The Democratic party is in trouble. But why? In this Fox Panel, Mercedes Schlapp and Matthew Continetti explain why. As Continetti explains:
Fox News anchor Bret Baier played a clip from President Obama’s “60
Minutes” interview in which he discussed losing multiple public
relations battles during his administration and how his team came up
short in mobilizing public opinion behind their initiatives. Following
the clip, Baier asked Continetti to respond to what Obama said.
Continetti agreed with Obama and said the president was “kind of right”
about losing several PR battles despite his personal popularity.
Continetti then discussed the 2016 election and how Obama’s popularity
did not translate to a victory for Hillary Clinton, who largely
campaigned as a third term for Obama.
“The Democrats are hobbled
by multiculturalism and political correctness,” Continetti said. “That’s
what Donald Trump exploited in kind of getting the frustration with the
status quo and the frustration with not being able to speak your mind
in this country. He exploited that and that helped him win.”
First and foremost...a little analogy is in order...when fighting a forest fire one does not attack it with a squirt gun...a firefighter sets a back fire to control...using all the tools one has at his/her's disposal...in this case "common sense" yes I realize common *sense* is a oxymoron and is lacking in congress along with a definite lack of cajones' to get the job done...let me help you out...reach down and grab your crotch then briskly give a quick jerk upward to realign and reset your God given manhood.
The ACA aka ObamaCare bill was a disaster from day one 2600 pages of regulations and taxes that has done zip zero to help people with affordable health care...all it did was pad the personal financial portfolios of those who wrote and supported it.
Now those same people are on a rampage demanding y'all show your replacement plan to this disaster before you repeal it...ah ha here let me help you out...just repeal the damn thing already and say to them quoting Nancy Pelosi...: "we have to pass the bill to find out what's in it " thats how to fight a forest fire by starting a back fire...squirt guns will never work ....do you get my drift? Need I really say more?
oped: Hope Toby dedicates this song to Obama and CNN with a lil change in the lyrics...ha: ♫ Justice will be served and the battle will rage. ♫ ♫ This big dog will fight when you rattle his cage. ♫ ♫ And you’ll be sorry that you messed with ♫ ♫ the Trump DOJ. ♫ ♫ 'Cause they’ll put a boot in your ass, ♫ ♫ it’s the American way! ♫
Donald Trump’s inauguration committee has added several musical performers to the lineup.
According to the inaugural committee, Toby Keith, Jennifer Holliday and
the band 3 Doors Down will all perform at a pre-inauguration concert in
Washington, D.C. on Jan. 19, the day before Trump is sworn in as
president.
“President-elect Trump has made it clear that this inaugural is of, by,
and for the American people,” chairman Tom Barrack said in a statement
Friday.
“The 58th Inaugural will celebrate American history and heritage, while
setting the course to a brighter and bolder future for all Americans.
Above all, it will serve as tribute to one of our greatest attributes,
the peaceful transition of partisan power.”
Obama was ‘unprecedented’ in his war on Fox News and the rest of the
Media (D) didn’t say a word about it. And now, it’s CNN’s turn. You know
what they say about Karma?
Watch Jim Acosta complain about his treatment by the President-Elect and Sean Spicer: https://youtu.be/k_EAK491QMw
Now for a little juxtaposition courtesy of the New York Times:
Attacking the news media is a time-honored White House tactic but to an unusual degree, the
Obama administration has narrowed its sights to one specific
organization, the Fox News Channel, calling it, in essence, part of the
political opposition.
“We’re going to treat them the way we would treat an opponent,” said Anita Dunn, the White House communications director, in a telephone interview on Sunday. “As they are undertaking a war against Barack Obama and the White House, we don’t need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave.”
Her comments are only the latest in the volatile exchange between the
administration and the top-rated network, which is owned by the News
Corporation, controlled by Rupert Murdoch. Last month, Roger Ailes, the
chairman of Fox News, and David Axelrod, a senior adviser to President
Obama, met for coffee in New York, in what Politico, which last week
broke that news, labeled a “Fox summit.”…
…“Instead of governing, the White House continues to be in campaign mode, and Fox News is the target of their attack mentality,”
Michael Clemente, the channel’s senior vice president for news, said in
a statement on Sunday. “Perhaps the energy would be better spent on the
critical issues that voters are worried about.”…
…“I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to
attacking my administration,” he said in June, though he did not mention
Fox by name. He added, “You’d be hard pressed if you watched the entire
day to find a positive story about me on that front.”
The White House has limited administration members’ appearances on
the network in recent weeks. In mid-September, when the White House
booked Mr. Obama on a round robin of Sunday morning talk shows, it skipped Fox and called it an “ideological outlet,”
leading the “Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace to appear on Bill
O’Reilly’s prime-time show and call the administration “the biggest
bunch of crybabies I have dealt with in my 30 years in Washington.”
Ms. Dunn called that remark juvenile and stressed that administration
officials would still talk to Fox, and that Mr. Obama was likely to be
interviewed on the network in the future. But, she added, “we’re not going to legitimize them as a news organization.” (Emphasis added)
So… the Obama Administration, in essence, called Fox News ‘Fake News’.
It was the official White House policy.
And why was Fox News considered not a ‘legitimate’ news organization?
Because they didn’t bow and kiss the ring.
They dared to critique the Obama Administration on policy.
They gave a voice to the Tea Party.
They dared to hire conservatives… and then let them speak.
This is worlds apart from what CNN did — they reported something that was unverified and salacious. True, they didn’t report on the salacious bits, but BuzzFeed did.
And now, the entire world sees the President-Elect differently.
Thank you, ass-hats. Sean Hannity has a handy list on his website of all the times that Obama has blamed Fox News for his impotent Presidency.
Here’s a sample: Obama says Fox News is ‘Attacking’ his Administration (CNBC’s Closing Bell, June 16, 2009)
PRESIDENT OBAMA: It’s very hard for me to swallow that one. First of
all, I’ve got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my
administration. I mean, you know, that’s a pretty…
HARWOOD: I assume you’re talking about Fox.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, that’s a pretty big megaphone. And you’d be
hard-pressed, if you watched the entire day, to find a positive story
about me on that front. Obama calls Fox News ‘Destructive’ (Rolling Stone, Oct. 14, 2010)
“Look, as president, I swore to uphold the Constitution, and part of
that Constitution is a free press. We’ve got a tradition in this country
of a press that oftentimes is opinionated. The golden age of an
objective press was a pretty narrow span of time in our history. Before
that, you had folks like Hearst who used their newspapers very
intentionally to promote their viewpoints. I think Fox is part of that
tradition — it is part of the tradition that has a very clear,
undeniable point of view. It’s a point of view that I disagree with.
It’s a point of view that I think is ultimately destructive for the
long-term growth of a country that has a vibrant middle class and is
competitive in the world.”
Obama blames Fox News for Benghazi and IRS Scandals (Interview with Bill O’Reilly, February 2, 2014)
“Your detractors believe that you did not tell the world it was a
terror attack because your campaign didn’t want that out,” O’Reilly
said. “That’s what they believe.”
“And they believe it because folks like you tell them that,” Obama
said, adding on the IRS scandal: “These kinds of things keep on
surfacing, because folks like you will promote them.” Obama says Fox News is hard on Obamacare
President Obama: While affordable health care
might still be a threat to freedom on Fox News, it’s working pretty well
in the real world.
Obama blames Fox News for the ‘Balkanization of the Media’ (Real Time with Bill Maher, November 3, 2016)
“The problem is we’ve got all these filters. Look, if I watched Fox
News, I wouldn’t vote for me either because you’ve got this screen—this
funhouse mirror—through which people are receiving information. How to
break through that is a big challenge.”
Obama blames Fox News for his third term Hillary’s Election loss
“In this election, [they] turned out in huge numbers for Trump. And I
think that part of it has to do with our inability, our failure, to
reach those voters effectively. Part of it is Fox News in every bar and
restaurant in big chunks of the country, but part of it is also
Democrats not working at a grassroots level, being in there, showing up,
making arguments.”
Obama’s had has hate on for Fox News since he began his run for
President, and he used his position as President to delegitimize the
news organization because he didn’t like what they had to say.
Read these RELATED ClashDaily articles: P-SSY OF THE WEEK: Obama And His FOX News Obsession BOOM: Kimberly Guilfoyle Exposes WHY, Snowflake Obama, HATES Fox News
The Media (D) has taken to Twitter to express their ‘shock’ over the treatment of CNN:
"We
are fully confident in our report. It represents the core of what the
First Amendment protects. " CNN statement on our Trump reporting https://t.co/EeIwQMykBT
oped: No surprise here...John McCain is bought and paid for by George Soros as is Hillary and Bill Clinton they owe there soul to the company store!
by:Pamela Geller
This looks much like the fake military documents that Dan Rather and
60 Minutes ran to destroy George W. Bush just days before the election.
CNN and Buzzfeed ran this “fake
news” story last night about Trump hiring Russian prostitutes to
urinate on each other on a bed that Obama allegedly slept in in Russia.
Yes, they bought that insanity, as did the CIA and FBI. The Daily Mail reported: Sworn Donald Trump enemy John McCain admitted Wednesday that
he passed the dossier of claims of a Russian blackmail plot against the
president-elect.
The Arizona senator issued a public statement amid mounting questions
of his exact role in the affair – and how a document riddled with
errors and unverifiable claims came to be published.
‘Late last year, I received sensitive information that has since been made public,’ he said.
‘Upon examination of the contents, and unable to make a judgment
about their accuracy, I delivered the information to the Director of the
FBI.
That has been the extent of my contact with the FBI or any other government agency regarding this issue.’
Jim write:
Trump partook in “golden showers” in Russia with
prostitutes on a bed Obama once slept on… Russia then blackmailed Trump,
not by asking for money or influence in his business deals, but by
forcing him to run for president against all odds and win?
Here is the story that the CIA and idiots in the FAKE NEWS Media are pushing on America–
Here’s what they want us to believe — Let’s recount:
** Obama has a meeting in Russia.
** Trump flies to Russia, finds out the hotel room Obama stayed in, and books it.
** Trump finds at least two hookers and invites them to Obama’s former hotel suite.
** Trump instructs the hookers to PISS ON THE BED because he hates Obama so much.
** Little did Trump know Putin had the entire room outfitted with video cameras.
** The Russian government now has video proof of Trump watching hookers PISS on a bed.
** Russian government tells Trump they will release the video if he does not run for president.
** Trump runs for president and against all odds and WINS the White House.
And no one questioned this report?
Seriously?
It was ALL A HOAX!
And now this…
John McCain: I gave Russia blackmail dossier on Trump to FBI
Sen. John McCain admitted Wednesday that he gave the FBI a dossier
detailing claims of a Russian blackmail plot against President-elect
Donald Trump.
The Arizona lawmaker, a longtime Trump critic, made the public
statement as questions piled up about his alleged role in spreading an
unverified and error-riddled document that Trump has denounced as “a
complete and total fabrication.”
“Late last year, I received sensitive information that has since been made public,” McCain said.
“Upon examination of the contents, and unable to make a judgment
about their accuracy, I delivered the information to the Director of the
FBI. That has been the extent of my contact with the FBI or any other
government agency regarding this issue.”
Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein, who contributed to a story about
the dossier reported by CNN on Tuesday, said McCain was given the
document by a former British ambassador to Moscow.
“It came from a former British MI6 agent who was hired from a
political opposition research firm in Washington who was doing work
about Donald Trump for both republican and democratic candidates opposed
to Trump,” Bernstein told CNN.
“They were looking at Trump’s business ties. They saw some
questionable things about Russians, about his businesses in Russia. They
in turn hired this MI6 former investigator. He then came up with
additional information from his Russian sources. He was very concerned
by the implications of it. He then took it to an FBI colleague that he
had known in his undercover work for years. He took it to this FBI man
in Rome who turned it over to the bureau in Washington in August,”
Bernstein said.
“And then, a former British ambassador to Russia independently was
made aware of these findings and he took the information to John McCain –
Senator John McCain of Arizona – in the period just after the election,
and showed it to McCain – additional findings,” he added.
McCain is no fan of Trump as he disavowed the president-elect weeks before the election.
During the campaign Trump said McCain wasn’t a war hero because he was captured during the Vietnam War.
Article reposted with permission from PamelaGeller.com
by:Tim Brown
All presidents have done it, so it's nothing new. However, at this late stage, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah, a criminal occupying the Oval Office, is rushing to grant clemency to convicted criminals and issue pardons before Donald Trump takes office on January 20. The Washington Examiner reports: President Obama has upped his use of executive power to grant
clemency and pardons to thousands of federal prisoners, rushing to get
them done before President-elect Trump takes office and possibly grinds
things to a halt.
Through his clemency initiative, which he launched in 2014, Obama
has commuted the sentences of 1,176 individuals. He has also granted an
additional 148 pardons.
If any of this was not convincing enough for there to warrant a federal investigation, one really should read the Kenyan Parliament's own minutes on November 5, 2008, where they openly stated,
"Mr. Obama, is a son of the soil of this
country (Kenya). Every other country in this continent is celebrating
the Obama win. It is only proper and fitting that the country which he
originates should show the same excitement, pomp and colour."
This statement was followed by the Deputy Speaker warning the member who just made the statement,
"You had better be very careful where you transgress
between watching your own sovereignty and what can be interpreted in
some quarters as some form of treason."
Nicole Kidman said it’s time for the country to get behind Donald Trump.
The 49-year-old actress — who is Australian but has a dual citizenship
in America — wants people to accept the fact that he beat Hillary
Clinton.
“[Trump is] now elected and we, as a country, need to support whoever is
the president,” Kidman said during an interview with BBC this
week. “That is what the country is based on. And however that happened,
it happened, and let’s go.”
“I’m always reticent to start commenting politically, I’ve never done it
in terms of America or Australia. I’m issue based. I’m very, very
committed to women’s issues.”
Thousands of Muslims are turning to Jesus Christ and what they view as
the "religion of freedom" amid ongoing bloodshed in the Middle East,
reports indicate. Some churches hope that millions of people will accept
Christ amid a "spiritual hunger" that is forming in the wake of
persecution.
Voice Of the Martyrs Canada, which supports Christian radio broadcasts in the region, told BosNewsLife that
despite the mass exodus of Christians from Iraq and Syria due to
terrorism, persecution, and war, scores of Muslims are making the
decision to embrace Christianity. FRANKLIN GRAHAM, SAEED ABEDINI PUSH FOR RELEASE OF PASTOR IMPRISONED IN TURKEY
"There are thousands upon thousands coming to
Christ," VOMC revealed. "We are in regular contact with our FM stations
in Iraq and have talked with many people who have family in the Middle
East."
"Some of our Middle Eastern broadcasters have shared
testimonies [about many turning to Christ] with us, which they hear
directly from listeners when visiting there ..."
In Iran, Christian house churches are regularly targeted and shut down
by the nation's Islamic government. Despite this persecution, mission
group Elam Ministries revealed that Christians have been growing in
terms of numbers, and today estimates suggest there are 360,000
believers in Iran – up from only 500 in 1979.
"Church leaders believe that millions can be added to the church in
the next few years -- such is the spiritual hunger that exists and the
disillusionment with the Islamic regime," Elam Ministries stated.
"If we remain faithful to our calling, our conviction
is that it is possible to see the nation transformed within our
lifetime. Because Iran is a strategic gateway nation, the growing church
in Iran will impact Muslim nations across the Islamic world."
With all the reports coming out claiming that well funded far-left activist groups intend to incite the largest riots in U.S. history in the days leading up to and during Donald Trump’s
inauguration, there is good reason for well-informed Americans to be
feeling a bit on edge, or a bit anxious these days. We are living in
uncertain times to say the least, and the country is heading into
uncharted waters to be sure.
Until recently, there has been a lot of speculation about whether
the investigations into Hillary Clinton would continue or not, but
as you’re about to learn, House Oversight and Government Reform
Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, just announced that Congress is
throttling forward with their investigation of Hillary & Co.
You may recall, shortly after his surprise victory, Donald Trump walked back his comments with regard to making an effort to “lock up Hillary,”
but that is hardly the end of it. Anyone who watched the confirmation
hearing of Senator Jeff Sessions for Attorney General today knows that:
1) Barring some bombshell revelation, Senator Jeff Sessions will be the
next Attorney General, because Senate Democrats do not have the votes to
block him; and 2) Sessions has every intention of following the law
(aka passed legislation), whether he agrees with it personally or not.
With that said, here is a list of the crimes Hillary Clinton and her
team could be charged with right now:
Money laundering
Child exploitation
Sex crimes with minors (children)
Perjury
Pay to play through Clinton Foundation
Obstruction of justice
There’s absolutely no reason for Hillary Clinton to not be charged. One of the many mandates We the People elected Donald Trump
on was the idea that he would hold Hillary Clinton accountable for her
actions. Whether that happens or not, depends almost entirely on if
President Obama decides to pardon Hillary Clinton. One thing is for
sure, with only 10 days and counting, odds are that Hillary's
fingernails probably desperately need a manicure… In the following video I discuss the recent announcement by Chaffetz,
and then review some of the reasons why Obama might be inclined to
pardon Hillary, and some of the reasons why he might not be. I also
review whether Donald Trump has any means of legal recourse if Obama does decide to pardon Hillary. See video: https://thelastgreatstand.com/2017/01/11/congress-announces-unobstructed-criminal-probe-into-hillary-clinton-video/
Republican investigators are vowing to pursue the criminal
probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server and
mishandling of classified information, with Jason Chaffetz warning that
her election loss won’t grant her a get out of jail free card.
“This was never a political targeting in the beginning and just because there was a political election doesn’t mean it goes away,” House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told reporters Monday. “There were a lot of other characters that were involved in this that we have to look at.”
Their review will encompass an array of figures, ranging from Clinton’s ousted team, including Huma Abedin, to incumbent leaders of the FBI. “This was potentially one of the largest breaches of security in the history of the State Department,” he said. “It
cannot and should never be repeated again. How is it that so much
information was able to migrate out into the world? These are still open
questions that we need to finish up so that they don’t happen again.“
Appetite for justice Washington Examiner reports that Chaffetz wants to review
the security clearances of Clinton aides who helped manage the
“extremely careless” email process described by FBI Director James
Comey. Chaffetz said he is inclined to hold Bryan Pagliano, a key Clinton IT aide, in contempt of Congress for flouting subpoenas last year. “You can’t just get a subpoena from Congress to testify and not show up,” he said.
The Utah Republican wants to target more senior officials, such as
State Department Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy, in
light of FBI suggestions that he tried to set up a “quid pro quo” with the FBIto suppress revelations that Clinton’s email server held classified information.
FBI leadership could also be a live target of the review, as Republicans are troubled that Va.
Gov Terry McAuliffe, a longtime ally of the Clintons, made campaign
donations to the wife of Andrew McCabe, the agency’s second-in-command. “I’m very concerned about the straight-up conflict of interest that Mr. McCabe had,” Chaffetz said. “That’s something we’ll continue to spend resources on.”
“Lock her up” Trump regularly led “lock her up”
chants on the campaign trail, but Chaffetz hinted that the
collaboration might not be as automatic as the party registration of Trump and the lawmakers might suggest.
“It depends how cooperative the administration is going to be. We’re
going to work with [White House General Counsel Don] McGahn and
[incoming] Attorney General Sessions and others to see what sort of
documents and what sort of access we’re going to be allowed.“
Even if the White House does sign off, Chaffetz suggested that lower level State Department officials might hamper the probe. “We’re
still dealing with the massive bureaucracy; changing the secretary of
state doesn’t necessarily change the whole bureaucracy,” Chaffetz said. “I
don’t want this to linger, but the reason we’re still talking about it
now is because stuff that we’ve been asking for since 2010 still hasn’t
arrived.”
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand
In previous articles I have reviewed the planned activities of the ANSWER Coalition, #DisruptJ20 and the ANTIFA during the week leading up to the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States. In this article we will review a new and even more dangerous organization, Refuse Fascism, which has stated their intent to stop the inauguration and prevent Donald Trump from becoming President.
REFUSE FASCISM – STOP THE TRUMP-PENCE REGIME BEFORE IT STARTS
On the surface this stated goal may seem unclear, but when you review their action plan you find the following:
“It is true that the current widespread opposition to
this fascist regime could end up becoming deeply disoriented,
demoralized, and decimated through repression. But it is also true that
the current angst and outrage could be transformed, in a very short,
telescoped period of time, into resistance which reaches such massive
proportions, and is characterized by such a depth of determination, that
it actually creates a ‘crisis of rule,’ and prevents the Trump/Pence
fascist regime from consolidating its hold on the governance of
society.”
“And this must be done before this regime officially takes power,
isolates and crushes opposition, and moves forcefully to implement its
fascist program. The aim must be nothing less than to create such a
profound political crisis before the intended inauguration (January 20,
2017) that the fascist regime is actually not able to take the reins of
government.”
This organization is clearly promoting treason against the people and the Constitution of United States of America. Our Operation HYPO
team has penetrated this organization, attended their meetings and
communicated with their leadership. Their intent is to create a crisis
in Washington, D.C. before January 20, 2017. The crisis will manifest
thru sustained protests starting on January 14, reaching a crescendo not
later than January 19 with supporting “direct” actions including
blocking roads, vandalism, and stopping Metro subway service starting on
January 17. The following is an example of the scenario they envision:
“As 2011 dawned, President Hosni Mubarak had ruled Egypt for decades and
seemed to be immovably implanted in power. But Mubarak was forced to
leave office and actually arrested after being confronted by massive
demonstrations that braved very severe repression, focused in the main
square in Cairo, along with opposition from all sectors of society
manifesting in different ways. From the time of the first
demonstrations to the removal of Mubarak took less than a month.”
Refuse Fascism is promoting riots as a method to achieve their stated
goals, suggesting the need for much larger events than the massively
destructive and deadly riots that occurred in Ferguson, MO and
Baltimore, MD.
“These protests could be something with the character of
the protests against police murder over the past few years… but larger
by several orders of magnitude and even more determined. Such protests
would have to have the effect of figuratively ‘stopping society in its
tracks’…”
Clearly this organization has crossed the line and its leadership
should be arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit treason,
conspiracy to incite violence and other charges as appropriate. If the
Obama Justice Department and the FBI does not immediately move to halt
their schemes, we will know that they are complicit. One of the demands
of this organization will be to stop the inauguration of Donald Trump as
the 45th President of the United States and hold new
elections. We also know that in the past week, the DHS has made the
unprecedented move to inject Federal oversight of the election systems.
While these items could be a coincidence, it is certainly suspicious
timing with President Obama having less than 10 days remaining in
office.
The key element of the Refuse Fascism argument for new elections is
the CIA sponsored propaganda related to Russian interference in the U.S.
Presidential Election. This “fake news”
appears to be integrally connected with their overthrow plot and could
indicate some level of cooperation. The level of deception contained in
the most recent two reports alleging Russian interference in the
election is quite remarkable. I suggest the following article from ZeroHedge is a responsible overview of the issues. The Refuse Fascism leadership is the “who’s who” of Communist and Islamic Revolutionaries, including:
“The Nicaragua Network was the leading Nicaragua
solidarity organization in the 1980s after the triumph of the Sandinista
Revolution over the US-backed Somoza dictatorship. Tens of thousands of
current and former activists throughout the progressive movement cut
their activist teeth on coffee or cotton picking brigades to Nicaragua
or by building schools, health clinics and houses in Nicaragua and
witnessing directly the consequences of US imperialism, but also the
courage of ordinary people who were fighting back.”
“Sandinistas always told the Nicaragua Network, “What you can do to
most help us is to change your own government.” We took that
instruction to heart in 1990 when the Sandinistas lost an election due
to overwhelming US interference and funding as well as the Nicaraguan
peoples’ exhaustion from nine years of the US-sponsored Contra terrorist
war.”
The Alliance for Global Justice receives funding from a number of left-wing philanthropies, including George Soros‘s Open Society Institute and the Tides Foundation.
All information that our Operation Hypo team
has collected, including video, audio, planning documents and personnel
rosters will be delivered to the DC Metropolitan Police Department and
other authorities as appropriate.
The time has come to set the record straight...The GOP ,Conservatives and yes even the Libertarians are fighting the fight against the looney left progressives all wrong [Fight Fire with Fire using the law against them]...as soon as they call you racist y'all curl up in a ball and raise the proverbial white flag of defeat! All you have to do to set the record straight is fight back using history and facts and shove it down their proverbial throats like they have been doing to you for decades using mis-information and facts deleted! SEE: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/barry-barack-obama-is-new-anthony.html
This latest fiasco going on in congress with the Black Caucus ...hanging a picture in the halls of congress [a Government Building] depicting police officers as pigs shooting po' Black Folks (BLM) ?...and claiming the 1st Amendment right to do so..using the same against them "It offends me" hello fair is fair yes? Better yet just apply the laws fairly to all not just a select group of loud mouths without facts to back up their claims and rights! Alrighty then...does this not also apply to Alabama and their freedom of speech rights re: the Confederate Flag, the 10 Commandments, the celebration of Christmas with Nativity Scenes in government as well as public places also? Indeed it does and the ACLU (Anti_Christ_Legions_Unleashed ) can stuff it and suck on the law as it applies to all! I was going to go on and on about this however sometimes it is better to keep it short and sweet to the point...easy to digest without boring the reader to death... "life is short keep it short" is my motto ha:
As for Social Media especially FaceBook and Twitter knock the crap off everyone is covered under the 1st Amendment!
President-elect Donald Trump's team is moving ahead with plans to
move the U.S. Embassy in Israel out of Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, although
diplomats and officials are ramping up warnings against the move. CNN reported speculation
in Israel is the U.S. will announce the move May 24, a national holiday
in that country. Earlier this month, President Barack Obama renewed a
waiver that blocks the move for six months.
Allies have said moving the embassy could ramp up violence.
"It's very dangerous," one European diplomat told CNN. "Chances for
the peace process are going very quickly — it's now or never. Violence
is always a concern and, at this point, it's probably easy for
Palestinians to demonstrate their frustration."
He added the move could also damage the U.S. standing in the peace process.
"If the U.S. changes its policy so dramatically, then it's very easy
for others to dismiss their role and leadership in the peace process by
saying, 'Well, now the Americans are so closely aligned with Israel,
it's hard for us to take them as brokers.'"
The diplomat wants to wait on moving the embassy until a peace deal is in place.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas wrote to Trump saying he opposed
the move, and has also written letters to the leaders of Russia, China,
France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the Arab League. Al-Jazeera
reported, in the letter, Abbas told Trump the move would have a
"disastrous impact on the peace process, on the two-state solution and
on the stability and security of the entire region."
CNN reported, in a recent speech, Abbas said, "Any statement or
position that disrupts or changes the status of Jerusalem is a red line
which we will not accept."
Secretary of State John Kerry also opposed the move, saying, "You'd
have an explosion — an absolute explosion in the region, not just in the
West Bank and perhaps even in Israel itself, but throughout the
region."
Another European diplomat told CNN the location of the move is an issue.
"If it's moved into East Jerusalem, the Palestinians would certainly view it as a provocative move," the diplomat said.
Diplomats are hoping the Trump administration backs away from the
relocation once the new president sees the realities of the situation
when he takes office, CNN reported.
Last week, three prominent Republican senatorsintroduced a bill that would force the United States to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio called Jerusalem "the eternal capital" of
Israel and said "it is finally time to cut through the double-speak and
broken promises and do what Congress said we should do in 1995, formally
move our embassy to the capital of our great ally Israel."
Presidential Candidates since Bill Clinton have promised to move the
United States embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, but not one has followed
kept the promise once they took office. All indications are that when
he moves into the White House, Donald Trump will keep his promise and
move the U.S. Embassy to Israel’s capital city, Jerusalem. But the
“moderate peace partners” of the Palestinian Authority are threatening
Trump that they will react with violence if the U.S. Embassy is moved to
Israel’s capital. The question is will their threats stop Trump from
making the move?
The Palestinian Authority’s supreme Sharia judge and President Abbas’
advisor on religious affairs, Mahmoud Al-Habbash declared on during
Friday prayers that a move of the embassy would be considered “a
declaration of war” on all Muslims. His sermon was broadcast live on
Palestinian TV with PA President Abbas in the audience.
According to the translation published by Palestinian Media Watch, Al-Habbash said moving the embassy to Jerusalem “harms” Muslim faith, and then threatened: ”
“The new American administration intends to transfer its
embassy to Jerusalem. In a simple, calm, and rational manner, in clear
words that need no explanation and which are unambiguous: Such a step,
for every Muslim, is a declaration of war on all Muslims. It’s a
declaration of war on all Muslims. We are no one’s enemies, and we do
not want to be. We are not enemies of the US and we do not want to be.
However, when something harms our faith and our existence, we cannot
stand by and do nothing. We will not agree to this under any
circumstances. This will not pass in silence… The entire Muslim world
will not accept it, and the entire Christian world will not accept it.
Occupied Jerusalem is our eternal capital, the capital of our existence
and the capital of our state. In politics there can be compromises here
and there… In politics there can be negotiation. However, in matters of
religion, faith, values, ethics, and history, there can be no
compromises. Therefore, it isn’t possible to compromise on or negotiate
over Jerusalem. This of course does not mean that we will prevent anyone
from considering Jerusalem their direction of prayer. Our Jerusalem
will remain open to all believers as it has been. Open to all of the
monotheists.”
From the sound of it Al-Habbash isn’t a big believer in the Qur’an which refers
to the existence of both temples in verse 17:7. In this passage, the
Qur’an deals with God’s punishment of the Children of Israel for their
transgressions:
(We permitted your enemies)
To disfigure your faces,
And to enter your Temple
As they had entered it before,
And to visit with destruction
All that fell into their power.
The word translated as “Temple” by Abdullah Yusuf Ali (and by the
influential translator Marmaduke Pickthall before him) is masjid. This
word, which is usually translated as mosque, has the meaning of a
sanctuary wherever it appears in a pre-Islamic context. The usual Muslim
exegesis of this verse (including that of Abdullah Yusuf Ali) holds
that it refers to the destruction of the First and Second Temples. Continue Reading
“Will there be civil war if Brexit isn’t delivered?” the UK’s SKY News asks
in a Monday Sky Views piece. Senior News Correspondent Michelle
Clifford decided to do a human interest story on sentiments in at a fish
and chips restaurant in Burnley, a “Lancashire town, where 67% of
residents voted to leave the EU.”
“Oh, there’ll be mass riots. There’ll be hysteria,” proprietor Liz Pugh told Clifford. “There could even be a civil war.”
Of course this is pretty much hyperbole, speculation put together by Sky News because stoking emotions draws in readers.
No doubt feelings are intense, and no doubt the UK’s overwhelmingly
Eurocentric leadership — and a substantial percentage of the citizenry
(subjectry?) — have upped the odds of kingdom-wide uprisings. But
chances are acts of insurrection won’t originate from hard-working
people being squeezed out of their ancestral homeland. It will more
likely initiate from within the foreign replacement population being
brought in and embedded by globalists intent on erasing national
borders.
When it does, the questions for people like Ms. Pugh would be “How will you resist?” and “With what?”
Because aside from some tightly-controlled “sporting arms,” your average Brit is essentially defenseless. Per GunPolicy.org,
a project of the Sydney School of Public Health (that partners with
globalist gun-grabbers, but nonetheless has a good database of
disarmament laws from around the world), “The regulation of guns in the
United Kingdom is categorised as restrictive.”
That’s an understatement. Here’s the gist of it:
So bottom line, the people are dependent on the same government selling
them out to protect them from threats to sovereignty and freedom, and if
that government instead partners with enemies foreign and domestic
against them, they don’t have the means to force an alternative outcome.
Every few years I ask readers a question
based on an old WWII ad that asked readers to “Send a gun to defend a
British home.” Overwhelmingly, the answer is not only “No,” but an
emphatic “Hell no!” followed by the correct observation that they’ve
squandered the freedom Americans died to secure for them and brought
their sorry state upon themselves.
This time around let me add a follow-on question to those not feeling enough sympathy to help out:
Would UK patriots fighting to ensure sovereignty against Eurocrats and globalists change your mind?
The National Center on Sexual
Exploitation released a press release exposing the mega-retailing
company Amazon, which was listed on its Dirty Dozen list of mainstream
companies that facilitate sexual exploitation. The press release NCOSE
references an incident in which a little boy asks Amazon’s intelligent
personal assistant Alexa to play a song, and instead Alexa starts
spouting pornographic phrases.
“This Alexa scandal reveals what the
National Center on Sexual Exploitation has already documented—Amazon is
reckless about exposing the public to pornography and sexually
exploitive materials,” said Dawn Hawkins, Executive Director of the
National Center on Sexual Exploitation. “While I’m grateful that Amazon
quickly resolved this particular problem and apologized to the affected
family, it is not enough. Amazon must adopt a proactive approach to
pornography and sexual exploitative materials across its business
platforms.”
Hawkins continued by explaining that Amazon’s sexual exploitation runs much deeper, stating, “Amazon.com features thousands of pornography-related items and has so far refused to remove
sex dolls (many with childlike features), eroticized child nudity
photography books, and other pornified items including T-shirts, baby
clothes, and pillowcases, as well as hardcore pornographic films from
its website,” Hawkins continued. “Further, Amazon Prime is producing
original television programming with highly sexualized content, and does
not provide a means for blocking unwanted recommendations of sexually
explicit programs.”
The statement from NCOSE finishes by
calling Amazon to adopt protective “It is clear that the pervading
business culture at Amazon continues to cater to pornographic interests
that are harmful to not only minors but adults as well. It is time for
Amazon to accept its corporate responsibility to adopt and rigorously
enforce standards that seek to foster a world free sexual exploitation.”
As seen first by Mediate: Yep. Vince Vaughn and Mel Gibson, who worked
together on the war film Hacksaw Ridge, didn’t look thrilled with what
Streep was saying.
We already noted the reaction on Twitter to legendary actress Meryl Streep’s Golden Globes speech in
which she defended Hollywood, the press, foreigners all while taking
aim at President-elect Donald Trump. And, as we noticed, conservatives
were none too pleased with Meryl’s words.
by Jeff Dunetz On Wednesday, the DNC tried to throw
the FBI under the bus by saying that neither the FBI nor any other
intelligence agency ever did an independent assessment of the
organization’s breached servers. Instead, they alleged, the FBI relied
exclusively on information from private digital forensics company
Crowdstrike. While essentially true, the Democratic Party left out one
very important piece of information…the DNC wouldn’t allow the FBI to
look a their servers for the hacking investigation, instead forced them
to use the Crowdstrike report paid for by the Party.
Eric Walker, the DNC’s deputy communications director told Buzzfeed:
“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the
FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (DC) Field Office, the
Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s
Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers.”
But a senior FBI law enforcement official told Wired,
“The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the
necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be
rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated.”
President Barack Obama’s longtime adviser Valerie Jarrett made an
embarrassing and flat-out false statement to CNN Sunday when she
claimed, “The president prides himself on the fact that his
administration hasn’t had a scandal.”
Do people actually believe this garbage?
Since the Obama administration seems to have forgotten the last eight years of a scandal, The Horn News is here to help.
Here are five of Obama’s biggest, most infamous scandals from his presidency.
#1 – Fast and Furious
One of Obama’s first scandals was a failed attempt to track Mexican
drug cartels. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
(AFT) participated in a “gunrunning” operation in which they allowed
guns to be sold to Mexican drug cartels with the goal of recovering them
at crime scenes.
The Obama administration failed miserably when they lost track of an estimated 2,000 weapons after they crossed the border.
In other words, Obama armed the Mexican drug cartels with no benefit to America whatsoever.
#2 – IRS targeting conservative groups
In 2013, the Internal Revenue Service revealed that conservative
political groups applying for tax-exempt status were subject to intense
scrutiny solely based on their political affiliation. It became apparent
that groups were targeted if their names included words like, “tea
party”, “patriot”, “constitution”, and “liberty”.
While the IRS blamed it on low-level employees, they deferred
releasing a list of the specific targeted organizations until 2016 when
they were accused of avoiding the release.
Upon release, a judge ruled the allegations were substantial, and the
IRS would take four-times longer to process tea-party applications.
A pretty big scandal Jarrett seems to be ignoring.
#3 – Benghazi
Benghazi is one of the biggest scandals of Obama’s presidency that
contributed to the Democratic Party’s loss in the 2016 election. On
September 11th, 2012, four Americans were killed in Benghazi,
Libya, and what followed was a slew of lies. The Obama administration
claimed that an anti-Muslim YouTube video caused protests resulting in
the attack, when in reality there was no protest that night.
The administration repeated these claims again and again, continuously lying to the American people.
When then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was questioned about the
event, she claimed she never saw a message from the late Ambassador
warning that they could not defend themselves against a “coordinated
attack.” Had Clinton done her job properly, the lives of those American
heroes could’ve been spared.
#4 – “Keep your doctor” Obamacare
Obama touts the Affordable Care Act as one of his greatest
accomplishments, but it has been an utter failure since its inception.
He famously promised, “You can keep your doctor” — which has been proven
to be a lie.
Premiums have been consistently spiking year after year, make the
Affordable Care Act not so affordable. All of the wonderful aspects that
Obama promised turned out to be lies, making Obamacare one of his
biggest scandals.
#5 – VA death list
One of the worst mistakes of the Obama administration resulted in the
death of thousands of our nation’s heroes. After veterans risked their
lives to protect American freedom, they faced insane wait times to
receive care promised to them by the Veterans Administration.
A VA inspector general’s report revealed that 800,000 records were
left sitting in the agency’s system for enrollment, 307,000 of which
belonged to veterans who died while waiting to be processed.
One veteran who passed away waited to be processed for an astounding
14 years! Obama’s lack of care for veterans will go down in history as
one of the biggest, most costly scandal of Obama’s administration.
oped:This is clearly in violation of the US Constitution, which states that
in order for the central government to own land outside its 10 square
miles in DC, it must obtain the land from state legislatures
and that land must be used "for the Erection of Forts, Magazines,
Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings" (Article I, Section
8, Clause 17). None of that is taking place concerning this issue. Some of the patriots who stood in both Nevada and Oregon are already
looking to make a similar stand again regarding this latest land grab. See more: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2017/01/obama-illegally-seizes-bundy-ranch-land.html
Using a 1906 law intended to keep looters away from Indian graves,
Barack Obama has seized over 553,0000,000 acres of United States
territory and declared it federal property.The area of the United States quietly seized by Obama under the Antiquities Act is equal to that of 27 of the 50 states.
Under
the Antiquities Act, the President can declare land a “national
monument” if he deems it culturally significant. The law was passed 111
years ago as a way of protecting Indian graves from looters.
But it didn’t take long for presidents to begin using the law to
seize millions of acres of land that has nothing to do with Indian
burials.
Because of its loose wording, it gave the President the
power to snatch up as much land as he wants, for whatever reason he
wants.
And under presidents like Barack Obama and Bill Clinton,
millions of acres of the United States have been declared “national
monuments” only to stop Americans from creating jobs through mining,
energy exploration and timber harvesting.
The Antiquities Act has become a blank check to shut down businesses and fire workers.
But that blank check may be about to be ripped up.
Buoyed by the election of President Donald Trump, congressional Republicans may introduce legislation to repeal the Act.
“You
know I understand why Teddy Roosevelt had this in place and it seems to
me that recently presidents have gone way beyond the original intent,”
Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) tells Talking Points Memo. “At some point you
you say ‘enough’ and I’m at that point right now.”
It is unknown
whether Trump would support repeal. Despite a general skepticism of
government, Trump has voiced opposition to reducing the federal
government’s control over public lands.
Patriots plan to bombard the White House with phone calls and letters urging Trump to repeal the Antiquities Act.
This organization is clearly promoting treason against the people and the Constitution of United States of America. Our 
