Saturday, September 22, 2012

Pelosi Vow To Amend Constitution To Overturn Citizens United If Dems Retake The House…

OpEd: Jack
Wow Nancy Pelosi /Barack Obama just get dumber by the day..guess they forgot how that works...hello to amend the Constitution it takes 2/3 rds of the States to ratify!

Nancy longs for the good old days when unions were allowed sole access to influence elections with hundreds of millions of dollars.
If Democrats were to take control of the House of Representatives after the November elections, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said her party would “amend the [U.S.] Constitution” on the “very first day” to overturn the Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” decision.

President Obama said he supports a constitutional amendment to reverse the ruling and keep undisclosed corporate contributions out of elections.
“On the very first day we would have a jobs bill. We would have a jobs bill, much of it would contain what President Obama has in the American Jobs Act. It would be as simple as A-B-C.
Continue Reading on


   Trailer Version..the Full Movie was taken down by the opposition :

More confusion about Obama's real father

by Jerome R. Corsi 

His father taught him to love jazz?
So claims an email dispatched this week from the Obama campaign soliciting a donation for a chance to have “Dinner with Barack,” with airfare “on us.”
But the claim is not credible, contends Joel Gilbert, whose documentary “Dreams from My Real Father” has just been released.
“How is this possible?” Gilbert asked.
“Obama’s official life story claims he was with Barack Obama, the Kenyan, only one time, in the early 1970s, and then briefly, for a week or 10 days,” he explained.
“How was that enough time to teach 9-year-old Obama to love jazz music? Besides, jazz is uniquely American. Besides, what evidence is there the Kenyan dug Coltrane?”

Nevertheless, on Monday Gilbert received an email solicitation from Julianna Smoot, deputy campaign manager of Obama for America.
The same announcement also was posted on the campaign website, encouraging voters to try to win a dinner with President Obama.
Smoot spelled out some of the benefits the winner will enjoy.
“You can learn a lot: His dad taught him to love jazz, his girls get crazy-embarrassed when he dances or sings in public, his dream job is starting point guard for the Chicago Bulls – and he really looks forward to sharing these meals with supporters like you.”

Gilbert’s first reaction was to assume the Obama campaign was conceding to the major premise of his documentary: that Frank Marshall Davis was the real, biological and ideological father of Barack Obama, not Barack Obama, the Kenyan, who came from Africa in 1959 to attend the University of Hawaii in Honolulu.
“There can be no arguing that there never was an opportunity for the Kenyan Obama to teach Barry to love jazz,” Gilbert told WND. “However, there was a man who raised Obama who was a jazz aficionado, his name was Frank Marshall Davis.”
Gilbert viewed the ad as a breakthrough.
“It appears the Obama campaign is finally admitting I’m right, that Frank Marshall Davis, the Communist Party USA propagandist and Marxist, was his real father. So there you have it, Obama is a red diaper baby.”
In contrast to the Kenyan Obama, Frank Marshall Davis was widely recognized as a lover of jazz and an expert.
Davis befriended jazz musicians in Chicago, where he was a DJ for a short time on a jazz radio station, WJJD.
After coming to Hawaii in 1948 to help organize the communist-controlled ILWU trade union, Davis wrote a column in the communist-run Honolulu Record newspaper in which he regularly wrote about jazz.

One of his “Frank-ly Speaking” columns can be seen here:

Frank Marshall Davis column, Honolulu Record

Davis also maintained a large collection of jazz records.
In “Dreams from My Real Father,” Gilbert displays nude photos of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, taken at what he determined was Davis’ house at 2994 Kalihi Street in Honolulu.
In the one of the photos, a record player and record collection are clearly visible.
Two jazz record albums are easily identified – Nat King Cole’s “Love is the Thing” and Stan Kenton’s “Cuban Fire.”
“Now Obama needs to come clean and tell us what Davis taught him about Marxist ideology and destroying the middle class,” Gilbert said. “I would love to go to dinner with Barack Obama and find out all the things his real father taught him, not just “a love of jazz music.”
Still, Gilbert does not plan to donate to the Obama campaign to enter into the contest to win the dinner, but he encourages others to do so.
Borrowing a line from Smoot’s email, he quipped: “If you win, I will expect a full report!”
See the “Dreams from My Real Father” trailer: 

Florida Dem asks for 'discovery' into Obama eligibility

by Bob Unruh 

A Florida Democrat who went to court to determine whether Barack Obama is qualified for the office of president is asking the First District Court of Appeal there to order legal “discovery” in the case, a process in which each side examines evidence held by the other.
“Appellant submitted multiple sworn affidavits setting forth the fraudulent nature of Appellee Obama’s birth certificate and other identifying documents,” said the appeal of a decision by Judge Terry Lewis, who said Obama is eligible and the case shouldn’t go forward.

The arguments were filed by attorney Larry Klayman, founder of both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, who is being assisted in the case by a special Constitution Action fund. The case is on behalf of Michael Voeltz, a registered member of the Democratic Party of Florida.
“Appellee Obama conspicuously offered no evidence to the contrary and instead asked for a stay of discovery in order to avoid a proper determination of his citizenship. With only appellant’s affidavits in front of him as no contra-affidavits were put forth by appellee Obama, Judge Lewis ignored this sworn evidence and incorrectly determined that appellee Obama was a natural born citizen,” the filing explains.
It continues: “A question of fact such as this cannot be determined without the parties having been given the opportunity to take discovery. Appellant was not permitted to investigate through discovery or even observe the underlying documents that allegedly establish appellee Obama’s natural born citizenship.
“If appellee Obama was born outside of the United States then he is not a natural born citizen, or even a citizen. In addition to being born within the United States, as noted above, a natural born citizen must be born to two U.S. citizen parents. If it is shown through discovery that Barack H. Obama Sr., appellee Obama’s father, was not a U.S. citizen at the time of appellee Obama’s birth, then appellee Obama is clearly not a natural born citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution.”

The case seeks to exclude Obama from the 2012 ballot. Klayman and Voeltz claim that Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, because he was born a British subject.

The case cited the evidence produced by Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s special investigative unit, which has asserted that the birth documentation from Hawaii that Obama claimed was “proof positive” of his Hawaiian birth is not real.
As WND reported, Voeltz, a voter and taxpayer in Broward County, challenged Obama’s eligibility, arguing that the “natural born citizen” clause was rightly understood in historical context to mean a child not only born in the U.S., but born to two American-citizen parents, so as not to have divided loyalties. Obama, however, readily admits to being born a dual citizen because of his father’s British citizenship.
But Lewis rejected the evidence before him and ruled that Obama is eligible.
“The United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States,’” Lewis wrote.
Not exactly, Klayman explained.
“The judge equated being a ‘citizen’ with a ‘natural born citizen’ and cited no authority to conclude the two terms are the same,” Klayman said. “He quotes other state’s cases, where judges reached that conclusion, but that’s not precedent for him. What other courts said in lower cases means nothing to him.”

Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve? Here’s WND’s complete archive of news reports on the issue
Lewis also said the case had to be dismissed because Obama, the only candidate offered by the Democratic Party, actually was not “nominated” as a candidate for president because at that time the nominating convention had not been held.
Lewis also said his court lacked jurisdiction in the case.
Klayman argued in the appeal brief that Lewis is wrong on several counts.
“Lewis’ ruling bars any elector contest of eligibility in a presidential primary, or in any unopposed primary, and is clearly contrary to the plain wording of the well crafted and crystal clear Florida statutes,” he wrote. “Appellant rightfully has standing, and the judiciary is obliged to make a determination as to eligibility of ‘any candidate,’ including presidential candidates.”
He continued: “By his own birth story, well told, he is not an eligible natural born citizen, due to foreign citizenship at birth. Appellant also asks for a determination of current citizenship that would require examination of all of Mr. Obama’s passport and other relevant records.
“If it is found that Barack Obama Sr. is indeed the father of Barack H. Obama II, then appellant also seeks an injunction, preventing the placement of the name Barack H. Obama on the Florida General Election Ballot by order of the Florida judiciary, since he would not be an eligible natural born citizen.”

Turkey appears to be seeking the restoration of the old Ottoman Empire.

OpEd: Jack
Not only no but hell no.... Turkey appears to be seeking the restoration of the old Ottoman Empire. Ancient History 101 gives a prime example why Islam should always be is not a religion it is actually a 7th Century Theocracy..still stuck in 7th Century philosophy and barbarism...Sharia Law should be banned in all countries world wide
The Life of Muhammad:
An Inconvenient Truth


by Michael Carl 

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erodgan, who just days ago said a movie that “insults religions” and “prophets” is not protected by freedom of speech, now is insisting that international bodies pass laws making criticism of Islam a crime.
The Turkish newspaper, Today’s Zaman, reported Erdogan made the comments before a large crowed in Bosnia.

He said he is the “prime minister of a nation, of [whom] most are Muslims and that has declared anti-Semitism a crime against humanity. But the West hasn’t recognized Islamophobia as a crime against humanity – it has encouraged it.”
He provided the comments in response to the growing controversy surrounding the YouTube movie, “Innocence of Muslims,” allegedly made by an Egyptian living in the United States.
Attorney, writer and independent foreign policy analyst Andrew Harrod said Erdogan’s statement is illogical because he is comparing prejudice against an ethnic group or race with prejudice against a group for holding to a specific set of beliefs.
“This is an absurd proposition. Intellectual claims simply have no boundaries, such that conflicting ideas demand testing in order to determine which one is right,” Harrod said.
Harrod added that others, including Jihad Watch Director Robert Spencer, have observed that the American-made film is the pretext for a coordinated campaign to pressure free societies on issues such as freedom of speech in the name of criticizing Islam.

“Leaders like Erdogan are trying to put a logical, pro-Western face on their campaign to suppress speech, and thus are making various arguments to make their agenda sound like an advancement of human rights,” Harrod said.
ACLJ International Director Tiffany Barrans said Turkey is one of the leaders in a move to get international bodies to adopt a Pakistan-like law prohibiting the criticism of Islam.
“Turkey is among a number of countries, including Pakistan and Indonesia, that will likely continue to push for the creation of a new international law limiting one’s right to freely speak should that speech somehow defame or insult a religious theology,” Barrans said.
Raymond Ibrahim, Middle East analyst and fellow with the Middle East Forum, said Erdogan is following a familiar script among Middle East leaders.

“Erdogan is basically doing what other Muslim leaders do: talk about what the West ‘needs’ to do, followed by much illogical talk,” Ibrahim said.
“For example, the assertion ‘Freedom of thought and belief ends where the freedom of thought and belief of others start.’ In fact, the one civilization that finds it especially difficult to live up to this assertion is Islam, which habitually encroaches on the freedom of thought and belief of others,” Ibrahim said.
Erdogan and other Muslim leaders, he said, are “banking on the idea that the softer and more naive elements of the West will fall for such talk.”
Harrod said that the film is an excellent attention-getting device to push the Islamic agenda.
“Leftist multicultural elements around the world might buy into this, and thereby enervate the free societies of the world,” Harrod said.
Barrans said that, ironically, laws prohibiting some forms of religious speech usually hurt the people they were allegedly designed to protect.
“International human rights standards derive from the inherent dignity of humankind as individuals. What is clear is that these blasphemy laws are extremely troubling by placing minorities – those whom human rights laws are designed to protect – at risk,” he said.
Barrans predicted the United Nations will be the venue for the debate.

“In light of the recent demonstrations and attacks in the name of Allah, it is likely that the United Nations will see a renewed push for [a] Defamation of Religions resolution,” Barrans said.
But he added that any move for a “defamation law” should be rejected.
“This push should be emphatically rejected by those who wish to preserve freedom of expression and open dialogue and debate about religion,” Barrans said. “All nations that respect religious freedom and freedom of expression should take a strong stance against any push for a Defamations of Religions resolution.
“A person’s right to freedom of expression, even expression that might be deemed offensive, is considered a ‘cornerstone right’ without which other rights fall into jeopardy,” Barrans said.
Islamic nations already for years have been pushing in the U.N. for a “Defamation of Religions” law that came out of an original plan by the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation for a “Defamation of Islam” law to crack down on criticism of that religion.
Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice said it’s nothing “more than an effort to achieve special protections for Islam – a move to stifle religious speech.”
Critics of the idea say Muslim nations would simply use it as an endorsement of their attacks on Christians for statements as simple as their belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ, which Muslims consider an affront.

Turkey has become a stronger voice in the Middle East, and WND reported in September 2011 that Turkey was setting up a confrontation with Israel.
Analysts were warning the U.S. and Israel about the instability they see in Turkey, where Erdogan has called Israel the biggest impediment to Middle East peace. He has demanded Israel apologize for defending itself and has suggested his nation’s military might enable blockade runners to move against Israel’s weapons blockade of the Gaza Strip.
The American Enterprise Institute’s Middle East analyst, Michael Rubin, said Turkey’s actions and closer alignment with the Islamic world in recent days demonstrate that Turkey is not a good fit for the freedom-focused North Atlantic Treaty Organization, of which it is a member.
“While Turkey was an important Cold War ally, increasingly Turkey has become a liability to the United States and NATO,” Rubin said.
WND reported in March 2010 that former PLO operative turned Christian anti-terrorism analyst Walid Shoebat warned that Turkey was emerging as the world’s growing Islamic power.
Shoebat said the United States needs to be watching not Iran, Syria or even Hamas and Hezbollah as closely as it needs to follow the actions of the Islamic leaders of Turkey.
It was just a few months ago when Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin reported Turkey appeared to be seeking the restoration of the old Ottoman Empire.

The report said Turkey’s increasing lack of interest in the European Union combined with its efforts to re-establish its influence in Turkic countries of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan and its outreaches to Russian, Syria and Iran were cause for concern.
Earlier this week, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told reporters in New York that “free speech” has limits, especially when religious beliefs are involved.
Referencing the controversy over the movie, he said: “All of this freedom of expression should not be abused by individuals. … Some people abuse this freedom. This effort to provoke, to humiliate others by using (religious) beliefs cannot be protected in such a way.
“All human beings have inalienable rights, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, but at the same time, freedom of expression should not be abused by individuals,” he said.
WND also reported when one of the world’s most influential Muslims began calling on the United Nations to impose international restrictions on free speech, criminalizing any statement that impugns Islam.
Sheik Abdullah Bin Bayyah, a professor at King Abdul Aziz University in Saudi Arabia, is a member of several international organizations, including the Centre for Studying the Aims of Shariah in the U.K. He also is the vice chairman of the International Union of Muslim Scholars.
The Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre ranked bin Bayyah No. 31 on its list of the 500 most influential Muslims in the world for 2011.

In a public declaration issued to several Islamic bodies, including the All Dulles Area Muslim Society, one of the largest Muslim mosques in the D.C. metro area and the U.S., bin Bayyah called upon “people of reason and understanding” to put a legal stop to statements that would offend Muslims and thereby threaten world peace.
“We ask everyone to ponder the ramifications of provoking the feelings of over one billion people by a small party of people who desire not to seek peace nor fraternity between members of humanity,” bin Bayyah wrote. “This poses a threat to world peace with no tangible benefit realized. Is it not necessary in today’s world for the United Nations to issue a resolution criminalizing the impingement of religious symbols? We request all religious and political authorities, as well as people of reason to join us in putting a stop to this futility that benefits no one.”

Friday, September 21, 2012

Obama Asking Supporters To Pledge Allegiance To Him -- Hollywood All Too Happy To Oblige

by Anthony Edwards 
The Obama team has launched their "For All" campaign in which they ask supporters to send in pictures of themselves with a hand on their heart and a note as to why they are pledging allegiance to Obama.

Jessica Alba, who is apparently famous for some reason, has proudly pledged her allegiance to Obama. Alba said:

“Growing up, my classmates and I started every day with a ritual: We’d stand up, put our right hand over our hearts, and say the Pledge of Allegiance. That gesture was a promise. A promise to be involved and engaged in this country’s future. A promise to work for liberty and justice — and for affordable education, health care, and equality — for all.”

I for one can never forget the inspirational words from the pledge that we all used to recite " . . . . one nation, with no need for God, with liberty, justice, free health care, free education, and equality for all!"

I find pledging allegiance to any candidate or politician to be reprehensible. I will be voting for Romney and I will never pledge allegiance to him. Do you know why? Because if he even comes close to circumventing The Constitution (also known as breaking the law), I'm done with Romney. we are a nation of laws, not of men. I pledge my allegiance to our republic.

Pledging allegiance to a leader is from the playbook of Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and the like.

Jessica Alba, Natalie Portman, Scarlet Johansson, and other "celebrities" have all sent in pictures of themselves pledging allegiance to Obama. Written on their hands is their reasons for doing so.

Alba has "equal pay" written on one hand and "right to choose" written on another. Natalie Portman has "women's rights" written on her hand.

Really? Does Portman want Obama to give women more rights? Has Portman never read The Constitution? Women have the same rights as men. Has she heard Mitt Romney say that he is going to repeal the nineteenth amendment and take away voting rights for women? I haven't heard anything of the sort

Alba's reasons (equal pay and right to choose) are equally ignorant. Women already have the right to choose, and Romney and co. aren't going to take it away. And there is already equal pay, if you actually compare apples to apples.

One thing that really perplexes me is Natalie Portman's allegiance to Obama. Her dad is Israeli. Portman was born in Jerusalem, Israel. She has dual citizenship in the U.S. and Israel. So why is she pledging allegiance to Obama, who is the first hostile president to Israel since Jimmy Carter? As my grandpa would say, it don't make no sense.

Portman is either a complete political-party stooge, or she is not seeking truth. Obama refuses to meet with Netanyahu because he "doesn't have the time." Really? With all the hostility going on in the middle-east, Iran on the edge of coming to nuclear power, Obama doesn't have the time to meet with our only ally in the region? He made time to stop and have an interview with the sycophantic David Letterman, but not Netanyahu. Obama despises Netanyahu and has no plans to assist Israel in any way.

Let the Hollywood zombies pledge their allegiance to The Great One. We now know where their loyalties lay.

Jessica Alba gleefully pledging to support a dictator Natalie Portman showing her truly idiotic stupidity
President Obama looking very humble Obama being really cool when he smokes a cigarette
Copyright © 2012 Nillabyte LLC

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Iran official: 'Big war' means Mahdi's coming

by Reza Kahlili 

For the first time, Iran’s highest-ranking military official has tied the reappearance of the last Islamic messiah to the regime being prepared to go to a war based on ideology.
“With having the treasure of the Holy Defense, Valayat (Guardianship of the Jurist) and martyrs, we are ready for a big war,” Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi said, according to Mashregh news, which is run by the Revolutionary Guards.

“Of course this confrontation has always continued; however, since we are in the era of The Coming, this war will be a significant war.”
Shi’ites believe that at the end of time great wars will take place, and Imam Mahdi, the Shi’ites’ 12th imam, will reappear and kill all the infidels, raising the flag of Islam in all corners of the world.
Vahidi became the Revolutionary Guards intelligence officer after the 1979 Islamic revolution and later was promoted to chief commander of the Quds Forces. He is on the Interpol most-wanted list for the Jewish community center bombing in Buenos Aires in 1994 that killed 85 and injured hundreds.
Vahidi also played a major role in the 1996 Khobar Tower bombing in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 U.S. servicemen.
Speaking at a mosque in remembrance of the martyrs who died in service to Iran, Vahidi stated that, “The Islamic republic is going to create a new environment on the world stage, and without a doubt victory awaits those who continue the path of martyrs. … we can defeat the enemy at its home and our nation is ready for jihad. Martyrdom has taught us to avoid wrong paths and return to the right path. Martyrdom is the right path, it’s the path to God.”

Vahidi said Iran’s enemies would have taken action in Syria in the past couple of years if they had the capability. Iran is a much more formidable power than Syria, he said, and concluded that Tehran can easily wipe out the “Zionist regime” of Israel.
Several U.S. officials, including Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have called the officials of the Islamic regime “rational actors.”

Meanwhile, a Revolutionary Guards report quoting the head of the Guards’ public relations, Ramezan Sharif, revealed that Iran has military assets in several countries.
The presence of Quds Forces in Syria and Lebanon, Sharif said, is with the goal of supporting the Islamic nations and for the special situations that exist in those countries.
Sharif said Iranian presence is based on international laws and that, “Currently the Revolutionary Guards has presence in 15 countries, among them Syria and Lebanon, while the Iranian military also has presence in some other countries.”

As revealed recently, terrorist assets of the Islamic regime have been put on high alert for attacks on Israeli and U.S. interests. This extends from the Middle East to Africa, Latin America and the United States.
In a report Thursday in the Washington Times, Kevin L. Perkins, deputy director of the FBI, told a hearing of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that the agency considered Iran’s assets a “serious threat.”
“Quds Forces, Hezbollah and others have shown they both have the capability and the willingness to extend beyond that (Middle East) region of the world and likely here into the homeland itself,” he testified.

Guard commanders have openly stated that they have recruited assets from Latin America and even some from European countries to avoid suspicion by intelligence agencies and will target America should it get involved militarily against Iran.

Is Obama Using Sex to Promote his Campaign?

The people marketing President Obama seem to be selling what everybody on Madison Avenue knows sells better than anything else: Sex.

The Obama campaign is being prominently represented by some of the nation’s hottest celebrities. That is, not just the hottest stars in the country, but the hottest looking stars in the country.
The old “Obama girl,” whose sexy video helped make Obama hip last election cycle, doesn’t even seem to know if she’s going to vote for him this time. But who needs her?
And who needs the dowdy Oprah Winfrey, with her incessant stuggles to lose weight? The Obama team, which relied on her so heavily in 2008, when she had the biggest show on the planet, has pretty much shunted her aside this year.

'Gay' advocates cook up Chick-fil-A fairytale

by Dave Tombers 

“Gay” media organizations and the mainstream press have headlined over the last two days Chick-fil-A’s “change” that they claim means the company suddenly is promising not to discriminate against homosexuals – and that it would stop giving money to those organizations that promote traditional marriage.
“Chick-fil-A says it will stop funding antigay groups” proclaimed the Detroit Free Press.

But it appears the facts are that the company’s anti-discrimination policy remains just as it was months ago – before the controversy over owner Dan Cathy’s Christian beliefs erupted – and its donations appear to have had no new directive applied.
The company is not allowing any interviews, but the anti-discrimination policy it proclaims remains the same as it was months ago, and Joe Moreno, a Chicago alderman securely in the pro-homosexual camp, confirmed to WND that the company’s giving should not even have been an issue.
Responding to a question about his review of Chick-fil-A form 990 for 2011, he confirmed that there were no donations “of concern.”
He was asked, “Does the alderman reviewing the 990 for 2011 and finding no donations of concern mean that Chick-fil-A was already meeting a demand before it was even a demand since at least 2010.”
“I believe that is the case,” a statement from Moreno’s office confirmed to WND.
The controversy erupted over the summer, when company CEO Dan Cathy told Baptist Press he was “guilty as charged” for supporting the “biblical definition of the family unit.”

Homosexual lobbyists and activists pounced, promoting a boycott and obtaining statements from city officials such as Chicago’s Moreno that they would crack down on the company over the CEO’s beliefs.
Marriage supporters responded to a campaign by former presidential candidate Gov. Mike Huckabee for a “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” by lining up by the thousands at stories. Additionally, more than 6.3 million people have “liked” Chick-fil-A on Facebook.
Now the headlines have developed that the company “Ceases Anti-gay Donations.”
Moreno jumped before the cameras to say he has “finalized” negotiations with Chick-fil-A with a promise that the company no longer will give money to anti-”gay” organizations.

He said in an interview with that a statement had been obtained that the company no longer would donate to pro-marriage organizations, and “I also recently reviewed their 990 statement, which is a statement that shows all of their givings, they they must submit publicly in the spring, and as of this date they haven’t given a dollar to those groups.”
But the most recent 990 form would cover 2011, meaning there was no “objectionable” giving, according to Moreno, as long back as 21 months – predating any of the flap over Cathy’s statements.
The company also had posted when the controversy erupted a statement on its website announcing it would not discriminate on the basis of gender orientation. The months-old statement, which at that time was represented as stating an existing policy, said, “The Chick-fil-A culture and service tradition in our restaurants is to treat every person with honor, dignity and respect – regardless of their belief, race, creed, sexual orientation or gender.”
Moreno, however, told Cenk Uygur on “The Young Turks” just this week that, “This is the first time in the company’s history that they’ve done this [stated a non-discrimination policy]. I think it’s because of your actions, the community’s actions and partly because of my actions in not supporting the restaurant… That they’ve changed their tune, it’s a big step for the community.”
It was a statement from The Civil Rights Agenda that prompted the recent headlines. It stated that Moreno “finalized” negotiations with the company with a promise to no longer give money to “anti-gay” organizations.

The statement said of the Cathy family’s foundation, the WinShape Foundation, “is now taking a much closer look at the organizations it considers helping, and in that process will remain true to its stated philosophy of not supporting organizations with political agendas.”
But it was in July when the company stated, “Going forward, our intent is to leave the policy debate over same-sex marriage to the government and political arena.”
The Civil Rights Agenda didn’t name groups, but others did. One was the National Organization for Marriage, which responded immediately, “Despite recent news articles claiming Chick-fil-A’s WinShape Foundation donated money to our organization – this is false. The National Organization for Marriage has never received funding from them. We support Chick-fil-A’s philosophy that every person is treated with ‘honor, dignity and respect – regardless of their belief, race, creed, sexual orientation or gender;’ and we will continue to endorse ‘Chick-fil-A Wednesdays’ calling upon all supporters of marriage, free speech and religious liberty to thank Chick-fil-A’s president, Dan Cathy, for taking a courageous stand to speak out in defense of marriage and his freedom to speak.”
The Family Research Council also was mentioned, and told WND that it has gotten nothing since a $1,000 donation in 2010.
Focus on the Family was also mentioned, but declined WND’s request for comment.
Even Anthony Martinez, TCRA executive director, said in an interview with Windy City Media Group that the language Chick-Fil-A uses in its non-discrimination policy hasn’t changed.

The site reported Martinez said, “With regard to policy, there really isn’t that much of a change.”
Moreno disagreed. He issued a statement Wednesday that “the company today as put into writing, for the first time, that its employees are to ‘treat every person with honor, dignity and respect – regardless of their beliefs, race, creed, sexual orientation and gender…”
But he admitted that the issue of corporate donations was a nonstarter from the beginning.
“I corroborated what they told me back in January; that donations to anti-gay groups … have ceased.”

Egypt’s New President Keeps Useful Idiot Obama On Short Muslim Brotherhood Leash


Muslim Brotherhood gift SC Egypt’s new president keeps useful idiot Obama on short Muslim Brotherhood leash
Barack Obama’s Arab Spring is being celebrated in a big way in Egypt as the former American ally and 30 year peace partner of Israel becomes a full-fledged Islamic theocracy and property of the ruling Muslim Brotherhood. “It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet,” said Brotherhood founder al-Banna, a devout believer in the role of Islamic Jihad as the proper means of carrying out “…the precepts of the Qur’an.”
And there could be no better guy to advance that Brotherhood agenda of world domination than Mohammed Morsi, longtime Brotherhood member and Egypt’s newly elected president by virtue of the U.S. State Department-led overthrow of the America-supporting Hosni Mubarak. Morsi has made his own allegiance to the precepts of Islamic rule clear enough even for a mainstream American media that refuses to report it.
During a May campaign speech to the people of Egypt, Morsi said:
The shari’a, then the shari’a, and finally, the shari’a. Rejoice and rest assured that [the Egyptian] people will not accept a [constitutional] text that does not reflect the true meaning of the Islamic shari’a as a text to be implemented and as a platform. The people will not agree to anything else.  

Morsi was not posturing for Egyptian voters, and he obviously had little concern for the way his words might be received by an American audience. As his then-political benefactor, Obama must have hoped Morsi might play the role of a moderately secular candidate who would keep at bay the threat of radical Islam at LEAST for American television cameras and through Barack’s November bid for re-election! After all, didn’t the Muslim Brotherhood owe that small subterfuge to Obama for having so graciously given them Egypt?
But Mohammed Morsi is not a secularist, nor will he bow to the campaign wishes of Barack Obama. In fact, since winning the fraud-enhanced June election, Morsi has vowed to turn Egypt into an Islamic theocracy, free jailed terrorists, and tear up the 3-decade peace treaty with Israel. He is also demanding that Obama free Omar Abdel-Rahman, the blind sheik sentenced to life for his part in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

When Egypt’s Muslim thugs began climbing the walls into American Embassy grounds in Cairo, Morsi immediately informed Obama that “the Prophet ‘is a red line for all Muslims, and we refuse any attack.’”  Though faced with a situation that could threaten his bid for re-election should he be made to look impotent by the man his Administration had literally placed in Egypt’s highest office, Obama’s telephone plea that Morsi increase protection for Embassy workers was answered with a demand that Obama  “…take dissuasive measures against those trying to demolish relations with the US.” It was in response to this “suggestion” from the Egyptian president that Barack Obama asked YouTube to banish the “Innocence of Muslims” film from its site. The filmmaker was picked up at his California home by FBI agents for a  midnight chat, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs asked Pastor Terry Jones to withdraw any support he might have given the film production. It seems 1st Amendment rights give way with ease when our president is threatened with electoral extinction by the Muslim Brotherhood.
Morsi will be visiting with Obama later this month, invited to the White House along with a previously banned Egyptian terrorist (a special visa has been arranged) and a band of Muslim Brotherhood officials.
It will be interesting to discover when and how high Barack is told to jump by his new best friends from the Middle East.

Street Vibrations Fall Rally~Starts today..!

 Reno,Sparks,Virginia City,Lake Tahoe Nevada...this year it will be a no colors event to avoid problems :) 

Got a little edgy last year Up on the Hill...oh boy!

Obama Orders Launched Fast and Furious

Project Gun Runner (Fast and Furious) was launched under the orders of President Barack Obama with the knowledge of Attorney General Eric Holder. Deputy Attorney General David Ogden announced the Obama Administration's new and aggressive 'comprehensive plan' on March, 24, 2009. The plan was aimed at disrupting gun trafficking between the United States and Mexico.

Yes, Islam is an enemy

by Erik Rush 

With the events of the last week, the fact of Islam’s compatibility with American society has been rendered as unambiguous as it could possibly be. This is not because Muslims possess inconveniently hypersensitive religious sensibilities; they obviously do, but it has been established that the Mideast riots that kicked off on Sept. 11, 2012, had nothing to do with a certain pathetic anti-Islam video, so we won’t even go there.
Islam has never played well with others, and this is because it is a worldview with a creed, dogma and religious aspects, rather than a religion per se. All of these militate against its tolerance of divergent societies and cultures. While certain theologians and historians will argue this, an objective view of Islam’s history clearly bears it out. It has been well-established historically by former lay Muslims and former Muslims in the academic realm that once practitioners of Islam reach an elusive “critical mass” within a population, they become dissident aggressors, intent upon implementing Islam across the entirety of a society. This is why they have such terms as taqiyya and dhimmi in their lexicon in the first place.

As of last Saturday, there were anti-American protests taking place in well over three dozen Islamic cities in over 17 countries, from Europe and North Africa through Asia and into the South Pacific. Given the observations we have of Muslims over the past 20 years alone, it is imperative that we cast aside the politically correct weakness of academics and sentimental fools who declare that it’s only a minority within Islam who are extreme and violent, and that they “know lots of peaceful Muslims,” respectively.
Every day, I see the so-called “peaceful Muslims” who have jobs and families, and send their children to schools with ours. Although they appear generally unassuming most of the time, I have also seen Muslim students among them protesting against Israel and the U.S. on street corners near the local university (one may recall that the press designation for perpetrators of the Iran hostage crisis in 1979 was “students”). My own children have heard theirs let slip at school concerning the necessity of Israel’s destruction and America being an oppressor nation.
Whether our “peaceful” Muslim neighbors are truly peaceful or practicing taqiyya (deceiving infidels to advance the faith), the results will be the same. At best, they remain silent in fear of the radical element; at worst, they will support the radical element, or mobilize to fight alongside them as needed. I believe that the majority of “moderate” Muslim talking heads we see in the media are most certainly practicing taqiyya, disinformation being their chief function in the struggle to subjugate America.

I’m no more eager to segregate or disenfranchise anyone than are most of us. I know that the innocent children of our ostensibly peaceful Muslim neighbors are being victimized, just as the squads of jihad-indoctrinated and occasionally armed youngsters abroad we see in news photos and video clips are being victimized. They are nonetheless just as able to shout of death to Jews and America as are their parents. Might they just as readily detonate a suicide vest in an American school or market or theater if so ordered?
This is truth: Both the political left and Islamists in America have been exploiting the First Amendment and Americans’ generous nature in order to conquer us. It’s that simple, and if it does come to violent confrontation, I’d rather our side be victorious, whatever that takes.
Propaganda and misinformed voters aside, the majority of Americans will not stand for a socialist totalitarian state, nor one that adheres to Shariah law. Radical Islamists, like many primitive and patriarchal cultures, understand but one thing: willingness to employ the unrestrained force of might. Perhaps this is why the original Count Dracula (aka “Vlad the Impaler”), chose to very publicly impale thousands of his Turkish Muslim enemies after a 1459 victory in battle. The extremity of this measure far surpassed that which the Ottomans expected from their European would-be dhimmis. 

Liberals who have been dedicatedly working toward disenfranchising the Christian majority in America now demand that we don kid gloves and walk on eggshells, lest we “hurt Muslim feelings.” This, for a culture that murders over perceived slights, throws acid in women’s faces, blames rape victims, marries off 9-year-old girls and saws people’s heads off as a matter of course. While it is doubtful that liberal leaders actually desire our mass conversion to Islam, it is certain that this is part of the general subversion of the paradigm, the process of breaking the American spirit.
We have seen how effectively radical Islamists can mobilize in nations in which they are a majority and the dangerous transformations they have achieved in areas of Europe. With this evidence before us, will Americans simply “choose” to be stupid, to be led into desolation by the worst among us, unwilling to commit to decisive action over names we may be called by our enemies?
I pray that this is not the case.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Secret retirement plans: Does Obama expect to lose?

How lovely a shrine being donated to Satans his minions!

by Jerome R. Corsi 

$35 million Hawaii estate regarded as possible Obama retirement home

Are Obama insiders secretly making retirement plans for the Obamas with the expectation the president will lose his bid for re-election in November?
Very quietly, Obama’s chief financier, Penny Pritzker, has entered the Hawaii housing market to buy a retirement home for the president and his family that will be available not in 2016, but in January 2013, according to a confidential source within Pritzker’s Chicago organization
Pritzker, a wealthy Chicago business executive and heiress to the Hyatt Hotels fortune, served as national finance chairman for Obama’s 2008 campaign and is the co-chairman of his 2012 effort.
The source told WND that highly confidential internal polls conducted by the Obama campaign indicate Obama cannot win re-election, despite public surveys that show him in the lead.
“The public polls are mostly political,” the source argued. “Obama radicals want Romney supporters to feel discouraged and give up. Truth is that Romney’s winning.”
The source further told WND that Pritzker is experiencing frustration in her fundraising efforts, as wealthy donors who contributed generously to Obama in 2008 are not even returning her phone calls.
The source said Pritzker is “reminding everyone how generous to their supporters the Clintons were when they left office.”
“Everything is for sale. Ambassadorships, government grants, stimulus money – you name it,” the source told WND.

“There’s nearly three months between the Nov. 6 election and the Jan. 20 inauguration – plenty of time to hand out goodies to friends from the Oval Office.”
Pritzker is telling potential donors that the Obamas have no intention of returning to Chicago when they leave the White House, according to the source.
She is also raising money for the Obama presidential library and museum, which also are slated for Hawaii.
Pritzker’s search for a developed property, suitable for occupancy four months from now, instead of property where a custom-designed estate might be built, is further indication that insiders believe Obama will not be re-elected.

Kevin DuJan, founder and editor of, first reported Pritzker was acting as a proxy to purchase a $35 million oceanfront estate in Kailua, the “Beverly Hills of Hawaii,” on the northeast shore of the island of Oahu.
DuJan reported billionaire Pritzker herself may contribute up to half the $35 million purchase price of the future Obama residence.
Hawaii Five-O
The property that appears to fit the description is an estate seen in a recent episode of the popular television show “Hawaii Five-O.”
As featured recently in Honolulu Magazine, the property consists of a main residence and a guest home located on 1.5 acres in an area called “Beachfront,” just before the Lanikai neighborhood in Kailua on Oahu’s Windward Coast.
Jeff Kerr of Kerr Michaels Design told Honolulu Magazine he designed the estate to replicate properties constructed in Hawaii in the early 1900s.

Ocean view from living room of possible Obama retirement home

The interior of the house is 8,419 square feet, with another 5,359 square feet of lanai area. The main house has five bedrooms, five baths, two powder rooms, a professional media room and a cabana adjacent to the pool and spa.
A panoramic tour of the world-class, beachfront property can be taken on the Internet, allowing the viewer to “walk through” the home and see its expansive views of the Pacific Ocean.
Signals Obama will leave Chicago behind
In recent months, various members of the Obama family have been indicating that the family does not intend to return to Chicago when the Obama presidency ends.
On Sept. 14, the Weekly Standard reported Michelle Obama was asked by a school child during a visit to a Virginia YMCA where the Obamas would live if President Obama loses.
The first lady said the family would figure that out later, according to the pool report.
In an interview with USA Today in May, Michelle Obama de-emphasized the importance of returning to Chicago.
“So this is home in many ways,” she said, speaking about Chicago. “I mean, we have a house that has stuff in it back in Chicago. We have friends that we love who we invite here all the time.

Inside $35 million Hawaii estate

“But the truth is,” she said, “is that if you plucked us up and put us anywhere right now, what we’d know with this change is that we’re always a family when we’re together. And in the end, that’s what really matters.”
DuJan at has been reporting that Michelle Obama’s mother, Marian Robinson, who is currently living with the Obama family in the White House, has been bragging about moving to Hawaii.
“It was fun while it lasted,” quotes Robinson as saying, “but wait until you see the place they’re buying for Michelle and Barack!”

Congressman Allen West Joins the Thomas More Law Center’s Citizens Advisory Board

Today, TMLC announced that Congressman Allen West (R-FL) has agreed to serve on the Law Center’s Citizens Advisory Board.
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center stated,We are honored that Congressman West, a courageous American patriot, has agreed to serve on our Board.  He has been steadfast and unafraid in his public opposition to the internal threat posed by radical Islam.  He distinguished himself as a combat officer in the Iraq war, and he is now distinguishing himself as a representative of patriotic Americans throughout the nation.  He symbolizes everything the Law Center strives to be, and as a member of the Citizens Advisory Board, he will help develop the Law Center’s national strategy to accomplish its mission.” 
In accepting service on the Advisory Board, Congressman West stated,
I know that the Thomas More Law Center is aggressively advancing in courtrooms throughout America the same principles I fought for as a soldier for 22 years, and what I’m fighting for now as a Congressman.  I support their mission and I am honored to serve on their Advisory Board, which is chaired by a true American hero, retired Admiral Jeremiah Denton.”
Said West,
“What impressed me about the Law Center is that it knows the true threat to our nation posed by radical Islam and it has initiated and funded more cases challenging the Stealth Jihad being waged against our Nation than any other public interest law firm in America.”
Before retiring as an Army Lieutenant Colonel, West served as a Field Artillery Officer in several combat zones: in Operation Desert Storm, in Operation Iraqi Freedom, where he was battalion commander for the Army’s 4th Infantry Division, and in Afghanistan, where he trained Afghan officers to take on the responsibility of securing their own country.

Before retiring as an Army Lieutenant Colonel, West served as a Field Artillery Officer in several combat zones: in Operation Desert Storm, in Operation Iraqi Freedom, where he was battalion commander for the Army’s 4th Infantry Division, and in Afghanistan, where he trained Afghan officers to take on the responsibility of securing their own country.
Allen West was elected to House of Representatives in November 2010.  As a Member of the House Armed Services Committee, Congressman West advances the principle that peace is best kept through a strong national defense.
Some of the positions he has taken as a Congressman include:
  •  The radical Islamist movement is one of the most dangerous threats we have ever seen, and too many government officials are ignoring the grave risks confronting the country.
  • We are a nation at war against a totalitarian theocratic political ideology that glorifies death rather than celebrating life. To defeat it, we must stay on the offensive. From Afghanistan and Iraq to the Greater Middle East and South America, radical Islam is on the march.
  •  Political correctness cannot be part of our national security system.
  • Every time Congress takes for itself new powers, not enumerated in the Constitution, it chips away at freedom, individual liberty, and the right of the people to choose what is best for them, in their communities.
  • The 2nd Amendment is an individual right.
For more information on Congressman Allen West and his positions on the important issues facing our nation, please visit his official website at:

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Democrats Hoping Hillary Clinton Can Lie Away Their Responsibility For Middle East Attacks


Hillary Clinton speech 8 SC Democrats hoping Hillary Clinton can lie away their responsibility for Middle East attacks
The one constant about Hillary Clinton is that as a good Democrat, she has always been a good liar. Having learned her skills from her degenerate husband, how could she fail to improve her lying abilities over the years she has spent “standing by her man”?
Given the explosive events unfolding by the day in her “Arab Spring” world, Clinton’s skills are going to be put to the test for as far as the eye can see. Nevertheless, truth-phobic Democrats need not worry: Hillary is in charge of this cover-up. She knows how and what lies to feed the media cheerleading lap dogs who masquerade as the America media. The only question is: can the enormity of the facts overshadow her lies? Dead Ambassadors, burned American flags, shouts of “Obama we are all Osama”, and evacuated embassies may be too hard to smother, even for a Clinton.

Lie one: There is no connection between the “spontaneous” outbreaks of “freedom of speech” in Egypt, Libya, and the rest of the Middle East.
Truth:  The Muslin Brotherhood is behind all of this, and it is all aimed at growing enough strength to successfully erase Israel from the face of the earth.  Now that Clinton and Barack Obama have insured the Muslim Brotherhood’s ascension to control of Egypt and her modern military (stocked with American and European weapons), all they need is an endless supply of drooling halfwits willing to run toward flaming Israeli machine guns and cannons to complete the job. Now thanks to Clinton and Obama, the Brotherhood has more willing martyrs than Israel has bullets.

Lie two: The halfwits are angry over a movie. By spreading this lie, the Democrats and the media are trying to make us believe that the halfwits NEED a reason to attack American interests and threaten Israel. “If only that evil Coptic Christian had not made that movie, none of this would be happening”, goes that lie.
Truth: al Qaeda is telling the truth about these attacks. It is saying they are  retaliation for drone attacks that are killing their leaders and most importantly the killing of bin Laden (but Obama TOLD us al Qaeda was finished when HE killed bin Laden).
Now patriotic American bloggers are telling the world Hillary is scrubbing the State Department’s website of references that prove her lies. She was TOLD this was coming and did nothing. She gambled with American lives, and those Americans lost their lives.

Egyptian Foreign Minister:..Obama told me he was still a Muslim

By Pamela Geller
 Egyptian Foreign Minister: Obama told me himself, I am a Muslim.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said he had a one-on-one meeting with Obama, in which President Obama told him that he was still a Muslim, the son of a Muslim father, the stepson of Muslim stepfather, that his half brothers in Kenya are Muslims, and that he was sympathetic towards the Muslim agenda.
“Finally, during the week of 14-18th of January 2010, just on the eve of my winter tour to the US, Rachel picked up a Nile TV broadcast in which Egyptian Foreign Minister Abul Gheit said on the “Round Table Show” that he had had a one on one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he was a Moslem, the son of a Moslem father and step-son of Moslem step-father, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Moslems, and that he was loyal to the Moslem agenda. He asked that the Moslem world show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some domestic American problems (Healthcare), that he would show the Moslem world what he would do with Israel.”
This is according to Israel Today here. Here is the passage from the May 2010 issue of “Israel Today.” It is on page 3 in an article titled “Obama, a ‘Strategic Catastrophe,’” by Aviel Schneider:
“The feeling among the Israeli public is that Obama is appeasing the Muslim world at the expense of Israel. “The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim,” said Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit on Nile TV.”

No More ‘Mr. Nice Guy’ Foreign Policy


Obama Appeaser Enemies SC No More Mr. Nice Guy Foreign Policy
As truth’s brilliant light breaks through the fogginess of mistruth as to the reason behind the violent anti-American sentiment currently burning its way across the globe, one thing is for sure: An internet YouTube video is not the culprit, and those who say it is are either seriously misinformed, trying to deflect blame, delusional, lying — or a little of each.
Of all the terrible scenes portraying the violence this past week, the picture most concerning is that of the video’s creator — an American citizen protected by our Constitution’s First Amendment — being ushered away by federal agents purportedly due to a potential parole violation. Sure. Got it. Or, maybe… it was an attempt to throw red meat to those in the Mideast region who seem to wear their religious sensibilities on their sleeves, since repeated apologies have not worked… Just thinking out loud here.

Let’s be honest; the Obama administration’s “Mr. Nice Guy” approach has failed miserably; those teethed on bloodshed view congeniality as weakness rather than strength. As a result, the Mideast region burns today with a raging fire kindled by fear and uncertainty because, as former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice so eloquently stated during the recent Republican National Convention, the world no longer has an answer to a most pressing question: “Where does America stand?” Every which way but loose, it seems.
In the past, America has always stood against In the past, America has always stood against evil regimes and ideologies and stood for, as Ms. Rice said, “free peoples and free markets.” Because we have an administration that wishes to stand on all sides of every issue, the world is more dangerous than it was when everyone clearly understood our position.

Attempting to have it both ways eventually forces us to either stand for our founding principles or reject them — as recently happened when the Obama administration made the preposterous decision to sacrifice our First Amendment rights on the altar of political correctness. For the unaware, the administration recently asked Google to remove the YouTube video from the internet. Thankfully, Google refused. In so doing, the Obama administration sent a loud and clear message to Muslim extremists that our Constitution is subservient to their extremist beliefs.
The story from the leader on the ground, Libyan President Mohammed el-Megarif, doesn’t mesh with the White House’s canard regarding the video. el-Megarif told Al Jazerra he believed the attacks on the embassy in Libya were preplanned by “experienced masterminds”, quite possibly connected to al Qaeda. From the BVD bombing attempt to the failed Times Square bomb plot and the Fort Hood massacre, the Obama administration has tried to paint a picture that Islamic extremism is a non-issue.
Sure, bin Laden’s dead (and GM’s alive, lest we forget), but getting one heckova lucky opportunity to sign your name to a military operation does not sound foreign policy make.

During his Cairo speech in 2009, Obama promised his leadership would be better than his predecessor’s. Obama vowed, “I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition.” One look at the flags, as dark as the Jihad they represent, rising across the Middle East will tell you who appears to be winning.
The world longs for and urgently needs American leadership, but it is missing in action. The gut-wrenching scene at Joint Base Andrews last week of four American flag-draped coffins holding the remains of patriots savagely murdered in Benghazi is proof-positive as to how badly the world needs to know where America stands.

Why Hillary Clinton Has Chris Stevens’ Blood On Her Hands


Hillary Clinton speech 9 SC Why Hillary Clinton has Chris Stevens’ blood on her hands
According to reports, the Islamist animals who murdered J. Christopher Stevens, our Ambassador to Libya, sodomized him before, while, and after he was killed. They followed the same formula they used when they murdered Gadhafi. To these 7th century “warriors”, doing such things shows the extreme disrespect they have for the male victims. In their half- witted minds, this “manly” act makes the victim a woman in death and in life after death. They are misogynist skunks who hate women because of their own sick feelings of inadequacy.  Hillary Clinton should have known these things but apparently never bothered herself with details.
The blood of J. Christopher Stevens, a man who happened to be gay but had a love of America that compelled him to step forward to work for our nation, is absolutely on the hands of Hillary Clinton as the fake she is and Barack Obama for the incompetent he is.

Clinton is a woman with no particular qualifications, except that she “took one for the team” and allowed herself to be publicly humiliated by her sexually depraved husband.
Because she “put ice on her lip” and sung “Stand by your man” on 60 Minutes, the poster boy for degradation of women was elected and reelected to the presidency. The Democrats who are a Party that rewards degenerates have been thanking Hillary ever since she and her husband sold their last pardon on January 20, 2001.
We know her career path.  She pushed aside all qualified and loyal New York State Democrats (Nita Lowey comes to mind) so she could run in the deepest Blue State that suited her fancy without a difficult race.  She tried to be the president but was out- “race-carded” as her pervert husband put it. To stay in the public’s eye, she accepted the position of  Secretary of State and has done an horrifically bad job at it. That happens when being a good Democrat is the only consideration for appointment to a position of high trust and importance.

For reasons known only to her, she successfully urged Barack Obama to help the Muslim Brotherhood overthrow the American-friendly Mubarack government in Egypt and help the Brotherhood kill Gadhafi in Libya.
Then she installed a man she knew to be gay (she said she knew him well) as the Ambassador to a country controlled by vicious gay-hating animals. She did this to win favor with America’s gay community so they would keep contributing to the Democrat Party. Now Chris Stevens has been killed and sodomized by the people Hillary Clinton helped put in power throughout the Middle East. Any questions?

Islam is at War with Obama's LGBT Administration..!

In Islamic terminology, homosexuality is alternatively called al-fahsha' (an obscene act), shudhudh (abnormality), or 'amal qawm Lut (behavior of the People of Lut). Islam teaches that believers should neither participate in nor support homosexuality.

From the Qur'an

The Qur'an shares stories which are meant to teach people valuable lessons. The Qur'an tells the story of the people of Lut (Lot), which is similar to the story as shared in the Old Testament of the Bible. We learn of an entire nation which was destroyed by God due to their obscene behavior, which included rampant homosexuality. As a prophet of God, Lut preached to his people. We also sent Lut. He said to his people: 'Will you commit lewdness such as no people in creation ever committed before you? For you come in lust to men in preference to women. No, you are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds' (Qur'an 7:80-81). In another verse, Lut advised them: 'Of all the creatures in the world, will you approach males, and leave those whom Allah has created for you to be your mates? No, you are a people transgressing (all limits)!' (Qur'an 26:165-166). The people rejected Lut and threw him out of the city. In response, God destroyed them as punishment for their transgressions and disobedience. 

Muslim scholars cite these verses to support a prohibition against homosexual behavior.

Marriage in Islam

The Qur'an describes that everything has been created in pairs which complement one another. Pairing of male and female is thus part of human nature and the natural order. Marriage and family is the accepted way in Islam for a person's emotional, psychological, and physical needs to be met. The Qur'an describes the husband/wife relationship as one of love, tenderness, and support. Procreation is another way of fulfilling human needs, for those whom God blesses with children. The institution of marriage is considered the foundation of Islamic society, the natural state in which all people have been created to live.

Punishment for Homosexual Behavior

Muslims generally believe that homosexuality stems from conditioning or exposure, and that a person who feels homosexual urges should strive to change. It is a challenge and struggle to overcome, just as others face in their lives in different ways. In Islam, there is no legal judgment against people who feel homosexual impulses but do not act upon them. In many Muslim countries, acting upon homosexual feelings -- the behavior itself -- is condemned and subject to legal punishment. The specific punishment varies among jurists, ranging from jail time or flogging, to the death penalty. In Islam, capital punishment is only reserved for the most grievous crimes which hurt society as a whole. Some jurists view homosexuality in that light, particularly in countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Yemen.

Ok let's be honest and take the gloves off ...the escalation of violence against the United States in recent months was not caused by youtube movies or trailers...The pot has been simmering since President Obama overturned DADT within the military... came out in support of Gay marriage and appointed a considerable amount of his staff,cabinet members and Ambassadors to openly homosexual persons or those who support the LGBT movement...Stories have broken on President Obama 's homosexuality and acting openly gay within the Chicago Gay community prior to his becoming President
Stories broke on the perversion within the Department of Homeland Security..lead by a Lesbian Secretary!

President Obama has embarrassed us and made us the laughing stock of the world...and our military a target for  radical Islam zealots who follow their cultural  Sharia Law...sending a homosexual Ambassador to a country that abhors openly homosexual behavior caused the death of the Ambassador his assistant as well as two innocent ex Navy seals assigned as protection. The Main Stream Media enables Obama by covering up his perverted administration therefore they are as guilty as he for the consequences we suffer...It is too late to put the proverbial cat back in the bag..what is done is done and will continue to escalate until the United States elects a administration that returns morality and respect to the United States.
At which point the Holy War against us will turn:

Monday, September 17, 2012

Did Obama send a 'gay' ambassador to Libya?

by Jerome R. Corsi 

Did President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton send a “gay” ambassador to Muslim-majority Libya, where homosexual behavior is a crime punishable by imprisonment?
Believing the “Arab Spring” countries would be encouraged to embrace democracy through left-leaning diplomats dedicated to understanding and dialoguing with Muslim communities, did a State Department under Secretary Clinton that refused to establish rules of engagement providing embassy personnel Marine Corp protection take the additional risk of placing a gay ambassador in Muslim countries?

The question comes amid claims in the diplomatic community that J. Christopher Stevens — the U.S. ambassador to Libya brutally murdered on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks — was homosexual.
The question is worth serious exploration, even if Stevens’ sexuality cannot be determined with certainty, because U.S. government Foreign Service agencies are actively recruiting from the homosexual community for diplomatic assignments overseas, including in the Middle East.
The recruitment derives from a larger policy decision Obama and Clinton have made to confront discrimination against homosexuals globally, even in Muslim countries.
Meanwhile, the Obama administration insists on attributing the deadly attack in Libya and the violent protests throughout the Muslim world as solely a reaction to a 14-minute movie trailer posted on the Internet, without acknowledging that the movie, “Innocence of Muslims,” depicts the Islamic prophet, Muhammad, as a pedophile and a homosexual.

Was Stevens gay?
A Washington Post obituary noted Stevens never married and had no children.
On a homosexual-rights blog called The New Civil Rights Movement, Jean Ann Esselink, who describes herself as “a straight friend to the gay community,” explored rumors Stevens was “gay.” She said she had heard the rumors and thought that, if true, Stevens’ story would make a good feature for the website.
She concluded: “But the truth is, I cannot tell you if Chris was gay. I can only tell you that he was a 52-year-old man without wife or child, at least one he claimed in public.”
Esselink noted the phone call Clinton made to inform his next of kin of his death went to his sister, a Seattle doctor.
“I could not find a single statement made by Chris himself, about any LGBT issue,” Esselink wrote. “Upon reflection, I suspect it is the kind of briar patch topic that Foreign Service officials avoid.”

However, Kevin DuJan, the openly homosexual founder of, told WND he spoke with two sources in Chicago diplomatic circles who said Stevens was homosexual. He also pointed to Facebook postings by Stevens’ roommate at the University of California at Berkeley, Austin Tichenor, who directed Stevens in musical productions in the 1980s.
On Sept. 12, the day after Stevens was killed, Tichenor posted a tribute on Twitter, calling Stevens an “old friend.” Tichenor’s thumbnail profile picture is a photograph from the 1980s of himself (right) embracing Stevens (left) at a college theme party, as seen in Exhibit 1.

Subsequent postings, on Tichenor’s Facebook page, were more direct.
On Sept. 14, Tichenor changed his profile picture on Facebook to the photo of himself and Stevens from the 1980s.
Also seen in Exhibit 2, a friend, Elizabeth Dennehy, posted a comment: “Brideshead Revisited? It’s so bloody sad” – a reference to the 1945 Evelyn Waugh novel.

DuJan noted that no one corrected Dennehy on her “Brideshead Revisited” posting.
“This is total gay code that, yes, these two had a sexual relationship in the past,” he said.
DuJan, a Chicago-based former gossip columnist who also has presented evidence Barack Obama is hiding a “gay life,” obtained additional confirmation from an employee of the Serbian Consulate in Chicago. The Serb told him it was “widely known” and “not a secret at all” in diplomatic circles and from others in the Chicago theater world that Stevens was “gay” and that he and Tichenor had been lovers.
Michelangelo Signorile, editor at large for the Huffington Post’s Gay Voice’s blog, ridiculed DuJan’s claim that Stevens was homosexual, characterizing DuJan as a “longtime gay conservative blogger and Tea Party smear artist.”
Signorile argued Tichenor is married and has two children, commenting: “I know: Just because a man is married to a woman doesn’t necessarily mean he can’t be in a relationship with another man, but you’d think the right-wing brigade would have mentioned the fact.”
Signorile insisted Stevens’ sexual orientation is irrelevant.
“But even if he were gay, it’s absurd to claim he couldn’t do the job, nor shouldn’t have been sent to Libya, particularly since he’d been working in foreign service in North Africa for most of his working life and doing nothing less than a stellar job according to every news report.”

DuJan countered that sending Stevens to the Muslim Middle East, where some countries punish homosexual behavior with death, is like sending “a dolphin to swim among the sharks.”
“Many on the political left who spend their lives in academia or working for the government live in this utopia,” he said. “A part of political correctness says, ‘Just because Stevens is gay, why wouldn’t we send him there.’ It’s insane not to appreciate the risks we face living in a very hostile world.”
Sarcastically, Signorile said: “It’s encouraging, though, to learn that right-wing bloggers actually do care about the well-being of American gay people. Who knew?”
Tichenor’s biography on the Reduced Shakespeare Co. website also notes he “has two kids (one of each),” although no mention of his wife, Dee Ryan, is made.
[Edit for space read complete at:
What has been established is that the U.S. State Department under the direction of Hillary Clinton had provided only minimal security for Stevens trip to Beghazi, evidently assuming he was well-loved by the Libyans, given his experience with the region and his dedication to transforming the Arab Spring into genuine democracy for Libya.
Stevens lacked a Marine security detail in Benghazi, in contrast to White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett, who appears to have a 24-hour, seven-day-a-week Secret Service detail of five or six agents, including when she vacations on Martha Vineyard, according to Democratic pollster Pat Caddell.
Fox News military analyst Col. David Hunt laid the blame for Stevens’ murder on Hillary Clinton, noting the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya prohibited Marines from providing security at any American diplomatic installation in country. Local nationals hired as security guards in Benghazi were not authorized to load their weapons with bullets.
On Sept. 15, the London Daily Telegraph reported al-Qaida “meticulously planned” the attack in Libya to occur on the anniversary of 9/11. It was ordered by al-Qaida chief Ayman al-Zawahiri in retaliation for a U.S. drone that killed al-Qaida propaganda chief Sheik Abu Yahya al-Libi in June.

Rebekah Kennedy on Twitter...!

A must follow...she is so funny,snarky down to earth and a hoot to follow...she isn't all snooty ...will talk back at ya:) Guess cause' she be a Texas girl..knows how to handle them there Dogies'...dunno fer Hey she does pretty good in spooky flicks, now there is sumpin' the SYFY channel should take note of:!
@rebekahkennedy  Rebekah Kennedy

Rebekah Kennedy Picture   Check out her site for all the latest:

Obama chastised: Come clean on Islam!

by Drew Zahn 

Voters may soon have even more reason to ask Barack Obama why his policies have aided the Muslim Brotherhood.
An organization called Let Freedom Ring is working to buy air time for a new commercial highlighting both the Brotherhood’s radical agenda and Obama’s support for the terror-tied organization.
The advertisement claims the Muslim Brotherhood seeks to conquer Israel, renew ties with Iran – a country “building nuclear weapons to slaughter the Israeli people” – and even collapse the United States from within. Is that the kind of group America’s president should be helping?
Citing a Politico news report, the ad asks, “President Obama, you invited the Muslim Brotherhood to the White House? Legitimizing a group that wants to undermine America and destroy Israel?”
Citing a CBS News report from March, the ad asks, “You sent them 1.5 billion of our dollars? Why, Mr. President? Why?”
The Muslim Brotherhood has gained strength throughout the Mideast, thanks to the power void left by the “Arab Spring” populist uprisings, which have overthrown dictators in several nations, including Egypt and Libya, only to fill new government posts with Brotherhood members.
Obama has been a public supporter of the uprisings, even providing direct assistance, including weapons and finances, to the Libyan rebels.

But only this past week, including in Egypt and Libya, radical Muslim elements have turned the Arab Spring nations into a hotbed for anti-American sentiment, including the violent and fatal storming of American embassies across the region.
Let Freedom Ring is launching its “Why, Mr. President, Why?” campaign,hoping to raise funds to air the commercial in pivotal states leading up to the 2012 election. Earlier this month, Let Freedom Ring announced a $7-million online advertising campaign claiming the Obama administration terminated the pensions of nonunion workers at Delphi auto parts plants while bailing out union workers’ pensions as part of the 2009 General Motors reorganization.
Let Freedom Ring is a non-profit, nonpartisan public policy membership organization that promotes constitutional government, economic freedom and traditional values.

U.S. out of the Mideast now!

by Joseph Farah 

It couldn’t be more clear that U.S. military – and even diplomatic – presence in the Arab Middle East does more harm than good.
It’s time to pull up stakes. America, under Barack Obama, is in no position to defend our interests there.
Our interests are two-fold:
  • oil
  • Israel
As for oil, America has reserves in excess of those of Saudi Arabia. We should drill. We should build refineries. We should harvest our natural gas supplies. We should explore and drill off shore. And we should build the Canadian pipeline.
If we do those things, we don’t need Arab oil – and the blood, aggravation, hatred and death that comes with it.
As for Israel, America has become a liability. The U.S. treats Israel like a pariah state that does not have the same rights as other sovereign nations – defending itself from unjustified attacks, building and repairing homes and businesses in its own capital, erecting fences to protect itself from maniacs who seek to kill and maim its civilians, attack and destroy nuclear facilities from neighboring countries threatening the country with annihilation.
America is no longer a blessing to Israel. It has become a curse.
At the same time we pull up stakes from the Middle East, we should end all foreign aid – not only the Middle east, but to the entire world. It’s not money we have, and it’s not constitutional to spend it this way if we had it.

If this sounds like a prescription for neo-isolationism, forgive me. That’s what it is. It’s the only policy that makes sense for America as long as we have a man in the White House who doesn’t attend daily security briefings and who seems genuinely surprised that his calculations to undermine Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, Moammar Gadhafi in Libya and Bashar Assad in Syria at the behest of the Muslim Brotherhood fanatics has backfired in the form of attacks on U.S. embassies.
Obama is reaping what he has sown. And it’s not a pretty harvest.
He doesn’t even know if Egypt is an ally or a foe.
He wouldn’t recognize an ally if one came knocking on his door – as Benjamin Netanyahu has done on more than one occasion.
In other words, his Middle East policy – like all of his foreign and domestic policies – seems calculated to bring America down.
I want to raise America up.
We can’t do that meddling in the affairs of people who hate us, despise us and want to kill us.
  • Shut the borders to any new Muslim immigration so this kind of madness doesn’t come to our shores
  • Develop our own natural resources in the U.S. and with friendly neighbors to the north so we are no longer dependent on the barbarians in the Mideast.
  • Work strategically as an ally with Israel as an equal partner – not as a bully. 
That’s what we need to do – and we need to do it now.
Barack Obama is setting the stage for a regional war – if not a world war – through his incoherent policies in the Middle East.
Get out now, wave goodbye and be done with the fanatics. Let them seethe in their own anger – and watch them turn on each other.
No more American blood should be spilled there.
Israel is quite prepared to take care of itself. We should simply green-light our friends to do whatever is necessary to defend themselves with our blessing – and sell them all the arms and munitions they need.
That’s my simple solution to what we see happening in the Middle East – simple, neat and clean.
What’s wrong with this prescription?