Saturday, September 10, 2016

Hillary Clinton et al the Obama administration... the epitome of oxymorons

What they call others applies to themselves!

Also :

If you are a #ZNation #WalkingDead fan or crew ya need to visit us this Fall!

interiorbanner redrun2016
 redrun4 announcement

C'mon up this fall season...hella fun for all... Virginia City, Nevada: 
Fall events: 
Dead Zone Reveal: The Burn Zone
140 years ago, most of Virginia City burned to the ground. This past summer, on the scorched earth where that devastating fire erupted, flames ignited again. The site is once more a smoldering, black corpse. Is it a freak coincidence or has something angered the ghosts of the Great Fire? An eerie presence has risen from beneath the ash and soot. That's why the Burn Zone is back. The fresh black soot and tree ash over this vast dead zone landscape will make for an authentic post Great Fire experience. This Dead Zone is just one way Redrun will separate the survivors from zombie scraps. On October 8th, Armageddon will hit Virginia City. We will be revealing more Dead Zones every week leading up to Redrun 4. Think you'll be ready? You're dead wrong.
For the history of The Burn Zone and to register go to 
Redrun will be the most frightening run of your life. On October 8th, Armageddon will hit the historic town of Virginia City, Nevada. To escape the cannabalistic corpses and the crazy you will fight your way through some of the most chilling landmarks ever documented: cemeteries, century-old train tunnels, mining bunkers, corpse-like buildings, and through the heart of one of the oldest "living" ghost towns in the country. Will you survive? 
Are you a zombie, a member of the living insane, or are you a survivor? It's time to decide. This is your last chance to register for Redrun 4 before the prices go up. On October 8th, Armageddon will hit Virginia City, Nevada. Get ready to run like hell. 

 RedRun 4 coming soon: 


Who is Responsible for the DESTRUCTION of America?

by Bradlee dean 

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”
-Abraham Lincoln
Did you hear about John Hinckley Jr., the man that attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1980? He was declared not guilty by reason of insanity.
Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defines Insane: Unsound in mind or intellect; mad; deranged in mind, delirious…
Yet, 35 years later, Federal Judge Paul L. Friedman wrote that Hinckley, 61, no longer poses a danger to himself or others and will be freed to live full time with his mother in Williamsburg, Virginia.

He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death. – Exodus 21:12 

Libertarian (without regard for law, free will) Presidential candidate Gary Johnson was asked about the illegals coming into America.  He responded, “They came into this country because they couldn’t get in legally. And the jobs existed.”
“Just so you know when you use that term illegal immigrants, you are upsetting a lot of people by saying that, just so that you know,” he added.  “If you use the term illegal immigrants, it is very incendiary to our Hispanic population here in this country.”

When Johnson was asked by the reporter, “If you enter the country without documentation is that or is that not an illegal act?” he answered, “Technically, yes!”
Moreover, you shall provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens. – Exodus 18:21
Did you know that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, through Operation Pacifier, distributed child porn to tens of thousands of people?  It is noteworthy that this is the same organization who protects pedophile criminals that call themselves representatives in this country.

Remember the ICE investigation at the Pentagon, which exposed over 5,000 employees downloading child pornography?  Instead of the guilty being prosecuted for their felony offenses, the DOJ, under Eric Holder, conveniently stated they didn’t have enough manpower to bring prosecutions.
Ye shall not afflict any widow, or fatherless child. If you afflict them in any way, and they cry at all unto me, I will surely hear their cry; And my wrath shall wax hot, and I will kill you with the sword; and your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless. – Exodus 22-24
It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones. – Luke 17:2

Remember what Abraham Lincoln stated, “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”
Americans do not need to be worried about what other countries are doing to them.  It is the Americans that have no one to blame but themselves (Isaiah 59).
O Lord, righteousness belongeth unto thee, but unto us confusion of faces, as at this day; to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and unto all Israel, that are near, and that are far off, through all the countries whither thou hast driven them, because of their trespass that they have trespassed against thee. – Daniel 9:7

The heathen are sunk down in the pit that they made: in the net which they hid is their own foot taken.
The Lord is known by the judgment which he executeth: the wicked is snared in the work of his own hands. Higgaion. Selah.
The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God. – Psalm 15-17
What of Hillary Clinton this last week? She was praised by none other than CNN who reported that she raised $143 million dollars in the month of August alone.

Did anyone take the time to ask where that money came from?
·        Kingdom of Saudi Arabia $10-25 million
·        State of Kuwait $5-10 million
·        State of Qatar $1-5 million
·        Sultanate of Oman $1-5 million
·        United Arab Emirates $1-5 million
·        Embassy of Algeria $250-500 Thousand
·        Government of Brunei Darussalam $1-5million
Hillary does not have the support from the American people.  Therefore, she has to receive it from the foreigners who are out to destroy America.

Can Americans define Treason?
18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
I have to throw this last one in here for you, though there is a plethora of topics to pick from:
A very confused “Pornstar” has come out of the closet — as a conservative— and confirmed to Breitbart News that she is voting for Donald Trump in November. This whore (Deuteronomy 23:17) claimed, “I absolutely am voting for Trump,” she said. “I am a conservative.”
This whore, without a doubt, is the product of her un-American upbringing (Laminations 5:7; Luke 7:35).
As a jewel of gold in a swine’s snout, so is a fair woman which is without discretion. – Proverbs 11:22
Really? A conservative? “Conservative” is defined in Webster’s 1828 dictionary as: preservative; having power to preserve in a safe or entire state, or from loss, waste or injury.
In parallel, salt preserves and stops putrefaction.
Jesus said in Matthew 5:13:
“Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savor, wherewith shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.”

oped: to be fair Bradlee...Jesus also had sympathy for the "whore"...and said go and sin no more...Judge not lest ye shall be Judged !

The modern Christian-conservatives have lost their savor and have allowed the American blood-bought Constitution to be trampled under the foot of the corrupt because America has become corrupt (Psalm 78:8-10).  So, who is responsible for the destruction of America?


Scientific Consensus: MAJORITY of Doctors Surveyed Say This About Hillary’s Health


by Philip Hodges 

Liberals always bring up the alleged “97%” of scientists who believe that man is behind catastrophic global warming. Never mind the fact that the 97% represented just 75 scientists out of a total of 79.
All because of that bogus survey, liberals have shut down debate on the issue. Science is always supposed to be up for debate. But manmade global warming has gotten so political that they desperately need to silence any opposition.
What will liberals say now that a majority of doctors surveyed say that Hillary Clinton’s health concerns are so serious that she could be disqualified from the office of Presidency?

Concerns about Hillary Clinton’s health are “serious—could be disqualifying for the position of President of the U.S.,” say nearly 71% of 250 physicians responding to an informal internet survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). About 20% said concerns were “likely overblown, but should be addressed as by full release of medical records.” Only 2.7% responded that they were “just a political attack; I have confidence in the letter from her physician and see no cause for concern.”
While more than 81% were aware of her history of a concussion, only 59% were aware of the cerebral sinus thrombosis, and 52% of the history of deep venous thrombosis. 

More than 78% said the health concerns had received “not enough emphasis” in the media, and only 2.7% that there had been “too much emphasis.”

Nearly two-thirds said that a physician who had a concern about a candidate’s fitness to serve for health reasons should “make the concerns known to the public.” Only 11% said a physician should “keep silent unless he had personally examined the patient,” and 10% that the candidate’s health was “off limits for public discussion.”

Let me guess. Liberals are going to say that the issue has gotten way too political. After all, these must have been mostly partisan doctors who were obviously being paid off by the vast alt-right conspiracy.
According to The Hill, the Clinton campaign and the media are doubling down, trying to silence anyone who criticizes Hillary’s health, just as liberals have done with global warming.

Friday, September 9, 2016

Jury Selection In Bundy Trial Already Rigged

Join Oath Keepers

Elias Alias: Jury Selection In Bundy Trial Already Rigged

Jury selection/rejection began today, Wednesday, September 07, 2016, in Portland, Oregon, for the Bundy trial. I am not surprised to read accounts of the judge’s bias against jury nullification. The Oregonian/OregonLive website posted an article which quotes a few of judge Anna J. Brown’s opinions about protecting the government’s assumed power to railroad defendants.
> A passage from the article:
“Jury selection is something of a misnomer,” said Jeffrey T. Frederick, director of jury research services for the National Legal Research Group. “It really is jury rejection.” That’s because the practice is meant as a filter, to keep unqualified people from sitting in judgment, he said.
Further down the article we read:
Potential jurors will almost certainly face questions on their opinions about federal control of public land, militias, law enforcement, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and whether they believe a person exercising their First or Second Amendment rights must observe lawful limitations on those rights. 

That judge has had ample opportunity to learn the truth regarding jury nullification. Her refusal to see that truth robs her soul of dignity and makes of her a robotic agent of government force, indifferent to the spirit of the Constitution, ignorant of Thomas Jefferson’s philosophy of “Unalienable Rights”, and repugnant to every principle of individual freedom. She is a willing agent of what we old hippies used to call “The Establishment” or “The System“.
Recall, another judge has already ruled that the Bunkerville, Nevada, trials will be shrouded in secrecy. See my article of July 25, 2016, on that —

My God! The Judge Wants Total Secrecy In Bundy Trial!

So judge Brown is not the only one willing to defend government’s sins. But she is tying up the hands of justice in her own way by her denial of Jurors’ rights to judge of the law as well as of the facts of the case.
We are looking directly into the face of governmental tyranny unabashedly displaying itself with cold cruelty in a theatrical abomination of the very purpose of “justice”.  The infrastructure of power now has its own evil momentum and will lay to waste any dissent, in order to protect the gigantic fraud which the mechanism of government has asserted through “code” and “statute”, through “color of law” and “rules of the court”. States’ Rights be damned; Jury Nullification be damned; it’s full steam ahead for the soul-less, ego-driven hunger of authoritarian power dressed appropriately in the black robes of darkness and death.

Readers may wonder why I speak this way about our corrupt court system, and some may feel that I’m condemning all judges. I am not condemning all judges, just most of them. I am happy to show an example of a true judge who sat on the Washington State Supreme Court and honored his Oath. I’ve written about the man, and his message of jury nullification, many years ago. It is right here on the Oath Keepers website. I would encourage any reader who has not read that article to pause here and do so now. And someone needs to show the article to Judge Brown. The opening of that article —
In a small but powerful booklet which was copyrighted in 1996, former Washington State Supreme Court Justice William Goodloe gives an accounting of the origin and establishment of our present-day jury powers. I would like to share with you some passages from his essay entitled:
Jury Nullification: Empowering The Jury As The Fourth Branch Of Government
Quoting former Washington State Supreme Court Justice William Goodloe:
“Of all the great trials in history tried at Old Bailey in London only one is commemorated by a plaque. Located near Courtroom Number Five it reads:
“Near this site William Penn and William Mead were tried in 1670 for preaching to an unlawful assembly in Gracechurch Street. This tablet commemorates the courage and endurance of the Jury. Thomas Vere, Edward Bushell and ten others, who refused to give a verdict against them although they were locked up without food for two nights and were fined for their final verdict of Not Guilty. The case of these jurymen was reviewed on a writ of Habeas Corpus and Chief Justice Vaughan delivered the opinion of the court which established the Right of Juries to give their Verdict according to their conviction.” 

“The case commemorated is Bushell’s Case, 6 Howell’s State Trials 999 (1670). This case is a good beginning for tracing the roots of a legal doctrine known as jury nullification.” (End quoted passage by Justice William Goodloe, ret.)
Justice Goodloe’s article builds from there, giving context, founders’ commentary on the subject, court cases concluded favorably on jury nullification, and, as his intelligence shown through brilliantly, his booklet shows the proper place for common sense and moral uprightness in the American court system. So the question remains — why do not all judges care enough about their duties, and their Oaths, to educate themselves about our rights as embodied in jury nullification?  This judge Brown is positioning herself as the antithesis of what our court system is supposed to be. Here are some passages from the bottom of the OregonLive article linked above.

The judge also said she intends to question each juror on whether they were handed a flier outside court about jury nullification, and to instruct them that they must follow the law even if they disagree with it. Judge Brown said deputy U.S. marshals indicated there may be people outside court distributing such fliers.
Ryan Bundy and Ammon Bundy’s lawyer Marcus Mumford objected to the judge’s proposed instructions to prospective jurors. Ryan Bundy argued that they will “rob a juror” of the right to serve as a “check and balance” on the federal government’s power.
Mumford asked that the judge not suggest that any of the defendants were responsible for such fliers.
“A jury’s place is to be able to use their common sense, their intellect, their conscience, whether the law is proper or not proper,” Ryan Bundy argued.
Judge Brown dismissed his objection.  
“It’s overruled,” she responded.
Jurors take oaths, the judge said, and she plans to advise them to “follow the law whether they agree with it or not.”
“I’m not going to say they have the option,” the judge said. 

So there we have it.  Damn what’s right. Damn the people. Damn the purpose of the law in the first place; and damn moral duty to our fellow man. Damn everything when the authority of Statism might be threatened by the truth.
The cowboys never shot at a cop, never killed an agent, never shot at anyone. Instead, they merely made a conscientious stand to raise the question in public about who Constitutionally is authorized to manage public lands within the boundaries of a State in this Union. They are correct, and the Federal government is wrong. The American Lands Council has that information,  < here >
One of the phrases in my culture when I was growing up was — “Ignorance of the law is no excuse.” My question today is why do most judges insist on remaining ignorant of the highest uncontested law of the land? It must be something like a fervent and worshipful passion for that un-named religion called “Statism”, the philosophy of worshiping authority over all else in the name of Statism; the theology of which was encapsulated accurately by one Adolf Hitler, who put it this way [1]:
“It is thus necessary that the individual should finally come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of his nation; that the position of the individual ego is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole … that above all the unity of a nation’s spirit and will are worth far more than the freedom of the spirit and will of an individual…”
That is a classic example of Statism, and that is exactly the mindset of modern judges who deny a jury’s right and duty to nullify according to their consciences in any criminal case.

There is a wonderful article at the Fully Informed Jury Association website which plainly shows why We The People, when confronted with this sort of corruption coming from a damned judge, are morally justified in outright lying to the prosecuting attorneys and the judge during Voir Dire (the process of screening jurors with, by, and for bias favoring the government).  Read it here —

Obama Nomination of Qureshi to DC Court to Test Senate Republicans

Join Oath Keepers 

oped: All  have to say is Congress had better not appointments to the bench from the outgoing POTUS...reserve for the incoming POTUS #Period EOS

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy” (Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966.) [Photo: The White House]

“President Obama nominated Abid Riaz Qureshi to serve on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia,” the White House announced Tuesday.
“I am pleased to nominate Mr. Qureshi to serve on the United States District Court bench,” Obama declared. “I am confident he will serve the American people with integrity and a steadfast commitment to justice.”
Does anyone doubt a long term “progressive” goal is an “inclusive” Supreme Court?
“Muslim-American groups are applauding President Barack Obama’s nomination of a Washington lawyer to serve in U.S. District Court — a move that could make him the first ever Muslim-American federal judge, according to advocates,” NBC News reported on the development. The story included approving statements from the Council on American-Islamic Relations and Muslim Advocates.

Some will no doubt express concern over the Pakistani-born lawyer’s religion, and that’s not to say it’s not a factor that shouldn’t be vetted. It’s certainly not something to ignore out of pressured political correctness.  To those who say what a nominee strongly believes shouldn’t matter, such attitudes typically come from secular viewpoints, or from those who haven’t thought things through completely and with consistency.  Or from those with an agenda.
Case in point, a nominee with strong religious convictions against the death penalty would be hard-pressed to fairly decide on capital cases, and ascertaining whether that would create a conflict would be warranted. And if you really believe religion has no bearing on qualifications (or desirability), do you also think someone lunatic enough to identify as a Satanist has the judgment to be trusted with power over the lives and freedoms of others?

CAIR had previously proclaimed “No Religious Test” is needed for the Presidency, that Includes Islam.” In the interests of establishing consistency, will they also agree with that statement if the word “Satanism” is substituted?
Still, they do have a point, and it’s a reality those who have pledged an oath to the Constitution cannot just disregard.  I’m referring to the First Amendment Establishment Clause, and the Article VI prohibition on religious tests. And while some contend Islam is not a religion but a doctrine of totalitarianism, that argument is unlikely to get any traction in the political arena or in the courts.
We’re left with a for-the-most-part-gutless Republican Senate — no doubt feeling pressure to publicly demonstrate its “inclusiveness” and “tolerance” as a way to defray criticism for the stalled SCOTUS nomination of Merrick Garland. As GOP leadership has already gone on record agreeing with CAIR on Muslims being in power, effort would better be spent in determining where Qureshi stands on the Founders’ view of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Naturally, those concerned with the right to keep and bear arms will want to know if Qureshi believes the Second Amendment articulates an individual right, if cases coming before him should be considered under strict scrutiny, and if the legal concept “in common use at the time,” at a minimum, applies to weaponry carried by infantry soldiers for battlefield use, in addition to those commonly used for self-defense and sport.
Don’t expect answers on those questions to be forthcoming. Don’t even expect them to be asked by politicians gun owners and conservatives helped put in power.
What’s left? How else can we figure out where an (intentional) enigma stands on issues affecting future legal protections of liberty? Especially when noting that, thanks to Democrat maneuverings and Republican complicity, a “progressive” majority now exists in 70%of U.S. appeals court appointments.

What you can make book on — Obama is not going to nominate anyone he doesn’t think is going to advance his agenda. And he’s relying on Republicans afraid of bigotry charges being cowed (in addition to the ones he knows he can count on) to get his way.
So what do we know about Qureshi? He’s a partner in Latham & Watkins, a DC-based insider/globalist law firm. What do we know about them? In 2012, 71% of their political contributions went to Democrats. They do pro bono work for Syrian refugees and they proudly display awards for LGBT inclusiveness. Assessing the culture as “progressive,” with all that implies for “conservative” sympathies, is hardly a stretch.
It’s also interesting to note how many appointments to key administration posts Obama seems to have made from Latham & Watkins (and that’s something I intend to follow up on, because it may prove key). One of special interest is White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler. She was the administration lawyer who blocked the House Oversight and Senate Judiciary Committees from interviewing former National Security Council Director of North American Affairs Kevin O’Reilly, a story with a recent development I talked about here.

Small world. Or as George Carlin observed [NSFW] “It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.”
But Qureshi is. And that makes his professional and personal relationships and loyalties another factor to be thoroughly vetted, just as they should be for every nominee.
The question is: Will Senate Republicans do a thorough job?
Bottom line, Obama’s going to put a key player in a key position on a key court, and unless someone can come up with a politically non-toxic reason why Qureshi should not be confirmed (and don’t look to the cheerleader media to actually investigate), he’ll breeze through.
Update: KrisAnne Hall shares some important thoughts for our consideration.
Also see:Fundamental Court Transformation Removes Choices for Gun Owners except Obey or Not.”

Thursday, September 8, 2016

UNR Wolfpack Football 2018 Season

Schedule game by game results as they come in..   

Home 08/31 vs Portland State  w 72-14

09/8 vs  Vanderbilt                       L 10-41  

Home 09/15 vs Oregon State     w 37-35    

09/22 vs Toledo                             L 44-63 

09/29 vs AirForce                          w 28-25

Home 10/6  vs Fresno State        L 3-21

Home 10/13 vs Boise State         L 31-27

10/20 vs Hawaii                             w 40-22

Home 10/27 vs San Diego State  w 28-24

Home 11/10 vs Colorado State    w 49-10

11/17 vs SanJose State                 w 21-12

11/24 vs UNLV                                  L 29-34

Overall: 7-5

Conf:      5-3

Home:    4-2

Away:     3-3




Top reasons to vote #Trump...#NeverHillary
To preserve and protect the 1st and 2nd amendments...SCOTUS,economy,jobs,no new taxes,balance the budget,security,stop Illegal Immigration and a strong military!  


As for the 2nd amendment which protects the 1st and all others including personal protection...the gun has something to say about this!

Bakery Refuses to Bake Donald Trump Cake – No One Sues, Customers Simply Use Different Bakery

Bakery Refuses to Bake Donald Trump Cake – No One Sues, Customers Simply Use Different Bakery

by:Onan Coca 

In a shocking development, someone was refused service at a bakery, and instead of suing, the customer instead chose to give their business to a different bakery!
No, this had nothing to do with homosexuality, Christianity, or social justice warriors. But it does offer us an interesting look into “what might have been,” had liberals chosen to respond to a situation in the same manner that conservatives do. 

A Facebook post from one Louisiana teenager has gone viral after local media picked up the story. 

Screen Shot 2016-09-07 at 4.42.13 PMApparently, Ms. Gill was ordering a birthday cake for her Trump themed 18th birthday party when she was notified by the baker that she would not be making such a cake for her. When Gill and her mother arrived at the Albertson’s bakery to order their cake, they never expected that they might be doing something controversial. “We just need an American flag cake with Trump 2016 on it, and right when I said Trump the lady just (makes face) kinda Trump? And she was like I can make you a flag cake but I’m not going to write Trump on it,” Ms. Gill told the local Fox News station. When they realized that the bakery would not make the cake they wanted, they simply went elsewhere to get it. “It’s your job, we’re not really going for your opinion on what you think of the candidates we were just wanting Trump 2016 on the cake.” 

Gill later recounted her story on Facebook as a way to “vent” her frustration, never expecting the story to gain national attention. In response to the traction that the story gained and the threat of backlash from local shoppers, Albertson’s corporate office issued an apology and said that the employees simply misunderstood company policy regarding copyrighted phrases, which sounds like an odd explanation for their initial refusal. 

I would argue that there is a bigger lesson to be learned here though.
Notice that in response to the customer being refused service, there was an uproar and that the financial interests of the store were threatened, which pushed them to action. This is the way that a difference of opinion, complaint, or problem should be handled in a free market system. This is quite different than the methods used by homosexual activists to browbeat anyone who disagrees with their values and beliefs. In recent years we’ve seen example after example of a Christian-owned business being sued and persecuted by activists and local governments in an effort to drive those folks out of business. This is not the way a “free” society handles discrimination or dispute.
How much better off would our nation be if the liberal fascists stopped using the government as a bludgeon against conservative Christian citizens, and instead simply used the free market to voice their disagreement? Perhaps we’d be a kinder, gentler country if we were all free to believe and to shop as we pleased.

Weakling-in-Chief! Obama meets prez who humiliated him

460x (1)
Looks like it’s time to check President Barack Obama’s medical records — because he seems to have had his spine surgically removed.
In his latest show of weakness, Obama met with Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte informally on Wednesday before attending a gala dinner at a regional summit, Philippine officials said.
That’s the same Duterte who called Obama a “son of a bitch” just days ago.
The brief meeting was designed to take a little sting out of the soured relations caused by Duterte’s intemperate language in referring to Obama earlier this week. That had caused Obama to cancel a formal meeting scheduled for Tuesday.
There was no immediate confirmation from the White House.

Philippine Foreign Secretary Pefecto Yasay told The Associated Press that the leaders had met.
“They met at the holding room and they were the last persons to leave the holding room. I can’t say how long they met. It all springs from the fact the relationship between the Philippines and the United States is firm, very strong. The basis for this relationship is historical and both leaders realize this. And I’m very happy that it happened.”
Obama and Duterte are in the Laotian capital along with other regional leaders for a summit. All of them made their way through the holding room before heading to the banquet hall.

On Monday, hours before arriving in Laos, Duterte told Philippine reporters he wouldn’t accept questions from Obama about extrajudicial killings that have occurred during his crackdown on suspected drug dealers and users. More than 2,000 people have been killed in the crackdown since he took office on June 30.
“I do not have any master except the Filipino people, nobody but nobody. You must be respectful. Do not just throw questions. Putang ina, I will swear at you in that forum,” Duterte said, using the Tagalog phrase for “son of a bitch.”
On Tuesday, Duterte expressed regret over the remarks, but they were another foreign relations disaster for Obama.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Busted! Hillary being coached through earpiece?

clinton ear piece

Hillary Clinton’s slogan of “Stronger Together” just took on a whole new meaning, and should maybe be changed to “Helpless Without.”
Clinton is known for avoiding press conferences and often misspeaking when under pressure, and apparently people in the Clinton camp are now concerned about what she will say in her own words.
So have they have taken the matter into their own hands?
Social media users were up in arms during last night’s Commander-in-chief forum live on NBC, when they noticed what appeared to be a mini, flesh-colored ear bud in the ear of Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

That led to questions about whether Clinton was being coached by aides on how to respond to NBC’s Matt Lauer during the live interview.
True Pundit reported, “NYPD sources involved with the NBC forum’s security detail confirm Clinton was wearing an ‘inductive earpiece,” the same technology employed by almost all lead Broadway actors to receive forgotten lines and stealth off-stage cues from directors.”
The article continues to report details about the technology of the piece, asserting that it is Bluetooth and Clinton could have been receiving help in New York City from someone all the way in Washington D.C.
While the technology is astounding, it wasn’t enough to stop Hillary from stalling her speech while apparently processing and reiterating whatever she was being told to say.

Throughout the live questioning by Lauer, tougher questions prompted a clear stalled reaction from the former First Lady.
When asked about her emails regarding the covert drone program, Clinton took an entire 4 seconds to respond. There were other moments during the interview where Clinton’s words were broken and the spacing between her words seemed unnaturally long.
Conservative actor James Woods, who would certainly be familiar with the technology as an experienced stage performer, drew media attention to the earpiece in a tweet. 


#Hillaryearpiece quickly gained popularity on twitter, with one user tweeting, “This cheater can’t even speak for herself. UNFIT to lead. Reddit users on The Donald subreddit were quick to criticize Clinton, with one user commenting “either she admits a health issue and says she’s deaf, or she admits to cheating.”— The Horn editorial team

Mutiny! FBI turning on James Comey?

By Kevin Hart 

FBI Director James Comey is on a permanent hot seat after his agency’s decision to not prosecute presidential candidate Hillary Clinton over her mishandling of classified information while secretary of state.
Now Comey seems to be trying to quiet a rebellion within his own ranks.
Comey sent a memo to FBI employees yesterday attempting to explain why the FBI let Clinton walk, and why it published the notes from its investigation just before a long holiday weekend.
The highly unusual move seems to indicate that Comey felt he had some explaining to do, and that career FBI officials were baffled by some of his recent decisions.

In his memo, first reported by CNN, Comey tried to claim that the decision to not prosecute Clinton was not political, nor a close call. He also said the late-Friday document dump occurred because it was simply the first day the materials were available.
But don’t expect many members of the public — or even many reporters — to buy either explanation.
The memo comes after Comey reportedly received heat from former FBI agents who said the decision to recommend criminal charges against Clinton should have been a slam dunk. Politicians ranging from former Texas Governor Rick Perry to House Speaker Paul Ryan have openly questioned whether Comey was influenced by political pressure.
After the release of the investigation notes last Friday, House Republicans are calling for new hearings on whether Clinton failed to secure classified information on her home-brew private server.
Comey has been fielding calls to resign over his handling of the Clinton case. Now it seems possible that some of those calls may be coming from within FBI headquarters.

"Middle Fingered" Obama Shown the Door

by:David Hunter 
“You must be respectful.” – potty-mouthed Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte
The Chinese enjoy their petty torments. Barack Obama's 10th and last excellent Asian adventure (a final, meaningless oriental photo-op) has met with unexpected snafus. Upon airport arrival, Chinese officials failed to provide the customary portable staircase for any U.S. president to disembark from the upper door of Air Force One. Mr. Obama was relegated to a smaller, built-in staircase from the back end of the aircraft. The Dalai Lama would say this is Mr. Obama's karma for directing his holiness to a back door exit by the White House trash heaps in 2010. Apparently, the Chinese have returned the disrespect. 

The karma continues. In Laos, Mr. Obama was to meet with new Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte. That meeting was abruptly canceled, after Mr. Duterte called him a “son of a whore” (for Obama's busybody objection to his country's extrajudicial killings of drug dealers). Leave it to Barack Obama to always side with the criminal element. Support of his corrupt would-be successor Hillary Clinton comes to mind.
Speaking of respect, Donald Trump said, “If that were me, I'd say, 'You know what, folks, I respect you a lot, let's close the doors, let's get out of here.'” If Mr. Trump succeeds Mr. Obama, there will be no repeat bowing and scraping apology tour. Like Ronald Reagan, Mr. Trump will always command respect. For starters, that means politeness from hosting regimes—and entering or leaving with the appropriate stairways.

George Soros: Western Society Must Fall Before One World Govt Can Be Established

by:MIchael DePinto 
In the following video, Alex Jones begins by making a general statement in response to a question he’s been asked more times than he cares to count over the course of his professional career. The question always comes from the willfully ignorant, normally in a very condescending tone, and it often sounds something like, “If there really is a big bad secret world government, then where is it, and tell us who runs it.” See video:
Alex’s response is perfect. He says it’s really not a secret who runs the TransPacific Partnership. It’s really not a secret who runs the IMF, and the World Bank. It’s also really not secret who runs the United Nations. These days, the globalists are so over the top and in our faces about what they’re doing, sometimes information is learned that can later appear to have been kept secret, but that’s normally more the result of the public’s limited access to programs inside certain institutions, rather than a deliberate effort to conceal information.    

The insanity of it all, is that the global elite have brainwashed the masses, largely with the assistance of the globalist run mainstream media, to disregard what their own eyes and ears tell them. For example, George Soros admits the he’s been the financial backing to the refugee “crisis” that has brought Europe to it’s knees, and he admits that he’s funding the far-left group Black Lives Matter here in the U.S., but yet anyone that brings up either, is somehow branded a “conspiracy theorist??” Can anyone explain that to me?!?! 
To make matters worse, not only has much of what “conspiracy theorists” claim to be true already been committed to writing and published by the elite (try actually READING in Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030), but there are huge amounts of what  “conspiracy theorists” are warning about that have already been voted into binding legislation too. Furthermore, those who are carrying out such acts claim to be operating under some imagined diplomatic immunity, making them free from prosecution.  

As Alex rightfully points out, Soros & Co. aren’t “secret” about much of ANYTHING these days. People have become SO ignorant, that no one even bats an eyelash when a globalist thug freely speaks about his intention to use the U.N.’s migrant counsel as a weapon to undermine national homogeneity. That is utterly insane. He should be locked up. We live in a time when the head of the U.N.’s migrant counsel is openly sharing his intent to use his authority to deliberately undermine the sovereignty of countries, for no other reason than that their population is naturally indigenous, or potentially more predisposed to being white. What?!?!
It absolutely shocks the conscious, that in a day and age when information is available at the click of a button, that there could still be so many of the smug condescending types, who like to laugh, point fingers, and yell “conspiracy theory,” when issues this serious are discussed. Seriously? It’s almost as if a level of weapons grade stupidity, ignorance, or perhaps both, somehow got released into the atmosphere or something, because who could possibly be THAT clueless? Yet, here were are…. writes:
According to OSF documents, half of the $600,000 would go towards lobbying efforts. All $600,000 came from OSF’s “Europe Reserve Fund.”
(Infowars) – Leaked documents from left-wing financier George Soros’s Open Society Foundations continue to reveal the extent to which the group has influenced the political response to Europe’s refugee crisis. Internal documents show OSF used $600,000 in reserve funding in March 2016 to bring pro-refugee positions into the “political mainstream.”
Jordi Vaquer, OSF’s regional director for Europe, approved a $600,000 proposal entitled, “Countering the anti-migrant rhetoric and toxic narratives surrounding migration in Europe.”

According to OSF documents, half of the $600,000 would go towards lobbying efforts. All $600,000 came from OSF’s “Europe Reserve Fund.”
A summary of the proposal notes that “the proposed reserve fund allocation will allow for additional resources to be allocated towards countering xenophobic attitudes in Europe, move parts of the political mainstream towards more pro-refugee positions, and build constituencies around a more progressive approach to migration and asylum.”
A section of the proposal titled “Unforeseen need” explains that the money is needed because of the loss of sympathy for refugees in due in part to the November 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris.
“The debate around migration in Europe has become increasingly anti-migrant both at the political and public level. In 2015, the high number of refugee arrivals and the terrorist attacks in Paris in November, have eroded much of the sympathy towards refugees that was present earlier that year.”

The proposal notes, “While Germany started in mid-2015 with a widespread welcoming attitude towards refugees, by now general sentiment leans towards closure of borders.” The proposal claims that “Sweden, the other traditional stronghold of solidarity towards refugees, is facing similar challenges.”
As originally reported by The Daily Caller, a leaked OSF memo from May 2016 argues that Europe’s refugee crisis should be accepted as a “new normal,” and that the refugee crisis means “new opportunities” for Soros’s organization to influence immigration policies on a global scale.
That memo made three key points: OSF — the nation’s least transparent think tank —  has been successful at influencing global immigration policy; Europe’s refugee crisis presents “new opportunities” for the organization to influence global immigration policy; and the refugee crisis is the “new normal.”

Another leaked memo reveals that OSF is anticipating an increase in “migration pressures in the coming decades” due in part to “globalization.”
The OSF documents were released by “hacktivist” group DCLeaks, which publishes documents from powerful political figures around the world.
As you’ll learn in the second video with Alex Jones, the above referenced hack of Soros’ email is FAR from the only one of its kind lately. During recent weeks, there have been quite a few Soros related hacks, as well as the leaking of sensitive Soros files obtained during those hacks. I include links to several of the stories below.  

In a recent post titled, NWO Deliberately Causing More Global Chaos. Why? Because Global Problems Require Global Solutions, I discus one of the leaks that “should” be of particular concern to Americans. The leak involved details of another radical far-left group started by Soros, otherwise known as Demos, and among other things, two of the group’s goals are: 
1) “To implement UN Agendas-21 and Agenda 2030, which seeks to eradicate National sovereignty to the United Nations in favor of a globally controlled centralized government,which includes the diaphanous agenda of climate change; and
2) The complete globalization of America’s culture in order to balkanize and effectively destroy the very nature of what American culture is, as they are now also doing, throughout Europe, in deleting European culture.
Doesn't that sound grand? Those who like to name call should have to roll that up and wear it because they aren't cool enough for tin foil" hats yet! 

Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand. Article by Michael DePinto.


Feds Drop All Charges against Pete Santilli in Oregon Malheur Case
by: Tim Brown 
For one, I'm very happy to discover the news that the charges against alternative media reporter Pete Santilli in the Oregon Malheur Wildlife Reserve case have been dropped.
KOIN reports:
In a filing on Tuesday, US Attorney Billy J. Williams said prosecutors decided not to pursue charges against Santilli because of "this Court's pretrial evidentiary rulings excluding evidence against" him. 

The charges were dismissed without prejudice, which means it is as though the action had never been filed.

"It's been our position since the beginning that Pete had innocent intentions here," Santilli's lawyer Tom Coan told KOIN 6 News. "He never encouraged anyone to go out and stay at the refuge." 

The Las Vegas Review and Journal adds:
The dismissal came at the request of federal prosecutors in Portland who acknowledged in court papers that they no longer had enough evidence to pursue their case against conservative radio talk show host Pete Santilli. Prosecutors cited rulings that barred them from presenting some of their evidence. 

"Based upon this Court's pretrial evidentiary rulings excluding evidence against Santilli (ECF No. 1171), the government has decided that the interests of justice do not support further pursuit of these charges against Santilli," wrote US Attorney Billy J. Williams.
Awww, their evidence wasn't admitted? Poor babies. Perhaps, they should try acknowledging who is actually committing the crimes on land that, according the Constitution, belongs to the people of the State of Oregon.
However, this does not mean that Santilli is completely off the hook just yet. He is being transported to Nevada where he is facing trumped up charges from the 2014 Bundy Ranch siege in Bunkerville, Nevada.

"He looks forward to focusing 100 percent of his time defending the charges here in Nevada," Santilli attorney Chris Rasmussen said Tuesday.
Ammon Bundy's former attorney Mike Arnold added that he believes the trial on what he refers to as "thought crimes" will be a long one.
"We don't have thought crimes in America. You need, typically, overt acts to accompany speech in order to make it past First Amendment muster," Arnold said. "In this case, the government is claiming that the possession of firearms on the property was such an overt act and the protesters are presumably going to say, 'you know, we have a right to open carry.'"
Frankly, the entire federal case is a lot of unconstitutional trumped up charges not only against Santilli, but everyone involved. The feds attacked Santilli's freedom of the press and many protesters freedom of speech in Nevada and in Oregon. Furthermore, they continue to coverup their unconstitutional claims to the land in western states and through the union.

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Oops! Michelle Obama’s got a BIG secret

First lady Michelle Obama hosts the Smithsonian's Cooper-Hewitt National Design Award luncheon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Friday, July 13, 2012. A District of Columbia police officer who worked as a motorcycle escort for the White House and other officials has been moved to administrative duty after he allegedly made threatening comments about Michelle Obama.  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) 
oped: Yes indeed just another *Borg* Queen see:

It’s a moment that Hillary Clinton hopes can reverse her sagging fortunes.
The Clinton campaign was practically giddy yesterday when it announced that First Lady Michelle Obama would be joining Hillary on the campaign trail.
But Michelle Obama has a big secret that she’s hoping millions of Americans forget. 
She can’t stand Hillary Clinton any more than the rest of us — and she hasn’t been shy about saying so.
During the 2008 Democratic primary race, Michelle blasted Hillary for not being an honorable role model for what families should look like.
In the same year, in an interview on Good Morning America, when asked if she would endorse Hillary should her husband not win the primary, she dodged the question saying, “I would have to think about that.” 

Her hesitation reflects strong feelings of distrust the First Lady has for Hillary, and it is apparent that those emotions have not faded over the years.
A more detailed and up-to-date description of their strained relationship is revealed in Kate Anderson Bower’s new book, “First Women, the Grace and Power of America’s Modern First Ladies.”
Bower reports the negative words exchanged between the two women during the 2008 presidential campaign, “left deep and lasting scars on both the Clinton and Obama camps, and they are still shockingly fresh.”
Sources close to Clinton told the author that Hillary is running for president now out of a vengeance for the loss in 2008.
Hillary mocked Barack Obama’s campaign slogan of “hope and change,” an act that Michelle took great offense to. 

Her feelings are evident in the observation that Hillary was never invited to dinner at the Obama White House during her tenure as secretary of state.
Michelle Obama allegedly was hoping that Vice President Joe Biden would run for president in 2016 and keep Hillary out of the presidential race.
But the dislike Michelle has for Hillary is mutual, and Clinton aides suggested to Bower that Hillary didn’t think Michelle did enough as First Lady.
In a presumed desperate effort to keep Donald Trump out of the White House, Michelle will attempt to conceal her hatred for Hillary and campaign with her in Northern Virginia on Sept. 16

Mrs. Obama’s task will be to urge all voters, but especially young people, in hotly contested Virginia to support Clinton and running mate Tim Kaine in the Nov. 8 election.
She’ll also urge people not to miss the state’s Oct. 17 deadline to register to vote.
But don’t be fooled by the kind words Michelle will predictably read off a teleprompter about Hillary.
They’re not friends — just strange and desperate bedfellows who apparently otherwise can’t stand each other’s company.
— The Horn editorial team

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

What Kathleen Willey Overheard White House Staff Teaching Hillary

Kathleen Willey Hillary Clinton
oped:Kathleen Willey overheard Hillary being told to use the cannot recall answer during scandal investigations 22 years ago. Obviously, this is one thing Hillary has learned to do well or not well as you please. Her recent FBI interview made her sound like the village idiot. The things should did not recall was a staggering list. She may not be sure she even worked at the State Department. Can you accept that she is running for President? Read more below. 

As Written By Aaron Klein for Breitbart:
In a BREITBART EXCLUSIVE – Kathleen Willey: I Overheard White House Staff Teaching Hillary Her Trademark ‘I Don’t Recall’ Defense.
In 1994, at the height of numerous scandals, including Whitewater, File-gate and others, Willey says Hillary Clinton and White House Counsel Bernie Nussbaum were speaking in a room with the door open, when she says she heard Nussbaum shout at Clinton that she should tell investigators she could not recall events.
Stated Willey:
“The first time I heard it I thought it, wow! And I heard Bernie Nussbaum talking extremely very loudly to Hillary. And basically said, ‘For Christ’s sake, Hillary. All you have to say is you don’t recall. You don’t remember anything. Nobody can argue with that.’”
Willey was speaking on this reporter’s talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” broadcast on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and NewsTalk 990 AM.

EXCLUSIVE – Kathleen Willey: I Overheard White House Staff Teaching Hillary Her Trademark ‘I Don’t Recall’ Defense – Breitbart

Hollywood Royalty turns on Hillary’s Incompetent Corruption


You know Democrats are in trouble when members of “Hollywood Royalty” openly support the Republican candidate.
What could be wrong with Hillary Clinton?  After all, she has female anatomy, which is an ace in the hole for the next Democrat president to be criticism proof.  The first black Moslem president has been able to trample the Constitution under his banana republic boots, so the first female should be able to continue his legacy of tearing down America and rebuilding it in their leftwing socialist image.  Hillary has been able to claim she doesn’t know what classified material is after twenty years in the top of government, but her zombies believe she has the utmost respect for national security and the law.

Which is worse; that Hillary is the most corrupt person ever to run for president who has built vast wealth by selling government access to foreign powers, or that she claims to be completely incompetent and senile in handling classified state department materials?
It’s not enough that the Clinton Foundation has raked in a hundred millions dollars from foreign governments including those hostile to America, and that money is being laundered as campaign cash for the Clinton political machine under the guise of being a charity with multiple tax benefits.  It’s not enough that the Clintons are paid tens of millions of dollars by Democrat donors as “fees for speeches,” as if anyone else in the country can make six figures giving twenty minute speeches.  It’s not enough that she installed an illegal server in her basement by which she communicated with foreign powers and domestic donors, and that she destroyed the evidence when subpoenaed by the FBI and claims innocence.  It’s not enough that the emails she sent were discovered to have been classified and she, after twenty years in Washington, claims that she couldn’t recognize classified markings.

Her lemming zombies will never turn on her and will always fall at her feet and believe what she says regardless of what she does just as they have for Obama.  Betraying the nation means nothing to Democrats who hate America and believe it has never been great, but would be great if brought down to their level.  Democrats are all in on giving control of America to foreigners and transforming her into a banana republic.
The Agent of Change vs. the Queen of Corruption

Wish a Doolittle Raider, 'Happy Birthday'

American Veterans Center

Dear Patriot,

You may know Col. Richard Cole as Jimmy Doolittle's Co-Pilot for the Doolittle Raid, but I know him as one of the men that helped raise the morale of the country after the Japanese sneak attack at Pearl Harbor. I remember after Pearl Harbor, our nation didn't think we could defeat or even hit the Japanese back. After what the Doolittle Raiders did it raised the moral of our nation and we all believed we could WIN!

I was alive in World War II and fought with the Marines all over the Pacific and was badly wounded on Iwo Jima. Those Raiders gave our nation hope and especially to all of us fighting. We remembered what a daring mission they took part in and many of us realized the enemy was not as invincible as we once thought.

 Tomorrow, Col. Cole turns 101 years old. He is the LAST surviving Doolittle Raider. Will you join the American Veterans Center as we celebrate the birthday for a very special friend, Lt. Colonel Richard E. Cole? You can join us by signing his 101st Birthday Card? 

As a WWII veteran he reminds me of all the men that took part in this mission. I wish more Americans would reflect back on those brave men and what they did for our country. Will you help me surprise Col. Cole with your birthday wishes and sign his birthday card?

If you'd like to make a donation in honor of Col. Cole, you will help support the American Veterans Center AND the Doolittle Tokyo Raiders Education Fund. 

Thank you,

 Don Mates
WWII Veteran
Iwo Jima 

Donations made to the American Veterans Center are tax-deductible. The American Veterans Center is a project of The American Studies Center, which is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational foundation.