Saturday, July 2, 2016

Video: Syrian migrants placed in Canadian high school sexually harassing young girls

Syrian migrants in Canadian high school
By Joe Newby
A series of videos posted by Rebel Media shows the results of Canada’s immigration policy, especially with regard to migrants from Syria.  According to the report, Syrian migrant men — some in their twenties with full beards — have been dumped into a New Brunswick high school.  And the results are pretty much what you’d expect.
Rebel Media said:
Sexual harassment. Bullying. Picking on the Jewish kids. Threatening and swearing at teachers. Talking about terrorist weapons, like rocket propelled grenades.
Demanding that men and women be separated, sharia style. Refusing to speak English.
It goes on and on. 

I know this, because we received a confidential tip from a parent, who couldn’t get anyone in New Brunswick to help. The media, the police, the politicians — everybody is petrified of being called “racist” for even mentioning the disaster that has come from putting unassimilated Muslim migrant men right into our schools.
Here’s one of the videos posted by Rebel Media:

And, Faith Goldy added, teachers at the school reported “energy” or “excitement” among “students of a certain culture” on the day of the Brussels terror attack.

This is just a glimpse of the some 2,700 documents Rebel Media received.  Worse yet, Goldy says in the third video, the so-called “mainstream media” has remained completely silent about the issue.  The result, she added, is a de facto implementation of sharia law in schools.
There’s more, here.

Keep in mind that Hillary Clinton wants to bring tens of thousands of these individuals into the United States…

Happy 4th of July y'all...From Virginia City Nevada

Ha no Jihadi party crashers welcome...
Albeit the town is prepared to welcome any unwanted guests with with a 2nd amendment response !
I truly hope everyone else across the country enjoys the celebrations as well!

Independence Day, also commonly known as the Fourth of July, is a federal holiday in the United States of America commemorating the adoption of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, declaring independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain (now officially known as the United Kingdom). Independence Day is commonly associated with fireworks, parades, barbecues, carnivals, fairs, picnics, concerts, baseball games, family reunions, and political speeches and ceremonies, in addition to various other public and private events celebrating the history, government, and traditions of the United States. Independence Day is the National Day of the United States
Fourth of July on the Comstock rocks. Virginia City offers one of the region's longest firework displays. Echoing off Mt. Davidson for nearly 30 minutes, you'll feel the boom in your bones this July 4 as the fireworks soar high above the town and into Six Mile Canyon, making it visible from nearly anywhere in town.

The Virginia City Fourth of July Celebration also includes a Fourth of July Parade, a raffle and auction, the Comstock Cowboys Second Amendment Concert, an old-west shoot-out and plenty of food and beverage vendors. Throughout the day, visitors can stroll the boardwalk, sample sweets, browse the shops and ride the V&T Railroad short line....and longer ride to Carson City

Attn:Kawlifornia Conservatives and supporters of the USC/Bill of Rights...

Image result for funny pictures California gov brown Lt Gov Newsom pot heads  Image result for funny pictures California gov brown Lt Gov Newsom pot heads
Gov Brown <~evil Gun-a-Phobic SOB's~>Lt Gov Newsom

California is in self destruct mode under control of the looney seditionist known as the progressive party (CPUSA).
The only way Kawlifornia can be saved is by every conservative to pack up and leave the state taking your family,money,business,pets and yes everything you own including the kitchen sink and relocating to a state that embraces all of the Bill of Rights! Since conservatives pay most of the taxes the only way to wake the state up is by removing their tax income...let the progressives eat cake... take your steak where you and your God given rights are welcomed! I bailed out of California way back in 1994 moved to N/Nevada I saw the writing on the wall.... Kawlifornia  has been going downhill fast since.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but  it is only going to get worse...Your only option is to get the hell out of Dodge even if you lose some initial money in the process, after all the well being and security of your family should outweigh any temporary inconvenience!

addendum side note: If all conservatives left it would remove 60% of the tax base...which would force cuts to welfare and all the special interest programs...causing BlackLivesMatter/ illegal aliens to this would be justice ha!

Image result for funny pictures California

Good luck and God speed

Conservatives Press Bill that Would Pull the United States OUT of the United Nations!

Image result for funny pictures United Nations  Image result for funny pictures United Nations

by:Onan Coca 
In the wake of the wonderful decision by the people of the United Kingdom to #Brexit, some conservatives in Congress have decided to seize the moment and push for an #Amexit (American Exit) from the United Nations! It’s an idea that conservatives have long supported and may now grab the national imagination, as Americans seek new ways to disconnect themselves from the corrupt establishment that runs our political world. 
Bill sponsors Thomas Massie 
(R-KY), Mike Rogers 
(R-MI), Tim Huelskamp (R-KS), Jeff Duncan (R-SC), Lynn Westmoreland 
(R-GA), and Ted Yoho (R-FL) recently released the text of their bill hoping to convince Americans to embrace Independence and leave the U.N.

From Rep. Massie’s Facebook Page:
In response to overwhelming interest in the bill to ‪#‎amexit from the UN, here is the full text of HR 1205, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act. Among other things, this bill would (1) stop US payments to the UN, (2) prevent US Armed Forces from serving under UN command, (3) terminate diplomatic immunity for foreign UN members in the US, (4) get the UN out of the US, i.e. close the headquarters in NY, (5) terminate US membership in the UN, WHO, UNESCO, (6) repeal the United Nations Environment Program Participation Act. 

#‎brexit #amexit ‪#‎UNexit ‪#‎americout
1st Session
H. R. 1205

March 2, 2015
Mr. Rogers of Alabama (for himself, Mr. Massie, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Westmoreland, and Mr. Huelskamp) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

[Mr. Yoho and Mr. Duncan of South Carolina are also cosponsors] 

To end membership of the United States in the United Nations.
1.Short title
This Act may be cited as the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015.

2.Repeal of United Nations Participation Act of 1945
The United Nations Participation Act of 1945 (Public Law 79–264; 22 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) is repealed.

(b)Termination of membership in United Nations
The President shall terminate all membership by the United States in the United Nations, and in any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations.

(c)Closure of United States Mission to United Nations
The United States Mission to the United Nations is closed. Any remaining functions of such office shall not be carried out.

3.Repeal of United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act
The United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act (Public Law 80–357) is repealed.

The United States withdraws from the agreement between the United States of America and the United Nations regarding the headquarters of the United Nations (signed at Lake Success, New York, on June 26, 1947, which was brought into effect by the United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act).

4.United States assessed and voluntary contributions to the United Nations
No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for assessed or voluntary contributions of the United States to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, except that funds may be appropriated to facilitate termination of United States membership and withdrawal of United States personnel and equipment, in accordance with sections 2 and 3, respectively. Upon termination of United States membership, no payments shall be made to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, out of any funds appropriated prior to such termination or out of any other funds available for such purposes.

5.United Nations peacekeeping operations
No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any United States contribution to any United Nations military or peacekeeping operation or force.

(b)Terminations of United States participation in United Nations peacekeeping operations
No funds may be obligated or expended to support the participation of any member of the Armed Forces of the United States as part of any United Nations military or peacekeeping operation or force. No member of the Armed Forces of the United States may serve under the command of the United Nations.

6.Withdrawal of United Nations presence in facilities of the government of the United States and repeal of diplomatic immunity
(a)Withdrawal from United States Government property
The United Nations (including any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations) may not occupy or use any property or facility of the United States Government.

(b)Diplomatic immunity
No officer or employee of the United Nations (including any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations) or any representative, officer, or employee of any mission to the United Nations of any foreign government shall be entitled to enjoy the privileges and immunities of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961, nor may any such privileges and immunities be extended to any such individual. The privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided for in the International Organizations Immunities Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq.), or in any agreement or treaty to which the United States is a party, including the agreement entitled Agreement Between the United Nations and the United States of America Regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed June 26, 1947 (22 U.S.C. 287 note), and the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, entered into force with respect to the United States on April 29, 1970 (21 UST 1418; TIAS 6900; UNTS 16), shall not apply to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, to the officers and employees of the United Nations, or of any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, or to the families, suites, or servants of such officers or employees.

7.Repeal of United States membership and participation in the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization
The joint resolution entitled A joint resolution providing for membership and participation by the United States in the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, and authorizing an appropriation therefor, approved July 30, 1946 (Public Law 79–565, 22 U.S.C. 287m et seq.), is repealed.

8.Repeal of United Nations Environment Program Participation Act of 1973
The United Nations Environment Program Participation Act of 1973 (22 U.S.C. 287 note) is repealed.

9.Repeal of United States participation in the World Health Organization
The joint resolution entitled Joint Resolution providing for membership and participation by the United States in the World Health Organization and authorizing an appropriation therefor, approved June 14, 1948 (22 U.S.C. 290), is repealed.

10.Repeal of involvement in United Nations conventions and agreements
Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States will end any participation in any conventions and agreements with the United Nations and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations. Any remaining functions of such conventions and agreements shall not be carried out.

11.Reemployment with United States Government after service with an international organization
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to affect the rights of employees under subchapter IV of chapter 35 of title 5, United States Code, relating to reemployment after service with an international organization.

Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall notify the United Nations and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations of the provisions of this Act.

13.Effective date Except as otherwise provided, this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date that is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Image result for funny pictures United Nations  
Image result for funny pictures United Nations

Call your Congressmen, call your Senators, call your local representatives and tell them that it’s time to embrace our independence and end our membership in the United Nations. 

Article reposted with permission from Eagle Rising


4th of July Zombies - Americans Don't Know Why We Celebrate Fourth of July!

Meet the Americans who don't know why we celebrate Independence Day, what country we declared independence from, what year the Declaration of Independence was signed, and other basic knowledge that every U.S. citizen should know. Media analyst Mark Dice hits the beach in San Diego, California for his 6th annual Fourth of July Man on the Street Monday interviews. © 2016 by Mark Dice. 

Friday, July 1, 2016

Happy 4th of July week-end y'all...just remember...

No matter what the #Obama administration and his flunky appointed officials @ DOD,DHS,DOJ,SCOTUS et al would have you believe...#OathKeepers have your #NavySeals #GreenBerets... being Bad to the Bone and supported by Army Cav,airmen,sailors,marines...just toast a beer during the 4th of July bbq for those not at home and being devoted to protecting all of our rights and yes let's not forget those who volunteer to serve come from Middle America not elite Universities,professional students,MSM talking heads and career politicians!


Bottom line..a must read...I think I just about covered on all the links to get the drift!  

Also See:

A Congress that Took the Oath Seriously would Impeach Judge Richard Posner

Join Oath Keepers

[ Posner spreads his judicial subversion to elite Harvard law students eager to learn from a master. (Photo credit: chensiyuan: Creative Commons/GNU Free Documentation License) ]


“I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation (across the centuries—well, just a little more than two centuries, and of course less for many of the amendments),” Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner writes in Slate.  “Eighteenth-century guys, however smart, could not foresee the culture, technology, etc., of the 21st century. Which means that the original Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the post–Civil War amendments (including the 14th), do not speak to today.”
Constitutional scholar Josh Blackman, Associate Professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law, noted Posner’s judgment on the oath he freely took in order to gain power:
It’s funny to talk about the oath judges take to uphold the constitution since the Supreme Court has transformed the Constitution in its decisions. The oath is not really to the original constitution, or to the constitution as amended. It is to some body of law created by the Supreme Court. You can forget about the oath. That is not of significance.
That’s evident from a judicial officer whose views put Al Gore’s “living Constitution” on steroids. Per Posner, the Constitution is what those in power say it is. They define what powers they will assume and what “rights” they will recognize.

That’s tyranny. And Posner is a demonstrable oath-breaker. He is unfit to pass judgment on any American, and certainly unfit to weigh in on what rights we have and how they are to be exercised.
A Congress with integrity and guts would impeach him.
It’s been done before, and for less existential reasons than total disregard for the Constitution — something he had no intention of upholding when he swore that he would.
That Congress won’t, that no one will even introduce articles of impeachment, says much about how little regard “our” representatives have for their own oaths of office, which outrageously, is no great surprise to anyone. We might — maybe, but more likely not — be able to get a majority in the House needed to pass such a resolution, but the Senate as currently constituted would never be able to get anywhere near the 2/3 vote needed for a conviction.
Still, the process could be useful to flush those who agree with Posner out of the woodwork, and be especially instrumental at outing “progressive” Republican infiltrators (not that we can’t already tell by examining their legislative records). It could also put so-called (and fictional) “Blue Dog/Conservative” Democrats on the spot with non-urban constituencies that still hold on to many traditional American values.

That said, nothing will happen unless politicians sense a demand from their constituents with a credible “or else” attached to it. The only time most ever “lead” is when they’re pushed from behind or when they sense a payoff worth the risk. Without massive support for an effort capable of reaching millions and persuading them to act, don’t look for that push to happen.
Instead, look for Judge Posner, and innumerable judges like him, to continue subversive activism from the bench and total disregard for the Constitution they swore an oath to uphold. Were it any different, “shall not be infringed” would have ended the legal discussion on gun owner control the first time the subject came up.
UPDATE: On that score, I’m reminded that Posner ruled favorably on concealed carry in Moore v MadiganHe even had pretty good reasoning, and referenced originalist conditions along with later precedents. That said, applying his “standard” of ignoring the Constitution and disparaging the oath is too fundamentally dangerous to tolerate, as that’s also embraced by judges who would make an opposite ruling.

David’s excellent article highlights why I founded Oath Keepers.   From my own experience working on the DC staff of Congressman Ron Paul and then attending Yale Law School, it became abundantly clear that few people, of either party, in politics or the law, gave a damn about the Constitution and we needed to focus instead on the American warrior class – the military, police, and first responders at the tip of the spear, to get as many of them to side with liberty as possible, to throw a monkeywrench into the treasonous plans of the elites.  At least Posner is honest about his treason, when he says:
It’s funny to talk about the oath judges take to uphold the constitution since the Supreme Court has transformed the Constitution in its decisions. The oath is not really to the original constitution, or to the constitution as amended. It is to some body of law created by the Supreme Court. You can forget about the oath. That is not of significance.
So, Posner admits that he and other judges operate as if their oath was really “I will support and defend whatever the Supreme Court majority says.”  And for the Supreme Court, those laywers in dresses operate as if their own oath was “I will support and defend whatever I think is right, and if I can get the majority to agree with me, that is what the Constitution will be – whatever we say, goes” so for them it is really “I will support and defend whatever we think is right.”

I am glad that Posner is so open about his treason.   That just makes it easier for us to point out the illegitimacy of the entire current batch of usurping tyrant lawyers in dresses across the board (and ditto for their lying lawyer pals in Congress, and in the Executive Branch.  The “bipartisan” assault on the Constitution by the PATRIOT Act and the NDAA of 2012 is all you should need to see that both parties are in on the gang raping of lady Liberty, with at least 90% of them in violation of their oaths).  Personally, I am glad that I am no longer a lawyer, since it is now a corrupt profession, that with few exceptions, is an enthusiastic participant in the destruction of our Republic.  The only thing that could make me feel dirtier would be to be a sitting member of Congress.

They and their decrees deserve zero respect, and the only question that needs to be in our minds is how do we best expose them and how do we best organize the greatest number of our fellow Americans possible to nullify, resist, and defy their morally and legally bankrupt and null and void decrees (remember, as the Supreme Court itself said many times in the past, any act of government contrary to the Constitution is null and void from inception).
I believe the best starting point is re-read what Jefferson and Madison had to say in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions about the obligations of the states to resist and interpose to defend their people from federal tyranny.  And then we need to apply those same principles not just at the level of the state legislature and governor (where possible in this corrupt “two party system”), but also down at the individual, community, town, and county levels (as we have seen with constitutional sheriffs preemptively declaring their refusal to enforce or allow the enforcement of proposed federal “gun control” legislation that violates the Second Amendment).

Nullification, defiance, non-compliance, and resistance as a community is also what the Founders themselves used against the edicts of Crown and Parliament.   Let’s apply their hard learned lessons of resistance to our current “long train of abuses and usurpations.”
A good book to read on that score is Dr. Edwin Vieira’s excellent little book “Three Rights.”  While reading it, think of what constitutional sheriffs, backed up by armed, trained, and organized patriots as their posse, can do to resist, restore, and renew American liberty and our Republic from the bottom up.
But the first step is to stop giving any respect to the lying lawyers in black dresses, and for that we can thank Posner for giving us a fantastic, arrogant example of their open oath breaking treason.   – Stewart Rhodes

Stacey Dash Blasts Jesse Williams for ‘Racist Speech’ at BET Awards

From The Blaze
Conservative actor Stacey Dash tore into fellow performer Jesse Williams for delivering a “racist speech” with lines “straight out of the Black Lives Matter playbook” during the BET Awards earlier this week.
“You’ve just seen the perfect example of a HOLLYWOOD plantation slave!” Dash, a Fox News contributor, wrote in a blog post Wednesday. “Sorry, Mr Williams. But the fact that you were standing on that stage at THOSE awards tells people you really don’t know what your talking about. Just spewing hate and anger.”

Dash noted that Williams, the son of a black father and white mother, gave the speech on a network that is “keeping racism and segregation alive and this past Sunday’s awards show proves it.”
During his racially-charged acceptance speech for BET’s Humanitarian Award Sunday night, the “Grey’s Anatomy” star addressed social issues currently plaguing the black community, from police brutality to the American concept of “whiteness.”
“Yesterday would have been young Tamir Rice’s 14th birthday, so I don’t want to hear any more about how far we’ve come when paid public servants can pull a drive-by on a 12 year old playing alone in a park in broad daylight, killing him on television and then going home to make a sandwich,” Williams said.

Of those who criticize the Black Lives Matter movement, the actor instructed, “If you have no interest in equal rights for black people, then do not make suggestions to those who do. Sit down.”
But those words were hollow, according to Dash, who wrote Williams is “just like everyone else hustling to get money.” The conservative firebrand told him to “get over yourself and get on with it.”
“That chip on the shoulders of people like you will weigh you down and keep you from flying free. But true freedom is never free. You have to know how to fly. If anyone is making you feel this way its you,” Dash continued. “Living in a psychological prison of your own making. If anyone is GHETTO-IZING anyone, it’s people like you letting the BETs and other media outlets portray us in stereotypes.”

Read Full Story At The Blaze

AG Lynch: Are Cops 'Even People?'
oped: I'm sorry but Loretta Lynch has made one mistake after another...or not...she is just parroting the Obama administration agenda...she not only needs to recuse herself, but outright resign...what credibility she had entering office has been totally destroyed...she is no better nor worse than Eric Holder and VanJones.
Anyone who believes the chance meeting with Bill Clinton in Phoenix Arizona was a accidental encounter and all that was discussed for 30 minutes was golf and grandchildren...really need to examine their ability to comprehend what is going on in the world of politics under the corrupt Obama administration! 

by:Ashley Rae Goldenberg
While speaking about her community policing tour, Attorney General Loretta Lynch asked if police officers are “even people.”
Asked about how school police officers can be more transparent and “change the way police officers are viewed in the community’s eyes,” Lynch said, “One of the things that I have learned also on this tour, when I talk to young people in different communities, they talk about the fact that they just want to get to know who officers are. Are they even people?”

“You know, it can seem like a different world. And having a way to connect, and using social media, is really important in that. I think it can be a great tool,” Lynch continued.
Earlier in the discussion, Lynch said community members need to be able to learn “what kind of training police officers get” so that young activists can provide “input.”
Lynch also discussed her travels to Baltimore and her outreach to community activists in the area. Lynch launched a federal investigation into the Baltimore police department following the death of Freddie Gray. Six officers have been charged in relation to Gray’s death. So far, one of the officers involved received a mistrial, another was found not guilty on all charges, and another was acquitted of all charges.

Judicial Watch: Paris Attacker's Gun May Be Linked to 'Fast and Furious' 
by:Nick Kangadis 

While the federal government and media want you to believe that they want gun control in order to stop violence, it would seem that in reality, they want gun control simply for the fact that they want all the guns.
Judicial Watch is reporting that a case agent for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) released a report saying that one of the guns used in the ISIS-inspired Paris terror attack last November came from Phoenix, Arizona.
It's not yet clear whether the terrorist who came to be in possession of the gun had purchased it from a man involved in the federal government's gun-running operation known as “Fast and Furious.” However, there are some sketchy indications that raise this very question. 

Judicial Watch reported:
A Report of Investigation (ROI) filed by a case agent in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) tracked the gun used in the Paris attacks to a Phoenix gun owner who sold it illegally, “off book,” Judicial Watch’s law enforcement sources confirm. Federal agents tracing the firearm also found the Phoenix gun owner to be in possession of an unregistered fully automatic weapon, according to law enforcement officials with firsthand knowledge of the investigation.

The investigative follow up of the Paris weapon consisted of tracking a paper trail using a 4473 form, which documents a gun’s ownership history by, among other things, using serial numbers. The Phoenix gun owner that the weapon was traced back to was found to have at least two federal firearms violations—for selling one weapon illegally and possessing an unregistered automatic—but no enforcement or prosecutorial action was taken against the individual. Instead, ATF leaders went out of their way to keep the information under the radar and ensure that the gun owner’s identity was “kept quiet,” according to law enforcement sources involved with the case. “Agents were told, in the process of taking the fully auto, not to anger the seller to prevent him from going public,” a veteran law enforcement official told Judicial Watch.

It’s not clear if the agency, which is responsible for cracking down on the illegal use and trafficking of firearms, did this because the individual was involved in the Fast and Furious gun-running scheme. An ATF spokesman, Corey Ray, at the agency’s Washington D.C. headquarters told Judicial Watch that “no firearms used in the Paris attacks have been traced” by the agency. When asked about the ROI report linking the weapon used in Paris to Phoenix, Ray said “I’m not familiar with the report you’re referencing.” Judicial Watch also tried contacting the Phoenix ATF office, but multiple calls were not returned.

The ATF ran the Fast and Furious experiment and actually allowed criminals, “straw purchasers,” working for Mexican drug cartels to buy weapons at federally licensed firearms dealers in Phoenix and allowed the guns to be “walked”—possessed without any knowledge of their whereabouts. The government lost track of most of the weapons and many have been used to murder hundreds of innocent people as well as a U.S. Border Patrol agent, Brian Terry, in Arizona. A mainstream newspaper reported that a Muslim terrorist who planned to murder attendees of a Muhammad cartoon contest in Garland, Texas last year bought a 9-millimeter pistol at a Phoenix gun shop that participated in the ATF’s Fast and Furious program despite drug and assault charges that should have raised red flags. Judicial Watch has thoroughly investigated Fast and Furious and has sued the Obama administration for information about the once-secret operation.

Judge for yourself, but this should be investigated -- and potentially prosecuted -- to the highest extent of the law.

SHOCK: Another Mass Shooting at Club, But Look Why Media’s Refusing to Report It


The mass shooting terrorist attack in Orlando has been discussed endlessly by the liberal media for weeks now, but you probably didn’t hear about another mass shooting that occurred this past weekend in South Carolina.
Why didn’t you hear about it? Well, because it was promptly stopped by a concealed carrier who used his gun to take out the bad guy before he could kill anybody.
According to the Spartanburg Herald-Journal, the incident happened in the early hours of Sunday morning in Lyman, South Carolina. Jody Ray Thompson, a 32-year-old Lyman resident, allegedly got into a verbal confrontation with another man outside the Playoffz nightclub at about 3:30.

Thompson quickly decided to escalate the verbal altercation, firing at random into the crowd and hitting three people. One of the men who was shot at, however, had a concealed carry license. He fired back at Thompson, wounding him in the leg and stopping his rampage.
Thompson has been charged with four counts of attempted murder; the man who returned his fire will not be charged, according to police, as he was acting in self-defense.
Of the three people who were hit, only one was seriously injured — Renada Shantrice Irby, 34, who had one of the bullets lodged in her pelvis.

According to Bearing Arms, Thompson had a criminal record dating back to 2003 and should not have legally had a gun. But apparently, gun control didn’t keep this criminal from getting it.
Shocking, right?
Meanwhile, liberals have been trying to take guns away from people like the man who ended this mass shooting, legal gun owners who want to defend themselves.
The media is along for the ride. That’s why the fact that a potential Orlando-style mass shooting, minus the terrorist motivation, isn’t being covered — because a legal gun owner was able to stop it.

If the media wants to pretend that they cover both sides of the story, then what happened in Lyman, South Carolina, needs to be reported. It shows just how important the Second Amendment is to protecting ourselves as a people.
If someone like this man had been at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, maybe there wouldn’t be 49 dead people.
Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter if you agree that a good guy with a gun is the best way to stop a bad guy with a gun.

Thursday, June 30, 2016

OUTRAGE: What Obama Just Did to the White House Logo Will Make You Sick

[ Here is what the original logo looked like]


There are many conspiracy theories floating out there about President Barack Obama. Some claim he is a Muslim, a terrorist or a Russian spy. However, what is known beyond any reasonable doubt is that he is largely incompetent and has little love for America.
Proof of this can be found by looking no further that the White House logo, which was redesigned in 2009 after Obama was sworn into office.
Everyone known what the White House logo is supposed to look like — a portrait of the North Face of the White House — but what few people have noticed over the past few years was the change at the top of the logo.
For many years, the White House logo had the American flag flying on the top of the White House — as it does in real life. In Obama’s redesigned version, there is no American flag, just a white flag.

And here is Obama’s sanitized version:
The white flag is a common symbol for surrender, which has many people wondering if Obama was trying to secretly signal to America’s enemies that he was surrendering.
In all seriousness, this probably wasn’t some secret signal. It was just Obama disrespecting America and trying to get rid of anything that made us special — which really shouldn’t surprise anyone at this point.
Obama has disgraced the American flag multiple times while in office, so it should be no surprise that he would completely remove it from the White House logo.
We’ve suffered for almost eight years under a president who has made it clear he doesn’t think America is special. We desperately need to elect someone who will restore our faith in our country and put America, and Americans, first.

Boom! Fleeing ISIS cowards face justice


U.S. forces just caught scores of Islamic terrorists in the open — and they brought the pain.
U.S.-led airstrikes targeted Islamic State convoys in Iraq late Tuesday night into Wednesday, killing at least 250 ISIS fighters and destroying over hundreds of enemy vehicles, a U.S. military spokesman told Fox News.
As Iraqi ground forces were fighting ISIS militants in an area southwest of Fallujah, where there is known ISIS influence, the first convoy was spotted leaving the city, Col. Christopher Garver said.
U.S. airstrikes demolished approximately 55 vehicles in that convoy.
A second convoy was later seen east of Ramadi later on Wednesday, when the U.S. coalition and Iraqi jets attacked with more airstrikes, annihilating approximately 120 more ISIS vehicles.
The successful airstrikes were some of the most devastating since the U.S.-led coalition began operations in the country, and came just one day after the ISIS suicide bombings at Istanbul’s Airport that killed more than 40 people.
The U.S.-led coalition has been carrying out airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq and Syria since 2014 and 300 U.S. Special Forces are embedded with a Kurdish-led militia in northern Syria.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.

The most corrupt Clinton move ever?

bill clinton

It was a move so outrageous, it has some critics calling it the most corrupt move in the Clinton family’s long history of controversies — and it all but proves accusations that President Barack Obama’s administration has a clear conflict of interest in investigating Hillary Clinton.
In one of the most inappropriate moves in United States political and legal history, former president Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately on a plane in Phoenix — right as the FBI is investigating the potential mishandling of sensitive information that passed through the server Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democratic nominee, used for allegedly illegal correspondence as secretary of state.
Critics have loudly voiced their concerns that Lynch has a conflict of interest in the email case — and legal analysts say this closed-door meeting adds serious weight to those claims.
“There is a brazen effort to undermine U.S. law and at the very least the appearance of impropriety and ethical considerations, which you and I know, as lawyers, people take very seriously,” Laura Ingraham told Greta Van Susteren on Fox News’ “On the Record.”

Lynch is responsible for looking into potential charges against Clinton, whom Obama has publicly endorsed for president. Republicans have repeatedly called for an independent prosecutor, saying the Justice Department under a Democratic president should not be investigating a Democratic presidential candidate.
CBS News reporter Paul Reid called the meeting “shocking, absolutely shocking.”
“The most high-profile national security investigation under the attorney general is the investigation into whether or not classified information was mishandled in connection with Hillary Clinton’s server,” Reid said. “Now, President Clinton and his foundation are also tangentially involved in that investigation, so the appearance of impropriety is just stunning.”
Lynch insisted their private meeting did not involve the active investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email use as secretary of state, and said instead it was about their grandchildren.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.

Busted! Clinton aide comes clean

Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., left, has a word with aide Huma Abedin prior to the start of a discussion on jobs, Wednesday, April 2, 2008, during a campaign event at the IBEW Local Union 5 Training Facility in Pittsburgh, Pa. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

She’s one of Hillary Clinton’s most trusted insiders, so close that the Clintons’ consider her part of the family.
Wednesday, longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin made an admission that could cost her boss — big time.
Abedin admitted in a legal proceeding that Clinton did not want her emails accessible to “anybody,” according to transcripts.
Abedin’s comments provided new insight into the highly unusual decision by the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate to operate a private email server in her basement to conduct government business when she served as secretary of state.
Such a candid admission could be serious damaging to Clinton’s presidential campaign, which polls show is already struggling to convince voters of her trustworthiness.

Abedin also said under oath that she was not aware whether Clinton personally deleted any emails during her tenure as secretary.
Abedin told lawyers for the conservative group Judicial Watch in a deposition that she could not recall whether she or Clinton discussed with any State Department officials Clinton’s use of her server exclusively for government business. Abedin, who was Clinton’s deputy chief of staff at the State Department, now works with Clinton’s presidential campaign and often travels with the candidate. Abedin used an email account on Clinton’s server occasionally for government business, although Abedin also used a government address.
“I assumed it was OK to do,” she testified.
Abedin is one of several former State Department officials who are being deposed by the conservative group in a civil lawsuit over the agency’s failure to turn over files under the Freedom of Information Act. A transcript of the proceeding was released by Judicial Watch on Wednesday.
Judicial Watch lawyers repeatedly pressed Abedin to explain Clinton’s concern expressed to her in a November 2010 message that her emails might become public, but the longtime aide insisted that Clinton’s interest in wanting to keep her correspondence from being reviewed was similar to any private citizen’s right to privacy.

But Clinton’s private server contained tens of thousands of work-related emails as well as private messages, and her decision to conduct both private and government business on her system meant that she kept control of both types of correspondence, effectively preventing her State Department correspondence from being archived by the agency and made available for public records requests. It was not until late 2014 – more than a year after Clinton left office – that the State Department learned that she held all of her emails and requested that she turn over all work-related records.
Clinton turned over nearly 33,000 business-related messages while disposing of about the same number of personal messages. But Clinton failed to turn over at least three dozen work-related emails, according to the agency. Among those emails was a November 2010 email exchange with Abedin discussing her concerns about the risk of the “personal being accessible.”
The Clinton campaign Wednesday criticized Judicial Watch for its role in filing several lawsuits against the State Department, among more than 30 filed by conservative legal groups and media outlets, including The Associated Press, to obtain Clinton documents. Clinton campaign spokesman Nick Merrill said Judicial Watch’s lawsuits ended up “clogging up the courts at the expense of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars.”

Abedin’s deposition also raised questions about the State Department’s practices responding to government records requests under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act. Abedin, a senior aide during Clinton’s entire tenure there, testified under oath that she never searched or was asked to search for documents in her State Department or her private Clinton email accounts in response to requests or lawsuits under the open records law.
But a review of all requests to the State Department during that period found several asking specifically for copies of Abedin’s emails on a variety of subjects, including her husband, one-time disgraced Rep. Anthony Weiner.
“Did you ever search, were you ever asked to search your e-mail account in response to a FOIA request or FOIA litigation?” lawyer Ramona Cocta asked.
“I believe I said ‘no,'” Abedin answered.
“Were you ever asked to search your Clinton account during your tenure at the State Department in response to a FOIA request or FOIA litigation?” Cocta asked.

“No, I was not,” Abedin said.
It was not immediately clear how the State Department could have complied with such legal requests for Abedin’s emails without asking Abedin to search her messages. Some federal agencies permit full-time FOIA staffers to search the inboxes of senior government officials, but many agencies expect officials to search their own accounts and no U.S. employee presumably would have had access to Abedin’s personal account on Clinton’s private server. Abedin said she was not aware that anyone else searched her accounts, either.
The Associated Press contributed to this article