Saturday, October 24, 2015

Judge orders Clinton Foundation racketeering case to trial

Jack Shaw 
Next stop the proverbial Southern Chain gang:  


oped: The poor witch; she is so finished...Like the old saying goes: "When you play you must pay"!
Ya and a old fashioned ball & chain to enhance the look of the orange jump suit...enjoy and don't forget to learn the lyrics so ya can sing along  Kari Okie from Da Skokie style:) or sumpin' like that! 


By Sarah Westwood 

A Florida judge has set a trial date in the racketeering case against the Clinton Foundation and Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Judge Donald Middlebrooks of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida ordered the racketeering, influenced and corrupt organizations, or RICO, case to head to trial January 20, 2016.
The order, entered Friday and obtained by the Washington Examiner, came days after Larry Klayman of Freedom of Watch filed a lengthy civil complaint against the Clintons and their foundation in the same court.
While the Clinton legal team could settle the case or enter a variety of motions in an effort to derail the lawsuit before the trial, the judge's swift decision means the matter could go to court before the Feb. 1 Iowa caucus and Feb. 9 New Hampshire primary.

Klayman, who has filed dozens of lawsuits against the Clintons and other prominent politicians, suggested the former first couple and their family philanthropy used their political clout to drum up foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation and lavish diplomatic favors for contributors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state.
Klayman also asked the judge to order a "neutral forensic expert ... to take custody and control of the private email server and reconstruct and preserve the official U.S. Government records relating to the conduct of U.S. foreign policy during Defendant Secretary Clinton's term as Secretary of State."
Judge Middlebrooks has not yet ruled on Klayman's request that the court seize Hillary Clinton's server.

The court documents also state the Clinton Foundation and the former first couple must discuss the Cameras in the Courtroom pilot project, an initiative in the Southern District of Florida aimed at incorporating video recordings into civil cases.
"I am pleased that the Court has set this case for early jury trial," Klayman told the Examiner. "This is a matter of extreme national importance and before now, for decades, the Clintons have not had to answer to a jury for their alleged crimes. Now, justice will be done."

The Clinton Foundation declined a request for comment Friday.

Hero drug company undercuts hated Pharma Bro with $1 AIDS pill

 oped: Indeed...kudos to Imprimis Pharmaceuticals...Big Pharms/FDA should be investigated by the FBI under the RICO statues... See: 

SEE all:

Brad Reed 

Last month, the Internet went into full outrage mode when it learned that Turing Pharmaceuticals decided to jack up the price of an important AIDS-related drug called Daraprim from $13.50 per tablet to $750 per tablet. The company did this despite the fact that this is not a new medicine, it isn’t facing massive shortages, and it doesn’t cost anywhere close to $750 per tablet for the company to produce. 

The CEO of Turing, a sickeningly smug former hedge funder named Martin Shkreli, tried to paint this gigantic price increase as an altruistic move that would benefit patients. This only made the rest of humanity collectively gag even further and Shkreli, who has earned the nickname “Pharma Bro,” became the most hated man on the Internet, even beating out the dentist who killed Cecil the Lion.
OK, so with all that background information out of the way, it seems that a heroic rival drug company has decided to take Shkreli to the cleaners by introducing a rival drug that will cost significantly less. As Ars Technica reports, Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is selling 100-pill packages of its Daraprim alternative for $99 each, which works out to just $0.99 per pill. 

“While we respect Turing’s right to charge patients and insurance companies whatever it believes is appropriate, there may be more cost-effective compounded options for medications, such as Daraprim,” Imprimis CEO Mark L. Baum said in a news release announcing the drug.
At any rate, this is a very good lesson in public relations for future Ayn Randian supermen who think that the way to succeed in capitalism is to simply be as greedy and ruthless as possible: If you do things that make the entire world hate you, a competitor will find a way to exploit you. Hopefully Imprimis’s ploy works and the Pharma Bro will never think of pulling a stunt like this again.

Pew: Immigrants Will Account For 88% of US Population Growth by 2065

Currently one in five immigrants worldwide live here…….
If current demographic trends continue, over 100 million future immigrants and their descendants will account for 88 percent of population growth in the U.S. over the next 50 years, according to a recent report by the Pew Research Center.
Pew’s analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data projects that the total population of the United States will increase by 117 million people, from 324 million in 2015 to 441 million people in 2065.
Without immigration, the projected U.S. population in 2065 would be 338 million, according to Pew.
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) recently released a chart, using Pew data, showing that for every native-born American added to the country’s current population, immigration will add seven more over the next half century. One in five immigrants worldwide currently reside in the U.S.
With 103 million first- or second-generation immigrants comprising 36 percent of the U.S. population by 2065, Pew estimates that in 50 years, a record 17.7 percent of the U.S. population will be foreign-born – compared to the current 14 percent and five percent in 1965.

Pew also reports that since 1965, foreign-born immigrants have been the main driver of U.S. population growth as well as demographic change. The report argues that 1965 saw a major shift in immigration policy with the passage of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson.
The 1965 law changed the criteria for immigrants admitted to the United States. Before 1965, quotas were assigned to countries based on how nationalities were represented in the census. According to Pew, 70 percent of visas were reserved for immigrants from Europe, primarily the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Germany. Prior to 1965, 80 percent of immigrants were white.
However, the new immigration system abandoned national origin quotas, and instead focused on bringing in relatives of U.S. citizens, as well as taking in immigrants based on their skills in the workplace.
Continue Reading on

Clinton State Dept Approved U.S. Weapons Shipment To Libya Despite Ban

... hillary clinton photoshop politics 6 other times hillary clinton was
Just more fuel to the fire…..
The State Department initially approved a weapons shipment from a California company to Libyans seeking to oust Moammar Gadhafi in 2011 even though a United Nations arms ban was in place, according to memos recovered from the burned-out compound in Benghazi.
The documents, obtained by The Washington Times, show U.S. diplomats at the Benghazi compound were keeping track of several potential U.S.-sanctioned shipments to allies, one or more of which were destined for the Transitional National Council, the Libyan movement that was seeking to oust Gadhafi and form a new government.
At least one of those shipments, kept in a file marked “arms deal,” was supposed to come from Dolarian Capital Inc. of Fresno, California, according to an end use certificate from the State Department’s office of defense trade controls licensing that was contained in the file.

The shipment was to include rocket launchers, grenade launchers, 7,000 machine guns and 8 million rounds of ammunition, much of it new and inexpensive hardware originally produced in the former Soviet bloc of Eastern Europe, according to an itemized list included in the end use certificate.
Dolarian Capital, part of a small network of U.S. arms merchants that has worked with U.S. intelligence, confirmed one of its licensing requests to ship weapons via Kuwait to Libya was approved by the State Department in spring 2011 and then inexplicably revoked before the armaments were sent.
Continue Reading on

Oops: Mayors Reject Clinton Team’s Claim They Endorsed Her

More lies from the Clinton campaign….
On Tuesday, the Clinton campaign proudly released a list of 90 African-American mayors who had endorsed the former secretary of state for president. The only problem is, not all of them had.
It wasn’t until Wednesday, when Williams, the mayor of Wilmington, Delaware, found out his friend Biden was out of the running, that he announced his support for Clinton.
That wasn’t the end of the Team Clinton blunder. Mayor Ivy R. Taylor of San Antonio, who had been included on “Hillary’s Texas Leadership Council,” also corrected the campaign, saying she had not, nor had any plans to, publicly support any candidate next year. Clinton’s staff included her on the list after a “brief meeting.” Yet, she also met with GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina.
“The mayor appreciates the service of Secretary Clinton, Mrs. Fiorina and all the candidates for president,” said Mrs. Taylor’s spokeswoman, Leslie Garza. However, because the mayor’s position is nonpartisan, Ms. Garza added, “Mayor Taylor will not be making an endorsement or supporting any candidate.”
The same goes for Tommy Calvert, a commissioner in Bexar County. He too had been included on the list, yet denied ever agreeing to back Clinton.
Note to Clinton staff: A friendly smile or conversation does not equal an endorsement.
Continue Reading on

Obama: ‘Black Lives Matter’ Movement Not Anti-Police


oped:All I have to say about that:

Again, so out of touch with the real world…..
President Obama is defending the Black Lives Matter Movement. During an event discussing Criminal Justice reform, the president told the audience that the African-American community was not just “making stuff up.”
During a Panel Discussion on Criminal Justice Reform at the White House yesterday, Obama described the Black Lives Matter as a social media movement that rose in the wake of Ferguson and the death of Eric Gardner in New York City.
He also defended the organization from being labeled as an anti-police movement, suggesting that the overall movement was based on a positive idea.
“Sometimes, like any of these loose organizations, some people pop off and say dumb things,” he admitted.
He also pointed out that the movement was sometimes misunderstood because of their slogan.

“The notion was somehow saying ‘black lives matter’ was reverse racism or suggesting that other people’s lives didn’t matter or police officers lives didn’t matter,” Obama said, referring to critics of the organization accusing them of being “bogged down” in negative stereotypes.
“I think everybody understands all lives matter,” he continued. “I think the reason that the organizers used the phrase ‘Black Lives Matter’ was not because they were suggesting nobody else’s lives matter.”
Obama insisted that the protests were based on a “legitimate issue,” pointing out that African-Americans were not being treated fairly in some communities. He urged critics realize that the African-American community was “not just making this up.”
Continue Reading on

Ellison's 'Extremism' Charge Deflects from Own Subversive Affiliations

So did Keith Ellison, who calls us and “haters” and “anti-government extremists,” sing any songs of the heroic struggles of the people…? –Keith Ellison/Facebook (with modifications by yours truly)   

Quick Links

Oath Keepers Site

Oath Keepers Store

Join Oath Keepers!

National And State
Chapter Forums


Contact Oath Keepers

David Codrea's Blog




by David Codrea
“Oath Keepers and Three Percenters [are] extremist anti-government movements,” Rep. Keith Ellison charged in a CNN hit piece we talked about in my last column. I noted then we’d take a look at the pot dissing the kettle, and now seems as good a time as any.
I’m not going to hit him up for taking the oath of office on Thomas Jefferson’s Quran, except to note that anyone who swears such an oath and then actively undermines the Bill of Rights, particularly the Second Amendment, is an oath breaker and a domestic enemy. So it’s no surprise that he’d want to attack those who have sworn to uphold the Constitution and to keep true to their oaths. Those of us who know that for “progressives,” every day is Opposite Day, would expect no less.
Likewise, I’m not going to dwell on Ellison’s being a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, except to note the howls of “Racism!” we would expect from the Southern Poverty Law Center and other “progressive” hypocrites should any representative be politically deaf, dumb and blind enough to propose a Congressional White Caucus.

Likewise, I’m not going to dwell on Ellison’s being a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, except to note the howls of “Racism!” we would expect from the Southern Poverty Law Center and other “progressive” hypocrites should any representative be politically deaf, dumb and blind enough to propose a Congressional White Caucus.
Instead, I’m going to focus on Ellison’s membership – and leadership – in the Congressional Progressive Caucus, founded by Democrat presidential contender Bernie Sanders and containing 69 of the most rabidly left-wing politicians to ever menace the future of the Republic. Or as Obi-Wan said about Mos Eisley, “You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy”…
Importantly, one of the CPC’s core “principles” is contempt for the right to keep and bear arms. They know that every tyranny that ever beat its subjects into dehumanized submission had to first disarm them, rendering them pliable, subservient and helpless.  But don’t take my word for it – take theirs, paying special attention to their demand to ban firearms of militia utility.
OK, so they’re typical Democrats. Is that all I’ve got?

Well, yeah, that and pointing out the CPC’s close ties with another “progressive” group, the Democratic Socialists of America.
DSA is the domestic arm of Socialist International — Stalin, you’ll recall, led the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, whereas Hitler headed up the National Socialists. A lie of the left is that Nazis weren’t really what their name claimed, but anyone who has looked beyond the sound bites knows that’s just another deception, and the bitter enmity between totalitarians was essentially one of rival gangs. Basically, these are the folks who want to supplant freedom with a plague that has produced tyranny, misery and genocide since it first broke out to torment humanity.
Do you like songs? So does the DSA, so much that they devoted a page on their website to hymns glorifying their “struggle” (i.e., what Hitler called “Mein Kampf” ). The following in particular should be of special interest, since the people they’re talking about, the “bourgeoisie,” are you and me! And they really explain (better than anything I could say) why the socialists need to take away our guns. Ready? All together now:

Are You Sleeping, Bourgeoisie
(Traditional American song, sung in rounds to the tune of “Frere Jacques”).
Are you sleeping, Are you sleeping,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie,
And when the revolution comes,
We’ll kill you all with knives and guns,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie, See How They Run
(Usually sung in rounds after “Are You Sleeping, Bourgeoisie”. Sung to the tune of “Three Blind Mice”.)
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie,
See how they run,
See how they run
And when the revolution comes,
We’ll kill them all with knives and guns,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie n

Oh, wait—you can’t find those on the DSA website any more — they took them down. Back in 2008 I posted a piece written years earlier (Joseph Farah of World Net Daily wrote about the songs in 1998) and I noted they had been removed by DSA, and further, that the “disappearing” of inconvenient information for purposes of historical revisionism was a trick for mass manipulation right out of the “progressive” playbook.   Fortunately, we have the Internet Archive “Wayback Machine,” that preserves a record of the songs on the DSA site, presumably reflecting the approval of party members like Keith Ellison, who demand we be disarmed while calling us the extremists and the haters.
For all their talk about egalitarian power sharing, the Prozis sure are stingy with the firepower, aren’t they? And they sure are bloodthirsty whenever they achieve a monopoly of violence.
I see Comrade Keith had a musical gig last night —  I wonder if he sang any songs about what he’d like to do to the [disarmed] Bourgeoisie…?

Hillary Clinton calls Republican's impeachment vow 'pathetic'

[There she goes again...showing us her IQ]

oped:Well now all I have to say about that:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Friday denounced as "pathetic" and "totally ridiculous" a Republican congressman's call to impeach her on her first day in office if she is elected to the White House next year. 

Clinton, the front-runner for her party's November 2016 presidential nomination, was responding to comments made by Republican Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama. 

He told a radio interviewer that "she will be a unique president if she is elected by the public next November because the day she's sworn in is the day that she's subject to impeachment because she has committed high crimes and misdemeanors."
Appearing on MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show," Clinton said of the comments by Brooks: "Isn't that pathetic? It's just laughable. It's so totally ridiculous."
"It, perhaps, is good politics with, you know, the most intense, extreme part of their base. I guess that is, or otherwise why would they be doing it?" Clinton added.
Brooks told The Hill newspaper this week Clinton would be subject to impeachment for improperly handling classified information on her private email server while serving as secretary of state.
The Republican-led House of Representatives voted in 1998 to impeach her husband, President Bill Clinton, amid a scandal over his sexual relationship with a White House intern. The Senate in 1999 voted to acquit the president.

Clinton also addressed her 11 hours of testimony a day earlier before a Republican-led House panel on her handling of the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya. The U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were killed in the incident.
Asked what she did after the marathon hearing ended late into the night on Thursday, Clinton said, "Well, I had my whole team come over to my house and we sat around eating Indian food and drinking wine and beer. That's what we did. It was great."
(Reporting by Will Dunham; Editing by Diane Craft)

Friday, October 23, 2015

Obama on #BLM: People ‘Have To Take It Seriously’
[So says Barry Barack...self appointed el Presidente' for life...King Obama...Mr. half & half ...guess he prefers his black half /Islam side... Dunno but sure does appear that way! ]

President Obama said Thursday that the Black Lives Matter movement has helped to highlight legitimate issues black people are facing in the U.S., and that Americans “have to take it seriously.”
“The African American community’s not just making this up. It’s not just something being politicized. It’s incumbent on people to realize that. And it’s incumbent on activists to take seriously the job police have,” Obama said about the movement.
Obama also stressed that despite efforts to paint it that way, the Black Lives Matter movement is not opposed to law enforcement and is not inciting violence against law enforcement. Instead, it’s a movement raising “legitimate” concerns about how black communities are being treated by everyone from police to fellow Americans.

oped: Really ? wow... hmmm I guess Barry missed or ignores this lil tid bit:   

The Black Lives Matter movement is not suggesting that “no one else’s lives matter, rather what they were suggesting was there is a specific problem that is happening in the African American community that’s not happening in other communities,” Obama said. “That is a legitimate issue we’ve got to address.”
Read More:

Army Fires 120,000 Soldiers Amid Budget Cuts

The Army has disclosed that it has cut 80,000 soldiers since 2010 and plans to reduce the force by another 40,000 by the end of 2017, bringing the total active number of troops to 450,000, according to a report to Congress that was recently released under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
[Thanks to Barry Obama PIC ..'Prick in Chief 'Mr. Gay pen and phone Veto man!]

“Nearly every Army installation will experience reductions of some size,” according to the report, which was obtained and released by the Federation of American Scientists (FAS).
It warns of a “permanent reduction of sizable numbers of members of the Armed Forces,” which translates to a 21 percent total cut across the board.
“Significant structure cuts at overseas installations have already occurred,” according to the report.
The Army will be forced to further cut its budget in 2018 and beyond, according to the report
“These force structure reductions and the resulting impacts on installation populations could be significant to both military communities and to the defense posture of our nation.”
At least six Army installations will see their forces cut by more than 1,000 soldiers, according to the report. These include Fort Benning in Georgia, Fort Bliss in Texas, Fort Hood in Texas, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska, Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington, and Schofield Barracks in Hawaii.
The continuing cuts come as the military faces massive and ongoing budget cuts that have not only reduced the forces but have also impacted the purchase and maintenance of military hardware.
Read More:

Feds Have Spent More on Origami Condoms, Fat Lesbian Studies Than on Benghazi Committee

Harry Reid's Latest Accusation - Middle Class Hell
[Harry Reid's Latest Accusation]
LGBT Baby Boomers Need Support for Social Security Equality Bill | The ...
[Fat Lesbian Rep Linda Sanchez with Star Trek George Takei on LGBT Baby Boomers Need Support for Social Security Equality Bill]
Elijah Cummings Gives Oscar-Worthy Performance in IRS Hearing Freakout ...
[Racist Rep Elijah Cummings Gives Oscar-Worthy Performance in Benghazi Hearing Freakout ...]

The amount of taxpayer funding that has gone toward the investigation into the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, is less than the amount the federal government has invested in “Origami condoms” and studies on why lesbians are obese.
Democrats are very concerned that the Select Committee on Benghazi is wasting taxpayer dollars. Leading Senate Democrats, including Minority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.), are demanding that the RNC reimburse the government for the cost of the investigation.
Rep. Linda Sanchez (D., Calif.) said it was a “gross misuse” of millions in taxpayer dollars. Ranking Member of the Benghazi committee Elijah Cummings (D., Md.) began his opening statement during the hearing with Hillary Clinton on Thursday saying, “Republicans are squandering millions of taxpayer dollars on this abusive effort to derail Secretary Clinton’s presidential campaign.”
tags funny stuff hilary clinton political humor posted in funny ...
[Chubby Thesbian...Actor/bi-sexual for political expedience ]

Democratic members of the committee now have a spending tracker, similar to a debt clock, showing the investigation’s costs in real time.
The clock showed the investigation has cost $4,809, 266 as of Thursday afternoon. The figure is more than $1 million less in taxpayer funds that were given to an accused conman to finance his condom inventions and studies into why the majority of lesbians are overweight.
Read More:

Thursday, October 22, 2015

Democrats in Deep Trouble

Show All Comments Sort Oldest to newest Newest to oldest Most Popular

Democrat funny | LOL and some funny politics !! | Pinterest
Democrats have embraced liberal lies and are now reaping what they have sowed.
Check it out:
Matthew Yglesias, no relation to Julio Iglesias, no relation to Enrique Iglesias and therefore no relationship to that blonde Russian tennis player. What’s her name? Anna Kournikova.
Matthew is a lone Yglesias. He runs around with his buddies at Vox, which would be Ezra Klein and a number of other young Millennial types for the most part that grew tired of working for the old stand-by big guys, New York Times, Washington Post. They found some funding, which is what liberals do, and got this site that… I guess it’s owned now by… I forget now who owns it. A major, major, big time organization owns it now, but they set their site up as an explainer site, not as a news site. 

Meaning they take the news out there and they do explainer stories. “What does this mean? What is it about?” They leave the reporting to others. And they explain it, of course, with a very, very demonstrable left-wing tilt. But Matthew Yglesias is the first Democrat I have seen stumble on to this topic and write about it. The headline of his piece: “Democrats Are in Denial. Their Party Is Actually in Deep Trouble.” Now, I have been pointing this out since 2010. The midterm elections 2010, the first Tea Party midterm.
Remember that election? The Democrats lost 700 seats across the country. Governorships, state legislatures, mayorals, city council, you name it — and they lost another close to 700 in 2014. They are down nearly 1500 seats, between 12,000 and 1500 seats/elected positions nationwide. And Yglesias has stumbled across this. I hope I do not damage his reputation or career by citing him here. But it happens. But I just want to say, because young Millennials are reading this today. 

“The Democratic Party is in much greater peril than its leaders or supporters recognize, and it has no plan to save itself. Yes, Barack Obama is taking a victory lap in his seventh year in office. Yes, Republicans can’t find a credible candidate to so much as run for speaker of the House. Yes, the GOP presidential field is led by a megalomaniacal reality TV star,” and yeah, they’re bumbling like the Keystone Cops. “All this is true — but rather than lay the foundation for enduring Democratic success, all it’s done is breed a wrongheaded atmosphere of complacence,” among Democrats.
“The presidency is extremely important, of course. But there are also thousands of critically important offices all the way down the ballot. And the vast majority — 70% of state legislatures, more than 60% of governors, 55% of attorneys general and secretaries of state — are in Republicans hands,” and the brunt of that since the 2010 midterms nationwide. There has been a rejection of Barack Obama and the Democrat Party that they don’t want to talk about. 

And, folks, I have to tell you: It has not been an embrace of the Republican Party because the Republican hasn’t run for anything. The Republican Party strategically in both midterms stayed mute. They were afraid of saying anything that would anger people. So they didn’t say diddlysquat. They didn’t criticize Obama. Individual candidates out there did. But the party itself did not. So the people of this country, it is accurate to say, in the midterms in 2010 and 2014, rejected Democrats all over this country.
Exceptions, of course, California, New York. But the numbers are still what they are: “70% of state legislatures, more than 60% of governors, 55% of attorneys general and secretaries of state — are in Republicans hands. And, of course, Republicans control both chambers of Congress. Indeed, even the House infighting reflects, in some ways, the health of the GOP coalition. Republicans are confident they won’t lose power in the House,” in 2016, “and are hungry for a vigorous argument about how best to use the power they have.

YOU’LL FREAK: When You See What Obama Just Promised The ‘Refugees’

Screen Shot 2015-10-21 at 7.05.21 PM
As the Veteran’s Affairs budget is short by $2.6 billion, the Obama administration has donated a total of $4.5 billion in aid for Syrian refugees.
The United States will give $419­ million more in humanitarian aid to assist Syrian refugees and the countries that are hosting them, administration officials said Monday.
The new aid brings the total U.S. donation since the Syrian conflict began in 2011 to $4.5 billion, more than any other country. It was announced a day after Secretary of State John F. Kerry said the United States would raise its annual refu­gee resettlement cap from 70,000 this fiscal year to 85,000 next year and 100,000 in 2017. (Washington Post)
Take a look at how that compares to the VA and you’ll see exactly where Obama’s priorities are:
House lawmakers say the Veterans Affairs Department’s $2.6 billion budget shortfall for this fiscal year is further proof of administrators’ incompetence and poor planning.
VA officials have a slightly different take, saying the shortfall is a sign of their extraordinary efforts to get veterans the medical care they need, regardless of the cost.
Either way, the department has a gigantic deficit to fill in the next three months.
And it could get bigger.
It also could mean furloughs, hiring freezes and program cancellations if a solution can’t be found.
“We are going to do the right thing for veterans and be good stewards of taxpayer dollars,” VA Deputy Secretary Sloan Gibson told members of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee on Thursday. “But to succeed, we need the flexibility to use funds to meet veterans needs as they arise.” (Military Times)

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Let me educate the #BlackLivesMatter crowd...!

First and foremost let us all jump into the Delorean and take a short trip 'Back to the Future'  

First stop 17th century Colony of Virginia: Did You Know the First Legal Slave Owner in America Was a Black Man? Yes indeed Here’s something you won’t read about in the US history books.
The first legal slave owner in America was black and he owned white slaves. 

Anthony Johnson (BC 1600 – 1670) was an Angolan who achieved freedom in the early 17th century Colony of Virginia. 
Johnson was captured in his native Angola by an enemy tribe and sold to Arab (Muslim) slave traders. He was eventually sold as an indentured servant to a merchant working for the Virginia Company.
Sometime after 1635, Antonio and Mary gained their freedom from indenture. Antonio changed his name to Anthony Johnson. SEE:  for the full story! 

Second stop...The southern states after the civil war1877-1960's Civil Rights movement! The Jim Crow laws and school segregation laws were enacted by the democratic party of the South...Then and Now: After the Civil War, the Democratic Party in the South was the party of white supremacy. Now, African Americans form the party's most loyal base of support.

 Third stop...1960's Civil rights movement: Republican President Eisenhower ended school segregation enforced desegregation:  
Blacks took matters into their own hands. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was determined to overturn the judicial doctrine, established in the court case Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, that segregation of black and white students in schools was constitutional if facilities were "separate but equal." That decree had been used for decades to sanction rigid segregation in the South, where facilities were seldom, if ever, equal.

Blacks achieved their goal of overturning Plessy in 1954 when the Supreme Court -- presided over by an Eisenhower appointee, Chief Justice Earl Warren -- handed down its Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The Court declared unanimously that "separate facilities are inherently unequal," and decreed that the "separate but equal" doctrine could no longer be used in public schools. A year later, the Supreme Court demanded that local school boards move "with all deliberate speed" to implement the decision.

Eisenhower, although sympathetic to the needs of the South as it faced a major transition, nonetheless acted quickly to see that the law was upheld. He ordered the desegregation of Washington, D.C., schools to serve as a model for the rest of the country, and sought to end discrimination in other areas as well.
He faced a major crisis in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1957. Just before implementation of a desegregation plan calling for the admission of nine black students to a previously all-white high school, the governor declared that violence threatened, and posted Arkansas National Guardsmen to keep peace by turning the black students away. When a federal court ordered the troops to leave, the students came to school, only to encounter belligerent taunts. As mobs became hostile, the black students left.

Eisenhower responded by placing the National Guardsmen under federal command and calling them back to Little Rock. He was reluctant to do so because federal troops had not been used to protect black rights since the end of Reconstruction, but he knew he had no choice. And so desegregation began with soldiers standing in classrooms to ensure the rule of law.

The moral to the story is why do blacks continue supporting the democratic party who keeps them in slavery via unemployment,slums  and welfare programs? It just baffles the mind folks!
May I suggest the movement spend more time researching facts before they go off and blame conservatives/police for all that ails them!

One can only lead a mule to water but can't make it drink ...please do yourselves a favor and spend more time on education than protesting and rioting!

And just for the record #ALL LIVES MATTER   #PERIOD


Santa Clause is watching you...

Alrighty then...Oktoberfest is over we are awaiting the Halloween as well as the Thanksgiving ,Christmas season...Summer reruns of  'The Walking Dead' and 'Z-Nation' are over...the new season is upon us...and don't take me wrong I enjoy these programs and all... they are fun and entertain us...but we must also enjoy the season of love,peace and tranquility YES? :)

And just for the record... for the adult entertainment Pimps...y'all were the Bully's/Pervs  I fought with in elementary,middle and HS...and yes I got me proverbial butt kicked a time or two...until I told me Dad and Uncle about me plight...well they trained me in boxing and  martial arts...and things changed ! I began to win the good fight and to this day continue:) Only now in me golden years I use the mighty pen to save bruised knuckles...ha

Without further adieu...for all the lost souls in the adult  entertainment industry as well as career politicians:

 And for all me good friends that are cowboys,ranchers,farmers and just  good ol' boy blue collar workers..
Don't let the Obama progressive administration get ya down...we  still have a good ol' boy Red Neck Christmas eh? :)


Liberals See Immigration as a Way to Abolish the Second Amendment

<br /><b>Warning</b>:  Illegal string offset 'alt' in <b>/home/godfatherpolitic/public_html/wp-content/themes/godfatherpolitics/gp-responsive-email-template.php</b> on line <b>217</b><br />h

The long-term effects of immigration -- legal and illegal -- could have disastrous consequences.
First, soccer would become the national past time.
Second, the Second Amendment would be abolished:
"Mass immigration from the Third World would destroy the NRA and ultimately the Second Amendment, a Washington Post op-ed declares, as foreigners with no cultural connection to America continue to pour into the nation at an unprecedented rate." 
These Third-World immigrants would create a country like the country from which they escaped. The only people who would be armed would be the police, soldiers, and criminals. The people would be left defenseless.
The United States would become a Third-World country with no way to oppose the new tyranny. Centuries of worked out and tested governing policies based on a Christian worldview would be displaced.
Even if every gun was confiscated and turned into a mass of metal, it wold not mean that people would not seek to harm other people.
Timothy McVeigh used fuel oil and fertilizer. Islamic extremists used box cutters and jet planes.

Jews in Israel are being stabbed to death.
The problem isn't with knives, guns, box cutters, jet planes, fuel oil, or fists. It's with people.
What makes the anti-Second Amendment establishment think that getting rid of guns will stop some people from killing other people? It hasn't happened where guns are outlawed. The use of a gun in the right situation can save lives.

Two things need to change. First, and fundamentally, people need to change. We live in a culture where life is considered cheap. People actually used to fear God for what they might do. With God out of the picture, there is no ultimate moral restraint.
Congress still refuses to stop the funding of Planned Parenthood where unborn babies are killed. Young people are taught that they have evolved from "nothing," therefore we are all all the descendants of nothing.

"While evolution teaches that we are accidents or freaks of nature, creationism shows humankind as the offspring of a divine Creator. There are rules to follow which govern not only our time on Earth, but also our afterlife.
"Human action is determined by core beliefs. Creationism teaches that humans are wonderfully made with the promise of high expectations.
“If evolution is forced on our kids, we shouldn’t be perplexed when they beat on their chests or, worse yet, beat on each other and their teachers.”1
Second, people who are intent on harming others need to know that there are armed people ready, willing, and able to defend themselves against an attack.

They need to be made to think that anyone might be armed.

ISLAM AND LIBERALISM: Twin ‘Beasts of the Apocalypse’

is chr

Mankind’s enduring “culture war” is nothing new. It first began in a garden long ago and today has reached a fever pitch worldwide. The battle lines are drawn, not so much between conservative vs. liberal, as many presume, but, rather, between biblical vs. unbiblical, truth vs. deception. In its most distilled form the culture war signifies the worldly manifestation of an otherworldy spiritual battle between good and evil.

African Cardinal Robert Sarah, a man many view as a potential future pope, recently made news by boldly drilling down into this reality. During the Vatican’s ongoing Synod of Bishops, Sarah noted that the “idolatry of Western freedom”, which he described as “atheistic secularism” (aka modern liberalism), and “Islamic fundamentalism” represent twin threats to the world, not unlike Nazism and communism. Atheistic secularism and Islam, he observed, are “almost like the Beasts of the Apocalypse.”
“What Nazism-fascism and communism were to the 20th century, Western ideologies on homosexuality and abortion and Islamic fanaticism are to today,” noted Sarah. “Certain keys allow us to discern the same demonic origin of these two movements: they both advocate a universal and totalitarian law, they’re both violently intolerant, destroyers of families and the Church, and openly anti-Christian,” he concluded.

Indeed, while there are exceptions, the “progressive” left is overwhelmingly anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and pro-Muslim. Liberals and Islamists, such as those belonging to the American-Islamic terrorist group CAIR, as well as Obama’s pals in the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran, have forged a bizarre and notably incongruous sociopolitical partnership I call the “Islamo-’progressive’ axis of evil.” The only explanation for this, as far as I can tell, is best illustrated by the maxim: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
The common enemy, of course, is Christ Jesus, who is Truth.
Whereas Cardinal Sarah clearly recognizes the existence of this “demonic” Islamo-”progressive” axis, it seems, and distressingly so, that the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Catholicism’s official doctrine, does not. While, on the issues of abortion, sexual sin and natural marriage, the Catechism is deeply rooted in Scripture and, as such, taps the living waters of Truth, on the problem of Islam, it has, conversely, tapped the fiery pits of hell.

On, “The Church’s relationship with the Muslims,” the Catechism states: “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”
Where to begin. Rarely does one find so many mistruths packed into a single sentence.
First is the troubling assertion that, “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator.” Wrong. Even the demons “believe there is one God” (see James 2:19). The plan of salvation includes, exclusively, those who at once acknowledge the Creator and have faith in His only begotten Son, Christ Jesus. Says He: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (see John 14:6).
Islam expressly denies both the deity of Christ and that He is the Son of God. Any religion that denies Christ, the Messiah, as the Son of God, is a false religion. Any false religion that worships a god without the Son worships a false god – an idol of its own making.

Islam is idolatry. It is a false religion.
And Allah, a false god.
While, as the Catechism suggests, Muslims “profess to hold the faith of Abraham” and “adore the one, merciful God,” the fact remains that they do neither. The “faith of Abraham” foretold the coming of Christ, the Messiah, who is, in fact, the “one, merciful God” incarnate. Not only do Muslims deny Christ, they persecute, under flame and sword, His very body – the Christian faithful.
A central tenet of Islam is to convert, enslave or kill the infidel. An infidel is anyone who is not Muslim or, depending on who’s doing the killing, belongs to a different sect of Islam. Those who fall into that minority category tagged “moderate Muslim” are also infidels or “idolaters.” “When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them,” commands Surah 9:5 of the Quran. “Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them.”

Islam is about control. The word itself means “submission.” It is a socio-political pseudo-religion based upon the incoherent scribblings of one man – the “prophet” Muhammad, a warring tyrant who, as even the Quran concedes, was a murderous misogynist and pedophile. This unholy book is loosely plagiarized from the Bible’s Old and New Testaments – scriptures that, by contrast, were seamlessly transcribed over centuries by roughly 40 men under the direct and divine inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
Islam is Christianity’s photo-negative. While Christianity brings eternal life to those choosing to surrender to Jesus, who alone is “the Way, the Truth and the Life”, Islam brings eternal death to those who surrender to Allah, who is “the best of deceivers” (“[A]nd Allah was deceptive, for Allah is the best of deceivers.” [see Surah 3:54]).

It’s worth mentioning here that the Bible similarly calls Satan a deceiver. Revelation 12:9, for instance, explains that he “deceives the whole world.” Even though it is often claimed that Muslims, Christians and Jews “worship the same God,” nothing could be further from the truth. Allah is not God. Allah is the deceiver, and insofar as Christianity, true Christianity, spreads peace, love and truth – Islam, true Islam, spreads violence, hate and deception. Allah is definitely real. He’s just not God. Though he wanted to “ascend above the tops of the clouds” and “make [himself] like the Most High” (see Isaiah 14:14), Allah, most assuredly, is not God.
And so, the “best of deceivers” cares not whether we worship the idol of self, as do the secular-”progressives,” the deceiver himself, as do the Muslims, or some other false god. The deceptive one cares only that we deny God the Father, Christ His Son and the Holy Spirit, three in one.

Those who refuse will face persecution, even unto temporal death.
But those who refuse will likewise face salvation, even unto eternal Life.

YAHTZEE! Democrat Jim Webb Leaves Democrat Race and BLASTS Hillary On His Way Out…

Jim Webb speaks at a rally for President Obama in 2012 (AP Photo/Steve ...

ABC News Politics @ABCPolitics
WATCH: @JimWebbUSA withdraws from Democratic primary, says Americans are fed up with extremes of both parties:

Prepare for an epic Hillary roast in 3…2…1. Boom.
American war hero and former Virginia Senator Jim Webb dropped out of the race for the Democratic nomination for President on Tuesday, during a speech in which he leveled a parting shot at challenger Hillary Clinton.
Webb, who earned the prestigious Navy Cross for his service in Vietnam, spoke about the importance of distinguishing real enemies from simple ideological disagreements:
“The other party’s not the enemy. They’re the opposition.”
Webb’s remarks on enemies vs. opposition was likely in reference to Clinton’s response during the first Democratic primary debate, in which she listed Republicans as one of her foremost enemies, alongside “the drug companies” and “the Iranians.”
The lone veteran in the 2016 field, Webb also acknowledged his differences with the Democratic Party, which has seemingly embraced a self-avowed “Democratic Socialist” like Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.

Webb said:
“I fully accept that my views on many issues are not compatible with the power structure and the nominating base of the Democratic Party.”
Read more: IJ Review

JENNA JAMESON: Check Out Who Jenna’s Supporting For 2016? (YOU’LL BE SHOCKED)

She’s also no fan of Islam. The former adult film-star just endorsed the most unlikely candidate in line for the 2016 elections. While she was at it, she also voiced her support her Israel after the recent knife attacks. Check it out…

Jenna Jameson Retweeted American Prometheus
is the clear choice!!!!
Jenna Jameson added,

Former adult actress Jenna Jameson has sparked online outrage after tweeting support for Israel in the wake of recent tension in the area.
The Celebrity Big Brother star, who converted to Judaism after becoming engaged to her partner Lior Britton, urged Israelis to ‘stand strong and defend yourself by all means’.
The 41-year-old former porn star’s comments, which comes amid fears of a third intifada as violence between Israel and Palestine escalates, has been met with both anger and scorn.
Read more: Daily Mail

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

U.S. Military Constitutionally Obligated to Arrest Obama, Congress for Treason

Oh can you imagine? This would certainly light things up. 
Check it out:
The U.S. Constitution is the bedrock of all American jurisprudence. Without it, no legal protections for human rights and no laws ensuring liberty or freedom exist. All branches of government require office holders to pledge oaths and/or commitments to upholding the U.S. Constitution. Commissioned and non-commissioned officers, as well as enlisted members of the Armed Forces, also take oaths to defend the Constitution.  

Description Dod-seal.png

When elected officials take their oaths, they are swearing to defend the U.S. Constitution. Constitutional oaths prohibit enacting and following unconstitutional laws and illegal orders. Constitutional oaths also prohibit oath takers from participating in and/or defending corruption, including covering up illegal actions of other oath takers.
In fact, defending the Constitution requires members of the Armed Forces to disobey illegal orders. And, in the case of alleged treasonous acts, members of the Armed Forces are constitutionally bound to arrest such offenders. 

The Case for Treason
By sending billions of dollars to provide “aid and comfort” to America’s sworn enemy, Iran, Barack Obama and the majority of Congress are guilty of treason.
Treason against the United States is defined as 1) “consist[ing] only in levying war against them,” or 2) “in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”
Some argue this definition is only applicable during wartime. Regardless of how one defines America “at war” sending cash to Iran, a sworn enemy whose leaders have publicly declared its intent to destroy America, and to continue building nuclear weapons, clearly falls within the Constitutional definition of a treasonous act.
U.S. Senators and Congressmen can be arrested for acts of “Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace,” as outlined in Article 1 Section 6 of the Constitution.

GW Bush..oh my...hypocrit much?


Ok I liked GW Bush...not so much anymore...guess he doesn't adhere to Reagan's Commandment about attacking your own in the GOP...his statement in support of his lil bro Jeb: 'I don't like Senator Ted Cruz' Well George just for the record I LIKE TED CRUZ!
Well now George weren't you the one who said he does not criticize Presidents former or present...namely Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is  You did not criticize him at any level!


George fyi most people in Middle America will not vote for another Bush...we have had two already...we live in a Republic not a Monarchy...this also applies to the Clinton's and Obama's as well!

SARAH PALIN SLAMS PASTOR: Who Called Her A ‘Hypocrite’ For Being Pro-Gun And …


Sarah Palin always knows how to perfectly respond to her haters in the most epic way possible. After this ‘Pastor’ tried to call her out for being pro-gun and pro-life, she fired back on her Facebook page. Check it out…

Sarah Palin added 5 new photos.
Politician · 4,552,770 Likes
· Yesterday at 4:44pm ·
Preacher calling me out with his holier-than-thou condemnation for being both pro-Second Amendment and pro-life? I couldn't be prouder. And typically twisting context to fit his bizarre rant... er, "sermon?" Bring it on. Good job, shepherd. Don't think too many Americans will be led astray by you standing at the pulpit on this one.…/armor-of-light-one-sided-propagan…/

Sarah Palin's photo.
Sarah Palin's photo.

OBAMA’S SUPERIOR MILITARY: Soldier Who’s Not an Obama Fan Ordered to Shut Up

Screen Shot 2015-10-20 at 7.53.53 AM 

By Thomas Holmes 

The beatings will continue until morale improves. That seems to be the primary order our current Commander in Chief is giving the military he commands. In what some veterans are calling a highly suspect ruling, Master Sgt. Nathan Sommers was found guilty of disobeying an order, making a false official statement and failing to arrive at an appointed place. His real crime against the Army lead by the Muslim in Chief? Having an anti-Obama bumper sticker on his personal car. 

Yup. Master Sgt. Sommers was previously reprimanded for his bumper sticker and having the gall, the utter disgrace towards the Obama, to read books by conservative authors during his lunch break- a lunch break which apparently included meals from…..Chic fil-A!!! I know, how is this guy not serving 25 to life in Leavenworth right now?? According to Sommers’ interview on Fox News, that treatment alone made him suspect he was being discriminated against. Apparently, Sommers found himself in the crosshairs in 2014 when a superior explained that his choice of reading and eating and along with his bumper was causing “unnecessary workplace tension”. Boy, it never ceases to sicken me how quickly the 1st Amendment gets tossed out the window by the very philosophy claiming to “free” and “empower” everyone.

Now, maybe President Obama can be exempt from this awkward situation. I mean, how can he be expected be responsible or even knowledgeable of everything going on in his military when there’s still so much golf still to play? You might think Obama has nothing to do with Master Sgt. Sommer’s railroading, but you’d be wrong. Only in Obama’s Marx-colored universe where he can ignore and blame the military when it suits his plans, only to leverage his authority as Commander in Chief other times would he completely fail to understand that American soldiers don’t actually exist to serve him. Every member of the American military bears allegiance to protect the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic, but nowhere in that oath are they required to swear allegiance to the President similar to, say, the German soldier’s personal oath to Hitler. Obama, or at the very least the four or five left-leaning American soldiers, seem to think that just because you chose to put on the uniform to protect these shores, you’ve forfeited your right to read a book and eat a meal of your choosing on your down time.
Tell me I’m over-doing it people, but if you’re reprimanded for disliking President Obama thereby causing “workplace tension”, how soon before reading the “wrong” book means you’re at fault for inciting “workplace violence” – since we know that could never be a terrorist act?

PUTIN MEME: Expresses What Many Americans Feel About Islam and Obama

If only our President was actually a leader. Remember those days?

Share if you think Obama pales in comparison to Putin

THESE 16 STATES: Make A HUGE Move Against Islam – And Every State Should Also

Screen Shot 2015-10-19 at 7.14.15 AM
It would only be common sense for all 50 states to be doing this.

CAIR identified 16 states as having introduced legislation to ban or restrict Shariah law in 2013. The list is supposed to be meant as a condemnation of these states.
However, I know plenty of people who would use such a list as a guide for where to move.
The states are:
  • Alabama (two bills)
  • Arkansas
  • Florida (two bills)
  • Indiana (two bills)
  • Iowa
  • Kentucky
  • Mississippi (four bills)
  • Missouri (two bills) 
  • North Carolina
  • Oklahoma (seven bills)
  • South Carolina (two bills)
  • Texas (six bills)
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wyoming (two bills)
And hopefully in 2015, the list will get longer.
Maybe someday we can even list all 50 states. (Conservative Tribune)