Saturday, April 22, 2017

Can someone please explain to me when flirting became sexual harassment?


I don't know about y'all but I for one have had enough of this PC generation...WTH is wrong with these people? Never mind I already know...IMHO ...being a old fart from the Oldies Generation... I have analyzed the situation and my hypothesis is the following based on 8 years of the #LGBTQ Obama Administration:
In order for a psychopathic generation to take over a normal generation they must destroy everything considered NORMAL...attack~attack~attack no facts needed just repeat the same agenda based story line...and destroy morality,religion and the family base. Use every negative connotation found in Websters Dictionary to embarrass and wear down the opposition!
Convince the population that normal flirtation between hetrosexuals is somehow evil sexual harassment...WTF how did we get here?...and we better backtrack soon...lest breeding,family,marriage will be done in test tubes not through the normal process of the mating game found in nature! *Screw That* #pun

See: for a visual effect...Here’s a video cut from the classic apocalyptic sci-fi film 'Metropolis' for the very short sci-fi folk song 'In The Year 2525' by Zager & Evans. I really found them fitting together in a transhumanistic, dystopian, Aldous Huxley kind of way. What awaits at the end of singularity? If we ever get there? Thea von Harbou had some very intensively accurate visions of the future (ironically she also stayed loyal to the Nazi regime) and Fritz Lang did the visual masterpiece. All this is now a classic topic about the future of humanity. So in this video I wanted to concentrate the idea, message and visions of the future.

This is nothing new it dates back to the Caligula Empire of ancient Rome and was used quite effectively 1920's-1945 German Pink Swastika Party...aka Nazi Party.

Be Warned!

Operation Gotham Shield: U.S. Gov’t To “Simulate Nuke Blast Over Manhattan” As Actual War Nears

by: Mac Slavo
False flag watch is now active.
A general alert is out for something major in the near or immediate future. Hopefully, it is just another false alarm, instead of another false flag. Either way, and danger is at hand.
Given all that is going on in the world, it is downright eerie to discover that the federal government is once again staging mock disasters that draw disturbing parallels with current world events.
In just a few days, during April 24-26th, Operation Gotham Shield will commence.
It is a tabletop, joint agency exercise involving FEMA, Homeland Security and a myriad of law enforcement and military agencies. WMD, chemical and biological units will all be on hand as a response is tested for a “simulated” nuclear detonation over the United States’ foremost urban center, in the iconic and densely populated island of Manhattan and nearby shores of New Jersey.

The potential for a more explosive false flag to spin out of control, by hijacking and ‘converting’ the simulated actions, is all too real.
This is closely related to the mechanism that many researchers believe was at work on the day of 9/11, nesting a false flag attack inside of a series of large-scale training operations which invoked emergency powers and simulated attacks in locations that were actually hit.
According to the Voice of Reason:

On April 18th thru May 5th, 2017, state, local, and federal organizations alike are planning for Operation Gotham Shield 2017 — a major nuclear detonation drill in the New York-New Jersey area, along with the U.S.-Canadian border. During this exercise, 4 nuclear devices, 2 of which are rendered “safe” during the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Vital Archer Exercise, and one successful 10kt detonation in the NYC/NJ area, along with one smaller detonation on the U.S./Canadian border are to take place.

Among the organizations involved are:
– U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
– U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)
– U.S. Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO)
– U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
– U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
– U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM)
– State of New Jersey Office of Emergency Management
– State of New York Office of Emergency Management
– City of New York Office of Emergency Management 

The following document comes from The Nevada National Security Service. Their primary role with the government is to help ensure the security of the United States and its allies by supporting the stewardship of the nuclear deterrent, providing emergency response capability and training, and contributing to key nonproliferation and arms control initiatives.

Will anything catastrophic happen during or after that window of time? Will North Korea really attack the U.S. mainland? Will someone else do so, and blame their overseas enemies?
No one who knows the answers to these questions is willing to talk. For now, all we can do is watch, wait and listen.
Don’t jump to fear and speculation, but don’t lie down or look away either.
These will be trying times.
Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan

Friday, April 21, 2017

NYPD Boss Alberto Randazzo Jailed For 28 Years In Elite Pedophile Ring Sting

NYPD Boss Jailed For 28 Years By Elite Pedophile Ring Investigators ...

by:MIchael DePinto
It truly is disgusting to see how many pedophiles hold high positions in our society. And for too long, they have been doing more than just getting away with it, they have been abusing their positions of power to exploit even more children. Well, that’s about to change, and the Trump administration’s often-unreported crackdown against pedophile rings continues. Their latest capture is former NYPD department boss Alberto Randazzo.
In the following video, Right Wing News looks at the crimes committed by Randazzo, which includes persuading mothers to sexually abuse their children for his own sick viewing pleasure. This is horrifying, but compared to the elite pedophiles infesting DC, this guy is a small fry. How many more pedophiles are hiding in positions of power?

Your News Wire reports:
Alberto Randazzo, a former New York City Police Department boss, was sentenced to 28 years in prison for sexual exploitation of children and receipt of child pornography, as the Trump administration’s investigation into the elite pedophile ring that has infiltrated politics and law enforcement nationwide continues taking down high-profile perpetrators.
Randazzo was caught targeting mothers, persuading them to sexually abuse their children and send him pictures and videos of the acts. 

The federal investigation into the elite pedophile ring is moving full steam ahead and heavy hitters have been employed to lead prosecutions.
Randazzo’s sentence was announced by Bridget M. Rohde, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Angel M. Melendez, Special Agent-in-Charge, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), New York, and James P. O’Neill, Commissioner, New York City Police Department (NYPD).
Alberto Randazzo lived a double life, publicly serving as an NYPD police officer while privately engaging in conduct to exploit the most vulnerable members of the community – our children,” stated Acting United States Attorney Rohde.  “Together with our law enforcement partners we will continue to strive to protect the most vulnerable among us.”
Special Agent-in-Charge Melendez said the days of elite pedophiles getting away with their heinous crimes because of their positions in society are officially over. 

“Randazzo held a position with the sole purpose to serve and protect the people of this city. Instead, he targeted certain women, persuaded them to sexually abuse their children and had them send him pictures and videos of the acts,” said Special Agent-in-Charge Melendez.
His behavior is no less than deplorable. It is with continued joint law enforcement efforts that we can target these types of offenders and ensure that they are punished for their heinous deeds.”
After the conviction, Police Commissioner James P. O’Neill took the opportunity to deliver a shout out to Trump’s team of elite pedophile ring busters.
“Alberto Randazzo’s exploitation of innocent children is unconscionable. I am grateful to our detectives in Internal Affairs, Homeland Security, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of New York for their work in bringing Randazzo to justice for these horrific crimes,” said O’Neill. 

According to the Department of Justice: On July 12, 2016, the defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to sexually exploit a child and one count of receipt of child pornography.  According to court filings, from as early as 2010 through 2013, Randazzo targeted women through websites such as Ashley Madison and and persuaded them to sexually abuse children to whom they had access, so he could watch the abuse.
Randazzo was caught in February 2013, when a witness found disturbing text messages on Randazzo’s phone and uncovered emails from women sending Randazzo pictures of them molesting their children.  When the witness confronted him, Randazzo admitted his sexual interest in mothers having sex with their children.

At sentencing the government presented evidence that at least five women complied with Randazzo’s solicitations and sexually abused children in order to satisfy his sexual desires.
Randazzo’s victims ranged in age from a few months to eight years old, and he traveled out of state to watch two of them be molested in person.  Randazzo arranged to have the eight-year-old victim drugged so that he would not remember the abuse.
Three of the women Randazzo solicited have also been charged in the Eastern District of New York. Two have pleaded guilty, one of whom was sentenced to five years imprisonment, one of whom is awaiting sentencing, and another is awaiting trial.
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand

ALERT: Shocking Report Released On Real Reason Bill O’Reilly Was Pushed Out

Bill O’Reilly is no longer at Fox News and there definitely seemed to be some factors at play other than the alleged sexual harassment. 


Sexual harassment is a terrible thing but a settlement doesn’t mean you are guilty.
From Young Conservatives
In fact, many wealthy people settle rather than go through a drawn out trial.
We also told you that there were liberal groups actively working to get O’Reilly fired.
On top of that, it looks like the wives of the Fox News bosses were directly involved in getting rid of Bill.
From The New York Daily News:

Sarah and Kathryn Murdoch — the wives of the ousted talk show host’s young bosses — are at least partially responsible for his humiliating exit from Fox News Wednesday.
Sarah, 44, is a progressive-minded, British-born Australian model, former host of “Australia’s Next Top Model” — and wife of Lachlan Murdoch, co-chairman of Fox News Channel parent, 21st Century Fox. She was also instrumental in convincing her husband to boot the controversial O’Reilly, company sources told MediaBlast. “These woman have unique access and complete trust (of Lachlan and James),” a Fox News executive said. 

“They’re very progressive and the O’Reilly situation has infuriated them.”
Turns out the wives were behind paying the accusers millions of dollars.
Doesn’t really sound like these two were especially concerned with getting to the bottom of things.
Once the Murdoch family made up their mind, there wasn’t much Bill could do.
Oh, and let’s not forget this connection between Kathryn Murdoch and someone you’ve probably heard of.

From Politico:
I thought I’d begin this thing on comfortable terrain, with a small advance on a reportorial obsession of mine: Rupert Murdoch’s relationship with Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Here’s how close they’ve grown: Murdoch’s daughter-in-law, Kathryn (center, above), is currently employed by none other than the Clinton Foundation (!), working with old-time Clintonite Ira Magaziner (!!) on climate change issues (!!!). Kathryn Murdoch is married to the London-based James Murdoch, who’s now the heir apparent to the family empire; she’s described in print as a model and marketing executive.

Sarah Palin Drops BOMB After O’Reilly Is Fired: Why Would Women Who Are Sexually Harassed Stick Around for a Paycheck?

Sarah Palin Drops BOMB After O'Reilly Is Fired: Why Would Women Who Are Sexually Harassed Stick Around for a Paycheck? 

oped: First and foremost I totally agree with Sarah Palin on her opinion. However I will take it a step further.
I'm gonna be blunt,open and honest... something missing in this fiasco of he said she said! Let's get real here folks this is nothing new this culture has been going on since Adam and Eve.
Women flirt and men flirt it's called the mating game and it also extends into the work place..Women flirt with the boss in order to obtain a hire,promotions as well as retention...they play the game well and take advantage of the situation... especially if they are above average in looks. 
As Sarah noted why did they not complain when it happened or leave if they didn't like it, but stay on for years and years collecting promotions and a pay check? Well it's simple really, as they began to age, a new generation entered the work force they were no longer the center of attention. And then here comes the accusations of harrassment...they feel spurned and want revenge!

Let's face the facts woman are known for being catty (especially when dealing with each other)...they respond to most situations based on emotions. Most women I know have said they would rather have a man as a boss than a women because they know most are catty!
Both parties are guilty to some extent...yes most men think with the head below the belt when dealing with women they find attractive...I would also venture to say this also applies to women as well... only difference being is men show it...women hide it...if'n ya get my drift!  

While this applies to all places of employment the entertainment/media world is the most odious culture...think the proverbial 'CastingCouch' this is not a is real, and how many film super stars as well as News Media Anchors consented to get their start and a shot at the proverbial Hollywood Star?...Not all mind ya but many did and all entering this field are aware of how the game is played! So please folks don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining...I ain't buying all this false outrage! 

I'm sorry but this has become a case of "Harper Valley PTA" and all involved Hypocrits! 

Thats my two cents take it or leave it!

The news of the week is that the king of cable news is no longer with Fox News following allegations of sexual harassment and some higher ups at the network who clearly weren’t fans of his.
Plenty of people on both sides of the aisle are weighing in.
Gov. Sarah Palin, one of the biggest names there is in conservative circles, gave her two cents on the subject and let’s just say liberal heads are guaranteed to explode.

From Washington Examiner:

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin says the corporate culture needs to change at her former employer Fox News.
“Corporate culture there obviously has to change. You know, women don’t deserve – they should not ever have to put up with any kind of intimidating workspace,” Palin told CNN.
She also added that women who do face sexual harassment in the workplace should speak out and not remain in hostile environments just to collect a paycheck.
“If a woman believes that she is being intimidated and harassed, she needs to stand up and do something about it, not stick around for a paycheck for years and years and years, and then after the fact complain about what she went through,” Palin said.


Obviously, the left will say Palin is blaming the victim when she says you shouldn’t keep taking a paycheck.
She’s not.  Fox did a bad job creating a good environment for employees. However, at the same time, there is a level of personal accountability that should at least be talked about.  It’s ridiculous that we can’t even suggest that maybe you should leave your job if you are getting harassed. It’s the company’s job to protect you. But, Fox clearly was doing a bad job at that.
Palin is absolutely correct.  Some of these allegations are from years ago. Why was it not a problem then? Why are you piling on now? Those are questions that should at least be asked even if they are never answered.  If someone is doing something wrong then they should be called out for it immediately.
On another note, check out what Sarah Palin was up to yesterday.

Vandals Call for Beheading Berkeley College Republicans

UC Berkeley Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
by:Tim Brown
The "Student Revolution" of the sixties that began at a Berkeley are now bearing their rotten fruit in attacks on free speech and now attacks human life.  Now, some of the good little Communists of Berkeley are siding with the Islamists and calling for the beheading of Berkeley College Republicans (BCR).
The BCR was targeted by vandals through graffiti that were explicit death threats.  The Daily Californian reports:
“Various pieces of campus property have been vandalized with death threats against BCR. The graffiti, which has been found in spaces like the Unit 1 Housing sign and a pole by Crossroads, includes messages such as 'KILL BCR,' 'BEHEAD THE B.C.R.’s' and 'LYNCH the B.C.R.’s.' Recently, the group has had its contact list stolen and signs destroyed. Members of the BCR contact list have also been sent harassing emails by anonymous senders."

BCR spokesperson Naweed Tahmas has been a member of BCR for a year and said that threats against the group have not increased or decreased in the wake of the recent election of President Donald Trump. Tahmas said, however, that the organization has faced constant threats. He added that he believes some community members have projected their worst ideological fears onto BCR, causing others to be more aggressive against the organization.
Tahmas said that BCR takes these threats very seriously and they have forced the group to be more cautious and constantly aware of their surroundings. According to Tahmas, when BCR receives threats, it immediately contacts UCPD to allow the campus police to document the harassment.

“There isn’t much we can do about it beyond reporting,” Tahmas said. “It’s up to students to manage their behavior towards us and understand that we are students as well.”

“All members of our campus community have a right to feel safe and not threatened based off political viewpoints or club affiliation,” said ASUC President Will Morrow. “Vandalism does not speak to (campus) values and my biggest priority is making sure everyone, including the Berkeley College Republicans, feel safe on this campus and you cannot feel safe with such incendiary rhetoric being vandalized around our campus.”

Members of the club have been “pepper sprayed, sucker-punched and verbally and physically assaulted for voicing their opinions and beliefs,” according to one spokesperson for the group.
A UCPD detective is currently investigating the incident and anyone with any information regarding the graffiti is urged to call the hotline at 643-0890
So, if you don't think that Islam is having an impact in America, you have stuck your head in the sand.  Furthermore, not understanding that Islam, as well as the militant homosexuals, are being used to undermine the laws of our Republic and eventually bring in totalitarianism.  This is happening because the law is not being enforced.
Additionally, we know that the Muslims have been using the same playbook as the homosexuals when it comes to self-inflicted hate crimes to present themselves as victims.  Now, those they have garnered sympathy from are siding with them and advancing as the tyrants they truly are. 

My advice to the Berkeley College Republicans is to ignore a tyrannical government that has declared your right to keep and bear arms does not exist at Berkeley and make a pact to exercise your right to do so.  Stay in groups when you are on campus and be prepared to defend your life and the lives of your fellow students against these little Communists.
Ayn Rand was able to see exactly what was to be spawned from the Student Revolution of the sixties.  Pamela Geller posted the following reminder (Yes, it's long, but worth the read).
The Cashing-In: The Student Rebellion
Ayn Rand The Objectivist Newsletter, 1965
reprinted in The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution, New York, Signet, 1971
The so-called student rebellion, which was started and keynoted at the University of California at Berkeley, has profound significance, but not of the kind that most commentators have ascribed to it. And the nature of the misrepresentations is part of its significance.The events at Berkeley began, in the fall of 1964, ostensibly as a student protest against the University administration's order forbidding political activity — specifically, the recruiting, fund-raising and organizing of students for political action off-campus — on a certain strip of ground adjoining the campus, which was owned by the University. Claiming that their rights had been violated, a small group of rebels rallied thousands of students of all political views, including many conservatives, and assumed the title of the Free Speech Movement. The Movement staged sit-in protests in the administration building, and committed other acts of physical force, such as assaults on the police and the seizure of a police car for use as a rostrum.

The spirit, style and tactics of the rebellion are best illustrated by one particular incident. The University administration called a mass meeting, which was attended by eighteen thousand students and faculty members, to hear an address on the situation by the University President, Clark Kerr; it had been expressly announced that no student speakers would be allowed to address the meeting. Kerr attempted to end the rebellion by capitulating; he had promised to grant most of the rebels demands; it looked as if he had won the audience to his side. Whereupon, Mario Savio, the rebel leader, seized the microphone, in an attempt to take over the meeting, ignoring rules and the fact that the meeting had been adjourned. When he was — properly — dragged off the platform, the leaders of the F.S.M. admitted, openly and jubilantly, that they had almost lost their battle, but had saved it by provoking the administration to an act of violence (thus admitting that the victory of their publicly proclaimed goals was not the goal of their battle).

What followed was nationwide publicity, of a peculiar kind. It was a sudden and, seemingly, spontaneous out-pouring of articles, studies, surveys, revealing a strange unanimity of approach in several basic aspects: in ascribing to the F.S.M. the importance of a national movement, unwarranted by the facts — in blurring the facts by means of unintelligible generalities — in granting to the rebels the status of spokesmen for American youth, acclaiming their idealism and commitment to political action, hailing them as a symptom of the awakening of college students from political apathy. If ever a puff-job was done by a major part of the press, this was it.

In the meantime, what followed at Berkeley was a fierce, three-cornered struggle among the University administration, its Board of Regents and its faculty, a struggle so sketchily reported in the press that its exact nature remains fogbound. One can gather only that the Regents were, apparently, demanding a tough policy toward the rebels, that the majority of the faculty on the rebels side and that the administration was caught in the moderate middle of the road.
The struggle led to the permanent resignation of the University's Chancellor (as the rebels had demanded) — the temporary resignation, and later reinstatement, of President Kerr — and, ultimately, an almost complete capitulation to the F.S.M., with the administration granting most of the rebels demands. (These included the right to advocate illegal acts and the right to an unrestricted freedom of speech on campus.)

To the astonishment of the nave, this did not end the rebellion: the more demands were granted, the more were made. As the administration intensified its efforts to appease the F.S.M., the F.S.M. intensified its provocations. The unrestricted freedom of speech took the form of a Filthy Language movement, which consisted of students carrying placards with four-letter words, and broadcasting obscenities over the University loudspeakers (which Movement was dismissed with mild reproof by most of the press, as a mere adolescent prank).

This, apparently, was too much even for those who sympathized with the rebellion. The F.S.M. began to lose its following — and was, eventually, dissolved. Mario Savio quit the University, declaring that he could not keep up with the undemocratic procedures that the administration is following (italics mine) — and departed, reportedly to organize a nationwide revolutionary student movement.
This is a bare summary of the events as they were reported by the press. But some revealing information was provided by volunteers, outside the regular news channels, such as in the letters-to-the-editor columns.
An eloquent account was given in a letter to The New York Times (March 31, 1965) by Alexander Grendon, a biophysicist in the Donner Laboratory, University of California:


The F.S.M. has always applied coercion to insure victory. One-party democracy, as in the Communist countries or the lily-white portions of the South, corrects opponents of the party line by punishment. The punishment of the recalcitrant university administration (and more than 20,000 students who avoided participation in the conflict) was to bring the university to a grinding halt by physical force.
To capitulate to such corruption of democracy is to teach students that these methods are right. President Kerr capitulated repeatedly.
Kerr agreed the university would not control advocacy of illegal acts, an abstraction until illustrated by examples: In a university lecture hall, a self-proclaimed anarchist advises students how to cheat to escape military service; a nationally known Communist uses the university facilities to condemn our Government in vicious terms for its action in Vietnam, while funds to support the Viet-cong are illegally solicited; propaganda for the use of marijuana, with instructions where to buy it, is openly distributed on campus.

Even the abstraction obscenity is better understood when one hears a speaker, using the universitys amplifying equipment, describe in vulgar words his experiences in group sexual intercourse and homosexuality and recommend these practices, while another suggests students should have the same sexual freedom on campus as dogs
Clark Kerrs negotiation — a euphemism for surrender — on each deliberate defiance of orderly university processes contributes not to a liberal university but to a lawless one.

David S. Landes, professor of history, Harvard University, made an interesting observation in a letter to The New York Times (December 29, 1964). Stating that the Berkeley revolt represents potentially one of the most serious assaults on academic freedom in America, he wrote:

In conclusion, I should like to point out the deleterious implications of this dispute for the University of California. I know personally of five or six faculty members who are leaving, not because of lack of sympathy with free speech or political action, but because, as one put it, who wants to teach at the University of Saigon?

The clearest account and most perceptive evaluation were offered in an article in the Columbia University Forum (Spring 1965), entitled Whats Left at Berkeley, by William Petersen, professor of Sociology at the University of California at Berkeley.
He writes:

Continue Reading: