Saturday, April 13, 2013

RNC Votes Unanimously Backing Traditional Marriage

oped: Finally some good News...guess they are getting the message!

By Sandy Fitzgerald
The Republican National Committee voted unanimously Friday to reaffirm the party's view that marriage should strictly be the union of one man and one woman, rebuffing its chairman's call for the party to be more tolerant on social issues.

Less than a month ago, National Chairman Reince Priebus released a 98-page document that appraised his party's political liabilities in an attempt to re-brand the party and attract voters following last November's election setbacks.

However, the RNC's resolved to uphold its stance on marriage, declaring that the union between a man and a woman is “the optimum environment in which to raise healthy children for the future of America,” reports the Wall Street Journal.

Urgent: Should Gay Marriage Be Legal? Vote Here in Urgent National Poll.

The 168 RNC members, by casting their unanimous vote, shows the party faces further challenges as it looks for ways to broaden its voting base. While some Republicans agree with Priebus that the party needs to further acknowledge and attract minority groups and younger voters, others believe doing that will cause the GOP to abandon its core values.

The party's base seems to agree with the RNC's vote, according to the results of a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll released this past week. The poll showed that while 53 percent of Americans favor allowing same-sex marriages, only 27 percent of Republicans approve.

Supporters of the new RNC resolution say it was made to create the party's clear line on marriage.

"At the very least we wanted to clarify the position of the party," said A.J. Spiker, who chairs the Iowa Republican Party. “(We) can certainly be welcoming without compromising on marriage and the definition of marriage."

Meanwhile, social-conservative group leaders, including Gary Bauer and Tony Perkins, wrote a letter to Priebus last week to voice their “great displeasure” with his assessment of the party, warning that the party will make a “huge historical mistake” by skirting “the issues which attract and energize them by the millions.”

Priebus and other GOP leaders, though, say they are trying to balance the party's stance on traditional marriage while being more accepting of other views.

“What's important is for people who disagree with this stance to know they're welcome in the party,” said former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, who helped draft the RNC re-assessment report.

The RNC's resolution also urges the Supreme Court to uphold the Defense of Marriage Act, which limits the recognition of gay marriage, and California's Proposition 8 legislation, which bans same-sex unions. Both issues remain under court review.

Priebus Friday rejected suggestions that he and others want the party to change its values.
“I'd never suggest we should waiver on our principles," he said in a speech before the vote was taken. "But I also won't tell anyone they can't be a part of this party. If you're willing to defend liberty and champion opportunity, then you should be a Republican."

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

ESPN Sources: Two NASCAR Drivers Advised Not to Do Interviews in Media Center to Avoid Appearing With NRA Logo

NASCAR Racers Told Not to Appear With NRA Logo Behind Them: Sources

ESPN said that sources confirmed to the outlet that two drivers have been advised by their PR people not to conduct interviews in the Texas Motor Speedway media center in order to avoid the NRA logo from appearing behind them.
The move is just the latest in media hysteria that has resulted from the NRA sponsoring Saturday night’s NASCAR Sprint Cup race, the NRA 500.
Earlier in the week Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy (D) urged Fox not to air the race in an attempt to demonize the NRA, which has been critical of some of the gun control measures that have cropped up in the wake of the Newtown massacre.
“This celebration of guns is inappropriate in the immediate wake of the Newtown massacre,” Murphy said in a statement. “But most importantly, broadcasting this race, which will highlight the NRA and its radical agenda during this time, sends a harmful signal to the families affected by gun violence, as well as the millions of Americans who support sensible gun control measures and enjoy your sports programming.”

But Murphy isn’t the only one making controversial statements. NASCAR spokesman David Higdon is sharing that honor. On Friday, Higdon released a statement seemingly bowing to pressure from critics.

EXCLUSIVE: ICE Union President: Rubio Must 'Leave' the Gang of 8

oped: The gang of 8 made up of Progressive Marxist Dems and Rinos are not doing the peoples work...but are pandering to special interest groups and getting drunk&rich on the peoples dime...Enough is Enough of these SOB's

Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents’ union president Chris Crane called on Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio to abandon the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” in the U.S. Senate pushing immigration reform on Friday in a statement obtained exclusively by Breitbart News.

“Senator Rubio was asked during a recent interview that ‘if you don’t get enforcement first, or securing the borders first, is that a deal killer for you?,’” Crane said. “And he replied ‘Absolutely…Because we will be right back here again.’ But the outline from the Gang of 8 offers legalization, or amnesty, before enforcement is accomplished. Senator Schumer admitted as much: ‘we’ve come to a basic agreement, which is that first, people will be legalized…Then, we will make sure the border is secure.’ I would then respectfully call on Senator Rubio to follow through on his commitment to the American people -- and his pledge to accomplish enforcement before legalization - and to leave the Gang of 8.”

Rubio still has an opportunity to leave the group if he wants. The Washington Post reported earlier this month, Rubio “can just say Democrats rushed it, or didn’t allow enough amendments.”
Reports continue surfacing about how Democrats in Congress are going to rush the bill, and more keep coming up about how members of the Gang of Eight are planning to band together to block amendments to their bill.
While the group of senators--Republicans Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Jeff Flake and Rubio, and Democrats Michael Bennet, Robert Menendez, Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin--have not briefed their respective caucuses or the Senate Judiciary Committee on the details of the forthcoming legislation, information leaked to the media by their offices suggests that border security will not come first.
“There is nothing in the proposed plan that I have seen to suggest that there will be any effort to accomplish enforcement before legalization occurs,” Crane said. “Moreover, a lack of strong and immediate interior enforcement means the US will again become a sanctuary for the millions of illegal aliens who undoubtedly will flood across our nation’s borders in the future. Once across the border, guidance from the Obama administration will continue to prohibit ICE officers from enforcing immigration laws on the interior of the United States providing illegal aliens with safe haven and residence.”

Crane added that what he has noticed as the “only precondition to amnesty” in the Gang of Eight outline is one that requires Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to “submit a ‘plan’ about how she’ll secure the border years after millions of illegal aliens have already been granted amnesty.”
Crane noted, too, that ICE officers—the men and women of law enforcement who are charged with upholding America’s immigration laws inside the country, after people make it through the border—have requested meetings with the White House and the Gang of Eight on immigration reform but both have refused to hear from them.
A Menendez spokesperson, Crane said, told the media ICE officers were refused a meeting because: “'Since the Gang of 8 has not met with anybody else, they did not agree to meet with the ICE union president.”
“Contrary to these statements from the Gang of 8, however, news reporters have repeatedly indicated that the Gang has consulted with the powerful Chamber of Commerce, the AFL-CIO and many others,” Crane rebuts Menendez and the Gang. “Someone clearly isn’t telling the American people the truth regarding the Gang’s activities or their alliances.”
“Attempts to obtain a White House meeting have also failed – even though the White House has met repeatedly with powerful business executives and pro-amnesty special interest groups,” he added.

Rick Perry Reaches Out to Connecticut Rifle manufacturer PTR: Come to Texas!

oped: Hello Governor Sandoval!!...wake up don't pull a Dean Heller on us...follow Rick's lead and reach out to gun manufactures...Northern Nevada would be the perfect place for them  to locate...get on it Gov...*sheesh*

Gun Makers Are Solicited To Set Up Shop Out West -

by:John Hawkins
Colt Competition has already moved to Texas because of Connecticut’s new gun control laws and if Rick Perry has his way, Precision Target Rifles will follow suit.
Earlier this week, PTR announced that it plans to leave Connecticut.

This past week an historic and highly controversial bill was passed by the State of Connecticut which will have far reaching consequences to the state, its citizens, and businesses. The bill we refer to is Bill No. 1160, AN ACT CONCERNING GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND CHILDRENS SAFETY.
…The rights of the citizens of CT have been trampled upon. The safety of its children is at best questionably improved from the day of the tragedy that triggered the events that lead us here. Finally, due to an improperly drafted bill, manufacturing of modern sporting rifles in the State of CT has been effectively outlawed. With a heavy heart but a clear mind, we have been forced to decide that our business can no longer survive in Connecticut – the former Constitution state.
After that, Rick Perry reached out to the company on Twitter and let it know that it would be welcome in the Lone Star State.

Rick Perry Twitter

Attn:Joe Biden Obama admin et al: I am an American and I’m tired of your crap! All of you.

by: Joe Wurzelbacher 

Senate Uses Doctors for Gun Control

Dear Joe Biden,
Not coming for our guns? The ‘Black Helicopter people’ are just paranoid? Nothing to see here – just some “reasonable” gun control coming down from on high? We shouldn’t worry about the Obama Administration “swooping down” on us?
Let me tell you something, Mr. Vice President: You’ll never be President. You’ll never be more than a joke on America, because that’s what Barack Obama does. He puts people in positions who are nothing more than lapdogs for his agenda and will do nothing more than help him ram it through. But you’re right about one thing Joe – you’re not going to be swooping down to get anyone’s guns anytime soon, because it is tyranny such as the goals of this Administration which the Founding Fathers warned us about when they wrote The Second Amendment into the Bill of Rights.
Directly after the Right to Free Speech came the Right to Bear Arms, friendo.
The Second Amendment does not compel you to purchase or own a weapon. It does not guarantee the privilege of quail hunting, nor does it bestow on us the freedom to take our sons and daughters target shooting. The Second Amendment was to provide a firewall against a government of tyrants who would otherwise subjugate us.
Guns are for hunting despots, Mr. Biden – not pheasants. And stripping away any part of the Second Amendment is an act of treason by all politicians who are entrusted to uphold The Constitution above all else.

I saw your little speech, deriding us folks who are concerned we may be losing part of our liberty. I heard your code words, your backhanded put-downs, and watched you look down your nose at us. You may think it’s something to giggle about Uncle Joe, but we’re not laughing.
We now live in a world where suddenly, Congress people from both sides of the aisle think they can go behind closed doors, work out “a deal” and then vote on amending The Constitution. It’s against the law for them to do that, Mr. Vice-president, because you need the States and the people through their representatives in order to strip away or add anything to our Constitution and that includes the Bill of Rights.
All ten of them, not just the ones that float your boat.
It’s Marxism 101, Mr. Biden. You and Barack Obama along with your cronies in the media are the Cloward–Piven strategy personified. It wasn’t very fashionable to say that when your ticket was elected in 2008, and those who did were dismissed as paranoid and sore losers for a long time. But the President, along with Democrats in Congress and collectivists in the media has let the closet door creak open.

Any discerning citizen can see for themselves that this is a three-legged stool of oppression whose goals are to “fundamentally transform” this nation from one of liberty and individual freedom to one dominated by The State. You and your ilk, Mr. Biden, have become emboldened. When the light comes on, the cockroaches are no longer scrambling into the cracks – they’re looking right into the camera and spewing Marxist doctrine, railing against Capitalism and convincing large swaths of ignorant voters that conservatism is a disease in need of a cure.
You heard it the other day – loud and clear by way of NBC: “Your kids don’t belong to you. They belong to the community…:” My God, it’s like a bad movie, yet it’s happening. Need some more? Here you go:
One of the provisions in the Toomey-Manchin gun control proposal voted on yesterday may contain a provision allowing doctors to place people receiving mental health treatment on the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) without the patient’s knowledge. If that sounds familiar, it’s probably because you read about this type of strategy in The Rise and Fall of The Third Reich or any number of WWII history books.

Doctors will now be tasked with deciding which patients should go on the list of people who are too crazy to own a gun. What is wrong with that? First of all, the opportunity for activism on the part of health providers will be like the Wild West. In comes a patient you disagree with politically – on the list they go. Next patient is devoutly religious – on the list they go. The next one attended a Tea Party rally? … Well, you’re on the list twice. But the folks who will really be having a field day are…. drum roll please: Trial lawyers.
What happens to a doctor who doesn’t put you on the list, then you go out and shoot up a gun-free zone? Damages and malpractice for starters. As if doctors don’t have enough problems with volumes of crazy and frivolous litigation, now they have to worry about which patient coming through their doors might commit crime in the future? Soon enough, doctors will be erring on the side of caution, which means putting as many people on the list as possible and would you blame them? Now they have to worry about racking up years and a fortune in litigation, because some attorney sues them for not keeping guns away from that patient. Do I have to tell you what the effect on health-care costs will be?

While we’re here, let’s consider the patient for a moment. Someone who is thinking about seeing a doctor or therapist for a mental health issue might think twice if it’s going to land them on a government list, so less people will get help. Less will be treated. Less will get the cure they need. Imagine a woman with an abusive husband going in for therapy and getting put on the ‘too crazy to buy a gun for protection’ list? Joking or blowing off steam could surely land you on the list if your physician is in CYA mode. And they will be.
But like I said, this isn’t exactly new. Fascists and socialists throughout history have regularly used the health profession to discredit, silence or imprison their enemies. Now Barack Obama is using the health care system to disarm us.

First we were citizens, then we became voters, now we are subjects, and soon we will be dissidents. But the line is being drawn Mr. VP and it ends right here and right now. I know you think about being the next President, but you’ll never be President and when Hillary, Bill, Barack and Michelle are in private, they have a good chuckle over it, trust me…
Oh, and one last thing, Mr. Biden:
This isn’t some babbling, fanatical hayseed as you portray conservative, freedom-loving people as being. This isn’t a mealy-mouthed establishment Republican who caves at every turn because the press might call him names. This isn’t some wrinkly old media hack who tows the Obama line in order to keep their position in Washington. I am an American and I’m tired of your crap! All of you.

Cops: Anti-gun mayor demanded sex at gunpoint *Bloomberg Buddy*

WND Exclusive
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” organization was revealed last fall to include a long list of mayors who, because of their convictions, were no longer eligible to own weapons themselves.
Now another embarrassment has surfaced for the organization.
According to a report from the Second Amendment Foundation, Mayor James Schiliro, of Marcus Hook, Pa., now is facing a long list of charges for allegedly trying to force an underage boy to perform sex acts – and then firing one of three handguns he grabbed at a wall when the boy refused.
“Mayor Schiliro is one more example of why we started the ‘Gun Owners Against Illegal Mayors’ campaign,” said Alan Gottlieb, the organization’s executive director.
“He joins recently convicted former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, and recently indicted former New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, both of whom were MAIG members.”

SAF launched its campaign last fall, and “the list keeps growing,” Gottlieb said.
“Schiliro’s case is not only bad, but bizarre,” Gottlieb explained. “He’s been charged with false imprisonment, unlawful restraint, reckless endangerment, serving alcohol to a minor and other crimes, and he also allegedly used more than one gun in this incident, in which at least one shot was fired.
“The allegations against Schiliro creeped me out. With associates like this, I can understand why Bloomberg doesn’t trust people with guns,” Gottlieb said.
“According to published reports, Schiliro’s attorney says the mayor has sold his guns and entered alcoholism treatment, but this doesn’t get any traction with me. If the charges against this guy are proven in court, he deserves to have the book thrown at him, same as Mayor Bloomberg would demand if any other gun owner did what police and prosecutors think Schiliro did.

“It is amusing,” Gottlieb added, “that Schiliro – who signed an infamous letter to the U.S. Senate with 600 other mayors – has suddenly disappeared from the MAIG roster on that group’s website.
“Mayor Bloomberg should be more interested in the conduct of MAIG members than trying to pry into the personal lives of gun owners or soda drinkers,” he stated. “If anybody needs a background check, it would be a MAIG member.”

WND reported earlier on the SAF’s campaign about Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns, set up in 2006 by Bloomberg.
“Michael Bloomberg created this group to further his personal agenda of public disarmament,” Gottlieb explained at the time “But within the ranks of his organization, our research has found several politicians who have been convicted of various serious crimes, thus making it impossible for them to finish their terms.
“We discovered,” he said, “one mayor convicted of perjury and embezzlement, another who was convicted of attempted child molestation, and yet another who was convicted of assault and racketeering. There was one who was convicted on bribery, fraud and money laundering, and another who was convicted of domestic violence.
“In short,” Gottlieb said, “many of these elitist politicians can no longer own firearms. The crimes they were convicted of suggest they are public enemies rather than public servants. No wonder they want to take guns from law-abiding citizens!”
On April 25, 2006, 15 mayors worked with Bloomberg and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino to set up the organization to restrict guns.

An argument for armed self-defense, in “America Fights Back: Armed Self-Defense in a Violent Age.”
The group said it wanted to make cities safer by cracking down on illegal guns, because mayors “have a responsibility to protect their communities by holding gun offenders and irresponsible gun dealers accountable.”
They say they want trace data for law enforcement efforts, and they want lawmakers to fix gaps and loopholes in laws “that make it far too easy for criminals and other prohibited purchasers to get guns.”
The group boasts that it has grown to more than 725 mayors in 40 states.
But SAF is publicizing mayors who have run into their own troubles.
It launched its campaign in newspapers, magazines and on the Internet, revealing the criminal and ethical wrongdoings of many of the mayors themselves.
See the ad.
Gottlieb reported the research conducted by the foundation found “a far higher rate of criminal activity within the ranks of the MAIG than among the ranks of more than eight million citizens who are licensed to carry concealed firearms in 49 states.”

“While Michael Bloomberg has been campaigning to turn gun owners into criminals,” Gottlieb said, “the criminals in his own ranks were engaged in such activities as tax evasion , extortion, accepting bribes, child pornography, trademark counterfeiting and perjury. One was even convicted of assaulting a police officer.
“And these people have the audacity to smear law-abiding gun owners as potential criminals, simply because they exercise their constitutional right to keep and bear arms,” he concluded. “He should pay more attention to what his friends are up to than worry about the gun owners he’s been trying to demonize.”

The Second Amendment Foundation is the nation’s oldest and biggest group to focus on the constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, the foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters. In addition to the precedent-setting McDonald v. Chicago Supreme Court Case, SAF has funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles; New Haven, Conn.; New Orleans; Chicago; and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners.
The organization also has been acting largely under the radar to fight unconstitutional firearms restrictions across the nation. Recently, it won its request for preliminary injunction against the New Mexico standard.
The injunction was handed down just days ago by District Judge M. Christina Armijo, who took action in the case of John Jackson, a permanent legal resident alien who could not obtain a concealed carry permit in the state.
The organization also announced it has filed a motion for injunctive relief in a related case in Nebraska. There, non-citizens legally living in the state are prohibited from obtaining a concealed carry permit.

The SAF fought and won the landmark McDonald v. Chicago Supreme Court Case that applied Second Amendment rights to individuals in states all across the nation.
Another recent battle for the SAF was in Alameda County, Calif., which changed the rules as three businessmen were trying to open a gun shop. The foundation successfully sued the county for allegedly violating the constitutional rights of three businessmen by wrongfully denying them permits to open a gun shop.
The foundation also recently argued a pair of California cities and the state’s Department of Justice improperly confiscated firearms during investigations and then refused to return them to their owners – even after the subjects of the inquiries were cleared.

Other cases the SAF has handled recently:
  • SAF sued the state of California over a “vague” gun ban over a case in which a man twice was jailed and then cleared. The focal point is the definition of an “assault weapon.” The statute’s definition of weapons is so “vague and ambiguous,” the group contends, that one man was arrested on two different occasions for violations but ultimately cleared of any wrongdoing. “It’s an insult to be arrested once for violating a law that is so vague and ambiguous that law enforcement officers cannot tell the difference between what is and what is not a legal firearm under this statute,” said Gottlieb, “but to be arrested and jailed twice for the same offense is an outrage.”
  • In New York, the organization has asked for a summary judgment that would strike New York City’s $340 triennial fee for just owning a handgun. The legal brief explains that under U.S. Supreme Court rulings “the right to keep a handgun in the home for self-defense is a part of the ‘core’ of the Second Amendment’s protections.” The case, brought by SAF, the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association and individuals including an electrical contractor, a paramedic, CPA and woodworker, argues, “The city’s $340 fee is inherently prohibitive and serves the impermissible purpose of discouraging the exercise of constitutional rights. While the city can charge a nominal fee to defray costs, the $340 fee is not nominal, and has never been calculated to defray costs.”
  • The organization has sued New Jersey and officials and judges over procedures that allowed them to refuse firearms permits for a kidnap victim, a man who carries large amounts of cash for his business and a civilian FBI employee who fears attacks from radical Islamists. The permissions were denied on the grounds people had not shown a “justifiable need.” “Law-abiding New Jersey citizens have been arbitrarily deprived of their ability to defend themselves and their families for years under the state’s horribly crafted laws,” said an SAF spokesman. “The law grants uncontrolled discretion to police chiefs and other public officials to deny license applications even in cases where the applicant has shown a clear and present danger exists.” 
  • The SAF filed a case on behalf of an honorably discharged veteran from the Vietnam War and names as defendants Attorney General Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The case was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of Jefferson Wayne Schrader. The question is whether the state of Maryland can deprive an individual of the right to possess a weapon over a misdemeanor. Schrader had been convicted of misdemeanor assault relating to a fight involving a man who previously had assaulted him in Annapolis. But he was denied the opportunity to receive a shotgun as a gift or to purchase a handgun for personal protection.
  • SAF filed a claim against Maryland for a man who alleged the state was violating the Second Amendment by refusing to renew his handgun permit. Raymond Woollard originally was issued a carry permit after a man broke into his home during a family event in 2002. Woollard’s permit was renewed in 2005 after the defendant in the case was released from prison. But state officials later refused to renew the permit, even though the intruder now lives some three miles from Woollard.
  • SAF sued Westchester County, N.Y., because officials there were requiring that residents have a “good cause” to ask for a handgun permit. The federal lawsuit alleges the requirement conflicts with the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment establishes a personal right to “keep and bear arms.” Individual plaintiffs in the case are Alan Kachalsky and Christina Nikolov, both Westchester County residents whose permit applications were denied.

Obama eligibility appeal in Roy Moore's court

Many cases challenging Barack Obama's presidential eligibility have come and gone, but now an appeal has been filed with a state Supreme Court led by a newly elected chief justice who has expressed doubt about Obama's qualification for office.

Roy Moore was elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court last November, a decade after he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.

Now, 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish are asking the state's highest court to force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state's 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.

Get Judge Roy Moore's classic book about his battle for liberty, "So Help Me God: The Ten Commandments, Judicial Tyranny, and the Battle for Religious Freedom."

Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of the Washington, D.C.-watch dog Judicial Watch and now head of Freedom Watch, filed the appeal Tuesday with the Alabama Supreme Court, asking for oral arguments.

"We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law," Klayman told WND.

Klayman says he and his team "have great respect for Chief Justice Moore and his integrity and legal acumen."

"He is one courageous and brave man. There are few in this country."

The case is an appeal of a dismissal by the Montgomery Circuit Court.

In his brief, Klayman says "credible evidence and information from an official source" was presented to Chapman before the election indicating Obama might not have been qualified for Oval Office.

The complaint argues Chapman failed her constitutional duty as secretary of state to verify the eligibility of candidates.

Moore is on the record questioning Obama's eligibility.

In an interview with WND in 2010, he defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin's demand that President Obama prove his eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment orders.

Moore said he had seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a natural-born citizen and much evidence that suggests he is not.

Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty."

"And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said.

Click here to learn more about Lakin's book. Officer's Oath: Why My Vow to Defend the Constitution Demanded That I Sacrifice My Career

Get Judge Roy Moore's classic book about his battle for liberty, "So Help Me God: The Ten Commandments, Judicial Tyranny, and the Battle for Religious Freedom."

'Affirmative duty'

Klayman asserts the secretary of state "has an affirmative duty that stems from her oath of office under both the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions, to protect the citizens from fraud and other misconduct by candidates."

As a result of her refusal to investigate the qualifications of candidates for president, Klayman says, "a person believed to be unqualified for that office has been elected."

The remedy, he said, "is to require each candidate to do what every teenager is required to do to get a learner's permit."

"It is to produce a bona fide birth certificate … and the Secretary of State is the official to cause that to happen."

McInnish is a member of the Madison County Republican Executive Committee and also sits on the state Republican Executive Committee.

Citing the investigation of Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse, Klayman says Chapman "gained knowledge from an official source that there was probable cause to believe the Barack Obama had not met a certifying qualification."

The appeal brief notes McInnish visited the secretary of state's office Feb. 2, 2012, and spoke with the deputy secretary of state, Emily Thompson, in Chapman's absence.

Thompson, the brief says, "represented that her office would not investigate the legitimacy of any candidate, thus violating her duties under the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions."

As WND reported, Arpaio and his team concluded that Obama's long-form birth certificate was a computer-generated forgery.

You don't know Obama. Watch the trailer below for 2016: Obamas America.

Klayman, in a previous brief, argued the secretary of state, "having the power to certify candidates, can surely de-certify – in effect disqualify – them if they are found to be ineligible."

In his new appeal, Klayman points, as an example, to California Secretary of State Debra Bowen's rejection of Petra Lindsay on the 2012 California primary ballot because she was 27 years old. The U.S. Constitution requires the president to be at least 35.

In his conclusion, Klayman argues the fact that the election is over does not make the case moot.

"It would be paradoxical beyond measure if the real and grave question of the legitimacy of the de facto President, a question which lies at the very heart of our American Constitutional Government, were left unresolved for want of the simplest of documents, a birth certificate."

If either a bona fide birth certificate is produced or an admission is made that it does not exist, he writes, "this most important of legal questions will have been answered, the purity of Alabama's ballot maintained, and the anxiety of Alabama citizens stilled."

If the issue is not resolved, he said, citizens will be left with the impression "that their government was dysfunctional and has ignored their real concerns.

Click here to visit WND's Eligibility Store. You will find dozens of products that explain why Obama is ineligible to be president.

'Certain documentation'

In an earlier step in the case one year ago, before a panel of Alabama Supreme Court justices, one justice raised doubts about Obama's eligibility.

The justices denied a petition filed by McInnish seeking to require Obama submit an original birth certificate before he could be placed on the state's 2012 ballot.

Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish's charges of "forgery" were legitimate cause for concern.

"Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the 'short form' and the 'long form' birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public."

The "certain documentation" is the findings of Arpaio's investigation.

"The Alabama Constitution implies that this court is without jurisdiction over McInnish's original petition," Parker explained. "The office of the secretary of state of Alabama is not a 'court of inferior jurisdiction' that this court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a petition."

Now, however, the case is coming from a lower court.

Click here to visit WND's Eligibility Store. You will find dozens of products that explain why Obama is ineligible to be president.

'Obama violated the Constitution'

Moore told WND in an interview after his election last November that the country must return to a standard in which the rule of law prevails over politics.

He said Obama violated the Constitution when he bombed Libya, because the Constitution stipulates only Congress shall declare war.

"No president has the power to violate constitutional restraints of power," Moore said.

"The Constitution is the rule of law, and [my job is] to uphold the rule of law."

Government's job, Moore said, is to secure and protect those rights.

"There is little regard for the Constitution in the courts today, even the U.S. Supreme Court."

Friday, April 12, 2013

It’s Time to Push for Impeachment Proceedings Against Eric Holder


Attorney General Eric Holder has again shown his true colors – his disdain for America and her laws. Recently, he took action against the Romeike family that is seeking asylum in the United States after being forced to flee their home country or risk losing their five children to the German government. Germany was attempting to force the Romeikes to put their children in a government school against their religious beliefs in a terrifying repeat of history.
Holder said that asylum should not be granted to homeschoolers because, according to him (not the law), homeschooling is not protected under religious freedom.


Regarding education, the federal government does not have the right to break the law by implementing any type of educational curriculum. Parents are responsible for training their children in the way they should go (Prov. 22:6), not the federal government (Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution).
The fallout of federal education is stupefying. More than 700,000 students who graduate high school each year cannot even read their own diplomas. Bill Bennett, the Secretary of Education under Reagan, said, “The longer you stay in school in America, the dumber you get.”
Eric Holder doesn’t have a right to break the law; his job is to ensure the rights of the people, not to strip them away.
Holder, who is appointed to magnify the law against crime, has instead repeatedly magnified crime against the law.
On Wednesday, March 6, 2013, Eric Holder testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee, implying that Wall Street tycoons are above the law, in essence giving them a license to plunder the American people. Holder’s head of the criminal division did not prosecute a single Wall Street executive for the fraud that destroyed the economy.

As we all know, Eric Holder is guilty of putting thousands of assault rifles into the hands of Mexican drug lords in an attempt to blame the American people for the crimes administration officials are guilty of contriving and committing. As a result, Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed, along with hundreds of Mexican civilians, including teens at a birthday party and a Mexican beauty queen.
Soon after being sworn in as Obama’s attorney general, Holder ordered the voter intimidation case against the Black Panthers during the 2008 presidential election to be dropped.

During his tenure as Bill Clinton’s Deputy Attorney General, Holder was involved in the controversial pardon of Marc Rich, a major Democratic contributor and fugitive for tax fraud. Holder advised Rich’s lawyer to bypass the normal pardon request procedures and take their plea directly to the White House. Holder also failed to inform prosecutors that a pardon was in process for Rich, denying them the opportunity to intervene.
The Canada Free Press reported that against the express wishes of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the federal prosecutor, and the victims of the Boricua Popular Army, at Holder’s recommendation, Bill Clinton granted clemency to the 16 convicted terrorist group members.
Article II, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution states the grounds for impeachment: “all civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Since 1797, the House of Representatives has impeached 16 federal officials.
It is time to bind criminals such as Eric Holder down with the chains of the Constitution, as Benjamin Franklin put it. America is a government of the People, by the People, and for the People. Therefore, it is OUR responsibility to uphold the laws of our republic and hold our public servants to their oaths of office to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States.
If we fail to do so, our government will become “a source of terror to all its citizens” and create “a country where everyone lives in fear.”

Obama's Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood buddies follow his 'party hardy' attitude

via Live Leak:
Egyptian mob gang-rapes a pair of Coptic Christian women in Cairo
Happened recently in Cairo in broad daylight, This was in the backdrop of brutal violence that occurred in the past few days against the Coptic Christian community by the majority Muslim population that saw several members of their community killed, the Christians held a protest against the violence but were met by a larger muslim mob that forced them to flee into a Cathedral where they were surrounded by the larger mob who began hurling Molotov cocktails into the packed Cathedral, the police started shooting into the Cathedral as well with shotguns:
The Coptic Christians should get their own state partitioned out of Egypt, like the South Sudanese or Israel, otherwise they will all be driven out or killed.

Shouts of “Christians” could be heard from the frenzied mob of ”Allahu Akbar“- screaming Muslim savages as they viciously gang-raped two Coptic Christian women in the streets of Cairo… just like what happened to CBS reporter, Lara Logan.
LiveLeak  NOTE: YouTube removed the click the link below...*warning graphic*
The attacks took place in broad daylight, amidst a backdrop of brutal violence against the Coptic Christian community that saw several members of their community killed by Muslims in the past week. Christians held a protest against the violence but were met by a larger Muslim mob that forced them to flee into a Cathedral where they were surrounded by the Muslim mob who began hurling Molotov cocktails into the packed Cathedral.
If Youtube removes this, CLICK HERE TO SEE

Barack Obama is preparing to DECLARE MARTIAL LAW -- we MUST STOP HIM NOW!

Rush Limbaugh Spreads Sen. Ted Cruz's Warning Against Barack Obama's POWER GRAB -- Select HERE to DEMAND Congress STOP Obama's Push for MARTIAL LAW!

ALERT: The word is spreading -- our actions are picking up speed -- now we need to PRESS IN to STOP Obama's unconstitutional grab for power!

Conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh has joined in with us in spreading Sen. Ted Cruz's shocking report on Barack Hussein Obama's ever-growing power grab. On his radio show this week, Limbaugh stated, "There are six cases here where the Supreme Court, in the last 16 months, has beaten back the Obama administration in various power grabs. So you asked for some good news, and there IS some!"


And now, thanks to YOUR barrage of messages to Congress, some of them are finally starting to WAKE UP to the fact that Obama is driving our country towards MARTIAL LAW!


Sen. Cruz (R-TX) has just released this shocking report -- "The Legal Limit: The Obama Administration's Attempts to Expand Federal Power" -- that analyzes just SIX of the times in the last 15 months where the U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously rejected the Obama Administration's arguments for increased federal power. His summary of Obama's power grab is right on target:

"When President Obama's own Supreme Court nominees join their colleagues in unanimously rejecting his Administration's call for broader federal power six times in just over one year, the inescapable conclusion is that the Obama Administration's view of federal power knows virtually no bounds. This is a deeply troubling pattern that we will continue to highlight as long as this Administration continues seeking ways to expand its power in direct violation of Americans' constitutional rights."

That's exactly what the Obama regime is doing -- "seeking ways to expand its power in direct violation of Americans' constitutional rights"! It's up to Americans like YOU AND ME to thwart him!


The facts are plain. Sen. Cruz's report highlights just six of the cases that the Supreme Court has unanimously rejected since January 2012. Had President Obama's Department of Justice been successful in its cases, the federal government would have the power to:
  • Attach GPSs to a citizen's vehicle to monitor his movements, without having any cause to believe that a person has committed a crime (United States v. Jones);
  • Deprive landowners of the right to challenge potential government fines as high as $75,000 per day and take away their ability to have a hearing to challenge those fines (Sackett v. EPA);
  • Interfere with a church's selection of its own ministers. (Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC);
  • Override state law whenever the President desires. (Arizona v. United States);
  • Dramatically extend statutes of limitations to impose penalties for acts committed decades ago. (Gabelli v. SEC); and
  • Destroy private property without paying just compensation. (Arkansas Fish & Game Commission v. United States).
The arguments advanced in these cases demonstrate an astonishing view of federal power on behalf of the Obama Administration -- one that shouldn't surprise us. HE WANTS COMPLETE CONTROL. So far, the Supreme Court has been able to slow him down... but none of this has stopped Obama from continuing his push for MARTIAL LAW:

The latest report in Obama's continuing push has the ominous headline, "Homeland Security To Military: We Will Absorb You" --

Homeland Security sees the role of the military as a subset of its own mission. A right wing position paper from a think tank noted how the Army has taken critical steps to broaden its mission to include homeland security tasks. But the thinking was that the Army needs to redirect its focus and broaden its nission to augmenting its capacity to operate in the "Homeland" and broaden the reach of DHS.

In s sort of "hedging strategy"--read that; a way to bypass posse comitatus, the Army, under the authority of the Deputy chief of Staff For Operations and Plans (G3) sponsored a RAND Corporation study to explore the idea. The study noted that the nation places primary and immediate homeland security operations with civilian organizations and the National Guard and proposed a hybrid model to blend military support with civilian authority structure...

Some of you may be having a problem wrapping your minds around the idea that Homeland Security is absorbing the military in the US, but look at the way the DHS has spread military funding aroundn to local and state police agencies. Look at the way DHS is carving an empire out of federal law enforcement and reaching out to other agencies, via funding, grants, and equipment giveaways.

This is one of the reasons our police forces have been militarized. After all, you do not give big boys toys without expecting them to play with them. But military equipment comes with a price, namely fostering a militaristic mindset in our police forces, an US vs. them mentaility which is not compatible with community policing, or domestic law enforcement...

Which is EXACTLY what Barack Obama WANTS to see happen, as he pushes America further and further towards MARTIAL LAW!


Barack Obama may be taking a lot of taxpayer-funded vacations, but it seems like he NEVER stops working to push us closer and closer to MARTIAL LAW! Would you be surprised to learn that now Obama is planning to RIG future elections?

YOU READ THAT RIGHT -- he just signed a NEW Executive Order which would basically NATIONALIZE elections across America... and make sure those elections would be favorable to Democrats from now on!

We already know about the rampant voter fraud in the most recent presidential election. Now, Obama is trying to institutionalize that in every state:

President Barack Obama defied his harshest critics this past week, by quietly signing an executive order establishing a Presidential administration dedicated to, among other things, registering non-English speaking citizens to vote.

Last Thursday, while the nation was busy preparing for their Easter holiday President Obama signed an Executive Order establishing the Presidential Commission on Election Administration, a wing of the federal government he has tasked with "election administration," a move critics say is an attempt to nationalize the country's elections for partisan advantage...

Among one of the missions of the board will be to "ensure that all eligible voters have the opportunity to cast their ballots without undue delay, and to improve the experience of voters facing other obstacles in casting their ballots, such as... voters with limited English proficiency." A voting bloc that leans Democratic by a margin of 70% in most elections.

In a bold and unprecedented step, the executive order, which side steps any legislation or national debate, created a federal Commission that shall consider, "the number, location, management, operation, and design of polling places; the training, recruitment, and number of poll workers; the efficient management of voter rolls and poll books; voter education; and voting accessibility for individuals with disabilities, limited English proficiency, and other special needs."

This Executive Order is just one more step for Obama and his cronies, down the path to complete control -- even MARTIAL LAW. We MUST STOP HIM NOW!


Have you heard that Obama's Department of Homeland Security has ordered up to 1.6 BILLION rounds of ammunition for its more than 100,000 armed agents?

In fact, they've ordered so much ammunition, that local police departments across the country are beginning to discover that ammunition is difficult to find!

As News 2 KJRH reports:

Police Chief Cameron Arthur of Jenks, Oklahoma says that his department and others are starting to have trouble getting rounds for their officers. Some departments are even starting to barter with each other to fulfill needs because suppliers cannot fill orders.

"Ammunition and assault weapons in general have skyrocketed. In the past, $3,000 would get us several rifles or a great deal of ammunition. But we have seen prices go up 30, 40, 50 percent. In addition... the time to get it could be six months to a year, or in some cases even longer," Arthur said.

CNSNews also reports that several police departments around the country are rationing ammunition for its officers and putting off buying new weapons due to scarcity of product.


Rep. Timothy Huelskamp (R-KS) has been attempting to get DHS to explain why it is ordering so many rounds -- but the Congressman has reported that the department has thus far refused to answer key questions submitted by members of Congress.

They have tried to claim that the large purchases are "to keep costs down" -- but as Tim Brown at Freedom Outpost notes, that does NOT explain why within the past year there have been solicitations for "up to" nearly 2 billion rounds, "when according to Peggy Dixon, spokeswoman for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Glynco, Ga, her training center and others like it that are run by DHS use as many as 15 million rounds every year, mostly on shooting ranges and in training exercises." The argument that "it keeps costs down" doesn't make sense if you are only purchasing between ten and twenty percent of what you are soliciting for!


Barack Obama is taking the U.S. down the path to MARTIAL LAW -- we MUST STOP HIM NOW!

This is obviously only ONE of the pieces that Obama has moved into place on his giant chess board. As we already reported, Obama has already taken a giant leap forward in his drive to institute martial law: according to 2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow, he claims he was told by a top military veteran that the Obama administration's "litmus test" for new military leaders isn't whether they are the best military commanders...

It's whether or not they will obey an order to fire on U.S. Citizens!

Garrow was nominated three years ago for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize and is the founder of The Pink Pagoda Girls, an organization dedicated to rescuing baby girls from "gendercide" in China. Garrow has been personally involved in "helping rescue more than 36,000 Chinese baby girls from death." He is a public figure, not an anonymous voice on the Internet, which makes his claim all the more disturbing.

"I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new "litmus test" in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. "The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not". Those who will not are being removed," Garrow wrote on his Facebook page, later following up the post by adding the man who told him is, "one of America's foremost military heroes," whose goal in divulging the information was to "sound the alarm."

Garrow's claim is even more explosive given that the country is in the throes of a national debate about gun control, with gun rights advocates instisting that the founders put the Second Amendment in the Constitution primarily as a defense against government tyranny.

It also follows reports on Sunday that General James Mattis, head of the United States Central Command, "is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned." As reporter Paul Joseph Watson commented:

"Concerns over US troops being given orders to fire on American citizens in the event of mass gun confiscation first arose in 1995 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms, California were given a survey as part of an academic project by Navy Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the Marines if they would, 'Fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.'

The survey was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by the tone of the question.

The US Military has clearly outlined innumerable civil emergency scenarios under which troops would be authorized to fire on U.S. citizens.

In July 2012, the process by which this could take place was made clear in a leaked US Army Military Police training manual for 'Civil Disturbance Operations' (PDF) dating from 2006. Similar plans were also outlined in an updated manual released in 2010 entitled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations.

The 2006 document outlines how military assets will be used to 'help local and state authorities to restore and maintain law and order' in the event of mass riots, civil unrest or a declaration of martial law.

On page 20 of the manual, rules regarding the use of 'deadly force' in confronting "dissidents" on American soil are made disturbingly clear with the directive that a, 'Warning shot will not be fired.'

Given that second amendment advocates are now being depicted as dangerous terrorists by the federal government and local law enforcement, Garrow's claim is sure to stoke controversy given that Americans are seeing their gun rights eviscerated while the federal government itself stockpiles billions of bullets."

DID YOU GET THAT? You and I are now being labeled as potential "terrorists" because we believe in the Constitution -- and Obama is signing Executive Orders and making Executive decisions to STOP patriotic Americans like us from opposing him!


Again and again... One after another after another... Obama keeps signing more and more Executive Orders and new laws to get around Congress, get around the U.S. Constitution, and consolidate his POWER...

Of course, we also reported to you even more OUTRAGEOUS news: While the whole country was distracted with a Killer Storm and a Killer Presidential Election, Barack Hussein Obama was continuing with his plans to initiate MARTIAL LAW!

Remember these almost unbelievable headlines?

"Just before Hurricane Sandy, Obama signed executive order merging
Homeland Security with private sector to create VIRTUAL DICTATORSHIP"

The news article under that headline only gets worse: "While all eyes were on Hurricane Sandy in the days leading up to the storm's breach on the mainland of the Northeast, the White House was busy devising new ways to enslave Americans under the guise of protecting national security. On October 26, 2012, Barack Obama quietly signed an Executive Order (EO) establishing the so-called Homeland Security Partnership Council, a public-private partnership that basically merges the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with local governments and the private sector for the implied purpose of giving the Executive Branch complete and limitless control over the American people."

This Executive Order went further than any other in conflating federal power structures with local governments and the private sector. Based on the unbelievable language contained in the EO itself, the federal government "appears ready to begin rapidly expanding its command and control operations at the local level," according to a story in Natural News, by establishing a vast network of homeland security "partnerships" throughout the country, which will be tasked with reporting back to the central command center and feeding "intelligence" information as requested by federal officials.

"[W]e must tap the ingenuity outside government through strategic partnerships with the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, and community-based organizations," says the EO. It goes on to add that the merger between the federal government and the private sector is necessary to facilitate the government's desire to better "address homeland security priorities," which includes things like "responding to natural disasters ... (and) preventing terrorism by utilizing diverse perspectives, skills, tools, and resources."

An official "Steering Committee" will be established with representatives from virtually every single federal agency, and this committee will be guided by a separate council on how to best incorporate the federal government and DHS into every nook and cranny of American society. Once established, this council will maintain control over presumably all aspects of society by overseeing a secret police force comprised of spies from schools, community groups, churches, and various other local institutions.

"[W]e must institutionalize an all-of-Nation effort to address the evolving threats to the United States," adds the Executive Order, which has YET to be covered AT ALL in the mainstream media.

But why would we be surprised at that? The media STILL hasn't covered one of the biggest bombshells in recent weeks:

One of the leading global magazines of politics, economics, and ideas, Foreign Policy Magazine, posted a bombshell on their website:

"Gen. Boykin: U.S. economy close to collapse, could result in martial law"

You read that right: retired Lt. General William Boykin, a former CIA Deputy Director of Special Activities, has said that the U.S. economy "is just about the break" and collapse. And when the dam gives way, severe food shortages and pervasive violence throughout America will result in an executive declaration of martial law.

Those "in the know" are trying to WARN us: Barack Obama is preparing to DECLARE MARTIAL LAW -- we MUST STOP HIM NOW!

This former CIA General's warning is HUGE!!! "I'll be very honest with you; the situation in America could be such that martial law is actually warranted, and that situation in my view could occur if we had an economic collapse," says Gen. Boykin:

"The dam is just about to break on our economy, and I think when it does, there's going to be a major disruption of the distribution of food," he added. "And I think what you'll see particularly in the inner cities is you will see riots, civil unrest that ultimately might justify MARTIAL LAW... I think those people that are not in the major cities are going to be far better off, but it could actually justify martial law," Boykin continued. "And I'm praying that we will not see that kind of collapse, we won't see a disruption of the distribution of food in America. That's probably the single biggest problem."

How much more proof do we need? It's obvious what Obama is planning for! Not only has he ordered for his Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 1.2 billion rounds of ammo and armored checkpoint booths... now reports are coming in that DHS has now been given fully-armored APCs -- the same standard used by our military:

"To the list of recent unsettling developments at DHS and other federal agencies -- such as... massive DHS ammo buys, a creepy new biometric surveillance system just being rolled-out by the FBI, and drones buzzing our backyards with cameras -- we can now add the appearance across the country of not just heavily-armored military grade Humvees, but 'GLS' armored personnel carriers (APC's) -- 2500 of them to be exact. According to reports the Department of Homeland Security... already have thousands of heavily armored vehicles in DHS 'Police/Rescue' livery, resplendent in either a dashing Gulf War tan or menacing stealth-anthracite..."

Once again, it's obvious that Barack Obama is preparing to DECLARE MARTIAL LAW -- we MUST STOP HIM NOW!

These news reports of preparations for a police state came after we had already learned that Barack Hussein Obama was planning to sign ANOTHER "martial law" style Executive Order -- this time to enable him to take over America's "critical infrastructure," such as the POWER GRID and FINANCIAL INDUSTRIES!

Federal News Radio reported that the Obama regime was preparing to sign off on this new Executive Order, since patriots like YOU AND I have been able to STOP Obama's so-called "cybersecurity" bill so far:

"The White House so far has failed to get a bill passed by both houses of Congress to improve the cybersecurity of the nation's critical infrastructure, so it wants to take an alternative approach. The administration has created a draft executive order detailing how, within its authority, it would improve the information assurance of the nation's critical infrastructure, such as the power grid and financial industries... The draft EO, which Federal News Radio viewed a draft copy of, closely follows the second version of comprehensive cyber legislation introduced by Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R- Maine) in July."

DID YOU GET THAT? These people failed to get their Martial Law bills passed in Congress, so Obama is ready to BYPASS our elected officials and do it himself -- AGAIN!

Of course, that wasn't all he did. THAT outrageous action by Barack Obama came not long after he announced his plans to sign yet ANOTHER Executive Order, which will enable him to take over the INTERNET!

As WorldNet Daily reported,

Obama has signaled his intention to push through his Internet agenda via executive order. This, after last week's failed attempt to bring the Democrat-supported Cybersecurity Act of 2012 to a full vote in the U.S. Senate. The bill would have given federal regulatory agencies the ability to mandate cybersecurity recommendations on critical infrastructure power and utility companies.

As reported in The Hill, responding to a question about whether President Obama was considering advancing his party's cyber-plan through an executive order, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney didn't rule out the possibility. "In the wake of congressional inaction and Republican stall tactics, unfortunately, we will continue to be hamstrung by outdated and inadequate statutory authorities that the legislation would have fixed," Carney said. And John Brennan, Obama's counterterrorism adviser, said at an event at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, "If the Congress is not going to act on something like this, then the president wants to make sure that we're doing everything possible."


He just doesn't seem to stop! The threat to take over the Internet came hot on the heels of another Executive Order, signed by Obama last July, which ONCE AGAIN brings America a step closer to finding itself under MARTIAL LAW -- this time by giving him dictator-type powers over ALL communications during any so-called "crisis" that he might declare!

As reported by "Tea Party Economist" blogger, Dr. Gary North:

"Obama has signed an executive order outlining the nationalization of the entire communications system. It is written in bureaucratese. I have no doubt that it was not understood by Obama. It is too detailed. It sets up a powerful new bureaucracy. The language is limited to a national emergency. But an emergency on this scale is almost inconceivable. The government never discusses what could justify an executive order this comprehensive.

If such a threat to the nation (and the world) really exists, the voters should be given a detailed description of its nature. Congress should debate this. Solving it should be a high national priority. If the answer is, "discussing this would create panic," then democracy is a sham. If the answer is, "we don't know what might happen, so we are asserting total control in advance," then this executive order should never have been signed. It transfers too much power to bureaucrats to determine when to implement it.

As Dr. North declares, "This is no longer a nation run by the Constitution."

The executive order itself is long, and very few people will actually bother to read it. But what it does is very clear: it authorizes the White House to take over the entire communications system, simply on "the authority of the President."

The bottom line is this: Obama thinks that this power belongs to the President.

We've seen this coming. We even reported on how a government "whistleblower" inside the Obama regime blew the lid off of why Barack Hussein Obama has signed all of these Executive Orders that give him the power to declare martial law across America!

According to this whistleblower, Obama, through the Department of Homeland Security(DHS) and other agencies and "czars," is plotting a major "Reichstag" event to generate racial riots and produce the justification for martial law!

This DHS whistleblower informed the Canada Free Press "that the DHS is actively preparing for massive social unrest inside the United States. He then corrected himself, stating that 'a civil war' is the more appropriate term. 'Certain elements of the government are not only expecting and preparing for it, they are actually facilitating it.'"

A "Reichstag event" refers to a fire started in Germany's legislature during Hitler's rise to power. The fire allowed him to grab emergency powers and eliminate his opposition. While he blamed it on Communists, historians have long believed that Hitler started the fire himself.

According to the anonymous "whistleblower" inside Obama's DHS, this "Reichstag event" would take the form of a staged assassination attempt against Barack Obama, "carefully choreographed" and manufactured by Obama operatives. It would subsequently be blamed on "white supremacists" and used to enrage the black community to rioting and looting, the DHS source warned.

The Obama administration would then use the violence and chaos they created as justification for the imposition of martial law in major urban cities in America, the creation of DHS checkpoints, restriction of travel, and more:

"The DHS takes their marching orders from the Obama administration, from Obama himself, but mostly from his un-appointed czars. And Jarrett, especially Valerie Jarrett. Don't think for a minute that the administration is doing anything to stabilize events in the U.S. They are revolutionaries, and revolutionaries thrive on chaos," he added.

This is getting TOO BIG to hide -- now, even the MEDIA is starting to pick up on the shocking news:

Barack Hussein Obama has signed Executive Orders giving him the power to declare MARTIAL LAW in America!

On a recent episode of his Fox News show, Sean Hannity himself declared:

"Tonight... we shine the spotlight on an executive order that the White House was hoping that you would never learn about. Now, the President signed the National Defense Resources Preparedness [NDRP] executive order late Friday afternoon. And since that time, now the measure has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media. Now, the order essentially gives the president of the United States absolute power over any and all American resources during both times of peace and national crisis. Now, this includes, but it's not limited to food and livestock, water, plants, energy, health resources, transportation and construction materials and gives the government the ability to, quote, 'control the general distribution of any material, including applicable services in this civilian market.'"

Hannity then went on to discuss how "this would give the President of the United States the authority to declare basically Martial Law during times of peace. And to be sure, this is simply the latest string of actions taken by the administration that ignore the basic principles of our constitution."


As you can see, Obama's preparations to institute MARTIAL LAW IN AMERICA are coming together quickly.

FIRST, he signed an Executive Order, for so-called "National Defense Resources Preparedness" -- that would give him DICTATOR POWERS whenever he decides he "needs" them.

THEN, he signed ANOTHER "Executive Order", this time to take control of America's domestic natural gas production.

Then, he did it AGAIN -- he signed YET ANOTHER Executive Order... declaring INTERNATIONAL LAW for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

As reported sarcastically by blogger Henry Shivley:

"On May 1, 2012, our Glorious Leader, Premier Barack Obama AKA Barry Soetoro AKA Barry the Rat, signed yet another Executive Order - Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation. This dictate is designed to standardize regulations between the United States and its so-called trading partners.

What is a regulation? A law. So what is actually being attempted here is a standardization of international law. It is an absolute violation of the Constitution for the United States to legislate our law outside of our borders."

And what exactly can this unconstitutional Executive Order lead to? As Shivley states, "Considering the many international security agreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial. And once these foreign laws are brought to the United States under the various security agreements, foreign troops will be brought in to enforce the foreign laws upon the people of the United States."

This Executive Order came hot on the heels of the one that Barack Obama signed to take control of America's domestic natural gas production. As columnist Mac Slavo reports:

"While Americans focused their attention on the Colombian controversy involving U.S. Secret Service agents, prostitutes and excessive drinking, President Obama quietly signed his latest Presidential Executive Order.

The Supporting Safe and Responsible Development of Unconventional Domestic Natural Gas Resources Executive Order seeks to create what amounts to a Presidential super committee that will oversee the regulation and development of the 'unconventional' natural gas industry for the purpose of ensuring a long-term natural gas supply for the United States, as well as to do so in a safe and environmentally responsible manner."

So now, by Presidential decree alone, the federal government can "coordinate action" through thirteen core federal agencies against any domestic natural gas production facility -- all according to standards determined to be "appropriate" not by law, but because of political agenda.

Moreover, because a key stated purpose of this Executive Order is to "ensure long-term supplies," Barack Obama's decree gives the federal government the ability to shut down gas production operations as THEY see fit, which can lead directly to government price fixing and centralized control of an essential natural energy resource.

While Obama's Executive Order aims to curtail some of the practices of the hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," industry, it further expands government control over our lives through more centralization of power and bureaucracy.

THINGS ARE GETTING WORSE. As experts start to dig deeper into Barack Hussein Obama's Executive Order for so-called "National Defense Resources Preparedness," they are reporting just how bad this really is: OBAMA IS PREPARING TO DECLARE MARTIAL LAW IN AMERICA.

As detailed in this report from the Canada Free Press:

Under this order the heads of these cabinet level positions; Agriculture, Energy, Health and Human Services, Transportation, Defense and Commerce can take food, livestock, fertilizer, farm equipment, all forms of energy, water resources, all forms of civil transportation (meaning any vehicles, boats, planes), and any other materials, including construction materials from wherever they are available. This is probably why the government has been visiting farms with GPS devices, so they know exactly where to go when they turn this one on.

Specifically, the government is allowed to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate. They decide what necessary or appropriate means.


It's up to YOU AND ME to STOP HIM NOW!

Thankfully, there are Members of Congress who are standing UP for the U.S. Constitution. For example, in the last session, Rep. Sandy Adams (R-FL) introduced H. Con. Res. 110 in response to President Obama's blatant attempt to go around the Constitution and institute martial law if HE thinks it's "necessary."

In introducing her bill, Rep. Adams stated, "President Obama issued a National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order on March 16, 2012 that raises some serious concerns in its wording and intent. The order has historically been based on the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.). However, unlike previous presidents, President Obama's executive order broadens the definition of 'national defense.' This leaves the door open for the president to give himself control over American resources during both times of peace, and national crisis. In response to the order, I have introduced a resolution to make it clear the president cannot use this as an excuse to abuse his executive power."

Rep. Adams' bill never got a full vote -- because she needed a lot more co-sponsors to get the bill to the floor. So this session, we're going to need a much bigger push to get any anti-martial law bill passed.


If we can FLOOD the offices of all of these Congressmen, demanding that they immediately pass bills against Obama's grabbing unconstitutional powers through all of his new Presidential Executive Orders, we CAN put a stop to Obama's attempt to circumvent the Constitution and lay the groundwork for martial law. But we need YOUR help. Send your Blast Faxes to every single U.S. Congressman and Senator NOW!


William Greene, President

P.S. As Rep. Adams stated when introducing her bill last session to stop Barack Obama's attempt to put in place the ability to institute martial law on his own whim, "Each of us in Congress began our service to our friends, neighbors, and communities with the knowledge it was our responsibility to uphold the Constitution. We were elected to protect the values that make our nation great and to be a line of defense against the growing interjection of government into the everyday lives of the American people. I will continue to defend the principles on which our nation was founded and I will continue to uphold our Constitution."

YOU AND I need to JOIN IN and force the REST of Congress to uphold our Constitution! TAKE ACTION NOW!



As always, you can also send a FREE message directly to your Representative and Senators by clicking here. Thank you.