Saturday, January 17, 2015

Firearms Company Para USA Snubs Hollyweird...#LiamNeeson

Protect the 2nd Amendment!
While Hollywood, the movie studio, and the production company ignored the anti-gun, pro gun-control comments by Liam Neeson, one company did not – PARA USA Firearms. PARA USA supplied the firearms for use on the set for "Taken 3" starring the liberal, anti-gun Neeson. Because of Neeson's fiery statements, PARA USA is cutting all ties with the Irish born star. 

In a Facebook post appearing in the article at The Blaze, PARA USA stated:
PARA USA regrets its decision to provide firearms for use in the film "Taken 3." While the film itself is entertaining, comments made by its Irish-born star during press junkets reflect a cultural and factual ignorance that undermines support of the Second Amendment and American liberties. We will no longer provide firearms for use in films starring Liam Neeson and ask that our friends and partners in Hollywood refrain from associating our brand and products with his projects. Further, we encourage our partners and friends in the firearms industry to do the same. 

Kudos to PARA USA Firearms! Hopefully others in the firearms industry will cease supplying their brands of firearms to Hollyweird and its liberal collective.
Of course, the liberals might see this action by PARA USA as retaliative for Neeson's right to free speech. Their argument would be that Neeson had every right to express his opinion on firearms. In that aspect, they would be right. Neeson does have the right to his opinion and the freedom to express it. However, free speech must be factual and unemotional. Neeson's tirade blasting firearms was riddled with falsehoods and based primarily in emotion.

But, this is how liberals operate. They make no connection between their actions and their speech. Former Mayor Bloomberg fights against the Second Amendment every chance he gets while his own "bodyguards" carry firearms. No hypocrisy in that, is there? Sen. Dianne Feinstein would take every gun out of the hands of Americans, if she had her way, while she herself carries a gun on a daily basis. Moochie Obama wants to tell your children what they need to be eating at lunch and how you should shop for food while she gloats herself at lavish restaurants in Hawaii and plays hostess to extravagant White House dinners. You can bet they aren't eating bland steamed broccoli, raw carrots and shredded lettuce beside an unseasoned 3 ounce serving of chicken breast. How many times has Obama himself been seen barfing down a burger, shake or shaved ice? It's the old "do what I say and not what I do" mantra.   

Neeson, as well, saw no conflict in his action to portray an individual in the movies who carried guns and his statements. By the same token, Neeson even admitted that going to see movies such as his latest in the "Taken" series would not cause people to become killers or go out and get a gun. As someone who played "cowboys and indians" using the finger gun gesture, Neeson stated this innocent play acting as a child did not cause him to grow up to be a killer.
Neeson cannot make the connection that law abiding gun owners do not commit crimes. Nor can he make the connection that inanimate objects are not the problem as they perform no action independently with thoughtful purpose. Neeson's further disconnect caused him to express opinions against Americans' rights to gun ownership after an incident of terrorism in France where strict gun-control laws exist and criminal terrorists, with guns, perpetrated an attack against those exercising freedom of speech. He failed to connect the dots that despite "gun-control" laws, criminals obtained guns and the law-abiding people were left defenseless as they could not get a gun.

By the same token, PARA USA Firearms has every right to choose with whom they do business. If they do not want to conduct business with a company that employs an individual who promotes ideas antithetical to their own and spreads falsehoods, they have that right. This company knows the meaning and reasoning for the Second Amendment. They know the facts when it comes to firearms and gun ownership by law abiding citizens. They didn't have to state them, but the company, without emotion, stood on them.   

PARA USA has demonstrated a willingness to forego monetary gain to stand for their principles, values and their beliefs. They are matching their principles and values to their actions by refusing to engage in hypocrisy, a favorite past time of liberals. This company also provides a lifetime warranty of their firearms for as long as you own it. With their immediate response to Neeson's comments, one has to believe their warranty statement.
What will the movie studio and production company do in response to Neeson's comments? It's Hollyweird, so as long as the money comes rolling in, they will neither condone nor promote Neeson's comments. It will be shoved under the rug so individuals who do not share Neeson's sentiments will blindly use their hard-earned dollars to support an industry and actor who "undermines the Second Amendment and American liberties."
Well, with freedom comes great responsibility. The film company releasing "Taken 3" is 20th Century Fox. The producer is Luc Beeson and the director is Oliver Megaton. The film also starred Famke Jenssen, Forest Whitaker, Maggie Grace, Dougray Scott, Sam Spruell, and Leland Orser. While parts of the film were shot in Los Angeles, others were shot near my neck of the woods, Covington, GA, at the Newton College and Career Academy.
It's time Americans started speaking to this company and these actors with their wallets. No longer should those of us who value our freedoms support monetarily those who so adamantly support limiting our individual rights or promote debauchery. It's also time to address the local government about hosting companies and individuals that seek to promote "anti-American" principles. As my mother is so fond of saying, "guilt by association." And, right now, the local government here is choosing to associate itself with those opposed to liberty and freedom.

By the same token, it's time Americans spoke with their wallets in support of companies like PARA USA Firearms. Let our actions reflect our convictions.

3,000 “Moderate Rebels” Defect To ISIS – US Preparing 5,000 More

How soon until Obama sends an Ambassador to the Islamic State?
Check it out:
Reported along the peripheries of the Western media, it was reported recently that some 3,000 so-called “moderate rebels” of the “Free Syrian Army” had defected to the “Islamic State” (ISIS). While not the first time so-called “moderates” have crossed over openly to Al Qaeda or ISIS, it is one of the largest crossovers that has occurred.
With them, these 3,000 fighters will bring weapons, cash, equipment, and training provided to them by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United States, the UK, and perhaps most ironic of all in the wake of the recent terror attack in Paris, France. Indeed, ISIS and Al Qaeda’s ranks continue to swell amid this insidious network of “terror laundering” that is only set to grow.

It was an open conspiracy exposed by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh in his 2007 article, “The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?“, that the US and its regional allies sought to use Al Qaeda and other extremist groups to wage a proxy war on Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah in Lebanon. This conspiracy has clearly manifested itself today in the form of ISIS. Despite a feigned military campaign waged against ISIS, targeting primarily Syria’s oil infrastructure, the true source of ISIS’ strength, emanating from NATO territory in Turkey, remains unscathed and uninterrupted. Additionally, torrents of cash, weapons, and supplies are working their way across ISIS’ rank and file through the migration of so-called “moderates” under their banner.
Before this brigade-sized defection, several other “vetted moderate rebel” groups, armed by the US in particular, have openly pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda. The most notorious incident was when terror group Harakat Hazm, provided antitank TOW missiles by the US, openly pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda’s Syrian franchise, US State Department-listed foreign terrorist organization Al Nusra. Al Nusra would assume possession of the TOW missiles, using them allegedly in a successful campaign in Syria’s Idlib province.
Continue Reading on ...

Five Shocking “Free” Things Illegals Get Under Obama That You Don’t

Obama is making sure our nation is getting invaded with government dependents.
Check it out:
1. Free food! The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), otherwise known as “food stamps” is widely utilized by the illegal immigrant community.
2. Free education! American taxpayers are footing the bill for educating every illegal immigrant under 18 years old who chooses to attend a public school.
3. Free housing! $50 million worth of free housing, that is, courtesy President Barack Obama.
Continue Reading on ...

Obama Blames America for Muslim Terrorism


Obama has made sure terrorists are stronger than ever.
Check it out:
You want to hear even more absurdity? What is the focus of militant Islamism today? It’s Yemeni Al-Qaeda, is it not, Mr. Snerdley? Al-Qaeda in Yemen is the new focus. They’re the guys that supposedly blew up Charlie Hebdo and all that. So what’s Obama doing? He’s releasing Al-Qaeda from Yemen prisoners at Club Gitmo in the middle of all this. 

I’m watching Fox News today and of course they’re trying to understand it because nobody can come to grips — I’m listening to them ask questions of each other. “You know, is it possible that maybe, uh, you know, Obama’s so far off the beaten path of where most Americans are. Is it possible that maybe — oh, it couldn’t be, but I know a lot of people are — is it possible that he’s, like, really doing this on purpose?” We’re into our seventh year and there are still people that can’t get their arms around all this. “Is it possible that Obama might be, oh, no –” Let me ask you a question.   

Why, when the focus of the most recent terror attacks happens to be Al-Qaeda in Yemen, why the hell is Obama releasing Al-Qaeda from Yemen from Club Gitmo? Why is he doing it? Two reasons. Yeah, in your face is part of it. But I’m gonna give you the charitable reason, and it’s gonna be pretty close to right. Obama really believes that the prison at Guantanamo is responsible for all this. I think Obama and a number of leftists actually believe that when a terrorist says, “Yeah, I saw those pictures at Abu Ghraib, yeah, that’s what made me a terrorist.” I think he believes it.
They’re so invested in Bush being the devil. They’re so invested in Bush being to blame for all this. They’re so invested in having the convenience of being able to blame George W. Bush and Gitmo’s Bush. I think Obama can tell the world, “I’m just trying to stop this stuff. I’m just trying to stop these attacks.” He doesn’t realize that by releasing Al-Qaeda in Yemen prisoners they’re free to go perform jihad. He thinks releasing them is akin to appeasing them. That’s the charitable view, Snerdley, that’s the charitable view. That’s being as charitable as I can… (interruption) I’m just telling you I’m being as charitable as I can be. I’m not telling you I believe this. I’m just telling you that’s the most charitable I can be to explain it.

He really, really believes that our prison at Guantanamo Bay is the reason these Islamists hate us and the reason they keep attacking people. He promised he’s gonna close it and he hasn’t done it and he’s gonna keep trying to get prisoners out of there as a means of stopping terror. (interruption) You don’t think he’s that stupid? Then why else would he be doing this? Unless he wants these people to act the reason they got imprisoned in the first place, is he releasing them so they’ll go continue to perform militant acts of terror?
You really want to say that? Is that what you want to level as an accusation? Of course you don’t want to say it. Well, we do know there’s a recidivism rate. We do know that many released terrorists go back and join their buddies on the battlefield. He knows it, too. Exactly right.
Continue Reading on ...

Redistribute Meryl Streep’s Oscars to Black Actresses!
This is how liberals want everything else done, so why not this.
Check it out:
Major, major controversy in Hollywood. No black nominees. Al Sharpton on the protest prowl. I have a solution. Meryl Streep has a bunch of ‘em, probably some she doesn’t even deserve to have won. Maybe she could give some of hers away to some black actresses.
Well, why not? It’s what liberalism does. It takes from the people that don’t deserve and gives it to everybody else who does. Whether you earn it or not is irrelevant. Redistribute the Oscars. If we’re gonna redistribute income, if we’re gonna redistribute health care, why not redistribute the Academy Awards?

Al Sharpton, an emergency meeting to discuss the appalling all white Oscar nominees. And the media is all behind this. What has happened to us? Here we have a literal buffoon of a human being, Al Sharpton, a hoaxer, a fraud, a tax cheat, a tax evader, a man who has inspired riots in Harlem. And this man holds positions of prominence in our culture today.
What’s wrong with this picture? Al Sharpton? Talk about a nation of wusses and cowards. I mean, the Sony hack happens and the first thing they do is bend over, grab the ankles, call Al Sharpton. And now Sharpton is raising holy hell about Academy Awards nominees, and they’re listening?
Al Sharpton? I mean, despicable human — forget, you know, making jokes and stuff of usual political commentary, just Al Sharpton, Tawana Brawley hoax, the Freddie’s Fashion Mart deaths and riots, the tax cheats stuff, this buffoonery, and yet he has a position of prominence because he sits at the right hand of Barack Hussein O. He sits at the right hand of Obama, not an accident there, either.
Continue Reading on ...

Obama to ISIS: We’re Sending Tourists

Obama making it easy for terrorists to find more people to behead.
Check it out:
In addition to bombing ISIS as it marches across the Mideast, the Obama administration has devised a new, supplemental plan to address the negative impact the radical Muslim terror army and other destabilizing forces are having on the region: Dump millions more in U.S. taxpayer dollars into promoting tourism there.
The U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, continues to focus on bolstering the lagging hospitality industry in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, where the agency granted contracting giant Chemonics International yet another award to boost the viability of that business sector.
The latest project will focus on creating a new Bakery and Pastry Skills program at a Vocational Training Center in the city of Irbid.

The U.S. under both the Obama and George W. Bush administrations has launched programs over the past decade-plus in an attempt to increase tourism-related employment in Jordan.
The U.S. from 1951 through 2013 provided Jordan with economic and military aid totaling $13.83 billion, according to a Congressional Research Service report released last month and made available by the Federation of American Scientists.
Under Obama the U.S. has provided about $660 million in annual foreign assistance to Jordan; and in the year ahead, the U.S. and Jordanian governments “may try to reach a new five-year aid deal.”
Continue Reading on ...

Canadian Man Gets 18 Months in Jail for Saying 'Islam is Evil'

Embedded image permalink
oped: Oh really Canada? Let me get this right...after having a Radical Islamist run over two of your soldiers...then another shoot a soldier standing guard and then attack your government house ...attempting to assassinate your Prime Minister y'all arrest,prosecute and sentence  a citizen for just saying he hates Islam?   
Not to forget those who disagree with homosexual marriage rights...this is also a so called hate crime in Canada!
Whats wrong with this picture? Oh wait this picture relates to the 1956 movie "1984" 
George Orwell's novel of a totalitarian future society in which a man whose daily work is rewriting history tries to rebel by falling in love. After The Atomic War the world is divided into three states. London is the capital of Oceania, ruled by a party who has total control over all its citizens. Winston Smith is one of the bureaucrats, rewriting history in one of the departments. One day he commits the crime of falling in love with Julia. They try to escape Big Brother's listening and viewing devices, but, of course, nobody can really escape...  

As for Islam y'all need a course in ancient history 101...1400 years of Radical Islam:

I guess it’s not just the Islamic terrorists who hate free speech. Apparently, it’s also the governments of free Western nations.
Eric Brazau has long been an opponent of Islam – but he has never committed any physical act of violence against anyone. In fact, he hasn’t ever even suggested that violence be done to anyone else… ever. But the Canadian government recently arrested Brazau for a “hate crime.”

What crime did he commit?
He was arrested and then denied bail for saying that he hated Islam.
Things got even worse when Brazau went before a judge…
Eric BrazauThe judge told him,
“You had a ticket to ride, not a pass to harass”

Post Continues:

Arizona will require civics exam as condition for high school graduation

test taking

Arizona lawmakers have made the state the first in the U.S. to require a basic understanding of civics in order for students to receive high school diplomas.
New Republican Gov. Doug Ducey signed into law last week a bill making the test mandatory, although the law leaves it up to schools how best to instruct students to prepare to pass it.
In September, Republican State Rep. Steve Montenegro proposed that the state require students to pass the same 100-question civics test the federal government uses to test foreigners who apply for U.S. naturalization.
“Every single student in Arizona and across the United States of America should have basic knowledge and understanding of American government,” Montenegro said at the time.

According to The Arizona Republic, the civics requirement has set a precedent that 17 other states may soon follow. A consultant pushing the legislation in state houses across the country said North Dakota is likely to be the next state to implement the change.
While the law has its critics, it has been well received by others.
Moses Sanchez, a Tempe parent, shared his enthusiasm for the new requirement — one born of personal experience.
“As an immigrant and naturalized citizen, I observed and assisted my parents as they studied for their citizenship test and shared in their pride as they passed it,” he told the Arizona Senate Education Committee. “As a parent, I support this bill.”

While the naturalization process requires a foreign applicant to correctly answer 6 out of 10 questions administered verbally by an immigration official, the Arizona schools version will require students to correctly answer 60 questions out of 100. Students can take the test as early as their 8th grade year, and can retake it until they pass.

Friday, January 16, 2015

“Moderate Muslims” Are Irrelevant To America And The World

Photo credit: scottmontreal (Flickr)
Many argue that terrorist attacks are committed by extremists. However, as I have repeatedly argued, a small minority has always been responsible for implementing violent ideology to overtake the “peaceful” and “moderate” majority.
Consider this: of the 1.2 billion Muslims worldwide, national security organizations estimate “radical Muslims” account for 15-25 percent.
That equates to approximately 180-300 million “Radical Muslims,” nearly the entire population of the United States, dedicated to destroying Western civilization. 

Consider how “moderate” and “peaceful” Muslims prevented or responded to the acts committed by “extremist,” “isolated,” “lone wolves”:
  • The 2015, 2012, and 2010 Charlie Hedbo attacks
  • The 2014 Paris suicide driving attacks and car bombs
  • The 2014 (and ongoing) Boko Haram kidnapping and selling of women and children
  • The 2014 AirAsia flight 8501 disappearance
  • The 2014 Malaysian Flight 370 disappearance
  • The 2014 Oklahoma beheader
  • The 2014 machete NYPD murderer 

  • The 2014 Army Peshawar Public School massacre and murder-by-burning of Pakistani teacher by recently released GITMO prisoner
  • The 2014 Fort Hood Murders
  • The 2013 Boston Marathon Bombings
  • The 2012 Benghazi U.S. Embassy Attack
  • The 2008 Bombay & Mumbai India Attacks
  • The 2005 London Subway Suicide Bombings
  • The 2004 Madrid Train Bombing
  • The 2004 Besian Russian School Attack
  • The 2002 Beltway Sniper Shootings
  • The 2002 U.S.S. Cole Attack
  • The 2002 Moscow Theatre Attack
  • The 2002 Bafi Nightclub Bombing
  • The 2001 multiple airline hijackings and attack on Pentagon and WTC
  • The 2001 Shoe Bomber 
  • The 1998 Kenyan U.S. Embassy Bombing
  • The 1996 Saudi Khobar Towers U.S. Air Force housing attack
  • The 1994 Buenos Aires AMIA bombing
  • The 1993 World Trade Center attack
  • The 1986 Nigerian underwear bomber attack
  • The 1985 Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijacking
  • The 1983 Beirut Marine Barracks bombing
  • The 1983 Beirut U.S. Embassy bombing
  • The 1980 Iranian Embassy Hostage Crisis
  • The 1976 Air France Entebbe Hijacking
  • The 1972 Munich Israeli Olympic Team Murders
  • The 1970 Pan-Am flight #93 Hijacking
And those are only a few that have occurred within my lifetime.

This list excludes the ongoing ISIS, Muslim Brotherhood, and Al-Qaeda terrorist threats to Christians, Kurds, and Jews worldwide–specifically cataloged by The Jamestown Foundation’s Terrorism Monitor and Center for Security Policy reports, among others.
Consider how no intentional, orchestrated, or funded terrorist attacks and/or violence is committed among these groups who actually live peacefully amongst each other:
  • Buddhists living among Hindus, Sikhs, Shintos, and/or Atheists
  • Hindus living among Christians, Jews, and/or Baha’is
  • Christians living among Shintos and/or Jews
  • Shintos living among Confucians and Atheists
  • Confucians living among Baha’is and Hindus
  • Baha’is living among Jews and Christians
  • Jews living among Atheists and Buddhists
  • Sikhs living among Hindus
  • Atheists living among Confucians
Since Islam was invented in the 7th century, Muslims have followed Muhammad’s example to commit violence against Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, Jews, Sikhs, Baha’is, Shintos, and Atheists. Islamic ideology is political, designed to dominate the world under one totalitarian Sharia system clearly outlined in the Qur’an.

This is no different than a brief recounting of history throughout which the “radical” minority overpowered the “peaceful” and “moderate” majority.
In 1939, only 6 percent of Germans were members of the Nazi party. Within less than ten years, however, that 6 percent caused the death of more than 66 million people and the destruction of entire European regions.
The peaceful majority of Germans were irrelevant.
Stalin killed more than 50 million people, nearly one third of Russia’s population. The peaceful majority of Russians were irrelevant.
The Ottomans massacred more than 1 million Armenians in 1915. The peaceful majority of Muslims were irrelevant.
The Japanese slaughtered more than 30 million throughout Southeast Asia. And Mao Zedong’s regime killed well over 50 million people, over 30 million alone during his “Great Leap Forward.” The peaceful majority living throughout the entire Southeast and Asian region were irrelevant.

More significantly, on September 11, 2001, there were 2.3 million Muslims living in America. It only took 19 “radicals” to kill nearly 3,000 Americans.
The majority of “peaceful” and “moderate” Muslims in America and worldwide are irrelevant. The reality is that nearly the entire population of America, among one group, is devoted to destroying Western civilization.
The question remains: who will be irrelevant in America? 

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

It’s Over, The Fox News Showdown With Dish Network, And Look Who Just Got Served Big Time

Fox News Up Ratings (1)

How appropriate that “dish” is a key word in this story of media giants battling it out to a bloody but decisive finish.
The showdown between Fox News and Dish Network is reportedly over following a three-week confrontation that saw each side dishing out super-heated charges against the other.
Dish accused Fox of extortion. Fox accused Dish of censorship. And now that the radioactive dust is clearing, it’s apparent that Roger Ailes and Fox News have served the second largest satellite programming provider with a steaming dish of humble pie.

Mediaite reports that Dish has been broken, or at the very least badly cracked, in its highly publicized battle with the undisputed ratings king of cable news.
The Wall Street Journal says that the new multi-year distribution deal not only puts Fox News back on the satellite TV service with its 14 million subscribers, but it also puts much more money in Fox pockets.
The rate per-subscriber that Dish reportedly agreed to pay to Fox will increase by a whopping 50 percent, up to $1.50. Plus, Fox Business Network will appear next to Fox News in the channel lineup, enabling Fox Business to be more readily seen in a greater number of households.

A big reason that Dish Network has caved, say insiders, is an old and familiar one — money, specifically, lost money — severely bleeding revenues. As Western Journalism has reported, a Fox News source indicated a few days ago that some 90,000 subscribers had dropped their Dish service because of the loss of Fox on their TVs.
…resulting in tens of millions in losses if a majority had a typical package for Dish (paying $99.00-$127.00 per month). When the dust settled, Fox had the luxury of audience devotion and familiar faces on the front lines, while Dish was just another faceless, hated cable provider in the same way Comcast, Time Warner and Cablevision are.
USA Today tells us that, in the end, after weeks of airing charges and counter-charges, executives from Dish and Fox issued a terse joint statement: “We thank the viewers of Fox News and Fox Business and Dish customers for their patience throughout this process.”

H/T: Mediaite
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

JESSICA CHAMBERS UPDATE: Told Mother Before Murder, “The Bitches Think I’m Snitching”

by Donald Joy 
It’s been five weeks since 19-year-old blonde former cheerleader Jessica Chambers was horrifyingly burned over 98% of her body in her hometown of rural Courtland, Mississippi, on the side of a country back road on a Saturday night.  She died several hours later, at a Memphis hospital, after being flown by medevac helicopter from near the scene of the apparent homicide.
Just before her death, Jessica had appeared to be working toward ending abusive relationships and turning her troubled young life around, partly through a 6-8 week stay at an intensive Christian women’s discipleship program at a place called Leah’s House.  While there, she hand-wrote an ebullient letter full of cheerful flourishes to her niece, expressing love, optimism, and excitement about the future, writing “I know I messed up in the past but it’s going to be so much better!”  After leaving Leah’s House, she started working a part-time job at Goody’s, a local chain retail store.

Still, some ominous darkness followed her.  Recently Pastor Michael Green spoke directly with certain people who had been close to Jessica before her death, including her mother, Lisa Daugherty.  Green obtained express permission from Daugherty to share with me, for this article, that Jessica had been worried, very worried, that local female gang members suspected her of betrayal.  In the week before her death, terrified of being harmed by them, Jessica twice told her mother, “the bitches think I’m snitching.”
Pastor Green says another person whom Jessica trusted (and with whom Jessica discussed having been gang-raped) also told him that about three months ago, Jessica was showing severe emotional distress, and expressed fear that certain people might be planning to kill her.  A week before she died, in a maudlin and fearful moment, she made a point of telling/playing for her mother the song she wanted to be played at her funeral.

Those following the case over these weeks, with interest in seeing justice done, have been frustrated by the appalling bungling(or deliberate abandonment) of the most basic police procedures in failing to secure crucial, initial crime scene evidence in the aftermath of the event, by indications of gang-land corruption permeating the area of jurisdiction, and by lack of any arrests nor appearance of any real urgency on the part of the authorities in Panola County.  There is a near-total dearth of information released to the public by Sheriff Dennis Darby and District Attorney John Champion(partly due to relevant Mississippi state law), along with some troubling official conduct about which I’ve previously written.
Adding to the frustration is the relative lack of attention by the mainstream media, when compared to the nationwide hysteria and outrage generated by the frenzied reporting on certain other cases — such as when criminal black teenagers justifiably meet with deadly results for themselves when they attempt to murder or threaten to murder non-black men who dare watch or confront them.

Despite a recent public pledge by the governor of Mississippi to use all available resources to help solve the Jessica Chambers mystery and bring justice to the guilty party, and despite the FBI newly announcing a reward of $43,000 for information which will help crack the case, some observers insist that a deliberate, politically-motivated cover-up is afoot, given the usual known priorities of the media and associated powers at various levels to push only a particular racial narrative and agenda.
Things may change in due order, however.  Earlier this month, I received confidential messages from a trusted, leading source in the alternative media about an alleged eyewitness who, despite being “beyond petrified,” had contacted him with extremely compelling revelations.  I now have received permission from that source to include the information here.

According to the witness, about four days before her death Jessica had received some sort of relationship proposal from a black male, and she had rebuked and rejected him.  The witness said that on the night of December 6th, in the hour or so just before her death, the male in question and three other black males grabbed Jessica, took her to a motel in nearby Batesville, and sexually assaulted her there, followed by two of them taking Jessica away to some unknown location.  This person said they observed the event from across the street from the motel, being employed near there and having witnessed some “similar sordid activity” there before, but “never seen it result in murder.”  Jessica was found shortly after that, about 6 miles South, burned and barely alive near her completely torched 2005 Kia Rio alongside Herron Road.

The witness, as reported by my source, knew two of the perpetrators’ identities for sure, but had only a 50% idea of the identities of the other two.
The alleged eyewitness said they had at first been silent, dreading deadly consequences for their children and themselves if they came forward in a way that would expose them to being identified.  They later decided to contact my source, partly because his diligent and thoughtful online postings about the case had won enough of their confidence to encourage them to do so, and partly out of anger at what they saw as damaging theories and disinformation being spun on social media and by writers at attempting to implicate white supremacist gangs, along with suspicions cast on Jessica’s own family members, particularly her ex-convict father.  That anger compelled them to overcome being terrified of the culprits enough to reach out to my source, seeking to set the story straight.

My source said that this alleged witness came across as rock-solid.  However, conscientious concern on my source’s part caused him to immediately instruct the witness to just hold on to whatever further details they had, pending his helping them find strong, prudent legal counsel for immediate referral to law enforcement.  At the time of this being written, the witness had been turned over to a good attorney, in order to work out the arrangements for their protection while getting information to the investigators.  Presumably, since then, he or she has either been assisting with the investigation, or has been for some reason deemed unreliable and dismissed.
There has of course been endless speculation, theorizing, and hearsay about the case bandied about for week after week, primarily at the #JusticeforJessica hashtag on Twitter and at’s daily(until yesterday) case research and analysis threads.  Much of it has been productive of worthy insights and exposure of relevant social media clues, however much has also just, at this point, amounted to exhaustion and frustration as to anticipated closure.

Admittedly, what I have included here is, mainly, merely more hearsay.  It’s understood that journalism, even at its most compelling, is not the same as a court of law.  The point is that justice for Jessica may only come if and only if we of the world-wide fever swamps keep the story alive; not let the case go completely cold by just throwing up our hands and walking away from it.  We must crank up the controversy, crank up the coverage, and crank up the ruckus over the horrible crime that took place, and of the failure of the powers that be, until the bright sunlight of Truth blasts away the shadows.
Even if it’s far too late to get those in charge down there in Northwest Mississippi to properly secure the crime scene and critical evidence, and if they for whatever reason can’t, or won’t, put together a solid enough case against whoever to make any arrests to date, the least we can do in the meantime is to throw everything we have at the media blockage until something big breaks loose.  I don’t care one whit if the locals are upset with us for intruding on their provincial problems.  In the internet age, and in the absence of justice as of yet, that’s our job — to get them to bring the big lights, the satellite trucks, and the crowds to Courtland.
Make it happen.  #JusticeforJessica

Thursday, January 15, 2015

The Huffington Post Just Pulled a Huge Race Card: Here’s Their Target…

Obama Sharpton Huffpo

The Obama house organ known as The Huffington Post has apparently received the message from the Obama Regime that it’s “all racism all the time,” in order to push the regime’s divisive Marxist narrative. 
The leftstream news site is so desperate to find new race-hustling shakedown cases for professional racial grievance profiteer Al Sharpton, now Obama’s leading adviser on all race issues, that they’ve even thrown one of their kindred spirits when it comes to worshipping Obama under the bus.


Pulling out an 800- pound race card, “Huffpo” is accusing The Oscars of being racist. Yes, rather than follow MLK’s admonition to judge people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin, the racial quota bean counters at Huffpo are broadcasting on their front page that, “This Will Be The Whitest Oscars Since 1998.”
Benedict Cumberbatch, Eddie Redmayne and other white people kindly welcome you to the whitest Oscars since 1998. Yes, unfortunately, you read that right: Without a nod for David Oyelowo announced this morning (see white person Brad Pitt for help on that pronunciation) 2015 will be the worst year for diversity in Hollywood since the 70th annual ceremony.
Huffpo goes onto proclaim that “we have a long way to go before we can truly talk about progress being made,” and that “Also: this sucks.”

RAW VIDEO: In a Split Second, Officer’s Questioning of Suspect Turns Deadly; Officer Assassinated


On December 27, Flagstaff Police Officer Tyler Stewart was killed when responding to a domestic violence call. The girlfriend of 28-year old Robert Smith had called police to report an altercation with him. Officer Stewart went to Smith’s home to question him about the incident. Little did the officer know that the seemingly calm conversation between him and Smith would lead to him losing his life.

The body camera worn by Officer Stewart captured his entire altercation with Smith on video.
While Officer Stewart was questioning Smith outside about the domestic violence incident, there was seemingly no issues with Smith complying with answering the officer’s questions. But, the conversation took a very quick and deadly turn after the officer asked Smith if he could conduct a routine pat down to make sure he didn’t have any weapons.
His compliance ended when Smith unexpectedly took out a .22 caliber gun and immediately fired at Officer Stewart.
The video has been edited so that the assassination of Officer Stewart is not shown, but you can see from the video how even the seemingly calm of conversations between an officer and a suspect can change in an instant, putting the officer’s life at risk.

Fox 10 Phoenix reports on what happens, according to police officers, after the portion of the body cam video that is actually released ends.
Flagstaff Police say the video goes on you would hear three shots, the camera falling to the ground and then three more shots. Then nine seconds of silence, followed by what investigators say is the sound of Officer Stewart’s service weapon cycling, then a seventh and final round is heard.
Unfortunately for Officer Stewart and his family, he did not survive the gunfire and died at the scene. Smith killed himself after killing Officer Stewart.

Flagstaff Police Officer Tyler Stewart was shot and killed by a suspect in a simple domestic violence call back in Dec. 2014. His body camera captured his final moments, and the police have released the footage up until the moment he was killed.

John Travolta Poses for 3 A.M. Gym Selfie

 John Travolta Bald
oped: trolling for love again eh'?  

One gym bunny got a maHOOsive surprise on Tuesday night, when he found himself alone, in the gym, with John Travolta

by The Insider 
We typically see John Travolta sporting a full head of hair, but the Hollywood heavyweight hung up his hairpiece for a recent late-night trip to the gym. The 60-year-old posed for a selfie with a fan, confidently displaying his thinning hair as he gave a thumbs up alongside the fellow gym goer at a local Planet Fitness in Florida. The fan posted the pic to Reddit on Wednesday after bumping in to the "Pulp Fiction" star at 3 a.m. "I was really confused at first and got really choked up," he wrote. "It was surreal for a moment."  

See YouTube video:

Is this the Watershed Moment for Confronting Radical Islamic Terrorism?


The eyes of the world were focused on the City of Lights on Sunday as close to 4 million people in France including 1.6 million in Paris alone participated in a march of solidarity for the 17 victims of the horrific killings perpetrated by radical Islamic terrorists this week at the headquarters of the satirical publication Charlie Hebdo and a Paris kosher supermarket. Over 40 world leaders were present and the world witnessed French President Francois Hollande linking arms with other leaders, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, to show support for not only the victims but also for what they represented: freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion. But there was one person missing from the images which cascaded across the news feeds. President Barack Obama, the leader of the “free world”, the individual considered to be one of the most powerful political leaders in the world was conspicuously absent. Jane Hartley, the US Ambassador to France, was the chosen to represent the US. And while Ms. Hartley should clearly be present, she should not have been the highest ranking US individual at a tribute for the victims of an event which has been described as “France’s 9/11”. 

The media spin machine is already in full gear with reporters citing that the security detail involved with transporting President Obama would interfere and detract from the tribute. We have also been told that Secretary of State John Kerry was in India and unable to attend. Apparently Attorney General Eric Holder was in Paris, but he was not present at the rally or tribute services. Instead he was hosting a summit where he made the statement that there was “no credible information” as yet that Al-Qaeda was behind the attacks in France. The White House also issued a statement that it was organizing a global summit on February 18 on fighting "violent extremism around the world." Once again, the White House is pussyfooting with terminology because they are afraid to speak the words “radical Islamic terrorism” lest they offend the many peaceful Muslims. There are approximately 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. Approximately 300 million are radical practitioners of the faith. It is about time the United States and other world powers take the risk of “offense,” for the truly peaceful Muslims will be our biggest allies in our efforts the destroy radical Islamic terrorists, “ the fifth column” which attempts to “undermine our world’s solidarity by any means at their disposal.” 

Step One – Stop being Politically Correct
The first step towards eradicating radical Islam is to label it appropriately. Some leaders have already done this such as French Prime Minister Manuel Valls, who said that we need to declare “a war against terrorism and radical Islamism, against everything that would break our solidarity, our liberty, our fraternity.” And “Our indignation must be clear, total and last longer than three days. It must be permanent.” Other leaders need to follow his example. 

Step Two- Stop the Money Flow
Money is needed to recruit, train, indoctrinate feed and house Jihadists. Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest sponsor of radical Islamic terrorists. And the US has been supporting Saudi Arabia militarily with National Security Intelligence and other resources for over 70 years. For instance, Cherif and Said Kouachi, the perpetrators of the attack at Charlie Hebdo, received weapons training in Yemen in the summer of 2011 where they were also introduced to the preacher “Anwar al-Awlaki”. Someone had to fund their training, travel and lodging expenses. If we find a way to cut off the money supply, we disable the recruiting cell pipeline.

Step Three- Learn from History and Improve Our Intelligence Gathering
obama islamWe have witnessed incident after incident of violence at the hands of radical Islamic extremists. We implement short term tactical responses, but we don’t seem to be able to fully connect the dots. We have had repeated situations where we learned that individuals who were on the “no fly” list were later pulled off after a period of laying low. Or we experience breakdowns in communication between different government agencies where an individual is flagged for monitoring by one agency but the information is not appropriately shared for either civil liberties reasons, operational problems or other excuses. We need to revisit reinstating monitoring programs which have been stopped for one reason or another, such as New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s recent cessation of the “stop and frisk” program because he thought it interfered with individual’s civil liberties. 

Step Four - Engage the Muslim Community to Look Inward
We need to do a better job of engaging the leaders within the Muslim community to look inward so that they can better identify the disenfranchised members of their society and provide them with the support that they need so that they do not fall prey to Islamic terrorism. These efforts would include better community integration so that they do not feel socially isolated. These leaders also need to do a better job of creating access to education and training to teens and young adults so that they can earn a living and contribute to society. The statistics have demonstrated that the most vulnerable individuals to terrorism recruitment are those lacking family, money, education or skills. Furthermore, we all need to accept the uncomfortable realization that there are some people who are “rotten at the core” and that no amount of outreach is going to reform them.

Step Five – Stop Giving Jihadists Their 15 Minutes of Fame
In the interest of news dissemination, we need to circulate some photos of criminals. But we need to stop glamorizing them. Who can forget the photo of Boston Marathon bomber Dzokhar Tsarnaev on the cover of Rolling Stone which made him look like a rock star, not an Islamic Jihadist who killed three people and wounded more than 200, and also gave chase to a manhunt which left a police officer dead? What was Rolling Stone thinking? Pictures of Hayat Boumeddiene in a bikini have also surfaced. But that’s not the image we should be sending out. The picture of her in a birka with a cross bow is what we should see of the “most wanted woman in France.” We have to remember that “fame” is one of the key motivators for these individuals. We have to stop giving them the spotlight.

Most importantly, we need to seize the moment. Over the past few days, we have participated in global tragedy that took place on French soil. While we are now experiencing the warmth that comes from a shared emotional reaction, we cannot stop there. It is not enough to just express support with social media posts; we need to take action. We cannot let the tragic deaths which took place this week in Paris at the hands of radical Islamic terrorists fade into just a memory of a moment of world solidarity. We need to strategically and tactically come together to hunt for and smoke out the enemies to our fundamental liberties.

The Hilarious Liberal Vision of how the 2nd Amendment Came to Pass

The Second Amendment states:
The brilliant and funny Steven Crowder has just released a brilliant analysis of what the liberals seem to believe happened more than 200 years ago. Instead of penning a Bill of Rights that simply means what it says… Liberals must believe that James Madison really meant something totally different than what he wrote
On June 7th, 1789, the night before James Madison proposed the Bill of Rights before the House of Representatives, he sat down to pen the first draft of the second amendment. The following is what many (liberal) scholars believe to be the original and unedited version of that amendment.  

Protect the 2nd Amendment!

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

White House: Obama Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles – Free Speech Activists to Protest Islamic Event

oped: Here we go Jihad boy has declared war on the Media and 'We the People'... it is past due time for the Media at large as well as Congress to push forward with Impeachment,arrest and prosecution of Barry Barack Obama for sedition and treason against the US Constitution,The Bill of Rights and 'We the People' Take off the damn gloves already this SOB POTUS poser has crossed the line! 


After ignoring the global jihad for the whole of his presidency, his silence amounted to nothing short of support. And that support let to empowerment and jihad success in the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.   

Now that the Jihad is raging, thanks in large part to his islamophiliac foreign policy, Obama's solution to the bloodshed and the carnage is — don't report it. If a tree falls in the woods and the media doesn't cover it, then it doesn't make a sound. Obama was elected President, but he behaves like a tinpot dictator.
This is, by the way, exactly what Islamic supremacists have been demanding for years. That media stop reporting on jihad. The media have, in large part, complied. But when Sydney, Paris, Ottawa happen — it cannot be denied.

I expect Obama to come after counter-jihad sites as well, because truth-seeking freedom lovers increasingly are going to the net for their news.
"White House: Obama Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles" Neil Munro, Daily Caller, January 13, 2015

President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation's journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation's defenses forces, the White House's press secretary said Jan. 12.

"The president … will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform" whenever journalists' work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House's daily briefing.

The unprecedented reversal of Americans' civil-military relations, and of the president's duty to protect the First Amendment, was pushed by Earnest as he tried to excuse the administration's opposition in 2012 to the publication of anti-jihadi cartoons by the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.

The White House voiced its objections in 2012 after the magazine's office were burned by jihadis, followings its publication of anti-jihadi cartoons.

Earnest's defense of the 2012 objections came just five days after the magazine's office was attacked by additional jihadis. Eight journalists, two policeman and a visitor were murdered by two French-born Muslims who objected to the magazine's criticism of Islam's final prophet

Editor's Note: In addition to pointing out what the White House is set to do, in violation of free speech, Geller's organization is bringing the fight to the Islamists in Garland, Texas in the form of a free speech rally outside and Islamic event. Here's the information:
Islamic supremacists and terror-tied imams from across America will gather in Texas this weekend to hold the annual Stand With the Prophet in Honor and Respect conference, a weekend forum that is being billed as a "movement to defend Prophet Muhammad, his person, and his message," according to event information.

The Stand With the Prophet in Honor and Respect conference declares that it is trying to start a "movement to defend Prophet Muhammad, his person, and his message." This theme is strikingly similar to the motive of the Charlie Hebdo jihad killers: after they had murdered twelve people in the Charlie Hebdo offices, one of the gunmen shouted, "We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad."
This kind of hate-filled rhetoric fuels the violence and murder of freedom loving people.
We will protest this supremacism and stand in defense of free speech. Je suis Charlie! 
This Saturday, January 17 at 3:00pm in CST, 4999 Naaman Forest Blvd., Garland, TX 75040
Bring lots of American flags and free speech and Je Suis Charlie!  signs.

Glenn Beck Blasts Mike Huckabee: A ‘Progressive’ Who’s ‘Not What he Appears’

Glenn Beck Mike Huckabee
oped: I don't agree with Glenn 100% of the time... more like 80% of the time on most issues...however on this observation I agree 100% . Yes indeed Mike is a player, more concerned with running for office then being a man of God, albeit he consistently plays on it...I also have issues with his 'Little Rocker Band' and pushing his way to rock with the Big Kids on his former show the way I may be getting a lil tone deaf in me old age...because I could never hear the base when he played...sorry, Mr Bass man he not be imho mind ya!  

Bass is very important in a band...and is quite obvious in it's vibes and sound...always missing when Rocker Mike supposedly played ...maybe not connected to the amp ? 

Talk radio host and founder of The Blaze  Glenn Beck slammed potential 2016 Republican presidential candidate and former Arkansas governor, Mike Huckabee, as being “one of the most disingenuous men” that Beck has “ever, ever met.”
“I will tell you, however, that Mike Huckabee is not what he appears,” Beck warned his vast audience on Tuesday. “Mike Huckabee is one of the most disingenuous men I have ever, ever met. And I have had several encounters with him and I know a lot of people really like him. I am not one of them. I think he’s a political player, and I have less respect for people who invoke the name of God and then are politicians on top of it. He’s a politician from the get-go,” Beck stated.

As the segment continued, Beck’s criticism of Huckabee, who recently quit his weekly FOX News program in order to explore a his presidential aspirations, got even more heated.

“I will tell you that my dislike for him goes beyond his [being] progressive. He’s a liar to your face. He is a very disingenuous man,” Beck charged.

Beck continued the conversation with his talk show cohorts Stu Burguiere and Pat Gray, comparing notes on Huckabee policies that are abhorrent to most constitutional conservatives, like his fervent support for Common Core.

“He is Jeb Bush hiding behind the cross. He is,” Beck contended, followed by Gray reading a statement from Huckabee saying that it was “disturbing” to him that conservatives had been critical of Common Core.

Finally, Beck asserted that Huckabee is running to be “interference for Ted Cruz to try to split the religious vote off of Ted Cruz.”
“I think that’s what’s happening. Just as much as Mitt Romney is trying to run block and tackle for Jeb Bush. Huckabee is running block and tackle for — against Ted Cruz. Being good little foot shoulders. I can guarantee you he doesn’t like Ted Cruz’s policy. Guarantee it.”

America’s Muslim in chief

President Barack Obama talks on the phone with President Beji Caid Essebsi of Tunisia during a foreign leader call in the Oval Office, Jan. 5, 2015. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

President Barack Obama wants gays to come out of the closet. I think it is time for him to come out of the closet as a Muslim.
Point in fact: In the wake of the Paris slaughter that took place last week at Charlie Hebdo, the President’s mouthpieces have already busied themselves in explaining away any connection between that act and the peace-loving followers of Islam.
It makes sense given that the Obama administration called out Charlie Hebdo in 2012 for publishing cartoons satirizing Islam.
Then-White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters: “Well, we are aware that a French magazine published cartoons featuring a figure resembling the Prophet Muhammad, and obviously, we have questions about the judgment of publishing something like this. We know that these images will be deeply offensive to many and have the potential to be inflammatory.”

Carney was speaking for the president, who has dissociated Islam from terror around the globe despite the obvious fact that it is being carried out by Muslims. And notice that Carney didn’t suggest Charlie Hebdo lay off on Jesus, Moses, Buddha or Joseph Smith.
Speaking of Smith, can you picture America’s outrage if Mitt Romney won the last election and celebrated Mormonism the way Obama celebrates Islam? It hurts the brain to think of morons engaging in a global jihad, building armies with aims on regional and even world conquest. And try to picture Romney holding a special White House dinner celebrating Mormonism the way Obama celebrated Islam last summer at a formal White House dinner.
My experiences with young men I’ve met on Mormon missions are that they are well-spoken, well-dressed and polite. Their worst fault is they can sometime be a bit boring. They don’t threaten to cut your head off if you don’t convert.

But nary is there any form of an apology from Obama and his views with regard to Islam and the Charlie Hebdo slaughter. What we have is quite to the contrary. After the French attack by Muslims, Jimmy Carter’s former national security adviser and Obama adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” He said “common sense” is more important than freedom of press or expression. Brzezinski must not have read the 1st Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Obama constantly makes comments about what he always calls the “Holy Quran,” plus what a peace-loving and progressive religion Islam is. Here are some of the president’s words:

  • “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
  • [The Muslim call to prayer is] “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”
  • “We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world — including in my own country.”
  • “As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam.”
  • “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.”
  • “I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”
  • “[W]e will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities.”
Encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities? That is tantamount to President Dwight D. Eisenhower proclaiming in the 1950s that more Americans should go to schools in the Soviet Union.

Now let’s read what Obama has said about Christianity:
  • “Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation.”
  • “If all it took was someone proclaiming, “I believe Jesus Christ and that he died for my sins,” and that was all there was to it, people wouldn’t have to keep coming to church, would they?”
  • “On Easter or Christmas Day, my mother might drag me to church, just as she dragged me to the Buddhist temple, the Chinese New Year celebration, the Shinto shrine, and ancient Hawaiian burial sites.”
Yes, good Christians, going to church is like being dragged off to an ancient burial site. As for the first quote on Christianity, it may be self-fulfilling if all Islamists disrespect Christianity as much as Obama does.

In fact, the president has taken his pro-Islam stance so far that last summer during a national address, he declared: “ISIL is not ‘Islamic.’ No religion condones the killing of innocents.” This must come as quite a shock to the founders of the Islamic State (aka ISIS or ISIL). After all, the first word of their organization is “Islamic.” With Obama it is just another pattern of presenting the good side of Islam, as if there were a good side.
Take the case of the 2009 Fort Hood massacre where Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a U.S. Army psychiatrist and closet jihadist, fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others. The Obama administration called it “workplace violence,” ignoring Hasan’s communications with Muslim extremists.

CNN reported:
The intense investigation into the mass shooting remains largely shrouded in silence. Army officials have voiced concern about jumping to any conclusions about the motive, warning about a possible backlash against Muslim soldiers. Several bystanders, like (Pvt. Joseph) Foster, reported Hasan shouted “Allahu akbar,” Arabic for “God is great,” which terrorists have used as a battle cry.
In December 2011, when Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) was the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, he said the military has become a “direct target of violent Islamist extremism” within the United States.
Of course, we know who else is on the target list of Islamic extremists — people like us and all nonbelievers in Western democratic countries. Obama disregards this threat not at his peril but at ours.

Finally, it is hard to square away what Obama is saying and what his military advisers are saying, that ISIS is a threat to order in the Middle East and to the world. Regardless of how much the president praises the Holy Quran millions of Muslims draw their radicalism from it, just as millions of Germans drew theirs from “Mein Kampf.”
Others beside Obama seem to finally get it. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, once an Islam apologist, said last April that Western democracies must finally face who the real enemy is.

The Guardian reported:
With support for intervention ebbing fast, especially in Britain, Blair urged a wilfully blind west to realise it must take sides and if necessary make common cause with Russia and China in the G20 to counter the Islamic extremism that lies at the root of all failures of western intervention.
Of course, all this advice is lost on Obama. After all, he is our Muslim in chief.

Alien UFO Cover-Up? NASA Shuts Livestream As Gigantic UFO Appears Near ISS, Blogger Claims

via: Inquisitr
UFO hunter Toby Lundh is causing a stir among alien UFO believers with the claim that on Jan. 6, 2015, NASA cut abruptly its live stream after a massive UFO appeared on the live feed.
Lundh, who contacted, provided a still photo of the alleged UFO to support his claim that NASA attempted to cover up “evidence” of a massive UFO presence near the International Space Station (ISS) by shutting the live video feed after the UFO appeared on it.
According to Lundh, NASA has removed the recording from its archives as part of the agency’s effort to conceal what alien UFO believers have long held are clandestine interactions between ISS astronauts and technologically advanced aliens.

Lundh’s claim has caught the attention of the online alien UFO enthusiasts community. A sampling of the reactions of members of this thriving community shows there is widespread distrust of NASA and other government agencies among them. Reacting to Lundh’s allegation on BeforeItsNews, a user observed that the incident illustrates why many in the “Truth movement” do not trust NASA.
“Many in the Truth movement no longer trust anything NASA says or does and here’s another example of why. As their live feed was showing the ISS, a huge UFO appeared and NASA cut the feed.”
Several other users expressed distrust of the agency.
“Did anyone actually believe anything NASA said from the start? Not me… They cut the feed because right there in-front of your eyes is a UFO and rather than open that can of worms they would prefer to label you insane.”
“Never believe anything the official people have to say. Just like Pharmacy. You want me to believe all these medicines and shots help keep me healthy, when you get paid to cure sick people? It defeats your job to do so, so why should I believe such BS? Anyone who believes that in this society should be declared insane.”
NASA has not responded to Lundh’s allegation, but some UFO skeptics on Reddit have dismissed his claims and questioned his credibility.

Read More:

The excuses made for murderous jihadis ...

and the rest of Arab suicidal's is ridiculous! 

Embedded image permalink


Screen Shot 2015-01-13 at 5.05.03 PM
oped: Here we go as predicted...first came the LGBT Gay marriage beastality is acceptable...whats next adult/child love (NAMBLA).... Incest? 

What kind of frickin’ father would approve of that crap? No pun intended.
During Sunday night’s season premiere of HBO’s Girls, Lena Dunham and company once again pushed the boundaries with a racy sex scene in which Allison Williams was on the receiving end of… well… the receiving end.
The show’s cast seemingly hopes to create a new normal in revolutionizing television, and scene’s like Williams’s, pictured above, will spearhead the show to the front of the movement, while focusing on the “backs” of its characters. 

NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams, Allison’s father, weighed in on the release of the new season’s first episode, in which his daughter, who was recently panned for her performance in Peter Pan Live, was the subject of the indecent act.
During the interview, Williams was asked how he felt about his daughter’s performance in the scene, which aired while Sunday evening’s Golden Globe awards were being hosted in Los Angeles.
“She’s always been an actress. For us, watching her is the family occupation and everybody has to remember it’s acting, no animals were harmed during the filming, and ideally nobody gets hurt,” he explained.
Read more: Breitbart

BREAKING: Whiny Muslim Group Demands Fox News Fire These Hosts And Others

Screen Shot 2015-01-14 at 8.43.59 AM

I think I speak for most people when I say, if you don’t like America then pick up your crap and move back to Suckistan.
Apparently, for radical Muslims, the murder of ten journalists at the offices of French newspaper Charlie Hebdo didn’t go far enough to silence opposition to their extremism.
Now they are demanding that Fox News fire any hosts who speak ill of Islam or the Prophet Muhammad.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, long understood by conservatives to be a front group for Islamic terror, recently demanded that Fox “drop Islamophobes” from its programming.

The group seemed to be focused primarily on guests who are interviewed or invited to provide commentary on its programming, but it reportedly made no exclusion for regular Fox News hosts.
By CAIR’s definition, that would include some of the Fox New Channel’s most recognizable personalities, including Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Megyn Kelly, Andrea Tantaros and many others.
Read more: Conservative Tribune