Saturday, June 4, 2016

Obama Is The Most Radical Pro-LGBT President In U.S. History

oped: Alrighty then this old Vn era Veteran who grew up during Happy Days/American Graffitti  when boys were boys and girls were girls no confusion and whos Dad & Uncles fought during WWII against Germany,Italy and Japan has had enough of this draft dodging perverted CIC/ POTUS...he is nothing new just a redax of Hitlers Brown Shirts SEE: 

Barry Barack would have us all believe that a dude poking another dude in the butt is love as well as a gal strapping on a dildo and satisfying her partner is somehow normal and deserving of equal rights and marriage.
I beg to differ...don't get me wrong I really don't care what consenting adults do in private...they can indulge in their fetishes to their hearts desire...just don't try to shove your preference down my throat..lest I guarantee I will fight especially when you take it to the schools and try to force this crap on my kids and grandkids! 
I grew up when music made sense...not like all this crap of today when four letter words, hate and perversion, are glorified agendas... 
Have a listen when music was normal and artist were talented !   


By Michael Ware 

There is no way to avoid seeing things differently. We, being human and sinful, are going to have things upon which we disagree. Those who hold to the same confession of faith will find themselves at odds over an issue. But, it has gone well past this when we look at what the President has done.

Christian News reports
As the most vocal president in American history in regard to homosexuality and transgenderism, Barack Obama issued on Tuesday his eighth annual proclamation calling upon Americans to “celebrate diversity” in observing June as “LGBT Pride Month.”
“Since our founding, America has advanced on an unending path toward becoming a more perfect Union,” he wrote in his lengthy proclamation, which praised advocates who seek to change the nation’s laws for homosexual causes.
Once again Obama is trying to connect the fight for equal rights with the fight to normalize sodomy. It is an attempt to make the LGBT movement the same cause as that of Martin Luther King Jr. And for what purpose?

Obama wishes to make this sinful sexual practice accepted by society, even as this acceptance has led to more health issues among the same group. But Obama wants to frame this as a fight for inclusion.
Christian News continues
“The fight for dignity and equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people is reflected in the tireless dedication of advocates and allies who strive to forge a more inclusive society,” Obama said. “They have spurred sweeping progress by changing hearts and minds and by demanding equal treatment—under our laws, from our courts, and in our politics.”
Therefore, he said, “This month, we recognize all they have done to bring us to this point, and we recommit to bending the arc of our Nation
toward justice.”

How can we speak of justice while calling for a celebration of lawbreaking (Rom. 1:24-32)? Is this not an oxymoronic approach to this issue?

DEAR AMERICA: Guess What Historical Figure Also DISRUPTED Opponent’s Rallies With VIOLENCE?

Here’s a BIG eye opener and a great history lesson for those who are siding with the disrupter’s and rioters at Trump’s rallies.
Please forward this to all the Anti-Trump mob sympathizers that you know:

oped: Indeed and what people don't know is Hitlers *Brown Shirts* were the original #LGBTQ movement! 


Hillary’s FIRST Email Scandal was in ’98 0h my...

Note: The New York Post wrote about Project X, but didn’t mention any details about it. Below tells the full story (with links) of the very first Clinton email scandal.
During Bill Clinton’s tenure in the White House a “glitch” (or person) turned off the automatic email archiving system causing the loss of of roughly one million emails. The emails just “happened” to disappear while special prosecutor Kenneth Starr was subpoenaing emails for the Monica Lewinsky scandal and congress was asking for emails because it was investigating the “Filegate” scandal.
The lost emails just “happened” to be Bill Clinton’s and others being investigated in the above scandals; and the people who discovered the missing emails were threatened with jail if they spoke about them.
Read the full story at

Judge Claims Obama Might Testify In Investigation of Hillary’s E-Mail Scandal


Judge Andrew Napolitano just dropped a major bombshell about Hillary’s email scandal: a major witness could be called in to testify against Clinton …
None other than the Commander-in-Chief himself, President Barack Obama.
Napolitano believes that some of the top secret and classified material on Clinton’s server had to involve exchanges between the former Secretary of State and the President.
Napolitano predicted that the investigation will be concluded fairly soon, with Clinton’s own interview taking place after Tuesday’s New Jersey and California primaries.
He refuted Clinton’s claims that she’s looking forward to the interview, saying, “She can’t be possibly be looking forward to it.”
The rest of the country is certainly looking forward to it.
Via the Daily Caller:

Judge Andrew Napolitano believes there’s a possibility of President Barack Obama being subpoenaed to testify against Hillary Clinton as part of the investigation into her use of email while secretary of state.
Appearing on Fox News’s “Shepard Smith Reporting” on Tuesday, guest host Harris Faulkner asked if Obama could be subpoenaed to testify against Clinton, to which Napolitano replied, “I am fairly confident that some of those top secret e-mails that Mrs. Clinton sent and received came from and went back to the president. If he didn’t know where they were going and if he’s not a witness in this case, I don’t know who else might be.”
Napolitano went on to say that the investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server and a private email account while secretary of state “is about to come to an end.”
“As soon as the New Jersey and California primaries are over on Tuesday, she will have her interview. She says she’s looking forward to it. She can’t be possibly be looking forward to it. They know a lot more about this case, the people interrogating her than she does.”
Judge Napolitano has previously said “the evidence of her (Clinton’s) guilt is overwhelming,” adding he is “100-percent certain” that the FBI has enough evidence to indict and convict.
Can you imagine if President Obama’s possible testimony played a role in that?

Cross-posted at The Political Insider

State Dept. Drops BOMBSHELL About Cover-Up… They Were ORDERED To Do It

BREAKING: State Dept. Drops BOMBSHELL About Cover-Up…
Little more than a month ago, senior Obama adviser Ben Rhodes let slip, either unwittingly or braggadociously, that he and others had essentially lied to the media and American people about the Iran nuclear deal in order to advance the administration’s narrative.
This admission raised a number of questions regarding the truthfulness of prior statements from Obama officials about the deal, compelling some to go back and check archived video of past press conferences, which in turn led to the discovery that a pertinent exchange during a 2013 State Department press conference had been edited out of the record.
That edit of an exchange between Fox News reporter James Rosen and then-State spokeswoman Jen Psaki, in which she admitted with a wink and a nod that the administration lies to keep certain information private, was initially dismissed as nothing more than a “glitch.”

However, it has now been admitted by spokesman John Kirby that the edit was no glitch, but a deliberate erasure of the record on orders from on high in the administration.
Speaking to the crew of Fox’s “The Five,” Rosen said it was “significant” that the administration effectively admitted to lying about covering up a prior admission of lying.
“I think this is a significant moment insofar as we have the United States government essentially admitting here that its spokespeople lied from the State Department podium, that they then admitted that from the State Department podium, and then tried to cover up that admission by deleting the official archive of this material, and so I’m honored to play some small role in holding our public officials to account, and we’ll see if this is the end of it,” Rosen explained.

However, the new-found truthiness of at least one member of the Obama administration only went so far, for while Kirby admitted that the edit to the tape had been ordered, he claimed not to know who had given that order.
Rosen and the rest weren’t buying that excuse, though, with Rosen surmising, “If you remember being asked to do it, you probably have a very good chance of remembering who asked you to do it.”
“The Five” co-host Dana Perino, former spokeswoman for the Bush administration, thought Rosen was too nice in his assessment of the situation, saying, “I think that their explanation falls well short of acceptable, because one, it is a violation of the Federal Records Act. It has to be.”

This administration lies, the lies about lying, then lies about lying about lying. Then, on the rare occasion that it actually slips up and tells the truth, it quickly reverts to lies and subterfuge to counteract and cover up the truth with more lies and deception.
This from the “most transparent administration in history” no less.
H/T Washington Free Beacon

Michelle Obama: I Wake Up Each Day in House Built By Slaves

oped: May I suggest Michelle Obama as well as Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is educate themselves on US History 101 /Slavery

“I really want you all to know that there is a reason why, of all of the colleges and universities in this country, I chose this particular school in this particular city for this special moment,” Michelle Obama told the graduates of the City College of New York.

"And, graduates, it’s the story that I witness every single day when I wake up in a house that was built by slaves, and I watch my daughters –- two beautiful, black young women -– head off to school — (applause) — waving goodbye to their father, the President of the United States, the son of a man from Kenya who came here to America — to America for the same reasons as many of you: To get an education and improve his prospects in life. Michelle Obama also made a reference to presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump by saying “some folks” don’t value the diversity that City College embodies. Trump has promised to build a wall at the border between the United States and Mexico and has proposed banning Muslims from entering the U.S. 

Progressives Can’t Deal with the Truth – So They Plan to Stifle Debate and Ignore the First Amendment
by Nicholas Wishek 

It didn’t make much news at the time, but on May 19th the Portland School Board decided to ban any classroom materials that cast doubt on climate change. The resolution requires that textbooks and other material purchased by the district present climate change as a fact rather than theory, and to present human activity as one of the main causes. One of those testifying in the hearing said, “It is unacceptable that we have textbooks in our schools that spread doubt about the human causes and urgency of the crisis.” Now, few of the ‘climate change deniers’ are actually disputing that climate changes. Of course it does. Heck, there were glaciers as far south as St. Louis during the last ice age! What we are saying is that if climate has changed in the past long before any possible influence by human beings could account for it, why are we so certain climate is changing now primarily from human activity now? 

Naturally, progressives don’t want to debate the issue rationally and honestly. Instead they resorted to the kind of tactics they always use. They ridiculed and called those who disagreed with them names. They use the repeated lie technique whereby if you tell a lie often enough people will eventually believe it. To an extent they have succeeded, but not enough people are worried enough about climate change to allow them the kinds of draconian measures they want to impose on the country. So to advance their policies, they now want to totally shut down any debate at all. The Portland School Board will not be the only liberal minded school board to ban contrary opinions.

That’s bad, but it gets even worse. Back in March Attorney General Loretta Lynch admitted that the Justice Department is considering legal action against climate change deniers. In fact, Fifteen state attorney generals plus the attorney generals of the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands have banded together to subpoena records of fossil fuel producers and climate change deniers. New York Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman said, “The bottom line is simple: Climate change is real.” He then said that if companies are committing fraud by “lying” about the dangers of climate change, they will “pursue them to the fullest extent of the law.” This is no different than the Nazi’s burning books that the government deemed unsuitable.

The truth is that the question of to what extent man is causing climate change is not an established or proven fact. It should be investigated, but progressives don’t dare allow honest debate because the facts aren’t on their side. That doesn’t matter to them because man caused climate change is the equivalent of an article of faith to them. Climate change proponents have a pretty poor track record of climate change predictions. During the first Earth Day back in 1970 one of the predictions was, “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000.

This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” Didn’t happen. What about the Al Gore film, An Inconvenient truth? It’s been ten years since it was released. His track record is equally bad. Sea levels aren’t rising. Polar bears aren’t dying out, rather they are increasing in number. The Arctic isn’t melting. The Sahel is not drying, it is gaining flora. The list is long and as time goes by will like become even longer. All the computer models are no better than the information that goes into them and have an equally bad prediction record. 

Government should not be involved in scientific debate. When those in power dictate what to believe the results are not good. Consider what happened to Galileo Galilei, when he went against the politically correct idea of the times that the earth was the center of the universe. He was investigated by the inquisition and came close to being executed for heresy. He was forced to recant his beliefs and wound up spending the rest of his life under house arrest. A more recent example of the problems that can arise from politicians interfering with real science was the support of the theory of eugenics in the late 19th and early 20th century. As with global warming, many prominent people of the time supported the idea that the human race needed to “purify” our genetic gene pool. Those deemed unfit were sterilized or worse. The Nazis were the biggest supporters of eugenics going so far as exterminating those deemed unworthy by the state.

The progressive desire to shut down opposition and penalize those they disagree with is flat out dangerous to our freedom of speech, but unless saner heads prevail we will have no honest discussion on issues like man caused climate change because those who do dissent will be silenced.

Friday, June 3, 2016

Are All Democrats This Clueless About the Declaration of Independence?

Image result for funny picture declaration of independence

And for the low info college student voters...simplified for your consumption: Image result for funny picture declaration of independence

oped: Democrat Louisiana lawmaker Barbara Norton needs a lesson in US History 101 re: Slavery and the democrat party...she hasn't a clue...typical of the low information voter/politician just rants and raves without taking the time to research the issue ! Let me educate the looney progressive Ms. Norton


It seems that Louisiana State Rep. Barbara Norton, D-Shreveport, doesn’t understand history or the Declaration of Independence. During a debate about a bill that would require schools to teach students about America’s founding documents, Norton objected– basing her argument on her misunderstanding of history or the legal document that founded America and its subsequent jurisprudence. She said:

“Representative Hodges, I’m not really sure what your intent is, but one thing that I do know is all men are not created equal.
“When I think back in 1776, July the fourth, African-Americans were slaves. And for you to… you to bring a bill to request that our children will recite the Declaration, I think it’s a little bit unfair to us to ask those children to recite something that’s not the truth.”
“You don’t think that all men are created equal?” asked. Rep. Hodges. She responded:
“For you to ask our children to repeat the Declaration stating that all mens are free… I think that’s unfair. In 1776, Dr. King was not even born. He was not even… African-Americans were in slavery. So, since they were in slavery, and the Declaration of Independence say we were all treated eq-… we were all created equal, we were not created equal because in 1776, July the fourth, I nor you nor any of us were born, nor was Dr. King born, so we were in slavery, and to have our children to repeat… to repeat again and again documents that was not even validated(4), I don’t think that that’s fair because we’re teaching them a lie.”

A post at RedState accurately suggests that Dr. King had nothing to do with the Declaration of Independence and asks if Norton believes King freed the slaves. Is she entirely ignorant about the Revolutionary War and the Civil War?
Worse still– she refutes her own reasoning, criticizing slavery for being morally wrong, yet at the same time argues “all men are not created equal.” The entire point of equality stems from creation, not manmade laws. Slavery is only repugnant because all men were created equal by God.
Listen to her remarks:

H/T Joe Newby at

California Goes Full Fascist – Outlawing Global Warming Skeptics and their Guns!

 oped: Indeed and may I add Onan :

by Onan Coca 
The nuttiest state in the Union has long been known for the insanity that seeps out of Hollywood and Sacramento, but this past week California outdid itself with the crazy. 

It’s not been a banner week for California. The nuttiest state in the Union has long been known for the insanity that seeps out of Hollywood and Sacramento, but this past week California outdid itself with the crazy.
First, the California state Assembly rammed through several bills which would enact even more restrictive laws/regulations on gun rights, criminalizing the mere possession of unserialized firearm parts, banning the purchase of more than one firearm in a month, allowing your boss, teacher, or therapist to secretly take away your RIGHT to self-defense, banning guns with a bullet button, and allowing the state to send harassing mail to legal gun owners!

Yes, you’d only be allowed to buy one gun a month because the ninnies in Sacramento think that that is enough. Yes, your boss, teacher or therapist could go behind your back and tell the government to take your guns and that would be enough for the government to do it. No if’s and’s or but’s from you. All of the measures are completely unconstitutional and un-American, and their penalties are absolutely Draconian.
These idiotic new laws would be enough to paint the California Assembly as the most fascist legislature of the week, but they didn’t stop there. No, they decided that undermining the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights wasn’t enough. They also chose to launch an all-out assault on the 1st Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech as well.

gun control2The first-of-its-kind legislation — Senate Bill 1161, or the California Climate Science Truth and Accountability Act of 2016 — is scheduled for floor action Thursday after clearing Senate committees in April and May.
The measure would allow state and local prosecutors to pursue claims against climate-change skepticism as a violation of the state’s Unfair Competition Law [UCL], as well as extend the four-year statute of limitations for such claims retroactively to Jan. 1, 2021.
“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” says the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis. 

Yes, you read that right. California is planning to make it illegal for you, your business, or anyone else, to disagree with the liberal opinion on man-made climate change/global warming. ILLEGAL. Over at the California Political Review, Stephen Frank puts this into perspective and explains what this bill really is.
“Did you donate to the Pacific Legal Foundation?  Do you support Americans for Prosperity?  Are you a member of the California Republican Party, which has a platform approving of all forms of energy, including fossil fuel (oil)?  Do you work for a gas station, an oil company, have your written a letter to the editor in favor of oil drilling?  If so, you could find yourself with being charged in a court of law, thanks to SB 1161… a totalitarian statement by Democrats that the First Amendment is now dead.” 

If you actually believe that the progressive left in America today is the same Democrat left that existed 50 years ago, you are simply fooling yourself. The generation that fought for civil liberties and less government interference in their lives have apparently either died off or gone completely senile in their drunken quest for power. The hippies who used to advocate for more “freedom” are now the very same people clawing and scraping to unburden you from your liberty. Today’s Democrat Party has more in common with the totalitarian excesses of the Soviet Union, or Mao’s China.
This may be happening in California, but if liberals have their way, they’ll soon be coming for the rest of us and our freedoms as well.

Ilya Ilf’s 1935 quote may have actually been a prophecy…
Ilya Ilf

For more on this travesty of justice go read Jeff Dunetz at the Lid


Dalai Lama Warns ‘Too Many Muslim Refugees’ …Obama Shocked


Dalai Lama Says Europe Has Accepted ‘Too Many Refugees’
The Dalai Lama suggests that the immense flow of indefinitely housed refugees into Europeans countries is a bad idea. 

“When we look into the face of every single refugee, especially the children and women, we can feel their suffering,” the Tibetan spiritual leader commented.
“A human being who is a bit more fortunate has the duty to help them,” he continued. “On the other hand, there are too many now.” The Daily reported that he was laughing at the time, aware that his comments would appear shocking to many. The Dalai Lama went on to say:
“Europe and America Cannot Become Arab Countries.”
“From a moral point of view too, I think that the refugees should only be admitted temporarily,” he concluded. “The goal should be that they return and help rebuild their countries.” 

President Obama cannot be happy about this challenge to his actions. When the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism is saying we have overextend our compassion, you know we have gone too far.
We also know that Obama respects the spiritual leader and has called him “a powerful example of what it means to practice compassion” and one who “inspires us to speak up for the freedom and dignity of all human beings.”
Should Obama Listen To The Dalai Lama?  

Watch Obama Throw Up On Himself As He Attempts Trump Take-down

Image result for funny pictures obama lame duck

oped: Barry Barack Obama has gone beyond the Lame Duck phase of his presidency he is now in the self destruct mode! Oh and Barry if'n ya are going to borrow one of my wasn't *Okey Doke* it was "Okie Dokie" Here I will give you another one to chew on and stutter with ' Theory without fact is hypothesis...fact without theory is chaos' You sir, used loosely, are pure chaos!


Watch Obama Throw Up On Himself As He Attempts Trump Take-down
On the campaign trail for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, President Barack Obama attempted to regale the Democrat faithful in Elkhart, Indiana with his silk-tongued verbal prowess.
Instead, he stuttered and stammered to find words. And then he stuttered some more, groping his way through his speech.
It needs to be seen and heard to be appreciated. And enjoyed. Obama, in mid-if!

ALERT: Something Disturbing Was Just Found Out About The Judge In Trump University Case


Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has made headlines for months claiming that the GOP primary process was a rigged game favoring establishment insiders.
This week, a discovery about the federal judge overseeing two of three big lawsuits against Trump and the defunct real estate training program that bore his name has the billionaire’s supporters claiming the legal system has been rigged against him, too.
And whatever the real story is behind the now-defunct “Trump University” and its practices, the news about Judge Gonzalo Curiel should raise flags for anyone — especially when the disposition of the lawsuit could make a real difference in the election of the next American president.

Curiel was appointed to the federal bench in 2012 by President Barack Obama, the same president who elevated Sonia “the wise Latina” Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. U.S. District Court Judge Curiel is also a noted member of a Hispanic advocacy group called “La Raza Lawyers of San Diego” — an activist organization that recently awarded a law school scholarship to an illegal alien, according to the Daily Caller. 
Of course, federal judges have to be appointed by the president, and it’s not Curiel’s fault that president happens to be Barack Obama (about 69 million misguided Americans who voted for Obama the first time can be blamed for that). And as an American citizen born in Indiana, the California jurist has a right to be a member of any group he damn well pleases.
But for a judge with such a public profile opposing Trump’s stand on illegal immigration to be presiding over a major legal case with the potential power to damage Trump’s campaign has to raise questions.

And there appears to be little doubt about where Curiel stands on illegal immigration — he seems to have no problem with it. He was on the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego’s selection committee that chose to award an illegal immigrant with a scholarship.
Trump and his legal team say Curiel should step aside from the Trump University case.
“We’re in front of a very hostile judge,” Trump told a campaign rally in San Diego last week. “The judge was appointed by Barack Obama, federal judge. Frankly, he should recuse himself because he’s given us ruling after ruling after ruling, negative, negative, negative.”
Curiel’s “La Raza Lawyers of San Diego” tried to downplay its political side in a statement to the Daily Caller on Wednesday.

“Our organization has not been involved in organizing any of the anti-Trump rallies, much less encouraged our members or anyone to participate in any illegal activity,” the statement said. “We help empower Latino attorneys, judges and law students, and provide services to the greater local Latino community.”
Leave aside the obvious untruth here (since giving a scholarship to an illegal alien doesn’t just “promote” illegal activity, it pays for it). The idea that Donald Trump can get a fair shake from an activist judge with a current membership in a legal group that supports illegal immigration is more than a little hard to believe.
But as Trump noted, this judge was appointed by Barack Obama, a president whose disdain for law, the United States Constitution and the judiciary showed through when he used a snarling State of the Union address to attack the Supreme Court itself back in 2010. And his ends-justifies-the-means approach has only gotten clearer with every day, and every executive order, since.

That means it’s not just hard to believe for a lot of people that Trump will get a fair shake in court. It’s impossible.
Check out some of these social media comments.

Exasperated with the White House? How about Americans who elected the guy who lives there?

Actress and Fox News Host Stacey Dash reveals she was raped at gunpoint

Image result for stacey dash

oped: This is why I like Stacey...she is open and honest and addresses the issues based on logic not emotions a good trait!

Fox News contributor and actress Stacey Dash explained her position on guns and why she was so passionate about her Second Amendment rights, but her Hollywood counterparts won’t like it one bit.
In an interview with People magazine on Wednesday, Dash, 49, revealed that a gun saved her life nearly 25 years ago after an ex-boyfriend raped her.
Dash said she was in a physically abusive relationship with that man for years. During her relationship, he often beat her.

Related Stories

“I was so starving for love, that I held on. Some of the time he took care of me, and I got (beaten up) in order to have those moments,” the Clueless actress said.
After the couple broke up, the ex-boyfriend still stalked her. Even after she had another man’s baby, the ex still came around and even raped her.
“He had a gun to my head and I thought, ‘My son is in that crib right there,'” Dash said. In that moment, she thought, “‘No, you are not going to do this. My son’s life was more important to me than my own.'”

When her attacker came back, she was ready for him with a gun. She fired several shots at him, but missed.
“I wanted to kill him,” she admitted, but the gun did what she wanted it to do — it scared the thug away.
Dash explained that her right to bear arms made all the difference in the world when it came to protecting herself from a person with evil intent.
“A gun saved my life,” she said. “That’s why my Second Amendment right will not be taken away from me.”

Dash did what any other right-thinking individual, man or woman, would do in her situation — she fought back.
So many people — not just women — agree with Dash’s perspective on the issue. Put simply, guns save lives. A gun can become especially handy when a thug thinks he can attack a women just because he thinks she is defenseless.
Anyone exercising their right to bear arms doesn’t need to fear for their life or safety.
H/T The Washington Times
Share this story and let us know what you think about Dash’s perspective on guns.

Thursday, June 2, 2016

BREAKING: Home Depot Co-Founder Makes Stunning Announcement About Trump

Image result for The Home Depot co-founder Bernie Marcus

In an op-ed piece for RealClearPolitics, The Home Depot co-founder Bernie Marcus said he was supporting Donald Trump, arguing that another four years of liberal policies could ruin the country.
“As a backer of former Republican presidential candidates, I now stand in support of Donald J. Trump because the fate of this nation depends upon sending him, and not Hillary Clinton, to the White House,” Marcus wrote in the Wednesday piece.
“I know Donald Trump, but we’re not close friends,” he explained. “However, I believe he will begin on Day One undoing the damage done by President Barack Obama. I stand ready to help him at every turn.”

Marcus’ first priority is making sure that the Supreme Court does not veer dangerously leftward.
“Like many, I am deeply concerned about the U.S. Supreme Court. When Trump recently released his list of potential appointees, I grew confident in his resolve to keep our court balanced,” Marcus wrote. “Even more important: Clinton will push the court leftward for generations. She must be stopped.”
He also said that the left’s anti-business policies would wreak further havoc on our economy.

“I genuinely believe that if we to started The Home Depot today, we would fail because of the hurdles government, especially the current administration, places in front of small business owners. I never forget The Home Depot’s small business roots — we started as a small business with four stores in Atlanta, Georgia,” he wrote.
“I think of the banker who nearly lost his job by taking a risk and giving us a line of credit when we started. He didn’t just look at our balance sheet; he believed in our character and determination. Government regulators don’t allow this under Dodd-Frank — a law Hillary Clinton wants to make far worse.
“Yet the risks we took in the 1970s have resulted in millions of jobs — not just at The Home Depot, but at our suppliers, our vendors, and even our customers’ businesses. Investors believed in us, and the government did not stop us.

“We could not do this today, for the same reason why so many Americans have dropped out of the workforce, why their wages have been stagnant, why their health care is a mess, and why our economy has stalled. It’s Obama/Clinton-style government that’s getting in the way.”

Marcus also included a message to anti-Trump elements within the Republican Party.
“One of the greatest lessons we took away from The Home Depot is to always listen to your customers. Without their input, we surely would have failed. Republican leaders must listen to their customers, too — their voters — and they have spoken clearly,” Marcus wrote.
“Make no mistake, Republicans who refuse to stand behind their party’s nominee are electing Clinton, whether they cast their ballots for her or not. I have a message for the #NeverTrump crowd: Enough already. Donald Trump is our presumptive nominee and it is time to get over wishing it were not so. If you don’t, change your social media hashtag to #HillaryGOP,” he continued.

“As a GOP donor who stood steadfastly behind Jeb Bush — and who has contributed to candidates for a generation — I urge all Republicans to stand up and be counted in support for Donald Trump.”
H/T Breitbart
Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter if you support Marcus’ endorsement of Donald Trump.

UCLA Shooter Identified

Image result for Mainak Sarkar
    Image result for Mainak Sarkar
Image result for Mainak Sarkar 

by: AAN Staff
Initial press reports suggested that the UCLA shooter was a "six foot white male." The LA Times reports:
The gunman who shot and killed a UCLA professor Wednesday has been identified as Mainak Sarkar, a former doctoral student who had accused the victim of stealing his computer code and giving it to someone else, according to Los Angeles police.

Sarkar, 38, took his own life after killing William Klug, 39, in a small office in UCLA Engineering Building 4, sources confirmed. The Los Angeles County coroner’s office on Thursday did not identify the shooter, although it did confirm the victim’s identity Thursday morning.

Klug was an associate professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering and had been the target of Sarkar’s anger on social media for months. On March 10, Sarkar called the professor a “very sick person” who should not be trusted.  

Image result for Mainak Sarkar

“William Klug, UCLA professor is not the kind of person when you think of a professor. He is a very sick person. I urge every new student coming to UCLA to stay away from this guy,” Sarkar wrote. “He made me really sick." Your enemy is my enemy. But your friend can do a lot more harm. Be careful about whom you trust.”

 A source called the gunman’s accusations “absolutely untrue.”  
“The idea that somebody took his ideas is absolutely psychotic,” the university source said.
Many are alleging that Sakar is a Muslim, but this has yet to be confirmed. But once again, the media narrative that unhinged, Christian white men bitterly clinging to their guns and religion are running around the country shooting people with machine guns is totally false.

 Source: AAN

Revealed! Clinton gave ZERO to veterans’ charities

After months of being on the defensive, Hillary Clinton thought she had found the perfect way to break Donald Trump’s connection with the voters: accuse him of lying about his multi-million dollar donation to veterans’ charities.
She went all out this week, hiring more than a dozen veterans to protest outside Trump Tower and demanding the media press Trump about whether he ever donated the proceeds of his January 28 fundraiser in Iowa to vets.
But the attack ricocheted.
The only thing it exposed is the fact that Donald Trump gave more than 50 times as much money to America’s fighting men and women in one night than Hillary Clinton did in eight years.
In fact, over the past few years Clinton apparently has given ZERO to veterans’ charities. That’s especially curious — and insulting — given that Clinton was planning a presidential run and knew that her tax records would be released.

In an unforgettable press conference on Tuesday, in between calling reporters “dishonest” and “a sleaze,” Mr. Trump had an admission to make. He had fallen just shy of the $6 million in donations to vets he had previously announced. Instead, he collected $5.6 million for America’s fighting men and women – including $1 million of his own money.
“Find out how much Hillary Clinton’s given to the veterans,” Trump challenged reporters. “Nothing.”
As it turns out, it wasn’t quite nothing – but not by much.
Hillary Clinton’s campaign told the New York Times on Wednesday she had donated a paltry $105,000 to veterans groups between 2006 and 2012. They did not document any donations since.
The Clintons are reportedly worth at least $110 million.

These funds came, not from the Clinton Foundation – which Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel called a “charity fraud” – but from the smaller Clinton Family Foundation.
That’s less than two percent of what Donald Trump donated to vets in one fundraiser.
In fact, at least nine of the grants he made to 41 veterans groups from the Iowa fundraiser exceeded the $110,000 Clinton contributed to vets over eight years.
That doesn’t include tens of thousands of dollars the Donald J. Trump Foundation has given vets in the last few years on its own.
Clearly on the defensive on CNN, Hillary told Jake Tapper that “of course” she had “given money to veterans charities,” and that she and John McCain had raised money for fallen veterans – the Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund – which Mr. Trump also gave $175,000. She pointed to votes she had taken as a senator that “increased benefits to veterans and their families.”

But combat veterans have a keen sense for sizing up someone quickly deciding whether that person is friend or foe. And they know exactly where Hillary Clinton stands.
In his 1969 draft letter, Bill Clinton confessed to “loathing the military.” He cut defense spending by roughly 25 percent – while increasing the useless skirmishes and “peacekeeping actions” Americans fought in Somalia, Haiti, and Serbia, among others.
If anything, Hillary is more hawkish and more ideological than Bill.
Trump, who attended military school, said he always felt a close kinship with enlisted men. His budget proposal would give them the tools and freedom to do their job. And his foreign policy would assure they weren’t sent into harm’s way unnecessarily.
The dollar figures are just one more illustration of which candidate is really on the veterans’ side.
— The Horn editorial team

Iran gloats: Obama “surrendered” to us

The left continues to praise the unconscionable deal President Barack Obama struck with the “death to America” chanting Ayatollahs of Iran, claiming the pact will help promote peace.
But inside Tehran, the hardline terror-backing Islamist leaders are already telling another story.
They’ve declared VICTORY over the United States, claiming that the president has SURRENDERED to Iran!
“There was a time when enemies would not accept even a single centrifuge inside Iran, but they finally surrendered in the face of Iran’s nuclear might,” said Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader handpicked by the madman Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. “In fact, it was not the Americans who gave (us) this concession; we got it with our own power.”

The nuclear deal is barely a year old and there are already signs the Iranians have no intention of living by the letter of the law.
Under the deal, sanctions are lifted, Iran gets some $100 billion in frozen assets and the country can resume selling oil on the world market.
In return, the country didn’t have to give up its nuclear program – which is clearly focused on building a bomb – but just live with easy-to-undermine U.N. inspections.
Already, there are signs Tehran is doing its best to evade inspectors and hide its true intentions, with key information already missing from the reports.
“Without this information, an independent determination of whether Iran is complying with (the agreement) is not possible,” the watchdog group Institute for Science and International Security said in a statement.

The group then blasted International Atomic Energy Agency, which is supposed to be ensuring compliance, for either falling asleep on the job… or quite possibly covering up Iran’s true activities.
“If the IAEA is unwilling to provide routine and adequate transparency, can it be trusted to be transparent every time a violation occurs?” the statement said. “It is in fact unclear if the IAEA has reported all the violations thus far. It also appears that the IAEA is not reporting information relevant to loopholes in the agreement that Iran is exploiting.”
And that’s not the only way Iran has become emboldened.
The clueless media is celebrating a push to throw ISIS out of the Iraqi city of Fallujah – but ABC News reports that the forces moving in have been dominated by Iranians, including the notorious Quds Force and Islamic Revolutionary Guards.
Iran could end up controlling large portions of Iraq by proxy, allowing it to take indirect control over that nation’s oil fields to raise even more cash to finance its nuclear program and fund Hezbollah.

And that means its next move is almost inevitable.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned in May that Iran is “preparing another Holocaust.”
The world has ignored his warnings in the past. Will they listen this time?
— The Horn editorial team

Anthony Weiner inserts F-bomb into Trump name

Image result for Anthony Weiner gay pride parade

The following excerpt is from an article that originally appeared on WND 
Anthony Weiner, the former congressman from New York whose political star lost its shine during a series of social media sexual messages, emerged from the shadows cast by his high-powered wife, Hillary Clinton confidante Huma Abedin, to slam Donald Trump on Twitter with a childish F-bomb mock – as a “F-face Von Clownstick.”
His exact words?
The ‘Stop Hillary’ campaign is on fire! Join the surging response to this theme: ‘Clinton for prosecution, not president’
They came in reference to a poll that showed Clinton beating Trump by three percentage points.
And they read: “If we are gonna test fanciful hypothetics, how does HRC do against F*ckface Von Clownstick?” 

Yes indeed Tony Weiner runs on the #LGBTQ platform...'Weiners for all! 

    Image result for Anthony Weiner gay pride parade
Image result for Anthony Weiner gay pride parade     Image result for Anthony Weiner gay pride parade
Image result for Anthony Weiner gay pride parade  Image result for Anthony Weiner gay pride parade  

He then included a link to a tweet from Chris Jansing,…
Click here to Read this Entire Story on WND