Saturday, May 16, 2015

Army Delta Forces takes out ISIS Commander in Syria

OOOOOOOOHAAAAAAAAA..bout' damn time the Pentagon sent in the first team...I mean like I respect the Navy Seals and all but the Green Berets/Army Cav/101st AB/Marines were kickin' royal ass in Viet Nam when Navy Seals were still Frogmen... and I was growing weary of Seal Team6 this and Seal Team6 that all the time over and over again while the Delta Force ...Washington State was sitting idly by saying why not we!...and when it comes to fixing bayonets in the dirt...well Amy Rocks...ha I know Navy always seems to beat Army in the Army vs Navy football give me a break I am a happy camper and just cheering on my boys...Go Army:)
As for POTUS (and yes this is directed at Barry Obama the POTUS pot head) giving the go ahead...well thats what a POTUS is supposed to do listen to his Generals...and by no means take credit... give credit where credit is due...Those who get down and dirty...not those masturbating in a plush office ..enough said yes?

At any rate cue:

ISIS Caliph: Islam the 'Religion of War'

The Clash Of Civilizations: Awaiting The Coming Crusade We Got It All – All About Webistes, Entertainment And Blogging


How many times have you heard that Islam is a "religion of peace," usually said shortly after something explodes?
Or the baloney about the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria being neither Islamic nor a state? (One gets the impression that President Obama would like to add "Nor are they in Iraq or Syria" if he thought he could get away with it.)
Well, finally, a major political figure has come forward speaking the truth about modern Islam.
It's the Caliph of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who lectured the world's Muslims in an online post: "O Muslims, Islam was never for a day the religion of peace. Islam is the religion of war."

There you have it straight from the camel's mouth.
But there was more as the caliph urged Muslims to get off the bench.
"Where are you in relation to your prophet (peace be upon him) whom you claim to emulate, and who spent his whole life … as a mujahid for the cause of Allah, fighting for his enemies?" al-Baghdadi wrote. "His lateral incisor tooth was broken in battle, his forehead was wounded, two rings from his chainmail cut his cheeks, his helmet was broken on his head and blood ran down his face."

Soon enough, though, al-Baghdadi reverted to more typical Muslim form, blaming all the violence of ISIS on Christians and Jews "waging war" against Muslims.
If only. We might actually want to try that sometime. It worked out pretty well during Jefferson's day in stopping the Barbary pirates.
Al-Baghdadi and his followers are a bunch of loathsome animals who have murdered, raped and pillaged their way across the Mideast, but they know the score.

This is war.
Not just against the United States, but against the entire Western World and, ultimately, civilization itself.
If our leaders don't wake up to that fact soon, the future of mankind may come to resemble its dark Stone Age past.  

Holy War or Funny Jihad photo

Judge Blocks Eminent Domain Seizure of Private Airport

Privately-Owned New Jersey Airport Faces Government Takeover
A year and half ago, I wrote about the Solberg Airport in Readington Township, New Jersey. Located about 36 miles west southwest of Newark, the Solberg Airport was privately owned and operated by the Solberg family since 1939. Three generations of Solbergs have successfully run the small airport. 
In fact, the airport was so successful that the Readington Township officials decided that they wanted it for their own so they passed an ordinance declaring that they wanted to convert the privately owned airport into a municipal airport.

This is nothing more than a case of pure greed and power on the part of the Readington Township Committee. In 2006, they filed a condemnation lawsuit against the Solbergs in an attempt to force them to sell the airport to the township, but the lawsuit failed.
In November 2013, the Readington Township Committee passed an ordinance giving themselves the power to use eminent domain to seize control of the Solberg Airport. At a township meeting, every resident spoke out against the committee’s plan, but they were determined to seize the airport for themselves. The Solberg’s continued to fight the Township’s actions.
I’m happy to announce that New Jersey Superior Court Judge Paul Armstrong issued a 50 page ruling that ripped the Readington Township Committee to pieces. He stopped short of saying outright that the Township’s testimony in the case was false as he wrote:

“In the case of Solberg Hunterdon Airport this Court finds that the stated purpose of the condemnation was a subterfuge. Its sole purpose was to prevent the expansion of the airport under the pretextual banner of open space policy. Thus, given the strong inferences presented in an extensive record, the Court concludes that the Township of Readington has no reasonable public need for the Solberg property. The Court further holds that the Township’s primary purpose was never environmental protection, but rather limiting airport expansion. The Complaint was therefore presented in bad faith and is hereby dismissed pursuant to the law of eminent domain in New Jersey.”
“The foregoing analyses, findings and opinion of the Court informs and authenticates the invalidation of the condemnation in its entirety as a manifest abuse of the power of eminent domain.”
Judge Armstrong also ordered the Readington Township Committee to pay all of the legal fees incurred by the Solberg family over the years, which is in the millions of dollars.
It’s refreshing to see a judge actually rule on the law rather than on agenda, especially in today’s ever growing liberal judicial system.
Eminent domain was initially created to help cities and municipalities to fight urban blight and clean up properties that have fallen into ruin. However, I find that in most cases it’s used primarily for greed and no other reason.
In northern Kentucky, there was a long legal fight against eminent domain when a city wanted to take over private property so that a private builder could build stores on the same property. Eventually, a home owner won out and was able to save his home, but not after a long and expensive legal fight.

But in most cases, liberal courts uphold the efforts of liberal and greedy politicians and private citizens have their homes and properties stolen from them by the very government that’s supposed to serve and protect them.


Complaint says crosses at Catholic school offensive, prevent Muslim prayers

Crosses in every room at Washingon D.C.’s Catholic University of America are a human rights violation that prevent Muslim students from praying.
That’s the complaint to the Washington, D.C. Office of Human Rights filed by a professor from rival George Washington University across town.
GWU Law School Professor John Banzhaf takes the Catholic institution to task for acting “probably with malice” against Muslim students in a 60-page complaint that cites “offensive” Catholic imagery all over the Catholic school, which he says hinder Muslims from praying.

Baffled Catholic University officials say they have never received a complaint from any of the schools Muslim students.
Banzhaf, who already has a pending lawsuit against the university over ending its policy of allowing mixed-gender dormitories and has a history of filing civil rights suits on such topics as childhood obesity and smoking, filed the complaint alleging that Muslim students are not given their own prayer rooms.
He alleges that the university, “does not provide space – as other universities do – for the many daily prayers Muslim students must make, forcing them instead to find temporarily empty classrooms where they are often surrounded by Catholic symbols which are incongruous to their religion,” according to the Tower, Catholic University’s student newspaper.
The complaint further objects that Muslims must pray at the school’s chapels “and at the cathedral that looms over the entire campus – the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.”
A spokesperson for the human rights office said they are investigating Banzhaf’s complaint — and the inquiry could take as long as six months.

"This attorney is really turning civil rights on its head,” observed Patrick Reilly of the Cardinal Newman Socity. “He’s using the law for his own discrimination against the Catholic institution and essentially saying Catholic University cannot operate according to Catholic principles.”
The complaint is absurd, writes Thomas Peters on the website CatholicVote.
Can you imagine a law professor helping Catholic students to sue a Jewish or Muslim school to demand that the schools install crosses, remove their religious symbols, and allow the Catholics to construct a chapel on their property?” wrote Peters. “Can you imagine the argument being that Jewish and Muslims schools using their religious symbols and following their faith traditions would be described in the legal brief as “offensive”?!
“Normally I would have confidence that this lawsuit will be deemed without merit, but the way things are going these days, I just can’t be sure anymore. Simply incredible.”

Friday, May 15, 2015

'Wag the Dog' Clintons 'No~Hell No~' Hillary 2016 Lest us not forget #Bosnia

 Image result for funny pictures bill clinton madeline albright bombing bosnia
[Caption : So Billy..lets attack those damn Bosnia Christians and bury the Monica scandal]

oped:The Clintons along with Madelein Halfbright ushered in the new Caliphate when they sided with the Muslims and attacked the Christian Serbs in Bosnia...akin to what is happening with the Barack Obama administration now...this is why studying history is so important...those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it!  
Image result for funny pictures bill clinton madeline albright bombing bosnia

by:Citizen Soldier ^ 


Why Clinton Bombed the Serbs - A National Disgrace Few American Even Know Nor Care About

1. To appease the Islamic world for our daily bombing of Iraq. President Clinton wanted to prove to the Muslim world that we really cared and that we were willing to destroy a Christian people to prove it.

2. The Saudis wanted the first Islamic country in the belly of Europe, and Clinton wanted cheap oil and Saudi money. The Saudis had signed a letter of intent to buy $6 billion worth of Boeing aircraft. The day after we bombed the Serbs in 1995 based on the self-inflicted Markale market place massacre by Bosnian Muslim forces, the Saudis signed on the dotted line. A coincidence? I don't think so. This is what Yossef Bodansky, author of "Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America," had to say in his 1995 book, "Offensive in the Balkans:"

- "Phase Three started with the self-inflicted major terrorist provocation. On Friday 5, 1994, a major explosion rocked the Markale -- Sarajevo's main market place -- causing heavy casualties. What was immediately described as the ubiquitous "Serb mortar shell" was actually a special charge designed and built with help from HizbAllah experts and then most likely dropped from a nearby rooftop onto the crowd of shoppers. Video cameras at the ready recorded this expertly-staged spectacle of gore, while dozens of corpses of Bosnian Muslim troops killed in action (exchanged the day before in a 'body swap' with the Serbs) were paraded in front of cameras to raise the casualty count.

- "This callous self-killing was designed to shock the West especially sentimental and gullible Washington, in order to raise the level of Western sympathy to the Bosnian Muslims and further demonize the Serbs so that Western governments would be more supportive of Sarajevo's forthcoming aggressive moves, and perhaps even finally intervene military."

There were other reports from European newspapers such as The [London] Sunday Times," with headlines that read, "Serbs 'not guilty' of massacre, Experts warned US that mortar was Bosnian" (1 Oct. 1995), and "US Framed Serbs for Market Bombing," from the Stoneyhill Center, a British think tank (Oct 1995). No such headlines appeared in US national newspapers.

3. Clinton needed a new mission for NATO. The Soviet Union had collapsed and if you recall, the NATO Treaty was a collective security agreement between member nations that if one NATO nation were attacked by the Soviet Union (CCCP), other NATO members would go to its defense. In violation of International law, the NATO Treaty, the UN Charter and without the approval of Congress, Clinton and his administration, along with Serb-hating Madeline Albright, Wesley Clark, Richard Holbrooke and the rest of the Clinton gang, bombed tiny Yugoslavia that did not attack us or any NATO nation, was never a threat to us, nor did it have weapons of mass destruction.

One graphic example of Madeleine Albright's animosity towards the Serbs was the time she was entering the United Nations building as US ambassador and a Serb called out and asked why she was doing these terrible things to the Serbs. She answered, "Because they deserve it!" A more humorous account regarding Ms. Albright is the story of how the war in the Balkans really began. During a meeting of Madeleine Albright with the all-male NATO ministers, she asked the question, "Well gentleman, do we make love or do we make war?" Of course, the answer was unanimously for war.

4. Clinton couldn't let this pip-squeak of a nation defy The New World Order.

5. Our wag-the-dog president had to have a diversion from his affair in the Oval Office with a woman young enough to be his daughter.

6. Clinton also needed a war to prove he was a wartime president in the mold of FDR in order to put to rest his draft-dodging days and his contempt for the US military. The propaganda against the Serbian people has not been equalled since Hitler's Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, said, "If you tell a big enough lie and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." In civil wars all sides do terrible things, but in this war all blame fell on the Serbs. President Clinton was (and continues to be) the biggest con artist this nation has ever seen and it is unfortunate that the American people believed every word uttered by him regarding the events in the Balkans even though over 75% of the American people believed him to be a liar. The fate of the Serbs from Bosnia to Kosovo was sealed.

It is a sad reflection on all Americans what William Jefferson Clinton did to the Serbian people in our name. Sadder still is the realization that if he were able to run for president again he might very well be elected.  So Hell No on Hillary 2016

Religion of Peace? Muslim Killers Murder 3 Bloggers in 4 Months

... , Bangladesh, and hacked him to death with machete blows to the head

You probably haven’t noticed, what with the mayhem in the Middle East and the terrorist attacks here in the West, but the Far East is suffering under Islamic terror as well.
In the nation of Bangladesh, generally considered a “moderate” Muslim nation, three bloggers have been butchered by radicals over the last four months. Stories like this hit especially hard for someone like myself, who makes a living blogging about current events and politics in the USA. I think that here in America we often take our ability to speak freely for granted, not realizing or considering that all over the world people put their lives on the line when they speak out against injustice. (Even here in the USA conservative bloggers face danger from Islamists and from liberals.)
Yesterday morning in Bangladesh Ananta Bijoy Das, 32, was butchered as he went to work at a local bank. Witnesses say four masked men armed with “cleavers” and machetes attacked him by hacking at him with their weapons. Police say that Das died during the attack and would have been killed instantly by one of the blows he received.

Das is the 3rd blogger killed since February in a scene that is becoming all too commonplace in Bangladesh. Muslim cowards murdering anyone who disagrees with them… I wonder if the people who were so vehemently against Pamela Geller’s free speech event in Garland, Texas think that these bloggers also deserved what they got? Is giving your opinion about Islam now a crime that can be punished no matter who you are, where you live, or what you believe?

In March, another Bangladeshi blogger, Washiqur Rahman, was also hacked to death. Read one of the last things he wrote before his assassination.
Today is Bangladesh’s liberation day
The Mullah has freedom, extremists have freedom, Muslims have freedom, the corrupt have freedom, political leaders have freedom, adulates of the political leaders have freedom, rapists are free, the armed forces are free, so-called civil society is free, intellectuals who support Islamists, they also have freedom, religious leaders have freedom, the garment factory owners have freedom, the ferry owners have freedom.
Not free: the farmers and labours
Not free: indigenous people and minorities
Not free: Freethinkers
Not free: All the people who just want to be human… 

In February, a Bangladeshi-American blogger, Avjit Roy, was also murdered with machetes and knives as he walked home from a book fair with his wife in Bangladesh’s capital of Dhaka.
These three men are the latest casualties in Islam’s war on free speech, but they are far from the only casualties. Over the last few years, many other Bangladeshi bloggers have dies in similarly “mysterious” circumstances. To be a blogger in Bangladesh who does not agree with Islam is to take your very life in your hands.

Anger from across the Internet was palpable as bloggers, activists and anyone else who was paying attention spoke out against the madness of the murdering Muslim terrorists.

Not so “irrational” after all is it?
But of course some seemed happy about what had happened. (The word Bismillah means “in the name of Allah.”)

This entire exercise reminds me of a televised debate that Dutch politician, free speech advocate and anti-Islam activist, Geert Wilders, had a while back. The fellow he was debating had just accused him of some pretty nasty things, including hating people for being different when he tried to equate Islam with other world religions. But Wilders was having none of it… his response is epic and it clearly explains the difference between Islam and Christianity.
From Around the Web

Only one presidential candidate with 100% conservative voting record

We certainly like 100% Conservative.
Check it out:
Every year, the American Conservative Union releases their ratings of U.S. lawmakers. It basically makes it easier for the public to hold them accountable. You can say you’re a conservative– championing limited government, fiscal responsibility and free market policies­– all day, but that dumb cliché is true. Actions speak louder than words. 

Most Republicans scored over 60 percent, but only sixteen scored a 100 percent conservative voting record. Of those, only one is officially running for president.

It’s none other than Sen. Ted Cruz.
Continue reading on

Thursday, May 14, 2015

The Saudis just went nuclear on their Obama snub

The Saudi-Obama rift keeps getting deeper - Business Insider
First, King Salman of Saudi Arabia embarrassed the Obama administration when he backed out of the summit after the White House announced he was going to attend.
The last-minute move was widely perceived as a deliberate snub, and the Saudis offered only a vague excuse for King Salman's absence.
Crown Prince and Defense Minister Mohammed bin Nayef and Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz attended the talks in Salman's place.

Obama then incorrectly introduced the deputy crown prince and misnamed the founder of the kingdom.
Then came today's big news: The New York Times reported that Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries intend to match Iran's nuclear capacity if the US reaches a deal that allows some aspects of the country's nuclear program, including uranium enrichment and ballistic missiles research, to continue.
One unnamed Arab leader who is participating in the talks told the Times that Sunni Arab countries "can't sit back and be nowhere as Iran [a Shiite regime] is allowed to retain much of its capability and amass its research."
David Rothkopf, CEO and editor of the group that publishes Foreign Policy magazine, weighed in on the implications of this, saying that Saudi Arabia's expression of intent to match Iran's nuclear development is a bigger blow to Obama's summit than King Salman's absence.

While the nuclear deal would allow international monitoring of Iran's nuclear activities, many worry that Iran intends to eventually construct a nuclear weapon and would not hold up its end of the agreement.

(REUTERS) Obama's summit, which includes high-level officials from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, and Bahrain and is being held at the White House and Camp David, was designed to reassure Arab leaders that the US is still keeping their security in mind as negotiations over Iran's nuclear program progress.
But so far, the talks don't seem to be having their desired effect.
"My guess is that the summit is going to leave everybody feeling a little bit unsatisfied," Jon Alterman, the Middle East director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told the Associated Press.
The rift between the US and Sunni Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, has gotten so wide that some leaders from the region may be counting the days until Obama is out of office.
Emile El Hokayem of the International Institute for Strategic Studies told The Wall Street Journal: "They hope what they have is an Obama problem, not a US problem. They’re looking toward 2016."
For his part, Obama seems intent on finalizing the landmark deal with Iran while also assuaging the concerns of Gulf Arab leaders. 

Deeper than nuclear negotiations

(Reuters) Saudi Arabia's King Salman gestures to the media as he sits with President Obama (L) at Erga Palace in Riyadh, January 27, 2015.
Other sources of strain between the US and Saudi Arabia that go beyond the US' handling of the nuclear negotiations make that more difficult.
The US has been working in parallel with Iran-backed Shiite militias to help drive the Islamic State terror group out of Iraq. The US has also become less dependent on Saudi Arabia for oil, and this changing economic relationship has altered the relationship between the two allies.
The Saudis, in turn, are increasingly taking regional matters into their own hands. A Saudi-led coalition has been bombing Houthi positions in Yemen in an effort to beat back forces that are aligned with Iran and Yemen's former president, who was overthrown during the Arab Spring uprisings. 

With Washington reorienting its policies in the region and with Riyadh feeling less constrained by its relationship with the US, Saudi Arabia could continue its assertive policies, enhancing its regional power and prestige.
As David Ottaway, a scholar at the Wilson Center in Washington, DC, told Bloomberg: "We are witnessing the first real attempt to see whether Saudi Arabia can become the new military and political superpower of the Arab world. A younger generation of impatient Saudi hawks is coming to power that is fed up with the failure of the kingdom to project its military and political influence."

Calling Evil Good And Good Evil: End Times Are Here!


2500 years ago, the prophet Isaiah issued this warning in the ancient scroll bearing his name in chapter 5, verse 20:
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
Ancient scriptures that talk about horrendous judgment against people and nations who don’t heed this warning and others like it are too numerous to list.
So let’s see just how close our modern culture is to completely thumbing its nose at our Creator and His warnings to us.

Modern culture portrays being a pure virgin woman as bad–but dressing and acting slutty is good.
Marriage solely between man and woman is now called bad–but homosexual/same-sex marriage is called good.
Killing animals is called evil–but murdering innocent, pre-born children in their mother’s wombs through abortion is called good.
Being too lazy to work is called good and is rewarded with welfare–but working hard enough to be rich is called bad, and bad, rich people must be taxed to give their money to people who don’t work. This is the opposite of scriptural teaching that if a man doesn’t work, he doesn’t eat.
And this is just scratching the surface. So with America embracing evil and shunning good, is it any wonder we have so many problems today? How could we have so quickly changed from a nation embracing morality to a country literally begging to be destroyed?

Isaiah’s warning bears repeating: “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
If you want to see America reverse course and head toward moral sanity, please forward a link of this video to others. Thank you.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth 

A Plea To The Prisoners Of The Quran

I recently wrote an article entitled “Islam: Dirty Work At The Crossroads.” I compared the current Islamization of America to a huge, out of control train. In that analogy, our nation is a stalled car at a railroad crossing – where Obama has parked us – and the coal train (Islam) is bearing down hard and fast toward our destruction. It was not an optimistic picture because my comparison is not an exaggeration.
I talked about the ‘malevolent spirit’ that drives that terroristic train. That got some attention.
The afternoon of its release, Arab World News picked up my story from Western Journalism. It was their lead feature for a while and stayed on their front page for the balance of the day. It remains in their archives. They chose my most provocative statement and ran THAT beneath the accompanying photograph.
I have since made stronger statements about the deception and danger of Islam. The world needs to be awakened to the realities of this “religion of peace” that will mow down anything in its path that is contrary to it.

On a Christian church marquis, a pastor recently put up the words “We don’t have to agree on ANYTHING, to be kind to one another.” Militant Islamists haven’t a nodding aquaintence with the concept of amicable disagreement. They kill people who disagree with them. Americans, however, are not obliged to cower before their tantrums.
Christians have been martyred for simply remaining faithful to God. Islam’s ‘martyrs’ include vaporized clones who have packed their own wives and children with explosives. Only the devil sees his prisoners as being so cheaply disposable.

I have to write about all this because I’m a Christian. The Bible calls it ‘exposing the works of darkness’ – an effort all Christians are supposed to take part in. While I have the right and opportunity here in America to openly speak the truth (and I don’t see that lasting much longer), I am obligated to expose devilish error – which Islam is. (Ephesians 5:11, Acts 4:12, etc.)
I’m not retracting anything I wrote – but one very important point should be added and emphasized. I pray that many of those who read my criticism of Islam will read this:
While America can still be considered a predominantly ‘Christian’ nation, we are generally no longer behaving as such. Nevertheless, I feel safe in saying that the remnant of ‘Christian America’ (and that includes this author) bears NO HATRED toward the PEOPLE of Islam.
Islam’s arrogant and paranoid ruling infrastructure has convinced their followers that Christianity opposes and hates the individual Muslim. And that simply isn’t so.
The One who made us all, THE TRUE GOD of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (and the same One who may now be tapping on the door of your heart [John 16:7-8]) has commanded, indeed BEGS, His children to love all who don’t know Him personally. Far from hating Islamic people (as Islam HATES those who oppose it), we hate what Islam does to people and what we see it doing to our nation and the world.

I have known some Muslims, personally. Most have been friends and easy to love. Beneath the heavyhanded demands of Islam, Muslims are simply imperfect people, like the rest of us. The crucial difference between Muslims and Christians is that real Christians possess the forgiveness of God–and they KNOW it. They live and rest in it. Muslims, and others outside of Christ’s atoning sacrifice, only know the hard LABOR of trying (in vain) to earn God’s acceptance.
The prophet Amos once asked: “Can two walk together (in the same direction) unless they be agreed?” (Amos 3:3) The obvious answer is “No.” And that’s why true Christians can’t be politically correct. Even the threat of Islamic violence (and there is plenty of that) ultimately cannot force a Christian to pretend that God is in any way involved with that false religion.
Again, believing Christians are NOT haters of THE Muslim PEOPLE. We only despise the false religion that will wind them up in hell. And Islam is just that.
All the Bible-prophesied insanity happening around us confirms the spiritual battle underway for the souls of mankind. Fighting that battle, for the true Christian, is never a contest of ‘my god against your god,’ but rather the sincere presentation of the Word of God given in prayerful love. The crux of the battle centers entirely upon the light of God’s simple, verifiable truth exposing and vanquishing deceitful treachery.

The dark ayatollahs and imams of Islam keep followers in blinded obedience by the intimidating cruelty found in the Quran. Yet the love of God in Christ can easily break that spell. The might of God’s love is infinitely more powerful than the threat of the Islamic god’s vengeance. And people will obey, out of sheer gratitude, the promptings of God’s love, while legalistic fear will only produce compliant slaves.
The bottom line, Muslims, is that Jesus of the Bible died and conquered death (which your Quran denies). He put together the perfect covenant as a GIFT and told his children to help Him pursue the souls of lost mankind.
His enemy, the prince of darkness (who disguises himself as an angel of light [2 Corinthians 11:14]), will not relinquish his prisoners voluntarily. “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” (2 Corinthians 3:17) For the Muslim, there is no liberty–only law and judgment enforced by the fear of severe punishment and even death.
Islam’s undeniably carnal ‘heaven’ is eternal sex for the men and a vaguely described breather for the women who have obediently waited upon them.
The Christian’s heaven is simply being in the presence of God, available to all God’s born-again children, man or woman! Until you have tasted of His pure love and peace, you can’t even imagine what I’m talking about.

Certainly not all Americans are Christian. So don’t expect godly treatment from America, per se (especially under the leadership of our current president). But from real Christians, worldwide, our heart’s message to you is: “We love and pray for you. But the time remaining in this life, this time of decision, is short and soon to cease.”
Recognize the ungodly brutality of Islam for what it is, and repent. Say a silent prayer to that still, small voice in your heart which confirms His love for you! Call upon Jesus and be saved. It’s that simple.
“Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12)
“And every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” (Philippians 2:11)

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

America’s oldest living vet turns 109 and shows us his guns (VIDEO)

Richard Overton turned 109 on Monday, May 11, 2015. This makes him America’s oldest surviving World War II veteran.
I recently had the honor of visiting with Richard at his home in Austin, Texas. He credits his health and longevity to smoking cigars, drinking whiskey and being able to defend himself and his country with firearms.
He’s hung out with everyone from the president to senators to celebrities.
I wanted to do something different with Richard and since this is, I asked him to show me some of his own personal firearms.
Happy birthday Richard and God bless you from all of us living in the free world.

PLANTING SEASON: While You Plant Flowers, Obama’s Planting Muslims

by Audrey Russo 
It’s Spring…the start of gardening and planting season. When things are planted that bring nourishment and beauty to mankind. Mr. Obama has been planting things too…but clearly something no one under freedom wants…
Obama has been planting Muslims, here in the United States, since he came into office … under the guise of refugee status.
To make sense of all this, there are a few things that must be understood to make a better assessment of the influx of refugees:
— You might be familiar with the five pillars of Islam (Shahadah, Salat, Zakat, Sawm, Hajj), which sound relatively benign. But there are also five charges (responsibilities) given in the Hadiths: “I charge you with five of what Allah has charged me with: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate and to wage Jihad for the sake of Allah” — Hadith no. 2863 Kitab al Amthael reported by Timri, also reported by Imam Ahmed Ibn Hanbel as Hadith no 17344
— Sam Solomon, and his co-author E Al Maqdisi in their book, Modern Day Trojan Horse, reveal that Muhammed himself declared that migration IS jihad. Migration is a religious obligation. It is incumbent upon all those believers who are able to migrate, from country to country, city to city, or town to town, to do so in order to foster the Islamic state. Daily, they further that agenda.

Islamic migration is called Hijra, and it’s also known as Islamization. Civilizational Jihad. Since the 90s, the United Nations high commissioner for refugees has selected 200,000 to 250,000 refugees from Islamic countries to be resettled in the United States. Most of them have come from Somalia and Iraq. ALL Muslim. In the 2012 UN report, there’s a breakdown of the top countries of resettlement that year. The US tops the list with 50,097.
will house a troupe of Chinese jugglers, a fake Rolex assembly plant ...
And sadly, Western leaders…like Barack Obama, have aided this mandatory effort utilizing the RAP (Refugee and Admission Program). Barack Obama determined that during fiscal year 2014, up to 70,000 refugees were to be admitted to the U.S.. In his memorandum for Secretary of State John Kerry, Obama said his decision is “justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.” (National interest?)

All paid for by US Taxpayers. Many now showing up in North Dakota, Kentucky, North Carolina, Ohio and Washington.

According to the State Dept.: “A refugee is someone who has fled from his or her home country and cannot return because he or she has a well-founded fear of persecution based on religion, race, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.”

THAT does not describe these Muslims from Muslim countries…but it DOES define the Christians under Muslim persecution throughout the Middle East and Africa. The graphic examples include the 21 Coptic Christian men beheaded by Islamic ISIS, the 30 Ethiopian Christian men beheaded by Islamic ISIS, and the 147 Christian students beheaded/stabbed by Islamic al-Shabaab.

NONE of the Christians in the Middle East or Africa…Christians, the most persecuted people group on the earth today…have been migrated as refugees to safety in the US. Instead, the State Dept., influenced heavily by the Obama administration, has created pockets of potential jihad in America.

And when that planting blooms: It will be a harvest from Hell. 
The issue of the burka is not a religious issue, it is a question of ... New York - Investigators were working on Friday to determine why a man ...

Can a President Defy an Unconstitutional Supreme Court Ruling?

Obama doesn’t think he has any limits.
Check it out:
Dr. Ben Carson, to his everlasting credit, has raised the issue of whether or not a president can refuse to enforce an unconstitutional ruling of the Supreme Court. 

In my opinion, and speaking just for myself, the answer to this question is, “Of course.” In fact, when circumstances require it, it may be that he must, or he will be betraying his oath of office.
Such presidential courage may in the end be the only way to preserve our Constitutional Republic.
No president of the United States EVER takes an oath to uphold the rulings of the Supreme Court. His oath is to uphold the Constitution of the United States and to see that the laws passed by Congress are faithfully executed.
The Supreme Court, isn’t.
That is, it is not the supreme branch of government. It is one of three co-equal branches of government, none superior to the others.
Continue reading on

Minneapolis Terror ‘Deradicalization’ Program Fails After Just Months, ‘Test Case’ Back in Jail


Minneapolis Terror ‘Deradicalization’ Program Fails After Just Months, ‘Test Case’ Back in Jail,” by Patrick Poole, PJ Media, May 12, 2015: (thanks to Counter Jihad Report)
A terror deradicalization program — established in the “Ground Zero” of terror recruitment, Minnesota’s Twin Cities — has already failed after just a few months.
The program was established after a federal court released 19-year-old terror suspect Abdullahi Yusuf to a halfway house earlier this year. Federal prosecutors opposed Yusuf’s release, but were overruled by the federal judge in the case, Michael J. Davis, the Chief Judge of the District of Minnesota. Today, Yusuf again sits in jail, having violated the terms of his release.
Remarkably, Judge Davis said today in a separate case of six men charged with trying to join the Islamic State that he would be willing to consider “less restrictive options” than detaining the men – just a day after Yusuf’s re-arrest. 

Last May, Yusuf was arrested at the Minneapolis airport while on his way to Syria by way of Turkey to join the Islamic State. One of his accomplices, Abdi Nur, did make it to Syria, and he now serves as an effective recruiter for the terror group.

Just last week, the Wall Street Journal reported on the program with an article titled “A Test Case for ‘Deradicalization’“:
The path of reform for Abdullahi Yusuf, a U.S. teenager who tried to become a radical Islamic soldier, passes through writings of Martin Luther King Jr., readings of the U.S. Constitution and discussions about life and literature with a fellow Somali-American named Ahmed Amin.
Mr. Yusuf’s attempt to travel to the Middle East last year helped lead authorities to six Minnesota men who were charged last month in connection with a plan to join Islamic State abroad. The 19-year-old has become a test case for whether Americans lured by Islamic extremism can be deradicalized.
A Minnesota judge earlier this year sent Mr. Yusuf to a halfway house, where he adheres to a tailor-made curriculum aimed at reintegrating him into American society and his immigrant community here. If the program succeeds, Mr. Yusuf’s sentence could be reduced — and the approach to his deradicalization replicated, experts say.
Counterterrorism experts believe it is the first such effort in the U.S. to try to turn a young person connected to a terror prosecution away from an extremist Islamist ideology since the advent of groups like al-Shabaab and Islamic State, or ISIS.

Apparently, reading Martin Luther King Jr., Richard Wright’s Native Son, and articles about the experience of Native Americans didn’t sway Yusuf to keep compliant with the program. The Star-Tribune reports today:
Abdullahi Yusuf, a Somali-American who pleaded guilty to conspiring to support terrorists in the Middle East, has been taken into custody for allegedly violating conditions while living in a St. Paul halfway house, according to court documents filed Monday.
Yusef, a student at Inver Grove Community College, drew national attention after a federal judge decided to place him in a halfway house and provide counseling for him rather than hold him in custody while awaiting sentencing.
Yusuf’s alleged violations were not detailed in court records.
Despite the violations not being detailed, the video report on Abdullahi’s re-arrest aired on the local CBS affiliate notes Abdullahi’s violations occurred on the same day last month that six other Twin Cities men were arrested for attempting to join the Islamic State

One additional interesting tidbit is that according to the New York Times, federal prosecutors opposed Yusuf’s release:
Mr. Yusuf, Mr. Nur’s co-defendant, has pleaded guilty to conspiring to provide material support for terrorism and faces a maximum sentence of 15 years. But in an experiment being watched nationally, Judge Michael J. Davis of Federal District Court agreed to a presentence plan to divert Mr. Yusuf to a halfway house with the support of Heartland Democracy, an education nonprofit in Minneapolis. He worked at Best Buy and attended community college until late November, when he was jailed for a time in connection with his attempt to travel to Syria. His supporters are now working with the court to get him back in classes and eventually back in a job.
The idea, said Mary McKinley, executive director of Heartland Democracy, is to gradually reintegrate Mr. Yusuf into the community, and possibly give him a role in countering the radicalization of young people.
“Ideally, Abdullahi will be able to tell his story in a way that is useful to young people who are frustrated and disengaged,” Ms. McKinley said. His lawyer, Jean M. Brandl, said her client was not prepared to speak publicly.

Federal prosecutors opposed giving Mr. Yusuf a break, noting that he had lied to F.B.I. agents at the airport. But Judge Davis, who knows the Somali community well enough to ask about clans and sub-clans, went along with the plan, intended to reduce the chasm between Somalis and law enforcement officials. Parents and friends concerned about a young person drawn to the Islamic State are more likely to call the police, advocates say, if they believe there is an alternative to a long prison sentence.
The Associated Press reports today that during a hearing for the other six men arrested in April accused of trying to join the Islamic State Judge Davis said he is willing to consider “less restrictive options” than holding the men until trial:
Five Minnesota men accused of trying to travel to Syria to join the Islamic State group were ordered Tuesday to remain in custody pending trial, but Chief U.S. District Judge Michael Davis said he’s open to exploring less restrictive options.
The five men are all charged with conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization; four are charged with attempting to provide such support. Their attorneys had appealed orders that the men be held while their cases proceed, arguing their clients weren’t dangerous or a flight risk.

In separate hearings for each man Tuesday, Davis said no set of conditions could reasonably ensure the community’s safety or guarantee that each man would not flee. But he told attorneys to come up with plans that could support their release.
“I’m not rushing into this,” Davis said. “It’s a slow process. But I’m taking a look at each of these defendants individually.”
As the saying goes, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results.”

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Black Males Open Fire on 5 Year-Old White Girl. Where’s Sharpton and Jackson?


A five year old girl who had done nothing wrong was wantonly murdered as she sat on the lap of her grandfather. You haven’t heard about it? That’s not surprising; while the Al Sharptons and the Jesse Jacksons of the world posture and bloviate about violence and a lack of respect for human life that permeates communities, they routinely keep quiet about attacks that happen every single day in America unless the victim was a person of color and there are television cameras pointed at them.

You see, the left isn’t interested in telling the story of the murder of Laylah Petersen because Petersen doesn’t fit the preferred narrative. What I mean is: Petersen was white.
While sitting on her grandfather’s lap, a hail of bullets rang throughout the house in a mostly-black neighborhood in Milwaukee. Reports indicate that two black males went to the door of the house and opened fire on the house that belonged to Laylah’s grandparents.
The neighborhood in which Laylah’s grandparents lived is 77% black and only 14% white.
Of course, nobody will ever know the true motive behind this heinous crime; but then again, nobody bothered to ask about the motive before Sharpton, Jackson, Attorney General Eric Holder and the partisan media pounced on the shooting deaths of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown. 

All they knew is that a black person was killed by a white (or, in the case of Martin, a Hispanic) person. All other facts melted away in the early moments of rage and rhetoric and little Laylah Petersen lies dead and the race-hustlers and dividers don’t give a… darn.
Even if we account for the conflicting version of events surrounding the deaths of Martin and Brown, we can see that the issue is more-complicated than originally suspected. Brown had just robbed a store and allegedly attacked police officers. Martin had allegedly scuffled with George Zimmerman and went for Zimmerman’s gun.
What the hell could Laylah Petersen possibly have done? She was five years old and sitting on her grandfather’s knee in the relative safety of her grandparents’ home. Was she a Crip from a rival set? Did she owe bookies money? Had she perpetrated a drive-by earlier in the day and this shooting was retaliation? All highly unlikely scenarios…
So, I ask again: where are the supposed defenders of innocent life? Where are the race-hustlers demanding a full accounting of what is being done to see that justice is done? 

Somehow, I can’t help but believe that this would receive more attention if Laylah wasn’t white.

Dear Bill O’Reilly & Juan Williams: How Much Of Islam’s Butt Should We Kiss?

Screen Shot 2015-05-10 at 9.18.51 AM
by Doug Giles 
According to Bill O’Reilly and Juan Williams we shouldn’t have drawing contests that mock Mohammed because that’ll “unnecessarily” get Muslims miffed.
FYI, to O’Reilly and Juan: Most of Islam lives in a 24/7 state of unnecessary rage.  They’re more moody than my buddy’s nutty wife who makes a rabid Rottweiler on meth look like Mr. Rogers after seventeen bong hits of Bruce Banner #3.
Look, gents (and you know this), everything we do ticks Islam off. We don’t have to doodle Mohammed cartoons to get them in a full-on hissy fit.  They’re there.  Like in, already.  As in, right now.

For example: I had an applewood, avocado, bibb lettuce, farm fresh tomato, herb aioli on pressed sourdough double-bacon BLT for lunch today served up by a definite non-Muslim girl who looked just like a 22-year-old Britney Spears in a black T-shirt. You think Islam liked that? Uh, no.  It’s an ”abomination” to them, worthy of lashings.
Oh … speaking of BritBrit, they are also no-fan of Miss Spears’ cleavage, and it’s not because her two kids from Federline drained the living life out of her mammaries, but principally because she likes to show off her puppies pretty much everywhere she goes; and somehow that’s deemed an “offense” to the men who stare at goats.  Go figure.
Another, kooky example of how discombobulated the Religion Of Perpetual Rage is: Iran just banned trendy haircuts because they’re supposedly spawned by “devil worshipers”.

Now granted, I’m sure Josè Eber is no saint. I mean … like … who is?  But to call the likes of a hair-stylist, such as Josè, a “devil worshiper” for providing men with a hipster hair-cut, is to, how would one say, skip a few steps.
By the way, if these lovelies think a modicum of pomade makes one an apostate then please …  for the love of God …  no one forward them pics of Adam Lambert’s new-doo because their heads will explode and we’ll be picking brain tissue and rag particles out of the acoustic tiles in HUD homes for the next decade.
While we’re on the topic of what makes Islam incensed, get a load of this: kids who lip-sync to Pharrell’s “Happy” song, I kid you not, make Muslims muy loco. Yes, a song about being Happy, makes The Religion Of Peace mad as hell and it lead to the arrest of six young Iranians.

So, Bill and Juan, what should we do with the implacable Islamic nutters?
How much do we cave to their crazy, graceless criteria?  Where does it end?
If we follow your line of logic and not do cartoons that make Muslims mad, then should I dispense with my BLT? Should Britney stop shopping at Frederick’s of Hollywood? Should Adam abandon getting his faux-hawk moussed to gravity-defying heights? And Should Pharrell scrap his “Happy” tune because that makes Islam so mad they want to spit?
Should we all just roll up in the fetal position and wet our big wussy diaper lest we offend The Religion Of Never-Ending Offense?
Here’s looking out for you.