Saturday, August 30, 2014

Obama Sides with the Muslims - Goes Fund Raising as Islamists Threaten America

Comment on this Politifake

What a difference a year makes. Last year at this time, President Obama was doing everything possible to convince us that bombing the Assad Regime in Syria to help radical Islamist insurgents take control of that country was the right thing to do. This year, the President is trying to sway us into permitting the US to bomb ISIS insurgent positions inside Syria in an attempt to keep them from taking control of the Syrian government. 

For those of you who may not know what ISIS is, it is essentially a terrorist group comprised of many different radical Islamist organizations formed in 2006 by Al Qaeda in Iraq.
ISIS has also been trained in Jordan by the US military beginning in 2012.
As I have stated many times in previous articles in various publications over the last few years, President Obama has been aiding terrorist organizations with billions of dollars, arms and actual military help almost since the very day he took office. Currently, the US is the largest financial contributor, arms supplier, and military abettor both in training and on the battlefield of terrorist groups than any single entity in the world.

The sudden urge to bomb ISIS targets in Syria only comes after this Obama created terrorist organization came very close to taking control of Iraq, which prompted US surgical air strikes on them in an attempt to curb their advance. 
I suspect Obama told the truth for once in his life when he recently stated that his Administration had no strategy on the table in dealing with military advances by ISIS. The bottom line is he wouldn't have plans available in dealing with a force he himself has made as strong as he has with ISIS.
Across the Middle East and N. Africa from Libya, Egypt, to Syria and Iraq we have witnessed President Obama help virtually every known terrorist group acquire country after country in the guise of freedom and liberation. Yet, this so called freedom has resulted in the mass extermination of anyone who doesn't share the creed of the jihadists and liberation has become subjugation.

All of this comes as no surprise to anyone except the President, whom I suspect is not surprised at all, because his primary goal since taking office seems to be the destruction of the very country of which he was elected.
From trying his best to keep the economy down and unemployment numbers up by wanting amnesty for millions of illegal aliens, to putting the final nail in the economic coffin in the form of climate change laws to losing what friends we had in the world because of a lousy foreign policy, this President has done everything possible to destroy this country. It isn't because the President is incompetent as a leader, as many believe, it is due to his sheer will to bring this country down.

If the people of the US had not put up such strong opposition to helping ISIS take over Syria in 2013, we would now be looking at terrorist organizations being in control there and well on their way to incorporating much of the Mid-East.
What we have here is the President putting on a show in striking inane targets in Iraq and again pushing for an air war in Syria in hopes the Assad Regime will attack our planes giving us the excuse to actually help ISIS. Obama's foreign policy has not changed in a year's time, only new deceptive ways in reaching the same goal has.

UNR WolfPack 2014-2015 Season Updates

Game by game 2014-2015 schedule Will post results as they come in W/L... Damn I sure hope they do better this season...was a disaster the first season without Chris Ault!
vs. Southern Utah
Day: Saturday
Date: Aug. 30, 2014
Location: Reno, Nev.
Time: 12:00 p.m. PT
Nevada opens '14 campaign Saturday at Mackay

08/30/14 vs Southern Utah : W 28-19

09/05/14 vs Washington State: W 24-13

09/13/14 at Arizona :               L 28-35

09/27/14 at San Jose State:      W 21-10

10/04/14 vs Boise State(Homecoming) : L  51-46

10/11/14 vs Colorado State:      L 31-24

10/18/14 at BYU :                   W 42-35

10/25/14 at Hawaii:                  W 26-18

11/01/14 vs San Diego State:    W 30-14

11/15/14 at Air Force:              L 45-38

11/22/14 vs Fresno State:         L 40-20

11/29/14 at UNLV :                 W 49-27

CIA now admits that President Obama is a radical Islamic enemy of America

Obama: “We don’t have a strategy yet” on the Islamic State ...
[Obama: “We don’t have a strategy yet” on the Islamic State ...]
by: Vicky Nissen
It’s an explosive charge, one that practically accuses the president of treason.
If you want to receive further articles, please click on SUBSCRIBE.
Today, a former CIA agent bluntly told the newspaper, World Net Daily, that America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama. Clare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record. 
Obama is so funny, man! Obama Jokes About Pirates Who Killed Americans ...

Clare M. Lopez is the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute. Since 2013, she has served as a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi. Also Vice President of the Intelligence Summit, she formerly was a career operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency, a professor at the Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies, Executive Director of the Iran Policy Committee from 2005-2006, and has served as a consultant, intelligence analyst, and researcher for a variety of defense firms. She was named a Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute in 2011.

Lopez said the global war on terror had been an effort to “stay free of Shariah,” or repressive Islamic law, until the Obama administration began siding with such jihadist groups as the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates. Lopez believes that the Muslim Brotherhood has thoroughly infiltrated the Obama administration and other branches of the federal government. One of the most outrageous of those appointments is Mohamed Elibiary, a senior member of the Department of Homeland Security Advisory Council. According to a report by the Center for Security Policy, Elibiary supports brokering a U.S. partnership with the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group. Two months ago, a firestorm erupted online after Elibiary tweeted that a “Caliphate” is inevitable and compared it to the European Union. 
funny obama quotes. funny obama quotes

Ms. Lopez also believes Obama had essentially the same goals in the Mideast as the late Osama bin Laden: “to remove American power and influence, including military forces, from Islamic lands.” The former CIA operative’s perspective affects her prescription for what the U.S. should do about the terror army ISIS, as she called for caution and restraint.
While there has been a sudden chorus of politicians and military experts calling for the immediate elimination of the terrorist army after it beheaded American journalist James Foley last week, Lopez believes the U.S. should have an overall strategy in place before fully re-engaging in the Mideast militarily.Any military action would be further complicated, she told WND, if it were not clear which side the U.S. is on, either in the short term or in the overall war on terror.

Lopez felt it was impossible to understand why the president and some of his top appointees, such as CIA Director John Brennan, who is believed to be a Muslim convert, “consistently seem to apologize for Islam, even in the face of such atrocities as the Foley beheading,” adding, they “take pains to assure the world they don’t think IS, (or the Islamic State, also called ISIS) or whichever perpetrator it was, has anything to do with Islam. How can they possibly believe that genuinely when everything these jihadis do tracks directly to the literal text of Quran, hadiths and Shariah?”
“In any case, and for whatever motivations, there is no doubt this administration switched sides in what used to be called the Global War on Terror,” she said.
I wonder if those who don't want to go 'on the record' will finally speak out. 

Cartoon commenting on Barack Obama's overgenuflecting tendency related ...

Blue State Dems Hate On Nancy Pelosi

Nancy Pelosi hears voices 
by: Rachel Stoltzfoos

Two Democrats running for congress in West Virginia’s first and second districts took a strong stance against House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi at a state Chamber of Commerce Business Summit Friday.
Asked who he’d like to see as House speaker, Rep. David McKinley, a Republican incumbent in the state’s 1st District said, “Not Nancy Pelosi,” the Charleston Daily Mail reported.
McKinley’s Democratic challenger and state auditor Glen Gainer agreed. “I wouldn’t vote for Nancy Pelosi either,” he said.
Democrat Nick Casey, who’s challenging Republican Alex Mooney for Republican Senate candidate Shelley Moore Capito’s open seat in the 2nd District, said “I cannot support and will not support Nancy Pelosi.”   

West Virginia voters have been increasingly frustrated by President Barack Obama’s “War on Coal,” forcing Democratic candidates in a state with deep Democratic roots to distance themselves from Washington. (RELATED: Protesters: President Obama’s ‘War On Coal’ Is ‘Immoral,’ ‘Outrageous’)
“If they say that they support Nancy Pelosi for Speaker of the House, they are sealing their electoral doom before a single ballot is cast,” A spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee told The Daily Caller. ”On the other hand, if they ‘promise’ to vote against Pelosi, they are guaranteeing that they will be the last voice heard in a weak minority party and will be unable to get anything done for West Virginia.” 

via: Daily Caller

Friday, August 29, 2014

Judicial Watch: Imminent Terrorist Attack Warning By Feds on US Border

via OathKeepers:

Quick Links

Oath Keepers Site

Join Oath Keepers

Oath Keepers Store

National And State
Chapter Forums


Contact Oath Keepers




Imminent Terrorist Attack Warning By Feds on US Border

This article was first published at Judicial Watch, here —
AUGUST 29, 2014

Islamic terrorist groups are operating in the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez and planning to attack the United States with car bombs or other vehicle born improvised explosive devices (VBIED). High-level federal law enforcement, intelligence and other sources have confirmed to Judicial Watch that a warning bulletin for an imminent terrorist attack on the border has been issued.  Agents across a number of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense agencies have all been placed on alert and instructed to aggressively work all possible leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat.
Specifically, the government sources reveal that the militant group Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS) is confirmed to now be operating in Juarez, a famously crime-infested narcotics hotbed situated across from El Paso, Texas. Violent crimes are so rampant in Juarez that the U.S. State Department has issued a number of travel warnings for anyone planning to go there. The last one was issued just a few days ago.

Intelligence officials have picked up radio talk and chatter indicating that the terrorist groups are going to “carry out an attack on the border,” according to one JW source.  “It’s coming very soon,” according to another high-level source, who clearly identified the groups planning the plots as “ISIS and Al Qaeda.” An attack is so imminent that the commanding general at Ft. Bliss, the U.S. Army post in El Paso, is being briefed, JW’s sources say. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to multiple inquiries from Judicial Watch, both telephonic and in writing, about this information.
The disturbing inside intelligence comes on the heels of news reports revealing that U.S. intelligence has picked up increased chatter among Islamist terror networks approaching the 13th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. While these terrorists reportedly plan their attack just outside the U.S., President Obama admits that “we don’t have a strategy yet” to combat ISIS. “I don’t want to put the cart before the horse,” the commander-in-chief said this week during a White House press briefing. “I think what I’ve seen in some of the news reports suggest that folks are getting a little further ahead of what we’re at than what we currently are.”
The administration has also covered up, or at the very least downplayed, a serious epidemic of crime along the Mexican border even as heavily armed drug cartels have taken over portions of the region. Judicial Watch has reported that the U.S. Border Patrol actually ordered officers to avoid the most crime-infested stretches because they’re “too dangerous” and patrolling them could result in an “international incident” of cross border shooting. In the meantime, who could forget the famous words of Obama’s first Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano; the southern border is “as secure as it has ever been.”
Judicial Watch:

ISIS Threatens To Execute 26-Year-Old Female Relief Worker if U.S. Does Not Fulfill ISIS’ Demands

oped: Now if I were in charge I would give them 48 hours to release the worker unharmed or the entire area will be carpet ands if's or butts...the only thing crazies understand is one who will act in accordance to their actions...they are rabid dogs and the only cure is termination !
Congress needs to Impeach Obama ...declare war on IS and put a real CIC in charge...I'm sorry folks but you really need to drop the Naive and realize Barry Barack is one of them[hello 6 of his cabinet Czars are in fact Muslim Brotherhood]...all his actions over the last 5 1/2 years clearly spells out his true agenda...Barack Obama is a Traitor #PERIOD 
addendum: another scenario would be nix the 6m...agree to trade for Aafia Siddiqui a tracking device on her unknown to her...can be done...make the exchange in the open desert with a chopper as in Bergdahl...have drones circling out of site...after the exchange is made and away from the immediate action have the drones track em' back to their hive...then ya get the drift eh?


There’s a reason that United States policy had originally been to never negotiate with terrorists. Now that Obama has, they’ve been emboldened — and so they’re threatening to kill a female American if we don’t pay them millions of dollars and release another terrorist.

This morning it was revealed that a third American citizen held hostage by ISIS is a 26-year-old woman from the West Coast who was performing humanitarian relief work when she was kidnapped in Syria last year. The family requested that the name not be released to the public.
ABC News reports:
The terror group is demanding $6.6 million and the release of U.S. prisoners for the life of the young woman, who the family requested not be identified.
In addition to the multi-million dollar ransom, the terror group has also demanded that the U.S. release Aafia Siddiqui, an MIT-trained neuroscientist who was convicted by the U.S. in 2010 of trying to kill U.S. officials two years before, according to a supporter of Siddiqui who has been in contact with the hostage’s family. 

Why the increase in demands for the release of U.S. hostages? Through the Bergdahl trade, the President has already shown that he will release terrorists we hold in exchange for American citizens.
This young woman has probably been through hell during her captivity, and one would expect that the Obama administration is using all of the resources at its disposal to locate and rescue her and our other hostages. Hopefully last week’s disclosures of the failed Foley rescue mission will not have jeopardized a mission to rescue her.
It’s horrific enough to see ISIS behead an innocent American civilian, but for them to behead an American woman, a relief worker, should spur international outrage the likes of which ISIS has never seen. Unfortunately, Obama only negotiates with terrorists to secure the return of a deserter who may have even joined the Taliban himself — but rest assured, he’ll get right on orchestrating this woman’s rescue… just as soon as his latest round of golf is over.
Also see: Why Does God Allow Bad Things To Happen To Good People?

Obama Named in Racketeering Lawsuit

Trouble brewing for Obama and Holder in Fast and Furious
This could get really interesting.
Check it out:
It is high time that someone brought charges against the Obama administration in the context of what the Obama administration is – a criminal enterprise.
Attorney Larry Klayman, fresh off a preliminary court ruling that the National Security Agency’s spying on Americans likely is unconstitutional, now has named President Obama and others in a racketeering complaint.
Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch and a columnist for WorldNetDaily, alleges the president and others laundered U.S. taxpayer money that was spent on Hamas rockets fired against Israel.

The civil lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington falls under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, alleges criminal acts by Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon.
Seeking $1.5 billion in compensatory damages as well as punitive damages, it accuses the global figures of “laundering U.S. dollars” to Hamas, which is officially designated by the U.S. government as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
Continue Reading on ...

Seized ISIS Laptop In Syria Contains Plans For 'Bubonic Plague' Weapons

Reuters KurdsAugust 22, 2014: Members of Kurdish security forces take part during an intensive security deployment after clashes with militants of the Islamic State, in Jalawla, Diyala province, August 22, 2014. REUTERS/Stringer 

A laptop allegedly seized from an ISIS (also known as Islamic State) base in Syria contains plans to launch devastating terror attacks harnessing the bubonic plague.
Discovered by a moderate rebel group from an IS base in Idlib, northern Syria, in January, the computer belonged to a Tunisian militant and also contains instructions on how to build explosives, use disguises to travel undetected, and plans to build chemical weapons.
"The advantage of biological weapons is that they do not cost a lot of money, while the human casualties can be huge," a document retrieved from the computer stated.

The Dell laptop was shown to journalists working with Foreign Policy magazine.
They report that the computer initially seemed to be blank, but on closer investigation contained a trove of hidden files.
Information retrieved indicated that the computer had belonged to a Tunisian called "Muhammed S.", who had joined IS in Syria.
The magazine does not diclose the full name of the rebel.
Further documents showed that the owner studied physics and chemistry in two universities in the northeast of Tunisia, and planned to put his knowledge to deadly effect.

A 19-page document outlines plans to weaponise the bubonic plague from infected animals. It describes how to safely test diseases to be used in terror attacks.
"When the microbe is injected in small mice, the symptoms of the disease should start to appear within 24 hours," the document explains.
It also contains a 26-page fatwa, or Islamic ruling, proclaiming the use of chemical weapons to be acceptable against kafirs, or non-believers.
"If Muslims cannot defeat the kafir in a different way, it is permissible to use weapons of mass destruction," states the fatwa by Saudi jihadist cleric Nasir al-Fahd, who was jailed in Saudi Arabia in 2003. "Even if it kills all of them and wipes them and their descendants off the face of the Earth."

One of the Tunisian universities named in the documents confirmed to FP that the author had been a student there.
In June, the Tunisian foreign minister said that there was an estimated 2,400 Tunisians fighting in the Syrian civil war, mostly for IS.
Though attempts by al Qaeda to acquire chemical weapons in the past came to nothing, IS militants have seized swathes of territory in Syria and Iraq, including Mosul's university, where it is feared they could be developing deadly new weapons.
In July, IS reportedly used chemical weapons on the battlefield against Kurdish fighters in clashes in a semi-autonamous Kurdish region in Syria.

The region's health minister, Dr Na'san Ahmed, told of "strange white injuries" on the bodies of some fighters, and called on international medical institutions and human rights organisations to investigate the incident.
In July, IS militants seized a factory northeast of Baghdad used by Saddam Hussein's regime to make chemical weapons. However, experts said that no weapons remained at the site.
"Use small grenades with the virus [sic -- although the bubonic plague is spread by bacteria, not viruses], and throw them in closed areas like metros, soccer stadiums, or entertainment centers," the 19-page document on biological weapons advises. "Best to do it next to the air-conditioning. It also can be used during suicide operations."

The Gender Identity Crisis Of America

Photo Credit: Sharon (Flickr)

All Rachel Pepe wanted was to be treated like one of the girls. There is one major problem, however. She’s a boy.
Gender identity and sexual preference is a huge issue in America today. If you’re like me, your natural reaction may be, “TMI!”
NJ Governor, Chris Christie, may have felt similarly when he swiftly shut down the whole notion of children working through their sexual identity issues with a licensed counselor, in August of last year. But when dress codes and gender specific restrooms become a matter of ambiguity, what’s a school administrator to do?

I regret the abuse and ridicule that too many of our youth must endure – whatever the reason. But I also believe we must not overreact or overcompensate in meeting the tender emotional needs of the conflicted child.
I do believe children should be supported and loved in expressing the inner conflict and emotional pain they may be experiencing on account of some deep-seeded gender conflict, real or perceived. A full-court gender-conversion press may do more harm than good. But everyone should have a safe place they can go where frustrations and distresses can be revealed without fear or shame.
We may not agree with the choices of our neighbor, but may we never willfully mistreat or cause emotional harm to another human being. On the other hand, nobody should exploit a distraught child for their own personal gain (or agenda).

I personally believe Jesus is bigger than any trumped-up sexuality fixation in our day.
Every single soul in society should be treated with a level of compassion and regard (nobody is disposable). No one deserves to be written off. We should conduct ourselves in such a way that we naturally produce a positive response from others (despite our differences).
But ultimately, we must instill in our children a strong sense of dignity and self-respect (and reflect those same qualities ourselves). We may not be perfect now, but with God on our side, we can know that we are fearfully and wonderfully made.
May the desires of the soul be cultivated above and beyond that of the “psyche” and the “libido.”
Photo Credit: Sharon (Flickr)

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

You Won’t Believe What Obvious US Terror Threat The FBI Leaves Out Of Its Annual Assessment


You might think that the terror threat from Islamic extremism in the United States would be high on the FBI watch list — the national threat assessment, as the bureau calls it. But, remarkably, it’s NOT high on the list. In fact, the threat of attacks inside the U.S. from Muslim extremists is NOT ON THE LIST AT ALL.
According to an article in the Washington Free Beacon, the newly released internal FBI report:
…makes no reference to Islamist terror threats, despite last year’s Boston Marathon bombing and the 2009 Fort Hood shooting—both carried out by radical Muslim Americans.

Instead, the internal FBI intelligence report concluded in its 2013 assessment published this month that the threat to U.S. internal security from extremists is limited to attacks and activities by eight types of domestic extremist movements—none motivated by radical Islam.
The groups we need to watch out for, says the FBI, include:
…anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with “sovereign citizen” nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists.
The Free Beacon report points out that Islamic terror groups are not included on the FBI’s watch list, despite the fact that there were specific, violent, fatal attacks by domestic terrorists inspired or motivated by Islamic extremism:
The report left out all references to the April 2013 bombing of the Boston Marathon, which killed three people and injured some 264 others. Two brothers, Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who were motivated by Islamist extremist beliefs, carried out the bombing. They learned the techniques for the homemade pressure cooker bombers from an al Qaeda linked magazine.
The fact that the FBI leaves terror threats by Islamic radicals off its list draws sharp criticism from law enforcement experts:  

In considering why the FBI would omit Islamic terrorism from its domestic threat list, one must consider who runs the Department of Justice…Eric Holder.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom
Former FBI Agent John Guandolo said…“It should not surprise anyone who follows the jihadi threats in the United States that the FBI would not even include ‘Islamic terrorism’ in its assessment of serious threats to the republic in an official report.
“Since 9/11, FBI leadership—as well as leaders from Department of Homeland Security, the State Department, CIA, Pentagon, and the National Security Council—relies on easily identifiable jihadis from the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas, al Qaeda and elsewhere to advise it on how to deal with ‘domestic extremism.’”
Patrick Poole, a domestic terrorism expert, also was critical of the report’s omission of U.S. Islamist extremism, blaming “politically correct” policies at the FBI for the problem.
“At the same time we have senior members of the Obama administration openly saying that it’s not a question of if but when we have a terror attack targeting the United States by ISIL, we have the FBI putting on blinders to make sure they don’t see that threat,” Poole said. “These politically correct policies have already allowed Americans to be killed at Fort Hood and in Boston,” he added.

Michael Brown’s Criminal Past Revealed To Journalist By St. Louis Authorities

Michael Brown Was Suspect in Robbery | INCOG MAN

Journalist Charles C. Johnson of Got News confirmed earlier this month that he was told by multiple St. Louis area authorities that Michael Brown had a substantial criminal record as a juvenile – including a second-degree murder charge.
Charles C. Johnson @ChuckCJohnson
Confirmed earlier report that had juvenile arrest record involving second degree murder... Working on getting report

General Warns That Flight MH~370 Could Be Returning For Attack On American Soil

the-malaysia-airlines-passenger-flight-mh370-that-went-missing-march-8 ...
MH370: The presumed diverted flight path (Reuters) .. India to search ...
[MH370: The presumed diverted flight path (Reuters)]

Since the 9/11 terrorist attack of 2001, its anniversary has evoked both sorrow and fear in the hearts of Americans.
While remembering the thousands killed in the execution of that savage plot, the threat that radicals could mark Sept. 11 with another attack has been a recurring concern. Those fears were realized two years ago when a terrorist strike on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya left four Americans dead.
If retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney is right, the upcoming 13th anniversary of 9/11 could pose an even greater risk to Americans.

In a recent Fox News appearance, he noted that military leaders see the threat much differently than Barack Obama. “The president thinks everything’s OK,” McInerney said, celebrating the fact that “al Qaeda’s dead and he killed Osama bin Laden.”
In reality, however, he asserted that Obama’s narrative is “three years behind.”
As it stands, military experts – including Secretary of State John Kerry – are pleading with Obama to take decisive action regarding the threat that terrorist organization Islamic State, or ISIS, poses in Iraq, Syria, and beyond. “ISIS unchecked is an existential threat to the United States,” he said, “and soon. I’m not talking two or three years from now. I’m talking very, very soon.”

In order to counter that threat, McInerney suggested taking “very aggressive corrective action,” including “hitting 200 targets a day” in order to neutralize the terrorist network’s ability to stage attacks. Insisting the U.S. should increase its terror threat level ahead of Sept. 11, he noted that there are a number of ways ISIS could wreak havoc within the U.S.
He then alluded to an upcoming book from “a major news network and publishing network” that he said will offer an “earth-shattering” look at the immediate danger posed by these Islamic militants. “The fact is we may even see a 9/11/14 MH-370 resurface again,” he said. “We should go to DEFCON 1, our highest state of readiness and be prepared as we lead up to 9/11.”
He has previously suggested that the commercial airliner that disappeared in March could have safely landed in Pakistan, where it sits ready to be used by terrorists for a potential attack.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Shocking: The Sinister Reason Why Obama Doesn’t Have A Plan To Defeat ISIS

Photo Credit: SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

We have all seen the pictures of the beheaded children, the mass executions, girls jumping to their deaths off mountains after they were raped, Iraqis being crucified, genocide being committed against whole peoples starving and dying of thirst on mountains, etc. etc. These people trusted us. The relied on us. They listened to our words and believed in us. They risked everything they had including their families for us. These evil acts have been going on for months now. As I have said before, Obama had to have been warned by our intelligence services as to the consequences of pulling out of Iraq and allowing Islamic Jihadism to go unchecked. So if he knew the consequences, and did nothing, the question is why? Why did he continue to pull ALL American forces out of Iraq after all of the blood and treasure the United States lost there?
And now, we hear from our Dear Leader during a press conference yesterday that he has no strategy to deal with ISIS. Again, the question is why? To answer this question, I think Americans have to open the dark closet door of the unknown that many on the Left fear to tread but that Conservatives have seen as obvious for some time now. The President of the United States is a Muslim and could be on the side of ISIS.

We have written extensively that you can’t just listen to Obama’s words when evaluating the success of his presidency. You have to look at the results. Ask yourself this question, could there be any worse result in the Middle East after America’s involvement there? When Obama left, Iraq was stable. Now look at it. We have an Islamic State that is murderous and worse than Nazi Germany. Iran continues to threaten Israel and develop nuclear weapons. At the very least, President Obama doesn’t care about American national security interests abroad.

The results speak for themselves. But, I believe the answer is much darker. There is an agenda, one no one knows about. Maybe only Obama himself knows his real agenda. The circumstantial evidence is just too great to ignore. President Obama’s agenda could be the destruction of the United States. Listen to the words again, after all of the evidence we have seen of the evil nature of ISIS. I don’t have a strategy yet for dealing with ISIS. Could it be that he doesn’t want to really deal with ISIS because he wants to allow them to approach the United States with weapons of mass destruction? Could it be he opened the borders to allow terrorists to enter undetected? Could it be he is allowing the Islamic State to be created in order to threaten Israel? Could it be that he is allowing Iran to get nuclear weapons to allow it to destroy Israel? Again, the results speak for themselves. If anyone has a better explanation, I’d love to hear it.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom 
Photo Credit: SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

Conservative Activist: Obama-Loving Liberals are Too-Far Gone to Have Rational Discussions


All across America, there remains a divide amongst Americans. Democrats continue to push for amnesty for illegal immigrants, moderate Republicans seek permission to cave to Democrat demands and Tea Partiers and other assorted conservatives who value the rule of law demand a plan to halt illegal immigration- a plan that does not reward those who came here in violation of our laws.
On Thursday, TPNN’s Tim Constantine spoke Dutch Martin of the black conservative group, Project 21, and discussed the debate raging over illegal immigration in America.

Martin is married to an immigrant who immigrated to the United States legally and blasted the Obama Administration and those calling for blanket amnesty, saying, “[They’re] spitting on my wife’s naturalization certificate and every other foreign-born naturalized citizen who played by the rules and became legal residents and naturalized American citizens. It’s basically a slap in the face to them.”

Martin explained that his wife was furious when she discovered that Obama hopes to grant amnesty to those who came here illegally. “They should play by the rules like I did,” Martin recalled her saying. Martin noted that his wife, who served as a paralegal and with suburb professional qualifications, had to jump through hoops to immigrate legally as the Obama Administration welcomes in gang members and other nefarious types from Central and South America.

Constantine explained that he was a staunch supporter of legal immigration, but Martin countered that when one tries to explain the distinction, it’s a non-starter for liberals who are guided by zealotry and blind dogma.
“You’re trying to have a rational discussion with liberals. I would rather bang by head up against a brick wall rather than try to have a rational discussion with liberals… because you cannot, I repeat, you cannot reason with them. They are zombies; they are so drunk off [Obama’s} Kool-Aid, it’s repulsive.”

Please share this article on Facebook and Twitter if you believe too many liberals are incapable of seeing the flaws in Obama’s policies. 

Please click below for The Capitol Hill Show segment: 

WOAH! Obama Pushes to Let Hawaii Secede from Union

New Comedy "1600 Penn" to Portray Quirky White House Family: Best TV ...
Apparently seething with authoritarian hubris, President Obama is seeking to wave his magic “pen and a phone” once more to undo legislatively-passed laws and set the stage for allowing Hawaii to secede as a state.
For decades, the State of Hawaii has vied for the right to return to being a sovereign kingdom. The chain of islands has a fascinating and rich history as a kingdom, but was adopted as a state in 1959. Multiple attempts by Hawaiian lawmakers to return Hawaii to a kingdom have failed and in recent years, Former Senator Daniel Inouye and Senator Daniel Akaka, Democrats senators from Hawaii, have pushed the Native Hawaiian Recognition Act- an act that would restore Hawaii to a kingdom run by ethnically native Hawaiians.

As one might expect, Congress has routinely defeated this legislation. A 2007 DOJ statement to the Senate highlighted the absurdity of the proposed law and noted, 
“Moreover, S. 310 effectively seeks to undo the political bargain through which Hawaii secured its admission into the Union in 1959. On November 7, 1950, all citizens of the Hawaiian Territory – including native Hawaiians – voted to seek admission to the United States. See, e.g., Pub. L. No. 86-3, 73 Stat. 4. By a decisive 2-1 margin, native Hawaiians themselves voted for statehood, thus voluntarily and democratically relinquishing any residual sovereignty to the United

Obama, who grew up in Hawaii (amongst many other places), appears sympathetic to this plight and his Department of the Interior has issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to overrule the will of Congress.
What the notice proposes is enacting a “government-to-government relationship between the United State and the Native Hawaiian community,” allowing the government of Hawaii to run as a kingdom dominated by a racial hierarchy, with native Hawaiians being in charge.

Obama’s crusade, however, is fraught with legal complications. Aside from the obvious fact that such decisions are not the domain of the president, but rather the legislative body, Obama’s actions would likely violate 15th Amendment protections as well as establish a precedent that states can secede in the pursuit of instituting a government centered on racial hierarchy- an obvious violation of innumerable tenets of our government and society.

In late May, TPNN reported: 
The policy proposal, an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, states:
“The Secretary of the Interior is considering whether to propose an administrative rule that would facilitate the reestablishment of a government-to-government relationship with the Native Hawaiian community.”
The document claims that the goal is “to more effectively implement the special political and trust relationship that Congress has established between that [Hawaiian] community and the United States.”
What this does is essentially create a two-tier system based on race in Hawaii. It will afford separate taxes and law enforcement to one race and another set of policies will govern another race. 
Since then, the Department of the Interior has endured a barrage of push-back from legislators and other assorted bureaucrats who have maintained that not only is this a terrible idea, but one that is inherently unconstitutional. Under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress, not the president, has the authority to recognize tribes.

In fact, Obama’s head of Indian Affairs at the Interior Department, Assistant Secretary Kevin K. Washburn, testified before a House subcommittee that this administration did not “have the authority to recognize Native Hawaiians.” Washburn claimed that “we would need legislation to be able to proceed down that road.”
Still, despite having no Constitutional authority, the Obama administration is continuing to push the policy change that could have far-reaching effects. It is unclear if even the Congress has the authority to allow such policies; it is, however, certain that the executive branch possesses no such powers.

While it is far from certain that Hawaii will be granted the right to secede, what such policy shifts are aimed at is creating a wider divide between races and unapologetically implementing a racial hierarchy with native Hawaiians at the top.
At a time when the most divisive president in history pretends to be interested in equality and egalitarian beliefs, it’s nauseating to see his administration stoke the flames of racial prejudice and seek to codify racial supremacy in law. 

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Students Are Fed Up With Michelle Obama’s Control Freak Ways And Now They’re Hitting Back Full Force

Well, well, well, it seems like Food Nazi Michelle Obama is more of a ...
[Well, well, well, it seems like Food Nazi Michelle Obama is more of a Ms as I say not as I do Akin to her Hubby Barry Barack]
First Lady Michelle Obama led a healthy foods initiative designed to ...


It’s well known by now that First Lady Michelle Obama has long campaigned for “healthier” food choices in America’s schools. Out with the “bad”, in with the “good” — at least good in her opinion. And a lot of parents as well as nutritionists support the “Lunch Lady’s” effort to reduce kids’ sugar and fat intake. However…
There is significant push-back in many places. From kids who are unhappy. Parents who don’t like the dictates. School districts that find they’re throwing out tons of “healthy” but uneaten food.
And as students all over America return to their classrooms, a new twitter hashtag — #BringBackOurSnacks — is exploding with tasty comments about empty vending machines and unwelcome food menu selections.
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Liberals/Progressives And Evolution

Photo Credit: screenpunk (Flickr)
Liberals have historically supported the theory of evolution as introduced by Charles Darwin, at least on paper. What they haven’t done is embrace any of the conclusions of evolutionary theory for themselves.
Basically, evolution states that animals evolve because the fittest individuals in any group of interbreeding creatures have the best chance of breeding success. More successful breeding means more offspring that contain whatever bits of genetic coding that made the parent fitter. It doesn’t have to mean that the parent was bigger and stronger and more aggressive than others of his/her species. In fact, the ability to hide is often most important. Fitness is only that characteristic that allows the individual to survive long enough to breed more than his/her fellows. This mark of fitness can change rapidly as conditions change. Those individuals who were most fit in a time of plenty may be least fit in a time of drought.
As a general rule, however, any action which tends to interfere with the individual’s ability to produce more offspring is anti-evolutionary. This can be questioned in such cases as wolf-packs when individuals forgo the mating privilege to support a brother or sister, but the result is the same, his or her genes are transmitted to the next generation, even though it wasn’t done directly. But wolf-packs will generally attempt to kill the offspring of other unrelated wolf-packs. Likewise male lions will usually kill all the cubs of the previous king when they take over a pride.

Only with humans has evolution been thrown on its head. Only a foolish human would imagine that fewer children might be better. Only a foolish human would decide that it was somehow proper to have no children at all. The fitter you are, the fewer children you have, how is that pro-evolutionary? Margaret Sanger was wrong about the relative value of the black race, but she was right about how to deal with a perceived threat to one’s own superiority. She started Planned Parenthood precisely to eliminate the black race. She was like the male lion who prefers his own offspring to those of his supposed inferiors. Yet the Democrats very strongly downplay that face of abortion. But how can any species that follows the dictates of evolution stand up and support killing its own children?

It’s not only abortion that is anti-evolutionary. No evolutionary creature will give up its time and effort to support an individual that poses no benefit to its own breeding success. There is no welfare society in the wild kingdom. No other creature leaves out bits of food for unrelated creatures, either of its own species or another. If you see something that looks like it does, you can bet that at the bottom is a benefit to one’s own breeding success. By forcing others to support those who give back no benefit to oneself, or even allowing yourself to be so forced is completely against all evolutionary ideas.
Now, there are individuals in all species that do seem to be anti-evolutionary. But guess what, they don’t breed and soon die out. I do happen to believe that a greater percentage of homosexual humans are genetically built that way. That is one of the reasons why there are so few homosexual members of any species, those who for one reason or another choose to be homosexual, seldom breed and therefore whatever tendency that caused them to be so will die out.

The odd thing about homosexuality in humans is that it has only survived to the extent it has because it has been so suppressed over the years. Previously, they had children, often to hide their true nature. But now they don’t have to hide and more often than not, don’t have children. I suspect that in the future there will be far fewer gay people than there are now, because they do not breed as much as straights. Whether this is true for bi-sexuals, I don’t know. Some people believe that bisexuality is more of a lifestyle than hard wiring. Only time will tell if that is so.
Another anti-evolutionary idea is tribal diversity. Uncontrolled diversity is a killer to evolution because it washes out the effects of an individual’s genes. This is why tribalism exists. A tribe is generally related much like the wolf-pack. The continued existence of the tribe means the continued existence of the basic genetic makeup of the tribe which means your genes will carry on, even if your offspring do not. Tribalism/racism is a highly evolutionary trait. Hence, the tribe’s need to keep up their population also tended to discourage homosexuality and even made celibacy a crime in many early societies.

Women Volunteer for Sexual Jihad with Islamic State

Really? Are these woman brainwashed or just uneducated?
Check it out:
Records show that Australian, British, and Malaysian women travel to Iraq and Syria to participate in jihad al-nikah, or sexual jihad, for the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorists. They intend to become comfort women for the jihadists as the men continue to establish a Caliphate in Iraq and Syria.
“These women are believed to have offered themselves in sexual comfort roles to ISIS fighters who are attempting to establish Islamic rule in the Middle East,” said one source in Malaysia, adding, “This concept may seem controversial but it has arisen as certain Muslim women here are showing sympathy for the ISIS struggle.”
“Checks with our foreign counterparts and intelligence disseminated reveal that there may be up to 50 Malaysians in the Middle East,” he said.

The official shared information with Britain and Australia. Numbers from those countries show hundreds of men fight with ISIS, but also women who left because of sexual jihad.  

"This figure also includes British Muslim women who are not fighting on the front line, but are still involved by performing sexual jihad,” said the source. “Australian intelligence officials have revealed that more than 100 Australian Muslims are in Syria fighting alongside ISIS.”
In 2013, a Wahhabi edict asked Sunni women to offer themselves as comfort women “to boost the morale of fighters” in Syria who fight against President Bashar al-Assad. Many women from Tunisia traveled to Syria in the name of sexual jihad after the fatwas were issued. Wahhabi is a conservative school of Islam, but there are a few who view jihad al-nikah as a legitimate form of holy war. Some of the fatwas on the Internet called on women as young as 14-years-old to help those fighting the war.
ISIS, who identify with Wahhabi, executed its own sexual jihad edict in June after the terrorists took over Mosul, Iraq. Unfortunately, many of the women were forced into the sexual jihad against their will. The terrorists demanded residents bring all unmarried girls to perform their duty in jihad by providing sex to the militants.
Posters read, “We call upon the people of this county to bring their unmarried girls so they can fulfill their duty in sex jihad for their warrior brothers in the city and anyone who will not appear will feel the full force of the sharia [Islamic law] upon him.”

Four women committed suicide after ISIS terrorists raped them. Also, two Iraqi girls provided testimony after men raped them. The terrorists attacked their house, killed the men inside, and took turns raping the two young girls. They claimed it was legitimate in the name of sexual jihad.

Continue Reading on ...

Marched to their deaths: Sickening ISIS slaughter continues as 250 soldiers captured at Syrian airbase are stripped then led to the desert for mass execution

'Another ISIS war crime': Footage and photographs have emerged of Islamic State fighters marching more than 200 soldiers across the desert to their deaths in only their underwear after capturing Syria's Tabqa air base
'Another ISIS war crime': Footage and photographs have emerged of Islamic State fighters marching more than 200 soldiers across the desert to their deaths in only their underwear after capturing Syria's Tabqa air base
By Dan Bloom for MailOnline
Sickening footage appears to show Islamic State militants parading around 250 captured soldiers through the desert in their underwear before they are killed and their bodies piled on the bare earth.
An Islamic State fighter claimed the men were from the Syrian government's Tabqa air base which extremists seized on Sunday, potentially handing them warplanes, tanks, artillery and ammunition.
The video, which has not been independently verified, is too graphic to be published in full.
It begins by showing dozens of men being marched through the desert wearing only their underwear. It then fades to black, resuming with a pile of bloodied bodies stacked on top of one another.  

Horror: The video, too graphic to be published in full, fades to black before revealing a chain of men's bodies 
Horror: The video, too graphic to be published in full, fades to black before revealing a chain of men's bodies 
Slaughter: A separate image showed masked gunmen preparing to shoot seven men from the same air base. The chilling photograph was released by the Raqqa Media Center yesterday and tallies with other reporting 
Slaughter: A separate image showed masked gunmen preparing to shoot seven men from the same air base. The chilling photograph was released by the Raqqa Media Center yesterday and tallies with other reporting  
As the horrific footage progresses it pans slowly across a vast line of men who appear to be dead, and whose bodies have been laid out one by one.
The line forms a slow crescent across the desert, seemingly stretching to the horizon as militants stand beside it. Eventually, after more than a minute, the cameraman reaches the end of the line.
The precise death toll is uncertain and other sources put it at lower than 250, but at least 150 bodies are visible in the shaky video. 

Its description on Youtube said it showed the execution of Army officers and Nusayri people, a significant minority of Shia Muslims in Syria.
A caption to another version of the video said: 'The 250 shabeeha taken captive by the Islamic State from Tabqa in Raqqa have been executed.' Shabeeha is the Islamist name for soldiers loyal to President Bashar al-Assad.
An Islamic State fighter in Raqqa told Reuters: 'Yes we have executed them all'. 

Marched: Earlier stills from the video showed men being paraded in their underwear and ordered to chant 
Marched: Earlier stills from the video showed men being paraded in their underwear and ordered to chant 
Before they were killed, the men's captors chanted 'Islamic State' - to which they replied: 'It will remain'. 
Islamic State won a week-long battle on Sunday to capture the Tabqa base, which is 25 miles from their Syrian stronghold in Raqqa. 
Syria's authorities insisted at the time that their soldiers had 'successfully regrouped' - suggesting they were later hunted down by the militants and executed. 

Despite heavy losses on the Islamic State side, the base's capture prompted fresh fears that the fighters have got hold of advanced military technology which will allow them to cement their self-declared regime.
Video footage has already suggested Islamic State fighters have drones which were used to shoot reconnaissance footage of an army base.
Today's reported mass killing also underscores how the group uses images of violence as much as violence itself to terrorise its opponents, as it sweeps further into Syria and Iraq.
Nadim Houry, deputy director of Human Rights Watch for the Middle East, described the video as 'another ISIS war crime'. 
And yesterday a UN commission accused the extremist group of committing crimes against humanity in Syria, similar to those it has already committed in Iraq.
Yet the extremists are also in touch with modern ideas of PR, releasing glossy magazines in English which feature mutilated bodies to promote their cause in the West. 

The captured men were escorted closely by Islamic State militants dressed in black and waving flags 
The captured men were escorted closely by Islamic State militants dressed in black and waving flags 

The Home Secretary has sounded fresh warnings over the radicalisation of young Brits, with authorities fearing around 500 have joined an array of jihadi groups in Iraq and Syria.  
Extremists have declared a self-styled caliphate, a Sunni regime ordering its subjects to operate under an extreme interpretation of Sharia law.
It has opened up three fronts in the fighting in Syria, which is already home to a bloody and long-running civil war between President Assad's forces and anti-government rebels.  

Captured: A resident of Tabqa waves the Islamic State flag on Sunday after militants seized the nearby air base 
Captured: A resident of Tabqa waves the Islamic State flag on Sunday after militants seized the nearby air base 
Death march: Another video appearing to show the same march through the desert was put on social media 
Death march: Another video appearing to show the same march through the desert was put on social media 
There were chants of 'Islamic State', to which the men replied 'It will remain', their hands behind their backs 
There were chants of 'Islamic State', to which the men replied 'It will remain', their hands behind their backs 
Tormented: At one point the men appeared to be taunted by their captors as some turned towards the camera 
Tormented: At one point the men appeared to be taunted by their captors as some turned towards the camera 
Today CNN claimed the militants in Iraq have also been burning oil wells near the town of Zummar, which is crucial because it is near a road which links Mosul to the Syrian border.
The network suggested fighters are attempting to 'cover their tracks' as Kurdish Peshmerga fighters draw closer. 
The Islamic State extremists now control roughly a third of Syria, mostly areas in the north and east of the country, as the U.S. threatens air strikes similar to those already used in Iraq. 
But the situation is complicated as Washington has claimed the Syrian government - embroiled in a bloody civil war - is part of the problem despite offering itself as a force against extremism.
French President Francois Hollande added today that President Assad, whose forces used brutal force to crush what began as a peaceful uprising three years ago, was no ally in the fight against Islamic State.  

Sprawling: An image of what is believed to be the air base, just south of the city of Tabqa, shows its long fence 
Sprawling: An image of what is believed to be the air base, just south of the city of Tabqa, shows its long fence 
Arsenal: Campaigners say the base contained weapons and jets which may now be used by the militants 
Arsenal: Campaigners say the base contained weapons and jets which may now be used by the militants 
Today Syrian warplanes hit Islamic State targets in the eastern stronghold of Deir al-Zor and killed some of the group's commanders, according to the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
The Observatory, run by a Syrian emigrant from his terraced house in Coventry, said the planes struck a building used as an Islamic State headquarters during a meeting of its commanders. 
Syrian state TV reported that the army 'eliminated more than 10 terrorists' in an attack east of Deir al-Zor military airport, including two Islamic State leaders, and destroyed 14 armoured vehicles. 
Another video posted online today appeared to show at least one Syrian soldier being interrogated before a group of other captured men in their underwear.
The soldier identifies himself as a Shia Muslim officer from the same sect as many high-ranking military officers and President Assad. Islamic State members are Sunni Muslims. 
'How many have you killed? How many have you raped?' the interrogator shouts. The soldier replies: 'None. I've been stationed here in the airport.'
The interrogator asks why the soldier had been fighting on behalf of Assad and did not defect, adding: 'We're going to send you right back to hell by slaughter'.