Saturday, October 11, 2014

Turkish Soldiers Pose with Islamic State Slaughterers in Kobani

Obama, Erdogan discuss Karabakh, Armenian Genocide bills at Seoul ...
oped: Indeed  Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is have the same goal... to restore the Ottoman Empire under the new Caliphate...! Barry wants to really~ really be a Imam! 

Rush Limbaugh calls Obama the "Imam Obama." Disrespectful or funnier ...

via: Pamela Geller
Obama said his “most trusted,” “favorite ally” in the world is Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan — the man responsible for throwing off the modern era of Ataturk and returning Turkey to the backward savage system of the oppression and subjugation of Islamic rule.
“The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers.” Turkish PM Recip Erdogan
Turkish President and former Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan thinks of himself as a caliph, and is looking at Syria with imperial ambitions (more). President Assad of Syria said, “[Erdoğan] personally thinks that he is the new sultan of the Ottomans and he can control the region as it was during the Ottoman Empire under a new umbrella. In his heart he thinks he is a caliph.”
One anonymous US official, speaking to the New York Times this week, said that Ankara was “inventing reasons not to act” in the besieged northern Syrian town of Kobani: “this isn’t how a NATO ally acts while hell is unfolding a stone’s throw from their border,” the official added. An anonymous U.S. official reached by the Washington Post was no kinder: the Turks, the senior official said, are dragging their feet because “they want the U.S. to come in and take care of the problem.”

Muslim fighters from Europe, Canada, the US, Australia, etc., are using the Turkey/Syria border to cross in order to fight for the Islamic State.
Much thanks to Oliver North for the photo: “A Turkish soldier ‘visiting’ an ISIS anti-aircraft unit at Kobani. They look way too friendly. Photo was sent to me by a US contractor at the Kobani border crossing.” (thanks to Armaros)


Ankara may deny helping ISIS, but the evidence for this is overwhelming. “As we have the longest border with Syria,” writes Orhan Kemal Cengiz, a Turkish newspaper columnist, “Turkey’s support was vital for the jihadists in getting in and out of the country.” Indeed, the ISIS strongholds not coincidentally cluster close to Turkey’s frontiers.
Kurds, academic experts and the Syrian opposition agree that Syrians, Turks (estimated to number 3,000), and foreign fighters (especially Saudis but also a fair number of Westerners) have crossed the Turkish-Syrian border at will, often to join ISIS. What Turkish journalist Kadri Gursel calls a “two-way jihadist highway,” has no bothersome border checks and sometimes involves the active assistance of Turkish intelligence services. CNN even broadcast a video on “The secret jihadi smuggling route through Turkey.”
Actually, the Turks offered far more than an easy border crossing: they provided the bulk of ISIS’ funds, logistics, training and arms. Turkish residents near the Syrian border tell of Turkish ambulances going to Kurdish-ISIS battle zones and then evacuating ISIS casualties to Turkish hospitals. Indeed, a sensational photograph has surfaced showing ISIS commander Abu Muhammad in a hospital bed receiving treatment for battle wounds in Hatay State Hospital in April 2014.
One Turkish opposition politician estimates that Turkey has paid $800 million to ISIS for oil shipments. Another politician released information about active duty Turkish soldiers training ISIS members. Critics note that Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has met three times with someone, Yasin al-Qadi, who has close ties to ISIS and has funded it…… (Source: MEF)

Shawn MAHAN for Storey County, Nevada SHERIFF

oped: At this point in the Sheriffs Race Sharlas Labyrinth is leaning toward endorsing Shawn for Sheriff...however I need to know where Shawn stands on the 2 nd Amendment ...our current Sheriff voted with Nevada's Sheriffs and Police Chiefs to remove Arizona CCW permits from being accepted in Nevada.
I am a retired former Federal Customs Patrol Officer who worked the Mexican border in the Yuma Arizona sector...1975-1979 then worked LAX and was promoted to Regional Intelligence Officer before taking a early retirement option 1986...I also worked for LAPD 1971-1974 after serving in the US Army 1964-1968 Cav! 
I was a Reserve Sheriffs Deputy, Storey County 1995-1996 after relocating in Storey County 1994! 
I respect Arizona as a 2nd amendment supporter state and their requirements for a CCW permit is equal to all other states including Nevada..note: even thou Nevada voted to not recognize Arizona permits Arizona being first class still accepts Nevada.
I also find it a tad strange that Arizona permits are not accepted when Nevada's Constitution has a open carry clause(Law) no permit required. I have a current Arizona non resident permit, I keep it because it is cheaper and is accepted in more states than Nevada...yet mine is not valid in my home state! 
Question for Shawn will you fight to have Arizonas permits recognized in Nevada? 
 Addendum: I voted today 11/4 for Gerald Antinoro...Shawn Mahan never got back to me...however Gerald did and said he would bring up my concern at the next Sheriffs and Chiefs of Police meeting!

My name is Shawn Mahan.  I intend on being your next Storey County Sheriff.
Storey County residents are once again at a crossroad.  Another four-year term is ending and voters will be bombarded with confrontations about who the right candidates are. Personal and financial interests participate greatly in these influences.  The cycle of meeting in drinking establishments and conducting calculated endeavors to destroy others is at hand.  Unfortunately, candidate credentials are once again left at the roadside.
If you are new to the Comstock, this is a common occurrence.  Every four years anger and hostilities arise which focus on the previous candidate, the poor job they have done and how to replace them with a newer better model.  Elections then take place and new candidates are elected which continues the cycle.  If you are not new to the Comstock this will not come as a shock to you.  We need local stability.
My question to you is: Will you allow these harmful effects to control the Storey County Sheriff you elect?  Do you truly know your candidate and not believe what others are forcing you to believe?  Please make an informed decision when choosing this years Sheriff candidate.
You have the opportunity to break this cycle of dysfunction.   While we live in a grass roots community, we are truly on the world stage.  You deserve a sheriff with established character and genuine intentions.  Together, we can change these senseless ways and move towards making Storey County the bright and shining diamond it deserves to be.
Your vote for me supports untainted professionalism in promoting a positive image; developing constructive collaborations and demonstrating authentic care for Storey County citizens.  I believe in providing selfless service and look forward to delivering this product to you for many years to come.
My commitments to the communities and people of Storey County are genuine and recognized.  I understand the evolving needs of our region and can propel the Storey County Sheriff’s Office forward during theses challenging times.  As your elected Sheriff, I only aspire to serve you better.  I am a qualified local candidate who will make Storey County a better place to live, visit and raise your family.
See my 5 Point Leadership Transition Plan
See my Four Cornerstones of the Storey County Sheriff’s Office
Thank you for your time,
Shawn Mahan

Friday, October 10, 2014

One Device to End All Disease

oped: I did the research on this 5 months ago on my blog...this claim has merit...however I have not completed research on this start up company as of I can't endorse their 'specific' claims.
No one would ever imagine a cure for cancer existed before WWII, or that the world’s most powerful drug companies conspired to crush this affordable cure before it ever saw the light of day.
But this pre-war hatchet job was just the first of many efforts to rob you and all of humanity of effective cures for one of the most feared diseases in history.
It all started back in 1934, when inventor and engineer Raymond Rife teamed up with the University of Southern California (USC) to show the world that cancer cells vibrate at a unique frequency.
You see, Rife discovered that by increasing the intensity of a cancer cell’s frequency, cancer cells die without harming healthy cells.
And during his experiment with USC...

100% of the terminal cancer patients in the study were completely cured within four months.

This is all documented and a matter of public record. SEE:  

I also did the research on homeopathic natural treatments on cancer vs Traditional SEE complete : 


An amazing new device with the power to end ebola, cancer, heart disease, strokes and much more… for less than $50.
It’s quietly been cleared by the FDA. But it can’t stay quiet much longer.
And according to industry experts, it’s going to create $7 trillion in new wealth.
You can see it for yourself here. 

A venture capitalist reveals a prototype of the technology here.

Thursday, October 9, 2014

Rep Gerald Connolly (D-VA)Supports Muslim Brotherhood Wants To Fund Muslim Terrorists

Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. // Susan Walsh/AP
[Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va] 


When it comes to Congressional representatives for the adjacent 8th and 11th districts of Virginia, there has been a distinct alliance with a certain Muslim Brotherhood-linked mosque and individuals. From the mid-1990's until he left office in 2009, Rep. Thomas M. Davis (R-VA) rubbed elbows with the Chairman of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, VA.

Davis' Democrat successor Congressman Gerald Connolly (D-VA) has picked up right where Davis left off. Among other things, earlier this year, a Board member for Dar al-Hijrah – Akram Elzend – hosted a fundraiser for Connolly, as reported. Last year, Connolly defended the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt by asserting that because they were elected to power, the group's removal was unjustified. Connolly failed to acknowledge that one of the reasons 30 million Egyptians took to the streets to remove Mohammed Mursi was because Mursi was implementing Sharia law, which, ironically, would have ended democracy.

Last month, Connolly defended the Muslim Brotherhood and called for the continued funding of the Palestinian Authority, despite the group's inclusion of Hamas leaders:
As has reported, Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA) has served the 8th district for years. In addition to embracing Dar al-Hijrah's longtime chairman Bassam Estwani like Davis did, it was recently revealed that Moran donated substantially to Muslim Brotherhood front group CAIR.

Huckabee Vows to Leave GOP If It Doesn't Fight Same-Sex Marriage

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee (photo: Fox News).
oped: My suggest solution:

By Todd Beamon
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee threatened to leave the GOP and run for the White House in 2016 as an independent if Republicans "capitulate" and support same-sex marriage.

"If the Republicans want to lose guys like me, and a whole bunch of still God-fearing, Bible-believing people, go ahead and just abdicate on this issue — and go ahead and say abortion doesn’t matter, either," Huckabee told the American Family Association President Tim Wildom on his "Today's Issues" radio show. "Because at that point, you lose me, I’m gone."

"I’ll become an independent," he vowed in an interview on Tuesday. "I’ll start finding people that have guts to stand. I’m tired of this."

Huckabee's declaration came a day after the Supreme Court cleared the way for a huge expansion of gay marriage in as many as 30 states and the District of Columbia.

Obama: The Media is Suppressing All My Successes


oped: AU CONTRAIRE Barry Barack...they have given you full credit for your perverted homosexual agenda...Obama Care et al however you are correct about one thing...they have failed to give you credit for your enabling of MB,ISIS,ISIL IS  et al radical Islam to march forward on their new 'Ottoman Empire' and glorious Caliphate unhindered by the US Military under the marvelous CIC/POTUS of the United States of Broken America! 
And your narcism and bi-polar disorder are duly is enough to gaga a maggot! 

For rich liberals who wanted to recreate the amazing experience of 2008 of being suckered by an egomanical con artist reciting third rate Ophraisms, it only cost them a mere $32K a plate.
There they could hear Obama take them for a tour of the river of denial with such claims as, the media was suppressing all his successes.
Obama also told the attendees that they could be forgiven for not knowing about his successes because Washington and the media are too cynical, according to the pool report.
“The reason you don’t hear about them is they elicit hope. They’re good news,” he said.
That darn media.
Read More:

South Carolina Supreme Court Halts Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

The SC Supreme Court hears oral arguments in June on Attorney General ...
[The SC Supreme Court]
oped: Indeed this issue is by no means over!

Fox’s Bob Beckel Challenges Jason Mattera to a Knife Fight Over Lerner Ambush Video

Bob Beckel Does It Again
oped: Just *SMH* at Bobby Joe...uuuh Bob I say you are the dodged the draft during the VietNam conflict...why don't you make up for it and go fight IS with the Kurds since you are claiming to be in such great physical shape now! Hello you are 65 going on 15 just saying! Oh and for petes sake loose the suspenders already ya ain't no farmer John either...just a blowhard talkin' head!
Bryan Preston 

Liberal Democrat Bob Beckel, co-host on Fox News Channel’s The Five, has never given the IRS targeting scandal any credibility. He has insisted that it’s not a scandal, even that the conservatives who were subjected to invasive scrutiny by the IRS and Lois Lerner deserved it. He has said that they all should have been subjected to even more invasive questioning and more politically driven delays.
So imagine Beckel’s reaction to this video of conservative Jason Mattera targeting Lois Lerner, the bureaucrat at the center of the IRS scandal, for some invasive questioning.
Beckel did react to the video today, in his typically understanding, even-handed fashion. Which is to say that he wants to hurt Mr. Mattera, with a knife. 

Greg Gutfeld set up the segment prior to the clip above by contrasting it with a more traditional political ad, which Gutfeld cited as a better way to go.
Beckel came flat-out unhinged on Mattera: “Let me move to this, Jason, let me give a very special comment to him. You’re twice as young as I am, you’re a punk, you’re a coward, my name is Bob Beckel, you’re a coward, you’re a punk, you pick on people and you deserve to have your — kicked. So get in touch with me.” Beckel offered to let Fox give Mattera his personal address.

Others on the panel noted that Lerner dodged questions that Americans, other than Beckel, want answered. Eric Bolling defended Mattera by reminding everyone that Andrew Breitbart was subjected to “a million of these” ambush videos by the left.
Gutfeld notes that conservatives like Mattera are “catching up to the left,” and then Beckel lost his mind again.
“That was an insult to Breitbart’s history. That was an insult by a guy who is a punk and it’s lousy, lying, un-American punk. He is un-American! You don’t do that, you don’t chase your neighbors down. He is un-American.”
Beckel continued: “Let him go fight ISIS.”
Bolling, aware that Mattera is far younger than Beckel and in far better shape, stood up for Jason and told Bob “He’ll kick your butt.”
“That’s fine, let him try it,” Beckel said. “And bring a knife, punk!”

Harry Reid’s Bodyguard Physically Attacks “Crapitalism” Author Jason Mattera

Prepare a long goodbye for Arrogance; Senator Harry Reid (D-NV)

Little Harry Reid’s bodyguards gets all fussy when Jason tries to ask the dipstick some tough questions. Enjoy.

See Video:

Harry Reid's bodyguard attacks "Crapitalism" author 

One of Harry Reid’s bodyguards accosted a conservative journalist for asking a few basic questions about the Senate Majority Leader’s wealth.
Jason Mattera, author of the explosive new book CRAPITALISM: Liberals Who Make Millions Swiping Your Tax Dollars, recently caught up with Reid and asked him, “How did you become so rich working in government?” The senator refused to answer.
Mattera, who publishes Daily Surge, followed up. “How does someone on a government salary most of their career accumulate your type of wealth?” Still, there was no answer from Reid.
Suddenly, one of the Majority Leader’s bodyguards intervened. “Are you press?” he asked, before shoving Mattera and then pinning him against a wall.
“What are you doing holding me up like that?” Mattera asked the bodyguard.
After the author identified himself as a member of the press, the bodyguard retorted, “I don’t care if you’re press or not.” The man refused to give Mattera his name.
Read more:

SNAP: OK Republican, ‘Any Muslim Who Practices Islam Shouldn’t Be Trusted’

Screen Shot 2014-10-09 at 8.36.23 AM
Here’s a ballsy dude saying what pretty much everyone thinks now but is afraid to say. Enjoy.
A local Oklahoma Republican representative said recently that while not all Muslims are bad people, any Muslim that subscribes to the actual practices of Islam should not be trusted. State Rep. John Bennett even went so far as to draw comparisons to Germans who were complicit in what the Nazis did.
Oklahoma, of course, got national attention after a Muslim man there beheaded a co-worker. Bennett argued, “Mohammed’s teaching only teaches one thing. And that’s the violence that we’re seeing today in ISIS and in the beheading in Moore and other places.”

One woman challenged him and said there are nice, moderate Muslims who don’t appreciate their elected leaders calling them “no better than ISIS.” Bennett shot back, “Where are your nice friends? Why aren’t they here? Why aren’t they out there saying, ‘Hey, you know what, we don’t believe in that?’”
He made a comparison to the Nazis and basically said that any Muslim who practices the Muslim faith cannot be trusted:
“You think every German was a Nazi? No, they weren’t. But what happened with the Nazis was that once they got in power, all those Germans that sat quiet or were scared to say anything had no choice but to follow and support what they were doing. “So is every Muslim bad? No. but if they subscribe to Islam and what it teaches, and if they’re not standing up and condemning what Islam teaches, then they’re just going right along with them, just like the Germans did when the Nazis were around.”
Read More:

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

"We're Screwed": MSM Caught on Hot Mic at White House Ebola Press Briefing

For a little insight into what the American mainstream media really thinks (but will never say), check out what CBS News Chief White House Correspondent Major Garrett and two of his colleagues had to say when Garrett apparently forgot his mic was still on after the White House's October 3rd press briefing on the government's Ebola response ended.

Now, Aaron and I are in no way saying "we're screwed." We're just trying to show you these mainstream reporters obviously don't believe the government b.s. any more than we do...yet they go on prime time TV and tell everyone exactly what the government wants us all to hear night after night. It really is all a dog and pony show, and this clip is just more obvious proof of that.

All of this is highly disturbing considering the mortality rate of Ebola. Is it really as one government emergency manager suggested, the Ebola outbreak is being conducted on purpose?
Additionally, the Obama administration continues to purposefully sit on their hands regarding banning air travel from countries where Ebola has grown out of control. The American people have been petitioning this criminal administration to ban all incoming and outgoing flights to Ebola-stricken countries.
It's so bad that even the media's useful idiots from the White House Press corps are saying "We're screwed."

I don't believe we're screwed. We serve the God of heaven. However, I do think it to be a wise thing for us to be prudent in the matter and prepare ourselves for what may be ahead. To that end, a recent article may help with some of those prepping needs.

Federal Appellate Courts and SCOTUS on Gay marriage...both off the mark!


I for one have had enough of activist Judges from the States Supreme Courts up through the Federal Appellate Courts and ending in the US Supreme Court...Fact : Judges are not authorized/empowered to make Law they are there to make sure the rule of Law is followed and to give opinions which may or may not be binding ...Laws are enacted by legislatures of the states and the Congress of the United States of America... representatives are elected by 'We the People!  Activist gay or straight judges have no right to replace state rights laws voted on by 'We The People' and replaced with their own personal opinion/laws based on prejudicial agendas  PERIOD!

Marriage is one of the most important commitments that someone can make during their lifetime. If you are considering making a marriage commitment, it is important to reflect on the type of commitment that you will be making with the person you plan to marry. 

Marriage is the most basic and significant social relationship to humankind. This relationship must be nurtured and maintained for the welfare of all. Without marriage, society will fail.
God's design for marital relationship is heterosexual, not homosexual, and monogamous, not polygamous. This relational aspect of God's image in marriage has analogues portrayed in Yahweh's relation with Israel ( Isa 54:5 ; Jer 31:32 ; Ezek 16:8-14 ; Hosea 2:14-20 ) as well as in Christ's relation with the church ( Eph 5:21-33 ; cf. 1 Cor 11:1-3 ; 2 Cor 11:2 ; Rev 19:7-9 ). Israel is portrayed as Yahweh's wife ( Isa 54:5 ; Jer 31:32 ; Ezek 16:8-14 ; Hosea 2:14-20 ). Her idolatrous unfaithfulness and disobedience to Yahweh are frequently depicted as spiritual "adultery" ( Num 25:1-4 ; Judges 2:17 ; Jer 3:20 ; Ezek 16:15-59 ; 23:1-48 ; Hosea 1:2 ; 2:2-13 ; 3:3 ) for which she was punished by captivity. Yahweh "divorced" his "unfaithful wife" ( Isa 50:1 ; Jer 3:8 ; Hosea 2:2 ), but ultimately will have compassion and delightfully restore her to faithfulness and holiness ( Isa 54 ; 62:4-5 ; Ezek 16:53-63 ; Hosea 2:14-3:1 ).

God commanded the male and female to perform two specific functions: procreation ("fruitful and multiply") and ruling over the earth ("subdue" and "rule") ( Gen 1:28 ). These are functions that reflect God's image. Humankind (male and female) receive God-ordained authority to rule over the rest of creation, but not over each other.
Human reproduction comes through intimate sexual union designed for the marriage relationship. While reproduction is a divine purpose of marriage, some couples are unable to have children for various physical reasons. This does not make their marriage second-rate or inferior. However, a married couple should desire to obey the divine injunction of procreation if possible. Children are one manifestation of the "one flesh" of marriage. The procreative injunction obviously precludes homosexual "marriages."

Here is my suggestion to end this war on marriage once and for all and is fair to all parties involved:
The term marriage should be divided into two separate catagories:

A marriage covenant/contract is a bi-lateral legal agreement between two people. It is a performance-based agreement. It is binding only as long as each spouse performs according to the covenant/contract. If one spouse fails to adequately uphold the contract, the other spouse can choose to no longer be bound by the contract.

1) Covenantal relationship between husband, wife and the Creator.
Marriage Covenant
A Moral Commitment  
Binding under Law  
For hetrosexual /religious relationships


2) Union contract:
Marriage Contract
A Legal Commitment 
Binding under Law for 
homosexual relationships 
Progressive Liberals 

Why ISIS and Hamas Wear Masks

Hamas ISIS Europe
The biblical story of Saul teaches us a powerful lesson regarding the individual's moral choice and what that choice may lead to.
In ancient Israel, as the era of the judges was ending, it came time for the Israelites to finally have a king. Saul was God's first choice. He had the strength and support necessary to protect the Israelites and, under God's command, once and for all destroy the threats and specter of death that the Israelites had lived under for centuries. And yet when it came to the key battle with the sworn enemy of the Israelites -- the nation of Amalek -- Saul thought he would be more compassionate than God Himself, ignoring His command by sparing the life of the Amalekite king Agag -- the Bin Laden of his time.
Later on in his life, Saul wrongly believed that a young shepherd named David was a challenge to his throne and pursued him with his army. Mistakenly convinced that a village of priests had aided David's escape, Saul in a fit of paranoia massacred the village.
That's quite a moral shift.

How did such a promising young man who was hand-picked by God end up going down such a wicked path? The Talmud offers this famous response: "Those who are kind when they should be cruel will end up being cruel when they should be kind."
We today witness this teaching unfolding before our eyes, living as we do in a bizarre era where so many people in a position to support nations who stand for freedom and justice choose instead to support forces of evil, all in the name of compassion.
Why in a world where we know what organizations like Hamas stand for -- brutality towards women, murder of gays, suppression of freedom, genocidal aspirations toward the Jews -- can people elevate the terrorist organization over democratic Israel? The answer lies in evil's ability to hide in the shadows and escape the light of scrutiny. To hide behind masks as it commits atrocities. To cower behind lies and propaganda that ensnare the illiterate and befuddle the blind. It is found in the refusal to analyze and scrutinize one's own biases and to uncover the contradictions and fallacies that pervade one's own thinking.

Hamas, ISIS, al Qaeda, and Hezbollah all thrive from a deficiency of information and critical thinking on the part of the public. People whose knowledge of the Middle East comes from pictures on the Internet of Israel dropping bombs on Gaza will quickly conclude that Israel is the aggressor. Morality that results from two-dimensional images rather than deep-seated values cannot easily distinguish between right and wrong. This phenomenon is found in William Golding's novel "Lord of the Flies," where otherwise innocent young boys slowly turn into savages. Golding understood all too well how deprave action, when freed from the light of scrutiny, can corrupt one's very humanity.
In describing the character of Jack, Golding wrote how the boy began painting his face and "the mask was a thing of its own, behind which Jack hid, liberated from shame and self-consciousness." The boys who challenged and refused to be taken in by the evil "understand only too well the liberation into savagery that the concealing paint brought."
Jihadi John, once an aspiring British rapper, committed some of the most ghastly crimes imaginable while hiding his face behind a black mask. Hooded Hamas executioners who were themselves once just innocent children grew up to be monsters, able to freely murder dissidents in broad daylight, knowing their masks would both conceal their identities while simultaneously striking fear in those who would challenge them.
... Party leader echoes Netanyahu’s new theme: Hamas equals ISIS
Evil flourishes when concealed. Brutality thrives in fog.
Hitler only started his program of mass genocide against the Jews under the cover of the Second World War, just as the Turks had done to the Armenians a quarter century earlier under the cover of the First. Kim Jong Un, the young monster dictator of North Korea, commits his atrocities -- as did his father and grandfather -- in the most inaccessible regime on earth. And in this latest terror war against Israel Hamas fired its murderous rockets from under tents, all the better to conceal their genocidal intent.
Then there are those individuals who hide behind organizations -- distorting facts and perpetrating outright slander -- allowing evil to proliferate. Hiding behind warped morals and a political correctness that has become extreme, it accomplishes the opposite of its intended purpose.
Recently it was discovered that a gang of pedophiles molested over 1,400 girls in Britain. They got away with this crime for the last fifteen years because authorities, abetted by the police, did not wish to seem racist in investigating the charges because the alleged perpetrators were of Pakistani origin. 

Brutality dare never be allowed in the name of compassion.
Readers of this publication will be aware that a few weeks ago I called out Naomi Wolf for her fraudulent and monstrous allegations of an Israeli genocide against the Palestinians. After being spotlighted and closely scrutinized, Naomi attempted to defend herself and was finally forced to write that she condemns Hamas.
I publicly challenged her to a debate on her charges of an Israeli genocide which she at first accepted. However when I continued to expose in detail just how far Naomi had deviated from her own humanitarian and feminist principles in condemning Israel while being most lax on Hamas -- its human rights violations, brutality against women, execution of homosexuals, suicide bombings -- Naomi chose the path of the fainthearted and canceled her participation in the debate. She gave the excuse that she wanted to first wait for the facts from the UN investigation to come out before debating whether Israel committed genocide. Funny how those same facts didn't matter when it came to libeling the Jewish state in the first instance and providing fuel for anti-Semites the world over who wish to destroy Israel. In offering a flimsy pretext for her withdrawal, Naomi was simply donning yet another mask rather than owning up to the truth: she knew she'd be utterly crushed in an open exchange over her venomous and ridiculous charge that Israel seeks to exterminate the Palestinians.

Naomi also ironically claimed that she could not do the debate because she was already scheduled to speak that day on sexual violence at the Oxford Union. I trust that she will choose to mention the sexual violence perpetrated by Hamas and other Islamist extremists that she has until now largely omitted and excused so many times before.
In the end Naomi's claims of an Israeli genocide -- which she still refuses to withdraw -- cost her not only her credibility but even the support of so many of her Hamas-embracing Facebook followers who feel she has sold them out by uttering even a word of criticism toward the terrorists.
So much for compassion.
ISIS and Israel allies against a Palestinian state

Iraq Slave Markets Sell Women for $10 to Attract Isis Recruits

Embedded image permalink

Immigration Expert: Obama Admin Responsible for Letting Ebola Patient into U.S.

President Barack Obama, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, and Secretary of State John Kerry are directly responsible for allowing Ebola into the United States, the Center for Immigration Studies Director of Policy Studies Jessica Vaughan told Breitbart News.

Vaughan points to federal law--the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)--which she notes gives the administration “broad authority” to bar non-citizens like Thomas Eric Duncan, the first Ebola patient allowed into the U.S., from entering the country. The administration took no steps pursuant to that federal law, however, to block people like him from potentially endangering Americans.
“They have broad authority to bar any non-citizen from entering the country,” she said in a phone interview with Breitbart News. “But the INA does have a provision on the books already that bars people who have communicable diseases who of public health significance. It gives the authority to HHS to create that list. The language says it’s only people who have them who are barred." 

"So what you have to do is set up a system of screening to make sure people you’re allowing to travel into the country are clear," she explained. "We’ve done that with some of these other diseases in the past-and the way they do that is every visa issuing post has local doctors that they work with who will screen people who get immigrant visas to make sure they don’t have tuberculosis or leprosy or other diseases. You could similarly require that people who want to travel here on visitor’s visas go through a medical screening and put the burden of proof on the traveler to show they are not infected and are not carrying the disease.”
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), in an appearance on Laura Ingraham's nationally syndicated radio show Wednesday morning, also warned that the administration was not acting forcefully enough. “I think that it is being dominated by political correctness, and I think because it’s being dominated by political correctness we’re not really making sound, rational, scientific decisions,” Paul said.
The government has put Ebola on the list of “banned diseases” but hasn’t taken any steps to put together a screening process or bar immigration from Ebola-stricken nations into the U.S.

“It’s all under the executive branch’s authority how to manage that,” Vaughan said. “They should be working with public health experts on how to detect the disease and for what period of time people should be cleared for. But my understanding from listening to the reports about this case in Dallas is that it’s the airline that’s having people fill out reports and taking their temperature. From what I’ve read that’s not enough."
"People have to have not had contact with an infected person for 21 days and that’s not happening--there was one member of Congress who had asked for a total travel ban to and from these countries and that’s the most aggressive approach we could do, say we are simply not going to admit people who have been in these countries in the last three months," she continued. "That’s what one congressman asked for. That’s the safest thing to do--but if you don’t want to do that, you could do other things like requiring a physician’s clearance and work with that physician and people have to show they haven’t been in touch with someone for 21 days and are fever-free for 21 days.”

The statute explicitly states that “any alien” or legal immigrant or visitor, “who is determined (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) to have a communicable disease of public health significance” or someone who is “who is determined (in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultation with the [Secretary of Homeland Security])… to have a physical or mental disorder and behavior associated with the disorder that may pose, or has posed, a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others, or” is considered to be “inadmissible.”
As such, Burwell and Johnson--and the president--bear direct responsibility for not setting up such a system, she says. She also includes Kerry because the State Department has broad latitude with regards to the issuance of visas to people who wish to either visit or immigrate from these nations.
“In visa issuance, DHS has always had this slight edge over State, but if John Kerry wanted something it’d get done,” Vaughan said. “And they [DHS and HHS] could tell Kerry at the State Department what to do. But I think Kerry bears responsibility here too because they [the State Department] know what the conditions are on the ground in those countries.”

But Vaughan said the Obama administration has done “nothing” to screen for Ebola getting into the U.S. or to stop visas from those countries.
“It seems to have been outsourced to the airlines. I don’t know if the State Department has ceased issuing visas-I certainly have not heard that,” she said, adding that if any actions have been taken it would have been publicly announced by the administration. The only announcement the administration made on Liberia so far is that it is suspending deportations of illegal aliens in the U.S. from that country so those people don’t contract the disease upon their return. Vaughan says that means Obama is protecting illegal aliens from Ebola but not doing anything to protect Americans from the disease.
“But one thing they did announce was they were suspending deportations to Liberia in order to protect the criminal aliens who are living here from having to go back to their own country and catch this disease,” she said. “We keep hearing from the CDC that there’s almost no way to catch it, and yet we’re protecting people from deportation? We don’t protect people from deportation to countries that have high rates of HIV or Tuberculosis? This is supposedly harder to catch than that, Tuberculosis." 

"So we’ve taken steps to protect illegal aliens from catching this in their home country but there hasn’t been anything done to protect Americans because there already are about 200,000 people who have been issued visas to travel here," Vaughan stated. "Even if you stopped issuing visas today, there are already 200,000 people who have been issued visas to come here.”
Vaughan said if the administration actually had a plan earlier, the case in Dallas would likely not exist.
“If they had stepped in earlier with a more robust prevention plan, presumably this case from Dallas would not have happened,” she said, adding that Duncan--the man with Ebola in Dallas--should have been stopped from entering the United States.
“First of all, he is what we call a third-country national -- someone applying for a non-immigrant visa outside their country of citizenship,” Vaughan said. “That is a red flag, because it means that the applicant’s ties to the country in which he is living are assumed to be weak. Add to that the fact that he is apparently a young single unemployed male Liberian living in Ghana and a citizen of the country that has one of the highest visa overstay rates of any country in the world and he already has a close family member in the US, and this was his first trip to the US." 

"There are many factors weighing against issuing this visa under any circumstances, regardless of the Ebola problem," she explained. "Personally, I am comfortable saying that I probably would not have issued this man a visitor’s visa at all. This guy was a visa overstay waiting to happen.”

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

US Laws on the books to deny entry from Ebola infected countries

Today, it was revealed that there is a third American Ebola patient. A ...
Ebola patient arriving in Atlanta on Saturday, and doctors are ready ...

Ebola Patient Image on Background Wallpaper
[Ebola Patient] 
Ebola Patient intensive care 
Ebola patient 

[Ebola patient] 

 Female Nigerian Medical Doctor & Patient Contract Ebola Virus In Lagos
[Female Nigerian Medical Doctor & Patient Contract Ebola Virus In Lagos] 
Dr. Ben Carson: Ebola Patients Should NOT Be In The United States for ...
[Dr. Ben Carson: Ebola Patients Should NOT Be In The United States for ...treatment]
Sorry about the pictures but is necessary to see what this disease does! 
Ebola threatens humanity by preying on human instincts of caring ...

The question now becomes why is the Obama administration not enforcing these laws? The answer is quite obvious the same reason he ignores Immigration Laws the US Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. The Obama administration is a out of control criminal entity hell bent on the destruction of the United States of and's, if's or buts about it! He is committing sedition and treason against our beloved country and Congress has it's proverbial head in the sand! It is really getting scary folks we have never been under such dangerous conditions/actions by any former President or administration in our countries history!

SEE: 42 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Part G - Quarantine and Inspection
Sec. 265 - Suspension of entries and imports from designated places to prevent spread of communicable diseases
From the U.S. Government Printing Office,

§265. Suspension of entries and imports from designated places to prevent spread of communicable diseases

Whenever the Surgeon General determines that by reason of the existence of any communicable disease in a foreign country there is serious danger of the introduction of such disease into the United States, and that this danger is so increased by the introduction of persons or property from such country that a suspension of the right to introduce such persons and property is required in the interest of the public health, the Surgeon General, in accordance with regulations approved by the President, shall have the power to prohibit, in whole or in part, the introduction of persons and property from such countries or places as he shall designate in order to avert such danger, and for such period of time as he may deem necessary for such purpose.
(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III, §362, 58 Stat. 704.)

Transfer of Functions

Office of Surgeon General abolished by section 3 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1966, eff. June 25, 1966, 31 F.R. 8855, 80 Stat. 1610, and functions thereof transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 1 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1966, set out as a note under section 202 of this title. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare redesignated Secretary of Health and Human Services by section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88 which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

Delegation of Functions

For assignment of functions of President under this section, see section 3 of Ex. Ord. No. 13295, Apr. 4, 2003, 68 F.R. 17255, set out as a note under section 264 of this title. 

Specific Laws and Regulations Governing the Control of Communicable Diseases

The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services has statutory responsibility for preventing the introduction, transmission, and spread of communicable diseases in the United States. Under its delegated authority, the Division of Global Migration and Quarantine works to fulfill this responsibility through a variety of activities, including
  • the operation of Quarantine Stations at ports of entry
  • establishment of standards for medical examination of persons destined for the United States, and
  • administration of interstate and foreign quarantine regulations, which govern the international and interstate movement of persons, animals, and cargo.
The legal foundation for these activities is found in Titles 8 and 42 of the U.S. Code and relevant supporting regulations.

Legal Authorities for Isolation and Quarantine

The federal government derives its authority for isolation and quarantine from the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Read more on the Legal Authorities for Isolation and Quarantine page.

United States Federal Laws and Regulations for Control of Communicable Diseases

United States Code

The United States Code is a consolidation and codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States. Sections 264-272 of the following portion of the code apply: Title 42 - The Public Health and Welfare, Chapter 6A - Public Health Service, Subchapter II - General Powers and Duties, Part G - Quarantine and Inspection. Links are provided by the Government Printing Office.

First Whitewater prosecutor says 'serious crimes' were uncovered in probe

Scandal Memes That Make You Go Hmmmm!
The Hillary Clinton Scandals: Volume 1 Hillary waves after testifying on Whitewater, 1996
                                                   [Hillary waves after testifying on Whitewater, 1996]

The first federal prosecutor to probe the financial dealings of Bill and Hillary Clinton says he was poised to bring high-profile indictments against top Arkansas political and business figures — based in part on testimony from a chief witness against the then president — when he was abruptly replaced by a panel of federal judges, throwing his investigation into turmoil.
"I was angry, frustrated and above all disappointed that I was not going to be able to carry through and finish bringing the indictments," writes Robert Fiske, a former U.S. attorney who served as the original independent counsel in charge of the Whitewater investigation, in a forthcoming memoir, "Prosecutor Defender Counselor." 
Fiske — ever the punctilious prosecutor — offers no judgments on the conduct of the Clintons, nor on that of the man who replaced him, Kenneth Starr. 

But in his first extensive public comments on his Whitewater investigation, in his book and in an exclusive Yahoo News interview, Fiske contends his removal had a devastating impact on the agents and prosecutors working the case: It ultimately caused the Whitewater probe to stretch on for years longer than it needed to under Starr, a conservative former federal appellate judge who had no prosecutorial experience.
"The simplest way to put it, after I was replaced, the lawyers on the staff in Arkansas said the agents for the FBI and IRS were totally demoralized," Fiske said in the Yahoo News interview. "They thought we were on the brink of doing all these great things, and now that was not going to happen."
The long-ago Whitewater probe seems likely to be revived by political foes if, as is widely expected, Hillary Clinton runs for president. (The Clinton library is due to release new documents, including some that are expected to include Whitewater files, this Friday.) For years, the Clintons have sought to portray the entire investigation as a politically inspired witch hunt, pushed by partisans hunting for any ammunition they could find to damage the president and first lady. 

"I'm still waiting for them to admit that there was nothing to Whitewater," Bill Clinton said in a recent appearance.
But the new account of Fiske, a pillar of the New York legal community, offers a more complicated picture. He describes how he had quickly uncovered "serious crimes" in the Whitewater investigation but that his probe was cut short after conservatives falsely accused him of a "cover up."
"There were indictments, there were convictions," said Fiske when asked about claims that there was "nothing" to the investigation. "People went to jail. There was never any evidence that was sufficient to link the Clintons to any of it, but there were certainly serious crimes." 

Appointed by Janet Reno in January 1994, Fiske describes how he moved aggressively from the start, carving out a wide-ranging mandate and hiring a top-flight staff of veteran prosecutors. One of his first moves was to subpoena Hillary Clinton's law firm billing records — documents that were later found under mysterious circumstances in the White House living quarters.
By the summer of 1994, Fiske says, he was preparing to bring eight indictments against 11 defendants, including criminal charges for fraud against Jim and Susan McDougal (the Clintons' Whitewater business partners), Webster Hubbell (then an associate attorney general and formerly Hillary Clinton's law partner) and Jim Guy Tucker (Clinton's successor as governor of Arkansas). 

A key witness in these cases was David Hale, a former municipal judge and the owner of a federally subsidized small-business lending company. It was Hale who had made the most serious allegation against Bill Clinton: Hale had claimed that Clinton, while Arkansas governor, had pressured him to make a fraudulent $300,000 federally backed loan to a marketing company owned by Susan McDougal that was really intended to pay off the two couples' debts in their Whitewater real estate investment. ("My name can't show up on this," Hale claimed Clinton had told him, an account that President Clinton later denied.)
Defenders of the Clintons have long depicted Hale as an inveterate liar who was put up to his allegations by bitter political enemies of the then president and first lady.
But Fiske devotes a chapter of his book to how he cut a plea deal with Hale, titling it "An Early Breakthrough," and describing how Hale's information "moved us forward." 

"You used David Hale as a witness. You believed he was credible?" Fiske was asked by Yahoo News.
"Yes, we did," Fiske replied. He noted that FBI agents and prosecutors working for him (including famed Texas trial attorney Rusty Hardin) had closely vetted Hale's story.
"He provided very valuable information to us," Fiske said about Hale.
But Hale was also a confessed felon, who had pleaded guilty to defrauding the government. "Standing alone, nobody was going to bring a case based on what he was telling us," Fiske said — unless there was corroboration from other witnesses and documents. "But from what we had seen of him, we thought the story was plausible and was certainly worth pursuing," said Fiske. 

Despite Fiske's efforts to find more evidence, he soon ran afoul of conservatives in Congress and on the Wall Street Journal editorial page, who accused him of pulling his punches. In late June, he issued two reports — one clearing the Clintons and White House officials of any wrongdoing in trying to influence a regulatory agency review of Jim McDougal's savings and loan, and a second one concluding that Vince Foster, another law firm partner of Hillary Clinton's, who was serving as White House counsel, had committed suicide in Fort Marcy Park overlooking the Potomac River and was not the victim of foul play.
In his memoir, Fiske contends that the evidence that Foster took his own life was overwhelming. But Fiske writes, "conspiracy theorists" attacked his findings, suggesting that Foster may have been murdered elsewhere and his body dumped in the park. Fiske recounts how an Indiana congressman, Dan Burton, even sought to disprove his findings by shooting a watermelon in his backyard. And soon Fiske was also being accused of conflicts of interest and protecting the Clintons. "The Fiske cover up," ran the headline on one Wall Street Journal editorial. 

In August 1994, just as his investigation in Arkansas was gathering steam, Fiske was jolted when a panel of three federal judges — two of them strong conservatives — removed him on the grounds that he was not independent enough (because he had been appointed by Clinton's attorney general) and replaced him with Starr.
Fiske says he sought to reassure his dejected staff. Starr "has no experience as a prosecutor, so things may move a little slower but these indictments will happen," he told them.
The indictments were ultimately brought by Starr — only in some cases more than a year after Fiske's removal, and by then, Starr was widely being depicted by the White House and its allies as a conservative partisan. In that sense, Fiske's removal may have been a turning point that ended up undermining public confidence in the entire Whitewater probe, said Ken Gormley, the dean of Duquesne University School of Law and the author of "The Death of American Virtue: Clinton vs. Starr," an exhaustive study of the investigation. 

"Painting the whole thing as a witch hunt would have been much harder" if Fiske had not been replaced, said Gormley. And, he believes, Fiske would likely not have expanded the probe, as Starr did, to include Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky. "Fiske was a lawyer's lawyer," said Gormley. "He was the consummate principled prosecutor."