Saturday, July 9, 2016

Have Terrorists Infiltrated Our Military?

 Image result for pictures Muslim Brotherhood   Image result for pictures Muslim Brotherhood
by: ADN Staff
Since 2001, the US military has been heavily infiltrated by terrorists. The identified Dallas shooter, Micah Xavier Johnson, was an Army veteran turned Black Supremacist who then went on to murder 5 police officers on July 7th. He displayed adequate tactical knowledge that enabled him to prolong his fight with the police. He was eventually brought down by a robot strapped with a claymore mine.

This is not the first time that a veteran has turned rogue and joined terrorist organizations. In March, a former US Airman tried to join ISIS by going to Turkey and attempting a border crossing. He was caught before he could leave the United States, and was convicted for 35 years in prison. A US Army veteran from Washington also attempted to join ISIS, and was caught in an FBI sting.

Back in 2009, a muslim US Army Major named Nidal Hasan shot up Fort Hood, murdering 13 fellow soldiers. He was radicalized, but somehow was not detected by the US military until it was too late.

It was already reported that gang members have infiltrated all branch of the US military. Neo-nazis, black power gangs, and muslim radicals all have a presence in the military - either to do harm to the US Armed Forces' mission, or to get military training for future illegal operations. It is not known yet if Johnson became a black supremacist after his time in the military, or if he purposefully entered the military to become a killer.

The United States government is having a serious problem of seditious elements within its ranks - between violent terrorists and those who leak classified material like "Chelsea" Manning. It's time to rethink how to weed out hostile elements from our own ranks.
 Source: ADN

Head Of Police Group Blames Obama For Dallas

by:Andrew West 

As the country is still trying to put together the pieces of the Dallas ambush of police by Black Lives Matter, one cop says the president is to blame. 

William Johnson, who runs the National Association of Police Organizations, took to the airwaves to lambast the president’s lack of foresight in his treatment of groups such as Black Lives Matter, stating that their rampant radicalization making violence inevitable while the commander in chief twiddled his thumbs.
“’I think [the Obama’s administration] continued appeasements at the federal level with the Department of Justice, their appeasement of violent criminals, their refusal to condemn movements like Black Lives Matter, actively calling for the death of police officers, that type of thing, all the while blaming police for the problems in this country has led directly to the climate that has made Dallas possible,’ William Johnson, the executive director of the National Association of Police Organizations, said in an interview with Fox on Friday morning.
“‘It’s a war on cops,’ Johnson also said. ‘And the Obama administration is the Neville Chamberlain of this war.’
“Obama on Friday morning strongly condemned the Dallas shootings, which happened at the end of a protest about the killings of two black men by police officers earlier this week, as a ‘vicious, calculated and despicable attack.'”
Barack Obama’s soft stances on several matters of national security have been called into question lately, including this fight to allow Syrian refugees to enter the country unabated, and now this inability to recognize and condemn a hate group when he sees one.
You can read more here.


Could Trey Gowdy’s Questions Put Hillary Clinton Behind Bars?

Trey Gowdy

Trey Gowdy, the pride of South Carolina, again showed why he is such a valuable asset to America, the Constitution, and South Carolina. In one fell swoop, Gowdy exposed both FBI director Comey and Democratic presumptive Presidential nominee Hillary. It appears Gowdy has advanced judicial plans for slippery Hillary.
Gowdy appeared to be setting Hillary Clinton up for perjury charges. Hillary previously testified about her emails to the House Benghazi Committee. Specifically, Hillary said under oath that she had not sent or received classified documents on her personal email server.
Under cross-examination from Representative Gowdy, Director Comey admitted that Hillary lied. Since she was under oath, this sets her up for being charged with perjury. That is why Trey Gowdy is such an important member of the House of Representatives! He set the proceedings to charge Hillary with perjury.

Trey Gowdy questioned Comey on the definition of intent and how Clinton could possibly evade punishment. The exchange grew heated at times, with comments like this one from Gowdy: “You and I both know intent is really difficult to prove. Very rarely do defendants announce ‘On this date I intend to break this criminal code section. Just to put everyone on notice, I am going to break the law on this date.'”
Comey admitted to Gowdy that Hillary Clinton’s attorneys scrubbed her devices and server in a way that would prevent recovery of some emails. He also stated that Hillary lied and used multiple devices to send emails. It also came to light during this questioning that Hillary lied about sending classified information, but she had a rationale behind that. Gowdy was inventive enough in his rapid-fire questioning to get Comey to admit that Hillary is shockingly inept to know what classified means!

Here’s a full transcript of the exchange:
Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?
Comey: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.
Gowdy: It was not true?
Comey: That’s what I said.
Gowdy: OK. Well, I’m looking for a shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long. Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails sent or received. Was that true?
Comey: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said, “I did not e-mail any classified information to anyone on my e-mail there was no classified material.” That is true?
Comey: There was classified information emailed.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton used one device, was that true?
Comey: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?
Comey: No. We found work related email, thousands, that were not returned.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said neither she or anyone else deleted work related emails from her personal account.
Comey: That’s a harder one to answer. We found traces of work-related emails in — on devices or in space. Whether they were deleted or when a server was changed out something happened to them, there’s no doubt that the work related emails that were removed electronically from the email system.
Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the email content individually?
Comey: No.

Gowdy: Well, in the interest of time and because I have a plane to catch tomorrow afternoon, I’m not going to go through any more of the false statements but I am going to ask you to put on your old hat. Faults exculpatory statements are used for what?
Comey: Well, either for a substantive prosecution or evidence of intent in a criminal prosecution.
Gowdy: Exactly. Intent and consciousness of guilt, right?
Comey: That is right?
Gowdy: Consciousness of guilt and intent? In your old job, you would prove intent as you referenced by showing the jury evidence of a complex scheme that was designed for the very purpose of concealing the public record and you would be arguing in addition to concealment the destruction that you and I just talked about or certainly the failure to preserve.

You would argue all of that under the heading of content. You would also — intent. You would also be arguing the pervasiveness of the scheme when it started when it ended and the number of emails whether they were originally classified or of classified under the heading of intent.
You would also, probably, under the common scheme or plan, argue the burn bags of daily calendar entries or the missing daily calendar entries as a common scheme or plan to conceal.
Two days ago, Director, you said a reasonable person in her position should have known a private email was no place to send and receive classified information. You’re right. An average person does know not to do that.

This is no average person. This is a former First Lady, a former United States senator, and a former Secretary of State that the president now contends is the most competent, qualified person to be president since Jefferson. He didn’t say that in ’08 but says it now.
She affirmatively rejected efforts to give her a account, kept the private emails for almost two years and only turned them over to Congress because we found out she had a private email account.
So you have a rogue email system set up before she took the oath of office, thousands of what we now know to be classified emails, some of which were classified at the time. One of her more frequent email comrades was hacked and you don’t know whether or not she was.

And this scheme took place over a long period of time and resulted in the destruction of public records and yet you say there is insufficient evidence of intent. You say she was extremely careless, but not intentionally so.
You and I both know the intent is really difficult to prove. Very rarely do defendants announce ‘On this date I intend to break this criminal code section. Just to put everyone on notice, I am going to break the law on this date.’
It never happens that way. You have to do it with circumstantial evidence or if you’re Congress and you realize how difficult it is proved, specific intent, you will form lathe a statute that allows for gross negligence.
My time is out but this is really important. You mentioned there’s no precedent for criminal prosecution. My fear is there still isn’t. There’s nothing to keep a future Secretary of State or President from this exact same email scheme or their staff.

And my real fear is this, what the chairman touched upon, this double track justice system that is rightly or wrongly perceived in this country. That if you are a private in the Army and email yourself classified information you will be kicked out. But if you are Hillary Clinton, and you seek a promotion to Commander in Chief, you will not be. So what I hope you can do today is help the average person, the reasonable person you made reference to, the reasonable person understand why she appears to be treated differently than the rest of us would be. With that, I would yield back.
The source of this transcript is closed captioning.
It is the time that we get the full truth and Justice needs to prevail in this case.

Talk Stupidly and Carry a Big Mouth ~> #Obama

Obama Anti-Cop Rhetoric – We don’t need more gun control, we need more presidential mouth control from Obama. Many blame Obama for the police Massacre in Dallas Texas !

Friday, July 8, 2016

Nevada: Updated List of Recognized Concealed-Carry Permits


The Nevada Department of Public Safety recently released an updated list of out-out-state carry permits which are now recognized in Nevada.  Several changes were made to the list as a result of Senate Bill 175 which passed the Nevada Legislature last year and was signed into law by Governor Sandoval on June 2, 2015.  Effective July 1, 2016, the State of Nevada now recognizes concealed weapons permits from the following states

Idaho Enhanced Permit
Mississippi Enhanced Permits
New Mexico
North Carolina 
North Dakota (both types of permits)
South Carolina
South Dakota Enhanced Permit
West Virginia

Congradulations to Erik Estrada...he just joined the Brothers in Blue
 [Erik Estrada becomes a reserve Police officer with the city of St Anthony,Idaho ]

Now he needs to join OathKeepers to make his new life complete: 

                                                                           Join Oath Keepers  Made up of Military...current/retired/and well as Law Enforcement,1st Responders to include associates(Supporters)

In Dallas, Mark Hughes Exercising His Second Amendment Rights Leads To A Rush To Judgement

by Jay Caruso
What would you think if you were sitting home and you suddenly saw yourself on television, identified as a suspect in the deadliest attack on law enforcement officers since the 9/11 attacks? Freaked out would be one descriptor at least. It would be worse if you were identified as a suspect simply because you were exercising your constitutional rights.
That is what happened to Mark Hughes who was mistakenly identified by the Dallas Police Department in a tweet as one of the suspects in yesterday's deadly shootings in Dallas: 

The photo shows a smiling Hughes, walking with what appears to be a semi-automatic rifle slung across his shoulder.
That is perfectly legal in Texas. Hughes was not one of the shooters but just a person attending the protests. That he was legally armed should not have been a concern to anybody.

Somebody might say, "Well Jay, in the midst of all that was happening, it is reasonable that somebody might think he was dangerous."
Actually, it isn't reasonable at all.  Unfortunately, we live in a culture where people have been taught not to fear guns in the way we fear our parents or God - with respect - but to be afraid of guns. Worse, to be irrationally afraid of them. More so when we see somebody carrying one.
Mark Hughes brother was interviewed about him and at one point is asked by a reporter why he took a gun to a peaceful protest and his answer was spot on. He said, "The same reason other people across the country bring their guns. Because it is his right."  

There needs to be a culture shift. The law and the constitution is on the side of gun owners. More states are going the "constitutional carry" route where people do not need to licensed to carry firearms and can do so concealed or openly. But people are still afraid and the automatic assumption is by too many, that a man (or woman) carrying a firearm is up to no good.
It's a ridiculous assumption but it is a narrative that is given strength every day by left wing politicians, ignoramus actors and musicians, as well as charlatans like Michael Bloomberg and Shannon Watts who use lies and intimidation tactics (thanks to Bloomberg's deep pockets) to further the narrative.

But there's another reason it was easy for some to assume that since Mark Hughes was identified as a suspect because he was carrying a firearm: the underlying subtle racism of those in the anti-gun movement.
Shannon Watts, Michael Bloomberg and others in the chattering class who hate guns would have us all believe that nearly all gun owners are white men. It allows the mindset to take hold that a black man carrying a gun must be up to no good....because he's black.  

At the time of this writing, the Dallas Police Department still has the tweet up, identifying Hughes as a suspect. They should take it down. Since the police already questioned and released him, they know he isn't a suspect.
In addition, all of those who are supporters of the second amendment should rally around Hughes, politics be damned. Why? Because as his brother said, he was doing what he did, because it is his right. 

Snipers Kill Five Officers, Wound Six, During Dallas Black Lives Matter Protest

Join Oath Keepers

A Police Officer Breaks Down at Local Hospital Where His Fellow Officers Undergo Emergency Surgery After Sniper Attack

NOTE FROM STEWART RHODES.  Sadly, this sniper attack does not come as a surprise after the incessant cop killer inspiring rhetoric of Black Lives Matter and similar radical leftist groups, inciting violence against all police officers while alleging that any and all shootings of black or Hispanic suspects in this nation just must be driven by racism, with condemnation and cries of “racist!” coming before any investigation has a chance to even start.  And it also does not come as a surprise given the incessant Marxist mantra that America is a “racist nation” and that police serve as the weapons of that racist nation against all “people of color” – all of which serves the Marxist agenda to divide and conquer along racial lines and inspire blind hatred against all police, and against this nation in general (which is clearly successful, judging from the many photos and videos of Black Lives Matter activists standing on the American flag, burning the flag, and even wiping their rear ends with the flag, with many favorable comments and thumbs up given in support online).

And this attack shows the extreme vulnerability of police officers to sniper fire during such events.   From here forward, officers would be well advised to treat all such public protests as magnets for snipers and terrorists, and take appropriate countermeasures, such as active patrolling and/or police occupation of any elevated location that may serve as a possible sniper position.  You can also expect officers to end the practice of going alone on patrol, and instead teaming up in buddy pairs (and that was already starting to happen in response to the increasing targeted assassination attacks on officers in the past two years).

And this attack will cause police to want to further militarize, in their own defense, to include deployment of counter-sniper and armored vehicles, and will cause police to be even more jumpy and on-guard during contacts with the public.   No doubt, that is what the Marxists want as well, so they can further justify their cop hating rhetoric and incitement to violence.   And it will also further their agenda to trample on the right of the people to keep and bear arms.  The blame will not fall on their rhetoric and incitement, but will instead fall on gun ownership in general.   The Marxists’ only proposed “solution” to an attack they caused will be to disarm the rest of us, and to insist on the nationalization of all police, bringing them under the heel of the DOJ.  In other words, they will blame the victims of this attack, and innocent American gun owners, since they see both as their enemies.

Therefore, I call on all Oath Keepers, and all patriotic Americans, to come to the aid of their local police, and to the aid of their communities, and unite and coordinate in mutual defense against this orchestrated campaign of Marxist terrorism, which is the modern version of the wave of terrorism we saw in the late 60s and early 70s by the Marxist Weather Underground and related groups (who also frequently targeted police), along with the closely related Jihadist terrorism offensive, with Orlando being merely the latest in an ongoing wave of attacks.    What is now needed, more than ever, is the reestablishment of the militia of the people, trained, equipped and organized in each town, to defend against what is now clearly a “Tet Offensive” American style, as Navy SEAL veteran Matt Bracken warned.    While we work to reestablish that militia system, you must go armed at all times, and be prepared, at all times, to defend your community against these Marxist terrorists as well as their Islamist terror allies.  Remember, they are in league, and you are their common enemy and their common targets.

The power elites who control, aid, abet and fund these terrorists will attempt to use these attacks to further destroy what little is left of our Constitution, but the one thing they do not want, and the one thing they truly fear, is for We the People, who are still armed, to come together and restore the militia of the several states.   And the elites’ terrorist proxies among the Marxists and Islamacists also fear such a revitalization and restoration.  So, let’s do what our enemies all fear most.  Let us resurrect  and restore the militia system of this nation, which the Founders told us is necessary for the security of a free state, and which must consist of ALL of the able bodied citizens of your community.  It is time to finally get down to doing what is necessary.    It starts with you and your neighbors coming together, now, to address this grave threat, and for you to lead them toward the only constitutional solution – the revitalization of the militia.
For the Republic,
– Stewart Rhodes

Thursday, July 7, 2016

So the DOJ and FBI are investigating another police shooting White on Black

Ok fair enough ,however why not also investigate themselves in the shooting of white persons by police including by the FBI,ATF,US Marshalls {Ruby Ridge/Waco Texas etc},all local /state police et al.
IMO after serving for over 15 years in Law Enforcement Local as well as Federal I blame it on training,and a few bad apples 99% of LE officers do their job well, special interest groups instigating hate against the police,overreaction by the public when making 911 calls and the anti-2nd amendment activists...thus causing overreaction on both sides!

I can't count the times I had to draw down during a stop, search and arrest...when it got really scarry...however I never got to the point of popping the proverbial cap...I relied on my instincts of not being to the point of no return...taking a life...was I lucky or calm and collected on whether I would only fire if no other option was available...I would like to think I had the temperament and control.

That being the police academies they are taught the 15' rule of a person with a knife thus allowing for the use of deadly force for just crossing the well as if a fellow officer yells "Gun" it allows the officer to shoot whether or not he or she actually sees the threat! This is bad training I would only drop the hammer if I saw a  actual threat...but thats just me...and I survived my career without taking a life or being be the judge...I'm not second guessing individual circumstances just pointing out some facts as related to my experience!

I blame both sides in the latest shooting as well as others from the past...I will post the links to make the point...and yes I am concerned as I have a CCW and carry in my retirement phase of life...just remember if a officer gives a order right or wrong comply you can sue later if your rights were violated!
See The Finicum/FBI/Oregon State Police Files: 


Islam and Homosexuality: Two Peas in a Pod


Having observed both Islam and homosexuality in great detail for over forty years, I am constantly reminded of their similar infrastructures and propaganda techniques. Really, this should not be surprising because both are neo-socialist.
Islam has always had its methods of making people comply, but since the rise of ISIS Islam has copied homosexual activism remarkably. One of the most obvious copies is the word ‘Islamophobia’, following the obvious other label, ‘Homophobia’. When ‘Homophobia’ was first thrown out, it meant ‘fear of homosexuals’. (Its etymology does not mean that, but extremists don’t care about accuracy).

But, when this definition didn’t work, the meaning was changed to ‘hatred of homosexuals’, which took it even farther away from its etymology! But, the media was sucked in to accept it, followed by academia and governments, though its bizarre change was so glaring. Both the word and the definitions were invented, then simply changed at will. They are not real, but are meaningless. But, after a while of being pounded daily by the word and its definition, the world slowly accepted both ‘phobias’ as genuine, even though there was, and still is, no real evidence that anyone hates homosexuals or Muslims (except when Muslims are terrorists)!

Words are part of propaganda. Socialists of every hue, communist and fascist, have used words to make an impact on the general population. Words are changed in type and meaning, so that true meanings become lost (see A/523, ‘How Gay Propaganda Twists Truth’, by request from our website). Even the word ‘gay’ has been totally turned around so that its original use is obscured. In the 1960s homosexuals preferred to use ‘gay’ because of its mental image of happy and carefree. The fact that ‘gay’ is far from carefree and happy is carefully erased from reports, stories, and even films, which all depict this inglorious lifestyle as always wonderful and loving, when it is the exact opposite.

This change of words and meanings is deliberate and cold-hearted. They are used to change society’s attitude and, eventually society itself, without society realizing what is going on. Because of my age, I was able to personally observe this remaking of history. And the changes have been phenomenal but unworthy. With each word change came societal deterioration. Even so, you can batter someone’s brain until they accept what you say… but after a while they become immune to the changes and finally see they have been taken for a ride. Then comes the resurgence of hope, truth and rebellion.

This is because the real words and their meanings do not resonate in the mind. People know instinctively that something is wrong. Eventually, what was once hailed as the best is seen to be the worst, and society starts to reject what has been forced down their throats.
Islamists (those who are fanatically Muslim) have used the same tactics as homosexuals, firstly by using the word ‘Islamophobia’. Homosexuals used ‘homophobia’ to convince governments they needed special protection. From there came laws to ‘protect’ them, and then laws, still in progress, to punish those who do not accept the homosexual mindset. At every stage, there was no true evidence that they needed protection at all; so they also invented false examples of a ‘need’ to be protected specially. But, they lied and continue to lie. The latest example is the mass shooting in Orlando, which was blamed on ‘homophobia’. In reality it was an act of Islamic terrorism!

Similarly, Islamists are trying to make society believe Muslims are being persecuted by white people/the West. But, it is all an invention, as with homosexuality. Homosexuals like to complain about being attacked in the streets for their sexual choice, but these are usually false. The same goes for Islamists – with many Muslims setting fire to mosques to convince the police they need protecting! It is ironic and almost amusing that Islamists are following the same propaganda path taken by the homosexuals they claim to hate, and using their methods.

Another way Islamists twist words and meanings is in their usual anti-West diatribes. While liberals and leftists instantly apologize to Islam for all the (invented) things the West is supposedly guilty of, the same Westerners don’t bother to check the facts! (On my website you will find three major articles about this systemic form of lying by jihadists, which is also used by Obama).
What of the word ‘Islam’? Muslims in the West are very happy to let western leaders repeat that ‘Islam means peace’, when, in fact, it means ‘submission’. However, many Islamic leaders in Islamic countries are outraged by this, and repeatedly say Islam is nothing to do with ‘peace’ but with forcing others into submission! But the twee Western leaders insist on spreading their own meanings, thus deceiving the public.

Take, too, the word ‘peace’ itself. Muslims deliberately avoid advising us in the West that in Islamic terms ‘peace’ is not what Westerners take it to mean. In Islam, ‘peace’ refers to a time when all the world is taken over by Islamic control. And when they say a town they occupy is now the most peaceful place on earth (they said this about Mosul), they do not actually explain what they mean. That is, the town is at peace in the Islamic sense – the people obey Allah and imams and terrorists, rather than have their heads cut off. Thus, the ‘peace’ is a state of being so afraid that you keep your head down (literally) and do whatever the occupiers tell you to do. So, when Islamists tell you something, check out the actual meaning of their words, because (a) they lie and (b) meanings are not Western.

Because of this word-change and substitute word meanings, Western leaders are played like violins! Or, rather, played for what they are – fools who become tools of Islamic propaganda without knowing it. (Obama is different, because he is Muslim and knows what Islamic words mean).
Remember, though – words that are forcibly changed and given alien meanings, can only hold a society for a time. Then, that society slowly realizes it has been duped, and starts to regain its senses and intelligence. After that truth begins to again take control, and the people who deceived to get their own way are told to “Get lost!”
I can’t wait for this to happen with homosexuality and Islam, but there are many other candidates for this makeover from lies to truth. Never lose your critical faculty! It is your only defense against propaganda.

Hillary in a Race Against Time to Keep Bill's Having AIDS a Secret

      Image result for current pictures bill clinton  
oped: Interesting analysis...quiet possible as Bill has really aged badly and definitely does not look healthy! 

         Image result for current pictures bill clinton

by:Tony Elliott 
Most of you have probably noticed during the Hillary Clinton campaign that Bill Clinton looks like some zombie or mummified corpse from some science fiction movie. He is clearly very ill and showing it.
The truth is, Bill Clinton exhibits all the physical symptoms and actions of a person who has advanced AIDS. His drastic weight loss, trembling hands at times, red blotches on his face, and inflamed nodules on his nose are sure signs of advanced AIDS.

In noticing these same symptoms in actor Charlie Sheen, I wrote an article stating that Sheen had AIDS and would announce it soon. The article was published some 3 weeks before Sheen publicly announced he had AIDS.
Like Charlie Sheen, Bill Clinton has led a sexually promiscuous life for most of his existence, and his chances of contracting HIV from one of his sex partners is very high

Both Hillary and Bill have had their medical records sealed, and aside from some obvious health issues with Hillary and her coughing fits, the primary reason for keeping much of their medical records secret is because it would show Bill as having AIDS.
Anyone can compare men approximately the same age as Bill Clinton, such as George W. Bush and Donald Trump, and find Bush and Trump looking healthy, vigorous, and very active. Yet, in Bill's case, he looks like Frankenstein's corpse who was resurrected from the dead. 

The fact is, anyone as clearly ill as Bill will in no way make it through the first two years of the next Administration, and the demands of the job as President that Hillary will be under will drastically shorten his time from two years.
Hillary will do anything to keep this secret, at least until after the election, in fear that such an admission of her husband having AIDS would ruin what little chances she has of becoming the next POTUS.
As the demands of the campaign drastically increase the closer we get to the general election in November, it would not be a surprise to see Bill Clinton collapse during some public function, or disappear from Hillary's campaign trail altogether.
Bill Clinton is a gravely ill man who, more than likely, will have to admit to having AIDS in the very near future. It is a race against time now for Hillary Clinton's campaign, where she hopes her husband can hold it together, at least until after the Presidential Election. With the stress Bill is under during his wife's campaign, it is highly doubtful he can keep this a secret for much longer.


Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Prosecute Corrupt Loretta Lynch For Bill Clinton Meeting & More

30-Bill-Clinton-Attorney-General-Loretta-Lynch-Meet-on-Private-Plane (1)
AG Loretta Lynch is a corrupt bureaucrat who only has one goal in mind: the erosion and destruction of the United States’ judicial integrity.
The Attorney General of the United States is supposed to be above politics and is supposed to uphold the integrity of the entire U.S. judicial system.

But Lynch, time and time again refuses to uphold American law from refusing to enforce illegal immigration laws, turning a blind eye on radical Islam and now meeting privately with Bill Clinton while she is investigating Hillary Clinton.
To Obama Democrats and Progressives, it is always politics, 100% of the time. There is no honor, there is no recognition of America’s history of judicial impartiality and there is no respect.
The reporter who broke the story said, “The former president steps into her plane. They then speak for 30 minutes privately. The FBI there on the tarmac instructing everybody around ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones.’”
If the meeting was innocent, why no pictures, no cell phones?

If Lynch and Bill Clinton didn’t discuss the obvious elephant in the room then why are countless people defending her? Clearly there was an offense.
Harry Reid says about Lynch that “Her ethics are above reproach. No one could ever question her strong feelings about the rule of law, and her ethics are the best.”
We know she is hiding something. If nothing was wrongly done, then why do people need to support her? Why would a former President wait around for a short, private meeting? Lynch and Clinton say it was for social purposes. Really? On a plane in the middle of a desert that Lynch didn’t disclose?

Go here to sign petition:

  By signing your message will be delivered directly to your Congressman and your voice WILL be heard!

BOMBSHELL:(Gretchen Carlson) ANOTHER Sex Scandal Rocks Fox News(Updated)

oped: Hey Donald Trump...come to the rescue *Gretch* needs a PR job...nows your chance to put Hillary on the back burners:) 
I saw this post on her Twitter account:
Jul 2
Just happened to be at on tonight w/ and - great show. 
Save this poor girl from the grasp of the Clintons...she is not thinking clearly!

UPDATE (3:11 PM) : Carlson posted a message to her fans on social media:

Unofficial: Gretchen Carlson
4 hours ago
As you may have heard, I am no longer with Fox News. I value your support and friendship, especially now, so please stay in touch with me. I value your support and friendship, especially now, so please stay in touch with me.
You can reach me via my website, and on social media, here, via Twitter,, on and on Snapchat at GCarlsonTV.

This is wild. Long time Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson was recently fired, and in turn is filing a sexual harrassment suit against Fox News CEO Roger Ailes. As Politico's Hadas Gold details:
According to the lawyers at Smith Mullin P.C., who are representing Carlson, her contract was terminated on June 23. Fox News did not publicly announce the contract termination, and Carlson said on her Twitter account at the time that she was on “on vacation”.

"I have strived to empower women and girls throughout my entire career,” Carlson said in a statement. “Although this was a difficult step to take, I had to stand up for myself and speak out for all women and the next generation of women in the workplace. I am extremely proud of my accomplishments at Fox News and for keeping our loyal viewers engaged and informed on events and news topics of the day.”

Gold details some of the allegations made by Carlson:

The complaint was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey and claims Ailes made “sexually-charged comments” to Carlson, "ranging from lewd innuendo, ogling and remarks about Ms. Carlson’s body to demands for sex as a way for her to improve her job standing."

“[D]uring a meeting last September in which Ms. Carlson complained about ongoing discriminatory and retaliatory treatment, Mr. Ailes stated, "I think you and I should have had a sexual relationship a long time ago and then you’d be good and better and I’d be good and better," adding that "sometimes problems are easier to solve' that way,” according to Carlson’s lawyers.

On other occasions, the complaint alleges Ailes asked Carlson to "turn around so he could view her posterior, commented repeatedly about her legs, and instructed her to wear certain outfits that he claimed enhanced her figure.” Ailes also allegedly “directed sexist comments” about Carlson in public and announced to others at a industry event that “he had slept with three former Miss Americas, but not with her.” Carlson is the third high profile female to leave Fox News in the last six months. Former Breitbart columnist Michelle Fields was let go by the network after her tiff with Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski. Former "Outnumbered" host Andrea Tantaros  vanished mysteriously from the network on the day her book debuted, and has yet to return.

We will update this story as more information becomes available.

 Source: AAN

Proving the “Clinton” Double-Standard: Five Americans Obama Jailed For Mishandling Classified Information

On Tuesday morning FBI Director James Comey said “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statute regarding the handling of classified information, no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”
Really? Since Obama took office in 2009, seven people have been charged under the Espionage Act — all for leaking classified or sensitive information. Five—John Kiriakou, Shamai Leibowitz, Jeffrey Sterling, former State Department official Stephen Kim, and BradleyChelsea Manning — got jail time.”

Skipping Bradley Chelsea Manning because his leak was in a category of its own, the other four shows that there are “reasonable” prosecutors who will bring charges in such cases.
Stephen Kim pleaded guilty in 2014 to disclosing a classified report on North Korea to Fox News reporter James Rosen. That was the case where the former AG Eric Holder wiretapped Rosen’s parents. His lawyer said the information at issue “was less sensitive or surprising than much of what we read in the newspaper every day.” He did 13 months in prison. Note he revealed classifed info, Hillary was reckless with top secret info as well as the lower classifications of secrets.
Jeffrey Sterling was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in May for revealing classified information about the CIA’s effort to disrupt Iran’s nuclear program to journalist James Risen (who refused to reveal his sources). Sterling was convicted of sharing with Risen information of a failed C.I.A. operation to give flawed nuclear blueprints to Iran, Mr. Risen revealed the operation in his 2006 book, “State of War,” describing it as a mismanaged, potentially reckless mission that may have inadvertently aided the Iranian nuclear program.

Read More:

Judge Jeanine: Comey Has ‘Destroyed the Reputation’ of the FBI

06-Judge Jeanine

From Fox News
Judge Jeanine Pirro harshly criticized FBI Director James Comey for recommending no charges against Hillary Clinton, saying the director has “destroyed the reputation” of his agency.
“This is a dark day for criminal justice,” she said. “This is a dark day for the Department of Justice and the FBI. There’s a lot of good people in those departments. He has destroyed that reputation.”
Pirro also reacted to Comey saying that there would normally be “administrative sanctions” for someone who made the same mistakes as Clinton.

“If she were to be president of the United States, hasn’t she already proven that she cannot be trusted with this information? Shouldn’t she lose any security clearance that she has?”
She sharply disagreed that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring a criminal case against Clinton.
“Jim, you’re wrong. I respect you but you’re wrong.”
Read Full Story At Fox News

Clinton Aide Reveals Where Hillary Told Her to Put Documents…Lock Her Up NOW

An aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified in a deposition that Clinton did, in fact, destroy documents that she was not legally allowed to destroy.
Huma Abedin’s response to a lawsuit filed by a government watchdog was that schedules, more specifically Clinton’s daily schedules, were burned in “the burn bag” frequently.
“If there was a schedule that was created that was her secretary of state daily schedule, and a copy of that was then put in the burn bag, that . . . that certainly happened on . . . on more than one occasion,” said Abedin.

Certainly, appearances have always suggested that the approach to public records taken by Clinton and her aides spit in the face of the spirit — and likely the letter — of public records laws, but Abedin’s testimony is the best evidence yet of how little regard for the law the office had.
Clinton’s email scandal has been an ongoing source of daily shock among website blogs, in real-life consequences seem to have about as much traction as Mike Huckabee’s doomed campaign for president and the damning power of President Obama’s lack of a proper birth certificate.
Even though the testimony marks the first instance of Clinton or her staff admitting to the destruction of official State Department documents, Clinton’s previous admission that she permanently deleted emails is somewhat similar legally. Her defense that the emails were personal is likely to be attributed to her schedule as well. 

Congressional Republicans have previously refused to take action against the White House on matters such as this. It’s difficult to imagine the trend would change any time soon without significant public demand.
H/T The Hill
Please share on Facebook and Twitter to demand that Republicans do something about Hillary Clinton’s illegal activity

Trump vows to investigate Clinton after FBI clears her


From Washington Examiner
Donald Trump promised Tuesday to look into whether Hillary Clinton abused special privileges while secretary of state. The declaration came hours after the FBI declared it would not recommend criminal charges against the Democratic presidential candidate to the Justice Department.
“I’m going to further look into it and we will see what we will see,” Trump told Fox News host Bill O’Reilly in a phone interview recorded Tuesday afternoon.
In February, the billionaire businessman said he expected Clinton to get away with her use of private email servers while the top State official, but as president, he would look in to prosecuting Clinton.

The businessman turned politician pointed to a number of events over the past five days that have him questioning whether there was a conspiracy between federal officials and the Clintons.
Read Full Story At Washington Examiner

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

Bottom line...what will you do when they come for You?

At this point in time...I really don't care anymore...I have been, along with many~many #OathKeepers sounding the alarm from a lonely vigil on a mountain top...The Obama administration is a perverted progressive political party... a cross between the CPUSA and the ISIS Caliphate, hell bent on the destruction of the US Constitution/Bill of Rights.
If Hillary Clinton is allowed to be elected to the office of POTUS y'all are on your own, I as well as many who gave blood,sweat and tears serving this country as Military,Law Enforcement and 1st Responders will be way to busy protecting our own family,friends and associates to come to your have made your own bed and must therefore sleep in it...Don't call me/us because we  have zero sympathy for you and yours lack of knowledge/ action to protect our US Constitution/Bill of Rights.

I hate to be so cold blooded about this issue, however the truth is out there you just refuse to see it...why I have no idea...stupidity comes to light...then again maybe y'all want it...ok take it I refuse to join you and yours when the truth comes to light and the sheep are lead to have been is up to you to defend your own I said #OathKeepers , who are well trained, will be will get a busy signal or low bar on your stupid cell phones...good luck idiots!

Comey,Lynch,Clinton..Three Amigos- Bar Scene (My Little Buttercup)

Yes indeed this just about sums up this latest fiasco...hell even former NYC Mayor Rudy chastized his former underling Jim Comey as the former NY US Attorney before becoming mayor!

Independence In LaVoy Finicum’s Vision

Join Oath Keepers

Independence In LaVoy Finicum’s Vision
LaVoy Finicum Speaking
LaVoy Finicum Speaking 

So it’s Independence Day, 2016 and I’m a seventy-years-old man with wrinkles and wet eyes.
The wrinkles are a testament of how I forged my view of the world for over half a century, as I now can see it looking back. Live and Learn.
Experience untied to time does not exist; and that explains the “old man with wrinkles” part of the sentence above. But what about the wet eyes?
I am a sensitive man  who cannot bear too much reality, as I learned back in the 1960s in Viet Nam.  I don’t cry easily. But it can happen, if only very rarely. And this morning, July 04, 2016, Independence Day, in the wee hours, it happened.  Here’s how.
Back in early June I traveled to the little town named Plains, Montana, to join a rally for Jake Ryan’s release from jail. Thirty-seven patriots had been jailed for daring oppose federal abuse of States Rights. Jake Ryan was one of them. The rally turned into a celebration as Jake was released.
I drove back again the next day to attend a speaking event produced by Dan and Roxsanna Ryan, Jake’s parents. LaVoy Finicum’s widow, Jeanette Finicum, was among the speakers. I bought a copy of her late husband’s novel.

LaVoy_Finicum_Blood_Suffering_CoverThe title is “Only By Blood And Suffering“. This weekend I took time off and read the book. Just finished it. That is why my eyes are wet.
It is Independence Day, 2016. The man who wrote this book is dead and there is no getting him back this side of the grave. Knowing that he is dead, and how he died, put a filter over my mind as I read his book. I had written about him, had posted my favorite of his videos, had followed the whole Burns, Oregon situation, but I did not read LaVoy’s book until this weekend.
I am blown away. I had no idea the man was a writer. Wow. He grabbed me early on and built a surprising drive in me to follow his story page by page. It is a cowboy’s take on Independence.
Yes, it’s that, but it’s also a tense portrait of a family’s struggle to unite and save themselves as society breaks down in the aftermath of an EMP attack. That is the context in which LaVoy Finicum developed his story. What surprised me this weekend as I was reading his novel was how, in tracing the trials and courage of a rancher’s son and daughters as they struggled to get home to their ranch and safety, LaVoy skillfully packed the principles of freedom into the narrative and action of the book.

LaVoy Finicum left no stone un-turned as he wove the nature of “government” itself into the flesh-and-blood experience of humanity in mankind’s endless struggle to achieve full freedom.  He paints pictures in words, words which expose a —
“…long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object [which] evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism…
LaVoy packed into his story the values of personal responsibility, of reverence, love, courage, dignity, and commitment to a personal code of honor. He did that (and much more) in contexts of modern-day cowboys who live yet on the land while a wobbly world is under NSA satellite surveillance, federal regulations, Homeland Security’s tyranny, political correctness, advertising, “news”, economic manipulations, and other blights on our freedom as Americans with a traditional way of life on our vast natural lands within State borders.
There is treachery, gunfighting, spying, crowd-manipulation, defense of farm, food, and family. There is also a damning indictment on crowd mentality, which I laud him for doing masterfully. In the middle of all that LaVoy has also developed a tender romance which I found to be compelling as well as reassuring. My claim is that anyone who reads this novel will love it, and all patriots (and especially their good neighbors) simply must read this book.

As I already noted, I did not know LaVoy Finicum was a talented writer. I tried my hand at doing a bit of writing myself. I know what is involved in developing a story and I was floored at how masterfully LaVoy built this book.  The characters are fully developed, the action is ever-so plausible, the facts of life in a cowboy’s world are refreshing and encouraging.  This book will inspire a generation and reinforce the patriot movement greatly.
My point in talking about this book is simple. The original patriots, those Colonists who defied their government to throw off subjugation and establish thirteen free “sovereign nation-state Republics”, found their success only “by blood and suffering“. LaVoy reminds us that nothing has changed.  To me, personally, the dominant challenge which I felt riding like wild horses through his novel is simple – will I stand for freedom?  

It’s about Independence!

Buy it. Read it. Live it!
LaVoy Finicum is a national treasure. His Spirit shall live on forever in America through his work and his book.

HILARIOUS: Gun’s Don’t KILL People, Clintons Kill People

Here’s another gun control meme that Hillary is going to hate. Do you agree?
It seems that anyone who happens to be close to the Clintons when a scandal breaks out then mysteriously disappears.

Here is a list of all the mysterious deaths involved with the Clintons:
1 – James McDougal – Clinton’s convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.
2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
3 – Vince Foster – Former white House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.
4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors.
5 – C. Victor Raiser II and Montgomery Raiser, Major players in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.
6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock, September 1992… Described by Clinton as a “Dear friend and trusted advisor.”
7- Ed Willey – Clinton fund raiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.
8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock. Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.
9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas.
10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater.
11- Kathy Ferguson, ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.
12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.
13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.
14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal Mena Airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.
15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.
16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.
17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.
18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993 in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno three weeks before his death
19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guarantee scandal.
20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.
21- Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.
22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee, died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton’s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.
23 – Barry Seal – Drug running pilot out of Mena, Arkansas, death was no accident.
24 – Johnny Lawhorn Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.
25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guarantee. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.
26- Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fund raiser died March 1, 1994 when his plane exploded.
27 – Kevin Ives and Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the two boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, July 1988.
29 – Keith McMaskle – Died stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988
30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.
31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.
33 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to “natural causes.”
34 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.
35 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.
THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD: 36 – Major William S. Barkley Jr. 37 – Captain Scott J. Reynolds 38 – Sgt. Brian Hanley 39 – Sgt. Tim Sabel 40 – Major General William Robertson 41 – Col. William Densberger 42 – Col. Robert Kelly 43 – Spec. Gary Rhodes 44 – Steve Willis 45 – Robert Williams 46 – Conway LeBleu 47 – Todd McKeehan

Share if you’ve had enough of the Clintons

SO CORRUPT: Guess WHO Hillary’s Attorney General Will Be IF She Wins?

        Image result for hillary clinton loretta lynch comey

    Image result for hillary clinton loretta lynch comey

  Image result for hillary clinton loretta lynch comey

This is further proof that Hillary will only be Obama 2.0 if she gets into office. Do you want more of the same and worse if she is elected President?
In her first 100 days, she would also tap women to make up half of her cabinet in hopes of bringing a new tone and collaborative sensibility to Washington, while also looking past Wall Street to places like Silicon Valley for talent — perhaps wooing Sheryl Sandberg from Facebook, and maybe asking Tim Cook from Apple to become the first openly gay cabinet secretary.
She hopes to reassure progressives with her executive actions, which would also include new protections for undocumented immigrant parents, as well as her personnel appointments.

Having women make up half of her cabinet would be historic (in recent years, a quarter to a third of cabinet positions have been held by women), and Democrats close to Mrs. Clinton say she may decide to retain Ms. Lynch, the nation’s first black woman to be attorney general, who took office in April 2015.
Read more: NY Times
Meanwhile, Hillary will be hitching a ride with Obama on Air Force One. Who do you think is going to be paying for this?

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Why is President Obama allowed to use Air Force One on the campaign trail with Crooked Hillary? She is flying with him tomorrow. Who pays?