Saturday, December 24, 2016

WATCH: Muslim Parents send 7 and 9 year old Daughters on Suicide Bombing Mission


By Kyle McDonough 

Remember when Democrats were mocking us for being Islamophobic because we weren’t thrilled at the idea of importing thousands of unvetted Muslim refugees from countries infested with jihadists? 

Barrack Obama himself scolded his own countrymen for rejecting a bunch of “widows and orphans” and having a baseless fear of “3 year old children” refugees.
Well maybe Barrack should take a gander at this footage that reportedly depicts a Syrian mother and father giving their 7 & 9 year old daughters a pep talk before they’re to carry out a suicide bombing mission, all in the name of Islam.
We can see the father walk them through their mission, preparing them to walk into a place filled with innocent people and detonate a bomb. He reassures them that it will be alright – it’s exciting, even – because they’ll soon be with God. Islam truly does have something evil within it that will require a serious reformation. Watch..

Allahu Akbar, Barrack, am I right? Welcome to your legacy.
It was reported a short time prior to the emergence of this video that a police station in Syria was blown up by a young girl suicide bomber.
The reports are inconclusive as to whether it was one of these particular two girls or not, but it really doesn’t matter. It’s obvious to anyone with eyes and a spec of intellectual honesty that radical Islamic terrorist commit to any level of heinous evil in the name of jihad, even sending their own young girls into a building with bombs strapped to their backs.
This truly is evil.

Hillary Clinton Followers - Let it Go ....

Stop blaming the Nation,Trump or the world at large for her loss...blame the candidate! Know and's ,if's or but's about it!

Hillaryland meltdown goes NUCLEAR

oped: The Wicked Witch of the West/East coast "I'm melting~I'm melting" ...ha, see that's what happens when one follows the Yellow Brick Road of corruption 

 ... a normal cleansing shower becomes acid rain to a filthy body,mind and soul!

hillary mad
Things are not well in Hillary Clinton’s inner circle. Ever since the former secretary of state lost to President-elect Donald Trump, Hillary and her followers have been in an emotional nosedive.
Despite rigging the election, the American people rejected the Clinton crime family… and the people that make up “Hillaryland” are not happy about it.
Now, reports are surfacing that infighting among Clinton insiders has gotten particularly vicious. Many are blaming Hillary’s top aide, Huma Abedin, for their stunning loss.
“The real anger is toward Hillary’s inner circle,” a Clinton insider told Vanity Fair. “[Abedin] was enjoying the red carpet and enjoying the photo spreads much too much in my opinion. She enjoyed being a celebrity too much.”

When asked about Abedin’s uncertain future, the insider confessed: “Maybe I’m just p****d off, but I really don’t give a s**t about what happens to Huma to be honest with you.”
According to The New York Times, Abedin is having trouble coming to grips with the blame. But it’s not just Clinton’s inner circle taking things poorly.
Reports say former President Bill Clinton has started yelling at aides, while angry donors are demanding answers about their money.
Meanwhile, Hillary’s mental health has been the subject of speculation, Clinton campaign strategists scream at each other in public, and supporters continue to openly weep over the loss. Even Hillary’s celebrity backers are having difficulty reconciling the loss.
Cheer up, guys. There’s another election in four years you’ll have a chance to rig.
— The Horn editorial team

It’s Fun To Watch Obama Government Officials Panic Over Tolerance


Trump’s transition team has been doing the yeoman’s work of getting a new administration set up, with less than enthusiastic cooperation, in a very short amount of time. And for doing this job, asking questions that any transition team would normally ask, they touched the liberal third rail. Like tattle-taling children, liberals went running to the New York Times to tell all.

The one-page memo, a copy of which was provided to The New York Times on Thursday, directed employees to outline "existing programs and activities to promote gender equality, such as ending gender-based violence, promoting women’s participation in economic and political spheres, entrepreneurship, etc.”
It also requested a list of positions “whose primary functions are to promote such issues” — though not the names of people in those positions — as well as how much funding was directed to gender-related programs in 2016. The United States Agency for International Development also received the request, according to a senior official there.
The Obama administration was looking forward to the transition with their friendly Clinton counterparts, but got sucker punched on November 8th. You know, democracy and all that. It’s not that Trump’s team asked anything improper, or hinted at making changes. They didn’t. But the  fact that they dare ask at all was a source of pique.
The wording of the memo is neutral and does not hint at any policy change. Nevertheless, some State Department employees took note of the reference to “gender-related staffing,” which they said could also refer to programs focused on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender issues, though the memo did not refer specifically to them.
Even current State spokesman John Kirby told the NYT that Trump’s team is doing nothing unusual.
“Having gone through a transition myself a few years ago, without getting into detail, I can tell you that the kinds of things, the kinds of material, the kind of information that they are asking for is very much in keeping with what I’ve seen in at least the one previous presidential transition that I lived through when I was at the Pentagon,” Mr. Kirby said.
We know the cause of the tizzy isn’t anything Trump’s team has done. It’s the fact that people who don’t share all of their liberal values are asking these questions. If it was Hillary’s transition team asking, there would be no questioning of motives at all.
It’s not just the State Department being thrown into panic.

The memo is reminiscent of one the transition team sent recently to the Energy Department, which asked for the names of people who had worked on climate change    or attended global climate talks organized by the United Nations within the past five years. That more detailed questionnaire, on the heels of Mr. Trump’s appointment of a climate change denialist to head the Environmental Protection Agency, sowed fears that the Trump administration would purge anyone involved in trying to curb the effects of climate change.
It’s really enjoyable and delicious to watch them panic that what they’ve done to climate change data skeptics (because there’s only one data model these people accept, and it’s the one showing we will all melt in ten years) will be done to them. I am thoroughly enjoying watching panicked liberals think that their gender-studies degrees won’t get them a cushy government job anymore. 

You know it is possible to have a women-friendly work environment that rewards performance with equal merit to men, without employing an entire office full of gender equality police to enforce it. It’s also possible to hire people who happen to be gay, or even transgender, without regard to their sexual preference, without promoting that lifestyle. That’s what “tolerance” is, dealing with people as human beings without being forced to agree with them or celebrate everything they do.
Liberals are deathly afraid of real tolerance. It’s fun to see them panic.

Friday, December 23, 2016

WikiLeaks Founder Sent A Stunning Message To The Media

via:American Patriot Daily
The conduct of the press became a major campaign issue.
The so-called “mainstream” media lined up in lockstep to act as partisan opposition to Donald Trump.
But after Trump’s victory, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange delivered a stunning message to the media.
During an interview on Sean Hannity’s radio program, Assange delivered his assessment of the media.
He declared the media a “paper tiger” and said they “aren’t very important.”

Yahoo reports:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Thursday blasted US media outlets, contending in an interview that the power possessed by journalists had greatly diminished in recent years.
“They’re increasingly not very important,” Assange said in a radio interview with Sean Hannity.
The Fox News host agreed: “So true.”
Assange characterized the press as a “paper tiger” in the 2016 election and said the rise of new media had eroded the influence of traditional outlets.
“The old press is less important,” he said.
Assange took particular issue with the “liberal press,” blaming such journalists for a “degree of bias” that chased away readers.
“Readers see that. They feel it,” he said. “They don’t like being lectured or told what to do. And they rebel against it.”
There is a reason an American Press Institute poll found only six percent of Americans have a great deal of confidence in the press.
The media’s conduct in the presidential election was over the top, and struck many as trying to tip the scale to Hillary Clinton.
A study by the Shorenstein Center at Harvard University found 91 percent of the coverage on the networks’ evening newscasts over the last 12 weeks was hostile toward Donald Trump.
Even the New York Times’ Public Editor, Liz Spayd, criticized her own paper’s coverage of Trump.

She wrote:
“Readers complain heatedly and repeatedly about the forecasting odometer from The Upshot that was anchored on the home page and predicted that Hillary Clinton had an 80 percent chance or better of winning. They complain that The Times’ attempt to tap the sentiments of Trump supporters was lacking. And they complain about the liberal tint The Times applies to its coverage, without awareness that it does.
Few could deny that if Trump’s more moderate supporters are feeling bruised right now, the blame lies partly with their candidate and his penchant for inflammatory rhetoric. But the media is at fault too, for turning his remarks into a grim caricature that it applied to those who backed him. What struck me is how many liberal voters I spoke with felt so, too. They were Clinton backers, but they want a news source that fairly covers people across the spectrum.”
Despite the media attempting to stack the deck against Trump, he won a decisive Electoral College victory.
And many Americans agree with Assange that it exposed the so-called “mainstream” media as the Emperor who wore no clothes.
They concocted an entire fake news narrative that Trump couldn’t win because he had offended so many groups in America.
But Trump did no worse with women voters than other Republican nominees.
And he performed better than Mitt Romney with Black and Hispanic voters.
The so-called “mainstream” media’s narrative about the election was entirely fake news, and enough of the American people saw through it on November 8th and elected Donald Trump — which is why Julian Assange is declaring them “not very important.”

Loretta Lynch Just Made Her Most Outrageous Move Yet

via: American Patriot Daily
Controversy continues to swirl around Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
Over the summer, she met with Bill Clinton aboard her government airplane, leading many critics to believe the fix was in on the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.
And now – with just months remaining in her term – she has created another firestorm.
In the final years of the Obama administration, liberals placed so-called “criminal justice reform” at the top of their agenda.
From Barack Obama on down, the left believes our criminal justice system is inherently biased against blacks and other minorities.
So-called “mass incarceration” is now one of the top buzzwords among liberals and misguided conservatives. 

Before the election, a bill many conservatives deemed a “get out jail free legislation” was gaining steam in Congress.
Speaker Paul Ryan would often tout his support for criminal justice reform as evidence the GOP could appeal to Democrat leaning voters.
But in the wake of Donald Trump’s election, releasing thousands of dangerous criminals is dead upon arrival.
Trump campaigned on restoring law-and-order and the respect for our police officers.

Buzzfeed reports:
“But now aides to members involved in Congress’ bipartisan criminal justice reform legislation believe that the effort could essentially die with the election of Donald Trump, who ran an outspoken campaign on restoring law and order.
“It’s dead,” said one Senate Republican aide close to the criminal justice reform effort. “It’s not something Trump wants and leadership has no incentive to anger him over it.”
 A senior Democratic aide in the Senate said criminal justice reform is “totally dead,” at least for the lame duck period. “Beyond that I don’t really know.”
 During the election campaign, Trump repeatedly said the country needed to “bring back law and order” to curb inner city violence. He suggested restoring controversial stop-and-frisk policies, but has otherwise yet to articulate the details of any plan.” 

Trump’s law-and-order message resonated with a diverse group of Americans in the wake of violent Black Lives Matter protests and rising homicide rates in major cities across America.
Enter Loretta Lynch.
Liberals have taken to the streets in violent protest to intimidate Trump and the GOP-controlled Congress from implementing their agenda.
Now the Attorney General is applying pressure through the media by imploring Congress to take up the cause of so-called “criminal justice reform”.

Politico reports:
With Trump’s election fanning concerns about hate crimes and a potential rollback in civil rights protections, Lynch argued in a speech Tuesday that Trump’s team should maintain the Justice Department’s focus on combating bail and fine policies that have turned the poor into a source of cash for some communities.
“Bringing justice to those who feel excluded and left behind is one of the great civil rights challenges of our times. And the work to meet that challenge begun under this administration must continue into the next,” Lynch said, never mentioning Trump by name. “Regardless of our political beliefs, we should be able to agree, as Americans, that poverty is not a crime. We should be able to agree, as Americans, that justice is not a commodity to be bought and sold. We should be able to agree, as Americans, that the law should empower the most vulnerable — not oppress them.”
But do we need so-called “criminal justice reform?
Conservative Review reports that, “contrary to popular belief, there are not millions of federal inmates.”
There are only 195,900 inmates housed in federal prisons.
This represents a ten-year low.
And 25% of these inmates are illegal aliens who should have been deported, rather than costing the tax payers money for housing them in federal correctional facilities.
Conservatives hope President-elect Trump will resist the urge to let loose thousands of criminals before their sentences are completed.
And they hope he stands by his message of law-and-order.

Here’s Where You Absolutely Don’t Want to Be “When It All Turns Ugly”

Map Shows Us Where We Don’t Want To Be When It All Turns Ugly h/t All News Pipeline


OK, this is actually pretty obvious – but it is worth pointing out that the “archipelago” of islands across the vast expanse of the United States that carried the vote for Hillary Clinton during the election – also happens to be a ring of the liberal cities that:
a) have exploded with crime, riots and unrest
b) have provided sanctuary for millions of illegal immigrants that have destabilized the country
c) are going bankrupt and will be unable to fulfill pension obligations, or pay their share of social security, welfare, etc.
d) have been foremost in advocating gun control, and ensuring that only criminals and police have guns, while 2nd Amendment arm-bearing citizen have flocked to the rural areas where their rights are not generally restricted
e) will be the first places to be become unstable during any major crisis – as soon as grocery store shelves go empty. Martial law will be the only way to maintain stability, and that will come at a further price to liberty.
f) will be the first place to line up for FEMA camps and beg for food, shelter and rations, again, at a further price to liberty
Of course, there are many more items that could be added to the list, but it gets tedious, and I think everyone gets the point.
Liberal havens have become largely clueless about the real world about them, and have turned a blind eye to the destabilizing forces that are compounding upon them.
IF/WHEN the SHTF, these will be the absolute last places you’d want to be caught dead.
IF you were clueless enough to believe Hillary’s lies and endorse the collapsing establishment line, then there’s a very good chance that you’ll have no idea what to do when the system breaks down. You will either help fuel or be caught up in chaos, violence and desperation – don’t let that be you.
As All News Pipeline reported:

Getting as far away from the large population hubs in America as possible should be looked at as ‘survival rule #1’ as ‘population density’ is one of the most important survival criteria. And with America’s large cities overwhelmingly voting for Hillary Clinton and ‘snowflake’ after ‘cupcake’ having nervous breakdowns recently, finding a place out in the mountains or the country should be a priority for anyone still stuck in the cities or large suburbs. Should chaos strike, would you rather ‘already be where you’re going’ or stuck with 100,000 or more ‘cupcakes’ trying to ‘get away’ from the madness?
And as SHTF noted last week:

Places like Baltimore, Detroit, Washington D.C., New York, Philadelphia and other cities across the map are still deeply divided often police and race issues. Many have seen serious riots, looting and unrest. These social wedge issues are still being pushed from moneyed political interests, while political divide after the direction of the country has become sharp.
Dallas, Texas just suspended pension payments for some of its civil servants, a sign that financial insolvency could create an epidemic during the next crisis. Several states, like California, have over promised benefits to state employees in the pension programs, without ever planning to pay for them. If people lose it, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and the whole of the surrounding areas could simply erupt. Similar problems have left Detroit, Michigan and Puerto Rico, the commonwealth island, extremely vulnerable to bankruptcy and economic apocalypse that could contaminate the nation and global within hours.
If a natural disaster, such as a hurricane, hits the East or Gulf Coast, tens of millions of people could be caught up in traffic, locked in cities without food, and desperate to cling to order and survive. Likewise, if a major earthquake hit the West Coast, millions could be displaced and left without many options. That’s when things turn ugly.
When these cities break down, you’re going to want to be far away from them, and far from the path of millions exiting them and looking for food, resources… and anything they can take.
Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays… and stay out of harm’s way, whether it be in these disaster zone cities, or any other known risk potential.
Stay prepped, and stay focused on what may prove to be a difficult time ahead.
Read more:
The Prepper’s Blueprint: The Step-by-step Guide to Help You Prepare for Any Disaster
Lessons In Urban Warfare: “People Will Die In Huge Numbers”
“Desperate”: City of 8 Million May Run out of Water This Month
Urban Survival: When the Cities Fall Apart, These Strategies Will Keep You Alive
“After Armageddon”: Marine Shows How to Survive An Urban Disaster
25 Cities On the Brink of Disaster: “Don’t Be Here When Things Get Violent, Unsafe and Fragile”
Click here to Read this Entire Story on SHTF Plan

Merry Christmas Deplorables!

“Merry Clinton Christmas” Hillary’s dreams of returning to the white house have fallen and they can’t get back up. 

Merry Clinton Christmas

Slovakian PM Robert Fico: ‘We Will Not Let You Muslims Destroy The Cultural Identity Of Europe’

Slovakian PM Robert Fico: ‘We Will Not Let You Muslims Destroy The Cultural Identity Of Europe’

After the horrible terrorist attacks at the Christmas market in Berlin, Slovakian PM Robert Fico has doubled down against the Muslims, saying what happened there was proof that Islam is threatening to destroy the cultural identity of Europe. He vowed to work with the Czech Republic and Austria to seal their borders, keep Muslims out, and prevent the formation of a Muslim community in Slovakia:
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico called Monday’s massacre in Berlin as an attack against the cultural identity of Europe. Suspected of a crime, according to him migrant, which Germany won refugee status. Slovakia in response to tightened security measures, the immediate threat to the country under the Tatras Slovak authorities however do not.
“An attack on people who meet at the Christmas markets and who to some extent are preparing for Christmas, consider an attack against the cultural identity of Europe. We need the public to say that the attacks that are taking place, as well as attacks against European identity,” he said today Fico reporters.

Slovak Prime Minister also advocated measures that Slovakia advocated during the migratory crisis, including bringing an action against the decision of the majority of EU member states obligatory quota for redistribution of migrants between countries of the European Union.
Fico repeated that if the chairman of the Slovak government does not agree with the creation of integrated Muslim community in the Slovak Republic. For this statement he has in the past faced criticism.
According to Fico attack in Berlin changed attitude of several EU Member States on migration. “The public in Europe will legitimately expect considerably more vigorous measures to ensure that people can peacefully spend their free time,” said the Prime Minister.

Slovakia after the attack in Berlin increased border surveillance and security measures that have previously reinforced the context of the current presidency country of the EU Council. Police, for example, a thousand doubled the number of patrols in the streets of Slovak towns.

“We have introduced protection of our borders with the Czech Republic and Austria in the event of transfer either suspects or anyone who could potentially participate in the attack,” said Slovak Interior Minister Robert Kalinak. He added that the increased security measures in the country will remain in force at least until the upcoming Christmas holidays.

According KALIŇÁK Slovak authorities had earlier about possible security threat in the region of Central Europe. The minister did not disclose details, saying only that some of the information is not confirmed, and some have managed to minimize. (source)
This is how a government is supposed to handle a threat from Islam and Muslims. Kowtowing, pleading, or “dialog” does not work because Islam does not care about these things, as it only comes to crush, conquer, and convert anybody and anything that is not part of the dar Al-Islam.
Likewise, PM Fico noted how the attack on the Christmas market was symbolic of the identity of Europe. The Muslims understand this too - that is why the conquest and Islamization of Europe is such a persistent theme on Muslim’s minds. It does not matter that most of Europe (save the east) is in a state of apostasy because it is the spiritual meaning behind it. Likewise, it also explains the Islamic obsession with the destruction of Rome, Italy, because the conquest of Rome means, for a Muslim, the temporal and spiritual destruction of Christianity.
Article reposted with permission from

Merry Christmas...just remember ladies Santa is watching you!


Thursday, December 22, 2016

Man Accosts Ivanka On Flight, Screams At Her And Her Kids

 oped: I will  give credit to Ivanka for trying to connect with the working class and flying coach class as well as saving money and the dreaded [sarcasm] Carbon Footprint of flying private. The only redeeming factor to this incident is that Ivanka got a taste of what conservatives have been putting up with from the looney DNC progressives for decades! I hope she learned her lesson and breaks ties with her past associations with the looney left DNC et al!

On Thursday, a man accosted president-elect Donald Trump’s daughter and her three children in a Jet Blue flight, yelling at her and taunting her three children. According to TMZ, Ivanka Trump was leaving JFK, seated in the coach area of the plane, when the man, apparently carrying his child, started yelling at her, "Your father is ruining the country." He ranted, "Why is she on our flight. She should be flying private!"
A passenger on the flight told TMZ Ivanka Trump ignored the tirade and tried distracting her kids with crayons.  JetBlue personnel escorted the man off the flight as he shrieked, "You're kicking me off for expressing my opinion?!!"

Twitchy filled in the blanks in the story:


Blumenthal Delusion on Trump and Guns a Ploy for Attention and Disruption

Join Oath Keepers

Only following orders, right guys? So much for their oath, when they willingly appear with Sen. Richard Blumenthal for a photo op aimed at disarming their countrymen. (Sen. Richard Blumenthal Facebook photo)


Calling Congress “complicit” for criminal murders using guns, Connecticut Democrat Sen. Richard Blumenthal called on President-elect Donald Trump to “do the unpredictable” and support citizen disarmament edicts, PJ Media reports.
“It’s a Nixon to China moment for Donald Trump when he can defy the expectation, do the unpredictable – he likes doing the unpredictable – respond to a rally, which he also likes to do, and the rally is the America people who are clamoring and demanding action,” Blumenthal posited at a Capitol Hill rally exploiting families and survivors victimized by violent armed criminals. “Donald Trump has a legacy moment. When he can seize this opportunity, a historic opportunity, do the right thing and adopt these common-sense measures: background checks for every gun purchase, a ban on terrorists buying guns and ending the immunity, the legal immunity, unprecedented, unknown to any other industry for gun manufacturers. These are your ideas, 
Donald. We’ll give you credit for them.”

In other words, his bright idea is for Trump to betray the constituency that put him in power and embrace rejected policies that lost the election for Hillary Clinton. Blumenthal is suggesting Trump will do his dirty work for him, undermining the Bill of Rights by enacting edicts that are the kiss of political death anywhere but in blue state “progressive” enclaves. That’s what his partner in oath-breaking, Connecticut’s other senator, Chris Murphy unintentionally admitted, all the while trying to put a spin on reality to mask his on-the-ropes desperation. 

Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes candidly assessed Blumenthal’s seemingly delusional plea:
This is the same as saying, “Do the unpredictable and cut your own political throat by violating your oath and your promise to your supporters to defend the Second Amendment, and act exactly the same as if Hillary had won.” What Trump should do instead is call these oath breaking politicians out as the blood dancers they are, who turn a blind eye to the reality that it is criminal street thugs and gang bangers who are killing each other en-mass in Democratic stronghold “sanctuary cities” such as Chicago [or New Haven, CT for that matter], where the gang-bangers have free reign to rule the streets without having to worry about local people taking out the trash (like the people of Mexico are starting to do with armed citizen patrols), since the law-abiding locals in such Democrat controlled cities are forbidden to carry guns for self defense.
The leftist answer is to always blame the law-abiding, decent gun owners for the gang-bangers’ obsession with violence and murder. They don’t blame the gang culture, and the hip-hop culture that idolizes it, but instead blame the rest of us who don’t run around doing drive-by shootings and gang-land assassinations. And it is us they seek to disarm. And we know why – because they have plans for us that require us to be disarmed before they can be effectively carried out.
So both totalitarian wannabes, Blumenthal and Murphy, are from Connecticut, eh?  The place must be a lost cause, right?
Not if gun owners fighting on the front lines there have anything to say about it.  Many times when documenting the latest in-your-face infringements from drunk-on-power politicians, gun owners will weigh in and condemn the entire state. We’ve all seen comments generalizing and applying blame to California, New Jersey or New York.
That works against liberty. I’ve met some fine Connecticut Bill of Rights defenders, including members of our Connecticut Oath Keepers chapter, and they’re as dedicated a group of patriots as any. The ones with their backs against the wall can be the most committed activists, devoting time, treasure and effort while fighting against overwhelming odds. These people have earned our admiration and gratitude for not giving up, and for showing those of us who don’t have it as bad as they do what it means to not give up. They deserve our encouragement and support.
Those front lines are important, because it’s where the abuses are strongest that significant stands for liberty are made. Connecticut is one of the places a friend and colleague to many of us, the late Mike Vanderboegh, led by example, committing acts of civil disobedience when no other means of peaceable recourse were available. Again, quoting Stewart:

I am glad we were able to help Mike with travel expenses on several occasions, so he could speak at important events, such as his speech on the steps of the Connecticut capitol (where he committed his first of many acts of defiance to unjust, unconstitutional anti-gun edicts by oath-breaking politicians), and his speech at the Alamo. I felt it was important to do that, so that people who called themselves “Three Percenters” would know who Mike was, and would listen to his advice and counsel as the founder of that movement on how to do that mission right.
Blumenthal and Murphy are making noise, getting media recognition and appealing to the useful idiots who keep them in power. They’re not really delusional, because they know exactly what they’re doing. They’re saving face and they’re laying the groundwork to make things as disruptive as possible to discourage Trump from keeping campaign promises and to poison public perception when he does. 

Additional resources:

Latest Band in Talks to Perform Inauguration — The Beach Boys

Latest Band in Talks to Perform Inauguration — The Beach Boys 


oped: Good for them...may I also suggest the following: 

Oh and IMO Garth Brooks is a Hollywood Saturday Night Cowboy...not real...he may have come out of retirement...however he won't be getting any of this real conservative cowboy's money...nope not gonna purchase any of his new CD's...he sux big time in my books!

Do the Beach Boys have bigger balls than Garth Brooks and Andrea Bocelli?

The icons of California surf rock have been asked to bring some good vibrations to Donald Trump’s inauguration — and they’ve yet to decline.

“They have not made a decision,” said a source close to the band, which is currently headed by original member Mike Love and operating sans co-founder Brian Wilson.

Country/western star Brooks and blind tenor Bocelli both declined to perform at the celebrations of Trump’s Jan. 20 swearing-in after Hillary Clintonsupporters attacked them on social media and threatened to boycott their concerts.
 Source: Page Six

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

TRAITORS! “Impeach Trump” plot discovered

Just how insane have left-wing politicians and voters become in America?
Even since losing the election, Democrats have encouraged violence, hate speech, and threats — all while demanding the Electoral College overturn the election.
Their repeated failure to rig our elections and overturn our democracy won’t discourage the left.
In fact, they’re already planning their next plot — to impeach Donald Trump as soon as he’s inaugurated. And Democratic lawmakers are seizing the momentum as an opportunity to further their own political ambitions.
Texas Republican elector Chris Suprun, one of the two faithless electors that voted against Trump on Monday, has already confessed that there is a plan for Trump’s impeachment in the works.

“As a person who has always played fast and loose with the law, Trump will likely be impeached within the first year of his Presidency by responsible Republicans in Congress. For the rest of us Americans, his presence in the Oval Office represents a crisis for the Constitution, the economy and the country,” Suprun said in the statement.
Worse of all, the plan to quickly impeach Trump isn’t a fringe effort. This plot is a widespread conspiracy being actively discussed among establishment politicians.
Insiders have leaked that top House Democrats have already held at least one mock hearing – using television cameras, directors, staging, and witness testimony – during a Trump trial for planned corruption accusations.

That’s right — Democrats are so certain of an impeachment, they’ve begun practicing their poses for television cameras to make sure they look their best.
“The narrative that Trump could run afoul of the Emoluments Clause — which bars government officials from receiving gifts from foreign states — is gaining support from some progressive voices,” Fox News reported Wednesday.
The willingness of the left to attack the president-elect on bogus charges — before he’s even sworn in — is undemocratic at best. At worst, it’s treasonous.
This is beyond sour grapes.

The far left has begun attack the foundation of America itself — a core principal of which is the peaceful transition of power.
Even more shameful, liberal elected officials are gleefully piling on, more concerned about their public image than about properly governing our country.
It is, quite simply, madness. It is dangerous and irresponsible.
And it needs to stop. NOW.
— The Horn editorial team

NBC: Obama Told Putin Election Hacking Could Result in 'Armed Conflict'

Image: NBC: Obama Told Putin Election Hacking Could Result in 'Armed Conflict'
By Jason Devaney  

President Barack Obama reportedly told Russian President Vladimir Putin in October that directly interfering with the U.S. election could result in an "armed conflict."
According to NBC News, Obama opted to use the red phone to contact Moscow directly, a communication system that dates back to the Cold War. It's not an actual telephone, but instead sends a secure email message between the two countries.

"International law, including the law for armed conflict, applies to actions in cyberspace," part of the Oct. 31 message read, according to NBC. "We will hold Russia to those standards."
One of Obama's senior advisers reportedly told the president months ago that he should use the phrase "act of war" when it came to Russia's alleged meddling in the presidential election. Obama declined to use that term when the two leaders met at the September G-20 summit in China, instead telling Putin he should cease any election-hacking activities.

NBC connects Russia's alleged hacking with the release of stolen emails from Democrats, although WikiLeaks — the organization responsible for making much of the material public — denied Russia was behind the theft.
Obama's use of the red phone was the first time he had used the system during his presidency, NBC notes.

© 2016 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

House Committee: Obama Fired Top Scientist Over Climate Change

Image: House Committee: Obama Fired Top Scientist Over Climate Change
by: Cathy Burke  

The Obama administration fired a scientist, intimidated staff at the Department of Energy, and allegedly ordered officials to obstruct Congress – all in order to push its climate change agenda, a House committee report asserted.
The Washington Free Beacon detailed Tuesday a report released by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, which is chaired by Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, charged senior Obama administration officials retaliated against the scientist, Dr. Noelle Getting, who was manager of a radiation research program, and devised ways to block a congressional inquiry into the radiation research.

"Instead of providing the type of scientific information needed by Congress to legislate effectively, senior departmental officials sought to hide information, lobbied against legislation, and retaliated against a scientist for being forthcoming," Smith said in a statement, the Free Beacon reported.
"In this staff report based on lengthy record before the committee, much has been revealed about how senior level agency officials under the Obama administration retaliated against a scientist who did not follow the party line."
The scathing analysis comes in the wake of a report the Department of Energy refused to turn over to Donald Trump's transition team the names of its staff members who worked on climate change issues for the Obama administration.

The Free Beacon reported the analysis goes into congressional efforts to regulate the Low Dose Radiation Research Program, which aimed to test the impact of radiation on human beings. The program, started in the 1990s, was meant to support research into waste cleanup and the impact of nuclear weapons.
Lawmakers introduced the Low Dose Radiation Act of 2014 late that year to regulate the program and minimize harmful side effects, the Free Beacon noted.
During an October 2014 briefing on the matter, Getting testified, and less than a month later, she was "removed . . . from federal service for allegedly providing too much information in response to questions posed by" Congress during the briefing, the report stated.

Smith's report found congressional investigators determined the removal was in part retaliation against her because she "refused to conform to the predetermined remarks and talking points designed by management to undermine the advancement of "the 2014 radiation act," the Free Beacon reported.
Congress is recommending a full overhaul of the energy department's management structure, the Free Beacon reported.

© 2016 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Megyn Kelly Gets Caught Fabricating "News" - Gets Corrected by Alex Jones

Megyn Kelly, TV Salary Gallery

by:Tim Brown

Fox News' Megyn Kelly has once again put her foot in her mouth, and fabricated a news story. However, the person she fabricated the news about was Alex Jones, and Jones was not happy about it. So, he took to video to set the record straight.
Kelly purposefully edited statements of Jones and claimed that he said that Hillary Clinton was directly involved in the murder of children in the PizzaGate scandal.

However, the reality is that she pulled the audio from another  story Jones was doing on Syria and how Clinton was tied to it.  Yet, it appears that Kelly is hoping the American people won't listen for themselves.  So, we're going to help them out by letting Jones explain just what took place, including his thoughts that Pizzagate was a Psyop that is being used to silence free speech and the press.

Obama advises "wait and see" approach to Trump... See video: 

WARNING: Language:

Ed Klein: Hillary's Delusion: 'I'm Going to Run Again in 2020'

Image: Ed Klein: Hillary's Delusion: 'I'm Going to Run Again in 2020'
oped: I'm sorry but this family is the epitome of the proverbial dysfunctional family...Bill,Hillary and yes Chelsea need to be committed to a Asylum for the criminally insane...they are akin to a V-8 running on 4 cylinders, misfiring and billowing smoke as it chugs down the highway of life...they cannot fathom reality even when it bites them on the proverbial butt! Good God must we suffer another election cycle led by the family from "One flew over the Cuckoos Nest"  ?

 By: Ed Klein   

Hillary Clinton intends to keep her campaign organization together for the next four years and run again for president in 2020.
“She’s convinced that, sooner than later, the voters will come to their senses and realize they made a horrible mistake by putting [Donald] Trump in the White House,” a source close to Hillary told Ed Klein Confidential. “She’s sure the voters will beg her to get in the race and she says, ‘I’m going to run again in 2020.’”
Not all her advisers agree. In fact, several of them believe Hillary is in a bad way—deeply depressed, drinking too much, and delusional about her chances of making a successful run for the White House four years from now when she’ll be 73 and in shaky health.
But these advisers are afraid to dash Hillary’s presidential dreams and send her into an even deeper depression.

“Hillary is in a state of denial and accepts zero responsibility for her loss to Trump,” one of these sources said. “She’s convinced that [FBI Director James] Comey’s last-minute announcement that he was reopening his investigation of Hillary’s emails was planned in advance by her Republican enemies. She’s also convinced that [Russian president Vladimir] Putin was working with Trump and that the two were in direct contact.
“She further believes that a groundswell of anger is going to make it impossible for Trump to govern effectively,” the source continued. “In her view, Trump is a rank amateur in the art of politics, and he’s going to screw up badly and find himself in deep trouble.
“She told me—and I’m paraphrasing: ‘Trump has no idea what it’s like to run the biggest corporation in the world, the United States government. He has no f—–g idea how complicated it is, how many cogs are spinning at the same time, how many people are fighting at cross purposes, how much disinformation you get.’”

According to sources close to Bill Clinton, he does not want Hillary to run again. Given his own serious health problems, Bill doubts he will be in any shape to help Hillary four years from now.
“Bill hopes Hillary will see the light and change her mind,” a source close to Bill said. “He’s sure the party will want a fresh new face come 2020.”
© 2016 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Man Who Killed the Democrat Party will Lead Effort to Rehabilitate It

 by: Dave Jolly 

In 2009, Barack Obama was sworn into office. His Democratic victory was shared with many as the composition of the US Senate changed from 49 Democrats to 57. In the US House of Representatives, the composition changed from 233 Democrats to 256. The Democratic Party not only took control of the White House, but also gained control of the Senate and House, all riding on the coattails and promises of Barack Obama and his promises of hope and change.

In 2011, the composition of the Senate and House both changed. Democrats retained control of the Senate, but lost 6 seats to Republicans, giving the Democrats a 51-47 advantage. In the House, Democrats lost 59 seats and control to Republicans. The GOP controlled by a wide margin of 242-193 over the Democrats.
In 2013, Democrats gained 18 seats in the House, but still were in a minority to the 234-201 GOP majority. In the Senate, the Democrats increased their lead to 54-45.
In 2015, the American people were fed up with Obama and his Democratic minions. Republicans won 9 seats in the Senate to take a 54-44 lead over the Democrats. In the House, Republicans won 12 more seats to increase their lead to 246-188.

This coming year, not only will a Republican be sworn in as President of the United States, but Republicans will continue their control in both the Senate and House. The composition of the Senate will be 52-46-2 in the Republicans favor (2 Independents) and in the House, the makeup will be 241-194 in favor of the Republicans.
Barack Obama refuses to see the obvious reason for the Democratic losses since he took over. In a recent interview, Obama blamed the reason for the Democratic losses on the Democrats failing to show up and to properly make their arguments to the American people.

Obama told the interviewer:
“There are some things that we know are a challenge for Democrats — structural problems.”
“So as a consequence, you’ve got a situation where there’re not only entire states but also big chunks of states where, if we’re not showing up, if we’re not in there making an argument, then we’re going to lose.”  

“And we can lose badly, and that’s what happened in this election.”
“There are clearly, though, failures on our part to give people in rural areas or in exurban areas a sense day-to-day that we’re fighting for them or connected to them.”  

“So part of the reason it’s important to show up, and when I say show up, I don’t just mean during election time, but to be in there engaging and listening and being with people, is because it then builds trust and it gives you a better sense of how should you talk about issues in a way that feel salient and feel meaningful to people.” 

What is Obama’s solution to fix his perceived problem with the Democratic Party? He plans on coaching younger Democratic politicians on how to show up and win elections. Obama stated:
“There are such incredible young people who not only worked on my campaign, but I’ve seen in advocacy groups.”
“That’s part of what makes me optimistic about our future because I know those young people are out there ready to lead, and when they start moving into more and more positions of authority, then I think the issues that I care most deeply about are going to be well served.”
“Somebody who can build on the incredible work that has already been done by young people, and that to a large degree was responsible for getting me elected.”
The man who led the Democratic Party to ruination and loss of control of the White House, Senate and House plans on coaching young Democrats to be just like him. That could be taken as good news and bad news.
It’s good news if you just look at the surface with a loser coaching others to be a loser also, but it’s also bad news since the hidden forces that put Obama in the White House could come into play and help those Obama is coaching. Only time will tell which scenario becomes reality.

Guess who says that Donald Trump “Has No Right to Enter” the White House?

Photo Credit: lev radin /
by: Onan Coca 

Liberal icon and all-around bad guy Michael Moore recently appeared on MSNBC with Chris Hayes to talk about what Moore believes the American people should be doing over the next few days, weeks, and months. In a word – he wants them protesting the just held, legally conducted, and cleanly won (by Donald Trump) election. Moore’s coup de grâce? This gem of a line, where he argues that the American people should act lawlessly to protest Trump’s lawful election.
When asked what Americans should be doing, Moore says…
Protesting, obstructing, disrupting, civil disobedience. I mean, the man has no right to enter that house.

Moore’s always been out in left field, but with this latest diatribe he has walked out of the stadium, gotten on the train and is well on his way to the suburbs. I mean, this is crazy. Even if the Russians played a role in the leaks of the DNC and Clinton campaign emails, it’s not like they invented the information those emails contained! Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, and all of the Democrat operatives who were embarrassed by the emails that they wrote actually wrote the emails! The Americans who voted against them for these things were right to do so, even if the Russians played a part in getting the information out there.

It’s unconscionable to think that Democrats are actually arguing that the election is illegitimate because the American people learned truths that they weren’t supposed to know. Yes, the Democrat Party has reached a new, disgusting low, and Michael Moore is the embodiment (and perfect image) of that nadir.

Listen, we are hours away now from the Electoral College coming together on Monday. This needs protest, this needs people’s voices. You can go to Vigils For America, I think it’s dot org, and they have a list of all the state protests at the state capitols this weekend and on Monday.
People need to have their voice heard. Don’t say to yourself, oh, what’s the use? How do we — nothing’s going to happen. You don’t know that. You don’t know that. That’s why we have to keep fighting. We have to fight all the way to inauguration day and then be ready for them to start the day after the inauguration passing law after law after law…
Protesting, obstructing, disrupting, civil disobedience. I mean, the man has no right to enter that house. There are too many questions about whatever collusion was going on. I mean, they admitted that they were in touch with the Russians during the campaign. They have said that… 
So we would need to know as Americans what the hell was going on there and he does not have a mandate. He does not have a mandate. And that just needs to be said over and over and over again. And the media, for God’s sake, please do your job. 

Muslim Army Chaplain says it’s OK to Beat Your Wives

by:Onan Coca 

Dr. Iqbal Al-Navdi is the Muslim Chaplain of the Canadian Army and an important Muslim leader here in North America. In fact, he is one of the very few in North America who have the authority to give a fatwah and is very well respected as professor of Shariah Law and jurisprudence. 
Back in February of 2015, Dr. Navdi delivered a speech on the importance of the family in society and in Islam. Dr. Navdi spent some time covering one issue that is quite controversial in the West (though not so controversial in the Muslim world): wife beating. Here is what Verse 34 of Surah Al-Nisa’ in the Quran says:
“Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband’s] absence what Allah would have them guard.  But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance.  [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them [lightly].  But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.”

Dr. Navdi explained that the Quran most certainly allows husbands to beat their wives, but because their relationship is so important, the beating should only happen as part of an attempt to resolve conflict between the two and that the beatings should always happen in private. Here’s a partial transcript from his lecture beginning around 19:20 in the video:
“In Islam as [inaudible] Qadar says many rulings (احكام) of the Islamic Law (الشريعة) in Islam, in Quran, [are] given just in concept, in brief, rights? But the family issue is covered by Quran in a very detailed way. Not only what we should do, but even what you do if face some problems. How [do] you solve it.
“So in that sense for example we see that the protection of family is covered by Islam in three layers,right?
“The first layer is – solve the problem mutually between husband and wife, right? In many times it happens that in these days and Glory be to Allah, meaning (يعني) when we are attacked, right? and Islam is criticized that Islam promotes suppose wife beating, right? and so many things. 

“So many people when they translate the word fa-idribuhunna (فاضربوهن) they translate, change the meaning of it. [inaudible]
“Me, of example, I want to say one thing. First thing is that the is the ruling (حكم) of the Quran. It is existing. I can not change it. But I need to know from the messenger of Allah (رسول الله) peace and blessing be upon him (صلى الله عليه وسلم) what it means? How [do] we implement it? Do we have an example from messenger of Allah (رسول الله) peace and blessing be upon him (صلى الله عليه وسلم) that he ever used this order? Right? 

“So it means what? It means only that Islam is saying that the husband and wife issue and relation is so sacred, is so important, it must not be exposed to others. It supposes to be solved among each other. It is the first layer. 

“And this is the point where for example Quran says if you are taking the issue, and Hadith says, if you are doing this thing, you can beat or can leave [avoid sleeping with the wife]. But why? Just keep the issue among each other.
“But the second layer is what? If it is not working make mediation, right? What? Bring one
person from husband, one person from wife and they will do what? And Quran says what? إن يريدا إصلاحا يوفق الله بينهما If they are trying to make reconciliation (صلح) Allah will enble them to do this thing, right?
“After that when the issue is not working then it will go to legal system, or it will go to court, it will go to other way. So what happen? In our situation most of the time we used last step first time, right?” 

This is one of the very mainstream leaders of Islam in North America, folks. He’s well-respected in the Muslim community and in the non-Muslim Canadian community. Here he is speaking at a “mainstream” Muslim gathering, and he is teaching hundreds of Muslim men (plus the thousands who have watched on video) that it is perfectly acceptable to physically abuse their wives. The religion of peace, where beating your wife is totally cool.

Deadly Hatred Manifested in Post-Election ‘Treason’ Accusations

Join Oath Keepers

A threatening sentiment is emerging in the bitter accusations and actions following Donald Trump’s electoral landslide victory. Anyone not joining in the lynch mob being formed against his inauguration is being branded a “traitor.” And that includes Oath Keepers.
Those who frequent this website are more in tune than most at attempts to discredit the Trump victory with accusations of “fake news” by establishment media hypocrites (it’s no surprise Hillary Clinton wants “Congressional action,” that is, enforceable laws with punishments). We’re also aware of attempts to sway so-called “faithless electors” via partisan CIA careerists leveling unsubstantiated allegations of Russian hacking, and, thanks to exclusive intelligence analysis reporting, of planned disruptions that may very well erupt into widespread lawless violence.
What we don’t know, but can reasonably infer, is that frustrated weaker minds are being primed to lash out violently. With all the intentional spreading of hate, not just at Trump – but at his supporters, at Republicans in general and at anyone not on board with the “progressive” (totalitarian) agenda – we shouldn’t be surprised to see rhetoric transform into something destructive and even deadly.

The cold civil war is heating up, and the targets are getting closer to home. Case in point:
“What is abundantly clear to real Americans is that any other American who still supports a White House-bound friend of Putin and beneficiary of ‘warfare against America’ is a traitor,” Politicus USA asserts. “And that particularly includes each and every one of the so-called ‘real American’ patriots, Oathkeepers and militia-types who never wavered in supporting Trump despite his love-affair with a foreign ‘aggressor that consistently undermines American interests.’”
“It’s a COUP. It’s war. It’s an attack by Russia.” Keith Olbermann rants. “Those supporting it are TRAITORS.”
We have to assume those leveling such charges mean what they say, and that they’re not alone. Indeed, the sentiment is being parroted on Politico, and repeated on Bill Moyers’ website. Expect to hear more of it as it becomes a meme.
Then consider what the ultimate penalty for treason is, and what can happen to “traitors.” Those throwing the word around are aware of that.
Is it really a stretch to conclude that – if you’re not with them on this and other agenda items – they want you executed by a state they’re bent on making unchallengeable? Is it really a coincidence the same accusing voices rail the loudest against an armed citizenry? And does anyone capable of rational observation truly believe that the horrors of totalitarianism useful “progressive” idiots would empower can never happen here?
“Not on our watch”?

Death Bed Video Message from Marine/Patriot to Americans: “Farewell Dear Friends, God Bless You All”

 by:Tim Brown

Marine and American patriot, Dr. Larry Lindsey, shared a video message just shortly before he died, which seemed to be addressed to President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence, as well as all Americans.
If you recall, Dr. Lindsey made headlines earlier this year when he burned his Republican registration.

Lindsey died on Saturday, December 17, but was able to produce the following video message before passing into eternity.

Lindsey's outspokenness drew attention to corruption that took place, which sought to rob Donald Trump of votes at the time and hand the state to Ted Cruz during the primaries.
A family member posted to Facebook following Lindsey's death

"It is with heavy heart that we let everyone know that Larry is know [sic] with the Lord," wrote the family member. "He died peacefully in the arms of his wife, Natasha at 10:45pm on his birthday December 17th. We will miss him!"

Facebook Post
[Larry Wayne Lindsey
on Sunday
It is with a heavy heart that we let everyone know that Larry is know with the Lord. He died peacefully in the arms of his wife Natasha at 10:45pm on his birthday December 17th. We will miss him! ]

Indeed, he will be missed.

Fraudulent Obama Birth Certificate Evidence Heads to Congress… Again

Email Template

by:Tim Brown
Following Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's press conference last week concerning Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah's fake birth certificate that's been stored on the White House website for several years, reports are that the evidence will be going to Congress soon.
In 2012, Sheriff Arpaio sought to present the evidence that he and his Cold Case Posse had determined to be significant in determining that Obama's birth certificate was indeed a fraud to delagates to the Republican National Convention. In 2014, lead investigator Mike Zullo said that some members of Congress were paying attention to the investigation.

However, like many political figures in DC, they either don't care or they were more concerned with their own political aspirations than upholding their constitutional duty which might make them look unfavorable to their peers.
Now, Bob Unruh is reporting that there is a rush to get the evidence in the hands of Congressmen in light of Arpiao's exiting the Sheriff's office at the end of the month and Donald Trump entering the White House in January.

Evidence that the document presented to the American public by Barack Obama as his Hawaiian birth certificate is fake soon will be heading to members of Congress, and the difficult discussions over what crimes may have been committed and what should be done could begin soon.

The atmosphere in Washington will be different under Trump, who will be inaugurated Jan. 20, since he publicly questioned Obama's birth certificate in 2011. During this election season, he stated he now believes Obama was born in Hawaii.

But at a news conference Thursday, Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the only law enforcement officer to formally investigate the allegations of fraud, presented evidence that the image of the birth document posted by the White House was fraudulent. 

One thing seems certain: The evidence will have to go elsewhere for action to be taken, since Arpaio, known as "America's toughest sheriff" and innovator of such jail amenities as pink underwear and surplus Army tents in the desert heat for jail inmates, is leaving office Jan. 1 after more than two decades serving Phoenix-area residents, who had asked him for the birth certificate investigation. 

"I plan on turning over this investigation this month to the federal government," said Arpaio. "And Congress. And hope Congress No. 1 will pass a law, the president should be vetted. Common sense."
Barack Obama's own attorney, Alexandra Hill, pretty much admitted the document was fraudulent. In her appearance in a New Jersey courtroom to argue that Obama was eligible to be on the ballot back in 2012, Hill argued that the online birth certificates was "irrelevant to his placement on the ballot." She then went on to try and establish his eligibility by speaking of his political popularity, not legal qualification, in order to be a candidate!

Even the Kenyan government heavily documented in its own records that Barack Obama was born in Kenya! In wanting to congratulate Obama on his first victory in 2008, the Kenyan Parliament recorded these words:
"Mr. Obama, is a son of the soil of this country (Kenya). Every other country in this continent is celebrating the Obama win. It is only proper and fitting that the country which he originates should show the same excitement, pomp and colour." 

This statement was followed by the Deputy Speaker warning the member who just made the statement,
"You had better be very careful where you transgress between watching your own sovereignty and what can be interpreted in some quarters as some form of treason." 

Unruh also points out many other documents that Obama has never publicly released.
Among the many records the Obama camp has refused to release are the marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name-change records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of his and his mother's repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records. 

So, it's time for the GOP to put up or shut up concerning the upholding of the law concerning fraudulent documents, especially those perpetrated on the chief law enforcer. If they are allowed to ignore this again, as far as I'm concerned, they are and have been complicit in the lawlessness of every single usurpation of the Constitution by Barack Obama and those in his administration. However, I'm sure they have been complicit. The question is, will the American people have such a loud voice to demand justice for the crimes against them?

Monday, December 19, 2016

Donald Trump the new Andrew Jackson?

I'm thinking yes...he was not liked by his opposition he used out of the box thinking...however no matter how you judge his rule...he did win the war of 1812...the second attempt by the British to take back the colonies!
He used Native American tactics ( now called Special Op's) which were not approved of by the British nor the elite's. After the war he went on to become POTUS and was even more disliked by his opposition...oh well deja vu!

At any rate enjoy the Battle of New Orleans 1814...hit it Johnny!

Report: Somalis given access to secured areas at major U.S. airports

Photo: Alan Wilson/Flickr (cc by-sa 2.0)

Somalis Given Access to Sensitive Information
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 31 pages of records from U.S. Customs and Border Protection revealing that the Department of Homeland Security has given Somalis “community engagement tours,” including security briefings, in secured areas at least three major U.S. airports – Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and Columbus, Ohio.
The records came in response to a May 2016 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, which sought records, documents and communications regarding a “Community Engagement Tour” in Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport on February 18, 2016.

The briefings provided to the Somali groups were so sensitive that in 14 instances the agency redacted portions of the records under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption (B)(7)(e), the law-enforcement “risk circumvention” exemption, which reads: 
Exemption 7(E) of the Freedom of Information Act affords protection to all law enforcement information that would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law.
In another instance, Customs and Border Protection exempted under (B)(7)(e) a portion of a February 16, 2016, “Minute by Minute Agenda” provided during a tour/briefing of the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP). The material that was withheld from Judicial Watch as too law-enforcement sensitive – but provided in full to the Somali group – included a section entitled: “TSA Overview — Processing [Redacted].”  The invitees were provided briefings of the Global Entry system, APC [Automated Passport Control] system, secondary screening procedures, baggage-screening procedures and given tours of the holding cells/interview rooms.

Notes from the February Minneapolis St. Paul Airport tour include: “Current CBP and TSA job vacancies were discussed. Attendees responded with requests for DHS outreach efforts during Somali community events to further advertise these positions to interested individuals.”
The newly released records also reveal:

  • In addition to the Minneapolis Airport tours/briefings given to Somalis during 2014 and 2015 – and first revealed by Judicial Watch in August 2016 – tours of U.S. airports and security briefings also have been provided to other groups at airports in Los Angeles and Columbus, Ohio: “Once we agree on the dates we will select the time based on prayer schedules. Another idea could be the roundtable to take place at the airport after the tour. We have done that before in LA and Columbus and it worked well both times”.
  • The timing of the Minneapolis Airport tour given to a group of Somalis in February 2016 was scheduled between 6-8pm because it would “accommodate prayer times well”
  • During the “annual” tour, federal authorities granted excursions of the facility’s “secure areas.” It is also noted that two parties in the previous year “did not pass vetting.”
  • The invitation extended to the Somalis for the Minneapolis Airport tour addressed them as “Dear Colleague,” and promised “walking people through CBP’s process, walking people through TSA’s process” and provide “a step-by-step tour of our operations, designed to offer a greater understanding of airport processes and procedures.” 

Eight senior ranking Homeland Security and Customs officials were tasked with accompanying and briefing the Somalis on the February 18, 2016, Minneapolis Airport tour, including the Minneapolis Area Port Director, the Assistant Port Director, the Watch Commander, a Homeland Security Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Senior Policy Advisor (flown in from Washington), the TSA Federal Security Director and TSA Deputy Federal Security Director.
The documents show Customs officials reporting that one of the invited individuals had given “CBP Chicago a hard time” following the last tour and noted three of the invitees had had investigations against them, which had since been closed.  Another invitee had an active investigation pending.

“Logically, information that is too sensitive to provide to Judicial Watch and the public should not have been given to a ‘community engagement tour,’” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “The U.S. government has been aware for years that Minnesota is a hotbed of Somali terrorist-cell activity. The behind-the-scenes tours and security briefings of the Minneapolis airport very well could have created a threat to public safety.”
In August 2016, the Judicial Watch blog, Corruption Chronicles, reported on the Muslim airport tour story:
“The Obama administration gave Somali Muslims behind-the-scenes tours at a major U.S. airport after the group complained to Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson about feeling harassed and profiled, government records obtained by Judicial Watch reveal. The special security tours not offered to any other group occurred at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport after Department of Homeland Security roundtable meetings with local Somali leaders to obtain feedback for ‘modifications to practices that would allow for operations to be more culturally sensitive.’”