Trump Announces Gun Plan

 
oped: Excellent policy position...points and counter points...now all Mr Trump need do is review the counter points and incorporate them into his policy! 


by:Tim Brown 
Donald Trump has issued a policy position paper on arms and overall, the claims are very good. The only issue is how will he actually plan to deal with what he proposes.   

His position was posted at DonaldJTrump.com and it starts off with a very constitutional approach.

"The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear," he writes. "The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period."
"The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans," the paper reads. "The Constitution doesn't create that right – it ensures that the government can't take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment's purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple."  

I agree that we do indeed have a right to self-defense. I also think that the Second Amendment also encompasses something much larger than mere self-defense. It begins with "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…" This is a crucial point because if we limit the Second Amendment to just self-defense, then there will be those who come along and express that we don't need certain arms in order to defend ourselves, and this is even how many "conservatives" have argued. They fail to understand that arms are not only used by the people in self-defense, but also how arms are used by the people to secure a free state. And the militia mentioned in the Second Amendment is neither the US military nor the National Guard, but rather the people of the state they reside in.
Trump then adds, "It's been said that the Second Amendment is America's first freedom. That's because the Right to Keep and Bear Arms protects all our other rights. We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment. Protecting that freedom is imperative."

Again, I say this is well said. So, how is Trump projecting to do this?
His first point is to enforce the laws on the books.

"We need to get serious about prosecuting violent criminals," read the position paper. "The Obama administration's record on that is abysmal. Violent crime in cities like Baltimore, Chicago and many others is out of control. Drug dealers and gang members are given a slap on the wrist and turned loose on the street. This needs to stop."

I agree it does need to stop, and he goes on to recount a program in the state of Virginia called Project Exile, which decreased murders committed with guns by over 60%. The program took 350 armed felons off the street, which was a good thing. The problem is always there is never justice brought upon the criminal. If there was, the people would not be paying to feed and house them for the time of their imprisonment, but deal with them swiftly and justly for their crimes, thereby eliminating their potential threat to the citizenry ever again.
Trump believes that more programs like Project Exile will make the streets safer for the people, but he adds that another important way to fight crime is to "empower law-abiding gun owners to defend themselves." 

"Law enforcement is great, they do a tremendous job, but they can't be everywhere all of the time," Trump writes. "Our personal protection is ultimately up to us. That's why I'm a gun owner, that's why I have a concealed carry permit, and that's why tens of millions of Americans have concealed carry permits as well. It's just common sense. To make America great again, we're going to go after criminals and put the law back on the side of the law-abiding."


I couldn't agree more. However, I don't know how a president would make this a reality since the federal government is not authorized to make law based on this. Most definitely, the president can encourage the states to do these things, which is perfectly within the scope of his ability to exercise free speech. I would think Trump needs to be questioned as to whether or not he believes these programs should be state or federal. If state, fine, but if federal, then there are constitutional issues. 

Mr. Trump went on to express that the mental health system is broken. I confess, that I am very uncomfortable with government determining mental health. After all, I believe the mental health of many elected officials is questionable at best and have warned "conservatives" about jumping on the bandwagon concerning mental health. I did so after Sandy Hook and we can already see where that is going for our veterans.
"Let's be clear about this. Our mental health system is broken," reads the paper. "It needs to be fixed. Too many politicians have ignored this problem for too long."  

OK, but where in the Constitution is the authority to do anything about mental health?
"All of the tragic mass murders that occurred in the past several years have something in common – there were red flags that were ignored," he adds. "We can't allow that to continue. We need to expand treatment programs, because most people with mental health problems aren't violent, they just need help. But for those who are violent, a danger to themselves or others, we need to get them off the street before they can terrorize our communities. This is just common sense."

I agree there have been red flags, but those have been ignored by local law enforcement, as well as federal agencies. However, where does Trump get authority in the Constitution to "expand treatment programs"?
He does point out rightly that many mentally ill people are not necessarily violent, they just need help, and he also rightly points out that when they do engage in violence with guns, anti-gun agenda driven politicians go after law-abiding gun owners.
The final prong of his position is to do away with gun and magazine bans, enhance the national background checks sytem and implement a national right to carry, as well as arm our servicemen on military bases and in recruiting centers.

Trump rightly defines semi-automatic rifles, instead of calling them "assault weapons." To be clear, Trump has previously said that he supported the assault weapons ban, which included these same guns.
"The government has no business dictating what types of firearms good, honest people are allowed to own," he said. I agree so much that I would like to see him even declaring tanks as part of the Second Amendment. 
 As well as many other self defense weapon systems:)
 
I don't see the national background checks as part of the function of the federal government under the Second Amendment. Again, if we dealt justly with violent criminals who used guns against others, we wouldn't need a prison system and we wouldn't need a background check. They would face the death penalty in many cases.

A national right to carry is pretty much in the Second Amendment. Trump distinguishes between things like a driver's license, which he calls a privilege, and concealed carry, which is a right. However, if it is a right, then why press for a concealed carry permit, which government charges you to exercise your right legally? Why not just eliminate all gun laws and uphold the Second Amendment? The problem I see with this coming from the federal government is that we all know that someone would want a federal databse of gun owners with these permits and that would be unconstitutional, but the right to carry your concealed weapon across state lines is something that should be acknowledged as lawful.
There are things that need clarification and Trump needs to flesh out his policies of how they would look from his position as President because you can't hold to the Second Amendment and the Constitution and then start playing with it.
                                                             

                                                                        

This post-debate poll will horrify the GOP *establishment*

 



by Dara Lind 
There are sixteen major candidates for the Republican nomination for president. All but three of them have been United States senators or state governors at some point in their careers. The other three, according to a Morning Consult poll of people who watched the 11 leading contenders debate this past Wednesday, are leading the race.

 
A couple of big caveats: this is Morning Consult's first campaign season and it isn't yet a proven pollster, and the people who watched the Republican debates may not represent the party's primary electorate as a whole. But when you consider that this is a poll of Republicans (and independents who plan to vote in Republican primaries) who are engaged enough to watch an early debate — who one would think are the most engaged voters out there — it gets even more worrisome for the establishment.

Here are four terrible signs for the GOP establishment in the poll, and one good one:

1) Political n00bs get an outright majority of debate-watchers' support

36 percent of poll respondents support Donald Trump; 12 percent support Ben Carson; and 10 percent support Carly Fiorina. All together, that's 58 percent of Republican debate-watchers who support one of the three candidates in the race with no experience in elected office whatsoever. To put it another way, none of the twelve candidates in the field with political experience managed to crack 10 percent of the vote.

2) Fiorina's rising — but she's not taking Trump's support

Most observers, including the poll's respondents, agreed Fiorina won the debate. Now, many pundits are portraying her as the new candidate with momentum — implying that she's seizing it from Trump.
But Trump not only failed to lose support after a debate where he was largely irrelevant to the proceedings, he actually gained 5 percentage points since the last Morning Connect poll was conducted a week ago. If neither Fiorina's rise nor his own debate performance has hurt Trump, it's getting hard to imagine what can. 

3) Jeb Bush's numbers are dismal — and Scott Walker's are even worse

6 percent of poll respondents said they would vote for Jeb Bush. That ties him with Chris Christie for sixth place (behind Trump, Carson and Fiorina, as well as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio). Just like Trump is somehow still gaining support, Bush is somehow still losing it.
It is definitely bad news for the Republican establishment that their preferred candidate is getting 6 percent in the polls. But the man who was supposed to be his "conservative challenger" is doing even worse. Scott Walker, who when the race started was the closest thing to the candidate of the conservative movement, is polling at 1 percent. He is tied with former New York Governor George Pataki.

4) The highest-polling elected official is Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz made his name, nationally, fighting the leadership of his own party in the Senate in the floor fight that resulted in the 2011 government shutdown. Ted Cruz is notoriously disliked by his Republican Senate colleagues. Ted Cruz's strategy over the last few months has been to buddy up with Donald Trump — even appearing at a rally in DC against the Iran nuclear deal together — in the hopes that when (or if) Trump's candidacy fades, Cruz will swoop in and take his support. Ted Cruz is, in other words, running against the fact that he is an elected official. Ted Cruz is polling better than all the other elected officials. 

5) But what if all of this is just very good news for Marco Rubio?

If you are an establishment Republican donor, all of this looks pretty dismal to you. But there is hope! After yet another quietly competent debate performance, Marco Rubio — who was once languishing with Christie and Rand Paul — is rising in the polls and, according to Morning Connect, right behind Cruz.
Rubio is incredibly amenable to conservative establishment preferences. In fact, the biggest problem with his candidacy so far was that some of the people who might support Rubio were instead backing Jeb Bush. In a happy coincidence, just as Bush's campaign is looking hopeless — and just as it's becoming clear that the anti-establishment candidates aren't going to take each other out on their own — Rubio's looking a little better. In other words, Marco Rubio has a pretty strong case that if the GOP donor base wants to take down Donald Trump, he, and not Bush, is the candidate they should bet on.

The Obama File..Christian/Muslim? US Natural born Citizen? Certified for POTUS?

 


Nope~Nope~Nope
There is no documentation proving any of the above :


This guy is a fancy dancer, and he's lived for over 50 years without leaving any footprints -- none!  There is no Obama documentation -- no records -- no bona fides -- no paper trail -- nothing! -- and he's got an army of lawyers making sure it stays that way -- and the unflattering stuff, out there in the world and on the Internet -- it's systematically disappearing down the rabbit hole, and what's most amazing is he is not now, nor ever has been, a "natural born citizen," as required by the U. S. Constitution -- he was, "at birth," a British subject and citizen of Kenya -- a fact published on his own website. 

Must Read SEE full files: http://www.theobamafile.com/index_next_personal.html 
http://www.theobamafile.com/_opinion/LegendOfBarackObama.htm

I don't know about y'all but I for one am tired of MSM talking heads as well as John McCain,Chris Christie,Hillary Clinton et al ...taking the PC stance strongly and going out on the proverbial limb stating Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is...is a patriot, a natural born citizen and a good Christian.
Really now and how did they come to this conclusion lacking any evidence to prove this? 
I'm sorry but you can check with the FBI on requirements to obtain a confidential and secret clearance much less a top secret clearance...sorry folks but no way could Barack Obama pass a background check to obtain any clearance from the FBI lacking missing documentation! 

Hello I obtained a confidential and secret clearance/full field background checks while in the US Army as well as local police (Confidential) as well as a confidential/secret with USCS as a GS 11 Patrol officer/Regional Intelligence officer...believe me I had to provide all school records from elementary School forward...as well as Original hard copy birth certificate...Social security card records,military records,Draft registration records,passport records,every place I lived and all associates,family members,friends,jobs,baptism records,clubs,awards,criminal and civil records check etc! 

So for the love of God quit attacking anyone who questions Barry Obama's background...he has not provided any proof of who he really is,where he was born and what religion he adheres to! 

I say prove it or shut up already...but ya won't because ya can't prove it...and he refuses to release any of his records...shows guilt/fraud imho!

'Islamist' shot dead after stabbing German policewoman

By Frank Zeller  

Berlin (AFP) - An Iraqi man who spent time in jail for membership in an Islamist terrorist group was shot dead by German police Thursday after he stabbed and seriously wounded a policewoman.

The 41-year-old man had been convicted in 2008 of planning an attack in Berlin against former Iraqi prime minister Iyad Allawi, a prosecution spokesman told AFP.
Thursday's incident began around 0700 GMT, when four police cars were called to the western Berlin district of Spandau because the man was reported acting aggressively and threatening passers-by, police said.
When a policewoman approached him, he stabbed her with a knife with a nine-centimetre (3.5 inch) blade in the neck area, before one of her colleagues opened fire, killing the Iraqi man and "suspected Islamist", prosecutors said.

The 44-year-old woman was also hit accidentally by one of the bullets fired by her police colleague, said the prosecution service.

The Iraqi man had in the morning removed an electronic ankle monitor he had been ordered to wear after being released from prison.

National news agency DPA quoted chief prosecutor Dirk Feuerberg as saying it was too early to speculate about a "terrorist motive", and that the man's apartment was being searched.

Berlin police said on Twitter about the policewoman, who had been taken to hospital by helicopter, that "the condition of our colleague is stable, she remains in intensive care".

View gallery

The attacker died in an ambulance shortly after being shot, despite attempts to revive him.

- 'Hot-tempered, aggressive' -

Prosecution service spokesman Martin Steltner identified the Iraqi man as "Rafik Y.", saying he was sentenced in 2008 to an eight-year prison term for his role in a plot against Allawi. 

In the court case in the southwestern city of Stuttgart, Rafik Mohamad Yousef was one of three Iraqi men sentenced to jail terms, including time already spent behind bars during their trials.

News site Spiegel Online reported he had returned to Berlin in 2013, and was kept under surveillance.

Die Welt daily wrote that the convict could not be deported to Iraq under German law because he would face the death penalty there.

The three men had been convicted of belonging to a foreign terrorist organisation -- Iraqi militant group Ansar al-Islam -- and attempted conspiracy to commit murder.

Ansar al-Islam, a predominantly Kurdish group, was believed to have links to Al-Qaeda in Iraq. 

Yousef was believed to have volunteered to carry out the attack on Allawi, the court heard.

Presiding judge Christine Rebsam-Bender described Yousef as "hot-tempered and aggressive" and cited his frequent outbursts, including an attack on a prison guard that broke the officer's rib.

"Because they are Nazis!" Yousef shouted at the judge.

Intelligence services at the time estimated the group had about 100 members in Germany connected to a wider network of supporters across western Europe.

The court found that the plot to assassinate Allawi had been hatched only days before the premier's brief trip to Berlin in December 2004.

Hillary Clinton's new theme song..after the FBI/Congress Investigations

Hillary sings to Huma Abedin as Anthony whipes a tear from his eye oh my...
 

[Clinton confidante Huma Abedin sure had a lot of special deals set up ...whats a girl gonna do now when Hillary is in the pokey? Oh well back to square one find another important lady to seduce...sorry Hillary a girls gotta do what a girls gotta do for Islam!]

Hit it Bobby...

Interior Secretary Refuses To Testify On EPA Toxic Mine Spill

Obama #LGBT appointment...not based on experience /qualifications...
[Obama’s interior secretary says ........Whateva Barry wants]
oped: I'm sorry but I have to go with a 'Trumpism' on this one...Sally(Sal?) needs to be fracked...she is one manly looking dudette and dumb to boot or whatever...whoever wins the GOP nomination should consider Sarah Palin for Secretary Department of Interior...she knows oil and is cute to boot..


by Michael Bastasch 

Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell is refusing to testify before Congress about her department’s ongoing investigation of the massive toxic mine spill caused by EPA workers last month.
Despite an invitation Republican lawmakers to get Jewell to come before the committee Thursday to testify on the Interior’s investigation, the former CEO of REI has declined. Instead, Jewell’s staffers sent an unsigned statement to House lawmakers.
“Despite nearly every one of its agencies having jurisdiction over lands impacted by the spill and responsibilities to uphold for impacted communities, including tribes, Interior has been nearly invisible in the wake of the spill,” Wyoming Republican Rep. Cynthia Lummis told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an emailed statement.

The Interior Department has been tasked with releasing a technical report on the EPA-caused mine spill in August where agency contractorsaccidentally unleashed 3 million gallons of wastewater into Colorado’s Animas River.
But the department has largely been silent on its probe into the Gold King Mine spill. Interior told House lawmakers they “would be happy to provide the [lawmakers] with a briefing of that report after its release,” according to the statement to the House provided to TheDCNF by the department. Their response has only frustrated lawmakers.
“Both the EPA and the Department of the Interior must be held accountable, both today and as the recovery efforts continue,” Lummis said. “Right now, the public is being left in the dark. Refusing to appear before the committees and failing to even offer to send a representative on the department’s behalf is deeply concerning.”
The EPA-induced spill has attracted the ire of state officials and Republican lawmakers. Senate lawmakers held two hearings Wednesday where Republicans grilled EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy over the agency’s response to the spill.

In those hearings, McCarthy was repeatedly criticized for not reprimanding or firing any agency employees or contractors involved in the mine spill, which contaminated river water in three states with heavy metals, including lead and arsenic.
“Has anyone been fired for almost taking two days to notify the Navajo about the disaster?” Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain asked McCarthy in a Wednesday hearing. “Has anyone been fired for the Navajo’s complaint that the emergency response was inadequate?”
“So this long after the spill, you’re still trying to determine who’s accountable for the spill?” North Dakota Republican Sen. John Hoeven asked McCarthy.
McCarthy repeated that the agency was being held accountable, but wouldn’t go after individuals involved in the spill until after the Interior Department has completed its report on the spill. That report is set to come out at the end of October.

“Because of the soil and rock conditions, the access and drilling of a hole into the Adit from above would have been quite costly and require much more planning and multiple filed seasons to accomplish,” the EPA’s internal review says. “Although difficult and therefore expensive and technically challenging, this procedure may have been able to discover the pressurized conditions that turned out to cause the blowout.”
Source

Ignorant Liberals Who Support the Iran Deal but Don’t Know What it Says!

by Onan Coca 

The brilliant and very funny conservative pundit Ami Horowitz has become a popular topic on Fox News over the last few days after a video he posted went viral. Horowitz is known for his insightful “Ami on the Street” video series where he questions average liberals about political issues unmasking the mass ignorance that exists on the left.
In Ami’s most recent “man on the street” piece he traveled to New York’s Upper West Side to learn why liberals there overwhelmingly support the Iran Nuclear Deal. What he found is sure to interest conservatives… apparently liberals who support the deal don’t have any idea what the deal actually says!
“Wow. It’s Amazing how little people know.”

GERMANY SECURES BORDERS: After Watching These ‘Refugees’, You’ll See Exactly Why

[Refugees" Shout Allahu Akbar at Border Crossing...]


Hmm, maybe there is a reason why Germany is closing their borders? And maybe Obama should take note and do the same, but I doubt that will ever happen.

Just weeks ago, Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel posed for pictures with anguished Syrian refugees and pledged to take in as many as 500,000 per year. But as Fox News reported, “uneasy critics inside the European power fear the huge influx could not only skew the nation’s demographics in a hurry, but could also include terrorists hiding among the war weary masses…ISIS has already said it planted jihadist fighters among the refugees, and some in Germany wonder why the terrorist army’s claims are not being taken more seriously.”
Now in a complete reversal, Germany has announced it is immediately introducing border controls in the south of the country, as announced Sunday by Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière.
Vox.com reports the government of Chancellor Angela Merkel claimed “urgent security reasons.”
And when you view this clip courtesy of LiveLeak, it all makes perfect sense. Do you want to invite hooligans with sticks, stones and hurling fists into your quiet cul-de-sac?
Read more: Allen B West

CREEPING SHARIA: Muslims File Petition To End This German Tradition

oped: I'm sorry but after all is said and done...Islam under Sharia Law is nothing short of closet homosexual/pedophiles forcing their perversion on the world...it is quite obvious if one pays attention to what they say and do...#JustaFactJack!

By Angela Turner
Oktoberfest is an annual, world renowned festival in Munich that celebrates the German culture. Featuring beer, brats, dancing and beautiful girls, locals and tourists flood into the 16 day festival bringing huge revenue into the economy and fun for all ages. Everyone has an amazing time and the country makes millions – so what could possibly go wrong?
This is what makes my blood boil. Prepare for your head to spin. Intolerant Muslims have filed a petition to put an end to Oktoberfest. As Obama is doing is doing in America, Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel is flooding Germany with Muslims.  And instead of learning the culture of the generous people that have welcomed them into their country and supported them financially, Muslims are demanding that Germany end their celebrations.
“We tried to ignore the event, but there too many Un-Islamic acts done at the Oktoberfest, such as alcohol consumption, public nudity etc.” Can you imagine the audacity? To my friends in Germany: Turn it up! We in America have numerous Oktoberfests and we will plan on getting loud, dancing and celebrating in your honor!

Chancellor Merkel has proclaimed Islam “belongs to Germany” (sound familiar?). Germany has the largest Muslim population in Western Europe with 3.5 million Muslims. However, 80% of them do not have German citizenship. With thousands more now flooding in from Syria, men often patrol the streets in an attempt to enforce Sharia Law on the citizens. In addition, Muslims are known to attack Christians for their faith. For example, on Christmas 2014, in the German city of Mönchengladbach-Rheydt, Muslims attacked Catholics attending mass. They forced their way into the St. Mary’s Church by shouting “F*cking Christians” and randomly assaulting victims at their place of worship.
Share if this makes you blood boil!

Contrary to a Homosexual’s Claim, We Don’t Live Under Caesar

["Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and to God the things that are Gods.”]

by:Gary DeMar 

A pro-homosexual advocate wrote the following about the Kim Davis case in a Facebook post, being critical of the stand she has taken and those who support her:
“Read the Gospel ‘Render unto Caesar . . .’ [Matt. 22:21] and Jesus' commandment to love [Matt. 19:19; Mark 12:31; Luke 10:27; also Rom. 13:9; Gal. 5:14; James 2:8]. Then read the Constitution, specifically the Supremacy Clause and the First Amendment in [their] entirety. Come with something more valid next time. Peace out.”
Don’t you love it when someone appeals to the Bible to criticize a disputed point and then dismisses the Bible on the disputed topic? It happens on a regular basis.

Read more: "'Judge Not!' Impossible."
He appeals to “render unto Caesar” and “love your neighbor as yourself” in an attempt to silence opposition to same-sex marriage while ignoring passages that condemn same-sex marriage, all of which come from the same Bible!
First, we don't live under Caesar, although it seems we are moving in that direction. We live under the Constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state where we reside. Inn principle, these are our “Caesars.” Elected officials and judges also live under these governing documents they took an oath to uphold.
Second, neither the United States Constitution nor the Kentucky Constitution supports same-sex marriage. The Kentucky Constitution specifically forbids it; therefore, Kim Davis was rendering to the existing authorities as per Matthew 22:21: “render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and to God the things that are Gods.” I suspect that Kim Davis, in addition to keeping the oath she took to her state’s “Caesar,” believes she was also rendering “to God the things that are God’s.”

Third, as to the First Amendment, it states that "Congress shall make no law. . ." The First Amendment was designed to keep the national law-making body (Congress) from passing a national law that would (1) establish a national religion and (2) prohibit the free exercise of religion as well as guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, and assembly as well as give all of us the right to “petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Fourth, Congress did not make a law declaring that the states are required to acknowledge same-sex marriage, and that's the issue in this controversy. Neither the Executive nor Judicial branches can make law. In addition, Kentucky has not changed its constitution on the same-sex marriage provision. It’s still the law in Kentucky.

Fifth, the commandment to "love your neighbor as yourself" is originally found in Leviticus 19:18. Jesus and the other New Testament writers are quoting the Old Testament. The passage is sandwiched between Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, two specific passages that prohibit same-sex sexuality, and by logical extension, same-sex marriage. This means that a person can love his neighbor and still be against same-sex sexuality.
I can love my neighbor even when he or she steals, but that does not mean I can ignore the commandment “You shall not steal” (Ex. 20:15; Lev. 19:11). Loving one’s neighbor does not cancel the demands of the law for my neighbor. Consider what the apostle Paul writes:

He who steals must steal no longer; but rather he must labor, performing with his own hands what is good, so that he will have something to share with one who has need (Eph. 4:28).

Loving one’s neighbor means not ignoring a sin but finding a righteous remedy.
There were people in the Corinthian church who engaged in same-sex sexuality and other sexual sins (1 Cor. 5:1-2; Lev. 18:8; Deut. 22:30; 27:20). They were loved and restored based on the law:

[Y]ou yourselves wrong and defraud. You do this even to your brethren. Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God (1 Cor. 6:8-11).

When all the Bible is considered, it’s easy to see that loving one’s neighbor does not mean abandoning what it says about same-sex sexuality. There is not a contradiction.

Nixon’s Watergate Tapes Lost 18 Minutes – Hillary Clinton’s Emails are Missing 5 Months!

by:Tim Brown 
In a comparison to the infamous Watergate tapes of President Richard M. Nixon, who resigned office as he was facing impeachment, the emails that Hillary Clinton sent and received on an illegal server are missing 5 months' worth of emails.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the announcement of the gaps in the Clinton emails at the Leadership Summit on Washington Corruption and the Transparency Crisis, a day-long event in which many of the brightest in Washington come together to discuss what can be done to deal with the crises affecting the country under the Obama administration.

As a side note, I could tell them for free and it wouldn't take a day to do it. Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama followed by and indictment and formal charges, followed by trial and a public execution for his treasonous activities against the American people. As for Clinton, we could just bypass the impeachment process and indict her and replicate the rest of the line of judicial process. But, I digress.
Fitton said that there are approximately five months worth of emails that were received, which are missing from January 21, 2009, when she took office as the Secretary of State, until March 17, 2009. As for those Clinton sent, Fitton said those emails were from January 21, 2009 to April 12, 2009 and from December 30, 2012 to February 1, 2013.

Clinton had formerly testified, "I have directed that all of my emails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or potentially were federal records be provided to the Department of State."
Fitton claims that with the missing emails, that there is serious doubt that she was telling the truth. He claims, and rightfully so, that Clinton should have turned over every single email, which she apparently did not.
The FBI has taken control of her personal computer, but seriously, can we trust the FBI to do the right thing?
While the State Department claims that it has between 60,000 and 70,000 email correspondence from Clinton printed on paper, they also seem to acknowledge that there may be more. In a statement by the State Department, the department said:

"However, of the sample examined, many of the emails were from Secretary Clinton's personal email account to official Department email accounts of her staff. Emails originating from Secretary Clinton's personal email account would only be captured by Department systems when they came to an official Department email account, i.e., they would be captured only in the email accounts of those recipients. Secretary Clinton's staff no longer work at the Department, and the status of the email accounts of Secretary Clinton's staff (and other Department recipients) is unknown at this time."
Isn't that something? According to Fitton, at least one State Department did not want a written record of his inquiry in the email records of Hillary Clinton, but instead wished to discuss the matter over the phone.

WND reports:
Fitton also said that among the newly obtained documents is an internal appraisal by the State Department that determined none of Clinton's emails should have been excluded for examination as to whether they were personal or government business.

The document, titled "Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's Email Appraisal Report," dated Feb. 9, 2015, concluded: "As the person holding the highest level job in the Department, any email message maintained by or for the immediate use of the secretary of state is 'appropriate for preservation.' This record series cannot be considered personal papers based on the definition of a record in 44 U.S.C. 3301 or Department policy found in 5 FAM 443." 

All of Clinton's emails should have been turned over to the government for review, Fitton said.

That determination by the State Department is significant, because Clinton said she deleted more than 30,000 emails that her own staff had determined were personal.

Fitton emphasized that none of the Clinton emails were made public voluntarily but were disclosed as the result of litigation.

He compared the five-month Clinton email gap to the infamous 18-minute gap in the audio tapes turned over to Watergate investigators by President Nixon. 


And Nixon was the president of the united States who was about to be impeached for his criminal activity. Furthermore, Hillary Clinton was an aide to Jerry Zeifman, the man who served as chief counsel to the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate hearings. Desptie attempts by the left leaning Snopes to claim Zeifman didn't fire Clinton for lying, in 2014, Zeifman claimed just that in 2014.

"Because she was a liar," Zeifman said when asked why he fired her. "She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."

One could just call her Hillary Mihous Nixon.

Clinton is a known liar and deceiver. One need to look no further than her claim of dodging sniper fire or the infamous claim that Benghazi was the result of a YouTube video than to discover that when the woman opens her mouth she is lying. 


Now, it's time to stop beating around the bush and bring some justice upon her head!

Jeb Bush: There’s Not a National Right to Gun Ownership

by:Onan Coca  
This past week Jeb Bush was a guest on The Late Show with new host Stephen Colbert when Bush said something that some conservative voters might find shocking.
When Colbert asked the Governor if the Constitution implied a national right to gun ownership, Bush seemed to indicate that he believed each state had the right to legislate gun ownership as they see fit.
Stephen Colbert: Well, the right to have an individual firearm to protect yourself is a national document, in the Constitution, so shouldn't that also be applied national… 

Jeb Bush: No. Not necessarily…There's a 10th amendment to our country, the Bill of Rights has a 10th amendment that says powers are given to the states to create policy, and the federal government is not the end all and be all. That's an important value for this country, and it's an important federalist system that works quite well. 
  

After the story broke, the Bush campaign contacted the Daily Caller to explain that Bush is a strong supporter of the 2^nd Amendment and that he wasn't trying to argue that states have the right to limit the 2^nd Amendment.
Governor Bush is a strong 2nd amendment advocate and reiterated his view that the federal government should not be passing new gun control laws. He believes in states rights and as Governor of Florida he used the 10th Amendment to expand gun rights with a "Six Pack of Freedom" bill and received an A+ ratings from the NRA. 

While I appreciate what Governor Bush was trying to say in the interview, that the states are supposed to have as much power as the federal government (thus creating our federal system), on this issue, he is wrong. See, that's the whole point of the Bill of Rights. It's an enumeration of our specific rights that the federal government AND the states must respect. If the 2^nd Amendment did not exist… then his 10^th Amendment argument would make sense. 

Colbert wasn't asking if the government could expand gun rights, he was saying that since the right to gun ownership is nationally mandated so too should gun laws be nationally mandated.
While Jeb tries to use a states-right argument here, he should have simply turned Colbert's argument back on itself. Because the Constitution mandates the right to gun ownership, this means that the federal government (and the state governments) have no right legislating against gun ownership. If we can't trust Jeb to counter a simple and easily refuted attack on the 2^nd Amendment, how can we trust him with more complex issues?
Source
 

President Obama Orders Behavioral Experiments On American Public

 

oped: Smacks of the old classic movies:

Add a little soylent green and here we have the Obama administration: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUslj86R2xo



And that leaves only one thing to do...'Run Dude Run':  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USADM5Gk9Gs

Beyond amazing……………
President Obama announced a new executive order on Tuesday which authorizes federal agencies to conduct behavioral experiments on U.S. citizens in order to advance government initiatives.
“A growing body of evidence demonstrates that behavioral science insights — research findings from fields such as behavioral economics and psychology about how people make decisions and act on them — can be used to design government policies to better serve the American people,” reads the executive order, released on Tuesday.
The new program is the end result of a policy proposal the White House floated in 2013 entitled “Strengthening Federal Capacity for Behavioral Insights.”
According to a document released by the White House at that time, the program was modeled on one implemented in the U.K. in 2010. That initiative created a Behavioral Insights Teams, which used “iterative experimentation” to test “interventions that will further advance priorities of the British government.”

The initiative draws on research from University of Chicago economist Richard Thaler and Harvard law school professor Cass Sunstein, who was also dubbed Obama’s regulatory czar. The two behavioral scientists argued in their 2008 book “Nudge” that government policies can be designed in a way that “nudges” citizens towards certain behaviors and choices.
The desired choices almost always advance the goals of the federal government, though they are often couched as ways to cut overall program spending.

Continue Reading on dailycaller.com

Illegal Alien Slaughters Three Adults, Unborn Child, Leaving Behind ‘Almost Unimaginable’ Crime Scene

 After crossing over the border in Texas, but no “criminals” are coming over….according to the Obama administration!
Check it out:

Via The Blaze:

An illegal immigrant in Lee County, Florida, allegedly slaughtered three people and an unborn child in a shocking act of violence that left behind a crime scene that was “almost unimaginable,” police said.
The suspect, Brian Omar Hyde, has been charged in the killings of Dorla Pitts, 37, her 17-year-old daughter Starlette Pitts and 19-year-old Michael Kelly, Jr., WBBH-TV reported. Police only said the victims were hit several times with some type of sharp object.
Hyde reportedly crossed the southern border into the U.S. earlier this year. Police said he had blood on his clothes at the time of his arrest.
Keep reading…

“Tell the Truth!” 2016 CNN will host the second GOP presidential debate

Dear MRC Advocate,

The media are already doing everything in their power to determine the outcome of the 2016 elections. They are covering up President Obama’s failures, scandals and abuses of power, grossly underreporting the ongoing email scandal, and demonizing conservative ideals.

The Media Research Center is fighting back by implementing our groundbreaking “Tell the Truth!” 2016 campaign: a massive effort to prevent the media from influencing how Americans vote by making the media’s left-wing agenda a major national issue.

Tomorrow night, CNN will host the second GOP presidential debate during which, MRC will amplify the issue of liberal media bias by tweeting under the hashtag #TTT16.  

If you are active on Twitter, we need you, our most active and loyal soldiers in the war against the leftist press, to join us by logging on to Twitter and tweeting or retweeting our tweets under the hashtag #TTT16. If you’re not on Twitter, please go to http://www.tellthetruth2016.org to see how you can help us expose the media’s attempts to rig the 2016 elections.

The MRC is the only organization standing in their way. Join us tomorrow night on Twitter under the #TTT16 banner as we hold the media accountable and reach millions of Americans with the truth about liberal media bias.

As always, thank you for your support.

The MRC Action Team

Watch: U.S. Forces Discovered ISIS’ Weapons Stash. Then The Real Fun Began…

oped: Attention  Ayatollah Khamenei enjoy your diatribes while you can...Barry Barack Obama is akin to Jimmy Carter 1979...when he leaves office in 2017 all I can say is you can run but you can't hide... you are being tracked...and when the time comes you will be the first to go...and your elite guard will scatter like cockroaches when the bright light comes on! Hello we love 4th of July fireworks in the good ol' USA and we share! 
Oh and your minions in  ISIS are getting a taste of reality it will continue to build as 2015 goes into 2016 then the end will come  in 2017!



by:Jack Davis
American-led forces lit up the Iraqi sky like the Fourth of July during attacks on an Islamic State weapons cache in Ramadi, a key city 70 miles west of Baghdad.
Video of the attack shows an initial explosion as American jets hit the target, a stadium, then massive secondary explosions as the contents of the weapons ISIS had stored in the stadium ignite and turn the night bright. U.S. Central Command reported that the stadium held “homemade explosives, weapons and ammunition as well as VBIED (Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device) components.” 

https://youtu.be/Z9VNhz-i7VY



ISIS “used the stadium as a base of operations to control fighters across the Ramadi region, and as a central node for lethal aid funneled down the Euphrates River Valley,” said a statement from U.S. Central Command.
Destroying the massive weapons depot will “significantly disrupt” the ability of ISIS ” to conduct operations and resupply their fighters in Ramadi.”
The strikes were conducted on Tuesday in coordination with the Iraqi government as part of a strategy of tightening the noose around ISIS fighters, the Combined Joint Task Force said in a statement.

“Destroying this facility enables Iraqi security forces activities in and around Ramadi while degrading (ISIS) command and c7ontrol capability throughout the area,” said Army Col. Michael Indovina, a CJTF spokesman, also announcing that the strike in Ramadi came amid 17 other strikes against targets in Iraq and Syria.
ISIS seized Ramadi on May 17. Iraqi troops, backed by Shi’ite militias, Sunni tribal fighters and U.S.-led coalition air strikes, have been trying to encircle Islamic State militants in Ramadi before trying to retake the city, the Pentagon said last month. On Thursday, the Iraqi government was reporting that Iraqi forces had begun re-taking areas near the city.



h/t: Business Insider

V.A. Shrink Admits He Gets a $3K Bonus Per Vet for Seizing Their Guns

[Lobotomy anyone?
Bear with me...just a little story I want to share with y'all about shrinks and the VA
Ok don't get me started on psychiatrists especially in the VA...never mind get me started...
Ok I served in the military 1964-1968 US Army Cav...when I got out I went to work for the city of Los Angeles 1969...worked my way up to LAPD 1971~1974  decided I really liked law enforcement and so  desired to move up to the federal level...so I took a cut in pay and took a entrance level police officer position with the VA to get my proverbial foot in the door. 

I was a little concerned when I accepted the position as the policy of the VA was no firearms allowed for police officers nor batons [as dictated by the VA psychiatrists who seem to run the show within the VA ...just pepper spray was allowed...I said ok I can deal with that...ha, was I wrong!  

My first encounter was with a lobotomy patient who was being treated for bi polar disorder...he was placed in the VA psychiatric ward for previous violence and rape [in the military]...well he escaped and ran around town off post trying to find himself I guess...when he returned to the VA facility late at night I confronted him...he was a giant like 6'4" 290 lbs to my 5'7" 150lbs...as he walked toward me I ordered him to stop...he just smiled and kept coming...I thought oh shit now what...just me and pepper spray between us..so I drew and fired point blank range ...*yikes* no effect whatsoever...I thought ok I am going to bite the dust on this one...then he started to laugh...so my survival skills said go with it...so I laughed then said here take my pepper spray your turn...he laughed then put his arm on my shoulder and said take me to my room...I'm sleepy and tired...I said ok...and took him ...Thank God I said, it worked...lol   

Now here is where it started going down hill...my second encounter with a bi-polar patient was a call to ER when a patient had slashed two doctors and was holding a scapel...blood all over the ER...I remembered the encounter with the gentle giant and thought hell no I am not going to get slashed...so I grabbed a chair and pinned the patient to the wall...knocked the scapel out of hand and dropped him with a bar arm maneuver causing loss of conscience...I was shocked when the doctors reprimanded me for what they said was excessive force! 

Ok third encounter with a bi-polar patient...called to the the psychiatric ward for a patient who had a knife and had stabbed a nurse...so I did the same maneuver lacking adequate defense, a gun...so I did the chair and bar arm maneuver once again...then drug the patient to the padded room...Once again I was reprimanded by the Doctors...I was in my sixth month with the Va and said screw this...the doctors are nuttier than the patients...they want ya to save them then reprimand ya for doing so! 

I applied for and got a job with USCS working the Mexican Border as a patrol officer...hella fun and a rewarding job...real law enforcement! 

See: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2301/do-dentists-have-the-highest-suicide-rate
And just for the record..psychiatrists and dentists have the highest suicide rate among professions...makes sense to me after my experience working with them...they are nuttier then the inmates they treat or is that mistreat? You be the judge ! Hope ya enjoyed my little story...now on to the article:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
via: ClashDaily
 

In an hour long interview with George Hemminger, and a NY psychiatrist reveals shocking and detailed information of a seemingly insidious, deliberate and concerted effort by governmental auspices to confiscate firearms from veterans via psychiatric evaluations.
(Update Note: April 13, 2013 – We just enabled likes, dislikes and other settings on this video. Apologies as we’re technically working out the details. Also, we may have inadvertently left out or inserted repeated video and audio, that would be our technical mistake if there’s any looping.)
The psychiatrist’s voice has been altered to protect his anonymity. We apologize if you experience any difficulties hearing individual words or understanding all context.
It is up to each individual to listen carefully, believe or not believe and to draw their own conclusions.
PLEASE NOTE: Under no circumstances should anyone avoid seeking proper medical and psychiatric care from their personal physicians. Seek proper medical care from licensed medical care professionals for any and all health issues and concerns. Any and all content presented herein is strictly for educational, entertainment and/or informational purposes and is provided as a courtesy, only.

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/04/v-a-shrink-admits-he-gets-a-3k-bonus-per-vet-for-seizing-their-guns/