In
the spirit of liberal politicians’ seemingly intense desire to rewrite
the Constitution, I have decided to continue my series of Amendment
rewrites.
I rewrote the First Amendment as I believe the left would prefer it after Sen. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin said the following about freedom of religion as it pertains to the Amendment:
I rewrote the First Amendment as I believe the left would prefer it after Sen. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin said the following about freedom of religion as it pertains to the Amendment:
“Certainly
the First Amendment says that in institutions of faith that there is
absolute power to, you know, to observe deeply held religious beliefs.
But I don’t think it extends far beyond that…In this context, they’re
talking about expanding this far beyond our churches and synagogues to
businesses and individuals across this country. I think there are clear
limits that have been set in other contexts and we ought to abide by
those in this new context across America.”
Now, as the left despises the very
existence of the Second Amendment, I feel compelled to draft a liberal
rewrite—but first, the original text:
“A
well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed.”
Now the updated version:
“A
well regulated militia, one which is organized and operated solely
under the authority and discretion of the federal government, must be
maintained. For the security of our country, we must have a military
with the capacity to defend against attacks from other nations. However,
rather than rely on weapon-based defense, we should operate first under
the assumption that all men are essentially good, and base our
‘defense’ on diplomacy.
The
‘right’ of the people to keep and bear arms, an antiquated notion based
on 18th century conditions under which men and women had to make use of
slow-loading muskets to defend their property and family, shall not be
infringed, but henceforth tightly regulated.
Long-range
firearms of any kind, shotguns, and rifles shall be abolished for all
but the police and federal officials. Ammunition clips capable of
carrying more than two bullets shall be abolished for all but the police
and federal officials.
Certain
handguns may be permitted only after a lengthy application process
during which the applicant can demonstrate how their safety will be
negatively impacted should they not have access to a firearm.
Those
who are permitted under federal law to own a firearm must be
registered, and inspected twice yearly by federal officials.
Furthermore, legally permitted firearms must not be taken outside the
home, and while in the home, they must be unloaded and kept in a locked
compartment.
Should assistance be needed by any person or persons who are not legally permitted to own a firearm, 911 is a suitable option.
Should
anyone without a firearms permit be found in possession of such a
weapon, they will be fined a minimum of $10,000 and subjected to federal
adjudication. Such adjudication could result in prison time. The
decision shall be left to the discretion of a federally appointed
Judge.”
There you have it. The liberally revised Second Amendment. Look for it in a Constitution near you!
No comments:
Post a Comment