Mass Murder: Liberty is Rooted in the Fear of God

by:David Whitney 

It has happened again, two more College shootings; one in the wee hours of the morning, the other at midday. Northern Arizona University and Texas Southern University shootings come on the same day the imposter was scheduled to visit Roseburg, Oregon, where eight students and a teacher were shot and killed last week at Umpqua Community College. The odd thing of course is that all three colleges were gun free zones.
So how did that gun break the law and enter a gun free zone and murder people? Didn’t the gun read the sign? Gun free is just an invitation for safe working conditions for mass murders – it’s the promise that there will be no return fire. The sycophants of course are calling for all guns to be confiscated, while the evidence is that if you really want to reduce the killing, if you really care about human lives, more guns equals less crime. Just see John Lott’s research, More Guns Less Crime.  

oped: Well hell let the gun talk...he has much to say bout' dat:  

If they were to confiscate guns, criminals would still posses them and the killing would continue apace. In fact the greatest killers are not these shooters that are featured in the news. The biggest killers are in the White House, the Capital and the Supreme Court. They have murdered more than 60 million babies; their mountain of human carcasses overwhelms the senses in contrast to the small mole hill of the shooters.
Now we understand that murder is murder, and that thug in Oregon having killed himself now stands before the ultimate bar of justice, but what utter hypocrisy for the murderer in the White House to rail against the numerically much smaller crime committed in Oregon. That imposter is himself a mass murderer, with the blood of tens of millions on his hands, and unless he repents he will eternally pay for each and every murder he is accountable for. 

All this came home vividly for me last Sunday afternoon. We had concluded the Prolife Shut It Down rally at the football stadium in Sioux Falls, and we drove the short distance to a nondescript building with a sign out front with the intertwined logo PP, and in much smaller letters Planned Parenthood. If you were driving by you probably wouldn’t even notice it. We stood in protest of the murders which take place there week in week out, year in year out as one of the 553 killing fields of America. 

In Sioux Falls we received a majority of positive responses from those driving by on that main thoroughfare, but intermixed were the occasional driver indicting their IQ by thrusting forward a single digit and an occasionally indecipherable expletive shouted from a car window. South Dakota is one of four States which has only one killing field left. As I shared with the rally, I pray that what began last Sunday will result in South Dakota becoming the first State to rid itself of these killing fields. To that end I shared with those gathered at the rally, the Biblical doctrine of the lesser magistrate. That whenever a superior magistrate violates the law of God the lesser magistrate is called by God to interpose, in order to restore the godly order in society.   

We applied this to the Sheriff there in whose jurisdiction Planned Parenthood operates their murder mill. The Sheriff has the power, he has the authority and he has the duty to shut it down. Roe v. Wade as you all know is not the law of the land; it is a violation of God’s Law, a violation of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and must not be obeyed. On Monday, leaders of the Shut It Down movement met with the Sheriff, and I pray he will take to heart the doctrine of the lesser magistrate and take the actions to shut down Planned Parenthood, effectively ending abortion in South Dakota.
But what if the Sheriff doesn’t do his duty. Why might he not shut it down? In one word, “fear” - fear of what others will say about him, fear of some legal repercussions, such as a lawsuit against him, perhaps even fear of losing his pensions when he is two years from retirement. Webster’s 1828 defines fear as “a painful emotion or passion excited by an expectation of evil, or the apprehension of impending danger.” 

We, like the Sheriff, are given daily counsel from our fears, but what should be that overriding understanding? Turn to Exodus 20. We are beginning a new sermon series entitled “True Law is God’s Law” as we examine the fourth section of the book of Exodus. As we move into this new series, our heart, our attitude, and our thinking about God is vitally important. Please continue this journey with us. 

Bottom Line: 

   

 

“Hate Crime Massacre of Christians Finally Silences Obama!”

[oped: Need I really say more? a Picture with comments says it all!]

By Onan Coca 
Actor James Woods is not only a talented actor, he is also literally brilliant (as in very intelligent – he went to MIT and reportedly has an IQ of 180). We can see this extreme level of intelligence by watching his Twitter feed and listening as he excoriates the ridiculous liberal policies of the Obama administration.

Woods recently went off on President Obama for his callous handling of the Umpqua Community College shooting a couple of weeks ago. During his Twitter tirade he noted that while President Obama is usually quite quick to point out crimes (or any negative event really) that revolve around a Muslim victim, he was strangely silent about a crime that so obviously targeted Christians. 

Woods is right.
Obama holds to the same philosophy that his good friend Rahm Emanuel does about “never letting a good crisis go to waste.” The President loves when bad things happen that can reinforce his particularly twisted version of our world, but when horrible things transpire that put his warped views into question… he ignores them (or twists them). In the case of the Umpqua shooting, he ignored the assault on Christians and went straight after the gun freedom angle…
It’s deplorable, but it’s vintage Obama. 
Yup vintage Obama:
 
Yes indeed Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is...is a Jihad boy no and's if's or but's about it...EOS! 

Hitler’s Last Laugh: Angela Merkel’s Birthing of an Islamo-Fascist Fourth Reich

By Paul Dowling 

“Barbarism is the natural state of mankind.  Civilization is unnatural.  It is the whim of circumstance.  And barbarism must always ultimately triumph.”  —Robert E. Howard

Hitler’s Lament
Adolf Hitler once lamented that the Muslims lost the Battle of Tours in October of 732: “Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers . . . then we [Germans] should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens up the Seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone.  Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world.”

According to compatriot Albert Speer, Hitler, while criticizing Christianity, said, “The Muhammadan religion . . . would have been much more compatible to us [Germans] than Christianity.  Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?”  Also, according to Speer, “Hitler said that the conquering Arabs . . . could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire.”

Hitler’s Dream Come True
Chancellor Angela Merkel admitted—in 2010—that Germany will become an Islamic nation.  “Our country continues to change, and integration is also the task for society to deal with immigrants,” said Merkel.  “For years we’ve been deceiving ourselves about this.  Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before.”  (Read more here.)  Merkel’s acknowledgment is the first of any European leader regarding their shared fate; the demographic trends are undeniable.

No More Beer: A Sharia-Governed Germany
In Germany, Turkish youths—35% of whom attend mosque—are considerably more religious than Christian or Jewish youths—only 14% of whom attend worship services.  And the current German invasion by Syrian and African Muslims can only hasten the arrival of the coming Islamic Germany—devoid of beer at Oktoberfest or white wine from the Mosel or Rhine river valleys; without nude sun-bathing in Munich; and sans any Passion Play in Oberammergau.  The Sharia will forbid all of these and more.


Islamic Victory
Muammar Khaddafi, President of Libya at the time of Merkel’s announcement, said, “There are signs that Allah will grant victory to Islam in Europe without sword, without gun, without conquest.  We don’t need terrorists; we don’t need homicide bombers.  The 50-plus million Muslims [in Europe] will turn it into the Muslim Continent within a few decades.”

1.5 Million & Counting
Sigmar Gabriel, Angela Merkel’s Vice-Chancellor, announced that over one million refugees will arrive in Germany by the end of 2015.  More than 10,000 migrants arrive daily.  And German authorities are readying themselves for upwards of 1.5 million refugees in the long-term.  In a national survey of Germans, 50% of Germans were of the opinion that Germany could pull through the current crisis, while 45% disagreed.  A serious question about the current situation might be this: What happens if the influx of Muslims continues, unabated, for years on end?  What if the number of German newcomers does not stop at 1.5 million?  Or even 2.5, 3.5, or 5.5 million?  The Eurozone’s choice not to defend her borders against migratory invasion may indeed presage a much earlier death of Western civilization in Europe than anyone could have predicted, until just recently.

Birth Rates
The fertility rate of Muslim women is 8.1, while the Germans and French are only having, on average, 1.38 and 1.99 children per woman, respectively.  These figures are widely reported and of great interest.  Even without the mass Muslim migration that is occurring, simple mathematics indicate that, in a couple of generations, the heart of Europe—Germany and France—will be a majority-Muslim region.  Add to this demographic the ongoing immigration into these countries of Muslim migrants from Syria and Africa, and it could be game-over for Judeo-Christian culture much sooner.  The Berlin and Notre Dame cathedrals will soon be mosques.  As Islam becomes enshrined as the new governing ideology of both nation states, non-Muslim ways will be outlawed as jahiliyya. 


The Secret Life of Angela Merkel
The First Life of Angela M., a biography of Angela Merkel by Ralf Georg Reuth and Günther Lachmann, demystifies Merkel’s upbringing in East Germany.  The book is an exploration of Merkel's upbringing in the German Democratic Republic (GDR), where her father, Pastor Horst Kasner, was a devout socialist.  He lived freely in West Germany until he eventually chose the despotism of the East for his family in 1954.  Angela Merkel was, herself, a devoted Marxist, according to erstwhile German Transport Minister Günther Krause, an East German politician who knew Merkel before the Berlin Wall fell.



oped: She denies she was close to the Communist rulers in East Germany, where she grew up.

So this 1972 photo of her in military-style uniform has left German Chancellor Angela Merkel ‘not amused’.

Then called Angela Kasner and aged 17, she is shown happily involved in a civil defence exercise under the gaze of an East German officer.

Drills included first aid and preparing for nuclear attack. 




“With Agitation and Propaganda [a government bureau] you’re responsible for brainwashing in the sense of Marxism,” Krause offered.  “That was her [Merkel’s] task and that wasn’t cultural work.  [Merkel claims her duties at AgitProp were along the lines of secretarial duties, such as procuring theater tickets.]  Agitation and Propaganda was the group that was meant to fill people’s brains with everything you were supposed to believe in the GDR, with all the ideological tricks.  And what annoys me about this woman is simply the fact that she doesn’t admit to a closeness to the system in the GDR.  From a scientific standpoint she wasn’t indispensable at the Academy of Sciences.  But she was useful as a pastor’s daughter in terms of Marxism-Leninism.  And she's denying that.  But it's the truth.”

Merkel, who speaks Russian, used to read Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev’s speeches in the Communist Party newspaper, Pravda, and, seeing the handwriting on the wall, with regard to coming democratization, started to contact East German political reform groups a few months prior to the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989.  Allegedly, Merkel opined to family and friends that, for German Reunification to work, since the two differing German ideologies were so incompatible, the freedom philosophy of West Germany would have to be utilized.  Thus, Merkel seems to think more in terms of pragmatism and making things work more than she believes in freedom and casting aside statism.
After Reunification, Merkel’s political rise began.  She ended up with the Christian Democratic Union party in the 1990s, which contrasts sharply with her deeply-ingrained Marxism.  Was Merkel a wolf donning sheep’s clothing, biding her time for a day when she might have an opportunity to ensure that statism would ultimately triumph?  And did Islam finally provide Merkel a pathway to that outcome?  Merkel’s trademark trait throughout her career has been her secrecy.  Having grown up under Communism, Merkel learned the value of silence.  Werner Schulz, a member of the European Parliament said, “Her secrecy is a legacy of the GDR [East Germany]. . . .  At the time you had to be careful about blurting out your opinions without thinking first. . . .  Even today not many people know what she's really thinking.”  (Read more here.)

The Truth Will Out
Have Merkel’s totalitarian tendencies come to the fore, in her recent elevation of Islamo-fascism?  Merkel brings the Nazi mindset back into Germany and, without claiming the ideology as her own, does indeed support its right to exist while promoting it wholesale.  Merkel supports the idea of state schools allowing Islamic religious instruction, which grows leftwing Fascism anew, capitulating to a statist, Islamo-Nazi ideology.
Merkel’s statement that “Islam is part of Germany” during a state visit of Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, in January 2015, caused many in her own party to do a double-take.  The parliamentary leader, Volker Kauder, said that Islam is not part of Germany and that Muslims need to do some hard thinking about why so many people of violence justify their acts, by referring to the Koran.

A German-Led Eurozone with Nukes
So, the serious question, in the mind of Hitler—and perhaps Merkel herself—might be this one: Will it ultimately be the Arab Muslims or the vigorous natives—the Islamized Germans—who will stand at the head of the coming Muhammadan Caliphate?  For a future America, faced with a German-led Caliphate that includes France, and which has imported many doctrinaire Muslims, it will hardly matter whether the European Caliphate sports an Arab accent or a German one.  Sharia Law will govern either way, and, as Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan once said, “Islam is Islam.”  Of greater concern will be the fact that the European Caliphate will possess within its borders French nuclear weaponry that could easily be employed for the barbaric purposes of jihad.  And a Judeo-Christian America can only hope that Islamic barbarism does not ultimately triumph.

HILLARY HATES: This Brutal New Benghazi Ad… So Spread It Everywhere

https://youtu.be/31_kgEPGxoc



The latest Benghazi ad that’s out against Hillary is incredibly brutal – and we love it. Please forward this to all the Hillary supporters you know and have them try to refute it.
The YouTube description reads: Wouldn’t you like to know why four Americans were murdered in Benghazi? #idliketoask #stophillary

BRIT PUTS MUSLIMS ON BLAST: ‘Go Back To Your F-cking Country, You’re F-cking Rude’

This is an epic rant from a black woman that was told to shut up by Muslims. Watch what ensues; as you can see, this woman was clearly ticked at the amount of Muslim people in her city. Some say that the argument started when was told to shut up by the Muslim women. Here is part of the woman’s dialogue:
“Make me shutup f*cking bitch…F*cking ISIS bitches”
“That’s why no one likes you, because you’re f*cking rude, you come to England then you have no f*cking manners. Go back to your f*cking country where they’re bombing everyday and go there, not here where we’re free.”
“F*cking sandbox bitches, ISIS bitches…I will pull back this long leg and kick you in your face.”
“Make me stop, make me stop…touch me again, I’ll cut you in the head, dirty sandbags”
Do you think this was justified?

A ‘GENTLE’ AFRICAN LION: Kills & Eats Man In Front Of His Family (GRAPHIC VIDEO)

Lions are lions. Whether they’re in the “wild,” a zoo, or a national park.
And lions are killers. Plain and simple. Watch as someone forgets that fact.
Via Outdoor Beasts

Hillary Clinton is nuttier than a Fruit Cake...!

And only palatable to looney left progressives who are the people who re wrap the decades old proverbial Christmas fruit cake...and send it back and forth forever !
She also reminds me of  Nurse Ratchet on "One flew over the cuckoo's nest".. the proverbial inmate who took over the asylum!



[Clinton's email computer firm held 'Cuckoo's Nest' party]

OBAMA’S TICKED AT GUN LOVERS IN TEXAS: After They Made This Huge Move Against Him

This is why we love Texas – they don’t take Obama’s crap.
While the national media continues to portray guns as death machines, Texas is actually expanding its gun laws.
A few months ago Governor Greg Abbott signed HB 910, or the Texas Open Carry Bill for Concealed Handgun Holders. This law allows for people who were formerly forced to conceal their weapon to have it holstered in plain sight.
And now new legislation comes as the nation watched in horror as 9 more poeple died in a liberal-created “Gun-Free Zone” in Oregon — which only make it safe for criminals and psychopaths to kill without challenge. 

Here is the tweet:
Liberal News @LiberalsKickAss

Senior Obama Official denounces #TX Gov. Abbott support for guns on campus - "exactly the wrong solution" to gun violence

7:45 PM - 15 Oct 2015

The “Campus Carry” bill — requires public universities in Texas to allow handguns in dorms, classrooms, and campus buildings. The measure received final approval from the Texas legislature over the weekend.
Read more: Top Right News 

Ha let's let the gun speak:

Obama's comments about Hillary Clinton's email left 'a foul taste in the FBI's mouth'

oped: If the Obama administration blocks a FBI prosecution based on evidence...the Congress both sides of the aisle have no choice but to Impeach Obama and the AG for obstruction of Justice...PERIOD If they fail to Impeach, all those who voted against Impeachment should be prosecuted by their respective states for obstruction of Justice... PERIOD..failure to do so will cause unrest in the USA of which we have never seen...most likely another 1776 revolution! {Most likely Obama wants this so he can suspend the constitution and declare himself King for life...#ImpeachNow }

By Natasha Bertrand 

The FBI is mad at its president.

In an interview with "60 Minutes" last Sunday, President Barack Obama said that though it was probably a "mistake" for Hillary Clinton to use a private email server during her time as secretary of state, it “is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

His comments have reportedly angered the FBI, which has been investigating Clinton's server out of its DC headquarters since August to determine whether any classified national-security information was mishandled.

“Injecting politics into what is supposed to be a fact-finding inquiry leaves a foul taste in the F.B.I.’s mouth and makes them fear that no matter what they find, the Justice Department will take the president’s signal and not bring a case,” Ron Hosko, a former senior FBI official who retired in 2014, told The New York Times in a story published Friday. 

  

 

[ OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SURRENDERS AMERICAN LAW ... under Loretta Lynch?] 

Hosko added that it was inappropriate for the president to “suggest what side of the investigation he is on” during an ongoing investigation.

Though Clinton's use of a private email address was not illegal and was permitted by State Department rules, the federal government has standards for how servers are built, how they are secured, and how their data is stored.

The FBI is looking into the configuration of the server that Clinton handed over to authorities, as well as whether classified information passed over the remarkably unsecured server.

In August, the intelligence community's inspector general, Charles McCullough III, told Congress that he discovered two emails sent to Clinton that contained information classified as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," which is the government's highest levels of classification. Those emails were discovered in a sample of only about 40 emails. 

And an email sent to Clinton reportedly contained the name of a CIA asset in Libya. 

Agents perceived Obama's comments as an attempt to influence the outcome of their investigation, according to The Times. And they are annoyed that the president would pass judgment about whether Clinton's email setup endangered national security when officials have yet to determine whether her server — which contained information retroactively marked top secret and classified — was compromised by foreign adversaries. 

“If you know my folks,” FBI Director James Comey said earlier this month, “you know they don’t give a rip about politics.”

The administration has since backed off Obama's comments: White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters that Obama was not trying to undermine the investigation after he was grilled by reporters during Tuesday's daily briefing. 

"The president has a healthy respect for the kinds of independent investigations that are conducted by inspectors general and, where necessary, by the FBI," he said. 

Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wave upon arriving at Yangon International Airport, November 19, 2012.

Clinton's unusual email system was originally set up by a staffer during Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign, replacing a server used by her husband, former President Bill Clinton.

Facing criticism earlier this year for her use of the server, Clinton handed over about 30,000 work-related emails for the State Department to make public. She also deleted about 31,000 emails she says were personal. She handed over the entire server to the FBI in August. 

'Like inviting spies over to dinner'

Over the past three months, officials examining Clinton's emails have determined that some of the information that passed through her inbox is now considered either classified or top secret and should not have been discussed over such an insecure platform.

Indeed, according to a lengthy Reuters investigation, much of the information Clinton sent and received was inherently classified even if it was not marked as such at the time.

And reports that hackers in China, South Korea, Germany, and Russia tried to break into her server have raised questions about the kind of security precautions she took to safeguard this sensitive information. 

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a community forum campaign event at Cornell College in Mt. Vernon, Iowa.

It is unlikely that the foreign attacks on Clinton's server were targeted at her directly: The attempts discovered were basic phishing scams disguised as speeding tickets, The Associated Press reported, and rather unsophisticated.

But the malicious emails highlight the fact that Clinton's server was a target.

And according to a new AP investigation, the way Clinton's server was connected to the internet — via a Microsoft remote-desktop service that permitted remote-access connections without additional protective measures — made it particularly vulnerable to hackers, which is something experts say her own security experts should have known. 

If malicious state actors did know that Clinton was running a private email server and they tried to hack it, "then it's almost a sure thing that they were successful," Michael Borohovski, CTO of Tinfoil Security, told Business Insider.

"It's possible Clinton's server was breached before she even sent her first email," Borohovski added. "She probably didn’t mean to put government at risk, but she ended up doing it by running an external mail server that was secured with questionable resources." 

Clinton defended herself on "Meet the Press" earlier this month by saying that she was unfamiliar with the technical aspects of the server, which she left in the hands of experts.

But because Clinton made a conscious decision to bypass the State Department's server — and the millions of dollars the government has spent to protect it — in favor of her own risky setup, her ignorance of the technological particulars is a poor excuse, Joe Loomis, CEO of CyberSponse, told Business Insider last week.

"The fact that Clinton chose to use her personal email instead of a .gov account shows that she obviously doesn't understand security," Loomis said. "What she did is like inviting spies over to dinner — every device connected to the internet is an opportunity for them to collect intelligence." 

"This world is full of cyberwarfare, and your computer is a part of that war zone."

As The Times pointed out, the president and the FBI also sparred in 2012 when he commented on reports that David Petraeus had passed classified information to his mistress. 

"I have no evidence at this point, from what I’ve seen, that classified information was disclosed that in any way would have had a negative impact on our national security," Obama said at the time.

FBI officials reportedly believe that their recommendation for Petraeus — felony charges and a prison sentence — was overruled by the Justice Department at least in part because Obama had prejudiced the outcome.

PUTIN & OUR POLLS AGREE: And Obama Will Not Like Their Assessment Of Him

by Wes Walker 
Obama will probably have to hit the links again to settle his nerves. (Has it been 250 rounds yet, Mr. President?) He has, after all, had a hard time of it lately. He’s getting it from all sides now.  Even from the people who are supposed to like him.
There was that unpleasantness at 60 Minutes where he had accidental exposure to a real, live journalist. He actually asked questions. Hard ones. About his record.
That must have been exhausting, the poor lamb.  It was a new experience, after all.  But now, he’s getting hit from both sides. Vladimir Putin and Fox News are hitting him where it hurts most: his ego. 


For a guy so consistently desperate for the positive attention of celebrities and world leaders, one who bends over backwards to be acknowledged as a “citizen of the world” (Germany, 2008), and who defers often to the abstraction of “global community”, this must be a devastating blow.
Fox hates him, no surprise there. But who cares? Aren’t they just mouth-breathers too dense to appreciate his nuanced and sophisticated leadership style? So they say. But now there is a convergence. Putin, Fox polls, and an actual journalist have ALL called him a bad leader.
Scratch that. They have called him incompetent. “Mush-for-brains” was Putin’s actual phrase.
That fits with the opinion polls in which 52% call Obama’s foreign policy “weak and indecisive”, and only 20% think Obama has a clear strategy in the Syrian conflict, in which 61% believe “national security interests are at stake” 


That same poll of American citizens has almost half of them describing the former KGB officer as strong and shrewd, and three quarters think he holds the upper hand on this foreign policy file. Sad.
More sad was Obama’s puerile defense when 60 Minutes challenged him. He criticized Putin as weak and desperate. Putin running Russia’s economy “into the ground” over this is “not what [he’d] call leadership”. (Stop for a second, and appreciate the economic “leadership” irony.)
Is Putin just trash-talking? Or were his comments based on evidence?
Well, there was the small matter of Russia trying to coordinate their attacks with Americans, Identifying friend and foe. Let’s place the Mush-For-Brains quote in it’s context:
“the Russian government had asked for the coordinates of the groups that should or should not be attacked, the United States had not responded to either request.” “Recently, we have offered the Americans: ‘Give us objects that we shouldn’t target.’ Again, no answer,” he said. “It seems to me that some of our partners have mush for brains.”
Mush? How polite, compared to what many Americans have speculated.
 

Scholars Call on State and Federal Magistrates to Ignore SCOTUS Sodomite Ruling

oped: Indeed...SHOCKING REMAINS OF SODOM AND GOMORRAH SEND STARK WARNING TO OBAMA AND the progressive movement:  
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2015/10/wow-biblical-city-of-sodom-found-but.html  



by:Michael Ware 

Theology is important.  In fact a very wise man once said, "Everyone is a theologian, some are just bad at theology."  We see this almost daily as we go through life, and we see people live out what they believe.  It is no different when we get to jurisprudence.  We either have a firm grasp on what it means to uphold the law or we do not.  We understand how legitimate authority is exercised, or we do not.  It is good to see that some of our best legal minds get these concepts.

Christian News reports:
A group of over 60 legal scholars have signed a statement calling upon American citizens and public officials alike to reject the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion declaring that states must legalize same-sex "marriage."

"We stand with James Madison and Abraham Lincoln in recognizing that the Constitution is not whatever a majority of Supreme Court justices say it is," said Robert George, founder of American Principles Project, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University and one of the authors of the statement. "We remind all officeholders in the United States that they are pledged to uphold the Constitution of the United States, not the will of five members of the Supreme Court." 

As I have stated numerous times, there is a difference between an ordinance of the State (Local, State, and/or Federal laws) and Law.  The State can speak an ordinance as if it was law, and can even make you comply with that law, but these actions do not make that ordinance legal.  It does not mean that that command is a Law.
Our founders understood that, and this is why they had two safeguards.  First, they had the Constitution.  This, much like Scriptures for the Christian, was a place to appeal.  The second was the ability to write amendments.  This gave the people, through their representatives, the ability to correct or add that which was lacking in the law.
Never was the Supreme Court to be allowed to read back into the Constitution what they wanted it to say.  This is a clear breach of the law.  These Justices essentially made law, which is not their job.  Our recourse is simple; we are to ignore or reject this unjust ruling. n

Christian News continues:

 "The Court's majority opinion eschewed reliance on the text, logic, structure, or original understanding of the Constitution, as well as the Court's own interpretative doctrines and precedents, and supplied no compelling reasoning to show why it is unjustified for the laws of the states to sustain marriage as it has been understood for millennia as the union of husband and wife," the statement reads.

The reason the Supreme Court could not supply these things is because they simply are not there.  Nowhere in the Constitution is marriage mentioned.  Nowhere is the Federal government given any power concerning marriage.  Then the only thing that the Supreme Court could do was to either send the case back to its state courts or write law from the bench.  Unfortunately, they chose the second option.  Therefore, these scholars call on the elected officials and judges to uphold the law by ignoring their ruling.   

Christian News reports:

"We call on all federal and state officeholders: To refuse to accept Obergefell as binding precedent for all but the specific plaintiffs in that case; to recognize the authority of states to define marriage, and the right of federal and state officeholders to act in accordance with those definitions; to pledge full and mutual legal and political assistance to anyone who refuses to follow Obergefell for constitutionally protected reasons," they wrote.

When we understand that all rule and authority comes from God, then we understand that any rule or authority in opposition to God is abortive.  God has given the people ruling us their position, but they have rebelled against the source of that authority.  Therefore, we are no longer obliged to obey these rebellious authorities.

But Peter and the apostles answered, "We must obey God rather than men. - Acts 5:29
Source

12 Holistic Doctors have now died within a little over 90 Days

[Chemo drugs likely cause cancer]


oped: Big Pharms, AMA and the FDA cleaning house to protect big money profits? Could be!
SEE: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=cancer 

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2015/03/why-big-pharma-killed-president.html


by:TimBrown
Back in July, I reported that five holistic doctors had met untimely and suspicious deaths within 30 days and that five more were still missing. Within days of that report, two more doctors were also found dead under suspicious circumstances, which made 7 inside of a month. Now, within the span of 90 days, eleven doctors have been found dead under suspicious circumstances, and just prior to the writing of this article a twelfth holistic doctor, Marie Paas was found dead due to an apparent suicide.
The woman who broke these stories, Erin Elizabeth of Health Nut News, spoke to Luke Rudkowski and recounted that three of the doctors were found outside in the woods, who died of alleged suicide, four established murders and several who died suddenly for no apparent reason. Even family members have questioned their deaths since autopsies don't seem to confirm a reason for their deaths.

Family members of several of the doctors have spoken to Erin and she says that they really want to get to the bottom of what is going on. She was also able to connect several of these families so that they can share information and be supportive of one another.
So, what makes the work that many of these holistic doctors so important?
Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez was a very well-known doctor and author who had helped many of his patients survive cancer. We're not talking about through major surgeries and the such and we aren't talking about surviving easily treatable cancers. In fact, Erin referenced that at his funeral, former actress Suzanne Somers said that there were several survivors of late stage cancer present.

"There was patients there who are still alive today, years later, who had late stage… like pancreatic cancer, which is almost, you know, most people don't survive that… the survival rate is very low," she said. "And I have people writing me every day telling me they were cured by these doctors, especially Nicholas Gonzalez, who was an expert in his field."
While Dr. Gonzalez's death was reported a heart attack, the autopsy failed to confirm that and as of today, Dr. Gonzalez's death is a mystery.
As for three of the doctors who were found in the woods, Mrs. Elizabeth said, "It started with Dr. Bradstreet, who was found in a river, but it was secluded area. Then there was Dr. Jeffrey Whiteside, who was found, they looked for weeks and weeks… he was with his family and then just walked away and was found weeks later with a gun by his side and they immediately called that a suicide, and even the local news there said that they made a mess of the investigation."

"And then the last one was someone we knew, Dr. Mitch Gaynor, who was from New York City," she added. "He was found dead in the woods… outside his house. They called it a suicide, but there is still an ongoing investigation."
One of the most perplexing questions is that many of these doctors were also authors and had been on television. Yet, with all of their notoriety, the mainstream media has failed to bring their deaths to the forefront in top news stories.

Elizabeth recalled that when Dr. Bradstreet died, she recalled a national publication attempting to discredit him as a doctor. Apart from Dr. Bradstreet, the only other doctor in this list to make national headlines has been Dr. Teresa Sievers, who was bludgeoned to death in an upscale neighborhood.
So, the question is, what connects these doctors together and why have they all died in a such a short amount of time?
According to Ms. Elizabeth, cannabis oil was promoted by many of the doctors, and so was gcmaf, which has been shown to help people with autism or cancer. She doesn't claim that there is necessarily a connection, but her message is for people not to live in fear because if the deaths of these doctors were connected and there were orchestrated hits on them, then those behind them would obviously look for people to be afraid.

"I don't want people to be afraid," she said. "I want them to feel, especially doctors, who write me everyday and say that they're fearful, I really admire those who aren't afraid… keep practicing and stay strong and be aware, but don't be frightened. Don't be afraid and go into hiding because I really believe that the only way that we're going to prevail with this is to stay strong and stay united."

Obama Enables Liberal Circle Jerk Logic – Wants America to Embrace Wicked New “Values”

by:Suzanne Hamner 

Liberals, who might be better compared to "busybody" Gladys Cravitz, have "circle-jerk" logic that leaves one suffering from headaches trying to figure out how to get them out of the circle. Two good examples are baby murder in the womb and parent rights. Liberals contend it is a woman's "right" what she does with her body thereby championing the murder of babies in the womb. Yet, these same liberals support court decisions forcing parents to subject their children to chemotherapy, in the case of a 12 year old Amish girl who begged not to have the treatments because of side effects and the parents' concern over quality of life. A woman has the right to murder her child in the womb; but, parents and their children have no rights when it comes to decisions made affecting their lives if it conflicts with liberals' stance of child abuse in denying medical treatment based on informed consent.

On Saturday, Obama declared at an event held in a private home that "Americans must make a 'fundamental decision' about our values." He gave the example of the meaning of his statement by citing the Supreme Court decision that declared sodomite marriage a "right." Describing it as "one of the proudest things that we've been able to achieve during the course of my presidency," he went on to state America's greatness "would be measured by how we treat 'the vulnerable and the infirmed and the aged."

Excuse me? What?! If we were to measure America's greatness according to the measuring stick Obama used, America circled the bowl and went into the septic tank some time ago.
Here is part of what "circle-jerk" Obama had to say. You might want to have a trashcan nearby or barf bags in hand, just in case.
But part of it has to do with the fact that there is a fundamental decision we have to make as a country in terms of our values -- what do we believe, what do we care about.

I believe this country works best not when we're only thinking about ourselves but when we're thinking about others. 


I believe America is best when we treat everybody with fairness and respect, not just on the basis of whether it's making sure that we're not discriminating because of race or gender, but also that we're not discriminating against somebody because of who they love. And one of the proudest things that we've been able to achieve during the course of my presidency is marriage equality is now the law in all 50 states. Not just one or two or three or five, but everywhere.

So, the reason you're here is because you believe everybody should have a fair shot. You believe in justice; you believe in equality; you believe in opportunity; you believe in diplomacy. You believe that America's greatness is measured not just by our skyscrapers and our GDP and how many billionaires we have, but also how do we treat the vulnerable and the infirm and the aged, and our poor and our hungry. 


Where to begin with this load of bull manure. Let's start with the obvious. A Supreme Court decision is not law; therefore, sodomite marriage is not the law in all 50 states. But, repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth, especially to circle-jerk logic liberals.
The "fundamentals" of this nation are outlined in the self-evident truths contained in the Declaration of Independence -- "all men are created equal, endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed ...." The founders formed this nation based on those truths or values. This is what every American should believe and care to preserve -- a nation of laws where men are equal under it and government preserves God-given unalienable rights.

According to Obama, this nation works best when we think of others as well as ourselves. In the case of busybody liberals, "we think of everyone else and they need to do like we think." If that's the case, every liberal needs to have a vagus-optic nerve ligation -- just thinking of others and what is in their best interest.
If America is best, according to the liberal's "savior" Obama, when "everybody is treated with fairness and respect," America fell to its worst ever coddling liberal ideology. Christians have become hated and ridiculed in this nation by liberals and others, while certain other groups achieve elevated status. Disrespect is rampant, perpetrated by liberals and special interest groups, if a different opinion is voiced, support for the Constitution exhibited, or one expresses upholding of individual rights. Discrimination takes place daily based on race, gender, age, religion, Second Amendment support, etc. It's more prevalent now than in past decades. The only individuals liberal "circle-jerks" believe in treating with fairness and respect are themselves; everyone else is undeserving.

"Everybody should have a fair shot," according to His Racistness. And just who is everybody? Does that include babies in their mother's womb? Do they deserve a fair shot, justice, equality and an opportunity? How fair is it to "demand" individuals violate their religious conscience? Where is the justice and equality under the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment and Ninth Amendment or others?
Obama believes in measuring America's greatness in how we treat the vulnerable, the aged, the infirmed, the poor and the hungry about as much as I believe dust cures headaches. His Murderousness believes in legalized abortion up to the moment of birth. As State Senator from Illinois, Obama opposed legislation defining a baby surviving an abortion as a "person," "human being," and "individual" under the law in Illinois. This is how Obama thinks of the vulnerable. His Murderousness supports funding Planned Parenthood, the baby murder mill that "harvests" unborn baby organs before killing him or her, and threatens to veto legislation that denies funding to the organization.

His Unequalness threatens the Little Sisters of the Poor with a Supreme Court hearing because this group of nuns, who operate nursing homes for the elderly, refuse to participate in the Obamacare regulation requiring all healthcare plans to fund contraception, sterilization, abortion-inducing drugs and devices citing violation of their Catholic faith. His Liberal Communistness and his mindless followers refuse to acknowledge the Little Sisters of the Poor have the right to practice their religious beliefs without interference from the government. How His Hatefulness thinks about the elderly, the infirmed and the poor is on display; yet, it is ignored by liberal idiot tools.

Liberals, rife with hypocrisy, want to be in everyone's life, have government in everyone's life and establish the rules for it all. Unfortunately, their rules contradict one another so who knows which end is up at the end of the day. To add insult to injury, they believe their way of thinking trumps individuals' unalienable God-given rights.
What His Snideness is really saying is that liberals need to "force" their thinking on the rest of the nation as it serves his agenda. His Narcissistic Arrogantness doesn't believe any of what he is saying as applying to the entire country. His Race-baiting Petulantness doesn't believe any of what he says as applying to liberals either; they are just too stupid to see it. They hang on every Obama-ese speech by His Liarness to justify trampling every value outlined in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the united States of America. These liberal "useful idiots" are a means to an end for the Traitor-in-chief to continue to perpetrate high crimes and treason against the rightful government of this nation, We the People, and set the stage for his successor to continue in his footsteps.



All that can be said to these liberal circle-jerk, hypocrite, murder-loving, rights denying, Christian hating, narcissistic, arrogant, entitled "useful idiots" is when the shoe gets tight on your own foot -- and it will, your cries will fall on deaf ears and you will be as deserving of as much sympathy, empathy and consideration as you have exhibited. After all, it is the Golden Rule, which you liberals love to tout to the rest of us.

Congressional Staffer Arrested After Beating Sodomite Lover with Shovel

[Dem Rep Sander Levin]
 
[Levin staffer Tim Foster]

oped: So much for gays just wanna have fun & be accepted eh? Hmmm Barry Barack Obama : 'If I had a son he would look just like Tim'

by:Blake Neff 
Police arrested a congressional staffer to Democratic Rep. Sander Levin on Oct. 8, following a bizarre altercation where he attacked a lover with a shovel.  According to a police report, Tim Foster assaulted a black man described as his boyfriend with a small red and black shovel, leaving the man so badly injured that he was hospitalized with scrapes and bruises across his neck and torso, Roll Call reported Tuesday.
The dispute began at about 12:30 a.m., with the two getting into an argument at a house in Baltimore which soon escalated to physical violence on Foster's part, according to Roll Call. Making the domestic situation even more surreal is that Foster's wife apparently played a role in the fight:

Foster put his boyfriend in a choke hold and stated, "I want to kill you. Die dirty faggy," the man later told police. Foster released him, then allegedly grabbed a stainless kitchen knife. As the boyfriend fled toward the stairs, Foster chased him and warned, "When you reach the fifth step, I am going to stab you."
Foster lunged at his boyfriend with the knife. But Foster's wife "got in the way" and the knife then fell to the floor, the report states.
The boyfriend told police he attempted to escape the property, but was again assaulted by Foster. This time, Foster struck him in his upper back with a small black and red shovel. Foster continued to assault the man until he got into his vehicle, the report states.

Foster was released Friday after being jailed overnight, but he faces charges for second-degree assault and the use of a dangerous weapon.
Foster has worked for Levin, who represents Michigan's 9th District, for seven years, and currently serves as his online communications manager. Levin's office placed Foster on unpaid leave but otherwise declined to comment on the matter.
Source
 

Bill Gates Unveils His Very Own Hitler Youth Movement

[ The Hitler youth movement included girls but they were programmed to be baby factories for the Third Reich]


by:Dave Hodges 

Our youth are in danger. Parents can no longer count on the fact that society will be sending the same messages of morality to Christian children when they venture away from their homes. Children are being bombarded with messages that the NWO and climate change initiatives are good, while freedom and individual expression of opinion are bad.   

Any takeover of any nation would have to consist of a detailed plan to entrap the youth of the targeted nation. By propagandizing the youth of a new nation that the goals of the new elite are noble and worthy of support, the new establishment would target the youth with incessant messages that deviate from the messages imparted at home. Every youth program is predicated on the banner phrase "out with the old and in with the new.

The reason behind the undermining of parental authority in America has to do with I have come to call a "post-collapse" strategy, which will be ushered in following the demise of the dollar. If the NWO can convince children to buy into the new Agenda (21), then there will be fewer dissidents to deal with when the ultimate crackdown begins.
In service to this agenda, America can expect to see a series of Hitler Youth Movement type of organizations springing up with messages that espouse the belief that conformity is good and individual expression of liberty is undesirable.

John Whitehead Weighs In On This Topic

Freedom-fighting attorney John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute has weighed in on this subject in an article he wrote almost 18 months ago. Rutherford broached the subject of the brainwashing of our American youth in the following quote:

"How do you persuade a nation of relatively freedom-loving individuals to march in lock step with a police state? You start by convincing them that they're in danger, and only the government can protect them. Keep them keyed up with constant danger alerts, and the occasional terrorist incident, whether real or staged. Distract them with wall-to-wall news coverage about sinking ships, disappearing planes and pseudo-celebrities spouting racist diatribes. Use blockbuster movies, reality shows and violent video games to hype them up on military tactics, and then while they're distracted and numb to all that is taking place around them, indoctrinate their young people to your way of thinking, relying primarily on the public schools and popular culture."

In his book, A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, Rutherford states the following:

"…extracurricular activities such as the Explorers program, which trains young people—"ages 14 to 21 who have a C average"—to be future agents of the police state. Explorers meet weekly, train for competitions and spend their weekends working on service projects. In one Border Patrol training exercise, teenagers as young as 14, suited up in military gear with lethal-looking airsoft guns
image: https://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?source=bk&t=freedomoutpos-20&bm-id=default&l=ktl&linkId=e715b27071034ebb6662e5092a683c90&_cb=1444826488034
, were "instructed on how to quiet an obstreperous lookout," reports the New York Times. "Put him on his face and put a knee in his back," a Border Patrol agent explained. "I guarantee that he'll shut up."

Leading the charge in the creation of Hitler Youth Movements, are Bill and Melinda Gates.

Bill and Melinda Gates and Their Version of America's Version of the Hitler Youth Movement

Bill and Melinda Gates have initiated an offshoot of Agenda 21 programs known as Global Citizen Nights.  Global citizen nights are designed to lure in children and have them engage in some kind of community service with regard to the globalist agenda (e.g. biking vs driving, water conservation, etc.). In exchange for their good deeds, the participating teens will earn points and then be able to exchange their "globalist points" for high valued items such as concert tickets. Personal servitude to society sends the message to the young that your life does not belong to you. Charity towards one's own community should be borne out of a desire to help or heel in the name of some cause that has personal appeal to a young person. Mandatory compliance to these "volunteer programs" conditions the youth that their lives do not belong to them and that the state has the final authority of one's actions.

When one joins this globalist propaganda program, they are told that "Bill Gates recognizes that individuals have diverse passions and offers the Global Citizen network as one where, 'some people…will pick women's reproductive rights, some will pick agriculture. And then there are NGOs in each of those areas that you can volunteer for, give money to, and feel connected."
Teens are sent tweets, emails and Facebook messages encouraging them to get involved in these UN mandated programs. The targeted teens are given choices to be involved in such "worthy" endeavors as

1. Sustainability
2. Food and hunger
3. Water and Sanitation
4. Health (i.e. vaccines) 5. Women and Girls (i.e. reproduction issues and negative population growth)
6. Education (i.e. Common Core)
7. Ebola Action Center (author's note: And you thought we were done with Ebola).  

On one positive note, the Global Citizen Nights are intended to replace the drug-infested raves. However, rather than destroying their bodies with drugs such as ecstasy, the youth are destroying their minds with globalist propaganda.  One of the central themes of the Global Citizen Nights is the deliberate denigration of national sovereignty (e.g. "sovereignty is so 20th century) and the adoption of the globalist agenda at an age when young people's minds are prone to extremist thinking.
The Biggest Threat to Our Youth

"For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world, and forfeit his soul?
Mark 8:36

The biggest threat to our children is not the loss of the appreciation for the values of this country. This biggest threat to our young people is the loss of their soul. Agenda 21 so disparages the Christian religion, we Christians may soon be forced underground in order to continue with our worship. The Agenda 21 bias shows up in many of the leaders statements about Christianity. For example, President Obama has made the following statements regarding Christianity:

"Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation"
"We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation."

Conclusion

As Christians make a threat assessment with regard to the implementation of Agenda 21 policies, it is important that we, as Christians, come to know our enemy. This is best exemplified by the following:

"Among other things, the agenda called for a Global Biodiversity Assessment of the State of the Earth. Prepared by the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP), this 1140 page document armed UN leaders with the "ecological basis, and moral authority" they needed to validate their global management system. The GBA concludes on page 863 that "the root causes of the loss of biodiversity are embedded in the way societies use resources. This world view is characteristic of large scale societies, heavily dependent on resources brought from considerable distances. It is a world view that is characterized by the denial of sacred attributes in nature, a characteristic that became firmly established about 2000 years ago with the Judeo-Christian-Islamic religious traditions. Eastern cultures with religious traditions such as Buddhism, Jainism and Hinduism did not depart as drastically from the perspective of humans as members of a community of beings including other living and non-living elements." In other words Christians are to blame for the sorry state of the world because their religions do not involve worshiping "sacred nature." 

Christian parents need to perform their due diligence and assume responsibility for the development of the Christian spirit within their children. This begins by educating them about the evils of Agenda 21 and keeping them away from the Hitler Youth Movement type of organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates organization known as the Global Citizen Nights. When you hear the phrase "they are coming for your kids," you need to take heed.
Source