Saturday, July 28, 2012

Ben & Jerry's vs Chic~fil~A

Ben & Jerry's is stirring things up again with its decision to rename "Oh My! Apple Pie!" as "Apple-y Ever After" to support the U.K.'s proposal to legalize gay marriage.
Here we go folks more hypocrisy/double standards from the Gay Mafia and Looney Left..they rant and rave against a Ma & Pa Christian Chicken Sandwich shop franchise for supporting one man one woman for marriage...they rant about a private company speaking out over their beliefs...yet they do the same thing...and the Christian right does not rant and rave and boycott them!

Ben & Jerrys Renames Flavor to Support Gay Marriage in England | Apple y Ever AfterVS    Other GiftsCollectibles

Obama’s Convenient Pro-Israel Campaign

What’s Truth Got to Do With It?

Filed under Constitution, Politics
You’ve heard it said that the First Amendment gives us the right to free speech, but it doesn’t give us the right to yell “Fire” in a crowded theater. In other words, with rights come certain responsibilities; we’re not given carte blanche to say anything we want at any time. The First Amendment also gives us the right of a free press, in the same breath, in fact, as it gives the right to free speech. From this, I think we can assume that the framers saw these rights as practically the same—one being spoken, the other written.

The media is given a huge portion of power. The ability to inform is underestimated by most, yet abused by many. God chose to reveal His will to mankind through the spoken and written word. Jesus is referred to in the New Testament as the “Word.” Words can communicate either truth, error or, as is often the case, both. The wrong word at wrong time can send the wrong message, but the right word at the right time can bring understanding. We are all guilty of misusing words at times, but when it becomes a habit, we need to evaluate our communication skills. I believe the media in this country is at this particular crossroads.
The restraints and the responsibilities that the media should be exercising have long since vanished into the rabbit-hole of partisan politics. It’s no secret that every media outlet has a particular point of view on what is being reported—no one is truly objective. FOX News can claim that: “We report, you decide,” but hopefully we’re all a little smarter than that. FOX has an agenda, just as much as CNN has.
But, the real point here is fact-checking. How, in our media-saturated world can we ever really know the REAL story? The media is often referred to as the fourth branch of government, which should highlight both their responsibility and their power. In a field that is theoretically dedicated to getting at the truth, anonymous sources (real or otherwise) are often the ones driving the bus, with zero accountability. Unnamed sources are necessary sometimes,  but they were never meant to allow half-truths and hearsay to be printed as truth. It was supposed to be like the blurry oval that is used in crime documentaries, giving someone close to the action a chance to tell the story without revealing their true identity, often for reasons of safety.

The “free press” ideal of the Constitutional framers was never meant for us to become a society of individual reporters. Deadlines and cigar-chomping editors used to be the determining factors in what got released to the public as “news.” Today, the internet has removed these obstacles and has made “being first” the primary determining factor. Everyone wants to be the one to “break” the story and if that means making a few things up—or leaving a few things out—what’s the big deal? ABC’s recent linking of Joker shooter James Holmes with the TEA party is only one of many instances of ideological prejudices driving the presentation of the “news.”
As long as ideology—whether it’s political, religious, sexual orientation, cultural, tribal, or whatever—continues to drive the media, it will continue to get more fragmented and individualistic. When “truth” is arrived at only after it has been distilled through someone’s ideological grid and washed clean of anything that may offend their sensibilities (You hearing me, Tolerance Police?), it is no longer truth. It is an opinion baptized in current events. Personally, I am rather tired of having to read three news stories to get the big picture of one event. Anyway, they say history always repeats itself. Maybe I’ll just wait for the re-run…


Gun Control Misfires: A Tale of Four Cities

Friday, July 27, 2012

DOJ won't promise to protect free speech

by: Bob Unruh
Thought your free speech rights, those given by God and protected by the U.S. Constitution, were assured in the United States?
Well, maybe. DOJPerez
A representative of Barack Obama’s Department of Justice has refused – over and over – to answer a question from a member of Congress about the agency’s dedication to freedom of speech.
It was during this week’s hearing by the House Constitution subcommittee, headed by Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., where Tom Perez, of the DOJ’s civil rights office, repeatedly wouldn’t respond to Frank’s question.
In fact, Franks repeated the question four times: “Will you tell us here today simply that this administration’s Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion.”
WND has reported on the issue multiple times in the past. The issue primarily revolves around the idea contained in a proposal that has been made many times in the United Nations by the Islamic-led interests there.
The concept is that there should be a “Defamation of Religions” law internationally that would make it criminal to speak negatively about any “religion,” although the proposals always have focused on Islam.
The idea is “nothing more than an effort to achieve special protections for Islam – a move to stifle religious speech,” according to an analysis by Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice.

The Human Rights First organization has chimed in, saying the idea simply violates fundamental freedom of expression norms.
Tad Stahnke, of Human Rights First, said the concept is “unfortunate for both individuals at risk whose rights will surely be violated under the guise of prohibiting ‘defamation of religions,’ as well as for the standards of international norms on freedom of expression.”
The issue also has been addressed by Carl Moeller, chief of Open Doors USA, in an interview with WND at the time, because of the pending threat to the freedoms in America.
“This is a battle for our basic freedoms,” he warned. “This [U.N. idea] is Orwellian in its deviousness. To use language like the anti-defamation of a religion. It sounds like doublespeak worthy of Orwell’s 1984 because of what it really does.”
He said Muslim nations would use it as an endorsement of their attacks on Christians for statements as simple as their belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ, which Muslims consider an affront.
Worse would be the “chilling” effect on language that the U.N. plan would create worldwide, he said.
“This would be a huge blessing to those who would silence dissidents in their countries, Islamic regimes,” he said. “This stands as a monument to the gullibility of the masses in the United States and other places who don’t see this for what it is.”

Perez stumbled in responding, then referenced the context of the question. When Franks noted it was not a hard question, Perez responded that, in fact, it was, because “when you make threats…”
“If you have a proposal that you are considering we will actively…,” Perez said.
“Here’s my proposal,” Franks said. “I’m asking you to answer a question. That’s my proposal. I’m proposing you answer this question.”
He wouldn’t.
WND asked the Justice Department for some answers today, and a spokesman refused to respond, and said Perez was not and would not be available.
According to a report in the Daily Caller, the current round of questioning by Franks was prompted by its report from last year on a meeting between Perez and “hardcore Islamists, including Mohamed Magid, the Sudan-born, Saudi-trained head of the Islamic Society of North America.”
The report said Perez expressed a desire for more meetings with Islamists, “even though he had watched while Magid called for legal punishment of people who criticize Islamic texts that all for violence against non-Muslims and for the subordination fo women to men.”
The report continued, “Perez also listened while another Islamist called for the Justice Department to redefine religious free speech as illegal discrimination.”
The Daily Caller quoted Sahar Aziz, who spoke at that October 2011 meeting, saying the DOJ’s “civil rights lawyers are top of the line – I say this with utter honesty – I know they can come up with a way” to classify criticism and discrimination.

The Daily Caller called Perez “one of President Barack Obama’s most aggressive advocates.”
“For example, during an October meeting in Alabama intended to rally opponents to the state’s successful enforcement of immigration laws, Perez suggested that Alabama residents score lower on education tests than poorly educated immigrants from Mexico and other Latin American countries.”
The report continued, “‘State school performance may decline,’ he said, because ‘some of the [illegal immigrant] kids who are leaving [the state] are some of the highest performing kids,’ he told reporters.”
Trent’s office confirmed today to WND that at last year’s meeting, “Perez reportedly ended the meeting with an enthusiastic closing speech and was quoted as saying, ‘I sat here the entire time, taking notes…I have some very concrete thoughts … in the aftermath of this.’”

OPed: Jack
It appears as if 1984 came a little later than expected..ushered in ~2008 by Barack Obama

Olympic Committee is the Thought Police ~World Enforcer Now?

 The Hellenic Olympic Committee said that Papachristou was dropped from the Olympic team~ "for Freedom of speech statements?
 Voula Papachristou has revealed how she has been left feeling "very bitter and upset" after the decision

I am so fed up with the world we live in today...why pray tell does everyone believe they have the right to control the thoughts of others and deny Freedom of Speech because it may offend someone..if one does not like what someone has to say...debate the issue and express your opinion...but by know means do you have the right to punish or control individuals thoughts..The United States of America was founded over the rebellion from oppression by the British Empire..our Founding Fathers wrote our Constitution and Bill of Rights to guarantee our freedoms.
The world we live in now consists of Thought Police and Controllers...we live in a world where suing has become the norm...cry babies and generally weak people led by control freaks Zealots and Elitists who believe they  know what is best for long as they don't have to live by the same standard...'Do as I say not as I do"

I for one am sick and tired of the Gay Mafia ,ACLU,Progressives,CPUSA and Morons trying to force their Ideology down our throats..enough is enough folks...they are entitled to their opinions as are we...and 'We the People' will no longer be bullied by a minority of perverts with a corrupt agenda! 

Let's start by demanding the UK Olympic Committee reinstate Greece athlete Voula Papachristou all she did was express her opinion of what she thought was that grounds to expel her from all the hard years of work she did to make her countries Olympic Team and participate...all over  PC nonsense?

$25,000 Challenge to General Colin Powell

LTC (R) Allen West Oath Keeper

General(R) Colin Powell Oath Breaker
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Oath Keeper

On August 8, 2011 the Birther Summit issued a challenge to Gen. Colin Powell (Ret) to review a mountain of evidence clearly demonstrating the birth certificate officially released by the White House and posted on its server on April 27, 2011 was a forgery.

Nine days later, the Arizona "Surprise Tea Party" collected 242 signatures on a petition requesting Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona to conduct an investigation into the birth certificate posted on the White House servers on April 27, 2011.
One man honored his Oath of Office by immediately launching an investigation, while the other dismissed "We the People's" challenge in classic Alinsky style -- ridicule.
Article II Super PAC revisited the original challenge and upped the ante. We are giving General Colin Powell a second chance to do what an honorable man does--honor his Oath. We are challenging him "to meet with Sheriff Arpaio in the reasonably near future, review the evidence, and issue a statement regarding that evidence. If you choose to accept this challenge, which we pray you will do, then we will make a $25,000 donation to the Wounded Warrior Project in your name."
Duty, honor and country--does it still matter? Will Gen. Colin Powell accept Article II Super PAC's Challenge?

See our full page ad in the Washington Times, 07/16/2012:
Article II Super PAC, Gen Powell/Obama $25,000 Challenge, W.T. Print-Ad, July 16, 2012

Thursday, July 26, 2012

100 Million Gun Owners Didn’t Kill Anyone Last Week

guns SC 100 Million Gun Owners Didnt Kill Anyone Last Week
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.” – Thomas Jefferson
For my tenth birthday, I wanted a BB gun. Like the mother in “A Christmas Story,” mom simply said, “You’ll shoot your eye out.” Dad had a wiser response. He gave me a choice. I could have the BB gun or a pair of Roy Rogers cap pistols I had been admiring. He made it clear to me that once I owned a weapon that actually fired real projectiles — even if they were only BBs — my toy gun days were over. I chose the pistols, and he knew I wasn’t ready for the real thing.
Two years later, at age twelve, with my toy gun days behind me, Dad bought me a bolt-action .22-caliber rifle and taught me how to use it — safely. I still remember the three simple rules he taught me: this is not a toy, never point it at anyone, and always assume that it is loaded.
As I grew into a teenager, I always knew where Dad kept our guns — mine and his. They were not locked up. They were standing in their cases in the closet in my parents’ bedroom, with the ammunition on the shelf above. Yet never once did it occur to me to take those guns to school and shoot my classmates. Nor did I ever contemplate walking into a packed movie theater or a crowded mall and begin firing.

None of us has any way of knowing whether James Holmes, the shooter in Aurora, Colorado, is simply an evil genius putting on an act in court or if he is a loon who really believes he is Batman’s nemesis, the Joker. We don’t know if his father ever taught him how to use firearms, or if he got his knowledge from watching TV and movies and playing violent video games.
What we do know is that a society that once lived in reality has evolved into a culture wallowing in fantasy violence, ruled by people whose goal is to disarm the good guys, leaving us all at the mercy of the bad guys.
We know that, like so many communities today, Aurora, Colorado, did not allow law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons into the theater that night. Perhaps if they had, someone might have been able to stop Holmes before he killed a dozen innocent people and wounded scores of others.
Even in states that allow concealed carry of firearms, politically correct business owners can forbid the possession of such weapons in their establishments. A sign on the door of the Von Maur department store in Omaha, Nebraska announces that guns are not allowed. On December 5, 2007, 19-year-old Robert

Hawkins read that sign as follows: “Even our security guards are unarmed! Come on in and shoot us!” So he did, killing eight people and wounding five others.
Shortly after my dad bought me those cap pistols instead of that BB gun, a teenage punk named Charles Starkweather went on a rampage across Nebraska, killing eleven people. The entire Midwest was terrified. As the debate again heats up over banning certain-sized magazines for particular weapons, limiting the quantities and calibers of ammo, and other new forms of gun control, it is instructive to note that Starkweather’s weapons of choice on that spree were a pistol, a knife, a .22 rifle (similar to mine), and a .410 shotgun like one I almost bought a few years later.

Charles Starkweather proved in 1958 that he could kill just as many people with a .22 rifle and a small caliber shotgun as Robert Hawkins or James Holmes could a half-century later with a so-called assault rifle. Evil finds a way. As Bruce Wayne’s butler tells him in a previous Batman movie, “Some men just want to watch the world burn.”
In the wake of these latest murders, as you hear our politicians blather on about more gun control, remember that 100 million gun owners didn’t kill anyone last week. They are the good guys. They are on our side.
© 2012 by Doug Patton, Doug Patton describes himself as a recovering political speechwriter who agrees with himself much more often than not. Astute supporters and inane detractors alike are encouraged to e-mail him with their pithy comments at Now working as a freelance writer, his weekly columns are syndicated exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. For info on using his column at your publication or website, please email Cari Dawson Bartley at 
Photo credit: Gregory Wild-Smith (Creative Commons)

Deranged Man Attacks Group Protesting ObamaCare HHS Mandate

Free speech is less free in Arkansas. In fact, volunteers with Tradition Family and Property (TFP—Louisiana) were recently attacked in Little Rock during a peaceful rally against Obamacare and its HHS mandate. The incident occurred on July 17.

Three Presidential Debates Announced

by: Tim Brown

According to the Commission On Presidential Debates, the presidential candidates from the Democrat and Republican party will face off in three debate in the month of October.
On October 3 the debate will be at the University of Denver in Colorado. The debate will focus on domestic policy and be divided into six time segments of approximately 15 minutes each on topics to be selected by the moderator and announced several weeks before the debate. The moderator will open each segment with a question, after which each candidate will have two minutes to respond. The moderator will use the balance of the time in the segment for a discussion of the topic.

On October 16 the debate will be at the Hofstra University in Hempstead, NY. The second presidential debate will take the form of a town meeting, in which citizens will ask questions of the candidates on foreign and domestic issues. Candidates each will have two minutes to respond, and an additional minute for the moderator to facilitate a discussion. The town meeting participants will be undecided voters selected by the Gallup Organization.

On October 16 the debate will be at the Hofstra University in Hempstead, NY. The second presidential debate will take the form of a town meeting, in which citizens will ask questions of the candidates on foreign and domestic issues. Candidates each will have two minutes to respond, and an additional minute for the moderator to facilitate a discussion. The town meeting participants will be undecided voters selected by the Gallup Organization.
The final presidential debate will be on October 22, at Lynn University in Boca Raton, FL. The format for the debate will be identical to the first presidential debate and will focus on foreign policy.
There will also be a vice-presidential debate on October 11 at Centre College in Daville, KY. The debate will cover both foreign and domestic topics and be divided into nine time segments of approximately 10 minutes each. The moderator will ask an opening question, after which each candidate will have two minutes to respond. The moderator will use the balance of the time in the segment for a discussion of the question.
Honestly, are we expecting a lot of fireworks in these debates? Probably not. Are we expecting any real solutions to be laid out on the table? Probably not. Are we expecting some mud slinging to take place? My bets are on that for sure.

Obama Indirectly Tied To The Colorado Massacre?

Barack Obama has embraced and emboldened the Occupy movement since its inception, and despite increasing lawlessness reaching to the point of domestic terrorism in the form of the Occupy Black Bloc group, Obama has refused to distance himself from them.
We need only look at the history of those who have shaped Obama’s ideology, beginning with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, and a host of other socialists and communists.
Ayers took part in the famous “Day of Rage” in 1969, calling for an end to the Vietnam War, but more importantly calling for an end to capitalism.
When the Vietnam War began to wind down, the prop for Ayers’ socialism ceased to exist, but his  band of domestic terrorists, the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), lived on as capitalism still needed to be destroyed.

Despite Ayers’ bombs, America wanted nothing of his socialist utopia, so Ayers went about putting socialism in place with the help of groups like ACORN.
Then George W. Bush came along.
The radicals again put their “anti-war” movement together, including Obama with his October 2, 2002 anti-Iraq War speech at Chicago Federal Plaza, complete with former SDS members Mike Klonsky, Carl Davidson, and Marilyn Katz putting together an anti-war protest as a prop to give drama to Obama’s speech. Per the Obama campaign, video of the event (except for thirteen seconds of Obama’s speech, including his “dumb war” statement) was “lost.” It was “lost” because the crowd was filled to the gills with radicals that would in 2009 become the Occupy movement: same ideology, same players.
So in effect, we could say Obama is part of the Occupy movement.
What is different between Ayers’ ideology/ domestic terrorism of the 1960s and 1970s and the Occupy Black Bloc group?
Nothing. They are indistinguishable.
So if it is determined that the Colorado mass murderer James Holmes was part of the Occupy Black Bloc group, which is nothing more than a continuation of Obama and Ayers’ “anti-war” movement,  and Black Bloc researcher Bill Warner is correct that Holmes fits the Occupy Black Bloc profile to a tee, then President Barack Hussein Obama is indirectly tied to the massacre in Colorado.

Does Obama Think U.S. Soldiers Use AK-47s?

oped: Jack ~Well if Barry Barack Sotero Hussein Davis Obama served in the military he would have learned in Basic Training.. "Your gun is for fun your rifle to kill" However the only combat Obama saw was in the Chicago Bath he should be a expert on Guns!

President Barack Obama, speaking to the National Urban League on Wednesday evening, sounded a call for gun control–and revealed his apparent ignorance about the U.S. military in the process. Obama told the audience that “AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals.” However, the U.S. military does not generally use the AK-47, a weapon originally developed in the Soviet Union that was subsequently adopted by many other communist states. The AK-47 also became the weapon of choice for guerilla armies and terrorist groups.

Today, AK-47s are typically to be found among enemy forces that U.S. troops encounter on the battlefield. Osama bin Laden was often filmed or photographed near his AK-47 rifle–and was killed by U.S. Navy Seals when he reached for it. (Update: Yes, bin Laden preferred a newer, updated version of the weapon, the AK-74.) The former leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi also released video footage of himself taking target practice with an AK-47. (Update: Other videos featured the AK-47; the target practice was with a recovered American M249 rifle.) Taliban forces in  Afghanistan use the AK-47 in attacks on NATO forces. There are some allied forces that also use the AK-47, and the CIA once funneled AK-47s to “friendly” militias. Occasionally, members of specialized units may use the AK-47 in the field. Practically, however, as well as symbolically, the AK-47 is a weapon not typically associated with American soldiers.

Continue Reading on

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Pledge opposition to Hillary's Global Agenda..!

Dear Patriot,

Right now my feet are firmly on the ground just outside the United Nation’s complex in New York City.

You can imagine the scene...

Wannabe one-world dictators are feverishly putting the final touches on the freedom-killing UN "Small Arms Treaty."

And much to the chagrin of Hillary Clinton, I've managed to get my hands on a draft copy!  It's just as I've been warning:

“Small arms and light weapons” are listed as “covered items” right next to battle tanks and warships ... and they’ve left the definition so wide, it no doubt will include everyday firearms Americans use for defense and sport.

We only have until THIS FRIDAY July 27th to prepare for battle.

Please click here to see my critical video update: 


 Once the UN passes this global gun grab, President Obama will do everything in his power to force it through the U.S. Senate.

We will have just days to respond.

After you watch my video update, be sure to Pledge Opposition to Hillary's Global Agenda putting yourself squarely on record AGAINST this radical treaty.

Thank you,

Dudley Brown

Executive Vice President
National Association for Gun Rights

P.S. If you've already signed your pledge, please help us reach our goal of raising $250,000 by Friday July 27th, the day the UN Conference is set to announce it's treaty.

Chip in just $10 or $20 today!

Bill O’Reilly Goes ‘Ballistic’ Against Informed Congressman

Tuesday evening on Fox News’ The O’Reilly Factor, Bill O’Reilly demonstrated just how ignorant he is when it comes to guns and gun laws. He was so insecure about his own thinking in regards to this that he hardly gave Rep. Jason Chaffetz opportunity to respond. But when Chaffetz did, he schooled O’Reilly in the No Spin Zone. oreilly chaffetz
O’Reilly claimed that it “made sense” for the sale of all “heavy weapons” be reported to the FBI and that a law like that was “badly needed.” Now O’Reilly didn’t define exactly what he meant by that till the Congressman misunderstood what he said. Then he claimed he was speaking about “machine guns, mortars, howitzers.”
Now understand they were speaking in light of the Aurora, Colorado shooting. Not one of these devices were used in that shooting. James Holmes was armed with a shotgun, an AR-15, and two handguns.

O’Reilly said that people train at a flight school and the FBI is alerted. That must be news to the Department of Homeland Security who allowed 25 illegals to have flight training and an illegal alien to own the school. He then compared it to purchasing a machine gun and the FBI is not alerted.
For O’Reilly to claim that his show is the “No Spin Zone” he did a lot of spinning. Chaffetz rightly pointed out that you must get permission to purchase a machine gun. You need a class three license that is given by the ATF and there is a thorough background check. You can ask me how I know this via email if you like.
In addition to that, when a person goes to purchase a firearm the FBI is not “alerted” per se. For instance, if one does not have a concealed carry permit then paperwork is filled out and kept on site. The FBI is contacted to make sure that you are eligible to purchase the firearm, but they are not to be keeping records of that phone call. However, if you have a concealed weapon permit, then you have already gone through a background check and you simply fill out paperwork, which stays on site, and go on your merry way.

When Chaffetz pointed out the need to receive what he called a “tax certificate,” which is what I refer to as a class three license, O’Reilly tried to spin again asking if he had been to a gun show as though that made a difference in the discussion. Chaffetz rightly pointed out that you can’t just walk into a gun show and buy a “bazooka” or a fully automatic machine gun.
O’Reilly stopped him in mid-sentence to claim that one could buy an AK-47 in this country and there would be no report of it. That is just a flat out lie. It isn’t spin. It’s a lie. AK-47′s are short range rifles and they can be obtained in the same manner that you obtain any other weapon. The only way there would be no reporting would be in states where you sell from one person to another privately and even then there is to be a paper record to protect both parties. Any purchase through a gun dealer whether it’s a .22 handgun or an AK-47 has paperwork involved and the individual has been checked out via the FBI or through their CCW background check.

Then O’Reilly gets to more than just “heavy weapons.” He begins talking about the 60K rounds of ammunition tha0t he alleges Holmes had acquired via the internet. In reality Holmes only had 6,000 rounds. According to the New York Times he purchased 3,000 rounds of .40, 3,000 rounds of .223 and 350 12 gauge shotgun shells. So I’m guessing he wants a law for that too.
He then claimed that if you sell “heavy weaponry” and then included “automatics, semi-automatics, ammunition” all you do is file with the FBI. OK, this is where he changed up things. Now, he’s substituted “howitzers, mortars and machine guns” for virtually every gun that is provided through a gun dealer.
O’Reilly wants the government surveilling citizens if they buy a particular quantity of ammunition. He was bent over 60,000. But what about 20,000? How about 10,0000? What if it was only 1,000? You get nearly that in one ammo can of .223.

Chaffetz again rightly points out that there is not going to be a FBI agent trailing every individual who buys a large bulk of ammunition. My goodness, we can’t even get them to learn from 9-11 and follow up on 25 illegals taking flight training. They certainly aren’t going to be going after ammunition buyers!
Bill then tries to imply the 60,000 rounds were purchased at once and calls them “heavy duty” rounds. O’Reilly, these were not .50 rounds. They weren’t even .45′s. They were 12 gauge shotgun rounds, .40 caliber rounds and .223 rounds. O’Reilly was just being sensational in all of this and reacting emotionally. He also keeps talking about an AK-47, which was not used in the shooting. It was a Smith & Wesson M&P15, which is an AR-15 rifle.
O’Reilly in continuing his rant about the AK-47, that was non-existent in the shooting, was filled with misinformation, as well as, he claimed only a handful of states required the reporting.

What was almost hilarious was O’Reilly’s claim that the congressman defines the gun laws and then proceeds to claim there are loopholes where there aren’t loopholes and Rep. Chaffetz continues to tell him that they have defined the laws and that O’Reilly is misinformed, which he is.
While Bill O’Reilly says he wouldn’t ban AK’s and that he supports the Second Amendment, he then says he would ‘report’ such purchases as ammunition. OK then if you wouldn’t ban AK’s why are you speaking of them as though they are some sort of terrible thing? Why do you make them out to be so bad? Furthermore, since we are guaranteed to be secure via the Fourth Amendment, would O’Reilly then be in favor of the FBI having to obtain a warrant before snooping around every person that purchased a particular type of firearm or purchased bulk ammunition?
You see my friends, this is what acting emotionally to a situation gets you. It gets you blathering like an idiot and contradicting yourself and misinforming the public on issues like this.

Bill, sorry, but at least in this article, the spin stops here. Chaffetz called you on it and I’m calling you on it. Until you are better informed on the subject you should keep silent on it.

Mr. Bill O'Reilly keeps refering to Obama as a “Progressive”, “Democracy” and “Social Justice”. Kinda guy!


Ok Mr. Bill O'Reilly let's exam what you are referring to 'Mr.Bloviator in Charge' all means feel free to counter on your next 'Talking Points' episode!

Communists, Socialists, Marxists, Maoists and Islamics are in the US Government. They all believe in a government that’s opposed to the US Constitution and, thus, the America our founders created. They want America to give up its sovereignty and to become a member of a one-world socialist government. For simplicity, let’s call them all “commies”.
We began researching Obama and other commies in US Government and Media about 18 months ago and were shocked. Here’s the high-level overview of what we learned, which is chronicled in great detail at

- America has been at war with communism for over 90 years. The Cold War with Communist Russia did not end with the collapse of the Berlin War -- it just took a different form. A new war has commenced… a bloodless war aimed at taking all of our wealth and giving it to Communists, so they can rule America. This well-planned, decades-old, Communist Takeover is now in progress and we’ve been losing this war because Communists captured our media long ago and they hid this plan from us for years.
- The public code words for Communism now are “Progressive”, “Democracy” and “Social Justice”. You probably never heard these terms much until Obama took office, but you hear them now a lot these days.
- The Democratic Party is now a Socialist Party. Through its freely admitted, long term alliance and coordinated initiatives with The Party of European Socialists, the Democratic Party is openly connected to Chinese and Russian Socialists, as well as a full range of international commies and terrorists.

- Right now in the US Congress, there’s a publicly admitted Socialist, a couple of socialist Islamics, lots of criminals (assault, bribes, etc.), lots of anti-Constitutionalists, and way too many people who are taking money from Islamic terrorist-connected organizations. But don’t let that fool you. There are over 100 US Congress Members who are commies. Most belong to and/or are associated with members of Democratic Socialists of America and the Communist Party USA. The FBI states that the Communist Party USA and the United Nations are departments of the Russian KGB.
- Barack Hussein Obama (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Saebarkah), the 44th President of the United States of America is a communist. Obama precisely fits former FBI head, J. Edgar Hoover’s definition of a communist. He has associations with members of the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America, was raised by communists, spent his adult life with communists, was mentored by communists, supports communists, belonged to at least one communist organization, attended at least one communist rally, worked for at least two communist bosses, is advised by communists and now, while in office, regularly meets with communists on a daily basis.

- Obama is an ideological zealot and radical. His core skill is “communist rabble-rousing”. George Soros directly and indirectly funded Obama’s presidential campaign. Obama is George Soros’ puppet. Obama is told what to say by a teleprompter’s script that is written by a George Soros-funded group of commie writers. Obama has a PR organization of over 300 commies.
- Our research strongly suggests George Soros is the face of the USA Communist Takeover. Obama works for George Soros. Most of the media works for George Soros as his propaganda department. Hundreds of socialist, activist and union organizations work for Soros as a means to siphon government money from you, generate votes for commie Democrats and fund the Communist Takeover. Examples of the organizations Soros funds include the Democratic Party, SEIU, ACORN, Tides Foundation, National Public Radio, ACLU, Open Society Institute, and Obama’s favorite fake media outlet, the Huffington Post.
- Goldman Sachs works for George Soros. There is a strong body of evidence to suggest that George Soros, with the help of Jeffrey Sachs of Goldman Sachs, caused the 2008 US financial collapse (Soros and Sachs have done this in other countries before). “Crisis” is Phase Two in the four-phase Communist Takeover Plan. Soros and Sachs can further crash or damage our economy pretty much whenever they want.
- George Soros is a very bad dude and is a far, far greater threat to America than al Queada. George Soros is not only converting America to communism, he’s doing the same in other countries. Remember “the Domino Theory?” Soros may also be coordinating with al Queada and/or terrorists through his connections with Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and/or other radical organizations which Soros funds.
- George Soros’ “boss” is one or more of the following: Communist Russia, Communist China and/or a band of Ultra Rich Global Elites. Soros’ supporters and co-conspirators include Bill and Hillary Clinton, Bill Gates (Microsoft), Eric Schmidt (Google), Jeffrey Sachs (Goldman Sachs), NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Warren Buffet, Oprah Winfrey and a vast group of other global elites. Their combined wealth is greater than many countries.
RESISTING THE TAKEOVER: Exposure and awareness of George Soros, Obama, commie Congress members and their international criminal conspiracy is the key to Americans winning this war. Once the conspirators are exposed, they can be researched, contained, neutralized and prosecuted. So educate yourself and tell others. Vote out all Democrats.

THE TAKEOVER PLAN’S PRIMARY WEAKNESS: There is a very substantial body of evidence that indicates Obama is ineligible to serve as US President (father’s British citizenship, multiple social security numbers, foreign student, no long form birth certificate, no hospital that will claim him, no US State certified him as constitutionally eligible to be President, tremendous efforts undertaken to prevent access to Obama’s past records, etc., etc.). If Obama is found ineligible to serve, the Communist Takeover Plot will unravel fast. All laws signed by Obama will be nullified. Then, once unraveled, we can pursue the relationships of all of George Soros’ commie organizations and prosecute all of the related criminal conspirators to the maximum extent of US law.
So don’t you think that when the GOP takes over one or both Houses of Congress in January, they ought to immediately ask Obama for proof of his eligibility to serve? If not, what does that tell you about who may be running the Republican Party? Maybe the takeover is further along than we think?

Who is Rep Keith Ellison..?


Born in Detroit in 1963, Ellison was one of five children in a Roman Catholic family. He converted to Islam at 19 while attending Wayne State University. In 1987, he moved to Minnesota to attend University of Minnesota Law School, where he earned his Juris Doctor in 1990. He then practiced law privately in Minneapolis. In 2002, he was elected to the Minnesota State Legislature. He and his wife Kim have four children.

Improper disclosure of campaign funds

In early 2006, the Minnesota State Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board reprimanded Ellison for unreported contributions, discrepancies in cash balances, and misclassified disbursements. These transgressions occurred in the years 2002-2004. In 2005 when the board tried to get more information about the problems in Ellison's reports, they got no response from Ellison or his treasurer (his wife Kim). When the board heard nothing, they opened the investigation. Ellison was subpoenaed and fined. The board has also fined Ellison numerous times for late filings.

Association with the Nation of Islam

In 1990, Ellison wrote an article for a University of Minnesota newspaper (he was then a law student there) defending Louis Farrakhan against accusations of Antisemitism. He later retreated completely from this defense, stating that he was in err, and that he should have examined more closely the accusations leveled against the Nation of Islam founder at that time. [1]
Ellison's adversaries found further fodder for linking him to the Nation of Islam when it was revealed that he worked with the group for 18 months to organize the Minnesota contingent of the Million Man March. Ellison stated that while he collaborated closely with the group on the project, he was never a member of it

Celebrities who support the New Black Panther Party

Rap Star Master P with Barack Obama and Oprah. In 1998, the NBPP leader Khallid Muhammed credited Master P with financing their "Million Youth March" in Harlem.
In 2010, the New Black Panther Party [NBPP] hosted the Atlanta “Black Power Convention.” Press releases listed NBPP President Malik Zulu Shabazz, and NBPP Field Marshall Hashim Nzinga as being the “conveners” of the event. King Shamir, who is famous for the “kill some of their [white people's] babies videos” was among the speakers. DJ Greg Street was identified as a financial supporter of the convention.
Press releases list the following people as speaking at the 2010 NBPP national event event:
Hello see the connection to the above: Congressman Keith Ellison publicly supported the group in the 1990s. 

Rep. Keith Ellison told the propaganda news outlet RT that voter fraud is not a problem in America and the only reason Republicans are pursuing Voter ID laws is to keep themselves in power by weeding out Democrat voters:
All of a sudden he’s concerned about cost – when it’s something he’s against. But put another trillion dollar stimulus bill on the table and he’ll vote for it quicker than you can say Allahu Ackbar.
Also Mr. Ellison, here’s the non-existent voter ID fraud in Florida.

By: Devvy Kidd
December 25, 2006
© 2006 -
"The right-wing stranglehold on Congress has been broken," declared Joelle Fishman, chair of the Communist Party USA's (CPUSA) political action commission. "Electing the Democrats to control congress is a victory for communism." Fishman delivered her report to the committee as it discussed the results of the election. "With Democrats in charge the future of the Communist Party looks bright," said CPUSA's Executive Vice-chair Jarvis Tyner. Erica Smiley, National Coordinator of the Young Communist League, was buoyant, "The results of the 2006 election indicate a major turning point in our struggle to communize America."[1]
Keith Ellison was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives last month (Fifth Congressional District in the State of Minnesota). The Fifth District is without a doubt overwhelmingly Democrat, the favorite choice of the Communist Party. Citing religious reasons (Ellison says he's a Muslim), he will refuse to take his oath of office on the Bible, only the Quran. This has not set well with a considerable number of Americans. 


  • House Committee on Financial Services
    • Subcommitee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy, Trade, and Technology
    • Subcommitee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit
    • Subcommitee on Housing and Community Opportunity
  • House Committee on the Judiciary
    • Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties
    • Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims

Congressman Allen West Discusses Damaging Sequestration

 LTC Allen West is the only logical selection for the Mitt Romney VP slot...also Mitt would be wise to select Michele Bachmann as Attorney General along with Sarah Palin as Secretary of State..we need tried/vetted and proven leaders to take our country back from the Obama Marxist Administration!

Hillary's chief worked with al-Qaida front man

by: AAron Klein
Hillary Clinton’s chief-of-staff, Huma Abedin, worked on the editorial board of a Saudi-financed Islamic think tank alongside a Muslim extremist accused of financing al-Qaida fronts.
The extremist, Abdullah Omar Naseef, is deeply connected to the Abedin family.
Naseef is secretary-general of the Muslim World League, an Islamic charity known to have spawned terrorist groups, including one declared by the U.S. government to be an official al-Qaida front.
Democrat and Republican lawmakers have rallied to Huma Abedin’s defense since five GOP Congress members, led by Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, sent letters last month to the inspector generals at the departments of Homeland Security, Justice and State asking that they investigate Muslim Brotherhood influence on U.S. government officials.
The lawmakers noted Huma Abedin “has three family members – her late father, mother and her brother – connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations. Her position affords her routine access to the secretary and to policymaking.”
Last week, Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner, who admitted he hadn’t read the letters, defended Abedin, and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the accusations “sinister” and “nothing less than an unwarranted and unfounded attack on an honorable woman, a dedicated American and a loyal public servant.”
WND was first to report Huma’s mother, Saleha Abedin, was the official representative of Naseef’s terror-stained Muslim World League in the 1990s.

Aaron Klein’s “Fool Me Twice: Obama’s Shocking Plans for the Next Four Years Exposed” uncovers the blueprint for Obama’s second term
Also, Huma’s father, Professor Syed Abedin, was the founder of the Institute for Minority Affairs, a Saudi group that reportedly had the quiet, but active, support of Naseef.
Saleha is currently the editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, the publication of Syed’s Institute.
The institute bills itself as “the only scholarly institution dedicated to the systematic study of Muslim communities in non-Muslim societies around the world.”
Now it has emerged that Huma served on the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs’s editorial board from 2002 to 2008.
Huma Abedin
Documents obtained by author Walid Shoebat reveal that Naseef served on the board with Huma from at least December 2002 to December 2003.
Naseef’s sudden departure from the board in December 2003 coincides with the time at which various charities led by Naseef’s Muslim World League were declared illegal terrorism fronts worldwide, including by the U.S. and U.N.
The MWL, founded in Mecca in 1962, bills itself as one of the largest Islamic non-governmental organizations.
But according to U.S. government documents and testimony from the charity’s own officials, it is heavily financed by the Saudi government.

The MWL has been accused of terrorist ties, as have its various offshoots, including the International Islamic Relief Organization, or IIRO, and Al Haramain, which was declared by the U.S. and U.N. as a terror financing front.
Indeed, the Treasury Department, in a September 2004 press release, alleged Al Haramain had “direct links” with Osama bin Laden. The group is now banned worldwide by United Nations Security Council Committee 1267.
There long have been accusations that the IIRO and MWL also repeatedly funded al-Qaida.
In 1993, bin Laden reportedly told an associate that the MWL was one of his three most important charity fronts.
An Anti-Defamation League profile of the MWL accuses the group of promulgating a “fundamentalist interpretation of Islam around the world through a large network of charities and affiliated organizations.”
“Its ideological backbone is based on an extremist interpretation of Islam,” the profile states, “and several of its affiliated groups and individuals have been linked to terror-related activity.”
In 2003, U.S. News and World Report documented that accompanying the MWL’s donations, invariably, are “a blizzard of Wahhabist literature.”
“Critics argue that Wahhabism’s more extreme preachings – mistrust of infidels, branding of rival sects as apostates and emphasis on violent jihad –laid the groundwork for terrorist groups around the world,” the report continued.

An Egyptian-American cab driver, Ihab Mohamed Ali Nawawi, was arrested in Florida in 1990 on accusations he was an al-Qaida sleeper agent and a former personal pilot to bin Laden. At the time he was accused of serving bin Laden, he also reportedly worked for the Pakistani branch of the MWL.
The MWL in 1988 founded the Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, developing chapters in about 50 countries, including for a time in Oregon until it was designated a terrorist organization.
In the early 1990s, evidence began to grow that the foundation was funding Islamist militants in Somalia and Bosnia, and a 1996 CIA report detailed its Bosnian militant ties.
The U.S. Treasury designated Al Haramain’s offices in Kenya and Tanzania as sponsors of terrorism for their role in planning and funding the 1998 bombings of two American embassies in East Africa. The Comoros Islands office was also designated because it “was used as a staging area and exfiltration route for the perpetrators of the 1998 bombings.”
The New York Times reported in 2003 that Al Haramain had provided funds to the Indonesian terrorist group Jemaah Islamiyah, which was responsible for the 2002 Bali bombings that killed 202 people. The Indonesia office was later designated a terrorist entity by the Treasury.
In February 2004, the U.S. Treasury Department froze all Al Haramain’s financial assets pending an investigation, leading the Saudi government to disband the charity and fold it into another group, the Saudi National Commission for Relief and Charity Work Abroad.
In September 2004, the U.S. designated Al-Haramain a terrorist organization.
In June 2008, the Treasury Department applied the terrorist designation to the entire Al-Haramain organization worldwide

Bin Laden’s brother-in-law
In August 2006, the Treasury Department also designated the Philippine and Indonesian branch offices of the MWL-founded IIRO as terrorist entities “for facilitating fundraising for al-Qaida and affiliated terrorist groups.”
The Treasury Department added: “Abd Al Hamid Sulaiman Al-Mujil, a high-ranking IIRO official [executive director of its Eastern Province Branch] in Saudi Arabia, has used his position to bankroll the al-Qaida network in Southeast Asia. Al-Mujil has a long record of supporting Islamic militant groups, and he has maintained a cell of regular financial donors in the Middle East who support extremist causes.”
In the 1980s, Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, Osama bin Laden’s brother-in-law, ran the Philippines offices of the IIRO. Khalifa has been linked to Manila-based plots to target the pope and U.S. airlines.
The IIRO has also been accused of funding Hamas, Algerian radicals, Afghanistan militant bases and the Egyptian terror group Al-Gamaa al-Islamiyya.
The New York Post reported the families of the 9/11 victims filed a lawsuit against IIRO and other Muslim organizations for having “played key roles in laundering of funds to the terrorists in the 1998 African embassy bombings” and for having been involved in the “financing and ‘aiding and abetting’ of terrorists in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.”

‘Saudi government front’
In a court case in Canada, Arafat El-Asahi, the Canadian director of both the IIRO and the MWL, admitted the charities are near entities of the Saudi government.
Stated El-Asahi: “The Muslim World League, which is the mother of IIRO, is a fully government-funded organization. In other words, I work for the government of Saudi Arabia. I am an employee of that government.
“Second, the IIRO is the relief branch of that organization, which means that we are controlled in all our activities and plans by the government of Saudi Arabia. Keep that in mind, please,” he said.
Despite its offshoots being implicated in terror financing, the U.S. government never designated the MWL itself as a terror-financing charity. Many have speculated the U.S. has been trying to not embarrass the Saudi government.

Huma’s mother represented Muslim World League
Saleha Abedin has been quoted in numerous press accounts as both representing the MWL and serving as a delegate for the charity.
In 1995, for example, the Washington Times reported on a United Nations-arranged women’s conference in Beijing that called on governments throughout the world to give women statistical equality with men in the workplace.
The report quoted Saleha Abedin, who attended the conference as a delegate, as “also representing the Muslim World League based in Saudi Arabia and the Muslim NGO Caucus.”
The U.N.’s website references a report in the run-up to the Beijing conference that also lists Abedin as representing the MWL at the event.
The website posted an article from the now defunct United States Information Agency quoting Abedin and reporting she attended the Beijing conference as “a delegate of the Muslim World League and member of the Muslim Women’s NGO caucus.”
In the article, Abedin was listed under a shorter name, “Dr. Saleha Mahmoud, director of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs.”
WND has confirmed the individual listed is Huma Abedin’s mother. The reports misspelled part of Abedin’s name. Her full professional name is at times listed as Saleha Mahmood Abedin S.

Tied to Egypt’s new Muslim Brotherhood president
Last month, Shoebat reported that while she acted as one of 63 leaders of the Muslim Sisterhood, the de facto female version of the Muslim Brotherhood, Saleha Abedin served alongside Najla Ali Mahmoud, the wife of Mohammed Mursi, Egypt’s new president.
Clinton met with Mursi earlier this month.
Saleha Abedin and Mursi’s wife both were members of the Sisterhood’s Guidance Bureau, Shoebat found.

Hillary praise
Saleha Mahmood Abedin is an associate professor of sociology at Dar Al-Hekma College in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, which she helped to create. She formerly directed the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs in the U.K. and served as a delegate for the Muslim World League, an Islamic fundamentalist group Osama bin Laden reportedly told an associate was one of his most important charity fronts.
In February 2010, Clinton spoke at Abedin’s college, where she was first introduced by Abedin and then praised the work of the terror-tied professor:
“I have to say a special word about Dr. Saleha Abedin,” Clinton said. “You heard her present the very exciting partnerships that have been pioneered between colleges and universities in the United States and this college. And it is pioneering work to create these kinds of relationships.
“But I have to confess something that Dr. Abedin did not,” Clinton continued, “and that is that I have almost a familial bond with this college. Dr. Abedin’s daughter, one of her three daughters, is my deputy chief of staff, Huma Abedin, who started to work for me when she was a student at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.”
With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott

The Dark Knight Movie Massacre & Why I Carry a Gun Everywhere I Go

I would venture to guess that the folks filing in to see the latest Batman installment in Aurora, Colorado last Thursday evening didn’t figure on over 70 of them getting shot before the credits rolled. The last count I received before filing this column was 12 dead and 59 wounded.
As the news starting pouring in about what happened in the theater this week when Satan’s spawn James Holmes donned Kevlar and a small battery of weapons and opened fire on an unsuspecting crowd, I kept thinking, “One fast-thinking and trained person who was armed/licensed with a concealed weapon could have stopped that SOB right in his tracks before the body count skyrocketed.”

Yep, the armed citizen could have either killed him, sent him running for cover, or at least diverted his fire away from the masses and toward their person. Some readers, no doubt, are saying, “Well that would be stupid. What if that citizen got shot trying to protect others?” To that I reply: Well, Dinky, if they would have been shot and killed at least they would have died a hero. Have you ever heard of the term “hero”?
The Aurora Dark Knight Massacre is exactly why I carry at least one gun everywhere I go—because crap always happens when you least expect it. That’s why, as responsible citizens and gun owners, we must always be ready and must always expect it because when it happens, it happens fast; if you’re not ready, you and others are screwed.
For instance, it’s a beautiful and quiet day on Miami Beach this morning. I’m drinking my coffee at an outdoor cafe, minding my own business while I work on this column and on my website. I don’t see any bath salt zombies on the prowl. There are no Trench Coat Mafia wannabes lurking around. There is no real foreseeable reason to carry a weapon. But I am. The reason? Well, I’m not omniscient. I’m just a dumb clunk living in a jacked-up world where med school students go bat crap crazy and shoot up normally peaceful places for inexplicable reasons. Therefore, I’m locked, cocked and ready to rock should some demented dill weed decide to strafe the local patrons sipping a cup of Joe.
For those who say, “Doug’s insane with all this concealed weapons crap. We should leave such affairs to the police,” allow me to point out that the theater was crawling with cops for the Batman opening to control the crowds. By the time the police got to the particular theater, it was all over. Blood was already running down the aisles and the gunman had already left the building. You, my friend, are your first responder … your first line of defense.

Look, stuff happens when and where you don’t think it’ll happen. My recommendation to you, the good citizen, is to get equipped with a gun—a fire-breathing dragon of a weapon. Get proficient with it. Make it like a cell phone: an additional appendage to your body. And then pray that you’ll never have to use it.
However, should you be in line at the grocery store, or at Chili’s eating a burger, or at a park playing football with your homies, and some James Holmes wannabe shows up carting an arsenal and quoting Kafka as he shoots kids … you’ll be ready. Simply find cover if you can, draw your weapon, take a fine bead, and double tap the center mass of the murderous jackass. Should he or she have a bulletproof vest on then pull your sight picture up to the perp’s noggin and shoot him or her in the head; it’ll explode like a watermelon. You’ll feel bad for a nanosecond. But then the cops and families will show up and thank you for putting Jack the Ripper down. The end.
Watch my latest video, “Five Ways Romney Can Woo Young Weed Smokers.

Stop Spinning the Gun Issue, Bill O’Reilly

by: Steve Sheldon

For someone whose mantra is, “The spin stops here,” Bill O’Reilly couldn’t have spun more on the gun issue than the Tilt a Whirl at next week’s county fair. Yes, we in the hinterland still go to county fairs. And, if we encounter a mass killer there, we will shoot him, (in the face if he is wearing a gas mask).
On Monday July 24th’s Talking Points, Bill made some outrageously erroneous statements about guns and gun purchases, so misleading, that one would be led to believe that Michael More might have penned them. Sadly, many in even the ‘Conservative’ media have no idea when it comes to guns and the Second Amendment.

Mr. O’Reilly’s gets a good start by suggesting that, “(Bill) Moyers has no clue, no clue at all. He apparently believes that federal and state governments can actually control gun crimes. That’s so dumb it hurts.” But then, he follows up this statement with some of the most ignorant and uninformed talking points that I have witnessed on his show, and yes, I am a regular viewer.
Here’s the first gem. O’Reilly, “Anyone who sells a heavy weapon or ammo should be compelled to report the sale to the FBI. It’s a felony if you don’t. That’s what we should have in the U.S.A. and it just makes sense in this age of terrorism. Right now some gun dealers do background checks but nobody reports the sale of heavy weapons like AK-47′s to the feds. That’s insane.
Bill, if you would go and purchase an AK-47 today at your favorite corner gun store, you will be required to fill out Federal Form 4473. On this form, you will answer a barrage of questions about your criminal history and citizenship. A side note: Maybe one could be added stating that you do not intend to use the gun in a mass shooting, because that would surely stop mass killers. On page 2, section D, the form lists type of firearm, model number, manufacturer, serial number etc. that is being purchased. If a licensed gun dealer did not accurately complete this form, he would face penalties up to and including prison time! And, all dealers are REQUIRED to complete this for EVERY firearm purchase! This form is a BATFE form and if they do not talk to the FBI, then that is a problem between those departments and not gun purchasers.

As it relates to purchases of ammunition, the idea that one would report the hundreds millions of rounds of ammunition sold yearly would take a virtual army of federal employees to process the information. And, I would wager that they would catch as many criminals as the TSA has caught potential terrorists by feeling up Granny. However, they would be able to compile a great list of people like me who shoot regularly and buy their ammunition in bulk. That list would include my cowboy action shooting friends, trap shooters, prairie dog hunters (because we use a LOT of .223), individual police officers, military personnel, gun collectors, and so on. Keeping lists of law abiding citizens does not stop insane mass killers bent on anarchy.

The next statement is so outrageous that it is near impossible to comment without laughing. O’Reilly, “Terrorists could just move in here, buy bazookas and the FBI doesn’t know about it. Here is how crazy this is. If you take a flight lesson, the feds get a heads up. But you can buy a machine gun and they don’t know.” Bazookas and machine guns are commonly referred to as class III weapons and/or destructive devices which require a very special license to own. The ‘Feds’, have been licensing machine guns since 1934! To own a machine gun, one must first live in a state where it is legal, then complete a Federal licensing process which as I understand, takes several months. And, on top of all else, be prepared to spend in excess of $10,000 to start because the manufacturing of new guns has been banned for years. To the best of my knowledge, only one legally owned machine gun has been used in a crime since 1934 and the owner was a member of the law enforcement community.

Finally, I can’t resist the reference to an AK-47 being referred to as a “heavy weapon.” I’m picturing a scene in Afghanistan, where Taliban leaders upon being pinned down by superior American Forces call for back up and ask for “heavy weapons.” Upon receiving the order, Muhammad comes to the rescue with his AK-47. Even the Taliban would find this humorous. I could write a book on the misinformation spread by the likes of Mr. O’Reilly’s Talking Points and the main stream media about so called “assault weapons”, but will leave that discussion for another day. Perhaps Mr. O’Reilly would join me at the NRA Range in Virginia where I could arrange a demonstration of various types of firearms and fully explain all the current regulations regarding their purchase. I have some former colleagues from the National Firearms Museum who I’m sure would be happy to help.

The ONLY thing that would have stopped the mass shooter in Aurora and anywhere else for that matter would have been a return of accurate firepower by one or preferably more armed citizens who in this example were legally banned from carrying in the theater. For those of you who doubt that a concealed carry holder could have stopped such mayhem, you have an open invitation to the next cowboy action shoot where men many years older than me will clean a station with an old west six-shooter in a matter of seconds with a level of accuracy that will astonish even experienced shooters. If they can do that with a primitive firearm, imagine what can be done with something a little more modern like what I carry.
Stop spinning Bill and get your facts straight. I’m looking out for you.

Obama Campaign Needs More Time for Voter Fraud in Ohio

by: Da Tagliare 
Ohio has long been a key swing state in presidential elections.  Since 1964, no one has won the general election without carrying the state of Ohio.  In this year’s hotly contested presidential election, Ohio holds 18 electoral votes.  Only California (55), Illinois (20), Florida (29), New York (29) Texas (38) and Pennsylvania (20) carry more electoral votes than Ohio.
In years past, Ohio, along with 31 other states, have allowed voters to vote early by mail or in person.  In Ohio’s case, they have allowed voting to take place during the three days prior to the general election.
However, with a Republican governor, Ohio has passed a new law restricting the voting to the day of the election, except for absentee mail in ballots.  With the Democratic slogan of ‘vote early and vote more often’, it’s no wonder that the Obama campaign has filed a lawsuit with Ohio’s election officials claiming that the new law unfairly discriminates against voters who want to vote early.  They cite the fact that military and overseas voters are still allowed to cast their votes on the day before the election.
In the past couple of years, Ohio Democrats have done their best to block voter ID laws and have even tried to push through a bill that would eliminate the need of having an address in order to register to vote.  By not having an address and being able to vote for 4 days, imagine the ‘vote early and vote more often’ opportunities available for dishonest voters.  When I heard the Dems pushing for this law, it reminded me of the old ballot stuffing days in Chicago.  Say, isn’t that where Barack Obama is from?

Democrats need as many voting days as possible so that more dead dogs, people and illegal aliens can vote to help counter the military votes.  Even though Oho only has two military bases – the Integrated Support Cleveland base operated by the U.S. Coast Guard and Wright-Patterson A.F.B.), the military vote could be enough to make the difference come November.  Wright-Patterson Air Force Base is the largest military base on U.S. land.
According the last Gallup Poll taken in May, 24% more veterans favored Mitt Romney over Barack Obama.  With Wright-Patterson A.F.B. covering two counties in this important swing state and being the largest military base on U.S. soil, the Democrats are desperate to take any measure possible, legal or illegal, to get Obama re-elected.