Friday, May 26, 2017

BREAKING: Ted Cruz Goes After Soros And Obama With STUNNING New Investigation

Texas Senator Ted Cruz Hunting For Votes In Iowa Courtesy Nbcnews Com

Obama admin gave taxpayer money to Soros to spark leftist political revolution
(Free Beacon) – A group of leading senators is calling on newly installed Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to immediately launch an investigation into efforts by the Obama administration to sway foreign elections by sending taxpayer funds to “extreme and sometimes violent political activists” that promote leftist causes, according to a copy of the letter.
The lawmakers disclosed multiple conversations with foreign diplomats who outlined active political meddling by the Obama administration’s State Department, including the use of taxpayer funds to support leftist causes in Macedonia, Albania, Latin America, and Africa.
A portion of this State Department funding appears to have gone to organizations supported by the controversial liberal billionaire George Soros, according to the letter, which was authored by Republican Sens. Mike Lee (Utah), Jim Inhofe (Okla.), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Ted Cruz (Texas), David Perdue (Ga.), and Bill Cassidy (La.).

The senators are asking Tillerson to launch a full-scale investigation into these funding efforts in order to determine how exactly the Obama administration sought to promote left-leaning causes and political parties across the globe.
The latest disclosures of this activity mirror efforts by the Obama administration to send taxpayer funds to Israeli organizations that opposed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the country’s last election.
Political leaders from a range of nations spent months informing the lawmakers about these activities.
“Over the past few months, elected officials and political leaders of foreign nations have been coming to me with disappointing news and reports of U.S. activity in their respective countries,” Lee said in a statement. “This includes reports of diplomats playing political favorites, USAID funds supporting extreme and sometimes violent political activists, and the U.S. government working to marginalize the moderates and conservatives in leadership roles.”

“This sort of political favoritism from our missions around the world is unacceptable and endangers our bilateral relationships,” he said.
The senators are seeking an investigation that would review “all funds associated with promoting democracy and governance and review the programs, accounts, and multiplicity of U.S. entities involved in such activities.”
Such an investigation could shed light on the distribution of taxpayer funds to organizations and causes meant to instigate left-leaning political change abroad.
The letter insists that Tillerson should “review how all our tax dollars are being utilized in order to halt activities that are fomenting political unrest, disrespecting national sovereignty and civil society, and ultimately undermine our attempts to build beneficial international relationships.”

The lawmakers outline specific evidence of political meddling.
“We have received credible reports that, over the past few years, the U.S. Mission there has actively intervened in the party politics of Macedonia, as well as in the shaping of its media environment and civil society, often favoring left-leaning political groups over others,” they wrote.
This activity was pushed by USAID and groups associated with Soros’ Open Society Foundations, according to the lawmakers.
The organizations are said to have pushed a “progressive agenda” meant to “invigorate the political left” using taxpayer funds, according the letter.
“Respected leaders from Albania have made similar claims of U.S. diplomats and Soros-backed organizations pushing for certain political outcomes in their country,” the lawmakers wrote.
“Time and again, foreign leaders visiting Washington have expressed concerns to us about how American taxpayer funds are being used counterproductively in their respective countries,” the lawmakers disclosed, referring to efforts undertaken in Latin America and Africa.
This type of interference in foreign countries must stop immediately, the lawmakers said.


ATTN: #FBI #DOJ #SpecialCounsel forget Fake News #RussiaGate

Hillary Clinton's 'Old Friends' - Washington Free Beacon  – Sex offender Bill Clinton – Hillary Clinton ...  EBL: Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton's Democrat Fantasy Island Rule 5
...Concentrate on #PizzaGate...  Drain the real Swamp : 

What Happened To NYPD’s Pedophile RICO Case Against Hillary?

by:MIchael DePinto

For months, the NYPD has had their hands on Anthony Wiener’s laptop. Wiener, the estranged husband of former Clinton top advisor Huma Abedin, was of course just one of the many pedophiles infesting the upper strata of our society today. And that laptop was chock full of incriminating information, from the evidence of visits to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex island and even State Department emails. 

In the following video, Right Wing News looks at what has been and has not been done ever since the seizure of the laptop. Sure, the Trump administration has been cracking down hard on the DC pedophiles, with thousands of arrests since his inauguration. Of course, this has gone largely unreported by the hypocritical mainstream media. However, the question remains: is what they are doing enough and are they really going after the pedophiles at the highest level? 

Rick Wells reports:
NYPD is doing the entire nation a great service, according to Erick Prince, the founder of Blackwater and a retired Navy Seal. He is well known in military, security and law enforcement circles and has strong contacts within the New York Police Department. They are confirming some very serious and disturbing information that is leaking out about just what was on the Weiner laptop. Prince was interviewed on Breitbart radio on Friday.
According to Prince, “They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times.” 

What Happened To NYPD’s Pedophile RICO Case Against Hillary?

He said, “The amount of garbage that they found in emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, even by other Democrat members of Congress, was so disgusting, they then gave it to the FBI and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation, you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments.” 

Prince reveals that the NYPD wanted to hold a press conference and announce the additional arrests they were making and they received huge pushback to the point of coercion from the Justice Department. He said the Justice Department went so far as to direct them to charge an unrelated individual in the Eric Garner case of almost two years before. He says, “That’s the level of pushback the Obama Justice Department is doing against actually seeking justice in these email and other related criminal matters. He says in the unfortunate instance of Hillary Clinton being “elected” president there will be a constitutional crisis unlike anything since 1860.

Prince says, “NYPD was the first one to look at that laptop. Weiner and Huma Abedin, his wife, the closest adviser of Hillary Clinton of twenty years, have both flipped. They are cooperating with the government. They see potential jail time of many years for their crimes.”
NYPD kept a copy of the computer and passed a copy on to the FBI, which was what forced Comey to reopen the investigation. He says, “NYPD has all the information and they will pursue justice, within their rights, if the FBI doesn’t.  And there is all kind of criminal culpability, there’s all of the emails they’ve seen, of that 650,000, including money laundering, underage sex, pay for play, and of course, plenty of proof of inappropriate handling, sending and receiving of classified information, up to SAP level special access programs.
He quotes one of the NYPD Chiefs, saying, “As a parent, as a father with daughters, he could not let that level of evil continue.”
Recent stories on this topic with similar sources and conclusions can be seen at the following links. One with Doug Hagmann can be accessed by clicking this link and another featuring Dr. Steve Pieczenik can be found here.

If you happen to be someone who hasn’t looked into #Pizzagate at all, mainly because the very same people who’ve been lying to you about everything for years have told you it’s “fake news,” then I hope you’ll cease exercise contempt prior to investigation for just 17:00 minutes and watch the video below.  

Why not see and hear some of the evidence for yourself, and make your own decision as to whether #Pizzagate is worth looking into, rather than taking someone else’s word who refuses to show you any of the evidence. That’s rather suspect, is it not?
Furthermore, if there was nothing to the story of pedophile rings and their connection to the DNC, how is it that over 2,500 child sex offenders have been apprehended by Trump’s administration in just the first 60 days alone??? Why did the previous Democrat administration do nothing??? If there is nothing to the story, and it’s “fake news,” why did Jeff Sessions Tell Nancy Pelosi To Expect Pedophile Investigations to Begin, despite her threats not to?
Either #Pizzagate is “fake news,” and every arresting officer and agent involved in apprehending the 2,500 sex offenders did so knowing those people were innocent, or there is ABSOLUTELY something to the story. It’s one or the other. It cannot be both. Once you realize that, ask yourself who is more likely to lie? A handful of super elite politicians, or hundreds, if not thousands of men and women on the ground level making the arrests? 
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand

Thursday, May 25, 2017

LA Times OP-ED Keep concealed guns out of California
oped: First and foremost : So the Los Angeles City Attorney and Police Chief are against the 2nd Amendment and the reciprocity their logic does this also apply to drivers license reciprocity across state lines? After all California allows illegal aliens to get a California drivers license and to vote within the state...may other states say no to California drivers licenses?

Also both are incorrect about Arizona...yes residents may carry without a permit...however they must meet the same standards as those with  resident or non resident permits via criminal records check...if stopped a officer just runs a records check 10-28 10-29 ..if they have a record *Busted* FYI the federal reciprocity act would only apply to state issued CCW if your state allows ccw without permit one would still need to get a ccw permit  from the resident or non resident state to carry outside of the state!

I live in Nevada but have a Arizona CCW...I owned property in Arizona and visit from time to time...and yes I had to take the CCW course as well as pass the CCW federal background check for my non resident Arizona permit which is valid in Nevada. 
Nevada's constitution allows for open carry without permit same as 12 other states including Arizona. 

As for criminals...they will steal weapons or buy from the black market...and they don't care about permits!

The Los Angeles City Attorney as well as the Police Chief are political creatures, not Law Enforcement/ OathKeepers... imho they fall into the category of corrupt officials...

OP-ED by:

Californians have a lot on the line in the next congressional debate about America’s gun laws. Two bills stacked with legislative sponsors — HB 38 in the House, SB 446 in the Senate — would override our state’s longstanding rules governing who is allowed to carry a concealed, loaded firearm in public. These bills, both called the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, would dictate that if a person can carry a concealed weapon in any state, that person could carry it everywhere in America. This should be a call to action for all Californians concerned about keeping their families safe.
Twelve states do not require any permit to carry hidden, loaded guns within their borders. Some states’ rules have been so ineffective as to allow felons to carry concealed weapons. Not so in California. Our laws require good cause for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. Applicants must undergo a comprehensive background check. No one with a serious criminal conviction may receive a permit, nor may subjects of temporary or permanent domestic violence restraining orders.
But if concealed carry reciprocity were the law of the land, all this would change. Unbelievably, the House version would allow an individual denied a permit in California to cross the border to a more permissive state, obtain a permit there, then return to California — with a new right to carry here.

Because concealed carry reciprocity poses grave risks, the National Law Enforcement Partnership to Prevent Gun Violence, including the Major Cities Chiefs Assn. and the International Assn. of Chiefs of Police, along with the Assn. of Prosecuting Attorneys, the leaders of Prosecutors Against Gun Violence and many other partners in law enforcement, have strongly opposed it.

While the practical implications of this proposal are deeply troubling, the politics surrounding the debate are surreal. Members of Congress who have invoked states’ rights for years have supported these bills, even though concealed carry reciprocity destroys the notion that states should decide for themselves which rules best keep their residents safe.
Why lawmakers in D.C. are acting this way would be something of a mystery but for the fact that concealed carry reciprocity has been a top priority of gun rights organizations such as the National Rifle Assn. Invigorated by the recent election, gun rights advocates deride what they see as an inconsistent “patchwork” of concealed carry laws across the nation.If that were the real concern, though, Congress could take entirely different steps. Robust, national concealed carry standards similar to California’s would address the patchwork issue while protecting law enforcement officers and the public. Instead, concealed carry reciprocity defaults to the least stringent standards, with states like Arizona — where there are no universal background checks and residents can carry concealed weapons with no permit at all — dictating policy nationwide.

Finally, concealed carry reciprocity could damage our business community. Were great numbers of out-of-state visitors authorized to carry concealed guns in California, all sorts of venues — sports arenas, theme parks, commercial buildings — could be choked with metal detectors or other barriers installed by business owners legitimately concerned about their patrons’ safety.
Forcing concealed carry reciprocity is dangerous and undermines California’s gun laws. Lawmakers should find the courage to say no.
Mike Feuer is the city attorney of Los Angeles. Charlie Beck is the chief of the Los Angeles Police Department.
Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion or Facebook