Saturday, March 29, 2014

Eighteen strange notes have been found in books at Western University’s library

Mysterious codes found at Canadian college (Broken News Daily on Yahoo)
{Eighteen strange notes have been found in books at Western University’s library — and no one knows what they mean.)

Oh Oh Roswell NM 1947 same writings on mysterious Crashed Flying Saucer Debris...hmmm Anchor Space babies attending College on Government loans/Grants?...dunno

What is one of the secret endings codes on innerstar university? Ha:


View video:

BCH/Harvard Medical School of Frankenstein/Orwellian studies

The latest ruling on the Justina Pelletier case sent up a red flag for this former Federal as well as Local Law Enforcement Officer : At one point in my career I was assigned to Child Pornography Investigations (18 months) SEE: 

I took a look at the history of cases filed against Boston Childrens Hospital a branch of the Harvard Medical School . I was stunned at the numerous results on a google search...and the number of active investigations as well as prior arrests/convictions of staff going on...I suspect the Harvard Medical School is a bastion for psychiatric perversion as well as Frankenstein/Orwellian experimentation! It is becoming clear now as it relates to another time and place Germany 1930's-1944 SEE: 
A definite pattern surrounding this so called elite medical school is emerging and sends red flags to any LE officer...with the exception of Ma who appears to be complicit along with the Judicial system!
I will list some but not all as they are too numerous to list all...but if it peaks your interest by all means continue your own search for more results!  

BOSTON (CBS) – A pediatric endocrinologist at Boston Children’s Hospital, who is also a pediatrics instructor at Harvard Medical School, was arrested Thursday on child pornography charges.
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dr. Richard Keller, 56, of Andover, “knowingly received films depicting minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.”
Read: The Criminal Complaint (.pdf)
Continue Reading:  

December 20, 2013

Boston Children's Hospital accused of 'routinely kidnapping' children for profit ...BCH files 51A form against Justina's parents accusing them of child abuse

During a recent interview with NaturalNews' own Robert Scott Bell, Berman from, who broke the story, explained in further detail what he uncovered about the case, including how BCH filed a special form known as a 51A against Justina's parents that accused them of child abuse. This was the mechanism through which the hospital ultimately assumed custody of the child against the will of her parents.

Prior to her admission at BCH, Justina had reportedly been taking a number of medications for her condition that the hospital later scrapped as unnecessary. The assigned medical team also declared that Justina had developed regressive behavior around her family due to multiple "medical procedures and care episodes" that she was allegedly put through while under their care, circumstances that were later used as justification for calling DCF.

But Justina's family disagrees, having told reporters that their child regressed after being forcibly imprisoned at the hospital.

July 18, 2012

Judge tosses lawsuit against Boston Children’s Hospital

A judge in Boston has dismissed a lawsuit brought against Boston Children’s Hospital by 11 people alleging they were sexually abused as children in North Carolina by a now-deceased physician who worked previously at Children’s before moving south.
The Suffolk Superior Court judge rejected the argument by the plaintiffs, who said they were abused by Dr. Melvin D. Levine between 1987 and 2006 and that Children’s prevented the disclosure of Levine’s prior alleged abuse in Boston.
Judge Merita A. Hopkins said in her ruling issued Thursday that the plaintiffs failed to identify an obligation to them under Massachusetts law.
Continue Reading:  

2014 February 3 

Boston Children’s Hospital to be Investigated by Department of Public Health 
The Massachusetts Department of Public Health is set to investigate a complaint filed by a Boston Attorney against Boston Children’s Hospital and its “Bader 5″ Psychiatric Unit.
According to a January 31 posting by reporter Beau Berman – who broke the story leading to the complaint – the Department of Public Health has confirmed that it is assigning an investigator to review the complaint
For the benefit of those unfamiliar with the case, in February 2013, 15-year-old Justina Pelletier was checked into Boston Children’s Hospital with flu-like symptoms by her parents. Prior to her admission, Justina had been undergoing treatments for Mitochondrial Disorder at Tufts Medical Center in Boston.
Over three years ago, Justina had been diagnosed with the rare genetic condition of Mitochondrial Disease. Her 25-year-old sister, Jessica, also suffers from the disease. Both girls were treated by a specialist at Tufts Medical Center, Dr Mark Korson. The hospital was only a two-and-a-half-hour drive from their home in West Hartford, Connecticut.
Continue Reading: 

April 2, 2008
 Former Harvard Medical School Prof Sued for Child Abuse 

After being asked to step out while a pediatrician conducted a typical physical examination for his teenage son, John Doe No. 5—allegedly an anonymous victim of sexual abuse—became overwhelmed with emotion as the dark memories of his own physical examinations as a child came flooding back to him.

This event was the catalyst for a civil suit against the doctor who treated John Doe No. 5, according to the alleged victim’s lawyer. That doctor was Melvin D. Levine, a former Harvard Medical School professor who served as chief of ambulatory pediatrics for 14 years at Children’s Hospital Boston, one of Harvard’s main affiliated hospitals. Levine has been accused of sexually abusing at least seven boys in his care during his time at the hospital, according to a lawsuit filed in Suffolk Superior Court on Monday.
The unnamed plaintiff, now a 36-year-old father, alleges in his complaint that Levine “sexually assaulted, battered, and abused” him during his five years at Children’s for psychotherapy services. He was eight years old when the treatment sessions began.
According to the lawsuit, Levine’s sexual abuse included “numerous acts of genital fondling, masturbation, and other attempted and threatened acts of assault.” 

Continue Reading: 

February 23, 2011 

Former Children’s Hospital Boston Pediatrician Melvin D. Levine died Friday last week, a day after a class action lawsuit claiming he sexually abused his patients was filed against him. He was 71.
Officials in North Carolina, where Levine, a graduate of Harvard Medical School, lived after leaving Massachusetts in 1985, have yet to disclose a cause of death.
Attorneys behind the class action suit allege that Levine engaged in inappropriate conduct with his patients over the course of his career.
“From 1966 through at least 2006, Melvin Levine would, during the course
of medical examinations, make kids strip naked, and then in a non-medical way would manipulate their genitals,” said Carmen L. Durso, the attorney representing the plaintiffs. “My office has talked to in excess of 60 people who all tell the same story.”
Story Continues:

That should give the curious minds something to think about and put pressure on the Governor of Ma to initiate a full field investigation into the operations of Boston Childrens Hospital as well as Harvard Medical School of Psychiatrics!

Death Sentencing of Pakistani Christian for 'Blasphemy' Stirs Outrage

The Clash Of Civilizations: Awaiting The Coming Crusade
oped: I for one have had enough of Islamic Facism...Islam is not a is nothing more than a 7th Century Theocracy.... Educate yourselves on this perverted Theocracy.  I say charge Islam for blasphemy against Jews and Christians...being that Muhammad stole and perverted the writings of the Jewish Torah(Old Bible) and the New Testament (Christian Bible) written Centuries before Islam came into existence!

Maybe just maybe we are overdue for a new Crusade!  
MOTIVATIONAL POSTERS  Holy War or Funny Jihad photo

 By Anugrah Kumar  

Pakistan's opposition parties protested and international human rights groups condemned the death penalty given to a Christian sanitation worker about a year after he was accused of blasphemy.
The Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf party and the Pakistan People's Party on Friday strongly protested in parliament the sentencing of 27-year-old Sawan Masih, who was convicted of insulting the Prophet Muhammad while conversing with a Muslim friend in the eastern Lahore city's Joseph Colony in March last year.
Ghulam Murtaza Chaudhry, additional session judge of Lahore, sentenced Masih to death Thursday, saying he "must be hanged and fined," Reuters quoted the lawyer of the accused, Nameem Shakir, as saying. The sentencing includes a fine of Rs.200,000 (roughly U.S. $2,050).

The sentence is not expected to be carried out any time soon as there is a de facto moratorium on the death penalty in Pakistan.
Masih, a father of three, will appeal the verdict, the lawyer said.
The U.K.-based Centre for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement plans to file an appeal Saturday "in the hope of getting the decision overturned soon."
Meanwhile, David Griffiths, Amnesty International's deputy Asia Pacific director, called the verdict "a travesty of justice."
"There are serious concerns about the fairness of his trial, and an argument between two friends is not a basis for sending anyone to the gallows. Sawan Masih must be released immediately and unconditionally," Griffiths said.
The judgment was delivered in a jail due to apprehensions of an attack on Masih, who denied the charges and said the accusations were made due to a property dispute.
CLAAS lawyers Naeem Shakir, Tahir Bashir and Nasir Anjum were in the prison court room with Masih at the time of the sentencing.

"This is not the only blasphemy case where this has happened, there are other examples including the trial of Younis Masih," CLAAS said in a statement to The Christian Post. "Several blasphemy law victims have been killed during their hearings, including Rashid Emmanuel and Sajid Emmanuel who were killed by extremists in broad daylight in front of hundreds of people in the district court's compound in Faisalabad, in 2010."
However, Masih's family remains strong in their faith and are hopeful that "the decision will be overturned by the grace of God," the group said.
BBC quoted Masih's father as saying, "My son is innocent ... we are not being treated fairly."
Masih and his complainant and Muslim friend, Imran Shahid, had quarreled under the influence of liquor last March, but Shahid alleged that Masih insulted the Prophet Muhammad, according to the Dawn newspaper. "Both Imran and Sawan are close friends and the former has made the allegation only to settle a personal score because they had quarreled over some petty matter," a local resident, Dilawar Masih, who lost his house and shop in an attack, was quoted as saying at the time.

The blasphemy charge last year led to Muslims burning down more than 150 Christian homes.
"Unfortunately the blasphemy law has become a powerful tool in the hands of extremists and is continually being used to attack churches, burn down Christian towns and villages and also kill innocent people," said Nasir Saeed, director of CLAAS-UK.
The blasphemy laws, embedded in Sections 295 and 298 of the Pakistan Penal Code, are frequently misused to target religious minorities – Christians, Shi'as, Ahmadiyyas and Hindus – and allow Islamist extremists to justify killings. There is no provision in the law to punish a false accuser or a false witness of blasphemy.
The blasphemy laws have not been amended or revoked because "the government is under pressure from extremist groups," Saeed added.
Police were mute spectators when a Muslim mob was stealing valuable possessions and destroying Christians' homes after blasphemy charges were made against Masih last year, according to CLAAS.

Amnesty International points out that the vagueness of the anti-blasphemy laws, inadequate investigation and intimidation by mobs and some religious groups were behind vigilantism across Pakistan, especially in the northeastern state of Punjab.
A prominent Pakistani Christian, Shahbaz Bhatti, elected member of the National Assembly, was assassinated in March 2011 for his efforts to repeal the country's blasphemy law. Minister of Minority Affairs, Bhatti was killed two months after Punjab Governor Salman Taseer was assassinated for his advocacy for Pakistani Christian woman Asia Bibi, who had been convicted by a trial court for blasphemy.

Hillary Clinton writing shocking book..

Huma Abedin and Hillary Clinton
[Oped: and why pray tell buy her book when all one needs to read is this article...why make the Clintons richer for more trash?]

by: Cyrus Massoumi
For those of you who always thought that Hillary was lying about everything, you’re about to be proven right. Moreover, the news is going to come from a very unexpected source: Hillary herself.
The National Enquirer, which has stuck very close to honest reporting since getting burned in a long-ago libel suit, reports that Hillary has decided to stop the lies and tell the truth in an upcoming memoir. Simon & Schuster will pay her $25 million for writing the book, which she hopes will inoculate her 2016 presidential run against any future ugly revelations.
According to the National Enquirer’s source, a person who is allegedly one of Hillary’s close friends, “By writing this tell-all, Hillary will settle old scores and get revenge on her enemies.” Those enemies apparently include Barack and Michelle Obama, since pre-publication rumors have it that Hillary will report about Barack’s drinking problem and the Obamas’ serious marital problems. Hillary also plans to attack Valeria Jarrett, who is Obama’s right-hand woman and the person many believe is the real power in the White House. [oped side note: calling the proverbial kettle black again are we Hillary? You also have a drinking problemo as well as marital problemos  

... with secretary of state hillary rodham clinton wednesday march 24 2010 McAuliffe: Clinton Can Beat McCain -- In A Drinking Contest
Hillary Clinton Drunk Time for an Intervention
Hillary also intends to admit what many have known for years, but which her friends and ex-lovers have never confirmed: she’s bisexual and has had lesbian affairs. The National Enquirier smugly notes that the memoir will confirm one of its past reports that a veterinarian who came to the White House to treat Socks, the White House cat, caught Hillary in a steamy (and adulterous) embrace with another woman.
It will be interesting to see whether Hillary addresses the rumors that one of her lovers is Huma Abedin. Abedin is an interesting character, since she is Hillary’s closest confidant and aid; is married to Anthony Weiner, the Democrat politician who sent naked pictures of himself to women; and comes from a family tied closely to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Read More: Benghazi Whistleblower Shocked ‘My Jaw Hit the Floor’ When Obama Blamed YouTube.)
According to a source the National Enquirier identifies as a “family insider,” Hillary’s admission that she is a lesbian isn’t a sign that she repents her life of lies. Instead, it’s part of her cold-blooded political calculation:
“Bill and Hillary are the consummate politi­cians, and they realize the LGBT community is a huge voting bloc,” said a family insider.
“They want lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender people behind Hillary in the 2016 campaign. So Hillary’s going to come clean for the votes. She’ll admit that she’s bisexual and has had lesbian relationships.” [oped side note: *eye roll* hello... world wide population including the United States puts the LGBT at 1-3% of the total population...another lie from the looney left !]
Hillary will also admit that, when she suddenly vanished from the scene last December amidst State Department assurances that nothing bad was the matter, these assurances were yet another Clinton lie. In fact, after a fall, she was discovered to have a blood clot between her brain and her right ear, which was putting pressure on her brain. In the lead-up to the diagnosis, Hillary thought she had brain cancer, just as Teddy Kennedy did, and began saying good-bye to friends and families.
Hillary lying to a House investigative committee: 

SEE Video: 

For those who still care about Monica Lewinsky, whose sexual shenanigans with Bill almost lost Bill and Hillary the White House, Hillary will finally talk about her version of those events. According to Hillary’s view of things, Monica got word to Hillary that Bill was in love with Monica and wanted to start a family with him (and that she was even planning on getting pregnant without Bill’s consent). Hillary’s response to this news was to throw up in a White House bathroom.
The book isn’t just about the personal. As part of her attack on the Obamas, Hillary will detail her battles with Valerie Jarrett, “Obama’s brain,” to get a green light on attacking Osama bin Laden. Hillary also plans to detail the fight she had with the White House over Osama’s bloodied, bullet-ridden corpse. Hillary claims that she wanted it returned to the U.S. as proof that he was dead. Obama instead opted for a secret burial at sea (and Hillary promises to reveal the real location) so as not to inflame Muslim sensibilities.
Hillary’s plan is that this book, by telling all her dirty little secrets in advance, will clear the way for a 2016 presidential run since none of her opponents will have any dirt to spill on her. The mere fact that she feels compelled to write this book indicates that the Obamas have already gathered this information and, moreover, that they would have used it if Hillary had looked set to sweep the Democrat primaries in 2008. Releasing dirt on his Democrat opponents as a way to clear the field is, after all, vintage Obama.

Party partisans will no doubt applaud Hillary for her bravery in “coming out” (not that it’s very brave if everyone you care about thinks it’s a wonderful thing to do). It will be more interesting to see how ordinary Americans feel when they discover that the woman seeking the White House has lied to them every step of the way for decades.

Four Dems Down...

Oh, the tangled webs we weave, when we behave like Harry Reid.  

1142835943_lying_bitch_pelosi_lying_bastard_reid_answer_2_xlarge.jpeg Read more at... People tell us how ObamaCare failed them.

Friday, March 28, 2014

The Kelly Plan Helps All Americans


When I hear Democrats and RINOs whining about amnesty for illegal aliens like as if it would be good for America, I again hear the words of candidate Ronald Reagan in the 1980 Presidential debates: “There you go again.” That shot by Reagan was heard ‘round the world right after Jimmy Carter chose to fabricate his own version of Reagan’s views on Social Security and Medicare. Reagan called Carter on it, and the world is a different and better place because of Ronald Reagan, a man who was much more than a great communicator.
Unfortunately, the Obama Administration and the Democratic Congress are speaking fiction again. This time, they have had four RINOS as spokespersons to give their chicanery the look of legitimacy. It is not legitimate. It is an affront to honest Americans. It is Democratic Speak coming from the mouths of Democrat wannabees. We call them RINOS around here.
They passed the gang of eight tyrants’ plan on June 27, 2013 so they could enjoy their Health Independence Holiday (Nancy Pelosi), while the rest of America wonders if they have not destroyed Medicare completely. Let them stew in this great work of deceit! Fourteen traitors of conservativism have been discovered. They have no cover.

This time, the deception is about amnesty for illegals. Trust them at your own peril. They did not tell Americans the truth so they could rush through their noxious bill. I hope they bring in Ehrlich to get rid of the stench of the maggots in the Senate.
As most know, Reagan was such a kind-hearted man; he put his sympathy for the plight of illegal aliens above what was good for the country in 1986. It was Reagan who chose to give US our first round of full-bore amnesty. Reagan wanted to be a nice guy but he later realized that he had neither helped the aliens of the day, or the American people. He regretted this decision for the rest of his life.
Reagan’s plan legalized 2.7 million immediately and then an additional 3.3 million or so got to come on down free of charge by way of family reunification provisions. Reunification is a code word for unloading the populations of poor countries on the US taxpayer. We not only import most of our goods, we now import a good part of our services, and we import people who pretend to be our offspring so they can enjoy our retirement savings.
Reunification passed in the US Senate in June 2013, so we know our lawmakers are not on our side. It was demanded by Democrats trying to get a two-for or a three-for or a six-for—for each newly minted citizen. I hope Republicans in the HOUSE have the guts to do one for the Gipper (we the people), since the Democrats have left us down for sure.

The provisions in the gang of eight tyrants legislation permits only the nuclear family to be reunited. It is a ruse. Never believe a crooked politician especially if their first name is Senator.
What this means is that for a few years, Uncle Shamus will not be able to get his free pass. However, Mr. Shamus, and his entire brood would immediately be welcomed in America with open arms. Then, after just a few years, Uncle Shamus could petition for a green card right from the Old Sod, where he would meet the slip-shod qualifications of a corrupt administration, and he would be” In like Flint!” My apologies to James Coburn, a real hero!
After Reagan’s 1986 amnesty, you may know that a very large number of new citizens figured out how to take advantage of the good will of Americans by bringing anybody and everybody in with them. It was “such a deal,” nobody could say No!
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was so overwhelmed after the amnesty was granted that there are reports that a few fine looking dogs and cats were given citizenship. Some of these canines and felines more than likely are now collecting Social Security. Aren’t we a great country? Actually, we sure are.
Some of the amnestied brought in as many as 100 “relatives” on the reunification clause. To this day, more and more foreign nationals are continually being reunited through this loose, anything-goes immigration system that discriminates against those of European descent.

Loose administration of foreign birth records helped just about anybody who tried to get through the maze legally. About a million green cards a year are handed out and the principle reason is family reunification.

Voters—voters everywhere!
After gun control and perhaps pro-football control, a liberal immigration policy is at the top of the progressive agenda, hoping to attract more Democrat voters from other countries. US Democratic leaders would love to exchange the persnickety Democrats, often up in age with a fresh new brood from another country. They do not even care which country as long as they smell like Democrats.
So, let’s say that America goes ahead and does exactly what the Democrats and the unions and the corporations want. Let’s say that Harry Reid and our corrupt lawmakers grant amnesty again to ten million to perhaps as many as fifty million currently illegal residents. Who knows how many there really are? Then what? How does that help the jobs picture for Americans? Well, on June 27, 2013, Harry Reid did just that as did many of our Anti-American Senators. Hopefully John Boehner will choose to use his pair to represent Americans.
The Kelly Comprehensible and Sane Immigration Plan is an American way to handle the problem of illegal immigration. I sent the Kelly Plan package to my Congressman Republican Lou Barletta and I am hoping he introduces it in the HOUSE as a real answer to the Democrat and RINO chicanery against the American people.

At first, the Kelly Plan may not sound as good as deportation since it does offer temporary legalization. However, it also extracts a fee each year and demands that any EMTALA or other expenses from temporary legal guests be paid in order to get a clear and free guest pass renewal. There is no guest pass path to citizenship. The notion should grow on you, and you don’t have to wait for the bill in order to know what is in it. It is in this book. No voting privileges ever come along with the guest privileges; even if Chuck Schumer whines all day to Mayor Anthony Weiner.
Let me repeat; there is no citizenship and no amnesty in the Kelly Plan. The price to be a legal temporary guest will be high for those who expect Americans to pay any of their way. The fees collected will eventually be used to cover all costs for those now residing in the US.
The fact is illegal foreign nationals have been living it up on the taxpayer dime for years and this has been a huge cost for Americans. Have you yet to see a news broadcast with an illegal alien featured, who has been sucking up American largesse for years; complaining that we citizens give them too much. With the Kelly Plan, those taxpayer-funded boondoggle days are over. Amen!
Democrats are not the only bad guys in the picture. Grover Norquist, a billionaire for sure and a one-time true conservative, who has become a pure big-business Republican, recently came out of the woods in favor of amnesty. You see, he and other billionaires like to employ cheap labor—that’s your kids and grandkids, if you have been paying attention—much more than they want America to be for Americans.

They would be happy to employ Americans at cheap labor prices but those pesky Americans actually have minds of their owns and want silly things like—opportunity for advancement and good wages. The money boys want any advancement for Americans or for illegals made legal to be less than minimum wage or lower. That’s why these pigs truly disgust me.
The infamous Koch brothers are in the tank for amnesty also because their version of immigration reform is to get the American wage even lower than low if that is possible. I normally have approved of the Koch brothers conservative stance in the past but not on something that will hurt regular Americans. When money is the concern, they vote the dollar bill, not for the George Washington principles that built the dollars they crave.
The rich business class do not care that those legalized eventually will add to the US welfare state and will not give back to the economy. Americans have to take notice that allowing immigrants into the United States to sponge off American citizens or reduce the hourly wage doesn’t benefit average Americans. It sure does benefit businesses such as those who emulate the Robber Barons of the turn of the century.

Those businesses that can benefit from slave labor are thrilled that conservative Marco Rubio broke ranks with conservative thought for the cause of business and businesses. These rich, selfish, self-serving magnates will reward Mr. Rubio and others in Congress who acknowledge their demands with huge campaign contributions for years. Why? Because, though I hate to say it; it is all about money. They are willing to buy as individuals what you and I cannot get by getting people of like minds to vote out the corrupt politicians. These guys depend on corrupt politicians to make their next dollar. And we sure have enough corrupt Senators to go around.
They would be rich—regardless, but they are actually willing to say, “F” to America if they can get a gram of gold richer on the backs of real Americans. They care not a bit about you and I, and they care even less about conservatives. You see, they are true Republicans, and conservatives are merely those of us who have benefitted from hiding under their huge mantle.
Regular Americans have little to none of the big green stuff, so big fat politicians go where the bucks emerge. The Koch brothers, Grover Norquist, Sheldon Adelson, and other billionaires who still run major businesses don’t give a damn about the American people. Even I once thought they did.

They are so interested in making their next bucks that they are happy to make them off the backs of former middle class, soon-to-be-poor Americans, like you and I. Shame on them! Please Americans; let us deny them our respect if nothing else. Why potential saviors choose greed rather than saving is one for God to check out. Maybe he needs to do some fine tuning if he would, please!
Americans know what we want from immigration reform. The reason the gang of eight tyrants deal smells bad is because it is built from the droppings of a thousand bad ideas. There are many stipulations in the Kelly Plan that Americans will see as big winners; and each one helps America and Americans.
At the top of the list, formerly illegal American guests will never be able to vote. Rich Republican Business magnates do not care about America. They do not care if Democrats win as long as they kiss their rings for the money prizes to get them reelected. So, they do not care if these new folks vote Democratic (Progressive-socialist liberal communist), or whatever you choose to call it.
I am starting to like the term – the “Anti-American Party” as it best describes Democrats as the cheats and scoundrels, and thieves and liars that they surely have become. Yes, I am a Democrat, but at least I am embarrassed by my Party as all D’s should be. The big money Republicans have none of my respect either. I do love the conservative movement and I think we are America’s only chance to survive Obama, the Anti-American Party , and selfish Republicans, and the RINOS who just passed the Senate bill.

You are going to like the Kelly Plan. The cost to Americans for permitting guests to reside in the country legally is zero. Ask the gang of eight tyrants for an accounting. As another biggie for Americans, the Kelly Plan stipulates that any American citizen with the same talent can bump any “legal guest,” applying for any job in the country.
The bottom line is that Americans no longer will have to worry about foreigners controlling future elections; the huge cost of welfare, medical services and education; the inability to get jobs now held by illegal foreign nationals. What is there not to like, unless you are a Democrat leader or a Republican money taker or a big shot Republican billionaire.
Any preferences for anybody but an American end with the Kelly Plan since all guests must pay their own way. There are a ton of great American stipulations in the plan, each of which benefits Americans first. Overall, as a side benefit, the provisions of the plan are good for the guests also—compared to the shadows of course….
Any American that does not think this is a good idea fits the words of Utah Jazz President Frank Layden when describing the response of a former player to a simple question that Layden asked: “Son, what is it with you? Is it ignorance or apathy?” Just like a lot of low information Americans, who do not pay attention, the player responded to the coach: “I don’t know and I don’t care!” Of course, the player is still a millionaire who had his financial status gifted to him by our God who distributes talent. He is not a regular American. The more Americans learn about the Kelly Plan, the more they will care.

Lying about the numbers
Democrats (members of the Anti-American Party) as you know for the past few years have openly claimed that there are about 20 million, not 10 million in the illegal population. Ironically, as a vote on amnesty approaches, the Democrats now swear that as many as ten million residents have disappeared from their lists.
Their new numbers show that there are now just ten to twelve million illegal foreign nationals left in America. It is a miracle. This difference between ten and twelve to twenty million is calculated to sell Americans that amnesty will be no big deal since the numbers are decreasing. The fact that nobody is counting does help the Democrats with their charade.
The numbers are not decreasing at all and are upward bound. Unfortunately, there are more like fifty million illegal aliens in the US today unless USCIS has had a secret plot to legalize them and make them citizens under the cover of darkness so they would not be counted. I have been saying and writing 50,000,000 as my number for years and years.
Ahem! Those extra eight million to ten million or perhaps thirty-eight to forty million interlopers as I calculate will assure in the future that there will no longer be a need for a Republican Convention. The big money Republicans won’t have to put out their millions for no return ever again.

Future one party political system
Democrats, the anti-American Party, are looking for a one-party political system and if their amnesty takes hold, with fifty million more Democrats, a one party system is sure to follow. The moneyed Republican billionaires want to make sure that they can get more favors from Democrat thieves in office than Republicans, and that is why they do not care who gets their dollars as long as they get their due.
That one party system may be what is coming and the big loser is the American people. The Democrats in charge will tilt the whole country towards liberalism, socialism, progressivism, or communism as they see fit. Conservatives and the Republican brand will exist no more. But, the Republican money class will still be finding cash rakes that are efficient enough to bring their wads to the bank.
After the new “bipartisan” amnesty, just having been passed in the Senate by the gang of eight tyrants, waiting for the HOUSE to approve, you can expect a plethora of Irish speaking people to be legally residing in the country, and even more when the coattails finally reach back to Ireland for full family reunification? I am not worried for, as a Kelly, I am OK with the Irish for sure.
However, the German, Italian, Ghanaian, and the French immigrants and others, waiting years in the wings, might not be as pleased as I, since I am Irish, but then maybe I should have no say. Maybe Marco Rubio should have no say…

The decisions in the US Senate seem to have been left to the whims of John McCain and Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio, the RINOS of the Senate. SO, what happens when the House and Senate bills must be reconciled. These RINOS are major players in the gang of eight tyrants.
If Rubio, McCain and Graham have their way, it looks like it will be lots easier for Big Apple visitors to get a well poured drink legally in New York City, as all the Irish bartenders will be legalized. Nobody does whiskey better than the Irish. I know that for sure! But, despite that, I wish the Senate had decided otherwise, and for America.

Do foreigners really want to be US citizens?
A few years back, continuous Google search results showed me that less and less legal foreign nationals with green cards (permanent residents) chose to take the full plunge to become citizens. They were apparently happy speaking Gaelic. Being a permanent resident of the US with a green card is a pretty good deal and you do not ever have to learn the English language.
The word on the street is that many who have achieved green card permanent resident status have kept their loyalty with their home countries rather than choose to swear allegiance to the US as a citizen. Though they like living at large in the USA, they are not ready to profess full loyalty to America. Learning the language for many is simply a burden they choose to avoid. Green card holders can continue speaking Gaelic or whatever with impunity. I won’t answer this but I have the question: Why do we permit this?
I bet that The NJ resident, and Spanish speaking Dominican immigrant Pedro Quezada, who recently picked up a cool $300 million + in the somewhat recent 2013 Powerball, will be the most celebrated green card holder in his first ESL class. He sure seems like a good guy.
I hope he chooses to pay back the US for any largesse he may have received in the twenty-six years before he became an overnight lottery hero. First reports are that he is a hard worker, an independent business man, father of five, and just the type of person we like in America. Viva El Pedro! If I had the chance, I would ask Pedro why he never chose to take the next step to citizenship.

From Pedro, the Kelly Plan would have collected all of the charges for education, welfare, and medical, that he may have accumulated as recorded in our big Electronic Accountability Database (EAR). I recommend that the database be run by IBM or some other great and trustworthy company so it never becomes political. The contract should be 99 years for the same reason.
Right after Pedro cashed his Lottery check, I would have presented him with a bill to pay for those past services. Additionally, he would have been asked kindly to volunteer to send some other funds along for those in similar circumstance (foreign nationals) who have never had such a bonanza in their lives.
The bottom line is that lottery winners and corporate moguls, though the chances were small, made it big. If they have expenses from when they were poor and on Medicaid or they skipped from the university without paying tuition or their loans, when they hit it big, the Kelly Plan wants to collect something from them, for Americans before any other American should pay a dime.

With so many green card holders remaining as permanent residents, rather than moving towards citizenship, don’t you find it strange that there is such a push by Democratic politicians to push illegal foreign nationals into citizenship. The evidence suggests that it is not what they seem to desire. Can there be another reason for the push from the Anti-American Party than concern for the aliens?
Maybe the Democrats know that green card holders cannot vote for any favorite Democrat du jour since they are not citizens. Maybe the Democrats are not as happy letting the new residents enjoy their fine living in America without the Anti-American Party gaining something from it. You don’t think that Obama and the Democrats would play politics on such an important issue as a person’s life. Do you?


Dear Morning Briefing Subscriber ,
About a month ago, we emailed you announcing that the 2014 RedState Gathering will be held on August 8-10, 2014 in the great State of Texas at the Renaissance Worthington Hotel in Fort Worth.  I am pleased to announce the following confirmed and invited speakers:

Governor Rick Perry

via marie hall

Ted Cruz

Atty. Gen. Greg Abbott

Governor Chris Christie
Governor Nikki Haley
Governor Bobby Jindal
Senator Mike Lee
Senator Rand Paul
Senator Marco Rubio
Congressman Jim Bridenstine
RNC Chair Reince Priebus
Also invited are two of the best, most conservative RedState endorsed candidates in the field this year, Matt Bevin of Kentucky and Milton Wolf of Kansas.  We will continue to update you as we issue more invitations and confirm speakers.
REGISTER TODAY to receive special Early Bird pricing of only $249 to attend the most important conservative conference of the year.  This price includes two breakfasts, two lunches and three receptions.  No other conference delivers that much value for your hard-earned money.  Spouses receive an additional discount bringing the price down to $199.
We have also negotiated a RedState only hotel rate of $129/night, $100 off the current online rate.  Call the Renaissance Fort Worth Hotel at 817.850.1000 or click the link below.  American Airlines also provided us with a special RedState discount on airfare into Dallas/Fort Worth airport.  Visit and enter promo code 4584BG when booking.
I look forward to seeing you in Fort Worth, take a moment to register TODAY.

Erick W. Erickson


Special thanks to our sponsors:
Title Sponsor
Gold Sponsors

Tolerance: EBONY Editor Attacks Black Conservatives And Anyone Else With Whom She Disagrees

Tolerance: <i>EBONY</i> Editor Attacks Black Conservatives And Anyone Else With Whom She Disagrees
Jamilah Lemieux, Senior Editor for EBONY, has a message for black and white Americans who lean conservative or who don’t support individuals based solely on the color of their skin: Your opinions don’t matter and you are, in her opinion, very obviously hate-able.
Such is the tone of a few of Lemieux’s Twitter proclamations Thursday about blacks who don’t adhere to her worldview.
Joining a conversation about a new digital magazine for black conservatives called American CurrentSee, which is headed up by tea party darling Ben Carson and columnist Armstrong Williams, Lemieux made clear that she had no interest in knowing more about the project.

tweet pic 1

After the EBONY editor mocked the project and said that she wouldn’t bother wasting her time to learn more about the black conservatives’ point of view, Republican National Committee spokesman Raffi Williams said he was disappointed that someone in her position wouldn’t encourage diversity of thought.
That angered Lemieux, whose prejudices evidently drive more than her contempt for black conservatives— she isn’t interested in hearing anything that a “white dude” has to say about “how to do this black thing.” Her vitriolic response at first confused Williams, who noted that the magazine is being headed up by black men.
Lemieux quickly tried to clear things up by letting Williams know that he was the “white dude” whose opinions she would not tolerate.
There was just one small problem with Lemieux’s remark: Williams, the son of former NPR and current Fox contributor Juan Williams, is black. Lemieux quickly realized the error in her racist remark and tried to save face by blaming her outburst on too-small picture and “GOP folks” trolling on the social networking site.
After realizing what a jerk she’d been, Lemieux courted the ensuing Twitter backlash in the manner in which any abhorrent purveyor of intolerance worth his or her salt would— by hurling baseless insults at people with ideas that differ from her own.
twitter pic5
Before the exchange with Williams, Lemieux had already been busy hurling Twitter insults at NBA star Kobe Bryant for failing to make skin color a primary factor in deciding whether he felt the need to come to the defense of a fellow human being.
Bryant is quoted in a story scheduled to publish on March 31 in The New Yorker saying that, if it’s based solely on race, the Miami Heat’s show of solidarity with Florida shooting victim Trayvon Martin raises questions about whether the Nation has progressed as a society.
“So we want to advance as a society and a culture, but, say, if something happens to an African-American we immediately come to his defense? Yet you want to talk about how far we’ve progressed as a society? Well, we’ve progressed as a society, then don’t jump to somebody’s defense just because they’re African-American. You sit and you listen to the facts just like you would in any other situation, right? So I won’t assert myself,” Bryant reportedly responded to a question.
Enter Lemieux:
twitter pic final
Knowing as much about Lemieux as she does about the people she spent Thursday insulting on Twitter and taking special care not criticize her in a jingoistic or trite manner still leaves ample room to point out that her prejudices come from no more noble a place than the repugnant attitudes of the Nation’s lingering white racists.
There’s no question that the wounds of America’s ugly past will never fully heal. And just as world peace is an unachievable goal, post-racial society is a phrase with no meaning. But, whether from the left, right, white or minority, what gives Lemieux the right to hatefully disavow any idea that is not her own without fear of being exposed as an enemy of progress?
There is a quote of Horace Greeley’s, whose work toward enabling a more just society is certainly meritorious, that EBONY’s editor ought to keep in mind next time she feels compelled to deride opposing views without careful consideration or friendly debate:
Full of error, and suffering as the world yet is, we cannot afford to reject unexamined any idea which proposes to improve the Moral, Intellectual, or Social condition of mankind. Better incur the trouble of testing and exploding a thousand fallacies than, by rejecting, stifle a single beneficent truth.
Of course, Greeley was white, so Lemieux may not deem anything attributed to him as beneficial to those out there trying to do the “black thing.”

Bill Authorizing Government To Define Legitimate Journalism A Political Albatross For RINOs, Democrats

Bill Authorizing Government To Define Legitimate Journalism A Political Albatross For RINOs, Democrats
Another attempt from Congressional Democrats to define the media faces a shaky future. If Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) is right, the so-called media “shield law” bill, which essentially segments application of the 1st Amendment to lock out citizen journalists while favoring members of the media establishment, will never see a floor vote – even though it has been awaiting action since last September.
The Free Flow of Information Act, which in its original version died in the 110th Congress, is designed to codify who is (and who isn’t) protected from subpoenas, as well as who can be compelled to reveal their sources in court. Supported by media companies and opposed by bloggers, the bill seeks, for the first time, to augment 1st Amendment guarantees of free speech by affording card-carrying journalists the right to refuse to testify against sources, while denying independent reporters from all walks of life that same protection.

The bill is co-authored by Senators Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Lindesey Graham (R-S.C.), which probably tells you all you need to know. Schumer said last week the measure could come up for a Senate vote at any time, boasting that “we have the 60 votes” needed for passage.
Cornyn scoffed at that assertion this week, telling Breitbart Schumer doesn’t have that kind of support for the vote – and he knows it:
He’s bluffing, Cornyn retorts.
“If he had the votes to pass it, it already would have been passed,” Cornyn says, adding, “This isn’t about passing legislation, this is about distracting the public’s attention and changing the subject from the failed policies of this administration. I think you could put this in that same category.”
“…They want to pick and choose which journalists are covered,” the Texan Republican told Breitbart News. “In other words, if you’re a blogger they might not cover you, but if you work for the New York Times they might. Given the changes in the way we get information and the way we consume news, that really smacks to me in essence of government licensing who’s an official ‘journalist’ for the purposes of a shield law and who’s not. If there is one thing I can glean from the First Amendment, it is that government should not be in the business of licensing the news media.”
That’s a hard argument to rebut on the merits, and involving government in the business of defining its watchers doesn’t make good political sense, either.

Indeed, in a midterm election year in which embattled Democrats and their moderate GOP peers need a rallying point to ensure they hang on to their incumbencies, it’s a puzzling political strategy to push legislation that offends the sensibilities of a public already fed up with near-daily revelations of government infringements on their civil liberties.
Cornyn said he believes Senators who support the bill are clearly placing short-term, pet-issue politics ahead of both big-picture political strategizing and the good of the American people.
“Cornyn believes the bill’s timing – and the administration’s backing of it – appears to be aimed at alleviating criticism of the Justice Department’s secret attainment of Associated Press phone conversations and the administration’s similar actions against Fox News’ James Rosen, among other media targeting,” Breitbart reports.
“You remember when this [bill] was recently resurrected? It was essentially an attempt to deflect… from the Department of Justice and this administration… the criticism they were taking [from] James Rosen and other traditional journalists. So, I really question the timing of all of this,” Cornyn said.

A Democrat Is Double-Crossed by Obama — And We Get Obamacare

A Democrat Is Double-Crossed by Obama — And We Get Obamacare
So the Democratic Congressman who helped get the Affordable Care Act (otherwise known as the monstrosity called Obamacare) shoved down our throats in 2010 now says he was double-crossed by the Barack Obama Administration. Are we supposed to be surprised?
Four years ago, Bart Stupak was a member of Congress from Michigan who served as the leader of a group of anti-abortion Democrats. In an op-ed in USA Today two weeks ago, he told a very revealing story:
During the battle over the ACA’s passage, pro-life Democratic members of Congress negotiated with the President to ensure that the Act would not be employed to promote abortion. During the final debate on the Affordable Care Act, I engaged in a colloquy with Chairman Henry Waxman reaffirming that Americans would not be required to pay for abortions or violate their conscience by participating in or promoting a procedure they find morally objectionable.

Stupak says he and his colleagues got exactly what they requested: “In response, we received an ironclad commitment that our conscience would remain free and our principles would be honored.”
Of course, that is not what happened. Thanks to the support of Stupak and his colleagues, every Democrat in Congress voted for passage of the Affordable Care Act — even though none of them had actually read the thing. You’ll remember that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said they had to pass the measure to find out what was in it.
Well, they did. And as a result, the Department of Health and Human Services, which was given the job of enforcing the new law, issued a mandate in 2012 requiring all health plans cover all Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptives. Among the 20 different contraceptives that employers would be required to pay for were four drugs and devices that could terminate human life at its earliest stages.
Bart Stupak’s USA Today column carried the headline, “Contraception Mandate Doublecross: Column.” Welcome to Obama’s world, Mr. Stupak.
It is that provision that led two companies to challenge the mandate. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties claim that provisions of a 1993 law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, mean they should be exempt from this requirement.

Hobby Lobby is a family-owned chain of 560 arts-and-crafts stores. It was founded by David Green, who is an evangelical Christian who says, “I have deeply held convictions and I should not have to be required by the government to violate my conscience.” Conestoga Wood Specialties is a cabinet maker owned by a Mennonite family. Both contend that four of the contraceptive measures that HHS has mandated — a morning after pill and certain intrauterine devices — promote abortions, which their faith prohibits them from providing.
The government, of course, disagrees. The case has made it before the Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments from both sides this past Tuesday. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, arguing on behalf of the government, told the justices that because the two companies are for-profit businesses, they are not entitled to the same Constitutional rights as a private individual.
This led to an amusing exchange between Verrilli and Justice Antonin Scalia. The Solicitor General told the court: “In the entire history of this country, there is not a single case in which a for-profit corporation was granted an exemption.”
Justice Scalia replied: “Not a single case in which it was denied exemption either. All you’re saying is that there are no cases.”

It’s always dangerous to try to parse how justices will vote on a case based on their questions and remarks at a public hearing. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. seemed to be leaning in support of the plaintiffs when he observed that minority-owned businesses can bring racial discrimination lawsuits. So why can’t a Christian business (or a Muslim one, for that matter) base a policy on the religion of its owners?
But remember what happened when the original challenge to the Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act reached the Supreme Court in 2012. Many observers concluded that Roberts would vote against it, based on his remarks at the public hearings back then. So they were surprised (many even said they were shocked) when the chief justice voted to confirm the law — and used some very twisted logic to do so. Writing for the majority, Roberts said Obamacare was Constitutional because the mandate it imposed was a tax – this, despite the fact that Obama had spent the past two years emphatically denying that Obamacare was a tax.
So we know the justices can twist and distort the Constitution to say almost anything they want. Heck, that’s what they’ve been doing for more than 60 years. So I won’t be surprised if they decide to drive another nail in the coffin of religious liberty when they issue their decision in this case. We’ll find out in June.
In the meantime, I’m glad to see former Congressman Stupak on the right side of the fence at least this once. He’s joined with Democrats for Life in filing a brief urging the Supreme Court to rule on behalf of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Cabinets.

But that doesn’t mean he’s seen the light about Obamacare. In fact, in the op-ed piece I quoted above, he says he’s still convinced it’s a great idea. “As a member of Congress,” he wrote, “I was proud to vote for the Affordable Care Act.” And he continued: “No, I haven’t changed my position. I continue to believe the Affordable Care Act is critical to reforming our health care markets and providing a critical safety net for millions.”
I guess we should thank him for taking one tiny step in the right direction — and hope that at least five justices on the U.S. Supreme Court agree with him in June.
Until next time, keep some powder dry.

Democracy Is Not Political Morality

you can t legislate morality postcard $ 1 20
A question was posed to me recently that deserves a clear answer: “What is political morality?”
It was posed in the context that morality is different from one culture or ideology to the next. I strongly disagree with this notion. Instead, what changes is the culture’s peer pressure or coercion of its members to accept what they know to be immorality. There is a universal morality understood by all humans except a few sociopaths.
A government that upholds that morality is a politically moral government. Nearly all of human history is characterized by governments that instead chose amoral rule by a ruling class over a general population of serfs. The Founders of the United States took an honest look at morality, spelled it out then worked to build a political system that would limit the power of government to stray from it.
The Declaration of Independence states:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles…
We all know when we have been personally wronged. If someone commits the amoral act of trying to harm us, to kill us, to rob us, to steal our earnings or to bully us into silence when they don’t like what we are saying, we know they are doing us wrong. Every healthy creature will defend itself against someone trying to do such harms.

But what happens when an individual is set upon by superior numbers trying to do him wrong? That is democracy, in which superior numbers have an assumed authority to wrong someone just because there are more of them.
A politically moral government, as the Founders put it, will defend one single person against 99 percent of the population trying to do him wrong. It will defend that person’s property against wrongful taking; it will defend his liberty to say what he believes to be true even if others find it offensive; it will defend him personally against physical harm; it will punish anyone who tries to wrong him.
It’s why our Founders wrote our Constitution to defend us against the evils of democracy. It was to ensure the Federal government had no permission to act on the will of the people and could perform only the specific duties spelled out in Article I, Section 8. Its overarching duty is to defend the people against the wrongs we all know to be wrongs.
That is political morality.
–Victor Sayre

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Yeppers us Old Farts are akin to Captain Brittles...

We been there done that...but the time comes ya must saddle up and ride off to new one listens to us anywhoo! They will learn the hard way...such is the lessons of life!

Ya ever have one of those days..ya just want your rifle and Pony?

Well hell I am having one of those proverbial days...listening to talking heads,politicians and everyone else telling us what we need to think and believe makes me just want to head out into the sunset...I need relief from all the Diatribes hows bout' y'  

Hit it Dean& Rick...

Disgusting: Clinton Snared In Pedophile Ring

funny Bill Clinton demotivational poster
According to former child sex slave Virginia Roberts and a class action lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, former President Bill Clinton was present during sex parties involving up to twenty underage girls at Epstein’s secluded island in the Caribbean. That flight records show Clinton was flown on numerous occasions to the island on Epstein’s private jet. Clinton had a close relationship with an employee of Epstein’s who compiled thousands of photos of nude young girls posed in lewd positions. And these photos were used as a catalog for Epstein to loan out his girls to powerful politicians and British royalty, including Bill Clinton.
According to the lawsuit:

…Clinton was friends with an unnamed woman who “kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein… and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses.”
While Epstein was indicted and jailed for his pedophilia, Bill Clinton oddly has remained unscathed, more than likely by having friends in high places.

If Bill Clinton is in fact a pedophile, will the American people demand that he be put away for a very long time so that he can’t hurt any more children? Or will having friends in high places exempt him from the rule of law?
Time will tell.
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Let's Play "Name That Party": Chinese Triad Edition

Leland Yee
Sad news from the Golden State. A State senator has been indicted on charges of corruption and bribery. Via the San Jose Mercury, State Sen. Leland Yee indicted for public corruption in major FBI operation

SAN FRANCISCO — State Senator Leland Yee has been indicted for public corruption as part of a major FBI operation Tuesday morning spanning the Bay Area, according to law-enforcement sources.
Yee highlights a string of multiple arrests that also includes notorious Chinatown gangster Raymond “Shrimp Boy” Chow, connected to a variety of charges including racketeering and drug crimes, sources said.
FBI agents and local police are serving arrest and search warrants throughout the Bay Area, with agents seen in locations in San Francisco and San Mateo, as well as Yee’s Capitol office in Sacramento. One of the searches was at the San Francisco Chinatown office of the Gee King Tong Free Masons and is linked to Chow’s arrest.

Yee’s indictment might put his candidacy for Secretary of State in ruins…

This being California, an indictment for bribery and corruption doesn’t necessarily stop your political career.
As always, this article is a contestant in the RedState “Name That Party” contest, wherein we see how many paragraphs it takes to identify the party affiliation of a Democrat. In this case, the first direct reference to Yee as a Democrat is in the last paragraph.
My colleague, Leon Wolf (on twitter @LeonHWolf) has identified other worthy contestants in this iteration of “Name That Party,”


Let's Play Name That Party: Democrat Minority Mayor Edition.

This has been a bad day for politicians without a party. From the Charlotte Observer, Charlotte Mayor Patrick Cannon arrested on corruption charges
Charlotte Mayor Patrick Cannon was arrested Wednesday on federal public corruption laws after a four-year investigation, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Charlotte announced.

Cannon was charged with theft and bribery after an FBI sting operation, said Anne Tompkins, U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina.

Authorities said Cannon took bribes from undercover FBI agents five times, the last one on Feb. 21 when he took $20,000 in cash in the mayor’s office.
For reporting this, Mike Gordon of the Charlotte News Observer gets a free entry in our Name That Party competition.

Allen West: Something I'm extremely proud to be a part of...

Allen West Guardian Fund

Dear Patriot,

I've never been afraid to lead from the front when it comes to defending America.

Barack Obama is a disaster of a president and his ultra-liberal leadership is destroying our country.

But this past weekend, I was excited - more than excited...energized!! - to know that that we have an growing army of Guardian Fund supporters that are just as committed as I am to saving America. I know that we will succeed in reversing Obama's slide of liberal decline because our supporters are stronger than Obama's defeatism.

It was good to hear from friends like Donald Trump and Greg Gutfeld, who joined me to address an overcapacity crowd at our First Annual Allen West Boot Camp.

Patriot, we've started something that I'm extremely proud to be a part of but we have to keep fighting if want to be successful. Can you help me?

Will you make a generous donation of $25, $50, $100 or more right now to the Allen West Guardian Fund to elect 14 Constitutional conservatives in 2014 who will undue the horrific damage Barack Obama has done to America?

Receive a Free Book

As a special thank you for all you do for the Guardian Fund – the first 30 people to donate $100 or more will receive a signed copy of Greg Gutfeld's new book, Not Cool, as a one-of-a-kind thank you gift.

Patriot, Elections have consequences - and we're certainly seeing the effects of some serial bad decisions in this country.

The 2014 elections represent an opportunity for Americans to self-correct. The question I hope voters will ask themselves is, do we really want to continue on this path?

I think the answer is "NO" which is why I hope you can make a generous contribution the Allen West Guardian Fund today.

I'm committed to electing strong, principled veteran and minority candidates who will preserve our constitutional foundation, limit the growth of government to promote individual prosperity, and ensure our national security.

Steadfast and Loyal,

Allen West
Lt. Col. Allen B. West, USA (ret)
U.S. Congressman (2011-2013)

Obama’s ‘Voter ID’ Scam Is Busted!

Obama Spends $53M On Voter ID Cards In Kenya, But Voter ID in US is ...
Folks, we are being scammed. Democrats are winning elections through what appears to be massive voter fraud.
There is a saying, “He with the gold rules.” Well, whoever wins elections has the gold. The winner has the power to change everything, so he rules. It doesn’t matter if the win was by a small margin, or if the win was by committing fraud. Winning is everything. 

obama promise everything deliver nothing poster $ 19 25
Many citizens may not realize most national elections are won by a sliver of votes in only a few, key battleground States. Change the vote totals by a small bit in a few States and Mitt Romney is the President: Ohio, Florida, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Iowa, Pennsylvania.
Why did Barack Obama and Democrats win by just a sliver in those few battleground States? In 2012, it was a powerful one-two punch, both of which I believe were out-and-out voter fraud.
First, Obama used the Internal Revenue Service as his personal Mafia thug enforcers to persecute, intimidate and destroy his political opposition — ranging from Tea Party groups, to conservative fundraising organizations, to top GOP donors, to high-profile outspoken critics in the media (like myself).
This widespread Obama-IRS conspiracy killed enthusiasm and intensity, dampened energy, silenced free speech and prevented fundraising through an IRS witch hunt. This changed the outcome of the 2012 election, and Obama should be impeached for it.

If you think impeachment can’t happen, study Ukraine. One day, the president is mocking protesters and sending police to kill them. The next day, he is on the run for his life, abandoning his lavish palace, impeached by Congress; and the military is hugging the citizens in the streets. It all changes quickly.
But still, I believe the IRS scandal is the smaller problem. Impeach Obama and no President will use the IRS for political purposes ever again. Problem solved.
The more widespread problem involves voter ID (or the lack of it). Without voter ID, Democratic voters across this country could be voting four times, five times, 10 times each. There is no way to prevent it, and the facts indicate that is exactly what happened.
Take Philadelphia as just one example. There were voting precincts in Philly where the combined vote was Obama over Romney by about 30,000-0. In those precincts GOP poll watchers were forcibly removed for several hours, until judges ordered them back in. During those hours, were the ballot boxes stuffed? Did Democratic voters vote 10 times each? As absurd as 30,000-0 is (it’s just statistically impossible), maybe the right vote total was 6,000-0.
If I’m wrong, why did the wolves want the chicken coup left unguarded?
Here is an example of what’s happening across the country: An Ohio woman who sat on the board of an environmental group that received an Obama Administration Environmental Protection Agency grant and attended a conference with Obama’s Labor Secretary, Hilda Solis, was convicted of voter fraud because she voted for Obama six times in the 2012 election. This has barely been in the mainstream media. That’s because they don’t want you to know about it. They don’t want you to realize what it represents. They don’t want the light bulb to go off over your head — that this case represents “the tip of the iceberg.”

It’s important to note that after serving time in prison for her crime, her sentence was reduced by a George Soros-funded group’s intervention. Then, upon release from prison, she was hugged on stage by Al Sharpton at a Democratic rally.
Are you starting to get the picture? Connect the dots. Important Democrats with important careers, sitting on boards of influential organizations that receive government funding are voting six times. She’s just the one who got caught. How many more are there? Just think how many anonymous Democratic voters across this country, with nothing to lose, with no job at all, are voting six or 10 or 20 times.
Think of the importance of national Democratic figures like Sharpton publicly congratulating a criminal released from prison for voter fraud. Think of the importance of Soros-funded groups fighting on her behalf. Elections are being stolen across this country in order to advance the agenda to redistribute income and “murder the middle class.” Sharpton’s hug was a wink and a nod. Democratic insiders know this is exactly how they win elections.
How easy is it to cheat? Even left-leaning POLITICO just reported the voter registration system is in chaos. Millions of dead people are still on the voter rolls, 24 million registrations are no longer valid, 12 million have incorrect addresses and 2.75 million people are registered to vote in more than one State.
Democrats hate voter ID. It’s one of their biggest issues. But that’s ridiculous. Voter ID is a no-brainer. You need an ID to do most anything: Cash a check, buy cigarettes or alcohol, get food stamps, or get any government benefits. You even need ID to get into government buildings!

So why are Democrats so intense and passionate about such a minor issue? Methinks thou protesteth too much. This is a much bigger issue than meets the naked eye. Democrats are losing their minds over voter ID because they know they can’t win elections without fraud.
Obama and his socialist cabal are making “a mountain out of a molehill” because this is their edge. This is how they win elections when their policies are a failure, when they’ve ruined the economy, when they’ve spent the country into bankruptcy, when they’ve killed millions of jobs. Voter ID is their secret weapon. They stuff the ballot box. They cheat.
I dare Democrats to prove me wrong. But of course they can’t, because without voter ID, there is no way to prove voters are voting multiple times, in different precincts, using false names or the names of dead voters or the names of voters who have moved, or using illegal immigrants to illegally vote across this country.
But there is proof positive voter ID is a scam. The Obama-Democratic Party argument against voter ID is that:
  1. It’s racist.
  2. It’s meant to stop people from voting.
  3. It’s too big a burden for poor and minority voters to obtain ID.
I just returned from two doctor visits for a checkup and a follow-up test. These were my first doctor visits since Obamacare took effect. Guess what both medical offices asked me for before any doctor could see me or any medical test could be done?

Official government-issued photo ID.
You cannot see a doctor or receive your free Obamacare without ID to prove it’s really you. A health insurance card won’t do the trick, simply because the medical office needs to prove you are in fact the person whose name is on the insurance card.
I questioned the nurses at both offices. They verified no one can collect their “free” Obamacare services from any doctor without showing ID. And since everyone is now required to have health insurance (or is given free insurance), the government is requiring that everyone have a photo ID.
Does that make Obama and the Democrats racists? No, what it makes them is hypocrites who are in total fear of fair elections that they know they have no chance of winning — no chance, that is, unless they cheat. Don’t look now, but Obamacare just opened the door for voter ID.
This is where the younger generation screams, “Busted!”
Let’s take the hypocrisy a step further. Every single Democratic voter must be lining up to get his photo ID so he can get his free Obamacare. So the argument that poor and minority Democrat voters don’t have ID, or shouldn’t be “burdened” to get it, is out the window.
I think this is where the younger generation screams, “Double busted.”
That leaves only one possible reason to oppose photo ID for voters: the ability to cheat! 
The whole voter ID scam is dead in the water — just like the Obama economy. The argument against voter ID is killed — just like jobs in this Obama economy. And anyone who tries to argue “most voters don’t have ID” is a liar — just like the President who said, “If you like your insurance, you can keep it.”
continue reading political cartoons page 7
Obama, you are busted.