Saturday, August 8, 2015

Those who live in glass houses:Megyn Kelly vs Donald Trump


oped: I am not going to take sides on this issue..both are equally guilty...people really need to take notice of two old sayings of which applies to us all!
"Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones" and as Jesus once said : 'He who is without sin...caste the first stone' Enough said eh'?  This also applies to the looney left and the Obama administration et al

Side Note...Megyn Kelly also said on the Howard Stern show...
 he and Kelly played the age-old game, "Marry, F*ck, Kill" -- in which you're given three names and have to say which one you'd have sex with, which one you'd marry, and which one you'd kill (there are various forms of the game).
Stern presented Kelly with Fox News' three biggest names: Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity.
Her answer?
She'd have sex with Bill O'Reilly, marry Sean Hannity, and kill Glenn Beck.
...hmmm really now so is that how she was promoted so fast on Fox News...dunno but sure sounds like it! Slept with horn dog Bill,chasing Sean Hannity and trashed Glenn Becks show?

Donald Trump Was Right about Megyn Kelly and Here Is the Proof 

Donald Trump was disinvited from a prime speaking role to an important gathering of conservative activists on Friday for his criticism of Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly after a combustible debate performance. As for the vacant spot at the Red State gathering, Red State chief Erick Erickson has invited Kelly to replace Trump. Kelly replacing Trump was a fair judgment in Erickson's view for saying "blood coming out of her … whatever." The comment stirred up a hornets nest. Well, found a five-year-old interview of Megyn Kelly when she was climbing up the ladder, not minding to get on the Howard Stern Show to gain fame while allowing Stern to discuss with her every sort of smut including her private sex live, which is supposed to be sacred. She laughs and is okay with Stern discussing penises and breasts in a very trashy, nonchalant way. Listener be advised:  

Read more: Shoebat for the old video recording on the Howard Stern Show

Compare this to Trump's remark:


Donald Trump was right, Megyn Kelly is a wretch and a vulgar low life. Donald Trump posted on his Twitter that the biggest loser was Meghan Kelly:
"@RubenMMoreno: @realDonaldTrump The biggest loser in the debate was @megynkelly. You can't out trump Donald Trump. You will lose!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 7, 2015

Trump's blood comment could have meant that blood was coming out of her ears, nose … whatever. Even if Trump was saying that Kelly must have been on her menstrual cycle, it's a comment men usually use.
Kelly, who found the opportunity to gain ratings on the Howard Stern show, which was popular at the time, did not object to whatever smut Stern wanted to discuss with her and she did not mind having this utterly disgusting conversation.
Erickson said he had disinvited Trump from the event because of what he described as "demeaning" remarks about Kelly and, instead, invited the trashy Kelly, since she was one of Fox's highest profile anchors, to attend his conference in Trump's place. Erickson said in a Facebook statement that in a CNN interview, Trump said of Kelly: "You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes. Blood coming out of her wherever." "His comment was inappropriate," said Erickson. What utter hypocrisy.

Friday, August 7, 2015

NEW BFFs: Guess Which Toxic Celebrity Family Hillary Hung Out With Last Night

Screen Shot 2015-08-07 at 10.55.38 AM
Hillary Clinton and this family are like two peas in a pod as they’re both poisoning America.
Hillary Clinton made her third swing through Los Angeles since announcing her presidential bid, to raise money at the Brentwood home of Scooter Braun, manager to Justin Bieber and Ariana Grande, and his wife Yael Cohen.
The sold-out early evening event drew about 250 people, at ticket prices of $2,700 per person, giving her campaign another shot of cash. Early evening arrivals included Kim Kardashian and Kanye West, according to two attendees, along with Kris Jenner, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Jessica Alba and Cash Warren, Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson, Usher, Jason Collins and Mary Steenburgen, a longtime friend of the Clintons. Also there was Los Angeles District Attorney Jackie Lacey, Rep. Tony Cardenas (D-Calif.) and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.).
Read more: Variety
Here are the Instagram pictures posted by Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner: 



Screen Shot 2015-08-07 at 10.37.42 AM
The feds tried to come after this veteran’s firearm, but Idaho residents are not going to let that happen.
A group of residents in northern Idaho lined up outside a U.S. Navy veteran’s house on Thursday to protest claims that federal officials are planning on confiscating the man’s weapons.
Idaho Republican state Rep. Heather Scott of Blanchard said the Veteran Affairs office has sent a letter to John Arnold of Priest River warning him that he cannot possess or purchase firearms. 

The protest — spearheaded by Scott — attracted roughly 100 people. Among them were Bonner County Sheriff Daryl Wheeler, who promised to stand guard against any federal attempts to remove Arnold’s guns, and Republican Washington state Rep. Matthew Shea of Spokane Valley, who described the event as a “defiance against tyranny.”
“I took an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and uphold the laws of Idaho,” Wheeler said. “This seemed appropriate to show my support. I was going to make sure Mr. Arnold’s rights weren’t going to be breached.”
During Thursday’s demonstration, the group at times broke out in song to sing “God Bless America” and pray while waving both the American flag and the “Don’t tread on me” flag. With a population of just 1,700, Priest River is near the tip of northern Idaho — a region known for its strong tea party roots and gun-rights activism.
Read more: Fox News

SICK BASTARDS: Watch Muslims Harass Women Covered In Burkas – Then Blame THEM

: Watch Muslims Harass Women Covered In Burkas - Then Blame THEM ...
Here is Obama’s beautiful religion of peace at work.
Appalling YouTube footage has captured the moment two terrified women are hounded by a horde of jeering men as they walk along a promenade in Saudi Arabia.
In the minute-long video, the two young women – dressed in traditional burkhas and face veils – become visibly distressed as they are harassed and intimidated by the men in the city of Jeddah.
The clip recently went viral in the country and sparked public outrage, prompting a police investigation which reportedly led to six boys being detained and questioned.
But shockingly, the women are now being blamed for ‘provoking’ the primal reaction from the crowd by being ‘indecent’.
The outlandish claim is being supported by the emergence of a new video supposedly taken from the scene, which has been shown on semi-official news channels.

Read more: Daily Mail

Who is Cara Carleton Sneed ...?

None other than Carly Fiorina...2016 contender for POTUS...people really need to do the research before supporting/voting for a candidate for office therefore without further is Carly and how she got to where she is today!  


Carleton (Carly) S. Fiorina was born Cara Carleton Sneed in Austin, Texas on September 6, 1954. After dropping out of law school, she became an AT&T sales rep. She moved up the company ladder and became the first female officer in the Network Systems division. In 1998, she was put in charge of Lucent's Global Service Provider division. A year later, she was tapped as CEO of Hewlett-Packard. After the controversial merger with Compac Computers didn’t meet expectations, Fiorina was forced to resign. She then became a consultant for Republican candidates. 

Early Life

When Carly Fiorina told her father, law professor Joseph Tyree Sneed III, that she'd decided to drop out of law school after her first year at UCLA, he shook his head and said he didn't think she'd amount to much. Two decades later, she's been named the most powerful woman in American business by Fortune magazine and in 1999 was named president/CEO of one of the world's most important technology companies, Hewlett-Packard.
Carly, her artist mother, Madelon Montross, and her two siblings moved frequently thanks to her father's wide-ranging career. She attended five different high schools, including one in Ghana. In college, she studied medieval history and philosophy, and after trying law school, she bounced from job to job, working as a receptionist, teaching English in Italy, and finally signing on as a sales rep at AT&T at age 25. In the coming years, she would earn an MBA from the University of Maryland and a MS degree from MIT’s Sloan School of Management.

Ascent at AT&T

Interested in the developing field of network communications, she surprised her co-workers by joining the male-dominated Network Systems division. At age 35, Carly became the division's first female officer, and five years later was named head of North American sales. She combined an appreciation of new technologies with powerful sales instincts, which won the attention of top brass at AT&T. In 1996, the company decided to spin off its Western Electric and Bell Labs divisions into a new company. Carly was tagged to spearhead the effort. Under her guidance, the spin-off, dubbed Lucent, became one of the most successful IPOs (Initial Public Offerings) in U.S. history, raising $3 billion.
Carly’s first marriage ended in divorce. In 1985, she married AT&T executive Frank Fiorina who put his own career on the slow track in order to support hers. He predicted early on that she would run a big company someday, and he pledged to help her. Retired in 1998, he devotes his time to yachting, caring for their dogs, and accompanying Fiorina on business trips.

AP/Wide World Photos. Reproduced by permission.
As chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) of Hewlett-Packard (HP), a technology company worth $72 billion, Carly Fiorina is the most powerful woman in American business. Many give credit to the savvy businesswoman for leading the technology titan into the twenty-first century. In 2002 Fiorina cemented her reputation as a risk taker when she engineered a controversial merger between HP and Compaq Computers. After expanding her empire, Fiorina was sitting at the helm of the second largest computer company in the world. By the mid-2000s, however, given HP's shaky numbers, critics wondered if Fiorina's reign would continue. Regardless, her role in history as a trailblazer would remain. When she joined Hewlett-Packard in 1999, Fiorina became the only woman to head a large, publicly held company in the United States.

Steers toward business 

Businesswoman Carly Fiorina was born Cara Carleton Sneed on September 6, 1954, in Austin, Texas. Her unique name was the result of family tradition. All the male members of the Sneed family who were named Carleton died while serving in the Civil War (1861–1865). To honor them, one child in each subsequent generation was named either Carleton (if a boy) or Cara Carleton (if a girl). Fiorina's father, Joseph Sneed, was a lawyer and at one time served as deputy attorney general under President Richard M. Nixon (1913–1994). He also served for more than thirty years as an appeals court judge in San Francisco, California. Fiorina's mother, Madelon, was an abstract painter. In 2003, during a ceremony honoring her father's longstanding career, Fiorina credited her parents for inspiring her to excel. "In times of hardship and uncertainty," she observed, as quoted on the OCE Public Information Office Web site, "people need a strong internal compass to find their way." Fiorina specifically thanked her father for "always being my true north."
"Progress is not made by the cynics and doubters. It is made by those who believe everything is possible."
Although Fiorina was raised primarily in the San Francisco Bay area, her father's job caused the family to move quite a bit. She attended at least five high schools all over the world, including Ghana (in Africa) and London, England. Fiorina eventually returned to California to attend Stanford University, located in Palo Alto. Strangely enough, Hewlett-Packard's corporate headquarters are located in Palo Alto, and the future CEO worked in HP's shipping department during a summer break from college. After graduating with a degree in medieval history and philosophy, Fiorina decided to follow in her father's footsteps. She entered law school at the University of California at Los Angeles in 1976. After one semester, however, she dropped out, deciding that a career in law was not for her.

Do You Want to Be Carly Fiorina?

Carly Fiorina has graced the top of Fortune magazine's annual list of the most powerful women in business since the ranking was launched in 1998. But in October of 2003, when the magazine polled the other honorees and asked them whether they would like to be in Fiorina's shoes, the answer was consistently "no." Many seemed uncomfortable with the word power. As Ann Fudge, CEO of Young & Rubicam (and number 46 on the list), told Fortune, "We need to redefine power!" And according to Jenny Ming, president of Old Navy, "Power is in your face and aggressive. I'm not like that."
Definitions aside, according to Fortune, by the mid-2000s the trend was that women were regularly being offered positions of power but were not accepting them. And more and more women were leaving their top-level positions or taking short- or long-term breaks. One reason cited was that women were not willing to sacrifice their personal lives, especially time with their children, in order to work a staggering number of hours at their companies. As Jamie Gorelick, former vice chairman of Fannie Mae, commented to Fortune , the "secret is that women demand a lot more satisfaction in their lives than men do."
Of course it makes it a lot easier to devote time to a career if one spouse stays at home. Interestingly enough, according to Fortune, more than one-third of the women who appeared on the list in 2003 had husbands who were stay-at-home dads. In fact, Carly Fiorina's husband Frank, a former AT&T executive, took an early retirement in 1998 to help focus his energies on his wife's career.
Not only were women turning down or leaving upper level positions in the business world, but business schools were having a difficult time attracting female students. According to a 2002 study by Simmons College of over four thousand teenagers, only 9 percent of girls interviewed expressed an interest in going into business. In addition, women made up only 36 percent of students heading toward a master's degree in business administration (MBA). As Judy Rodin, president of the University of Pennsylvania, explained, young women on her campus regularly commented that "You [career-focused] women work too hard. You're too strung out." Considering that Carly Fiorina starts her day every morning at 4:00, maybe they are right.

Fortune did offer some hope. Young men appeared to be changing their attitudes toward the business world. They, like women, seemed to want a balance between their personal lives and their careers. According to Brenda Barnes, who teaches at the Kellogg School of Management in Chicago, her students have told her that they saw their parents "dedicating themselves to their companies" and that they are not willing to "give their lives over to their jobs." Women executives see this as good news. They predict that if business attitudes change, equality between men and women in the top business spots may become a reality. That reality may be some time coming, however, considering that in 2003 only 8 percent of the top level jobs in corporate America were held by women.
Not sure what to do, Fiorina tried her hand at a number of jobs. She even taught English in Bologna, Italy. It was while working as a receptionist at a New York brokerage firm that her interest in business was sparked. Fiorina decided to go back to school to get a master's degree in business administration (MBA), and in 1980 she graduated from the University of Maryland. Fresh out of graduate school, Fiorina landed a job at the telecommunications giant AT&T as a sales representative. She was quickly promoted to the position of commercial account executive, and was responsible for selling long distance telephone service to federal agencies in the U.S. government.

Lights up Lucent, then snagged by HP

Fiorina's aggressive sales record did not go unnoticed by her employers, who decided that she was definitely management material. As a result, in 1988 she was sent to the prestigious Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to earn a master of science degree in business. While at Sloan, Fiorina met the head of AT&T's Network Systems Group, a manufacturing division of the company that was viewed as sluggish and outdated. Against the advice of colleagues, she decided to transfer to Network Systems, even though it was a low profile area and the move seemed almost certain to stall her career. However, quite the opposite happened. In 1995 Fiorina was appointed as the first woman officer at Network Systems when she was put in charge of North American sales. She became instrumental in carving out new markets for AT&T in the Far East, well before it became commonplace for U.S. businesses to expand on a global scale.
In 1995 AT&T decided to spin off into three separate companies and Fiorina was at the center of the whirlwind. One company would focus on long distance, while NCR Corporation would be the computer company and Lucent Technologies would concentrate on telecommunications and networking equipment, essential for running the Internet. Network Systems was folded into Lucent, and Fiorina was put in charge of revamping the new company. She coordinated Lucent's $3 billion initial public offering (IPO), which is the offering of stock on the open market to the public for the first time. She was also responsible for creating Lucent's flashy marketing image, including its red swirl logo. Lucent quickly became a leader in the networking industry, and Fiorina was given most of the credit. In 1998 she became president of Lucent's Global Service Provider Business, and by year's end Lucent had chalked up $19 billion in revenue. That same year Fiorina was placed at the top of Fortune magazine's list of the most powerful women in business.

Other corporations soon took notice of the knowledgeable young professional, including Hewlett-Packard, the grandfather of all computer companies. In July of 1999, HP announced that it had hired Fiorina to be its president and chief executive officer (CEO). The move was remarkable for several reasons. One, HP was a family-owned business, and for the first time it was hiring a president from outside its own ranks. Second, the corporation became the first large U.S. company to place a woman in charge. Third, Fiorina was breaking into Silicon Valley, a region south of San Francisco where there is a concentration of high-tech industries, and until Fiorina came along, the industry had been strictly male-dominated. Although Fiorina was sad to leave AT&T after almost twenty years, she explained to Electronic News, "This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for me. Hewlett-Packard is a company of great accomplishment and even greater potential.... I will strive to strike the right balance between reinforcing HP's values and working to reinvent its business."

A house divided

Since its formation in 1939 by Bill Hewlett (1913–2001) and Dave Packard (1912–1996), Hewlett-Packard had grown into one of the preeminent leaders in the computer industry, noted primarily for cornering the printer market. But by the late 1990s it was starting to lose ground, especially to personal computer (PC) giant IBM. The company looked to Fiorina to help it reenergize. As Sam Ginn, a member of HP's board of directors told Electronic News, "The board unanimously agreed that she is quite simply the ideal candidate to leverage HP's core strengths in the rapidly changing information-systems industry and to lead this great company well into the new millennium."
Fiorina lost no time cleaning house. She streamlined operations by combining several different divisions into fewer, more manageable units. She also shook up the HP sales staff, telling them to shape up or leave the company. This was a harsh mandate, but at the same time Fiorina was also known for her exceptional leadership skills and for maintaining a loyal employee following. By 2001, however, analysts were wondering if HP's ambitious new CEO had been too aggressive. True, Fiorina had struck some very lucrative deals with Ford Motor Company and Delta Airlines to purchase exclusively from HP, but the corporation's PC sales were still lagging and there had been no major inroads into the world of e-business, as promised. HP remained optimistic. As board member George Keyworth explained to USA Today, "In the early summer of 1999, when we were interviewing Carly, we discussed it would take a minimum of three years to turn things around and there would be lots of ups and downs. We are absolutely behind her."
The board was divided, however, when Fiorina made a daring announcement in September of 2001. In a further effort to overtake IBM, she proposed to buy Compaq Computers, another faltering leader in the PC industry. The proposed merger could cost up to $25 billion, but Fiorina claimed that the combined assets of the two companies would create an information technology dynamo. Members of both the Hewlett and Packard families balked at the idea, and initially refused to go along with the deal. They eventually relented, and on May 3, 2002, Fiorina successfully engineered the $19 billion consolidation.
 Carly Fioina (left) shakes hands with the chief executive of Compaq, Michael Capellas. Hewlett-Packard purchased Compaq in 2002. AP/Wide World Photo. Reproduced by permission.
Carly Fioina (left) shakes hands with the chief executive of Compaq, Michael Capellas. Hewlett-Packard purchased Compaq in 2002.
AP/Wide World Photo. Reproduced by permission.

Carly claims victory with Compaq

A year-and-a-half after the merger, Fiorina was claiming victory. She told Fortune magazine that "the strategy has been vindicated." She also announced that HP "leads in every product category, every geography, and every customer segment in which we participate." The company did look different, and it launched a new ad campaign with the tag line "Everything is possible." It was also branching into new consumer electronics markets, like Tablet PCs and MP3 players, hoping to give new industry leader Dell Computers a run for their money.
But according to business analysts the numbers told a different story. In October of 2003, writer Stephanie Smith observed on the CNN Web site that the "new HP looks a lot like the old HP," and revealed that 80 percent of the company's $4.4 billion profit still came from printer sales. In addition, the morale of HP seemed to be suffering. By January of 2004 seven of HP's top managers had left the company. Some retired, some migrated to the competition, and at least one quit suddenly and without notice. Fiorina remained unfazed, telling Fortune that "only 1.7 percent of executives at the vice president level and above have left HP since the merger. That's a pretty small percentage."

Numbers aside, there is no doubt that Fiorina has ranked as a visionary. While at AT&T she helped usher in the era of global business; at Hewlett-Packard she has been at the forefront of new technological ventures. Fiorina has also helped HP become a leader in giving. She launched HP's Technology for Teaching program, which each year awards $10 million in technology grants to U.S. schools from kindergarten through college level. She has also established programs in other countries, including India, to "help bridge the digital divide between technology empowered and technology-excluded communities," as quoted in PR Newswire. As a result, in November of 2003 Hewlett-Packard was honored by the international nonprofit humanitarian organization Concern Worldwide for "its commitment to spearheading educational initiatives around the world."

Credit to: Encyclopedia World Biography

Thursday, August 6, 2015

President Obama Asks Liberals to Watch the GOP Debate so They See Them Ruin his Hard Work

Posted by Arz Raza at 08:45
If you thought only Republicans would be watching the GOP debate this Thursday, let me be the first to tell you: Masses of Obamabots will be tuning in from their very own debate watch parties!
Earlier today President Obama ensured that Fox News would receive the entire nation’s attention during the Cleveland debate after he sent an email to the Democratic National Committee requesting that fellow liberals watch the televised event. 

Democrats need to “listen carefully to what the Republican candidates for president say, and then hold them accountable for trying to undo all of the hard work we’ve done to move this country forward,” Obama said in an email message sent today by the Democratic National Committee.
“I can’t overstate what an important difference you can make by doing this.”
All the hard work? The Golfer-in-Chief actually says stuff like that with a straight face. To be quite frank, Mr. President seems a little bitter…
“I’m gonna bet that they’ll all promise to repeal the Affordable Care Act,” he writes. “They’ll all tell us that even though they aren’t scientists, we shouldn’t believe in the science behind climate change. They’ll all want to reverse course on immigration reform and marriage equality.

“They’re going to deny all of the progress we’ve made together over these past six years,” he adds.
“But here’s the thing: While these Republicans may have bad ideas, they’re still smart politicians. They know how to make policies that will take us in the wrong direction sound like they might actually be pretty good ideas.”
Continue reading on

Obama has lost it! Says Iranians chanting ‘death to America’ share ‘common cause’ with GOP

king obama speaks
[king obama speaks]
Comparing American politicians to Muslim mobs screaming “death to America” is an insult like no other in American politics – and President Obama hurled it Wednesday right at Republicans opposed to his nuclear deal with Iran.
Before a crowd of cheering sycophants at American University in Washington, Obama was patronizing before he became insulting. But the insult came. 

“I recognize that resorting to force may be tempting in the face of the rhetoric and behavior that emanates from parts of Iran. It is offensive. It is incendiary. We do take it seriously,” he said, as though he was talking to third-graders.
“But superpowers should not act impulsively in response to taunts, or even provocations that can be addressed short of war. Just because Iranian hard-liners chant ‘death to America’ does not mean that that’s what all Iranians believe.”
And that’s when the hammer fell.
“In fact, it’s those hard-liners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It’s those hard-liners chanting ‘death to America’ who have been most opposed to the deal. They’re making common cause with the Republican caucus.”

Continue reading on

Obama Decries Killing to Harvest Body Parts in Africa as ‘Foolish Tradition’; Fails to See the Irony!

king obama speaks
[king obama speaks]

Wow. Our President (and his team) really are clueless, aren’t they?
On Monday President Obama was speaking to a group of young African leaders who were attending the Young African Leaders Initiative in Washington, D.C.
During his time with them someone asked about the killing of Albinos which has plagued Africa – Albinos are murdered and then have their body parts harvested to be sold for religious rites and in potions.
The questioner said it like this, “Persons with Albinism in Africa are being killed and their body parts harvested for ritual purposes. My request to you is to raise this issue with heads of state of African countries to bring these atrocities to an end.” 

President Obama responded by condemning the barbaric activity.
“When I was in Africa, I said, there are important traditions and folkways that need to be respected that’s part of who each culture is -- each country is -- but there’s also foolish traditions and old ways of doing business.
The notion that any African would discriminate against somebody because of the color of their skin, after what black people around the world have gone through - is crazy.
It is infuriating and I have no patience for it.” 

oped: LOL really Barry and which half of you are you speaking for?

Posted by Arz Raza at 08:45

FoxNews GOP POTUS debate=Town Hall Party=Summertime Blues

Yes indeed here we go again...17 candidates trying to sell us all on why they should be the one...hmmm maybe try being open and honest...say what you mean and mean what you BS no false promises...we need jobs,security,reduction of debt so it is  not to be passed on to our children...a return to moral values,take care of our veterans as well as elderly...tell us how you are going to do it...not what you think we want to hear...and by all means we don't want to hear sorry son/daughter I can't help ya you are too young to vote or too old...or not a illegal...hit it Eddie tell em' like it is.............

Addendum: Carly Fiorina takes 1st in the GOP Debates (JV) moves up to Varsity...the big ten should take notice this is how it's done: How a SuperStar is born :

Wednesday, August 5, 2015

What Happens If Trump Wins?

by: Jeff Greenfield

Every political analyst, every political observer, every politician is absolutely sure that Donald Trump is not going to be the Republican nominee for president in 2016. And we’re all absolutely sure that Donald Trump is not going to be sworn in as president on January 20, 2017. Could we all be wrong?

So far, every poll seems to only be giving him more strength. Who would have thought even a month ago that as we enter the first GOP debate of the presidential election that Donald Trump, The Donald Trump, would be the leader in every single national poll and gaining strength in all the early primary and caucus states? Time and time again, in just a few weeks, his candidacy seems to have survived what we professional political observers all think are obviously fatal gaffes and flubs. Could this be the rare instance when politics is actually about to go haywire?

If you threw a ball up in the air and it didn’t come down, what would you think? Maybe it landed on the roof or got stuck in a tree. You would not think that the Law of Gravity had been repealed.

So if you’re trying to figure out why Donald Trump has so far left the political class in a state of stunned disbelief, it might be wise not to abandon every assumption about politics, but to ask a different question: When and why do voters behave in ways that seem to break the rules? When are bedrock assumptions about campaigns rendered at least temporarily inoperative? In this context, poll numbers taken months before an election don’t count; while they can measure a public mood, the choice of a candidate is something like a customer in a store trying on hats. The more telling question is: When do voters actually cast their ballots in ways that upend core premises?
 Source: POLITICO - TOP Stories

The Sad Truth of it All..#PlannedParenthood

A cartoon from the Christian organization Answers in Genesis accurately and shockingly supplies us all with the horrible truth... the United States has perpetrated the most disgusting Holocaust in human history. We should be ashamed of our national sin.

Liberals Don't Want Anyone Saying Anything Ever!

<br /><b>Warning</b>:  Illegal string offset 'alt' in <b>/home/eaglerising/public_html/wp-content/themes/morning/er-responsive-email-template.php</b> on line <b>217</b><br />h


Obama said…
“…from the rocky coast of Maine to the sunshine of California, we are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America…”
Who knew the gravity of what he was saying? Of what he meant?
Forget, for the moment, all of the very in-your-face-policies this President has introduced or forced on us that have failed miserably. Let’s look at the effect this president and his extreeeeeemely corrupt administration have had on the youth of this nation.
On campuses across the country we have seen unrest like never before. I know, some of you are going to say, “What about the hippies and the 60’s, Joe?” But, hey, the 60’s was about protesting war and more love for each other.

Today, it’s about word games and attacks on any norm of the day. Words like marriage, man, woman, girl, boy, and senior citizen are under attack. No, I’m not kidding.
Kids on campus can tell you the definition of cisgen but have no clue when the United States gained independence as a country, when we fought that war, and who it was against!
The mentality has become “what’s in it for me” instead of “what’s good for all.” History, optimism, and the American Dream is apparently no longer taught on our college campuses. It has been replaced with classes, seminars, and entire weeks focused on sexual orientations, social microaggressions, white privilege, only black lives matter, and every other manner of political correctness.
Many professors in mainstream colleges are so intent on making white people feel bad about what has been done in the name of “whiteness” and making sure they know about their “white privilege” that they fail teach the subjects they were hired to teach. One actually said, “This won’t end until all old, white men are dead.” Naw… that won’t spark any racist issues on campus, will it?

truth_is_the_new_hate_speechWe can’t say things like, “If you work hard, you can be anything you want to be in this country.” Why? According to one well-educated professor, because that will offend African Americans. Not Asians, Italians, or Mexicans? Nope. Just African Americans! SERIOUSLY?! Isn’t that a racist comment in and of itself? Aren’t you saying African Americans aren’t smart enough? Or maybe it’s just that “the man” will keep them down? How does apply to Mr. Obama, Mr. Holder, Gen. Colin Powell, Ms. Condoleezza Rice, Ms. Oprah Winfrey, and Mr. Sean Combs? They weren’t kept down. And what about these multi-billionaires: Michael Jordan, Mohamed Ibrahim (cell phone company CEO), Michael Lee-Chin (investment firm CEO), Ursula Burns (Xerox CEO, apparently they only care about how much green this black woman can bring in!) 

Did you know the first female self-made millionaire was a black woman? And at a time when most were lucky to make a week’s pay cleaning houses? Sarah Breedlove, also known as Madam C.J. Walker, experienced hair loss at an early age. In just 12 years, she developed a haircare salve and turned a job as a washer earning $1.50 per day into a hair-care empire. As if that weren’t impressive enough, prior to her death in 1919, she put her money to good use actively supporting anti-lynching campaigns and forwarding black education.
Apparently, if you work hard, you can be anything you want to be… including a millionaire! I can post another 100 stories about men and women who are home-grown success stories. But most people prefer to buy the spoon-fed garbage the mainstream media gives them.
They want us to stop using phrases like “melting pot” or “the most qualified person should get the job.” These are somehow derogatory? Melting pot was understood to mean all were welcome and would fit in together to make a better country (legally). And do you REALLY not want the most qualified person when it comes to hiring airplane pilots, doctors, or lawyers?

Some colleges, like the University of New Hampshire, have now created a list of commonly used words and phrases that are “problematic.” They say the term “American” is a problem because it infers that America is the only country on this continent. To the rest of us, it simply means the country we know as the United States. Loons!
They prefer we use “European American” instead of “Caucasian” because all whites are from Europe, right? You know, like all blacks are from Africa… oh wait, maybe not!
“Mothering” and “fathering” are offensive because people must “avoid gendering a non-gendered activity.” Should kids now say Parent One and Parent Two?
“Homosexual” is “an outdated clinical term considered derogatory and offensive by many gay and lesbian people.” The school administration thinks “Same Gender Loving” should be used instead. (Are they still allowed to say “gay” and “lesbian”? Because they just did!)

“Senior citizen” is bad, but “people of advanced age” is good. Who decided this? Did they take a poll of senior citizens? Did they reach out to the gay and lesbian groups or did they at least call the NAACP and ask if blacks were offended by the terminology? No. Of course they didn’t because like their leaders and saviors, these hard-core, Left groups, are the PC police. They see themselves as the keeper of the First Amendment rules and enforcement, so they can just change the rules as they go along.
But don’t ask them about basic American History!
The loons are running the asylum. Professors on the far Left and many of those in education that push socialism feel empowered by their socialist leader Mr. Obama to be able to push this line of thinking on trusting, impressionable students.

Some of you on the Left are proud that these young men and women (or whatever they want to be called, I’m sure I just insulted about half of them) are trying to do away with supposedly old, outdated terms. But with all the things our young people are facing after college… lack of jobs, high cost housing, mega debt, mega taxation, and more why does it seem like all they’re learning in college is what to call the greeter at Walmart?

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

DAY OF RECKONING? This is Your Nuremberg, Planned Parenthood


oped: Indeed Obama's Pink Swastika Party is in full swing... #WakeupAmerica  

by Matt Barber
Nazi monster Dr. Josef Mengele is known to have ordered the murder of over 400,000 Jews at Auschwitz from 1943 to 1945. Thousands more he kept alive and mercilessly tortured to death during experiments intended to create an Aryan super-race.
Much of Mengele’s “medical research” was conducted on children and newborns – especially twins. One witness described what happened after Mengele once delivered a Jewish “fetus”: “But when he saw that there was only one baby and not twins, he tore the baby right out of the mother’s uterus, threw it into an oven and walked away,” she said. “We saw this.”

Cryin’ shame. Were he alive today and working for Planned Parenthood, Mengele’s abortion could have easily yielded an extra $300 for this “intact specimen.” Sell baby’s body parts separately, and the profit margin goes up. That’s good money toward a Lamborghini.
Such a waste.
In 1990 attorney and author Mike Godwin coined the concept that has come to be known as “Godwin’s Law.” It holds that, “As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.” The first person to compare another to a Nazi or Hitler, as it goes, loses the argument.
But what of that rare occasion when the Nazi comparison is 100 percent accurate and the best available analogy for a given set of circumstances? In that instance, Godwin’s Law must properly be suspended.

That instance is now.
Indeed, there is nowhere else for Planned Parenthood and its “pro-choice” supporters to hide. No more “clump of cells” euphemisms, no more denials about Planned Parenthood’s human-chop-shop-for-profit schemes, and no more nonsense about “reproductive freedom” and “women’s rights” in the context of the wholesale slaughter of babies.
The jig’s up, you cold, calculating, modern-day Mengeles. The amazing investigative journalism of The Center for Medical Progress (CMP) has exposed smoking-gun proof that you intentionally and illegally profit, in the millions, by “crushing,” dismembering alive and otherwise torturing to death our most innocent fellow human beings, and then selling their body parts for Mengelesque “medical research.”
These are babies, and you know it. You’ve always know it. Even so, and with a conscience seared black by the father of lies himself, you simply don’t care.

Neither did the Nazis.
To be sure, in CMP’s fourth video release, investigators reveal “undercover footage [that] shows Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains’ Vice President and Medical Director, Dr. Savita Ginde, negotiating a fetal body parts deal, agreeing multiple times to illicit pricing per body part harvested, and suggesting ways to avoid legal consequences.”
“When the actors request intact fetal specimens,” continues CMP, “Ginde reveals that in PPRM’s abortion practice, ‘Sometimes, if we get, if someone delivers before we get to see them for a procedure, then we are intact.’”
Yes, you read that right. This is a high-ranking Planned Parenthood official admitting that they “sometimes” deliver live babies, murder them and then sell their “intact” bodies for “medical research.”
“It’s a baby,” Ginde admits to the undercover investigators while pointing at various body parts on a tray.
“And another boy!” jokes her medical assistant.

This is a holocaust no less real, no less evil than that perpetrated by the Nazi regime. We’ve simply moved from the gas chambers to the abortion chamber – from Auschwitz to Planned Parenthood.
To live under Roe v. Wade is to live in shame. To live under pro-abortion leadership is to live under the Fourth Reich.
Whereas the Nazis were responsible for the wholesale murder of more than 6 million Jews, those today who support the practice of abortion homicide are no less complicit in the systematic slaughter of 55-million-and-counting equally precious human beings post Roe v. Wade. The parallels are undeniable and the science unequivocal. Murder is murder whatever stage of development the human victim.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German pastor who famously faced the gallows for his efforts to end the Nazi holocaust and assassinate Adolf Hitler. He was likewise an outspoken abortion opponent and pro-life advocate.
“Destruction of the embryo in the mother’s womb is a violation of the right to live which God has bestowed upon this nascent life,” he once wrote.

“To raise the question whether we are here concerned already with a human being or not is merely to confuse the issue. The simple fact is that God certainly intended to create a human being and that this nascent human being has been deliberately deprived of his life. And that is nothing but murder,” he concluded.
Indeed, Psalm 139:13 says, “For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb.”
If pro-life advocates like those at CMP are modern-day Dietrich Bonhoeffers, and they are, then what does that make abortion supporters and providers? In the years leading up to and during World War II, many Germans who were otherwise generally good people succumbed to Nazi propaganda and acquiesced to the horrific Jewish persecution that escalated from a slow boil to a red-hot torrent around them. In effect, they bought into exactly the same kind of dehumanizing, euphemistic, semantical garbage embraced by those who today call themselves “pro-choice.”
In the heart of Washington D.C. sits the United States Memorial Holocaust Museum. Someday, Lord willing, there will be an Abortion Holocaust Museum nearby, and on that day people will walk through it and experience the same sense of shame, sadness and disgust felt by those who today visit the Nazi Holocaust Museum.

There remains good and evil in the world.
Hitler, Josef Mengele, Nazis and Nazi supporters were evil.
Cecile Richards, Savita Ginde, Planned Parenthood and its “pro-choice” supporters are evil.
They are one and the same.
If you consider yourself “pro-choice,” you are woefully deceived. As did many of the German people before you, you support mass murder. You embrace a culture of death. History will not treat you well. Repent now and join the culture of life.
If you are an individual supporter or corporate sponsor of Planned Parenthood, then shame on you. Stop! You are helping to finance this holocaust. The blood of millions of innocents is on your head.
If you are an elected official, no more excuses. Immediately withholding all taxpayer funding to Planned Parenthood is a no-brainer, but it’s only the beginning. These crimes against humanity must cease, and Planned Parenthood officials must be thoroughly investigated and, where supported by the weight of the evidence, prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

This is your Nuremberg, Planned Parenthood.

OBAMA’S DREAMER: Illegal Alien Torches Cop Car, Points Rifle at Cops, Hits Officer on Bike

Screen Shot 2015-08-03 at 9.56.21 AM
The reason this illegal teen gave officers for this attack will prove to you even more why we need to secure our borders.
BRAZORIA COUNTY – A 16-year-old here illegally from Mexico is behind bars and facing numerous felony charges after a wild run-in with law enforcement Saturday.
The teen allegedly set a Brazoria County Precinct 4 Constable’s car on fire this afternoon before leading police on a chase. According to Brazoria County Sheriff’s officials, deputies approached a Ford F-150 with the teen inside, who was acting suspicious. The teen then allegedly pulled a .22-caliber rifle on the approaching deputy before speeding off.

The suspect allegedly told deputies he was “tired of his people getting shot by police and nothing happening, so he came to shoot them.” He claimed “the incident was about a war against the government because ICE is always sending Mexicans back to Mexico for no reason, and they are the ones here in America doing all the work.”
Read more: KHOU

THIS IS BAD-ASS: Dad Hires A Special Forces Soldier To Get His Kidnapped Daughter Back

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.26.44 AM
This Dad wasn’t going to let anything get in the way of getting his daughter back home.
A father has revealed he hired a special forces soldier to get his daughter back after she was snatched by his ex-wife and taken to Poland.
Craig Michael hired a Special Forces sidekick to retrieve Crystal after reading about the former soldier’s child rescue service in the paper.
This was all completely legal too. After the local police service failed Craig, he went to the courts to make sure he could go about his business undeterred.
The successful mission ended two and a half years of heartache for the desperate dad. His ex-wife Marta had taken their daughter from their home in Cyprus and ignored two court orders to return her to her father.
According to the Daily Mirror, Craig spent over £35,000 trying to get his daughter back and hiring the ex-soldier was his last resort.
Read more: The LAD Bible

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.18.19 AM

LIBERALISM: Goes From “Mainstreaming Dumb” To “Mainstreaming Crazy”

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 11.17.57 AM
Liberals have gone from mainstreaming dumb ideas to flat out crazy and nutty ideas.
by John Hawkins, Townhall
As a rule, liberals support stupid, counter-productive policies that do more harm than good to the country. This is what I mean by saying that they’re “mainstreaming dumb.”
However, we’ve now gotten to the point where liberals are “mainstreaming crazy.” By that, I mean there is increasingly a merger of thought between radical college professors, weird feminists, commenters on the Daily Kos and Democrat senators.

By the time some fruit loop at Berkeley spouts off a half-thought-out piece of ludicrous nuttery, an article has been written about it and you’ve had time to roll your eyes and say, “Ugh, what a kook,” some Democrat congressman is publicly agreeing with him.
For example, if you don’t get “affirmative consent” before sex, it’s considered rape on some campuses. The same goes if your partner has been drinking.
That’s not just dumb; it’s crazy. By that standard, practically every man in America is a rapist. None of it is “rape” in the sense that normal human beings think of rape. In fact, it’s hard to believe human beings who’ve had intimate encounters came up with this. It seems more like a system that space aliens who’ve seen human mating from afar would have devised.
Then consider the #blacklivesmatter nut bags. Basically, these losers run around the country randomly blocking traffic and deliberately annoying people to protest the police.
Read more: Townhall

‘BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS': Please Note The Senators Who Failed To Defund Planned Parenthood

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.14.50 AM
These Senators are just as guilty as anyone else who is helping Planned Parenthood to murder unborn children.
A measure to defund Planned Parenthood failed in the Senate on Monday in a 53-46 vote, likely punting the issue into the fall debate over preventing a government shutdown.
Republicans fell short of the 60 votes needed to move forward with the legislation, which was fast-tracked to the floor after the release of undercover videos that show Planned Parenthood officials discussing fetal tissue from abortions.
Only two Democrats, Sens. Joe Donnelly (Ind.) and Joe Manchin (W.Va.), voted for the legislation, while two Republicans, Sen. Mark Kirk (Ill.) and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), voted against it.

McConnell voted no to preserve the option of bringing up the bill again.[ oped:Calling BS on this one all Mitch does is spin and lie along with his butt buddy John Boehner] Kirk, who is facing a tough reelection race in 2016, had signaled he was likely to break with his party on the vote, citing the preventive health services that Planned Parenthood provides.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who is running for president, was the only member to miss the vote.
McConnell and other supporters of the defunding bill said it would protect women’s access to medical services because the roughly $500 million in federal funding would be redistributed to other organizations, such as community health centers.
Read more: The Hill

Monday, August 3, 2015

America Was Founded in Liberty, But Now Mired In Tyranny

Most portraits of Washington picture him with three stars on his ...
Our first CIC then..

We need him again!

This is what we have now a bi-sexual pot head Private E-1 Gay Barack Obama funny pictures  with our beloved country in self destruct mode..chaos abounds and Congress has failed us...keep your powder dry wait for the battle cry!


“The foundation of our Empire was not laid in the gloomy age of Ignorance and Superstition, but at an Epoch when the rights of mankind were better understood and more clearly defined, than at any former period…The United States came into existence as a Nation, and if their Citizens should not be completely free and happy, the fault will be entirely their own.” So declared George Washington at the time of our founding as a nation.
It is unique and exceptional that this nation was established according to natural law, and declared inalienable individual rights of life, liberty, and property, or the pursuit of happiness. In an era when monarchs, rulers, oligarchs, autocrats and aristocrats governed according to their whims and disposition, having derived their right to rule based on caste or bloodline, a motley collection of men steeped in classical-liberal principles led a revolution and established a nation dedicated to individual freedom.

Those precepts were the foundation to the Declaration of Independence, which states: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” There is nothing more exceptional in human history than those two sentences and the nation that resulted from their utterance: a nation that derived its “just” powers from the “consent of the governed.”
A decade later, the structural document creating the governmental framework based on the tenets articulated in the Declaration of Independence was ratified by the colonies. That document, our Constitution, stated specifically as enumerated powers what our national government could do; and whatever powers were not specified or enumerated were “reserved to the states respectively or to the people.”

But even at the nascent stages of the American experiment, the author of liberty, Thomas Jefferson, saw how our system would metamorphose into something entirely different. “Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.”
What started as a small list of enumerated powers in the Constitution has evolved to hundreds of thousands of pages of laws and regulations in the Federal Register, and a government that has debt greater than the entire gross domestic product of the nation. Laws have become so obtrusive that on any given day, millions of our fellow citizens can unwittingly commit “crimes” against the state, as documented in the Alan Dershowitz and Harvey Silverglate book, “Three Felonies A Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent.”

We are so far removed from our foundation of individual liberty, that literally every action of every day that we engage in is regulated, taxed, or overseen by an omnipotent Master governing its peon subjects. The tyrannical control of our lives far, far exceeds the relatively minor transgressions of King George against our founding colonists.
Political scientist Theodore Lowi attested to this devolution from liberty to governmental tyranny forty years ago in his book “The End of Liberalism.” He empirically documented that “modern liberalism has left us with a government that is unlimited in scope but formless in action.” He illustrated how such a government “can neither plan nor achieve justice because liberalism replaces planning with bargaining and creates a regime of policy without law.”
With such a noose of governmental control around the throat of the country, it’s amazing that anything can be produced, sold, or used; for as government grows in scope, power, and control, individual liberty is diminished and quashed. It’s a testimonial to the viability of capitalism that, even under such oppressive regulatory control of the means of production, we can still eek out a modicum of GDP growth.
Government is increasingly looked to as the benevolent patriarch that can bestow “rights” and entitlements to a beseeching clientele, diminishing the liberty, rights, and privileges of another. In short, we have a new master; and we are all its subjects.

The cost of this bloating and egregious governmental power is great, and the cumulative cost can literally destroy a nation financially. Greece typifies this collapse, with several European nations not far behind. As columnist and author Dennis Praeger has said, “Countries will either shrink the size of their government, or they will eventually collapse economically. Every welfare state is a Ponzi scheme, relying on new payers to pay previous payers. Like the Ponzi scheme, when it runs out of new payers, the scheme collapses. European countries, all of which are welfare states, are already experiencing this problem to varying degrees.”
Can we ever reverse this course, and make a strong case for liberty again? It won’t be easy. For every dole paid out by our federal master, there is a clientele that would vociferously denounce any effort at reduction. In a representative democracy, the most vocal citizens appropriate to themselves more attention from the powers that be. But if the nation is to survive financially, the trend must be reversed.
This will require a resolute and informed electorate that is more vocal than the beneficiary recipients of our nanny-state master’s noblesse oblige. But if we’re to prevent the otherwise inevitable collapse of our currency, our economy, and the nation, we must muster the will and determination to begin shrinking the scope and cost of government. As Thomas Jefferson said, “The best government is that which governs least.” It’s also more likely to endure.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Five Ways San Francisco Has Descended Into A Liberal Disaster

22:18 funny pictures , funny pictures with captions , top 10 No ...
[Saturday at the Park San Fran...kid friendly? ]

Yup Nancy Pelosi thinks so : Barack Obama: Where to begin? Remember, Obama is the head of the ...
Screen Shot 2015-06-28 at 10.45.17 PM

The City by the Bay is in a state of progressive dysfunction.
Liberal Democrats have secured total control of the city’s elected offices. Being a Democrat isn’t enough anymore. In a city where there are more than six Democrats for every Republican, political campaigns are decided by which candidate is the true progressive.
With no evil capitalists or conservative Republicans to thwart their plans, San Francisco should be a socialist utopia. Income inequality solved. Affordable housing provided to all. Criminals rehabilitated. Women guaranteed equal protection under the law.
Yet, the city hasn’t made much “progress” on much of anything. Here’s a progress report on every liberal’s pet issues.

Income Inequality
A recent study by a Bay Area consulting group found the Bay Area is home to the nation’s worst income inequality. The middle class no longer exists in the Bay Area. The top 20 percent of households make $263,000 more than the poorest 20 percent of households.
“That’s 50 percent higher than the gap nationwide,” Jon Haveman, author of the study, recently told KQED. The Bay Area’s middle class is disappearing as a result of the high cost of living and exorbitant housing process, which are forcing people to leave the area.
While middle class private sector workers have been squeezed, public sector employees have reaped the benefits of electing liberal Democrats to state and local offices. More than 10,000 public employees in San Francisco earn six-figure salaries. More than a third of the city’s public workforce earns at least $100,000 in total compensation. Eighty-four city employees earn in excess of $250,000 each year in total compensation.

Affordable Housing
This spring, the average rent in San Francisco hit a record high of $3,458 per month. Even if you’re willing to cram into a tiny studio, you’ll pay more than $2,000 per month. Thanks to liberal policies restricting new developments, the region has learned what happens when supply remains constant and demand increases.
Many Bay Area residents have turned to the sharing economy to make ends meet by renting out a spare bedroom. But, that could soon end as the city seeks to criminalize the sharing economy. This November, voters will consider an initiative that limits short-term rentals, bans in-law unit rentals, and allows citizens to police their neighbors with lawsuits to enforce the anti-Airbnb measure.
In 2004, then-Mayor Gavin Newsom promised a “Ten Year Plan to Abolish Chronic Homelessness.”
How’d it work out? San Francisco taxpayers have spent roughly $1.5 billion over the past decade on leftist solutions to the city’s chronic homeless problem. At a cost of roughly $77,000 per homeless person, the city has seen its problem get worse.
“The homeless population is up 3 percent since 2005,” an in-depth analysis by the San Francisco Chronicle found. “In one of the richest cities in the world, an estimated 2,200 public school students lack permanent homes.”
The Bay Area’s crime problem is epitomized by the tragic Pier 14 murder of 32-year-old Kate Steinle. The San Francisco Sheriff’s Department went to the trouble (and expense) of bringing a five-time deported illegal immigrant felon out of a federal prison in Southern California to free him in San Francisco. How could the Sheriff’s Department be so incompetent, and so conflicted?
Progressives see the justice system as inherently biased against people of color. Criminals aren’t to be held accountable for their actions because they’re victims, too.
“California should be a leader in enlightened criminal justice,” San Francisco lawmaker Tom Ammiano, the longtime chair of the Assembly Public Safety Committee, explained of his philosophy to crime.
Women’s Issues
When San Francisco’s Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi isn’t busy letting illegal immigrant felons out of jail, he’s busy dealing with his own legal problems. The co-founder of the Green Party, who became a Democrat in 2010, was charged with domestic violence, child endangerment, and dissuading a witness in a legal proceeding, and plead guilty to one count of false imprisonment after a New Year’s Eve altercation with his wife in 2011.
He was able to retain his office even though pleading guilty to a crime, because the San Francisco Board of Supervisors could only muster seven of its 11 members to remove him from office. Liberals are right about the “war on women,” just wrong about who is leading it.

Planned Parenthood Revelations Disgusting

  Planned Parenthood EXPOSED! - Duration: 8:25.
Funny Happened To The Website From A Company That Buys Planned ... Planned Parenthood and evil


When I started doing asylum work almost twenty years ago, the comfortable cocoon that had been built around me began to crumble. Handling the cases of people who had been tortured for their beliefs, or their ethnicity, or their political principles, or simply because they wanted more than one baby to love was when I realized the depth of inhumanity.
The capacity for evil lurks inside the most normal, most benign-looking good citizens who go about their daily work without a worry or a care. It manifests itself in their ability to ignore the darkness inside of them, that then spreads from their hearts and hands to the greater world.
By now, you must know I’m talking about Planned Parenthood. If you support them because of all the “good” they supposedly do for women, you might want to stop reading now, because I consider a Planned Parenthood clinic to be no different from the killing fields of Cambodia.
It’s time we all stop excusing a multi-million dollar organization that treats five month old, pre-born children no better than specimens in a jar of formaldehyde. 

By now, we’ve all seen at least some parts of the videos filmed by the Center for Medical Progress, an admittedly anti-abortion organization. Clearly, these videos were designed to anger and indict an entire industry that has grown exponentially since 1973, when Roe v. Wade made it legal to mutilate a fetus in each of the 50 states.
Not even the most dedicated anti-abortion activist would deny that these videos are a cinematic “J’accuse” against a practice that dehumanizes what is inconveniently human: the second and third trimester fetus. I would personally argue that the moment egg meets sperm, a human life is created; but the point of this column is not to convince you that life begins at conception. That is wasted breath, and I have a more urgent obligation.

The point of this column is to scream (at the top of lungs that have not been harvested for sale) that what is depicted in both the edited and full length videos that came to light this past week transcends the horrors that I’ve studied in my office, presented to judges, and tried to extinguish with the help of a benevolent government.
The discussions about Lamborghinis to be purchased with the blood money from tiny severed limbs, about using ultrasound to better target hearts and kidneys and livers for experiments, about being careful not to say too much for fear that the lawyers might get wise and shut them down, about not “crunching” fragile baby carcasses because it would reduce the value of the hoped for exchange, are chilling.
More than chilling, they are an indictment written in the language of our ancestors lodged against the smug and unapologetic complacency of a society that thinks it is Promethean. We do not recognize a higher order or obligation, and we arrogate to ourselves the right to create and extinguish life as we see fit. The by-product of reproduction, as Planned Parenthood would term it, has no value beyond the value an unwilling mother gives it; and so it can be treated like a commodity which–squeezed of its spirit and divine fire–can be packaged for resale on the medical market.

No amount of obfuscation about how this “tissue” can help cure cancer or give sight to the blind or restore paralyzed limbs to grace changes the fact that Planned Parenthood engages in the most repulsive and hideous of practices: exploitation of a mutilated human body. And all of the editorials, written by skittish eugenicists, and all of the tap dancing done by self-righteous feminists will not hide that grisly fact.
When I complete an asylum case, I am able to put the memory of my client’s former persecution in perspective, knowing that they are now in a safe and loving place. The dark shadows of their past dissipate, for me if not for them, with the promise of a new life in America.
But the evil that I’ve seen in the faces and voices and intentions of the women of Planned Parenthood cannot be so easily neutralized, or erased from my conscious mind.
If we do not speak out, and stop this madness, we will lose our claim on humanity.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Watch: Former Planned Parenthood Director Drops BOMBSHELL Revelation PP Wants Quiet

Video Shock: Planned Parenthood Endorses Post-BIRTH Abortion Image

An ex-Planned Parenthood director recently discussed the moment of truth for her and some dirty secrets her former employer does not want the public to know.
Abby Johnson directed a Planned Parenthood facility for 8 years. She recently sat down for an interview with conservative political commentator Steven Crowder and shared why she left the industry.
She recounted how a visiting abortion doctor came to fill in at their facility for a week. Unlike the other doctors, he used an ultrasound machine to assist him during the procedure. Johnson told Crowder that as director, she usually was not in the room while the abortions were being performed–but the doctor asked for her help:

Funny Happened To The Website From A Company That Buys Planned ...
My job with to hold the ultrasound probe on the woman’s abdomen so he could see what was going on during the abortion, and I watched a 13 week old baby fight and struggle for his life during that abortion procedure, and I knew then that I had been lied to. I knew that because of that, I had, in turn, lied to thousands of women who had come through my facility.

That was a “turning point” for her. “I couldn’t make it right in my mind,” she recalled. “I knew I had to leave and that is when I made my decision to quit.”
Abby left her job a week later (in 2009) and was sued for Planned Parenthood out of fear she would give away proprietary secrets. She prevailed in the suit. There is no law against becoming pro-life, she told Crowder.   
The former director estimates that, during her time at Planned Parenthood, she oversaw 20,000 abortions. She also told Crowder that she herself had two abortions and stated that approximately 70 percent of those who work in the industry have had abortions. For some, working in the field is a way to try to make the decision right.

She said that for Planned Parenthood, the big ticket item is abortion. Over 90 percent of pregnant women who come into one of their facilities will abort their babies.
“The idea that they are there to offer options or referrals to other services is just a farce, because my director told us that our goal was to create every phone call, every client visit into a revenue generating visit,” Abby explained.
“Well if a woman comes in and she’s pregnant, the only way we can do that is by selling her an abortion, because we don’t do pre-natal care. Planned Parenthood does not provide pre-natal care at any of their clinics across the country. They don’t do adoption services. They don’t make money off of that. So the only way we can make money was to sell a woman an abortion. We were given the directive to sell abortions,” she said.
The former director explained that the business model is set up so even the women they provide contraceptives to often come back for an abortion at some point down the road.
“We were there as a family planning clinic, [which] provided abortion[s],” she said. “But the whole premise behind being a family planning clinic is to get woman on a contraceptive method that will eventually fail them. We know that 54 percent of women having abortions were using contraception at the time they got pregnant.”

“We want to give them a contraceptive method that has a higher risk of failure. What is going to have a higher risk of failure? Those that have higher human error failure rates.”
Johnson offered the example of the birth control pill. “I’m 35 years old, and I can’t remember to take a pill at the same time everyday. A 14 year-old sure as heck is not going to remember…She will forget, and eventually she will be one of our clients.”
Crowder followed up on that statement, asking whether that is truly a policy or an unwritten rule.
Johnson said: “We had an abortion quota.” They were there to sell abortions, plain and simple.
Abby has written a book about her experience entitled unPlanned: The Dramatic True Story of a Former Planned Parenthood Leader’s Eye-Opening Journey across the Life LineShe also started an organization called And Then There Were None to help abortion workers leave the industry. She told Crowder that 160 former employees have turned to her organization, including 6 abortion doctors.
Abby also experienced a spiritual transformation following her decision to leave Planned Parenthood. “The most important thing to know is that I believe in forgiveness, mercy, and redemption. No one is beyond the amazing power of Christ and His love,” she writes.

Thursday, March 26, 2015   AM, The Word, and The Comforter
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Busted: A GOP Candidate’s Massive Connection To Planned Parenthood Just Got Exposed

Until shortly before announcing his presidential candidacy, former Florida governor Jeb Bush was a director for a charity that gave tens of millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood.
Life Site News reports: “In 2010, Jeb was named one of the founding directors of the Bloomberg Family Foundation, established as a tax-exempt foundation to advance the vision of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.”
That foundation announced a major partnership with Planned Parenthood-Global to train and equip abortion activists in pro-life countries, to the tune of $50 million:
In 2014, we started supporting local nonprofit organizations in Burkina Faso, Senegal, Uganda, and Nicaragua to advocate for better policies in their countries that will expand access to comprehensive reproductive health services. These organizations will receive technical assistance from Planned Parenthood Federation of America – Global Division to help augment their capacity for effective advocacy.

The former New York mayor laid out how the partnership would work when he received Planned Parenthood’s Global Citizen Award at its annual gala in March 2014.
“I am happy to say our major partner in this project will be Planned Parenthood – Global,” Bloomberg said. “In some countries, our funding will help advocates work towards better sexual health policies for teens and better access to contraceptives. In others, we’ll help push for less restrictive abortion laws and more government funding for high-quality, accessible services.”

When asked if Jeb Bush supported these foundation initiatives, spokeswoman Kristy Campbell told the Tampa Bay Times: “Governor Bush was honored to serve on the board of Bloomberg Philanthropies, which does a lot of good work across the world. Governor Bush and Mayor Bloomberg have great mutual respect for one another. While they disagree on several policy issues, both share a passion for improving education in America.” Both Bloomberg and Bush are strong advocates for Common Core.
“As a board member, Governor Bush did not vote on or approve individual projects or programs,” Campbell said to the Times.
Stephen Phelan, director of mission communications at Human Life International, told Life Site News: “Bush’s people are probably right that as a board member he did not vote on every project.
“But Bloomberg has been so open about his foundation’s goals for so long that it really stretches credibility to say that Bush or his people wouldn’t have known that the foundation pushes abortion and other population-control efforts,” he said.

Bloomberg–the former Democrat, turned Republican (as he sought to succeed Rudy Giuliani in 2001), turned Independent–made clear his top priority policy goals when accepting Planned Parenthood’s Global Citizen Award. “You can’t fight every battle,” he said. “The things that are high on my priority list are sensible gun laws…I obviously care about a woman’s right to choose…Nobody’s a bigger supporter of gay rights.” He added that “we need a good immigration bill” including amnesty for an estimated 11 million illegal immigrants.
“Bloomberg has described abortion as a ‘fundamental human right,’ elevating it to a make-or-break position. ‘On this issue, you’re either with us or against us.’ He once cited abortion among his reasons for endorsing Barack Obama in 2012,” according to Life Site News.
The Daily Caller reached out to Jeb Bush’s campaign for a response to the Life Site News story. The campaign responded by email with the following statement:

Governor Bush’s strong record of fostering a culture of life is clear, and he has called on Congress to investigate and defund Planned Parenthood in light of the recent alarming revelations about its practices. During his eight years in office, Governor Bush took measures to protect innocent life by passing a partial-birth abortion ban, fighting for a constitutional amendment requiring parental notifications and doing everything possible to promote adoption.
As a board member of Bloomberg Philanthropies, Governor Bush did not vote on or approve individual projects or programs. Governor Bush and Mayor Bloomberg disagree on several policy areas, including Planned Parenthood. They do share a passion for reforming education, which was Governor Bush’s focus on the board.
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth