The other guy there is Bloomberg’s John Heilemann, who adds a fun anecdote about the special bond between Flynt and Bill Clinton:
That Flynt holds a special place in his heart for 42 is
evident, and Flynt claims that the feeling is mutual. In 2006, the two
men ran into each other at a fundraiser in Las Vegas for Jimmy Carter’s
son, Jack, who was running for Senate in Nevada. According to Flynt,
Bill Clinton—apparently still grateful for the porn king’s role in the
downfall of Bob Livingston, a key moment in the deflation of the
impeachment bubble—walked over, shook Flynt’s hand, and said, “You’re my
hero.” As I prepare to leave, Flynt shows me a photo on his desk of him
and Clinton from the fundraiser, noting that the former president has
denied the quote in question. “He can say whatever he wants,” Flynt
chuckles. “I have three witnesses.”
Those two have spent their whole lives obsessed with the same thing. And
now we’re supposed to vote for Hillary because she has one.
First and foremost all of the evidence has not been released in full...so I am limited on a response.
Was there probable cause by the officers to arrest Mr.Gray? On the surface it appears as yes...being that the officers were well aware of Mr. Grays past criminal history and the fact that Mr.Gray bolted when he was approached by the officers in a known narcotics sell area.
Now after Mr.Gray was apprehended... after a reported one mile foot chase..a concealed knife was found on a convicted known felon...at this point it does not matter if it was a folding knife or a switch blade ~which is illegal even for a non felon. Any concealed weapon is forbidden by a convicted felon...PERIOD
Apparently no narcotics were found on Mr.Gray...however considering a one mile foot chase Mr.Gray could have disposed of the contraband during the foot pursuit and was not found.
So this addresses the probable cause issue on behalf of the officers to arrest Mr.Gray!
Was there probable cause by the Baltimore DA Marilyn Mosby to levy a 2nd degree murder charge and manslaughter charges against the officers at this point and time of the investigation/ arrest process...It appears as not at this point..it appears as if the DA rushed to judgement as a political matter rather than a judicial matter!
Was there probable cause for civil charges of culpable negligence/misconduct by the officers for failing to protect the arrested Mr.Gray from physical harm as well as failure to get Mr.Gray prompt medical care?...Absolutely yes! Is it possible excessive force was used during the arrest?...it is possible...however nothing has been released to justify this charge as of yet!
So this is all I have to say on this matter and will digress until all of the evidence is released!
Popular politics website Politico had a very interesting article on Tuesday by the talented journalist Manu Raju. It was titled. ‘I’ve Been Hearing that since the Coolidge Administration’and
it contained several perfect examples of the disconnect between
conservatives and the mainstream GOP. The premise of the piece focused
in on the many promises GOP Presidential contenders have been making to
the electorate and how mainstream GOP politicians simply laugh off those
promises.
It’s really enough to make a conservative cynical… if he wasn’t already.
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has been championing term limits while
travelling around the country speaking to perspective voters. Term
limits has become a popular issue among conservatives and anyone else
fed up with the “same old, same old” in Washington, D.C. However, the
people who’ve been in DC for decades don’t seem so keen on term limits,
and they were quick to pour cold water on Paul’s proposal, saying that
passing term limits legislation would never happen. Moderate Republican
Senators Cornyn (R-TX) and Hatch (R-UT) both dismissed the idea of term
limits out of hand.
But the dismissing of conservative ideas didn’t stop there.
The skepticism covers more than just term-limit pledges. GOP
senators have poured cold water on Paul’s vow to repeal the Patriot Act,
with Kelly Ayotte even warning such a move would endanger Americans.
Marco Rubio’s promise to reverse President Barack Obama’s effort to
normalize relations with Cuba “would not fly,” in the estimation of
Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake. And Ted Cruz’s promise to abolish the IRS “I’ve been hearing that
since the Coolidge administration!” Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said
with a big laugh.
Notice that all of the skeptics who are so quick to poo-poo
conservative ideas also happen to be leaders in the RINO caucus. McCain,
Flake, Ayotte, Cornyn, Hatch… these are the people who are the real
problem in Washington. They offer no alternative to the Democrat Party –
in fact, you might just call them the Democrat JV team.
And therein lies our problem. For conservative grassroots activists
who are almost constantly being betrayed by the GOP, this is why we have
begun to question our support of the Republican Party. Why should we
work so hard for a group of politicians who so easily dismiss our ideas,
our desires, and our hopes? Why should we spend our time, talent, or
treasure working to see them elected when they won’t even lift a finger
to support us? It’s insanity. It makes no sense.
This is not to say that the GOP isn’t a “better” alternative than the
Democrat Party. They are. But the GOP is better in the sense that you
are choosing between two pilots to bring you home safely… one (the
Democrat) is unconscious, the other (the Republican) is blind and deaf.
Sure the guy who’s awake is the better choice to land the plane… but not
by much.
I’m a big fan of Idaho Republican Rep. Raul Labrador (who happens to
be supporting Rand Paul for President), and I think he may have had the
best insight on the matter. “That’s part of the problem: New
ideas are not going to come from within Washington. The new ideas are
going to come from the outside. They are going to come with new blood,
new people, and people who have been recently in the private sector —
not people who have been in Washington, D.C. for a long time.”
Exactly right. The new (and best) ideas to fix our nation will not come
from Washington, D.C. -- and it’s time these RINO’s get that message.
Gay activists in Canada (and in the USA)
have taken it upon themselves to “normalize” homosexual activity in the
common culture. They’ve used their allies in the media and in the public
schools to do this, and they’ve grown more and more bold in their
messaging. Taking advantage of the media, they’ve used popular
entertainment to make homosexuality as innocent and common as they can.
Modern television and movies even have homosexual characters appearing
in vastly greater numbers
than they do in everyday America. In public schools, the curriculum has
devolved at an ever-increasing pace and the most recent iterations of
the curriculum denounce most conservative perspectives of history,
civics, science, geography and even common sense.
However, the most dramatic attack from
the left may be in the perspectives being pushed from public schools on
sexuality. It is in the public school systems where the GLBT assault is
being felt most forcefully, as activists push for intersexed bathrooms,
locker rooms and showers. Also, as sex education classes become
increasingly more perverse and descriptive, and as parents are pushed
out of the education loop on this, the most important of moral and
social issues.
This insipid and evil force within our public schools is being
displayed in all of its disgusting glory at a homosexual activist
conference specifically designed for public school educators.
One conference speaker in particular may best describe just how far
gone our public schools are. Her name is Pam Strong and she is a
Canadian primary school teacher, focusing on kindergarten-aged children.
Ms. Strong is a lesbian who has been “teaching” for about five years
and has her principal’s full blessing on indoctrinating her children
into the homosexual lifestyle.
image: http://cdn1.eaglerising.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/gay-school-300x142.jpg “With
[the principal’s] encouragement, we decided that I would go from class
to class and talk about what ‘gay’ means, what does ‘LGBTQ’ mean, what
do ‘I’ mean,” she told about 40 attendees, all educators, at her
workshop.Strong related how she began with the junior kindergarten class. “And I read a [pro-gay child’s] book [King and King], and I
started to realize that conversations can be very difficult, and they
can have the most power when they are the most difficult.”
“But difficult conversations are a
part of what we do as teachers, right? And when these conversations are
properly supported by teachers within the safety of the classroom, they
provide a rich environment for our students as they unpack these complex
social issues and they reflect on their own preconceptions, rights, of
gender, sexuality, love, all these different things,” she said.
She went on to recount how her students responded negatively to
homosexuality, even saying that it wasn’t ‘normal’ behavior. But through
her use of children’s books and conversation, she has begun changing
the minds of these 4 and 5 year olds, so that they now see homosexuality
as a completely normal lifestyle choice. Strong is using her position
of power and influence to reshape the minds of these children from their
natural understanding, that homosexuality is out of the norm, and
forcing them to adjust their understanding of normal.
This is nothing new, yet most parents
continue to allow their community schools to indoctrinate their children
with a morality and culture that they themselves would never teach
their children at home. Why? Why have so many of our fellow citizens
simply accepted the public school system as some sort of common good,
when our government schools continue to prove themselves unworthy of our
support? Don’t kid yourself, fellow citizen, this is happening in your
local schools too. Maybe not on a school wide level, maybe most of your
kids’ teachers aren’t indoctrinating your children in liberalism… But
it’s still happening, a textbook here, a state sponsored video there, a
new teacher, a new standardized test…
Listen to what the activists themselves are saying: “I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn't
indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and
trans and queer people? That was a lie,” wrote Canadian gay activist
Sason Bear Bergman, a woman who identifies as a transgender man, in a
March 2015 piecetitled
“I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And
I'm Not a Bit Sorry).” Bergman holds nothing back, stating she wants to
make children “like us” even if that “goes against the way you have
interpreted the teachings of your religion.”
This little gem came across our Facebook
feed and we thought it was just too good to let pass without posting. As
far as we could find the author is anonymous but the humor is genuine.
Enjoy!
Hillary Clinton (of the famed
Clinton Crime Family) goes to a gifted-student primary school in New
York to talk about the world. After her talk she offers a
question-and-answer time. One little boy puts up his hand . Hillary asks him what his name is. "Larry." Then she asks: "And what is your question, Larry?" "I have three questions:
First - whatever happened in Benghazi?
Second - why would you run for President after your husband shamed the office?
And, Third –whatever happened to the missing 6 billion dollars while you were Secretary of State?"
Just then the bell rings for recess.
Hillary Clinton informs the children that they will continue after
recess. When they resume Hillary says, "Okay where were we? Oh, that's
right, question time. Who has a question?"
A different boy—little
Johnny--puts his hand up; Hillary points to him and asks him what his
name is. "Johnny." So she asks: "And what is your question, Johnny?" "I have five questions: First - whatever happened in Benghazi? Second - why would you run for President after your husband shamed the office? Third- whatever happened to the missing 6 billion dollars while you were Secretary of State?" Fourth - why did the recess bell go off 20 minutes early? And, Fifth - where's Larry?"
In a new story from Bloomberg News it’s
revealed that, contrary to their agreement with the White House and any
sense of transparency, the Clinton Foundation purposely chose not to disclose more than a thousand different foreign donations!
The problem is that when Hillary Clinton agreed to become Secretary of
State, she promised to disclose the names of every donor to the Clinton
Foundation as one of the conditions to her new position. Now we know she
(and her foundation) lied.
The Clinton family’s partner in this money making scheme, Frank
Giustra, is now trying to play off this little problem by pretending
that Canadian law will not allow the Canadian branch of the Clinton
Foundation to disclose their donors. However, that is just not true.
Giustra says that’s because
Canada’s federal privacy law forbids CGEP, a Canadian-registered
charity, from revealing its donors. A memo he provided explaining the
legal rationale cites CGEP’s “fiduciary obligations” to its contributors
and Canada’s Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure
Act. “We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the
names of our donors,” he says. Canadian tax and privacy law experts were
dubious of this claim. Len Farber, former director of tax policy at
Canada's Department of Finance, said he wasn't aware of any tax laws
that would prevent the charity from releasing its donors' names.
"There's nothing that would preclude them from releasing the names of
donors," he said. "It's entirely up to them."
The folks at the Federalist heard similar things from their Canadian tax experts.
Multiple Canadian tax and privacy law experts contacted by The Federalist, the Washington Post, and BloombergPolitics said there was no such blanket prohibition on public disclosure of charitable donor identities.
While Canada does include a ban on the release of donor information in
the course of commercial activity, it specifically exempts fundraising
from that definition. And because the public disclosure of a donor’s
name doesn’t include any transaction or consideration, it’s not
considered to be commercial activity.
While Guistra and the Clinton Foundation can continue pretending that
Canadian law is the reason that they chose to lie to the White House
and the American people, Sean Davis at the Federalist has an altogether
different theory about what is happening in Clinton land.
The Clinton Foundation’s deliberate misinterpretation of
Canadian privacy law in order to rationalize its secrecy raises several
questions, chief among them: why? Why go to all this effort to hide
years’ worth of million-dollar donations from foreign citizens and
foreign governments? Donations which were almost certainly being made
while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State, and almost
certainly with the intent to influence her decisions? The answer is an easy one, albeit one that is
highly uncomfortable: for the past several years, the Clinton Foundation
has basically been a foreign money-laundering operation. The
scheme works like this: collect millions of dollars in foreign money,
dump it into a foreign charity, pretend that the law prohibits you from
ever disclosing the identities of those foreign donors to the foreign
charity, then have the foreign charity bundle all the cash and send it
to the Clinton Foundation. Then, when the time comes–whether it be a
Clinton Foundation conference or a lavish Clinton Foundation trip overseas–make sure those individuals get some me-time with the Clintons.
This is what we’ve come to in American
politics today. The Democrat Party favorite for President of the United
States has been running an international money laundering scheme on a
grand scale, and no one in the party seems to care. Even the grassroots
activists who seem to prefer other liberal candidates can’t help but
support Clinton, even as the evidence of her malfeasance piles up. They
pretend that this is some “right-wing” conspiracy theory, even as
reputable news outlets like the Washington Times, Bloomberg Politics,
CNN, NBC, Fox News, the New York Times and the Washington Post continue
to find more and more problems with the Clinton Foundation. Here’s my advice to the Democrat Party… Pick Another Candidate. The one you’ve got now is an out of touch liar, schemer and crook.
Really liberals? This is the best you can do? You are beyond sad and should feel ashamed of yourselves.
Check it out: Whole Foods took down a photo of the National Guardsmen it fed after backlash on social media.
The company posted a photo to
Facebook and Instagram of members of the National Guard holding a bag of
its groceries. The National Guard has been called in to Baltimore to
help manage the protests that have broken out in the wake of Freddie
Gray’s death. “We teamed up with Whole Foods Market Mt. Washington to make
sandwiches for the men and women keeping Baltimore safe. We are so
thankful to have them here and they’re pumped for Turkey & Cheese!”
Whole Foods Market Harbor East posted on Facebook and Instagram.
Here is the real goal of liberals.
Check it out: Religious institutions could be at risk of losing their
tax-exempt status due to their beliefs about marriage if the Supreme
Court holds that gay couples have a constitutional right to wed,
President Obama’s attorney acknowledged to the Supreme Court today.
“It’s certainly going to be an issue,” Solicitor General Donald
Verrilli replied when Justice Samuel Alito asked if schools that support
the traditional definition of marriage would have to be treated like
schools that once opposed interracial marriage. “I don’t deny that.” Alito was continuing a line of questioning started by Chief
Justice John Roberts. “Would a religious school that has married housing
be required to afford such housing to same-sex couples?” Roberts had
asked. Continue reading on www.nationalreview.com
This is still developing, but there is a lot of evidence here and it
certainly fits into this story. Not that it really matters anyway. Don’t
fight the police and don’t get hurt.
Check it out: CONFIRMED: Court records show Freddie Gray was receiving a
structured settlement from Allstate Insurance and attempted to convert
it into one lump sum in early March.
EXCLUSIVE: The Fourth Estate has been told that Freddie Gray’s
life-ending injuries to his spine may have possibly been the result of
spinal and neck surgery that he allegedly received a week before he was
arrested, not from rough excessively rough treatment or abuse from
police.
The Fourth Estate has contacted sources who allege that Freddie Gray
received spinal and neck surgery a week before we was arrested, and was
allegedly receiving a large structured settlement from Allstate
Insurance. The surgery is allegedly related to a car accident in which
Gray was involved.
Sources allege that Gray also attempted to refinance his structured
settlement into one lump sum payment through Peachtree Funding.
If this is true, then it is possible that Gray’s spinal
injury resulting from his encounter with the Baltimore Police was not
the result of rough-handling or abuse, but rather a freak accident that
occurred when Gray should have been at home resting, not selling drugs. Continue reading on beforeitsnews.com
by Steven DuBois
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Jack Ely, the singer known for “Louie Louie,”
the low-budget recording that became one the most famous songs of the
20th century, died at his home in Redmond, Oregon, after a long battle
with an illness. He was 71.
His son, Sean Ely, confirmed the death Tuesday.
“Because of his religious beliefs, we’re not even sure what (the illness) was,” he said.
Jack
Ely was original member of the Kingsmen, a band formed in 1959 that
mostly performed cover versions of songs. Four years later, the group
recorded “Louie Louie” at a studio in its home city of Portland.
According to lore, it cost $36.
The song was written in the mid-1950s by Richard Berry, a Los Angeles
musician with roots in doo-wop music. As he recorded it in 1957, the
tune had a calypso feel and described a patron telling the barkeep he
had to go, to get back to his girl waiting across the sea in Jamaica.
“Louie
Louie” has been covered hundreds of times, a three-chord, garage-band
classic anybody could play soon after picking up an electric guitar.
Ely
and the Kingsmen picked it up along with other Northwest figures such
as Rockin’ Robin Roberts and Paul Revere. The Kingsmen’s version was
recorded in 1963 and is the definitive version, going from cult classic
to rock-and-roll standard. It has inspired more than a thousand cover
versions and there’s no reliable estimate for how many times it’s been
drunkenly sung at parties.
In addition to the song’s fame, Ely’s incoherent singing also made it
one of the most misunderstood. The FBI was so mystified by the
hard-to-understand lyrics that it conducted an investigation into
whether the song was obscene. They found it to be “unintelligible at any
speed.”
Over the years, Ely and other band members attributed the
indistinct lyrics to the microphone suspended from the ceiling, forcing
Ely to shout up at it. Sean Ely said his father got “quite the kick”
out the FBI’s 455-page investigative report. He said his father
certainly knew the words, and wasn’t just slurring nonsense.
“Right
of his mouth, my father would say: ‘We were initially just going to
record the song as an instrumental and at the last minute I decided I’d
sing it. It’s all of this is in a 10-by-10 room with one microphone. I’m
standing on my tippy toes yelling into the microphone: Louie Louie!
Louie Louie! We gotta go!’”
Ely had a falling out with the band shortly after the song was
recorded. He later trained horses in Central Oregon and, according to
his son, was content with his legacy as a one-hit wonder — a massive
one-hit wonder, to be precise.
“He wanted to try on different
occasions to pursue other endeavors in the music industry, but I think
when it was all done and said he was pretty happy that he did 'Louie
Louie.'
oped: Side Note: The FBI famously investigated the gibberish lyrics, apparently
suspecting something obscene or sexual, and produced a 455-page report, says Rolling Stone. Yes, your FBI used to waste time on such things. And now in the 21st Century the DOJ/FBI under the Obama administration refuses to investigate high crimes and misdemeanors committed by Eric Holder,Barack Obama the Clintons and Dirty Harry Reid...how ironic is that?
Lyrics bonus — for the record: Louie, Louie, oh, oh, me gotta go
Louie, Louie, oh, oh, me gotta go Fine little girl she waits for me
Me catch the ship for cross the sea
Me sail the ship all alone
Me never think me make it home
Louie, Louie...
Three nights and days me sail the sea
Me think of girl constantly
On the ship I dream she there
Me smell the rose in her hair
Louie, Louie...
Me see Jamaica moon above
It won't be long, me see my love,
I take her in my arms and then
Me tell her I never leave again Louie, Louie...
Yes indeed...I grew up in the San FernandoValley Sylmar,SunValley &Burbank....1950's-1960's when California was cool...before it became Kawlifornia...a bastion of perversions starting in the 1970's
I surely miss Happy Days...a time of American Grafitti...a time of normalcy,innocents and fun...when boys were boys and girls were girls no confusion when the word gay meant happy go lucky... not a sexual preference...no perversion was allowed !
What kind of sad religion do you have
to be to murder your own daughter? Sadly it is not that this is radical
Islam, the problem is that Islam is radical.
Check it out: It’s taken two years to see this through, but a Muslim father and
members of his immigrant family from Texas (originally from Jordan)
have been charged with murder of a woman for helping convert their
daughter to Christianity.
The father also murdered the Christian husband of his daughter who she ran away with:
I wonder why Obama would send 3 White House officials to this funeral but not for American Hero Chris Kyle?
The White House says the head of President Obama’s
initiative for minority males will attend the funeral of a Baltimore man
who died after sustaining serious injuries while in police custody.
Broderick Johnson, the chairman of the My Brother’s Keeper Task
Force, will represent the administration at Monday’s funeral for Freddie
Gray. Johnson is also the Cabinet secretary.
Gray is the 25-year-old black man who died a week after an encounter
with Baltimore police left him with grave spinal injuries. He is being
buried Monday in Baltimore.
The White House said Sunday night that Johnson, a Baltimore native, will be accompanied by two other officials.
Read more: Fox News
That is quite the rap sheet. Here are some things that you should know about Freddy Gray.
Heavy – Freddie Gray,
who died a week after suffering injuries while in Baltimore police
custody, had a lengthy criminal record, mainly for drug-related
offenses, according to state court records. Police claim he was
“involved in criminal activity,” prior to his arrest.
Gray, 25, died after spending seven days in a coma as a result of injuries he suffered while in the custody of city police, the Baltimore Sun reports.
[…]
Gray had a lengthy arrest record with convictions dating back until at least 2007, according to the Maryland Department of Justice.
Not all of the arrests led to convictions, in many of the cases he
pleaded guilty to one charge while the others were dropped. Details of
when he spent time in prison were not immediately available. His arrest
record includes at least 18 arrests:
March 20, 2015: Possession of a Controlled Dangerous Substance
March 13, 2015: Malicious destruction of property, second-degree assault
January 20, 2015: Fourth-degree burglary, trespassing
January 14, 2015: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance,
possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute
December 31, 2014: Possession of narcotics with intent to distribute
December 14, 2014: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance
August 31, 2014: Illegal gambling, trespassing
January 25, 2014: Possession of marijuana
September 28, 2013: Distribution of narcotics, unlawful possession
of a controlled dangerous substance, second-degree assault,
second-degree escape
April 13, 2012: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with
intent to distribute, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous
substance, violation of probation
July 16, 2008: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession with intent to distribute
March 28, 2008: Unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance
March 14, 2008: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to manufacture and distribute
February 11, 2008: Unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession of a controlled dangerous substance
August 29, 2007: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, violation of probation
August 28, 2007: Possession of marijuana
August 23, 2007: False statement to a peace officer, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance
July 16, 2007: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with
intent to distribute, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous
substance (2 counts)
oped: This is one messed up Dude...as are all who subscribe to the #LGBT movement...they haven't a clue who and what they are but want us all to support whatever they claim to be...just so messed up ! By the way Bruce are you claiming to be a hermaphrodite ? Having both sexual parts since birth? If so ok ya have the right to become whichever fits...if not ya are full of it as are all LGBT morons!
So he wants to be a she. And also likes women. Women who like women
are lesbians and considered gay. But of course we’re not allowed to put
logic to liberal thought processes.
Check it out: “I’m not gay.”
Bruce Jenner said the words emphatically.
Jenner admitted he’s identified as a woman his entire life going back
to his roots in suburban New York, before he was America’s Olympic
hero. But he has never been attracted to other men.
“Oh my God, is he gay? No, I’m not gay,” Jenner told Diane Sawyer during their interview special on ABC Friday.
“I am not gay. I am, as far as I know, heterosexual,” Jenner added. “I’ve never been with a guy.”
Should I feel bad for laughing at this?
Check it out: Hillary Clinton is reportedly furious and abashed as several
thousand cigars were recently delivered to her office in protest of her
announcement that she would run for President in 2016.
Thanks to Send Clinton Cigars (http://sendclintoncigars.com), a
service that allows you to anonymously purchase cigars and have them
directly mailed to Clinton, tens of thousands of Americans are blatantly
reminding her of her first stay in the White House.
For those with short term memory loss, this was reportedly the sexual
act of President Bill Clinton who used a cigar to pleasure White House
intern Monica Lewinsky.
Send Clinton Cigars site sports a non so subtle tagline of
“Clinton / Lewinsky 2016 · Don’t Blow It!” beside a logo against
smoking; cigars to be assumed. Continue reading on electleaders.com
by:Onan Coca Sodomy activists in Canada (and in the USA) have taken it upon themselves to "normalize" homosexual activity in the common culture.
They've used their allies in the media and in the public schools to do
this, and they've grown more and more bold in their messaging. Taking
advantage of the media, they've used popular entertainment to make
homosexuality as innocent and common as they can. Modern television and
movies even have homosexual characters appearing in vastly greater numbers than
they do in everyday America. In public schools, the curriculum has
devolved at an ever-increasing pace and the most recent iterations of
the curriculum denounce most conservative perspectives of history,
civics, science, geography and even common sense.
However, the most dramatic attack from the left may be in the
perspectives being pushed from public schools on sexuality. It is in the
public school systems where the GLBT assault is being felt most
forcefully, as activists push for intersexed bathrooms, locker rooms and showers.
Also, as sex education classes become increasingly more perverse and
descriptive, and as parents are pushed out of the education loop on
this, the most important of moral and social issues.
This insipid and evil force within our public schools is being
displayed in all of its disgusting glory at a homosexual activist
conference specifically designed for public school educators.
One conference speaker in particular may best describe just how far
gone our public schools are. Her name is Pam Strong and she is a
Canadian primary school teacher, focusing on kindergarten-aged children.
Ms. Strong is a lesbian who has been "teaching" for about five years
and has her principal's full blessing on indoctrinating her children
into the homosexual lifestyle.
Listen to some of what she had to say (from Life Site News): "With [the principal's] encouragement, we decided that I would go
from class to class and talk about what 'gay' means, what does 'LGBTQ'
mean, what do 'I' mean," she told about 40 attendees, all educators, at
her workshop. Strong related how she began with the junior kindergarten class. "And I read a [pro-gay child's] book [King and King], and I
started to realize that conversations can be very difficult, and they
can have the most power when they are the most difficult." "But difficult conversations are a part of what we do as
teachers, right? And when these conversations are properly supported by
teachers within the safety of the classroom, they provide a rich
environment for our students as they unpack these complex social issues
and they reflect on their own preconceptions, rights, of gender,
sexuality, love, all these different things," she said.
She went on to recount how her students responded negatively to
homosexuality, even saying that it wasn't 'normal' behavior. But through
her use of children's books and conversation, she has begun changing
the minds of these 4 and 5 year olds, so that they now see homosexuality
as a completely normal lifestyle choice. Strong is using her position
of power and influence to reshape the minds of these children from their
natural understanding, that homosexuality is out of the norm, and
forcing them to adjust their understanding of normal.
This is nothing new, yet most parents continue to allow their community schools to indoctrinate their children with a morality and culture
that they themselves would never teach their children at home. Why? Why
have so many of our fellow citizens simply accepted the public school
system as some sort of common good, when our government schools continue
to prove themselves unworthy of our support? Don't kid yourself, fellow
citizen, this is happening in your local schools too. Maybe not on a
school wide level, maybe most of your kids' teachers aren't
indoctrinating your children in liberalism… But it's still happening, a
textbook here, a state sponsored video there, a new teacher, a new
standardized test…
Listen to what the activists themselves are saying:
"I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn't
indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and
trans and queer people? That was a lie," wrote Canadian gay activist
Sason Bear Bergman, a woman who identifies as a transgender man, in a
March 2015 piece titled
"I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And
I'm Not a Bit Sorry)." Bergman holds nothing back, stating she wants to
make children "like us" even if that "goes against the way you have
interpreted the teachings of your religion."
They just affirm what many of us have already believed.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Citizen Journalist, Ryan Sorba recently went undercover in Palm Springs, California, posing as a same-sex marriage activist.
He asked the following question:
“Do you believe being gay is strictly genetic?”
The video enclosed in this email is a montage of clips from
interviews in which gays admit that they believe they are gay due
external circumstances, such as being sexually abused at an early age or
going through other traumatic experiences.
When asked how many interviews Sorba obtained during this venture, he answered, “There are many more to come.”
This video is a crucial component to the upcoming Supreme Court
marriage decision because it gives natural marriage proponents what they
need to neutralize any personal testimony that being gay is an
immutable characteristic such as race.
The video is particularly relevant because in all the past cases
in which the courts ruled in favor of overturning state Marriage
Amendments, which protected marriage as an institution between one man
and one woman, they did so by reasoning that being gay is on the same
footing as race and therefore protected by the Due Process Claus of the
14th Amendment. Specifically, they state the oft repeated claim
that, ‘gays are born that way’ in order to achieve Suspect Class Status
under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In order to be deemed a Suspect Class
under the Civil Rights Act a group must meet three criteria.
1. The group must have suffered a long history of discrimination
2. The group must be politically powerless to help themselves
3. The group must have been “born that way”
There is no scientific proof that people are ‘born gay.’ In order to argue that individuals are born that way lawyers
have relied on carefully selected personal testimonies. Carefully
selected personal testimonies can obviously rely on biased individuals
however who have ulterior motives. For this reason I decided to go
undercover to find out the truth from gays themselves. I was surprised
by how easy it was to get gays to talk openly about the fact that they
believe personal experiences were to blame and many of them stated that
they had been in love with a women or were originally attracted to women
until abuse occurred.
The video confirms that sexuality is not fixed like race or gender.
“That’s what we have known all along. The emotions are fluid.” Modern
behaviorist psychology has shown that the nervous system is a blank
slate. We can be conditioned to feel this way about that, or that way
about this. As can be seen in this video, being gay seems to have
something to do with unresolved emotional issues.
“I feel for the people interviewed in this video and wish the best
for them all. By way of this video, these people have been placed into
the cross-fire of the culture war, but I have no regrets. The truth in
this case is far too important for America. The truth had to come out of
the closet before the Supreme Court heard the case for Marriage on Tuesday. The institution of marriage is far more important than any one of us,” stated Sorba.
Man, our president is so hip and cool! Obama released this photoshopped
video of himself with the song “I Don’t Care” as Baltimore burns with
violent protests. His fourth quarter can’t come to a close fast enough.
Here is the original tweet from the White House:
oped:Cause' a picture is always worth 1000 words: [Yup Media Matters...old school WWI,WWII.Korea,VietNam ,First Gulf War vs the New Obama school Wars...need I say more?]
Oh, dear reader, how I love this.
The folks at Media Matters
have long been a thorn in the sides of conservatives everywhere. For
years the liberal media has pretended that Media Matters was some kind
of objective media watchdog or think tank – when the truth was far
seedier. Media Matters has always existed to spin, spin, spin liberal
failures into victories and conservative comments into scandals. And
they’ve done their job fairly well.
So it’s nice when Media Matters steps into a trap of their own making.
They recently chose to enter the Clinton scandalpalooza fray by
defending the Clintons from accusations of corruption, bribery and
criminality. The only problem is that these accusations didn’t come from
conservative sources like Fox News, Drudge or Breitbart… they came from
the New York Times and respected journalists like Peter Schweizer,
Jo Becker and Mike McIntire. So when Media Matters went on the assault
to defend the Clintons, the liberal media responded incredulously and
finally unmasked Media Matters for what they truly are – Partisan Hacks
who Lie to Cover for Democrat Failures.
Alex Wagner: Jeremy, there’s also the question of Bill Clinton,
independent of whether the Secretary was doing anything that favored
Clinton Foundation donors. There are the actions and the speeches and
the money taken by Bill Clinton personally. The Washington Post reports
that Bill Clinton was paid $26 million in speech fees by companies and organizations that were also major donors.
You know, what happens to Bill Clinton’s activities going forward? And I
guess I wonder what you think happens to CGI (Clinton Global
Initiative) between now and November of 2016?
Jeremy Peters:
The Clinton campaign is certainly already taken some steps to try to
get ahead of public relations problems like that, for example, Hillary
resigned from the board. I think they’re going to have to be more
transparent about the speaking fees because those questions are just
going to keep on piling up. What I wonder is if the
Clinton message machine ever decides to kind of recalibrate and dial it
back a little bit. Because right now, and this isn’t all coming from the
Clinton camp itself but from the orbit around them where you
have these people whose main goal is to misdirect and obfuscate every
time there’s the slightest bit of criticism about the Clintons
leadership.
Alex Wagner: Well, in their mind they’re not misinforming and obfuscating, they’re “clarifying.”
Joshua Green: I don’t think that’s true at all Alex. They know what they are doing.
Jeremy Peters: Exactly. They are definitely misdirecting here. I mean, this is what Media Matters exists to do.
It’s very easy (and fun) to ridicule
Joe Biden as a buffoon, but there are more than a few people who take
him seriously as an alternative to Hillary Clinton as Democrat nominee.
Biden fever is rising as Hillary herself is getting harder and harder
to take as a serious nominee. Scott McKay argues in the American Spectator:
If ever there was an ill-fitting and ill-considered
elevator pitch for a political candidate, it’s the narrative of Hillary
Clinton as the defender of ordinary Americans. The sales job, which
reportedly was the product of months of consideration from the Clinton
campaign gurus, unraveled almost immediately. (snip)
If the Democrats are in position to win presidential elections
consistently barring a major foul-up, then the smart play is to run
someone anodyne and safe rather than to test their current demographic
advantage.
But who is that anodyne,
generic Democrat for whom they can shelve the ethically challenged,
marble-mouthed former First Lady? There is the problem, and there is the
dilemma the Democrats find themselves in as Schweizer’s shot
reverberates through the countryside.
The White House
