Saturday, February 14, 2015

Donald Trump: MSM Investigation Into Scott Walker’s College A ‘Double Standard’

Donald Trump speaks to Breitbart News aboard his personal jet inn Myrtle Beach on Jan. 19, 2015.
by Matthew Boyle 

Real estate magnate and reality television star Donald Trump, a potential 2016 GOP presidential candidate, tells Breitbart News it’s a “double standard” for the Washington Post to spend as much time and effort as it did investigating Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s college days, when reporters haven’t put much effort into investigating President Barack Obama’s background.
“Why didn’t they send a reporter over to Occidental and to Columbia and to the various Obama schools?” Trump said in a phone interview. “There’s never been a reporter over there. Nobody’s ever found anything. There’s no records available. Why didn’t send a reporter over to talk to the people from the schools he went to? It seems like a terrible double standard.”
When asked about how, six years deep now into the Obama administration, the president has been able to keep his college transcripts and records hidden from the American people, Trump said it’s largely because Obama spent millions in legal fees aiming to keep them hidden.

“They have nothing. They have nothing,” Trump said. “They don’t even have any records at all. They have no record of names. They have no record he went there. And of course the president spent $3.2 million to make sure they don’t have any records.”
In a story before the 2012 election, the Washington Times’ Dave Boyer wrote that, “most presidents’ academic records are made public by the time they reach the highest office in the land, either with their consent or by someone else digging them up.”
“There’s no reason why people shouldn’t know,” Stephen Hess, a senior fellow at the liberal Brookings Institution, told the Times then, imploring Obama to be transparent. “At this point, it’s pretty moot — perhaps amusing if it turned out that he didn’t do very well.”
Boyer wrote that, “whenever Team Obama is asked about the president’s college performance, officials dodge the question, obviously with Mr. Obama’s blessing.”
Specifically, the way Obama dodges the questions, Boyer added, is an orchestrated process.
“The White House press office refers such questions to campaign officials, who in turn refuse to provide any information,” Boyer wrote. “The Obama campaign didn’t respond to questions for this article.”

Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly has also called on the president to publicly release his college records.
“President Obama himself has a very compelling story to tell,” O’Reilly said on the O’Reilly Factor in early 2013.
His father abandoned him. He was raised primarily by his maternal grandparents in Hawaii. He had few resources. Yet, Barack Obama rose up to become the most powerful man in the world, a stunning achievement. How much the system helped Mr. Obama is unknown as his college records have been kept private. We don’t know the extent of affirmative action. We don’t know how much the government subsidized his climb to the top. It would be very helpful to have that information simply to be fair to the president and his vision. There’s no question President Obama believes his success is partly due to government. That goes to his famous line: “You didn’t build that.”
At the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 2013, 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin remarked about Obama’s hidden background as well—in a joke about gun control efforts via more “background checks” for gun purchasers.
“Background checks?” Palin said on the stage. “Yeah, I guess to learn more about a person’s thinking and associations and intentions. More background checks? Dandy idea, Mr. President — should have started with yours.”

Obama’s Henchmen Not Done Attacking Sheriff Arpaio for Questioning Birth Certificate

Funny Obama pictures re-post

When most people decide to run for a political office, they are required to produce the necessary documentation to prove that they are legally eligible to hold the office sought after. However, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, he never properly provided the required documentation. That alone should have told America that Obama thought he was above the law before he ever ran for the White House, but too many Americans were blinded by Obama’s dark skin. 

What the...?! 
A group of concerned citizens in Arizona petitioned the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office to investigate Obama’s eligibility and the very questionable birth certificate, Social Security Number and Selective Service Card. Sheriff Joe Arpaio felt it was his sworn duty to take on the investigation, but rather than use taxpayer money, the investigation was turned over to department’s Cold Case Posse which is mostly volunteer run.

After a fairly thorough and frustrating investigation, the posse and Arpaio announced that they discovered substantial evidence to show that all three documents presented by the White House were forgeries and that whoever was involved in producing and promoting them were guilty of fraud.

Once Obama learned of the investigation, he sent his pit bull, Eric Holder, to attack Arpaio and try to run him out of office. Holder’s Justice Department brought bogus racial profiling charges against Arpaio and his department for targeting Hispanics. Arpaio countered by telling the feds that close to 90% of the crimes his department handled involved illegal drug and human trafficking and that it was Hispanics committing the crimes. If he didn’t look at and target these Hispanics, he would be failing in his job, but that wasn’t acceptable to Holder who took Arpaio to court before a liberal judge. Arpaio was found guilty of racial profiling and told that his department was no longer allowed to enforced federal immigration laws. The judge then ordered that a federally appointed monitor would watch everything the sheriff’s department did to make sure they weren’t targeting Hispanics or enforcing the federal immigration laws. It didn’t matter that such a large percentage of the crimes the sheriff’s department handled were committed by Hispanics. 

Now, US District Judge G. Murray Snow has ordered a civil contempt hearing against Arpaio and his department for:
- Evidence that deputies failed to abide by Snow's preliminary injunction to stop enforcing federal immigration law. Arpaio and several top aides must show why they should not be held in contempt.
- Evidence that sheriff's officials did not disclose all required information in pre-trial proceedings, including deputies' audio-recording devices.
- Why the office failed to follow oral orders given in May.

Now, US District Judge G. Murray Snow has ordered a civil contempt hearing against Arpaio and his department for:
- Evidence that deputies failed to abide by Snow's preliminary injunction to stop enforcing federal immigration law. Arpaio and several top aides must show why they should not be held in contempt.
- Evidence that sheriff's officials did not disclose all required information in pre-trial proceedings, including deputies' audio-recording devices.
- Why the office failed to follow oral orders given in May.
The residents of Maricopa County re-elected Arpaio to keep his position as the sheriff of Arizona’s most populous county of 4 million people. Many of the county residents are asking how Arpaio is supposed to do his job if he can’t enforce immigration laws.
I lived in Maricopa County for over 36 years and still have family and friends there and they tell me that large sections of the county have become overrun with illegal Hispanics. My old neighborhood that was a very safe and family friendly section of Mesa is now mostly all Hispanic. Many of the homes house 20-30 illegals and the crime rate in that area has skyrocketed. It is no longer a family friendly or safe place to be. My wife and I used to take walks in the evening, but nowadays, no one goes out night unless you’re looking for drugs or want to be the victim of a robbery or violence.
New NRA Head Not Fan Of ‘Fake President’ Obama, Thinks Civil War ...

Several weeks ago, an illegal shot and killed a convenience store clerk only a mile from where I used to live. The illegal man had been previously arrested several years ago and initially marked for deportation, but was allowed to go free anyway. Now a family mourns the death of their loved one because federal immigration laws are not enforced, thanks to Obama. I said it then and I’ll keep saying it that Obama should be held liable for the crimes committed by illegals that he allows to stay in the country.
If local police and the sheriff’s department were allowed to do their jobs and enforce federal immigration laws, the crime rates in Maricopa County could be drastically reduced, but that’s not important to Obama and his henchmen. They don’t care that countless American citizens are losing their lives and being driven from their homes and communities by the flood of illegals and illegal drugs. All they care about is attacking one man who had the integrity to stand up and say that Obama is not legally eligible to occupy the White House. And Obama will continue to attack Arpaio until he runs him out of office.

Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is Agenda/Motto:  
Who knew? I was born in California yet I came from some place else?

Officials Testify to Congress that Obama’s Amnesty to Result in Illegals Voting Illegally

Rating: 10.0/ 10 (3 votes cast)

Ever since Barack Obama started violating federal immigration laws, I wrote that his underlying intentions were to keep illegals in the US so that they could illegally vote for Democrats in local, state and national elections.

In many states, all they have to do to register to vote is obtain a valid driver’s license and then simply lie about being a US citizen. After all, if they have no problem entering OUR country illegally, then lying about being a US citizen is nothing to them.
Just months prior to the 2012 elections, Obama announced his illegal executive action known as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). This program allows the children of illegals that were brought illegally to the US prior to their 16th birthday and before June 2007, to remain here in the US without facing the threat of deportation. At the time, the federal government estimated that it would allow approximately 800,000 illegals to remain in the US.

During the 2012 elections, there were a number of reports of illegals having registered and voted in the elections. A number of those granted amnesty against deportation under DACA were of legal voting age by 2012 and undoubtedly some of them did vote illegally.
This is what prompted some states like Arizona to deny driver’s licenses to illegals because they knew the dangerous and expensive ramifications of allowing them to obtain the licenses. However, a liberal judge ruled on agenda rather than law and declared the Arizona law to be unconstitutional. It still galls me how one agenda driven judge can overturn the legal process taken by a state legislative body, let alone by the will of the majority of the people.
Now Obama wants to defer deportation for millions more illegals. The White House puts the number around 5 million, but others say that number is like the White House unemployment rate, grossly under reported. They put the real number of illegals at close to 20 million, especially after Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson has expanded the parameters of Obama’s illegal delayed deportation memo.
Funny Obama pictures re-post
After Obama made his announcement last November, just after the 2014 midterm elections had concluded, I again declared that the motive behind Obama’s actions was to allow millions of illegals to cast illegal votes for Democrats. Just looking at the recent midterm elections, 200,000 to 500,000 illegal votes in many states would have allowed the Democrats to sweep the elections and not only retain control of the Senate but regain control of the House. With Jeh Johnson’s expansion, 15 million to 20 million illegal votes in 2016 could insure a victory for Hillary Clinton or any other Democrat running for the Oval Office. 

I’ve received comments from liberal tyrant Democrats saying that there is no basis for my claims and that I’m flat wrong. Well, I’m not the only one sounding the illegal voting alarm as the Ohio and Kansas Secretaries of State just testified before a congressional hearing in Washington DC that Obama’s delayed deportation program will open the doors for illegals to vote illegally. 

They testified that current methods of registration make it easy for illegals to register and vote regardless of facing legal penalties if they are caught. They cited registration methods that include being asked when obtaining a driver’s license and the registration drives that take place during election years. Both state officials testified that all an illegal has to do is just lie about their citizen and they are registered to vote.
Kris W. Kobach, Kansas Secretary of State told the congressional hearing:
“It’s a guarantee it will happen.”
It didn’t take Democrats any time to instantly make false accusations against Republicans. Eleanor Holmes Norton, DC non-voting member of Congress, stated:
“The president’s executive order gives immigrants the right to stay — immigrants who have been here for years, immigrants who have been working hard and whose labor we have needed. The Republicans may want to go down in history as the party who tried once again 100 years later to nullify the right to vote. Well, I am here to say they shall not succeed.”
Have you ever asked yourself why Democrats work so hard to keep from making sure that our elections are kept legal? They are against voter ID and every proposed method of verifying a person’s right to vote. The only answer possible is that they want and need the millions of potential illegal votes because they are realizing that the majority of Americans are sick and tired of the socialistic and tyrannical policies of the Democrats. If they can’t win fairly and legally, they have to turn to alternative methods, of which some of them have already been caught doing.

Obama Knew Where Hostages Were Months Ago and Did Nothing ...

The UK Daily Mail confirmed that Obama and his administration were given actionable intelligence as to the whereabouts of not only the beheaded Americans James Foley and Steve Sotloff, but also American aid worker Kayla Mueller, quite some time ago. 

It has come to light that British intelligence knew in June of 2014 the locations of where ISIS was holding hostages. Worse yet, it is been reported that the French also shared information about hostage locations as early as March 2014 -- long before the beheadings.
The Daily Mail reports that "The United Kingdom gave the Obama administration intelligence in June 2014 about where in Syria the ISIS terror army was holding its American captives, but the White House dithered and missed its opportunity to rescue them."

The report asserts that both "U.S. and British officials said the administration sat on the information for nearly a month before launching a military raid…" Yet, by waiting until July to finally mount a rescue, they lost their window of opportunity, and by then, as we know, the hostages had been moved.
The Daily Beast added that an unnamed American official said Obama's people simply refused to launch or even plan a rescue from intelligence gathered by another government. The official said, "The issue was that they didn't trust it, and they wanted to develop and mature the intelligence, because it wasn't our own. They got the information. They just didn't trust it. And they did sit on it, there's no doubt about that."
They didn't trust it? They didn't trust intelligence gathered by our closest and most trusted ally and friend? Are you kidding?
Sadly, this official isn't kidding. What must the families of those three dead Americans think when they hear of Obama's dithering?

But this really isn't anything new and this revelation should come as no surprise to any of us. In 2013 the UKTelegraph reported that Professor Vali Nasr wrote a book entitled The Indispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat.
He wrote:
The president had a truly disturbing habit funneling major foreign policy decisions through a small cabal of relatively inexperienced White House advisers whose turf was strictly politics. The goal was to spare the president the risks that necessarily come with playing the leadership role that America claims to play in this region. They want to control everything. 

For any of you who have ever questioned what we mean by Obama “leading from behind,” this is what we mean.
In 2009, Ambassador John Bolton had determined that Obama may be the second coming of "Ethelred the Unready, the turn of the first millennium Anglo-Saxon king whose reputation for indecisiveness and his successful paying of Danegeld -- literally, ‘Danish tax’ -- to buy off Viking Raiders made him histories paradigmatic weak leader."

In 2012, retired General Jack Keane told Mike Huckabee on Fox News that thanks to the White House dithering, we almost lost bin Laden. He said "We actually had the target the summer before execution -- in other words we had the target the summer of 2010, and it took until the following May to execute the mission."
He added, "My sources tell me that the White House was trying to verify that the target was actually there… They actually wanted a photo, they wanted to see him, that he was really there, and without that there was a lot of delay and procrastination about it because they wanted verification."
You Want it Fixed or Not?
Prof. Nasr said that "Barack Obama is a dithering president who's controlling tendencies and extreme risk aversion attitude to foreign policy has damaged U.S. interest in the Middle East…"
With the Middle East on fire, and as many threats as there are in the world today, this is what we in America get to look forward to -- almost two more years of dithering and risk aversion.
Just imagine how our allies feel!

Islamic State Just Given Key to U.S. Back Door

To think that our porous border weren’t enough to get terrorists into our country.
Check it out:
A senior FBI official has admitted the United States is finding it virtually impossible to screen out terrorists that could be hiding among the thousands of Syrian “refugees” heading soon to American cities.
The U.S. simply does not have the resources to stop Islamic radicals in Syria from slipping into the country through the State Department’s refugee-resettlement program, said Michael Steinbach, deputy assistant director of the FBI’s counter terrorism unit.

Separating legitimate refugees from terrorists was difficult enough in Iraq, where the U.S. had a large occupation force. Even then, the U.S. government’s vetting process missed “dozens” of Iraqi jihadists who slipped into the country posing as refugees and took up residence in Kentucky, according to a November 2013 ABC News report.
In Syria, the challenges are much greater. That’s why Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, held hearings this week on the process of vetting refugees and sent a letter to the White House voicing the committee’s “serious national security concerns.”
“We learned our lessons with the Iraqi refugee population. We put in place a USIK-wide background and vetting process that we found to be effective,” Steinbach told the committee Wednesday.

“The difference is that in Iraq we were there on the ground collecting (information), so we had databases to use,” he added. “The concern is that in Syria, the lack of our footprint on the ground in Syria, the databases won’t have the information we need. So it’s not that we have a lack of a process, it’s that there is a lack the information.” 

Maxine Waters Calls Americans Against Sharia Law BIGOTS

Maxine Waters: Americans are Bigots for Opposing Sharia Law!!   

Maxine Waters: Another Slip of the Tongue?
[Akin to Barry Barack Hussein Obama]

So much for the oath Maxine Waters swore to protect. The Qur’an states 1: “Fight Those Who Do Not Believe” (Surah 9:29) fighting people that don’t believe. Don’t make Allies with Jews and Christians 5:51.
There’s no place in our Constitution that talks about Allah. This is America we believe in freedom, liberty and human rights. If you want to practice Sharia Law, Go back to where you came from. This is a direct conflict with our first amendment rights in the US Consistution.
Sharia law and U.S. law conflict in numerous ways, including on issues of freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and equality of rights for women. Allowing Sharia Law to be a determining factor in U.S. courtrooms threatens those rights for all of us.

Post Continues on

Friday, February 13, 2015

In Support of Israel, American Bikers Make a Stand for Netanyahu

US israel

Also on their website, the Club states they are comprised of “active military, veterans and civilians that believe the United States can still be saved from the shackles of tyranny that currently plagues this great nation.”
Sounds like my kind of people! I’m going! Are you?
As we’ve witnessed in the recent past, patriot bikers have been showing up for various events where Islamists have been flexing their political clout in America. The battle is real between good and evil, between Islam and the civilized world, this includes Israel as she is at the center of this struggle.
In case you need a quick reminder, we are witnessing anti-semitism at levels that we have never experienced on our soil before.
Here is a little taste of what is happening in the nation currently.

[God says to Israel] “I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.” Genesis 12:3

After Liberal Atheist Murders Three Muslim Students who were Members of Anti-Semitic, Muslim Brotherhood front Group...

President of Turkey Demands Obama Condemn Shooter for Committing Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes… and Obama Listens 

mexico s president enrique pena nieto r talks with turkey s president


Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was not satisfied with what he perceived to be a lack of outrage on the part of Barack Obama over the shooting deaths of three Muslim students in Chapel Hill this week. While in Mexico, Erdogan expressed disgust over Obama’s failure to adequately address the issue as an anti-Muslim hate crime. Indications are that if this was a hate crime, it was committed by an angry liberal atheist against three members of a racist, anti-semitic Muslim Brotherhood front group.
Nonetheless, it didn’t take long for Obama to jump, after Erdogan told him how high he wanted him to.

First, Erdogan’s comments on Thursday:
Speaking alongside Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto in Mexico City Thursday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said the silence of President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and Secretary of State John Kerry was “telling.”
“If you stay silent when faced with an incident like this and don’t make a statement, the world will stay silent toward you,” Erdogan said, condemning Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, who was arrested for the crimes. “I ask Mr. Obama, where are you, Mr. President?
Hicks has been charged with the murder of Deah Barakat, 23, a University of North Carolina dental student, his wife Yusor Mohammad Abu-Salha, 21, and her sister, Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19, a student at North Carolina State University. Local police say the shooting was a result of a parking dispute. The FBI is looking into whether Hicks killed them because they were Muslims (the women wore headscarves), which is a hate crime. Hicks, who turned himself in, is a self-proclaimed atheist who expressed anti-religious views on his Facebook page.

By Friday, Obama was acquiescing to Erdogan’s demands:
“No one in the United States of America should ever be targeted because of who they are, what they look like, or how they worship,” Obama said. He referred to the “overwhelming presence at the funeral” that reminded him, even as critics called on him to condemn the attacks as representative of anti-Muslim bigotry, that “we are all an American family.”
Craig Stephen Hicks, a 46-year-old Chapel Hill resident, allegedly shot and killed Deah Shaddy Barakat, 23, his new wife Yusor Mohammad, 21, and his wife’s sister Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19, Tuesday night. He turned himself in to local police and has since been charged with three counts of first-degree murder.
Aside from the fact that all of the individuals involved were American citizens, the evidence to this point indicates that the murders had nothing to do with anti-Muslim bigotry. Instead, they had to do with the shooter’s obsession with being able to park where he wanted.

At this point, the profile of the shooter is one of a maniacal, pro-gay marriage, left-wing atheist who was under the delusion that he had his own parking space at his apartment complex when he did not.
The profiles of the three Muslim students is that all three belonged to the North Carolina State University’s chapter of the Muslim Students Association (MSA), which is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, as reported.
The larger issue here, however, is that Obama appears to be granting Erdogan access to his teleprompter.

Rubio: Obama’s War Proposal Against Islamic State Is Weak

Obama Embracing Role of Dictator Once Again » Obama dictator
[Between the words: 'Carry on my brothers in Islam...long live our Caliphate..I've got your 6...Congress is in my back pocket and I will fire all generals/admirals who oppose me and you' ] 

to politifake stop obama stop obama s second

Rachel Stoltzfoos 

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio commended President Obama for coming to Congress with a request for limited authorization to fight ISIS, but said Thursday he needs every available power.
“I think it should be a pretty straight forward authorization,” Rubio said on the Senate floor. “It should say, ‘We authorize the president of the United States to destroy ISIL, to defeat them militarily.”

"I have very serious concerns and very serious reservations about our current strategy when it comes to ISIS,” he added. “I’m not sure it’s sufficient. I think it’s a strategy that will contain them, but it will not defeat them.”
Obama’s war proposal to fight ISIS has met with bipartisan criticism. Democrats worry the AUMF gives the president too much power, and could lead the country into another drawn out war. But Republicans, such as Rubio, say the AUMF doesn’t give the president enough power.
“We thank him for submitting one, but now it’s the job of the senate to write one of its own, and it may reflect many of the things the president wants,” Rubio added. “But what I believe it should reflect more than anything else is that we authorize him to defeat ISIS no matter what it takes, and no matter how long it takes.”

The war proposal would limit the president’s power in an unprecedented way, banning “enduring offensive ground combat operations” and restricting the use of power to three years.
Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch called the proposal “utterly stupid.”
“And here we have the president coming up with this — I think it’s utterly stupid — proposal,” Hatch said in a radio interview reported by The Hill. “And he’s binding the next president also with really stupid language.”
“Any president worth his or her salt is going to ask for as much authority as they can get, so at least the ISIS people know that he has the authority to come in on them anyway he wants to.”
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi admitted her members aren’t excited about the proposal, and said it will be “hard” to pass any version of an AUMF.
“I don’t ever remember a president sending legislation to the Congress to limit his power as commander in chief, so I think the administration has to be commended for that,” she said. “And we have to be commended for exercising our independent judgment … This is a very personal decision that people have to make.”

Attention, San Fran Nan: Government dependency kills jobs

Attention, San Fran Nan: Government dependency kills jobs
by: Michelle Malkin
Being a San Francisco liberal means never having to say you’re sorry. Or wrong. Take Nancy Pelosi, please.
Five years ago, California’s genius Bay Area Democrat declared that government unemployment checks generate job growth. Yes, really. “Let me say about unemployment insurance,” she told reporters, “this is one of the biggest stimuluses (sic) to our economy. Economists will tell you, this money is spent quickly. It injects demand into the economy and is job creating.” 

She babbled on: “It creates jobs faster than almost any other initiative you can name, because, again, it is money that is needed for families to survive, and it is spent. So it has a double benefit. It helps those who’ve lost their jobs, but it also is a job creator.”
What Crazy-Cakes Pelosi failed to mention, however, is the long-established conclusion of labor economists from all parts of the political spectrum that extending unemployment insurance benefits prolongs unemployment. While she heralded the short-term effects on consumer spending, she ignored the blindingly obvious: Outside the land of progressive make-believe, workers respond to incentives. Over the long term, subsidizing joblessness creates more of it. 

I bring this all up because a new paper from the venerable, nonpartisan National Bureau of Economic Research concludes that the recent job gains Pelosi and the Democrats are now crowing about may be due to the very policy they fought so hard against: ending extended unemployment benefits.
“We find that a 1 percent drop in benefit duration leads to a statistically significant increase of employment by 0.0161 log points,” the NBER economists reported. In practical terms, it means that “1.8 million additional jobs were created in 2014 due to the benefit cut.” Take note: “Almost 1 million of these jobs were filled by workers from out of the labor force who would not have participated in the labor market had benefit extensions been reauthorized.” 

The jobs bump coincided with the expiration of the 99-week UI benefits extension passed as part of the Obama stimulus package. Remember: Laid-off workers were already collecting up to 79 weeks of unemployment in half of the states before the last extension. Democrats were pushing for yet another 13-week extension that would have cost tens of billions of dollars more. The cost of the joint federal-state program is borne by employers who pay state and federal taxes on a portion of wages paid to each employee in a calendar year.
Remarkably, the NBER analysis attributed “61 percent of the aggregate employment growth in 2014″ to the congressional cutoff in unemployment benefits at the end of 2013. Here’s the NBER team’s bottom line for Pelosi and her fellow unemployment benefits cheerleaders: “The findings in this paper imply that the negative effects of unemployment benefit extensions on employment far outweigh the potential stimulative effects often ascribed to this policy.” 

This vindication comes after a hyperbolic campaign by Democrats accusing Republicans of “meanness” and “obstruction” for opposing “temporary” unemployment benefits that have become enshrined permanently.
But it’s not just partisan hacks in Washington who’ve so falsely demonized those opposed to endless unemployment checks as a “job creation” vehicle. During the contentious debate over extending UI checks as part of the Obama stimulus in 2009, I argued on an ABC “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” panel, “If you put enough government cheese in front of people, they are just going to keep eating it.” Atlanta Journal-Constitution columnist Cynthia Tucker took offense, mischaracterizing standard economic arguments for moral judgment. “Does the right really believe the unemployed are lazy?” she wailed. 

The left-leaning journalism outfit at PolitiFact jumped on board, rating my 100 percent-true reference to decades of labor economics literature on UI’s impact on joblessness “half-true.” And the George Soros-funded hitmen of Media Matters called me and several other conservatives “reality”-deniers for stating the bloody obvious about UI’s warped incentives — even though their favorite “progressive” economist Paul Krugman acknowledged that “everyone agrees that really generous unemployment benefits, by reducing the incentive to seek jobs, can raise the NAIRU” (the minimum rate of unemployment consistent with a stable inflation rate).
The politicians posing as economy-healers and the political operatives posing as journalists will no doubt find clever ways to slice, dice and explain away the latest NBER findings. But this simple truth endures: Government dependency doesn’t “create” jobs. It kills them. 

Thursday, February 12, 2015

IT’S ALL POLITICS: Obama’s Resolution Has Nothing To Do With Defeating ISIS

As usual, Obama’s decisions have nothing to do with what they should actually be about.
In a televised statement from the Roosevelt Room of the West Wing, President Obama announced he had sent Congress a draft resolution authorizing the use of force against the Islamic State. “We are strongest as a nation,” he said, “when the president and Congress work together.”
But make no mistake: This resolution has nothing to do with defeating the Islamic State — or respecting the constitutional role accorded Congress in war.
To the contrary, it’s yet another public declaration of limits President Obama seeks to impose on our war-fighting.
Read more: NY Post

JIHAD THIS: How To Get Your Name On A 500lb Bomb

Screen Shot 2015-02-12 at 10.07.10 AM
By Ben Philippi
Have you ever wondered how one goes about getting your name on a bomb? Well, it’s easier than you think: you just need to know a guy.
Doug Giles of posted a photo on his Facebook page of a 500lb precision-guided munition with his name on it. So I called him up and he was good enough to give me the lowdown on how to do this.
Ben: Doug, tell me, what made you decide to get your name on a bomb?
Doug: It was my way of saying, ‘go eff yourself’ to the “religion of peace.” In Christian love of course.
Ben: So how does one go about getting their name on the side of a bomb?
Doug: It’s not what you know, it’s who you know. And I know some death-dealin’ bad-asses in the Air Force.
Ben: What kind of bomb did you get?
Doug: A GBU38 Laser Guided 500 pound. JDAM. Yahtzee!

Ben: Can you choose the kind of bomb that you want?
Doug: No. But I was happy with what I got. Dead sexy pic if you ask me.
Ben: I noticed you only put your name, is this because you didn’t want to include a message? If you had included a message, what would it have been? Please keep in mind space constraints on the bomb.
Doug: The message was the bomb. Boom.
Ben: How do you know what kind of impact it had?
Doug: The pilot who dropped it wiped out four high value terrorist operatives one lonely night on a hilltop in Afghanistan. He has the video.
Ben: Were you ever worried that your bomb might hit the wrong target or heaven forbid, friendly forces?
Doug: No. My warrior friend is precise.
Ben: Do you know when putting names on bombs first start happening? For example, I’ve seen photos of British pilots in WW2 putting messages to Hitler.
Doug: I have no clue, but I think it’s more fun than riding Big Thunder Mountain Railroad at Disneyland.
Ben: If you could put your name on any kind of explosive device to be dropped in The War on Terror, what would it be?
Doug: The final Nuke to rain hell-fire down on ISIS.
Ben: In your mind, what is The War on Terror? What are we fighting?
Doug: We’re fighting implacable Islamists who carry out the dictates of a 7th-century pedophile.
Ben: Do you have a closing message?
Doug: If you think Islam is a ‘Religion Of Peace’ then you are nuttier-than-a-squirrel turd.

PTSD Fiction,fact or something else...?

LTC Moore's full speech:

Ok I'm  going to be blunt here...opinions are like A-holes everyone has I'm going to give you mine...from the perspective of a veteran who was born during WWII and served during the Vn era US Army Cav 1964-1968. I  can only speak from experience during this time era ie: listening to relatives who served during WWII and Korea and my experience serving during the Vn conflict...the rest is based on history prior to WWII dating back to the Revolutionary War forward...for the most part service was voluntary and based on ones desire to serve prior to the draft and now back to voluntary again.

Here is how I see it...if a person was a nut job in civilian life prior to serving...well shit howdy they were a nut job while serving and if they survived they continued to be a nut job after leaving military service... via re-entering civilian life...Just a fact Jack.. NOTE*.this is a very small number within the overall population !

When we take the prior draft vs all voluntary military service into consideration well shit howdy some slip through the proverbial cracks...this also applies to those who serve in Law enforcement in civilian life...a very small percentage of nut cases slip through the cracks visa background checks  as well as psychological examination/testing...and yes I served in local as well as federal LE after serving in the military so I can attest to this via observation!

Now when we debate the so called PTSD syndrome being pushed today as being so prevalent...I say this, I can get behind those who suffered loss of limbs and or traumatic brain damage as being truly suffering from PTSD...however most of these are suicidal... not nut cases who go out and rape,pillage and kill...are you following my drift here? I sure hope so because I also see many are using the PTSD syndrome for welfare benefits...having no loss of limb or traumatic brain injury to justify their medical complaint they were lazy before service,lazy during service and want to continue to be lazy after service...I'm sorry but many millions served in combat and experienced/ witnessed horrific events yet came home and continued their lives as normal productive human beings...the mind is a RESILIENT organ quite capable of adjusting and separating past events and returning to a normal state of mind in a short period of time.  I am by no means a psychiatrist or trained in psychology albeit I did take psychology 101 in college what a easy class and waste of time that was! I can only base my opinion on real time life experience of what I saw and how my friends ,family and associates turned out after serving!

I only have one suggestion for military/law enforcement recruiters /screeners... maybe come up with a better psychological examination for prospective recruits in the future... there is no guarantee, however, maybe it would reduce a few more to the already small number who slip through the proverbial cracks !

Thats my story and humble opinion and I'm sticking to it...have a nice day and life!

Obama State Dept: We’re “Comfortable Doing Business” with Designated Terror Group Muslim Brotherhood

oped: Congress needs to get it's proverbial head out of the sand and grow cajones' or the US Military needs to step up to the plate and remove this traitor from office and restore our Constitutional Republic before it's too late! 
Obama’s ties to Muslim Brotherhood


While Egypt got some sense in their heads nearly two years ago and ousted Mohamed Morsi as president and later dissolved the Muslim Brotherhood as a political party in Egypt and declared them a terrorist group, the Obama administration continues to cover for Islam and do business with America's enemies. In fact, they say they are quite "comfortable" doing business with the known Islamic terrorist group.   
Muslim Brotherhood issues call for jihad 2 days after meeting at the ... 
[Muslim Brotherhood issues call for jihad 2 days after meeting at the WH with Obama]

One day after the brutal murder of a Jordanian pilot by the Islamic State, Barack Obama met with Muslim Brotherhood members at the White House. The press was banned.
Friends, we are not talking about just hosting enemies here. We are talking aiding and abetting America's enemies. That's constitutionally called Treason.
To make matters worse, the Obama State Department lied about the Muslim Brotherhood leaders "organizing and funding" coming from Georgetown University.
According to Adam Kredo at the Washington Free Beacon, Georgetown denied those claims when contacted by WFB.
Of course, the meeting did nothing to help relations with the Egyptian government, who has designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terror group.
Kredo reported what happened when State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki continued to defend the State Department's hosting of the Muslim Brotherhood.

"Unfortunately, I didn't have the accurate information on one small piece. The meeting was set up by the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, a nonprofit. So the visit was not funded, as you know, by us or the U.S. Government, but it was also not funded by Georgetown," Psaki said.

He then went on to report what happened next:
When asked by a reporter "if there's been any rethink in—within the building about the appropriateness of this visit, considering what happened afterwards and the photographs that some of the participants took," Psaki responded, "No."

While at the State Department last week, one member of the delegation, a Brotherhood-aligned judge in Egypt, posed for a picture in which he held up the Islamic group's notorious four-finger Rabia symbol, according to his Facebook page.

Psaki went on to say that the Obama administration remains comfortable entertaining the Brotherhood.

"Are you—is the building comfortable with continuing to do business with this center, this group?" a reporter asked.

"Yes. Yes," Psaki responded. 

Investors Business Daily reported names some of the Muslim Brotherhood leaders in attendance:   

Imam Mohamed Magid, who preaches at a fundamentalist Northern Virginia mosque that has listed a number of trustees and major donors whose offices and homes were raided after 9/11 by federal agents on suspicion of funding terrorists.

Azhar Azeez, president of the Islamic Society of North America, a known radical Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas front group that remains on the Justice Department's list of unindicted terrorist co-conspirators.

Sherman Jackson, who as the King Faisal Chair of Islamic Thought at USC, once gave a lecture at a conference in Toronto that has been described by "Campus Watch" as a "call to battle" between Muslims and the West.

Hoda Hawa (Elshishtawy) national policy analyst for the Muslim Public Affairs Council, which was founded by known members of the Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist movement. The group's former president, Salam al-Marayati, was once kicked off the National Commission on Terrorism after his defense of terrorist acts and the groups who carry them out was revealed. 

IBD went on to cite the Detroit Free Press, who reported, "The White House ordered the Muslim attendees not to talk after the meeting about what Obama said during the discussion. However, some have broken the ground rules and leaked what was discussed."
"Topping the agenda was 'anti-Muslim bigotry' and banning Muslim terrorist profiling by federal law enforcement," the report added. "Participants said they got a sympathetic ear from Obama. The president reportedly entertained the idea of naming Muslim judges to federal courts. Meanwhile, the most pressing Muslim-related issue of our time — violent jihadism — was not discussed."
So, once again, the stealth jihad works in favor of Islam and against the American people. There were no calls for these people to toss out their Korans, which teach to wage war against the infidels and strike the necks of them in the name of Allah. No, they talked about playing the victim to further their agenda against the US.

The Muslim Brotherhood has documented front groups through the United States that are hell bent (literally) on the destruction of the West from within. They have even called for a "long, uncompromising jihad" literally days after meeting with the Obama State Department.
Yet, the Traitor-in-chief is hosting them in our House! And Congress does nothing! Neither do the American people! Why?
Barack Hussein Obama has been outed as a Muslim Brotherhood member and his brother is a financier of the Muslim Brotherhood with tax exempt status. One of his foundations is tied to Islamic terrorism. Furthermore, former Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi received the following from the Obama administration, courtesy of the American taxpayer:

Not only is this criminal using our tax dollars to empower our enemies, he has the audacity to bring them into our House as distinguished guests! Seriously, enough is enough America. We do not need to wait till 2016 to deal with this criminal. Congress must answer to the people for why they are not acting on his activities. If they will not do the job they were elected to do, and it doesn't seem that they are willing to do it, then we must take action. Consequently that action is already underway with many of us as we are beginning to target our representatives and provide the foundation to deal with them lawfully at the state level. Won't you join us?

Ominous Tweet From Matt Drudge About Obama:

“Like He Knows Something Terrible Coming… Very Unsettling”   
oped: I agree something not right about Obama ...either he is possessed or on the verge of a mental breakdown! 
Arguably one of the most influential people in global media, Matt Drudge is known for his breaking stories and connections to Washington politicos. It is said that he often drives the news cycle with over 1 billion monthly readers, many of whom work in politics and media.   

When Drudge says something, people listen, because if there's anyone who might get the heads up about events before they become public it's him. And based on a tweet recently posted to his Twitter account it's quite possible that he knows something we have not yet been made privy to.
On Sunday night President Obama delivered a pre-taped speech to audience members at the Grammy awards. Drudge posted a photo of the President from the speech and called Obama's appearance "greasy." He continued with the following ominous words:
Hoarse, watery eyes. Like he knows something terrible coming. Very unsettling… 

This is the short pre-recorded clip Drudge referenced in his Tweet:   
What do you think? Does Drudge have the inside scoop? Or does he, like many Americans, understand that we are living on borrowed time and all signs are pointing to something terrible coming in the near future?
Perhaps it really is time to prepare for the worst, just in case.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Rick Perry Proves He DOES NOT Understand the 2nd Amendment

Screen Shot 2015-02-09 at 5.15.59 PM
oped: Well Rick sorry but you just lost my support for a  aspiration of running for POTUS...I'm thinking you must have failed Reading Comprehension 101 in college...or you should have gotten a Rx for glasses way back when...The 2nd Amendment is simple and clear...not up for interpretation...either take a crash course in Reading Comprehension 101 or just retire to fishing on the back lakes & streams of rural Texas! 

Rick Perry has decided (based on HIS personal convictions) that people do not deserve Constitutional Carry.
Governor Rick Perry has outed himself on Constitutional Carry and also proved his lack of understanding of the 2nd Amendment by promoting regulations and restrictions on citizens who want to own firearms.
His position is clear from the recent comments he made in the Texas Tribune..

[Perry] said he “prefers concealed handguns for “a more practical reason.”
“I don’t want the bad guys to know if I’m carrying,” he said. “I don’t want to be the first person shot if something’s going down.”
Fine.. thats HIS personal preference. In a free country, he is entitled to his opinion and his personal preference for carrying a firearm.. however… his feelings do not and should not trump our Constitutional rights. 

Perry said he was “not necessarily all that fond of this open carry concept,” adding that those who carry guns ought to be “appropriately backgrounded, appropriately vetted, appropriately trained.”
So… according to Perry, we need to add some amendments to the 2nd Amendment: you have a right to carry IF YOU HAVE BEEN DEEMED APPROPRIATELY TRAINED, AND YOU HAVE A FLAWLESS BACKGROUND..
We have all seen what happens with that slippery slope in places like New York and California where people now have to PROVE they have a need for a firearm and even proof of death threats is not justification to be armed in New York.. (Just ask John Stossel who, was turned down repeatedly for a concealed weapon permit because the state said he did not justify a need even though he produced proof of death threats). 

Perry went on to say this: “We license people to drive on our highways,” he said. “We give them that privilege. The same is true with our concealed handguns.” oped: just another form of taxation!
Governor Perry clearly does not comprehend the 2nd Amendment. The right to bear arms is not a privilege given by the government. Our founding fathers made it clear that the right to defend life is a basic human need that people of this country are born with. The 2nd Amendment is not the a permission slip from the government giving citizens the right to bear arms..It is a statement TO THE GOVERNMENT that the citizens already have this right and YOU, GOVERNMENT, shall not infringe.
Governor Perry just lost my support for any office he ever attempts to hold.
I also believe he just lost support amongst the People of the Gun world for his presidential aspirations.

The good news for Texans is that permitted open carry stands an excellent chance of making it to Governor Abbott’s desk, who’s declared his intention to sign it.

Several Admirals and Generals Accusing Obama of Treason!

The Obama Caliphate?
Article III the Constitution states: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”


Don’t stop there, the list of Obama’s treasonous acts extends almost as long as there are days he has spent tin the Oval Office. There is a LONG list of people accusing him of TREASON! Lieutenant General Thomas Mcinnerney has declared the government is infected with terrorist cells in every branch.  

Thomas G. McInerney (born March 15, 1937) is a retired United States Air Force Lieutenant General. He is a command pilot with more than 4,100 flying hours, including 407 combat missions (243 in O-1s as a forward air controller and 164 in F-4 C’s, D’s and E’s) during the Vietnam War. In addition to his Vietnam Service, the McInerney served overseas in NATOPacific Air Forces and as commander of 11th Air Force in Alaska. Currently, he is a Fox News contributor, and is a member of the Iran Policy Committee

McInerney’s Military Awards and Decorations Include: 


Conservative Tribune continues: It has long been suspected that President Barack Obama has a more than just friendly relationship with the terrorist-affiliated front group Muslim Brotherhood.
In fact, more than just a few sources have made note of how the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated various levels of the U.S. government, including the highest levels of the White House.
Now the former commander of the Navy’s Pacific Fleet is coming forward and speaking up about the issue as well, stating that all of our nation’s intelligence services have been infiltrated by the terrorist front group.
Retired 4-star Admiral James “Ace” Lyons recently spoke to the National Press Club about Obama’s efforts to “fundamentally transform” America, something he has been doing since he was first elected in 2008.
Lyons pointed to Obama’s recent refusal to join other world leaders in Paris to take a stand for freedom of expression, saying this is just the latest of “many signals” of support he has sent to the Islamic jihadists over the years
“There’s no question we got a hell of a job ahead of us,” Lyons said, “with the Muslim Brotherhood penetration in every one of our national security agencies, including all our intelligence agencies.”
He pointed to the current head of the CIA, John Brennan, who is believed to be a convert to Islam, as proof of his assertions, according to the TPNN.