Saturday, March 18, 2017

Disruption to be brought to you be these Dem Hounds from Hell

oped:Nothing could bring more disruption onto the scene than the Hounds from Hell. These so-called non-partisan organizations have some ties and roots that need to be closely examined. Michelle Malkin takes a look at a new nonprofit called American Oversight, and the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington  (CREW). You need to see this. 

As Written By Michelle Malkin for
Here come the hyper-partisan hounds.
A new nonprofit called American Oversight launched this week to combat President Trump’s “culture of impunity.” The outfit declared itself “nonpartisan” and claims its crusaders will fight for a “transparent and ethical government.”
But like Waylon Jennings once crooned, “Baby, that dog won’t hunt.”
These Democrat operatives aren’t interested in accountability. Their mission is to attack, obstruct and destroy their political opponents at all costs.

Executive Director and Obama donor Austin Evers is certainly familiar with the “culture of impunity.” He worked as a lawyer at Williams and Connolly — the firm representing Hillary Clinton and the same firm that boasts longtime Clinton consigliere David Kendall, who shepherded scandal-ridden Bill and Hill through Whitewater, Lewinsky-gate and Email-gate. Evers had zero experience handling public records and classified document requests before he was hired by the State Department in 2015 to be Hillary’s information blocker. But the ethical olfactory nerves of the Democrats suddenly shut down over the clear conflict of interest.
“At the very least, this suspect arrangement raises questions about the State Department hiring process,” GOP Rep. Bob Goodlatte complained to the agency’s inspector general. “At worst, it suggests willful obstruction by handpicked Clinton associates at the State Department on behalf of former Secretary Clinton, to ensure damaging or incriminating documents never saw the light of day.”
CONTINUE READING ABOUT DIRTY DOGS HERE:  The dirty Dem dogs of disruption

Friday, March 17, 2017

This Teacher is Quitting Her Job at a Muslim School. The Reason Why is Absolutely INSANE

 Fahd Islamic School in the Liverpool area of southwest Sydney, NSW ...  ... College, an Islamic college in Sydney’s west Images - Frompo

An elementary school teacher in Sydney, Australia, has quit her job—after being threatened with beheading and other violence from young Muslim kids.

In addition, three other teachers have taken official leaves of absence due to stress—and the received counseling and financial compensation due to the severity of their bullying from the Muslim kids.

Some of the kids were as young as nine and ten.

The teacher who quit has not been named, but she outlined truly shocking and savage behavior from her young students. In one instance, she said she was physically abused by students after she stopped them from hanging a Syrian flag in her classroom. In another instance, she said she was physically pushed into the corner as students began marching around the room, chanting the Koran. 

She also claims that other students were bullied by the Muslim kids too, including a “group of [Muslim] boys who stood around a girl and called her horrible names, like ‘dog.’” Another kid was bullied for disobeying "Muslim scripture” and “betray[ing] his religion.”

The teacher said she had filed numerous complaints, dating back to 2014—but after students threatened to behead her and her family, she finally said enough was enough.

The Department of Education in New South Wales, which oversees Sydney schools,  did not deny that teachers had been given financial compensation for their distress, but didn’t give any additional details about the allegations. 

"The Department of Education continues to work closely with law enforcement agencies on such matters,” said a department spokesman. "To maintain effective operations and protect the privacy of students, the department will not identify schools participating in these programs.”
 Source: American Action News

Muslim Immigrants Brutally Gangraped a Woman... Live, on FB

Two Muslim immigrants from Afghanistan are charged with gang-raping a drunk woman—as their friend livestreamed it on Facebook.

Their victim was identified only as a Swedish woman in her 30s, who was under the influence of alcohol and drugs—and, thus, “particularly vulnerable,” under Swedish law. Her name has not been released.

The names of the men involved have not been released either. The two men suspected of rape have been described as Afghan citizens, one an 18-year-old and the other a 21-year-old. A third man, a Swedish national aged 24, was charged with being an accomplice, for livestreaming it. 

The vicious assault was broadcasted to a private Facebook group with about 60,000 members, and seen by eight people. The rape lasted for several minutes, as the horrified viewers on Facebook urged the 24-year-old to intervene and stop the attack—but he refused to do so.

One of the people watching quickly alerted police. The video has since been removed from Facebook, but copies of it continue to circulate on the internet.
All three men deny their involvement in the rape—but prosecutors claim they have plenty of evidence, including the footage from Facebook, to convict.
 Source: American Action News

The Utter Hypocrisy of the Government in the Bundy Ranch Trial

by: Tim Brown

The utter hypocrisy that is being demonstrated in the Bundy Ranch trial by those who swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution from both foreign and domestic enemies is quite telling as to the level of corruption we are seeing in our land today.  Furthermore, it is demonstrating that many of those who have taken that oath not only don't know what the Constitution says, but also have become the very domestic enemies they proclaim to oppose because of their ignorance.
First, take this update from Guerilla Media Network's Deb Jordan.

"Judge Gloria Navarro presiding over USA vs Cliven Bundy says, if the Prosecution does not call Daniel P. Love to the stand she is leaning heavily toward not allowing the defense to call him to the stand either," Jordan wrote.  "In a shocking statement made outside the earshot of the Jury this past Friday, Navarro said that she has no obligation to allow the defense to call the former Special Agent in Charge of the Bundy cattle impoundment to the stand for the purpose of impeaching his testimony to the grand jury."
No obligation?   This is the government's star snitch, I mean witness, Bureau of Land Management agent Daniel P. Love.  Perhaps, the reason lies in the fact that the BLM's conduct at Bundy Ranch was thuggish and tyrannical (Watch Video evidence of their misconduct here and here).  Perhaps, the reason lies with the fact that Love was found guilty of misconduct by the Inspector General on a number of issues, including using his influence to obtain tickets and special passes to the Burning Man festival in the Nevada desert.  He was also instrumental in driving Dr. James Redd to the point of suicide over his collecting of Indian Artifacts in 2009.
As for Judge Navarro, citizens are planning to issue a letter to Congress calling for her impeachment due to her conduct in the case.

However, that is not the whole of what is taking place in Nevada.  The Nevada Independent reports:
Although no shots were fired that day, federal officers previously testified that alarming investigative intelligence, combined with the guns present in the agitated crowd and para-military dress of some of the protesters, made them afraid for their safety. Six defendants the government describes as Bundy’s gunmen are on trial accused of  threatening and intimidating BLM and U.S. Parks Service law enforcement officers.

In recent weeks, on cross examination, the defense has managed to portray the federal cops as inexperienced wannabes who lacked judgment and overreacted under stress. After the decision was made to discontinue the roundup, some of BLM rangers and Park police initially refused orders to put away their weapons, stand down and pack up. Some of their responses under oath made them appear more fearful than professional.
But the defense this past week had little success with Metro Sgt. Tom Jenkins and none at all with Sheriff Joseph Lombardo. 

Additionally, there was testimony by Metro Sgt. Tom Jenkins, who claimed that protesters were flashing handguns and rifles "from the time we got there until the time we left."  However, he remained steadfast in his claims even though lengthy recorded exhibits didn't always agree with his testimony.  Someone is not being truthful or has a really bad memory that cannot be trusted.
Jenkins claims his officers were "scared" and "crying."  Really?
I wonder if Sgt. Jenkins thought there was fear in the hearts of the Bundys and their supporters over this?
or this?
Then there was testimony from Lombardo.  Again, from The Nevada Independent: 

When Lombardo’s took the stand Thursday, he reminded those who have followed his career that the public needn’t worry about his leadership skills. An assistant sheriff at the time of the standoff, Lombardo accompanied Sheriff Doug Gillespie to Bundy’s makeshift stage outside his ranch in an attempt to cool the heated rhetoric and avoid bloodshed. He stood patiently during Bundy’s windy grandstanding and impossible demands — disarm all federal law enforcement and bulldoze the entrance booths at the region’s federal conservation and recreation areas — and then returned to Las Vegas believing the botched cattle roundup was reaching a peaceful resolution.
For the first time jurors saw video of the elder Bundy holding forth with armed, uniformed members of the Arizona State Militia, who call themselves the “Praetorian Guard,” standing guard. Dozens of his hundreds of followers were armed with handguns and rifles.
When Bundy instructed his followers to go get his cattle, Lombardo’s day grew complicated and dangerous. He attempted to negotiate with one of Bundy’s sons, Dave Bundy, in a plea for patience and enough time to allow the BLM to make a safe exit.
It was Lombardo, jurors learned, who essentially put his career on the line to overrule BLM Supervisory Special Agent Dan Love and press for the release of the impounded cattle during the height of the armed standoff’s tensions.
“He advised me they were federal cattle and it was his decision,” Lombardo said.
Fortunately, Lombardo prevailed.

On what constitutional basis do Cliven Bundy's cattle become "federal cattle"?  There is no victim any what the government is portraying here.  Furthermore, just because a video shows armed citizens protecting one another from a tyrannical BLM, something that even Sheriff Lombardo was willing to stand up to, doesn't mean they were breaking the law.  Seriously, is no one reading the Second Amendment?  Do none of these people know why we have it and what provoked the writing of the Second Amendment?  or the First? or the Third? or the Fourth, etc. etc.?
While the author of the Nevada Independent piece concluded, "Bring guns to a peaceful protest, and you’re bound to get everyone’s attention," what he failed to identify is who brought them first.  The response of protesters with guns was an equal and measured defensive response to tyrants, period.  Now, you can see the utter hypocrisy and lack of moral compass that is on display in this case.

Thursday, March 16, 2017

Mexico Could Not Believe Trump Pulled This Off

Donald Trump promised to secure the border and crack down on illegal immigration.
Democrats scoffed at him and Mexican officials even came out and said they would not accept Trump’s immigration ban.
But new numbers have Democrats and Mexican officials stunned at what Trump’s done.
The Department of Homeland Security released figures showing illegal border crossings have dropped 40 percent during Trump’s first month in office.
This is exactly what he promised the voters when he campaigned for president.
Many in the media and on the left shrugged off his promises as typical campaign rhetoric.

But there was meat behind his pledge, and his first month in office proves it.
The Department of Homeland Security attributes the decrease in illegal border crossings in part to the new tone Trump set.
Illegal aliens no longer feel secure that the American government will allow them to roam the country and live off the American safety net.
Fox News reported on Trump’s success in stemming the tide of illegal immigration:

The number of people illegally crossing the U.S. southern border has dropped 40 percent in President Trump’s first full month in office, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said Wednesday.
U.S. Customs and Border Patrol reported that the number of illegal border crossings dropped from 31,578 to 18,762 persons. Kelly said border agents usually see a 10 to 20 percent increase in illegal immigrant apprehensions from January to February.
“The drop in apprehensions shows a marked change in trends,” Kelly said. “Since the administration’s implementation of executive orders to enforce immigration laws, apprehensions and inadmissible activity is trending toward the lowest monthly total in at least the last five years.” 

The new numbers are welcoming news for Trump who campaigned on illegal immigration crackdown.
Trump signed an executive order increasing border security and authorizing the construction of his promised border wall along the southern border in the first few days of his presidency. Trump also seeks to hire about 5,000 additional border patrol officials and 10,000 ICE agents and seeks to fast-track deportations. 

It’s important to note the reduction in illegal border crossings is two to four times greater than what is normally seen in a similar timeframe.
That is a direct result of Trump’s executive orders implementing stepped-up enforcement of immigration law, as well as expediting the deportation process.
America is seeing immediate results.
Just enforcing the law has led to fewer illegal aliens trying to sneak into America.
Illegal aliens must now take into account the likelihood of being deported should they be caught in America.
And that is having an effect on illegal border crossings.
No one believed Trump would implement his crackdown on illegal immigration.
But he has, and Americans are already seeing the benefits of his approach.


Is it Time to Stop Trusting Paul Ryan?

As I watched Paul Ryan roll up his sleeves and try to explain the GOP healthcare bill in a style reminiscent of an adjunct professor, and then his follow up performance on the Sunday morning talk show circuit, I was reminded as to why I was against electing this man as Speaker of the House. In the Sunday interviews there was a stark contrast between Ryan and Sen. Rand Paul who is opposing the bill. Ryan regularly spoke of  “the process”. In contrast, Paul, was on the same Sunday circuit speaking on both the substance and process of the bill. The difference between the two men’s appearances was quite revealing if one were to remove their Paul Ryan blinders. 

Personally, I never understood the hype in regards to Ryan. His resume is Congressional Intern, Congressional Staffer, and Congressman. In other words, he is a creature of Washington. He was literally raised on the hill. He views everything through a D.C. prism. Toughness and negotiation skills are a perquisite for any speaker to be successful. Additionally, a little charisma doesn’t hurt. Amazingly, these are all traits we have yet to see exhibited by the man who has choked on the big stage multiple times. 

People often refer to Paul Ryan as “one of the smartest people on the Hill”. While I’m sure Ryan appreciates the compliment, I’m not exactly sure it’s something to be proud of. “The Hill” is populated with people whose skillsets are so weak, they couldn’t last five minutes in the private sector.  Congress is filled with liars, whiners, and conventional thinkers. The reason Donald Trump is able to get networks from CNBC to Fox News to bow to his demands is because he understands negotiations. In contrast, Ryan botched the healthcare rollout showing that he didn’t learn from the controversial Ryan plan rollout prior to a very tight election. By unveiling this plan, he not only forced his Republicans colleagues to have to defend this plan, but he also gave the President and his fellow Democrats ammunition even though they did not have a plan themselves. 

In fairness to Ryan, in person, he is a very likable man. At the same time, there are plenty of nice men and women in Congress. The problem is how far being “nice” will get you with extremists like Nancy Pelosi or even an aggressive president in your own party who might need to be kept in check. For example, do people believe once Democrats begin calling Ryan, “anti-immigrant” he will respond by standing his ground on immigration reform? Do we believe he will fight side by side with President Trump on hot button legislation? Being nice guys is why the Romney/Ryan ticket lost a disaster of presidential administration in 2012. 

Although Ryan has exhibited a deficiency in toughness and negotiation skills, he also lacks the charisma to inspire. On top of these weaknesses, Ryan has horrible political instincts and has consistently choked on the big stage. Moreover, no one can claim he was an asset to the Romney presidential ticket. Let’s be real here. Sarah Palin was basically thrown into her vice-presidential debate unprepared and she kept then Senator Biden off guard. If you count his lies and exaggerations, she clearly won. In comparison, we are told Ryan is the boy wonder; a genius; a policy wonk. Yet, he had his clock cleaned by a Vice President who had to defend a disastrous four-year record. Ryan looked nervous, scared, and quite frankly out of his league against Biden, who at times appeared to be mentally unstable. 

 Perhaps I’ve always had low expectations when it came to Ryan’s ability to be an effective speaker. At the time, I believed Rep. Dan Webster would have made a much more effective speaker and I still believe that. I must confess I was never sold on the “Young Guns” crew of Kevin McCarthy, Eric Cantor, and Paul Ryan. Nevertheless, Ryan was clearly the brightest out of that bunch. Still, Ryan’s consistency is respectable, but Republicans have to ask themselves: Will continuing to believe in his abilities just mean more underwhelming results?
 Source: American Action News

BREAKING: Conservative Talk Radio Star Attacked in Public, Bloodied

Michael Savage has been a conservative talk radio superstar for decades now. The man was pushing borders, language, and culture before Donald Trump ever decided to run for president, and so it wasn't surprising when he was an early rider on the Trump Train.

Despite his rock ribbed conservatism, Savage has always chosen to make his home in a city he calls San-Fran-sicko. Long term Savage listeners have heard the host discuss his love/hate relationship with the Bay area for decades. Those of us who have come to know and love Dr. Savage were less than pleased to hear this San Francisco tale. Per World Net Daily:

On the day he launched his new book about the fierce, sometimes violent, opposition to Donald Trump, radio talk-show host Michael Savage was assaulted by a stranger at a San Francisco Bay Area restaurant.

Savage, with his dog, Teddy, was finishing up dinner Tuesday night at Servino Restaurant in Tiburon, California, north of San Francisco, when the unnamed assailant charged up to Savage and began yelling, reported local media blogger Rich Lieberman.

The attacker kicked the poodle out of the way, grabbed Savage and threw him to the ground, according to an eyewitness.

Savage was not seriously hurt, but the incident left him bloodied and shaken, Lieberman said.

This is absolute madness, but unfortunately, it's becoming a part of life for Bay Area conservatives. We wish Dr. Savage and Teddy a speedy recovery, and we hope the animal who perpetrated this vicious assault gets the justice he deserves.

PS: Savage discussed  the riots in Berkeley several weeks back, where liberal animals assaulted Trump supporters. We wonder if his attacker was there?

Source: American Action News

Allen West: Urgent Petition to Donald Trump

oped: Indeed...see more: 


Dear Fellow Patriot,

President Obama refused to pardon an innocent U.S. soldier before he left office.

Now I'm asking you to sign this PRESIDENTIAL PARDON PETITION FOR ARMY 1LT CLINT LORANCE urging President Trump to do what Obama refused to: send this innocent soldier home where he belongs!

In July, 2012, 1LT Clint Lorance was sent to Afghanistan to replace a platoon leader who was seriously wounded in a Taliban attack. On his third day on the job, Clint and his men were on patrol when a U.S. helicopter radioed that a motorcycle was sitting outside of the village near a road only used by the Taliban. When the motorcycle started gunning toward the platoon, 1LT Lorance ordered his marksman to fire.

Two of the riders were killed. The other was captured in the village, where days earlier a U.S. soldier was shot in the neck.

Those of us who have been stationed in Afghanistan know the tactics and actions of the enemy.
Without a doubt, these men posed a threat to Clint's platoon. And as the commanding officer, Clint knew he was responsible for getting every single one of his soldiers back to base alive.
Yet our own government didn't agree. 1LT Lorance was convicted of murder and sentenced to 20 years at the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth.

Now you know why I'm asking you to follow this link to sign the PRESIDENTIAL PARDON PETITION right away.
You see, it is customary for U.S. Presidents to grant high-profile pardons just before leaving office. However, when Obama's term came to an end on January 20, 2017, he refused to commute Clint's sentence.
  • Instead, Obama did commute the sentence of traitor Bradley Manning, who leaked sensitive national security information and put our troops at risk.
  • He did commute the sentence of Puerto Rican nationalist Oscar Lopez Rivera, who was serving 50 years in prison for plotting to overthrow the U.S. government and whose group killed four Americans in a New York City bombing in 1975.
  • And of course he pardoned and commuted the sentences of hundreds of criminal cocaine and heroin dealers.
As a combat veteran, I'm disgusted that Obama let traitors, drug dealers and murderers out of prison early – while 1LT Lorance is left to serve a 20-year sentence for protecting his men on the battlefield!
But now that Donald Trump has taken office, you and I have a new chance to finally free 1LT Lorance.

Will you follow this link to sign the PRESIDENTIAL PARDON PETITION to Donald Trump right now?
My friend, Clint Lorance signed up to serve his country and risked his life on the battlefield to protect your freedom. When his men were threatened, he did exactly what our military trained him to do.

As a combat veteran with 22 years of service, I can't turn my back on this young soldier. And I hope you won't either.
That's why I'm writing you this letter on behalf of the United American Patriots (UAP), an organization founded by another combat veteran who knows just like I do that you can't second-guess our young men for their split-second actions behind enemy lines.

UAP provides legal defenses for soldiers like Clint who have been unfairly accused of crimes for their actions in deadly combat zones. In fact, they're assisting 6 other wrongly accused soldiers who are sitting behind bars at Fort Leavenworth, in addition to funding 3 separate efforts to free Clint – an appeal, a motion for mistrial and of course this Presidential Pardon campaign.
But as a non-profit organization, UAP doesn't receive a dime of federal funding. Instead, they depend on the big hearts of American patriots like you who support them and their mission.

UAP has calculated the cost of filing all the paperwork for Clint's official pardon request and this Petition campaign to be more than $385,000. But I don't think you can put a price tag on this young man's freedom!

I'm not asking you to write a check for $385,000. But I am asking you to make a tax-deductible gift of $31 after you sign the Petition.

Every penny raised will support UAP's efforts to collect millions of Petitions on Clint's behalf – and cover the legal fees for other innocent soldiers – so if you are in the position to send a larger tax-deductible gift in the amount of $50, $100, $500 or more, I pray you will.

1LT Clint Lorance served our country honorably and courageously for 10 years. He does not deserve to be treated as a cold-blooded murderer for doing his job.

Will you take just 30 seconds right now to fight for Clint's freedom by signing the PRESIDENTIAL PARDON FOR ARMY 1LT CLINT LORANCE and make your best tax-deductible contribution of $31 or more.
On behalf of 1LT Lorance and his family, his legal team and UAP, thank you in advance for your support.

Steadfast and loyal,

LTC(R) Allen West
Congressman (2011-2013)

P.S. If you agree that it's time for President Trump to do what Barack Obama refused to – and send this innocent American soldier home to his family! – then please sign the PRESIDENTIAL PARDON FOR ARMY 1LT CLINT LORANCE right away and make your best tax-deductible donation of $31 or more to United American Patriots.

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

It Is Now “BLATANT RACISM” To Wear Red, White And Blue

First, for some context, here is a picture of the offensive clothing worn by Valley High School fans at the game: At first glance it certainly doesn’t look like these folks are engaging in any racist activity, but then, what do we know?

by:Mac Slavo
In today’s hypersensitive bizarro environment, where people are quite literally having mental breakdowns following the election of President Donald Trump, everything that used to be normal appears to now elicit howls of racism, xenophobia and sexism.
In the latest example, we turn to Iowa, where students from Valley High School attended a basketball game in traditional red, white and blue attire they reportedly wear to big games. One would think that showing support for their team wearing the colors of the U.S. flag wouldn’t even raise an eyebrow, but you’d be wrong.

“This is an example of BLATANT racism,” said Ty Leggett, a Valley High School alum, on the Valley High School – WDMCS Facebook page. “ALL participating should have been pulled and banned from ALL VHS extracurricular events for the remainder of the year! As a parent, I’d be mortified that my son or daughter thought this way, acted in this fashion and refrained from taking a stand against this 21st century inexcusable behavior!”
Erin Ness Carter, a mother living in the Iowan district, remarked that “for the supporters of one team from a primarily white part of town to paint themselves as the ‘team of the USA’ it strongly implies that the other team, the less white team, is less American.”

One Valley High School student, Dayna Dunnwald, noted that the school’s students had dressed with a USA-theme instead of their black and orange school colors “many times in the past.”
“A lot of people were very upset about it,” explained DeNasja Spencer, a sophomore at Des Moines North, to KCCI. “Even if that was their theme for the game, I feel like they should have switched that because everyone knows North is a more diverse school.”

Via Daily Caller
Valley High students were forced to issue a statement in response to the allegations of racism:
“We are deeply sorry if we have offended anyone in any way,” reads the statement, in part. “We have traditionally dressed in such a fashion for great games such as the one last night. Everyone here at Valley has immense respect not only for your team and players but for your community as a whole. Please know that our intent was in no way to offend or demean—just to support our own team in a way we have done before.”
That Valley High students were essentially forced to say they are “deeply sorry” for the incident is a travesty in and of itself.
Do we now live in a country where wearing the colors of the Star Spangled Banner can be construed as racist because they are somehow insensitive to diverse groups of people?
Last time we checked, and calls us crazy, we’re living in America, where our national colors happen to be… red… white… and blue.
Next we’ll be told that a woman wearing a white dress or someone wearing a Gadsden flag t-shirt is also racist. Oh, wait. Too late.

Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan

WOW! Watch 11 year old ‘Trump Girl’ KNOCK IT OUT OF THE PARK In this EPIC Interview

This is the most incredible child on the face of the planet. Not only does she have her stories straight but she can keep up with the questions being asked of her.
She knocked it out of the park. 


Monday, March 13, 2017

Obama Should Be Facing 20 Years Behind Bars; Trump Does Absolutely Nothing

oped: Indeed it falls within the Seditious Conspiracy Law: 18 USC 2384-2385

By: The Voice of Reason
Is President Trump being too patient with his predecessor? While Obama hardly deserves any respect, it could be argued that President Trump does not want to be viewed as being too combative against someone who held the Oval Office before him. But when your predecessor is openly advocating for your resignation or impeachment by any means necessary, perhaps it is time to take action.
In the following video, Right Wing News looks at how Obama’s actions with regards to the OFA and wiretapping could meet the legal definition of seditious activities. Obama, in his arrogance, has barely attempted to hide it, with Eric Holder openly saying “He’s coming,” about Obama’s return.
Of course, under the law, such seditious activities can land someone in jail for 20 years, however Obama hardly seems worried. Perhaps it’s time that President Trump took decisive action against the ......

See entire article:

Sunday, March 12, 2017

Guys~Gals It's OK to be normal and straight~really it is!


I for one am so tired of the looney left and the #LGBTQ movement attacking us from all sides...stating we are phobic this and phobic that....really how so? Just because we adhere to being God's creation or if you prefer Natures creation, somehow we are take the term phobic it means a fear of...just because one disagrees with anothers take on life does not equate to having a fear of...they have their preference and we have ours...therefore it is OK to be proud of being straight and normal!

Then we have the new age feminist movement who get their panties all in a bunch when a guy or gal makes a comment about one being sexy....really... wow so if we have to disregard finding someone of the opposite sex being sexy then how the hell do we get to the procreation stage?
Let's be honest here...opposites attract but equals marry (or should) we all have our preferences as to what is attractive in a persons trash is anothers treasure and vis versa.
When just dating it seems as though [being honest] sexy is the main attraction...when one is looking for a lifetime mate one looks for deeper attributes...I can only speak for myself...Not only someone who is sexy but is intelligent,warm,honest,funny and fun to be with, luvs kids and animals,the outdoors and nature, is conservative on all issues,assertive in a calm manner... somewhat old normal and straight... ha

At any rate I wrote this because of all the attacks on Kellyanne, Melania, Ivanka and numerous conservative talk show hosts and pundits.

One can be intelligent,warm, funny,assertive in a calm manner as well as being considered sexy,adorable and charming. A complete package for a desirable lifetime mate!

Here ya go this about sums up the oldies view on the attributes of a great mate: Yes sexy in the oldies days was not considered was just plain old sexy ha

Hypocrite Nancy Pelosi: ‘We Have a Right to Know What’s in Health Care Bill Before It Passes’

by:Tim Brown
In an utter display of hypocrisy, although what she said is right on, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) wrote a letter on Tuesday to Speaker of the House Paul Ryan demanding to know what is in his American Health Care Act.
Why is this hypocrisy?  Remember when the same Pelosi said of Obamacare, “We have to pass the bill so that you can see what is in it"? 

In 2012, Pelosi claimed to have read the Affordable Care Act.  Yes, she actually said she read all of this.


I wonder if she read all the regulations that went along with it.


On Tuesday, Pelosi wrote, “Members must not be asked to vote on this legislation before the CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation have answered the following questions about your legislation in 2018 and 2019, over the 10-year budget window, and in the decade after: How will this bill measure up to the Affordable Care Act and current Medicaid law on coverage, quality, and cost?  And how will it impact Medicare solvency?”
“Mr. Speaker, as a former Chair of both the Committee on Ways and Means and the Budget, you understand the importance of having the numbers as well as anyone,” she continued.  “The American people and Members have a right to know the full impact of this legislation before any vote in Committee or by the whole House."
"These are critical questions and I hope that Republicans will honor their responsibility to the American people both before the Committees vote and before the final bill goes to the House floor,” she concluded.

Now, I am all for reading and knowing what is in the bill.  It's not even a long read Rep. Pelosi.  You can read it here if you are really interested in doing so, but I think it's more foaming at the mouth in order to politicize the issue between two parties.  Frankly, neither Obamacare nor RINOCare are constitutional.  Senator Rand Paul's bill is closer to being constitutional than either of those bills.
While I'm glad that Pelosi does want to know the contents, it shouldn't be any trouble to determine now.  Though Ryan and the establishment gang didn't want to reveal the contents at first, their bill has now been made public, so Pelosi can read all she wants.

Personally, I'm not impressed with it, as I knew I wouldn't be because establishment Republicans simply want to rebrand and take control of it.  I do hope that President Donald Trump, as well as his press secretary, will have the wool removed from their eyes to see this is not constitutional nor what the people want from their government regarding their health insurance or care. 

General Mattis Nominates Muslim Brotherhood Stooge for Fourth Most Powerful Pentagon Position

oped: President Trump I warned you about your pick... General Mattis for Secretary of Defense ! 
And now you are seeing had many better choices,why you decided on Jim Mattis leaves me scratching my head! 

Former Special Forces officer: Mattis 'betrayed his duty to us'

by:Tim Brown 
Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis’ pick for undersecretary of defense for policy, Anne Patterson, is causing quite stir because if you remember correctly, during the Obama administration she was nothing more than a Muslim Brotherhood stooge.
Fox News reports:
President Trump’s defense secretary wants the Pentagon’s top civilian job to go to a onetime prominent supporter of ousted Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, a group Trump may designate as a terrorist organization.
Not surprisingly, the White House is resisting the choice by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, a retired Marine Corps general, of Anne Patterson to be undersecretary of defense for policy -- the Pentagon’s fourth most powerful position.

While Patterson’s bona fides are not in question – she has served as an ambassador to Egypt, Pakistan, Colombia, El Salvador and the United Nations, along with being President Obama’s assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs – there is widespread concern, both at home and abroad, about her close ties to ousted Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Patterson’s support of Morsi and his Islamist government – and her denunciation of the 2013 protests against the Egyptian leader as mere “street protests” – saw herself become the target of widespread criticism. Demonstrators plastered her face on signs and banners and made her the public face of the Obama administration’s policies in the North African nation.

In 2013, Patterson vowed to apply pressure to support the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, even as Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah told Christians in the area to stop protesting the Muslim Brotherhood.  At that time, we reported:
Evidence that the Obama administration is unhappy with the Egyptian people's liberation from Muslim Brotherhood rule continues to emerge.  As reported today by Youm 7, according to Muhammad Heikal — "the Arab world's most respected political commentator" and for some 50 years a political insider — soon after the overthrow of Morsi, U.S. ambassador Anne Patterson assured Hisham Qandil, who hours ago was Egypt's Prime Minister, that "there are many forms of pressure, and America holds the keys to the Gulf."

Such blatantly pro-Muslim Brotherhood assurances by Patterson are consistent with many of her other actions in Egypt, which have led most Egyptians, including politicians and activists, to refer to her as a Brotherhood stooge.  Among other things, in the days leading to June 30, she called on Egyptians not to protest — including by meeting with the Coptic Pope and asking him to urge the nation's Christian minority not to oppose the Brotherhood, even though Christians have naturally been the most to suffer under Morsi, especially in the context of "blasphemy" accusations.
Thus, and once again, the Obama administration makes indubitably clear that its primary interest in Egypt is to see the Muslim Brotherhood stay in power, the Egyptian people's will — the will of tens of millions of secularists, liberals, moderates, and Christians — be damned.

A former Egyptian Parliament member accused Patterson of being a part of a Muslim Brotherhood "sleeper cell."  It was her actions that helped secure the Muslim Brotherhood in power in Egypt, and later evidence demonstrated that the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood president who was installed was behind the Benghazi attacks.
Middle East commentator Raymond Ibrahim says that Patterson so supported the Muslim Brotherhood that the Egyptian people wanted her out because they believed both Obama and Patterson support terrorism.

Ibrahim reminds us:
Youm 7, a popular newspaper in Egypt (then the sixth-most visited website in the nation according to, conducted a survey asking its readers:
Do you support the call to kick U.S. Ambassador Anne Patterson out because she interfered in Egyptian affairs?A whopping 87.93% said yes, 10.54% said no, and 1.53% were indifferent. Youm 7’s audience is almost exclusively secular-leaning or Christian. It was the non-Islamists of Egypt that disliked the U.S. ambassador -- not the Muslim Brotherhood, which benefited from her.
In 2013, even Foreign Policy, a publication notorious for always siding with establishment D.C., noted that Patterson was widely seen among Republicans “as the key implementer for a policy that at least offers tacit support to the Muslim Brotherhood.”

This is the person Mattis wants in a very powerful position at the Pentagon.
“Mattis is a guy who cares very much about personnel,” a friend close to Mattis said. “He doesn’t want people off the tracks that he has laid down and that he’s running his train on.”
Perhaps, we need a new engineer for this train or create new tracks. 

Addendum: Being that POTUS  D.J.Trump is the *Midnight Special*...maybe a new engineer is needed YES?