The strange, strange story of 'gay fascism' deniers

OpEd: Jack
The  DHS surely smacks of Gay Fascism the department is ripe with LGBTQA staff..!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

By Dr. Scott Lively 
There has been an article floating around the Internet for a long time by a self-described “gay left-wing man” named Johann Hari, a columnist for the London Independent. The article is titled “The Strange, Strange Story of the Gay Fascists,” and you can read it for yourself at the vehemently pro-”gay” Huffington Post website. It contains the remarkably forthright admission that homosexuality and fascism have always gone hand in hand. Hari writes:

“The twisted truth is that gay men have been at the heart of every major fascist movement that ever was – including the gay-gassing, homocidal Third Reich. With the exception of Jean-Marie Le Pen, all the most high-profile fascists in Europe in the past 30 years have been gay. It’s time to admit something. Fascism isn’t something that happens out there, a nasty habit acquired by the straight boys. It is – in part, at least – a gay thing, and it’s time for non-fascist gay people to wake up and face the marching music.”
Now, I have a special interest in this article because I am the co-author, along with Orthodox Jewish researcher Kevin E. Abrams of “The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party,” which makes a nearly identical claim, but one backed with nearly 400 pages of documentation.
What I find most interesting about Hari’s article is that it has garnered virtually no opposition. The few comments on the HuffPo page are mostly benign, and if you do a search on Hari’s name you find not a single suggestion that his article constitutes “Holocaust revisionism” or that he, himself, is a “homophobic bigot.” That’s very strange, because I’ve been called both a revisionist and a bigot for writing “The Pink Swastika.” Indeed, the Southern Poverty Law Center (that legendary beacon of fair-mindedness) has labeled me a “hate group” for writing it (though they refuse to publicly debate me on the issue).

On a recent speaking trip to Oklahoma City, my arrival was featured in the newspaper in a story characterizing me as a “Holocaust revisionist.” This label has been permanently added to the “gay” activist talking points about me, as well as the canard that “the book has been discredited by historians.” It has not.
The Hari article is not the only admission by homosexuals that the Nazi Party was filled with “gays.” At least a fifth of the sources we cited in “The Pink Swastika” were homosexuals. For example, consider this incredible statement by Ludwig Lenz, the “gay” assistant director of the Berlin Institute of Sexology (headquarters of Germany’s “gay” movement in the 1920s and early ’30s) following the attack on the Institute by Nazi Brownshirts May 6, 1933.
“Why was it then, since we were completely non-party, that our purely scientific Institute was the first victim which fell to the new regime? The answer to this is simple …We knew too much. It would be against medical principles to provide a list of the Nazi leaders and their perversions [but] … not 10 percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal. … Our knowledge of such intimate secrets regarding members of the Nazi Party and other documentary material – we possessed about forty thousand confessions and biographical letters – was the cause of the complete and utter destruction of the Institute of Sexology.” [Haeberle, Irwin J. "Swastika, Pink Triangle, and Yellow Star: The Elite Rights Committee," 1992 p. 369.] (Is Haeberle some fringe conservative? Far from it. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erwin_J._Haeberle.)

How about this quote from Adolf Brand, editor of Der Eigene, the first homosexual magazine in Germany.
“Men such as Captain Roehm [Hitler's 'gay' mentor], are, to our knowledge, no rarity at all in the National Socialist Party. It rather teems there with homosexuals of all kinds. And the joy of man in man, which has been slandered in their papers so often as an oriental vice although the Edda frankly extols it as the highest virtue of the Teutons, blossoms around their campfires and is cultivated and fostered by them in a way done in no other male union that is reared on party politics. The threatened hanging on the gallows, with which they allege they want to exterminate homosexuals, is therefore only a horrible gesture that is supposed to make stupid people believe that the Hitler people, in the matter of male-to-male inclinations, are all as innocent as pigeons and pure as angels, just like the pious members of the Christian Society of the Virgin. …” [Oosterhuis, Harry, and Kennedy, Hubert (eds.). "Homosexuality and Male Bonding in Pre-Nazi Germany: the youth movement, the gay movement and male bonding before Hitler's rise: original transcripts from Der Eigene, the first gay journal in the world." New York, Harrington Park Press, 1991.] (Both Oosterhuis and Kennedy are “gay” college professors and historians.)
The Washington Blade, the newspaper of the homosexual community in Washington, D.C., reported on the research of John Fout, a “gay” history professor at Bard College in New York:

“The Nazis shut down the two or three active gay political organizations that had been operating in German (sic) as soon as Hitler took power in 1933. However, according to Fout, gay bars and bathhouses remained open until the late 1930s. … ‘The gay urban subculture survived the Nazi period,’ said Fout.” ["Researcher says Nazi persecution not systematic," The Washington Blade, May 22, 1998.]
Jewish homosexual Gad Beck, director of Berlin’s Jewish Adult Education Center, also challenged “gay” dogma on the degree to which homosexuals were persecuted in Germany. In his book, “An Underground Life: Memoirs of a Gay Jew in Nazi Berlin,” Beck claims, “There was no problem be[ing] a homosexual Jew. Everyone turned a blind eye to whatever we boys were up to with each other” and cited only one case of the Nazis persecuting a homosexual man. [Beck in "Fearless under the Fuhrer," The Advocate, Oct. 26, 1999.]
These are just a few of dozens of citations to “gay” sources in “The Pink Swastika.”
But back to Hari and the problem of “gay fascism” deniers. At the end of his lengthy article, in which he corroborates a great many facts cited in “The Pink Swastika” and adds quite a number that we were not aware of, Hari states:
“The growing awareness of the role gay men play in fascist movements has been abused by some homophobes. In an especially nutty work of revisionist history called ‘The Pink Swastika,’ the ‘historian’ Scott Lively tries to blame gay people for the entire Holocaust, and describes the murder of gay men in the camps as merely ‘gay-on-gay violence.’ A typical website commenting on the book claims absurdly, ‘”The Pink Swastika” shows that there was far more brutality, rape, torture and murder committed against innocent people by Nazi homosexuals than there even was against homosexuals themselves.’”

Herein lies the core of the problem. Leftists will abide one of their own who dares to tell the truth about homosexuality in the Nazi Party, but let a pro-family conservative compile their admissions into a single document and it becomes “an especially nutty work of revisionist history.” The book does not, by the way, “blame gay people for the entire Holocaust, and [describe] the murder of gay men in the camps as merely ‘gay-on-gay violence.’” That is a misrepresentation, something Hari was especially good at until he was suspended by the Independent for plagiarism in 2011.
In contrast to his self-serving (and “gay” cause-serving) libel about “The Pink Swastika,” Hari’s recitation of the facts about homo-fascism in history (as well as those of other “gay” sources) have an especially high degree of trustworthiness. They fall within a category of testimony that our judicial system calls “admissions against interest.” Homosexualists can be expected to insult pro-family conservatives, and one rightly suspects their opinions of being biased. But when a died-in-the-wool “gay” activist writer like Hari tells you that “gay men have been at the heart of every major fascist movement that ever was,” and “all the most high-profile fascists in Europe in the past 30 years [except LePen] have been gay,” you can take it to the bank.
So what about those hard leftists like the Southern Poverty Law Center folks and other homosexualist “experts” who know the truth about “gay” fascism but suppress it? Well, that’s what “The Pink Swastika” is for: to be a resource filled with undeniable facts to show up the dishonest “deniers” for who they really are. I urge you to pick up a copy of “The Pink Swastika” at the WND Superstore, but in the meantime you are invited to read a free PDF of Chapter 1 to see the truth for yourself.

Revisiting 'The Pink Swastika'

oped: This is a long video..bookmark and view when you have the time:
http://youtu.be/XLAESGZ9ycg 




by: Joseph Farah 

I’ve just finished one of the most disturbing books I’ve ever read.
It’s called “The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party” by Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams, and it puts the lie to myth that “gays” were systematically victimized under Adolf Hitler’s regime. In fact, it provides overwhelming, meticulously documented evidence from mainstream historical sources that most of those holding the reins of power in Nazi Germany were indeed homosexuals themselves – including Hitler.

In fact, the only conclusion one can make after reading “The Pink Swastika” is that German-style Nazism was a pagan, homosexual cult.
Yes, it is a thoroughly explosive book – so much so that I have been the victim of a malicious smear campaign in the homosexual blogosphere just for including the title in the WND Superstore.
You will hear that this book has been “thoroughly discredited.” Yet I have failed to find one jot or tittle that has been undermined by critics. Most of the primary sources cited in the book are respected historians and the works of homosexual activists themselves.
From the party’s founding in a homosexual bar, “The Pink Swastika” introduces the reader to all the household names of Nazism – from Goebbels to Goering and Himmler to Hess – and their secrets of sexual perversion, one of the driving forces of their genocidal sadism.
But perhaps not until very recently, with the mandating of open homosexuality in the military and the widespread promotion of same-sex marriage, could Americans have been expected to see the relevance of this remarkable work to their own society. We say, “never again.” But do we mean it? Do we even understand what actually happened? I didn’t – until I read this book.
Never before have I seen a book explore how someone reputed to be in his early years a homosexual male prostitute, Adolf Hitler, could become the most powerful man in Europe and lead the world into cataclysmic and unprecedented death and disaster.

“The Pink Swastika” also offers revealing quotations from Nazi leaders themselves that explain their religious bent, putting the lie to the notion that Hitler and his coterie had anything but contempt for Christianity.
It seems the Nazis sought first to destroy the Jews, but Christianity was next on the agenda.
The real target of the homosexual pagan cult of Nazism was Judeo-Christian morality, the book finds.
A widely circulated German publication, “Defilement of Race,” laid out the plan: “Through the German soul and through unadulterated German blood, the world will be able to return to a state of health, but only after it has been freed from the curse of Judaism and of Christianity. … The mission of German nationality in the world is to free this world of Jews and Christians. … It is the very essence of Christianity … for all people to become ‘united in brotherhood.’ To achieve this, all barriers of race must fall. The maintenance of such barriers means the preservation of national individuality, which is essentially irreconcilable with the Christian aim of universal brotherhood. … Because this disintegration of racial culture has been consciously and systematically pursued by Christianity, and is still being pursued today, it is race defilement.”
Dietrich Hutton, the author of that screed, explained Nazis saw Judaism as the source of the wider problem that involved all the world’s Christians, too.

“The way in which Christianity is directed in the interests of world Jewry and its attitude toward Judaism is traceable to the undeniable fact that the founders and proclaimers of the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth were full-blooded Jews,” he wrote. “It cannot therefore be coincidence, or negligence or ignorance that consciously makes Christians … deviate from the fundamental tenets of conservating nationality and cultivating race. The reason for this is to defile non-Jewish races, weaken and destroy them so that Judaism, as the ‘chosen people,’ can … [erect] a world sovereignty on the ruins of the non-Jewish races, which Christianity has destroyed.”
You will never look at Nazism or homosexuality the same way again after reading “The Pink Swastika.”
In fact, you may never look at America the same way, again.

Justice Scalia Says Supreme Court Responsible for ‘Destruction of Our Democratic System’

[Yes indeed...Justice Kennedy a closet homosexual...member of the Pink Swastika Party : ]
oped: It appears as if Justice Kennedy is a closet Homosexual/Bi-Sexual akin to Barack Obama and Adlof Hitler et al: 
See:  http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html

More: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+pink+swastika+party

by:Dave Jolly 

When our Founding Fathers wrote the US Constitution and established the three separate branches of government, they believed it would insure the survival of the newly formed republic. Most of the power of the federal government was placed in the hands of Congress which was supposed to represent and do the will of the people. Second in power was the executive branch where the office of president would have limited powers to prevent the formation of a dictatorship. The least powerful of the three branches was the judicial branch whose sole purpose was to make sure that the Constitution was legally observed. 

In today’s America, Congress no longer represents and does the will of the people and has become the least in power. The executive and judicial branches have both assumed far more power than the Constitution allows and in many ways both have become dictatorial. The judiciary in America, including the Supreme Court, no longer base their rulings on the Constitution. Many of the decisions handed down these days are based more on their personal agendas rather than on actual law. 

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia agrees. Last week, he was speaking to law students at Santa Clara University in the San Jose suburb. He shared his criticism of the Supreme Court stating that the court has been a liberal court ever since he was sworn in.
Scalia told the law students that the Supreme does not look at the Constitution as a black and white governing document. They consider our founding document to be a ‘living Constitution’ and have done so since the 1920s. A living Constitution is one that changes and evolves over time based upon the liberal opinions by the members of the Supreme Court.
Those liberal decisions, according to Scalia are leading the nation down a slippery slope, explaining: 

“At the bottom of that slope, I can’t imagine how you can go any further, is the right to same-sex marriage.”
“Do you think the American people would ever have ratified the Constitution if they had been told the meaning of this document shall be whatever a majority of the Supreme Court says it is. They vote on the basis of what they feel.”
“It’s the destruction of our democratic system. I cannot imagine the system can continue with more and more of the basic rules made by the Supreme Court.”

Scalia also told the law students that the Supreme Court is granting rights to citizens that are not spelled out in the Constitution. Among those wrongfully granted rights is the legalization of homosexual marriages and federally subsidized healthcare insurance. Speaking about the legality of same-sex marriage, Scalia stated:
"To allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation."

Scalia is often considered to be the leader of the conservative members of the high court. He was appointed to the court in 1986 by President Ronald Reagan. Many list the composition of the current Supreme Court to be 4 liberals, 4 conservatives and 1 moderate conservative. However, Chief Justice John Roberts has been voting more liberal than conservative in recent years, giving liberals the 5-4 edge.

The 2016 election could well decide the future balance of the Supreme Court. The average age of retirement of justices is 78 and including Scalia there are 3 justices over that retirement age. Scalia and Kennedy are 80, Ginsberg is 83 and Breyer is close at 77. Justice Kennedy has been a weak conservative known to tip over the line on some liberal issues. Ginsberg is as liberal as they come and should have recused herself from the same-sex marriage case due to the fact that she has personally performed same-sex marriage ceremonies. She did not recuse herself because she wanted to make sure the court legalized homosexual unions. Breyer started out as a moderate conservative but has drifted over to the dark side of liberalism soon after his appointment to the bench.
It’s quite possible that the next president could appoint 3-4 new members to the high court. Following Scalia’s words, the outcome of the 2016 election could determine whether the high court continues down the slippery slope or if it can start to correct some of the wrongs made by the current court and bring America closer to the country we knew and loved.

 
[Pretty much shows the mentality of LGBTQ  eh'? ]

‘Progressive’ Homosexual Activists Say ‘Good’ or ‘Bad’ Doesn’t Matter, It’s the Guns

https://www.oathkeepers.org  

oped: I for one have had enough of the #LGBTQ movement. It is nothing new it dates back to the Roman Empire under Caligula...It had a big resurgence in the 1920's-1945 Germany under Hitler's "Pink Swastika Party" labeled as Democratic Socialists/Nazi Party! See: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html  
More:
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+pink+swastika+party
The Taliban/ISIS  of today are the same as they were during WWII fighting alongside Hitlers elite SS troops in the Middle East campaign...they hate women (used only to procreate to fill the ranks) and prefer raping boys...same as Hitlers Brown Shirts! 

As for #POTUS44 Barry Barack Hussein Obama... he is not only the New Anthony Johnson but also the new leader of the Pink Swastika Party! See: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/barry-barack-obama-is-new-anthony.html 
Click on all of the links posted and let your journey for the truth begin!

As for ISIS/Taliban/CAIR nothing new here same ol' same ol' 7th Century Barbaric Theology See:
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+myth+of+islam




by: David Codrea 


“Don’t Take Your Eyes Off the Issue of Our Time – Gun Control,” The Advocate, self-identifying as a “the world’s leading gay news source” urges. Springboarding off the massacre at the “gun-free” Pulse nightclub by a bigoted Islamist (who some reports have identified as a club patron who had hookup sex with men, and whose former wife claimed the FBI tried to bury that information), authors Igor Volsky and Mark Glaze unintentionally do gun owner rights supporters a service. That’s because by taking off the mask, they show the “common sense gun safety laws” they demand resemble nothing so much as the state monopoly of violence needed to rule with an iron fist.

Understanding who the authors are helps in understanding how their article advances their agenda. Both are homosexual activists and “progressive” gun-grabbers. Volsky is “Deputy Director for the Center for American Progress Action Fund and former LGBT Editor for ThinkProgress.” Glaze is former executive director of Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown, a senior adviser to GunsDown, and interestingly, the son of a licensed gun dealer.
“LGBTQ people must fight for their safety against the epidemic of gun violence, just as hard as they have fought for equality,” they insist, citing a Southern Poverty Law Center anecdotal “report” on alleged harassment that says nothing about guns, but instead quotes from a handful of unsubstantiated and subjective accounts to smear Donald Trump supporters as intimidating haters.

That’s pretty much SOP for SPLC.
“Already at least seven transgender people have been killed this year — six of whom were killed with a firearm, according to media reports,” Volsky and Glaze continue. “This puts 2017 on a pace to exceed 2016, when at least 27 transgender people were killed. And just like in previous years, the violence has fallen disproportionately on trans women of color.”
Unexamined beyond the listing of names are issues of high-risk associations or that anti-“LGBTQ” hatred has not been proven as a motivating factor.
And instances of killers being “prohibited persons” also means total ban “gun control” edicts were already being violated. That doesn’t matter to Volsky and Glaze.

“Legally obtained or not, whether by ‘good guys’ or ‘bad guys,’ guns are the problem,” they insist. “If we’re serious about saving lives, we need to build a bolder, broader movement that finally tackles the problem at its core. We need to go after guns themselves.”
Actually, if they were serious about saving lives, they’d be out there warning that the greatest threat to health and life among the various sexual practitioners they claim to care about is behavioral and self-inflicted.
“Donald Trump won’t stand in the way. Congress won’t stand in the way,” Volksy and Glaze  promise, casting blame everywhere but on choices and actions. “We can. And together, we must.”
What they plan on doing to the rest of us “standing in the way” is left unsaid, but chances are they’re expecting armed men who took an oath to support the Constitution to carry out their disarmament fantasies for them.

If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work.  You can donate HERE.

'Barry' Barack Obama declares the USA a "Queer Nation"

oped: Not just No,but Hell NO! Enough is Enough...Congress must act like yesterday and remove the whole damn Obama administration from office including all the Federal  "Queer" Judges he appointed to rule illegally on all "Queer" issues, not using the rule of law but making their own law outside of congress...if this isn't treason I don't know what it is! Fact 1-3% of the world wide population is LGBTQ..it is now time for the 97% normal to take back the country as well as the world from the radical Pink Swastika Party...their  flag should be considered no less than the black flag of radical Islam!

Once again I submit the Obama administration is the Pink Swastika Party...smacks of Hitlers Gay SA/SS storm troopers...those who ignore history are bound to repeat it! 
SEE: 
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-strange-strange-story-of-gay.html

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2014/06/the-gay-bill-of-rightssmacks-of-pink.html

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2014/01/alternative-lifestyle-4yr-old-boy.html

On to the Article: 

Gay USA, Here Come the Flags

By Sara Noble
Mr. Obama is very effective and committed when he wants to be for those causes he thinks merit his attention. Iraq can’t pull him from his vacation resort, he just released more terrorists in Saudi Arabia because he’s not committed to safety, the southern border is porous because of policies like the DREAM Act and he went ahead and had a White House celebration yesterday to laud the success of a a few DREAMers, ignoring the criminal ones. What he does care about is the militant arm of LGBTQ and he is committed to it.
Mr. Obama is drawing up a new executive order to make it impossible to not hire LGBTs. LGBTs are not discriminated against in most jobs but one has to wonder how far he will go and how many lawsuits will result. It’s a wait-and-see on that one. LGBTs should not be discriminated against. How will he define “discrimination” or how will it be defined by the courts since they both legislate illegally?
My problem with this is he is violating constitutional law by circumventing congress and writing legislation and congress is letting him do it.
Obama, the first gay president, if you ignore President Buchanan, declared June LGBT month. LGBTs are starting to add the “Q” for Queer, making it LGBTQ month but he hasn’t yet. There is also LGBTQA with the “A” standing for Ally. 

Obama is drawing equivalence between pride in one’s country to pride in one’s sexual proclivities. This doesn’t raise the value of being LGBTQ, it lowers the value of the US flag. LGBTs aren’t a country.
Obama’s goal of establishing a radical homosexual agenda can be seen in many ways, but flags are probably the most noticeable.
The rainbow flag denoting homosexuality is now being placed just under the US flag as if it were its own country. We are the USA of Gay, like it or not.
Gay Pride Week saw the rainbow flag fly over the US Embassy of Tel Aviv.

The US embassy at the Vatican wanted the Vatican to celebrate LGBT Day with them.


It was flown over the US embassy in Madrid for International Family Day in May. Embassies ignored Armed Forces Day.


We flew it in Paraguay 

At least Rep. Darrel Issa remembered it was Armed Forces Day.

Sen. Ted Cruz remembered also:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWhbdI-lYRM 



Last September, we flew the flag over the embassy in Uruguay to honor the first gay marriage.
The US ambassador to the Dominican has a husband and he has the embassy fan page flying the rainbow flag.
To mark the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia (IDAHO), the U.S. Embassy in Tallinn on May 17 displayed the rainbow flag on the Embassy building at Kentmanni 20, Tallinn.
The US embassy in Nicosia celebrated IDAHO.


To commemorate Stockholm Pride 2013, the U.S. Embassy in Sweden flew the rainbow flag beneath the American flag, according to a post on the Embassy’s Facebook page.
Mark Brzezinski, the U.S. ambassador to Sweden, said for him it was about love.

May and June 2013, the US Consulate Shenyang and Local Partners Flew the Rainbow Flag across Northeast China.
The Northeast China Pride Festival has quickly grown to become one of the largest in China since it was first held in 2011. The U.S. Consulate in Shenyang has collaborated with local LGBT groups to organize the annual festival since its inception. This year’s festival theme was “Flying the Rainbow Flag,” and for the first time, organizers took photos of participants proudly flying the most recognized of LGBT symbols at major public sites in five of northeast China’s major cities.
That’s how your tax dollars are being spent – to promote LGBT around the world.

Consul General Stein with the flag

Then there is Bratislava and Slovakia: The US Embassy in Bratislava flew a rainbow flag and issued along with 19 other embassies the Representation of the European Commission in Slovakia in a joint statement supporting Rainbow PRIDE Bratislava 2013, the TASR newswire wrote.

“By flying this rainbow flag, the US Embassy in Bratislava is symbolically demonstrating our support and commitment to rights that I know Slovakia also supports and protects,” US Ambassador Theodore Sedgwick said in a video message on the Internet. 

What do you think? Are they a country? Heterosexuals might want to start flying their own flag to get equal time. 

 

One Response to Gay USA, Here Come the Flags 

Frank Boze

June 18, 2014 at 1:48 pm

Can you say “Cloward-Piven”??? This despicable, arrogant sob will not stop until he has brought this great country to it’s knee’s. Prepare ye son’s and daughters, for it will be they that will suffer the most from his designs for America The Beautiful. We are no longer a “FREE REPUBLIC”, and will have to fight to regain what we have lost !!!

 

An Open Letter To LTC Robert Bateman,LGBT Cmdr Pink Swastika

[LTC Robert Bateman...notice the Iron Cross proudly displayed?]


oped: Sir (used loosley) You are no LTC Moore the Father of the reborne 7th Cavalry 1965 VietNam era [My Era]..LTC Moore garnered the lost honor of LTC Custer, he made it possible for all those who served and are serving in the US Army Cavalry to hold their heads high...You are a embarrassment to all who served and are serving. You also are no LTC AllenWest...!
You are the epitimy of Hitlers Pink Swastika...you are the new LGBT military and need to be fired in dishonor for seditious behavior bordering on Treason!

The Pink Swastika : http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html   

Lt. Col. Bateman:
I understand you’re upset because of a kerfluffle between intellectual pygmies during the aftermath of a football game:

A woman charged with killing a fellow Alabama fan after the end of last weekend’s Iron Bowl football game was angry that the victim and others didn’t seem upset over the Crimson Tide’s loss to archrival Auburn, said the sister of the slain woman.

Because of this, you say that the Department of Defense should do a forcible buy-back of every privately-owned gun in America. However, in assigning blame, it seems to me that the tendency of football fans to become overwrought and irrational – as evidenced by their painting their faces in outlandish colors and designs – seems at least equally to blame in this unfortunate homicide. People who are crazed enough to murder those who root for opposing teams will find other ways. Would it have made you feel better if the murderess in this story had bashed her victim to death with a baseball bat?

Be that as it may, as I read your screed, it became clear that you are confused about questions of violence, and also freedom as set down in our Constitution which, you may recall, you once took an oath to defend. Judging from your photograph, this disorientation and forgetfulness is probably a function of your age, rather than some character defect. 

In the Esquire editorial you authored, you make the following boast:

My entire adult life has been dedicated to the deliberate management of violence. There are no two ways around that fact. My job, at the end of the day, is about killing. I orchestrate violence.

You use the word “orchestrate” in the present tense. Is this a typo? Again, from your photo, “orchestrated” would be a more correct word, as in, “I once orchestrated violence when, as a “butterbar” lieutenant, I charged up San Juan Hill with Teddy Roosevelt’s Rough Riders”. These days, I’m willing to bet the only “violence” you orchestrate is your habit of running over other people’s toes at the PX with your Hoveround cart. 

 You write:

I am not proud of that fact. Indeed, I am often torn-up by the realization that not only is this my job, but that I am really good at my job. But my profession is about directed violence on behalf of the nation. What is happening inside our country is random and disgusting, and living here in England I am at a complete loss as to how to explain this at all.

So you live in Great Britain? I believe I am starting to understand your obvious hoplophobia. Let me offer some advice: Renounce your citizenship, and retire to England, which does not have troubling things like the Second Amendment in its founding documents. As a British Citizen, you would no longer need to feel “embarrassed” by the Supreme Court’s affirming of that document – as you describe in your diatribe.

You make it clear that the intent of the Founding Fathers in writing the Second Amendment was to empower state-sanctioned militias only:

But just so we are all clear on this, let me spell it out for the rest of you. During the American Civil War, a topic about which I know a little bit, we had a system of state militias.

Yes, I am sure you know a great deal about the American Civil War. But I must warn you that memories of personal experiences can be tricky things.

Under a Batemanian America, you write that Americans will have only the following weapons:

a. Smoothbore or Rifled muzzle-loading blackpowder muskets. No 7-11 in history has ever been held up with one of these.
b. Double-barrel breech-loading shotguns. Hunting with these is valid.
c. Bolt-action rifles with a magazine capacity no greater than five rounds. Like I said, hunting is valid. But if you cannot bring down a defenseless deer in under five rounds, then you have no fking reason to be holding a killing tool in the first place.

Another typo: you neglected to place the letters “U” and “C” in “fking”. Really, you ought not try to write without your reading glasses, old-timer. Props, however, for at least trying to be a feisty old coot who is with-it enough to drop F-bombs.
I understand, sir, how daunting these newfangled six-shooters and repeaters must be to persons of your age cohort. Probably when I’m 120 years old, as you appear to be, I will look at things like “Phased Plasma Rifles in the 40-watt range” with similar disdain. But there’s no stopping technology, which brings me the blessings of semiautomatic pistols and rifles – and you the blessings of Geritol Plus and Cialis. Don’t be such a fuddy-duddy; get with it, gramps!

Now to the crux of your editorial: Your demand for a “buyback” program which would force American citizens to sell all their newfangled guns to the Department of Defense for pennies on the dollar, or face prison time; the nationalization of the firearms industry; horrific taxation on ammunition; and other pipedreams you concocted while puffing your pipe and sitting in the rocker you are arguably off of.
Oh well. Senility eventually comes to those who somehow manage to avoid death while “deliberately managing violence” on the battlefield every day, as you claim to.
Sorry, Colonel Bateman. I don’t buy that you are a dealer in death, any more than I buy your claim of being a “military historian”.
Because, if you were a military historian, you would understand the import of one of the most famous quotes in military history:
Molon Labe.
Regards,
Uncle Dave

addendum:

Oath-breaking Army officer wants to enforce citizen disarmament against America 

Read: http://www.examiner.com/article/oath-breaking-army-officer-wants-to-enforce-citizen-disarmament-against-america 

A Good Rule For Using The Internet In The 21st Century

By Lt. Col. Robert Bateman : http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/bateman-on-writing-anonymously-102313

Homosexuality, Hitler, and The Sochi Olympics"Don't Ask, Don't Tell"

Vlad Putin

Oped: I believe Vlad Putin is acting on the history surrounding homosexuality in Hitlers SS and SA troops who wreaked havoc.on the Russians during WWII  ...This is a very interesting read on the subject and credit goes to (Source: The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party, by Scott Lively, Founders Publishing Foundation, 1995.)




















Head of the SS Heinrich Himmler

By Bryan Fischer
The bottom line from what follows is this:

Homosexuality gave us Adolph Hitler, and homosexuals in the military gave us the Brown Shirts, the Nazi war machine and six million dead Jews. Gays in the military is an experiment that has been tried and found disastrously and tragically wanting. Maybe it's time for Congress to learn a lesson from history.

---

The leftwing blogosphere has gone berzerko over comments I made on my radio program this week regarding Adolph Hitler's homosexuality and the savage homosexuality of his Storm Troopers.

At this point, an excerpt of my remarks is now on YouTube and has been referred to by the Washington Post, the Huffington Post, and the Guardian in the U.K.

I have been accused of sinking to new lows and excoriated for rank homophobia.

The problem for my critics, however, is that I'm right.
In 2001, noted German historian Lothar Machtan published the book, "Hitler's Secret: The Double Life of a Dictator." As the far left London newspaper, The Guardian, reveals, not only is it a well-established matter of historical record that Hitler was a practicing homosexual, he murdered those around him who threatened to expose his sexual preference to the public.

Machtan's quotes from the memoirs of one Hans Mend, who served as a fellow-soldier of Hitler's in 1915 in France. Said Mend, "At night, Hitler lay with Schmidl, his male whore." According to Machtan, Schmidl and Hitler were "inseparable lovers" for five years.

A lawyer and and writer who reviewed Hitler's service records, said "Despite his bravery towards the enemy, because of his homosexual activity he lost out on a promotion to non-commissioned officer."

Machtan cites police reports from the early 1920s which reveal that Hitler's sexual proclivities had come to the attention of Munich law enforcement officials. An Army general kept the Munich police file, with its eyewitness accounts from a number of Hitler's male lovers, as insurance should Hitler think about removing him. These police reports apparently were published in Rome years ago by a close friend of Heinrich Himmler who also served as Hitler's interpreter. According to Machtan, because the book containing the reports never appeared in German many historians weren't aware of the information it contained.

Apparently Hitler had a raging love affair with his deputy Rudolf Hess, a relationship forged when they spent months together in the Landsberg prison.

Machtan's answer to why Hitler persecuted homosexuals? "'Hitler himself never condemned homosexuality, but he allowed the persecution of gays in order to disguise his own true colours."

Scott Lively's well-documented book, "The Pink Swastika," exposes a secret homosexual activists don't want you to know about Nazi Germany: that although the Nazis did persecute homosexuals, the homosexuals the Nazis persecuted were almost exclusively the effeminate members of the gay community in Germany, and that much of the mistreatment was administered by masculine homosexuals who despised effeminacy in all its forms.

What follows is a summary of the information contained in Lively's book.

Ludwig Lenz worked at the Sex Research Institute in Berlin, which was destroyed by Hitler's Brown Shirts in 1933 likely because its records, including 40,000 confessions from members of the Nazi Party, would have exposed the sexual perversions of Nazi leadership. Lenz said that "not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal."

In fact, the Nazi Party began in a gay bar in Munich, and Ernst Roehm, Hitler's right hand man in the early days of Nazism, was well-known for his taste in young boys. William Shirer says matter-of-factly in his definitive "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" not only that Roehm was "important in the rise of Hitler," but also "like so many of the early Nazis, (he was) a homosexual."

Hitler eventually had Roehm shot, not because he was a homosexual but because his influence over the Brown Shirts made him a political threat to Hitler's control. The Roehm Purge, or "Night of the Long Knives," was largely implemented by homosexuals.

Hitler's Brown Shirts, the dreaded SA, better known as "Storm Troopers," were the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach, and Storm Troopers were almost exclusively homosexual. They also, sadly, comprised most of the leadership of the Hitler Youth, resulting in frequent instances of sexual molestation.

The Brown Shirts were Hitler's enforcers. According to Nazi historian Louis Snyder, Roehm recruited homosexuals into the SA because Roehm felt Germany needed "a proud and arrogant lot who could brawl, carouse, smash windows, kill and slaughter for the hell of it. Straights, in (Roehm's) eyes, were not as adept in such behavior as practicing homosexuals."

Of the Brown Shirts, historian Thomas Fuchs says, "The principle function of this army-like organization was beating up on anyone who opposed the Nazis, and Hitler believed this was a job best undertaken by homosexuals."

Historian H.R. Knickerbocker writes, "Roehm, as the head of 2,500,000 Storm Troops, had surrounded himself with a staff of perverts. His chiefs were almost without exception homosexuals. Indeed, unless a Storm Troop officer were homosexual, he had no chance of advancement."

Most of Hitler's closest aides were homosexuals or sexual deviants. This circle included not only Roehm but the Hitler Youth leader, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Economics, Hermann Goering (who may not have been homosexual but who liked to dress in drag, paint his nails and put rouge on his cheeks), his personal attorney and his bodyguards. Hitler himself likely functioned as a male prostitute in the days of his youth in Vienna.

Heinrich Himmler, second in power only to Hitler, was publicly opposed to homosexuality but may have been a closet homosexual himself, and served Roehm faithfully and loyally until Roehm fell out of Hitler's favor. Himmler was deeply immersed in the occult, as was Hitler, which led them ultimately to replace every Christian holiday on the German calendar with a pagan counterpart.

In fact, Jews and clergy alike were targets of Nazi wrath. One of the favorite tunes of the Brown Shirts contained this line, "Storm Trooper Comrades, hang the Jews and put the priests against the wall."

In sum, as Lively points out, the masculine homosexual movement in Germany created the Brown Shirts, and the Brown Shirts in turn created the Nazi Party.

There of course is no question that the Nazis rounded up effeminate homosexuals and a great many of them died in slave labor camps as a result of mistreatment and disease. Historians estimate that less than one percent of Europe's homosexual community died at the hands of the Nazis. While even one such death is too many, this pales in comparison to the 85% of Europe's Jews who, unlike homosexuals, were sent to gas chambers.

It is by now well-established that the rate of pedophilia is orders of magnitude higher among homosexuals than among straights. Even though homosexuals comprise perhaps two percent of the population, they are responsible for more than a third of all instances of child sexual abuse. The same pattern occurred among the Nazis.

Many of the guards and administrators responsible for concentration camp horrors were themselves homosexuals and pedophiles. Famous Nazi hunter Elie Weisel was sent to Auschwitz, where he discovered that the head of his part of the camp "loved children," and observed that "there was a considerable traffic in young children among homosexuals there."

A Nazi administrator at Treblinka, according to one historian, "had a harem of little Jewish boys" and "sought in Treblinka only the satisfaction of his homosexual instincts."

In some camps, SS guards would actually sponsor lotteries to see which of the "young attractive homosexuals" would go to whom, while at the same time, according to one historian, they "lashed out with special fury against those who showed effeminate traits." A Pink Triangle survivor said, "The ones who were soft were the ones who suffered terribly."

The "Butch" homosexual guards and capos were capable of unrestrained cruelty, sadism and savagery. A guard at Auschwitz, for instance, strangled, crushed and gnawed to death as many as 100 boys and young men a day while raping them at his leisure.

Historian Frank Rector writes of a film made by the SS "that was secretly made for the enjoyment of a select coterie of Nazis showing a wild drunken orgy of beautiful boys and handsome young men being whipped, raped and murdered by the SS."

Even today in America, it is chic in some homosexual circles for individuals to wear replicas of Nazi Germany uniforms, complete with iron crosses, storm trooper outfits, military boots and even swastikas.

Some parts of the American Nazi movement are explicitly homosexual. The National Socialist League, in fact, at last word restricts its membership to homosexual Nazis.

What's the point here? Simply that there is another side to the constant refrain from homosexual activists who frequently mention the Nazi persecution of homosexuals and in so doing imply that Christians who oppose the normalization of homosexuality are in effect crypto-Nazis.

The truth is that Christians and certain portions of the homosexual community alike had much to fear from the Nazis.

As has been famously said, those who do not study history are condemned to repeat it. Nazi Germany became the horror that it was because it rejected both Christianity and its clear teaching about human sexuality. These are mistakes no sane culture should ever make again.

(Source: The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party, by Scott Lively, Founders Publishing Foundation, 1995.)

© Bryan Fischer

Barack Obama's homosexual agenda has come home to roost #ISIS #IS #ISIL et al

I have been sounding the alarm for over 6 years now...there is no difference between Hitlers SS Nazi Pink Swastika Party and Islams Sharia Law Party...they are one and the same and were allies during WWII
Please take the time to educate yourselves on the homosexual agenda of Hitlers SS and Islams Sharia law... women and hetrosexuals are considered inferior!

Once again: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+pink+swastika 
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html 
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+myth+of+islam 

If this does not wake y'all up all I can say is you are either totally naive or just plain brain dead!

ISIS Leader Sodomizes Eleven Muslim Recruits & Uses it as Blackmail Against Them 
by:Walid Shoebat
In one interrogation by Iraqi officials of an ISIS terrorist who carried out seven beheadings. The terrorist not only confesses the gruesome beheadings he carried out, but also confesses the dark side which is virtually unknown regarding sadistic homosexual group "marriages" and rituals. In this incredible story, Shoebat.com translates the short testimony of one of eleven recruits who were sodomized by the ISIS “prince” Abu Ala’.
Here is the video:





Abu Ala’ made a fatwa permitting himself to marry and sodomize his recruits, with the exception that no man can sodomize him.
ISIS is truly the manifestation of the purest form of the homosexual agenda: sodomizing men as both torture and pleasure, and killing those who disagree with them.
The incredible testimony confirms a documentary broadcasted on August 27th on the Kurdish station STERK TV, it was said that ISIS has been raping men in a ceremony it describes as “marriage” and records them to use as blackmail and force them to join.
ISIS uses rape, including gang rape, as a tactic of fear to intimidate populations it seeks to control, according to an August 28th report by the Firat News Agency, a Kurdish agency based in Amsterdam.

The STERK TV documentary records the confessions of more than 20 ISIS fighters who were captured by Kurdish fighters in Syria and includes horrific footage of ISIS crimes:

The ISIL elements admitted that what they called ‘marriage’ was in fact rape. They said that every new member of the group was raped. The footage of the rape would be used as blackmail in the event of the new recruit refusing to participate in actions.

In the documentary, ISIS fighter Abdul Kareem Ibrahim Bazo said he had been blindfolded and raped:

About a fortnight later they came and said I had to join. I did not want to. But they had the footage. They threatened to show it to my family.

Ferhan Salim Unuf Safen, 20, described how he had been abducted and raped by “six or seven” ISIS fighters and was ashamed to explain the things they had done to him:

I fainted. When I came round they told me: ‘you are now with ISIL’

Ahmed Hussain also described on camera how he had been abducted, drugged, tortured, forced into a “marriage” ceremony, and gang raped by ISIS elements:

They “married” me 15 times. Then they washed my head and put cologne on me. They told me no one could join ISIL without being married.

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSASSINATION OF VICTIMS
Eyewitness testimonies indicate that such ISIS’ actions are not isolated incidents, said Egyptian human rights attorney Wahib Majdi.
What is being done to victims is a means “to assassinate them while they are still alive”, he said, stressing the need for the psychological treatment of victims.
Cairo University graduate student Rasem al-Hilali, an Iraqi national, said Iraqis “used to dream of getting rid of the injustice, tyranny, oppression and crime, under which they suffered for decades”.
“Now they are suffering even more under the rule of ISIL,” he told Mawtani.
Source
*Theodore Shoebat contributed to this article.

Obama Breaks from Vacation to Kick Off Gay Games

 
As the World Burns Barry Barack turns a blind eye and enjoys his favorite pastime..everything gay!
oped: If I have said it once I have said it 100 times on my blog..the Obama administrations agenda has been 90 % LGBTQA issues of which 1-3 % of the world wide population claims to be..the remainder 10% has been the destruction of the US economy via illegal alien amnesty gaining untold numbers of illegal voters for the progressive party via voter fraud! 
I for one am sick and tired of this illegal Limp wristed POTUS destroying the moral fabric of the United States of America...his weak and enabling policies on Islam is duly noted by his appointment of 6 MB Czars to his cabinet...News flash Barry the MB aligned with Hitlers Pink Swastika Party WWII...and for the record Islam as well as the Nazi homosexual Pink Swastika Party terminated all femme Gays they only aligned with each other being Macho Homos...You Barry fall in the limp wristed femme gay sector and are on the hit list for when and if  the Caliphate of ISIS/ISIL Islamic State restores the Old Ottoman Empire .

SEE: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2014/08/obama-conservatives-are-greatest-threat.html 

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html 

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-strange-strange-story-of-gay.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

President Obama made a surprise video appearance at the opening ceremonies of the 2014 Gay Games in Cleveland on Saturday. Joining Greg Louganis, Lance Bass, the Pointer Sisters, and Broadway’s Andrea McArdle and Alex Newell in celebrating the event, Obama said, “Since 1982 the Gay Games have given lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender athletes and supporters around the world a chance to come together to compete, celebrate, and inspire others.”
President Obama, who is vacationing on Martha’s Vineyard, noted how the country has changed since the games began in 1982. “We’ve also seen America change in that time, even since 2006, when the games were last held in the United States in my hometown of Chicago. We’ve come a long way in our commitment to the equal rights of LGBT people here and around the world,” he said.

As international crises continue to dominate the world stage, the president took a break from his vacation and busy golf schedule to record the message for the Gay Games, boasting about his accomplishments on behalf of the LGBT movement since becoming president. ”I’m proud of my administration’s record and of the citizens who’ve helped push for justice.”
Read More:  http://pjmedia.com/

The Gay Rights Movement: ISIS Without the Bullets?

[ The Pink Swastika ] 



by:Gary DeMar 
The title to this article might seem extreme in comparing the gay rights movement to killing Christians and burning down their churches.

But the effect is nearly the same minus the bloodshed. Christians are persecuted, their businesses are shut down through intimidation, and renegade judges are levying massive punitive fines when Christians refuse to deny their faith and then demanded to serve a sexual religion they believe is false and immoral.
Today's liberal, pro-homosexual judges are our nation's mullahs. The law, what's left of it, is interpreted by the dictates of the gay narrative. The First Amendment is no longer an operating freedom. It has been usurped by a homosexual version of the Quran written to exclude all competing religions.

Consider some of these examples that can be found at WND:

• Family-owned Memories Pizza in Indiana came into the crosshairs of homosexuals when an owner was interviewed by a local TV station in the aftermath of the adoption of the state’s religious freedom law. Responding to a reporter’s question, the owner said that while her restaurant serves gays, her Christian faith wouldn’t allow her to cater a “gay wedding.” The restaurant immediately became a focal point of outrage toward the law, with threats of death and destruction, causing the owners to shut down their business.
• The Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association no longer is used for weddings because a lesbian duo was denied permission to use it, and a state discrimination complaint was filed.
•  

The owners of a Christian farm in upstate New York recently were fined $10,000 and assessed $1,500 in damages for not allowing a lesbian duo to use their land and home for a wedding.

The Colorado Civil Rights Commission ordered Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop to use his artistry to celebrate homosexual unions in violation of his Christian beliefs. . . . A state commissioner, Diann Rice, likened Christians to slaver owners and Nazis.

The Hitching Post wedding chapel in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, was ordered to perform same-sex weddings in violation of their faith.

In Washington state, florist Barronelle Stutzman has been penalized $1,001 for declining to support a same-sex wedding with her floral talents.

David and Jason Benham were en route to a new HGTV television show when homosexual activists made an issue of their belief in biblical marriage. The network canceled their real estate show, which was to be called “Flip it Forward.” The Benhams maintain that the RFRA is “a shield to protect companies, like, for instance, a Jewish-owned jewelry. It keeps the state from forcing him to create rings with the Nazi symbol on it. Or a Muslim-owned apparel company. It prevents the state from forcing him to maybe make T-shirts with the cross over the crescent. Or even a gay-owned apparel company from creating T-shirts that say Leviticus 18:22. Homosexuality is a sin.” Very simply, “the state should never force business owners to promote a message or an idea that conflicts with their beliefs.”

In a New Mexico dispute, courts ordered that a photographer could not refuse to use her talents to memorialize a homosexual wedding.

Brendan Eich, the chief executive officer of Mozilla, the company best known for creating Firefox, was attacked by homosexual activists and eventually lost his position because he donated $1,000 to support the 2008 Proposition 8 marriage-definition initiative that was approved by the majority of voters of progressive California.

Vermont’s Wildflower Inn paid a settlement and closed its wedding reception business after the ACLU won a $10,000 civil penalty for two lesbians. The settlement also requires the inn’s owners to place $20,000 in a charitable trust for the lesbians.

Oregon’s “Sweet Cakes by Melissa” bakery shut down after declining to bake for a “gay wedding.”

A Christian T-shirt maker in Kentucky was targeted by the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission for refusing to print “gay pride” designs for a local homosexual group.

Chris Penner, owner of the Twilight Room Annex bar in Portland, was fined $400,000 under the Oregon Equality Act for excluding transsexual men who, dressed as women, had been alienating other customers by using the women’s restroom. According to the Seattle Times, 11 people – calling themselves the “T-girls” – “will get the money, with awards ranging from $20,000 to 50,000.” 

And the list continues to grow.

Of course, there are some homosexuals (e.g., Tammy Bruce and Courtney Hoffman who donated $20 to the GoFundMe campaign for Memories Pizza) who have denounced what many of these media-hungry "gay" activists are doing and the media are promoting as "gay" leaders, but like so-called moderate Muslims not enough of them are standing up to the bullies. 

The Nazi Euthanasia Program: Forerunner of Obamacare~Ezekiel Emanuel,MD

 [Dr.Ezekiel J. Emanuel~Dr. Death] Wants to stop all medical care for those over 75


[Trial at Nuremberg..Hitlers personal SS Md.Karl Brandt]
Excerpts:

Ezekiel J. Emanuel is a Senior Fellow at American Progress and the vice provost for global initiatives, the Diane S. Levy and Robert M. Levy University Professor, and chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. He is also an op-ed contributor to The New York Times. 
Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, special advisor for healthcare at the Office of Management and Budget, the architect of Obamacare and the brother of Former WhiteHouse advisor to Obama and now Chicago Mayor 'Dead Fish' Emanuel .
Noteworthy  Dr. Emanuel served on President Bill Clinton’s Health Care Task Force...hello HillaryCare !

Dr.Ezekiel Emanuel having Jewish roots akin to non other than George Soros who brags about his collaboration with the Nazis during WWII...collecting their[Jews] possessions prior to their untimely demise in Hitlers Extermination Camps...making himself quite wealthy in the process!

Now you are probably saying how does this apply to Nazi Germany's Health Care Program of extermination?
Let me explain by taking a walk back into World History 101 WWII era...:
At his trial in front of the American National Military Tribunal in 1947, and later a leading euthanasia operative, testified that sometime in 1935 Hitler had informed Reich Health Leader Gerhard Wagner of his intention to implement euthanasia of the mentally disabled once war had begun. According to Brandt, Hitler believed the opposition to euthanasia from church circles would be less pronounced during war than in peacetime.   Anyone notice Barack Obama's attack on Christianity, Especially in the Military?

- The Nuremberg Precedent -

In the Medical Case conducted October 1946 to August 1947 as part of the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, the United States charged Nazi officials and doctors with mass killing of patients in the euthanasia ("mercy death") program. Among the defendants, Hitler's personal physician Karl Brandt created the organization for killing crippled children, and as National Health Commissioner ordered the murder of mental patients throughout the country. Viktor Brack, part of Hitler's Personal Chancellery, carried out the Hitler-Brandt "Aktion T-4" euthanasia program that trained the doctors in genocide; then he assigned Tiergarten-4 euthanasia personnel to work on the gas chambers for the extermination of Jews. Brandt and Brack were convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity and executed on June 2, 1948.
The U.S. National Military Tribunal identified as a prime motive of the euthanasia program, "to eliminate 'useless eaters' from the scene, in order to conserve food, hospital facilities, doctors and nurses for the more important use of the German armed forces."
That euthanasia program, and the rise to power of the Nazi regime that perpetrated it, had been sold to a population frantic from economic collapse and predisposed from years of propaganda by the eugenics/euthanasia movement to consider some lives unworthy to be lived.
]excerpts:http://larouchepac.com/node/10654]

Compare to today and Dr. 'Death' Emanuel's same philosophy and intentions:
"The dean of health-care economists, Victor Fuchs of Stanford, has long maintained that we will get health-care reform only when there is a war, a depression or some other major civil unrest. It's beginning to look like we might just have all three...."
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, "The Financial Crisis and Health Care," the Chicago Tribune, Oct. 12, 2008
When Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel wrote those words, he was chair of the Department of Bioethics (euthanasia education) at the United States Institutes of Health. Today he is President Obama's leading representative on a Federal "death council" drawing up a list of medical procedures to be used to deny care to elderly, chronically ill, and poor people, whose lives are considered of less value. Ezekiel's brother, Obama's Former Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, rammed this Nazi-revival policy through Congress with the help of his stooges Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid!

Sarah Palin called it right, " if you’re old, sick or disabled — or have a friend or loved one who is — you should be very wary of Democratic healthcare plans. And, too, you should keep an eye on “the Orwellian thinking of the president’s health care advisor, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of the White House chief of staff.” This is, after all, one of the two advisors to President Obama dubbed “deadly doctors” by the New York Post, a man also known as “Doctor Death,” who, as conservative blogger Gateway Pundit explained, “supports euthanasia … [and] believe[s] medical care should be reserved for non-disabled ‘participating’ members of society.”

I will take it a step further and call it like I see it...the Obama administration with the help of "Dr.Death" smacks of The Pink Swastika ...Hitlers SS Brown Shirt SS Party of WWII...you be the judge the facts are here read and comprehend then decide who is correct and who is wrong!

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+pink+swastika 

Dog Rape Sweeping America – Warning Graphic Content

oped: As the old saying goes from the WWII era..'First they came for the Jews' Hello! in todays world... 'First they attacked traditional marriage'  LGBT movement...then they attacked Child Love NAMBLA...now the progressive perverts are pushing for  beastality .
Therefore the old saying 'Those who ignore history are bound to repeat it"  Does Caligula/Nero the facists movement ring a bell? If not please become educated in World History 101...
'The Pink Swastika"  http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+pink+swastika 


by: Kevin Lake 

There seems to be a very disturbing rise in the rate of dog rape across America. We hear a lot in the alternative press about such issues as the new knock out game for degenerative black youth, but we are hearing very little about the massive spread of dog rape by sickos of all ages and across all ethnic ranges.
A man in California, 22 year old Christopher Alexander Caceres, was caught on surveillance camera last month drugging and raping a neighbor’s dog. The dog owner said that their dog had been acting differently of late, and another neighbor reported hearing the dog make strange sounds and shrieks in the middle of the night. The dog’s owner had found a cell phone and a lighter in their yard and decided to install a security camera. The scene the camera later caught is one of the most disturbing tales you’ll ever here.

Mail Online reports:

Footage shows the suspect stroll into the backyard and feed something to the dog. Normally prone to barking at strangers, the dog was happy to see the man, a sign she knew him, he told the Beacon.
‘He had done this before, it definitely wasn’t the first time,’ he lamented.
Soon after, the degenerate emerges pants-less from a dark corner of the backyard, pins the poor pooch to the ground and has marathon sex with the animal – for almost two hours until nearly 4am, said reports.
The dog tried to break free, but was repeatedly assaulted by the disgusting individual.

This incident happened in San Pedro, California and the dog rapist was arrested and held on $50,000 bond.
On the opposite seaboard of California, showing that this disgusting trend of dog rape is sweeping the nation, a 25 year old man, David Lee Carter, of Benson, North Carolina was also arrested in November for raping a dog, and he did so in front of an under age child.
The search warrants in this case, which were obtained by ABC11 said that Carter “willfully and feloniously did commit the abominable and detestable crime against nature with a male canine, family pet named ‘Drake’, (one and half year old Boxer.)”
Finding such disturbing stories had me do further  research only to find that dog rape was common in November in parts of Europe as well. A woman in Berlin last month had tied her dog up outside of a store before going in to do her shopping and it was kidnapped and raped by a gang of thieves. She recovered her dog a couple of days later after an animal shelter phoned her to let her know they had her dog. It was suffering from several internal injuries.
What in the he@* is going on, people?

Justice Kennedy Demands We Be Good Little Nazis and Obey His Laws

oped: It appears as if Justice Kennedy is a closet Homosexual/Bi-Sexual akin to Barack Obama and Adlof Hitler et al: 
See:  http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html

More: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=the+pink+swastika+party


by:Gary DeMar 
Justice Anthony Kennedy said something so shocking that if a conservative justice had said it, there would be calls for his impeachment or a required psychiatric evaluation to test his sanity. 
Speaking at Harvard Law School, Justice Anthony Kennedy — author of the unconstitutional Obergefell 5-4 majority same-sex marriage opinion — was asked a question on whether civil officials have the moral right to object to a new law based on the legal fundamentals of older constitutional laws, for example, abortion and same-sex marriage
Here’s part of Justice Kennedy’s answer:

“If I could rephrase it in a fair way, what is the duty of a public official if he or she cannot in good conscience, and consistent with their own personal and religious beliefs, enforce a law they think is morally corrupt?

“How many judges do you think resigned in the Third Reich? Three. Great respect, it seems to me, has to be given to people who resign rather than do something they think is morally wrong, in order to make a point. However, the rule of law is that, as a public official and performing your legal duties, you are bound to enforce the law.” 

What? It seems to me that greater respect should go to civil officials who resist unjust laws by staying in power and blocking the new laws. Resigning meant that there wouldn’t be any legal consequences like imprisonment, loss of livelihood, or a trip to an internment camp.
Resignation would mean that no price had to be paid. Just resign and collect your pension like a good little Nazi. The following clip from the 1953 prisoner of war film Stalag 17 reminded me of Kennedy's comments:

SEE Clip: http://godfatherpolitics.com/26121/justice-kennedy-demands-that-we-be-good-little-nazis-and-obey-his-laws/ 



Ted Cruz posted the video of Kennedy’s comments on his Facebook page and made the following observation:

“When a Supreme Court justice compares his own lawless rulings to the draconian oppression of the Nazis – and says that Christians should resign from public office if they will not surrender to his imperious decrees – that really says it all. Those are his words, not mine. Justice Kennedy is holding up the Nazis as exemplars for the current Supreme Court. 

“I, for one, would rather stand with heroes like Bonhoeffer, than the tyrants who inflicted unspeakable evil. And the persecution of Christians – in Iran, China, or America – is simply wrong.” (H/T: WND) 

What might have happened in Germany if civil officials had worked together to stop the new Nazi laws? What would happen in the United States if a majority of states, using the Tenth Amendment as their legal and constitutional standing, refused to follow federal laws and decisions by the Supreme Court that are unconstitutional?
In addition to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, there were Corrie ten Boom and her family, the "righteous Gentiles," Raoul Wallenberg, Oskar Schindler, Martin Neimoller, and many more who defied Nazi laws.

When Niemoeller used his pulpit to expose Adolf Hitler’s radical politics, “He knew every word spoken was reported by Nazi spies and secret agents.”1 Leo Stein describes in his book I Was in Hell with Niemoeller how the Gestapo gathered evidence against Niemoeller. Not the last sentence:

“Now, the charge against Niemoeller was based entirely on his sermons, which the Gestapo agents had taken down stenographically. But in none of his sermons did Pastor Niemoeller exhort his congregation to overthrow the Nazi regime. He merely raised his voice against some of the Nazi policies, particularly the policy directed against the Church. He had even refrained from criticizing the Nazi government itself or any of its personnel. Under the former government his sermons would have been construed only as an exercise of the right of free speech. Now, however, written laws, no matter how explicitly they were worded, were subjected to the interpretation of the judges.”2 

Read more: “Gestapo Tactics in Today’s Churches.”
The judges were the problem because they defended the Nazi regime. The three judges Kennedy mentions had no authority to oppose what the Nazis were doing because they followed his advice and resigned.
Let's ask Justice Kennedy if this November 1941 proclamation by Dr. Ludwig Fischer, the German district governor of Warsaw, should have been followed by German soldiers, judges, and other civil officials?:

"Concerning the Death Penalty for Illegally Leaving Jewish Residental Districts... Any Jew who illegally leaves the designated residential district will be punished by death. Anyone who deliberately offers refuge to such Jews or who aids them in any other manner (i.e., offering a night's lodging, food, or by taking them into vehicles of any kind, etc.) will be subject to the same punishment. Judgment will be rendered by a Special Court in Warsaw. I forcefully draw the attention of the entire population of the Warsaw District to this new decree, as henceforth it will be applied with the utmost severity."

And the rest, they say, is history – a bloody history.

1. Basil Miller, Martin Niemoeller: Hero of the Concentration Camp, 5th ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1942), 112. [↩]
2. Leo Stein, I Was in Hell with Niemoeller (New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1942), 175. [↩]

 

Huckabee 'libido' speech: Did he call tea party Nazis, too?

 
See what I mean Mike this pic is akin to Obama's...get the drift?]

oped: If I told Mike once I've told him twice to keep his day job at FoxNews...Mike you are a nice guy and all...however your history as Governor of Arkansas as well as your failed attempt for a POTUS run proves the point...yes Mike you are akin to a RINO you lean left on most social issues...we the people understand this, being that you were a preacher and all...but Mike you are no Commander in Chief nor is our current POTUS Barry Obama...your show is a hit...stick with it, let the hard job of CIC go to someone who has the experience and knowledge to return our military and country to the era it once was...strong ,feared and beyond reproach!

Your comments said it all you are trying your best to straddle the fence and be a friend to all...thats ok for a preacher but not a POTUS and CIC!
 Ok Mike I will bring you up to speed and direct you to the real atrocities that occurred in Nazi Germany WWII,since you made the analogy  it was because the people of Germany failed to see what was really going on in the Nazi /Facists party called the Socialist Party.  This was a cover for the true agenda... akin to Obama's Progressive Party, they took down Christianity and moral values in order to attack the Jews,hetrosexuals and any others who were not supportive of the Pink Swastika Movement!

Please review : http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html


Quotes from : By Peter Grier 

"Mike Huckabee scored points with Republicans with feisty comments on how Democrats 'insult' women, but his linking of conservatives' tactics to Nazi atrocities may take those points, and more, off the board. "

" Mike Huckabee is usually a pretty effective speaker. He’s folksy and cogent and smiles a lot, and that can soften the impact of his often-conservative social issue positions. But he sure created a stir on Thursday with his speech at the winter meeting of the Republican National Committee. Democrats are mad at him for his remarks about their party and women. And that’s not all – some tea party Republicans aren’t too pleased with what Mr. Huckabee said about them, too." 

"On the left it’s all about “libido." As we noted Thursday, Huckabee at one point said the GOP should fight harder for women’s votes. The party shouldn’t just sit back and take Democratic charges that Republicans wage a “war on women," the former Arkansas governor told the RNC crowd.

Then he said this: “If the Democrats want to insult the women of America by making them believe that they are helpless without Uncle Sugar coming in and providing for them a prescription each month for birth control because they cannot control their libido or their reproductive system without the help of the government, so be it."  

"It’s clear that Huckabee is trying to impute these retrograde beliefs to Democrats. But beyond that, his message was a bit muddied. And the whole subject is just bad news for the GOP, note Washington Post political experts Aaron Blake and Sean Sullivan." 

"In his speech, Huck talked about how he wanted conservatives to stop calling more moderate Republicans RINOs – “Republicans in name only."

“Let’s stop calling each other somehow less Republican than someone else,” he said.

Then Huckabee mentioned that he would be going to Auschwitz next week and that the horror of the Holocaust began with the “devaluation of people."

"How could an educated nation like Germany end up doing something so horrible?"

“You realize that the only way you can end up there is when you start with the idea that people just aren’t as valuable as you are,” said Huckabee, linking the RINO issue with fascist atrocities in World War II.

Talk about umbrage. “Mike Huckabee Might Want to Rethink That Allusion to Nazis” read the headline on a piece by conservative thought leader Erick Erickson on the right-leaning RedState site.

Huckabee is getting beat up unfairly about the “libido” remark, wrote Mr. Erickson in the piece. But if somebody wants to, say, defeat Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell in his Kentucky primary, that doesn’t make them a Nazi, he added."  

READ the Full Article: http://news.yahoo.com/huckabee-39-libido-39-speech-did-call-tea-175200569.html