Crybaby Hillary whining about Trump campaign rhetoric.

Obama’s Planned Gun Control Regulations to be Incrementally Imposed After the Holidays

[King Obama’s Royal Declaration: “I can do whatever I want” ]

oped: Being a Veteran I am calling *BrokenArrow* #Pentagon Chief of Staff...  you are now on notice...act or resign *MisBehaving* with the enemy ... USMJ codes apply!

by:Dave Hodges 

According to my sources, Obama will ultimately implement the following gun control regulations, mostly through a series of Executive Orders.

1. Tax ammunition into oblivion and encourage the prosecution of gun manufacturers and bullet producers for shootings using their products. This is a given and will be rolled out very early in the form of an Executive Order.

2. The Federal government will purchase as much ammunition as possible in order to create shortages, thus, driving up the price of ammunition.

3. The prohibition of purchasing a gun in one state and transporting that same gun across state lines.

4. New Federal regulations which will permit, without a warrant, any civil authority to enter a home of a registered gun owner to check for gun safety when it comes to the “proper” storage of guns. Said gun can be confiscated and the owner will be subject to arrest and fines if a gun does not meet governmental storage regulations. The new regulations will be devised to prevent one from using the gun in a moment’s notice.

   1. There is discussion among DoJ officials about limiting how guns, in the aggregate, that can be stored in one geographic area. This will amount to gun rationing.

   2. Gun owners will eventually be required to attend and pass gun safety courses in the same manner as one renews their drivers license. This will, again, drive up the cost of owning a gun.

   3. At some point, no doubt following a false flag event, an Executive Order will be issued to overturn all conceal and carry laws currently in place in several states.

   4. With regard to Child Protective Services investigations, any gun-owning parent will receive an negative score when it comes to investigation of child abuse and welfare cases.

      1. No veteran will be allowed to own a gun for an unspecified period of time following their discharge from the service. As part of the VA reform there is serious discussion about mandating outplacement counseling for all veterans and gun prohibitions will be a part of this. I was told that this is, in part, why all the Federal attention is being placed on streamlining the VA process for veteran access.

      2. The scope of gun free zones will be expanded. The IRS will be given policing powers on new gun control regulations. Bank accounts and homes can be seized for failure to comply. Further, RICO statutes can be utilized among the non-compliant. It was stressed to me that examples will be made of protesters and non-compliant people.

      3. Obama will wait for the next false flag, but will announce a ban on all assault rifles.

         None of the above are in any particular order. These soon-to-be regulations appeared on a D0J White Paper that leaked to one of my sources.
         According to EO 13603, the President, or the head of any federal agency that he shall designate, can conscript “persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation,” in both “peacetime and times of national emergency.” I can hear the Obama supporters now as they will write to me and say, “Obama would never do that, you are drinking from the Kool-Aid”. Well, here it is, you can read it for yourself.
         Sec. 502. Consultants. The head of each agency otherwise delegated functions under this order is delegated the authority of the President under sections 710(b) and (c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(b), (c), to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations. The authority delegated by this section may not be redelegated.
         
         This means that Obama, and his fellow communists, can seize any resource, property, or person at any time for any reason, including being able to force that person to perform assigned labor without being paid.
         There is only ONE word for forced, “uncompensated employment”. That would is slavery. Congratulations President Obama, you have effectively repealed the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.
         Section 601 of the act specifies, in part, how far the government can go in terms of making you their slave.
         
         Sec. 601. Secretary of Labor. (a) The Secretary of Labor, in coordination
         with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other agencies, as deemed
         appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall:
         (1) collect and maintain data necessary to make a continuing appraisal
         of the Nation’s workforce needs for purposes of national defense;
         (2) upon request by the Director of Selective Service, and in coordination
         with the Secretary of Defense, assist the Director of Selective Service
         in development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of
         persons for duty in the armed services;
         (3) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this
         order, consult with that agency with respect to: (i) the effect of contemplated
         actions on labor demand and utilization; (ii) the relation of
         labor demand to materials and facilities requirements; and (iii) such other
         matters as will assist in making the exercise of priority and allocations
         functions consistent with effective utilization and distribution of labor;
         (4) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this
         order: (i) formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting the labor
         requirements of actions to be taken for national defense purposes; and
         (ii) estimate training needs to help address national defense requirements
         and promote necessary and appropriate training programs
         
         If the above section was merely going to be a military draft, then the Secretary of Labor would not have to be involved. However, as you will note the “Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and heads of other agencies, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall: …assist in the development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of persons for duty in the armed services;… formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting the labor requirements of actions to be taken for national defense purposes; and (ii) estimate training needs to help address national defense requirements and promote necessary and appropriate training programs…”. Refer back to section 502 of sections 710(b) and (c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(b), (c); these are the people that the Secretary of the Labor will conscript in order “to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations.”
         
         This, my fellow Americans, is a civilian conscription and this is why the Secretary of Labor is in charge instead of the head of the Selective Service! Under these provisions, the government believes that they can send you anywhere, to work on anything of their choosing.
         Of course, Executive Order 13603 will be enforced by Federal goons armed with guns. And like Mao, their will be enforced against people who have been disarmed.
         The Solution? Noncompliance With All Government Imposed Gun Control Regulations.
         Source
         

Is America On the Brink of a Civil War? “If We Defend It Together, We Can Avoid Bloodshed”

by:Mac Slavo 
It could happen at any time. 
At least that’s what many experts think.
There are gross violations of the Constitution and the rights of the people at every turn. It is a daily staple of the news cycle. There have been potential flashpoints on the scale of Lexington Green (which started the American revolution in 1775) over and over again.
And people have never been so divided at any time in the collective memory.
Between threats of gun confiscation at the federal level, and repeated incidences of SWAT teams and military-like police forces abusing their power against people in their homes and at protests, there are many reasons to think things have gone too far. The PATRIOT Act, the NDAA, the TSA and Homeland Security all represent the occupation of the American people and the complete destruction of civil liberties.

Will something spark a revolution or a civil war, or will the powers that be lose the ability to pit people against each other?

https://youtu.be/dHWG9F6IkpY




Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes said (in the video above):

“If we defend it together, we can avoid bloodshed here at home. But if we allow our police to militarize and turn into an occupying army, or we allow our military to be used here at home domestically against the people, there will be another fight. And there should be.”

As Rhodes notes, many law enforcement officials have spoken out about the unconstitutional acts of this government, and have indicated that they will stand with the people. This is the best outcome, but not the only one that may happen.

Even at the top of the system, there are many who have rebelled and dissented against the unconstitutional and delusional acts of the sitting president. How much more can the system bear before it cracks at the foundation?
The You Tube channel Verify Events Research writes:

Award winning democrat Seymour Hersh revealed the US military was defying the White House and the CIA by providing intelligence to Syria against ISIS. While Obama is expected to move against guns in the next few days (another “conspiracy theory” coming true) it is good to put this issue into perspective and to point out the obvious red line of the US public on this issue. The system is disintegrating at the seams and with the US military revolting against the executive branch a civil war can start at any moment. 

[Part 2... | Don't Tread On Me ! 2016]

When the founders finally declared independence, it came with a well-thought out list of the many times when the British occupiers went too far in abusing the rights of the colonists, and it formed the basis of the fight for freedom.


While not all of abuses listed in the Declaration of Independence still apply today, many do. Read them for yourself and see if it applies to the corruption in Washington today:

• He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
• He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
• He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
• He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. 
• 
  
• He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
• He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
• He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands. 
• He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
• He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
• He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
• He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
• He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power. 
• He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
• For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
• For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
• For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
• For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
• For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
• For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
• For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies: 
• For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
• For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
• He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
• He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
• He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
• He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. 
• 
  
• He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

Will Americans still defend their rights today?
How many more abuses will the people take before they fight back? Will those in power back off if people refuse to cooperate any longer? Or will this country roll over and descend into full-blown tyranny like so many others before it?  



[2016...2nd American Revolution -- "The SHOT heard round' the world!" ]
Source
 

The Real Saint Nicholas vs aka Santa Clause

Remember When the Real St. Nick Punched a Heretic for Denying the Incarnation? 

by: Tim Brown 
There are a number of people in Church history that I have a lot of respect for. Some of those come from the time of the Council of Nicaea. One of those men is Athanasius, who stood firm in the doctrine of the Trinity. When it seemed all of the Roman Empire was following the heretic Arius, who denied that God was manifest in the flesh in the person of Jesus of Nazareth, a colleague of his told him, "The whole world is against you!" However, Athanasius declared, "Then it is Athanasius against the world." Another is one that is rarely mentioned, even though his battle was against the same heresy and against the same heretic. His name is St. Nicholas.

In today's modern world of excess, St. Nicholas has been transformed into a jolly fat man in a red suit, who is given God-like omniscience and omnipresence, but he is a myth. The real St. Nicholas was one who defended the very reason that many celebrate Christmas, and that is the Incarnation. As the apostle Paul wrote of Jesus the Christ:
And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. -1 Timothy 3:16 


Nicholas, who was born in AD 270 and died in AD 343, was one of many bishops who was a part of the First Council of Nicaea. Understand that many of these same bishops had been persecuted for the Christian faith. Nicholas not only defended orthodox Christianity, but he also put his name upon the Nicene Creed, which states:
I believe in one God,
the Father almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all things visible and invisible.

I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ,
the Only Begotten Son of God,
born of the Father before all ages.
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father;
through him all things were made.
For us men and for our salvation
he came down from heaven,
and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary,
and became man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate,
he suffered death and was buried,
and rose again on the third day
in accordance with the Scriptures.
He ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory
to judge the living and the dead
and his kingdom will have no end. 

I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son,
who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified,
who has spoken through the prophets.

I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church.
I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins
and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead
and the life of the world to come. Amen. 


The reference to "catholic" in the creed is not a reference to the Roman Catholic Church, but rather is defined as "universal," encompassing a people from every tribe, tongue and nation in the body of ChristThe creed was a doctrinal statement that countered the Arian heresy. When dealing with the attacks on the Incarnation and the deity of Christ by Arius, Nicholas was so enraged with righteous indignation, that he dealt a blow to Arius. This blow was not merely rhetorical, but with his fist!

As a result, many of the bishops became alarmed and stripped Nicholas of his office of bishop. However, before judging Nicholas too harshly, consider that the prophet Elijah and the people dealt even more severely with the prophets of Baal, who attempted to lead the people after a false god (1 Kings 18:40) and Nehemiah even spoke of laying hands (dealing blows) on those who came to sell their wares on the Sabbath (Neh. 13:21).
However, Nicholas was a very rich man because when he was very young, his parents died, leaving him quite a sum of money. But he was not one who coveted money. No, he was a very kind man and shared his wealth without the force of government. In fact, his reputation was one of helping the poor and providing gifts to those in need, but he did it secretly.

While many legends exist about St. Nicholas, we can't be sure of which ones are true and which are not, but there is at least one famous story about Nicholas' kindness that continues.
There was a poor man who had three daughters. He was so poor, he did not have enough money for a dowry, so his daughters couldn't get married. (A dowry is a sum of money paid to the bridegroom by the bride's parents on the wedding day. This still happens in some countries, even today.) One night, Nicholas secretly dropped a bag of gold down the chimney and into the house (This meant that the oldest daughter was then able to be married.). The bag fell into a stocking that had been hung by the fire to dry! This was repeated later with the second daughter. Finally, determined to discover the person who had given him the money, the father secretly hid by the fire every evening until he caught Nicholas dropping in a bag of gold. Nicholas begged the man to not tell anyone what he had done, because he did not want to bring attention to himself. But soon the news got out and when anyone received a secret gift, it was thought that maybe it was from Nicholas. 


The point I want you to see is that Nicholas defended the truth that God came to earth in the person of Jesus the Christ. He defended the truth of why people celebrate Christmas: The Incarnation. While I hate the thought of the modern day Santa Claus, in large part because people have elevated him to the status of a god, the real St. Nicholas is someone who should be remembered, especially in a day when we are not only faced with new Arianism in the form of Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses and others, but also Islamic antichrists.
May you all have a blessed and joyous Christmas and remember that Christ did not come to earth to be celebrated as a baby, but rather to give Himself as a ransom (1 Tim. 2:6) to set men free from their sin (Matt. 1:21) and reconcile them to their Creator (Eph. 2:16; Col. 1:20).

You Could be Fined $250,000 for using the Wrong Pronoun

by:Gary DeMar 

How many times were we told that legalizing same-sex sexuality and its kissing cousin transgenderism would not affect people who do not engage in same-sex sexuality or decide not to modify their true sexuality? 

Homosexuals and their advocates kept telling a gullible public that they were all about "live and let live." If there was a TIME magazine cover for "Lie of the Year," this would have been it.
We've seen that people who oppose same-sex sexuality have been dragged into court because they refused to service same-sex weddings. A florist in Richland, Washington, is experiencing the "live and let live" lie.

"The state attorney general says the Washington Supreme Court should uphold a decision ordering a Richland florist to stop discriminating against same-sex couples.

"The Tri-City Herald reports Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed a 64-page brief Wednesday supporting the Benton County Superior Court decision.

"'Defendants refused to serve Mr. Ingersoll when he sought flowers for his wedding to his partner, Mr. Freed. This was discrimination based on sexual orientation, pure and simple,' Ferguson wrote in the brief.

"The decision found the refusal to provide flowers because of sexual orientation by Adele’s Flowers owner Barronelle Stutzman violated Washington’s anti-discrimination and consumer-protection laws." (H/T: The Blaze) 

You should note that the Washington AG did not say that the florist refused to sell flowers to homosexuals but that the refused to sell flowers for a same-sex wedding. Could the same florist have refused to sell flowers to a couple for a KKK-themed wedding? Most certainly.
Read related article: "Homosexuals Use Radical Islamist-Like Tactics to Intimidate Christian Schools."
Then there's this from New York City. At first I thought the following was from a parody site:

"The New York City Commission on Human Rights has issued rules that fine employers for referring to transsexuals by their real gender.  

"The new 'guidance' ('NYC Pronoun Ban'), which has power to levy hefty fines against 'violators' who 'discriminate,' is an extension of the New York City Human Rights Law, based on the city’s laws against gender discrimination.

"Failing to use an individual’s preferred name or pronoun, under the new ban, will be considered a violation of New York City Human Rights Law, punishable by fines up to $250,000.

“Refusal to use a transgender employee’s preferred name, pronoun, or title (e.g., Ms./Mrs.) may constitute unlawful gender-based harassment,' the new NYC Pronoun Ban reads." 

"Live and let live" has become "live our way or we'll sue you and ruin your life."
Here's the worst part of this new law. A person can file a complaint "with the Commission within one year of a 'discriminatory act,' and file with the New York Supreme Court within three years of a 'discriminatory act.'  Significantly, the new ban does not qualify 'discriminatory acts' as 'alleged.'" (H/T: Life Site News)
All the power is in the hands of the accuser. Even if there was no "discrimination" in the use of the "wrong pronoun," a person accused of such a heinous crime could spend tens of thousands of dollars to defend himself (or is it "itself"?).
The "GENDER IDENTITY/GENDER EXPRESSION: LEGAL ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE" law is not only draconian in its conception, but it is draconian in the length of its specifications. There are enough legal provisions to trip up any person. Of course that's why these types of laws are written.

Here's just one of the definitions:

"Gender: an individual’s actual or perceived sex, gender identity, self-image, appearance, behavior, or expression, whether or not that gender identity, self-image, appearance, behavior or expression is different from that traditionally associated with the sex assigned at birth."

Fascism comes in many shapes and sizes. Here's the latest manifestation.

 

DONALD TRUMP: ‘They Will Kill Him Before They Let Him Be President’

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is attributed to William J. Bennett, Host of Bill Bennett’s Morning in America Show. 
We’ve yet to determine if it is Bennett’s work. That said, whomever wrote it we feel the message is a must read.

They will kill him before they let him be president. It could be a Republican or a Democrat that instigates the shutting up of Trump.
Don’t be surprised if Trump has an accident. Some people are getting very nervous: Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and Jon Corzine, to name just a few.
It’s about the unholy dynamics between big government, big business, and big media. They all benefit by the billions of dollars from this partnership, and it’s in all of their interests to protect one another. It’s one for all and all for one.

It’s a heck of a filthy relationship that makes everyone filthy rich, everyone except the American people. We get ripped off. We’re the patsies. But for once, the powerful socialist cabal and the corrupt crony capitalists are scared. The over-the-top reaction to Trump by politicians of both parties, the media, and the biggest corporations of America has been so swift and insanely angry that it suggests they are all threatened and frightened.
Donald Trump can self-fund. No matter how much they say to the contrary, the media, business, and political elite understand that Trump is no joke. He could actually win and upset their nice cozy apple cart.
It’s no coincidence that everyone has gotten together to destroy The Donald. It’s because most of the other politicians are part of the a good old boys club. They talk big, but they won’t change a thing. They are all beholden to big-money donors. They are all owned by lobbyists, unions, lawyers, gigantic environmental organizations, and multinational corporations – like Big Pharmacy or Big Oil. Or they are owned lock, stock, and barrel by foreigners like George Soros owns Obama or foreign governments own Hillary and their Clinton Foundation donations.

These run-of-the-mill establishment politicians are all puppets owned by big money. But there’s one man who isn’t beholden to anyone There’s one man who doesn’t need foreigners, or foreign governments, or George Soros, or the United Auto Workers, or the teacher’s union, or the Service Employees International Union, or the Bar Association to fund his campaign.
Billionaire tycoon and maverick Donald Trump doesn’t need anyone’s help. That means he doesn’t care what the media says. He doesn’t care what the corporate elites think. That makes him very dangerous to the entrenched interests. That makes Trump a huge threat to those people. Trump can ruin everything for the bribed politicians and their spoiled slave masters.
Don’t you ever wonder why the GOP has never tried to impeach Obama? Don’t you wonder why John Boehner and Mitch McConnell talk a big game [And now Speaker Ryan... just a mini me John *boner* Boehner...the alarm was sounded by many to no avail and so we get more of the same], but never actually try to stop Obama? Don’t you wonder why Congress holds the purse strings, yet has never tried to de-fund Obamacare or Obama’s clearly illegal executive action on amnesty for illegal aliens? Bizarre, right? It defies logic, right?

First, I’d guess many key Republicans are being bribed. Secondly, I believe many key Republicans are being blackmailed. Whether they are having affairs, or secretly gay, or stealing taxpayer money, the National Security Agency knows everything.
Ask former House Speaker Dennis Hastert about that. The government even knew he was withdrawing large sums of his own money from his own bank account. The NSA, the SEC, the IRS, and all the other three-letter government agencies are watching every Republican political leader. They surveil everything. Thirdly, many Republicans are petrified of being called racists, so they are scared to ever criticize Obama or call out his crimes, let alone demand his impeachment. Fourth , why rock the boat? After defeat or retirement, if you’re a good old boy, you’ve got a $5 million-per-year lobbying job waiting. The big-money interests have the system gamed. Win or lose, they win.
But Trump doesn’t play by any of these rules. Trump breaks up this nice, cozy relationship between big government, big media, and big business. All the rules are out the window if Trump wins the Presidency. The other politicians will protect Obama and his aides but not Trump. Remember: Trump is the guy who publicly questioned Obama’s birth certificate. He questioned Obama’s college records and how a mediocre student got into an Ivy League university.

Now, he’s doing something no Republican has the chutzpah to do. He’s questioning our relationship with Mexico; he’s questioning why the border is wide open; he’s questioning why no wall has been built across the border; he’s questioning if allowing millions of illegal aliens into America is in our best interests; he’s questioning why so many illegal aliens commit violent crimes, yet are not deported; and he’s questioning why our trade deals with Mexico, Russia and China are so bad.
Trump has the audacity to ask out loud why American workers always get the short end of the stick. Good question! I’m certain Trump will question what happened to the almost billion dollars given in a rigged no-bid contract to college friends of Michelle Obama at foreign companies to build the defective Obamacare website. By the way, that tab is now up to $5 billion. Trump will ask if Obamacare’s architects can be charged with fraud for selling it by lying. Trump will investigate Obama’s widespread IRS conspiracy, not to mention Obama’s college records. Trump will prosecute Clinton and Obama for fraud committed to cover up Benghazi before the election. How about the fraud committed by employees of the Labor Department when they made up dramatic job numbers in the last jobs report before the 2012 election?

Obama, the multinational corporations and the media need to stop Trump. They recognize this could get out of control. If left unchecked, telling the raw truth and asking questions everyone else is afraid to ask, Trump could wake a sleeping giant. Trump’s election would be a nightmare. Obama has committed many crimes. No one else but Trump would dare to prosecute. He will not hesitate. Once Trump gets in and gets a look at the cooked books and Obama’s records, the game is over. The jig is up. The goose is cooked. Holder could wind up in prison. Jarrett could wind up in prison. Obama bundler Corzine could wind up in prison for losing $1.5 billion of customer money. Clinton could wind up in jail for deleting 32,000 emails or for accepting bribes from foreign governments while Secretary of State, or for misplacing $6 billion as the head of the State Department, or for lying about Benghazi. The entire upper level management of the IRS could wind up in prison.
Obamacare will be de-funded and dismantled. Obama himself could wind up ruined, his legacy in tatters. Trump will investigate. Trump will prosecute. Trump will go after everyone involved. That’s why the dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump.
Yes, it’s become open season on Donald Trump. The left and the right are determined to attack his policies, harm his businesses, and, if possible, even keep him out of the coming debates. But they can’t silence him. And they sure can’t intimidate him. The more they try, the more the public will realize that he’s the one telling the truth.

Share if you think politicians are terrified of Trump

Hillary's Money Email Shows 'All Hell Is Breaking Loose'

A Hillary Clinton email Wednesday seeking to quickly raise $2 million from supporters because she might "lose" the Democratic presidential contests in Iowa and New Hampshire "indicates that all hell is breaking loose," political strategist Dick Morris told Newsmax TV. 


"For her to be in fact conceding five weeks before that she's going to lose those states, her polling must be disastrous in those states," Morris told "Newsmax Prime" host Ric Blackwell. Iowa holds its caucuses on Feb. 1, while the New Hampshire primary is set for the following week, on Feb. 9. Hillary for America sent the email Wednesday afternoon.

Morris is the co-author of The New York Times best-seller, "Power Grab: Obama's Dangerous Plan for a One-Party Nation."

He told Blackwell that Clinton could come back from losses in those states to her closest challenger, Sen. Bernie Sanders, with the South Carolina primary on Feb. 27 because of the state's large African-American vote.
"It's basically an all-black primary, mainly black," he said. "But then in Nevada and some of the other states, she's going to have a tough time.

"I would think that Bernie would be tied with her in the national polling after he won those first two states. And it really indicates that this Democratic primary is going to be highly competitive.

"For Hillary to be hedging her bets like that is crazy — and it also indicates that she got clobbered in that last debate," Morris said. "She should've stayed in the bathroom." 

Read More: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/dick-morris-reaction-hillary-clinton-email/2015/12/23/id/706988/?ns_mail_uid=12040981&ns_mail_job=1647515_12242015&s=al&dkt_nbr=cqk9hmds

Obama Continues Attacks On Trump… But What He Just Said About White Men Is INFURIATING

[King Obama’s Royal Declaration: “I can do whatever I want”]

President Barack Obama’s approval ratings have been embarrassingly low, probably because of his many failed policies during his tenure in the White House. But, of course, he won’t take responsibility for it and always finds someone or something else to point the finger at.
Most recently, during an interview where he attacked Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, Obama pointed his finger at one group, in particular — working class white people
In a Dec. 21 National Public Radio interview, Obama accused Trump of playing off the fears of white, working-class men to get a jump in the polls, according to The New York Times.

“President Obama said in a radio interview airing on Monday that Donald J. Trump, a leading contender for the Republican presidential nomination, is exploiting the resentment and anxieties of working-class men to boost his campaign,” The Times reported.
“Mr. Obama also argued that some of the scorn directed at him personally stems from the fact that he is the first African-American to hold the White House.”
In in the interview, Obama explained that “(d)emographic changes and economic stresses, including ‘flatlining’ wages and incomes, have meant that ‘particularly blue-collar men have had a lot of trouble in this new economy, where they are no longer getting the same bargain that they got when they were going to a factory and able to support their families on a single paycheck.'”

“You combine those things, and it means that there is going to be potential anger, frustration, fear — some of it justified, but just misdirected,” the president said. “I think somebody like Mr. Trump is taking advantage of that. That’s what he’s exploiting during the course of his campaign.”
Although the president didn’t come right out and say “white men hate me because I’m black,” it can be easily inferred by looking at his statement about the working class, combined with his comment about being the first black president.
Furthermore, it’s quite interesting that Obama himself admits in this interview that the economy is under stress during the “new economy” (aka: his administration’s economic failure). So, basically, the president is admitting that he is responsible for ruining the economy for the working class, but instead of taking responsibility for that, he just calls those who are upset at him “racist.”

We couldn’t possibly disagree with him based solely on his policies, apparently.
These are the very statements that perpetuate the racial animosity we experience in this country. It’s not “white people” who keep mentioning your skin color, Mr. President … it’s you.
H/T Mad World News

PAYBACK: Sam’s Club CEO Makes Anti-White Remarks, Instantly Learns Brutal Lesson About Racism

Rosalind Brewer, CEO of Sam’s Club, has come under fire for remarks she made in an interview with CNN recently about the diversity of the hiring process and condemnation of white males.
In fact, a movement to boycott Sam’s Club over the comments appears to be gaining momentum.
“It has to start with top leadership,” Brewer told CNN recently, according to Yahoo Finance. “My executive team is very diverse and I make that a priority. I demand it within my team.”

Basically, Brewer demands putting the color of a person’s skin over the quality of work someone can provide. That’s not only bad management; it’s racism.
“Just today we met with a supplier and the entire other side of the table was all Caucasian males,” she also said. “That was interesting. I decided not to talk about it directly with (the supplier’s) folks in the room because there were actually no females, like, levels down. So I’m going to place a call to him.”
So, Brewer is going to call the supplier’s CEO to discuss the lack of females representing his company; we call that sexism.

Upon the publication of these comments, thousands have called for a massive boycott of Sam’s Club. Twitter is going 100 miles a minute with tweets asking people to stop shopping there. Many people are waiting for some sort of corporate punishment, while some are curious to know why she hasn’t been fired already.
What would happen if Donald Trump made these comments after a meeting with several African-American women?
Al Sharpton would be inciting riots in every major city. The president’s spokesman would say that Trump is unfit for the White House — again. The ladies of “The View” would have conniption fits.
As Americans, we must be intolerant of racism and sexism elitists like Rosalind Brewer and allow every American — regardless of race or gender — to succeed or fail on the basis of his or her hard work, skills, experience and abilities.

H/T The Gateway Pundit

UFO captured? Man says he has proof

by:Phil Drake 

CLANCY, Mont.— For nearly two years Dr. Richard O’Connor has kept two cameras pointed at the sky with the deep hope and belief that something might be out there.
And then, after nearly 280,000 photos captured by motion detection, it happened.
Or maybe not.
But O’Connor’s findings of what he believes are two unidentified flying objects has set off a barrage of email exchanges, some of them angry, in the community of UFO fans and experts.

About noon on Nov. 4, his cameras captured five photos of something flying through the skies of Montana that is hard for some to explain.
“It appears to be a light source,” O’Connor said. “In my opinion, even a hardened skeptic would say ‘Wow, that is what I expect a UFO would look like.’”
But his discovery has sparked some debate, leaving the doctor to find his own photo experts to determine what his cameras may have captured.

This photo, taken by a Tribune camera from an image provided by Dr. Richard O’Connor, shows an unidentified flying object he says was captured by his cameras on Nov. 4 at his Clancy home. (Photo: Tribune photo/Phil Drake) 


The answers to this mystery remain up in the air.
O’Connor comes by his fascination with UFOs honestly. He said that for more than 25 years he was friends with Jesse Marcel Jr., perhaps best known for being a longtime doctor in Helena. O’Connor, now retired, worked as an anesthesiologist at St. Peter’s Hospital in Helena.
But Marcel may be even better known for something that happened to him as a child in New Mexico in July 1947.
His father, Maj. Jesse Marcel, was sent by his base commander to investigate the crash of a UFO on a ranch outside of Roswell Army Air Field. He loaded some of the wreckage into his vehicle and drove it home to show Jesse Jr., who was then 10.
They couldn’t make sense of what they were seeing. According to Marcel Jr.’s Sept. 1, 2013, obituary in the Helena Independent Record, The U.S. Army Air Corps issued a press release saying a “flying saucer” was found, but public uproar forced them to retract the statement and say a weather balloon had been found instead.

Those who were at the crash site were then sworn to secrecy. But in the ‘70s Marcel Sr. and his son began speaking about what they had seen, believing the coverup was a grave injustice to the public.
Marcel Jr. had a distinguished career not only as a doctor, but in the military as well. He was 76 when he died.


[ Dr. Richard O’Connor, left, and Dr. Jesse Marcel at the opening of the Jesse A. Marcel Library outside of Clancy in 2013. (Photo: Photo by Linda Marcel and courtesy of Dr. Richard O’Connor)

And after knowing him for nearly a quarter-century, O’Connor deeply believes Marcel saw what he saw as a child.
O’Connor, 60, even set up the Jesse A. Marcel Jr. Library on his rural property and his friend was there for its dedication.
He says he told him, “Your story is important, and to continue to educate the public we should open a library.”

And then he installed two Reconyx Hyperfire PC 900 Trail cameras on the southeast corner of his house with the goal of educating the public about the UFO phenomena. When triggered by motion, the cameras, which are about 30 feet off the ground, shoot 20 photos at approximately 1-second intervals.

Dr. Jesse Marcel, who said as a boy in 1947 that he touched wreckage from the UFO crash in Roswell, N.M. (Photo: Photo courtesy of Denise Marcel and Dr. Richard O’Connor)

He also posted a message on the Internet, giving the latitude and longitude of the cameras in the hopes that aliens would see it.
“Come, let us take your picture,” he said, reasoning that if they had the capability to get here they would also have the ability to find people who are reaching out to them.
The cameras were programmed to take photographs of moving objects. Among the 280,000 photos are a vast array of birds, squirrel tails and treetops dancing in the wind.
And then on Nov. 4, O’Connor says he noticed something.

“Basically what you see is a very symmetrical, smooth and reflective surface that appears to have his own light source,” he said.
Neither the FAA, nor the Air Force nor NASA handle UFO calls anymore, an FAA spokesman said, adding they are referred to National UFO Reporting Center, an organization that investigates UFO sightings and/or alien contacts. It was founded in 1974 by Robert J. Gribble.
The website features listings of UFO sightings by state. For instance, on Nov. 18, someone reported seeing three flashes of green light that lit up the entire sky after a power outage. On Nov. 11 in Great Falls, someone reported seeing a silent triangular object heading east to west before turning smoothly south and going out of sight. Massive in size. On Sept. 26, someone in Great Falls reported seeing a green glowing fireball.


The following is a screen shot from the National UFO Reporting Center State Report Index for Montana. Dr. Richard O’Connor’s UFO Nov. 4 report is at the very bottom of the screen. (Photo: Tribune photo) 


O’Connor, who says he has no knowledge of how to manipulate photos on a computer, forwarded his photos to NUFORC, which were there for a few weeks and then came a query to them from the Tribune.
Peter Davenport, now the head of the NUFORC, forwarded the photos to “a skilled photo-analyst,” requesting that he try to ‘extract’ more information about the object than mere visual inspection would permit.”
NUFORC is a self-funded website that Davenport describes as a “labor of love.”
“I do it so people have a place to call if they see a UFO,” he said.


Richard O’Connor sits in his Clancy home and discusses a photo, shown in the foreground, that one of his cameras has captured. He believes it is of a UFO. (Photo: Tribune photo/Phil Drake) 


The first review was heartening.
“Bottom line, I think the images are real, but remain a mystery,” the photo analyst wrote. “I suspect the lights in the first and last photos are sun reflections off of something rather than any propulsion system.”
And higher up in his assessment he wrote: “Thus, I conclude it is a puzzle to solve rather than a fake.”
But another analyst didn’t agree and angered O’Connor by proclaiming the photos “100 percent fake.”
O’Connor expressed his anger in an email to Davenport, saying he would get an unbiased photograph analysis. Davenport also suggests that O’Connor submit his photos to someone whose reputation he trusts.
O’Connor has also offered to take a polygraph.

O’Connor now plans to meet with various experts in photo analysis to get their take on his pictures.
In an earlier interview, O’Connor said, “What you see there is what came off that camera.”
He said his main intention is “to let people know that UFOs are real.  These photographs are proof positive that UFOs are real.”
He added they deserve to be studied in a “well-funded, unbiased scientific study to determine if we are being visited ...”
O’Connor recently received an assessment from a photo analysis from another UFO research organization.
This person wrote, “This photo is an interesting one. The colors of the object resembles the surrounding blue sky and clouds. This would naturally occur with highly reflective silver objects. The fact it was 1/20 second frame rules out balloons or other man-made objects. It also indicates the objects decelerated and accelerated and held position for just one frame, as there’s no elongated motion line that would have occurred if the velocity was constant.

“I’m sure some will say it’s one frame of hot pixels; which is impossible for just one frame and a wide selected zone of linear pixels,” the analyst wrote. “Some will say it’s a digital recording artifact; this is not possible because the pixels comprising ... the objects are linear with gradient fall off. When all other explanations are ruled out the proverbial ‘flying swamp gas’ explanation is offered, and this is done by those who choose to ignore the laws of physics.”
O’Connor said he understands the skepticism of others.
“They did not have the opportunity in their lives to know Dr. Marcel,” he said, adding that once he knew him and trusted him, his attitude changed.
His said his biggest fear is that the truth will be covered up.
“I am interested in the truth,” he said. “If I am subject to criticism to get to the bottom of this, then I guess it’s part of the deal.”
What’s out there?
To see UFO sightings from Montana reported to the National UFO Reporting Center, go to: www.nuforc.org/webreports/ndxlmt.html
To know more
To contact Dr. Richard O’Connor, email richard@cropcirclesresearchfoundation.
The photos can be seen as cropcirclesresearchfoundation.org or jamal.org.

VIDEO: Cameras at Dem Debate Catch Hillary Doing Something She Thought America Wouldn’t Notice

Back in 2008, Hillary Clinton launched a scathing attack against Barack Obama. She accused him of not being the right person to be there to answer the 3 a.m. phone call, the one that might endanger the entire United States.
While President Obama has missed plenty of major calls, Clinton managed to miss one of her own this weekend at the Democratic Party presidential debate.
According to The Daily Caller, Hillary Clinton managed to take too long with her “bathroom break” and missed the call to return to the debate proceedings.

The break took place about 90 minutes into the debate. For the first 90 seconds, commercials ran. Then the debate came back to a sort-of halftime show featuring liberal hack George Stephanopoulos and ABC News White House correspondent Jonathan Karl, where they talked about which candidates had done merely awesome and which candidates had did awesomest. That lasted about a minute.
Then, there were two-and-a-half more minutes of commercials. Finally, after five minutes, the debate resumed — without one of its major contenders.
“Welcome back tonight. As you can see, we have a packed audience here in New Hampshire, and we’re going to continue. We’ve already had a spirited conversation here at the top of the broadcast about ISIS, about concerns of terror here on the home front,” moderator David Muir began.

“And as we await Secretary Clinton back stage here, we’re going to begin on the economy. We want to turn to American jobs, wages, and raises in this country. And do we believe Secretary Clinton will be coming around the corner any minute. But in the meantime we want to start with this…”
Yep. Hillary can’t even take a “bathroom break” in five minutes. Hills eventually sauntered back on stage, deadpanning, “Sorry,” to the audience.

According to The New York Times, Clinton spokeswoman Huma Abedin didn’t waste a good opportunity, blaming the delay on a “gender gap” in bathroom distance at the debate site, St. Anselm’s College in New Hampshire.

The Times reported the shifty Abedin actually clocked how long it would take for Clinton to take from podium to bathroom and back. According to her calculations, it would take Clinton three minutes and thirty seconds to get from dais to restroom and back again, “significantly longer” than either Bernie Sanders or Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley had to travel to use the facilities.
I’m just going to pause for a second because the image of Huma Abedin with a stopwatch following Hillary Clinton waddling to pee through the hallways of a liberal arts college in New Hampshire has me laughing too hard for me to type. Really, try imagining it for yourself. It’ll make your day.
“You know, it does take me a little longer. That’s all I can say,” Hillary responded about her absence. 

Well, yes, for one of two reasons. First, Hillary thinks the nomination is a done deal and she oughtn’t bother showing up back on stage when the network tells her to. Second, that her age dictates that she move slower than either Martin O’Malley or (tellingly) Bernie Sanders.
Considering Sanders looks like Yoda dressed in Clarence Darrow’s old wardrobe, it’s time to seriously start raising the age factor in Hillary’s campaign. Tinpot dictators looking to invade other countries do not wait for presidents to go to the bathroom. Terrorist leaders with their finger on the button do not wait for presidents to go to the bathroom.
And — thankfully for us — the opposition definitely does not wait for Hillary Clinton to use the potty.

BREAKING: San Bernardino Families Reveal Sick Thing Obama Did During “Comforting” Photo-Op

On a stopover last week in San Bernardino, California, President Barack Obama was sure to visit with the families of those killed in the terrorist attack. As for the wounded and their families? Not so much.
According to the U.K. Daily Mail, Obama spent Friday evening with the families of the 14 dead, offering hugs and getting in some photos. However, one local official severely criticized Obama for failing to meet with first responders and the 22 who were left wounded by the Dec. 2 attack.
The visit was carried out as Obama was en route to his annual Christmas vacation in Hawaii.

The San Bernardino attacks, carried out by married Muslim terrorists Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik, has been a cause celebre for an Obama administration pushing for gun control. Recent reports indicate that the president specifically instructed intelligence services to downplay the terrorism aspect of the attack.
San Bernardino Supervisor Curt Hagman said the president was using a terror attack to “to promote his agenda on gun control.” He also called upon Obama to visit with first responders and wounded who “also deserve the president’s time.”
“This is an opportunity for unity and healing at the highest level and I call upon President Obama to be more inclusive with his meeting,” Hagman said in a statement.

Obama’s use of San Bernardino as yet another photo opportunity shouldn’t necessarily come as a surprise. After all, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Obama’s visit to San Bernardino was “patterned after” a similar visit he made to Roseburg, Oregon, in October after a shooting at Umpqua Community College.
During that visit, Obama met with some of the families of victims and pressed for gun control. However, he didn’t meet with either first responders or other family members of the wounded who had expressed opposition to Obama’s use of the tragedy as platform for gun control legislation.
Obama seems rather immune to that sort of criticism, though. As Rahm Emmanuel once said, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.” The president certainly doesn’t.
H/T WZ

ALERT: Look Who Obama Hosted at White House While You Weren’t Looking… We’re Under Attack

After the San Bernardino terror attack, Obama scheduled a meeting at the White House to talk about ways to push back against religious discrimination.
You might think he’d want to hold a meeting about pushing back against radical Islamic extremism, but only if you don’t know anything about this president.
WND reported that the Muslim advocacy group Council on American-Islamic Relations was invited to the meeting. CAIR’s ties to Islamic extremists in the Middle East have been well-documented by the FBI and others.

President Obama also reportedly did not invite any moderate Muslim groups, like the Muslim Reform Movement, to the discussion on discrimination.
Ironically enough, in 2008 the FBI forbade any outreach to CAIR because of its ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Apparently President Obama won’t even listen to his own FBI.
“Why would the White House include CAIR when FBI policy is to avoid the group?” terrorism expert Steve Emerson asked.

“The meeting’s focus is understandable,” Emerson stated. “But the inclusion of a prominent CAIR official serves only to enhance the status of a group with documented ties to a terrorist financing network.”
CAIR has been very public about supporting the family of the San Bernardino terrorists. The bodies from the attack weren’t even cold yet and CAIR was publicly stating that American foreign policy was responsible for the massacre, not radical Islam.
And this is who Obama invites to the White House just before leaving for his Christmas vacation — a vacation he was in such a hurry to get to that he snubbed the wounded victims of the San Bernardino shooting.

Next year, we need to elect a Republican who will call Islamic terror by its name and stand up to terrorists at home and abroad. And it can’t come soon enough.

PAYBACK: After Turning on Conservatives, Paul Ryan Just Got MASSIVE Bad News From Home

House Speaker Paul Ryan, a veritable turncoat who sold out every conservative in America last week when he signed off on a $1.1-trillion omnibus bill that handed President Barack Obama everything he wanted, might be on the verge of suffering some major payback for his treachery.
Writing for Crows Nest Politics, Ken Crow, former leader of Tea Party of America, urged his many followers to begin searching for a local “candidate willing to primary Paul Ryan in the 1st District.”
“All patriots should contact your group’s leaders and begin organizing nationwide to put down this RINO in order that he is not re-elected to his seat in Wisconsin,” Crow wrote. “The Badger State patriots need to begin soliciting your State Senators, high-profile business leaders or the State Legislators who reside within the 1st District of Wisconsin.”

Moreover, Crow’s poignant message got picked up by The Gateway Pundit and Fox News and eventually made its way onto the Facebook page for the Wisconsin Tea Party.
This means, in effect, that the movement to get rid of backstabber Paul Ryan has officially begun. In fact, someone already set up a “Primary Paul Ryan” Facebook page that had already accumulated over 18,000 followers by Monday morning.
As Crow pointed out, however, whoever steps up to the plate will need a lot of money to spar against Ryan, who reportedly commands at least $5 million in campaign funds.

“This candidate will need a truckload of cash to make this an actual race,” Crow explained. “This means we all need to reach deep and find an extra $10 or 20.00 bill to send to this candidate. If 200 or 300,000 of us do this, now we have a very real chance of knocking off Ryan in the primary and winning the general election.”
Republicans in Wisconsin have until April 5, 2016, to find a suitable candidate and raise enough money to take down backstabber Paul Ryan. We most certainly wish them the best of luck.
H/T WND

Hitlery Campaigns to Violate Constitution and Make Law Herself if Elected As People Applaud

by:Suzanne Hamner 
Trend setters. You know who they are. These are the individuals who parade out in thrown together garb; then, next thing you know, everyone is wearing it. It happens with hairstyles too -- men and women. Anything that someone who is highly visible in the media, such as Holly Weird dimwits, begin to parade around in, with or on becomes a trend for emulation. Unfortunately, it works that way in politics as well.
With Obama's ever increasing use of executive orders and fiats to change law or enact law to get what he wants, many called at each violation for the impeachment of Obama or else a precedent, read trend, would be established for future occupiers of the office to act like a dictator. The calls to impeach were ignored by Congress due to Boehner disagreeing with impeachment and Gowdy wondering if anyone had met Joe Biden. A complicit Congress has made it so that 2016 Democratic candidate for president, Hillary Clinton, stated she would use executive orders to do a work around Congress to force Republicans to respond to her agenda. 

Obama has had such success with his "lawmaking" abilities through executive orders that Hillary Clinton is campaigning, promising and declaring to use the same to "execute her domestic policy agenda on issues such as gun control, ending corporate 'inversion' deals and immigration, where she promises to shield more people from deportation." She has repeated this intention on three different occasions. Appearing on the NBC Today Show, Hitlery stated in regards to gun control, "I want to push hard to get more sensible restraints. I want to work with Congress, but I will look at ways as president," to impose her agenda.
On corporate inversion deals, where US companies buy foreign companies then moves it headquarters abroad to avoid US taxes, Hitlery called for the need to use executive action, decree, to "get the job done" if Republicans on Capitol Hill would not. Granted, the issue of corporate inversion is a problem and it might appeal to many citizens to support Hitlery in her idea. However, it is a usurpation for her to do so. 

Speaking at a campaign event in Waterloo, Iowa, she stated, "This is not only about fairness, this is about patriotism. If Congress won't act, then I will ask the Treasury Department when I'm there to use its regulatory authority, if that's what it takes."
Here is a candidate for president, a Democrat, absolutely telling the entire nation, she intends to violate the Constitution of the united States of America to end run Congress on the corporate inversion deals and calling it "patriotism."
Regarding immigration, Clinton declared her intent to go further than Obama to protect illegal alien invaders' rights through executive action.
Speaking at a Democratic Fundraiser in Iowa, Hitlery said, "I am going to back and support what President Obama has done to protect [young immigrants] and their families, to use executive action to prevent deportation. And I have said that if we cannot get comprehensive immigration reform as we need, and as we should, with a real path to citizenship that will actually grow our economy -- then I will go as far as I can, even beyond President Obama, to make sure law-abiding, decent, hard-working people in this country are not ripped away from their families." 

Republicans have huffed and puffed at Obama regarding his use of executive order to make law and end run around Congress. The presidential memorandum, a form of executive order, has been used by Obama more times than any other president in history. As Obama navigates around Congress using the memorandum and executive orders, Republicans cry "foul" yet refuse to follow the law and impeach the man. Instead, Republicans filed lawsuits challenging a few of Obama's orders, such as the recess appointments and the unilateral delay of the employer mandate of Obamacare. The Supreme Court found Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board unconstitutional. It didn't matter. The House refuses to do their duty and file articles of impeachment. 

Hitlery has taken notice. Now, she can campaign on a pledge to violate the Constitution, with impunity, as Republicans will not bring impeachment against Obama, and be the Democratic front-runner for the nomination. She has skirted any charges in the Benghazi attacks. Email-gate will go nowhere. Nothing will stop her; therefore, she proudly pledges to violate the Constitution, commit treason, and people applaud this woman.
It was predicted by many that Congress's failure to hold Obama accountable by filing articles of impeachment would result in future presidents violating the Constitution in the same manner, which basically means a dictatorship. Just so happens, Hitlery is now campaigning on that platform -- the use of executive "decree" to enact law without Congress -- to act as a dictator. People are applauding in support of this intention. She is admitting she will violate the Constitution, break the law and the oath of office should she be elected. 

Make no mistake; she'll use dictatorial edict on more than the three issues she's mentioned while campaigning.
In response, Congress will remain silent in complicity. They would not impeach Obama for whatever lame reason given to the public. More than likely, it was due to being blackmailed, coerced or threatened, while believing the media would slam-dunk them using the term "racist." Should Hitlery win the presidency, Congress will follow the same pattern as with Obama. Only this time, the accusation would be "sexist."
With what America has witnessed during the Hussein administration, it is obvious that Republicans have squarely placed themselves in bed with Democrats/Communists/Socialists. Nothing changed when Republicans were given a majority in the Senate to match the House. The same game was played with different players. Americans can expect the same thing in 2016 and forward from Congress as an emboldened Obama moves along with the agenda. 

Unfortunately, many in America have become stupid, ignorant, lazy, and brainwashed due to indoctrination that they applaud someone declaring to violate the law. These people cannot be helped. And, voting Republican will change nothing. Again, the same game will be afoot with different players.
It's time for Americans to begin to hate the game and the players. Politicians are playing a game that is about to finish the transformation of this nation from a constitutional republic to whatever they have decided. The players are set and the people being the pawns are moved about with little difficulty. Either American citizens support, uphold and defend the Constitution in its entirety, whether agreeing with all tenets or not, or be prepared to live under a government decreed to us. Remember, it is not the Constitution that is the problem. It is those in government, who are violating it, that are the problem.  
 

Former Illinois Congressman: "I think that we've begun a third American Revolution”

by:Suzanne Hamner 

Revolution. Just the mention of the word can often conjure up images of violence, oppression and despotism. However, it was out of revolution that this nation was born. Speaking to The Blaze, Former Illinois Congressman Joe Walsh, whose video challenging Attorney General Loretta Lynch went viral, stated a revolution is coming; and, it's coming in the Republican party. He indicated the possibility of violence could not be ruled out.   

In an exclusive interview with The Blaze, Walsh stated, "I think that we've begun a third American Revolution." Counting the War of Northern Aggression as the second, he continued, "I think people who recoil against both parties and believe in freedom are finally rising up. They're angry -- I mean, look at [Republican frontrunner Donald] Trump -- and they want to do something about it. I think we're at the beginning of this, and I think you're going to see it play out in the Republican Party because there could be a split in the Republican Party."

The first step for "revolutionaries" -- those who are conservative, Tea Party supporters, and other grassroots activists -- is to "clean out the Republican Party." He indicated if that didn't work, a new movement or political party could be right on the horizon.
The 53 year old Walsh stated it is difficult to say, "don't be afraid of it," because we won't know what is going to happen. "Remember," he claimed, "revolution is a scary term. It implies violence; it implies open rebellion. People shouldn't be afraid because initially we're going to use the political system in this revolt to try to fight back." 

Walsh is definitely on to something. Citizens who believe in, support , protect, uphold and defend the Constitution are tired of the same old status quo -- big government, growing a bigger government, charlatan politicians who pander for votes then sidle up to big lobbyists and corporations, the lies and corruption that permeate both chambers of Congress, criminals and traitors holding office, and the destruction of American culture. Yet, when one mentions the "restoration of our nation" through the means given by the founders, our Second Amendment, some immediately jump to the idea it means overthrowing what we have, revolting against our republic and the violence that would incur. On the contrary, it may be what is needed in order to restore the nation to its constitutional principles.
Walsh, a conservative radio host, believes this revolution would not be violent at first, but looks at the American Revolution and the Civil War (his term) as indicators of possibility.

"It's not going to get violent at first, but look, the two prior revolutions we had got violent -- the American Revolution and the Civil war," the one-term congressman continued. "Our founders believed that it may take violence to take back our country every now and then."

Walsh, looking at the 2016 presidential contenders, indicated that some have utilized the same ideas as him, including Donald Trump, who mobilized, by accident, the anger built up in America. Claiming that no candidate has tapped into that anger more than him, Walsh indicated that Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) was tinkering with "his idea of revolution;" however, Paul's libertarian-leaning campaign is fading.
"So, none of the Republican candidates will go there yet, because when I say revolution, I'm also talking about overthrowing the Republican Party, and no Republican candidate wants to say that yet," he said. 

Honestly, these are the risks faced when the idea emerges to the forefront of removing by force the current charlatans in Washington and replacing them with new guards in our government. It is these risks the corrupt count on to instill fear, calling the action "insurrection," and the added consequence of a traitor's death to keep the people immobilized. However, it is the preamble of the Constitution of the united States of America that guides us to who and what is the government.
We the people, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. 

Hillary Clinton, three times now, has pledged during her campaign to use executive orders to make law if Congress cannot. One knows the condition of the nation when people applaud a candidate pledging to violate their oath of office and the law before being elected. She is putting forth a platform more specific than "hope and change" and "fundamentally transform America." However, she is following the same path Obama carved out. If you don't like Obama's policies, you won't like Hitlery's.
Then, there is the Bernie Sanders (D-VT) campaign. Bernie, a self-declared communist/socialist, speaks as well of revolution while campaigning. Sanders, though, is calling for a revolution against our system of government - a constitutional republic - unlike Walsh. However, Walsh maintains the left doesn't need a revolution since they appear to be winning.

"There will be no revolution on the left because they're winning," Walsh told The Blaze. "The revolution is coming from the people on the right -- just average, hardworking Americans who are pissed off because government's too big."

Walsh spread his message of revolution to more than 200 college students in attendance at a winter conference for Turning Point USA, a conservative student organization with the tagline, "Big Government Sucks." Walsh told the students sitting inside a conference room that they will be at the "front lines fighting this fight."

Many college students in attendance voiced their agreement with Walsh, with one student saying Walsh focused for her that "partisan nonsense will not resonate with anyone my age."

The tactics of the left have vaulted their anti-American sentiment to appear to be the mainstream majority opinion. Using the club of political correctness, the labels of "whatever phobia" and racism, along with all other -isms out there, the left silenced those who believe in limited government as outlined in the Constitution and conservative principles. Lamestream enemedia outlets "turned left," disregarded their principles, and sold out the public by being the propaganda arm of the Obama administration. Then, you have the different movements across the nation: Black Lives Matter, the sodomite agenda, and the "peaceful" Islam rhetoric. It baffles the mind that a minute percentage of individuals could control an entire nation through intimidation.   

But, control they have. These wrong way Waldos spout about rights and freedoms while denying others the same. They bash everyone with rhetoric about being tolerant when they are the most intolerant group of individuals, ever. The left seeks to pin the sins of past generations upon the current generation while exonerating themselves of any wrong-doing, adopting the superior, arrogant attitude prevalent in secular humanism.
As of right now, there sits approximately 500 domestic enemies in both chambers of Congress, complimented by the entire staff at the White House, the residents of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and every federal agency and department head. The judicial system has been stacked with "yes men" and those with conflicting interests, which adds more names to the list of domestic enemies, especially where the Supreme Court is concerned. Elections have resulted in one enemy traded for another, meaning it is what should be expected from both parties at this point. Walsh voices in general what many are specifically thinking -- these people need to dragged out of their offices, new guards placed in government that will uphold the oath and let the trials begin.