Lest us not Forget Lara Logan..The MB/Taliban/alQaeda are perverts

Lara Logan, CBS Reporter and Warzone 'It Girl,' Raped Repeatedly Amid Egypt Celebration 

By Simone Wilson 

Lara Logan, the "60 Minutes" firecracker who was raped at the moment of Egypt's overthrow

Update: "Lara Logan Confirms She Was Brutally and Repeatedly Raped in Egypt: Why Did the Media Think She Wasn't?" Updated after the jump: Commenters respond to bloggers respond to reporters respond to Tweeters respond to the inexcusable crime against Lara Logan.
Breaking news: South African TV journalist Lara Logan, known for her shocking good looks and ballsy knack for pushing her way to the heart of the action, was brutally and repeatedly raped while a crowd of 200 celebrated the February 11 resignation of 30-year Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.
Logan was in Tahrir Square with her "60 Minutes" news team when Mubarak's announcement broke. Then, in a rush of frenzied excitement, some Egyptian protesters apparently consummated their newfound independence by sexually assaulting the blonde reporter:
CBS News reports that "she and her team and their security were surrounded by a dangerous element amidst the celebration." Then, the horrific assault:

In the crush of the mob, she was separated from her crew. She was surrounded and suffered a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating before being saved by a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers. She reconnected with the CBS team, returned to her hotel and returned to the United States on the first flight the next morning. She is currently in the hospital recovering.

Thirty-nine-year-old Logan has long attacked Hollywood-lite reporters for their dumbing down of overseas violence -- at the same time using her Hollywood good looks and spotlight to push a more hard-hitting agenda.
In this 2008 interview with Comedy Central's Jon Stewart, the gutsy stunner calls America out on its appetite for easy, bite-sized war reporting:
http://youtu.be/CT-Hq117w8s

Strangely, Logan had just been detained by the Egyptian government during anti-Mubarak protests the week before her rape, and was reported as having returned to the U.S. momentarily on February 4.
But she went back again, hoping to catch Middle Eastern history in the making -- and fell victim to the chaos of the moment. An Esquire interview with Logan last Friday called her "insane" for making the return trip to Egypt. One chilling excerpt:

But Lara Logan, you see, is not afraid. "There's no doubt in my mind that the situation we were caught in before, we are now arriving into again," she tells The Politics Blog.

Another unsettling discovery for us, in light of Logan's brutal rape, is how viciously she's long been attacked by both right and left bloggers for her no-holds-barred approach. On February 3, Mofo Politics wrote: "OMG if I were her captors and there were no sanctions for doing so? I would totally rape her." The Huffington Post has dealt her a few blows as well.
Logan's sex life famously came under fire in 2008. From the New York Post:

Sexy CBS siren Lara Logan spent her days covering the heat of the Iraq war - but that was nothing compared to the heat of her nights. The "60 Minutes" reporter and former swimsuit model apparently courted two beaus while she was in Baghdad, and has been labeled a home wrecker for allegedly destroying the marriage of a civilian contractor there, sources said.
Passions got so hot in the combat zone that one of her lovers, Joe Burkett, brawled in a Baghdad "safe house" with her other paramour, CNN war reporter Michael Ware, a source said.
The wife of Burkett, a US Embassy worker, claims the sultry 37-year-old correspondent seduced him while bullets flew overhead.

But there are also those who've focused on appreciating her attack approach -- including one Los Angeles Times blogger, who commented on the "Daily Show" cameo:

"I for one was struck by Logan's candor. What she says about the sanitizing of war coverage borders on media sacrilege. You rarely hear that kind of opinion from a major media representative, let alone on a major television station. Impressive."

Impressive, indeed -- but nobody's invincible. For a look back at Logan's break into big journalism, see 2005 New York Times piece "War Zone 'It Girl' Has a Big Future at CBS News." 


Update: Well! Never has this girl's inbox been so thoroughly inundated with hatred. Scary stuff, guys.
Just so we're clear: Rape is awful. Logan's rape was not her fault. Nothing she did before or during the February 11 attack could have possibly invited or justified the heinous crime that was committed against her. And, just so we're clear, nowhere in providing links to her highly publicized past did we mean to suggest those facts had somehow led to her assault.
Seriously though. We may be wordy and nosy and over-saturated, but we know our human rights.
True, Salon.com, apparently looking for its own hard-hitting approach to the day's biggest story, did choose to take that angle -- meanwhile reprinting about half our story on its own pages (enough said) -- but that was another blogger's choice.
Fox News, for its part, went after one prestigious New York University fellow and rampant Tweeter in particular, a somewhat public figure who made the mistake of thumbing out some disrespectful blurbs about war mongers and small humor and his own lack of sympathies.
And NPR apparently got so fed up with the hate speech in its comment stream that it resorted to deleting all the nasty ones.

But back to Logan.
We're mostly just glad the "blonde reporter" is alive today, and hopefully recovering, hopefully well on her way back to fighting the good fight for truth, journalism and girls who happen to fall on the gorgeous side of the fight for truthful journalism.
Things are definitely looking up on that front, seeing as she had the guts to go public with the roughest story of all yesterday: her own.
Originally posted February 15 at 1:35 p.m.
[@simone_electra/swilson@laweekly.com]

In The Phony “War On Women”, Both Scripture And Science Are Ignored

By Rev. Michael Bresciani 


A hush fell on the recent vice presidential debate in Denver when moderator Martha Raddatz asked Biden and Ryan about their heartfelt views on abortion. Biden, who doesn’t mind imposing Obamacare on America and hundreds of Obama’s executive orders on everyone from Charlie Brown to law enforcement officials, said he believed in the Catholic church’s position but would not impose it on others.
Ryan stated his faith in the church’s position as well, but added that he also used reason and science to complete or inform his views. Here is a case of a full-orbed personality: balanced, honest, and discerning. Is it safe to conclude that Ryan believes that all three (religion, reason, and science) are declaring the same thing? Is it reasonable to say they all declare that life begins at conception and thus needs to be regarded, protected, and nurtured from that initial point and forward?

The majority of Americans who are now pro-life are women, thanks to dozens of organizations like One Million Moms and others; but women who have decided to ignore the cry seem to be at ease or at least mostly silent about both abortion and abuse of women and children. This is reflected repeatedly in the silence that follows reported cases of abuse against women in Muslim countries and here at home.
Mychal Massie (one of the most outspoken journalists in the nation) in an article entitled “Muhammad Must Be Okay With This” asks the question: “Where are the malicious feminists and duplicitous women’s groups that protest women are being treated unfairly because certain private organizations are not open to women? Where are the feminist women’s groups that claim to care about the health of women worldwide?” Yet more scathing, Massie concludes his article with: “As for the liberal women’s groups, the music industry and Hollywood–shut up and go away until you decide to do something that actually matters.” Massie was addressing the media silence and the lack of women’s groups decrying the shooting of a 14 year old girl on a school bus in Pakistan by members of the Taliban. Malala Yousafzai’s only offense was to advocate for the education of women. Malala’s stand for women’s rights, human rights, should shame those who are carrying the fight for their so called ‘reproductive rights’; but if the news is any indicator, it has only caused them to flash their canines with renewed ferocity.
Does reason and science actually join with scripture and with religion to declare what liberal women of the day declare? Is it simply the right to decide about their own bodies? Do molecular biologists and geneticists have anything to say about the theory of ‘it’s my body’? Apparently, they do, and so does science’s sister that we still refer to as human reasoning.

An article I wrote titled “The Philosophy of Abortion – Intrinsically Flawed” drew a response from one woman whose sense of reason was well-honed. She invoked both science and reason by reminding me and my readers that if we were to check the DNA of any unborn child, we would be forced to declare that the child was indeed a separate human being. Mitochondrial DNA proves only that the unborn child came from the mother, but the entire DNA makeup of the child is different from its mother. In no uncertain terms, that means that it is a separate body with its own DNA; it is not the body of the mother. It is here we begin to see why some people are unafraid to call abortion murder.
If the child were found alone and deceased after connecting it to its mother by comparing the mitochondrial DNA to her, no one would say they found the body of the mother, no one – including law enforcement, religionists, scientists, thinking people, and perhaps even other children.
The only exception would be left thinking, liberal women who have declared that they are in a war. They seem to have missed the fact that they are the only combatants in history who are not actually dying in battle; only their children are!
In this day of perversity, twisted thinking, and rampant selfishness, no single scripture passage addresses this modern social ague better than this verse from the Great King Solomon. To wit:
“There is a way that seems right to a man, (or a woman) but its end is the way of death.” Proverbs 14: 12 NKJV (parenthesis mine)

Obama Campaign Borrows $15M From Bank Of America

Breaking News

Obama For America took out a $15 million loan from Bank of America last month, according to the campaign’s October monthly FEC report. The loan was incurred on September 4 and is due November 14, eight days after the election. OFA received an interest rate of 2.5% plus the current Libor rate.
Warren Buffett, Obama donor and namesake of the infamous “Buffett Rule,” invested $5 billion in Bank of America last year in an effort to help the ailing financial institution. Last month, two weeks after OFA took out the loan, Bank of America announced a plan that would lay off 16,000 workers by the end of the year.

Read more at The Washington Free Beacon.
Photo credit: I-5 Design & Manufacture (Creative Commons)

Who Cares What They Think?

By Ron-Reale 



I just can’t seem to muster up any concern or care for the ignorant and still uninformed to which I am supposed to waste my time repeating what I have been saying for years.
Everyone knows about our failed President’s allegiance to terrorists and America-haters like Bill Ayers, Reverend Wright, Hugo Chavez, and the Muslim Brotherhood. What else is there to say about his traitorous associates and his financial support for those buying weapons to kill us with the American taxpayer’s monies given to them by Barack Obama? If people aren’t aware of this by now, I don’t care if they never take another breath, let alone steal my time trying to educate them.

Everyone knows our failed President “saved” GM from a real bankruptcy by stealing the company from the investors who owned it and giving it to his union thug buddies (the same people that drove the company into bankruptcy in the first place), so the corrupt UAW would continue to support him with money and votes while stealing upwards of 30 BILLION dollars from the taxpayers to continue the corrupt contracts they would have lost under a real bankruptcy reorganization. If people aren’t aware of this by now, I don’t care if they never take another breath, let alone steal my time trying to educate them.

It is common knowledge amongst the non-brain dead that billions of dollars of stimulus monies have been misused and given to companies run by our failed President’s contributors and backers, companies like Solyndra. If people aren’t aware of this by now, I don’t care if they never take another breath, let alone steal my time trying to educate them.
All of the networks seem to care about what the least intelligent, most ignorant of the world, so-called undecided voters think.
WHO CARES WHAT THEY THINK?
They obviously haven’t paid any attention to the reality of the last 4 years. They obviously don’t have the capacity to think and are going through life blissfully unaware of what the difference between American capitalism and socialism and Marxism. If they did not know enough to make this decision 4 years ago, I don’t care if they never take another breath, let alone steal my time trying to educate them.
Ignorance is bliss.
I can’t muster up the enthusiasm to care if they live, never mind try to appeal to an obviously non-existent modicum of intelligence in the vacuum of their minds.
Photo credit: iambrianna (Creative Commons)

Video: Muslim Brotherhood Behind Benghazi Attack With Link To Obama

By Kris Zane 

http://youtu.be/sR_xo1uBTk8 





On September 10, 2012, the amateurish, anti-Muslim YouTube video “Innocence of Muslims” had been on the Internet for three months with exactly seventeen views.
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, UN Ambassador Susan Rice, and an army of Obama surrogates conducted a media blitz blaming this obscure video no one had seen for the entire Middle East exploding on 9/11, including a “protest turned violent” at the Libyan consulate that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

We later learned that there was no protest.
We later learned that intelligence on the ground linked it to a terrorist group within twenty-four hours.
We later learned that the Muslim Brotherhood president of Egypt, Mohammed Morsi, was behind the attack.
We now know it was not initially an attack, but an attempted kidnapping of Ambassador Stevens to use him as a pawn to get their beloved Blind Sheik back.

What is most shocking, however, is that a source within the White House states that it was arranged as an October surprise by Barack Obama. Obama, in order to make the release of the Blind Sheik more palatable to the American people, and to boost his sagging approval ratings, arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap Ambassador Stevens. Then, days before the election, acting the part of the hero, planned to release the Blind Sheik in exchange for Ambassador Stevens.
The plan was for security to be minimal at the consulate, protected by only Libyan security guards who would melt away into the night at the appointed time.
The plan fell apart as two former SEALs, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, fought the kidnappers, leading to a firefight and subsequent fire, killing Stevens, Woods, Doherty, and also Sean Smith, a communications specialist.
Obama then had to create a cover-up so massive that it will go down in the history books until the end of time.

Obama’s Media Allies Struggle To Conceal Red Mentor

By Cliff Kincaid 


A liberal writer named Elspeth Reeve, who writes for “The Atlantic” magazine, frets that Barack Obama’s relationship to Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis is getting more attention from voters and may constitute an “October surprise” that dooms the President’s re-election chances. She calls Davis only an “alleged communist” when in fact he was a card-carrying CPUSA member with a 600-page FBI file.
Her story goes further downhill from there, clearly suggesting that Obama’s media backers are worried and desperate to conceal the truth.

Practicing a new form of damage control, she acknowledges that “Davis was important to Obama” because the evidence of the relationship cannot be denied, but claims that “Obama doesn’t seem to have been important to Davis.” Her evidence for this claim is that Davis biographer John Edgar Tidwell was quoted as saying that there was no mention of Obama in any of Davis’s papers. She thinks this gap in the record somehow gets Obama off the hook for a relationship with a communist who doubled as a pornographer.
But what she is acknowledging, without saying so directly, is that Davis did not want his relationship with Obama to be revealed. This makes sense, especially if Davis was a Communist Party member under FBI surveillance engaged in espionage or recruitment. His file does suggest espionage on his part. The relationship was disclosed back in 2007 when a CPUSA writer talked about it, leading to the identification of “Frank” in Obama’s book, Dreams from My Father, as Frank Marshall Davis. The appropriate question, never asked by the major media, is why Obama would cover up Frank’s real identity. He makes a reference to “Frank” 22 times in his book.

Before I gave a speech on the subject of Davis at the September 21st AIM conference, Paul Kengor, author of a book on Davis, The Communist, told me, “I haven’t received a single media inquiry from anyone in the mainstream media, despite the book making the top 10 on the New York Times’ bestseller list and hitting number 1 in non-fiction on both Amazon and Barnes & Noble.com. Not one reporter from the mainstream media has bothered to contact me…They will do anything to protect Barack Obama. The truth be damned.”
The cover-up is getting more intense as Election Day approaches.
Paul Kengor now draws our attention to the fact that Obama’s audio version of Dreams from My Father has omitted every reference to “Frank” that was in the book.
For example, the book says, “It was the same dilemma that old Frank had posed to me the year I left Hawaii.” The audio version says, “It was the same dilemma posed to me the year I left Hawaii.”
Kengor told The Blaze, “This is blatant, flagrant—clearly a concealment. And it’s in Obama’s voice. There’s no question that Obama knew of this. No question.”
Joel Gilbert maintains that the cover-up stems from the fact that Davis was not only Obama’s mentor but his biological father. He has produced “Dreams from My Real Father,” a film being distributed to millions of voters in various swing states.
Gilbert reports that 1.5 Million DVDs of the film have been shipped to Florida; 700,000 to Colorado; 500,000 to Iowa; 1.2 million to Ohio; 100,000 to New Hampshire; 100,000 to Nevada; and 3 million are going to Pennsylvania, Virginia, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
“Because almost all levels of the mainstream media are suppressing the information in ‘Dreams from My Real Father,’ my distribution company is mailing millions of free copies of the DVD across the United States,” Gilbert says.

His theory is controversial, so much so that Gilbert tells me that The Washington Post, USA Today, and The New York Times would not run paid ads for it. “This ad has been declined,” the Times told Gilbert, with no further explanation.
On the other hand, The Washington Post and USA Today did run paid ads from pornographer Larry Flynt offering $1 million for information on Mitt Romney’s “unreleased tax forms” and bank accounts.
When the New York Post ran Gilbert’s paid ad, MSNBC’s Alex Wagner went ballistic and came to Obama’s defense. She labeled Davis a mere “labor activist,” continuing a cover-up in the media that has been going on for over four years.
The Gilbert film is now available through Netflix, the Internet subscription service that sends movies and TV programs over the internet to PCs, Macs, and TVs. Netflix has more than 27 million members.
This article originally appeared at AccuracyInMedia.com. 
Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)

“October Surprise” by feminist attorney Gloria Allred against GOP nominee Mitt Romney.

by Tim Brown 


The Republican party is preparing itself to fight back against what has only been rumored as an “October Surprise” by feminist attorney Gloria Allred against GOP nominee Mitt Romney.
Matt Drudge tweeted on Thursday: “Here she comes. Hearing Gloria Allred out there again, about to make a move. After all, it’s her time of the campaign. Team O at the ready!!”

“We’re doing too well to risk ‘an Allred,’ she can be stopped, but it will take action on our behalf,” a GOP watchdog group blogged, asking supporters to contact Romney’s campaign headquarters, the Republican National Committee and Judicial Watch.
Allred, an outspoken supporter of President Barack Obama refused to confirm, or deny, Drudge’s prediction, telling RadarOnline.com: “I have no comment at this time about Mr. Drudge’s Tweet. I don’t discuss meetings with potential clients.”
The Red Side of Life, Conservative Musings from New York says on their website, “Gloria Allred Prepares Anti-Mitt Strike. You Can STOP Her Now! (action!) Don’t underestimate Gloria Allred’s ability to inflict damage. The media will ‘eat up’ anything she feeds them and turn it into an endless scandal. Recall she took down Cain and RINO Whitman with NO EVIDENCE. We’re doing too well to risk ‘an Allred.’ She can be stopped, but it will take action on our behalf.”

 

“Please make these two calls,” the blog asks. “We will only get their attention if we bombard them. If you get VM, leave a message,” to the Republican National Committee and Mitt Romney’s national presidential campaign headquarters.
“The critical points to get across: Warn them about the pending attack (they really may not know) – Explain the severity of damage Allred can inflict – Demand that they get their teams of lawyers to launch a pre-emptive strike against Allred, coming down on her first like a ton of bricks -This is no trifling matter. Let’s roll!”
With just three weeks left till election day and the race in the final stretch, with the last debate next week anything is likely to come out, whether there is evidence or not and as we’ve seen in the past, it’s usually the latter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

OpEd:Jack 

Since Gloria Allred loves to defame....embarrass and sue...let's take a look at her background...hmmmm

To start with Gloria hates hetrosexual males and hangs around alot in Gay West Hollywood with the famous as well as the not so famous:

 

http://youtu.be/hvULHNhsy2M 

http://youtu.be/T0Wf_oBx2_M 

http://youtu.be/va6waD6ShuI

CALIFORNIA | LOCAL

Sparks Fly in Allred vs. Allred : Courts: Feminist attorney's ex-husband puts on gloves in bankruptcy hearing.

February 26, 1992 | SCOTT HARRIS, TIMES STAFF WRITER

For many years, William C. Allred had seemed the most docile of husbands, a quiet, patient man who lived in the shadow of his famous wife. To hear him tell it, he proudly helped make Gloria Allred the woman she is today, loyally supporting her climb to fame, fortune and influence as a firebrand feminist attorney. But now that he's out of prison, and now that the matter of Allred vs. Allred is in federal bankruptcy court, Bill Allred isn't so docile anymore.

CALIFORNIA | LOCAL

Judge Tells Allred to Produce Records

July 25, 1989

In the first day of a trial to determine how the assets of attorney Gloria Allred and her ex-husband should be divided, Glendale Superior Court Judge Joseph Kalin on Monday ordered Allred to produce financial records of her holdings in her Los Angeles law firm. William Allred is seeking half his ex-wife's holdings in the law firm--Allred, Maroko, Goldberg & Ribakoff--while Gloria Allred is seeking half of William Allred's share in his aerospace company, Donallco Inc.

Gloria Allred's Estranged Mate, 3 Others Convicted of Fraud

October 20, 1987 | United Press International

A federal court jury has convicted four executives of a North Hollywood aircraft parts company of conspiring to defraud the government by selling bogus parts to Kelly Air Force Base. Those convicted were Donallco Inc. President William Allred, 56, estranged husband of attorney Gloria Allred; product manager Antoine Haddad, 52; supervisor Soren Hansen, and engineering department chief Lou Milhous. 

NEWS

Allred's Estranged Spouse Faces Texas Fraud Hearing

February 14, 1987

The estranged husband of attorney Gloria Allred, his daughter and two other officers of his North Hollywood aircraft parts firm were ordered Friday by a federal magistrate to return to Texas to face an indictment charging them with selling counterfeit parts to the Air Force. U.S. Magistrate Ralph Geffen told the four to appear in U.S. District Court in San Antonio after attorneys for the defendants agreed to waive all proceedings here.

As the old saying goes where there is smoke there is fire..and Gloria Allred will be put under the proverbial spotlight if she so chooses to attack Mitt Romney!

Video: Obama Event Goers On Benghazi: What?!?

OpEd:Jack
OMG and we lowered the voting age to 18...Good Lord they don't even teach Current Events in Universities today...what the hell do they teach except for Protesting 101,102,103 etc etc?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Revealing Politics went to the Ohio University campus to an Obama event on October 17th to find out what the President’s supporters thought about the September 11 Benghazi attacks. Turns out they didn’t think much, as most of the event attendees we interviewed had never even heard of it.

http://youtu.be/A2EoZq2rXXI

Anatomy Of Obama’s Cover-Up

By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown 


9-11 has turned into a nightmare once again. Al Qaida has chosen this day on the calendar for regular attacks on the “Great Satan”, aka the United States of America. But this year is particularly troublesome because not only did Americans die in the attacks, but this year our own government decided to lie about it.

2012 being an election year, nothing can be allowed to break the campaigning President from his re-election talking point that Al Qaida has been vanquished into the dark recesses of history. Barack Obama has spent much of the year boasting about his success in defeating Al Qaida and killing their leader, Osama Bin Laden.
If this vanquished foe can reach from their grave on the anniversary of 9-11 and kill an American Ambassador, then the campaign rhetoric about how he, Barack Obama, has kept us safe is blown to bits.
So instead of the truth, we have been spoon-fed a first-class cover-up. The first phase of the cover-up was to mislead America. Rather than call the attack terrorism, we were given a steady stream of official statements intended to make us believe the attack in Benghazi, Libya was merely a demonstration about a YouTube video gone wrong.

Here are some examples of the Obama Administration’s cover-up lies.
Starting at the top on September 12th, Barack Obama told us this: “Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts…No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.”
Read Obama’s statement closely and make up your own mind. We don’t think he called the attack terrorism, but we publish the whole paragraph so you can make your own determination.
But to put his statement into context, we share some administration comments that came after the September 12th statement.
The next day, September 13th, Obama’s spokesman Jay Carney said this: “I think it’s important to note with regards to that protest that there are protests taking place in different countries across the world that are responding to the movie that has circulated on the Internet. As Secretary Clinton said today, the United States government had nothing to do with this movie. We reject its message and its contents. We find it disgusting and reprehensible.”
It isn’t the killing of our Ambassador that Carney is calling reprehensible; it is this YouTube video.

Then on September 14th, Hillary Clinton said this: “We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.” Again, the focus is on the video.
Later that day, Carney said at a news briefing: “I have seen that report, and the story is absolutely wrong. We were not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent. That report is false.”
But the most damning evidence of a cover-up is when Susan Rice, America’s Ambassador to the UN, made the rounds of the major Sunday shows saying: “Based on the best information we have to date … it began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video…. We do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.”
Only the Obama Administration saw it this way. We had more honesty from Mohamed Yusuf al-Magariaf, president of Libya’s General National Congress. He told us just the opposite on September 16th: “The way these perpetrators acted and moved, and their choosing the specific date for this so-called demonstration, this leaves us with no doubt that this was preplanned, predetermined.”
You get the picture. As late as September 25th, Barack Obama was not willing to call the Benghazi attack terrorism, pure and simple. Instead, he was still saying: “We are still doing an investigation.”
Obama definitely doesn’t want to be pinned down and is currently trying to re-write history, but we think any dispassionate review of the statements and the timeline shows that Obama and his people are engaged in a cover-up. Why? Obama is desperate to retain power and the presidency.

Video: Democrat Strategist: “It’s Over” For Obama

OpEd: Jack
Cracking up watching Bob try to spin and backtrack on this one...give it up Bob ya know it's over...TD has been accomplished...find another line of work...lol
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Fox News’ “The Five”, former Democratic strategist Bob Beckel sounded defeated when reflecting on today’s Gallup poll showing Mitt Romney taking a 52-45 percent lead over Barack Obama nationally. “It’s over. If these numbers are true, it’s over,” Beckel said.
 “It’s over. I don’t have anything else to say. It’s over… If I was looking at those numbers and I was managing a presidential campaign I would be upset. But if those numbers are correct – It is over. It is over.”

Via Breitbart TV:  Watch video > http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/10/wow-bob-beckel-on-romneys-latest-poll-numbers-it-is-over-its-over-video/comment-page-3/

President Obama Detailed

By Thomas Paine 


Obama is an insolent, militant, incompetent, narcissistic, execrable, America-hating slug. He is a union slave who has never worked a day in his life; yet he blames the failures of those who chose their own path on the successes of those who earned their way through hard work and commitment to family, community, and country.
He is an opportunistic community agitator and a dishonest predator, constantly on the prowl for a situation or occurrence that he can exploit to benefit his agenda, no matter how it affects the future of the nation. He hates American culture, American values, and American people. He hates the Constitution of the United States, and he abhors the Declaration of Independence.

He is a proponent of separatist multiculturalism and its inherent disruption of progress toward a unified America and the common good of all citizens. He is for open borders and closed minds. He has no regard for the rule of law or for the fair and impartial, yet critical judgment of criminals and terrorists.
He is for INSTANT EQUALITY, and he is against EQUAL OPPORTUNITY.
He is a Godless worm who is in favor of continual government intervention so as to alter the courses and lives of those who are the least fit to survive and prosper.

He is for Affirmative Action, political correctness, welfare, never-ending unemployment benefits, unbridled labor union power, globalism, wealth redistribution, restriction of free speech and movement, energy-based strangulation of business and prosperity, punishment through taxation, and the ridiculous notion that human beings can affect the climate.
He has a progressive, leftist, talking-point excuse for each and every one of his patriotic, social, intellectual, and contributory shortcomings, of which there are many.
He is pathetic.
He is Liberal.
He is Marxist.
He is a Democrat.
He is Barack Obama.
Most disconcerting of all, he is the “President”.

OpEd: Jack
WTF...Over! I have just about had enough of the LGBT movement...to be honest they are all nuts..all suffering from a classic 'Freudian Complex'...aka 'Caligula' they can't make up their minds if they are 'Gay' or out of 'gender'... until they can prove without a doubt DNA is the cause... we must rebuke this entire concept of being born that way...they are mental cases with a rediculous cause! Enough is Enough of this social experiment....soldiers do not need to deal with this crap!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Breaking News

Lesbian Soldier Begins Sex-Change Process During Deployment To Afghanistan

October 19, 2012 By Breaking News Leave a Comment

(CNSNews.com) – A 26-year-old lesbian deployed to Afghanistan reportedly brought along male hormones — part of her ongoing sex change from female to male, the Military Times reported this week.

The Specialist — who eventually plans to take the name “Keith” — says she has been legally married to a woman for the past two years. Contacted in Afghanistan by the newspaper, Keith said her voice is getting deeper: “I’m getting more muscle. I feel more energy. I feel more like myself,” she was quoted as saying. 

Keith also told the Military Times that her deployment to Afghanistan is a good opportunity to start taking male hormones: “I work out about every day, so the body definition is looking good.” She said she’s able to work out more when she’s deployed than she could when she’s home.

The article notes that the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” last year allowed homosexuals to serve openly in the military, but it did not address transgender individuals. The Military Times said under military policy, troops diagnosed with “gender identity disorder” are deemed medically unfit for service and face administration separation.

Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), a group that advocates “full LGBT equality” in the U.S. military, says transgender service is one of the issues that still must be addressed: 

Read More at cnsnews.com . By Susan Jones.

Video: Ouch!… Palin Slaps Down Bob Beckel On Death Panels

Sarah Palin slapped down liberal crank Bob Beckel yesterday on The Five. Beckel tried to bash the former Alaska governor but came up short. It was brutal.

http://youtu.be/mfeuoiNlj-U

Barack Obama hasn't a clue what the 2nd Amendment is about!

Barry Obama grew up in 'Lost World' Hasn't a clue where he is from nor who his Papa really is...but he can write great sequels to 'Fantasy Island'...'Da plane boss da plane' ...FYI Barry the 2nd amendment gives us the right to bear arms for our own protection from the evils of the world...be they domestic or foreign ! Maybe you should get some CD's of the old TV series 'Have Gun will Travel' Just about sums up 'Middle America' and how we cherish our God Given rights!

http://youtu.be/tgvxu8QY01s

SNOPES Try To Cover Up Obama’s Ring

People, don’t trust Snopes.com. They are liberal hacks and apologists for Barack Hussein Obama. Here, they are caught with their pants down.
http://youtu.be/oQLTI6-oNew

Teacher forces student to do 'Islamic hand sign'

WND Exclusive

A Chesapeake, Va., teacher is facing a charge of assault for allegedly forcing a student to do an “Islamic hand sign,” leaving the young girl “dripping with blood,” according to a report in The Blaze.
While police have confirmed the incident, school district officials  have said the case is a “personnel issue” and they are not allowed to divulge many details. And while the teacher identified by The Blaze as the suspect, Tara Harris, is scheduled to appear in court in a few days, her side of the story remains unclear.

The report said the elementary school teacher was trying to teach students an “Islamic hand sign” when she yanked the arm of the student, the 10-year-old daughter of Stephanie Bennett, and the student was injured.
“When [the student] didn’t get [the hand sign] right, [Harris] went over and yanked her hand out of her desk and my daughter’s hand got hung up on the metal wire on her file folder and the skin got caught on it,” said the mother.
“The other children saw my daughter’s hand dripping with blood after the teacher had gotten so mad that she went to twist my daughter’s hand into an Islamic sign.”
The mother told The Blaze she called police as soon as she learned what had happened. She said the school confirmed the teacher was placed on administrative leave. She said later the school told her the teacher was terminated from the system.
Officer Leo Kosinski in Chesapeake told The Blaze Harris was charged with a misdemeanor and released on a summons.

See Robert Spencer’s stunning conclusions in “Did Muhammad Exist?” – which reveals the “surprisingly shaky historical foundations for Islam.”
“It’s still a criminal charge. It happened at the school and it involved a student,” he said.
Bennett, whose daughter attends Butts Road Intermediate School in Chesapeake, said this teacher previously has tried to “indoctrinate” students in Islamic thought. The incident, on Oct. 2, happened this way, she said: “The teacher was going over Islamic hand signs with the children – she stayed on this issue for two days straight during their reading and math class.”
Her daughter, who suffers a “processing disorder,” was unable to meet the teacher’s demands, and the teacher became frustrated and tried to twist the girl’s fingers into the correct position.
The report said the daughter confirmed the teacher “prays to Allah in Arabic” several times a day and has explained how Islam is superior to other religions.
Another parent, Nita Reddit, told The Blaze that the story was confirmed by her son.
The Blaze said the school board met Oct. 8, and the minutes reflect a closed session regarding “personnel.”

Did Reuters file misleading Benghazi report?

by Aaron Klein 


NEW YORK – In the immediate aftermath of the jihadist attack against the U.S. mission in Benghazi, did Reuters file a false or misleading report quoting a purported protester by his first name who described a supposedly popular demonstration against an anti-Muhammad film outside the U.S. building?
According to new, vivid accounts provided by the State Department and intelligence officials, no such popular demonstration took place. Instead, video footage from Benghazi reportedly shows an organized group of armed men attacking the compound, the officials said.

The new account directly contradicts multiple statements by President Obama and White House officials who had claimed there was a civilian protest before the attacks and that the demonstration was an expression of anger over a YouTube video that mocked Muhammad.
Purchase a copy of “Fool Me Twice” by Aaron Klein and Brenda Elliott and receive a FREE copy of their New York Times bestseller “The Manchurian President.”
The new account also conflicts with a Reuters report from Sept. 13 – two days after the attack – describing a supposedly popular protest outside the U.S. mission and even claiming to quote a protester.
Reads the report: “Accounts from Libyan and U.S. officials, and from locals who watched what began as a protest on Tuesday against a crudely made American film that insults the Prophet Mohammad spiral into violence and a military-style assault on U.S. troops, point to a series of unfortunate choices amid the confusion and fear.”
The article quotes one protester and only by his first name, described as “a 17-year-old student named Hamam, who spoke to Reuters at the devastated compound on Wednesday.”
Reuters quotes “Hamam” as saying, “When we had heard that there was a film that was insulting to the Prophet, we, as members of the public, and not as militia brigades, we came to the consulate here to protest and hold a small demonstration.”

“Hamam” further claimed that a rumor had spread that a protester had been wounded by firing from inside the U.S. mission, and so Hamam and many others went off to retrieve guns which, Reuters reported, like many Libyans, they keep at home for security.
What really went on at Benghazi ‘consulate’
Like scores of news articles worldwide, the Reuters piece repeatedly referred to the attacked U.S. compound in Benghazi as a “consulate.”
However, as WND reported earlier this week, the building was not a consulate and at no point functioned as one. Instead, the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi served as a meeting place to coordinate aid for the rebel-led insurgencies in the Middle East, according to Middle Eastern security officials. Among the tasks performed inside the building was collaborating with Arab countries on the recruitment of fighters – including jihadists – to target Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.

The distinction may help explain why there was no major public security presence at what has been described as a “consulate.” Such a presence would draw attention to the shabby, nondescript building that was allegedly used for such sensitive purposes.
Since the mission was attacked last month, countless news media reports around the world have referred to the obscure post as a U.S. consulate. That theme continues to permeate the media, with articles daily referencing a “consulate” in Benghazi.
U.S. officials have been more careful in their rhetoric while not contradicting the media narrative that a consulate was attacked.
In his remarks on the attack, Obama has referred to the Benghazi post as a “U.S. mission.” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has similarly called the post a “mission.”
A consulate typically refers to the building that officially houses a consul, who is the official representatives of the government of one state in the territory of another. The U.S. consul in Libya, Jenny Cordell, works out of the embassy in Tripoli.
Consulates at times function as junior embassies, providing services related to visas, passports and citizen information.

On Aug. 26, about two weeks before his was killed, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens attended a ceremony marking the opening of consular services at the Tripoli embassy.
“I’m happy to announce that starting on Monday, August 27, we are ready to offer a full range of consular services to Libyans,” stated Stevens at the ceremony in Tripoli. “This means non-immigrant visas, as well as assistance to Americans residing in, or visiting, Libya.”
The main role of a consulate is to foster trade with the host and care for its own citizens who are traveling or living in the host nation.
Diplomatic missions, on the other hand, maintain a more generalized role. A diplomatic mission is simply a group of people from one state or an international inter-governmental organization present in another state to represent matters of the sending state or organization in the receiving state.
The State Department website lists no consulate in Benghazi.
Last week, the State Department gave a vivid account of Stevens’ final day during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. It was disclosed that about an hour before the attack began, Stevens concluded his final meeting of the day with a Turkish diplomat. Turkey has been leading the insurgency against Assad’s regime.

Last month, WND broke the story that Stevens played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Assad’s regime in Syria, according to Egyptian security officials.
Stevens served as a key contact with the Saudis to coordinate the recruitment by Saudi Arabia of Islamic fighters from North Africa and Libya. The jihadists were sent to Syria via Turkey to attack Assad’s forces, said the security officials.
The officials said Stevens also worked with the Saudis to send names of potential jihadi recruits to U.S. security organizations for review. Names found to be directly involved in previous attacks against the U.S., including in Iraq and Afghanistan, were ultimately not recruited by the Saudis to fight in Syria, said the officials.
Stevens and three other American diplomats were killed on Sept. 11 in an attack blamed on Islamists.
One witness to the mob scene in Libya said some of the gunmen attacking the U.S. installation had identified themselves as members of Ansar al-Shariah, which represents al-Qaida in Yemen and Libya.
The al-Qaida offshoot released a statement denying its members were behind the deadly attack, but a man identified as a leader of the Ansar brigade told Al Jazeera the group indeed took part in the Benghazi attack.

Al-Qaida among U.S.-supported rebels
As WND reported, questions remain about the nature of U.S. support for the revolutions in Egypt and Libya, including reports the U.S.-aided rebels that toppled Muammar Gadhafi’s regime in Libya consisted of al-Qaida and jihad groups. The U.S. provided direct assistance, including weapons and finances, to the Libyan rebels.
Similarly, the Obama administration is currently aiding the rebels fighting Assad’s regime in Syria amid widespread reports that al-Qaida jihadists are included in the ranks of the Free Syrian Army. Earlier this month, Obama announced $50 million more in aid to the Syrian rebels.
During the revolution against Gadhafi’s regime, the U.S. admitted to directly arming the rebel groups.
At the time, rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi admitted in an interview that a significant number of the Libyan rebels were al-Qaida fighters, many of whom had fought U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He insisted his fighters “are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists,” but he added that the “members of al-Qaida are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader.”
Adm. James Stavridis, NATO supreme commander for Europe, admitted Libya’s rebel force may include al-Qaida: “We have seen flickers in the intelligence of potential al-Qaida, Hezbollah.”
Former CIA officer Bruce Riedel went even further, telling the Hindustan Times: “There is no question that al-Qaida’s Libyan franchise, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, is a part of the opposition. It has always been Gadhafi’s biggest enemy and its stronghold is Benghazi. What is unclear is how much of the opposition is al-Qaida/Libyan Islamic Fighting Group – 2 percent or 80 percent.”

In Syria, meanwhile, the U.S. may be currently supporting al-Qaida and other jihadists fighting with the rebels targeting Assad’s regime.
In August, WND quoted a senior Syrian source claiming at least 500 hardcore mujahedeen from Afghanistan, many of whom were spearheading efforts to fight the U.S. there, were killed in clashes with Syrian forces last month.
Also last month, WND reported Jihadiya Salafia in the Gaza Strip, a group that represents al-Qaida in the coastal territory, had declared three days of mourning for its own jihadists who died in Syria in recent weeks.
There have been widespread reports of al-Qaida among the Syrian rebels, including in reports by Reuters and the New York Times.
WND reported in May there was growing collaboration between the Syrian opposition and al-Qaida as well as evidence the opposition is sending weapons to jihadists in Iraq, according to an Egyptian security official.
The military official told WND that Egypt has reports of collaboration between the Syrian opposition and three al-Qaida arms, including one the operates in Libya:

• Jund al-Sham, which is made up of al-Qaida militants who are Syrian, Palestinian and Lebanese;
• Jund al-Islam, which in recent years merged with Ansar al-Islam, an extremist group of Sunni Iraqis operating under the al-Qaida banner and operating in Yemen and Libya;
• Jund Ansar al-Allah, an al-Qaida group based in Gaza linked to Palestinian camps in Lebanon and Syria.

U.S. officials have stated the White House is providing nonlethal aid to the Syrian rebels while widespread reports have claimed the U.S. has been working with Arab countries to ensure the opposition in Syria is well armed.

Obama cuts deal with Iran over nukes

by Reza Kahlili 


Iranian and U.S. negotiators have reached an agreement that calls for Iran to halt part of its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of many of the U.S. sanctions against the Islamic regime, according to a highly placed source.
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, expects a letter from President Obama in a few days guaranteeing the details of the agreement, arrived at recently during secret negotiations in Doha, Qatar.

The source, who remains anonymous for security reasons and is highly placed in Iran’s regime, said that once Khamenei receives Obama’s guarantees, he will authorize an announcement by Iran on a solution to the nuclear crisis before the U.S. presidential elections.
The agreement calls for Iran to announce a temporary halt to partial uranium enrichment after which the U.S. will remove many of its sanctions, including those on the Iranian central bank, no later than by the Iranian New Year in March. Iran is in the throes of massive inflation and citizen unrest because of the sanctions.
French intelligence verified today that Yukiya Amano, the current director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, has been given the go-ahead by the U.S. to be ready to travel to Iran and announce the agreement, according to Hamid Reza Zakeri, a former intelligence officer in the regime who has defected to Europe.
The source in Tehran said Khamenei has made it clear that unless he receives Obama’s written guarantees, he will not begin the process, which would dramatically boost Obama’s re-election chances. If the guarantees are not given, Khamenei has warned, Iran will speed up its nuclear program.

The guarantees would ensure the regime’s right to peaceful enrichment, quickly remove many of the sanctions, accept that Iran’s nuclear program does not have a military dimension and relieve international pressure on the regime while it continues its nuclear program. Also, the U.S. would announce that the killing of Iranian nuclear scientists was the work of a foreign country, though Israel would not be named, to increase legal pressure on Israel.
According to the Iranian source, a previous Obama letter to Khamenei indicated that it’s best for the regime not to give any motive to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, a message that was re-emphasized in the Qatar negotiations.
As reported exclusively by WND Oct. 4, a three-person delegation led by a woman on behalf of the Obama administration traveled to Qatar about Oct. 1 and met with Iranian counterparts, including Ali Akbar Velayati, the former foreign minister of the Islamic regime and a close adviser to Khamenei on international matters.

In the meeting, according to the source, the U.S. delegation urged an announcement, even if only on a temporary nuclear deal, before the U.S. elections to help Obama get re-elected. A Romney presidency, the delegation said, would surely move more toward Israel, and the Iranians were reminded that Obama has stood up to Israel against any plans to attack Iran. The regime’s delegate was urged to understand that if Iran does not stand by Obama, Israel will attack Iran.
Days after the WND report, Ali Akbar Salehi, the regime’s foreign minister, in an
interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel, stated, “If our right to enrichment is guaranteed, we are prepared to offer an exchange.”
The same message was relayed by several other officials of the regime.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said recently in Kazakhstan that the sanctions can be lifted immediately if Tehran worked with world powers to address questions about its nuclear program.
In the Qatar meeting, according to the Iranian source, the American woman delegate, who has had several meetings with Velayati during the past several years, jokingly told Velayati that she will be the next secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development in a second Obama administration and that it would be wise for Iranians to invest in U.S. real estate.

In the past five months, four meetings were held in the U.S. with the Islamic regime’s surrogates to hash out what was to be discussed at the Doha meeting. The source identified Valerie Jarrett, a senior Obama adviser, as the head of the U.S. effort to engage Iran. Also identified was Cyrus Amir Mokri, assistant secretary of the Treasury Department for financial institutions, as another member advising the president on the issue.
Jarrett’s family has known the Velayati family since their stay in Iran in the 1950s, the source added. Jarrett’s father worked at the Namazi hospital in Shiraz, owned by an Iranian family that has been influential with the regime after the Islamic Revolution.
WND contacted both the U.S. State Department and the White House, asking about the Doha negotiations, who led the delegation from the U.S., whether Obama will provide the written guarantee, what negotiations the U.S. has pursued on its own and what is known about Amano’s plan to travel to Iran for the announcement.
The State Department declined to respond to multiple calls as well as email inquiries. A spokeswoman said the White House would not comment.

The European Union, which increased sanctions on Iran last week, fears back-channel negotiations between the Obama administration and Iran will leave it out. EU leaders are seeking to send a group of representatives from seven European countries to Tehran to strengthen their position with the regime over the nuclear program and their economic interests.
The Iranian currency, meanwhile, has hit another historic low, falling to 43,000 rials to one U.S. dollar. As reported recently, a secret memo by the Intelligence Ministry to regime officials has warned of major riots in Iran due to dire economic conditions.
Another internal report by the government’s Economic Commission indicated that government foreign currency reserves will run out in the coming months and that it will have difficulty meeting payrolls for public employees who could lose 50 percent of their pay.
Many within the Iranian opposition believe that if the West continues to pressure the Islamic regime and supports the aspirations of the majority of the Iranian people who resent the regime and its ideology, the regime will face a nationwide uprising and will collapse from within, changing the geopolitics of not only the region but the world.
However, if the regime is provided a lifeline for whatever reason, not only will it get the bomb but it will take Iranians and the world hostage for decades to come, they believe.
An Oct. 8 WND report revealed another secret nuclear site in Iran. The regime’s nuclear scientists have successfully completed testing of a neutron detonator and have nearly completed design of a nuclear warhead.

SB 1172 prohibits any counseling to reduce or eliminate unwanted same-sex attractions

STAND WITH LIBERTY COUNSEL AGAINST THE
 NEW CALIFORNIA LAW BANNING "CHANGE THERAPY"

SB 1172 prohibits any counseling to reduce or eliminate unwanted same-sex attractions, even when the client seeks help. Counselors who provide the banned treatment, or who refer clients to another counselor who does so, will be charged by the state with ethical misconduct and risk losing their licenses! Under California's SB 1172, counselors will be forced to disregard their clients' religious beliefs...or change them.
Liberty Counsel's lawsuit will prove that California's new policy contained in SB 1172
is an outrageous intrusion into the rights of both counselors and their
 patients and is clearly unconstitutional!   Simply add your name to the "Open Letter of Support" declaring your endorsement for Liberty Counsel's lawsuit and the rights of parents, children, and counselors. The letter will be delivered to the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) and the American Association for Christian Counselors (AACC).

If you've signed our petitions before, please enter the e-mail address that you used then click "Find Me" and we'll fill out your name and address information for you.  Email:

The letter states:   An Open Letter of Support to:
National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality
American Association for Christian Counselors

We, the undersigned citizens, stand united with mental health professionals and millions of California families in unapologetically declaring our support for Liberty Counsel's lawsuit and legal fight against the new policies contained in California's SB 1172.

This bill is an outrageous overreach of a state government's power and a clear violation of individual rights and we believe it must be declared unconstitutional.

SB 1172 and the ethical codes of all of the licensing boards are on an inevitable collision course. The licenses of countless mental health professionals hang in the balance. The lives of many young people and their families will be destroyed under this law. This law completely undermines parental rights and the work of mental health professionals.

For the state to assume that it knows best concerning the kind of counseling individual patients should receive is the height of hubris and ignorance!

We join with you in the battle to STOP this outrageous and appalling law from being implemented.

Signed, 

Add your name to the Letter of Support here: Title: First Name: Last Name: Address 1: Address 2: City: State: Zip: Country: Phone: Email: Confirm email: (Optional) I am also interested in the following issues: Saving the Pledge of Allegiance Protecting our First Amendment Rights Supporting Prayer in School Supporting School Choice Protecting Marriage and Family

Click "Submit" Please hit the submit button only once and be patient...Sign Petition: http://www.libertyaction.org/368/petition.asp?Ref_ID=18115&CID=368&RID=37106481        You must be 18 years of age or older to sign this petition. Thank you!

Defeat Barack Obama

Hi there!  It's Mary Parker Marcus (Lloyd Marcus' wife) and I'm here working with him on the "Rebuild America - Defeat Obama" tour.  We'll send you new pictures from our rallies later today - you will love them.

But for right now I want to focus you on the fact that we are now just 19 days away from Election Day.  And that means we've got to get our TV ads seen by more and more people in key battleground states.  Here are our 3 most recent ads - would you please help us out with a contribution so we can purchase more airtime for them?

WATCH TV AD:  "Obama's Legacy of Failure"

WATCH TV AD: "Time to Put the Adults Back in Charge of America"

WATCH TV AD:  "Paul Ryan vs. Joe Biden"

Help us deny Barack Obama and Joe Biden re-election by contributing to our TV advertising campaign  - CLICK HERE TO CONTRIBUTE.