Saturday, January 12, 2013

The Left’s Fascination With Death…


Abortion Protestor SC The Left’s Fascination with Death...
If we were to evaluate the ideology of the Left, we would find a common thread that runs through all flavors of Marxist, Socialist, Communist, and Progressive Democratic beliefs; and that is that death is integral with the inculcation of their philosophies. The Germans, Russians, and Chinese used a brutal implementation of their beliefs as they transformed their societies and nations in a compressed time span that resulted in conservatively 262 million deaths in the 20th century alone.
To accomplish this slow transformation, it is vital to attack and destroy our nation’s long-standing Judeo-Christian values, principles, and mores and advocate lifestyles that do not require commitment to their fellow man, much less raising a family. The single most frightening statement heard by today’s youth is: “dude, you knocked-up your girlfriend?” 

The answer of course is the abortionist.
Why should he or she be burdened with any responsibilities at such a young age? Ironically,“think of the children” is the left’s constant refrain.
When a society accepts the unbridled slaughter of innocent lives least able to speak for themselves (approximately 50 million in the 40 years of Roe v. Wade) all under the guise of “it’s my body, my choice” then other choices become easier to make and become accepted by a so-called moral and just society.

However, the left continues to advocate the destruction of personal responsibility so that other more destructive agendas are possible. We see it with the endless social engineering of welfare programs that take personal responsibility to a new low.
The ultimate accusation of these society-destroying policies becomes evident when we see multi-generational families conditioned to abrogate personal responsibility for themselves, their families, and their neighbors from a paternalistic so-called benevolent state with benefits that meet their basic needs into perpetuity. While, at the same time making them covetous of others’ success by the soul-destroying envy of dependence, exploited to full measure by Obama and his supporters of course.

In this heady brew of personal choice, responsibility is discouraged in favor of short-term solutions (sound familiar?) Washington has embraced this paradigm with all reasoned deliberation being thrown out the window for personal political gain by both Democrats and Republicans alike…what is in it for me?
We are implementing ObamaCare in a similar fashion to the European model with the same regulatory edicts becoming evident…we are beginning to see the full agenda for the aged in this rollout as another segment of innocent lives who have little use in a more enlightened society that the “left” envisions.
After paying a lifetime of tax revenues, it is now time for them to exit this life before they cost society too much in medical care in the autumn and winter season of their dwindling lives.

Dignity has nothing to do with transforming a nation.
We are seeing the much-maligned “death panels” that Sarah Palin warned us about being rolled out along with the willingness of government bureaucrats to regulate elders literally to death by denying them life-saving treatment. This is how the socialist model has played out in Europe as the internment and death camps of the past are much too disturbing to their citizens as a society educated to accept “DEATH” that these philosophies espouse is the preferred outcome.
All for the payment of their medical and long-term care from the State, there is a limit to their compassion.
This is in direct contrast to the gentle and humanistic philosophy of the individual as championed by our Constitution with citizens, making choices for themselves free from interference of the state for their own lives with the loving assistance of their family, friends, and clergy as they meet their failing health or demise on their own terms.

We are rapidly coming to the end game (fundamental transformation) as the nation is being manipulated by Obama and his cohorts to accelerate the transformational process begun in 2009 and bring his new society “Forward”  sooner than later.
This is where we are deviating from the European model.
The coming year will be filled with one assault after another against our basic freedoms in the all- too-familiar exaggerated media push that we must act in all haste, with Obama forever on the Stump. Failing the legislative avenue, the tyranny of the Executive Order will be used to full effect and accepted by a neutered Congress.

This can only mean that the left has grown impatient of the stealthy means of overthrow of this nation’s principles, or they feel they have accomplished their “re-educational” goals; take your pick.
Obama and his cohort are now preparing an all-out assault on our fundamental right to defend ourselves from all who would prey upon the citizens in our nation. Whether they are criminals, gangsters, Islamists, or our own government since they now wish to disarm the nation’s citizens of the means to throw off such tyranny or brutality.

Obama’s first objective is to marginalize and criminalize law-abiding citizens by characterizing them as pariahs who exercise their antiquated concept of our Second Amendment rights and freedoms. At the same time, he will reward another huge segment of our society that actually are criminals that have willingly broken our laws by bestowing amnesty on them…by granting citizenship to illegal aliens.
Consequently, cartel drug gangs are comprised mostly of illegal aliens and are arming themselves with high-power military-style “Assault Weapons” and pose a very real threat to citizens and law enforcement alike. One has to wonder whether they are getting weapons supplied from Hezbollah through the Mexican drug cartel pipeline that Eric Holder and Obama set up with Fast & Furious along with the poison they are spreading onto our streets.

In Obama’s ultimate wisdom, he has eliminated the National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC) that coordinated and reduced crime from Drug Cartels and their violence, which account for the vast majority of all murders in our nation (some place this estimate as high as 75%. )This agency was eliminated in June 2011; however, Obama failed to tout during last year’s contentious election an astonishing 60% reduction and elimination of cartel activity in 1500 American cities from 2010 to 2011 in an incredible one year’s time frame prior to disbanding of the NDIC.

Such a remarkable law enforcement effort should have been shouted from the rooftops!
Not claiming victory over such a major threat to the Nation seems unlikely and sketchy at best from a regime that puffs up the smallest details of other areas of their so-called accomplishments, particularity economic data. Speaking about economic data, in another curious move, Obama eliminated a similar agency in 2011 as well that reports on economic intelligence data that had been in constant publication since 1878 and listed all government spending right down to zip code.
Not having the means to verify the spending makes it impossible to reconcile the deficit spending that Congress does not budget for in the first place. One of the cornerstones of a Democratic Republic is open government and reporting of its activities; our government is going dark as Obama and his cohorts put policies in place to dismantle our nation.

This topsy-turvy scheme is readily apparent to the more rational amongst us, those of us destined for re-education, being caught in the crossfire or death depending on our age by a paternalistic and benevolent state in the age of Obama as the end game unfolds. The media, academia, and our legislators appear to celebrate this agenda, as they are all complicit in these nation-destroying acts as they revel in carving-up the spoils of the moribund carcass of this once great nation and line their own pockets with the proceeds.
However, there is still time to turn back the clock and this march to our eventual national suicide as a Constitutional Republic. The makers in our society, the 53% that actually pay income taxes, should act with one voice and refuse to send any more of the “Fruits of their Labor” to Washington in the form of TAXES.

In effect, I propose starving the Beast of revenue in a modern Tax Revolt modeled on 1776. We must exhaust all peaceful means to stop the destruction of the Republic. In addition, we must simply refuse to be disarmed.
If you think about it, we are actually giving the means of our own destruction to brigands that cannot even perform the rudiments of their Constitutional duty by passing a stinking budget as they “eat out our existence” with onerous taxes that are squandered on sycophants, supporters, and constituents of Obama and the indolent that he has created, whole heatedly supports, endorses, and panders to.
In addition, taxpayers are required to continue in his endeavor by unjust laws to support such folly as Obama rides the so-called rich, corporations, businesses, and taxpayers into the ground for his own ends. Rational men and women will indeed make other choices bringing us into headlong confrontation with elements that are bringing us to our very destruction and the Left’s fascination with death.

Video: Progressive Radio Host Calls For Mass Killing Of Birthers

People like Mike Malloy spare us from having to expose crazy progressives for who they are; they are doing a fine job of that themselves.

Top Gun Grabbers In The House Of Representatives Exposed


Bobby Rush Official Portrait 112th Congress Top Gun Grabbers In The House Of Representatives Exposed
We as a people seem to now be wondering if our Congress will ever do anything right. We saw the article posted by Tim Brown entitled “Ten New Gun Bills Introduced On First Day of Congress”. We then began reading, only to see names that looked funny doing this, so we looked up to find out just who these people are that have placed such bills on the floor of the House. Strange to say, the first one by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY) is purely due to what happened to her life. Her husband was shot back in 1993; and since then, gun laws have come and gone with no difference at all made, except possibly for the worst. It has to be noted that the individual who killed Rep. McCarthy’s husband had already broken several laws, so how are any additional laws going to stop people from obtaining guns or other weapons?

The next two Representatives that introduced bills, Bobby Rush (D-IL) and Rush Holt (D-NJ), seem to have questionable pasts! It seems that Bobby Rush is a member of the Democratic “Progressive” party. Now this, by itself, brings into the picture some very concerning questions about just who is being elected to the House of Representatives. Bobby Rush is a member of a group that has very close ties to the Institute for Policy Studies and the Democratic Socialists of America. The many times-called “Progressive” party is another name for the Democratic Socialist Party of America! Now many people either seem not to be bothered by that, or they are just plain dumb! Here in lies the problem, a group of people who do not have the Constitution at heart and actually wish to destroy the Constitution. We cannot state what Representative Holt is a part of; but if Holt is with Rush, it would seem to indicate that Holt also supports the Socialist Democratic Party. 

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) was founded in 1991 by Bernie Sanders, a self-identified socialist who had recently been elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. Sanders’ CPC co-founders included House members Ron Dellums, Lane Evans, Thomas Andrews, Peter DeFazio, and Maxine Waters. The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) was also involved in CPC’s founding and in Caucus activities thereafter; IPS continues to advise CPC on various matters to this day.
So let us look at what we have here so far: we see that at least two people here have “special’ interests at heart, and those interests have seemed to make them forget about their Oath of Office in which they swore to uphold the Constitution. Yet they are now introducing bills that are in direct conflict with the Constitution! Maybe this is why our nation is so messed up right now; we have people in office who just do not understand what the Constitution really means.

Now let us get back to Rep. Bobby Rush; now here is a real strange apple in the cart. Let us begin with the following given once again at the only site that shows the Socialists for who they are,; Bobby Rush is shown as:
-Democratic Member of Congress
-Member of the Progressive Caucus
-In 1968, went AWOL from the U.S. Army
-Co-founder of the Illinois branch of the Black Panther Party
-In 1969, served six months in jail for an illegal weapons conviction
-Advocates reparations for African Americans

Here it is shown that Bobby Rush had a 6-month jail term for an illegal weapons conviction in 1969! But this was during the time that Bobby Rush was also, what his “Socialist” friends would call him, the “Deputy Minister of Defense’! We have to wonder if maybe Obama would place him somewhere in his Administration since he has held a high office? Of course, he now disavows his past with the Black Panthers.
Rush was born in November 1946 in Albany, Georgia but grew up on Chicago’s North Side, where his mother was a Republican precinct captain. While serving in the U.S. Army from 1963-1968, Rush became involved with the radical Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. In 1968, he went AWOL (Absent Without Official Leave) from the military and co-founded the gangster-ridden Illinois branch of the Black

Panther Party (BPP), renowned for intimidating local business people into making “donations” to Panther “charities.” One BPP member recruited by Rush was Fred Hampton, who was killed in a December 4, 1969 police raid on Panther headquarters.
In 1969 Rush served six months in jail for an illegal weapons conviction. In 1971, his comrades were still describing him as the “Deputy Minister of Defense” for the BPP’s Illinois chapter. In 1992, the socialist magazine “In These Times” would praise Rush, who was by then a fledgling congressional candidate, as someone who “has continued to support progressive policies and has never disavowed his Panther past.”

We have to wonder just how could someone with a criminal background like this and with such a deep-rooted and hate-filled past be elected to the House of Representatives where laws are made and discussed? But Bobby Rush shows what he is after in his own words.
As a member of both the Progressive Caucus and the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), Rush is among the strongest congressional supporters of reparations for the descendants of African-American slaves. “The future of race relations will be determined by reparations for slavery,” Rush once told a congressional hearing.

Now, given Bobby Rush’s own words, it is clear just what he is looking for: reparations for slavery. In other words, he wants money for nothing. He even stated here that future race relations would be about reparations! Is this the kind of man we should have making laws for our nation?
In 1999, Rush’s 29-year-old son Huey Rich was shot and killed. “My son’s death was a senseless death,” he told supporters the following day at Jesse Jackson’s Operation PUSH headquarters. “We’ve got to rid our communities of guns.”

Instead of finding out why his son was killed, he just goes after the guns when guns were not what caused the killing. But wait: he goes before Jesse Jackson’s Operation PUSH. Rush gives a speech to these people; now this shows his connection to the far left of which the Socialist/Marxist/ Communist lay in wait. Jackson is also an open Socialist and proud of it.
Rush’s most noteworthy congressional race took place in 2000, when he defeated then-state senator Barack Obama in the Democratic Primary. During the campaign, Rush said: “Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Barack is a person who read about the civil-rights protests and thinks he knows all about it.”
Is this amazing where he calls Obama a fool? This representative is a prime example of what is wrong with our Congress today! Our nation has gone from being a proud display of the Constitution to one that seems to “tolerate” the Socialists/Communists/Marxists that have infiltrated our government!

During his legislative career, Rush has voted:
-against the development of a national missile defense system;
-against requiring hospitals to report (to the federal government) illegal aliens who receive emergency medical treatment;
-against separate proposals calling for the construction of some 700 miles of fencing to prevent illegal immigration along America’s southern border;
-against a proposal to grant state and local officials the authority to investigate, identify, and arrest illegal immigrants;
-against major tax cut proposals in September 1998, February 2000, March 2000, July 2000, May 2001, May 2003, October 2004, and May 2006;
-against separate welfare reform bills designed to move people off the welfare rolls and into paying jobs;
-in favor of prohibiting oil and gas exploration in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR);
-against a proposal to fund offshore oil exploration along the Outer Continental Shelf.
Bobby Rush seems to vote against all that would help the very people he depended upon to get elected!

Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) also put forth gun control legislation on the first day of the 113th Congress. She seems to have the idea that people over 21 would not go out and steal a gun and go on a bloody rampage. Now what is wrong with that? First off, it would not matter what age the law would cover simply because should a criminal wish to do harm to anyone, they would not have any problem breaking the law to do it! Her bill has to be one of the most stupid ideas since it would not stop anything at all; and if that would become a law, it would have to be circumvented for the service men and women! How dumb would that be?

Representative Sheila Jackson Lee is:
-Congresswoman representing the 18th District of Texas, downtown Houston
-Member of the Progressive Caucus
-Member of the Congressional Black Caucus
Lee belongs to the Progressive Caucus and the Congressional Black Caucus in the House of Representatives. Americans for Democratic Action consistently rates her voting record as 95-to-100 percent on the left side of legislation.
It seems that this lady is very smart, well, in her own mind anyway, because she has made that statement to her underlings. Per
Over the course of her political career, Lee has earned a reputation for having both an entitlement mentality and a volatile temper. In 1998, for example, she was accustomed to having an aide drive her daily, in a government-leased car, back and forth between her Capitol Hill apartment and her congressional office one block away. One day, she told a staffer who had failed to reserve a limousine: ‘You don’t understand. I am a queen, and I demand to be treated like a queen!’
What else has this lady done? What we reveal is not made up; it is factual and on the record. The following all comes from Congressional records and from

In July 2010, Lee wrongly stated, from the floor of the House of Representatives, that North and South Vietnam had managed to forge a peaceful relationship with one another in the years since the Vietnam War. (In fact, South Vietnam ceased to exist on July 2, 1976, when North and South were merged to form the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.) Said Lee:
Today we have two Vietnams, side by side, North and South, exchanging and working. We may not agree with all that North Vietnam is doing, but they are living in peace. I would look for a better human rights record for North Vietnam, but they are living side by side.
That same month, Lee spoke at an NAACP meeting where she derided the Tea Party movement as a racist phenomenon, saying:
All those who wore [Klansman] sheets a long time ago have now lifted them off and started wearing [applause], uh, clothing, uh, with a name, say, I am part of the Tea Party. Don’t you be fooled. [voices: "That's right.", applause] Those who used to wear sheets are now being able to walk down the aisle and speak as a patriot because you will not speak loudly about the lack of integrity of this movement.

In a January 2011 floor debate over a Republican bill (HR2) calling for repeal of the recently passed national healthcare reform legislation, Lee said that such a repeal would violate the Constitution:
The Fifth Amendment speaks specifically to denying someone their life and liberty without due process. That is what H.R. 2 does and I rise in opposition to it. And I rise in opposition because it is important that we preserve lives and we recognize that 40 million-plus are uninsured. Can you tell me what’s more unconstitutional than taking away from the people of America their Fifth Amendment rights, their Fourteenth Amendment rights, and the right to equal protection under the law?
One should ask why this lady is even in Congress, if she cannot understand what she is doing, much less has her history totally out of whack! It is like she and the rest of the Socialists are in a totally separate world and merely pop into ours to introduce laws that would have no bearing upon any sort of action to stop people from breaking the laws to get guns and kill people.
We have shown with just these people here just what Congress is facing today; and if “We The People” do not wake up soon, we will find ourselves being totally dominated by a bunch of Socialist/Communist people who have destroyed the Constitution and replaced it with the Communist Manifesto!
Here is the bunch that offered eight gun control bills on the first day of the new Congress. Yes, they have an agenda!

White House responds to secession petitions

by Drew Zahn 

The White House has responded to the hundreds of thousands of Americans who signed digital petitions asking permission for states to peacefully secede from the union.
In a nutshell, the answer is no.
“As much as we value a healthy debate,” writes Jon Carson, director of the White House’s Office of Public Engagement, in in the official response, “we don’t let that debate tear us apart.”
WND was the first news outlet in the nation to report when a Louisiana man began a petition on the White House’s “We the People” website, asking permission for his state to peacefully secede.
The Louisiana petition quoted from the Declaration of Independence: “‘Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and institute new Government.’”
According to the guidelines of the “We the People” website, when a petition reaches 25,000 signatures, the White House has pledged to put the petition on a queue for response. Read More:

Reid To Obama: Screw Congress, Raise Debt Ceiling Yourself

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other top Democrats are putting new pressure on the White House to circumvent Congress to boost the nation’s debt ceiling if no bipartisan agreement can be reached.
In a strongly worded letter to President Barack Obama obtained by POLITICO, Reid and his leadership team argue that failing to raise the $16.4 trillion debt ceiling would threaten the full faith and credit of the United States. Reid and Sens. Dick Durbin, Chuck Schumer and Patty Murray asserted that Obama “must make clear that you will never allow our nation’s economy and reputation to be held hostage.”
“In the event that Republicans make good on their threat by failing to act, or by moving unilaterally to pass a debt limit extension only as part of an unbalanced or unreasonable legislation, we believe you must be willing to take any lawful steps to ensure that America does not break its promises and trigger a global economic crisis — without congressional approval, if necessary,” the Friday letter to Obama says.
Continue Reading on ...

Republicans Begin Gun Cave

Right here it is, folks. It was Phil Gingrey, the Republican from Marietta, Georgia. He was speaking at the Smyrna area council of the Cobb Chamber of Commerce breakfast. It took place yesterday at the Smyrna Community Center. Phil Gingrey, said, “There are some problems, and maybe these huge magazines even for someone who says, ‘Look, I just use an AR-15 for target practice.’ But do you really need to be standing there shooting at a silhouette a shot a second or even quicker with that kind of weapon? For what purpose?” Gingrey asked. “I would be willing to listen to the possibility of the capacity of a magazine.” Meaning being limited.
It was only yesterday. I did not know he said this at breakfast, so he had already said this by the time we offered the postulation yesterday afternoon, but I didn’t know that. I’d heard rumblings. Erick Erickson at Red State sent a note, said, “You mark my words, the Republicans are gonna start fading on this just like they have on abortion and immigration.” And, by the way, just for what it’s worth, Gingrey, after saying he’s open to discussion on the limits of the capacity of a magazine, went on to say that Todd Akin was partly right on what he said about rape. He’ll be forgiven for that since he had the right position on magazine capacity. If Gingrey had just gone out and said, you know, Todd Akin is partly right, today he would have been taken out. But since he got it right as far as the media and the left is concerned on magazine capacity, he’s reported objectively and fairly, ostensibly, in the various places he’s been reporting.
Continue Reading on ...

Wizard Obama Can Save Us With His Magic Coin


The Democrats in the Senate wrote a letter begging him to “take an lawful [wink, wink] steps” to avoid allowing the Republican Majority in Congress to be allowed to function in their constitutional rule to make policy and vote on the budget. Of course, they didn’t put it exactly that way, but the fact remains that the Democrats have decided that, even though they are the minority in Congress, they should get to make all the rules anyway.  They proposed as a rationale for this illegal and treasonous coup either a fictional interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment or a trillion dollar coin.
I’m tempted to vent on the legal ramifications of the letter’s request. I noticed in McConnell’s reply he didn’t seem to want to harp all that much on the treasonous nature of the proposal that Congress be stripped of the power granted to it in the Constitution. I did appreciate that he dealt with the coin idea with only one word of description: “Democrats are looking at everything from the ridiculous (printing a trillion-dollar coin) to outright abdication of Congressional responsibility.”

I’m glad the senator didn’t waste more words on the coin, because stooping to argue about it shows too much respect to an idiotic idea. Consider how one non-conservative columnist describes it:
“Finally, in the stupid-government-tricks department, there’s the $1 trillion platinum coin. According to proponents of the idea… an odd provision in federal law would allow the U.S. Treasury Department to create a coin, made out of platinum, in a $1 trillion denomination. Federal assets would suddenly increase by $1 trillion, meaning the U.S. government would no longer be running up against its congressionally imposed debt ceiling. Voila! Problem solved! …this is clown-car politics beneath the dignity of the United States of America. It also would dynamite what little credibility the governing process in this country might still retain, and it’s a mark of our decline that such a concept would even be broached.”
Not just a mark of our decline, but of our desperation. Fiat currency has always been superstitious, but this lays it bare for all to see. Hearing this idea on the news is like waking up and learning that Obama will slaughter a dove on live TV at Noon, Eastern, and will sprinkle its blood on the feed of the statue in the Lincoln Memorial in order to save the economy.  

Indeed, the coin might not only be a mark of our decline, but an accelerator of it. The reason fiat currency works for a time is that people are accustomed to the money. Since I know that other people will exchange goods for the money I must also continue to exchange goods for the money. Everything seems to work. But as fiat currency starts to create greater crises in bubbles and busts, attitudes begin to change. The government counters this lack of credibility by using a variety of forms of propaganda. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve, for example, is always treated with great respect and is listened to even when he literally makes no sense (Alan Greenspan admitted to doing this intentionally).
But publicly suggesting this magic coin is a form of anti-propaganda. It publicly shows the world what kind of stupidity and arrogance are fueling the “economic” theory—that it is nothing more than a superstition. We can become a trillion dollars wealthier as a nation by minting one coin?
You can fool most of the people most of the time but this might be the moment when the American ruling class learns you can’t fool all the people all the time.

England’s Crime Rate Nearly Four Times Higher than United States

 I’ll give Piers Morgan credit for one thing: He’s not afraid to interview people who have strong disagreements with him. He’s giving them a platform for views that rarely see the light of day on liberal networks.
He had Alex Jones of InfoWars on a few nights ago. While Jones was a little over the top, he didn’t roll over for Morgan. Too many conservatives want to be friends with the media as if their agreeable style will somehow endear them to the liberal media establishment. It will never, never, never happen.
Morgan also had Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America on. Don’t mess with Larry Pratt. He comes to interviews prepared, and he’s a lot more measured and calm than Jones. In his December 19, 2012 interview, Pratt had said that “evil’s in our hearts. Not in the guns.” That’s probably the first time the secularist Morgan ever heard that before. Of course, it’s true. Good people, or at least people who work hard to say no to evil thoughts and desires, do not murder people. When some usually good person “snaps,” the snapping is the evil in them (James 1:13–15; Mark 7:14–15).

Pratt went on to say to Morgan in the interview:
“The problem occurs, sir, in those areas precisely where we have said ‘no guns.’ The problem doesn’t occur where the guns are allowed freely to be carried to be used by people. There we have very low murder rates.”
Pratt returned to Morgan’s show on January 9th of this year. The sparks flew over crime statistics.
The vast majority of people in England do not own guns. Guns are heavily restricted. Morgan sees this as one of the reasons crime is low in England. At least that’s what he’s been trying to pass off to his low-information viewers . . . until Larry Pratt showed up for round two.
Pratt maintained that the official police homicide numbers are cooked. “The data that you are using for the murder rate in England is a sham,” Pratt countered. “There’s a monumental miss-reporting of what constitutes murder. If three people are murdered, it’s likely to be counted as one event.” In fact, an article on crime statistics in England makes the same point: “there are the official police figures (which historically under-record the true level of crime).”

Morgan couldn’t handle the truth. He accused Pratt of “deliberately lying, deliberately twisting” the data. Where did Pratt get his information? Instead of there being 39 murders in 2011 that Morgan claimed, Pratt stated there were 970. “That’s exactly what your own constabulary is saying,” insisted Pratt.Then just yesterday, I came across an article that was published in The Telegraph on July 2, 2009:
“Analysis of figures from the European Commission showed a 77 per cent increase in murders, robberies, assaults and sexual offences in the UK since [the] Labour [Party] came to power.

The total number of violent offences recorded compared to population is higher than any other country in Europe, as well as America, Canada, Australia and South Africa.
“The UK had a greater number of murders in 2007 than any other EU country — 927 — and at a relative rate higher than most western European neighbours, including France, Germany, Italy and Spain.
It gets worse. “Overall, 5.4 million crimes were recorded in the UK in 2007 — more than 10 a minute — second only to Sweden. . . . It means there are over 2,000 crimes recorded per 100,000 population in the UK, making it the most violent place in Europe.”
Great Britain’s crime rate is nearly four times that of the United States. “By comparison, America has an estimated rate of 466 violent crimes per 100,000 population.”

Gun critics challenged to be without their guns

by Bob Unruh 

A spokesman for a foundation that successfully has battled in court to uphold the Constitution’s Second Amendment is challenging not only politicians but celebrities who think the American public should be disarmed to go without their own firearms protections.
“That would include Joe Biden’s shotguns,” said Alan Gottlieb, executive vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation, “and the armed security now enjoyed by Sens. Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.”
He said such leading opponents of gun ownership should begin the process and “lead by example” through repudiation of any of their own firearms as well as the “armed security” they now have.
“It seems clear from the direction the administration is going that it wants to severely restrict the rights of law-abiding gun owners to purchase the firearms of their choice,” Gottlieb said, “and we think they should demonstrate their belief in their own programs by giving up their firearms and security first.”
The issue is in the headlines right now because anti-gun politicians including President Obama are trying to capitalize on the horror following the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., that left 20 children and six adults victims.
The alleged gunman shot and killed himself, so there may be questions about the attack that never are answered.

Read More:

LTC Allen West “This is your gun control, this finger right here – your index finger,’’

By Bill Hoffmann and Kathleen Walter
Former Rep. Allen West predicts the Obama Administration will fail to enact restrictive gun laws that buck the Second Amendment and believes the issue is more about people control than gun control.
“This is your gun control, this finger right here – your index finger,’’ West told Newsmax TV in an exclusive interview.
“Nothing happens with that gun until you put that finger into the trigger well and you pull it. So my concern is that we’re not talking about the real issue, we’re talking about a political agenda.

“I don’t [see Obama succeeding]. I think the president maybe believes he has some sort of populous mandate . . . but that’s not going to fly very well.’’
The Florida Republican, a retired U.S. Army colonel who’s a tea party favorite, said there is “big concern’’ across the country about Obama enacting an executive order to push through a firearms mandate.
“That’s not in contra, as we are a republic with co-equal branches of government, separate of power — so that’s what really concerns people,’’ West said.
The lawmaker said when he studied the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School, Virginia Tech, Columbine High School,
and a Colorado movie theater “the real commonality is . . . that there were parental problems, there was a mental issue.
“And I think that’s where we should start first and foremost.’’
West said members of the military, police, and civilians are strongly responding to the possibility of a White House intervention.


Friday, January 11, 2013

No joke: Obama and Karzai agree to allow the Taliban to open an office in Qatar

... who don't already know, Taliban fighters are overwhelmingly Pashtun No wonder Barack Obama likes em' Chicago Gay Bath House anyone?
By Doug Powers 
What could go wrong?
From a statement on the White House website:
The Leaders [Obama and Karzai] said that they would support an office in Doha for the purpose of negotiations between the High Peace Council and the authorized representatives of the Taliban. In this context, the Leaders called on the armed opposition to join a political process, including by taking those steps necessary to open a Taliban office. They urged the Government of Qatar to facilitate this effort. The two Presidents reiterated that the outcomes of peace and reconciliation must respect the historic achievements that Afghanistan has made over the past decade, including protecting the rights that all citizens of Afghanistan, both men and women, guaranteed under the constitution. As a part of the outcome of any process, the Taliban and other armed opposition groups must end violence, break ties with Al Qaeda, and accept Afghanistan’s constitution.
And if the office thing goes well look for the Taliban to be allowed a team in the Afghan Bowling League so they can finally have a crack at unseating reigning champs the Panjshir Pinblasters.  

The Taliban confirm the new office, and are already making demands even before the Selectrics have been plugged in:
The Afghan Taliban said on Tuesday they have reached a preliminary agreement to set up a political office Qatar, and asked for the release of prisoners held at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay.
Naturally President Obama will make the Taliban adhere to EEOC hiring regs as a condition of allowing them to open an office, right?
Here’s more about the newest lessees at the Doha Office Park (I’m not even going to ask who’s going to end up covering what I’m guessing will be a rather steep damage deposit because I think I know the answer):
Despite repeated demands from Obama since 2009, the Taliban has not disassociated itself from its fellow jihadis in al-Qaida, even after U.S. forces toppled the Taliban government in 2001 following al-Qaida’s jihad attack in New York on Sept. 11, 2001.
Their alliance is based on shared religious and ideological views, personal ties, beneficial military cooperation and a growing confidence they can seize control of Afghanistan once Obama pulls U.S. forces from the country in 2014.

So, an office it is then.
Twitchy has some #TalibanOfficeRules, for those of you thinking of sending in an application.

Obama signs Bill giving himself Armed protection for Life

From the article:

"The new bill, which will cost American taxpayers millions of dollars, is a re-instatement of a 1965 law which will see presidents protected for life as well as their children up to age 16.
The irony of Obama seeking to surround himself with armed men for the rest of his life while simultaneously working to disarm the American people via a gun control agenda that is likely to be enforced via executive decree represents the height of hypocrisy.

But it’s not the first time that Obama has lauded the notion of responsible Americans using firearms to protect himself and his family while concurrently eviscerating that very same right for the American people.

During an ABC Nightline interview broadcast on December 26 yet recorded before the Sandy Hook shooting, Obama said one of the benefits of his re-election was the ability “to have men with guns around at all times,” in order to protect his daughters."

Article about this legislation here:

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Meeting Between NRA and Joe Biden-Led Gun Task Force Didn’t Go Well

by Amy 

Biden Meets With Pro-Gun Groups In Washington
WASHINGTON, DC – JANUARY 10: U.S. Vice President Joe Biden makes brief remarks to the press after a meeting with Cabinet members and sportsmen’s, wildlife and gun interest groups at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building January 10, 2013 in Washington, DC. U.S. President Barack Obama appointed Biden to oversee a task force on gun violence and also was to meet with a representative of National Rifle Association (NRA) in a second day of meetings.
The National Rifle Association on Thursday met with Vice President Joe Biden and the gun violence task force created by President Barack Obama to address gun-related violent crime. As you may have expected, the NRA and the Obama administration didn’t agree on much.
In a statement released shortly after Thursday’s meeting, the NRA said it was “disappointed with how little” the meeting “had to do with keeping our children safe and how much it had to do with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment.” Read the entire statement below (emphasis added):
The National Rifle Association of America is made up of over 4 million moms and dads, daughters and sons, who are involved in the national conversation about how to prevent a tragedy like Newtown from ever happening again. We attended today’s White House meeting to discuss how to keep our children safe and were prepared to have a meaningful conversation about school safety, mental health issues, the marketing of violence to our kids and the collapse of federal prosecutions of violent criminals.


About Amy

Hi, I am Amy, I got involved early on with the young Republicans .I worked on many political campaigns.Christian American. Patriot Conservative, Activist Blogger, Political Pundit, 2nd Amendment Rights Defender .Animal Lover. I have a passion for the direction the country is going in. Our constitution matters and liberty is not negotiable. Join me on twitter: SweetAmy@GOPLADYAMY Join me on …

South Carolina teacher on leave for stomping on American flag in front of class

A high school teacher in South Carolina is under investigation and has been placed on long-term administrative leave after he allegedly threw an American flag on the floor and stomped on it in front of his students.
Scott Compton, an English teacher at Chapin High School in Chapin, S.C., reprised the unpatriotic deed in three classes over the course of one day, reports local NBC affiliate WIS.
One parent, Michael Copeland, said he heard his teenage daughter discussing the incident and asked her to tell him the whole story.
“He drew a couple of symbols, like one of them was a cross, and he said, ‘What does this represent,’ and everybody said, ‘Christianity,’” Copeland explained to WIS.
“Then he proceeds to take down the American flag, and said, ‘This is a symbol, but it’s only a piece of cloth. It doesn’t mean anything,’ and then he throws it down on the floor and then stomps on it, repeatedly,” Copeland continued.
Continue Reading on ...

Oops: Obamacare Amendment Forbids Gun Registration

Good news — it has become known that hidden deep within the massive 2800-page bill called Obamacare there is a Senate Amendment protecting the right to keep and bear arms.
It seems that in their haste to cram socialized medicine down the throats of the American people, then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Barack Obama overlooked Senate amendment 3276, Sec. 2716, part c.  GunSale
According to reports, that amendment says the government cannot use doctors to collect “any information relating to the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition.”
CNN is calling it “a gift to the nation’s powerful gun lobby.”
Continue Reading on ...

“CAIR chief claims Muslims discovered America first”

OpEd: Jack
Uh huh right... Islam is tolerant and were great discoverers of the world outside of  deserts and walking tents the Nile Basin and all that abounded during Muhammed's their fantasy world all things are true !
See the following Links:

Ayman al-Zawahiri @al-Qaeda
Killing unbelievers so that I don't die a hypocrite.
(Sahih Muslim 4696


Dear Patriot, 
 According to a Daily Caller story below (highlights added), CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) co-founder Nihad Awad claims there are “historical accounts” proving that Muslims came to America before Columbus did. Seriously.

Awad’s preposterous claim hasn’t made it into our public school textbooks—yet. This is not to say school textbooks aren’t riddled with other absurdities in their treatment of Islam. (For instance, textbooks commonly claim that Muslim conquerors throughout history were “tolerant” of Christians and Jews and allowed them “full religious freedom,” which is patently false. You can see the textbook report ACT! for America Education published here.)

Last year CAIR launched a vicious and dishonest disinformation campaign against ALAC, “American Laws for American Courts” legislation that we’ve helped pass in Tennessee, Arizona and Kansas, and we expect CAIR to do that again this year.

So here’s a heads-up to every person reading this email, from concerned citizen to grassroots activist to journalist to state legislator:

When CAIR comes around this year peddling its so-called “fact sheet” about ALAC, remember that this is the same group that claims Muslims discovered America.

Read more:


Is An Executive Order a Law that Must be Obeyed?

There’s talk that President Obama will ignore Congress and issue Executive Orders to implement new gun regulations over against the clear reading of the Second Amendment to the Constitution. Is an Executive Order a law? Will we be obligated to obey it?
Executive Orders have a long history. Republicans and Democrats have issued them. Only a few of them have been overturned by the courts.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats do much about Executive Orders they don’t like since both parties issue them. This is how the Washington game is played.
Republicans and Democrats like Executive Orders on difficult issues because it stops the legislative process that they’ll have to participate in and eventually vote yes or no. They can always tell the voters back home, “Well, I would have voted against that if the President hadn’t issued an Executive Order. Golly gee willikers, now my hands are tied.” Right.
An Executive Order is only valid if it’s done within the jurisdictional authority of the President’s constitutional authority. To rule against the Second Amendment is not a presidential prerogative. If it is, then the President could turn his attention to the First Amendment and issue an order that newspapers can no longer criticize him. Conservative talk radio would die a quick death if the President issued an Executive Order saying that the freedom of speech had to be limited in several ways, one of which was negative political speech, especially about him.

Invoice to John Boehner

Dear Patriot,

During the recent "fiscal cliff" negotiations, House Speaker John Boehner -- after conceding $800 billion in new taxes -- asked President Obama, "What am I getting?"

The Wall Street Journal reports that Obama looked at Boehner and said, "You don't get anything for it. I'm taking that anyway."

This is the man who did our bidding? A man who repeatedly said that raising taxes "is not going to happen" and that "there will be no tax hikes"?

In fact, John Boehner told the world -- and every conservative in it -- that "extending all of the current tax rates and making them permanent will reduce the uncertainty in America and help small businesses begin to create jobs again."

+ + Boehner's Tough Talk Just Empty Promises

But his tough talk and blustering about fiscal responsibility and not raising taxes was for the cameras' benefit, not yours! In the end, it was more of the same beltway hot air -- full of empty promises and lip service. Sadly, Boehner's failure is about to impact all working-class Americans at a time when many can't afford it. 

But you can do something about it. Grassfire is making it possible for you to send John Boehner -- and others who supported the "fiscal cliff" deal -- the bill for the money they're costing you and your family!

Go here now to INVOICE them for the amount they're taking from you.

+ + Washington's Spending Crisis Shouldn't Be YOUR Crisis

Amidst rising unemployment; continuing economic uncertainty; fears about ObamaCare; and lawmakers authorizing the federal government to take, on average, an additional $1,667 from your pocket this year; grassroots Americans need to send the strongest response possible to those most responsible.

That's why Grassfire has created a platform for you to INVOICE your two Nevada senators and representative, as well as John Boehner and virtually all the Republican lawmakers who supported the outright theft of your hard-earned money. 

+ + Take Action: Invoice Boehner And His Friends For Taking Your Money

Tell them you won't stand for or support elected officials  who compromise their principles and then expect the American people to silently follow along.

John Boehner lied to you! But Grassfire can help you respond to him and other lawmakers who voted in favor of last week's "fiscal cliff" tax increase.

Use our FaxFire immediate delivery system to INVOICE John Boehner and other Congressional leaders for the money they're taking from you.

Thank you for the stand you're taking.

The Grassfire Team

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Muslim, Mahdi, Or Antichrist?

Angry Obama SC Muslim, Mahdi, or Antichrist? 
It should come as no surprise to those of us who read classic literature that those who make pacts with the devil eventually meet with desolation. Daniel Webster understood this, as do many preachers who stand in their pulpits and proclaim that you cannot enjoy the avails of sin for long. The pleasures, though real, are short-lived; and judgment always follows.
It seems obvious to those who watched the rise of the impertinent sham in the White House that something almost “magical” had accompanied his ascendancy, something other than his silver tongue and the ever-present teleprompter. How could an unknown with no track record for accomplishing anything of significance ascend to the Mt. Everest of power in our known universe?

These are questions that will likely persist for some years; until then, it is obvious to all but his most devoted followers that something has changed dramatically in the sphere of President Barack Obama since 2008. As though an angel had pulled the plug, we have seen an increasingly bumbling, fumbling shlub on the campaign trail. From time to time, Obama has waxed almost incoherent, a departure from his tightly-scripted, messianic oratory of 2008 and his cool, collected, “don’t you wish you were me?” presence.
In a less corrupted environment, this would bring Obama’s detractors almost pure joy. Instead, we have the feeling in the pit of our stomachs that ultimately, inevitably, this is a fraud sustained by those whose cravings for power and full pockets have led to their total submission to the myth that sits in the Oval Office. Though the myth is losing its lustre as the wheels of state begin to fall off, Muslims in the Middle East are showing their solidarity with Obama, just as he predicted.

Why have some religious leaders in the East speculated as to whether President Barack Obama might be Islam’s Mahdi, or Twelfth Imam? The prophecy of the Mahdi is, for the uninitiated, the Muslim approximation of the Jewish or Christian Messiah. He is embodied in different ways depending on the branch of Islam with which one is dealing and is of different levels of significance.

Shiite Muslim sect places the greatest stock in the Mahdi
At present, the Shiite Muslim sect places the greatest stock in the Mahdi and the entire Iranian paradigm as expressed by their leadership centers around this figure, his rise to power, and Iran’s role in bringing about his advent. This is largely the reason for their current political comportment, as they believe that fomenting an Islamic revolution is part of this process. The Mahdi, once in power, is prophesied to subjugate (read: “kill”) all remaining infidels and establish Islam in the four corners of the Earth.
Good enough. But how would Obama figure into this? Granted that some of the advertised similarities between the prophetic figure and the US president are superficial, some are not so superficial. Certain physical similarities are right on the mark (yes, they purport to know what this fellow will look like); yet others fall far off. More practically significant are the things that Obama has done during his tenure, which definitely speak to this apocalyptic prophecy.
Although some Muslims overseas are said to despise Obama with a purple passion, let us examine some of his dubious accomplishments from the perspective of the more contemplative Islamic zealot…
Obama facilitated the “Arab Spring”
Although the Western press fails to acknowledge this, it is practically common knowledge that Obama facilitated the “Arab Spring.” He’s also thrown Israel under the bus and done his level best to cripple America economically and in the areas of defense and national security.
Add to that his amity with the Muslim Brotherhood (having aided them in expanding their sphere of influence not only in the Muslim world but within the US), and you have someone who has probably garnered more support than enmity among Muslims. The only thing Obama really has going against him is having systematically taken out key al-Qaeda leaders, and this could be explained away as a matter of characteristically convoluted Muslim doctrine. How many Muslims have been killed by other Muslims via suicide attacks in recent years?

What we must understand is that the hatred the Muslim world has for the US is not rooted in national identity, practices, or culture. It is rooted in its Christianity. Christianity had its genesis in Judaism; thus they have hated us since the days of Ishmael and Hagar (his Mother) and the disrespect shown the founder of the Arab peoples. This has never been forgotten. The fact that Israel sprang from the seed of Abraham (and thus the Arabs and Jews are related) is lost in the shuffle. God promised that there would always be “enmity” between the two races; and as usual, He has proven to be correct.
Obama’s unequivocal defense of Islam at the expense of every other religion – Christianity in particular
In the time of Christ, there was a forebear of His coming. John the Baptist declared that the Jews would need to prepare; for the promised one was near. Would Obama be the Mahdi himself, or “the voice crying in the wilderness,” making the way for his appearance? One thing that has been made plain is his unequivocal defense of Islam at the expense of every other religion – Christianity in particular.
In the practical sense, our problem is indeed wrapped up in what or who Barack Hussein Obama is (or thinks he is) and why he does what he does. Is it one of today’s more complex questions, or is it as simple as a fake bringing down the most Christian nation on the planet?
Whether his “deal with the devil” has played out, or he’s simply worn out his welcome, he has proven his ability to mobilize the forces of evil, to the peril of us all.
Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)