Saturday, November 16, 2013

Israel and strategic US partner fall out over Iran

US President Barack Obama (R) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hold a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, September 30, 2013

Jerusalem (AFP) - Israel and its US ally have hit a troubled patch in their close relationship, caused by differences over Iran's nuclear plans and peace with the Palestinians.
In a highly public spat, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Barack Obama are each seeking to directly address the other's public.
At the moment, Israeli Economy Minister Naftali Bennett is campaigning in Washington, while the US ambassador to Israel, Dan Shapiro, has been making his case in the Israeli media.
"I'm not telling the Americans what they should do; I just give them the information, it's for them to decide," Bennet, who heads the far-right Jewish Home party, told Israeli public radio by telephone on Friday.
"It's not really lobbying, more a dialogue between friends," he said of his meetings on Capitol Hill and a speech to the Brookings Saban Center for Middle East Policy.

Meanwhile, Shapiro told public radio the high-profile war of words over a nascent deal Western powers are negotiating with Iran, which would see some easing of sanctions against the Islamic republic, was regrettable.
"It would be preferable if our differences were addressed in private, but sometimes that's not possible," he said.
In a speech to North American Jewish leaders in Jerusalem this week he said Obama "has made it crystal clear that he will not permit Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, period, and is prepared to use all elements of our national power to ensure that we are successful."
Despite such reassurances, Israeli media speak of a trans-Atlantic crisis of confidence over what Israel and the US say are Iran's plans to develop a nuclear weapon. A second element involves increasingly fragile peace talks with the Palestinians amid an Israeli West Bank settlement drive, which has come in for sharp US criticism.

On Friday, left-leaning daily Haaretz cited an unnamed senior Israeli minister saying that Secretary of State John Kerry "can no longer serve as an honest broker between Israel and the Palestinians".
Israeli Home Front Minister Gilad Erdan lashed out at Kerry on Thursday for slamming Netanyahu's intensive campaigning against the emerging nuclear deal with Iran.
"I was astounded to hear John Kerry's remarks about why the prime minister is criticising the agreement being formulated in Geneva without waiting for it to be signed," Erdan told an Institute for National Security Studies conference in Tel Aviv.
"When we're dealing with a country that wants to destroy Israel and the conditions that will enable it to carry out its wishes, what do they expect from the Israeli prime minister? Not to cry out when they're holding the knife, but only when it's at our throat?" he asked.
On Monday, Kerry had said Washington had Israel's interests at heart and that he shared Netanyahu's "deep concerns" about Iran.

"But I believe the prime minister needs to recognise that no agreement has been reached about the endgame here that's the subject of the negotiations," he said.
A 'bad and dangerous' deal
Netanyahu has repeatedly warned world powers against striking a "bad and dangerous" deal with Iran that fails to bring its alleged military nuclear programme to a complete halt.
On Wednesday, he warned that a "bad deal" could result in war.
Israel, the region's sole if undeclared nuclear power, views a nuclear Iran as an existential threat and has said it will not be bound by any deal with its arch-foe, refusing to rule out military action to halt its programme.
Netanyahu's hard line has the backing of the Israeli public, according to an opinion poll published on Friday that showed 65.5 percent of Jewish respondents opposed to a deal with Iran.

President Shimon Peres, however, urged restraint in relations with Washington.
"There can be disagreements, but they must be conducted with a view to the true depth of the situation," he said in a speech on Thursday night.
"If we have disagreements we should voice them, " he said. "But we should remember that the Americans also know a thing or two; we are not the only ones."
Public radio commentator Ronen Pollak said Netanyahu knows that a deal with Iran is inevitable, "but he has decided on a trial of strength with Washington so that the agreement is the least bad possible."

Actor Mark Wahlberg Defends Our Military Heroes

by: Onan Coca
One of my pet peeves has always been how those in our pop culture seem to enjoy comparing themselves to warriors, or their profession to war. It seems to be the go to move of athletes, coaches, musicians and actors. I understand the intention is not to defame or minimize what our soldiers are doing or to minimize the difficulties of war and battle. The purpose is to show just how hard these people have had to work or how difficult certain tasks were… but there is no comparison. Anything that is not warfare cannot be compared to warfare – it’s simply ridiculous.

So, like many Americans I was aghast when I heard that Tom Cruise implied that what he did on a daily basis was as difficult as being involved in combat.
Tom Cruise not only thinks he trains harder than Olympic athletes, he believes his job as a professional actor is as grueling as fighting the war in Afghanistan -- this according to legal docs obtained by TMZ.
First, the Middle East -- Tom says his location shoots are just like serving a tour in Afghanistan, "That's what it feels like. And certainly on this last movie, it was brutal. It was brutal."
Cue Mark Wahlberg. Wahlberg is also a superstar and has made a fortune first as music icon Marky Mark, and more recently as a celebrated actor. His latest film, Lone Survivor, is about the harrowing journey of Seal Team 10’s doomed “Operation Red Wings” mission. In the movie Wahlberg plays a Navy Seal trying to survive in the most terrible of circumstances, and one question he received at the premiere of the movie set off some fireworks. (Warning – the Language used is not family friendly)

For actors who sit there and talk about, "Oh, I went to SEAL training"? I don't give a f-ck what you did. You don't know what these guys did. For somebody go sit there and say my job was as difficult as being in the military? How f-cking dare you, while you sit in a makeup chair for two hours. 
...I don't give a sh-t if you get your ass busted. You get to go home at the end of the day. You get to go to your hotel room. You get to order your f-cking chicken. Whatever the f-ck it is.
When Wahlberg finished he apologized for "losing his sh-t" in front of everybody, but he did not apologize for standing up for Navy SEALS. He said simply, "Don't ask me anymore questions tonight."
Thank you for putting things into perspective, Mr. Wahlberg. Our soldiers risk everything to serve our nation; let’s not make light of their sacrifice by trying to pretend the mundane things we do in our daily lives are anything like what they deal with.
By the way, Mark Wahlberg’s new movie Lone Survivor looks terrific, make sure you get out and see it when it reaches your local theater in early January 2014.

Thanks a Lot, Mr. President: Single Mom’s Letter Goes Viral

by: Joe the Plumber
Just when you thought it couldn’t be tougher to be a single mom, trying to be both mother and father to her children and struggling to make ends meet, along came Obamacare.
One mom decided to vent her frustration by posting a letter to the President on her Facebook page. Yolanda Burroughs-Vestal of Palmer, Texas never expected her rant to go viral, but it has had tens of thousands of views and is still going strong.
Her “Thanks a lot, Mr. President” letter speaks to the day to day experiences that many parents – and not just single parents – have while working too many hours and making too little money. Suddenly former money problems seem minuscule in the face of the huge increase in expenses that Obamacare will bring, without any of the promised relief. (Most people are finding that once they make their monthly payments and cover their deductibles, they will have spent over $5000 before Obamacare ever covers a dime – and if the family is already struggling financially, who has room for that in the budget?)

Dear President Obama,
I wanted to take a moment to say thank you for all you have done and are doing. You see I am a single Mom located in the very small town of Palmer, Texas. I live in a small rental house with my two children. I drive an older car that I pray daily runs just a little longer. I work at a mediocre job bringing home a much lower paycheck than you or your wife could even imagine living on. I have a lot of concerns about the new “Obamacare” along with the taxes being forced on us Americans and debts you are adding to our country. I have a few questions for you Mr. President.
Have you ever struggled to pay your bills? I have.
Have you ever sat and watched your children eat and you eat what was left on their plates when they were done, because there wasn’t enough for you to eat to? I have.
Have you ever had to rob Peter to pay Paul, and it still not be enough? I have.
Have you ever been so sick that you needed to see a doctor and get medicine, but had no health insurance because it was too expensive? I have. 

Have you ever had to tell your children no, when they asked for something they needed? I have.
Have you ever patched holes in pants, glued shoes, replaced zippers, because it was cheaper than buying new? I have.
Have you ever had to put an item or two back at the grocery store, because you didn’t have enough money? I have.
Have you ever cried yourself to sleep, because you had no clue how you were going to make ends meet? I have. 

My questions could go on and on. I don’t believe you have a clue what Americans are actually going through and honestly, I don’t believe you care. Not everyone lives extravagantly. While your family takes expensive trips that cost more than most of us make in two-four years, there are so many of us that suffer. Yet, you are doing all you can to add to the suffering. I think you are a very selfish and cold hearted man, who does not care what is best for the people he was elected by (not by me) to represent, but more so out for the glory of your name attached to history. So thank you Mr. President, thank you for pushing those of us that are barely staying afloat completely under water and driving America into the ground. You have made your mark in history, as the absolute worst and most hated president of the United States. God have mercy on your soul!
Yolanda Vestal
Average American 

Vestal said she was worrying about paying the bills when she penned the letter. “It was on my mind I had to pay bills,” Vestal said. “All I could think was, how am I going to make it to the end of the month?” BizPac Review describes her situation:
A divorced mother of two teenage daughters, Vestal also has a son who lives with his father. While she and her ex-husband work together to do what’s best for their children, Vestal said, the economy has changed, putting a financial strain on both households. She makes too much money to receive assistance, she said, but barely enough to get by.
Vestal has received offers of help, but she said she’s not looking for handouts or charity, and that’s not the reason she wrote the letter.
“I’m not worthy,” she said. “I’m one of millions.”
She merely wanted to express her opinion that legislation pushed by the administration in the last few years is hurting people.
“Right is right, wrong is wrong,” she said. “What they’re doing is wrong.”
Vestal said she’s received a few negative comments, and some critics have made assumptions about her and her children. But she said she replies with, “God bless you,” and moves on to the next message.
The president was in Dallas Wednesday night for two campaign fundraisers – including a private dinner that commanded as much as $32,000 per plate, according to the Dallas News.
“One plate for dinner is equal to a year’s salary for some of us,” Vestal said.

What Obama And I Learned At Columbia: How To Destroy America From Within

oped: To be honest I really do not believe that Barry Soetoro Barack Hussein Obama ever attended classes at Columbia. I believe he was covered on the books by Marxist professors and administrators at Columbia for the time period needed to receive his degree, most likely falsified credit and completion and then enrolled at Harvard under the same circumstances.

IMO I believe Barry Soetoro Barack Hussein Obama was groomed off campus to be the mouthpiece for the Marxist movement..They had it all figured out, make Barry respectable with degrees from elite Universities change his name to make him appear as a minority with a humble past and connected to a African country which in their opinion would make it difficult for any entity to question Obama as everything could be turned into racism and scare off any intervention or investigations into his true identity and past!

Their plan worked quite well as a nobody from nowhere unknown to anyone outside of Chicago achieved the highest position of power within the United States of America and he became the puppet head of the Marxist movement which is in fact committing Treason as described within the US Constitution!
Some may go off on me and accuse me of Racism or a so called Birther for attacking the chosen one...however this all could be put to rest by having Barry Soetoro Barack Hussein Obama [or whatever his real name is] release all of his college records with transcripts attached,his Long Form Hawaii birth certificate,adoption records and name change records,Social Security number records as well as his Draft Card records...also his passport records dating back to his childhood forward and his conversion 'Baptism Records' from Muslim to Christian.

Until his records are released... calling me names and dodging the request only proves Barry has something to be the judge!

On to the article:

Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Here’s a story every American patriot needs to hear. What’s happening to America is not a coincidence. It’s not a mistake. It’s not fate. And President Barack Obama isn’t dumb or incompetent. He’s brilliant, and this is all a purposeful plan. I’m a witness.
Remember when Geraldo Rivera opened Al Capone’s vault live on national TV? Well, I’m about to solve the mystery of Obama. I’m about to break “the Obama code.” I’m about to tell you everything about the way Obama, and the people around him, really think. I’m about to rip open the true Obama plan to destroy our country, because I was there when the plan was hatched.
How do I know all this? Because I was Obama’s college classmate at Columbia University, class of ’83. I was easy to recognize: the lone outspoken conservative in a class of 700 students. I knew I was in trouble when my first political science class at Columbia was “Communism 101″ taught by Professor Trotsky in the Fidel Castro Building, at the corner of Marx Boulevard and Lenin Drive. I’m only half-kidding. My experiences at Columbia were not far off.

Everyone needs to hear my story, because what Obama and I learned at Columbia explains exactly what Obama is doing to America today.
The economy in deep decline; the disappearance of jobs; the annihilation of the middle class; the demonization of business owners; the destruction of small business with onerous regulations and taxes; the overwhelming debt and spending of out-of-control government; the millions of Americans losing their health insurance; and the unimaginable increase in dependency through welfare, food stamps, unemployment, disability and now free healthcare: It’s all easily explained when you hear what Obama and I learned at Columbia.
I predicted all of this for five long years. Every prediction about what Obama would do and how jobs would be killed and what would happen to the economy has come true. It’s a purposeful, brilliant plan hatched at Columbia University to destroy capitalism, American exceptionalism, Judeo-Christian values and the American dream.

I never met Obama at Columbia. We were both political science majors, both pre-law. We graduated on the same day. There were perhaps 100 to 150 of us in the political science department. And I thought I knew all of them. As the token big-mouthed conservative patriot, I know they all knew me — but not Obama. I never met him, saw him or even heard of him. Not one of my friends at Columbia ever met him either. At our 30th class reunion last May, I could not find a single classmate who had ever met him. Strange story, but I digress.
What matters is what Obama learned and experienced at Columbia. My classmates hated America. They spoke with glee about one day “taking the system down.” They blamed America for “unfairness, racism, inequality and lack of social justice.” Recognize those words?
My classmates proudly called themselves socialists, communists and Marxists. Even though almost all of them came from wealthy families (or perhaps because of it), they hated the rich and despised business owners. They talked about how the “white power structure” had to be dismantled, business owners bankrupted and capitalism destroyed. Everything in their minds was based on “social justice.”
Sound like the policies of anyone you recognize in the White House? Does “We have to spread the wealth around” ring a bell? How about “If you own a business, you didn’t build that”?

How about Obama’s hatred of Republicans and refusal to negotiate with Congress? It’s clear he thinks he’s “morally superior” to conservatives. That attitude was born at Columbia, too. In 1981, when a student burst through the doors to our political science class and screamed, “The President has been shot. They’ve assassinated Reagan,” my classmates yelled, hugged, high-fived and jumped up and down cheering the death of a Republican. Today, most of my classmates are either in government with Obama or controlling the mainstream media. They talk about “moderation and compromise,” but always remember 30 years ago they cheered for the death of a Republican.
But there’s more. We were all taught a simple, but brilliant plan. My classmates discussed it 24/7. It was their “American dream.” It was called “Cloward-Piven,” after former Columbia professors Richard Cloward and Frances Piven. To bring down America and our capitalist system, they were taught to overwhelm the system with massive spending, entitlements and debt. That would cause the economy to collapse, wipe out the middle class and bring Americans to their knees, begging government to save them. It’s the exact plan Obama has been implementing. The centerpiece is Obamacare.

Obamacare isn’t about healthcare. It’s about bankrupting the middle class and addicting it to government dependency. It’s about redistributing wealth from the middle class and small business to Obama’s voters (the poor and unions). Its goal is to wipe out the last vestiges of middle-class America, creating a two-class society: the super rich and the poor (both beholden to Obama). Obama learned well; it’s working to perfection.
So that explains the plan. But how do you implement it? We were taught that at Columbia, too. A key component of the plan involved fooling the voters by calling yourself “moderate” and a “uniter,” even though you are a radical Marxist. We were taught to never admit what you really believe in. It involved demonizing your opponents, calling them “evil, greedy, extreme, radical and terrorist.” Look in the mirror and call your opponents the very things you are. Obama learned well.

The plan taught us to hide your true intensions. (In other words, lie, misrepresent, commit fraud.) So Obamacare is about “saving the uninsured,” as opposed to income redistribution. Government regulations are to “protect us from global warming,” as opposed to wiping out small business. Amnesty for illegal immigrants is about “fairness,” as opposed to creating 12 million new Democratic voters. High taxes are to “create equality,” as opposed to starving Obama’s political opposition. Obscene spending is always about “helping widows and orphans,” as opposed to bribing Obama’s voters. Higher teacher salaries to reward terrible performance are “for the kids,” as opposed to enriching teachers unions so they can funnel hundreds of millions to Democratic politicians. Bailing out GM was to “save jobs,” as opposed to saving bloated auto union pensions.
It’s always about lying to cover up the Marxist agenda of destroying the middle class, redistributing wealth and putting big government in control of our every move. Why the lies? We were taught at Columbia that “It’s for the greater good” and “We know what’s best for those people” and “The ends justify the means.” Obama learned well.

But the key to it all is to “boil the frog slowly.” We learned at Columbia to set the fire low, so the frog wouldn’t complain. By the time he realized what was happening, he’d be cooked. That’s why every Obama speech starts and ends with “I’m here to save the middle class,” while his actions are annihilating them. He’s boiling the frog slowly. By the time the middle class realizes he’s the killer and they’re the prey, they’ll already be dead.
The root (excuse the pun) of every Obama policy, everything Obama does and everything happening to the U.S. economy, all started at Columbia. The entire Obama agenda to overwhelm the system, wipe out the middle class, bankrupt small business and destroy capitalism was hatched at Columbia.
Obama may not have attended class, but he learned well. He should have received Columbia’s Karl Marx Award for “Student Most Likely to Destroy America.” We never needed to fear terrorists, or Russia, or China. We’re being destroyed from within, and the orders emanate direct from our own White House. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. Same time, same place. God bless America.

Friday, November 15, 2013

Word of The Day...for Progressive Dems...*Judging*

Yes Obama the Military respects you...after all they return your salute...!

Sarcasm duly noted:)

Need more really need be said?

Rove To Save Vulnerable Democrat Senator?
Having lost a 17 point lead in a month, North Carolina Democrat Senator Kay Hagan is in big political trouble. Her blood is in the water, and the sharks are closing in on her.
North Carolina is swimming in the opposite direction of its neighbor, Virginia. The Tar Heel State is run by Republicans, and many of them are conservatives. One of them who is not a conservative is Thom Tillis; and predictably, he is Karl Rove’s candidate in the coming Republican primary to run against Hagan.
Although he is the Speaker of North Carolina’s House, Tillis is not a reflection of the conservative energy that brought his party a clean sweep of Raleigh. He let the state’s gas tax cap expire and has expressed his feeling that North Carolina’s marriage Amendment, which affirmed marriage as a union of a man and a woman, would “probably be overturned.” While he may be right, saying this tips his hand about a basic conservative issue.  Tillis is not leading the fight to reduce the size of government, as must be demanded of a Speaker whose very position was made possible by conservative voters.
This brings us to Tillis’ shameful leadership of the effort to ram through a pro-illegal alien bill that must have the pro-amnesty Karl Rove’s heart beating faster.
Tillis is a big government, pro-tax, pro-illegal alien model of that kind of puppet Karl Rove wants to fill our senate with. If you think for a minute that anything in his background besides being a sure vote for amnesty is important to Karl Rove, think again.

His fake conservative American Crossroads organization is already running spots in North Carolina attacking Kay Hagan. This is designed to endear him to voters who don’t know his real agenda, which is exactly how he hopes to stab us in the back.
The irony of Rove’s furtive support of a “Democrat lite” is that it will fail. By Election Day 2014, if the Republicans in the House cave and hand the Democrats amnesty, conservatives will stay home (and Hagan will be easily reelected.) He will have put both America and his own consulting business to death.
Candidates only use consultants when they think they can win.

Photo credit: National Constitution Center (Creative Commons) 

Feminists Assault Young Students

Liberal female teachers are making school a living hell for little boys. Time to fix that!

Obama Named as Accessory to Murder

Obama was named as an accessory to the Muslim Brotherhood’s murder, rape, and torture of Egyptian citizens according to a criminal complaint filed by Egyptian attorneys and lawmakers before the International Criminal Court.
Obama was also found to be secretly funneling millions of dollars to Muslim Brotherhood members. The bribes, recorded in a document seized by the Egyptian military, amounted to almost a million dollars paid to each Muslim Brotherhood operative, ostensibly charged with rounding up and killing anyone who opposed the Mohammed Morsi regime, which included the torture and crucifixion of Christians.
But this murder-for-hire plot is just the tip of the iceberg.

#House #Senate We the people are growing Weary...#ObamaCare #Benghazi et al

A Little Less Conversation~ More Action Please: 


Iran Simulates a possible counter attack on Israel

Here is a part of an Iranian documentary about the country's missile capabilities which simulate a counter attack on Israel. read more: 


Arrests, Citations Lurk at Union Group Approved by Obama Admin to Promote ObamaCare in Wisconsin

Among the 165 groups approved by the Obama Administration to promote or set-up ObamaCare in Wisconsin is Wisconsin Jobs Now, a liberal get-out-the-vote group affiliated with the SEIU. According to the federal Department of Health and Human Services, the organization is working as a certified application counselor, or CAC. Numerous individuals who have been employed by Wisconsin Jobs Now or who work there now have been investigated, arrested or cited by law enforcement agencies for legal violations.
Wisconsin Jobs Now is not a health insurance group or healthcare provider. It is strictly a community organizing outfit. During elections it runs one of the largest voter turnout efforts in support of Democratic candidates in Wisconsin.
That voter turnout effort has landed the group some scrutiny. In 2011 during the union and Democrat-led effort to recall Republican state senators from office, prosecutors investigated Wisconsin Jobs Now for offering barbecue dinners and raffle prizes to prospective voters as they were recruited and then shuttled to an early voting center in Milwaukee. After SEIU operative Todd E. Stoner was investigated for using a hotel address and out-of-state ID to vote in a Wisconsin election, the group hired him help manage their 2012 political efforts.

A complaint was filed with the Federal Election Commission in 2012 alleging that Paula J. Zellner, formerly of Wisconsin Jobs Now, violated campaign laws while working for both WJN and the campaign of a Democratic candidate for Congress.
Police cited Zellner and 16 others for harassing and disrupting a political fundraiser held by a Republican state official in January of 2012. In addition to Zellner, at least three of those cited worked for Wisconsin Jobs Now. They were Matthew S. Finnell, who still blogs and writes for the organization, Nicholas A. Janis, and the previously investigated Stoner.
An early participate in the Occupy Wall Street movement, Wisconsin Jobs Now has hosted sit-ins at district offices of Republican members of Congress and recruited people to disrupt an in-district speaking engagement of Congressman Paul Ryan. The result was 19 people arrested for disturbing the peace at the office of Senator Ron Johnson, and three people arrested during the Ryan speech.

Former Wisconsin Jobs Now organizer Austin Lee Thompson was arrested while protesting a bank in downtown Milwaukee when he walked into the bank and shouted, “This is a hostile takeover.” When Milwaukee police officers arrested him he reportedly shouted, “This is robbery! We are being robbed!”
All told, Wisconsin Jobs Now can be tied to 40 arrests and several investigations. The number of people who have signed up for ObamaCare in Wisconsin on the health insurance exchange is estimated to be less than 55.

Speaker Boehner Kills Immigration Reform… For Now

President Obama Delivers State Of The Union Address
If Speaker John Boehner is to be taken at his word, the House GOP may have just made a critical decision that is both good policy and good politics. A couple of weeks ago I posted about the growing pressure from the Senate Gang of [your number here] led by the odious John McCain and the duplicitous Lindsey Graham to legalize some millions of illegal immigrants living within the United States [see Immigration Reform: One Tiny Step at a Time]. At that time, John McCain was advocating a “pass the bill to find out what’s in it strategy” of having the House pass something that the Senate would replace in conference with the S. 744, a bill that is some 1200 pages long and among other things defines the minimum wage for various agricultural workers and makes Nevada a border state.
McCain said the outside groups have failed to push hard enough on the legislation.
“They’ve got to be more active to put pressure on these members of Congress to pass something,” he said after an event at the City Club of Chicago. “Just pass something, then we’ll go to conference with it.”
According to McCain, legalizing some  11 million plus immigrants, many with little to no education and minimal skills, and opening the cornucopia of government subsidies to them was a sure way for the GOP to become competitive for the Hispanic vote. To his credit, Speaker Boehner has pulled the plug on this bit of legislative legerdemain:
House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said Wednesday that the House will not enter negotiations with the Senate to hash out differences between its immigration plans and the Senate immigration bill — dealing a significant blow to the prospects of comprehensive immigration reform by this Congress.
“The idea that we’re going to take up a 1,300-page bill that no one had ever read, which is what the Senate did, is not going to happen in the House,” Boehner said. “And frankly, I’ll make clear that we have no intention of ever going to conference on the Senate bill.”
To a great extent the GOP suffers from the same problem that former Israeli Prime Minister Abba Eban attributed to the Palestinians: We never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. With Obamacare set to be the slow motion Chernobyl of domestic policy, the GOP Establishment was pushing to address an non-problem, and not only a non-problem but one where the GOP is not unified.

George Will, the faux conservative columnist to advocated voting for a Democrat astroturf candidate in the Virginia governor’s race, is advocating turning this all over to that master strategerist Mitch McConnell (as an aside Will refers to McConnell as the greatest Kentuckian since Henry Clay, inexplicably ignoring Colonel Harlan Sanders):
Immigration reforms should address three problems — border security (the least important problem; about 40 percent of those here illegally came on visas they overstayed), the needs of America’s workforce and the status of the 11 million here illegally. If McConnell were majority leader, the bill would be broken into manageable bits, and there might be found a different majority coalition for each.
But the majority leader is a Democrat (Harry Reid from the border state of Nevada) whose party has one overriding interest: turning as many of the 11 million into voters as fast as possible. They are holding all immigration reforms hostage to this objective. Which shall be the case unless and until McConnell is majority leader.

The House GOP should think twice about using this strategy.
The problem with any large and complex system is that the parts are interactive. There is a good reason why you don’t attempt to repair your car’s engine, or fix a flat, while traveling down the interstate at warp speed. We can debate whether the three problems Will addresses are actually the most important ones, I’m not sure I agree, but the first step has to be to set out a list of priorities that we can all agree on.
The GOP should identify discrete parts of the problem, legislate the necessary changes to one specific issue, monitor the progress, and once satisfied that the policy objective is being achieved move on to the next problem. Passing a slew of small bills that add up to comprehensive immigration reform, particularly under someone as compromised as Mitch McConnell, is just the recipe for disaster.
We’re often accused of being too critical of GOP congressmen and senators, so this would be a good opportunity to take to Twitter or email or the phones and let Speaker Boehner know that killing this nonsense was a great first step in fixing a broken immigration and naturalization system.


The Other Problem With Fred Upton’s Legislation

Erick Erickson 
Let’s say the House passes Congressman Upton’s legislation and the Senate passes Senate Landrieu’s legislation.
Let’s further say that Landrieu’s will not pass the House.
We have two pieces of legislation that cannot pass either chamber.
After the President’s press conference yesterday, a number of states announced that, contrary to what the President said, people will not be able to keep their healthcare plans. Likewise, more than a handful of lawyers came out and said the President has no authority to do what he did yesterday without Congress’s consent.
In other words, what the President said was just words with nothing to back them up.
Insurance companies understand that Mary Landrieu’s legislation would be devastating for them. So I suspect they’ll go to Harry Reid, encourage him to pass the Upton legislation, then send it on to President Obama who will sign it.

Now, most everyone pushing the Upton legislation points out that is really has no teeth. It is a paper tiger. Even the Wall Street Journal Editorial Board concedes this. But the Upton legislation gives the appearance of doing something.
So this Republican measure gets passed by the House, passed by the Senate, signed by the President, heralded by the media as a bipartisan success, and . . .?
And rates continue going up. The insurance companies that play along do so by letting people keep their existing plans at a much higher monthly premium. The public anger about Obamacare grows.
And now the Republican Party owns it too. They, after all, passed the Upton legislation. They, after all, promised the American public that the Upton legislation would allow people to keep their insurance plans.

Congratulations Republicans, you are now, if Upton does pass, co-owners of the rate shock Americans are suffering and your plan, as so many of you privately acknowledge, really does absolutely nothing.
So desperate are Republican leaders to avoid admitting they should have listened to Ted Cruz, they’ll become co-owners of Obamacare rather than fight for full repeal or defunding Obamacare.

Riddle Me This, Republicans

Erick Erickson
I have read Jeffrey Anderson trying to explain how the Upton + Landrieu combo is not a trap.
He and other Republicans argue that Landrieu will destabilize Obamacare by keeping people out of the exchanges who are needed in the exchanges to fund it.
Some of them are honest about what is going to happen. Rate shock will escalate more quickly and painfully.
Insurance companies that have spent three years preparing for the transition to Obamacare will be, with Landrieu, required to let people keep their present insurance.
But the companies will not be required to let people keep those present plans at present rates. Rates are going to skyrocket. People will not be able to afford what was just recently affordable. Further, they will not get subsidies.

So what is more likely to happen?
The Democrats will throw up their hands and say, “By God you Republicans were right. Let’s repeal and replace,” or will they say, “Hey, now we need expanded subsidies and more government control.”
Congratulations Republicans. In passing Fred Upton’s legislation, which the Democrats will counter with the Landrieu plan, the GOP will in one fell swoop be tied to:
  • Declaring it okay to use mandates;
  • Massive new increases in healthcare rates;
  • The reelection of Mary Landrieu; and,
  • An eventual bipartisan compromise that fixes Obamacare instead of replacing it.
You know that last one will happen.
And you don’t think this is a trap?

Then why is the President suddenly amenable to Mary Landrieu’s plan? Yesterday, you Republicans were saying the President would never sign it into law.
The President’s goal has never been a healthcare exchange. It has been to blow up the American healthcare system and rebuild it as a single payer plan. Upton/Landrieu destabilizes the system more, by the GOP’s own admission, and gets us to the President’s end game quicker. They’ll just expand medicaid and increase subsidies. Remember, just a month ago the GOP told us there was no point holding our ground on defunding or delaying Obamacare. The President would never agree to it. Remember?
Republicans are collaborating, willfully believing the President does not want to be thrown in this briar patch. How is this not a trap?

Washington State to Obama: **** Off

streiff (Diary)
There is good news and bad news here. Barack Obama has made a career of scapegoating people and playing one racial, ethnic, or economic group off against another. Obamacare is no different. It is simply class envy and income redistribution tarted up with good intentions.
Today’s presser was intended to make insurance companies the scapegoats for the Obama administration’s galactic incompetence. The bottom line is that it will be virtually impossible for insurance companies to recalculate rates, notify customers, etc., by the deadlines. This would permit Obama to say he did what he could but the evil insurance companies would not go along.
The last lie had hardly vanished from the ether when Washington State’s insurance commissioner announced that Washington’s insurers would be compelled to comply with the law:
Just hours after President Obama announced changes to his health care law to give insurance companies the option to keep offering consumers plans that would otherwise be canceled, Washington state Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler says those changes will not be allowed in our state.
Kreidler says Thursday he has “serious concerns” about how Obama’s proposal would be implemented and its potential impact on the overall stability of the state’s health insurance market.
“I do not believe his proposal is a good deal for the state of Washington,” Kreidler said in a statement announcing his decision. “In the interest of keeping the consumer protections, we have enacted and ensuring that we keep health insurance costs down for all consumers, we are staying the course. We will not be allowing insurance companies to extend their policies. I believe this is in the best interest of the health insurance market in Washington.” 
This will be interesting. One can imagine that Mr. Kreidler will not be the last insurance commissioner to arrive at the conclusion that Obama’s stream of consciousness will, when converted into reality, cause a meltdown of the insurance industry. So now he’s joined the ranks of the potential scapegoats.

Will Senate Democrats Lead The ObamaCare Repeal Effort?

TV ads featuring "Harry and Louise" helped defeat the Clinton health plan in 1994. The ads were funded by a group of insurance companies who feared they would be cut out of the market by larger firms.

As ObamaCare continues to unravel, the political liability for Democrats running in 2014 grows.
Other than Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Debbie Wasserman Shultz (D-FL), who remain ObamaCare stalwarts but also conveniently live in safe Congressional districts, many Democrats are trying to figure a way out of the ObamaCare quagmire.
Steven Hayward’s Forbes commentary, “Obamacare Will Be Repealed Well In Advance Of The 2014,” lays out the case that Obama’s signature health care law will be repealed and that effort will be led by Senate Democrats.
Hayward compares ObamaCare to Hillary Clinton’s failed health care effort in the 1990’s and identifies the key element that led to HillaryCare’s demise.
According to Hayward, HillayCare unraveled in 1994 when the public realized they might not be able to keep their doctors. He cites the famous Harry and Louise tv ads to make his case.
Now the reality of American’s losing their doctors and private plans are driving the approval of ObamaCare and President Obama’s poll numbers down.

“…Obamacare has become the domestic policy equivalent of the Iraq War: a protracted fiasco that is proving fatal to a president’s credibility and approval rating. The only thing missing is calling in FEMA to help fix this Category-5 political disaster.
Senate Democrats endangered for re-election will lead the charge for repeal perhaps as soon as January, after they get an earful over the Christmas break. They’ll call it ‘reform,’ and clothe it in calls for delaying the individual mandate and allowing people and businesses to keep their existing health insurance policies. But it is probably too late to go back in many cases. With the political damage guaranteed to continue, the momentum toward repeal will be unstoppable. Democrats will not want to face the voters next November with the albatross of Obamacare.”
Senate Democrats up for re-election in red states are trying to distance themselves from Obama and the disastrous law. Senator Mary Landreiu (D-LA) flew to New Orleans with Obama on Air Force One but did not appear with him at his public appearance.
We can only hope the scenario that Hayward describes becomes reality.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Crackhead Toronto Mayor Has A Higher Approval Rating Than Barack Obama


Rob Ford, the scandal-plagued Toronto mayor who’s been outed on video smoking what appears to be crack cocaine — and who even admitted before the city council this week that he recently purchased illegal drugs — has a higher approval rating among his constituency than President Barack Obama has among Americans.
Just to be clear, we’re talking about this guy, a guy who admits to hitting the crack pipe but has “zero tolerance” for drugs, guns and gangs:

Ford’s approval rating may be higher than it should be, but it’s not high. The Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC) found that Toronto voters are holding steady on Ford, who maintains an approval rating of 44 percent in spite of the crack scandal.
Obama doesn’t have a crack scandal (well, not one that anybody’s saying much about, anyway); but he does have a Hydra of other self-made problems, almost all of which have consistently driven down his approval ratings throughout his still-nascent second term. A Pew survey released last week shows Obama faces high disapproval on every policy point except terrorism.
A Quinnipiac poll released yesterday showed Obama’s overall approval rating at 39 percent — the lowest point in his five years as President. Even among women, considered a barometer of the health of a Democratic President, Obama is losing trust, polling a 51 percent disapproval rate compared with only 40 percent of women who approval of the job he’s done.
Similarly, Obama is losing the public trust. “For the first time today, American voters say 52 – 44 percent that Obama is not honest and trustworthy,” Quinnipiac reports. “His previous lowest marks on honesty were May 30, when 49 percent of voters said he was honest and 47 percent said he wasn’t.”
Here’s more:

"Like all new presidents, President Barack Obama had a honeymoon with American voters, with approval ratings in the high 50s. As the marriage wore on, he kept his job approval scores in the respectable, though not overwhelming, 40s. Today, for the first time it appears that 40 percent floor is cracking,” said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
“Any Democrat with an 11-point approval deficit among women is in trouble. And any elected official with an 8-point trust deficit is in serious trouble.”
Obama’s approval rating now has sunk to the same figure George W. Bush earned among voters at the same point during his second term, though he’s getting hammered far less in mainstream media for it."

Leaked Documents Of Secret Treaty Reveals Danger To Internet Freedom, Freedom Of Speech, Consumer Protections

Leaked Documents Of Secret Treaty Reveals Danger To Internet Freedom, Freedom Of Speech, Consumer Protections
On Wednesday, WikiLeaks released details pertaining to a highly secretive, multinational trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership, warning that passage of the NAFTA-esque trade agreement could have a serious negative impact on Internet freedom, innovation, medicine, patent law and civil liberty.
The portion of the trade agreement released by WikiLeaks is titled “Intellectual Property Rights Chapter” and details plans for implementing a transnational “enforcement regime” to deal with Intellectual Property, or IP, rights. The document reveals that TPP negotiators are seeking to expand the reach of intellectual property rights, while shrinking consumer rights and safeguards.
“Since the beginning of the TPP negotiations, the process of drafting and negotiating the treaty’s chapters has been shrouded in an unprecedented level of secrecy,” Wikileaks said in a statement on the release of the TPP draft. “Access to drafts of the TPP chapters is shielded from the general public. Members of the US Congress are only able to view selected portions of treaty-related documents in highly restrictive conditions and under strict supervision. It has been previously revealed that only three individuals in each TPP nation have access to the full text of the agreement, while 600 ’trade advisers’ — lobbyists guarding the interests of large US corporations such as Chevron, Halliburton, Monsanto and Walmart — are granted privileged access to crucial sections of the treaty text.”

The leaked portion of the treaty reveals that involved nations — including the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei — are seeking to “reduce impediments to trade and investment by promoting deeper economic integration through effective and adequate creation, utilization, protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, taking into account the different levels of economic development and capacity as well as differences in national legal systems.”
The TPP negotiators will accomplish the goal — which essentially amounts to emboldening copyright and patent protections for multinational corporations — by including provisions in the treaty that mirror the abandoned Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) legislation that died in the United States following public outcry.
An analysis of the leaked documents by Knowledge Ecology International notes: “The U.S. proposals are sometimes more restrictive than U.S. laws, and when consistent, are designed to lock-in the most anti-consumer features. On top of everything else, the U.S. proposals would create new global legal norms that would allow foreign governments and private investors to bring legal actions and win huge damages, if TPP member countries does not embrace anti-consumer practices.”
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said that the secret treaty, developed solely by government and corporate interests, is bad for just about anyone who would fall under its jurisdiction.
“If instituted, the TPP’s IP regime would trample over individual rights and free expression, as well as ride roughshod over the intellectual and creative commons. If you read, write, publish, think, listen, dance, sing or invent; if you farm or consume food; if you’re ill now or might one day be ill, the TPP has you in its crosshairs,” Assange said.
The Barack Obama Administration has said that it would like to fast-track the treaty and sign the agreement by early 2014.
This infographic from the Electronic Frontier Foundation explains more about TPP:


Sarah Palin On Their Minds...!

Sarah On Their Minds
For someone the Democrats have declared irrelevant, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin seems to be surprisingly relevant. According to the left, Palin hasn’t been a real factor since 2008. Yet every time she so much as makes a run to the grocery store, liberals scrutinize her behavior like disgraced Internal Revenue Service thug Lois Lerner reading Tea Party tax returns.
While conservatives, many of whom genuinely like Palin, invite her to break bread with them at various functions, liberals whine about her near omnipresence — all while fawning like groupies in an effort to entice her as an interview subject. I’d suggest the quest for ratings and subsequent advertising dollars drives them to seek out Palin the way lepers sought out Mother Teresa; but no self-respecting liberal would be in it just for the money and fame, right?

Monday morning, Palin graced the studios of NBC’s “Today Show,” where Matt Lauer attempted to press her on Obamacare — something Lauer’s fellow NBC talking head Chuck Todd was either unwilling or unable to do to President Barack Obama last Thursday. Of course, Lauer may be bright enough to know Palin equals ratings; but he’s clearly not bright enough to have learned Palin equals smarter than the women who make MSNBC such a ratings “success.” Palin dispensed with Lauer as easily as Michael Moore dispenses with anything coated in powdered sugar.
People who are being told today if you — and some of them are still being told — “Well, if you like that insurance policy and that coverage, you still will be able to keep it. It’s just going to cost you a little bit more.” That’s the point, if it’s going to cost you more, then it’s not the same policy.
If NBC, which is as redoubtable a Barack Obama Administration mouthpiece as White House press secretary Jay Carney, thought Palin’s views were worth their airtime, logic would dictate that the unbathed liberal masses would concur. Unfortunately, logic and liberalism collide as often as MSNBC and decent ratings. Yet the perfectly named left-wing hate speech blog Talking Points Memo reacted to Palin’s entirely accurate remarks about the lies Obama told to keep his train wreck on the rails by changing the subject.
When asked by Matt Lauer about her alternative plan, Palin gave a rambling answer that echoed her infamous 2008 interview with Katie Couric, in which the former Republican vice presidential nominee awkwardly struggled to name a newspaper or magazine she often read.

Lauer invited her to talk about Obamacare’s face-plant, and the liberals come up with: Palin is stupid, because… um… 2008!
Part of the left’s assaults against Palin stem from the same misogyny that has defined the Democrats for as long as Democrats have skittered across the fruited plains. These guys really don’t like women who don’t do what they’re told. They also seem to have a problem with women who look like women, but that’s a conversation for another day. Their attacks on Palin are virtually reflexive. Every time she speaks, Bill Maher’s staff gets jumpy. In fact, anytime any conservative woman raises her flag, the Democrats’ hate machine redlines its tachometer.
But part of this latest assault on Palin stems from the Democrats’ increasing desperation over the implosion of Obamacare. Keeping in mind that the Democrats consider politics vastly more important than everything, up to and including life itself, any dissent represents a commensurately grave threat. When someone like Palin takes to the airwaves to voice her discontent with Obama’s train wreck of a power grab, liberals go apoplectic.
To be honest, I don’t think Palin should run for President in 2016 for a number of reasons — among them, her own safety. From the so-called “Occupy” riots to pretty much anything involving more than one union thug, the Democrats have demonstrated a propensity for violence at the drop of Carlos Danger’s zipper. Combine their lack of compunction with the white-hot rage that Palin still inspires more than half a decade since they first declared her “irrelevant,” and you’ve got a perfect environment for some loon in a “Che’” T-shirt to trade his life for a week’s worth of admiring references on Ivy League professors’ Twitter feeds. They’re pressing a $2 trillion fraud, something for which non-Democrats risk serious prison time; and they’ve already attacked her children more than once. I doubt they’d hesitate to push one of their followers over the line between “foaming at the mouth with anti-Palin hate” and Mumia Abu-Jamal.

The Upton Plan is a trap....!

Erick Erickson

Yes, It’s a Trap.

Since yesterday afternoon a bunch of good Republicans who’ve decided to put their faith in the man who banned the incandescent lightbulb, have been telling me how wrong I am for thinking the Upton Plan is a trap.
Folks, it is a trap. You may not think it is a trap, but the Democrats are going to use it to turn the tables on the GOP
Certainly Upton and House Republican Leaders do not think it is a trap, but it is one the Democrats have flipped skillfully on the GOP.
First, understand that Upton is messaging legislation. It allows everyone in Congress to say they support people being able to keep their healthcare plans, but it lacks measures to force insurance companies to let people keep their plans. It is a paper tiger.
But Republicans are starting to pick up worried Democrat votes for the Upton legislation who feel they must stand for something with 2014 on the horizon.

So Upton will pass. It will be “bipartisan.”

Democrats, meanwhile, need to get Mary Landrieu and a host of other red state Democrats re-elected. The President’s law be damned, they want to save their Senate majority. Remember, Obamacare already has embedded in the law provisions bailing out insurance companies and the Democrats and Republicans have shown themselves perfectly comfortable bailing out businesses deemed “too big to fail” in the past. Insurance companies participating in the exchanges will be deemed “too big to fail” I guarantee. So the Democrats can hurt insurance companies and undermine their own exchanges, but the government will bail out the insurance companies affected under the terms of Obamacare as already written.
The House would send the Senate the Upton measure. The Senate Democrats will respond, “But Upton has not teeth. Landrieu has teeth.” The Senate will substitute Landrieu’s legislation for Upton’s, send it back to the House, and watch the GOP try to explain why they say their for letting people keep their health insurance plans, but will not actually force insurance companies to let people keep those plans.

Yet again, the GOP will be cast as the tool of insurance companies and Mary Landrieu as the savior of plans people already have. Republicans will cave. They’ll console themselves thinking Landrieu’s bill will undermine Obamacare and cause it to collapse.
Upton’s legislation by itself isn’t worth worrying about. But Upton passed with Landrieu’s bill still on the table gives the Democrats the offense back. Republicans will absolutely flub the response and, embarrassed, vote for Landrieu. If you don’t believe me, Fred Upton is open to Landrieu’s plan himself.
Lots of Republican pundits and folks at the NRSC are giddy thinking Landrieu will blow up Obamacare. No. It will deliver even quicker rate shock to Americans, but it will not stop Obamacare. Landrieu will do much harm, but it won’t somehow repeal or obstruct Obamacare.
The GOP is getting too clever by half. They need to just demand full repeal of Obamacare — not let Democrats like Landrieu save themselves while claiming to fix the unfixable.

Obamacare is not fixable. If anything, Landrieu shows just how unfixable it is.
In any event, this is all going to become academic as I expect the President, by the end of this week, to find some new way to claim he is saving people without Congress doing anything and then put the GOP leadership on defense where GOP leaders will spontaneously and pre-emptively blame Ted Cruz and Mike Lee and do whatever the President wants them to do.
Republicans thought themselves clever, but the Democrats are baiting a trap of the Republicans’ own design. The Democrats, and especially the President, want to be thrown in that briar patch.

Firearm Background Checks Out Pace Obamacare Purchases 63 To 1

Obama wants nothing more to than to take guns out of the hands of Americans.  He has tried to pass legislation to restrict gun ownership with the ultimate goal of outlawing all firearms from private ownership.   His efforts have led to record numbers of firearm background checks along with gun and ammo purchases.  The more Obama tries to destroy the firearm industry, the more he actually helps them, boosting sales to record numbers.  For the month of October, the FBI reported 1,687,599 applications for firearm background checks.

Read More:

Memo to Supreme Court Greece Is Not Congress Michael Anthony Peroutka

It must be difficult for a mentally unhealthy President to watch his signature legislation, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act---the most prized accomplishment of his Presidency---go down in flames; especially for America's crown prince of arrogance, Barrack Hussein Obama.
Had a young Barry Soetoro been taught humility---instead of foolish pride---the boy who became King would have known better than to assume all his days would be full of accolades. Then again, maybe he is not capable of knowing the difference.
ci_110108_obama_sad_face_ap_283_regularPresident Obama has never had to face failure in his life. Adversity perhaps, but not failure. President Obama has spent his life running away from his failures by seeking temporary and risky pleasures that fed his fragile ego and gratified his desire to be happy: Exotic travel, drugs, homosexual encounters, Islam. All collide with common man causes and a playboy appetite; all disturbing and conflicted excesses; all difficult for anyone to make sense of.


Obama Promoting Muslim Brotherhood “Stooge” Anne Patterson at State Department

anne patterson
If you haven't had enough evidence that Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham need to be removed from office, along with their dance partner Barack Obama, this should be enough to convince you. United States Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson is now being considered as Obama's pick for Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs.

the now infamous CBS 60 Minutes piece about Benghazi, Senator Lindsey Graham (RINO-SC) threatened to put a hold on Obama administration nominees until he was granted access to State Department survivors of the attack. Graham has now agreed to release holds on two of those nominees. If there is one nominee Graham shouldn't let off the hook, it's one he did – the U.S. Ambassador to Egypt who is accused of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood during her tenure there."
Patterson most definitely was supporting the Muslim Brotherhood as we have documented at Freedom Outpost.

Foreign Policy reports:
Since October, the South Carolina Republican has vowed to block President Obama's nominees from being confirmed by the Senate unless the administration makes more eyewitnesses of the September 2012 attack in Benghazi available to Congress. But a Graham spokesperson says her boss has made an exception for Anne Patterson, Obama's pick for Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, and Gregory Starr, nominated to be Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security. Graham's holds on all other administration nominees remain in place.

When asked if the State Department gave Graham anything in return for the lifted holds, the spokesperson said "no." A State Department official concurred: "I don't think there was anything — just acknowledgment of them as imp[ortant] posts."

One must question why Ms. Patterson is being promoted.

Shoebat adds, "In August of this year, it was learned that Hisham Barakat, Egypt's Attorney General, received multiple complaints that Muslim Brotherhood leaders were receiving bribes from the U.S. embassy in Cairo. A Qatari document which we published at the time seemed to bolster these claims as several Muslim Brotherhood leaders were identified as having received monthly "gifts" (bribes) in U.S. Dollars. As we wrote at the time, the names on the Qatari document match many of the names identified in the complaints filed with Barakat. As the U.S. Ambassador at the time, Patterson should have been made to answer questions. Instead, less than three months later, she's up for a promotion and Graham is lifting his hold on her nomination." Qatar Document indicates Bribes in U.S. Dollars

Earlier this year, Raymond Ibrahim reported that Patterson was part of a Muslim Brotherhood "sleeper cell" and vowed to apply pressure to support the Muslim Brotherhood while at the same time telling Coptic Christians to stop protesting against the Muslim Brotherhood.
What's not surprising was the fact that both Senator McCain and Graham traveled to Egypt following Mohamed Morsi's removal of power and called for the release of the Muslim Brotherhood leaders. Anyone else getting the picture for whose side these guys are on? And they have the nerve to talk to us about terrorism!
As we have reported here, there is most definitely an Egyptian connection to the attacks in Benghazi, involving Morsi.
While Graham is making a blowing a lot of hot air over Benghazi (something we need to get to the bottom of, but yes, I think that is all he is going to do), I think the real motivation for his song and dance with the holdup over Patterson is his loyalties and the fact that an election year is coming up; one that many of us in South Carolina cannot wait for so that we can remove him from his senate seat.

It seems that in America what we are lacking are true statesmen who are willing to be called names and endure the ridicule of being politically incorrect to oppose this administration's radical pro-Muslim Brotherhood foreign policy. Fortunately, we do have a few, but only a few.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

“How F*cking Dare You”, Mark Wahlberg Unloads on Tom Cruise About Veteran Comment

Mark Wahlberg Tom Cruise

This is one of the biggest lash outs from actor to actor in Hollywood we have seen in a while. We just got word from TMZ that Mark Wahlberg went on a rant and some what directly targeted Tom Cruise & other actors that compared their job to serving in army. Here’s where it all started:
“For actors to sit there and talk about ‘oh I went to SEAL training? I don’t give a f**k what you did.”
It all happened at an AFI festival last night in L.A., when he was asked about the story regarding Tom Cruise comparing his job to serving in Afghanistan. Wahlberg unloaded a brilliant jab at the crazed liberal, saying this:
“For somebody to sit there and say ‘my job was as difficult as being in the military.’ How f**king dare you, while you sit in a makeup chair for 2 hours.”

Marky Mark didn’t stop there. He went on and it got even more heated:
“I don’t give a s**t if you get your ass busted. You get to go home at the end of the day. You get to go to your hotel room. You get to order your f**king chicken.”
 A blistering shot at Tom Cruise, but this is what happens when you aren’t careful with your words.
In case you missed it. This is What Mark is responding to.

All I have to say about the Obama Administration~Mama told me not to come!

Hit it boys it covers the whole Obama Administration and all his trolls!

Are #ObamaCare Navigators Teaming With Battleground Texas To Turn The Lone Star State Blue?

Blue Texas
No, your information is not safe under ObamaCare…at least not in Texas.
Earlier this year, a left-wing group of organizers and operatives formed a group called Battleground Texas.
Headed by a former field director of Obama for America, Battleground Texas’ sole aim is to turn Texas from a so-called “red state” to another California–that is, almost singularly controlled by liberal Democrats.

Publicly, Battleground Texas is focused on registering voters. Its real purpose, however, is not nearly as benign:
The organization, dubbed “Battleground Texas,” plans to engage the state’s rapidly growing Latino population, as well as African-American voters and other Democratic-leaning constituencies that have been underrepresented at the ballot box in recent cycles. Two sources said the contemplated budget would run into the tens of millions of dollars over several years – a project Democrats hope has enough heft to help turn what has long been an electoral pipe dream into reality.
Now, however, a video released by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas over the last few days has revealed that Battleground Texas may actually be gathering data on ObamaCare enrollees from one of the groups enlisted to enroll ObamaCare enrollees.
According to O’Keefe’s video, Enroll America, a “501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to maximize the number of uninsured Americans who enroll in health coverage made available by the Affordable Care Act” is sharing data with Battleground Texas.
Clarence Landry, an organizer with Enroll America, Texas, is seen on the video talking about working with, and cross-pollinating the same data with Battleground Texas.
A moment later, a woman named Adrian Bell [sic], a field director with Battleground Texas explains that Battleground Texas is a “Democratic organization.”

Another individual, Bill Hunn, explains that Battleground Texas is a “political action committee.”
If Battleground Texas is a Democratic political action committee as is stated in the video, why is Enroll America sharing data with them?

According to the Enroll America’s website, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) awarded health centers in Texas a total of $9,907,738 to provide outreach and enrollment assistance and HHS is planning to provide another $8,151,185 to organizations in Texas to serve as navigators.
That a portion of this money (how much is unknown) is being used to share data sharing between a political action group like Battleground Texas, which states it is “a Democratic organization” is highly questionable. Whether it is illegal, is another matter entirely.
The fact is, if Battleground Texas is gathering data from ObamaCare enrollees that will be later used for political purposes, there is a fatal flaw in the enrollment process.
“Truth isn’t mean. It’s truth.”
Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)

Joe Biden gets a Detroit woman killed.

Moe Lane 
Good job there, Mr. Vice President:
It was shortly before 1 a.m. Nov. 2 and Renisha McBride was involved in an accident with a parked vehicle in Detroit.
More than two hours later and six blocks away, she was shot in the face by a man who told police he thought someone was breaking into his Dearborn Heights home. The 54-year-old homeowner, according to police, said his 12-gauge shotgun discharged accidentally.
…and by “good job” I mean “I hope that you’re happy, Joe Biden.” Because that homeowner did what Joe Biden told people to do (bolding mine):

V.P. BIDEN: Well, the way in which we measure it is—I think most scholars would say—is that as long as you have a weapon sufficient to be able to provide your self-defense. I did one of these town-hall meetings on the Internet and one guy said, “Well, what happens when the end days come? What happens when there’s the earthquake? I live in California, and I have to protect myself.”
I said, “Well, you know, my shotgun will do better for you than your AR-15, because you want to keep someone away from your house, just fire the shotgun through the door.”
And he told them that more than once:

In a Facebook town hall hosted by Parents magazine, vice president Joe Biden responded to a woman concerned that bans on various weapons may make law-abiding citizens more susceptible to criminals with the following advice: “If you want to protect yourself, get a double-barreled shotgun.” “You don’t need an AR-15, it’s harder to aim, it’s harder to use,” he stressed.
Biden indicated that he has given his own wife the same advice. “I said, ‘Jill, if there’s ever a problem, just walk out on the balcony here, put that double-barreled shotgun and fire two blasts outside the house,’” he said, and urged viewers, in closing, “Buy a shotgun, buy a shotgun!”

This is what a Democrat politician thinks is a ‘pro gun’ message, by the way: shake the Magic Boom Stick in the air and fire the Devil Bees in random directions until the Bad Man flees into the night. Out in the real world, what actually happens when you try that is that you run an unacceptably high risk of having a woman take a load of buckshot to the face.
Look, guns are not toys* and they are not magic staffs. They are very dangerous tools, designed to do a very specific job. If you do not treat them with respect and caution, you run the risk of misusing it, and thus causing a tragedy. If this is too difficult, it’s best to not have a gun in the first place. But even if you do not have a gun, it is still in everybody’s best interest if people speak responsibly about firearms. That includes the people that do not like firearms.
So you do not COWBOY it, Mister Vice President. This is not the WILD WEST or a VIDEO GAME. This is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and IN the USA there are people who think that surely the government would not let the Vice President say stupid things that would get people KILLED. Until they figure out that we really are letting Joe Biden do that, I suggest that Joe Biden stop talking.


Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Just a LiL advice for Bill and Hillary Clinton from 'We The People'

[Yeppers a real happy couple here] Let's be honest folks these two marriages were just to put on a normal face in order to get elected ~ all lies...!

We live in what is called a Republic form of government not a Monarchy...we say no more Clintons,Bushes or Obamas...move on with your lives in the public sector, you have had more than your fair share of  15 minutes of fame or rather infamous shame...get divorced and both of you can continue your favorite interests of chasing skirts! This also applies to Barry Barack and Michelle Obama they both can chase pants after their divorce...Barry made sure he can pursue his interest in the LGBT movement as POTUS after all 80% of his energy was devoted to LGBT issues! and it benefited Hillary &  Bill as move on down the road like good ol' pervs do...'We the People' have had enough of the Pink Swastika!

Oh and Bill after the divorce maybe ya could move to Parhump, Nevada ya could chat with Harry Reid at the sports bar...then head on over to the Girls~Girls~Girls door #2 hey they won't kiss and tell or say no they will serve ya well... a happy camper you should be: