Saturday, February 7, 2015

‘FEEL GOOD’ VS. SPEAKING TRUTH: Showmen Preachers, Progressives and Conservatives

by Chuck Gruenwald
If the self-destruction of several televangelists in the late 1980s was a lesson in hypocrisy, then the message that is pushed in today’s megachurches of “God loves you, regardless of your irresponsible and/or selfish behavior”, or “You’re saved no matter what”, is a lesson in shamelessly resorting to the breakdown of self-discipline in order to boost attendance in those message-neutral amphitheaters.
Despite growing up about fifteen miles from one of the most famous examples, I never paid attention to the megachurch movement until the televangelist meltdown of the late 1980s, when high-profile televangelists were caught engaging in behavior that they warned would lead their viewers and fans into eternal damnation.
Perhaps as a result, the megachurch showmen adopted a message that eliminated references to Hell, and replaced it with a new message that is more like an insurance policy; a benign, generic, feel-good message that helps fill lots of seats in a megachurch amphitheater, while giving those showmen an exit if they ever chose to put themselves in such compromising situations as their televangelist counterparts. This also gives megachurch leaders a feeling of accomplishment when they are either failing or refusing to assist followers who seek help for destructive behavior.

Shortly after Bill Clinton’s impeachment proceedings, the Daily Herald printed an article about one of his “spiritual advisers”, Willow Creek Community Church founder Bill Hybels. That column was accompanied by a photograph of Mr. Clinton and Mr. Hybels sitting outdoors and holding hands, while both men bowed their heads as a Secret Service agent looked away. It was the type of staged pseudo-humility that is usually seen on a megachurch Jumbotron, when an attendee is shown with closed eyes, quivering lips, and perhaps a tear; the type of facial expressions that are found on a person who is either pretending to appear devout, or is wishing he knew where the closest restroom is.
Christianity is very complex. Everyone within the hierarchy of Christianity holds their position for a reason. Unfortunately, the megachurch mentality that is embraced by the likes of Mr. Hybels avoids the clutter of history in favor of a message that is “modern, not outdated”, and “breaks with tradition.”

Those who choose to forget history however, will ultimately be forgotten by history.
Mr. Hybels is not the only person whom Mr. Clinton supposedly confided in during his impeachment era. While Jessie Jackson was allegedly counseling Bill as a result of his then recently-disclosed acts of debauchery, Mr. Jackson was quietly dealing with his own marital indiscretions, indiscretions that ultimately resulted in Mr. Jackson’s child with a mistress.
At one of his first appearances after the news of this relationship had broken, Jessie Jackson was greeted with applause in a Los Angeles church. This was not exactly the type of response that a self-appointed moral leader who failed his followers and family deserved. However, by steering clear of a message about self-discipline, Mr. Jackson helped the members of that crowd vindicate themselves for their own immoral behavior. In other words, if the “leader” not only doesn’t judge anyone, but also engages in similar behavior, then that person becomes a more attractive leader, since he or she is “one of us”.

While acting as counselors for Bill Clinton, both Jessie Jackson and Bill Hybels failed him. The need for publicity and a fear of alienating a high-profile source of publicity overrode the need to tell Mr. Clinton what he needed to hear. Instead, he was fed a message that would help him feel good about himself.
The contradictory messages between megachurches and Christianity regarding feeling good and being loved is similar to a big difference between how progressives and conservatives interact with others: progressives want to feel good about themselves and they need reinforcement from others in order to do so. They also take it upon themselves to make other people, such as minorities, feel good about themselves, whether the receiving party wants help from those progressives regarding their self-esteem or not. Conservatives, however do not need to “feel good” about themselves. Instead, they want to love others.
The conservative definition of love is not the same as the megachurch definition. While conservatives view love as something that requires discipline and self-sacrifice, megachurch showmen perceive love as the act of making others feel good about themselves, which is really the progressive method of building self-esteem.

Belonging to a religion requires some level of sacrifice. Believing that it is possible to belong to a specific religion without committing to the required sacrifices is similar to buying a uniform from a surplus store and then wearing it in public, or driving around in a Ford Crown Victoria in an attempt to appear as a police officer. These acts are intended to imitate people who have made commitments and sacrifices, and who have therefore earned a level of respect in the process.
Megachurches act as the proverbial used uniform or Crown Victoria, a place for showmen who want the credibility of a rabbi, priest, or pastor, without expecting commitment from their followers.
Unlike the aftermath of the televangelist scandals, where the televangelists paid the price for their hypocrisy, the victims in the collapse of the megachurch industry will be the followers of leaders who had no message.

SCHOOLING OBAMA: Jihad vs Crusades…Facts Are A BITCH

Here’s reality, BHO. Bill Warner, PhD explains the real difference between Jihadists and the Crusades.

Harry Reid’s Brother Arrested in Nevada; Here’s Why…

Harry and Larry Reid 
[Harry and Larry Reid...Two peas in a pod...the Boxer rebellion..ha] 
Seems DUI's and battery on police officers runs in the family!


“Moderate” Muslim Leader says all Muslims are “Radical” and “Extremists”

The Clash Of Civilizations: Awaiting The Coming Crusade

Of course. This is what we’ve been saying for quite some time and what our leaders in Washington seem so reticent to understand. There really is no such thing as a “moderate” Muslim. I’m not saying this to denigrate nice, law-abiding American Muslims… I’m saying this because of the overwhelming amount of evidence that orthodox Islamic teachings are in line with what we call “radical Islam.”
Sean Hannity has made a normal thing of inviting British Muslim leader Anjem Choudary on his show for this precise reason. Choudary argues that the Koran and Sharia Law both teach that beliefs that ISIS, al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram and others are espousing are normal everyday Muslim values. (Specifically Choudary is defending ISIS and al Qaeda.)

So, what I mean to say is this -- while Millions of Muslims may not be killing their non-Muslim neighbors, or their gay neighbors, or their neighbors who’ve converted away from Islam, these same people believe that if these neighbors were executed, that wouldn’t be a big deal.
Why? Because the Koran and Sharia Law explicitly call for these punishments! Gay people are supposed to be executed. Adulterers are supposed to be stoned. Converts away from Islam are supposed to be killed. Anyone saying anything negative about Islam, Allah, or Mohammed is supposed to put to death!
Don’t believe me? Well, how about if the leader of “moderate Muslims” in Europe told you? Here’s a video of Fahad Qureshi, the founder of Islam Net, and a leader in Norway’s Muslim community basically repeating what I just said. He was speaking to a group of Sunni Muslims at a conference in November of 2013.

"Every now and then, every time we have a conference, every time we invite a speaker, they [the media] always come with the same accusations: This speaker supports the death penalty for homosexuals, this speaker supports the death penalty for this crime or this crime or that he is homophobic, that he subjugates women, etcetera. I always try to tell them that it is not that speaker that we are inviting who has these 'extreme radical views,' as you say. These are general views that every Muslim actually has.
no moderate islamEvery Muslim believes in these things. Just because they are not telling you about it, or just because they are not out there in the media, doesn't mean that they don't believe in them.”
Qureshi then asks the people sitting in attendance to raise their hands if they agree about certain points of Islam, the Koran and Sharia Law.
“I will ask you, everyone in the room: How many of you are normal Muslims – you’re not extremists, you’re not radical – just normal Sunni Muslims Please, raise your hands. Everybody [raised their hands], with the grace of God. Okay, take down your hands. How many of you agree that men and women should sit separate? Please raise your hands. Everyone agrees, everyone agrees, brothers as well as sisters. So it's not just these 'radical' sheiks, then?
How many of you agree that the punishments described in the Koran and the Sunna – whether it is death, whether it is stoning for adultery, whatever it is --  if it is from Allah and His Messenger, that is the best punishment ever possible for humankind, and that is what we should apply in the world. Who
agrees with that? 

Allahu Akbar. Are you all radical extremists? So all of you are saying that you are common Muslims, you all go to different mosques in Norway. Or are you a specific sect, like the Islam Net sect, or anything like that? Are you like that? No. Are you like that? Please raise your hand if you are like that extreme Islam, that sect, or anything like that? No one, Allah Akbar.” 

The “radical” beliefs of the monsters in ISIS or al Qaeda aren’t really all that radical. They are the mainstream beliefs of most of the world’s Muslim communities – whether in Syria or Norway or even the good ol’ US of A.

Obama's Love of Islam is Costing us a War

Having turned the corner on the last half of his final presidential term, and having embarrassingly lost control of the Senate and the House, President Obama is now a man on a mission. He has lost all sense of pretense regarding his affection, if you will, for Islam, he is showing his true colors regarding his innate dislike and affiliation with Israel, and he is, by and large, declaring war on conservatives everywhere. He has separated himself from orthodox government and the Christian religion, and is virtually proclaiming his way, in nearly everything, is the only way. And as he grows stronger, his alliance with Islam grows more powerful every day. He won’t even meet with the leader of Israel, but he lunches with Al Sharpton and Black Muslim leaders. I’m reminded of a quote by Obama while addressing the United Nations: “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.” 

Most significantly, as if representative of this “new man,” Obama is in a constant, frantic race to release the remaining detainees of Gitmo. Hidden behind some sort of political and personal righteousness he is shuffling murderers and bombers out of the doors as fast as he can. But none of this self-righteousness can deny the fact that, of the 88 Guantanamo detainees he has recently released, U.S. intelligence authorities report that at least a third have returned to terrorism (and that is low-balling it). Simply put, the people we had incarcerated, bad people, that we had in custody, have once again become viable enemies -- leaders of al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Reminds me of another quote by our nation’s leader: The sweetest sound I know is the Muslim call to prayer.”

Speaking of quotes, I’m particularly fond of his latest – that “ISIS is not an Islamic group.” In a recent speech, Obama said flatly that ISIS, which is trying to install a caliphate in the Middle East, "is not Islamic." He didn't say they are perverting their religion; he said they're not even part of that religion. Suggesting that ISIS’ violence and its aim to install a caliphate have absolutely nothing to do with the Islamic faith, is nothing short of bald-faced propaganda.
obama muslim 4

There are only two scenarios here: our president is either wall-eyed, blindly stupid, or he is falsifying obvious information in the process of protecting Islamic extremism. I’ll let you be the judge.

There are only two scenarios here: our president is either wall-eyed, blindly stupid, or he is falsifying obvious information in the process of protecting Islamic extremism. I’ll let you be the judge.
Here is a man who found nothing wrong with a mosque being built at Ground Zero. He calls the Fort Hood shootings “workplace violence” instead of Islamic terrorism, and here is a man who, in his own musings, said, “I will stand with the Muslims if the political winds shift in an ugly direction,” Throughout his life his mentors have been communists or Muslims, leaving him sorely deficient in an appreciation for this nation and in somewhat of disdain for the Christian doctrine. Here is a man who recently said in a speech: “Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation.” 

Even more frightening is how effective this subtle takeover of America, (engineered by a handful of ardent and bitter leftists and ignored by our president) is progressing. Using the techniques of Lenin, Mao, and Castro they have learned that when you control the information and the media, you control the nation, and Mr. Obama is very nearly there. With the exception of the Fox News organization, this administration owns the tongues of all the major television networks and the majority of the larger newspapers in the U.S.
In addition, while the Web and its most powerful mediums such as Google began as nothing less than remarkable platforms for communication and the dissemination of knowledge, most of these platforms are deteriorating into devices for liberal propaganda. Worse yet, the truth-determining web organizations who claim to be “non-biased” --,, and, are all liberal-owned and controlled. (Like sending wolves to guard the henhouse).

All of this is shades of 1940s Germany – or Cuba after “the revolution,” but when you add the fervent and rapid expansionism of Radical Islam (a term our president refuses to even use…) you find this nation facing a challenge that may well represent the demise of the American way.
I’ll leave you with a couple of quotes by our president – food for thought: “Throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality. So let there be no doubt:  Islam is a part of America and America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam.”
Pretty scary, huh?


Obama, A Dull Blade

Funny image of barack obama . funny barack obama picture . funny obama ... 
[In his dreams] 
go invade the world obama
[In reality : 'I'll see your Crusade and raise you one Jihad' ]

I don’t know about you but I am sick of Obama’s boasts about going after Isis.  He taunts and dares and does nothing.  He is an empty revolver, a dull blade.
There exists a video of Isis containing the Jordanian pilot, Maaz al-Kassasbeh, in an orange jump suit in a cage surrounded by Isis soldiers.  Then he is doused with petrol and burned alive.
This is as shocking as the decapitations.  And Isis has the nerve to display these executions as if they are making fun of our inability to do anything to protect ourselves.
This is personal.  Pearl Harbor and Ground Zero were generic.  This is individual.  This is privately horrific.

Don’t we have a responsibility to go after these thugs?  Enflamed individuals are collateral damage so the whole world should regard itself as threatened by these murderers.
We should not target our particular enemies.  We should kill all, whether collateral or not. Kindness to our enemies is cruelty to ourselves.  Homicide of our enemies is better than suicide of ourselves.
Obama, the vacant vociferous mouth, says that the video shows "viciousness and barbarity." No kidding.  So does Obama’s reluctance to defend innocent people. He is passive aggressive.  His reluctance is enthusiasm for our enemies.

And once again he pretends that the video will "redouble the vigilance and determination on the part of our global coalition to make sure they are degraded and ultimately defeated."
Fat chance of that.
Then nah, nah, nah,nah,nah, he says that Isis’s ideology is bankrupt.  Wow, some insult.  A man is burning in the memory of the sky and he talks about bankrupt.  Maybe he means our economy is bankrupt under his failed leadership.

Friday, February 6, 2015

In unison, Muslim clerics lash out against Islamic State

oped: A day late and a dollar short...y'all really need to educate yourselves on the Myth of Islam...a 7th Century Theocracy...Christianity and Judaism (as well as all other centuries old religions) went through the same process a  thousand or more years ago..and have been  living in the 21st Century since ...whereas Islam is still stuck in the 7th Century Qur'an...[Needs a Rewrite]
Please educate yourselves... start here and bring yourselves into the 21st Century before y'all are exterminated through attrition of Centuries old stupidity!   


The Muslim Brotherhood, alQaeda ISIL/ ISIS et al are nothing more than common thieves,barbarians,thugs, rapist and the scum of the Earth..#EOS #Period who seem to pervert the image of Hollywood movies which are fantasy to say the least Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves - Le Blu-ray

Que the movie "The Mummy"...whom the Muslim Brotherhood has perverted a entertaining movie to justify their claim to fame...sorry this was just a fantasy movie... nothing more nothing less... not real!>   

BAGHDAD (AP) — The immolation of a Jordanian pilot by the Islamic State group has brought a unified outcry Friday from top religious clerics across the Muslim world — including a prominent jihadi preacher — who insisted the militants have gone too far.

Abu Mohammed al-Maqdesi, considered a spiritual mentor for many al-Qaida militants, said the killing of Lt. Muath al-Kaseasbeh is "not acceptable in any religion." He spoke in an interview with Jordan's Roya TV a day after being released from more than three months in detention.

At Friday prayers in neighboring Iraq, where the militant group has seized territory in a third of the country, top Shiite cleric Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani declared in a sermon that the "savage" act demonstrates the extremists know no boundaries and violate "Islamic values and humanity."
Religious groups, often at odds with one another over ideologies or politics, are increasingly speaking out in unison against the militants, who continue to enforce their rule in Iraq and Syria through massacres, kidnapping, forced marriages, stonings and other acts of brutality.
Iranian Shiite cleric Ayatollah Mohammad Emami Kashani claimed in his sermon that militant groups like the Islamic State are created by Western nations as a means for promoting "an ugly picture of Islam." 

Earlier this week, Islamic State militants released a video of al-Kaseasbeh, a Muslim, being burned to death in a cage. While the beheading of hostages from the U.S., Britain and Japan brought condemnation from most religious sects within Islam, the gruesome images of the airman's slaying served as a unifying battle-cry for Muslims across the world.
Jordan joined a U.S.-led military coalition against the militants in September, but said it would intensify its airstrikes in response to the killing of its air force pilot. On Thursday, dozens of fighter jets struck Islamic State weapons depots and training sites, Jordan's military said.
Outrage escalated in the capital of Amman following Friday prayers, with demonstrators unfurling a large Jordanian flag and holding up banners supporting King Abdullah II's pledge for a tough military response to avenge al-Kaseasbeh's death. 

"We all stand united with the Hashemite leadership in facing terrorism," one banner read.
It is unusual to see such a unified response from religious institutions, because moderate camps often represent drastically different views to those of hard-line minority groups. The recent attacks on journalists at the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, for instance, brought a range of responses in the Muslim world, with many condemning the death of innocent people but disagreeing on whether the publication crossed the line in its caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad.
The Sept. 11 attacks in the United States spurred a hint of celebration and praise from anti-American radical groups, including al-Qaida, the group behind the hijackings, but condemnation from moderate Islamic factions. Now, even al-Qaida has grown more outspoken against the Islamic State group, which originally was an al-Qaida offshoot in Iraq. That criticism has left the IS extremists in an increasingly isolated position. 

Even clerics aligned with the Islamic State group are said to be speaking out against the pilot's killing. Rami Abdurrahman, who heads the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, said extremists dismissed one of its religious officials in Aleppo province after he objected to how the Jordanian pilot was put to death.
The religious official, a Saudi cleric known as Abu Musab al-Jazrawi, said during a meeting that such killings contradict the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad, Abdurrahman said. Other clerics in the meeting in the northern town of Bab began a verbal attack against the Saudi cleric, who was later sacked and referred to a religious court, he said. The incident could not be confirmed independently.
Many Facebook users in Bosnia posted pictures Friday of the Jordanian king in his military uniform, hailing his pledge to take a "severe response" for the pilot's death. The head of Bosnia's Islamic community, Husein Kavazovic, denounced the militant group, saying "there is no 'but' in condemning those crimes." At least 150 Bosnians have reportedly joined the Islamic State group, and Kavazovic called on his government to strip them of their citizenship. 

Al-Maqdesi criticized the militants for declaring a caliphate, or an Islamic state, last year in the areas under their control. Al-Maqdesi said such a state run according to Islamic law is meant to unite Muslims, but the extremists have been divisive.
Grand Imam Ahmed al-Tayeb, head of the world's most prestigious seat of Sunni Islam learning, Cairo's Al-Azhar Mosque, said earlier this week that the IS militants deserve the Quranic punishment of death, crucifixion or chopping off their arms for being enemies of God and the Prophet Muhammad.
"Islam prohibits the taking of an innocent life," al-Tayeb said. By burning the pilot to death, he added, the militants violated Islam's prohibition on the immolation or mutilation of bodies — even during wartime.
Iraq's top Sunni mufti, Sheik Mahdi al-Sumaidaie, said the crime against al-Kaseasbeh is "unprecedented," adding that "the Prophet Muhammad said that only God can punish with fire." 

Pakistani Sunni cleric Munir Ahmed, in his sermon in Islamabad, also dismissed any theological basis for the crime, saying the "gruesome" death of the Jordanian pilot "is the most horrible act of cruelty." It's a punishment that "Allah has kept for its own authority and no human is authorized to do it," Ahmed said.
Associated Press writers Mohammed Daraghmeh and Karin Laub in Amman, Jordan; Bassem Mroue in Beirut; Ahmed Sami in Baghdad; Nasser Karimi in Tehran; Aida Cerkez in Sarajevo; Zarar Khan in Islamabad; and Maggie Michael and Hamza Hendawi in Cairo contributed to this report.

Obama Denied Request From Jordan For Predator Drones In Islamic State Fight

Obama doesn’t want his terrorist buddies to have to worry about this too.
Check it out:
The Obama administration this year turned down a request from Jordan for Predator spy drones that would help it locate targets in the war against the Islamic State.
The refusal, disclosed by a House Armed Services Committee member, has gained attention since Jordan has emerged as a critical player in a U.S.-led coalition to destroy the Islamist terrorist group in the days after it released a video of its execution by fire of a captured Jordanian military pilot.
Jordan retaliated Thursday with F-16 airstrikes on the Syrian town of Raqqa and is vowing a relentless war against the Islamic State, also known as ISIL and ISIS

Members of Congress are calling on the White House to approve a list of weapons for King Abdullah II, a strong U.S. ally.
Continue Reading on ...

Islamic State Claims U.S. Captive Died in Jordanian Airstrike

oped: Yeah right sure uuu huh! My best guess was she was raped to death in front of her Syrian BF right after the long ago posting of her in a Burka begging for her life...thats why no more was heard afterwords about her or her BF who also was killed after the rape! showing gang rape death by animals would not play well! #EOS and end of #Obama the enabler of such acts! 

Islamic State is trying to get the US and Jordan mad at each other. Nice try.
Check it out:
The Islamic State claimed Friday that the Jordanian bombings in northern Syria intended to avenge its immolation of a captured pilot had killed an American woman held hostage by the group.
An Islamic State message published by the SITE Intelligence Group, which tracks jihadist activity, said the American woman was killed when the building where she was being held in the Raqqa area collapsed in an airstrike.
“The failed Jordanian aircraft killed an American female hostage,” said the message. “No mujahid was injured in the bombardment, and all praise is due to Allah.” Mujahid means fighter.

The woman, the only remaining American hostage held by the Islamic State, disappeared inAugust of last year after she drove into Aleppo with her Syrian boyfriend. Her colleagues received a proof-of-life video a few months later, showing her wearing a hijab and begging for her life.
Continue Reading on ...

ISIS Offers Reward to Anyone Killing or Wounding a Jordanian Pilot

Clean cut: 26-year-old Moaz al-Kasasbeh is seen wearing his pilot's uniform before being captured by ISIS
Preparation: A woman is seen writing a message in Arabic on a plane-mounted missile before the air assault
[ Preparation: A woman is seen writing a message in Arabic on a plane-mounted missile before the air assault] 
Target: Dozens of Jordanian fighter jets bombed ISIS training centers and weapons storage sites on Thursday. Above, aerial footage from the video released today appears to show a pilot seeking a target
[ Dozens of Jordanian fighter jets bombed ISIS training centers and weapons storage sites on Thursday. Above, aerial footage from the video released today appears to show a pilot seeking a target]

See More:
The Tatler  

wanted pilots
wanted pilots2
A communiqué issued February 4, 2015, by the Islamic State’s (ISIS) General Security Bureau announces that the organization offers a reward to anyone killing or wounding a Jordanian pilot and thereby preventing him from taking part in airstrikes against the Islamic State. Appended to the communiqué is a list of Jordanian pilots allegedly supplied by the captured pilot Mu’adh Al-Kasasbeh before he was burned alive. Muslims in Jordan and Syria are urged to attack these pilots or alternatively provide information on their whereabouts.
The following are the main points of the communiqué, which was posted on the Twitter account of an ISIS media operative:[i]
The communiqué begins with Koranic verses (Al-Tawbah 14-15): “Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of the believers, and remove the anger of the believers’ hearts. Allah accepts the repentance of whom He wills. Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.”[ii] It then states: “The Islamic State’s Shura Council offers a reward to anyone killing or wounding a Jordanian pilot and preventing him from flying as part of the Crusader coalition that is attacking Muslims in the Islamic State”. The communiqué specifies that the reward is 100 gold dinars in Islamic State currency, or the equivalent in any currency the recipient prefers. It notes that the Islamic State is willing to dispatch the sum to any location selected by the recipient, provided he demonstrates he has met all the conditions for receiving the money.
Appended to the communiqué is a list of 52 Jordanian pilots whose names were allegedly supplied by Al-Kasasbeh. The list specifies the pilots’ addresses, ranks and jobs. Among those  named are Zaid ‘Ali Naqrash, commander of the Muwaffak Al-Salti Airbase, as well as Jamal Jabour Al-Mardini, who is mentioned by Al-Kasasbeh in the execution video as the fellow pilot who alerted him to the fact that his plane had been hit by a missile. The communiqué urges all Muslims in Jordan and Syria to attack the pilots on the list or at least provide useful information that would help reach them.

[i], February 5, 2015.
[ii] The title of ISIS’s video documenting Al-Kasasbeh’s execution, “Healing the Breast of the Believers”, as also taken from this verse. On this video, see MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 5952, “Video Shows Islamic State (ISIS) Execute Captured Jordanian Pilot By Burning Him Alive,” February 3, 2015.

Reprinted with permission from MEMRI.

Thursday, February 5, 2015

If ISIS Were Christian And White, Obama Would Name Them And Fight

by Donald Joy
With every new choreographed atrocity committed by ISIS or other Mohammed-emulating murderers carrying out the dictates of Islamic scriptures, Obama mumbles a few meaningless bromides for the cameras, proclaims the savages to be misunderstood, then promptly jives off for yet more rounds of golfing, fundraising, and hip-hop media appearances, strategy sessions with Sharpton and CAIR, or plotting his basketball brackets.
He just doesn’t give a rip about doing his actual primary job, and he utterly refuses to acknowledge or aggressively confront the nature of the glaring threat itself.

Obama made the deliberate choice to just abandon all the excruciatingly difficult and costly work, unfathomable sacrifices, and amazing successes that our personnel and allies achieved over many years to liberate and stabilize Iraq.  Against the pleas and stern warnings of the competent generals he shoved aside, Obama disdainfully ditched the status-of-forces negotiation process with the new Iraqi government, so he could fulfill his leftist democrat dream of simply buggering-out.
A realistic status-of-forces situation would have protected the population and preserved the hard-won peace in that region.  Obama is responsible for leaving the power-vacuum into which ISIS eagerly rushed.

As for the official claim about some alleged vast number of airstrikes made against ISIS by the Obama administration, I have about as much trust in whatever statements are made by this political perversion of what used to be our Department of Defense as I do the laughably bogus unemployment figures pushed by the Department of Labor, claims about immigration enforcement, or the criminally fraudulent pitches made for Obamacare.
If Obama has been supposedly striking at ISIS so resolutely, how is it they’re still snapping up and controlling more and more territory, while pushing the entire world’s buttons with repeated, slickly-produced, horrific snuff videos?
Suppose for a minute that a huge chunk of the Middle East was being brutally overrun and terrorized not by the swarthy Arab thugs of the Islamic State — just suppose instead that it was marauding palefaces doing the same thing, only in the name of defending Christians and advancing Christianity.
In that case, do you think for one second that Obama would have any problem at all publicly identifying the threat in accordance with its own professed ideology?

Of course he wouldn’t — Obama and his kind would dwell on how such cruel and heinous bullies closely resembled the ancient Inquisitions and Crusades!  Obama would enthusiastically point to and denounce parts of Old Testament scripture as blameworthy for motivating the apparent holy war.  He’d also eagerly attend every single intelligence briefing with hawkish alertness and interest, and he’d not sleep, party, fund-raise, nor golf until every last element of the offending opposition was deader than donkey droppings.
Barack Hussein Obama would go all-in against an army of purportedly Christian soldiers if (as if!) they did anything close to what ISIS does.
That’s arguably because Obama — as Jeremiah Wright went on record saying about him — is still a Muslim.

Furthermore, coming from multiple-Muslim natal and adoptive patrilineage, and raised partly in an Indonesianmadrassa, Obama would know (even if only subconsciously, from his early training) that one of the key duties of a Muslim is to practice taqiyya and kitman — to lie and obfuscate in order to run cover for Islam.
That would help explain Obama’s refusal to publicly admit the true Mohammedan character of ISIS, of Al Qaeda, and of countless other Mohammed- and Koran-inspired terrorist movements and attacks around the globe.
Even if that’s a far-fetched analysis, let’s just say for the moment that Obama — despite his Islamic upbringing and his having been (for cynically political purposes) a member of Jeremiah Wright’s South Chicago palace of kill-whitey Marxist Black Liberation Theology for two decades — really has no ideological, spiritual allegiance to anything except atheistic “progressive” neo-socialism.

In that case, Obama’s stubborn defiance of any attempts to get him to ascribe actual Islamic qualities to the barbarians who quote the Koran and fly the flag of Islam is identical to that of his non-Muslim fellow leftists:  It’s not good Marxist revolutionary thinking to associate anything that goes against traditional Western civilization — such as Islam, transgenderism, or black mob violence against whites — with undesirability, nor to resolutely confront and fight it.
To Obama’s ilk, any alternative which helps undermine traditional Western civilization/Christianity, and the paradigm of American dominance, adds to their multicultural portfolio of “inclusiveness” and “tolerance,”(translation: bringing America and Europe down toward the level of the chaotic and impoverished third world) and therefore must not be eradicated.
ISIS is an asset in the Left’s product mix, and it furthers the larger aim of reducing American influence in the world.  As far as the Godless Left are concerned, the enemies of their enemy (their enemy being mainly conservative white Christians) must notbe exposed nor meaningfully opposed.  That is, unless when politically necessary they can get away with appearing to do so, yet not really do so.

So Obama and his agents don’t really want to accurately identify nor destroy the threat posed by ISIS.  But you can bet your sweet bippee that if somehow they suddenly saw former Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson sporting a Knights of Templar cross in a YouTube video, with a new job as an executioner of jihadists in the jihadists’ own sandbox, it would be on like Donkey Kong from the situation room at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Islamic Leader: ‘Every Muslim’ Wants ‘Death Penalty for Homosexuals’

It is so confusing to know what Muslims really think. Typically it seems to be evil.
Check it out:
Fahad Qureshi, who founded Islam Net and is considered an Islamic leader in Norway, told a large group of Sunni Muslims that, contrary to media claims that it is only “radicals” and “extremists” who support barbaric punishments for those who violate sharia, regular Muslims support such things, including the “death penalty for homosexuals” and “stoning for adultery.”
“Every now and then, every time we have a conference, every time we invite a speaker, they [the media] always come with the same accusations: This speaker supports the death penalty for homosexuals, this speaker supports the death penalty for this crime or this crime or that he is homophobic, that he subjugates women, etcetera,” said Qureshi in a video posted by the Middle East Memory Research Institute (MEMRI).

“We always try to tell them,” he continued, “I always try to tell them that it is not that speaker that we are inviting who has these ‘extreme radical views,’ as you say. These are general views that every Muslim actually has.”
“Every Muslim believes in these things,” said Qureshi at the Nov. 7, 2013 conference. “Just because they are not telling you about it, or just because they are not out there in the media, doesn’t mean that they don’t believe in them.” 

Continue Reading on ...

Islamic State Releases Manifesto For Women

Maybe this is why Muslims are so mad all the time. They forget the one true lesson in life: Happy wife, happy life.
Check it out:
A manifesto for women published by the Islamic State (IS) group has criticized Western attitudes to women, saying that this so-called “Western model” has failed, that a woman’s place is in the home, and that Western women’s fashions, like earrings, are the work of the devil.
The manifesto, titled Women of the Islamic State, was shared on the Internet on January 23 by the IS group’s all-women unit, the Al-Khanssa Brigade. An English version of the manifesto was shared on February 5 by the Britain-based antiextremism think tank the Quilliam Foundation. It focuses on women’s daily lives and the role of women in an Islamic society and in the “caliphate” (the name given by the IS group to the areas under its control).

The overarching message of the manifesto is that women should be “sedentary” while men are characterized by “movement and flux.” […]
Earrings and hair “shaved in some places and not others” are the Devil’s work.
Continue Reading on ...

Obama: ’Terrible Deeds In The Name Of Christ’

Is this supposed to make what Islamic State is doing ok? How about a little less baloney talk and a lot more action!
Check it out:
At the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama reminded attendees that violence rooted in religion isn’t exclusive to Islam, but has been carried out by Christians as well.
Obama said that even though religion is a source for good around the world, there will always be people willing to “hijack religion for their own murderous ends.”
“Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ,” Obama said. “In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”

Obama also denounced Islamic State terrorists for professing to stand up for Islam when they were actually “betraying it.”

oped: Hey moron Barry Barack, slavery had absolutely nothing to do with Jesus Christ his teachings were against it! And by the way slavery has been a part of Islam since it's inception 7th Century and continues today see: Also the Jim Crow laws had nothing to do with religion...they were enacted by progressive Democrats who in fact were KKK members in the South Established after the Civil War...!

Jordanian King Personally Flying Sorties Against Islamic State

Is this what a leader looks like? All we get out of our President is excuses.
Check it out:
Jordan’s King Abdullah is reportedly personally involved in executing air strikes against Islamic State positions in the aftermath of the terrorist group’s brutal execution of Jordanian pilot 1st Lt. Moaz Kasasbeh.
Shafaqna news and claimed to have confirmed with their sources that King Abdullah is personally involved in conducting the air strikes. What remains unclear is whether Abdullah is personally suiting up and flying a plane, or instead commanding units involved in the mission.

“The Jordanian King Abdullah II will participate personally on Thursday in conducting air strikes against the shelters of the terrorist ISIL organization to revenge the execution of the Jordanian pilot [Kasasbeh] by the ISIL,” said the IraqiNews report.
Others on social media have reported similar statements.
Continue Reading on ...

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

White House calls for Islam to be Banished...!

Obama Embracing Role of Dictator Once Again » Obama dictator
*Sarcasm duly noted*
Fellow Patriots,
We're sending an evening update with quite a story that we think you'll enjoy. Turns out the White House is calling for something we NEVER thought we would see them call for. Indeed, as the title of this suggests, the White House has fully called for Islam to be banished
We kid you not. 
You see, Obama said, and I quote, they have an "undeterred resolve to see ISIL and its hateful ideology banished to the recesses of history." Which, to us, is a clear and obvious reference to Islam considering the undeniable fact that ISIS is Islamic in ideology. 
Of course, the White House would never admit this. But it still stands that if the White House is serious about its statement regarding ISIS, then it must also mean it intends to banish Islam. 
We're guessing they aren't serious. What say you?
For Liberty,
-Eric Odom
Visit Patriot Action Network at:

Obama: ‘Deploying All Assets’ To Rescue American Woman Held By Islamic State
Obama has a strange meaning for all assets. This probably means all White House staff will be using a new hashtag.
Check it out:
President Barack Obama told the Today Show the United States is working to release a 26-year-old American woman from the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL). The terrorists captured the woman on August 30.
“We’re deploying all assets that we can, working with all the coalition allies that we can to identify their locations,” he said. “We’re in very close contact with her family, trying to keep them updated. Obviously, this is something that is heartbreaking for families. And our obligation is to make sure that we do anything we can to try to make sure that any American citizen is rescued from this situation.”

The family requested that the media not release the woman’s identity. Authorities believe she is the only American left with the Islamic State. The terrorists beheaded journalist James Foley in August and also aid worker Peter Kassig in November. The group beheaded Japanese journalist Kenji Goto on Saturday. They also burned alive Jordanian pilot Mu’ath al-Kaseasbeh and released the video on Tuesday. 

Continue Reading on ...

U.S. Backed Fighters Switch to Islamic State

How many times will we arm Muslims who we later have to fight? Getting very old.
Check it out:
Before it even begins, the U.S. training and equipping of Syrian opposition forces to fight the Sunni army ISIS appears to have become more difficult with the decision by a U.S.-backed Syrian rebel group to join an Islamist coalition closely associated with ISIS and the al-Qaida-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra Front.
The Hazzm Movement, associated with the Free Syrian Army, is a secular Syrian insurgent group backed by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. It was one of the last of the non-jihadist opposition groups fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in northern Syria.
Its leadership has decided to join the Islamist coalition of the Levant Front fighting around the key Syrian city of Aleppo, according to Arab news sources, including NOW Lebanon.

The turn of events comes even though Hazzm was viewed by one former Defense Department intelligence officer as a “model candidate for greater U.S. and allied support, including lethal military assistance.”
The Hazzm Movement decided to switch sides after months of battling Nusra fighters and join the Levant Front, which was formed in late December. It reportedly is on good terms with Nusra.
The development further complicates the process of selecting fighters for training. Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm. John Kirby told WND in January some 5,000 members of the Free Syrian Army would receive training in Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia – all Sunni countries – to battle the Sunni group ISIS.
Continue Reading on ...

Obama Defends Islam in Remarks about Jordanian Pilot being Burned Alive by Islamic State

Pamela Geller 

The operative speaketh.
Whatever ideology they are operating under is “bankrupt.” Whatever ideology? That’s his default narrative in the wake of jihadi attacks. Scrubbing, whitewashing and sanitizing Islam.
As for “bankrupt,” the Islamic State is the richest Islamic terrorist group in the world. And their daily oil revenues are in the millions.
The Islamic State was quoting Quran chapter and verse, and that’s all Obama can come up with? “Whatever ideology.” He is evil.
He didn’t want to talk about the pilot being set afire. He wanted to “talk about how to make people healthier and make their lives better.” Well, how about protecting them from jihad? That’s a “healthy strategy.” They will make a lot of people’s “lives better.”
Did FDR and Churchill sit around and flap their tongues about Germans who weren’t members of the Nazi party, or the Japanese who weren’t Shintos?
OT but related: Valerie Jarrett sitting to the left of Obama in the video with that Cheshire smile on her face is contemptible.
ISIS video screenshot:
‘Healing the Believers Chests.’ That’s from the Qur’an: “Fight them, and Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you over them, heal the breasts of Believers.” (Qur’an 9:14)
Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her book

BOOM: Iraq’s Christians Take Up Arms to Fight Islamic State

Screen Shot 2015-02-04 at 8.16.27 AM
Hundreds of Christian men are picking up rifles to reclaim their towns from militants.
When Islamic State rampaged through Iraq last summer, the country’s Christian minority says it was left defenseless by fleeing Iraqi army troops and Kurdish peshmerga fighters, and Sunni neighbors largely supported the ISIS capture of Christian villages. Now,reports Nour Malas at The Wall Street Journal, hundreds of Iraqi Christian men are training for their own militia to recapture or defend Christian villages from ISIS.

They face a lot of challenges: No funding and few weapons, lack of support from the Iraqi government, and recruits who have never seen combat or even fired a gun. The Kurdistan Regional Government is lending them training weapons and use of a former U.S. camp outside Kirkuk, and American former military personnel (who say they are “volunteering through a nonprofit organization they declined to name”) are helping with the training.
Read more: The Week

UAE pulled out of IS fight after pilot capture: report

First Female pilot for UAE, Mariam Al Mansouri, was the team leader in ...
[Female UAE pilot Mariam Al Mansouri 'leads strikes'on Jihadists]

oped: Just another example of President Obama's failure to support our allies in the war against radical Islam...Obama won't even commit to downed pilot telling he supports ISIS et el
V22 Osprey Aircraft Wallpaper 1280x1024 V22 Osprey aircraft,Marine ...

Washington (AFP) - The United Arab Emirates pulled out of the air campaign fighting Islamic State militants after the capture of a Jordanian pilot who has since been killed by the extremists, the New York Times reported Wednesday.
The pilot was captured in December and Islamic State militants released a video Tuesday showing the man in a cage being burned alive.
The key US ally in the campaign suspended air strikes in December after the capture, fearing for the fate of its pilots, the Times said, quoting US officials. 

The United Arab Emirates want the US to improve its search-and-rescue efforts, including the use of V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft, in northern Iraq, closer to the battleground.
As it stands, the US-led mission is based in Kuwait, administration officials said, according to the Times.
It said UAE pilots will not rejoin the fight until the Ospreys -- which take off and land like helicopters but fly like planes -- are deployed in northern Iraq.
The Jordanian pilot was captured by Islamic State militants within minutes of his plane crashing in December near Raqqa, Syria, the Times said, quoting a senior US military official. 

But UAE officials questioned if American military rescue teams would have been able to reach the pilot even if there had been more time for a rescue effort, administration officials said.
The UAE foreign minister, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, asked Barbara Leaf, the new US ambassador, why the United States had not put proper resources in northern Iraq for rescuing downed pilots, a senior administration official said, according to the Times.
The UAE declined comment.
"We cannot comment on issues discussed in private meetings," an official source said in Abu Dhabi after the publication of the Times article.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

HILARIOUS: This Texas Farmer Has Pig Races, BBQ’s Bacon and Pork After Muslim Neighbors Complain and Tell Him to Move

oped: May I suggest the Islam neighbor relocate back  to the Middle East where pigs are not found...sorry Islam we luvs our bacon in the good ol' USA...if you have a problemo with this just go away, not mad but just go back are not welcome here! Resistance is futile...
ASSIMILATE,self destruct,or just leave... if help is needed packing your bags help is available just ask!
Don’t mess with freedom loving Texas farmers, especially if you’re a Muslim Mosque.
A Texas pig farmer just learns that Muslims trying to build a mosque had purchased the land next to his farm.
The new Muslim landowner actually asked him to leave.
Craig Baker, owns a pig farm, the Muslim community hates pigs. In an effort to “cleanse” the land, the Muslim landowner asked Baker to move out.
Read more: Conservative Post

Jordanian Pilot bbq'd alive by ISIS barbarians...!

BREAKING: ISIS Burned Jordanian Pilot Alive In a Cage — PHOTO ...

What response I suggest for this abomination against humanity: Fight fire with fire let the sick barbarians feel the pain they cause...The Jordanian Government should immediately execute all ISIS prisoners,then begin flying  sorties against ISIS positions using napalm as the choice of munition.

Second Congress on both sides of the aisle need to start immediate Impeachment hearings against Barry Barack Hussein Obama, how much longer must we suffer from this obvious Muslim Brotherhood / ISIS enabler ?
to politifake stop obama stop obama s second

Monday, February 2, 2015

Wyoming deputy rides into sunset after dress code bans cowboy hats

Deputy retires over Wyoming sheriff's ban on Western attire ...
Wyoming sheriff’s deputy’s cowboy boots are made for walking after ...

oped...Hello cowboy boots can be purchased with skid/ ice resistant soles as are Motor officer boots...and what's wrong with cowboy hats vs baseball caps for Deputies...this Sheriff must be a Kawlifornia transplant...had enough of this nonsense yet folks why not make cowboy boots &  hats the uniform of the day for all deputies...being that they serve in a cowboy area Wyoming?..

What can one say but to post the up side a cool video:) 

Trailer for ElectraGlide in blue :

By Ruffin Prevost
CODY, Wyo. (Reuters) - Sheriff's deputies in a western county of Wyoming, known for its official rodeo-rider logo and Cowboy State moniker, have been banned from wearing cowboy hats and boots under a new dress code that has prompted one longtime lawman to retire early.
Newly elected Sublette County Sheriff Stephen Haskell said he was surprised at the dust-up over his policy change, which was aimed at having consistent uniforms, rather than a variety of outfits that he said left his deputies looking like the "Skittles patrol."
"All law enforcement is supposed to be professional and look the same," said Haskell, who employs 68 deputies across a sprawling, rural county that covers nearly 5,000 square miles (12,950 sq km), but is home to only 10,000 residents.
Requiring rubber-soled shoes instead of cowboy-style leather boots that get less traction in ice and snow is also a matter of officer safety, he said.
The new dress code seemed for some to be at odds with the state's image, including license plates featuring the silhouette of a rodeo rider atop a bucking bronco - a registered trademark that serves as a symbol of the state's cultural identity. 

Veteran deputy Gene Bryson, 70, a 28-year department veteran, was too fond of his cowboy hat, leather vest and cowboy boots to make the change to the new uniforms, and chose retirement instead of a makeover.
"When you take away my individuality, I don't want to stay," said Bryson, who grew up on a ranch and has spent a lifetime in law enforcement.
Haskell, 53, a longtime Wyoming resident who rode in the semi-pro rodeo circuit himself for seven years, said on Monday he often wears Western-style garb while off-duty. But he insisted the new dress code was otherwise well-received in his department and the community, and that no other deputy has refused to comply. 

Bryson said he switched from patrol duty to courthouse security last year and had already planned to retire later this year anyway. Early retirement will allow him more time to focus on a gun store he owns in Marbleton, he said.
(Editing by Steve Gorman and Eric Walsh)

Stop the Federal Internet Takeover

Robocaller hit with record $30 million fine

oped: I can relate to this... getting screwed so many times over ...the FCC is a joke at best...they are by no means there to support 'We the People'...they serve Big Business and the political whims of so called elected officials...who serve Big Business...what is that called in old Mexico' ?...oh yeah 'Mordia'..back door kick backs *bribes* for services rendered! Bend over America we are going to get the Royal Shaft once again ( taxation without representation...hmm seems to be what started our first revolution eh'?) Mullah Barry Barack Obama and our weak kneed Congress  <~ ...who seem to be taking bribes also! I mean how else can one enter a elected office being financially average then become millionaires overnight?

Dear Friends,

Obamacare, the VA scandal, the IRS scandal--these are just a few examples of what happens when we give government huge power without oversight.

It's about to happen again--the Obama Administration is fighting for a government takeover of the Internet and the Federal Communications Commission is going to vote on it February 26th. That's why I am writing you today--I need your help to stop this.

President Obama came out a few weeks ago urging the FCC to vote to regulate the Internet the same way that it regulates public utilities under Title II. What this means is that, for the first time, billions of dollars in fees will be attached to Internet service just like they are to telephone service.

You see, under Title II if someone wants to own a telephone company, there are fees baked into the law--fees companies pass on to customers.

Now, under this new regulatory regime, Internet service providers will be subject to these fees as well, and then pass them on to you, the consumer.

This is essentially a massive tax increase on the middle class, being passed in the dead of night without the American public really being made aware of what is going on.

The Internet is built on speed and dynamism, it’s always changing, there are always new and better ideas that are exploding onto the scene, and part of the reason for that is that innovators are not having to go ask Washington, DC for permission every time they want to do something new.

What this really comes down to is a fundamental question:
Who do you want in charge of the direction of the Internet: people at dot-com startups that brought us game changing companies like Facebook, Google, Twitter, Amazon and Uber; or nameless, faceless, unelected bureaucrats in our nation’s capital?
There is another aspect of this that gets overlooked: the Internet is an incredibly important force for freedom, for liberty, and the rights of free speech that we hold dear. It is an existential threat to tyrants in countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Russia who seek to keep information from their people.

We must preserve the high ground for the United States to stand up to these countries and tell them to keep the Internet free and preserve free speech on the Internet throughout the world. We cannot do that if we are regulating the Internet in a similar manner ourselves.

I am not accusing anyone of sinister motives here, but I am deeply concerned about the idea of any government bureaucrat having the power to tell companies what they can and cannot do. In the long term, this could have a chilling effect on political speech, in ways that today we could not even begin to imagine.

We do not have much time left to stop this gigantic government takeover of the Internet. The FCC is voting on February 26th and the Left is mobilizing to support their effort to do so. We cannot let the conversation be totally one-sided. The FCC needs to hear from us today--not tomorrow or next week or next month. Today.

Please join me and go sign the petition to keep the Internet free. We must stand for liberty and preserve the Internet free of government interference.

Thank you for standing for Internet freedom.


Senator Mike Lee

Barack Obama Won't "quibble" over ISIS being "Islamists"

The Obama Caliphate? Will Obama succeed in creating a United States of Islam in the Middle ... ... -who-slander-prophet-islam-mohammad-barack-hussein-obama-muslim.jpg to politifake stop obama stop obama s second
                                                                            [Yup! bottom line a Trojan (ass) Horse ]

Frank Camp 

The President says he doesn’t want to “quibble with labels” by calling ISIS “radical Islamists”
Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong.” – Ayn Rand
The refusal of the Obama administration to label radical Islamic extremism “radical Islamic extremism” has become one of the most fascinatingly dumb episodes to watch unfold. There has always been trepidation on the part of liberals—specifically Obama—to call out Islamic extremism, but over the last several weeks, it has become laughable.
This avoidance has been getting more and more absurd as the days pass by. Last week, when a reporter asked White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki an easy question, Psaki dodged:
Reporter:The Taliban has taken credit for murdering three American civil contractors at the Kabul airport…We’re those murders an act of terrorism?

Psaki: Well one, I think the department of defense has spoken to this…we’ve seen reports that the Taliban have claimed responsibility…obviously, any attack that kills contractors, that kills individuals who are working there in harm’s way is horrific, and a tragedy, but I’m not gonna put new labels on it today.
Here’s what Psaki should have said. Get ready. Here we go. She should have said: “Yes. Next question.” So difficult.
Obama is no less dodgetastic. Appearing Sunday on CNN, Obama said the following:
I think that the way to understand this is, there is an element growing out of Muslim communities, in certain parts of the world, that have perverted the religion, have embraced an a nihilistic, violent, almost medieval interpretation of Islam. And they’re doing damage in a lot of countries around the world. But it is absolutely true that I reject a notion that somehow that creates a religious war, because the overwhelming majority of Muslims reject that interpretation of Islam. They don’t even recognize it as being Islam. And I think that for us to be successful in fighting this scourge is very important for us to align ourselves with the 99.9% of Muslims who are looking for the same thing we’re looking for — order, peace, prosperity, and so I don’t quibble with labels. I think we all recognize that this is a particular problem that has roots in Muslim communities, but I think we do ourselves a disservice in this fight if we are not taking into account the fact that the overwhelming majority of Muslims reject this ideology. 

I’ll distill what Obama said in my own words: “There are radicals Islamists, who are backward in their faith, and who want us dead. But this is not a religious war, because more muslims than not are non-violent. So we should side with the good Muslims. This problem does come from Islam, but, once again, since the majority of Muslims are nice people, it’s not a religious war.”
Good job, Mr. President. In your absolute desperation to avoid some kind of offense, but also realizing the truth of the matter, you’ve made yourself a nice little word soup there. In a single paragraph, you’ve contradicted yourself egregiously.
If there is a faction of Muslims—quite a large faction, even if it’s not the majority—and they interpret the Koran—a religious book—in such a way as to promulgate their evil, how is that not a religious war? Their entire mission is to establish a Muslim caliphate. Once again, a MUSLIM CALIPHATE!They even say it themselves! They may not be the majority, but that is entirely irrelevant to the argument. Many Muslims do reject that interpretation of Islam, but that doesn’t mean that the interpretation of ISIS is any less “religious.” It’s still Islamic. I can guarantee that if radical Catholics began to tear the world apart, it would be labeled a religious war within the first five minutes of the first bombing.

The President also implies that by acknowledging the truth that our war with ISIS is indeed a religious war, we are also lumping all Muslims together, regardless of their nature. That’s wildly disingenuous, and—to put it plainly—just plain stupid. Most Americans have the intellectual capacity to recognize the difference between men who wear plastique as an accessory, and our neighbors Frank, and Linda Hussein.
Mr. Obama, you call this a “scourge” that has roots in Islam. You say it has grown out of an old, “medieval” Islam, and yet you refuse to “quibble with labels?” Your manipulation of the English language needs some work. And honestly, after six years in office, I thought you’d be better at mastering the Clintonian art of word-games.
“It’s a religious war against Islamic extremists. It is not a war against all Muslims.” Wow, that was easy.
Mr. President, you are an absolute coward, and a disappointment to any position, let alone the office of the President of the United States. To know that you are mentioned in the same breath as George Washington, Ronald Reagan, and JFK is vomit-inducing.
If we don’t recognize the religious nature of ISIS, we will never, ever defeat them.

London Mayor says ISIS is Full of Porn-Addicted Losers!

Boris Johnson ISIS
Onan Coca 

Infamous London Mayor, Boris Johnson, owes his popularity to his irascible and straightforward manner. Johnson proved once again why his supporters love him so, when he recently discussed the members of ISIS as porn-addled losers! 

A London politician said British men who join ISIS are just porn-obsessed losers looking for an ego boost.
The “tortured” men turn to jihad because they lack purpose and self-esteem, and can’t get a girlfriend, London Mayor Boris Johnson told the Sun in a recent interview. “They are just young men in desperate need of self-esteem who do not have a particular mission in life, who feel that they are losers and this thing makes them feel strong – like winners.”
“They are not making it with girls and so they turn to other forms of spiritual comfort, which of course is no comfort,” he added. Johnson, who is a leading candidate to be the next Tory leader, referenced an MI5 profile on jihadis as evidence for his claims.
“If you look at all the psychological profiling about bombers, they typically will look at porn,” he said. “They are literally wankers. Severe onanists.”
He said the best way to ensure more British men don’t volunteer to be martyred for Islam is to give them a job.

Prime Minister David Cameron’s spokesperson told The Guardian Johnson has an “ever lovely turn of phrase,” but declined to say whether Cameron agrees with Johnson’s comments.
“The whole thing is ludicrous,” Charlie Winter told The Guardian on behalf of the Quilliam Foundation, an organization started by ex-Islamists to counter extremism. “To imply that they don’t have social skills is again a generalization … that has no evidence behind it. They are integrated, many of them are very well educated.”

Johnson told Sky News Friday his comments were not “remotely controversial.”
The crucial thing is that these are young men, principally young men who are growing up without much sense of success in their lives, without a feeling that the world holds much for them,” he said. “And … their problems need addressing in all sorts of ways.”
He also took heat in August for the way he disparaged the ISIS member who killed American journalist James Foley. “I suspect most of us don’t give a monkey’s what happens to this prat in heaven, whether he meets virgins or raisins,” he wrote in a column for The Daily Telegraph. “We just want someone to come along with a bunker buster and effect an introduction as fast as possible.”