Saturday, December 17, 2011

U.S. Supreme Court has Ruled Obama Ineligible. Minor vs Happersett

The argument before the two courts is plain. "Natural Born Citizen" was not defined in the U. S. Constitution. It was later defined as children born of two U.S. citizens' regardless of the location of the birth. The U. S. Supreme Court found:  The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. Resolution of that question was ultimately left to the decision of the United States Supreme Court and during 1875, that determination was made in a ruling and the decision was handed down:  Minor v, Happersett, Both parents must be U. S. Citizens. 

ICE agency report puts serious dent in Eric Holder’s DOJ case against sheriff Joe Arpaio

Back in March of 2009 the DOJ informed sheriff Arpaio that a probe was underway to investigate what the DOJ claimed were “alleged patterns or practices of discriminatory police practices and unconstitutional searches and seizures.” This is where things get sticky for Eric Holder and the Obama Administration.
Six months prior to this investigation the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) had already conducted its own investigation of sheriff Arpaio’s office and not only gave it a clean bill of health, they actually gave a raving review. The report said things like “The OI and DRO supervisors consider the conduct and performance of the MCSO … officers to be professional and meeting the requirement of the MOA.” And that they considered the working relationship between the feds and the sheriff’s office to be “excellent” and that cases brought by the sheriff’s office to be “high quality.” 

Friday, December 16, 2011

Sheriff Joe to Obama: I'll keep doing my job ...!

Sheriff Joe Arpaio told WND today he intends to fight Justice Department allegations that his office violated federal civil rights laws in enforcing immigration laws in Maricopa County, Arizona.
He further affirmed that his office will proceed with the Cold Case Posse investigation into the authenticity of Barack Obama's birth certificate and his eligibility to be president, which is scheduled to release preliminary findings in February.
In the Obama eligibility investigation, Arpaio's investigative team has amassed hundreds of pages of documentation and taken testimony from dozens of experts in preparation for a final phase of field investigation.
"President Obama has just put a welcome sign on the U.S. border with Mexico," Arpaio told WND in response to the Justice Department complaint.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Another Drone Goes Down Raising Speculation About Drone Virus...!

Well this is getting interesting...since Iran downloaded all the info on the drone that 'Landed' in Iran in tact...could this be a proverbial 'Trojan Horse'?...could it  be it was planned all along by DOD et al...hummm could the data be infected with a super virus?...could be...*wink* LOL at Ammadeedeeja et al...enjoy your early Christmas present!

Who is this masked Man...?

Oh wait it's Barry~Barack~Sotero~Hussein~Lincoln~Roosevelt~Wilson~Muhammad~Obama...
What was I thinking he told us

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Obama may be in deep trouble… Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court

By Rebel Rouser from Texas
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable. Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.
Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama’s major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.
Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.

Hint:>  Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.