hand man John Podesta), Mensch advises the Clinton team on how to better portray their candidate to the nation.

See video:

When the news broke that Mensch had been trying to help Hillary Clinton, she immediately responded by deflecting blame, and decrying WikiLeaks’ airing of the hacked emails.
Mensch first attempted to argue that Donald Trump was such a horrific candidate that she was happy to assist in defeating him. The problem with this line of defense is that if you read the timestamp of her original email, it was sent while the primary was still in question and Donald Trump was not yet the nominee. The original email was sent on February 14th when several other options remained as viable candidates for the GOP nomination.

Mensch now works for Evan McMullin, the Republican upstart running as an independent but likely to only appear on a handful of ballots in November. However, even as she works for a republican, she still shouts her support of Hillary Clinton from the highest rooftops… check out the Tweet she just pinned to the top of her newsfeed.
Sadly, Mensch and Heat Street will likely now go the way of the dinosaur as conservatives wake up to her treason. There is nothing conservative about Hillary Clinton, and even if you think that Donald Trump is a bad candidate (as many conservatives do), it doesn’t mean you should throw your support to Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton is a demonstrably worse choice for President than Donald Trump, and any conservative who says otherwise has lost their ever-loving mind.

The Government Should Focus Less On Islamophobia And More On Killing ISIS.

By Kyle McDonough 
Hi, I’m a Muslim-American who enjoys small puppies and California sunsets. Why do you hate me, you racist pig?”
That may as well be the question we hear every time a Republican is within 10 feet of a microphone. The most recent episode of ‘America Is Islamaphobic’ came during the second presidential debate between Trump and Clinton.
I have been critical of Trump for many things, policy and behavior alike, but his foreign policy positions against ISIS and radical Islam have been spot on. The idea that the Constitution requires America to surrender our security and liberty to foreign terrorists in the name of tolerance is a flat out lie.
We can and we should end the refugee program from countries that are currently religious war zones. We can and we should acknowledge that, while of course not all Muslims are terrorists, Islam is currently the single greatest inspiration for violence in the world. During the Obama administration radical Islam has grown to a threat level that will require much more than hashtags and French flag backdrops to address.

It will certainly require much more than anything Hillary Clinton and the Democrat party would possibly be willing and able to do.
Predictably, the progressive left’s response to our insistence that we confront radical Islamic terrorism is that we’re just being Islamaphobic. They claim Islamaphobia – a political term coined to defend jihadists – is on the rise and deterring it should be a top priority of government. In order to be perceived as loving and tolerant Americans, we’re to accept this premise with glee and welcome with open arms tens of thousands of refugees with unknown backgrounds from countries that are currently burning Christians alive on a daily basis. And let them vote. And get food stamps. And free healthcare. But mostly vote.

Honestly, I’m tired of arguing against this stupidity because no one stirring the pot is being honest. It just plays right into their hands. The ruling class pushing the ‘Islamophobia’ narrative doesn’t honestly believe their own garbage. It’s their way of controlling the narrative when ISIS throws their latest disturbingly creative execution on the internet, making the US look weak and foolish. Look, squirrel! The media wags its tail and chases the ball.
As a simple dad working a job and taking care of my family, I have limited control over this horrendous situation, one that directly and personally affects me and my family.
I will support Trump. I hope and pray he defeats Hillary and we can shift our focus from resisting communism to supporting liberty, security, and conservatism. I’m afraid that many great conservative voices have surrendered their influence by flying the Never Trump flag.

I will continue to make the case against the lying, corrupt Hillary Clinton and Democrat Party. Trump is far from a conservative savior, but I have no doubt his administration will be better for America simply by replacing an ongoing effort to strategically undermine America with a sincere effort to promote it.
I will prepare for what’s next, be it either a President Clinton or President Trump. Neither one will be around to protect and defend my family should the need arise.
What the government should do, the ones with a military and billions in spending power, is define our enemy as radical Islamic terrorists who wage jihad and kill every single one as quickly as possible. But they won’t do that, and it won’t change if we don’t rid ourselves of our weak, feckless ruling class. They’ll continue their willful blindness, choosing to chastise us while ISIS, Al-Qaida, the Taliban, and the rest of the savage pukes all wage war on anyone who isn’t on their side. That includes Muslim-Americans who ask stupid questions about ‘-phobias’ that don’t matter and largely don’t exist.
The question asked at debates by Muslim-Americans ought to be more like “What is your plan to destroy ISIS so I can practice my faith without fearing execution for failure to submit?

We have to get serious, folks.


BREAKING: Putin ally tells Americans: vote Trump or face nuclear war


Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a close friend of President Vladimir Putin, has said in an interview that Trump is the only person able to de-escalate dangerous tensions between Moscow and Washington.

By contrast, Trump's Democratic rival Hillary Clinton could spark World War Three, said Zhirinovsky.

Though Putin and Trump have never met, Zhirinovsky said he believed they could establish a close working relationship, adding: "Victory for Trump would be a gift to humanity. But if Hillary Clinton wins it will be the last U.S. president ever."

As all the polls point to a Hillary win this November we must keep a close eye on Russia. Putin's saber rattling might just make sense. Hillary has made her intentions of supporting ISIS in Syria very clear and Putin is drawing his line in the sand.  



As we reported yesterday, Putin is angry with the the United States and especially John Kerry as well as the United Nations and especially the French. He has called home all citizens living abroad and canceled a meeting with the French Prime Minister. Let’s look back at his relationship with the USA. 

“[Russia is] interested in keeping Assad in power. So I, when I was secretary of state, advocated and I advocate today a no-fly zone and safe zones. We need some leverage with the Russians, because they are not going to come to the negotiating table for a diplomatic resolution, unless there is some leverage over them.”
That was Hillary Clinton in the second presidential debate on Oct. 9 saying flat out that as President of the United States, she would impose a U.S.-enforced no-fly zone in Syria to keep Russia from bombing targets there.
That, even though the U.S. Marine Gen. James Dunford, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, just testified to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Sept. 22 that “for us to control all of the airspace in Syria would require us to go to war against Syria and Russia.”
And, even though on Oct. 6 the Kremlin had already warned it would shoot down U.S. war planes in Syria. Major General Igor Konashenkov issued a statement, saying, “Today, the Syrian army has effective S-200, Buk and other air defense systems, which have undergone technical renovation in the past year. I remind U.S. strategists that air cover for the Russian military bases in Tartus and Hmeymim includes S-400 and S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems, the range of which may come as a surprise to any unidentified flying objects.”

Now, we’re not any big fans of Russia per se, but is Clinton out of her ever-loving mind? Wouldn’t enforcing a no-fly zone in Syria be a pretty risky proposition under these circumstances if it increases the chances of a direct exchange of hostilities between the U.S. and Russia?
It is an act of war. Even though there is no authorization to use force in Syria. But maybe that doesn’t matter to Clinton, who, if she means what she says, would necessarily mean U.S. and Russian fighter jets in the same exact air space, with the U.S. Air Force having active orders to escort Russian Migs out of the zone or else shoot them down.
So, then let’s assume Russia runs the no-fly zone. After all, they were there first. Then what? Clinton would have to make a split-second decision about whether to enforce yet another “red line” in Syria. If she did decide to enforce it — in order to salvage the credible threat of U.S. force in the region — we’d be at war with Russia. Just like that.
We have to assume she’d enforce it. She’s been pushing for a no-fly zone in Syria since she was Secretary of State, and since before Russia had a sizeable presence in the country. Now, despite how the situation on the ground has radically changed, and with Russia clearly involved, she is still pushing.
Both the top spokesmen in both the U.S. and Russian militaries have warned explicitly that such actions would mean war, and yet Clinton — along with other hawks in the Senate like Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — are arrogantly pushing forward.

Get off it, already.
It’s one thing to have taken on Soviet satellites during the Cold War, ala North Korea or then-North Vietnam, but a fairly standard staple of Cold War doctrine did not usually include attacking satellites that had active Russian forces on the ground. That’s why it was called the Cold War.
Even President John Kennedy ruled out a military strike in Cuba to resolve the Cuban Missile Crisis in Oct. 1962 out of similar concerns. It was tantamount to nuclear holocaust then, and that remains true today. Both countries remain armed to the teeth with enough nuclear weapons to wipe out the other.
In the meantime, U.S. talks with Russia on Syria have ground to a halt and a U.S.-brokered “ceasefire” was broken almost instantly. The Obama administration is out there every day of the week accusing Russia of tampering with U.S. elections. The State Department is alleging war crimes by Russia and Syria at the city of Aleppo. And Russia just pulled out of a nuclear agreement with the U.S.
Maybe we really are on the brink this time.
All to defend the strategically super-important… city of Aleppo? Under Clinton we would risk crashing into the Russian air force — and risking a much wider, deadly war — to protect what remains of the ineffective rebels against the Bashar al Assad regime? What for? They’ve already lost the war. And even if they haven’t it is insanity when Russia has already indicated it will defend Syria.

When she was Secretary of State, Clinton had heralded a “Russian reset,” that is, a renewal of closer ties with Russia. Now look at how her policy has played out. By that, apparently she meant to put U.S. forces into extraordinarily risky adventures by threatening war with Russian satellite states like Syria and Ukraine.
We’re closer to war with Russia now than at any time since the Cuban Missile Crisis.
We’re on the brink of Armageddon with this hare-brained Clinton policy.
German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier warned last week that “it’s a fallacy to think that this is like the Cold War. The current times are different and more dangerous.” More dangerous than 1962? Whoa, boy.
Former Soviet Prime Minister Mikhail Gorbachev warned on Russian television, “I think the world has reached a dangerous point,” referring to the conflict in Syria. Yikes. He almost never speaks up.
You’d have to be a lunatic to support this policy. Stark raving mad. Clinton is looking for leverage and wants to prove how tough she is in the debates. So, sure, just throw up a no-fly zone in the middle of a Russian satellite’s airspace — that their forces are currently patrolling — what could go wrong?
In the meantime, perhaps everyone else should be looking at unearthing their 1950s era fallout shelters.
With its aging fleet and nuclear deterrent, is the U.S. even prepared for war with Russia?
If Hillary Clinton is elected president, we may be about to find out. Count me out.
Robert Romano is the senior editor of Americans for Limited Government.

Fox News: Decision to Not Prosecute Hillary Left FBI, DOJ Disgusted

Image: Fox News: Decision to Not Prosecute Hillary Left FBI, DOJ Disgusted
FBI Director James Comey's recommendation that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton not be prosecuted for using a private email server did not sit well with lower ranking members of the agency or at the Justice Department, Fox News reports an anonymous source involved in the case said.
"No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute — it was a top-down decision," the source, identified as a senior FBI official, told
Comey's decision was not an unanimous decision, the source said, adding, "It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton's] security clearance yanked."

"It is well known that the FBI agents on the ground, the human beings who did the investigative work, had built an extremely strong case against Hillary Clinton and were furious when the case did not move forward," Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said. "They believe the decision not to prosecute came from The White House."
Comey on July 5 announced his agency would not recommend prosecution, though his description of Clinton's actions led critics to believe he should have. Comey testified to Congress that the governing statute requires intent, and that his investigation was unable to prove intent.

"Basically, James Comey hijacked the DOJ’s role by saying 'no reasonable prosecutor would bring this case,'" the FBI source said. "The FBI does not decide who to prosecute and when, that is the sole province of a prosecutor – that never happens."

Related Stories:

John Podesta’s Accounts Reportedly Compromised After Password Found in WikiLeaks Dump

john-podesta Getty

 by Charlie Nash 

Unauthorized users appear to have accessed Hillary Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta’s various accounts after an email containing his Apple ID and password was found within the recent WikiLeaks email release. 

One user is alleged to have remotely erased Podesta’s iPhone after accessing his Apple account, which contained Podesta’s phone number, address, and various email accounts/

View image on Twitter
Do @TheDemocrats know nothing about security? Pedesta's phone got wiped by anon... Password from

Another user tagged WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange in a Twitter post along with various screenshots of Podesta’s Apple account and the comment: “You are going to be getting some interesting information shortly.” 

You are going to be getting some interesting information shortly
WikiLeaks have released numerous batches of emails sent from and to Podesta, and the leaked emails have since revealed the Clinton Campaign’s coziness to mainstream media reportersdistaste for Catholics, disregard for shootings that could not further their gun control agenda, and Podesta’s very own obsession with extraterrestrials.
The leaked emails also revealed that Rupert Murdoch’s Heat Street editor, Louise Mensch, had written an advert for Hillary Clinton that sought to capitalize on her gender, despite Mensch claiming to be an anti-SJW Republican.
“As you will know from Arnold I am a committed Republican (or would be if I had the vote this year). But I worry no end about Donald Trump becoming our President,” wrote Mensch in an email that was forwarded to Podesta. “Much rather have your girl Hillary.”