Saturday, July 18, 2015

Rick Perry calls on Donald Trump to withdraw from the presidential race
oped: Ok I respect Rick Perry,John McCain, and Lindsey Graham's military service...however this does not give them a pass..John and Lindsey do not get my respect for service in Congress on the political spectrum and now Rick Perry is giving me second thoughts...I want a real General as CIC  ya know like General Washington! Just because one served does not  get my depends on how and where they served ..gaining experience as a CIC...I am so done with week-end warriors without a clue! I am now leaning towards Ben Carson,Ted Cruz but must admit 'The Donald' is exposing  the frauds and week-kneed~ week-end warriors!

WASHINGTON - MAY 03: Texas Governor Rick Perry participates in a U.S. Chamber of Commerce summit on 'the role of free enterprise in job creation' at the chamber May 3, 2010 in Washington, DC. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce released a study before the summit highlighting 'free enterprise principles,' including entrepreneurship, open trade and competitive tax rates, benefit states when creating jobs. 

Real-estate magnate Donald Trump's latest comments were a bridge too far for many top Republican presidential rivals. And at least one candidate wants him out of the race.
Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) said Trump should be disqualified from running for president.
"His attack on veterans make him unfit to be Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed Forces, and he should immediately withdraw from the race for President," Perry said in a statement.
At an event in Iowa on Saturday, Trump raised eyebrows for criticizing Sen. John McCain's (R-Arizona) military service and status as a prisoner of war in Vietnam.
"He's a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren't captured," Trump said.

Trump's comments sparked immediate condemnation from the Republican presidential field. Perry was the first to explicitly call for him to withdraw from the race.
"I respect Sen. McCain because he volunteered to serve his country," Perry said in a statement. "I cannot say the same of Mr. Trump. His comments have reached a new low in American politics."
GOP candidate and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), McCain's long-time friend, also said Trump's comments were "disqualifying." Other Republican hopefuls, including former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R), Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R), and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R), condemned Trump's remarks.
Trump was quick to slightly tone down his comments about McCain, though he did not apologize.
"He is yet another all talk, no action politician who spends too much time on television and not enough time doing his job and helping the [veterans]," Trump said in a statement. "He is also allowing our military to decrease substantially in size and strength, something which should never be allowed to happen."

As it has done when defending controversial comments in the past, Trump's campaign cited the excitement in the crowd as proof that his message resonated with the crowd. 
"Note, Mr. Trump left to a long lasting standing ovation, which will be by far the biggest ovation of the weekend, and much congratulatory praise," a statement from the Trump campaign said.
Trump's comments come after McCain criticized the real estate mogul earlier this month for bringing out "the crazies" in the Republican base.
Perry — a former cargo-plane pilot in the Air Force — made military service a major part of his presidential campaign. In his announcement speech last month, the former governor was joined onstage with several veterans and the wife of sharpshooter Chris Kyle, made famous by the semi-biographical film American Sniper.

Friday, July 17, 2015

Kill The deal before Iran starts WWIII

Stop Iran Nuke Deal
Stop Iran Nuke Deal I'm asking you, as a patriotic citizen of our great nation, please contact your elected officials in Washington IMMEDIATELY, and demand they halt President Obama's catastrophic deal with Iran.

Call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 right away to be put in touch with your Senators and House Member.

And when your Senators and Representative return home for August recess, show up at their district offices, and bombard them at town hall meetings, making it clear in no uncertain terms that only they can prevent this deal . . . and that they must. 

I'm Frank Gaffney, Founder and President of Secure Freedom. During the 1980s, I was the Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security in the Reagan Administration, where I specifically focused on nuclear threats to our country and the job of countering them. And for the past twenty-seven years, my organization has fought tooth-and-nail to expose and combat America's gravest national security threats.

The notion that we can safely negotiate with an Islamic supremacist and jihadist nation such as Iran is ludicrous on its face. Yet that's exactly what our reckless Commander-in-Chief has done.

And just two days ago, he announced the completion of a deal that puts the lives of all of your loved ones--especially your children and grandchildren--at stake.

Obama's Iran deal contains too many flaws to list. Crucially, this Obamabomb deal . . .

  • Leaves Iran's nuclear weapon development infrastructure--some of which is known, and some of which is unknown--ENTIRELY INTACT.
  • Affords early sanction relief and the return to Iran of frozen assets that will provide a massive wealth infusion to Iran.
  • Invests all countries party to the deal in Iran's future, and ties them all to what is sure to be a disastrous outcome.  It enlists the "international community" in expanding and protecting Iran's nuclear capabilities. 
  • Secure Freedom is responding by conducting a multi-faceted campaign to expose this heinous deal, including but not limited to . . .
  • Running a media campaign, to include a series of strategically placed television and Internet ads;
  • Redoubling ongoing publishing and placement of articles in major national, state, and local media outlets across the country;
  • Maximizing the impact of a customized website ( dedicated to derailing this deal, that is now online and being enhanced daily;
  • Discussing the deal regularly with national and international leaders and experts on my nationally syndicated Secure Freedom Radio program;
  • Appearing on the national and international media to critique the Obamabomb deal;
  • And partnering with other like-minded influential individuals and organizations to persuade Congress to reject the deal.
But implementing all of this is extremely costly, and we need your support RIGHT NOW. There is seriously not a moment to lose.

And don't forget to contact your Congressional representatives today by dialing 202-224-3121.

Thank you, in advance, for all your support, and for everything you do to protect and preserve our nation.


Frank Gaffney
President and CEO
Secure Freedom

P.S. this deal with Iran is worse even than most of its opponents thought possible. It simply must be stopped.

Contact your Congressman and Senators today by dialing 202-224-3121, and urge them to kill Obama's deadly Obamabomb pact with Iran.

And please, support Secure Freedom's campaign to educate the American public on the disastrous details of this deal, with your most generous tax-deductible contribution.

Bruce Jenner Makes Me Want To Vomit

Do you get that? Hahaha!
Why is it that DNA and facts never matter to liberals?
Check it out:
To paraphrase Snoop Dogg, “Bruce Jenner isn’t news, he’s a science experiment.”
I couldn’t agree more. Shame on ESPN to be force feeding the sports watching public with this liberal dogmatic crap, continually hammering in this lie that having a sex change is somehow normal or a courageous act.
No. It is a mental disorder. It even has a name, Body Dysmorphic Disorder. We don’t champion anorexics or bulimics for being “brave” enough to starve or vomit their way to a thinner body.
There is nothing brave or natural about chopping off parts of your body and taking a plethora of drugs to change your sex. It’s a psychological disease that needs treatment and therapy and all the people who are cheering for Bruce Jenner’s mutilation of himself are fooling both themselves and this man whose mental disorder has led him down a path of Frankensteinian horror.
Continue reading on bulletsfirst.netReality Check:

Meet Caitlyn Jenner, Formerly Known as Bruce
[Photo Shopped]
Caitlyn Jenner (formerly Bruce Jenner) Photos   That was a good day,” she says of winning gold, in 1976. “But the ...
Cover Girl! Bruce Jenner Will Reportedly Reveal New Life As Transwoman ...

Jeb Bush Supports Transgender People Serving In U.S. Military

oped: Really now Jeb he who never served in the military...don't even go there until you have served ya don't know what the hell you are talking about ...this is a very bad and perverted idea...transgender/transexual people suffer from a mental disorder...not a good match for combat service or life in general for that matter! 

Which party is it that Jeb is running for?
Check it out:
Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush told Yahoo News that he supports the Obama administration’s move to allow transgender individuals to openly serve in the U.S. military.
Bush reportedly said he was “fine” with transgender persons openly wearing the uniform as long as the Pentagon determines that doing so would not undermine U.S. troop morale.

“If you can accommodate people who are transgendered and deal with making sure the military’s comfortable with this and making sure that the overriding principle ought to be how do we create the highest morale for the greatest fighting force the world has ever seen… and if you can accommodate those two concerns, then fine,” he told Yahoo News.
Earlier this week, Obama’s Department of Defense (DoD) issued two directives, bringing the Pentagon closer to rescinding its ban on open service by transgender people.
Defense Secretary Ash Carter ordered a 6-month review to examine the implications that allowing transgenders to serve openly in the military would have on policy and military readiness.
Carter said the transgender DoD ban is “outdated.”
Continue reading on

Iran Bans U.S. Inspectors from All Nuclear Sites

U.S. and Iranian officials confirmed Thursday that no American nuclear inspectors will be permitted to enter the country’s contested nuclear site under the parameters of a deal reached with world powers this week, according to multiple statements by American and Iranian officials.
Under the tenants of the final nuclear deal reached this week in Vienna, only countries with normal diplomatic relations with Iran will be permitted to participate in inspections teams organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The revelation of this caveat has attracted concern from some analysts who maintain that only American experts can be trusted to verify that Iran is not cheating on the deal and operating clandestine nuclear facilities.
The admission is the latest in a series of apparent concessions made by the United States to Iran under the deal. Other portions of the agreement include a promise by the United States to help Iran combat nuclear sabotage and threats to its program.
Read More:

Obama Believes He is Carrying Out God’s Will

oped: Don't hold your breath Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever your real name are not in prison now only because of the tricky little part in The US Constitution/Bill of rights you love to attack and hate...stating a sitting President cannot be arrested/prosecuted...however if Congress had the cajones' to Impeach all bets off...if they don't while you are sitting you can always be prosecuted after your term ends!

President Obama visited some of his staunchest supporters in prison today, and he remarked that the only reason that he was not in prison was because of his integral role in God’s plan.
Both publicly and privately, Obama acknowledges that his mischievous, sometimes marijuana-fueled adolescence in Hawaii might have brought about a very different adulthood had it taken place somewhere else.
“That’s what strikes me – there but for the grace of God,” he said[.]
For a Christian who never goes to church, Obama claims to have a remarkable insight into what God has planned for him.  Obama also strongly implied that God kept him out of prison so he could become president, presumably so he could import millions of illegal aliens, legalize homosexual marriage, give special rights to transvestites, and assume near dictatorial powers in budget, justice, and foreign affairs.  What kind of self-deluded fanaticism is that?

I, TOO, AM OPPRESSED: Persecution of a Short, Bass-Playing, Pipe-Smoking, Book-Reading, Cellphoneless Man

by John DeGroff 
There is now a real proliferation of classifications of oppression; so many that I finally realized that perhaps I might be oppressed and not even know it.  After much contemplation, soul searching and inner struggle (actually, just the amount of time it took to polish off a Guinness), I arrived at the horrible truth that, yes indeed, I am oppressed. 
My last column that was posted here concerned the fact that my “white privilege” wasn’t working.   Somehow along the way, I missed out on all the glory that belongs to us white folk and I was wondering what the heck went wrong.  But, thanks to myriad, sundry micro aggressions that have been hurled at me by society at large, my “white privilege”  never had a fighting chance in the first place.  After much trepidation, and the aforementioned Guinness, I have been forced to face the following list of causes for my oppression.

– I’m short.  Go ahead, laugh.  Short people are much maligned and it started long before Randy Newman’s song “Short People”.   At 5’3″ (without heels), I often have to prove how old I am.  But, I guess it doesn’t matter…I’m in good company.  Hitler was 5’7″ while Joseph Stalin was even shorter, at 5’4″.   (I can just about hear all the comments I’ll get from that remark, but it just proves don’t piss off the short person.)   History’s mass murderers and dictators aside, I’ve had to resign myself to the fact that I’ll never have a career in the NBA. 
– I play bass guitar.  Bass players are sort of the Rodney Dangerfield of music, we get no respect.   I’ve often felt that bass players are a lot like a roll of toilet paper-no one ever notices you until you’re NOT there.   I can make that analogy far more graphic but I won’t. Unless you’re a bass player who is also a pretty boy lead singer (no on both counts for me…), you will be ignored.     For a good idea of what bass players put up with, check out a great comedy video by the comedy team of Gamper and Dadoni. 

– I’m a pipe smoker.   I’ve already referenced my favorite beer, so I might as well put it out there that I’m an evil, wicked, nasty person who smokes AND drinks.  I also have other bad habits.  I’ve been know on occasion to fart, belch and scratch with total impunity.   But, no respect for pipe smokers, in spite of the fact that it smells a lot better than cigarettes.   I also like to occasional cigar, but prefer the pipe.   When I last went for a  physical I  told the doctor that yes, I smoke, but it’s a pipe and I don’t inhale. He just looked at me and asked if I was a Democrat.   See, no respect.
– I don’t own a cell phone.   This is more or less by choice, but I feel I’m missing out on what it’s like to be one of those annoying people who stands behind you in the grocery check-out line, graphically describing grandpa’s colostomy bag.   I also actually acknowledge the presence of wait staff, traffic lights, and most of the world around me on a regular basis.  However, I’m feeling more and more deprived because I can’t text anyone on a 24/7 basis, and this sort of leads to my next point…

– I read books.    Books…remember those old fashioned things consisting of printed words on paper bound together between two covers?   You don’t buy the book then pay for separate content, they don’t require batteries or a charge, and only crash if knocked off the table.   Granted, I can’t carry around 500 separate titles, but since I’m not a speed reader, one book at a time works well.   Still, I get some rather odd looks when everyone else is looking at their phones and I’m the only one who pulls out a book and reads, which is a task that does not require the use of my thumbs.    My poor thumbs are not as well developed as everyone else’s.   Totally oppressed here.
      Okay, so that’s the short list of how badly I’m oppressed.  I don’t see it getting  better any time soon, so I just have to ask: where does a short, bass-playing, pipe-smoking, book-reading, cellphoneless person go to get sympathy for my plight?   Where’s the ACLU?   When do I get to take my place in line at the government tit? 

HERE IT COMES: Immigration Is Set to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2Mil

Screen Shot 2015-07-17 at 11.16.02 AM
Prepare for the push.
The Associated Press and NBC are now reporting that Tennessee gunman Muhammed Youssef Abdulazees was an immigrant from the Muslim nation of Kuwait.
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing the President to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration. The Mayor of Nashville has launched a New American Advisory Council to help facilitate the legally-sanctioned transition from the previous inhabitants of Nashville to the new ones.

Pew Research has estimated that immigration will cause the population of U.S. Muslims to more than double over the next two decades—from 2.6 million in 2010 to 6.2 million in 2030. This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.
Read more: Breitbart

THE MUSLIM HOUSE: Here’s What The White House Celebrated the Day of TN Shooting
This will make you sick to your stomach.
President Barack Obama sent a celebratory message to Muslims around the world on the White House Twitter account nearly two hours before his first tweet on the subject of four dead Marines killed by an Islamic gunman.
“From my family to yours, Eid Mubarak!” —@POTUS to Muslims celebrating Eid-ul-Fitr,” the White House tweeted. This message was tweeted at 4:48 p.m. according to the White House Twitter feed.
A few minutes before the posting of this article, the White House tweeted a video message, shown below, calling the shooting in Chattanooga, Tennessee, a “heartbreaking circumstance.” Others might call the incident “a terrorist attack.” This message was tweeted at 6:08 p.m. according to the White House Twitter feed.
Read more: Breitbart

German Chancellor says NO WAY to Gay Marriage

Gay Barack Obama funny pictures


Can it really be that the United States has become more culturally liberal than Europe?
Maybe not all of Europe, but in Germany gay marriage is still not legal, and if you ask their leader Chancellor Angela Merkel, it shouldn’t ever be.
During a YouTube interview with popular German media figure Florian “LeFloid” Mundt, Merkel reiterated the stance that she has articulated for years -- that marriage should always be between “a man and a woman.” 
“I’m someone who is very supportive of us eliminating all discrimination. We have come a long way; when I remember, 25 years ago, many people didn’t dare to say that they are gay or lesbian. I’m someone who is very supportive of us eliminating all discrimination. We have come a long way; when I remember, 25 years ago, many people didn’t dare to say that they are gay or lesbian 

For me, personally, marriage is a man and a woman living together. That is my concept, but I support civil partnerships.
I am for registered civil partnerships. I am for our not having any discrimination in tax legislation. And wherever we still find discrimination, we will continue to dismantle it… I don’t want discrimination and [I want] equality, but I make a difference at some point."
This is not a new position for Chancellor Merkel, who, way back in 2012 said something remarkably similar.
"I personally want to preserve the privileged tax position of marriages because our constitution envisions marriage and family as being directly related and both are placed under the special protection of the institutional framework.
At the same time I think it is correct for us to have provided the same rights in some areas to registered homosexual partnerships as marriage, like in inheritance taxes or in public services law."
Here’s the video of the interview between Merkel and LeFloid – but if you can’t speak German you won’t be able to understand a word of it! 

Instead you may want to read about it at the Independent. 

Obama’s Blood-Soaked Hands: Giving the Bomb to a Modern-Day Hitler


“This agreement is a tragedy for all who aspire for regional stability and fear a nuclear Iran. . . .  This evil regime employs terror, funds terror, arms terror and disseminates terror across the world.  The agreement signed with Iran will only serve to further support this bloody enterprise.”  —Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Rewarding “Death to America” Zealots
President Barack Hussein Obama has now succeeded in getting world leaders to agree to a nuclear deal with Iran.  Obama went forward with the deal, regardless of the fact that the Ayatollah Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, has encouraged cries of “Death to America!” from Iran’s political leaders on a daily basis throughout the long months of negotiations.  It is as if Iran, in a perverse way, wanted to say to America, “Don’t say we didn’t warn you!”

Iran’s Ongoing Legacy of State-Sponsored Terrorism
Iran is the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism.  This is not only true, but it will be even more true once the financial sanctions against Iran are lifted, allowing the regime to spend even more towards funding Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terror groups around the globe.  Ayatollah Khamenei has said that, once sanctions are lifted, he will step up his efforts to wipe Israel off the map.  He has also said that Iran’s efforts against America will continue.

Putin Praises Obama’s Deal with Iran
Vladimir Putin loves the Iran deal, and, in fact, has even taken partial credit for it.  “The deal on [the] Iran nuclear program is based on the approach articulated by President Vladimir Putin,” according to a tweet by the Russian Foreign Ministry Tuesday.  Putin also let it be known that the Kremlin’s relations with Iran will no longer have to be “influenced by external factors.”  Russia, it would seem, has plans to benefit from the nuclear deal, because of how much power and autonomy it gives Iran, which, in turn, makes Iran an ally with much more to offer the Russians than before the deal was struck.
Iran and Russia are the main supporters of the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria, and both regimes also oppose the policies of Saudi Arabia.  With a stronger partner in the Middle East, Putin can devote more resources to pursuing his geopolitical goals in Eastern Europe.

History Echoes: the Iran Deal Is the Treaty of Hudaibiyyah
Iran Nuke DealLess than two years after making a ten-year peace treaty with the city of Mecca, known as the Treaty of Hudaibiyyah, Muhammad returned with an army and conquered the city.  When Muhammad made the treaty, he was not strong enough to take Mecca, so a treaty was to his advantage.  But when, at last, it became to Muhammad’s advantage to break the treaty, Allah gave Muhammad permission to break it, because doing so was to the advantage of Islam.  Thus, treaty-breaking is good, if it becomes advantageous to Islam to do so.  And Iran, as an adherent to Sharia Law, also practices taqiyya—sacred lying—when making agreements with non-Muslims, in order to gain advantages. 

The Jihadist Scorpion and the Infidel Bullfrog: A Cautionary Tale
A Jihadist Scorpion and a non-Muslim Bullfrog stood on the bank of a wide river.  They were keeping a safe distance from one another.  But then the Scorpion spoke: “I need to cross the river but cannot swim.  I need a ride.”
“But, Scorpion, taking you on my back would be my death,” replied the Bullfrog.  “After all, you are a Scorpion with a deadly sting and a suicidal ideology. My life would be needlessly lost.”
To this, the Scorpion responded, saying, “But this agreement is to our mutual benefit.  I love to praise Allah and wish to live.  Anyway, our truce must endure for only ten minutes.”
So the Bullfrog was convinced: “Okay, then.  Get on my back.  We shall cross together!”
Two minutes into the crossing, the Bullfrog felt the deadly prick of the Scorpion’s stinger.  “What have you done?” he asked.  “Now we both shall drown!”
“It’s my nature,” said the Scorpion, in a matter-of-fact tone.  “And while you love Life, I am, in fact, in love with Death.  Now I go to Paradise.  Allahu akbar!”
Moral to the Story: Making nuclear arms treaties with doctrinaire Muslims bodes ill for the preservation of life.

Peace in Our Time?
Although President Obama claimed the deal will prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons, giving us peace in our time, so to speak, Israeli leaders—who know the enemy well and are more realistic about the deal—are saying it would actually serve to guarantee the emergence of a nuclear Iran.  Indeed, the deal has become weaker over time, becoming worse with each passing month of negotiation.  The final terms are nothing less than disastrous.
The terms of the agreement stipulate that the Iranian regime must limit nuclear enrichment for eight years, which is down from the ten-year term originally promised by Obama.  And the Iranian regime must limit its research, agreeing to international oversight, even with respect to its facility at Fordow, which had been considered illegal but will now be allowed.  And what if there are other illegal facilities, unknown to us at present?  What happens in terms of monitoring such facilities?

Lifting Sanctions: Iran Receives a Bonanza to Spend on Murder and Terror
Under the deal, international sanctions will be dropped, and it will become very difficult to institute new ones, since no new sanctions are to be applied without a special dispute resolution process that is to be put in place to protect the Iranians.  Iran will grant very restricted access to international inspectors who wish to visit nuclear sites, and, incredulously, no visit can be made on demand, but, in most cases, two weeks’ notice must be given!  This is plenty of time to allow portable assets to be moved and hidden.  If Iran breaks any terms of the agreement, with regard to these inspections, nothing happens, unless a legal case is first fully heard and arbitrated by a Joint Commission.  Iran will be represented on the Commission, and, if Iran loses a case, sanctions cannot be re-imposed, unless the infraction is judged to be a case of “significant non-performance.”

The Broken 60-Day Promise
Iran-nuclearThe nuclear agreement says that the UN Security Council is to take up the issue of sanctions relief “without delay,” even though this breaks President Obama’s word that he would give the US Congress 60 days to review any agreement, before any of its terms might go into effect.  Of course, this is the same president who lied to Americans by saying that “if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, period!”  So, what the president has managed to do is this: he has basically started the lifting of economic sanctions, without approval of any of its terms by the Congress, per his promise to the American people. 

Iran’s Vows Continued Conflict
The Islamic Republic of Iran is broadcasting, on its airwaves, claims that Iran has been given permission, by treaty, to continue to build Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles, which they are doing, in order to achieve the means by which they will attack Israel and America.
Right up to signing the treaty, Iran would not back off its promise to destroy Israel, once the treaty is approved.  It has also said that its goal of destroying the Great Satan—America—is non-negotiable.  So, to be clear, Iran has not promised to be peaceful; in fact, they are pledging to do just the opposite: All sponsored terrorism will continue.
The Quds Force, headed by Qasem Suleimani—Iran’s Heinrich Himmler—will eventually see their sanctions also lifted.  This is like telling Hitler there will be no more sanctions against his SS (Schutzstaffel).

The Two Sides of Obama’s Mouth
Out of one side of his mouth, President Obama said, “I welcome a robust debate in Congress on this issue, and I welcome scrutiny of the details of this agreement.”  But from the other side of Obama’s mouth came this warning: “I will veto any legislation that prevents the successful implementation of this deal.”  So, which is it?  The first statement implies that his administration has done its best to arrive at a deal, and now it is up to Americans—through their representatives in the Congress—to decide whether or not they like it.  The second statement, however, refutes the notion that Americans should decide the fate of America with regard to such an important matter.  The veto, according to Obama, will happen as a matter of course.

Terms of the Deal Read all about the Iran nuclear deal, right here. Get out your spectacles.  It is over 150 pages of read

Thursday, July 16, 2015

Pastor Delivers Must Read Sermon to the Five Liberal Justices on Gay Marriage!

Good news everyone! Just in time for Pride, the Supreme Court struck ...
... underway in obergefell v hodges the supreme court case which will very
[Pretty much sums up the mentality/arrogance of SCOTUS on gay marriage eh'] 
oped: I'm sorry but gay sex is just a fetish not true love not worthy of marriage...for the life of me I cannot understand why a guy would want another guy shoving his ding dong up his butt...and why women put on dildos resembling a mans ding dong and go at it...just weird imo!

Pastor Douglas Wilson of Moscow, Idaho is a brilliant apologist, theologian, home school advocate and pastor who routinely engages the world in the most important topics of our day. This past week he delivered a stunning sermon that is a must read for anyone who has any interest in the recent Supreme Court decision forcing gay marriage on our nation. Titled “A Sermon for Five,” Pastor Wilson dissects the bad Supreme Court ruling using logic, Scripture and the God-given rights enshrined within our Constitution and the Bill of Rights. He expertly argues the right side of the debate and tears down many problems inherent within the argument laid out by the liberal Supreme Court justices. 

There is a lot of great information here, and it is an extremely important piece.

A Sermon for Five by Douglas Wilson at Blog & Mablog: Theology that Bites Back.
Written decisions of our Supreme Court justices are called opinions. Justices who differ with the majority may write a dissenting opinion. But in contrast to all such opinions, the Scripture requires preachers to declare the very oracles of God (1 Pet. 4:11). This is a responsibility that no man should ever take up lightly, and so even the apostle Paul himself cried out, “Who is sufficient for such things?” 

Momentous subjects should humble us. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court wrote in his dissent, “Just who do we think we are?” (Roberts, p. 3). This is a question that every mortal ought to ask far more frequently than we do, and yet, despite our objective unworthiness, God has called some men to speak the rising sun of His Word, however much the darkening clouds are gathering, and however much those clouds might think they are here to stay.
Consequently, in light of the Obergefell decision, a message taken from the pages of God’s Word must be declared to five justices of the Supreme Court, the five who voted with the majority in this decision. These were the five who vainly declared that there is a somehow a possibility of a genuine marriage occurring between two members of the same sex. 

While this sermon is directed to you as office holders, it is a message declared in the open, in the public square, and so all others are also invited to hear and heed. I am speaking specifically to Justices Kennedy, Kagan, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Breyer, but I summon all other Americans to take these things to heart as well. I call upon citizens of other nations to hear these words, and to pray for us. I thank the dissenting justices for their insights and faithfulness, calling upon them to remain faithful. And I call the mountains, rivers, oceans, lakes, and skies—all of which remain securely normal, just as they were created to be—to bear witness to this testimony against our nation’s legal corruption and rationalized descent into abnormal folly and sin. 

The Text:
Hear the text of Scripture. These are the words of God.
“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them” (Gen. 1:27). 

A Summary of Scriptural Teaching:
As Justice Thomas noted in his dissent, our form of government was established in a recognition that God alone is the source of our rights. The State does not create or bestow our rights, but rather is solemnly charged to defend and protect them. In order to do this, the State must submit to a reality outside itself. As Justice Thomas put it, our nation began with “a vision in which all humansare created in the image of God and therefore of inherent worth” (Thomas, p. 17, emphasis mine). That sentiment is fully in accord with Scripture and is a truth that is found in the first pages of Scripture. And, as we see in our text, this imago Dei is inextricably tied in with the fact of our creation as male and female. Just as a violin and bow are one instrument, and a lock and a key are one mechanism, and scissors are one tool, so also mankind created as male and female is one image. And as the Lord Jesus said in His teaching on this longsuffering subject of marriage, what God has joined together, no man should presume to put asunder (Matt. 19:6). What God has engineered may not be re-engineered by us… 

Take Down Darwinism and Planned Parenthood . . . Not the Confederate Flag

Planned Parenthood

The real ideological and historical danger to blacks in this country has been Charles Darwin and Margaret Sanger, not Confederate memorabilia. While blacks want all memories of the Confederacy removed from sight, it’s the godless doctrine of evolution and the racist origin of Planned Parenthood that are a greater danger because they are rooted in false science raised to the level of scientific dogma.
In the 1925 "Scope's Trial," the defendant John Scopes taught from "an approved school text called A Civic Biology by George Hunter."1 The book is a rehearsal of "Darwinism's social implications. In particular, chapter seventeen discusses the application to human society of "the laws of selection" and approves the eugenic policies and scientific racism common in the United States at the time." 

"Hunter believed that it would be criminal to hand down 'handicaps' to the next generation and regarded families with a history of tuberculosis, epilepsy and feeblemindedness as 'parasitic on society.' The remedy, according to Hunter, is to prevent breeding."2 

Here's how Hunter put it:
“If such people were lower animals, we would probably kill them off to prevent them from spreading. Humanity will not allow this, but we do have the remedy of separating the sexes in asylums or other places and in various ways preventing intermarriage and the possibilities of perpetuating such a low and degenerate race.”3
Darwinian evolution validated the eugenics movement by giving it scientific legitimacy. The same was true about entrenched ideas concerning race. "Hunter believed that the most evolved of the 'races of man' is that of 'the civilized white inhabitants of Europe and America,' which is 'the highest type of all.'"4
The full title of Darwin's 1859 defense of evolution was On the Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Darwin's supporters claim that his use of the word "races" was meant to describe subspecies of animals. To a certain degree, this is true. But what did Darwin mean by "subspecies"? Didn’t we evolve from animals, actually, from less than animals? What if Darwin thought of non-whites as "subspecies" of not so evolved animals?

In his evolutionary sequel, The Descent of Man, Darwin wrote:
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes . . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”5
Darwin believed that the various races were at different evolutionary stages, all distant from the apes, with Blacks at the bottom and Caucasians at the top.
Thomas H. Huxley, an ardent defender of Darwin who garnered the nickname "Darwin's Bulldog," believed that "No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average negro is the equal, still less the superior, of the white man." Huxley described whites as "bigger-brained and smaller-jawed."6
According to Raymond F. Surburg, Richard Hofstadter, in Social Darwinism in American Thought, demonstrated "that Darwinism was one of the chief sources of racism and of a belligerent ideology which characterized the last half of the 19th century in Europe and America. . . ."

Modern-day evolutionists will argue that evolutionists are not by definition racists or Darwin and Huxley were men of their times. The same can be said for those who were not slave owners or sons and daughters of slave owners and do not hold racist views but view the Civil War a criminal overreach in order to end slavery and oppress and control the South. 

Then there’s Margaret Sanger, the founder of today’s Planned Parenthood. Steve Deace's "Planned Parenthood: The next relic from our racist past that must be purged,"has this to say about additional misplaced outrage:
“While we’re busy exhuming the remains of Nathan Bedford Forrest in a progressive effort to purge our politically correct culture from all vestiges of its past racism, I’d like to humbly suggest the next target for cultural cleansing. 
I’m sure it’s just an oversight by our friends on the Left that this particular target was overlooked for their hit-list. That’s despite the fact it’s arguably the most viciously racist of them all. So many racists, so little time I always say. Still, I’m obviously infected with white privilege (that has never actually given me anything), and even I can see this is the next relic from our racist past that must be purged. 

“I’m speaking of Planned Parenthood.
“Since 1973, Planned Parenthood has helped execute 13 million black babies before they were born. That’s more than 20 times the total number of Union soldiers the racist Confederate army killed, wounded or captured during the entire Civil War. If the carcasses of all the black babies Planned Parenthood has killed and dismembered were its own state, it would be the 5th-most populous state in the nation.
“That, my dear comrades, is a lot of dead babies.
“And this systematic extermination of black America isn’t some random coincidence, but rather a well-coordinated plot that dates back to the death merchant’s original founder. 

Sanger left behind a documented legacy of racist screeds. Long before Democrats got a former grand wizard of the KKK named Robert Byrd elected to the U.S. Senate, Sanger proudly proclaimed the following:
  • “(We) are seeking to assist the white race toward the elimination of the unfit (blacks).” (Birth Control and Racial Betterment, 1919)
  • “Birth Control to create a (white) race of thoroughbreds!” (Subhead to Sanger’s magazine The Birth Control Review)
  • “We are paying for and submitting to an ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings (blacks) who never should have been born at all. That our wealth is being diverted from the progress of human civilization … Our eyes should be opened to the terrific cost to the community of this dead weight of (black) human waste.” (The Pivot of Civilization, 1922)
  • “Birth control is not contraception indiscriminately and thoughtlessly practiced. It means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extirpation of defective stocks–those human weeds (blacks) which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.” (New York Times interview, 1923) 

  • “I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan … I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses … I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak … In the end, through simple illustrations (explaining the problems with inferior races), I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.” (Margaret Sanger: An Autobiography, 1938)
Sanger established her first full-service ‘clinic’ in Harlem in 1929. Why Harlem? Because, silly, that’s where a lot of the black people she often referred to as ‘human weeds’ lived. Sanger described it as ‘an experimental clinic established for the benefit of the colored people.’ In this case, she defined ‘benefit’ as the overall reduction of the black population.” 

Deace concludes his assessment of Sanger’s racist views with this:
Sanger and Planned Parenthood should be purged, just as they’ve tried to purge an entire race for decades. I’d suggest exhuming her remains as well, but given the extremely warm place where she’s likely spending eternity it may not be worth the added expense.”
The problem for those who profit from black outrage is that there's no profit in taking on the Darwinists and the abortionists.


10 Horribly Violent Crimes That Were Committed By Illegal Immigrants

Sanctuary cities,” those illegal immigrant safe harbor towns that ...
[Sanctuary cities,” those illegal immigrant safe harbor towns]

Yes, illegal immigrants are responsible for lots of crime in this country. In recent years, nearly 1000 illegal immigrants have been convicted of committing sex crimes against children in the state of Texas alone. And as you will read about below, illegal immigrants have a murder rate that is 3 to 10 times higher than the general population. So anyone that suggests that illegal immigrants don’t commit more crime than the rest of us is simply lying to you. Unfortunately, even though we could prevent thousands upon thousands of violent crimes by securing our borders, the Obama administration refuses to do so and it has become very politically incorrect to even talk about this. Every single day, American citizens are being murdered and raped by people that should not be in this country and yet nobody is supposed to address this issue. No wonder our nation is in the process of self-destructing. The following are 10 horribly violent crimes that were committed by illegal immigrants… 
#1 An illegal immigrant that had been deported five times recently gunned down a young woman that was taking a walk with her father on a pier in San Francisco
Kate Steinle was walking on a busy pier in San Francisco with her father when there was a single popping sound in the air.
She fell to the ground, struck by a bullet, the victim of what police say appears to be a random killing.
The man accused of firing the deadly shot — 45-year-old Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez — is an undocumented immigrant, a repeat felon who has been deported five times to Mexico, according to immigration officials.

#2 An illegal immigrant has just been arrested for abducting a 13-year-old Florida girl and repeatedly raping her
On Thursday, Michigan police arrested a Mexican illegal alien, 23-year-old Aurelio Hernandez-Gomez, after finding him with a 13-year-old Florida girl who had last been seen two days before her ordeal.
Cops acted on a tip that led them to a Hartford home where Hernandez-Gomez hid the girl while assaulting her.

#3 Earlier this year, an illegal immigrant in Alabama was arrested and charged with sodomizing a 10-year-old girl
An illegal immigrant was arrested Monday in Alabama after sexually assaulting a young girl.
According to reports, Ramiro Ajualip, a 27-year-old who entered the country illegally, was accused earlier this week of raping a 10-year-old girl on Feb. 27 while he was living with the child’s family.
Ajualip was charged with first-degree rape and first-degree sodomy, which are both Class A felonies in Alabama and carry with them sentences ranging from 10 years to life in prison with parole a possibility if convicted, according to a local report.

#4 While taking refuge in the “sanctuary city” of Philadelphia, one illegal alien decided that it would be a good idea to attack and rape a 26-year-old doctor as she walked home from work
Living and working in sanctuary, Mr. Garcia last month, according to police, approached a 26-year-old Philadelphia doctor who was walking to her home in the city’s fashionable Rittenhouse Square neighborhood after a night out with friends. He is accused of forcing the woman into her apartment and raping her repeatedly.
Police said Mr. Garcia then stole the victim’s cellphone and rode away on his bicycle. In perhaps not the smartest of moves, Mr. Garcia kept the victim’s smartphone in his possession. Police said they found him, in part, by calling the phone and locating its signal.

#5 In Arizona, an illegal immigrant that had been deported six times has just been charged with a hit-and-run. It turns out that the vehicle that he hit contained a young mother and her two very young children
A six-time-deported illegal immigrant is charged in the felony hit-and-run of an Arizona mother and her two young children. The man allegedly admitted to being high on marijuana while causing the severe lacerations to a five-year-old boy. The five-year-old and a two-year-old were both taken to an area hospital.

#6 In Porterville, California a drunk illegal immigrant plowed through a fence and killed a 3-year-old girl that was standing in line for ice cream
An illegal immigrant driving drunk and without a license crashed through a fence Sunday, hitting and killing a 3-year-old girl as she was waiting in line for ice cream in Porterville, California.
Adolf Balbuena, 18, mowed down the toddler, Angeles Moreno, as she and several others, including an 8-year-old boy, were waiting line at an ice cream truck.
After hitting Moreno, Balbuena backed up and drove away. He was arrested at his home around an hour later, the Fresno Bee reported.
#7 Down in Laredo, Texas an illegal immigrant that had been deported four times confessed to murdering his wife with a hammer
Breitbart Texas has exclusively confirmed that a man who confessed to murdering his wife with a hammer in Laredo, Texas is a four-time deported illegal immigrant who would not have been in the U.S. had he not been able to illegally cross back into the country multiple times from Mexico after his deportations. In addition, the Laredo Police Department continuously encountered the man in violent episodes with his wife, yet did not notify Border Patrol, according to federal agents who spoke with Breitbart Texas on the condition of anonymity.

#8 In DeLand, Florida a 27-year-old Mexican immigrant that is here illegally has been charged with raping a woman that cannot hear or speak
A 27-year-old Mexican man is locked up after police charge him with raping a woman who cannot hear or speak.
Juan Corona-Martinez (picture courtesy Volusia County Jail) of Becca Lane in DeLand is held on $50,000 bond following his arrest on Friday.
The DeLand Police Department says they were called out to Florida Hospital DeLand on November 19th when a 37-year-old woman told a friend she had been raped by Corona-Martinez.

#9 Earlier this year, a 29-year-old illegal immigrant killed a convenience store clerk in Phoenix over two packs of cigarettes
Apolinar Altamirano, 29, an unauthorized Mexican illegal alien DREAMer, has been arrested for the January 22, 2015 first-degree murder of Phoenix Quick Trip store clerk Grant Ronnebeck, 21.
Altamirano is accused of shooting Ronnebeck and stealing two packs of cigarettes after the clerk demanded payment before giving Altamirano any cigarettes.
The murder was recorded on the store’s security camera and police captured Altamirano after a high speed chase in Phoenix. Altamirano had previous run-ins with local police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In 2012, he pleaded guilty to facilitation to commit burglary and got probation but was placed in deportation proceedings.
Before the murder of Ronnebeck, Altamirano was released on a $10,000 bond in 2013 from ICE custody despite the defendant’s own claims of ties to the Mexican Mafia.

#10 Not too long ago, three members of the MS-13 street gang forced a 16-year-old New York girl into the woods and took turns brutally raping her
Three MS-13 street-gang members from El Salvador are being held without bail on charges they forced a 16-year-old New York girl into the woods near a golf course, and two of them raped her while the third kept watch.
“This is one of the most brutal, heinous crimes that I have seen in a long, long time,” Suffolk County District Attorney Thomas Spota said at a news conference, according to New York’s WNBC-TV. “This poor young woman is so lucky that, quite frankly, that she is alive. These are vicious young men, vicious young men, and what they did to her was absolutely terrible.”
Spota, who said the attack was “barbaric,” identified the suspects as 17-year-old Jose Cornejo, 18-year-old Bryan Larios and 17-year-old Joel Escobar. All three of the MS-13 gang members, who are from El Salvador, were arrested May 29 just hours after the attack. They are being charged as adults.

According to Democrats (and some Republicans), we should not be too concerned about crimes such as these because the general population commits crimes at about the same rate.
But when they tell you that, they are flat out lying to you. The following numbers come from a recent American Thinker article
Let’s take homicide as an example. The GAO estimates “criminal aliens” were arrested, convicted and incarcerated for 25,064 homicides. If non-citizens committed them over seven years, the annual rate would be 14.2 per 100,000 non-citizens. If illegal aliens committed them over four years, the annual rate would be 58.0 per 100,000 illegal aliens. Either way you compute, those are high rates.
By comparison, the FBI reports the murder rates for the entire U.S. from 2003 through 2009 varied from 5.0 to 5.8 per 100,000 inhabitants for an average rate of 5.5. To be clear, 5.5 is much lower than either 14.2 or 58.0.
Or look at the total number of homicides in those years. Per the FBI, there were 67,642 murders in the U.S. from 2005 through 2008, and 115,717 from 2003 through 2009. Per the GAO, criminal aliens committed 25,064 of them. That means they committed 22% to 37% of all murders in the U.S., while being only 3.52% to 8.25% of the population.
Conclusion: criminal and illegal aliens commit murder at much higher rates than all inhabitants of the U.S. – at least 3 to 10 times higher.

We desperately need to secure our borders, but most of our politicians are against doing that because they believe that it would be bad for them politically.
So hardcore criminals, drug runners, gang members and sex offenders are going to continue to pour into this country. And what makes things even more infuriating is that there are hundreds of “sanctuary cities” that have rolled out the red carpet for them. If you can believe it, many of these sanctuary cities actually have a practice of releasing illegal immigrants with criminal records back into our communities rather than turn them over to the feds…
Some 276 “sanctuary cities,” nearly 50 percent more than previously revealed, released over 8,000 illegal immigrants with criminal records or facing charges free despite federal requests that they be turned over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement for deportation, according to an explosive new report.
The Center for Immigration Studies, revealing new numbers it received under the Freedom of Information Act, said that those releases from cities that ignored federal demands came over just eight months and are just part of an even larger release of 17,000 illegals with criminal records.

And of course the Obama administration has been releasing violent criminals back into our communities as well. This is a huge scandal that hardly anyone is talking about. In a previous article, I discussed how the Obama administration released more than 36,000 convicted criminals back on to our streets in one recent year alone
Why has Barack Obama been releasing thousands of illegal immigrants that have been convicted of crimes back on to the streets of our cities? According to U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, more than 36,000 were released from custody in Fiscal Year 2013 alone. These individuals were actually convicted of committing crimes, and many of them went on to commit new crimes once they were released by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In fact, Senator Grassley says that 121 of the criminals that were released during Fiscal Year 2013 were subsequently charged with committing murder. That means that more than 100 American citizens are now dead because of Obama’s foolish policies. Why is Obama doing this? He knows that one out of every five illegal immigrants has a criminal record, and he knows that many of these convicted criminals that he is releasing will go on to commit new crimes. What possible justification could Obama have for doing this to our communities? 

If we do not secure our borders and we continue to release convicted criminals back into our communities instead of deporting them, a lot more innocent people are going to get raped and murdered.
The families of those that have already been murdered can never get their loved ones back.
Those that have been brutally raped can never erase what has been done to them.
But we could prevent many future violent crimes if we were just willing to take some common sense measures to protect our citizens.
So why won’t our politicians do something?
Please feel free to share what you think by posting a comment below…


Obama’s Historic Lies

Iran Obama
Power without accountability in action. I called it all in my 2010 book, The Post American Presidency. Obama’s remarks today were not merely dishonest, they were duplicious. he lied. Big, bald-faced lies. And the media, his organ grinder’s monkey, delivers it unchallenged to a clueless American public.
Photo: Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif waves the nuclear deal on the balcony of the Palias Coburg in Vienna

iran laughing
Weighing the Arguments for an Iran Deal – WSJ
Iranian President Hasan Rouhani, a supposed reformer, spent last Friday marching prominently in the regime’s yearly “Death to America, Death to Israel” parade. If there is evidence of an Iranian trend toward moderation it behooves proponents of a deal to show it.

Omri Ceren nailed it when he said, ” It’s not that the concession wouldn’t be devastating – it would light up the region in so many different ways that they’re difficult to catalogue – but it just doesn’t seem possible that the Americans can give ground on this. What’s the sales pitch to Congress going to be? “Not only are we giving Iran $150 billion to bolster its military, but we’re also lifting arms restrictions to make it easier for them to buy next-generation cruise missiles they’ll use against the U.S. military and our allies.”

The Mullahs and ballistic missiles.
Iran wins $18 billion in sanctions relief, By Cheryl Chumley, WND, July 14, 2015
Obama ‘just lit a fuse for a nuclear arms race’
President Obama in a 7 a.m. news conference, during which he looked directly into the lens of the cameras, said: “This deal demonstrates that American diplomacy can bring about real and immediate change. … Today, because America negotiated from a position of strength and principle, we have stopped the spread of nuclear weapons in this region.”

Just the opposite is true. We caved on everything and set off a nuclear arms race in the region.
He said the forged deal is a win-win, and assured “every pathway to nuclear weapon is cut off.”
Among its specifics he cited: Iran is halted from producing highly enriched, nuclear grade plutonium; Iran will have to remove two-thirds of its centrifuges and store them under constant supervision; Iran can’t use its centrifuges for the next ten years; and Iran will have to modify its reactor in Iraq so it can’t produce weapons grade plutonium.”
Obama also guaranteed U.N. weapons inspectors would have access to visit Iran’s military sites and check for compliance with the deal.
Just the opposite is true. We caved on everything and set off a nuclear arms race in the region.
He said the forged deal is a win-win, and assured “every pathway to nuclear weapon is cut off.”
Among its specifics he cited: Iran is halted from producing highly enriched, nuclear grade plutonium; Iran will have to remove two-thirds of its centrifuges and store them under constant supervision; Iran can’t use its centrifuges for the next ten years; and Iran will have to modify its reactor in Iraq so it can’t produce weapons grade plutonium.”
Obama also guaranteed U.N. weapons inspectors would have access to visit Iran’s military sites and check for compliance with the deal.
(2) The sanctions regime will be shredded – the AP revealed at the beginning of June that the vast majority of the domestic U.S. sanctions regime will be dismantled. The Lausanne factsheet – which played a key role in dampening Congressional criticism to American concessions – had explicitly stated “U.S. sanctions on Iran for terrorism, human rights abuses, and ballistic missiles will remain in place under the deal.” That turns out to have been false. Instead the administration will redefine non-nuclear sanctions as nuclear, so that it can lift them. The Iranians are boasting that sanctions against Iran’s Central Bank, NIT Co., the National Iranian Oil Company, and 800 individuals and entities will be lifted. That’s probably exaggerated and a bit confused – CBI sanctions are statutory, and will probably not be getting “lifted” – but the sense is clear enough.

(3) The U.S. collapsed on the arms embargo – Just a week ago Dempsey told the Senate Armed Services Committee that “under no circumstances should we relieve pressure on Iran relative to ballistic missile capabilities and arms trafficking.” Now multiple outlets have confirmed that the embargo on conventional weapons will be lifted no later than 5 years from now, and that the embargo on ballistic missiles will expire in 8 years. No one in the region is going to wait for those embargoes to expire: they’ll rush to build up their stockpiles in anticipation of the sunset.

(4) The U.S. collapsed on anytime-anywhere inspections – The IAEA will get to request access to sensitive sites, the Iranians will get to say no, and then there will be an arbitration board that includes Iran as a member. This concession is particularly damaging politically and substantively because the administration long ago went all-in on verification. The original goal of the talks was to make the Iranians take physical actions that would prevent them from going nuclear if they wanted to: dismantling centrifuges, shuttering facilities, etc. The Iranians said no to those demands, and the Americans backed off. The fallback position relied 100% on verification: yes the Iranians would be physically able to cheat, the argument went, but the cheating would be detected because of an anytime-anywhere inspection regime. That is not what the Americans are bringing home.

(5) The U.S. collapsed on PMDs – This morning the Iranians and the IAEA signed a roadmap for a process that would see Tehran eventually providing access for the IAEA to clear up its concerns. This roadmap differs in no significant way from previous commitments the Iranians have made to the agency, except now Tehran will have received sanctions relief and stabilized its economy. Administration officials will have to look at lawmakers and nonetheless promise that this time the Iranians will give the IAEA what it needs.

“This deal is not built on trust,” Obama said. “It is built on verification. Inspectors will have 24-hour access to Iran’s key nuclear buildings.”
But a senior nuclear official said if IAEA inspectors must first petition Iran for permission to visit the sites 14 days in advance.
In return, Iran gets $18 billion in international sanctions’ relief. Obama said the sanctions’ relief will be phased in, as verification of compliance with the accord is achieved.
The deal also includes a caveat that if Iran fails to disable its centrifuge machines within 65 days, the sanctions go back in place.
What’s sure to be a controversial sticking point on Capitol Hill and in Israel especially is the facet of the deal that allows for Iran to stall IAEA inspectors from accessing suspected sites.
Critics are already lining up, saying the $18 billion gives Iran an open door to continue its terror activities around the world. And Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Nebraska, called the accord a path for Iran to develop nuclear weapons.
“Sadly the administration just lit a fuse for a nuclear arms race in the Middle East,” he said in a statement. “[It] allows for controlled nuclear proliferation.”

Iran has already positioned itself to take advantage of the sanctions relief. In the hours leading up to the announced deal with the six world powers, Tehran’s biggest oil-shipping company was already prepping to hit the European and international markets, as WND previously reported.
Obama said the deal will be solidified with a U.S. Security Council resolution, after Congress and the American people have a chance to review it. He also issued a warning, telling Congress that while he welcomes members’ input and discussion, a failure to approve the plan would leave the world in peril.
“Consider what happens in a world without this deal,” he said. “No deal means a greater chance for more war in the Middle East. … It would be irresponsible to walk away from this deal. I welcome robust debate in Congress on this issue … but I veto any legislation that prevents the successful implementation of this deal.”

Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking from Vienna, Austria, assured the deal would clamp Iran’s ability to enrich uranium well below the level needed to manufacture a weapons. He also said Iran’s Fordow site will be “transformed into a nuclear physics and technology center” that will be “subject to daily inspection.”
Kerry, like Obama, also spoke of the verification benefits and confirmed the sanctions’ relief only starts when Tehran meets key conditions of the accord.
“This agreement has no sunset,” Kerry said. “Inspectors will be able to gain access to any [facility] the IAEA … deem suspicious.”

16 reasons nuke deal is an Iranian victory and a Western catastrophe
Has Iran agreed to ‘anywhere, anytime’ inspections, an end to R&D on faster centrifuges, and the dismantling of its key nuclear sites? No, no, and no 

By David Horovitz, Times of Israel, July 15, 2014
The agreement legitimizes Iran’s nuclear program, allows it to retain core nuclear facilities, permits it to continue research in areas that will dramatically speed its breakout to the bomb should it choose to flout the deal, but also enables it to wait out those restrictions and proceed to become a nuclear threshold state with full international legitimacy. Here’s how.
1. Was the Iranian regime required, as a condition for this deal, to disclose the previous military dimensions of its nuclear program — to come clean on its violations — in order both to ensure effective inspections of all relevant facilities and to shatter the Iranian-dispelled myth that it has never breached its non-proliferation obligations? No. (This failure, arguably the original sin of the Western negotiating approach, is expertly detailed here by Emily B. Landau.) Rather than exposing Iran’s violations, the new deal solemnly asserts that the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which Iran has failed to honor “remains the cornerstone” of ongoing efforts to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. The deal provides for a mechanism “to address past and present issues of concern relating to its nuclear programme,” but Iran has managed to dodge such efforts for years, and the deal inspires little hope of change in that area, blithely anticipating “closing the issue” in the next few months.

President Hassan Rouhani making a statement following announcement of the Iran nuclear deal, Tuesday, July 14, 2015 in Tehran. (Press TV via AP video)
2. Has the Iranian regime been required to halt all uranium enrichment, including thousands of centrifuges spinning at its main Natanz enrichment facility? No. The deal specifically legitimizes enrichment under certain eroding limitations.
3. Has the Iranian regime been required to shut down and dismantle its Arak heavy water reactor and plutonium production plant? No. It will convert, not dismantle the facility, under a highly complex process. Even if it honors this clause, its commitment to “no additional heavy water reactors or accumulation of heavy water in Iran” will expire after 15 years.
4. Has the Iranian regime been required to shut down and dismantle the underground uranium enrichment facility it built secretly at Fordow? No. (Convert, not dismantle.)
5. Has the Iranian regime been required to halt its ongoing missile development? No.

A satellite image shown on Israel's Channel 2 news, January 21, 2015, said to show a new long-range Iranian missile on a launch pad outside Tehran. (Channel 2 screenshot)

6. Has the Iranian regime been required to halt research and development of the faster centrifuges that will enable it to break out to the bomb far more rapidly than is currently the case? No. The deal specifically legitimizes ongoing R&D under certain eroding limitations. It specifically provides, for instance, that Iran will commence testing of the fast “IR-8 on single centrifuge machines and its intermediate cascades” as soon as the deal goes into effect, and will “commence testing of up to 30 IR-6 and IR-8 centrifuges after eight and a half years.”
7. Has the Iranian regime been required to submit to “anywhere, anytime” inspections of any and all facilities suspected of engaging in rogue nuclear-related activity? No. Instead, the deal describes at considerable length a very protracted process of advance warning and “consultation” to resolve concerns.
8. Has the international community established procedures setting out how it will respond to different classes of Iranian violations, to ensure that the international community can act with sufficient speed and efficiency to thwart a breakout to the bomb? No.
9. Has the Iranian regime been required to halt its arming, financing and training of the Hezbollah terrorist army in south Lebanon? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.)
10. Has the Iranian regime been required to surrender for trial the members of its leadership placed on an Interpol watch list for their alleged involvement in the bombing, by a Hezbollah suicide bomber, of the AMIA Jewish community center offices in Buenos Aires in 1994 that resulted in the deaths of 85 people? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.)
11. Has the Iranian regime undertaken to close its 80 estimated “cultural centers” in South America from which it allegedly fosters terrorist networks? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.)

Iranian protesters burn an Israeli flag during a demonstration to mark al-Quds (Jerusalem) Day in Tehran on July 10, 2015. (AFP/ATTA KENARE)
12. Has the Iranian leadership agreed to stop inciting hatred among its people against Israel and the United States and to stop its relentless calls for the annihilation of Israel? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.)
13. Has the Iranian regime agreed to halt executions, currently running at an average of some three a day, the highest rate for 20 years? No. (This kind of non-nuclear issue was not discussed at the negotiations.)
14. Does the nuclear deal shatter the painstakingly constructed sanctions regime that forced Iran to the negotiating table? Yes.
15. Will the deal usher in a new era of global commercial interaction with Iran, reviving the Iranian economy and releasing financial resources that Iran will use to bolster its military forces and terrorist networks? Yes.
16. Does the nuclear deal further cement Iran’s repressive and ideologically rapacious regime in power? Yes.
No wonder Iran and its allies are celebrating. Nobody else should be.