Saturday, January 5, 2013

Judge orders eligibility attorney to stay away

OpEd: Jack
Unbelievable...this Judge should be relieved of duties #Fired for Obstruction of Justice...tarred and feathered and ran out of the United States of America!
by Bob Unruh 

Florida Circuit Judge Kevin Carroll, who previously cited the fictitious judge in “Miracle on 34th Street” in a ruling, now says he’s done with arguments over Barack Obama’s eligibility.
Carroll released an order today refusing to hear a request for a hearing that is allowed under state law when there are doubts about a candidate’s eligibility. And let that be the last, the judge said.
“No petitions for clarification or further rehearing will be entertained by the court,” he said in his ruling that refused to respond to a request for the state-allowed hearing in a case brought by Michael Voeltz.
“The court … finds no factual or legal cause to recede from its prior ruling that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction,” he wrote.
The attorney handling the case for Voeltz, Larry Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch, told WND if the judge doesn’t want to address the dispute, then he’ll take it to the appellate level, and that filing could occur as early as this weekend.
He noted that the judge had promised the plaintiffs time to respond to an Obama motion to dismiss the case but then dismissed it without allowing the time frame to expire.

Oliver Stone: Hugo Chavez Did for Venezuela What Obama is Doing for America

This is hilarious. I have CNN on one of my monitors here, and you may have heard that Hugo Chavez — the dictator and communist leader in Venezuela — is nearing room temperature. And this has the CNN people distressed. I mean, he’s a great socialist leader! He’s done great things to impoverish his people, but everybody’s equal down there. It’s cool. And, of course, with Chavez nearing the great reward, the Great Socialist in the Sky, they’re bringing on (in advance of his expiration) a bunch of tributes.
Normally they wait ’til people die to do tributes, but I guess they want Hugo to see this. Oliver Stone, who did a documentary on Hugo Chavez three years ago now, or two years ago, was very laudatory. Oliver Stone, who doesn’t like America much, is telling a very interested CNN all about Hugo Chavez. It’s just — I don’t know — fascinating to me. You have a major television network celebrating the life of a socialist-Marxist dictator as he nears death, with an American movie director on to sing his praises.
It’s a network that’s in last place and is supposedly making vast moves to become more mainstream. And who knows? This may be it. Hee-hee-hee.

Pelosi: I Only Supported Cuts To Social Security ‘To Call The Bluff’ Of GOP

OpEd: Jack
*Eye Roll* what can one say?..Nancy is senile and really needs to retire...she is all over the map once again!
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) upset progressives last month when, amid the fiscal cliff debate, she said she backed the idea of cutting Social Security benefits by changing the way inflation is calculated for recipients.
But now Pelosi says she was bluffing, at least in part, to see how far Republicans would go in compromising on a deal.
“It was really to call the bluff of the Republicans’ tactic,” Pelosi said during a small gathering with reporters on Friday. “At what figure will you raise taxes on the rich? At what place do you keep moving the goalpost on entitlements?”
In the final weeks of fiscal cliff negotiations, President Barack Obama said he supported the idea of tying Social Security cost-of-living increases to a chained CPI, or chained Consumer Price Index. Social Security benefits are currently calculated by inflation rates. By changing the formula and instead calculating benefits with a chained CPI, the result would mean small cuts at first, but would eventually cost beneficiaries thousands of dollars over time, which is why Democrats have largely fought the idea.
Continue Reading on ...

New Hampshire Legislator: We Need to ‘Restrict Freedoms’ of Conservatives

WTH is this?... LGB....'T' ~> cynthia-chaseJust 'it' being there would scare anyone away from moving to
A New Hampshire legislator wants her constituents to know that she feels conservatives are the “single biggest threat” her state faces today, and she wants to use her powers to legislate to “pass measures that will restrict” the freedoms of Granite State conservatives.
In a blog post made last month on the left-wing site Blue Hampshire, 3rd District State Representative Democrat Cynthia Chase advised her fellow legislators to use their positions to make New Hampshire less welcoming to any conservative or libertarian planning on moving to her state—not to mention those already in residence.
For those unaware, a conservative project of sorts has been underway in New Hampshire since 2001. The idea is that Americans of conservative ideals are to move to New Hampshire, gather in communities, run for office, and work to drive the state toward libertarianism and conservatism. It is called the “Free State Project” and adherents are called “Free Staters.”
Continue Reading on ...

2nd Amendment: Overthrowing a Tyrannical Government

Given all the gun talk lately, Mark Levin opened his show tonight clarifying the purpose of the 2nd amendment saying that it wasn’t for target shooting or hunting or anything else in that realm. He said that whether you like it or not or whether you agree with it or not, the reason why 2nd amendment exists is to arm the population in order to overthrow a tyrannical government. That’s it. 

Continue Reading on ...

Latest Twist in Benghazi Saga: Did Libyan Officials Prevent Help from Reaching Americans Under Siege?

Yesterday Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was released from the hospital following a bout with the flu, a concussion and a blood clot. She is reported to be preparing to testify on the attacks that took place in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. While the media has done all it can to help Americans forget Benghazi, many of us are still out to keep the story front and center every week. Now there seems to be a new twist that is coming out with regards to what took place in Benghazi and this was in the Senate Homeland Security Committee report titled Flashing Red: A Special Report On The Terrorist Attack At Benghazi, which has been largely overshadowed, perhaps even orchestrated by the entire “fiscal cliff” debacle.
The Daily Beast reports,
The biggest recent development—which was overshadowed by the fiscal cliff negotiations—came on New Year’s Eve, when the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee released a report that raised the question of whether Libyan officials assisted the Benghazi terrorists. The report found that a team of CIA contractors dispatched from Tripoli to Benghazi on the night of the attacks waited at least three hours after arriving at the Benghazi airport before departing to the scene because of negotiations with Libyan government officials. According to the report, members of Congress still don’t know the exact reason for the delay. “Was it simply the result of a difficult Libyan bureaucracy and a chaotic environment or was it part of a plot to keep American help from reaching the Americans under siege in Benghazi?” the report asks.
Read more:

Obama’s Family Vacations to Cost Taxpayers More Than $20 Million

With all this talk about America’s demise off the fiscal cliff, you’d think that the politicians running the show would at least pretend to live as if our financial situation was as dire as they and their media mouthpieces make it out to be. Actually, nevermind. These days, nothing surprises us anymore when it comes to political hypocrisy. “Political hypocrisy” has become redundant. So, it’s not really all that surprising to learn that the Obama’s Hawaii family vacations have netted over $20 million since he took office.
They vacation quite a bit. Michelle has to go skiing out West every year. They’ve gone to Martha’s Vineyard every summer except last year when he was campaigning. Vacationing during a political campaign looks bad. It makes it look like you don’t care all that much about being president. But vacationing during a financial crisis is nothing. Once you become president, you can do pretty much whatever you want, and the media will stay off your case about it as long as you’re a liberal.
But the $20 million figure is just from their Hawaii getaways every Christmas. Each time they visit there, it costs on average $4 million, much of which is eaten up by the costly flight there and back. It costs about $180,000 an hour for Air Force One to transport the Obamas to and fro Hawaii, an 18-hour roundtrip.

Friday, January 4, 2013

Lawmakers review plan to declare voters 'bigots'

by Bob Unruh 

A legal team specializing in civil rights, faith and freedom issues has written a letter to members of the Illinois legislature, warning that the new “Illinois Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act” isn’t all about “freedom” and “fairness.”
It’s about labeling constituents bigots, according to a statement from the attorneys at the Thomas More Society
The letter, from Thomas Brejcha, chief counsel for the Thomas More Society, is going to every member of the state General Assembly to encourage them to oppose the plan.
He advises lawmakers that voting for the proposed same-sex “marriage” bill will hurt constituents.
That’s because the “discriminatory act will declare Illinois residents who support traditional marriage to be bigoted and prejudicial.”
“You will declare your constituents who believe that marriage is a union of one man and one woman to be bigots and discriminators,” the letter explains. “You will further ensure that this declaration is reinforced through official government policy. Read More:

Germany accused of ‘deporting’ its elderly

 by UK Daily Mail 
Rising numbers moved to Asia and Eastern Europe because of sky-high care cost
German pensioners are being sent to care homes in Eastern Europe and Asia in what has been described as an ‘inhumane deportation’.
Rising numbers of the elderly and sick are moved overseas for long-term care because of sky-high costs at home.
Some private healthcare providers are even building homes overseas, while state insurers are also investigating whether they can care for their clients abroad.
Experts describe a time bomb’ of increasing numbers unable to afford the growing costs of retirement homes.
And they say the situation should be a warning to Britain, where rising numbers of pensioners are forced to sell their homes to pay for care.
The Sozialverband Deutschland (VdK), a socio-political advisory group, said the fact that many Germans were unable to afford the costs of a retirement home in their own country was a huge ‘alarm signal’.
‘We simply cannot let those people, who built Germany up to be what it is, be deported,’ VdK’s president Ulrike Mascher told The Guardian. ‘It is inhumane.’
This article was written by Mail Foreign Service for the UK Daily Mail; view full article at the UK Daily Mail

Open Letter to Congress and the Senate..No on Gun Control

Please be advised that we 'Oath Keepers' will not allow the fraudulent President: Barry Barack Hussein Sotero Obama to continue his attack on the Bill of Rights and the United States Constitution...Congress must act and Impeach Obama for High Crimes and Misdemeanors as defined within the Constitution..We will not allow further sedition on the part of said Barack Obama and his Progressive Party to destroy the Constitution of the United States and thumb his nose at the 'Bill of Rights'...There are over 200 duly elected Sheriffs at the time of this writing who have stated they will not allow 'anyone' or 'entity' to come into their collective Counties and seize weapons from Law abiding citizens!

Oath Keepers:

The first revolution that occurred within the United States of America was sparked by the order to turn in guns by the British Monarchy...we all know what this brought about....The 'Revolutionary War'...a new country with a 'Bill of Rights' and a 'Constitution' to protect 'we the people' from dictators!

The whole issue of gun control has nothing whatsoever to do with protecting children or citizens from is all about removing firearms from legal citizens to bring them to their knees and unable to resist the Marxist takeover by the Progressive Party USA

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona provided Congress with proof that Obama has committed a fraud on the American people as well as 'Treason and Sedition' so far has fallen on deaf more, Local Sheriffs have begun to muster to the call of 'We the People'

I have received verification from my local Sheriff Gerald Antinoro of Storey County ,Nevada that he and other Sheriffs and Chiefs of Police will address this issue:

Gerald Antinoro
Consider it done. The NV Sheriff's and Chiefs are considering a position on this very subject. For your edification, I have already responded with my position. I have attached a copy of my response to the Sheriff's & Chiefs.

Making Gun Owners A More Attractive Target For Lawyers: Requiring Liability Insurance

OpEd: Jack
Here we go...the Lawyers are getting into the act as well as insurance companies to get farther into our collective wallets! If this continues with the Obama administration all of our paychecks will go to the Obama administration via taxes,leans and penalities we will be lucky to keep 10% of earned income...Time to #Impeach
NPR floats the idea on their Planet Money blog that gun owners should be required to buy liability insurance.
One economist (Justin Wolters) put it this way:
“The real problem with gun ownership is that they involve “externalities,” which is economist-speak for the fact that your gun may be used to hurt others. For instance, when Nancy Lanza purchased her Bushmaster AR-15, she probably weighed the benefits of owning the gun—the joy of ownership—with the price (about $800). But it’s unlikely she considered the loss, pain and grief that might follow if it were used by her son to kill 26 innocents. When people fail to consider the broader social costs of choices like buying a gun, they’re more likely to do them, and society suffers.”
But what about what Society gains from widespread gun ownership?
I don’t personally own a gun right now. I’ve got other more pressing economic issues than the current price of becoming proficient and safe with a gun—partially the result, no doubt, of growing up in a family that was not “into” gun culture. But I would feel immeasurably safer in a neighborhood of widespread gun ownership than one in which most people were disarmed. I know the statistics and criminals learn not to break into houses in areas where there are a lot of people who own guns. Since those crimes are avoided, they never make splashy headlines.

Your Answer When They Come For Your Guns

I have previously written here and here about appropriate tactics for patriots to take (including Christian patriots) when we come to the realization that the current government of our land is tyrannical, and moving in the direction of further, more intensive despotism.
I’d like to add another tactic to that list today; and, that tactic is deception.
I realize that as soon as I suggest that deception is an appropriate tool for the opposition of tyrants,  I’m going to lose some of my fellow Christians. However, I beg a patient audience, as I will later try to show that the Bible itself endorses this idea. And when I suggest that Scripture endorses the move to deceive tyrants, I use that word advisedly. I don’t mean to merely say that Scripture allows deception in this case. I mean that the Bible endorses it. It commends it. It holds it up in more than one place as an act of faith.
Especially since we have moved into the Information Age, the American Federal government has sought to become a master collector of information. Information is the new currency, especially in endeavors such as the War on Terror. Information is so important that the government has launched an initiative, with the Utah Data Center, to (in fact) capture every piece of electronic communication that flies through cyberspace.

Biden promised Boston Mayor that Obama will Pass Sweeping Firearms Reforms by End of January

Sounds like the ‘comprehensive solution’ that Biden’s ‘mass shootings’ commission is working on will revolve almost exclusively around sweeping gun control. Ugh.
BOSTON HERALDVice President Joe Biden “guaranteed” Mayor Thomas M. Menino — a leading national gun control advocate — that President Obama will pass sweeping firearms reforms by the end of the month, the mayor said today.
“He said, ‘Tommy, I guarantee you, we’ll get it done by the end of January,’” Menino said at City Hall today. “They’re going to get it done.”
The mayor, who has been recovering from a host of ailments for the past two months, said Biden called him several times while he was in the hospital, including a call after the Newtown school massacre to discuss gun control.
Menino and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg co-chair the 500-mayor-strong Mayors Against Illegal Guns and have called for national gun reform in the wake of last month’s Sandy Hook school killings.
Read More:

Vindication: Egyptian Magazine Exposes Muslim Brotherhood Infiltration of Obama Administration

Once again, Geller (and the few brave truth tellers) are proven right. And the silent enemedia, yet again, are shown to be the quislings snakes that they are.
An Egyptian magazine is reporting about Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the Obama administration at the highest level. This Egyptian magazine names Rashad Hussain, exposed as Brotherhood at Atlas in January 2010; Arif Alikhan, exposed at Atlas here back in Janary 2009; and the others, Salam al-Marayati;  Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); and Eboo Patel, all profiled at Atlas many times. Since June 2009, when Obama invited the then-outlawed Muslim Brotherhood to his submission speech in Cairo, his subversive support of the Islamic supremacist organization has wreaked havoc on freedom-loving peoples the world over.
Americans may very well be painfully clueless about this fatal subterfuge, but it is devastating, really. Look at the world before Obama and after he took the mantle of power (Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, etc.).
An Egyptian magazine claims that six American Islamist activists who work with the Obama administration are Muslim Brotherhood operatives who enjoy strong influence over U.S. policy.
The Dec. 22 story published in Egypt’s Rose El-Youssef magazine (read an IPT translation here) suggests the six turned the White House “from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world to the largest and most important supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

The story is largely unsourced, but its publication is considered significant in raising the issue to Egyptian readers.
Read More:

Sauce for the goose or, home address and phone number of Journal-News publisher

White Plains newspaper The Journal- News, a Gannett publication, has published the full name and address of every licensed pistol permit holder in three New York counties. I don’t know whether the Journal’s publisher Janet Hasson is a permit holder herself, but here’s how to find her to ask:
(UPDATE: Uh oh – InstaPundit’s linked here. Hundreds of thousands of readers; Janet, you have a great Christmas Eve)
Janet Hasson, publisher, Journal News
Janet Hasson, publisher, Journal News
Janet Hasson, 3 Gate House Lane, Mamaroneck, NY 10534.
Phone number:
(914) 694-5204
Here’s a photo showing her Mamaroneck house – interior shots are on Zillow:
Janet Hasson, 3 Gate House Rd, MamaroneckUPDATE: From reader RJS: Gannett’s CEO-
Gracia C Martore
728 Springvale Rd
Great Falls, VA 22066
(703) 759-5954
The reporter on the story is
Dwight R Worley
23006 139 Ave
Springfield Gardens, NY 11413        (718) 527-0832
UPDATE: Intrepid readers have come up with all sorts of contacts for these people:
Miss Royle’s married name is Lambert. She lives in White Plains and here is her Facebook page complete with pictures of her and her kids. Hello Sanctimony.
Cynthia R Lambert
17 Mcbride Ave
White Plains, NY 10603 (914) 948-9388
Work: 914-694-5001
Drives a red convertible:
Family photo:
Publisher, Janet Hasson,
3 Gate House Lane, Mamaroneck NY, 10543
(914) 694-5204

Reporter, Dwight R. Worley, 23006 139 Ave
Springfield Gardens, NY 11413
(718) 527-0832

The “Visual Editor” responsible for the map itself is:
Robert F. Rodriguez
(w) Stephanie Azzarone
Home (212) 222-4566
420 Riverside Dr, Apt 7A
New York, NY 10025-7748
Publisher: Janet Hasson (@janhasson on twitter) 3 Gate House Rd, Mamaroneck, NY 10534

Gracia C Martore 728 Springvale Rd Great Falls, VA 22066 (703) 759-5954
Janet Hasson herself is married with one child, and her personal interests, as culled from her credit card records, are noted below: 

Screen Shot 2012-12-24 at 2.17.22 PM

This sums up the Obama administration..Back to the future 1934!

A picture is worth a thousand words!

FBI: More People Killed with Hammers, Clubs Each Year than Rifles

According to the FBI annual crime statistics, the number of murders committed annually with hammers and clubs far outnumbers the number of murders committed with a rifle.

This is an interesting fact, particularly amid the Democrats' feverish push to ban many different rifles, ostensibly to keep us safe of course.
However, it appears the zeal of Sens. like Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) is misdirected. For in looking at the FBI numbers from 2005 to 2011, the number of murders by hammers and clubs consistently exceeds the number of murders committed with a rifle.
Think about it: In 2005, the number of murders committed with a rifle was 445, while the number of murders committed with hammers and clubs was 605. In 2006, the number of murders committed with a rifle was 438, while the number of murders committed with hammers and clubs was 618. 

And so the list goes, with the actual numbers changing somewhat from year to year, yet the fact that more people are killed with blunt objects each year remains constant.
For example, in 2011, there was 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs.
While the FBI makes is clear that some of the "murder by rifle" numbers could be adjusted up slightly, when you take into account murders with non-categorized types of guns, it does not change the fact that their annual reports consistently show more lives are taken each year with these blunt objects than are taken with Feinstein's dreaded rifle.
Another interesting fact: According to the FBI, nearly twice as many people are killed by hands and fists each year than are killed by murderers who use rifles.
The bottom line: A rifle ban is as illogical as it is unconstitutional. We face far greater danger from individuals armed with carpenters' tools and a caveman's stick.
And it seems fairly obvious that if more people had a gun, less people would be inclined to try to hit them in the head with a hammer.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

US Marine To Dianne Feinstein: “I Am Not Your Subject – I Am The Person You Serve”


In a letter sent to Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) by U.S. Marine Joshua Boston titled “No ma’am” the displeasure he vented at the gun control legislation that she seeks to introduce today before the Senate was what many of us who live in real America were thinking. However, coming from a Marine, it just makes you want to shout “Oorah!”
The letter first appearted on CNN iReport, of all places on December 27. It has since gone viral. Here’s Mr. Boston’s letter in its entirety.

Senator Dianne Feinstein,
I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.
I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.
We, the people, deserve better than you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
United States Marine Corps

The Great Gun Debate... Myth Busted

Patrick Henry: “Give me Liberty, or Give me DEATH!”
Oath Keepers:

First and foremost let us address the 2nd Amendment...'The right to bear arms by a regulated militia'...just what is a 'regulated' militia? Taking the writing of the Bill of Rights into proper context and using the wordage used in the 1700's... a 'regulated militia' was the calling up of citizen warriors to defend the rights of a budding nation...they were farmers,builders,store keepers et al...They were called up to defend the right to bear arms and refused to surrender their weapons to the British Monarchy on demand...this is in fact what sparked the American Revolution!
The American Revoultion would never have gotten off the ground had the citizen warriors surrendered their weapons on demand...and would not have been there to supplement George Washington's Continental Army, which was in the fledgeling stage!

What is going on today with the 'Progressive Party USA' [Marxist] is the same thing that went on with the British Monarchy,Hitler,Stalin,Mussolini,PotPol,Stalin,HoCheMin' et al.
In order for the takeover and suspension of all human rights by a dictator... the first step is always the taking away of the arms of the citizen population. Once the population is disarmed they have no means to revolt

What the Progressive Party USA is doing is playing on the far left 'Bleeding Hearts' sensitivity...they stir them up to cry out to 'save the children' and grab every shooting event that pops [Except gang activity in the inner cities] up to continue the ranting,raving and false outrage!

Second: Let's address the so called assault weapons...true assault weapons are restricted to the military and law enforcement agencies...and the few FFL3 owners who must complete a substantial background investigation to own and posses fully automated weapons,silencers,cannons etc which are the true assault is illegal already for the general public to possess such weapons without having a FFL3 licence!
The so called assault weapon 'AR15' is nothing more than a 'bad ass' looking semi-auto akin to a semi-auto 22 cal rifle! It just has plastic attributes to make it look like a assault weapon!

There are more than enough laws on the books and requirements to purchase and own weapons...restricting them to law abiding citizens without a criminal nor mentally ill background...more laws and banning of weapons will have zero effect on criminals obtaining weapons of their choice...even if all weapons were banned from the law abiding citizens... criminals could obtain them from organized criminal smugglers outside of the country...and how has the laws against narcotics worked for all the bleeding hearts?...only 10% of all smuggled narcotics are caught that leaves 90% on the open market!

A analogy to put this issue into proper perspective~ a football team ...a team is not a winning team possessing just a great offense or defense...they must have both ...Defense are the laws already on the books...offense is the ability to defend oneself from criminals or a government that went rogue by possessing equal weapons capability. Thus the 'regulated militia' clause of the 'Bill of Rights'
Far more children are slaughtered daily by abortion and criminal perverts who violently rape and murder them ,then by all the shootings combined...check FBI stats! Does this mean we should imprison all the females who choose to kill their children or try to educate them about the wrong they are doing?
Should we chemically or physically casturate all males above the age of 16 years in order to guarantee the small number of perverts are stopped? See this is the catch 22 of the far left loons argument...instead of addressing the true issues they go off on tirades/false outrage demanding the banning of all things they see as offensive to them and them only! Just take a look at NYC Mayor Bloomberg...that man is off his rocker and a hypocrit to boot!

It’s Official! Obama Called ’1st Muslim Prez’

It started when Bill Clinton was famously called “the first black president” – not because of his skin color, of course, but because he supposedly exemplified so many “black” qualities and attitudes.
Since Barack Obama has been president, he’s been showered with many such accolades – most recently when Newsweek crowned him “The First Gay President” for his election-year abandonment of his opposition to same-sex marriage. But the elite media, to commemorate other Obama affinities and policy positions, have also dubbed him “The First Hispanic President,” “The First Asian-American President,” “The First Jewish President” – and even “The First Female President.”
But there’s one “first” label conspicuously absent from all the media homage paid to the 44th president – perhaps, ironically, because there’s more truth to it than the press is comfortable admitting – and that’s the title Whistleblower confers on Barack Obama in its blockbuster January 2013 issue: “THE FIRST MUSLIM PRESIDENT.”

The DNC and GOP Beverly Hillbillies of Washington DC..!

What can I say...'We the People' are getting screwed...and the only ones having a orgasm is Obama,the DNC & GOP Congressional Reps... Drunkin' Sailors in a cheap whore house! A picture and song are worth a thousand ya agree?

Liberal Chick: "The State is My Shepherd, I Shall Not Want (Psalm 666)." Hippie chick recites the Left's mantra ... "The State is My Shepherd, I Shall Not Want (Ps.666)." the column is here ... 

As 2nd Term Looms, Obama’s Hope and Change Become Fear and Gloom

With all the fuss over political cliff dives and President Obama’s gaffes, this fresh Gallup Poll almost slipped by unnoticed.
Faced with the prospect of 1,478 more days of empty Obama promises and speeches, at least half of Americans have now decided that America’s best days are behind us. While whopping majorities expect this year’s economy will remain troubled. That federal deficits will continue. That crime will increase. Taxes too. Along with foreign turmoil. While America’s influence and power decline globally.
Good thing these geniuses voted to return the Chicago crowd to the White House to handle all this. Again.
The post-Nethat less than half the population (47%) now believes the country’s best days lie ahead. Optimism about the future of the United States has been a standard popular expectation for many years and a staple of political discourse. Remember Ronald Reagan’s “Morning in America”? But half the country is sure those days are as far gone now as Obama’s promises of 2008.
A majority of independents (55%) are convinced the best is past, while three-out-of-four Republicans agree on that gloomy outlook. (Scroll down for an effective political video capturing that sense.)
Sixty-nine percent of Democrats, however, are sure the nation’s best days lie ahead, possibly due to mental damage from previous drug use. While only 28% of Dems agree with independents and the GOP.
By a nearly two-to-one margin Americans are certain that 2013 will see 12 months of economic troubles. That seems like a pretty safe expectation since that’s what we’ve had for four years of this administration, despite $800 billion-plus in wasted economic stimulus. Call it Obama Continuity.

‘No exemptions’: Dems Trample 2nd Amendment Going for Total Gun Grab

Supreme Court Armed in Public
Illinois Senate Democrats advanced legislation late Wednesday to restrict semiautomatic weapons and high-capacity magazines, pressing forward with new gun control measures in the waning days of the session over the objections of firearms groups.
Amid the developments, the Illinois State Rifle Association issued an “urgent alert” to its members warning them that Democratic legislators were trying to push through last-minute anti-gun legislation.
“There would be no exemptions and no grandfathering,” the group stated in its alert. “You would have a very short window to turn in your guns to the state police and avoid prosecution.”
A Senate committee approved two bills, one dealing with the weapons and the other with magazines. Democratic supporters could face a tough sell in the full Senate.
One measure would ban the possession, delivery, sale and transfer of semiautomatic handguns and rifles. People who currently own such weapons could keep them but would have to register them. The bill would allow semiautomatic weapons to be used at shooting ranges, but those facilities would be regulated.
National Rifle Association lobbyist Todd Vandermyde told lawmakers the bill would restrict about 75 percent of handguns and 50 percent of long guns in circulation today. He also said it would treat law-abiding gun owners like criminals, and is in conflict with Second Amendment rights upheld by the courts.
“I’ve never seen a piece of legislation that tramples on so many court decisions,” Vandermyde said.

County Sheriffs Can Block Federal Gun Control

President Obama has given his comic sidekick the task of pushing gun control measures through Congress.  Democrats and some liberal Republicans are calling for more gun control after the tragic shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School.  Some state and municipal politicians, like the #1 anti-gun person in the nation – New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, are also calling for more control.
But did you know that no matter what gun control laws are passed by the federal government, they can only be enforced in your area if your county sheriff allows them to be.
Most people, including politicians fail to realize that the ultimate legal authorities in the land are the county sheriffs.  This was established from the time of the Founding Fathers and upheld by the US Supreme Court in the 1997 case of Printz v. United States.  Initially, the case was Mack v. United States, but by the time it reached the Supreme Court it was renamed.
The case involved new federal regulations involved with the Brady Bill and gun control.  FBI agents went around to the various county sheriffs and demanded that they follow the new federal guidelines.  Then Graham County (AZ) Sheriff Richard Mack and several others saw the Brady Bill as being unconstitutional and refused to impose the new federal guidelines.  Part of their defense was that the county sheriff was the supreme law enforcement officer over their county and that the federal government could not supersede their legal authority.

Missouri School Board Discriminates Against Republican Teacher


In 1765, a French Canadian fur trader stopped in a hilly area between what we know as Mississippi and Missouri Rivers.  He helped establish a little trading post, making the tiny community the last stop before traveling into the western wilds of colonial America.  In 1804, the Lewis and Clark Expedition stopped there to pick up the last of their supplies before heading west to the Oregon shores of the Pacific Ocean.
In time, the village became known as St. Charles and is considered by many to be the oldest city west of the Mississippi.  In 1821, St. Charles was named as the first capital of the brand new state of Missouri and remained so until 1826.
Around the same time as St. Charles was founded, another small town sprung up just south of it on the other side of the Missouri River.  That town eventually became known as St. Louis.

Today, St. Charles has a population of around 65,000 and home to the Francis Howell School District and a growing controversy over political discrimination charges.  Bryan Spencer has been an elementary school teacher in the district for the past 22 years.  In November, he was elected to the Missouri State House of Representatives.  Upon his election, Spencer applied for an unpaid leave of absence from his teaching job for the time that he will spend at the state capital in Springfield.
However, the school board denied his request, basically forcing Spencer to have to resign from his teaching position in order to serve his district in the state legislature.  Herein lies the issue.  The same school board has approved other requests for unpaid leaves of absence from other teachers.  Spencer pointed out that two other teachers in the district were granted their leaves in order that they could serve as leaders with the Missouri National Education Association, which is a politically driven union.

Spencer claims the difference is that the teachers union is Democratic controlled and that those involved with the union, including the two teachers from the same district actively campaigned for Democrats.  Spencer is a Republican, and as such does not hold with some of the union practices.  He believes that the school board denied his request for an unpaid leave because of his political party, so he sent in a second request for an unpaid leave, but the board voted 5-2 to deny him a second time.

When asked why they denied him his request, Marty Hodits, President of the School Board, said the two teachers were still in educational roles during their leaves and that serving in the state legislature is not considered an educational role.  Hodits then said:

“The decision was do you let somebody test-drive a new job as long as they want and disrupt the education of students and then allow them back into the classroom.”

Using Hodits’s own logic, is not the absence from the classroom of the other two teachers and then their eventual return just as disruptive as it would be for Spencer?  In all cases there would be the same amount of disruption or lack thereof.
Secondly, what educational experience would any of the teachers bring back to the classroom?  In Spencer’s case, he would have a wealth of information to teach his students about how government works and how laws are made.  The other two teachers would only bring back their experience on how to campaign for liberal policies and politicians.  I’d much rather have my children in Spencer’s classroom than in the classrooms of the other two teachers.
Thirdly, is the fact that having Spencer in the state legislature would be good for the school district since he would be looking out for their benefit.  Jon Bennett, Chairman of the Missouri GOP expressed that concept when he said it would be a mistake for the school board not to grant him the leave and possibly lose his support in the state House.  In fact, Spencer has already been appointed to a committee on educational spending and plans to take up a number of educational issues while in Springfield.

When one looks at all of the evidence and precedence that has been set by the school board, it seems obvious that Spencer is being discriminated against because he is a Republican and not a liberal Democrat like the education union.  I don’t know what his plans are, but I would hope that when he is not serving in Springfield that he will be able to find a teaching position with a school district who would see the value of having him as part of their staff.   I wish him well as seeks to represent his district, even if some of them are against it.

Congressman: ‘We Buy Votes with Stolen Money’

OpEd: Jack
Well here we go again 2 more years of Boehner dropping to his knees for Obama...sorry folks but there is absolutely no difference between the GOP and the DNC they all cater to each others personal needs to be reelected and keep their power and spend our money like drunk sailors in a whore house...!


I will no longer let politicians define the debate. Even some of the good guys can’t tell the real truth. For example:
“The deal to avert the fiscal cliff which consists of special tax credits for green energy, Hollywood, distilleries and other industries, is a demonstration of Capitol Hill vote buying, Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.) said Wednesday.
The 154-page bill that passed the Senate and House on New Year’s Day to stop the tax hikes and spending cuts in the fiscal cliff contained 12 specific credits for green energy and 31 additional credits for various businesses, while increasing taxes on those earning more than $400,000.
All this money is stolen. That’s what Rep. Mulvaney should have said. Every Congressman who voted for the 154-page bill is a thief. They used their congressional powers to reach into my bank account (and yours) to steal our money. With that stolen money, they bought votes to keep them in power so they can continue to steal money from you and me. It’s that simple, and don’t let anyone say it’s not.

I want to know why a bill to extend tax cuts had to be 154 pages in length. Because there are 96 different provisions in it designed to help certain political industries. Why are we subsidizing Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands with our tax dollars? “In fiscal year 2009, the rum tax raised $547 million for the rum industries in the two U.S. territories, according to the [Washington] Post.”

Hollywood received a payback for its support of Obama and numerous liberal causes in the “Extension of Special Expensing Rules for Certain Film and Television Production.”
“The Washington Post reported that provision withheld $75 million in revenue by allowing motion picture studios to deduct up to $15 million of their costs if more than three fourths of the movies productions take place in the United States, or $20 million if the movie is produced in a low income area.”

Helping low income areas of the country using movie production sounds like a great project, but not with my money. Hollywooders have enough money to donate to Obama’s re-election campaign, but they can’t use their own money to produce movies in poor neighborhoods? Give me a break.
The money will be stolen from you and me so it can be given to other people. Try stealing money from people because you believe you have a “good cause.” You’ll be arrested and most likely sent to jail. But if Congress does it, well, that’s considered good government. You can’t do good things with stolen money.

Boehner rejected by 6-1 margin in poll

A new report notes that under the leadership of House Speaker John Boehner, Republicans in the body “avoided being held responsible for an across-the-board tax increase” and “gave up substantially less revenue than Obama demanded” in the fight over the so-called “fiscal cliff.”
The so-called cliff was avoided with a holiday vote by the U.S. House to approve a plan that raises more than $600 billion in new taxes, cuts an insignificant $15 billion from spending and allows huge new budget increases to develop under Barack Obama’s spending.
The bill also allowed virtually every working family in America to face higher taxes – with the expiration of a Social Security tax holiday – but didn’t rise to the trillion-dollar-plus tax hike that Obama originally advocated.
Boehner, however, isn’t getting credit for much, if anything, of the strategy by Republicans facing a Democratic White House and a Democratic Senate.
As of this afternoon, participants in an unscientific poll on the Drudge Report were rejecting Boehner as a future speaker of the House by a more than 6-1 margin. Read More:

Boehner to Resign?

Reports are starting to surface that John Boehner will resign as Speaker of the House later today. With calls coming in hot and heavy for someone else to take his place, this could be a way for Boehner to step aside with some dignity.

Ron Meyer Jr., spokesperson for the activist group American Majority Action, Appeared on MSNBC with Martin Bashir where he said that he is hearing rumors form reliable sources that House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) will resign the speakership tonight.

“We need a new Speaker,” Meyer said. “There are serious rumors that at the conference tonight, at 5 o’clock, John Boehner will announce to the conference that he is resigning as Speaker of the House.”
Bashir said he found that hard to believe, to which Meyer replied that he also found it unlikely. Bashir pressed and asked if there was any evidence to back this up or a candidate who is seeking to replace Boehner as speaker. Meyer replied that he thought Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) was spearheading this “coup,” but had no evidence to back that up.

Read More:

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

FBI Reports RECORD Gun Sales in December

OpEd: Jack
Progressive Libs just don't get it 'We the People' want to be armed to prevent their Marxist agenda...#Impeach Obama now... before the 2nd Revolution starts!
According to the FBI’s National Instant Check System (NICS) last month was a record breaking month in 2012. There were over 2.7 million background checks being conducted through the system. For the entire year, the FBI reports more checks were conducted than any year in history except 1998.
In December, 2,783,765 total background checks were carried out to purchase firearms, surpassing the previous record from November 2012 when 2,006,919 checks were performed.
For the year, 19,592,303 background checks carried out for firearm purchases-a 19 percent rise from 2011.
Each check doesn’t represent a single gun, just a single background check transaction.
NICS has access to information from computers at the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division, searching records that would prohibit a buyer from owning a gun, such as being a fugitive, having a felony conviction or charge, renouncing U.S. citizenship, or having been determined as mentally impaired. NICS was mandated by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act and set up in November 1998.
Since the NICS system was established in November 1998 a total of 160,474,702 background checks were made. Of these, around .006 percent of those attempted purchases were denied and .00008% (fewer than a hundred people a year) were prosecuted for lying on the form.
The monthly totals since 1998 can be viewed here.

Senate Received 154-Page Bill Only 3 Minutes Before Voting on it

OpEd: Jack
Hello...I'm sorry but our elected officials have to be the dumbest people around...what person signs a contract without reading it...would you sign a loan contract without reading it in it's entirety including the fine print?..I don't!
reid mcconnell
The U.S. Senate voted 89-8 to approve legislation to avoid the fiscal cliff despite having only 3 minutes to read the 154-pagebill and budget score.
Multiple Senate sources have confirmed to that senators received the bill at approximately 1:36 AM on Jan. 1, 2013 – a mere three minutes before they voted to approve it at 1:39 AM.
The bill is 154-pages and includes several provisions that are unrelated to the fiscal cliff, including repealing a section of ObamaCare, extending the wind-energy tax credit, and a rum tax subsidy deal for Puerto Rican rum makers.

Fighting Against the “Assault Weapon” Ban Legislation

If you understand the significance of the 2nd Amendment and its importance to maintaining liberty in America, here is your chance to put teeth to your position at no personal expense except a few moments of your time.
Feel free to use the following – edit as you wish
January XX, 2013
Honorable XXXX
City State Zip
Senator XXXXX:
My wife and I are constituents in your district (optional – who have voted for you consistently.)
Today for the first time we call for your swift and dedicated action as our elected representative. The so called “assault weapon” ban legislation as proposed by Senator Feinstein’s is a gross abuse of the American public’s rights as enumerated under the U.S. Constitution. As you well know, the US Constitution provides every American protection from government abuse under the Bill of Rights. The Constitution does not provide for merely a Bill of Needs – As such, the U.S. Government has no right to limit our rights based on its interpretation of our needs.

Further, the proposed Firearm Ban provides for the uncompensated seizure of private property by banning the inheritance or transfer of legally purchased and processed firearms to family members. It thus requires upon the death of the owner that those guns be surrendered to the government. This is yet, another abridgment of our Constitutional rights against unlawful seizure. Let us remember that from the adoption of the Constitution until the National Firearms Act of 1934, the intent of our founders was clear and unchallenged – the right to bear arms was the second most fundamental right we possess as Americans, and is specially designed to protect against the tyranny of our Government. The red-herring and false arguments of the Anti-Gun ownership leaders fall flat in face of the fact that not one founding father acted to modify the 2nd Amendment or limit the ownership of firearms to only state chartered militia members, even after such periods as the Whiskey Rebellion and the Civil War. Their intent is clear and ratified by their actions.
Also, the U.S. Supreme court has already ruled in Haynes v. United States against the forced federal registration of firearms as a violation of the Constitution. Yet, we see the willing disregard for well settled law and trampling our Constitutional rights by Senator Feinstein and the supporters of her efforts to violate the rights of every American. The Ban also ignores and would violate the rulings of Heller v The District of Columbia and McDonald v. Chicago the most recent Supreme Courts cases related to the 2nd Amendment. While, additional arguments and facts are available to defeat every element of the Gun Ban bill basis, the fundamental element of our rights, as established in the Bill of Rights, reduces the proposed ban and its seizure of property to an intolerable affront of our rights as enumerated by the U.S. Constitution.

The only true cause of the recent tragedies has been ignored and untreated mental health issues. Firearms, like the automobiles used to drive to the site of the crimes, were only tools used … not the cause of the actions. Let us address the true cause of these crimes – the lack of mental health treatment because of invented privacy laws which impede the identification and treatment of these persons. We call upon you as our elected representative to ensure the proposed Ban in its entirety is blocked or defeated. We also call for the mental health laws of this country to be modified to ensure that those in need get the treatment they require, and the public is protected from their untreated violent natures.

EMAIL, CALL, FAX, VISIT, TWEET, POST and WRITE, but ABOVE ALL BE POLITE!!! Snailmail for .99 cents Free Fax online
Reno Bruce R. Thompson, Courthouse & Federal Bldg, 400 S. Virginia St, Suite 902, Reno, NV 89501 Phone: 775-686-5750 Fax: 775-686-5757
Washington DC 522 Hart Senate Office Bldg, Washington, DC 20510 Phone: 202-224-3542 Fax: 202-224-7327 Toll Free for Nevadans: 1-866-SEN-REID (736-7343)
Carson City, 600 East William St, #304, Carson City, NV 89701, Phone: 775-882-REID (7343) Fax: 775-883-1980
Las Vegas Lloyd D. George Building, 333 Las Vegas Boulevard, South, Suite 8016, Las Vegas, NV 89101 Phone: 702-388-5020 Fax: 702-388-5030

Hollywood Gets Tax Break in Fiscal Cliff Deal

via: Patriot UpDate
It seems Hollywood’s rigorous backing of President Barack Obama and his Democrat peers in the waning months of 2012 paid off.
Section 317 of the freshly approved legislation includes an extension for “special expensing rules for certain film and television productions.” Congress first enacted production tax incentives favorable to the domestic entertainment industry in 2004, and extended them in 2008, but the deal was meant to expire in 2011.
The fiscal cliff deal extends the tax incentives through 2013–even as payroll taxes rise on ordinary Americans.

Third Term For BO, Absolutely! As Far As He Is Concerned!

If Obama remains in power and not removed due to his ineligibility he will never leave, think not, hopefully you will never see, However, I fear that he will anoint himself before the end of his second term if he is not removed because he is proven to be ineligible to hold office.

Mommy Angela And Mommy Jennifer Are Ruining Children’s Lives, But Does Anyone Care?


gay pride flag 3 SC Mommy Angela and Mommy Jennifer are ruining children’s lives, but does anyone care?
This story tells us of why lesbians playing make believe with the lives of children is a terrible thing. In Kansas in 2009, three amoral people (two lesbians and a male of unidentified sexual orientation) colluded to create a homemade baby.  The male provided his sperm, and the two lesbian mommies used it to impregnate lesbian “Mommy Jennifer” Schreiner.
The two Mommies, Mommy Angela Bauer and her honey Mommy Jennifer, made contact with the donor (William Marotta) through Craig’s List, saying “We are foster and adoptive parents, and now we desire to share a pregnancy and birth together.”

Presumably using something like a sterile turkey baster, Mommy Jennifer conceived a baby girl. Since all had signed a “legal” document excusing Marotta of any obligation to financially support the baby, the two Mommies thought they would live happily ever after. If things went wrong if need be, the State of Kansas would ultimately support their “We don’t need a man to have a baby” baby.
When the little girl was born, Mommy Jennifer refused to name her father on her birth certificate.

When the Mommy Angela and Mommy Jennifer “family” broke up, Mommy Jennifer applied for and got welfare payments to support the little girl.
Now the State of Kansas has stepped in to demand the welfare payments back. They want the money from Marotta.
The amoral trio is appalled! “Why, WE all agreed Bill would not be responsible for the baby. WE made this baby and the State’s only part in our life is paying for the child we made without a man – well kind of ‘without a man’” the Mommies are saying.
These mommies were allowed to “adopt” eight children during their eight years together, which came to an end the year after they produced their homemade baby.
One is now just three months old, meaning these two lovebirds had been separated for at least 18 months when they were allowed to adopt their latest child.  What kind of a system allows something like this? How could anyone look at these two and think it would be a good idea to let them adopt another child?
And now whose children are these adoptees anyway? Are they Mommy Angels’ or Mommy Jennifer’s? If they are Mommy Jennifer’s, can she share her custodial rights with the new person in her life – a man?
If Mommy Angela doesn’t like the arrangement, does she fight Mommy Jennifer for custody using free legal services provided to her by the State of Kansas? After all, she is on welfare.
And what of the homemade little girl, the “we don’t need a man to make a baby” baby?  Does anyone care about this little girl?

Understanding And Embracing “Your” State Militia

 guns SC Understanding And Embracing Your State Militia
A citizen militia is a group of citizens who are able and expected to defend their homeland in times of need. It is different from a military, which contains trained soldiers who work as soldiers full time. There are numerous different types of citizen militias, ranging from state-organized militias such as the National Guard in the United States to groups of irregular and sometimes dangerous individuals who label themselves “militias” in developing nations. The role of a militia also varies widely, depending on its host nation, with some militias actively assisting their national governments and supplementing their national militaries, while others are actually partisans fighting against their respective governments.
The term “militia” is taken from the Latin “miltes”, for “soldier.” Groups of organized civilians differentiated from professional soldiers have been known as militias since the 17th century. In several countries, including England and the United States, the militia has a long and complex history; and several different legislative acts govern the precise role of the militia. As a general rule, anyone who is eligible for military service is technically considered a member of the citizen militia, whether or not he or she has received training. (Attribute:

Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

In the past, protection intent was paramount in legislation. But legislation has taken away the protection intent and legitimacy of the constitutional requirement for the States to be ready to protect themselves and the country claiming it was only for hunting. This of course is as ludicrous as was their Benghazi cover story and Hillary’s concussion.
It is ludicrous to continue to legislate against legal protection by disarming the law abiding citizenship. Soon, there will be pneumatic and ray gun weapons that will make the laws of gun powder weapons obsolete. Weapons will always be a fact of life, and they will be used in many different ways. The world is no safer today than it was in days past, and protection intent is more important than ever.
Education is paramount. But of course, government does not like an educated populous because it interferes with their freedom-stripping legislation. Ignorance is a factor in socialist government to emplace “further” dependency on the people. Self-governing principals do not work in big government programs.
It would be interesting for the States to invent a private owner declaration and agreement to become a State Militia member or charter and to agree to help and render aid to any person under dire threat or to band together in a State or National emergency and only use their weapons for the good or feeding of mankind. I suppose Switzerland already has a document of some kind that may be copied or assisting. If nothing else, it would help owners to understand the full range of protection intent of the law and the criminals to understand that the citizenship is now standing ready to protect itself.

The Obama Strategy Of Straddle, Jump, And Ride Like Hell

Angry Obama SC The Obama Strategy of straddle, jump, and ride like hell
Obama’s “strategy” is akin to a circus rider astride two horses – one with currency manipulator George Soros, whom he has further enriched with the Gulf oil spill fiasco evicting rigs to Brazil offshore along with a billion taxpayer dollars to drill in Soros-controlled leases. (Note: only Republican people of wealth are the evil rich. 16 tons of gold Soros is just an international patriot the French would like to get their claws in.)
The other horse is obviously his love of Sharia Law. He told Putin that the Constitution was dead in 2009 – and now he has the flexibility he assured the Russians. Expenditures of American blood and treasure in the Middle East have resulted in Sharia-based constitutions and the murdering and driving-out of Christians.

Would the title “Supreme Caliph” suit him? The Pakistani Minister of Industry thought so.
In the meantime, leftist pundits praise his every stroke on the golf course while right wing pundits wring their hands, hoping he’ll finally figure out he’s destroying the country.  (No kidding!)
It’s called spiritual warfare, and we’re playing by Luciferian Saul Alinsky’s “Rules.” I now sense the Arab satisfaction of throwing a shoe at my TV when our leaders forget the Constitution they swore to uphold. It’s an idiot’s game as they ponder the next move to the phony fiscal cliff.
Which horse will Obama jump to when the scimitars start swinging? George better duck.
Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)

Back to Vacation: Obama Takes $1.8 Millon Dollar Midnight Flight to Hawaii

After Congress agreed temporarily to avert the “fiscal cliff” last night, President Barack Obama hailed the deal in brief remarks delivered from the White House, and then headed to Air Force One to take a midnight flight to Hawaii. Obama had left his family days earlier to return to Washington to deal with the “fiscal cliff.”
Obama “ended a seven-minute statement in the Press Briefing Room starting at about 11:27 p.m.,” according to the pool report. “Dressed only in a blue suit, he walked across the South Lawn to board Marine One at 11:40 p.m.”
The pool report adds, “Marine One touched down at Andrews Air Force Base at 11:54 p.m. POTUS, still in a dark gray suit and light blue tie, walked quickly to Air Force One and dashed up the stairs. Valerie Jarrett, Jay Carney and Alyssa Mastromonaco also are on board tonight. At 12:01 a.m., Air Force One is rolling.”
But the American tax payer paid a price for Obama’s return.
The cost of flying Air Force One from Andrews Air Force Base to Hawaii, MSNBC reports this morning is, $1.8 million. That means the total round-trip cost of President Obama’s return trip to Washington from his Hawaii vacation was at least $3.6 million.
Read More:

Hypocrisy! Journal News Hires Armed Security Guards

If you’ll remember, The Journal News published a Google map containing the names and addresses of those in 2 NY counties who have handgun permits. This was purely done in an attempt to shame and expose those who expressed their 2nd Amendment rights. Of course, what it did was tell criminals which homes they should not rob, namely those with guns. But, what about The Journal News itself?
(Rockland County Times) Guns are good for the goose but NOT for the gander.
A Clarkstown police report issued on December 28, 2012, confirmed that The Journal News has hired armed security guards from New City-based RGA Investigations and that they are manning the newspaper’s Rockland County headquarters at 1 Crosfield Ave., West Nyack, through at least tomorrow, Wednesday, January 2, 2013.
According to police reports on public record, Journal News Rockland Editor Caryn A. McBride was alarmed by the volume of “negative correspondence,” namely an avalanche of phone calls and emails to the Journal News office, following the newspaper’s publishing of a map of all pistol permit holders in Rockland and Westchester.
Due to apparent safety concerns, the newspaper then decided to hire RGA Investigations to provide armed personnel to man the location.
Read More:

Western Media Blames Capitalism For China’s Damage To Families


China has passed a law that allows parents to sue their adult children if the children don’t visit them often enough. The law is an interesting one, but what grabbed me was the way the Western media reported on it. Here is part of the AP story:
“A rapidly developing China is facing increasing difficulty in caring for its aging population. Three decades of market reforms have accelerated the breakup of the traditional extended family in China, and there are few affordable alternatives, such as retirement or care homes, for the elderly or others unable to live on their own.”
Seriously? When you’re thinking of reasons for “the breakup of the traditional extended family,” the best you can guess at is thirty years of “market reforms” in China?
How about forcing married couples to kill all future aunts and uncles? Wouldn’t that do some damage to the extended family?

Here is Slate’s take:
“The plight of elderly is one of the big challenges facing the fast-developing China as rapid industrialization has led to the breakup of the traditional family structure without an adequate state safety net to take its place.”

But why didn’t that happen in the United States? Yes, industrialization did affect the family, but it didn’t leave generations in jeopardy. It wasn’t industrialization that has left parents without support, it was the forced abortion of their children—something that Western Media personalities will commonly praise even as the pretend to condemn the coercion involved.  

No one wants to admit the most obvious truths: China’s state government exterminated Chinese society’s safety net. It wasn’t industrialization. It wasn’t market reforms. It was abortion. Killing babies has consequences. The word, “duh,” was invented for situations like this.
And, in fact, the so-called “safety net” in the modern, industrialized, Western world, is no more reliable. In virtually every Western country the “safety net” is some form of pension. It depends on a pool of people putting into it as well as taking out of it. When more people are pulling out of it than putting in, the country is at the brink of destruction. China’s one-child policy would have been just as damaging to a modern Social Security system. Japan is modern but adult diapers are outselling baby diapers. Their social safety net is about to go up in smoke.

While I don’t know much about it, I have to say that the idea behind the Chinese law requiring children to visit has some Biblical wisdom behind it. The Apostle Paul wrote, “But if a widow has children or grandchildren, let them first learn to show godliness to their own household and to make some return to their parents, for this is pleasing in the sight of God” (1 Timothy 5:4 ESV). And Jesus condemned the Pharisees because they taught that people could use gifts to the Temple as an excuse not to help out their parents (Mark 7.9-13).
As a Christian, I realize society has changed somewhat and it requires wisdom to apply the Bible’s commands. But it seems clear to me, in this case, that the ideal of children looking after their impoverished parents makes as much or more sense as a “safety net” than any government system.
Of course, the key is to value children and to not obstruct prosperity. In this way, there are enough children to share the load and enough prosperity available to these children so that a few years of helping parents are not too burdensome. China has failed on both counts and the West has not done that much better.