Hey Sen Dianne Feinstein 'F' you and the Marxist Ass ya rode in on...!

Dianne Feinstein Is Scheduling Another Senate Gun-Confiscation Hearing... And This Time Around, She's Not Going To Allow Pesky Pro-Second Amendment People, Like You, Spoil Her Party.
     The Washington Times reported that Senator Feinstein was apparently "unhappy with the list of witnesses" who testified at the last hearing and "says she plans to hold a separate hearing with witnesses more inclined to back gun control."

       Why hold another hearing...? The answer is simple. The American people are winning the battle to stop Feinstein and Barack Obama from eradicating the Second Amendment,but they believe that they can win if they simply change the national dialogue by stifling any and all voices of dissent  .

       Oh yes... she'll hold her new hearing... she'll stifle any voice of opposition... and she believes her lackeys in the media will give her the political cover she needs to trample on your God-given Constitutional rights.

       But we're going to prove Feinstein and Obama wrong... right here and right now.

---

---

         Plain and simple,  Dianne Feinstein and the Obama administration are trying to rig the deabte on guns ...so they can take away yours.

       Feinstein apparently didn't like the fact that the Senate allowed people who believe that the Constitution matters to testify at the last hearing.

       And she's not about to repeat her mistake. The Washington Times went on to report: "The [new] hearing, first reported in Politico, will focus on Mrs. Feinstein’s support for a ban on military-style semiautomatic rifles, commonly called assault weapons."

       So Feinstein is going straight to the Obama playbook. She's going to hold her own hearing and she is going to shut out all voices of reason and stack the panel with anti-Second Amendment cronies.

       And when she's done, she's going to close the doors and decide that, guess what, the Second Amendment is bad and the political know-it-alls in Congress have a duty to ban as many guns as humanly possible.

       She’s going to trample on the Constitution because she believes no one is going to stop her... but you can stop her now.

---

---

         Think we exaggerate... think it could never happen in America? Lest you doubt her true intentions, remember what Feinstein said:

       "If I could have banned them all - 'Mr. and Mrs. America turn in your guns' - I would have!"

       Make no mistake about it, Dianne Feinstein is going to use every single dirty trick in the progressive liberal playbook to gut your God-given Second Amendment rights.

       And once the 'Pesky Second Amendment' is out of the way, what's to stop Barack Obama and his cronies from putting your other Constitutional rights in the crosshairs [pun intended]? Answer: NOTHING...

       Feinstein has shown that she's willing to stack hearings with her cronies; do you doubt that she's beyond cutting closed-door, back-room deals?

       Do you doubt that she will stop at absolutely nothing to rip the Second Amendment out of the Constitution?

       Do you doubt that you should not just sit idly by as Obama and Feinstein push to eradicate even more of your God-given rights?

---

---

         There's no gray area here. Feinstein's gun-grab IS unconstitutional and like her boss, Feinstein sees the Constitution as a museum exhibit, a relic of a by-gone age that needs to be "updated" and "improved."

       Well we’ve got news for you, Senator Feinstein. The Mona Lisa is not just a painting of a woman. No one would ever dare to suggest that it needs to be "improved" or "updated."

       And like a great work of art, the founding document that gave birth to the greatest nation on earth doesn't need any "tweaking" either.

       Don't take our word for it. Chuck Cooper is a 30-year veteran litigator in Washington DC. Named one of the top ten lawyers in the city, he concluded that "these provisions [Dianne Feinstein’s new "Assault Weapons" bill"] would violate the Second Amendment by prohibiting the use of arms that are in common use by ordinary Americans for self defense and other lawful purposes."

       Yet, Dianne Feinstein and Barack Obama want to shove this VERY law down the American people's throats. Never mind their oaths of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. They will do anything to make their desired gun ban a reality.

       We'll take Cooper’s astute legal opinion a step further: Obama and Feinstein's proposed prelude to gun-confiscation – and the dirty tricks they are willing to employ to make it happen – is an abomination.

       They must be stopped and it's up to patriotic Americans, like you, to stop them.

---

---

         Dianne Feinstein and every other elected politician in Washington has no right to take away your Constitutional rights, but that's not about to stop her from giving it a go.

       Our founders, who dealt first-hand with a tyrannical and corrupt English king, knew that government power and authority is derived from the consent of free people, and that laws are not things that are just imposed upon the people by self anointed "rulers."

       And it's up to patriotic Americans, like us, to stop Feinstein and Obama.

       We must call them out. We must ensure that Feinstein is not successful in her attempt to silence the voices of freedom-loving Americans.

       Let's send our elected officials a clear message right now: Don’t tread on us and don't you dare try to take away our Constitutional rights.

---

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 45 Republican Members of the United States Senate. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the United States Senate.

Demand That They Go On Record, Here And Now, And State Their Intent To Filibuster The Obama-Feinstein Gun-Grab.

Send My Blast Faxes

---

        


Yours In Freedom

Center for Individual Freedom 815 King Street Suite 303 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone: 703-535-5836 Fax: 703-535-5838 CFIF is a 501(c)(4) not-for-profit constitutional advocacy organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights. Contributions to CFIF are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.

A trip down memory Lane....

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Britain’s credit rating downgraded

Moody’s announced on Friday night that it had cut the Government’s bond rating one notch from ‘Aaa’ – the highest possible level – to ‘Aa1’.
The move is a significant setback for Chancellor George Osborne, who has faced criticism that his strategy for dealing with UK’s huge debt burden is failing to deliver.
Moody’s pointed to “continuing weakness in the UK’s medium-term growth outlook, with a period of sluggish growth which [it] now expects will extend into the second half of the decade”.
The credit ratings agency also noted that the Government’s debt reduction programme faced significant “challenges” and that the UK’s huge debts are unlikely to “reverse before 2016″.
Moody’s said that despite considerable structural economic strengths, growth is expected to be sluggish due to a combination of weaker global economic activity and the drag on the UK economy “from the ongoing domestic public- and private-sector deleveraging process.” Continue Reading:
Continue Reading on www.telegraph.co.uk ...

Whoa: Columbine Survivor Pens Powerful Letter to Obama on Gun Rights

The Left routinely ascribes absolute moral authority to grieving victims in furtherance of their political agenda. Their agitprop is often manipulative and exploitive, but it works. Appeals to facts and reason aren’t enough anymore; persuading the public increasingly requires emotional appeals. Even if they find it inherently unpalatable, conservatives must promote people whose personal stories offer counter-narratives to liberals’ tragic parade of victimhood. Katie highlighted one such case earlier this week, and now The Blaze has another. This open letter is a must-read — not only for the case it lays out, but because of its author’s personal history (click through for the full, unedited missive):
Mr. President, As a student who was shot and wounded during the Columbine massacre, I have a few thoughts on the current gun debate. In regards to your gun control initiatives:


Ban on Military-Style Assault Weapons
The evidence is very clear pertaining to the inadequacies of the assault weapons ban. It had little to no effect when it was in place from 1994 until 2004. It was during this time that I personally witnessed two fellow students murder twelve of my classmates and one teacher. The assault weapons ban did not deter these two murderers, nor did the other thirty-something laws that they broke. Gun ownership is at an all time high. And although tragedies like Columbine and Newtown are exploited by ideologues and special-interest lobbying groups, crime is at an all time low. The people have spoken. Gun store shelves have been emptied. Gun shows are breaking attendance records. Gun manufacturers are sold out and back ordered. Shortages on ammo and firearms are countrywide. The American people have spoken and are telling you that our Second Amendment shall not be infringed.
Continue reading:
Continue Reading on townhall.com

Alert...Both Obama and Romney know ALL about this, but are SWORN to secrecy...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
oped: For info only not endorsing the content of this article!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

First off.

If you care about your safety...

Stop what you're doing.

And watch this video with the door shut.

=> Click here now...

I wish this was a joke.

Unfortunately it isn't.

It's deadly serious.

I'm sending this to all my friends, family and patriots brothers...

As quickly as I can...

Because it's the ONLY video I've seen that reveals the lethal "March Surprise", nobody is talking about...

>> Learn more... <<

Yes...

The "March Surprise" is bigger and far more dangerous than Sandy could ever be.

And it's headed to YOUR neighborhood...

WAY faster than you think.

>> Watch shocking video <<

The chilling speaker on the video (my new favorite patriot)...is going to give you the 3 practical steps you need to take TODAY..

To make it out alive and well...

This is the big one folks.

Don't take this lightly..

The "March Surprise" has already begun in certain parts of the country.

And it's about to make Hurrican Sandy look like a six year old flower girl.

Your fellow Patriot.

Jason Richards

P.S. Both Obama and Romney know ALL about this, but are SWORN to secrecy...

And when you watch the video you'll understand why.

>> Click here before it's too late

Now Media Matters targets Ben Carson

By Garth Kant 

Media Matters has posted  a “research article” claiming Dr. Benjamin Carson is just “the latest in a long line of black conservatives – from Clarence Thomas to Herman Cain – relentlessly promoted and propped up by right-wing voices in the media.” 

The article, “Ben Carson’s Moment,” contains just a few original paragraphs and a slew of links to articles and videos.
Carson, the director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, struck a chord with many Americans when he delivered a devastating critique of Obamacare at the National Prayer Breakfast earlier this month, with President Obama seated a few feet away.
Though he already was the youngest head of a major division at Johns Hopkins, the first surgeon to successfully separate conjoined twins and the recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, it was the prayer breakfast speech that catapulted him into headlines.
According to the Atlantic, he “voiced concern about the national debt and argued the case for a flat tax, using the Bible’s injunction to tithe a set percentage, and for health-savings accounts, a medical option that has gained currency among conservatives. Crucially, he delivered this speech from a podium just feet from President Obama.”
Media Matters chose to focus on the surgeon’s race.

“After Carson used a speech at the National Prayer Breakfast in front of President Obama to trumpet conservative arguments about economics and health care, News Corp. properties rushed to anoint him as the newest political ‘star.’ Fox News and Fox Business hosted Carson eight times in the days following his speech, and he has been praised by Fox personalities as a courageous leader who is ‘saving America’ and by the Wall Street Journal in an editorial headlined, ‘Ben Carson For President,’” Media Matters wrote.
See Carson’s books, “Gifted Hands,” “America the Beautiful,” and “Take the Risk” in the WND Superstore now!
The article contains clips of conservatives supportive of Carson. But it begins with a number of quotes questioning why a black would be conservative.
MSNBC commentator Joy Reid said: “Right now, first of all, there is a huge boom in it there is a big career advancement in it. If you want to be Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, any brown or black person who is willing to say conservative stuff, this is your moment. You can make a lot of money, get a lot of attention, get a lot of love from the right, because they really do need brown and black faces to start saying this script.

“But the problem is in order to fit in as a minority conservative, you really almost have to be even further to the right than typical conservatives. You have to mouth verbatim all of the party’s beliefs, because if you stray one bit, you are held in suspicion. So Rubio is caught in that matrix.”
The Atlantic’s David A. Graham also focused on race, writing “it’s impossible to pretend there’s no racial dimension involved in a successful black conservative castigating the liberal black president.”
“Black conservatives remain fascinating to Americans of all political persuasions and ethnicities; look no further than Herman Cain’s presidential campaign,” he said. “And in the age of Obama – when many on the right feel that any criticism of the president is liable to draw undeserved claims of racism – a champion for the cause who can sidestep that retort is sure to be welcomed.”
Tweets posted by Media Matters echo the sentiment.

• “Righties love them some Ben Carson now”
• “Today, if you’re a racist, you’re almost certainly a Republican. Did you forget all of those “Don’t Re-Nig in 2012″ bumper stickers?”
• “But in the end a man known for his medical skills and brought in to speak at a (supposedly) religious event could not resist the spotlight, but had to grasp the opportunity to bash the president. In essence, I believe he sold out his profession and his faith for the chance to become a political “hero”. I hope he enjoys it, his 15 minutes are ticking.”
• “Apparently in the right-wing parallel dimension, anybody who in any possible way does anything negative towards the president is worthy of a rock star reception. It really is sad that after 8 years of insisting you couldn’t question the president, that they’ve now managed to make ‘hating on the president’ an industry in and of itself.” 

President Bush awarded Carson the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2008. He made medical history in 1987 by becoming the first surgeon to successfully separate conjoined twins who had been joined at the back of the head. He’s written more than 100 neurosurgical publications, four best-selling books and has 38 honorary doctorate degrees.
The liberal backlash isn’t limited to Carson. When Herman Cain joined Fox News, tweets by liberals targeted his race:

• “uncle tom is now a fox news contributer. makes sense. smh. did i say uncle tom? i meant herman coon. oops…cain, herman cain.”
• “So the buffoon Herman Cain is over there palling around with the likes of fox news! Birds of a feather! Ole Uncle Tom acting S.O.B.”

This is not the first time Media Matters has gone after a prominent black conservative.
It refers to former Congressman Allen West as “widely known for using slanderous, AM radio-style hate rants against Democrats.” “CBS ought to know better than to treat reckless name-callers (and freshman Congressmen) like West as a important voices in American politics.”
The website wants the media to go after U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. “…the public would be better served if the media reported that one justice on the Supreme Court has repeatedly demonstrated himself to be out of the court’s mainstream: Justice Clarence Thomas. Indeed, perhaps the media should be asking how progressive a new nominee has to be in order to counterbalance Thomas.”

Economist and columnist Thomas Sowell is accused of “a diatribe laden with falsehoods that mimics the tone most often employed by scores of anti-immigrant nativists, Sowell relies on agitprop from that same lobby to broadcast a flawed economic argument against immigration.”
Media Matters posted a clip of commentator Star Parker with the headline “In Kitchen Sink Attack, Star Parker Blames ‘Minimum Wage,’ Obama’s Call For Taxes On Rich, ‘Liberals’ For Poverty.”
A clip of former presidential candidate Herman Cain was titled “Fox News’ Herman Cain Belittles 51 Percent Of Americans As Having ‘A Severe Ignorance Problem’ For Reelecting Obama.”
Media Matters calls out former GOP party chief Michael Steele. “If you were a reporter, and you were typing up RNC chairman Michael Steele’s call for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s resignation over a racially insensitive remark, would you maybe find room to mention that just a few days ago, Steele used the phrase ‘honest injun’”?
And, the website ran a clip of former presidential candidate Alan Keyes titled “Alan Keyes’ unhinged rant on Fox News: Obama ‘has made himself the focus of evil, the focus of child-killing policy.’”
See Carson’s books, “Gifted Hands,” “America the Beautiful,” and “Take the Risk” in the WND Superstore now!

Rapists for Gun Control

Why do liberal gun control schemes target honest citizens? Wild Bill has a theory.

http://youtu.be/Hz09n2LCGNs

Elections Have Consequences: Employees Who Voted for Obama Should Be the First Fired.

by Lori Wallach Boxer
The economic environment facing defense contractors and defense employees is a DIRECT RESULT of voting for Obama. You reap what you sow. “Elections have consequences.” Isn’t that what Obeyme and the SoProMarxComs keep telling us? So, it’s poetic justice to read (see link below) about a woman in Ohio who is suing a defense contractor, claiming she was fired because she voted for Obama.
I know plenty of small business owners who have had to fire employees, and who are now working longer hours, physically exhausted. I know medium size business owners who not only have already fired employees since the first of this year, but who will also be firing more to get under 50 employee’s by year’s end.

Every Constitution loving business owner should fire every Obama voter. Let them feel the pain this POS president has created for business owners. Business owners can check their employees’ Facebook profiles. Check with your county voter registrar’s office because oftentimes they will have public access computers that list all the registered voters and their party affiliation. Walk through your business/office parking lot and record all the car tags with “Obama/Biden” stickers, then check them against your parking permit records. When you have to trim staff, it’s only fitting that those whose vote forced you to make the cuts be the ones who pay with their jobs. Then, when and if the time comes, as you fire an Obeyme drone, tell them, “I wish you luck, and I hope you enjoy the fundamental transformation of your employment status.”
Why should I support people who do not support me? Why employ those who vote to raise my costs and the costs of my family as well as other employees, forcing me to either close or downsize, rather than expand and hire? Why should I employ people who essentially hate profit, who think Obama should dictate what my ‘fair share’ of profit is so he can take the rest and redistribute as he sees fit? Why shouldn’t I fire someone who voted AGAINST the company that employs them?
If it’s my company, I will decide who works for me and who does not using any damn criteria that I want.
You know … the REAL way to handle the situation is not to FIRE Obama voters. We should DEPORT them.

Ex Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino @ Guns Across America Rally in Annapolis, MD - 2nd Amendment

                          Patrick Henry: "Give me Liberty, or Give me DEATH!"
oped: This is a must see video...Dan Bongino addresses the problem in the way we all feel...and like so many of us Ex/retired Law Enforcement officers as well as veterans we see what is going down with the Obama administration...the takeover from within (Marxismn) is in full steam ahead mode...people need to wake up and join the Oath Keepers...this is the only hope and salvation we have! We must unite and take on the enemy of the State...our lives ,liberty and the pursuit of happiness is at stake ...if not for yourselves at least do it for your children! Join Now: http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/2009/03/oath-keepers-declaration-of-orders-we.html

http://youtu.be/QjErcYTerdY

Teacher Asks for Report on Anything Then Gives Students Zeroes for Writing on Gun Show & Hunting

oped: This is a good case for Home Schooling...the public school system is a hot bed for Progressive (Marxist)teachers forcing their agenda on our children...not only violating the Bill of Rights and the Constitution but also forcing perversion ie: LGBT acceptance!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
byFrancis Marion 

Dewey Christian, an English teacher at Denton High School in Denton, Texas, a suburb or the Dallas-Fort Worth area, told his students to write a report on anything they wanted.  The subject matter was wide open and left to the discretion of the students.
Marshall Williams, a student in the class, decided to write his report about his recent visit to a Fort Worth gun show.  Before the report was finished, Christian told Williams that he would give him a zero on the report if he wrote about the gun show.  Alex Wright, a classmate of Williams mentioned hunting in his report and was also given a zero and rejected by Christian.
When Williams’ mother, Kimberly, heard what happened, she and her son went to meet with Christian about the rejected report.  The teacher said that he rejected the paper because he was concerned about school violence and the report talked about guns.  Fortunately for Kimberly, she recorded the meeting with her cell phone.
Marshall said he wrote about the visiting the gun show because he enjoyed the experience.  In his report, he never wrote about shooting a gun or any mention of political motives.  His mom told the local news:

“If it went against any district policy I would support it completely, but it doesn’t. It’s just his own moral beliefs trying to be put in his classroom and I disagree with that.”
Marshall added:

“I feel like he has just stomped on our right to free speech. He told us we would not be allowed to express ourselves and didn’t even consider what we had said.”

Only after the story hit the local news and the teacher was accused of violating the students’ First Amendment rights of free speech that school district issued the following statement:

“The teacher has accepted the paper and apologized to the student for misperceptions. The teacher’s intent was for guns not to be trivialized in any school situation because of recent events.”

Once again we see teachers pushing their own personal agendas onto their students and trampling on their constitutional rights at the same time.  It’s also another good reason to pull your kids out of public school and either homeschool or put them in a good private school where they can receive a morally sound education.

Biden to Law Enforcement: You’ve Had No Better Friend Than Me

byGordan Runyan 

That ol’ coot, Joe Biden. “Bless his little heart.” If you’ve ever attended church in the Bible belt, you know exactly the tone of voice to say that in, and exactly what it really means.
Even he would admit he’s let loose with some whoppers from time to time. He’s good for comic relief if nothing else. So, when he takes the time to warn you before he lets one go that this one’s really gonna smell a little “off,” well, best hold on to your hats.
Speaking at a gun control rally in Connecticut, the patron saint of foot-in-mouth disease gave the audience time to grab onto something.

” I am going to say something outrageous.”

Katie, bar the door!

Directing his next words at law enforcement agencies, he then said, “You’ve had no better friend over the last 35 years than me.”
I’ll give credit where it’s due. A rare moment of clear-thinking lucidity to recognize before he said it that sane people would greet such a statement with donkey-laughs. Here’s a far left lib now claiming that he’s spent three and half decades on the side of law and order.  It’s as outrageous as Barack Obama claiming that he can’t say one way or another about whether abortion kills a living human, as that’s above his pay grade. As outrageous as Hillary Clinton claiming it doesn’t really matter why the Americans in Benghazi died.
Joe Biden became a big law and order guy precisely when he became the second-in-command of all federal law enforcement.

He went on to speak of those killed in the Newtown shooting.
“We have to speak for all those voices, speak for those 20 beautiful children, who died 69 days ago, 12 miles from here.”
Indeed. Assuming that incident went down according to the official story, which is still dubious at best, I  have to wonder if not a single one of those slain might say, if given a voice, “Why didn’t anyone shoot back to protect me? Why were none of those who were watching over me able to defend me? Is there a difference between the phrase, ‘Gun Free Zone’ and the phrase ‘Target Rich Environment?’ How can you claim to speak for me when none of your ideas, if they had been fully enacted on that day, would’ve saved my life?”

How is it that only liberals know what any of the victims would say if they could speak from the grave?
Here is the truth: A gun free zone is nothing other than a No Self Defense Zone. It’s a Do Whatever You Like To Us Zone.
It’s more important than ever that Christian patriots understand the Scriptural explanation for the right we have from our Creator, which has been set forth clearly in the Second Amendment. This weekend, 2/23-2/24, Kindle readers can get the 10 page, information-jammed article The Biblical Case for Private Gun Ownership, for FREE. The Government does not give anyone any rights at all. Every right we have, if it is truly a right in the first place, comes from our Creator, as the Declaration of Independence declares.

CAIR Missouri—“…prosecute…anti-Islamic content on the internet…”

Visit our News page

CAIR Missouri—“…prosecute…anti-Islamic content on the internet…”

Tune in to our national “free speech” webcast Monday, March 11^th

Dear Patriot,

While the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) works relentlessly to get nations to criminalize speech that “denigrates” Islam, here in the U.S. some so-called “Muslim civil rights groups” are demanding the same thing.

Check out the post (below) that we found on the website of Hamas-linked CAIR-Missouri (Council on American-Islamic Relations).
We’ve highlighted one particularly offensive section for your edification.

Do you agree that “enough is enough?”

Then join us on Monday night, March 11^th, for our National Webcast announcing our “Americans United to Defend Free Speech” campaign.

---

Social Media Task Force
Written by Executive Director Faizan Syed

http://ztruth.typepad.com/files/prosecuteantiislamwww-cair-stlouis-com-1.pdf

Need for Muslim Social Media task force

As for those who think may have realize by now the power of social media, especially in recent days when mainstream electronic media boycotted the carnage of Rohingya Muslims. Experts are saying that the days of Electronic and print media are numbered, very soon social media will take over and it will play a vital role in shaping public opinion.

US military is fully exploiting this new technology to their advantage, read this article published in New York Times last year in November: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/18/world/us-military-goesonline-to-rebut-extremists.html?_r=1&;;pagewanted=all

Rand Corporation a think tank that works for Pentagon released a report a while ago suggesting that US should invest 20 billion dollars in coming years to drive the public opinion in it’s favor especially in war zones like in Afghanistan, Iraq and anywhere else where the anti western sentiments are high.

The need now for the Muslim community is to take heed and realize the urgent need to establish Muslim Social media task force which will monitor internet and counter the negative and anti Islam and Anti Muslim narratives instantly and in an efficient manner,

One lesson to be derived in this regard is the strategy adopted by Israeli government, it is training Jewish students from around the world and training them in Journalism and media monitoring.

Here is one example of the training American Jewish organizations is offering in US: http://www.theisraelproject.org/site/c.hsJPK0PIJpH/b.2540123/k.318F/TIPDC_Media_Fellowship_Details.htm

I have few suggestions to make in this regard.

An association of Muslim Youth should be created, they be trained in media monitoring and response and in media relations (See above link of Jewish organization for further details) These Youth should be encouraged to be passionate, aggressive and prompt in their responses. There need at least one such team in every country (I know it’s a daunting taks, but one small steps takes us to bigger one) *They should coordinate with other Muslim youth operating in different countries. Report anti Islamic and anti Muslim content on the internet to appropriate authorities to take action to remove it and go after those who post it online and prosecute and take actions according to the Shariah ruling. * Highlight the inconsistencies of the mainstream media and spread it across the web using social networking and all other platforms available to us. Highlight the bias of media in reporting issues pertaining to Islam and Muslims Write to editors and journalist reporting on Islam and on Muslim issues (Believe it does have an impact) Send mass emails out promptly urging Muslims to respond on news reports that is bias and anti Islamic in nature to the editors and journalist and TV anchors. Promote books, documentaries, movies that is of beneficial to the Muslim youth.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Make sure you receive all of your messages from ACT for America. Add actforamerica@donationnet.net to your address book as an approved email sender. If you found this message in your "Bulk" or "Spam" folder, please click the "Not Spam" button to notify your provider that these are emails you want to receive.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACT for America
P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591
www.actforamerica.org

Why Republicans Lose

By David Lane 

Newt Gingrich fired a cigar-shaped, self-propelled underwater projectile yesterday into the side of the USS Rove and his destroyer escorts.
Os Guinness’ insight is most helpful in the examination — and battle — for the soul of the Republican Party:
Put another way, if there are no universals or absolutes, then ‘normality’ is also relative and must be dictated by an arbitrary absolute created either by the stat or by the consensus of the population. This is true whether ‘normality’ refers to morality or sanity, badness or madness. One man’s ‘normality’ can become an implied or explicit judgment of another man’s ‘abnormality,’ whether mental or moral. Or, the assertion of one man’s ‘abnormality’ may be an assertion of freedom from the other man’s ‘normality.’ A man’s refusal to admit any degree of ‘abnormality’ in himself leads to the process of rationalization required to maintain his ‘normality’ at the expense of the other man’s ‘normality.’ This process tends to rationalize violence; for men justify their mistreatment of others by considering them as “abnormal” simply because others differ from them.

Last cycle, the GOP chieftains’ and lieutenants’ political killing of Todd Akin — yet funding $1M to liberal, homosexual activist candidate Richard Tisei — brings clarity to the philosophy of the Permanent Republican Majority, Karl Rove’s brainchild.
The amoral Permanent Republican Majority’s attempt to become the “normality” of the Republican Party — the concept of transmission being political triangulation which takes the place of principled conservative beliefs based upon conviction and moral absolutes — is troubling.
Christians participating in picking up a Republican House or Senate seat — ignoring one’s behavior, ethics, or integrity — is idolatry and worship of a false god and ultimately will collapse due to faulty construction to the foundation.
The Permanent Republican Majority’s “normality” (i.e. picking up Republican seats regardless of Biblical virtue, righteousness, or standard of decency) is the opposite of the ideology espoused by the wisest man — politically — who ever lived: “Righteousness exalts a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.”
The glory of a nation lies in its righteousness, not in its wealth or military might. If the key to maintaining sustainable freedom is righteousness — opposite of the credo and philosophy of the Permanent Republican Majority — Republicans and America are in a world of hurt.

Worse, Christian values — generally housed within the Republican Party — are being painted as “abnormal” in the attempt by the honchos of the Republican establishment to legitimize homosexual marriage within the Grand Old Party.
The USS Rove and its destroyer escorts’ postulation that their empty political philosophy is the gold standard for “being electable” — when in truth it’s a lust for power and money — challenges the notion that Biblical values, virtue, and Christian “normality” permit a democratic people to remain free.
Freedom always faces a fundamental moral challenge; virtue is a key component of freedom. Taking the Permanent Republican Majority’s route in the end will destroy the Republican Party initially, then America’s freedom.
Someone’s values are going to reign supreme in America. In God’s economy — from a Biblical perspective — the foundation that allows sustainable freedom and guards the nation are justice and righteousness.
Proverbs 20:28: “Mercy and truth preserve the king; and he upholdeth his throne by mercy.”
Michael V. Fox: “God’s loyalty and fidelity guard the king, but other proverbs about the foundation and security of the throne (nation) make it dependent on the king’s (nation’s) virtues.”

Having lost our Judeo Christian heritage (and it’s by-product of a Christian culture), secular America cannot absorb the virtues and values that Wisdom brings — ‘knowledge’, ‘insight’, ‘prudence’, ‘cunning’, ‘discretion’, ‘learning’, ‘guidance’, ‘counsel’, ‘understanding’, ‘competence’, ‘resourcefulness’, ‘heroic strength’ — it sounds like Pig Latin.
Dr. Bruce K. Waltke: “These virtues equip one to rule and to give him gravitas (dignity) associated with wealth.”
The establishment of a just and righteous society is primarily the responsibility of America’s pastors and pews; alas, deceived by the lie of the ‘separation of church and state’, the salt has lost its savor in this civil society.
Profiteering off of this empty, amoral political philosophy — which calls evil good and good evil — when carried to its logical conclusion results in the collapse of the Republican Party…ultimately.
David Lane
American Renewal Project

Photo Credit: Donkey Hotey (Creative Commons)

Lawmakers “Accidentally” Legalize Warrantless Invasion Of Gun Owners’ Homes

 
By Doug Book 

Lawmakers in Washington State have accidentally written a bill permitting police to invade private homes for the purpose of confiscating “illegal” guns and accessories, such as magazines that hold over 10 rounds.
According to Senate Bill 5737, introduced on February 13^th by Democrat State Senators Murray, Kohl-Welles, and Kline, no one may possess an “assault weapon” or the combination of a semi-automatic pistol or rifle capable of using a detachable magazine AND any magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds of ammo.

Happily, however, you ARE allowed to possess an UNLOADED assault weapon “…for the purpose of permanently relinquishing it to a law enforcement agency of the state.”  (Pg. 6)
Naturally, the statute would NOT apply to police, members of law enforcement in the state, or to federal authorities; in short, the oft-referred to “only ones.” That is, the only ones, the political ruling class tells us, who can be trusted with firearms.
However, if one happens to own an “assault weapon” prior to the effective date of the legislation, he may keep it IF he agrees to “safely and securely store the assault weapon.” And by the way, “THE SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY MAY, NO MORE THAN ONCE PER YEAR, CONDUCT AN INSPECTION TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE…” Not surprisingly, safe and secure storage is not defined in the bill. (Pg. 7) Also not surprisingly, this language was quickly deleted from the bill immediately upon lawmakers learning of the public outrage their little foray into dictatorship had spawned.

Yet, in order to provide cover for the bill’s sponsors and fellow liberals, duplicitous “journalist” Danny Westneat is hoping to sell Washington gun owners on the laughable story that the whole thing was just an unfortunate mistake! According to Westneat, one of the bill’s sponsors, Democrat Adam Kline “…did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on.” Naturally, ALL prospective laws should be written without paying much attention to what’s in them!
And the PRIME sponsor, Democrat Ed Murray, admitted that the language was “probably unconstitutional.” “I have to admit that shouldn’t be in there,” allowed the munificent liberal.
PROBABLY unconstitutional?  Here is the 4^th Amendment to the Constitution:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

And by the way, MR. Murray, how were your “only ones” to know which homes to enter and search? Could it be that mandatory, statewide gun registration was to become the next in your series of “common sense” gun laws?

But even with the Orwellian language now removed, SB 5737 is an affront to the God-given rights of the American people. After all, the bill still states that, should one inherit an “assault weapon,” he must either dispose of it by allowing law enforcement to confiscate it or permanently disable it. It is government literally authorizing the theft or destruction of personal property. Anyone who objects will be subject to one year in prison.
As for the claim by the bill’s authors that it was a mistake, a misstep? “It’s a “misstep” because they said what they want to do.  They gave away what their plan is.” The truth is, “it’s not a misstep, it’s the next step.”
Freedom-loving Americans must understand that the left will never stop their assault on our liberty until WE FINALLY STOP THEM.

John Brennan, Alleged Obama Blackmailer, Gaining Dictatorial Power

http://youtu.be/hKPZsYaOdgU 





By Kris Zane 
For anyone who has done even a cursory study of Barack Obama’s life, they know that his radical Marxist views are not a recent phenomenon.  They probably go back to his Occidental days, most definitely to the New York years, where he attended at least two (and probably three) of the annual Socialist Scholars Conferences held in Manhattan.
This leftist bent continued with his association in the 1990s with the Marxist New Party; socialist-funding groups like the Woods Fund (where Obama, with Bill Ayers at the helm, doled out money to groups like ACORN); and his later connection to the anti-Iraq War movement, anti-torture movement, anti-drone movement, etc.

So when Obama ascended to power, none of us who had been doing even basic research on Obama were surprised when he surrounded himself with a gaggle of leftist ideologues. But like those picture games kids play where the question is asked “What doesn’t belong?”, it was extremely odd when Obama in 2008 put John Brennan at the top of the list to head the CIA.
For years, as part of the CIA, Brennan was knee-deep in Bush’s use of waterboarding and psychotropic drugs to gain information. He was a proponent of the Iraq War, a proponent of drones to carry out assassinations, and a Republican—all things Obama and his leftist base have fought against for years. And Obama’s leftist base was livid and demanded that Brennan’s name be withdrawn from consideration for CIA head.
Obama brought Brennan into the inner circle anyway, giving him the job of what has turned out to be a position more powerful than the CIA director. His title sounds innocuous enough: Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.

Brennan, running something akin to a fiefdom with his drone assassination program, has the power to decide who lives and who dies and doesn’t have to provide evidence to any entity that the “target” presents any threat to America—even if they are an American—even if the American is living in the United States!
Investigative Reporter Michael Isikoff uncovered a secret memo, entitled “Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al Qa’ida or An Associated Force.”
The memo gives the Obama Administration—in effect, Brennan—the authority to kill any American citizen at anytime for any reason without proof, without due process, and with absolutely no oversight.
But this unchecked power exercised by John Brennan is mild compared to what we learned with the recent release of an extensive book on the Benghazi consulate attack. Benghazi: The Definitive Report, released on February 12, makes the shocking claim that Obama’s chief counter-terrorism officer, John Brennan, aside from having the authority to murder American citizens, has been waging a series of secret wars in North Africa and the Middle East against Al Qaeda and Al-Qaeda-linked groups. How secret? So secret that he and his minions at JSOC (Joint Special Operations Command) operated not only outside the purview of Congress, but outside the purview of the Pentagon and CIA. Former CIA head David Petraeus wasn’t even aware of Brennan’s secret wars! 


According to Benghazi: The Definitive Report, the attack on the Benghazi consulate had nothing to do with, as we were told, an amateurish anti-Muslim YouTube video leading to a “protest turned violent,” but was retaliation for John Brennan’s JSOC attacks on the Libya-based terrorist group Ansar al-Sharia.
So the question becomes: Why does a leftist ideologue President pal up with a man—John Brennan—whose ideology is the complete opposite to his?
For the answer to this, we must go back to the beginning of 2008 when it was announced that a company that no one had ever heard of—Analysis Corporation—had breached Obama’s passport file.
The incident was reported to simply be mischief, and the employee was reprimanded. We would soon find out that John Brennan, then advisor on intelligence and foreign policy to the Obama campaign, headed Analysis Corporation.
What we weren’t told at the time, however, was that Analysis Corporation (now Sotera Defense Solutions) then as now not only had access to virtually every passport of every American, but Social Security numbers (and probably birth certificates.)
We were told that Analysis Corporation was a State Department contractor. This was only partially true. Analysis Corporation was a database-crunching company focusing on national security and counterterrorism and thus worked for virtually every government entity with a connection to U.S. intelligence: CIA, FBI, DHS, etc. The Analysis Corporation was staffed by former government agents, which was why John Brennan, who had been the former second-in-command at the CIA, ran the company.

It has been theorized that the 2008 breach of Obama’s records was not in fact simply mischief by an employee, but was a cover to purge Barack Obama’s file of any reference to foreign citizenship.
What if in fact Brennan, as head of Analysis Corporation and obviously with access to Obama’s records, breached his file not to cover for him, but to blackmail him?
When John Brennan looked at Obama’s passport, his Social Security file, and possibly his birth certificate in early 2008, what exactly did he see? Something that America would find deeply disturbing? Something that would disqualify Obama from being President like the fact that Obama probably became an Indonesian citizen when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, as evidenced by Obama’s grammar school records, indicating that he was a Muslim Indonesian with the legal name of Barry Soetoro?
Is Brennan using this information to force Obama to make him CIA chief?
What exactly does Brennan gain by becoming the CIA chief? Not simply becoming the head of our spy agency. This would give him access to virtually all electronic communications: phone, email, text, video—everything—access to a database that has been in the works for years, covering every single American—an Orwellian database that was revealed by a former National Security Agency whistleblower in July of 2012.
We also know a wide-scale domestic drone program is coming. The DHS has branded it for “public safety.” Who will be in charge of this “public safety” drone program? Probably the person with the most experience with drones: John Brennan.  With access to every piece of information on every American,  able to dispatch a drone to spy on and and kill anyone at any time, he will be the most powerful person in the United States.
John Brennan, dictator, brought to power all because Barack Obama wants to keep his records secret.
 

Breaking: Obama Campaign Caught In Major NC Vote Fraud Scheme

North Carolina’s Civitas Institute has revealed that the North Carolina State Board of Elections and the Obama campaign conspired to register at least 11,000 people via the internet in violation of state law. This has been confirmed through records requests filed with all of North Carolina’s 100 counties. The counting is not yet complete.
North Carolina does not allow online voting, but according to Civitas, SBE staff authorized an Obama campaign website, Gottaregister.com, to use a web-based registration program. The SBE’s chief lawyer responded to the charge with a plainly disingenuous 1984-newspeak answer:

Wright repeatedly denied that the SBE allowed online voter registration, insisting that it was “web-based voter registration”[ii] instead, as if there could be a “web-based” process that wasn’t online.
The technology from Allpoint Voter Services uses remote-control pens to transmit “signatures” over the Internet, according to techpresident.com[iii]. After entering voter information in an online form, the citizen “signs” it with a stylus or a finger. The Allpoint technology records the signature and then transmits it to one of two autopens – one in California, the other in Nevada[iv]. One of the pens transcribes the signature on to a paper voter registration form. Allpoint then mails the documents to local election boards – or is supposed to, a point we’ll come back to.
To say this is not “online” registration but “web-based” is like saying a certain vehicle is not a car, it’s an automobile. The point of having a “wet signature” – one in ink – is to provide a universally accepted way proving that a prospective voter is affirming in person all the facts on the form. To have an auto pen inserted at one point in this long computerized process is a far different thing. Even the Obama campaign called it online voter registration. Because, no matter how you twist words around, that’s what it is.

Read more at AIM.org. By James Simpson.

From My Cold, Dead Booty: Feminists, Try Coming for my Panties

by: Teri O’Brien
Whether it’s economics, biology, or criminology, the Left is permanently at war with reality. Some of its most militant combatants are radical feminists, who refuse to accept the fact that there’s more to the difference between men and women than our plumbing. Unfortunately, as the recent insane decision by the Obama administration to lift the ban on women in direct combat shows, feminists have been very successful at infecting our society with their ridiculous, wrongheaded and destructive view of gender differences. Oh, wait … there aren’t any gender differences. That’s what the New York Times, Time magazine, and every other irrelevant Lame Stream Media rag has been telling us for at least 40 years.

It’s not enough that feminists have managed to convince at least one, and probably two, generations of women that the ultimate in liberation is to hit the sheets with as many guys as possible, comfortable that their state-mandated contraception will eliminate any unpleasant, style-cramping consequences, or knowing that in a worse case scenario, in which they find themselves in what we used to call “a family way,” they can quickly and easily get rid of that inconvenient tissue mass and move on as if it never happened. It’s also not enough that they have practically made it a crime for little boys to be boys in public schools. It’s not even enough that they have forced the government to recognize their “right” to weaken the U.S. Military and threaten our national security. Now they want our panties.

Sarah Fentem, who is identified as “a writer based in Chicago,” writes in the Atlantic:

Every month or so, I receive a glossy coupon from Victoria’s Secret in my mailbox. “Free panty!” it beckons. “No purchase necessary!”
Reading those words, I cringe a little bit. Not because I hate underwear — I’m an ardent lover of underwear. It’s because I hate the word “panty.” I hate the plural form of “panty” as well. “Panties” creeps me out.

And apparently I’m not alone. In addition to a slew of blog posts and message boards denouncing the word, The Huffington Post’s Zoë Triska named it “the worst word ever.” Cracked.com included “panties” in its list of the “Five Words That Need To Be Banned From English.”
Why does the word “panties” bother so many people?

Oh, she is so right. Anti-panty fever is obviously sweeping the nation!
I do agree with her, in part. “Panties” creeps me out, too, but only because so often while watching some of our alleged male leaders, I ask myself “Gee, I wonder what color panties he’s wearing?”
It’s easy to dismiss Ms. Fentem’s column as absurd, which it is, but it is also an insight into the rat’s nest of intellectual confusion that is the liberal mind in general, and the feminist’s in particular. To understand how anyone can even write the sentence “Why does the word “panties” bother so many people?” you need to think (and I use the word “think” loosely) like someone who has had every ounce of common sense wrung out of her by years of feminist indoctrination, someone who buys into all the “gender is a cultural construct” baloney that they bleat incessantly.
Why do feminists hate the word “panties?” It’s simple. “Panties” are something innately feminine, as in something worn by women, who are distinctly different from men, and happily so. It’s a word that conjures up visions of lace, underwire bras, nylon stockings, and sexually-alluring females, desired by and pursued by men. Yikes! If any feminists read that last sentence, it’s probably all they can do to keep from falling out of their combat boots, and there lies the real kernel of truth in this silly, anti-panty idea. Feminists despise the basic biological fact that men are attracted to good-looking women. I will leave it to you decide why that is so, although I might suggest that a Google images search of the names of some prominent radical feminists might provide some insight.
I’m sorry, my chunky, short-haired sisters, it’s true. Attractive women are desirable to men, and men chase them, buy them jewelry and want to be with them. And, because alluring women are desirable, they can be selective. Consider the research from Notre Dame sociologist Elizabeth McClintock, as reported in the Wall Street Journal:

The better-looking a man is, the more lifetime sexual partners he reports; the better-looking a woman, the fewer. Good-looking men are more likely to have had sex soon after meeting a partner; good-looking women, less likely. Good-looking women are likelier to describe their relationships as “committed”; good-looking men, less likely.

That’s what the feminists really hate. Pretty girls can choose the men they want, and get them to not only buy them dinner, but marry them, and support their children. It’s actually nature’s way, and I for one, love it.
There I said it. I enjoy being a girl. I dare you, Feminists. Try coming for my panties.
Teri O’Brien is America’s Original Conservative Warrior Princess, and host of The Teri O’Brien Show, which debuted on Chicago’s radio home for Rush Limbaugh, and now airs in the cutting edge world of online media, She is a yoga-practicing, 2nd Amendment-loving, bench pressing Mac girl geek, attorney, provocateur, author, and dangerous thinker. Learn more at http://www.teriobrien.com.

Top Medical School Hosts Porn Panel In Campus Chapel

oped: Isn't the Obama world wonderful...perversion is the new norm!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Depending on which source you use, Washington University Medical School in St. Louis, Missouri, is ranked anywhere from number six to number four of the top medical schools in the nation.  The medical school is part of Washington University whose reputation for excellence is world renown
That’s why I found this report so disturbing.
Washington University recently hosted ‘A Night With the Stars: Life, Love, and Sex in the Workplace.’  The panel of stars was composed of famed porn stars James Deen, Lance Hart and Tori Black.  Each of the panelists have appeared in numerous, perhaps hundreds of porn videos and movies.
The event, part of the program at the school referred to as Sex Week, was held in the main chapel on campus.  The three porn stars talked about careers in the porn industry while sitting in what once was a house of God.
Even more troubling was that the $10,350 cost of the event was paid for with mandatory student fees.  Additionally, it was sanctioned by campus administration.
Read more: lastresistance.com

ALERT: Congress must remove Obama from office for targeting American citizens, assembling a police state, and destroying the Second Amendment.

ALERT: Congress must remove Obama from office for targeting American citizens, assembling a police state, and destroying the Second Amendment. Take Action: Demand Congress to file articles of impeachment! Conservative American, The United States as "the land of the free" is swiftly becoming fiction and Obama's "fundamentally transformed America" is becoming reality. While it is true that all branches of government have encroached upon our God-given freedoms - the Congress and the Courts both playing a part - America's overgrown Executive is chiefly to blame. That's right; the Constitution and the Rule of Law have been flipped on their head by Barack Obama and his Administration through executive orders, memoranda, and "emergency" actions. In 2013 alone we have seen Obama's full-blown attack on the People's Second Amendment. Yes; Obama's Second Amendment seems to read "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed ... unless one works for the government." In Obama's "fundamentally transformed America," Americans themselves are targeted by the police and the military. How much longer will Congress - a separate, but equal power - allow the Constitution and the Rule of Law be trampled by Obama and his hired men? Barack Obama has been and is the most dangerous, reckless president in our entire nation's history and it is time that upright members of Congress stop him! The House and the Senate must take action against Obama's dictatorship by seeking to convict him of his crimes and remove him office! Take Action: Demand Congress to file articles of impeachment against Barack Obama! Select Here and Blast Faxes! Obama's Pocket Police Obama just added another weapon to his arsenal against American citizens - the "Interagency Working Group to Counter Online Radicalization to Violence." While the agency's high-sounding title may sound admirable, it only takes one scratch on its surface to prove otherwise. The key is in the questions: Who is does the agency target? Who are the so-called "radicals"? Seeing that White House website describes the group essentially as a digital counterterrorism police force - able to "investigate and prosecute" - it isn't striking to see groups like al-Qa'ida listed as targets. However, what is striking is the agency's listing of "sovereign citizens" among legitimate terrorist organizations. That's right; Obama's new "digital cops" are directed to take action against so-called "extremists" who "believe that even though they physically reside in this country, they are separate or 'sovereign' from the United States." These are Americans he is after! Under this criterion, our founding fathers would today be considered enemies of the state, and their Declaration of Independence called a "terrorist" manifesto! It looks like West Point's junk-study that essentially declares war on patriotism is paying off... How many more bricks will Congress allow the Dictator-in-Chief Barack Obama lay in his building of the American Police State? Further, how many more Americans will be arrested, imprisoned, or added to Barack Obama's personal kill list? We must tell Congress that enough is enough! No more "legal" attacks on Americans by the Obama Administration can be tolerated! Take Action: Demand Congress to file articles of impeachment against Barack Obama! Select Here and Blast Faxes! Obama's National Security Force Obama's DHS has been stockpiling weapons and ammunition - hollow-points no less - for what purpose? Remember, Homeland Security is placing these orders, not the Department of Defense! In fact, the DHS just recently requested an additional 7,000 "personal defense weapons." Is Obama's "civilian military" being assembled under our noses - the one he hinted at during his 2008 campaign when he said, "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." (Note: The defense budget at the time of this statement was $439 billion; to keep the "civilian" force "just as well-funded" would require an additional $438 billion.) Georgia's Rep. Paul Broun says that Obama's "civilian military force" is: "totally against freedom, it's not in the best interest of the American people ... [it's] exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany, it's exactly what the Soviet Union did. In fact, every fascist dictatorship [had] established a national police force or national security force ...As a peace-loving, freedom-loving American who believes in the Constitution as our founding fathers meant it to be, I'm just extremely fearful of this kind of mentality." So far as one can tell, Rep. Broun has been proven absolutely correct. Nobel Peace Prize winner Dr. Jim Garrow told Ben Swann in an interview that the Obama Administration, right now, is dispelling military officers that aren't willing to fire on American citizens! Click here to watch the full interview.) Garrow said, "... the Obama Administration is in fact pushing the military into doing that that are a breach of the Constitution and a breach of the Second Amendment." Take Action: Demand Congress to file articles of impeachment against Barack Obama! Select Here and Blast Faxes! Since Obama took office, military training exercises in public locations have not been uncommon - in fact, they are described as "routine." Just last month, for example, black helicopters were "buzzing around" Miami. Their purpose? Police told the Miami Herald: "This ... routine training conducted by military personnel [is] designed to ensure the military's ability to operate in urban environments, prepare forces for upcoming overseas deployments, and meet mandatory training certification requirement." In case that isn't scary enough, read this comment from the Examiner: "Nevertheless, the sight of soldiers rappelling onto rooftops and the sound of gunfire have many concerned. At one point, a photographer in Miami captured video of a military helicopter firing its machine guns as it flew over an area freeway. The chopper was firing blanks, but an artist visiting the city apparently didn't know that. "I heard the machine gun fire and then I hit the deck...I didn't know what to expect, and it was one of the loudest things I'd ever heard," Josh Epperson said. While Obama's DHS is loading-up on ammunition - enough rounds to plug every American six-times - and buying "assault weapons" - the very kinds that gun-grabbers are trying to remove from the hands of Americans - many Congressmen remain sitting on their hands! When will Congress stand-up and fight for the people they claim to represent? When will they flex their muscles and check the power of the overgrown Executive Branch? Congressional action is long overdue and things are only getting worse... action is needed now! Take Action: Demand Congress to file articles of impeachment against Barack Obama! Select Here and Blast Faxes! Obama's Disarmament Agenda In the Virginia Ratifying Convention of 1778, George Mason identified one of King George III's tactics to control the colonists: disarmament. Mason said: "Forty years ago, when the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man, who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually ..." Our founders knew well that big government always prefers to rule by disarmament, because an unarmed populace - like Mason rightly noted - is an "enslaved" one. In addition to providing specifications for an army to be raised for the defense of the States' freedom (see: Article I, Section 8, Clause 12); the Second Amendment to the Constitution established "the right to keep and bear arms." Thus, the Constitutional provision for Congress to create Armed Forces is treated as separate from the individual's right to hold his own arms. In other words, the Second Amendment was not adopted to establish rights for an army; no, it was adopted to codify the natural, individual right to self-defense and as a block against tyranny. On January 16 - just over one month ago - Barack Obama made a declaration in front of the nation in opposition to this basic, constitutional right. His nearly thirty-minute address on "curbing gun violence" was an assault on the Second Amendment. Despite his oath of office - which he recently recited for a second time - where he placed his hand on the Bible and proclaimed that he will, to the best of his ability, "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" - Obama has worked against the Constitution in the name of defending it. Though many of his executive actions urged Congress to take action - regardless of the fact the not one of the twenty-three are in the proper role of the general government - Barack Obama has stood against the People's right to keep and bear arms. Considering this fact, we must urge the House of Representatives to file articles of impeachment against Barack Obama for standing in opposition to the Second Amendment, and the Constitution itself, by accomplishing (via Presidential Memoranda) and promoting (via executive action) national gun-control. The Congress must exercise their power against Barack Obama's January 16 attack against the Second Amendment! Take Action: Demand Congress to file articles of impeachment against Barack Obama! Select Here and Blast Faxes! Congressmen say "Impeach!" Despite Obama's law-breaking there are a few members of Congress willing to take action. Representative Steve Stockman was the first member of Congress to seriously threat filing articles of impeachment regarding Obama's twenty-three anti-gun executive orders last month. In a January 14 statement he said, "I will seek to thwart [Obama's executive lawbreaking] by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment." Rep. Trey Radel joined Stockman shortly after, saying, "We have completely lost our checks and balances in this country, the Congress needs to hold the president accountable for the decisions that he's making right now, and that why again, I would say that all options should be on the table." It's likely that several other Congressmen are thinking the same, but keeping silent for fear of being branded as "radical" by the media and their liberal constituents. It's time we send a clear message to Congress reminding them that it is their duty to uphold the Constitution and check the Executive Branch, regardless of whether or not it is popular! Obama's law-breaking must be met with Congressional force... it's time for Congress to call for Obama's impeachment! Take Action: Demand Congress to file articles of impeachment against Barack Obama! Select Here and Blast Faxes! We The People must demand our elected servants to do the right thing! We must demand that they convict and remove Obama from office! For America, Conservative Action Alerts www.ConservativeActionAlerts.com P.S. Obama's unconstitutional actions must be opposed! Tell Congress to file articles of impeachment against Obama! Select Here to send your free letters to your lawmakers!