Saturday, August 6, 2016

Yikes! Trump Controvery is Heating Up Again...

Trump's "Outrageous" Words Leave Conservatives Speechless...

Donald Trump is a lightening rod and a lot of what he says is borderline outlandish, but THIS takes is the most extreme ever!
His most recent comments have left conservatives speechless and the media has chose to flat out ignore it. Wonder why? 


This is information you DESERVE to know about and it proves why Trump should be elected (no matter what you think about some of his controversial antics and ideas).
THIS Video reveals a coming crisis that only Trump recognizes and other candidates have turned a blind eye to it.
After you watch this video, you'll forget about his plan to build a wall or ban Muslims.
You should go watch it right now (and share it with people you love or respect!).
Thank you.
P.S. You won't hear Hillary talking about this. She is choosing to ignore it completely which is why she would be a nightmare if elected!

New Polls Are Being Rigged for Hillary Up to 9 Points (Video)

by:MIchael DePinto
To quote one pollster specifically from The New York Times, Cliff Zukin said, “Election polling is in a near crisis, and we pollsters know.”
In the following video, you’ll learn that to no one’s surprise, recent polls coming out of the mainstream media the last few days have been a bit shady to say the least. Every major poll studied by the New York Times conveniently has Hillary ahead of Donald Trump by huge margins, despite such a high percentage of voters saying they could never trust Hillary. It seems polling companies are changing their formulas however they have to in order to show that Hillary is ahead.  

Breitbart reported: 

On Sunday’s Breitbart News Daily with SiriusXM host Alex Marlow, political strategist Pat Caddell outlined his charge that Reuters tampered with its own daily tracking poll to manufacture a sudden surge for Hillary Clinton.
“They not only changed their formula, to put Hillary ahead. They went back and changed the results, for a week of results where Trump was ahead, and then they turned those into Hillary leads,” said Caddell. “They also erased all the former polling off the site. They didn’t tweak their procedure – they cooked it.” 

“Never in my life have I seen a news organization, and a supposedly reputable poll, do something so dishonest,” Caddell continued. “What they have done is, they decided the people who said, ‘oh, I’m never for someone’ – oh, those must be Hillary votes. They used to be Trump voters.”
“They made a switch, as much as nine points, in their results from the beginning of last week, the 25th and 26th. It is, beyond doubt, the most outrageous thing,” he declared, noting that results in three- and four-way polls that include independent candidates Gary Johnson and Jill Stein were also skewed.
“This is what the media is willing to do, to try to elect her,” Caddell said. “This poll is nothing but a part of a media offensive. In the 45 years since I was a child, in top-level presidential campaigns, I have never seen the media on such a jihad, and so involved in hiding facts, and not following up. This is a crisis of democracy, what the press is now doing.” 

He noted that Hillary Clinton made “big news” on Fox News Sunday when she claimed the FBI found her responses to questions about her secret email server to be honest and consistent, when in fact FBI Director James Comey said the opposite, when he declined to refer charges against her to prosecutors.
“That is language from another planet,” Caddell declared. “This woman, to make that assertion after all the proven lies, should be a big story, but it will not be.” He also noted the contrast between how Donald Trump’s appearance on ABC News over the weekend was immediately followed by a round-table of commentators attacking him, but Fox News staged no such ambush of Clinton.
Caddell furthermore dismissed Trump’s ABC News interviewer George Stephanopoulos as “a former Democratic operative, a Clinton contributor, and an absolute fraud as a newsperson.”
Read the rest of the article here:

Friday, August 5, 2016

Breaking News: John McCain’s 1969 “Tokyo Rose” Propaganda Recording Released Showing he WAS a Traitor who Turned Against His Own Country

Join Oath Keepers
[ ]

Breaking News: John McCain’s 1969 “Tokyo Rose” Propaganda Recording Released Showing he WAS a Traitor who Turned Against His Own Country

The “Songbird” Traitor, Doing His Fake Hero Act, Begins His Rise to Power
An audio recording has surfaced proving that U.S. Senator John McCain collaborated with the North Vietnamese by recording a “Tokyo Rose”-style propaganda message that was broadcast on North Vietnamese radio in 1969.
For many years, American former P.O.W.s who were in the “Hanoi Hilton” North Vietnamese prison with John McCain called him a “Songbird” who collaborated with the enemy against his own country.   They accused him of turning against them and against his own country in exchange for preferential treatment while many of the actually brave and honorable American P.O.W.s endured torture and denial of medical care and food for refusing to collaborate.  The P.O.W.s branded McCain a traitor who was no hero, but nonetheless used his fake hero status to rise to political power.

But we only had their word against his – until now.   Now, from the U.S. National Archives comes the proof of their allegations – McCain, by his own words, WAS in fact a traitor who collaborated with the enemy by recording a “Tokyo Rose” statement condemning his own nation by admitting “crimes” against the North Vietnamese people, stating “I, as a U.S. airman, am guilty of crimes against the Vietnamese country and people.”  McCain’s recorded statement also painted a picture of humane treatment of prisoners even though he knew many of his fellow Americans were being tortured and denied medical care and adequate food.  In the recording he is heard to say “I received this kind treatment and food even though I came here as an aggressor and the people who I injured have much difficulty in their living standards. I wish to express my deep gratitude for my kind treatment and I will never forget this kindness extended to me.”

Watch this, and listen to the recording yourself: 

John McCain, Traitor and Songbird, sings for his masters
Several years ago, I (Stewart Rhodes) was attacked by the left wing media for calling McCain a traitor who deserved to be tried for treason, and then, once convicted, deserved to suffer the usual punishment for someone convicted of treason, which is to be hung by the neck until dead.   Turns out I was right.   He IS a traitor, and now there is direct evidence to back that up, in addition to his horrid voting record against the Constitution.  Well, now, can we finally try him for treason and then sentence him accordingly?   Or will he, like Hillary Clinton, get a pass on his crimes despite direct, smoking gun evidence, because both of them are part of the political elite?   You already know the answer to that. is to be commended for their work in making this recording public, after all these years.   Here is what they have to say about this:

(TRUNEWS) U.S. Senator John McCain recorded a Tokyo Rose-style propaganda message that was broadcast on North Vietnamese radio in 1969.
TRUNEWS acquired the audio recording in cooperation with, a new media company founded by Charles Johnson.
The 1969 North Vietnamese radio broadcast has never been heard in the United States of America. In fact, there has never been any knowledge that such a recording existed. The audio recording was found in a misplaced file in the National Archives in Washington, D.C. The broadcast was recorded by the Foreign Broadcast Information Service, a branch of the CIA that monitored international shortwave and foreign radio broadcasts.
Lt. Commander John McCain was shot down over Hanoi by a North Vietnamese missile while flying his 23rd bombing mission. Both of his arms and one leg were broken. He was pulled ashore by North Vietnamese who took him to a prison known by POWs as the “Hanoi Hilton.”
McCain was a prisoner of war for five and a half years. He was released on March 14, 1973, and returned to the United States of America as a war hero. His POW legacy propelled McCain to victory in a race for a U.S. Congressional seat in Arizona in 1982. He replaced Barry Goldwater in the Senate in 1986.
– See more at:

Read more here.
Here is a transcript of the recording:
To the Vietnamese people and the government of the DRVN:
From John Sidney McCain, 624787, Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Navy, born 29 August, 1936, Panama, home state Oregon. Shot down 26 October, 1967, A-4E aircraft.
I, as a U.S. airman, am guilty of crimes against the Vietnamese country and people. I bombed their cities, towns and villages and caused many injuries, even deaths, for the people of Vietnam.
I was captured in the capital city of Hanoi, while attacking it. After I was captured, I was taken to the hospital in Hanoi, where I received very good medical treatment. I was given an operation on my leg, which allowed me to walk again, and a cast on my right arm, which was badly broken in three places.
The doctors were very good and they knew a great deal about the practice of medicine. I remained in the hospital for some time and regained much of my health and strength. Since I arrived in the camp of detention, I received humane and lenient treatment.
I received this kind treatment and food even though I came here as an aggressor and the people who I injured have much difficulty in their living standards. I wish to express my deep gratitude for my kind treatment and I will never forget this kindness extended to me.

– See more at:
Note that reports that “the broadcast was recorded by the Foreign Broadcast Information Service, a branch of the CIA that monitored international shortwave and foreign radio broadcasts.”   So, the CIA, knew that he was a traitor.  Did they report that to President Nixon? Did they inform the Joint Chief of Staff?  Did they even notify McCain’s command?  Again, you already know the answer to that.  What they did is sit on it, and no doubt they “misfiled” it in the National Archives, and let McCain know they had it there, somewhere, so he would be compliant and do as commanded throughout his career.  That is how it is done.  – Stewart Rhodes

Comparing ‘1984’ With Today…the Similarities are STRIKING

by iPatriot 
Make sure to surf over to and join the citizen journalist revolution!
One of my all time favorite novels is 1984 by George Orwell. It was particularly fascinating to me back in the late ‘50s or early 60s when I first read it. The direct parallels with today’s politics are equally bewitching.
When I first encountered the book, it was for the pleasure of reading pure fiction. I did, however, at the time and oft thereafter question, “What if?”. Over the decades, I have seen many comparisons to the work. Today the book reads more like an honest news account than most of what the broadcast or print media offers.

Orwell had other sage and salient quotes to his credit. Following are just a few.
Ignorance Is Strength.” Have you ever noticed how ignorant people have a great deal of strength in their convictions?” George Orwell.
Liberals, in particular, tend to get loud and call names when their arguments lack merit.  What they know inherently is all they need to know and there is little chance of enlightening them with facts or reason.  Our public schools do a lot to reinforce this inability.

Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness. (George Orwell)
Have you been called a racist yet because your take on right and wrong varies from that of our current administration and their subject lemmings? If you don’t accept that it is Bush’s fault, then you simply cannot stand to have a man of color in the White House. Certainly, these can be the only reasons for not accepting the fundamental change of the nation promised by this president. Being called a racist is much like the accusing question, “Have you been caught cheating on your spouse yet?” There is no right answer.
“Newspeak was the official language … The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits…
Read the rest of the story at

Protestors SHOUT Hillary Down At ‘Rally’ – Her Reaction Is STRANGE

Hillary stands FROZEN as protesters flood her rally. What she did next is just WEIRD…
Animal rights activists disrupt a Hillary rally in a shoe-box-sized room and she just stands there looking like a deer in headlights.
Secret Service agents jump onstage and tell her to continue her speech.

Hillary laughs nervously a few times and then says the oddest thing:
‘Apparently these people are here to protest Trump because Trump and his kids have killed a lot of animals.’
Watch the BIZARRE episode below:

Share if you think Hillary’s reaction was REALLY STRANGE

Thursday, August 4, 2016

What’s that hole in Hillary’s tongue?

[ Here’s the image in question]

Two weeks ago, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton experienced what could have been an epileptic seizure on camera. Then she coughed 22 times during one speech, her staff manipulating the applause form the crowd to give her time to clear her throat. Now, sharp-eyed internet sleuths have spotted a suspicious cavity on Clinton’s tongue that could be indicative of a biopsy:
I believe it may have been Glenn Reynolds who first examined the picture closely and wondered “What the heck is that dark thing on Hillary’s tongue?”
…it doesn’t look like a throat lozenge that might have been employed to stay her persistent, sickly cough.
iOTWreport discovered a likely cause of said cavity: It appears to be the result of a tongue biopsy.

If you want to read some saucy speculation about why Clinton might have needed a tongue biopsy, you can do so here. The picture does however highlight the issue of tongue biopsies which is not something we think about much, so we thought it would be interesting to cover them. Here’s what the U.S National Library of Medicine has to say. 

Tongue biopsy

A tongue biopsy is a minor surgery that is done to remove a small piece of the tongue. The tissue is then examined under a microscope. 
A tongue biopsy can be done using a needle.
  • You will get numbing medicine at the place where the biopsy is to be done.
  • The health care provider will gently stick the needle into the tongue and remove a tiny piece of tissue.
Some types of tongue biopsies remove a thin slice of tissue. Medicine to numb the area (local anesthetic) will be used. Others are done under general anesthesia, (allowing you to be asleep and pain-free) so that a larger area may be removed and examined.

How to Prepare for the Test

You may be told not to eat or drink anything for several hours before the test.

How the Test will Feel

Your tongue is very sensitive so a needle biopsy may be uncomfortable even when numbing medicine is used.
Your tongue can be tender or sore, and it may feel slightly swollen after the biopsy. You may have stitches or an open sore where the biopsy was done.

Why the Test is Performed

The test is done to find the cause of abnormal growths or suspicious-looking areas of the tongue.

Normal Results

The tongue tissue is normal when examined.

What Abnormal Results Mean

Abnormal results may mean:
  • Amyloidosis
  • Tongue (oral) cancer Tongue cancer tends to be diagnosed when the cancer is small and more easily removed through surgery.
  • Viral ulcer
  • Benign tumors


Risks for this procedure include:
Complications from this procedure are rare. But we understand that biopsies can affect speech. If this is the case, former-First Lady Hillary Clinton did a good job of overcoming these effects at the recent Democrat Convention where she was elected as their nominee for President.

Are These Men Using PC Liberal Guilt to Plot a Terror Attack?

oped: Should there be an attack by these "patriotic" muslims at the airport Barry Barack Obama, Jeh Johnson and his co-conspirator Andrew Rhodes should be immediately impeached,arrested and prosecuted for treason.
Jeh Johnson converted to Islam and supports the Muslim Brotherhood as do many in the Obama administration.
This isn’t the first time that federal authorities have breached security by granting access to the facility’s secure areas. Judicial Watch obtained records from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), showing that Muslim participants were given “ in-depth, on-site tours” by the Customs and Border Protection (CBP), on both December 18, 2014 and February 18, 2015, where Muslims ate lunch with officials and discussed “specific practices” of the airport.

Just *SMH*...when you think the government simply cannot get more moronic, we hear about this kind of crap going on. Maybe we should have given the Nazis and the Japanese "behind the scenes" tours of Los Alamos before the end of WWII. Where do these morons come from? Oh wait that would be the new Democrat party now known as progressives[CPUSA] new name for comrade

by: Greg Richter
A group of Somali Muslims was given a private behind-the-scenes tour of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport after complaining to Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson they felt harassed and profiled, Judicial Watch reports.

At least two tours were given — on December 18, 2014 and February 18, 2015 — after the Department of Homeland Security held roundtable meetings with local Somali leaders to obtain feedback for "modifications to practices that would allow for operations to be more culturally sensitive," according to documents obtained by the conservative watchdog group. 

The tours were conducted by Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and gave participants "an in-depth, on-site tour and discussion of CBP's airport, including both inbound and outbound passenger processing," according to TSA files. The meetings between the agency and community leaders and imams allowed participants to ask about the agency's "specific practices" at the airport, Judicial Watch reports.

No other groups have been given such access, TSA "Somali liaison officer" Andrew Rhoades told Judicial Watch.

 Source: Newsmax

BREAKING: Black Lives Matter Issues Shocking Statement About the Clintons

by: Amber Randall
The leader of the Black Lives Matter movement recently said in an interview that the Clintons use the black community as a way to garner more votes.

Alicia Garza, the founder of Blacks Lives Matter, discussed the Black Lives Matter movement and “systematic racism” in America with Bloomberg Businessweek. In her interview, she claimed that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton does not back up her claims that she cares for the black community.

Garza said that the Clintons routinely use the black community for their own benefit. 

“The Clintons use black people for votes, but then don’t do anything for black communities after they’re elected. They use us for photo ops,” Garza said.

Garza also had words for former President Bill Clinton, who she said angered her over a comment he made to black protesters. During a campaign event for Hillary Clinton, Black Lives Matter protesters interrupted Clinton’s event. Bill Clinton told the protesters that they were “defending the people who kill the lives you say matter.”

 Source: Daily Caller

Muslim Religious Leader Tells British Boys they CAN Take SEX SLAVES

By Onan Coca 
Great Britain is in an uproar this week as news has broken about another “moderate” Muslim mosque preaching some pretty barbaric and horrific things to their young men. An Imam in a popular Welsh mosque was recently recorded telling a group of young men that war with the West was coming and that the Islamic religion allowed them to take women as slaves and rape them.

His name is Ali Hammuda and he teaches and works at Cardiff’s Al-Manar Mosque (where British terrorists have worshipped at before, leaving to join ISIS in Syria). Hammuda was recently recorded by an undercover reporter working with the Daily Mail who explained that while he was at Al-Manar he saw “books preaching brutal violence, sexism, homophobia, aggressive physical jihad, dismemberment and capital punishment implemented by the state.
It reinforces the idea that what these militant groups are doing, what IS is doing, is legitimised by history.”
But it’s what he caught Hammuda saying that should really trouble his fellow Brits and everyone else living in the West, where the Muslim population continues it’s rapid growth.

In the recording Hammuda can be clearly heard telling these young men:
‘One of the interpretations as to what this means is that towards the end of time there will be many wars like what we are seeing today, and because of these wars women will be taken as captives, as slaves, yeah, women will be taken as slaves.
‘And then, er, her master has relations with her because this is permissible in Islam, it’s permissible to have relations with a woman who is your slave or your wife.’
In his rambling address to the boys, Hammuda also stated that another interpretation of the Hadith is that children will come to treat their mothers like slaves. He said: ‘The one I think is strongest is that towards the end of time you will see a lot of Muslims disobeying their mothers and fathers… you see children speaking to their mothers and fathers as if they are your slave.’ 
See Video:

This is so-called “moderate” Western Islam. Now someone explain to me the difference between “moderate” and “extreme” Islam. I just don’t see the difference.


Clint Eastwood Is Tired of Political Correctness, Trump Onto Something

By Eric Mack 

Famed actor Clint Eastwood, 86, returned to the political fray with some pointed comments in an Esquire magazine interview, dishing on political correctness and the need for change from what the Obama Administration has offered the past two presidential terms.
Eastwood's interview excerpts, culled by the Independent Journal Review on Wednesday, were conservative in nature. While he didn't officially endorse Republican nominee Donald Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton, Eastwood is leaning away from the left.

"I'd have to go for Trump … you know, 'cause she's declared that she's gonna follow in Obama's footsteps," Eastwood told the magazine. "There's been just too much funny business on both sides of the aisle. She's made a lot of dough out of being a politician."

Trump has faced a firestorm in recent days with his inability to tone down his antics to remain politically correct, but that's precisely what Eastwood likes about the candidate.

"He's onto something, because secretly everybody's getting tired of political correctness, kissing up," he said. "… Everybody's walking on eggshells.
"All these people that say, 'Oh, you can't do that, and you can't do this, and you can't say that.' I guess it's just the times.

"What Trump is onto is he's just saying what's on his mind. And sometimes it's not so good. And sometimes it's … I mean, I can understand where he's coming from, but I don't always agree with it."

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

The List Of Establishment Republicans That Say They Are Voting For Hillary Clinton Is Staggering 

oped: As I keep saying we are a Republic not a Monarchy...therefore no more Bushes,Clintons nor Obamas...period EOS! Just remember 1776 
Image result for funny pictures the Bush monarchy

by:Michael Snyder

Who would have ever believed that so many big names in the Republican Party would publicly pledge to vote for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election?  All throughout the primaries and the caucuses, the Republican establishment expressed tremendous disdain for Donald Trump, but they were unable to derail his march to the nomination.  Now that we have reached the general election, some of the biggest names in the GOP are actually taking the unprecedented step of crossing over to the other side and are publicly announcing their support for Hillary Clinton.  This shows that many of these individuals were only “Republicans in name only” to begin with, and it also demonstrates the lengths that the elite are willing to go to in order to keep Donald Trump out of the White House.

One of the latest big Republican names to publicly support Hillary Clinton is Sally Bradshaw.  CNN is describing her as “Jeb Bush’s top adviser," and she has gone so far as to completely remove herself from the Republican Party because of Donald Trump…

Jeb Bush’s top adviser, Sally Bradshaw, has left the Republican Party to become an independent, and says if the presidential race in Florida is close, she’ll vote for Hillary Clinton.
Bradshaw, who’s been close to the former Florida governor for decades and was senior adviser to his 2016 campaign, officially switched her registration to unaffiliated. She told CNN’s Jamie Gangel in an email interview that the GOP is “at a crossroads and have nominated a total narcissist — a misogynist — a bigot.”

“This is a time when country has to take priority over political parties. Donald Trump cannot be elected president,” Bradshaw said.

Bradshaw has been working for the Bushes ever since the 1988 presidential campaign, and she never would have made such a bold move without the approval of the Bushes.
Needless to say, the Bushes absolutely hate Trump, and they have a vested interest in seeing him lose the election.  There are some that believe that Jeb Bush is already lining up for another run in 2020, and Donald Trump has to lose in order for that to be possible.
In addition to Sally Bradshaw, another prominent friend of the Bush family has also recently announced that he is going to be voting for Hillary Clinton.  Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson was at the center of the storm during the financial crisis of 2008, and not too long ago he announced his intentions in the Washington Post

When it comes to the presidency, I will not vote for Donald Trump,” Paulson wrote in The Washington Post last week. “I will not cast a write-in vote. I’ll be voting for Hillary Clinton, with the hope that she can bring Americans together to do the things necessary to strengthen our economy, our environment and our place in the world. To my Republican friends: I know I’m not alone.”

Does Henry Paulson actually believe that Hillary Clinton can “bring Americans together to do the things necessary to strengthen our economy, our environment and our place in the world”?
I find that difficult to believe.
But apparently he intends to try to persuade as many of his fellow Republicans as possible to vote for Hillary Clinton, and a whole bunch of other establishment Republicans have already lined up behind her.
These are just some of the big Republican names that the Washington Post says have already committed to voting for Hillary Clinton…  

oped: Drum Roll...remember these names..for they are mentally ill spoiled brats who would rather see the USA go down in flames rather then have someone out of their circle "It takes a village" mentality win!

Richard Armitage, deputy secretary of state and adviser to Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush
Brent Scowcroft, chairman of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board and adviser to three previous GOP presidents
Alan Steinberg, regional EPA administrator
Kori Schake, National Security Council and State Department aide
Doug Elmets, former Reagan spokesman
Jim Cicconi, former Reagan and George H.W. Bush aide
Charles Fried, former U.S. solicitor general under Reagan
Robert Kagan, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, former Reagan State Department aide and adviser to the presidential campaigns of John McCain and Mitt Romney
Max Boot, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and adviser to GOP presidential candidates
Peter Mansoor, retired Army colonel and former aide to David Petraeus
Larry Pressler, former three-term Republican senator from South Dakota
Arne Carlson, a former two-term Republican governor of Minnesota
Robert Smith, former judge on New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals
Mark Salter, former top adviser to John McCain
Mike Treiser, former Mitt Romney aide
Ben Howe, editor at

As I have said all along, the establishment will do whatever it has to do to keep Donald Trump out of the White House.
If that means voting for Hillary Clinton and encouraging others to do the same, that is precisely what they are going to do.
And if more insidious means are necessary, the establishment definitely has plenty of tricks up their sleeves.  Politics in America is a very, very dirty game, and if you have ever been deep inside a national campaign you know exactly what I am talking about.
At this point, even Donald Trump is raising concerns about the integrity of the upcoming election.  On Monday, he told a rally in Ohio that he is “afraid the election is going to be rigged”

Donald Trump said he’s afraid the general election in November will be rigged, but didn’t elaborate on the comment at a rally in Ohio Monday afternoon.
I’m afraid the election is going to be rigged, I have to be honest,” the Republican nominee for president said, in remarks that did not mention the controversy generated by his comments about the parents of a slain U.S. soldier.

In my opinion, Donald Trump has legitimate reasons to be concerned.  We have already seen the elite spend millions upon millions of dollars to try to defeat him, and virtually all of the big money on Wall Street is lining up behind his opponent.  Many patriotic, conservative and faith-oriented Americans are really hoping that Trump can win and move this nation in a positive direction, but the truth is that he is facing overwhelming odds.
Ultimately, it is probably not going to matter too much who wins this election, because America is on the verge of a time of chaos unlike anything we have ever seen before.  No matter who the next president is, we are going to see civil unrest, rising crime, political scandals, governmental shaking, major economic and financial problems, and geopolitical events will continue to spiral out of control.
And the establishment is going to do everything it possibly can to make sure that the next president is not Donald Trump.  If you go to just about any major news website on the Internet these days, there will be a negative story about Donald Trump featured very prominently, and it is usually accompanied by some sort of positive story about Hillary Clinton.

In the end, one of the biggest stories that will come out of the 2016 election will be the fact that the American people got to see how far the elite are willing to go to keep someone that is not “in the club” from becoming president.
The establishment absolutely loathes Trump, and they are willing to move heaven and earth to try to stop him.
Hold on tight, because the next three months are going to be very, very interesting.
Article reposted with permission from End of the American Dream
Take a look at the future of America: The Beginning of the End and then prepare

Meet the bomber the US is sending to crush ISIS

The Aviationist » Broken Arrow incidents: when U.S. B-52 bombers lost ...

by: ,
The B-52 has been a symbol of American power since the 1950s. The youngest one in the Air Force may be a half-century old, but it's still a fierce fighting machine.
The U.S. Air Force recently announced plans to send the legendary -- and intensely powerful -- B-52 Stratofortress bomber into battle yet again, this time against ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria.
The airborne behemoth proves that old doesn't have to mean outdated, even in an era of rapid technological change. Just the opposite: Through good maintenance and occasional updates, vintage tech can hold its own against flashier, more expensive, more finicky next-generation designs.

52 Stratofortress Images  File:Boeing B-52 dropping bombs.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia File:B-52D(061127-F-1234S-017).jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Description B-52 Stratofortress.jpg  Description B-52 and B-2.jpg

Hillary Says, ‘She LOVES The Little Children’ … EXCEPT For This One!

Here’s what Hillary does NOT want you to see — but she can only hide it for so long. Newly discovered audio recordings show that Hillary actually doesn’t care about women. 

Newly discovered audio recordings of Hillary Clinton from the early 1980s include the former first lady’s frank and detailed assessment of the most significant criminal case of her legal career: defending a man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl. 

In 1975, the same year she married Bill, Hillary Clinton agreed to serve as the court-appointed attorney for Thomas Alfred Taylor, a 41-year-old accused of raping the child after luring her into a car.

The recordings, which date from 1983-1987 and have never before been reported, include Clinton’s suggestion that she knew Taylor was guilty at the time. She says she used a legal technicality to plead her client, who faced 30 years to life in prison, down to a lesser charge. The recording and transcript, along with court documents pertaining to the case, are embedded below.
The full story of the Taylor defense calls into question Clinton’s narrative of her early years as a devoted women and children’s advocate in Arkansas—a narrative the 2016 presidential frontrunner continues to promote on her current book tour.

Her comments on the rape trial are part of more than five hours of unpublished interviews conducted by Arkansas reporter Roy Reed with then-Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton and his wife in the mid-1980s.
The interviews, archived at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville, were intended for an Esquire magazine profile that was never published, and offer a rare personal glimpse of the couple during a pivotal moment in their political careers.
But Hillary Clinton’s most revealing comments—and those most likely to inflame critics—concern the decades-old rape case.

Read more: Free Beacon

PATRIOTS: Should Trump HIRE Monica To Sit In The FRONT Row During The Debates? 
What would Hillary do? Would she be able to hold it together?
It would be priceless! Share the hell out of this! 

Share if you think Monica should sit in the front row at the debate

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

#NeverTrump campaign pretends Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are equally bad, ignoring what Hillary will do to the Supreme Court.

Hillary Burqa

oped: The sane in the GOP need to put a leash on Speaker Ryan et al the sore losers who will destroy the USA over their narcissistic personality disorders...they need to get over it already...the electorate made their choice...get on board or at least lose the false pride and is what it it or not...keeping the party divided only guarantees a el Diablo Hillary win! 

" Trump stated he would clean house. Completely and under Justice.
Those who betrayed the Constitution would be tried.
He said he'd appoint Supreme court Justices who would completely uphold the entirety of the Letter of the Supreme Law of the Land. That's huge. Look at all the court cases he is referring to. Mountainous.
Any laws that do not meet the standards of the Constitution are to be considered, 'null and void'. All law mandated and usurped by that magic pen, are nisi prisi, and null and void as well. Supreme decisions through interpretation, null and void.
Why are the courts of such great importance? That's where you clean house. By legal jurisdiction, through the letter of our Law, The Constitution.
All a Trump administration needs to do is one indictment and the domino affect begins, with no stopping it.

And many within our government know very well how many are becoming educated in their fraud. Because it is all based on a lie. The lie of complicity. Even if a duly elected is not well versed in the Constitution, they know it holds answers to their deceit and fraud, and all it will take is one indictment, validated and on the books to start the process rolling.
If Trump makes good on his promises to clean house, he must do it in the courts. And the answer lies in our courts and in the Supreme Law; the Constitution."

by:Joe Scudder

This interview on Fox News spells out what the #NeverTrump campaign tries to hide: that the Supreme Court hangs in the balance in this election. 

With the death of Justice Scalia, the Supreme Court is at a pivotal moment. If Hillary gets elected, her promised liberal Supreme Court appointments could practically annul the Constitution. Donald Trump, on the other hand, promises to appoint conservative judges. Mike Pence, his running mate, has assured us Trump will make good on his promise.
How can the #NeverTrump campaign claim that Donald Trump is just as bad as Hillary Clinton?
We know that Trump needs the Evangelical voting bloc. We also have good reason to believe he does not want to be a one-term loser. Appointing a replacement for Scalia will have to be one of the first things Trump does as President.

Is it likely that Trump will break his promises? No!
Nevertheless, the #NeverTrump campaign pretends that there is no good reason to vote for Donald Trump.

As I wrote a few weeks ago,
It almost seems that some Christians believe, because they are sure that Trump has not lived up to their moral standards, it is ethical to exaggerate his negatives. It’s as if Jesus doesn’t mind us gossiping about pagans.
Trump has made promises about judicial appointments, abolishing Obamacare, and many other things that are conservative and the very opposite of what Hillary promises. Speculation that he will break some of those promises does not outweigh the promises we know Hillary will keep. One of the two candidates is going to determine the ideological bent of the Supreme Court. You have two possibilities. Which do you want to become a reality?
The #NeverTrump campaign is selling a dangerous fantasy.

Obama Admin ALREADY Discriminates Against Syrians -- if They're Christians

oped: Hillary Clinton and Barry Barack Obama claim to be Christian...really now,then please explain why you support Muslims over your Christian brothers and sisters...ya know the ones being slaughtered !

By Patrick Poole
Hundreds of Assyrian families, some of them recently arrived from Islamic State controlled areas of Syria, attend Easter Sunday service at St. Georges Assyrian Church of The East in Sed El Baouchrieh, a working class suburb of Beirut.
Non-Muslim Syrian refugees have been virtually locked out by the Obama administration, according to current data from the State Department.
According to the Refugee Processing Center, of the 6,877 Syrian refugees that have arrived in 2016 through July 31st, 6,834 of those are identified as Sunni, Shia, or generic Muslim. Only 43 (0.7 percent of total) refugees admitted have been non-Muslim. 

That 0.7 percent of refugees arriving this year represents a statistically insignificant fraction of the more than 2.6 million Catholic, Syriac, Assyrian, and Greek Orthodox Christians, as well as Yazidis, other religions, and atheists living in Syria.
Yet all of these groups are being targeted by Islamic extremists -- indeed, Secretary of State John Kerry himself has claimed these groups are facing a genocide.
Just yesterday, House Speaker Paul Ryan announced that he is opposed to any religious test for entering the United States:
A religious test for entering our country is not reflective of America's fundamental values. I reject it.
— Paul Ryan (@SpeakerRyan) July 31, 2016
Despite Ryan's rejection, the State Department's own numbers reveal active discrimination targeting non-Muslim Syrian refugees.
According to The Gulf/2000 Project at Columbia University, the religious breakdown of the Syrian population 2008-2009 shows that 15.98 million are Sunnis (73 percent of the population) while 3.29 million are Shiites (14.7 percent of the population). Christians account for 2.04 million people, or 9.3 percent of the population, while other religions account for 590,000 people, or 2.7 percent of the population.

This past March, Secretary of State John Kerry acknowledged at a State Department press conference that minority religious communities in Syria were being targeted for genocide:
My purpose here today is to assert in my judgment, (ISIS) is responsible for genocide against groups in areas under its control including Yazidis, Christians, and Shiite Muslims.
So why haven't we heard Speaker Ryan's outrage over active religious discrimination against non-Muslim minority Syrian refugees?
And why is Kerry overseeing the systematic religious discrimination of Syrian refugees in his own State Department?

I've witnessed this discrimination by the State Department against Mideast Christians first-hand. Two years ago, I was introduced to an Egyptian Coptic Christian man who had fled Egypt and made it to the U.S. after he was threatened by the Muslim Brotherhood following the July 2013 ouster of Mohamed Morsi. The introduction was made by my friend, Father Anthony Hanna of the St. Mary and St. Mina Coptic Church in Concord, California. In August 2013, he escorted me into Upper Egypt to survey the destruction of Egypt's churches and monasteries carried out by the Muslim Brotherhood.
This man's wife and children had been attacked in their village near Minya, where attacks against Christians continue to this day. They were in hiding with family members elsewhere in Egypt, and had hoped to visit their husband and father in the United States.
With the assistance of several members of Congress who had given the family members letters of support, the family applied to visas with the U.S. Embassy in Cairo.
And yet, the State Department denied their visa requests.  

I commonly hear of U.S. State Department denials of visa requests from Christians in Egypt. I commonly hear of these denials from Coptic Church authorities as well.
So when Democrats and Republicans alike virtue-signal that they would NEVER countenance religious discrimination for refugees, constituents and the media should remind them that this administration is ALREADY doing it.
The State Department is systematically discriminating against Christians and other religious minorities among the Syrian refugees looking to come to the United States. And despite the virtue-signaling from Ryan and others, they do nothing about it.

Disgusting! College goons banning conservative speakers

By Kevin Hart, Publisher
If there’s anyone in the DePaul University administration with half a brain (and that’s become highly debatable), they’ll have the school’s library on 24-hour watch.
Because if campus liberals have their way, they’ll burn half the books in there.
A group of leftist crybaby students recently continued their campaign to suppress free speech and open dialogue on college campuses. They effectively stopped conservative commentator Ben Shapiro (a former editor at Breitbart and current editor at The Daily Wire) from giving a speech at DePaul.
Last week, DePaul’s Young Americans for Freedom chapter received a letter from a university administrator saying Shapiro wouldn’t be allowed to give his planned address. The letter cited “security concerns” and the “experiences” at previous campuses where Shapiro had spoken (more on that in a minute). 

You read that right. A school that bills itself as the “nation’s largest Catholic University” — that is, in fact, run by a Catholic priest — has actually banned a conservative speaker from appearing.
If that isn’t political correctness run amok… if that isn’t enough to have the Vincentian monks and priests who founded DePaul spinning in their graves… I don’t know what is.
And, unfortunately, this isn’t the first time that DePaul has given in to mob rule. Just a couple months ago, Breitbart journalist Milo Yiannapoulos’ speech at DePaul had to be cut short after a troop of Black Lives Matter protesters stormed the stage and threatened him.
Make no mistake about it. This is the liberal vision of America — a place where dissenting opinions are harshly silenced by gangs of closed-minded buffoons. And, too often, especially where college campuses are concerned, they’re getting away with it.
It doesn’t matter if you agree with Ben Shapiro’s politics. He’s smart enough to understand that many people don’t. 

But the fact is, he’s an American success story with knowledge that would greatly benefit college-aged students — if they’d only stop to listen.
At only 32 years old, Shapiro has graduated from Harvard Law School, written six books, and reached tens of millions of people worldwide through his websites and media appearances.
He’s in a unique position to deliver a young person’s perspective on politics, the law, entrepreneurship, and, at a college like DePaul (where only about half of students graduate after four years), academic success.
And the problems that have occurred at previous Shapiro appearances at college campuses were certainly not his doing. He’s had protesters block doors and even trigger fire alarms (you can see the video below) to make sure he couldn’t be heard.  

Now, of course, these same protesters will crow loudly about their freedoms to express themselves and assemble. But what they fail to understand is that conservatives like Shapiro (and the students who support him) have First Amendment rights, too — and, in fact, the First Amendment exists to encourage the dissemination of dissenting opinions.
That exchange of ideas isn’t just a fundamental American principle — it should also be the essence of a good college education.
Now some would argue that DePaul, as a private university, is free to accept or reject speakers as it wishes. But that’s utter nonsense.
As long as DePaul continues to rake in tens of millions of dollars in federally subsidized student loans — underwritten by the American taxpayer — there’s nothing truly private about it.
This isn’t a problem without solutions. In fact, the answers are remarkably simple 

In a perfect world, students would be mature enough to listen to opinions that they may not agree with. Barring that, if you don’t want to be exposed to conservative ideology, maybe you shouldn’t enroll in a Catholic or other Christian university.
Believe me, there are plenty of other schools willing to take $50,000 a year off your hands for a 50-50 chance you’ll graduate after four years.
In addition, universities that are regularly interfering with the practice of free speech should have their access to federal funds reviewed. It shouldn’t be the role of the federal government to underwrite specific, preferred political ideologies.
And, finally, universities should have codes of conduct that discipline students who interfere with their classmates’ rights to engage in free speech. We know that institutions of higher learning have great latitude in drafting these codes, and many already have language preventing other types of discrimination. This would be a natural extension.
Today’s college students need to learn that plugging your ears and shouting down your opponents doesn’t make you right — or your opponents wrong. But that lesson will only be learned if adults have the backbones to stand up to these student mobs.
And, unfortunately, at many colleges like DePaul, that leadership is badly lacking.

Mike Pence STUNS angry crowd with this perfect response

via:The Horn News

Critics of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump aren’t going to like this.
During a campaign stop in Nevada, Trump running mate Mike Pence defended a military mom’s right to criticize comments made about the Muslim parents of a slain U.S. Army veteran. And by quietly standing up for free speech — and correcting misinformation — Pence threw cold water on the growing controversy that liberals are trying to create.
Pence quieted a crowd that was booing a woman who asked Pence at a town hall meeting in Carson City Monday how he could tolerate Trump’s “disrespect” for American servicemen.
“That’s what freedom looks like,” Pence said, in reference to the woman’s right to free speech — even in the face of a hostile crowd. Pence thanked the woman for her son’s service, and the crowd cheered his simple response to her criticism. Pence stated that Captain Humayun Khan was an American hero but his family (which has been critical of Trump) is simply mistaken, because Trump is more devoted to our armed forces than anyone else he’d ever met — and that veterans are responding to that message.

You can see video of the exchange here:

In Reno a few hours later, Pence repeated that both he and Trump have stated that “Capt. Humayun Khan is an American hero.”
Pence said he understands and appreciates the attention given to Khan’s family. But he doesn’t understand “why the media maligned and continues to ignore the moving mother of fallen Air Force veteran and diplomat Sean Smith.”
Pence said much of the same media criticizing Trump earlier condemned Patricia Smith’s speech at the GOP convention about the U.S. information officer killed in the 2012 attack in Benghazi.
“Let’s demand the media listen to and honor all of the families of the fallen in this country,” he said.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.

Monday, August 1, 2016

What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States

khizr copy


By Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat (SHOEBAT EXCLUSIVE)
The Muslim who attacked Donald Trump, Khizr Muazzam Khan, is a Muslim Brotherhood agent, working to bring Muslims into the United States. After reading what we discovered so far, it becomes obvious that Khan wanted to ‘trump’ Trump’s Muslim immigration policy of limiting Muslim immigration into the U.S.
But not so fast. Trump we have your back. 

Khizr Muazzam Khan graduated in Punjab University Law College, as the New York Times confirms. He specialized in International Trade Law in Saudi Arabia. An interest lawyer for Islamic oil companies Khan wrote a paper, called In Defense of OPEC to defend the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries.
But more than this, Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law in the U.S. He was a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia).  Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah [the works of Muhammad] — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).”  A snapshot of his essay can be seen here:

But Khan’s fascination with Islam isn’t the only issue lest they say he was a “moderate Muslim”. What is more worrisome is that at the bottom of the intro, Khan shows his appreciation and the source of his work and gives credit to an icon of the Muslim Brotherhood:
“The contribution to this article of S. Ramadan’s writing is gratefully acknowledged.”
khan 1 copy
This alone speaks volumes. Khan used the works of S. Ramadan to lay his foundation for his inspiration regarding the promotion of Sharia. S. Ramadan is Said Ramadan, head of the Islamic Center in Geneva and a major icon of the Muslim Brotherhood, the grandson of Hassan Al-Banna the founder and hero of the Muslim Brotherhood which spread terrorism throughout the world
UPDATE: We read through Khan’s work and will continue to post excerpts. It is obvious that Khan instructs Muslims to submit to Sharia:

khan file copy It is also crucial to mention more on Khan’s icon and who Said Ramadan was.

Said Ramadan, Muslim Brotherhood agent
[ Said Ramadan, Muslim Brotherhood agent]

Ramadan was a writer who wrote material for the Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, an organization that has been promoting Islamic revivalism and indoctrination to recruit young people in Malaysia to jihadism. It is actually a Malaysian branch of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Khan’s fascination for Muslim Brotherhood icon and Islamic Sharia stems from Ramadan’s book Islamic Law: Its Scope and Equity, which Khan gleaned from to do his work giving credit to Ramadan. A version of it was published for the Malaysian Muslim Youth Movement (a branch of WAMY):

kahn 4 copy

WAMY is the World Association of Muslim Youth which was created through the collaboration of the Wahhabist and Muslim Brotherhood led by Said Ramadan who was, again, the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood including Ahmad Bahefzallah, the boss of Huma Abedin (Hillary Clinton’s aid) and her parents Sayed Z. Abedin (father) and Saleha Mahmoud Abedin (mother). It was also financed by the wealthy Abdullah Omar Naseef, another boss of the Abedin family who was an Al-Qaeda financier.
Again, Khan wrote his Sharia Law supporting work in the eighties while he was in Saudi Arabia, the motherland of Wahhabism. This would never be possible unless Khan clearly had the support of the Saudi Wahhabist religious institution. We took a snapshot of the text:

khan copy
While there is so much to glean from his work, time is of the essence, but Khan’s travel according to a recent report, he moved from Pakistan to the United Arab Emirates, a hotbed for the Muslim Brotherhood. Currently he runs a law firm in New York City called KM Khan Law Office. According to the website, the the law firm specializes in “immigration services” to bring Muslims into the U.S., which presents a clash with Trump’s suggested policy to limit Muslim immigration into the U.S.

To understand the inception of Muslim immigration one must study the Muslim Minority Affairs, a paradigm and an Islamic jurisprudence created by Saudi Arabia which sparked during the times Khan lived in Saudi Arabia while collaborating with the Saudi kingdom.
Khan needs further study and analysis to see how his connect with Hillary Clinton’s campaign since he serves the interest of Muslim oil companies as well as Muslim immigration into the U.S. Intelius reveals Khizr M. Khan used to work for Hogan & Hartson and Lovells, which has ties to the Clinton Foundation:

Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign”
Many lawyers at Hogan Lovells remember the week in 2004 when U.S. Army Capt. Humayun Khan lost his life to a suicide bomber. Then-Hogan & Hartson attorneys mourned the death because the soldier’s father, Khizr Khan, a Muslim American immigrant, was among their beloved colleagues”

Saudi interests with using Khan to advance Muslim immigration and advance Muslim Sharia is a lengthy subject which has ties to Hillary Clinton’s aid Huma Abedin as well. It will take hours of reading just to cover this topic on how it was The House of Saud’s “Muslim Minority Affairs” and the Abedins (Huma Abedin and family) that played a central role in using Muslim immigration to infiltrate the west with Wahhbi agenda. The House of Saud had used Huma’s father Sayed Zaynul Abedin’s work regarding the Muslim Minority Affairs in the West, published in 1998 as part of 29 works to construct a plan to conquer the U.S. with Islam. It is obvious that Khan is upset, that a Trump victory will eliminate and destroy decades of hard work to bring in Islamic immigration into the United States which was spearheaded by agents in Saudi Arabia like Khan and Huma Abedin and family (Sayed Z. Abedin) which we translated excerpts from his work.

sm copy
sm2 copy
sm2 copy
You can study this here which includes links, evidences, photocopies, history … everything
In regards to his son and his sacrifice, on the other side of the coin, many were the ‘Muslim martyrs’ who joined the US military. Ali Abdul Saoud Mohamed, for example, enlisted in the Special Forces of the US Army; he was a double agent for Al-Qaeda. How about Hasan K. Akbar, a Muslim American soldier who murdered and injured fifteen soldiers. There was Bowe Bergdahl, an American Muslim soldier who deserted his men to join the Taliban, a desertion which led to six American being ambushed and killed while they were on the search looking for him. And of course the example of Nidal Malik Hassan, who murdered fourteen Americans in cold blood in Fort Hood. What about infiltration into the U.S. military like Taha Jaber Al-Alwani, a major Muslim thinker for the Muslim Minority Affairs, an icon of the Abedin family (Hillary’s aid Huma) who, while he served in U.S. military, called on arming Muslims to fight the U.S? Al-Alwani is an IMMA (Institute of Muslims Minority Affairs) favorite, Taha Jaber al-Alwani, whom Hillary’s aid Huma Abedin credit Al-Alwani as the source for their doctrine (it can’t get any better than this) also see Abedins-Mein-Kampf. Al-Alwani is an ardent anti-Semite who by the way, runs the United States Department of Defense program (out of all places) for training Muslim military chaplains in the U.S. military.

Alwani runs GSISS (Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences) GSISS is a United States Department of Defense program for training Muslim military chaplains. It was the GSISS that produced the United States Marine Corps’ first Muslim chaplain. Alawani even writes Nazi-style, anti-Semitic studies depicting Jews as the “Golden Calf” while condemning the United States: “…the Zionist leaders made this calf a model for today’s world so they can be able to control it. Today’s world with its secularism and its phony democracy and alongside its free and controlled trade and national legitimacy and all these other subjects that bellows…”

We translated some of his quotes on the issue of The Muslim Minority Affairs:
“… it [MMA, Muslim Minority Affairs] is a Jurisprudence for a group confned to its special circumstances which is allowed what others are not. Its exercise needs an understanding of social sciences, especially sociology, economics, political science and international relations… for the fundamentals of success for the Muslim Minority Jurisprudence it must adhere to the collective earth concept.” [link from Arabic here]
The movement is an “international relations” issue which means linking to politicians in the U.S. Alwani, a double agent, is a man commissioned by our government, even calls for a soon-to-be military conquest (literal Jihad) on U.S. soil and provides an offcial fatwa in preparation for the use of force against the U.S.:

“Commitment to the Quranic concept of Geography: The land belongs to Allah, his religion is Islam, and every country is already in the House of Islam—now in the present time—since they will be in the House of Islam by force in the near future. The whole of humanity is a Muslim Nation: it is either ‘the religion of the nation’ which has embraced this religion [Islam], or a ‘proselyte nation’ we are obliged to conquer.” (Alwani, The Jurisprudence of Muslim Minority Affairs. No. 7, translated from Arabic by
What part of “they will be in the House of Islam by force in the near future” don’t these democrats understand? Do the democrats want more dead Americans?

Even the Abedins’ Journal for Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA ) confrms that their program stems from these same extremist sources including the notorious Taha Jaber Al-Alwani as well as the spiritual head of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sheikh Yousuf Al-Qaradawi. Huma Abedin, Hillary’s aid wrote:
“The theory of the Jurisprudence of Muslim Minorities is most easily clarified by shedding light on its founders” which the notes state are none other than Muslim Brotherhood “Yusuf al-Qaradawi” and “Taha Jabir al-Alwani”.
In a nutshell, The Muslim Minority Affairs program is part of a grand plan to destroy America from within, exactly as what the Muslim Brotherhood planned, which was exposed in the HLF (Holy Land Foundation) trial.

I can go on and on. Muslims in general wanted a war in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan where Islamists clearly participated in such wars with U.S. aid since the time of Ronald Reagan. If Khan wanted his son’s life preserved he would avoid such wars and will stand with Trump, pure and simple, unless of course, the U.S. was clearing the runway for a greater cause, a cause we have seen brewing for decades which needs no evidence here on how Islamists do not mind collaborating with the U.S. To each his agenda. 
These Muslim soldiers were “heroes” of course, until the snow melted later on. Is it likely that Khan’s son was killed before the snow melted? Only another type of investigation will determine that.  Does Hillary’s man ever mention how many soldiers have died because of Muslim traitors? Do they ever bring up how many Christians in the US military were killed? Yet the modernists and homosexuals continue to attack Christians.
But soon everything we need to know will be uncovered as a Middle Eastern proverb says: the snow always melts and the sh*t under it will soon be revealed.