Saturday, July 11, 2015

VIDEO: Mexican Laborer Has A Message For Donald Trump!

Screen Shot 2015-07-11 at 9.13.55 AM


Eetterinakki 5 days ago
Isn’t he a so called “right-wing bigot”? Let’s see: he supports working for one’s living and opposes welfare to lazy druggies. He opposes taxing him for his honest work just so some lazy ghetto asshole could buy more cocaine. This is the kind of man the US needs, this is the kind of voter they need.

HEATED GAY MARRIAGE VIDEO” Candace Cameron Bure Calls Out ‘The View’ . . . BIG TIME!!!

The View

Candace Cameron Bure from Full House, calls out the ladies on The View! 

And She Doesn’t Back Down . . . AT ALL!!!
“I don’t think this is discrimination at all,” Candace says of the bakery fined $135,000 for refusing to make a lesbian couples’ wedding cake.
Like her brother, Candace is a strong Christian who seeks to push the word of the Lord unto those who don’t know any better (meaning, secular liberals). Because of her strong beliefs, the 39-year-old Bure, who is married to former hockey star Valeri Bure, chose to forego her prime Hollywood years in order to raise a family.
What a concept.
Here’s what she has to say about same-sex marriage on the highly liberal program The View

Today, Candace was on The View to talk about same-sex marriage, specifically the case out of Oregon with the owners of the Sweet Cakes by Melissa bakery being fined $135,000 because they refused to bake a cake for a lesbian wedding. And, honestly, I think Candace did a phenomenal job (considering she was on The View and they’re super-hostile to conservative Christians’ viewpoints). And I can’t help but LAUGH at Raven-Symone’s reaction when Candace doesn’t back down after Raven basically accuses her of being a bigot –
VIDEO: Candace Cameron Bure Calls Out ‘The View’ on Gay Marriage  

ATTN: All POTUS Candidates for 2016

... serving in our military, visit Soldiers’ Angels or Any Soldier

This old veteran is growing weary...please explain why you chose to serve or  not to serve your country in military service..
I for one dropped out of college to serve during the Vn conflict 1964-1968 went Army Cav...I put my life on hold to serve my country, was not drafted I joined !
I am so tired of all the week-kneed/week-end warriors [politicians] who state how they will protect us from our enemies foreign and domestic when they did not have the cajones' to put on the uniform and get their proverbial hands dirty or gain the experience to be a CIC/POTUS

Side Note...Our First POTUS/CIC set the example (George Washington...General)...why have we not followed it...thats how you win independence...getting your hands dirty and gaining actual experience!

How can a CIC/POTUS who never served know what war is all about? and the best policies to defend our country...I am positive you cannot learn it in college...especially the progressive colleges of today...all ya have are perverted professors who think passive resistance/thought processes and community organizing /protesting tactics will win in the end...*News Flash*..y'all are pure and simple nutso...imho!

Here is your chance candidates on both sides of the aisle...make your case and see if 'Middle America' where veterans come from  buys it! Good Luck y'all

Side note: I am neither GOP nor DNC..a registered conservative independent..retired and on a fixed income...please spare me begging for political donations to a party...if you send me e-mails just tell me what you are going to do in detail no want my stop  begging for money...I just delete as soon as I see donate $10~$25~$$$$ or more!

Kansas Governor Brownback Issues Order Protecting Beliefs of Clergy About Same-Sex “Marriage”

Kansas Governor Sam Brownback issued an executive order on July 7 that prohibits the state government from taking any action against any individual clergy, religious leader, or religious organization that “acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman.”
The governor said his order protects “Kansas clergy and religious organizations from being forced to participate in activities that violate their sincerely and deeply held beliefs.”
Brownback issued the executive order, entitled “Preservation and Protection of Religious Freedom,” in reponse to last month’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, mandating recognition of same-sex “marriage” in all 50 states. In the order, he cited the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Section Seven of the Bill of Rights of the Kansas Constitution, and the Kansas Preservation of Religious Freedom Act (which he signed in 2013), all of which protect the religious liberty of Kansans. He quoted from the latter, which provides that state government shall not “substantially burden a person’s civil right to exercise of religion.”

Building on that legal foundation, Brown noted that “the recent imposition of same sex marriage by the United States Supreme Court poses potential infringements on the civil right of religious liberty” and that “government actions and laws that protect the free exercise of religious beliefs about marriage will encourage private citizens and institutions to demonstrate tolerance for those beliefs and convictions and therefore contribute to a more respectful, diverse, and peaceful society.”
Read More:

Pelosi: Congress Has a Moral Authority to Act on Gun Control, But Not on Illegal Aliens

nancy pelosi obama change hope liar lipstick pig cartoon hot funny ...
ADD YOUR OWN CAPTION Use our meme generator to create your own Pelosi

oped: Nancy Pelosi... she with an IQ of 90 *Borderline Dull Normal* and thats being generous...The more she speaks the dumber she gets... Just a fact Jack! 

Communist Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) called for more gun control following the murder of Kathryn Steinle at the hands of an illegal alien using a federal agent’s gun. She even said that it is a “moral responsibility” that Congress has to act. What she failed to put at the forefront was acting with regard to illegal aliens.
“Last week, in San Francisco, our city suffered our own senseless act of gun violence with the killing of Kathryn Steinle, and our thoughts and prayers are very much with her family,” she said. “Today, we must do more as a nation to prevent dangerous people from getting easy access to guns. And Congress has a moral responsibility to act. What is so unclear? What do they not understand about that?

Good question, what is so unclear? What do people not understand about this issue?
First, let’s address this moral responsibility that Pelosi claims Congress has. Neither Congress, nor any other branch of the federal government has any such authority to restrict or regulate arms of any type and the Second Amendment is clear on that issue. Therefore, to do so would be immoral, not moral. It is not their responsibility.

Post Continues on

Obama: American Troops Can’t Defeat Islamic State

Obama Grows ISIS © Gary McCoy,Cagle Cartoons,ISIS,Islamic State,Abu ...

Obama just admitted today in his press conference at the Pentagon that he doesn’t believe American troops can defeat ISIS:
It is not enough for us to simply send an American troops to temporarily set back organizations like ISIL, but to then, as soon as we leave see that void filled once again with extremists. It is going to be vital for us to make sure that we are preparing the kinds of local ground forces and security forces with our partners that can not only succeed against ISIL, but then sustained in terms of security and in terms of governance.
We had won the war in Iraq until Obama showed up and gave it away by pulling all of our troops out. And then ISIS happened.
Now he’s suggesting that American troops can’t succeed against ISIS, saying that we can only ‘temporarily’ set them back and that they will begin again once we leave.

Post Continues on

Obama Administration Revives Plan Once Criticized as 'Death Panels'

What the VA Scandal Tells Us About ObamaCare –Pete602@Twitter
Six years after end-of-life planning nearly derailed development of the Affordable Care Act amid charges of “death panels,” the Obama administration has revived a proposal to reimburse physicians for talking with their Medicare patients about how patients want to be cared for as they near death.
The proposal, contained in a large set of Medicare regulations unveiled Wednesday, comes amid growing public discussion about the need for medical care that better reflects patients’ wishes as they get older.
Two months ago, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, one of the front-runners for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016, suggested that Medicare patients should sign so-called advance directives that spell out the care they want if they become incapacitated.
The American Medical Assn. has recommended the Medicare billing change.
The new proposal from the Department of Health and Human Services would not require Medicare patients to sign any order or even to talk with their physicians about end-of-life care.

Gay Couples In Texas Just Lost Their Right To Get Married In Texas, Despite SCOTUS Ruling

 President Obama's Thought Process On Supporting Gay Marriage
Last week, the Supreme Court caused nationwide debate when they determined that same-sex marriage is a Constitutional right and is therefore legal throughout the United States.
Liberals, of course, broke out in celebration. However some conservative states are pushing back against the measure. According to reports, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has determined that country clerks are able to refuse to perform same-sex ceremonies if it violates their religious beliefs.

While this defies the Supreme Court’s ruling, it protects the rights of Christians. Paxton claims that “numerous lawyers stand ready to assist clerks defending their religious beliefs” should anyone face any trouble.
Paxton criticized the court’s ruling as well, stating that the United States Supreme Court “again ignored the text and spirit of the Constitution to manufacture a right that simply does not exist.”
“In so doing, the court weakened itself and weakened the rule of law, but did nothing to weaken our resolve to protect religious liberty and return to democratic self-government in the face of judicial activists attempting to tell us how to live,” Paxton stated. “The reach of the court’s opinion stops at the door of the First Amendment and our laws protecting religious liberty.”

obama family photos , barack obama family 2012 , barack obama funny ...  stupid-obama-sw.jpg

First Lady to Indian Youth: We’re Finally Embracing ‘Wisdom of Your Ancestors’ on Climate Change

Yes indeed Michelle Obama has now been given the name 'Ms Walking Eagle' too full of s*** to fly also  by native American tribes in honor of her hubby 'Walking Eagle' too full of s*** to fly !
OBAMA gets Tagged by Native Americans ~ Walking Eagle - YouTube ...

Finally embracing wisdom?
Check it out:
First Lady Michelle Obama said on Thursday at a tribal youth gathering at the White House that the United States is “finally” embracing the wisdom of Native Americans on conservation and climate change, and claimed that America’s founders modeled the U.S. government partly on the “Iroquois Confederacy.”
Continue Reading on

Friday, July 10, 2015

Liberal DC Wants to Give Non-Citizens the Right to Vote

Onan Coca 

District of Columbia council members voiced their support Wednesday for a new law that would allow non-citizens to vote in local elections.
“These are residents who are well on their paths to citizenship,” Councilman David Grosso said. ”Unfortunately not all of our residents have a say in the politicians who are elected to represent them.”
The bill would allow permanent residents in the city who are not American citizens to vote in elections for mayor, city council, the attorney general and State Board of Education members, among other things.

“They are our neighbors and our friends and they want to see our city flourish, yet they have no say in how the city’s government is run,” said Councilwoman Elissa Silverman.
Silverman went on to say that nearly one in eight D.C. citizens are immigrants, but only about 30 percent of them are American citizens, and that “all long-term residents of a city should have a right to have a choice in who represents them.”
“This speaks to the fundamental fairness and justice of our democracy, and in particular our local democracy,” Councilman Charles Allen added.
Under the current law, a person needs to be a citizen of the United States.

One opponent is Dorothy Brizill, executive director of DCWatch– a government watchdog group in the district. Brizill said that those who fought for years to get the right to vote  civil rights movement are resentful, since they were already American citizens and still had to fight.
“For many the right to vote is the essence of citizenship,” she said as she warned the council not to move too hastily to pass the legislation.
Brizill brought up the difficulties that arise when non-citizens are given the right to vote, which would require two separate voter registration rolls for citizens and non-citizens.
“Would there be confusion at the polls?” Brizill asked of the council. “We’ve already seen confusion at the past.”
If the law passes, the city’s Board of Elections would need to decide between holding an election every year or providing separate ballots for non-citizens.
If the city decides to hold an election every year, local elections and national elections would alternate each year, so immigrants and citizens can vote in local elections one year, and only citizens would be eligible to vote in national elections the next.

Clifford Tatum, director of the Board of Elections, told council members if the city decides to hold both elections the same year, the ballots for immigrants would need to look significantly different from the regular ballots so the two would not be confused.
Either way, he said, it will “require significant financial resources” to implement the law, though he couldn’t say how much it would cost.
In 2014, the city enacted a law that allows illegal immigrants to obtain drivers licenses, becoming one of just 10 states to do so.

The “limited purpose” licenses allow illegal immigrants to drive cars legally, since before the law passed they were doing so illegally. The licenses do not, though, allow immigrants to enter federal buildings or board airplanes, because they are not recognized by the federal government.
The licenses are also not recognized in any state other than the District of Columbia.

If Liberals Rewrote the Second Amendment

Rob Knowles 
In the spirit of liberal politicians’ seemingly intense desire to rewrite the Constitution, I have decided to continue my series of Amendment rewrites.
I rewrote the First Amendment as I believe the left would prefer it after Sen. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin said the following about freedom of religion as it pertains to the Amendment:
“Certainly the First Amendment says that in institutions of faith that there is absolute power to, you know, to observe deeply held religious beliefs. But I don’t think it extends far beyond that…In this context, they’re talking about expanding this far beyond our churches and synagogues to businesses and individuals across this country. I think there are clear limits that have been set in other contexts and we ought to abide by those in this new context across America.” 

Now, as the left despises the very existence of the Second Amendment, I feel compelled to draft a liberal rewrite—but first, the original text:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” 

Now the updated version:
“A well regulated militia, one which is organized and operated solely under the authority and discretion of the federal government, must be maintained. For the security of our country, we must have a military with the capacity to defend against attacks from other nations. However, rather than rely on weapon-based defense, we should operate first under the assumption that all men are essentially good, and base our ‘defense’ on diplomacy. 

The ‘right’ of the people to keep and bear arms, an antiquated notion based on 18th century conditions under which men and women had to make use of slow-loading muskets to defend their property and family, shall not be infringed, but henceforth tightly regulated.
Long-range firearms of any kind, shotguns, and rifles shall be abolished for all but the police and federal officials. Ammunition clips capable of carrying more than two bullets shall be abolished for all but the police and federal officials.
Certain handguns may be permitted only after a lengthy application process during which the applicant can demonstrate how their safety will be negatively impacted should they not have access to a firearm.
Those who are permitted under federal law to own a firearm must be registered, and inspected twice yearly by federal officials. Furthermore, legally permitted firearms must not be taken outside the home, and while in the home, they must be unloaded and kept in a locked compartment.
Should assistance be needed by any person or persons who are not legally permitted to own a firearm, 911 is a suitable option. 

Should anyone without a firearms permit be found in possession of such a weapon, they will be fined a minimum of $10,000 and subjected to federal adjudication. Such adjudication could result in prison time. The decision shall be left to the discretion of a federally appointed Judge.”
There you have it. The liberally revised Second Amendment. Look for it in a Constitution near you!


Las Vegas completing last straw to draw Lake Mead water

Last week, Lake Mead dropped to the lowest levels since the reservoir was filled upon the completion of the Hoover Dam in the 1930s.... water levels in Lake Mead have fallen more than sixty feet due to sustained drought. ... Fluctuations in the lake level are a natural part of its operations. 

Lots of money for little water….
Check it out:
It took $817 million, two starts, more than six years and one worker’s life to drill a so-called “Third Straw” to make sure glittery casinos and sprawling suburbs of Las Vegas can keep getting drinking water from near the bottom of drought-stricken Lake Mead.
The pipeline, however, won’t drain the largest Colorado River reservoir any faster. It’s designed to ensure that Las Vegas can still get water if the lake surface drops below two existing supply intakes.
Continue Reading on

‘Dangerously low’: Army unveils deep troop cuts
You would think there were other things the government could “cut” to reduce the budget.
Check it out:
The U.S. Army on Thursday unveiled a controversial plan to reduce its force size by 40,000 soldiers, the latest downsizing of the U.S. military blamed on budget cutbacks.
Though military officials say their hands are tied by funding levels, lawmakers decried the reductions as a security threat. The new cuts will shrink the Army to its smallest size since 9/11.
Continue Reading on

A Silent Coup in This Country

Screen Shot 2015-07-09 at 6.23.03 PM
Not sure how silent it has been….
Check this out: 
Nationally syndicated radio talk show host Mark Levin said that “we’ve had a silent coup in this country” with the Obama administration taking over healthcare, targeting the suburbs, and nationalizing the local police.
“His government doesn’t have the authority to do any of these things, but he does it,” Levin said on his July 8 broadcast. “Well, if that’s not martial law, what the hell is? We’ve had a silent coup in this country.”

Here is a transcript of what Levin said:
“So, Obama’s pushing the ‘browning of America,’ not my phrase, theirs, ‘with open amnesty.’ Even if it means murderers, rapists and whatever come in. His friends in the sanctuary cities, he hasn’t spoken against a sanctuary city yet, has he? Despite the mayhem and the murder?
"Not a word. Nothing.
“He’s taken over our healthcare system and he’s destroying it. He’s destroying everything. And now, he is targeting the suburbs. He’s specifically targeting the suburbs. He’s nationalized local police departments effectively.
“You know people say, ‘Obama is going to declare martial law.’ He’s doesn’t have to declare it. He’s exercising it, isn’t he? His government doesn’t have the authority to do any of these things, but he does it.
"Well, if that’s not martial law, what the hell is?
“We’ve had a silent coup in this country. And the damn fools on the Supreme Court, most of them, not all of them … ‘Yes, yes. Yes he did. Prosecutorial discretion…we defer to the …’ Damn, fools."

COMMIE LOVER: Look Who Obama Is Welcoming to the White House With Open Arms

Screen Shot 2015-07-09 at 6.23.03 PM
Even Democrats aren’t happy about this – that says a lot.
President Obama is facing bipartisan criticism for hosting Vietnam’s Communist Party boss at the White House this week, given the government’s “deplorable” human rights record and “authoritarian” one-party system.
The president met Tuesday with Nguyen Phu Trong, head of Vietnam’s Communist Party. Trong does not hold an official government position, but is regarded as the nation’s de-facto leader for directing Vietnam’s controlling party.

But the meeting, coming after the administration took yet another step to normalize relations with Communist Cuba, rubbed many on Capitol Hill the wrong way.
“I am disappointed that the administration has chosen to host Nguyen Phu Trong,” Rep. Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif., co-chair of the Congressional Caucus on Vietnam, said in a statement. “As an advocate for human rights in Vietnam I cannot ignore the dismal state of freedom of the press and freedom of speech.”
Read more: Fox News

STRAIGHT PRIDE: Russia Adopts Pro-Heterosexual Flag Sending Gays Into Full On Hissy Fit

Screen Shot 2015-07-09 at 10.08.22 AM
Vladmir Putin is promoting the traditional family while Obama lights up the White House gay.
The party of Russian president Vladimir Putin has released a flag for straight pride which celebrates #realfamilies, offering a counterpoint to the present celebrations and homomania presently gripping the United States and other developed nations.
The flag, closely based on a design long used by French traditional-marriage advocacy group La Manif Pour Tous (the marriage for all) is enhanced by the addition of a third child to the depicted ‘traditional family’ and the Cyrillic hash-tag #RealFamilies. The change is entirely in line with present Russian government policy, which is attempting to turn-around the declining birthrate by encouraging Russian mothers to have more children as an alternative to mass immigration.

Gay interest site Pink News reports the comments of Russia United politician Aleksey Lisovenko, who said of the design:
“This is our answer to same sex marriages, this mockery of the very concept of family. We must prevent gay fever in our country and support traditional values”.
Read more: Breitbart

UNREAL: Gay Fascists Go After Christian Bakers’ Home

Screen Shot 2015-07-09 at 6.35.25 PM
Are we still living in America?
Fox News is reporting that the fascist state of Oregon  is ramping up its persecution campaign against Christian bakers who declined to bake a wedding cake for a same sex lesbian couple. Aaron and Melissa Klein, the owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa, have been told that if they don’t pay the $135,000 awarded to the lesbian couple who sued them, a lien will be placed against their home next week.
Speaking to Todd Starnes of Fox News, Klein said that the case in on appeal and the couple is worried that if they win the appeal, they will never get their money back. ” “This is intimidation and bullying – that’s exactly what it is,” Klein said.

The fascist state of Orgeon has also placed a gag order on the Kleins that makes it illegal for them to talk openly about their desire to participate and profit from same sex weddings through their small business.
Read more: Breitbart

Thursday, July 9, 2015

If Liberals Can Ignore Immigration Laws, Conservatives Can Ignore Same-Sex Marriage Laws

oped: Indeed...all I have to add to this is:

Regarding same-sex marriage, the Knoxville Sun Sentinel wrote: "In a historic decision, a sharply divided US Supreme Court on Friday extended the right to marry gays and lesbians. The 5-4 decision immediately wiped out Tennessee's constitutional definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman. All states now must license and recognize same-sex marriages. Gov. Bill Haslam and state Atty. Gen. Herbert Slatery, though expressing dismay at the outcome, pledge to abide by the decision." 

Many states have said something similar. "Once the Supreme Court has ruled, it's order is the law of the land,’ Georgia Atty. Gen. Sam Olens wrote. As such, Georgia will follow the law and adhere to the ruling of the court." And Arkansas Atty. Gen. Leslie Rutledge wrote that, "I am disappointed that the justices have chosen to ignore the role of the states to define marriage. The justices have issued a decision, and that decision must be followed." 

So it appears most of the remaining holdout states are falling in line. But one isn't, and that one is Texas. "A judge-based edict that is not based in the law," is how Texas Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton described the Supreme Court ruling.
If I may divert slightly -- regarding the 13 holdout states -- I've heard and seen the left describe them derogatorily as backwards. But I've also seen the stats regarding those 13, and many more states. Invariably, when the question of same-sex marriage is put on a state ballot, the voters overwhelmingly reject the measure -- even in ultra-liberal California, with blacks and Hispanics leading the no-vote pack.
March 7, 2000: By a 61% majority, California voters approved Proposition 22, which says only marriage between a man and a woman is valid.
But one might say, that was a long time ago. A lot has changed. True but several years later, on November 4, 2008, by a 52% majority, California voters approved Proposition 8, which restored the ban on same-sex marriage.

Twice a majority of voters exclaimed they did not want same-sex marriage and twice the California Supreme Court defied the will of the people. And now the federal Supreme Court has done the same nationwide, by inexplicably bestowing rights as if they were God.
Okay, same-sex marriage is now the de facto "law of the land," despite, as the Texas AG said, it is an edict, not a law. But the left says it is the law, so we backwards bumpkins must follow it.

Why can San Francisco or any other sanctuary city defy immigration "laws of the land"? If we must adhere to the law, why don't they have to? And why is no one calling them on their hypocrisy?
If I were Texas AG, I would propose something like this. Publish an open letter and send it to every major newspaper, cable news outlet an Internet site out there.
Propose the following: Texas will agree to issue same-sex marriage licenses the day every sanctuary city and state in the nation denounces their current unlawful practices, follows all federal immigration laws, and disregards any and all Obama executive orders and unlawful mandates, beginning with San Francisco.
Or better yet, maybe we get Donald Trump to draft the letter.

Would American Flag be Outlawed If Dylann Roof Had Waved It Instead of Confederate Flag?

Screen Shot 2015-07-07 at 7.19.00 PM

oped: Rep Jenny Horne diatribe on the SC floor showed fake outrage/tears could win a Oscar for that performance...can she prove she is a descendant of Jefferson Davis ? 
At any rate she needs a quick class in US Civil War History 101:

The reaction to the Confederate Flag has gotten completely out of control and only demonstrates just how much black racists are influencing our nation. 
On June 17, Dylann Roof sat in on a Bible study group for an hour before pulling out a gun and shooting those that only sought to learn more of God’s Word. Nine of Roof’s ten victims died from their wounds, including Pastor/State Senator Clementa Pinckney.
There is no doubt that Roof’s motive was racial and for that we all condemn him. However, because he posted a video that showed him with a Confederate flag, the flag has been vilified as if it is responsible for the murders. Yes he did display the American flag only to burn it, but what if he had burned the Confederate flag and waved the American flag?

Black activists have come out of the woodwork demanding that every Confederate flag and anything displaying a Confederate flag be removed from all of American society. They forget some of the true history behind the Confederate flag and only see their own blind racial hatred.
There has been a huge push to force South Carolina to remove the Confederate flag from the state capital and the efforts have succeeded. At the time of this writing, the state senate approved a bill to remove the flag and now it’s up to the state house to do the same. Gov. Nikki Haley, a Republican, has vowed to sign the bill to take down the Confederate flag once it passes the house.
Stores like Walmart have taken steps to remove all merchandise that display the American flag. I saw a commercial that used a clip from the Dukes of Hazzard and noticed that the quick shots of the roof of the General Lee was whited out, in fear that someone might catch a glimpse of the Confederate flag.

Now I learn that the US House has just voted to ban the displaying of the Confederate flag at historic federal cemeteries in the deep South. The measure was tied to a funding bill for the National Park Service that maintains 14 national cemeteries. If this travesty is allowed to happen, it will affect famed cemeteries like Andersonville and Vicksburg. Both of these cemeteries are the resting place of many Confederate soldiers.

These men died for a cause they believed in at the time and they have descendants living today that still like to honor their ancestors by placing the Confederate flag they died for on their graves. Because of black activists screaming race at every little thing, these families will be denied the right honor their loved ones the way they want to.
The Confederate flag is NOT the villain. It’s the heart of racists like Roof that’s the problem. Now it’s the heart of black racists that are perpetuating their racial hatred upon any display of the Confederate flag all because Roof waved one in his video.
So what will happen if the next mass murderer waves an American flag before he/she goes on their murderous spree? What if someone waves an American flag and then caries out a similar attack on a Muslim mosque? Would everyone be calling for the removal and ban of the American flag had Roof burned the Confederate flag and waved the American flag?

Will the same racial activists scream for the outlawing of the American flag? Where will the hatred and stupidity end? When will people come to their senses and face their own hate filled hearts?

Scientist Attempts to Rewrite America’s Christian History

Jeff Schweitzer is a scientist and former White House Senior Policy Analyst. He holds a Ph.D. in marine biology/neurophysiology. He’s obviously a smart guy, but he needs to spend more time checking out the facts related to Christianity and the founding of America. America did not begin in 1787, and there's more to the impact that Christianity had on the nation than the writings of five or six founders. 

In this article, I will only be dealing with one item claimed by Dr. Schweitzer. I've addressed most of his claims elsewhere.
Read more: "North Carolina Judge Rules Against State’s Religious and Constitutional History."
Recently, Schweitzer wrote “Founding Fathers: We Are Not a Christian Nation.” He immediately goes off track with the following quotation that he attributes to John Adams with no documentation (see image below):
“The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”

John adams_tripoli

John Adams neither said nor wrote this. The phrase "the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion" has been attributed to George Washington numerous times. A portion of the above quotation found its way on the cover of Liberty Magazine. The publisher gave the impression that George Washington wrote the words. Washington's signature followed the excerpted line that read, "The United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion."
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy concocts a story of how George Washington “acquiesced” to the radical deistic views of Joel Barlow, then American consul in Algiers. Here is how the story is told:
“In answer to a direct question from a Muslim potentate in Tripoli, Washington acquiesced in the declaration of Joel Barlow, then American Consul in Algiers, that ‘the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.’”1 

This is pure fiction. Washington had no direct involvement with the Treaty. He had left office before the Treaty was signed.
So what is the origin of the citation? It’s found in a 1797 treaty with the Muslim territory of Tripoli. Adams signed it, and so did a unanimous Congress, most of whom were orthodox Christians. How can this be explained given the fact that America has a rich Christian heritage exemplified in various state constitutions and official declarations? Forrest Church offers this bit of commentary on Article 11 of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and Tripoli:
Treaty of Tripoli_Title
“Too much can be made of this document as a proof text that Adams believed, as the treaty says, that ‘the United States is by no means founded on the Christian religion.’ Washington, Jefferson, and Madison certainly could have endorsed this clause, but Adams, at this point in his political career, anyway, could not. . . . At the time Adams expressly believed that the U.S. government could not prosper apart from a sound Christian foundation.”2
The statement in the 1797 treaty was a declaration “that ‘the Christian religion’ as a formal institution was not a part of the American government in the same way that the religious structures of Islam are a part of Islamic governments.”3 The statement was to assure a Muslim government that America would not depose that government and impose Christianity by force, something Islamic nations do.
If the United States was a Christian nation in the same way that Muslim nations were Islamic, Muslims would not sign such a treaty.
Our own government today makes accommodations with Muslim nations by removing crosses and forbidding passing out Bibles. There was a directive given to U.S. soldiers on how they were to act during Ramadan. The late self-professed anti-theist Christopher Hitchens commented: “[T]hose secularists like myself who like to cite this treaty must concede that its conciliatory language was part of America’s attempt to come to terms with Barbary demands.”4.

The Barbary pirates habitually preyed on ships from “Christian nations,” enslaving “Christian” seamen. Since the treaty with Tripoli was a treaty between the United States and an Islamic government, was America not one of these Christian nations? Joseph Wheelan’s historical assessment of the time is on target. “Except for its Native American population and a small percentage of Jews, the United States was solidly Christian, while the North African regencies were just as solidly Muslim — openly hostile toward Christians.”5
Stephen Decatur boarding a Tripolitan gunboat during a naval engagement (August 3, 1804)
In drafting the treaty, the United States was assuring the Dey (ruler) of Tripoli that in its struggle with the pirates “it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen” (an archaic designation for Muslims], that “the said states never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan [Muslim] nation” due to religious considerations. These are the qualifying statements found in the treaty that explain why the phrase “founded on the Christian religion” was used.

In what way is the “government of the United States of America . . . not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion”? Here’s the passage in context:
“As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion, -- as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen, -- and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.” 

The Dey of Tripoli had to be convinced that America, as a Christian nation based on the reading of the state constitutions and other official documents, would not impose its religion on the Muslim people. Our own Constitution references Jesus Christ with the phrase, just above George Washington’s signature, “Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth. . .”
In the Annotated Translation of 1930, there’s mention of “American Christians,” “Christian enemies,” “Christians with whom we are at peace,” and “like all the other Christian nations.” Presumably this means that Tripoli considered the United States to be a Christian nation as well as other nations at the time.
It is important to note that the 1805 treaty with Tripoli, drafted during Thomas Jefferson’s administration, differs from the 1797 Treaty in that the phrase “as the Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion” is conspicuously absent.

Article 14 of the new 1805 treaty corresponds to Article 11 of the first treaty of 1797. It reads in part: “[T]he government of the United States of America has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility of Musselmen.” Once again, the issue of American interference in the internal affairs of an Islamic nation is at issue, the same issue that was stated in the 1797 treaty. Assurances are still offered that the United States will not interfere with Tripoli’s religion or laws. It’s obvious that by 1805 the United States had greater bargaining power and did not have to knuckle under to the demands of this Muslim stronghold. A strong navy and a contingent of Marines also helped.


I Thought ‘Gay’ Was the ‘New Black’: Black Judge Refuses to Marry Same-Sex Couple

<br /> <b>Warning</b>:  Illegal string offset 'alt' in <b>/home/godfatherpolitic/public_html/wp-content/themes/godfatherpolitics/gp-responsive-email-template.php</b> on line <b>217</b><br /> h
"A Toledo Municipal Court judge who declined to marry a same-sex couple said . . . his decision was based upon his ‘personal and Christian beliefs.’ Judge C. Allen McConnell said in a written statement his refusal . . . followed his beliefs developed over many years." 
I wonder if he could have used the same reasoning if a couple had come in dressed in matching Confederate Battle Flag outfits. Would he have been duty-bound to marry them?
“‘I apologize to the couple for the delay they experienced and wish them the best,’ Judge McConnell said. ‘The court has implemented a process whereby same sex marriages will be accommodated.’”
Judge C. Allen McConnell is black and heads up the local NAACP in Toledo.
Comparing same-sex marriage and same-sex sex with the struggles of blacks trying to secure equal rights including voting rights has become a popular tactic of the same-sex movement. Most African Americans are insulted by the comparison.
For all recorded American history, same-sex marriage was never considered. There was no basis for it constitutionally, morally, or historically. In fact, when President Obama ran for President in 2008, he came out against same-sex marriage.

Obama Meme same-sex marriage
[It was a lie...just told people what they wanted to hear in order to be electable Barry Barack is not a Christian was raised as a Marxist.Muslim]  

So for hundreds of years in the United States (and most if not all countries around the world) same-sex marriage was not considered to be a legal or moral right, President Obama opposed it (as did Hillary Clinton), more than 30 states voted against it, and then a switch is turned on and same-sex marriage becomes the law of the land and everybody must accept what is immoral, unnatural, and unconstitutional.
As expected, pro-homosexuals want Judge McConnell impeached to make an example of him.

Impeach Judge

How many times were we assured by homosexuals and their supporters that legalizing same-sex marriage would not affect anybody opposed to same-sex marriage.
Tell that to the owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa that have been fined $135,000 for refusing to bake a cake for a same-sex couple or the former CEO of Mozilla, Brendan Eich, who had been fired after it was revealed that he had donated to support Prop. 8, the California ballot initiative that barred same-sex marriage in California, a ballot measure that was approved by a majority of voters in the state.
Would the owners of Sweet Cakes have been forced to make a Confederate Battle flag cake?


Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Academic: Constitution Is ‘Confederate Symbol,’ Censor It


oped: Obviously this idiot professor is akin to Barry Barack Obama...failed reading Comp101 re: US History.
The US Constitution/Bill of Rights was plain and simple to comprehend not Rocket Science.
Hello see:

A political scientist and former professor has penned an article calling for the U.S. Constitution to be censored in order to conceal older parts that are offensive.
“South Carolina’s battle flag may soon come down from the capitol flagpole, but other symbols of the Confederacy’s ideology remain in place,” writes political scientist and former University of Maryland professor Henry Bain in an editorial that has appeared in several newspapers around the country. “For example, consider the U. S. Constitution.”
Bain isn’t calling for the creation of a new Constitution, but rather says the current one should simply be edited to remove parts he considers immoral and outdated.
“All copies of the Constitution promulgate detailed instructions for the recapture of slaves who have run away from their owners,” he says. “They also specify that slaves are to be counted as three-fifths of a person in the Census, giving a boost to the slave-owning states in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College.”

REBEL YELL: Marion County, GA Reverses Ban, Raises Confederate Flag at Gov’t Complex

Screen Shot 2015-07-07 at 7.19.00 PM
oped: Indeed they should see:

Marion County in Georgia isn’t putting up with the PC pressure trying to take down the Confederate flag.
Marion County commissioners voted unanimously Tuesday to put the Confederate flag back up at the county’s government complex.
The flag was removed Thursday and temporarily replaced with a flag with the seal of Marion County.
County officials said the decision to remove the flag last week was in response to growing controversy surrounding the flag following the shooting deaths of nine black men and women at a historic church in Charleston, South Carolina on June 17. The suspect, 21-year-old Dylann Roof, had posed with a Confederate flag in photos posted on a website that displayed a racist manifesto attributed to him.

After the deadly shootings, Marion County’s interim county administrator, Bill Kauffman, consulted with County Commission Chairman Stan McClain and decided to remove the Confederate flag, which has flown outside the county’s government complex for more than two decades.
Read more: My News 13

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has a big announcement: She’s getting involved in the 2016 presidential election

The good news is that starting in August, you can watch the Sarah Palin Channel for free. She said she’s killing the annual subscription because with the election coming up, she wants to make sure everyone can watch her insightful videos.
“It is an honor to have you subscribe, really it’s been so illuminating and still is so illuminating to read and to respond to many of your insightful comments about current events, about so many things going on in our world today,” Palin said in a video.
“Now, it is with an important presidential election coming up that we are going to do this. I just want to make sure that your voices and mine are heard by the widest possible audience across this great land of ours. I really look forward to continuing to hear your ideas and your dreams and your solutions for America.”

Sanctuary and Free Zones...oh my

[In other words we have the right to our those who oppose ours do...gays / atheists etc are welcome to start their own bakeries or any other establishment and service their own...just as religious establishments have the right to refuse service/participation in a event that violates their tenants/belief as established in the US Constitution/Bill of Rights]

The time has come to use the looney left progressives tactics against the following and let it run it's course through the legal system all the way to the SCOTUS if they rule against you... then they just ruled against their own decree on refusing service re: gay marriage cakes etc.

Since cities,states,federal and SCOTUS recognize sanctuary cities and gun free zones how about we start posting signs at our christian and hetrosexual establishments.

Example: Sanctuary Bakery  {Reserve the right to refuse service that violates religious belief and to be free of city,state and federal intrusion}
                Gay Free Zone          {Hetrophobia free zone from gays who fear our religious beliefs}

If sanctuary cities are allowed to not enforce federal laws then sanctuary bakery's should be allowed  to ignore SCOTUS decrees and federal law also

If establishments are allowed to restrict the rights of those under the 2nd Amendment by posting a sign 'Gun Free Zone'
 at the entrance...then christian and other religious establishments should be allowed to post 'Gay Marriage Free Zones'   allowing restriction of some services to the non religious compliant... if such service violates their respective beliefs!

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Kenyans Warn Obama: Don’t Bring Abortion or Gay Agenda Here!

Kenyans Warn Obama: Don’t Bring Abortion or Gay Agenda Here!
When he visits his father’s homeland in Africa later this month, President Obama is expected to run into vocal opposition over his administration’s high-profile promotion of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) issues.
Obama’s trip to Kenya, his first as president, is scheduled to take place four weeks after the White House was bathed in rainbow colors to mark the U.S. Supreme Court ruling declaring that same-sex marriage is a right.
At a small pro-family demonstration at the parliament in Nairobi Monday, organized by the Evangelical Alliance of Kenya, participants called on the American president not to raise the subject during his visit.
“It is important for us as Kenyans to know that the U.S. is not God,” local media quoted evangelical Bishop Mark Kariuki as saying, adding that Obama should not use the visit to “talk about the gay issue.”
Irungu Kangata, a lawmaker in President Uhuru Kenyatta’s The National Alliance (TNA) party, was blunter: “We are telling Mr. Obama when he comes to Kenya this month and he tries to bring the abortion agenda, the gay agenda, we shall tell him to shut up and go home.”
Read More:

States Rebel Against Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling

Resistance may look futile, but U.S. lawmakers and state workers are not done rebelling against the Supreme Court’s ruling on gay marriage.
In Decatur County, Tennessee the clerk and two employees — the whole office — have resigned, effective July 14, rather than issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, and a Texas clerk said Monday she will not obey the court’s “lawless” ruling.
Traditional marriage advocates are urging lawmakers to enact the First Amendment Defense Act, introduced by Sen. Mike Lee of Utah and Rep. Raul Labrador of Idaho, both Republicans.
This legislation — which would stop government from taking “any discriminatory action” against someone who objects to same-sex marriage because of their religious faith — should be passed at the federal and state levels, Brian S. Brown told a National Organization for Marriage event Thursday.

Sodomites Celebrate with Sacrilege – So Who Exactly are the Haters?


A few photos making the rounds on the Internet from several sodomy pride events should offer definitive proof about which side of the debate is "tolerant" and which is not. The practice of defaming Christianity and blaspheming God is routine among the LGBT community and often takes center stage at massive rallies and events. Meanwhile, when conservatives or Christians hold an event, the people waving hateful signs are often relegated to the fringes.   

Think about it – Everyone despises the people from Westboro Church, who go around holding signs saying terrible thing about homosexuals. Does everyone despise the sodomite activists who mock and blaspheme Christianity? Nope.
I'm going to post the pictures that have been circulating. Please be warned they are GRAPHIC and they are DISGUSTING. The people in these pictures are obviously filled with hate and have no desire for real reconciliation with conservatives or Christians. It's very sad to see…


You can find hundreds, perhaps thousands, of similar photos across the web. Yet, it is not these sodomite activists who are "intolerant," but we Christians whom they hate. Amazing.
One more note. These disgusting displays take place at sodomy pride events all over the country (and at feminist events all over the world) all the time… are any of these people worried that they might be attacked and/or murdered by Christians for blasphemy against God? I don't think so. In fact, the people in these pictures may well become famous for these photos, and they will likely never face any sort of condemnation for their acts (other than the words printed here). Still LGBT activists will pretend that Christianity is somehow akin to Islam when it comes to the "rights" of the LGBT community. It's a farce. A joke. If LGBT activists even wandered into a Muslim nation they'd be at risk of murder; add blasphemy to the list and the chances of death would rise from probable to certain!

Still, the LGBT activists (and their friends in the media) pretend that Christians are to blame for all of society's woes. This is the world we live in now. How sad it is.

Idaho Citizens Want Closure of Muslim Illegal Alien Center Taking in Unscreened Islamists from Syria

Syria Muslim refugee resettlement is a 'backdoor for jihadists.' A long-standing refugee welcoming center in conservative Idaho has found itself at the center of a campaign by adversaries seeking to force it closed, citing fears that the Muslim illegal aliens it hosts could include a large number of Islamic State (ISIS) terrorists. ISIS has already confirmed it is embedding jihadists among Syrian refugees headed for the West.   

Breitbart: The backlash comes amid an uptick in anti-Islamic protests and advertising campaigns in the United States, including a high profile May rally outside an Arizona mosque that saw more than 200 protesters, some armed, berate Islam and Mohammad.
The newly formed Idaho group, whose 100 members plan a door-to-door information drive in July to win support for closing the refugee center in Twin Falls, said it was concerned the center will welcome Syrians displaced from that country's civil war who may not have been adequately screened by the U.S. government for security risks.

"Bringing in Syrians, who are predominantly of Muslim background, may be opening the door to terrorists pretending to be refugees," said Rick Martin, head of the so-called Committee to End the CSI (College of Southern Idaho) Refugee Center in nearby Buhl, a conservative agricultural area.
"We're not against legitimate refugees. They need to be treated with dignity and respect. But it would be easy for someone to lie about their background," he added.
U.S. authorities have arrested numerous individuals, including a number of U.S. citizens, in recent months over accusations of supporting Islamic State militants operating in Syria and Iraq.
But there has been no indication of any substantial links between Islamic State militants and the resettled Syrian refugee community, and U.S. State Department spokesman Daniel Langenkamp said refugees are the most carefully vetted of travelers to the United States.

The CSI Refugee Center, mostly federally funded, has, in the past three decades, helped resettle several thousand refugees from countries including Afghanistan, Sudan, and Vietnam.
A recent United Nations report showed the world's biggest refugee crisis is tied to the 4 million displaced from Syria. More than 850 refugees from the war-torn Arab nation have been admitted into the United States since October, Langenkamp said.  
But center director Zeze Rwasama said his group had no immediate plans to serve Syrian refugees, adding that he did not know the origins of the refugees it will serve for the upcoming fiscal year.
Rwasama said the center, which helps newly arrived refugees secure food, housing, and employment, has not previously experienced a sustained attack on its activities, although tensions have occasionally arisen.
"I trust all the federal agencies involved in clearing the refugees and I do not believe the concerns being expressed are legitimate," he said.

Hispanic Activists Burn American And Confederate Flags In Tampa To End “Racist Violence”

Not sure this ended or started racist violence?
Check it out:
On the eve of the anniversary of our nation’s independence, some gathered in protest and set fire to the American flag. The rally at Curtis Hixon Park was advertised to “End Racist Violence,” but the message was quickly lost as the stars and stripes went up in flames.
Continue Reading on

Tensions mounting among Hispanic construction workers at Trump’s DC hotel

After the mogul/candidate’s rant on border crossers, laborers at the Old Post Office site — even those who have gained legal status — worry about their jobs.
Washington Post Writes:
For weeks, dozens of construction workers from Latin America have streamed onto the site of the Old Post Office Pavilion in downtown Washington and taken pride in their work building one of the city’s newest luxury hotels.
But that job site is now laden with tension after the man behind the project — billionaire developer Donald Trump — put himself at the center of the nation’s debate over illegal immigration.
Trump garnered headlines — and prompted several business associates to sever relations with him — when he launched his bid for the Republican presidential nomination last month with a controversial description of drug dealers and “rapists” crossing the border each day into the United States from Mexico.
But a Trump company may be relying on some undocumented workers to finish the $200 million hotel, which will sit five blocks from the White House on Pennsylvania Avenue, according to several who work there. A Trump spokeswoman said the company and its contractors follow all applicable laws. But in light of Trump’s comments, some of the workers at the site said they are now worried about their jobs — while others simply expressed disgust over the opinions of the man ultimately responsible for the creation of those jobs.