Saturday, February 11, 2017

Schumer: ‘We’re Very, Very — Pleased’ With How We Treated Trump’s Nominees

... ribbon cutting ceremonies and then is pleased about making a funny
oped: Will someone please *BitchSlap* this little #TURD Schumer !

Chuck Schumer is congratulating himself and his fellow democrats for their part in disparaging President Trump’s cabinet nominees.   “We think we have done a real service to America,” he said.   Seriously Chuck?   You’ve served Americans by further driving a wedge between them and their rightful President?  You’ve served Americans by deceiving them, showing them how obnoxious and vile obstructionists can be, and pandering to a base that couldn’t get your candidate elected with their leftist, liberal ideals?   Congratulations!   You believe you’ve planned well for the eventual failure of Trump and his nominees.   But, you’ve failed to see their potential for success.  Who’s going to look like the idiot when they do succeed? 

CNS News reports – Schumer said Democrats are “doing everything we can to stop these awful nominees, whether it’s staying late and speaking (on the Senate floor); whether it’s holding press conferences; whether it’s going on Facebook live where we had huge turnout last night; or whether it’s demanding when the record is so abysmal.”
Schumer said Democrats hope they can force the withdrawal of Puzder’s nomination, but even if they can’t, it’s all about laying the groundwork to stymie the Trump administration:
“But whether we do or not, we think we have done a real service to America,” he said. “We have shown who these Cabinet nominees are. Every time (Education Secretary) Betsy DeVos does something now that might hurt public education, there’s going to be millions of Americans looking over her shoulder. Every time (Attorney General) Jeff Sessions hurts immigrants or voting rights, there are going to be millions of Americans looking over his shoulder.

“Because we’ve laid the predicate for who these nominees are. And we’re very, very — pleased is the wrong word, because we wish they had never gotten to these positions, but we think we’ve been very effective in showing who they are and putting some constraints on their actions and on the president’s actions in future years.”
Read More:

Friday, February 10, 2017

Bundy Ranch Trial update Las Vegas,Nevada

John Lamb Court Observer:

Trump Needs to Dump Google

It is certainly understandable that the Donald Trump presidency has left Google – oops, I mean Alphabet – more than a mite discombobulated, writes our friend Seton Motley. 
Google has just spent the last eight years all-but-running the Barack Obama Administration.  Google people visited the Obama White House at least 427 times.  Dozens of key Google staffers – transmogrified into key Obama Administration staffers.  Google literally wrote ridiculously crony policies that ridiculously favored them and crippled their competitors.
But all bad things must come to an end.  The eight-year-long-national-nightmare Obama Administration finally drew to a close.  And as it did, Google went all-in to secure Obama’s Democrat successor – Hillary Clinton.  To ensure that its crony gravy train continued.

Lest we forget, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt in June 2016 claimed “We’re not going to touch Trump vs. Clinton.”  Which was..not exactly true.  Schmidt worked directly with the Clinton campaign.  Schmidt was also a member of the “Democratic Victory Task Force.”  Google was caught – at least twice – rigging Clinton search results so as to cover up her massive corruption.
But none of it worked.  The Google crony magic was gone – Trump won.
And Google hasn’t been dealing particularly well: Anti-Trump Protesters Gather at Google Headquarters: “(C)rowd(s) at the Mountain View, California headquarters, as well as offices in San Francisco, New York, Seattle, and around the world,…A person at the (headquarters) rally told CNBC that Google CEO Sundar Pichai and cofounder Sergey Brin spoke there.…”

Not dealing so well: “‘Some of us may need to adopt Pence 2017 bumper stickers,’ Google’s cofounder Sergey Brin joked at a company sponsored anti-Trump protest….”
Not dealing very well at all: “Google lawyers flooded the California office of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, demanding she oppose (Trump nominee) Sen. Jeff Sessions’ confirmation as attorney general.”
Eric Schmidt’s opposition has also been…less than understated: “(T)he Trump administration is ‘going to do these evil things.…’”
But while doing and saying things like all of that – Schmidt and Google are attempting to do things like this: “Eric Schmidt, Google’s former CEO and chair of Alphabet, has traveled to Trump Tower a least twice to meet with the president and his team, but hasn’t made any real progress.”

Google should make absolutely zero progress.  They spent most of the last decade enjoying anti-free market government favors from a Democrat administration.  They strived mightily to ensure that there would be a successor Democrat administration – to continue their crippling cronyism.
And Google lost.  To Trump – a man who won in large part by pledging to end just this sort of Washington, D.C. business-as-usual corruption.
Google’s minions should be totally removed from anywhere they infest the federal government – and Google should get absolutely no further favoritism from DC.
Much has rightly been made of Obama Administration staff holdovers being obnoxious, surreptitious disruptors of the Trump Administration.  They all should be in totality swept out of the government.  Yet bizarrely: Trump Keeping 50 Obama Administration Officials.  Why on Earth would he do that?

As but one example – Trump is inheriting Patent and Trademark Office head Michelle Lee.  Whose immediately preceding gig was the first ever head of Patents and Patent Strategy – for Google.  Google’s patent strategy – is to steal as many patents as they possibly can.  I would like to think the Trump Administration would remove Google’s crafter of patent theft – from atop the U.S. patent office.
Despite some lame face-saving attempts at post-election outreach, Google clearly remains vociferously opposed to the Trump Administration and the many anti-cronyism cleanups in which this administration is going to engage.
Obama Administration Google holdovers – are an awful subset of all of the awful Obama Administration holdovers.  Leaving any of these residual moles in place – will only greatly hamstring and damage the DC improvements this administration will try to make.  ALL of them – absolutely need to go.

And any continued Google lobbying efforts – any attempts to maintain any of their government-crony favors – should be summarily rebuffed and dismissed.  While their government-favors – are summarily rolled back and dispatched.
Google has already had all things DC their way – for far too long.
Seton Motley is the founder and president of Less Government.  Please feel free to follow him on Twitter (@SetonMotley) and Facebook.  It’s his kind of stalking.
This first appeared in Red State.

Judge Robart...Aiding and Abetting

Some say Judge Robart may be to blame for future terror in America if his ruling against President Trump’s travel ban isn’t overturned.

Taya Kyle: John McCain Should Apologize to Navy Seals Family

Image result for funny pictures songbird john mccain

oped: Don't hold your breath Taya...LCDR John McCain still has not apologized to Viet Nam Veterans much less the USA for his treasoness activity 1967 Hanoi Hilton...the only thing that saved his sorry ass was a pardon by President Nixon...33 were on the list and John was at the top! 

As seen first on Fox and Friends: Taya Kyle, the widow of “American Sniper” Chris Kyle, joined “Fox & Friends” Thursday to discuss Sen. John McCain’s comments saying a recent raid in Yemen resulting in the loss of a Navy SEAL’s life was unsuccessful.

Nancy Pelosi Called Out By Zionist Group

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from California has been called to account for her slanderous attacks on Presidential aide Steve Bannon. Pelosi has labeled Bannon a white supremacist when there is nothing but contrary evidence. Nancy Pelosi is very adept at the politics of personal destruction. That is her go-to play when there is no truth to use. 

As Written By Jerome Hudson for Breitbart: 
The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), a prominent pro-Israel group, is calling on Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to retract her recent comments calling White House chief strategist and former Breitbart News executive chairman Steve Bannon a “white supremacist.”
“ZOA urges U.S. House Minority Leader Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to retract her defamatory, ugly and erroneous name calling of Senior Presidential Strategist Stephen Bannon,” the organization wrote in a press release.

“It is beneath the dignity of her office, and sets a very bad example for the nation, for her to engage in name-calling – especially when she hurls attacks that are baseless and untrue,” the press release said. “We are thus deeply disappointed that Congresswoman Pelosi repeatedly defamed presidential advisor and National Security Council member Stephen Bannon on February 2, 2017 by wrongly and falsely calling him a ‘white supremacist.’”
ZOA says the “absurdity” of Pelosi “labeling Mr. Bannon a ‘white supremacist’” is evidenced by the multiple pro-Israel stories published by Breitbart News while Mr. Bannon was the site’s chairman.
ZOA cites:

Breitbart lamented the higher unemployment rates suffered by black-Americans. (See, e.g., “Black Unemployment Rate Nearly Twice the National Average On Eve Of Selma Anniversary,” by Carolyn May, Breitbart, Mar. 6, 2015.)  Breitbart interviewed and published a lengthy, highly favorable report on black-American surgeon Dr. Ben Carson’s ideas and presidential candidacy.  (“Exclusive: Dr. Ben Carson: ‘The Ladders of Opportunity Are There’,” by Jerome Hudson, Breitbart, Sept. 7, 2015.) Breitbart also published an Obama official’s statements and expert testimony that “illegal immigration disproportionately impacts the wages and employment opportunities of African-Americans.”  (“U.S. Civil Rights Commissioner to Congressional Black Caucus: Amnesty Hurts Black Workers,” by Tony Lee, Breitbart, May 20, 2014.)  Breitbart also reported the human cost and pain to a Jewish student at the New School of finding a swastika scrawled on her dorm room door  (“Swastikas Drawn on NYC New School Dorm Doors,” Breitbart Jerusalem, Nov. 14, 2016), and the scourge of increasing anti-Semitism on U.S. college …..
Zionist Group Demands Pelosi Retract Slander Against Bannon

Thursday, February 9, 2017

Reba McEntire Sounds Off: Fans Don't Pay to Hear My Political Opinions

Reba Sounds Off: Fans Don't Pay to Hear My Political Opinions

oped: Yeppers Reba get's it...still a sweety...want's to entertain not preach,rant and rave...wish she would do another sequel to "Tremors" she cracked me up in Tremors...maybe cast Behar and Whoopie as walk on's they are taken by da worm...Reba can say 'told ya... ya got's bad vibes attracts the graboids'...ha! 

Country music superstar Reba McEntire is the latest artist to endorse the idea that entertainers should not preach their political opinions to their fans.

The View co-host Joy Behar broached the topic with McEntire Wednesday by referencing rapper Drake’s recent F-bomb-laced anti-Donald Trump rant. “F*ck that man!” Drake told a sold-out crowd in England after a lengthy screed about Trump dividing Americans.

Behar asked McEntire, “If you ever went on a political rant in the middle of your act, what would happen?”

“My fans would be shocked,” the two-time Grammy-winner said. “I take it this way: they have paid their hard-earned money to come in there and fill a seat — parking, getting something at the concession stand, go and eat before the concert — I am there to entertain them, to take their worries away from them, so when they walk out, they can kind of have a little lift in their step and go, ‘Aw, that was such a great break from all the problems I have to deal with during daily life.’ So I’m not going to give them my political views.” 

Source: Breitbart

The Muslim Plot to Colonize America

by:Tim Brown

Is there a plot by Muslim supremacist groups to colonize America and eventually turn it into an Islamic Sharia government?  According to one woman, the answer is an emphatic "Yes."
Ann Corcoran, the woman behind Refugee Resettlement Watch, claims that the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees is “under the influence of a powerful Muslim supremacist group.”

Corcoran, author of Refugee Resettlement and the Hijra to America, described Muslims migration as "hijra."
“Mohammed told his followers to migrate and spread Islam, in order to dominate all the lands of the world ... and that’s exactly what they’re doing now," she said.
She is not far off either.  Historical evidence is on her side when she warns of this.  Author Robert Spencer has written not only of the history of Islam, but also the means they will use to accomplish global domination as instructed in the Koran and the Hadiths.
Ms. Corcoran is a former environmental lobbyist from Maryland, who was made are of African refugees that were being resettled near her in 2006.  That's when she began to blog and document the concerns she had and what she discovered.

Ms. Corcoran has a bachelor's degree in wildlife biology from Rutgers and a master's in environmental studies from Yale.  She used her background to lobby for the Nationa Audubon Society from 1975 to 1980.
Before you write her off, consider that she was targeted by the premier hate group in America, the Southern Poverty Law Center.
In April 2015, Corcoran wrote. "There needs to be a national debate about how many refugees and other immigrants we take and from what cultures they come from.  Frankly, we have made a grievous error in taking the Muslim refugees, Somalis in particular, who have no intention of becoming Americans.  They are here to change America.  Unfortunately, political correctness and a worshipful attitude toward multiculturalism have blinded us."

She went on to warn, "The explosion on this front is yet to come and it will be like the Major Hasan slaughter at Ft. Hood and there will be much fingerpointing and gnashing of teeth about who is to blame primarily at the US State Department."
Corcoran has also hooked up with Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy.
"It is now public knowledge that nearly every major Muslim organization in the United States is actually controlled by the MB [Muslim Brotherhood] or a derivative organization," reads a 2011 Center for Security Policy report. "Consequently, most of the Muslim American groups of any prominence in America are now known to be, as a matter of fact, hostile to the United States and its Constitution."
The effects of the resettlement program will not be fully seen for a generation or two, but unless Christians get busy presenting Muslims with the truth of the Gospel, America is headed for a destructive future.  Before you say it can't or wont' happen, perhaps you should take a look at Dearborn, Michigan, or a glimpse at Tampa, Florida, or more recently, the streets of New York City.

C.I.A. Links Top Hillary Donor George Soros to Terrorist Bombing
by:MIchael DePinto 
When it comes to George Soros, it’s probably safe to assume well informed people around the globe fall into one of two camps. There are those who come from a socialist, or a communist background, and they see see Soros as one of the world’s wealthiest men, who often acts as a financier to fight capitalism and freedom wherever the opportunity presents itself. As a boy, Soros was a Nazi sympathizer during WWII, and the rest of his adult life he’s maintained intimate ties to Socialism and Communism. Furthermore, Soros is often viewed or perceived as the “front man” for many of the other uber elites around the world, many of whom are members of exclusive secret societies including as the Bilderberg Group and the Illuminati.  

In the other camp, are those who value freedom, liberty, and free market capitalism, and they therefore see George Soros as an "untouchable terrorist" because of his wealth and power. George Soros is the man behind the heinous organization, and in recent years has funded uprisings and riots at events including those in: Ukraine, the Arab Spring, Ferguson, Baltimore, Occupy Wall Street, and most recently Soros is bankrolling the wretched group Black Lives Matter, as well as the group Democracy Spring, which is promising to bring about the “largest civil disobedience action of the century” if they don’t get their way in the 2016 elections. Anyone recall if there was any violence or deaths at the aforementioned events? Exactly!
As far back as when Soros was a young man during Nazi occupied Hungary, Soros always traded currencies on the black market. Gradually, over the years, while mastering his craft, Soros became one of the wealthiest men on earth in the process. During that period, he’s come to be known in global currency markets as, “The Currency Killer.” That will be important later. For now, just realize that George Soros’ primary business is importing chaos into regions he needs destabilized for his own personal gain.

Based on that premise, it should be easy to understand what Alex Jones is talking about in the first video below, which is how the CIA has tied Soros, a HUGE Hillary Clinton financial backer, with having ties to a terrorists. As you read this post, keep in your mind that THIS is the company Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have long ben in bed with politically, and funded by in many of their exploits. Obama is a Soros favorite.

“Terrorism” is nothing new to George Soros, it just isn’t called “terrorism” when he does it. As an example of Soros terrorism, now would be a good time to mention that in addition to financing people to riot at the places mentioned above, Soros and Hillary Clinton were actually the ones behind all the anti-Trump rallies, and the violence that came with them. It was later discovered after the media had spun its false narrative, that the protestors were being paid $16 per hour to show up and cause chaos. They didn't have a beef with Trump. They were paid to be there.
THE VERY DEFINITION OF TERRORISM IS DEFINED AS: "A Person Who Uses Terror In the Pursuit of a Political Aim"
This isn’t rocket science. Using violence, and threatening to carry out the “largest civil disobedience action of the century” if "Democracy Spring" doesn't get their way in the 2016 elections, is a textbook example of “using terror in the pursuit of a political aim.” If you doubt that that it should be called terror, might I suggest questioning some of the dead from previous Soros funded events, and see if they agree with me or you. Let me know how that goes.

As November keeps getting dangerously closer each day, if the new Soros group “Democracy Spring,” and Black Lives Matter continue down the road they are on now, given the amount of carnage we saw in places like Ferguson and Baltimore, it’s VERY easy to see how Obama and the White House might be “forced” to declare a state of Martial Law, whether they “want” to or not, and be forced to suspend the elections. It's only through peoples' OWN ignorance of ALL the facts, do many people seem to think Martial Law is a far fetched possibility. Quite the opposite! I submit to you, it’s considerably more far fetched to see the country somehow make it through the entire election process WITHOUT having Martial Law Declared. Based on the stories below, I’m not alone in that assessment:
Looks Like President Barack Obama May Suspend 2016 Presidential Elections…
Is Obama Really Going to Suspend Elections and Declare Martial Law? (Videos)
When Obama Suspends 2016 Election, a Guide to Survive Martial Law (Videos)
Watch This Please! U.S Soldier Exposes Barack Obama’s Martial Law Plan (Video)
Former Military Officer: The 2016 Election Doesn't Even Matter (Videos)
Warning: The Establishment Is Preparing For Martial Law and Civil War (Videos)
A Former Federal Prosecutor Warned: Obama Plans to Incite Race War This Summer (Video)

Don’t think Soros is limited to importing chaos into just  U.S. politics either. As the “front man” for the Bilderberg Group and the Illuminati, George Soros is very open publicly about his desire for one world government, and has even admitted to helping fund to facilitate the process.
In the video below, you’ll see that long before the Muslim refugee crisis got way out of hand, Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orban, was opposed to Muslim Refugees/migrants coming into Hungary. After taking matters into his own hands, in an email issued to Bloomberg Business, Soros took responsibility for starting the Muslim invasion of Europe by financing the beginning of the massive migrant wave. Soros claimed his foundation was “helping uphold European values,” while the Prime Minister’s actions in strengthening Hungary’s border “undermined those values.”
Referring to the Prime Minister, Soros later added, “His plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle… Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle." The Prime Minister responded to Soros saying, “This invasion is driven, on the one hand, by people smugglers, and on the other by those activists who support everything that weakens the nation-state.”

George Soros has been a long time ally of both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. His alleged ties to a terrorist act should not surprise anyone. Unbeknownst to so many Americans, Soros funds virtually all left wing/Communist uprisings, and is virtually always the money behind poetical agitators here in the United States. Sadly, because the mainstream media is so dishonest and so corrupt, the typical American voter has no idea that events the “presstitutes” report as “spontaneous, with no organization or funding” are normally quite the opposite. They are highly coordinated, and very well funded efforts, with Soros usually behind them.
If Americans are smart, they’ll take this information about Soros' alleged ties to a terrorist act, and combined with all of Hillary’s other shady dealings, they’ll be able to deduce there is no way that woman is fit for President. For anyone who just can’t seem to break away from supporting Hillary, might I suggest reading, Why Did Illuminated George Soros Liquidate 37% of His Stock to Buy Gold? (Video).

Recall up above I said that Soros’ nickname for years has been, “The Currency Killer,” right? With all you SHOULD know about the problems in the U.S. economy, why would Hillary be so closely associated with one of the richest men on earth (and a man nicknamed “The Currency Killer”), who also just happened to bet for the whole world to see, that the U.S. Dollar is is about to collapse?

Finally, now that you have all the pieces, put them together. Soros’s refugee “crisis” isn’t only affecting Europe is it? Think about all the battles being waged in Washington D.C. right now with Obama trying to rush in as many unvetted Muslim “refugees” as possible. Also consider the new reports of massive numbers of FEMA Camps going up everywhere across 13 southern states that came out this week… As Ronald Reagan said:

Infowars writes:
In an era of growing “false flag” terrorist incidents, a formerly Top Secret Central Intelligence Agency document, the National Intelligence Daily of February 4, 1987, strongly suggests a George Soros connection to a terrorist bombing in what was then Czechoslovakia.
1986 to 1987 saw the early effects of Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev’s glasnost policies begin to take effect in eastern Europe. George Soros, whose insider currency speculation made him one of only a few Wall Street vampires to make out financially in the “crash of October 1987,” began to take advantage of the situation in eastern Europe. Two weeks after “Black Monday,” Soros shorted the U.S. dollar and his Quantum Fund ended 1987 with a 13 percent gain in value. Soros was flush with money to launder to groups in eastern Europe, funds the CIA calls “kosher cash.” Soros intended to weaken the then-ruling Communist governments. One of Soros’s first targets was Czechoslovakia.

Soros, who already had a link with the CIA through his participation in and funding of a number of CIA groups, including the Council on Foreign Relations, funneled cash, and lots of it, to “pro-democracy” pressure groups like Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia and Solidarity, both now known as nothing more than CIA fronts. In fact, the Charter 77 Foundation received a third of its funding from Soros, with a substantial amount of its remaining funding provided by CIA-linked entities like the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy (NED). Soros began his infiltration of eastern Europe in 1984 when his New York-based Soros Foundation signed an agreement with Hungary that established the Soros Foundation Budapest. Eventually, Soros Foundation Budapest merged with a Cold War CIA front in Paris, the French affiliate of the Congress for Cultural Freedom.

Soros’s championship of “themed revolutions” through “non-violent” street action has often led Soros-backed groups to commit acts of violence. This has been seen on the streets of Kiev, Tbilisi, Caracas, Cairo, Sana’a, and Damascus.
With Soros’s agents and money flooding Czechoslovakia and helping to prop up Charter 77 and leaders like Vaclav Havel and Karel Schwarzenberg, a leader of the Czech opposition based in Vienna, did Soros raise the stakes by helping to fund acts of terrorism in Czechoslovakia?
The CIA report states “the recent bombing of the Czechoslovak Communist Party’s headquarters at Ceske Budejovice and subsequent attempted attacks on the party’s buildings in other cities have alarmed authorities and led to heightened security at facilities across the country. [The source of the CIA’s information is redacted].”

Charter 77-New York organization, financed by Soros, hosts Vaclav Havel, second from left.
The CIA then reveals the Prague government pointed the finger at foreign agitators working through “youth gangs.” The major funders of youth groups agitating against the Communist government at the time were supported by Soros and the NED. The question remains: Did George Soros authorize acts of terrorism against the Czechoslovak government? If so, why is Mr. Soros not in prison for aiding and abetting acts of terrorism in Europe?
The CIA analysis of the terrorist attacks concluded that the violence may have represented the work of an “outside group.” Again, the finger pointed at Soros. An entire paragraph in the report on the Czechoslovak bombing campaign remains redacted by the CIA.

The CIA believed that the bombings were conducted in order to mobilize the “usually apathetic” Czechoslovak population. The CIA has its own sordid history of waking up apathetic populations through the use of false flag terrorist attacks.
Mr. Soros is a major contributor to Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Soros’s possible activities in 1986 and 1987 may eventually show that Mrs. Clinton’s campaign was financed by a bank roller of terrorism.
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand


Trump to Use Obama Executive Order to declare George Soros a National Security Threat?

by:MIchael DePinto 
Top Democratic Party donor George Soros is finally being labeled a “threat to national security” based on a 2014 Executive Order put in place by then-President Barak Obama for actions against the peaceful transition of power in the Ukraine. President Trump was able to legally assign this label to Soros based on information provided by Russia when they reported that it was Soros who was being the financing of groups that were paid to violently protest in the Ukraine.  
In the following video, Right Wing News revisits the Executive Order signed President Obama that was just used to label Obama’s long-time ally a “threat to national security” because of his involvement Ukraine, and also reviews how Soros has been linked to various far-left movements in the United States including his financing of Black Lives Matter, paying protesters $15/hour to act up and cause violence at various campaign events, and most recently paying over 50 anti-Trump protests that took place on Inauguration Day and the day after the inauguration with all the Women’s March groups. 

Conservative Daily Post Writes:
It’s About Time!
It’s no surprise that one of the most hated people in the entire world is George Soros. This liberal billionaire has used his massive wealth and resources to essentially control the Democratic Party. Which is why if Hillary Clinton had won the presidential election, she would have been listening to Soros.
When you’re done imaging that nightmare scenario, it’s important to realize that the fight isn’t over yet. Hillary might have lost the election, but Soros is still out there, mobilizing and planning more moves that seek to dismantle the Donald Trump presidency.
That’s why Trump finally had enough and is going to charge Soros as a “threat to national security” in the United States. Considering that this is the same man that has mobilized and paid protesters to create a tremendous amount of damage, it’s been a long time coming for this order.

Trump had placed a call to Russia to ask about “any and all” files that are related to Soros. He was able to do this thanks to the 2014 Executive Order that was signed by President Obama, entitled “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine.”
“I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, find that the actions and policies of persons that undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets, constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.”

Obama’s Executive Order In 2014 Paved The Way For This To Happen
Nearly a month after this order was signed US diplomatic cables show that Soros did “undermine the processes and institutions in Ukraine.” Due to Soros’s illegal intervention into a peaceful transition of power, mass conflict erupted and an estimated 9,600 men, women, and children lost their lives.
Clearly that is interfering in the process. So why didn’t President Obama charge Soros as a threat to the United States national security? It’s because Soros flooded Obama and Hillary’s Democratic Party with about $100 million in donations. You really think that Obama is going to charge someone that has donated that much to their party?
Soros began his takeover back in 2004, as he declared “it is the central focus of my life” and “a matter of life and death” to push his influence on the American people and our democracy. While 2004 failed, Soros had turned to 2016 and had become Hillary’s highest donor. We know that Hillary listens to people that donate to her, so she would have been listening to Soros the entire time.

Now that the Democratic Party has been completely defeated, Soros is doing what he can to go against President Trump, saying “democracy is now in crisis.” Soros has been active in his fight against Trump, as he was discovered to have been the mastermind behind paying protesters to cause as much damage and destruction as possible.
During the election season, there were several Black Lives Matter protests that quickly turned violent. These protesters started riots, went up against the police force, and generally made life difficult for law-abiding citizens. Then came a report that Soros was paying these protesters around $15 an hour to protest, and they would have their expenses paid for.

Soros Paid Protesters To Riot And Cause Damage
It didn’t just stop at the Black Lives Matter protests either. There were several protests against Trump during the election season that turned violent. Again, another report circulated that protesters were getting paid to cause as much destruction as possible.
Considering that one of these protests actually shut down a speech that Trump had planned to make, it’s safe to say that they were effective at the time. Not to mention that these people were endangering other people around them and creating a lot of problems for the police forces that were assigned to them.
It’s about time that Trump did something against Soros. This man has been responsible for funding protests that have turned violent in the United States. He has been responsible for attempting to control the Democrats through his donations to the Party. This man is a menace to society, and Trump is finally labeling Soros like he should be: a “National Security Threat.”

Other nations are starting to do something against Soros as well. Hungary became the first nation to come forward and do what they could to bring down Soros. Hungary said that they will use “all the tools at its disposal” to “sweep out” various NGOs that are tied to Soros. In other words, his wealth won’t be able to influence government positions anymore.
Again, Soros has done what he could to help finance and protest against Trump’s inauguration.   A report came out that showed he was directly tied to over 50 groups that were set to protest the inauguration of Trump. If he is tied to that many groups, then that is a lot of money invested in people just to protest something.
Share this article to show that Trump is finally going to label Soros for what he is, and that is a threat to the security of the United States. Trump was able to do this thanks to Obama’s Executive Order back in 2014. Considering all the damage that Soros has done to the United States through his funding of protests, this was a long time coming.
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand


Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Hillary – still making us reach for the sick bag

Hillary Clinton just released this video, it’s her first since the election.
Her usual liberal tropes about about glass ceilings and making history are supplemented with praise for the “women’s marches” across the country. BTW, she’s still ultra-annoying. Watch out for an irritating four-word phrase that’ll make you want to punch the screen.

The video is for the 2017 MAKERS Conference. Apparently MAKERS is a women’s movie-making group. (HRC has sure fallen down the speech ladder, this one won’t bring in millions of dollars!)
According to their nauseating women-as-victim website with the obligatory BS hashtag , “MAKERS will bring together hundreds of trailblazing leaders, inviting everyone to #BeBold, elevate the conversation and raise challenges and solutions through action-oriented sessions. The conference will shine a light on issues ranging from violence against women to inclusion of men — ultimately creating a bold agenda that flips the script and creates lasting impact.”
How can any woman bust a glass ceiling when she’s weighed down by so much condescension from her own sex? 

Chelsea Clinton SLAMMED for nasty attack

The Clinton family spent the past three decades eagerly milking every dollar they could from the U.S. political system. Reports say the family pocketed nearly $250 million in various fees, book deals, and backroom handshakes with Wall Street giants during their time in public office.
But following Hillary’s defeat in November to President Donald Trump, the Clinton’s “bank robbery” approach to politics appeared to be over.
It has left critics of the former First Family to wonder, “What’s next for the Clinton cartel?”
Enter Chelsea Clinton. The former first daughter is cultivating an increasingly public profile, which suggests she’s gearing up for some sort of political run. Specifically, rumors have surfaced that Chelsea is being groomed for run for New York Senate as a way to restore her family to power.
And when it comes to her ability to stick her foot firmly in her mouth, the Clinton apple didn’t fall far from the tree.

Last Friday, Chelsea tweeted a lazy attack on the Trump administration’s Kellyanne Conway, after Conway mistaken use of the word “massacre” when referring to the two Al Qaeda terrorists arrested plotting an attack in Bowling Green, Kentucky. Chelsea wrote —
The response was epic.

Social media exploded as users lined up to point out the Clinton family hypocrisy.
It was so bad, celebrity Roseanna Barr couldn’t help but jump in —

Stick to charity work, Chelsea. Politics doesn’t suit you. 

Even Kellyanne Conway responded, directing her ire at Chelsea and the dishonest mainstream media —
Well said.
— The Horn editorial team

Do You Know Someone Suffering From Trump Unacceptance & Resistance Disorder (TURD)?

Know the signs, spot the symptoms, and save a life. 

TURD is a pattern of pathologically dissociative and psychotic behavior, first observed in the late hours of Nov. 8, 2016, and increasing in severity with time.
Sufferers from TURD often exhibit pronounced cognitive dissonance, sudden bouts of childlike rage, rioting and uncontrollable crying.
People with TURD are characterized by a persistent unwillingness to accept that Donald Trump was elected president of the United States of America. For many, both in America and worldwide, this was a shocking and unexpected outcome, their preferred news sources having failed to inform them that the alternative candidate was a criminal parasite in such ill health she got chucked into the back of a van like a kidnap victim.
Research is ongoing, but TURD appears to correlate closely with the following environmental and behavioral factors: 

Membership in the Progressive Democratic Party
Identifying as a feminist
Current enrollment in college, and/or possession of a liberal arts college degree and/or lifetime indoctrination.
Living in a densely populated metropolitan area
Massive student debt
Spotty or non-existent work history
Patients with TURD are very resistant to treatment, and dangerous in large groups. Any possibility of successful treatment requires that they be separated from their hive-mind support apparatus; they cannot begin the process of accepting reality in the presence of encouragement towards delusion and irrationality. Separation may require the assistance of law enforcement.
If you have a friend or loved one suffering from TURD, urge them to seek treatment. Together we can beat this scourge. 


Liberal Fight Club trains University students to fight Conservatives?!?!
oped: Is there any doubt now that the Progressive Party is the CPUSA?
Leftists now have their own fight club in order to bash the Republicans that are allegedly “attacking” them. Excuse me? I think that all of the violence is coming from the left side of the aisle. Using fake news as a basis for teaching attack methods, the left seem to be girding for physical combat in central Florida. This is a bad trend. 

As Written by Lauren Cooley a Florida Campus Correspondent for Campus Reform:
The UCF “Knights for Socialism” group will teach left-wing students how to “BASH THE FASH” with a “Leftist Fight Club” open to everyone but Republicans.
The “Knights for Socialism” group at the University of Central Florida (UCF) held a workshop Sunday to teach left-wing students how to “BASH THE FASH” with a “Leftist Fight Club” open to everyone but Republicans.
“In response to the record number of hate crimes against Latinxs, Immigrants, Muslims, Women, the LGBTQIA+ community, Jews, African Americans and other minorities since the rise of Donald Trump and other Alt-Right Neo-Nazis, Knights for Socialism has decided to host a series of self-defense clinics for anyone that wants to learn how to BASH THE FASH,” asserts the Facebook event page for “Leftist Fight Club: The Rumbles at Lake Claire.”

The description explains that a local amateur boxer was on hand to teach basic hand-to-hand combat techniques at the self-defense clinic, in order to help the socialist students better protect themselves from potential hate crimes performed by those sympathetic to “Donald Trump and other Alt-Right Neo……

If you notice when you go to the Facebook page and view this photo, up at the top is shows the word “edit” because they removed the headline from the screengrab above.

Leftist Fight Club’ trains UCF students to fight Republicans

Justice Ginsberg Makes DANGEROUS Statement at Stanford Law School

If you ever wondered just how important the appointing of a Supreme Court Justice is, then read these remarks by Justice Ginsberg. This is proof that having Justices who adhere to the Constitution and don’t rewrite the law are so important to the Republic. She would support a constitutional amendment.  

As Written By Mark Hensch for The Hill:
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she would support changing the Electoral College.
“There are some things I would like to change, one is the Electoral College,” she said late Monday at Stanford Law School in California, according to CNN.
“But that would require a constitutional amendment, and amending our Constitution is powerfully hard to do,” she added.
Ginsburg also lamented partisan divisions in Congress, which she said hurt the confirmation process for justices.
“I wish there was a way I could wave a magic wand and put back when people were respectful of each other and the Congress was working for the good of the country and not just along party lines,” she said.
“Someday there will be great people, great elected representatives who will say, ‘enough of this nonsense, let’s be the kind of legislature the United States should have,’” the 83-year-old judge added. “I hope that day ….
Ginsburg: I would back changing the Electoral College | TheHill

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

Why the Progressive Democrats are attacking Donald Trump!

Logans Run
Well the answer is quite simplistic in's not for his policies nor all boils down to the fact that Donald was a Democrat shortly before he registered as a Republican and threw his proverbial hat into the Candidate for POTUS ring.. 

It appears as if Donald woke up one morning and said to himself this whole democratic plantation thingee is not working...he got on the phone and ordered a zillion red baseball caps with the logo "Make America Great Again" His crime to progressive democrats was the fact he jumped ship...became a runner and hauled ass down the road away from the Democrat slave plantation...never looking back and never apologizing. 
Logan's Run (Wallpaper), Wallpaper for "Logan's Run" which is a 1976 ...

This is his unforgivable crime to the overseers of the Progressives at the DNC...they will hunt him down relentlessly until he concedes or beats them at their own game...of which I have confidence he will, and beat them badly, as he knows everything about each and everyone of the players!

Yes indeed The Donald has become 'Logan' of the old 70's SyFy classic "Logans Run" Isn't it strange that  if one goes back in time to the 70's classic SYFY movies and get's a glimp of that which is to come? 
Logan’s Run (1976) | Cinema Nostalgia

At any rate enjoy "Logans Run" playing now at a street corner near you!

Monday, February 6, 2017

The ACLU stands up for liberal rights

The American Civil Liberties Union is little more than a fundraising arm and mouthpiece for the DNC.
The national nonprofit organization is supposed to champion civil liberties for all — but a series of high-profile events that have played out over the past week have highlighted how that’s hardly the case.
When President Trump announced his sweeping executive order on immigration that paused travel from seven Muslim-majority countries and temporarily halted the nation’s refugee program, the ACLU didn’t waste a minute in strongly condemning his actions on social media and filing suit. Their public opposition to the order led to millions in donations aimed at fighting Trump tooth and nail.
But when thugs, anarchists and arsonists rioted at the University of California, Berkeley to prevent gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking at their liberal campus, the ACLU was silent. Clearly the ACLU only believes in protecting free speech when non-conservatives are doing the talking. 

So much for pro-diversity. Like many liberals, the ACLU pretends to be tolerant but blatantly practices intolerance toward anyone with differing viewpoints.
The ACLU didn’t denounce the violent protesters at Berkeley, who trampled the speaker’s right to free speech and caused nearly $100,000 in property damage.
When former vice presidential candidate and U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine fanned the flames by telling his Democrat supporters to “fight in the streets” against Trump’s policies, it was once again crickets from the ACLU. But then again, he’s a card-carrying liberal, he gets a pass.
Then there were the riots at New York University Thursday night, where out-of-control protesters smashed windows and destroyed public property to keep Gavin McInnes, another conservative, from speaking at the college. And despite 11 arrests, the ACLU said nothing.
Why? Because the ACLU cherry-picks issues that support a liberal political narrative.

When a Trump campaign office in North Carolina was firebombed last fall, did the ACLU defend Republicans’ right to political speech? Did they denounce the “Kill Your Local Trump Supporter” graffiti that was spray-painted in Mission Hill last fall?
Nope, they looked the other way. But you can bet if a Syrian refugee’s rights are being violated, they’ll go ballistic.
The ACLU should change its name to the ACLUFS. American Civil Liberties Union — For Some.
Adriana Cohen is host of the “Adriana Cohen Show” airing Wednesdays at noon on Boston Herald Radio. Follow her on Twitter @AdrianaCohen16.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz Chickens Out On Returning Public Land to the People: “Sends the Wrong Message”

by:Tim Brown

Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) has withdrawn legislation that would have upheld his oath of office and the Constitution by returning land back to the people from the usurpation of the central government and the Bureau of Land Management, apparently under pressure from "groups" he "supports" believing that it "sends the wrong message."
Chaffetz's legislation was introduced in January and called on the Department of Interior to either dispose of or sell 3.3 million acres of "public lands."
However, it appears that he is facing pressure from conservationist groups who claim the legislation "sends the wrong message."

"I'm a proud gun owner, hunter and love our public lands," Chaffetz posted. "The bill would have disposed of small parcels of lands Pres. Clinton identified as serving no public purpose but groups I support and care about fear it sends the wrong message."

I am withdrawing HR 621. I'm a proud gun owner, hunter and love our public lands. The bill would have disposed of small parcels of lands Pres. Clinton identified as serving no public purpose but groups I support and care about fear it sends the wrong message. The bill was originally introduced several years ago. I look forward to working with you. I hear you and HR 621 dies tomorrow. #keepitpublic #tbt 
According to The Washington Post, "The Disposal of Excess Federal Lands Act, which would have shifted federal holdings to state governments in Utah, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon and Wyoming, prompted an outcry among hunters and anglers' groups. Introduced three weeks after House Republicans enacted a rule change to make it easier to sell off federal land, the measure prompted two separate rallies in Santa Fe, N.M., and Helena, Mont., this week that drew hundreds of people opposed to the measure." 
The Salt Lake Tribune reports:
The legislation details swaths of Bureau of Land Management acreage over 10 Western states cited in a 1997 Clinton administration report as not otherwise set aside for oil, gas or mineral extraction, listed for wilderness protection or designated for Native American groups. That includes 132,931 acres in Utah.

The findings, though, note that some of the lands identified may have other conflicts, including disposal costs, the existence of cultural resources or hazardous conditions. The study was requested by Congress at the time as part of an exchange plan to restore the Florida Everglades. 
Chaffetz has introduced the bill every year since 2010, but it has never passed or gone forward to a committee hearing. The legislation accords with other Republican efforts in Utah to take control public lands, which account for about two-thirds of the state's area.

"While there are national treasures worthy of federal protection, there are lands that should be returned to private ownership," Chaffetz said in 2011.

The move to drop the legislation, though, was lauded by public lands conservation groups.

Chris Saeger, director of Western Values Project, said Chaffetz deserves thanks for withdrawing the "irresponsible bill." 
"If he values public lands enough to abandon this plan," Saeger said in a prepared statement, "he should refrain from interfering with the land protected by President Obama's Bears Ears monument."

That step is not likely. Chaffetz has been a staunch opponent of the December monument designation in San Juan County, calling it "a slap in the face to the people of Utah." 
Of course, it's a slap in the face of the people of Utah Congressman! However, it's a bigger slap in the face that the central government "owns" a ton of land it never acquired per the Constitution, through state legislatures! Yet, you claim your legislation "sends the wrong message." However, you never tell us what that message is. Is it that the DC government should not own or manage that land? That is the right message, Sir! Is it that some people who support you want the Constitution violated concerning "public land," something that the Constitution clearly limits?
Does this map look like Constitutional limits on "public land," Mr. Chaffetz?  

From what I can see, so-called "conservatives" are ok with this kind of lawlessness when it benefits them. Alex Robinson of Outdoor Life elaborated on conservationists and hunting groups having concerns that selling off small portions of land to private interests could cut off public access to national forests for hunter or campers.
Well, again, where is that in the Constitution, friends? If you want land to hunt on, get a friend that has the land and ask to hunt, or buy property!
I know what some are saying, "Tim, it's not that simple." Oh yes, it is. It's as simple as the central government coming in and in one quick swoop usurping constitutional authority, growing government to enforce that usurpation and even threatening and imprisoning those who would seek to correct the injustice.

Thanks for nothing on this one Congressman Chaffetz.