Is Barack Obama Fearing Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Investigation?

by: da Tagliare
According to WND senior write Jerome Corsi, President Barack Obama is starting to run scared in lieu of additional findings uncovered by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse investigation into his birth certificate.

Ever since Sheriff Joe held his press conference on March 1 where he announced that the Barack Hussein Obama birth certificate was most likely a forgery and that an act of fraud had been committed, Corsi believes that the White House is getting quite concerned.  The attacks on Arpaio and his department have escalated since the press conference.
More recently, Sheriff Joe has indicated that he may be holding another press conference around the first of June where he may release more damaging information surrounding Obama and his eligibility to hold the office of president.  In an email seeking support for Sheriff Joe, it quoted him as saying,

“I’m not going after the president to keep him off a ballot or anything else, but that could happen.  I’m going at it strictly as a law-enforcement guy investigating a possible forgery and fraud. I’m sticking with that, but I’ll tell you one thing. We got tons of other information that could be very shocking, too, but I’m sticking now with just the [forgery] investigation and possible criminal violations.”

In an attempt to thwart off the second press conference, Corsi believes that Obama is using Al Sharpton to attack the Arpaio’s credibility.  Sharpton hosts an MSNBC program Politics Nation, on which he recently started criticizing Arpaio and downplaying the investigation and their alleged findings.   Not only has Sharpton directed his comments at Sheriff Joe, but he also mentioned those who were supportive of him and his findings including Tony Perkins from the Family Research Council and Florida Republican Rep Cliff Stearns.
The legitimacy of Obama’s presidency is about to come unglued.”
One can only hope and pray that Corsi is right and that Obama’s presidency not only comes unglued, but it completely implodes on itself and the man who has perpetrated that greatest fraud in American history is arrested and thrown into jail for the rest of his life.  We need to move Obama from the White House to the Big House where he can continue to live off taxpayer money as he has always intended to do.

Scuttling health care act will freeze Medicare, White House warns

 Will the Obama threats ever cease...Congress must take immediate action to Impeach the fraudulent POTUS who has illegally taken up residence in the WH as a Putin style dictator..!

 

By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar

Associated Press 

WASHINGTON -- Medicare's payment system, the unseen but vital network that handles 100 million monthly claims, could freeze if President Barack Obama's health care law is summarily overturned, the administration quietly informed the courts.
Although Obama's overhaul made significant cuts to providers and improved prescription and preventive benefits, Medicare was overlooked in Supreme Court arguments that focused on the law's controversial requirement that all individuals carry health insurance.
Havoc for Medicare could have repercussions as both parties avidly court seniors in this election year and as hospitals and doctors increasingly complain the program doesn't pay enough.

In papers filed with the Supreme Court, administration lawyers warned of "extraordinary disruption" if Medicare is forced to unwind countless transactions that are based on payment changes required by more than 20 separate sections of the Affordable Care Act.
Opponents say the whole law must go. The administration counters that even if the court strikes down the insurance mandate, it should preserve most of the rest of the legislation. That would leave in place the changes to Medicare and a major expansion of Medicaid coverage.
Last year, in a lower court filing, Justice Department lawyers said reversing Medicare payment changes "would impose staggering administrative burdens" on the government and "could cause major delays and errors" in claims payment.

AARP expresses concern

Former program administrators disagree on the potential for disruptions, while some private industry executives predict an avalanche of litigation unless Congress intervenes.
The AARP says it's concerned. If doctors became embroiled in a legal battle over payments, then "a general concern would be that physicians would cease to take on new Medicare patients, as well as potentially have issues seeing their current patients," said Ariel Gonzalez, an AARP lobbyist.
Medicare payment policies are set through a time-consuming process that begins with legislation passed by Congress. Even if the law were completely overturned, the government would have authority under previous legislation to pay hospitals, doctors, nursing homes and other providers.
But reversing the new law's payment changes from one day to the next would be a huge legal and logistical challenge and raise many questions. How would Medicare treat payments made over the last two years, when the overhaul was the law of the land? Would providers who received cuts subsequently have a right to refunds?
"Medicare cannot turn on a dime," said former administrator Don Berwick, Obama's first Medicare chief. "I would not be surprised if there are delays and problems with payment flow."
It's not just reimbursement levels that would get scrambled, he said. The law's new philosophy of paying hospitals and doctors for quality results, rather than for sheer volume of procedures, has been incorporated into some payment policies.

Trouble for bureaucrats

Tom Scully, who ran Medicare during former President George W. Bush's first term, does not foresee major problems, although he acknowledges it would be a nightmare for agency bureaucrats.
"It is highly unlikely in the short term that any health plan or provider would suffer," Scully said. "If you look at the way the law was (financed), it was a combination of higher taxes and lower (Medicare) payments. That's what you would be rolling back."
The White House declined to comment.
Administration officials say they are confident the entire law will be upheld by the Supreme Court. But sharp questioning by the court's conservative justices during public arguments led many to speculate that at least some parts of the law will be struck down.
Former officials say it's likely that some form of high-level assessment and planning for the worst outcome is going on within the administration.
Repeal of the law also would mean that seniors would lose some new benefits, including the closing of the prescription coverage gap, called the doughnut hole, and no-charge preventive services, such as an annual wellness physical.
"There is no doubt that striking down Medicare provisions would be enormously disruptive for patients, physicians, hospitals and countless other providers and suppliers," said Rep. Sander Levin of Royal Oak, ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, which oversees the program.

Troop movement renews Sinai reoccupation buzz

Editor’s Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports.
WASHINGTON – The reported call-up by the Israeli Defense Forces of six battalions of reservists to be assigned mostly along the 150-mile border with Egypt facing the Sinai Peninsula has renewed buzz that Israel is planning to reoccupy the region, according to a report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.
The move underscores not only concern by Tel Aviv of heightened terrorist attacks launched from the deserts there, but also the possibility of a remedy, at least temporarily, to the growing energy crisis that has emerged following Egypt’s cancellation of the contract that brought natural gas into Israel.
The gas, which met some 40 percent of Israel’s energy requirements, flowed through a pipeline that has been sabotaged some 14 times since the fall of President Hosni Mubarak last year.
The interim governing Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, or SCAF, then decided to pull back Egyptian troops from that frontier, and Israelis say now it is showing increased al-Qaida and Bedouin tribe violence.
In addition, Israeli officials say that Hamas militants from the Gaza Strip are using the Sinai to launch attacks into Israel.

In announcing the call-up of six battalions of reserves, the Israeli Knesset, or parliament, reportedly authorized the IDF to mobilize another 16 reserve battalions, if needed. Some of the battalions already called up also will be positioned along the border with Syria, addressing the increasing unrest there.
Sources say a number of developments are triggering the call-up, which include implementing a 2008 Reserve Duty Law in which combat soldiers are called for active reserve duty once every three years.
While the immediate reason given for the call-up was due to tensions between Israel and Egypt and continued unrest in Syria, another reason for the troop positioning could be to deal with any attack that could occur from Syria, Lebanon and the Sinai should the Israeli government decide to launch an attack against
Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Syria and Lebanon’s Hezbollah, along with the Hamas from the Gaza Strip, have vowed to come to Iran’s assistance in the event its nuclear facilities are attacked.
The Sinai poses a particularly vexing problem for the Israelis, since law enforcement in that region had been left up to the Egyptians since the signing of the 1979 peace treaty between Israel and Egypt. Israel had been occupying the Sinai since the 1967 war. Israel withdrew from the Sinai in 1982.


However, with the Egyptian government itself now in chaos, the Egyptians have not maintained order, allowing terror threats to surge.
Last August, for example, eight Israelis were killed and 25 were wounded. There remains a number of Israelis who have settled in the Sinai and whose lives now may be threatened.
This development has posed an increasingly serious security issue for Israel, which now must position the troops along the border with the Sinai in an effort to minimize attacks on Israel itself.
Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about critical developments around the globe with Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and published by the founder of WND.
For the complete report and full immediate access to Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, subscribe now.

Dictator Obama Issues New Threat To Supreme Court

By:

Sher Zieve ~ Canada Free Press

In his latest display of his full USA federal government dictatorship over both the American people and the former co-branches of government, Dictator Obama is warning the Supreme Court to either rule in his favor or face severe consequences.


In his latest display of his full USA federal government dictatorship over both the American people and the former co-branches of government, Dictator Obama is warning the Supreme Court to either rule in his favor or face severe consequences.
Fox News’ Martha McCallum advised Thursday that the Obama Administration has been quietly sending missives to the Supreme Court threatening that if it doesn’t rule in his favor on ObamaCare, Medicare will face disruption and “chaos.” Therefore, if SCOTUS rules in favor of the US Constitution, Obama & Co will begin its campaign to either destroy Medicare or make those on it suffer greatly. The Obama syndicate is said to be threatening to hold off Medicare payments to doctors and hospitals if SCOTUS does not comply with Obama’s demands and submit to him.
As an additional example of Obama’s illegal and (I believe) highly treasonous behaviors, on 1 May and 2 May Obama issued two additional unconstitutional and illegal Executive Orders. The first E.O., issued 1 May 2012, makes the USA subject to “international regulations” as opposed to looking to and following the US Constitution. Also, with this new E.O., the US FDA will now be able to be bypassed by International committees—thus, replacing the FDA with any international group which may be chosen. In essence, Obama is quickly eliminating US Sovereignty and selling the USA to the international “community.”


The second E.O. issued in 2 days was signed by Obama on 2 May 2012. This E.O. instructs the USA to bow to international regulations instead of the US Constitution and Businessweek reports: “Obama’s order provides a framework to organize scattered efforts to promote international regulatory cooperation, the chamber’s top global regulatory official said today.
“Today’s executive order marks a paradigm shift for U.S. regulators by directing them to take the international implications of their work into account in a consistent and comprehensive way,” Sean Heather, vice president of the chamber’s Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation, said in an e-mailed statement.” This also brings the USA closer to becoming a “North American Union” and—also—eliminating its sovereignty—in toto.
Suffice it to say, no one in Congress has issued even the proverbial “peep” over either of these illegal “orders.” Do the American people really want to continue to live under this blatant tyranny?
The second question is “Will the Supreme Court of the United States of America bow to Obama and give up its co-equal status to the dictator as the US Congress has already done?” If so, perhaps its time for We-the-People to recruit the Honduran Supreme Court who, along with their military, ousted its then President Manuel Zelaya who had become a dictator. Oppression under the Obama syndicate becomes worse each and every day, folks. Will we ever choose to go back to the sunshine?
“And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?”—Revelation 13:4

Free Speech Threatened In Sergeant’s Discharge

by: Peter Brown

Sergeant Stein should have not been discharged as a result of what he said. A broad spectrum of supporters have rallied to his defense, from the Tea Party and the United States Justice Foundation to even the ACLU. On his own behalf, Stein stated: “If I am guilty of anything, it would be that I am American, a freedom loving conservative, hell bent on defending the Constitution and preserving America’s greatness.” A former staff judge advocate for the Marine Corps, Brigadier General David Brahms, came to his defense. Brahms, with 49 years as a lawyer with the Marines, said in a written statement: “I do not believe that… the behavior in question violates the cited UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) provision.” Furthermore, Brahms stated that the rule which Stein is said to have violated, Department of Defense directive 1344.10, is difficult to understand.  He said:  ”If I cannot understand 1344.10 as a 74 year-old retired brigadier general and staff judge advocate to the Commandant of the Marines, there is little hope that a sergeant would understand.” When you consider that Sergeant Stein even put up a disclaimer that the views he expressed were not those of the US military, you have a compelling case that Sergeant Stein should not have lost his job over the comments he made.
Sergeant Stein made a courageous decision to speak out against the Obama administration and lost his nine year career with the Marines as a result. His unjustified discharge should come as a sobering reminder that our rights to freedom of speech may not be nearly as strong as we think.

Sergeant Gary Stein’s fight to stay in the Marine Corps is one of the most important First Amendment court cases of the year. Given the First Amendment’s central place in our Bill of Rights, this case deserves close scrutiny by those who value our Constitution. For those who are unfamiliar with the case, Sergeant Stein was recently given an “other than honorable”  discharge from the Marine Corps for postings he made about President Obama on Facebook.  Specifically, he wrote: “Screw Obama and I will not follow all orders from him.” Sergeant Stein later clarified that he would not follow unlawful orders from Obama. Why does this case matter? It matters because it deals with a soldier’s right to free speech. Before you say “whoa, soldiers are not entitled to free speech rights like civilians are,” consider what the military has to say on this issue. 

 

Troops are encouraged to “carry out the obligations of citizenship” and are allowed to express a “personal opinion on political candidates and issues.” U.S. soldiers are some of the most respected people in our country. If anyone deserves to have free speech rights, it is the military. After all, they risk their lives for the cause of freedom. Shouldn’t they be able to partake in those freedoms as well? 

 

After serving for nine years as a Marine (including time spent in Iraq), Sergeant Stein was given an “other than honorable discharge.” This was a big decision by those who made it. He did not have to be discharged at all for the remarks he made, or he even could have been given a still-negative “general discharge.” Instead, he was given an “other than honorable discharge” typically reserved for those whose conduct significantly deviates from what is expected of a US military member. He will lose most of his benefits and be demoted in rank to lance corporal as a result of the discharge. In short, he will lose his career and lose it in a bad fashion. 

 

 Sergeant Stein should have not been discharged as a result of what he said. A broad spectrum of supporters have rallied to his defense, from the Tea Party and the United States Justice Foundation to even the ACLU. On his own behalf, Stein stated: “If I am guilty of anything, it would be that I am American, a freedom loving conservative, hell bent on defending the Constitution and preserving America’s greatness.” A former staff judge advocate for the Marine Corps, Brigadier General David Brahms, came to his defense. Brahms, with 49 years as a lawyer with the Marines, said in a written statement: “I do not believe that… the

behavior in question violates the cited UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) provision.” Furthermore, Brahms stated that the rule which Stein is said to have violated, Department of Defense directive 1344.10, is difficult to understand.  He said:  ”If I cannot understand 1344.10 as a 74 year-old retired brigadier general and staff judge advocate to the Commandant of the Marines, there is little hope that a sergeant would understand.” When you consider that Sergeant Stein even put up a disclaimer that the views he expressed were not those of the US military, you have a compelling case that Sergeant Stein should not have lost his job over the comments he made. Sergeant Stein made a courageous decision to speak out against the Obama administration and lost his nine year career with the Marines as a result. His unjustified discharge should come as a sobering reminder that our rights to freedom of speech may not be nearly as strong as we think.

Left~Right~Center one and the same?

Don't know about y'all but I am really growing weary and totally fed up with the DNC and GOP..I am beginning to believe they are one and the same..neither side listens to Middle America anymore..all they care about is re-election..they tell us what they believe we want to hear...hello !!!~ listen to us for once..we want our freedom back....y'all suck...yeppers being blunt!  Take a hint!

Arrest made in black-mob attack on whites

by: Chelsea Schilling
Police have arrested a 16-year-old in connection with a mob attack by large numbers of black teenagers against a young white couple in a car, a case which has sparked national outrage.

As WND reported in a story posted on the popular Drudge Report, the couple was pummeled April 14 by dozens of black teens, and the Virginian-Pilot newspaper did not report the incident for two weeks, despite the fact the victims, Dave Forster and Marjon Rostami, are both news reporters for the paper.
Police arrested the suspect this morning, but authorities will not release his name due to his age. According to the Virginian-Pilot, he has been charged with throwing a missile at a vehicle, a felony, as well as two counts of simple assault by mob, destruction of property and participation in a riot, all misdemeanors.
The attack was first reported in an opinion piece by columnist Michelle Washington.
“Wave after wave of young men surged forward to take turns punching and kicking their victim,” Washington wrote, describing the onslaught that began when Dave Forster and Marjon Rostami stopped at a traffic light while driving home from a show on a Saturday night. A crowd of at least 100 black young people was on the sidewalk at the time.
“Rostami locked her car door. Someone threw a rock at her window. Forster got out to confront the rock-thrower, and that’s when the beating began. …
“The victim’s friend, a young woman, tried to pull him back into his car. Attackers came after her, pulling her hair, punching her head and causing a bloody scratch to the surface of her eye. She called 911. A recording told her all lines were busy. She called again. Busy. On her third try, she got through and, hysterical, could scream only their location. Church and Brambleton. Church and Brambleton. Church and Brambleton. It happened four blocks from where they work, here at the Virginian-Pilot.”
Washington said neither suffered grave injuries, but both were out of work for a week. Forster’s torso ached from blows to his ribs, and he retained a thumb-sized bump on his head. Rostami reportedly fears to be alone in her home, while Forster wishes he’d stayed in the car.
Pilot editor Denis Finley addressed the paper’s decision not to cover the attack in a front-page column today.
“Some have assumed the worst and accused The Pilot of everything from liberal hand-wringing to outright lying about the incident,” he wrote. “We did not cover up anything. What would we gain by protecting some thugs who beat up two of our reporters? The accusation is ludicrous.

Dave Forster

“We bend over backward to treat ourselves the same way we would treat any other member of the community. In fact, we go overboard at times to make sure there is no perception that we have treated ourselves favorably. Based on the facts, this story did not cross the bar to be published because as a general rule, The Pilot doesn’t publish stories about simple assaults.”
In her column about the assault, Washington said the day after the beatings, Forster searched Twitter for mention of the attack, and one post in particular chilled him.
“I feel for the white man who got beat up at the light,” wrote one person.
“I don’t,” wrote another, indicating laughter. “(do it for trayvon martin)”
Trayvon Martin is the unarmed black teen who died after being shot by a community-watch captain with white and Hispanic parents, George Zimmerman, in Sanford, Fla., sparking a wave of outrage long after the incident.
But at a press conference today, interim Norfolk Police Chief Sharon Chamberlin said the department is not investigating the case as a hate crime.
“At no time in our investigation or in statements taken from the victims did it appear this assault was racially motivated,” she said.
Just yesterday, a police spokesman told WND authorities were not sure if the attack was racially motivated.
“Could it have been? Yeah, it could have, I guess,” said police spokesman Chris Amos. “We certainly haven’t ruled that out, but we haven’t seen anything that jumps out at us other than someone throwing a rock at someone’s car.”
“A whole lot of racial implications have been made. We don’t know the motive of this. Race didn’t become a factor until Twitter comments later. No one at the scene said it was racially motivated. They didn’t tell us then and they didn’t hear any [comments such as] ‘Remember Trayvon Martin.’”
Rostami estimated there were around 100 people in the crowd, with about 30 near their car.
However, Chamberlin said police think only a few people in the crowd participated in the attack.
“It is important to clarify that 30 people did not carry out the assault,” she said. “There was a large group in the vicinity, but our investigation and the statements of the victims show that no more than a handful of people were involved.”
She said the crowd had emerged from three entertainment venues around the same time on the night of the attack.
“This is a situation where you had a whole bunch of events let out all at once, you had a lot of people on the street, you had an assault occur and that was isolated with a small number of people,” Chamberlin said. “The streets of Norfolk are safe. We are a vibrant city, we are growing, we are changing each and every day and citizens should not judge our streets in light of this particular thing.”
The police investigation is continuing. Amos told WND suspects are “facing felony charges, if we can find them and identify and if our victims can identify them.”

Diver Claims He Has Located Bin Laden’s Body

by: Bryan Nash
Bill Warren, the Californian treasure hunter who last year promised to find the body of notorious terrorist Osama bin Laden, told the Spanish newspaper El Mundo that he has found the location where the body was lowered.
Bin Laden was buried at sea, and photos were not released in order to prevent a terrorist backlash. The U.S. government tried to provide bin Laden with a burial in accordance with Islamic law.
Warren said he has determined the whereabouts of the corpse alleged to be bin Laden’s from satellite imagery, and he is the only one who knows the coordinates of the body. Warren claims the body is 200 miles west of Surat, India.
Warren is now trying to finance the deep-water diving expedition. His tentative plan is to start on June 1. He believes he may be able to find the body within a week.

Warren doubts President Barack Obama’s claim that bin Laden was killed, and he fears the Obama regime may attempt to kill him in order to stop his efforts.

A Report From The Front Lines In The War Between Catholics And Obama

by: Kevin "coach" Collins 

CINO (Catholic In Name Only) Democrat Ohio State Senator has become the latest abortion/gay “marriage” supporter to discover that the Catholic Church is serious about standing up for Her teachings about the sanctity of life and morality. Those who would trample on Catholic Church doctrine for their own selfish reasons will continue to learn this lesson.
Last week, State Senator Robert Hagan had his nose rubbed in the reality of the War between the Catholic Church and Barack Obama when he was disinvited to speak at this month’s commencement at Mercy School of Nursing, a Catholic school in Youngstown, Ohio.
The disinvitation came at the direction of Bishop George V. Murry, the head of the Diocese of Youngstown.
 In his statement explaining his action, Bishop Murry commented, “It recently came to my attention, without any proper review by my office, that the Mercy School of Nursing, a Catholic institution, invited Representative Robert Hagan to be its commencement speaker at the Cathedral of St. Columba. While I respect and appreciate many of the social justice positions taken by Representative Hagan, it remains a fact that he also has consistently voted for pro-abortion legislation, policies, and funding. As Catholics, we must in good conscience oppose Representative Hagan’s position in support of abortion. Therefore, I asked the Mercy School of Nursing, a Catholic sponsored institution, to rescind their invitation to Representative Hagan to speak at the Nursing School graduation.”
Hagan’s response was sour, but predictable.
After first complaining about the short notice of the disinvitation, the snarky Hagan referenced Bishop Murrys having acted on “directives he’s getting from the Vatican” (as if a Catholic Bishop needs a message from the Vatican to defend Catholic doctrine.) The fact that Bishop Murry is an African American begs the question of whether he would say such a thing about a white Bishop.
Toward the end of his statement, Hagan seemed to announce his own self-imposed excommunication from the Catholic Church saying, “I’m not a genuflecting Catholic any longer. I define myself and describe myself as a Catholic. I’ve had problems with the Catholic Church since the Vietnam War. I’m 63 years old, and I thought the Church should’ve taken a tougher stance against the war, and the Catholic Church take a less inclined, a less activist position on gay rights and gay marriage.”
Hagan learned that babble about a war that ended 37 years ago won’t work to change the subject. Elected abortion and Gay “marriage” supporting CINOs around the country (most of whom are Democrats) ought to take notice. You are free to walk down the street any Sunday morning, but you are no longer free to masquerade as a Catholic while trampling Catholic doctrine. The war is on. Your boss started it, and the Catholic Church will not back down.
Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Dan Savage: ‘Tolerant’ Bully

They used to arrest middle-aged perverts who get their jollies from talking dirty to children. Today, they get a television show, a nationally syndicated column, a lecture circuit, and multiple visits to the Obama White House.
You know: “Forward.”

The irony is palpable. Dan Savage, sex columnist and founder of the LGBT anti-bullying “It Gets Better” campaign, has been outed. Not as a homosexual. He’s out and proud in that regard. In fact, Savage pushes his “anything goes” brand of sexual anarchy on kids worldwide. MTV has even given the sex-obsessed radical his own show, “Savage U” – a moral-relativist platform from which to corrupt the kiddos.
Creepy stuff.
No, Savage has finally managed to publicly discredit himself as the anti-Christian bigot and bully he’s always been. Never again will this guy be taken seriously as an anti-bullying crusader. Savage lectures teens in high schools and colleges around the country on the benefits of “non-monogamy,” the occasional “three-way” tryst, and any other disease-spreading sexual impulse that might cross their impressionable, hormone-charged young minds (and many they can’t yet imagine).
Well, recently, rather than just shocking his teenaged audience with vulgar, sophomoric psychobabble as usual, Savage apparently thought it’d be fun to bully the kids with whom he disagreed.
While addressing a crowd of hundreds of high schoolers at the National High School Journalism Convention, Savage launched into an unhinged anti-Christian diatribe. He advised the teens to “ignore the bulls–t in the Bible” about sexual morality. “We ignore bulls–t in the Bible about all sorts of things,” he barked.
He then walked through a list of the same tired left-wing talking points about the Bible – long ago discredited – covering shellfish, virginity, etc. “The Bible is a radically pro-slavery document,” he said (anti-Christian trash we’ve come to expect from the secular left).
But when a hundred or more kids got up and began to walk out on Savage’s anti-Christian rant, the 47-year-old tough guy turned his hostility toward them. “It’s funny to someone who is on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the Bible how pansya–ed people react when you push back,” he mocked. Some of the young girls were seen leaving in tears.
“It took a real dark, hostile turn, certainly, as I saw it,” teacher Rick Tuttle told CNN. “It became very hostile toward Christianity, to the point that many students did walk out, including some of my students.
“They felt that they were attacked … a very pointed, direct attack on one particular group of students. It’s amazing that we go to an anti-bullying speech and one group of students is picked on in particular, with harsh, profane language.”

But the only thing surprising is that anyone is surprised. Dan Savage is known in Christian circles as “the gay Fred Phelps.” Phelps, of course, is the similarly cartoonish Westboro Baptist “preacher” who gained notoriety by protesting military funerals with his incestuous brood of pseudo-Christian haters. Savage is Phelps’ photo negative. Whereas Phelps’ hateful mantra is “God hates fags,” Savage’s central message is “I hate God and anyone who loves Him.”
Savage’s primary claim to fame is that he formed the website “Santorum.com,” to create a “Google bomb” that would smear the good name of former senator and presidential candidate Rick Santorum. On the site, he redefined the senator’s last name, Santorum, using language so vile and repulsive that I won’t repeat it. When Christian advocate and Americans for Truth founder Peter LaBarbera asked Savage to take down the website, Savage responded, “I’m asking Peter LaBarbera to go f–k himself.”
Savage also once bragged that he licked the doorknobs at former Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer’s campaign office in hopes of giving Mr. Bauer the flu.
Savage told the Daily Pennsylvanian in 2006 that Carl Romanelli, a U.S. senate candidate he didn’t like, “should be dragged behind a pickup truck until there’s nothing left but the rope.” In the same interview, he opined: “Mr. Romanelli should go f–k himself.” He also once said on HBO that he “wished all Republicans were f–king dead.”
Yep, this deviant troglodyte is the face of the left’s anti-bullying efforts. I’ve often said that those wonderfully “tolerant” liberals – the self-styled opponents of “hate” and “bigotry” – are the most intolerant, hateful bigots among us.
Thanks for proving my point, Dan.
Matt Barber (jmattbarber@comcast.net) is an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. He serves as Director of Cultural Affairs with Liberty Counsel. Facebook/jmattbarber / Twitter @jmattbarber.
Photo credit: Better Than Bacon (Creative Commons)

Defection Denied

The office of Vice President Joe Biden overruled State and Justice Department officials in denying the political asylum request of a senior Chinese communist official last February over fears the high-level defection would upset the U.S. visit of China’s vice president, according to U.S. officials.

The defector, Wang Lijun, was turned away after 30 hours inside the U.S. Consulate Chengdu and given over to China’s Ministry of State Security, the political police and intelligence service.

Wang has not been seen since Feb. 7 and remains under investigation. His attempt to flee China set off a major power struggle within the ruling Communist Party and led to the ouster of leftist Politburo member Bo Xilai and the arrest of his wife on murder charges.

New disclosures on the handling of the failed defection come as the Obama administration is facing a new test of its relations with Beijing over another defection, the flight to the U.S. Embassy in Beijing of Chen Guangcheng, a blind human rights activist who is believed to be in hiding there.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was scheduled to leave Monday night for talks with the Chinese in Beijing as part of what is called the Strategic and Economic Dialogue. The Obama administration has sought to downplay Beijing’s human rights abuses as part of its foreign policy toward China. 

Read More at freebeacon.com By Bill Gertz

Chicken Man kills himself after long fight with Roswell government officials

We all need to band together and fight this obvious Government attack Nationwide on our freedoms..!

This is one of those stories that often never makes it to the Front Page of any newspaper or website. It’s a story about Property Rights and Eminent domain, it’s the story of one man who tried to fight back, and sadly it’s the story of a man who lost it all in the process. It’s also a story that can happen to anyone who is reading this article.
The story begins back in 2009 when Andrew Wordes, otherwise known as the Roswell Chicken Man, began his fight to raise chickens on his property. In February 2009, the city of Roswell, GA started to cite Andrew Wordes for raising livestock in his backyard. Wordes, who had started raising chickens on his .97-acre homestead in 2005, decided to fight back. And guess what he Won.

But sadly that’s when the real trouble started….  
You see, the story actually has very little to do with chickens. While the city of Roswell, and cities just like it across America ,would like people to believe it’s as simple as chickens -  the real story is about  the rights of property owners.
In a map that was published back in 2003, as part of Roswell’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan for city improvements, one thing becomes painfully obvious. The city had already planned to take Wordes property.
The Map showed that the city had major plans for his property. In fact, Wordes property sat right in the middle of a planned city park. His property was being targeted for “city improvements”, and this fight had nothing to do with chickens. The chickens were really just the catalyst for the city to unlawfully seize his land.
After initially winning his fight in municipal court, the City of Roswell made Wordes life a living hell.

The Harassment Begins…
On Dec. 14, 2009, the city council approved a new ordinance banning roosters and using lot size to limit how many chickens a resident could keep. Wordes claimed that the harassment started immediately after the meeting, when Roswell police ticketed him for no insurance and a number of other moving violations.

• In September of 2010,  Roswell prosecuted Wordes under the new ordinance claiming he had too many birds for his lot size. The judge found him not guilty since he had the chickens before the ordinance became law.
• In September of 2010,  he was convicted of grading sediment on his land without a permit and having inoperable vehicles in his yard.  He was sentenced to community service.
• In November of 2010, code enforcement served Wordes with a  nuisance citation.
• After winning twice in court against the city, the county then got involved and actually cited him for “not properly stacking his firewood.”
• In 2011, the 84 year-old women who held Mr. Wordes mortgage was harassed by the city into selling Wordes mortgage for forty cents on the dollar. The city then began the foreclosure process.
• While in the process of trying to save his home, Andrew Wordes was arrested by Roswell Police on the day that he was to bring paperwork that would’ve delayed his bankruptcy and the foreclosure on his home.
• Wordes was jailed for violating his probation after the city claimed he only served 122 of the 150 hours of community service that he had been ordered to serve.  He then served 99 days in jail.

After his release, he placed a sign on his property that read “Trespassers will be construed as a bodily threat” and then waited for authorities to arrive and remove him.

On Monday at 10:45 a.m. Marshalls arrived at the home. After a two hour standoff,  Wordes advised the Marshalls that they needed to immediately leave the property.  That’s when the explosion happened. After years of battling for his right to keep his land, Wordes finally had enough.
On a website dedicated to Andrew Wordes, one of his friends wrote:

We all lost a little something today. Andrew was a man of faith, with a strong love for God. He was a staunch Constitutionalist with a passion for our freedoms and liberties.
You pushed Mr. Wordes to this point. You marched around Roswell bashing Andrew, annihilating his character, marking him as crazy and filing lawsuits whenever you could, bankrupting him and denying him rights given to property owners in the United States.
Andrew fought the good fight,not just for himself but for others because he knew it could happen to anyone. And it is. Eminent domain is being abused all over our country, just look it up. Communities are plagued with repeated abuses of the use of eminent domain. It’s tragic and your neighborhood could be next. Andrew fought to his last breath, for himself, for me, for you. In his mind, he went on his terms. Right out of Atlas Shrugged. Andrew is at peace now but it’s not over.

The sad truth about this story is it’s 100% true.
It’s also not an isolate incident.
From the Federal Government seizing property because of “environmental regulations”, to local municipalities who use code enforcement agents codes to intimidate people into giving up their land, we have a huge problem in this country. Our property rights are being shredded before our eyes and it’s only a matter of time before this story becomes an everyday occurrence.
The Chicken Man, Andrew Wordes, in his own words from an interview he gave last month on the Rusty Humphries show.

‘Democrats Make Sure We All Share Our Toys Like Mommy Does’

by: Gary DeMar
“As the twig is bent so grows the tree” is an adage with a lot of truth attached to it. The earlier a person begins to study a subject, the easier it is to learn. This is true with everything from learning a language and Morse Code to political philosophy and economic theory.

Our founders understood the principle. That’s why they started colonial colleges like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Liberals caught on quickly, and that’s why they took over colleges like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton.


Public (government) schools are bastions of liberal group-think. Education degrees reinforce the idea that the government is the best educator. Step by step liberals took over the public school system in the United States and use it to further their leftist worldview.
Not stopping with government education, liberals have been using children’s books to promote their radical ideas at an even earlier age. Heather Has two Mommies, And tango Makes Three, Momma, Mommy, and Me, Daddy, Papa, and Me, The Tree of Life: The Wonders of Evolution, and so many more. One that I missed is Why Mommy is a Democrat.
It’s about a family of squirrels. One page caught my attention. It reads:

“Democrats Make Sure We All Share Our Toys Like Mommy Does.”

Sharing is a big part of child development. Republicans teach their children to share their toys. Sharing assumes ownership. Sharing is not the same thing as confiscating. Sharing assumes a voluntary action on the part of the owner. Sharing is a personal choice. What if a child is hard on toys? Should your child be forced to share them with him? What if in the sharing process another child breaks the shared toy or decides to take it home with him? You can’t share what does not belong to you, and there is no mandate that sharing means anything more than a temporary offering of an item.
A Democrat’s view of sharing is the government taking money from some people so other people can have some toys. A consistent mommy Democrat, when visiting a friend, would claim that her friend’s children have too many toys. She would then get some of her Democrat friends, form a committee (government), and force the abundant toy-owning family to turn over their excess toys to the committee so they could redistribute the toys to the less fortunate.
This isn’t sharing; it’s stealing. But because a “committee” does it, it’s considered to be the right thing to do. It’s so right, Democrat mommies argue, that sharing must be mandated.
You might think twice about forcing your children to share their toys. They might become Democrats.

Video: Occupy Protester Throws Brick Off Roof, Hits One Of His Own

I really feel sorry for these idiots. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing, and they pose a danger to the well-being of this country. The police need to keep a tight leash on these trouble-makers before another person gets hurt.



by:Daniel Noe

The Threat A “Living Constitution” Poses To America

by: James Huffman

How can we have rule of law when judges can amend our founding document at their whim?
The term “living constitution” doesn’t poll well. That’s what Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) president and founder Doug Kendall told participants in a teleforum sponsored by the American Association of University Women. Kendall, a self-described progressive, was explaining why other progressives need to replace the “living constitutional method” with something new. That something new, Kendall believes, is the “whole constitutional method.”
For decades, liberals (now progressives) have been advancing the living constitution approach to constitutional interpretation. The term dates back to Professor Howard McBain’s 1927 book The Living Constitution. Constitutional scholar David Strauss published a book with the same title just two years ago. Apparently Strauss had not seen the polling data, or maybe it is only in the last few months that the term “living constitution” fell out of favor.
In a nutshell, the idea of the “living constitution” is that a constitution drafted in 1787 cannot possibly serve the needs of a twenty-first-century society. So it is incumbent on the courts to adapt the Constitution to modern conditions and changed values. Textualists and originalists object that this approach defeats the liberty-protecting, power-restraining purposes of the Constitution. How can we have the rule of law, they ask rhetorically, if judges are free to effectively amend the Constitution.

The living constitution theory has had friends in high places. Supreme Court Justice David Souter was a quiet but committed practitioner of  the living constitution theory while on the Court. In a rare public appearance at Harvard’s 2010 commencement ceremony, Souter argued that the approach has been key to many important rulings of the Supreme Court, like Brown v. Board of Education. The leading advocate for living constitution theory on the current court is Justice Stephen Breyer, though in his recently published book Making Democracy Work, he calls it “pragmatism.” Perhaps Breyer got wind of the discouraging poll results.

read more: http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/the-threat-a-living-constitution-poses-to-america/

The Modern Leftist Progressive Politician And His Propensity For Arrogance

by: Allan P. Halbert

As a nation, we are faced with a moral dilemma of our collective conscious, which we have never seen before as our politicians continue to serve up ever more unsavory bits of tyranny in bite size pieces for the sake of security.  In the not-too-distant past, all American children were given an identity of belonging to a moral society comprised of individuals that were shaped by their own desires unencumbered by societal rank or privilege other than what one’s own wealth or aspiration could acquire for themselves or their family.  We accomplished this through public education and pride of purpose as demonstrated to each of us in a practical manner in our own families as we conducted the mundane duties of life on a daily basis.
This simple belief has been corrupted by the purveyors of liberal and progressive thought, particularly the wholesale abrogation of the concept of “American Exceptionalism” which had been our guiding “moral imperative” prior to the modern era.  The modern era started after WWII, and with it began the process of the diluting our national character which allowed the encroachment of other philosophies into our national identity as a free and able people.  As a nation, we have always corrected ourselves when we strayed too far from our founding principles.
The abolition of slavery and civil rights legislation speaks volumes to this self correcting course programmed into our government and identity based upon our founding principles, as enumerated in our Constitution and Declaration of Independence and practiced by our citizens.
Prior to this gradual change in philosophy, we described ourselves with the concept of a “Melting Pot”,  symbolized by the Latin phrase E Pluribus Unum (“Out of Many–One”.)  We believe so wholeheartedly in this principle that we print this motto on our currency; it gives credence and support to our identity as a free and able people.  We are now faced with a re-definition of our identity as a deliberate and cruel hoax perpetrated by the progressive liberal left described as a “rainbow coalition” as they fully embrace the separatism of multiculturalism.
This definition is accepted at face value without question by many in our society as a modern symbol of this corrupt reinterpretation and ultimate rejection of the melting pot concept.  Rainbows are nothing more than light that has been broken down into their individual wavelengths separated by the various colors of the visible light spectrum.  These colors never mix with distinct boundaries; rainbows are anything but harmonious and represent separatism on a physical level for visible light.  This is in direct contradiction to our founding societal concept of “out of many–one” and only further divides us as a distinct and exceptional people since the “melting pot” is homogenous, and rainbows as symbols are the very definition of separatism and exclusion.  This interferes with the absorption of émigrés into our national identity and the homogenizing force that the melting pot creates.  We are simply an American collective identity or “Brand” of a free and able people that believe in self-rule and rule of law.

read more: http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/the-modern-leftist-progressive-politician-and-his-propensity-for-arrogance/

Video: Obama: We’re Giving In To The Taliban

by: Daniel Noe
Obama announced yesterday that his administration is “pursuing a negotiated peace with the Taliban” in Afghanistan. Two hours later, they bombed the US Embassy. How’s that working out for you, Mr. President?

Things Not Looking Good For Obama, Jackson, And Sharpton

by: Kevin"coach" Collins

inShare9

Recently released results from the Public Religion Research Institute hold seriously bad news for the long term viability of the Democrats and Barack Obama’s chances of reelection.   The pollsters spoke to adults between the ages of 18 and 24 about their views on race relations, and their findings were surprising.
One of the questions they asked these young people centered on whether they thought the government paid too much attention to the complaints of blacks and minorities in general.  They were asked about the existence of reverse discrimination and if it was a problem in their view.
These young people – “millennials” as they are labeled by sociologists- don’t seem to be following the Democrats’ script on how they should think about racial issues. Almost half of them (46%) believe the government pays too much attention to the complaints of minorities, and 48% feel that discrimination against whites is a considerable problem.
When the responses from minorities were removed to count only the responses from white millennials (who represent 2/3 of the millennial population), a sizable majority  (56%) agreed that the government caters to the concerns of minorities too much. This is not good news for a Democrat Party that so heavily relied on “white guilt” to elect an unqualified black man as our president. This is a hammer blow to the race-hustling world view of the Democrat Party and it’s main “white guilt” salesmen like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.  Young white people have been taught a conflicting message, and the framers of that message will reap the destruction it brings.
A lifetime of listening to baseless charges that they have somehow discriminated against minorities is apparently not being passively accepted by white millennials. They don’t feel guilty of discrimination toward minorities. Apparently, a majority of them are beginning to compare the devastating effect “Affirmative Action” programs have had on their innocent parents and older siblings to the unwarranted preferential treatment of minorities by our government and refusing to smile and accept their undeserved punishment.
If there is worse news for the Democrats in regards to white millennials, it’s that they are just beginning to vote.

ONLY YOU CAN HELP US SEND THIS MARINE TO CONGRESS!

ONLY YOU CAN HELP US SEND THIS MARINE TO CONGRESS! Ilario Pantano is a US Marine Corps Officer who fought for our nation in Fallujah, Iraq and now wants to fight for our troops in Congress.  He has an upcoming primary election in his own state of North Carolina and he needs your support! Pantano first swore an oath to defend the Constitution when he joined the Marines at the age of 17 and fought in the first Gulf War before leaving the Marine Corps to pursue his life goals.  After 9/11, Pantano re-enlisted because he heard the call to defend his country and he answered it. Pantano led his troops into the chaos of battle in Iraq.  He gained the respect of his soldiers, and was described as one superior as having “more integrity, dedication and drive than any Marine he’s ever met.” SEAN HANNITY TELLS MARINE OFFICER ‘YOU BELONG IN CONGRESS’ Pantano has gained the support of another pro-troop celebrity, also a great friend to Move America Forward, Sean Hannity!   “You Belong in Congress, I’m impressed,” proclaimed Hannity, when he interviewed Pantano on his Fox News show last year. MAF FREEDOM PAC IS WORKING TO SEND PANTANO TO WASHINGTON! YOU CAN HELP NOW BY MAKING A DONATION! Sean Hannity is a great friend of Move America Forward, as he has helped MAF on every one of our annual Troopathon events to raise money to send care packages to the troops. Hannity’s own series of “Freedom Concerts” have also raised millions to create college scholarships for the children of wounded vets. Hannity is a true friend to the American serviceman and woman and his endorsement of Illario Pantano should not be taken lightly! MAF Freedom PAC could not agree with Hannity more! We need USMC Officer Ilario Pantano to clean up Washington! Perhaps that’s why many on the left have started calling Ilario Pantano a “Jack Bauer Republican.”  He has a reputation of being tough, but loyal, of not being afraid to shake things up in order to get the job done. We want Pantano to bring that same integrity, dedication and drive to the halls of congress. That’s why Move America Forward Freedom PAC is supporting Illario Pantano in his primary race to win the GOP nomination to run for Congress!  Pantano stood up for our country and for our troops, now we must stand up for him. Please help us support his campaign so we can elect the kind of man who will make the tough calls, defend the Constitution, and protect the troops at home and in the battlefield. Please make a contribution of $500, $100, or $50 so that we can continue our support for Ilario Pantano, a true American hero and a warrior whom America needs in Congress! Paid for and authorized by Move America Forward Freedom PAC - a federal political action committee. MAF Freedom PAC is responsible for the content of this message. This message is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Contributions are not tax deductible for federal tax purposes. No corporate checks are permitted. www.maffreedompac.com www.mafpac.org Move America Forward Freedom PAC ATTN: Danny Gonzalez, Director of Communications 8795 Folsom Blvd Suite #103 Sacramento, CA 95826

Obama: Stop Lying About Oil Prices!

by: John Myers 

Oil at more than $100 per barrel is far too expensive. Despite President Barack Obama’s recent protestations that oil speculators are to blame for expensive petroleum, the truth is that most of the blame rests on his shoulders.
There is plenty of oil in North America. Yet Obama and his Green lobby are happy to see gasoline prices go even higher just as we hit the busy summer driving season. The reason is that higher petroleum prices back up Obama’s argument that renewable energy is urgently needed.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt made the famous pronouncement that “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”

Nearly 80 years later, a Democratic President is not playing down public fears but actually fanning them. If you don’t believe me, consider the facts about North America’s vast petroleum reserves and surging production.
Canadian oil production rose to 1.6 million barrels per day (mb/d) last year. That was an increase of more than 13 percent from the year before. According to the Canadian Energy Research Institute, Alberta and Saskatchewan oil sands production will more than double to 4 mb/d in the next seven years and will reach 6.2 mb/d by 2045.
Add that in with the expected increase in both U.S. and Mexican oil production, and North America will be producing 11 mb/d by the end of this decade. That is about the same amount of oil that Saudi Arabia can produce if it opens its spigots all the way.
The 11 mb/d of oil production is a conservative estimate. Mitt Romney promises that if he is elected, he will vastly open up offshore drilling. If ever fully tapped, North America has the potential reserves to produce 14 mb/d of oil by 2020.
“North America is becoming the new Middle East,” recently wrote Ed Morse, the managing director and head of global commodities research at Citigroup.
Of course, much of North America’s energy independence will depend on who is in the Oval Office. If it is someone like Romney, who believes in free markets, I believe gasoline will be affordable again within a couple of years.
However, if Obama is re-elected and he continues to object to the import of Canada’s oil sands as well as expanded drilling within U.S. borders, petroleum prices might hit new records by the end of 2013. That will be more bad news for a shaky U.S. economy and will only further weaken America and the greenback.
After all, shortages and panics happen all the time. They certainly don’t require a U.S. President to get them going.
My First Lesson In Fear Economics
In the autumn of 1972, Alberta’s bitter cold was settling in. The engine to my mother’s Mercury was idling hard when the gasoline pump clunked to a halt. I pulled the nozzle out of the tank and pushed it back into its cradle.
I fished $10 from my wallet, enough to buy the gas and still have change left over for a coffee.
After paying, I headed for the door. Before I reached it, I was called back.
The manager asked: “Do you know about the antifreeze shortage?”
“What antifreeze shortage?”
“The one that’s coming this fall,” said the manager. “I haven’t gotten half the orders I was promised. My supplier told me the province is running out of antifreeze.”
I thought I better buy antifreeze. I dipped into my wallet and found some cash I was saving for the weekend. I gathered up what was left.
Whether it was real or manufactured, I don’t know; but by the end of 1972, there was an antifreeze shortage. In December that year, you couldn’t find a gallon of antifreeze. For farmers caught in the middle of a cold Canadian winter, much depended upon it.
Years afterward, people in Alberta were still tripping over gallons of old antifreeze they had bought in 1972.
What happened to antifreeze happened to oil just a few months later. But in the case of oil, hoarding occurred on a worldwide scale, and the stakes were far bigger.
By late 1972, OPEC was sick of trading its petroleum for devaluing dollars. The seeds were planted for the first Arab Oil Embargo. For traders, just the idea that oil would be withheld from the market sent prices soaring.
From October to December 1973, the price of crude oil rose from $5.40 to $17. That was only the beginning of a frenzy that would send the price of crude above $70 per barrel in today’s money.

The climax to the oil crisis came in 1979 in the wake of the Iranian Revolution. Oil companies bought more than what they needed — not just because of the price (which they thought was headed higher), but because they were unsure they would get any oil later on.
Hoarding wasn’t limited to just oil companies. Everyone was intent on building oil inventories, even everyday motorists.
In his book The Prize, Daniel Yergin writes that before the 1979 oil crisis, American motorists drove around with, on average, their gas tanks one-quarter full. Following the Iranian Revolution, those gas tanks were, on average, three-quarters full. That changeover in itself sucked 1 billion gallons of motor fuel out of gasoline station tanks.
As a result of the Iranian Revolution, Western oil supplies were cut by 2 mb/d. Not only was the reaction to the oil embargo (3 mb/d of hoarding) worse, but it was the deciding factor in pushing oil prices above $35 a barrel and throwing the West into a recession.
My point is that you have to beware of textbook arguments by economists who don’t account for human emotions. Just because we’re not running out of oil doesn’t mean that oil prices can’t go higher, perhaps much higher. In the end, prices for everything from tulip bulbs to antifreeze and even petroleum depend much more on mass perception than the reality of supply and demand.
The Phony Oil Crisis
There doesn’t need to be an oil crisis on North America’s horizon. All we need is a straightforward U.S. President who believes in the free markets. We don’t need the leader we have now — an anti-oil President who insists on Green energy regardless of the social and economic costs.
On Townhall.com last month, columnist Paul Driessen summed up Obama’s broker energy policy:
Yet another “renewable” argument is that petroleum “keeps us trapped in the past.” In truth, we need to worry about the present, especially our depressing unemployment and unsustainable debt. Oil and gas provide 60% of America’s energy. By contrast, despite untold billions in subsidies, wind and solar combined still provide barely 0.60% – and are unlikely to do much better for decades to come.

Boehner Protects Eric Holder From Contempt Of Congress Citation…Again

By:  Doug Book

Three months ago, conservatives were jubilant over reports that Congressman Darrell Issa would offer a Contempt of Congress complaint against Eric Holder. After all, the Attorney General had openly refused to honor House Oversight Committee subpoenas for an estimated 80,000 documents vital to the Committee’s investigation of the role played by members of the Obama Regime in Operation Fast and Furious.
Holder spent nearly a year lying to Congressional committees and making clear he had no intention of honoring legal subpoenas. His Assistant Attorney General Ron Weich had written a February 4^th, 2011 letter to Congress claiming that the criminal walking of more than 2000 firearms across the Mexican border had never happened. It was that letter which would have the distinction of being the first ever Department of Justice communication to Congress which had to be withdrawn by its sender, due to certain “inaccuracies.”
Yet deadlines set by Issa and Senator Charles Grassley for the production of subpoenaed documents have systematically been ignored by this corrupt Attorney General with no substantial response by congressional Republicans.
Last week, CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson, who has reported ferociously on Regime Fast and Furious felonies and misdemeanors since its inception, wrote of another contempt citation being prepared by Darrell Issa. Attkisson discovered a 48 page draft had been provided House Speaker John Boehner, undoubtedly complete with Holder’s every lie, diversion and refusal to comply with House subpoenas.

Were Republican leaders to issue the go-ahead to Darrell Issa and actively persuade any recalcitrant (that is, weak-kneed) GOP members of the House to cooperate, the passage of a contempt citation could provide the American people a long-awaited view of Eric Holder being frog-marched to the well of the House, under arrest by the Sergeant at Arms. And reports of the Obama Regime’s assault on the 2^ndAmendment rights of the American people would finally shatter the full-fledged, 18 month Fast and Furious media blockade.
But here is the latest word from a Republican spokesman:  “While there are very legitimate arguments to be made in favor of such an action, no decision has been made to move forward with one by the Speaker or by House Republican leaders.”
Three months ago, it was reported that John Boehner would sell out to Eric Holder and the Democrat Party by making an under the table deal with the Attorney General for the Fast and Furious generated scalps of a few DOJ underlings. Of course, Barack Obama and Eric Holder would in return be exonerated. Unfortunately, if a nationwide account of this contemplated betrayal worked to stop Speaker Boehner in his tracks, it certainly didn’t seem to provide incentive for a more courageous tack.
In 1821, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress must have the power to issue citations of contempt in order to “…not [be] exposed to every indignity and interruption that rudeness, caprice, or even conspiracy may mediate against it.”
Yet although proof of his decades of criminal wrongdoing abounds, Republican leaders are frightened to death at the thought of holding Eric Holder to account. And he is in return piling successive rounds of indignity upon the House of Representatives via the deadly Obama Regime conspiracy of Operation Fast and Furious.
Photo Credit: European Parliament (Creative Commons)
If you would like to add your name to the growing numbers calling for Eric Holder’s Impeachment, use this link: Impeach Eric Holder.

Sgt Bowe Bergdahl needs help... MIA

Sgt #BoweBergdahl   American #POW #Hero needs your voice... Congress and the Main Stream Media need to get off their proverbial duffs and scream/take action.

Jaimie @Nytfury is giving them Hell tonight on Twitter!

Gotta love the spirit of conservative women..:) Post date 05/01/2012 pm

@Nytfury Well you know what? SCREW YOU @BarackObama & your minions! Yeah YOU who's watching wht I tweet! Im an AMERICAN CITIZEN w 1st Amndmnt rights!

@Nytfury Mr. @BarackObama u need to grow a fucking spine & learn to deal w conserv voices! WE R NOT GOING AWAY!!!

@Nytfury And Twitter... SHAME ON YOU for being such the cowardly lion & sucking up so far up @BarackObama 's ass that you allow this to happen!!!

@Nytfury Conservatives have every right to be on here! There is NO need for twitter to be suspending us like this! & all you pansy ass libs STFU!

@Nytfury All of you radical libs who can't respect another view, attack, foam at the mouth, suck face w @BarackObama ass....... FUCK OFF!

@Nytfury To my liberal followers who DON'T attack me, these rants aren't about you. You know full well that both sides have vile douchebag asshats!

@Nytfury "I say Push her down the stairs, push her down the stairs!" #FRIENDs 


@Nytfury Sick of this twitter suspension bullshit!!! I first heard of a 'block party' when crazy Perry fans had my best friend #WBU2 suspended!

@Nytfury He lost all his followers, took hm a long time 2 build it back up, only to have twitter suspend it again in March & he's been missing since!

@Nytfury @kathyannbryant that cheered me up Kathy, TY! I'm so frustrated w twitter suspending conservs accnts... Hw r u?

Ed note: This will be a continuing saga..lil ol Jaimie vs Goliath
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Addendum she is on a roll again...:)>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@Ntyfury  I'm so sick of @BarackObama shitting all over this country as if he were cleaning it up! Disrespects r GOD, r flag, r military, & r lives!

@Nytfury  @BarackObama ,u may think ppl like #WBU2 & I r nuts, but Americans r on2 u. Cnt get ur way? We KNOW u'll lie cheat & steal ur

@Nytfury I don't give a flying fuck what u think abt Bush, the policies of @BarackObama r atrocious to this country! RADICAL RADICAL RADICAL!

@Nytfury  All you haters out there r loving this! Once in a blue moon I spout off like u do EVERY DAY! I jst have one thing to say to u: ┌П┐(•͡_•͡)┌П┐

@Nytfury  I know full well the outcome of this world. But I'm not going to sit by & be silent while I still have breath!  [ed note: well said Jaimie neds to run for Congress:]

@Nytfury @BarackObama , YOU ARE A TRAITOR! A COWARD! THE WORST EXCUSE FOR A LEADER! A LIAR! THIEF!

@Nytfury @BarackObama I know full well you have a devious little man watching twitter to get a read on public reaction to your policies...

@Nytfury Hello @BarackObama 's devious little man watching twitter... I can't stand the prez policies, I'm sick of Conserv media being silenced!

@Nytfury @BarackObama is looking for ANY distraction, any reason, any chance to give grounds 4 martial law. Martial Law means he stays in power!

@Nytfury The new acronym for @BarackObama is T.H.U.G.= Trojan Horse Undercover Gestapo #tcot 


@Nytfury Again: @BarackObama = T.H.U.G. = T.ROJAN H.ORSE U.NDERCOVER G.ESTAPO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@Nytfury @BarackObama I will do EVERYTHING I can to make sure you LOSE as many votes as possible! I will not go down w out a fight!!!!!!!!!!!

@Nytfury  @BarackObama YOU ARE AGAINST enhanced interrogations, yet take credit for bin Laden? What a pathetic, excuse 4 a POTUS u are! No humility!

@Nytfury .@BarackObama & all his followers... You're right, I don't like his black half, AND guess what? I don't like his white half either!

@Nytfury @l0rddarkf0rce so sick of this! We DO need to fight back!!!

@Nytfury Why is it ths cntry attackd Pres. Bush n the mst vilest ways possble, but if we were 2 say same abt @BarackObama, all hell wld break loose?!

@Nytfury Jay...I'm giving u fair warning...u don't wanna mess me 2nyt. I WON'T b civil... @JayInstinct

@Ntyfury @Battleborne TY Walt!!!