Here's Who Made Trump's Wish List to Perform at Inauguration

oped: Being that the incoming Trump administration has stacked his cabinet with millionaires/billionaires and Generals can we the little people...remember us the ones who supported and voted Donald into office Nov 8 ...maybe along with the Supa Star's to perform at the inauguration you could have less known yet talented performers do the lead in to the Supa Stars...like throw us a bone and at least humor us! 

May I suggest :
For the NRA/2A supporters:  



For the Oldies Crowd...old school supporters:    




And not to forget all the crazy deplorable supporters: https://youtu.be/PKpQRjj_WbU 

Donald Trump’s campaign manager Kellyanne Conway joined “Fox & Friends” Friday morning where she gave viewers an idea of the musical artists they might expect to see at the presidential inauguration.

Towards the end of her interview with the Fox hosts, Conway jokingly tried to hush rumors about the president-elect’s musical guests. When one of the hosts asked about rumblings they may be getting pop stars Bruno Mars or Justin Timberlake to perform it took Conway by surprise.

“Shhh,” she reacted hushing the host. “Yes, you’ll be the third to know.” 

A Hollywood Insider who told The Wrap he declined to take part in the inauguration said the Inaugural Committee “was in talks with Kid Rock, Ted Nugent, and Garth Brooks.” But he also hinted that they’re also trying to get an artist that wasn’t necessarily in support of the president-elect.

Trump’s inauguration team is hoping to land “artists like Justin Timberlake and Bruno Mars,” according to the Hollywood source. “They’re calling managers, agents, everyone in town to see who they can get.” 

 Source: The Smoke Room

Global Warming and Climate Change: Both Are False Narratives

oped: Read more: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2016/12/attn-ivanka-trumpclimate-change-really.html 

by:
Dr. Robert Owens
http://freedomoutpost.com/inconvenient-truths-about-the-man-made-global-warming-scam/


by: Leon Puissegur 

We hear all sorts of ideas about this false idea that man is causing an increase in carbon dioxide. Let us take a quick look at a research paper from a scientist named Nasif Nahle, Scientific Research Director-Biology Cabinet. The paragraph below is taken directly from his abstract:

ABSTRACT
Scientific studies have shown that atmospheric Carbon Dioxide in past eras reached concentrations that were 20 times higher than the current concentration. Recent investigations have shown that the current change of climate is part of a larger cycle known as climatic lowstand phase which precedes a sequential warming period known as transgression phase. The purpose of this evaluation is to demonstrate that the Earth is actually cooling, in the context of the total geological timescale, and that the current change is equivalent to a serial climate phase known as lowstand.

The earth is going through a cooling phase and warming alarmists lay claim to their ideology based upon false data that has been twisted to fit the Climate Change, Global Warming Narrative. We will demonstrate this below.
Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert is a retired geologist and data computation expert. He has painstakingly examined and tabulated all NASA GISS’s temperature data series, taken from 1153 stations and going back to 1881. His conclusion: that if you look at the raw data, as opposed to NASA’s revisions, you’ll find that, since 1940, the planet has been cooling, not warming.
According to Günter Ederer, the German journalist who has reported on Ewert’s findings:
From the publicly available data, Ewert made an unbelievable discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after 1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012 shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it never existed.

Apart from Australia, the planet has in fact been on a cooling trend:
Using the NASA data from 2010 the surface temperature globally from 1940 until today has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C […]. The cooling has hit every continent except for Australia, which warmed by 0.6339°C since 2000. The figures for Europe: From 1940 to 2010, using the data from 2010, there was a cooling of 0.5465°C and a cooling of 0.3739°C since 2000.

But the activist scientists at NASA GISS – initially led by James Hansen, later by Gavin Schmidt – wanted the records they are in charge of maintaining to show warming, not cooling, so they began systematically adjusting the data for various spurious reasons using ten different methods.
The most commonly used ones were:

• Reducing the annual mean in the early phase.
  • Reducing the high values in the first warming phase.
  • Increasing individual values during the second warming phase.
  • Suppression of the second cooling phase starting in 1995.
  • Shortening the early decades of the datasets.
  • With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened.

Ewert’s findings echo that of US meteorologists Joseph D’Aleo and Anthony Watts, who examined 6,000 NASA weather stations and found a host of irregularities, both with the way they were cited and how the raw data had been adjusted to reflect such influences as the Urban Heat Island effect.

Britain’s Paul Homewood is also on NASA GISS’s case. Here, he shows the shocking extent of the adjustments they have made to a temperature record in Brazil, which has been altered so that a cooling trend becomes a warming trend.
Now this pure evidence showing that the opposite is really happening and our earth is not warming means that these data sets are being manipulated for reasons that are not related to any sort of Climate Change and can be directly related to an attempt by the United Nations to “Redistribute” the wealth of nations to the poor ones.  Why else would scientists align with a flawed and fraudulent narrative? We have to show this, and the best way to do so is with an article published December 12, 2015, which shows the United Nations working towards a “Climate Deal” that will “REDISTRIBUTE” money from the rich nations, such as the United States, to poor nations.

Continue Reading: http://freedomoutpost.com/global-warming-and-climate-change-both-are-false-narratives/

Megyn Kelly, Roger Ailes Harassment Allegations Film in the Works

oped: Let me get this right...way back 2005 when Megyn started her career change from attorney to upstart reporter with Fox News, and now in 2016, claims she was sexually harassed by Roger Ailes 2005! 
Really? and if this is true why did she not walk out the door and apply elsewhere? Hmmmm maybe if true she consented to the proverbial casting couch and continued such action working her way up the ladder to fame and fortune... culminating in her now Super Star status at FoxNews. (If true and she resisted she would not still be at FoxNews 11 years later)

IMO Megyn Kelly suffers from the proverbial Narcissitic Personality Disorder Syndrome...and will do and say almost anything to advance her career. Now she is on a book tour pushing her 'Kiss and Tell' novel disguised as a Self Help/How to succeed in life nonsense book written by a Ghost Writer(hubby?) at her direction!  

She thinks she is so smart and this will be her last needed push to whatever goal she is trying to obtain...not to smart Megyn where pray tell are you going to go from here another novel 'Kiss and Tell' of all the casting couch adventures of Megyn Kelly? Looks to me like you are auditioning for the Adult Entertainment Industry not MSM then again Media and the entertainment industry do make for strange bedfellows! 

At any rate...thats my opinion and I'm sticking to it...y'all be the judge!

Learn More

Megyn Kelly’s accusations of sexual harassment against former Fox News chief Roger Ailes will be the subject of a new film from Oscar-winning The Big Short screenwriter Charles Randolph.

According to Variety, Annapurna Pictures (the studio behind Seth Rogen’s raunchy animated comedy Sausage Party) has snagged the rights to the project, which will also center on the allegations made by other women against Ailes, including those of former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson.

Annapurna’s Megan Ellison will co-produce alongside Margaret Riley and Randolph, while Randolph is also slated to write the script.

Kelly detailed her allegations against Ailes in her recently-released memoir Settle for More, in which she wrote that the 76-year-old former chairman and CEO of Fox News made improper sexually-charged advances toward her shortly after she joined the network in 2005.

 Source: Breitbart

Hillary’s revenge starts Dec. 15th

oped: Bottom line: Donald Trump must accept responsibility for this continuation of "A Never Ending Story" When, after winning the POTUS election, he went on to say Hillary and Bill "are good people and have suffered enough"...thus opening the door to a Never Ending Story!

“The Clintons are like herpes,” actor Tim Allen said last month, “Just when you think they’re gone, they show up again.” 

As if on cue, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has come back to life with a new plan to continue her family’s political dynasty – and she’s anointing her daughter, Chelsea Clinton, as our country’s next leader.
Hillary stopped sobbing over her defeat long enough to speak at Harry Reid’s retirement this week, where she announced that she’s throwing a  “thank you” dinner inside the Plaza Hotel’s elegant Grand Ballroom on December 15.
Of course, she’s not thanking her voters like President-elect Donald Trump is.
That’s not the Clinton’s style.
Instead, Hillary is making the event ultra exclusive, inviting only the most elite of her financial donors to the six-figure gala.
To get on this list, you not only had to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for her campaign, but you also had to host an event introducing her to other donors. The bar is so high that even longtime Clinton pals are complaining about being snubbed, according to The Washington Post.
What’s behind all this? According to sources closest to her, it’s plotting her next move to put the Clinton family back into power ASAP – and it links straight back to Chelsea Clinton.

Since voters rejected her last month, Hillary has tried everything from hopeless state recounts, to claiming Russians hacked U.S. voting machines, to trying to sway faithless members of the Electoral College in order to steal the 2016 election.
Still, she’s walking away a loser – this time.
But the Clintons never go away, no matter how much the American people demand it. Journalist Ron Fournier, a Clinton confidante, wrote on Twitter that “sources close to her” told him that “raising doubts about legitimacy of election, even w/out overturning result, is part of Clinton’s plans to keep her options open for 2020.”
That’s right; Hillary Clinton is considering another run for president four years from now, at the age of 73!
But critics says that announcement may just be a smoke screen
For once, Hillary may be doing something that doesn’t benefit her own political career — she’s trying to convince her top donors to shift their money to her daughter, Chelsea Clinton, the Clinton’s cartel’s ace-in-the-hole.

A source close to the Clintons told The New York Post that “the Clintons need some time to regroup after Hillary’s crushing loss,” but “they will not give up.”
“Chelsea would be the next extension of the Clinton brand,” the Clinton insider said.
The plan is for Chelsea Clinton to run for Congress, maybe as early as 2018.
Chelsea will run for the seat of Rep. Nita Lowey, a 79-year-old far-left Democrat from New York, when Lowey retires.
Lowey’s district has two advantages: It’s a Democratic safe seat. Chelsea is unlikely to run into any serious competition there. And Lowey represents the city of Chappaqua, where the Clintons have a home. Chelsea doesn’t live there – she lives in Manhattan with husband Marc Mezvinsky – but that’s no problem for the Clintons. After all, Hillary didn’t live in New York before becoming its U.S. senator.
So, the plan is to put Lowey out to pasture and install Chelsea in her place.
So far, Chelsea has made a comfortable living by cashing in on her family name and access to power, and has been groomed for years by her power hungry parents.

Chelsea Clinton is vice chair of the ethically challenged Clinton Foundation, where she has taken a special interest in its fundraising operations. Coincidentally, she has an estimated net worth of $15 million and owns a $10.5 million apartment overlooking New York City’s Madison Square Park.
And like her parents, Chelsea’s media connections run deep. For example, in 2011 NBC News paid her $600,000 as a special correspondent, although she had no experience in journalism – or, as far as we could tell, any talent, either.
Chelsea only faces one major problem: Lowey is not stepping aside quietly. She says she has no plans to retire, Chelsea’s future plans be damned.
“You’ll have to ask Chelsea” where stories about her retirement are coming from, Lowey said. “I’m running for office. I currently serve, and… I will keep running.”
In fact, a New Rochelle newspaper first published reports that Chelsea plans to run for Lowey’s seat five years ago – but still Lowey hasn’t budged.

If Chelsea wants her seat, it will be over her dead body (which rumors say can be arranged in Clintonland).
But at a minimum, Chelsea will have to work for it, which is more than this 36-year-old grown child has done for anything else in her life.
— The Horn editorial team

Oath Keepers Opposes Anti-Gun Activist David Petraeus for Secretary of State

https://www.oathkeepers.org



by: Stewart Rhodes 

Just Say “No!” to General “Betrayus,” an Oath Breaker and Enemy of the Right to Bear Arms.  Mr. Trump, if you really want to make America great again, make America CONSTITUTIONAL again.

Retired General and former CIA Director David Petraeus is a bad choice for Secretary of State, Oath Keepers advised President-Elect Donald Trump, strongly supporting a call to action initiated by Gun Owners of America.  In addition to “mishandling” classified information and sharing it with his mistress (he avoided felony charges, prison time and “prohibited person” status against owning firearms by pleading guilty to a misdemeanor),  Petraeus’ advocacy of infringements on the right to keep and bear arms effectively renounces the obligation he freely took when he swore an oath to “support and defend the Constitution…”
Petraeus turned his back on that oath when he joined with retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal and other veterans to form “The Veterans Coalition for Common Sense.” The group is part of retired Captain Mark Kelly’s and Gabby Gifford’s “Americans for Responsible Solutions,” which posted a list of all the military notables lending their names to the effort.  By doing so, they’re disregarding the paramount importance of civilian control of the military, and are presuming to overturn the Founders’ judgment about what was and is “necessary to the security of a free State” – a militia of the people, well armed.

As Founding Father Tench Coxe described it:

The powers of the sword are in the hands of the yeomanry of America from sixteen to sixty. The militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every terrible implement of the soldier are the birthright of Americans.

Petraeus, McChrystal, and the other gun-gabbers disagree, and they want their preferences to trump the intent of the Founders and the rights of the people secured by the Bill of Rights.

“Every Terrible Implement of the Soldier.”  That’s What it Takes to Stop Bad Guys the World Over, Including Here at Home.  A Ferguson, MO Store Owner Gets it Done During the 2014 Riots.

“As Secretary of State, Petraeus would play a key role in deciding whether to remove the U.S. from the UN Arms Trade Treaty (UN ATT),” GOA warned in a member alert. “This agreement would mandate gun registration, and would authorize comprehensive gun bans — all goals supported by Petraeus’ colleagues Kelly and Giffords.
“Petraeus would effectively decide whether to push for ratification of the anti-gun UN Small Arms Treaty. Finally, Petraeus would have jurisdiction over the international trade (ITAR) regulations,” GOA continued. “Under Clinton/Kerry ‘guidance,’ these regulations have been expanded to outlaw gunsmithing. In addition, a gun technician who communicates ‘how-to’ information about guns on the Internet (without purchasing a $2,250 State Department license) could be prosecuted and imprisoned.”
“You can read GOA’s comments against these anti-gun State Department regulations here,” the alert elaborated. “If anti-gun Petraeus is nominated and confirmed, we can expect these policies to be continued and expanded.”
That’s vital information for informed gun owners to understand.  But being informed without taking action doesn’t do much good, so Oath Keepers joins GOA in urging members to contact President-Elect Trump to express unequivocal opposition to David Petraeus being part of his cabinet, let alone Secretary of State. To that end, they have included a contact email address that will get to Trump’s team:

info@donaldtrump.com
You can use GOA’s pre-written letter or craft a message of your own.  And don’t forget there are other ways to reach the president-elect, including by leaving comments on his Facebook page or by sending him a Twitter “tweet” along with a link to the GOA Alert and/or to this announcement of Oath Keepers joining the opposition to Petraeus.
Oath Keepers goes the additional step of letting President-Elect Trump know that former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney are also unacceptable candidates for the same reasons stated by GOA about Petraeus.  That’s because “America’s Mayor” betrayed his oath when he backed federal testing/licensing of gun owners, semi-auto bans, and suing manufacturers. Romney has done the same throughout his political career, despite attempts by “gun lobby” compromisers to minimize his betrayals, and even paint them as necessary strategic moves.
“Just say ‘No!’ to General ‘Betrayus,'” Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes declared. “As GOA noted, ‘Donald Trump was elected with the broad support of members of the Second Amendment community.  We believe it would be a huge mistake to begin his transition by putting an anti-gun activist in a position where he could regulate and ban guns.’  Not only would it be a huge mistake, it would be a violation of Trump’s own Oath, which he will take on January 20, 2017.  Petraeus is either ignorant of the purpose of the Second Amendment (that the people, as the militia, have the military capacity to ‘execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions’) or he is a willful oath-breaker who wants to gut the Second Amendment.  Either way, Petraeus is spectacularly unfit for any post now that he has blatantly turned his back on the right of the people to keep and bear arms.  President-Elect Trump can, and must, do better.”

Regarding a series of troubling Trump appointments and possible appointments, Stewart Rhodes said:

If President-Elect Trump really wants to “drain the Swamp” he needs to drain the GOP side too, and flush out the anti-constitution “neocon” slime, right along with the anti-constitution Marxist slime.  Two sides of the same globalist, totalitarian, Constitution killing coin.   Trump really needs to start listening to the hardcore patriots and constitutionalists who got him elected, not the inside-the-beltway, Bush Admin leftovers, and “lesser of two evils” oath breakers in the GOP.  Root them all out.   Drain the whole damn thing. 

Mr. Trump, if you really want to make America great again, make America CONSTITUTIONAL again.

Please take a moment to contact Trump and tell him “No gun-grabbers at State. Petraeus, Giuliani and Romney are wrong for gun owners, and wrong for the Constitution we all swore to defend.”
For the Republic,
Oath Keepers
* Note:  We sincerely thank David Codrea for his work on this statement.

The (Liberal) Zombie Apocalypse is Here…

Zombie apocalypse?  It’s here…

If you’ve been watching television for about a year now, you may have noticed that there’s a lot of shows dealing with the gruesome. There’s zombies, vampires, even werewolves now and then. What is the fascination here?   You don’t need to watch television to see some of these creatures…you only have to venture out onto a street where there is a protest of some sort taking place.  By and large, and this is just my opinion you understand, the protesters march along with their signs and bull-horns blaring out their slogans.  When questioned about what they’re doing, a majority of them do not seem to know why they are there, which leads me to believe in zombies.   We all know, or should, what a zombie is…a person that has no will of their own and is responding to some sort of stimulus…at least that’s my impression. 

Between political correctness run amok, and the general apathy evidenced by young people today, we are being faced with the very real possibility that our country will be run by these zombies. In a time when you can wake up one morning and claim to “feel” like the opposite sex and therefore be allowed to use a bathroom of that sex, it doesn’t bode well for people who DON’T think that way. The PC crowd also wants to eliminate all manner of gender labels, to the point of ridiculousness.   In some colleges and universities it is frowned upon to call people by ANY reference to their gender. So you have banned phrases like “you guys” and words like “Sir” or “Ma’am” and, heaven forbid that you should utter something about patriotism, you might well get drummed out of the class!

What’s wrong with being patriotic?  We know, because the Supreme Court says so, that it’s alright to desecrate the American flag, even to burning it. That’s free speech and it’s covered. What isn’t covered is the possible consequence of a couple of men(Oh…can I use that word?) coming up to the flag-burner and beating the crap out of him or her.  See, free speech, or any action, always has consequences and some of them might be unintended on the part of the person committing the act. Again, what’s wrong with being patriotic? During the Vietnam War, which was undeclared by the way, the saying was that if America was good enough to live in, it was good enough to fight for…which led a number of Americans to flee to Canada and stay there until it was all over.

Continue Reading

The Media is Upset over this Fake News by Santa Maria PD?

The media and press in Santa Maria, California is feeling abused over being fed fake news. In order to prevent two murders and round up a dozen murderers, the Santa Maria Police Chief said two gang members had been deported. In fact they were placed in protective custody. The media screams foul and cites trust. The same media that runs false narratives about police brutality. Do you think the police chief did the right thing?
As Reported by the Associated Press:

Police investigating a notorious gang in a city on California’s central coast issued a fake press release that the chief credited with saving two men by deceiving gang members who wanted to kill them, but the ruse was criticized by news organizations who reported it as fact. 

Santa Maria Police Chief Ralph Martin defended the rare tactic this week when it came to light, saying he had never done such a thing in his 43-year career, but he wouldn’t rule out doing it again.

“It was a moral and ethical decision, and I stand by it,” Martin said Friday. “I am keenly aware and sensitive to the community and the media. I also had 21 bodies lying in the city in the last 15 months.” 

The phony announcement issued in February was discovered in court documents and only reported this week by the Santa Maria Sun, a weekly newspaper in the city 140 miles northwest of Los Angeles.

The daily newspaper and local television stations were unaware the information in the release was false when they reported that two men, Jose Santos Melendez, 22, and Jose Marino Melendez, 23, had been….

Full Story Here:
News from The Associated Press

Megyn Kelly: "Pam Geller is, no question, a HATEFUL PERSON

 In hitting President-elect Trump and supposedly defending the freedom of speech, Megyn Kelly on NPR Wednesday night referred to “Pam [sic] Geller, who there’s no question is a hateful person, who held this Draw Muhammad contest down in Texas.”

Kelly said this in the context of defending the freedom of speech: “Now she’s a provocateur and she’s not a fan of anyone who’s Muslim from the sound of what she says, but this is America and she has the right to say those things. And she has the right to have a contest like that.” But in smearing me as “hateful,” she demonstrates that she doesn’t really know what was at stake when Islamic jihadis attacked our free speech event in Garland.

Why am I hateful for standing for the First Amendment? Is she copying the tactics of Islamic propagandists, smearing as “hateful” those of us who refuse to submit to the most brutal and extreme ideology on the face of the earth?

And I’m a “provocateur”? Why? The Garland attack was part of a longstanding jihad war against the freedom of speech. Those who say I provoked the jihadis don’t remember, or care to remember, that as jihadis were killing the Muhammad cartoonists in Paris, their accomplice was murdering Jews in a nearby kosher supermarket. Were the Jews “hateful”? Did they “provoke” the jihadis?

I held the event in the same venue where Muslim leaders held a conference in support of the sharia, in support of the ideology behind the Charlie Hebdo jihad massacre. Was that provocative? Should we submit to the devout Muslims who use violence to impose the speech laws under the sharia?

Drawing Muhammad offends Islamic jihadists? So does being Jewish, as many anti-Semitic attacks have proven. How much accommodation of any kind should we give to murderous savagery? To kowtow to violent intimidation will only encourage more of it. 

 Megyn Kelly should know that.

What does Megyn Kelly know about my work as a whole? What did she do to help Rifqa Bary, the Ohio teenager who was threatened with death by her father for converting from Islam to Christianity? What has Megyn Kelly done for the other Muslim girls who wanted to live a free life, and whom I helped to safety?

Megyn Kelly has never had me on her show. She covered the jihad attack against our free speech event in Texas for over a week but did not have me on. How does she know what I think, or why I did what I did? She made her “stand” for free speech regarding the Garland jihad attack while excoriating me. The thing about Kelly is that she assumed my mantle and championed my work while attacking and smearing me; that is the hallmark of a true second-hander.

Meanwhile, the scallywags, scoundrels, and misanthropes to whom she gives a platform on her show are reprehensible. Kelly has oppressors and terror-tied operatives on her show, including representatives of the Hamas-tied Council on American (CAIR). The lovefest between Megyn Kelly and Michael Moore pulled the curtain back on the RINO news network. It was jarring.

Ever since Megyn Kelly got her mancut haircut (emulating iconic female TV personality Diane Sawyer), she has seemingly been on a mission to move to the alphabets (ABC, NBC, CBS).

Sadly, Rupert Murdoch’s left-wing sons, Tweedledee and Tweedledum (who took over after Roger Ailes was stupidly forced out) have made complete asses of themselves furiously trying to keep her. They have offered her over 20 million dollars a year. Why? She has alienated the Fox News audience by attacking Trump and shamelessly trying to curry favor with left-wing news executives at the big three.

The auction for her services never materialized, and Kelly has kicked it up several notches, making her show unwatchable. The good news? Hannity has skyrocketed, pulling even with her in the ratings and at times surpassing her. 

I hope her ego gets the better of her and she goes. She will go down with that ship. We saw what happened when FOX gave her a special on the FOX Network. She bombed.

Drop Kelly and replace her with Tomi Lahren. Two birds, one stone. We the people get our kind of gal, and the Murdoch idiots get a millennial icon.
[ Pot meet kettle. Wed night, Megyn Kelly went on NPR and proceeded to smear and libel me in order to garner favor with the left-wing primitives she so desperately wishes to get into bed with. How embarrassing for her.]

Obama Urges Soldiers to Question Trump’s Authority, ‘Criticize Our President’

oped: Yeppers Donald Trump says: "I like this guy".... how dense is that? Y'all be the Judge...I'm just shaking my head in disbelief *sheesh*  Yup seems the #Trump administration is becoming the Kumbia' smoor's campfire sing a long amigos akin to Kawlifornias governors Jerry Brown and A'Nold da terminator in name only!

by: Warner Todd Huston 

In his final address to America’s armed forces, President Barack Obama reminded troops that once Donald J. Trump becomes president, soldiers have a duty to question his authority and criticize him. Obama also said the Second Amendment and global warming can be blamed for terrorism.

Obama stood before soldiers at MacDill Air Force Base, in Tampa, Florida on Tuesday, December 6, to talk about “the foundation that we will leave for the next administration,” CNSNews.com reported. 
Characterizing the military’s mission as a fight against “violent extremism,” Obama insisted that soldiers need to rise up against Trump if they feel he is pushing policies that are ill considered.
Obama told the troops, “each of us has…the universal right to speak your minds and to protest against authority; to live in a society that’s open and free; that can criticize our president without retribution.”
Obama went on to insist that a proper U.S. policy against “violent extremism” is a “long term” policy.
“So rather than offer false promises that we can eliminate terrorism by dropping more bombs or deploying more and more troops or fencing ourselves off from the rest of the world,” Obama said, “we have to take a long view of the terrorist threat. And we have to pursue a smart strategy that can be sustained. In the time remaining, let me just suggest what I think should guide this approach.”

The lame duck president also went on to blame terrorism on the Second Amendment and global warming.
In addressing the war-torn Middle East, Obama insisted that global warming forms a large part of that conflict. “A changing climate is increasing competition for food and water,” which, he claimed, drives the conflict in Syria and other nearby nations.
Obama also blamed the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution for “violent extremism” in the United States.
“Somebody who is trying to kill and willing to be killed is dangerous, particularly when we live in a country where it’s very easy for that person to buy a very powerful weapon,” Obama insisted.
The presidential short-timer also placed blame on the Constitution’s First Amendment, hinting that he thinks free speech is too freely indulged to prevent “impressionable minds” from being warped by “extremism” on the Internet.

Obama touted his efforts to limit the reach of terror recruiters online saying, “We’ve worked with our tech sector to support efforts to push back on terrorist messages on social media that motivate people to kill.”
The president also defended Islam against the charge of extremism:

We are fighting terrorists who claim to fight on behalf of Islam. But they do not speak for over a billion Muslims around the world, and they do not speak for American Muslims including many who wear the uniform of the United States of America’s military. If we stigmatize good patriotic Muslims, that just feeds the terrorists’ narrative. It fuels the same false grievances they they use to motivate people to kill. If we act like this is a war between the United States and Islam, we’re not gonna lose more Americans to terrorist attacks, but we’ll also lose the sight of the very principles we claim to defend

As to the rise of ISIS, Obama insisted it was not given aide by his actions of pulling out of Iraq in 2011 but was instead given succor by the policies of George W. Bush.

“By 2011, Iraqis wanted our military presence to end, and they were unwilling to sign a new status of forces agreement to protect our troops from prosecution if they were trying to defend themselves in Iraq,” Obama proclaimed. “In addition, maintaining American troops in Iraq at the time could not have reversed the forces that contributed to ISIL’s rise.”
Obama added, “Some of the mistakes of the 2003 invasion have helped to give rise to the organization that became ISIL in the first place.”

New Plans to ‘disrupt’ Trump’s inauguration

Michael Moore, who is not a good loser, is calling for people to ‘dispupt’ the inauguration of President-Elect Donald Trump. Do not be misled by this code speak that is actually calling for riots and violence. His words are already the foundation and justification for any action they deem necessary. So much for the peaceful transfer of power. This aberant behavior cannot be allowed to stand. I have heard from other sources, by the way, that some biker groups supporting Trump will also be in attendance. Enough said.
As reported and seen first on Fox News:
Michael Moore — who predicted Donald Trump would win the presidency months before his surprise victory — is now encouraging people to protest the President-elect’s upcoming inauguration.

“Disrupt the Inauguration. The Majority have spoken – by nearly 2.7 million votes &counting! Silence is not an option,” Moore tweeted Wednesday.
The liberal filmmaker shared a link to the website for DisruptJ20, a campaign for “a bold mobilization against the inauguration of Donald Trump on January 20, 2017.”

Disrupt the Inauguration. The Majority have spoken – by nearly 2.7 million votes &counting! Silence is not an option https://t.co/HSmP3pREvy

— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) December 7, 2016

Full Story Here:
Michael Moore calls for protesters to ‘disrupt’ Trump’s inauguration | Fox News

Government Threatens Action if Facebook doesn’t Censor “Fake News” and “Hate Speech” in 24 Hours

by: Tim Brown 

It's amazing how people who whine about tolerance and coexisting and democracy and such are the first ones to look to censor other's free speech and freedom of the press. Take the European Union for example. On Sunday, The EU's justice commissioner called on Facebook to censor a plethora of online speech, including what the state-controlled media has referred to as "fake news," which is really independent journalists and commentators.
Breitbart reports:
The unelected executive arm of the European Union (EU) is threatening to escalate from "non-legislative" action if Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube do not censor what it considers "illegal" online speech within 24 hours.

In May of this year, the U.S. tech giants signed a "code of conduct", promising to work with the Commission and national law enforcement to "criminalize" and "sanction" "individual perpetrators" as well as committing to "promoting independent counter-narratives" that the EU favours. 


Speaking on Sunday, the EU's justice commissioner added "fake news" to the list of what they want censored online.

The "series of commitments to combat the spread of illegal hate speech online in Europe" developed "together with… the IT companies" included a promise to "review the majority" of flagged "hate speech" within 24 hours.

So far, the Commission claims that this is only occurring in France and Germany. Interestingly, they have been the recipients of quite a few Muslim invaders. Does anyone smell political correctness to protect the guilty in all of this?
EU Justice Commissioner Věra Jourová told The Financial Times (FT): "If Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Microsoft want to convince me and the ministers that the non-legislative approach can work, they will have to act quickly and make a strong effort in the coming months."
"The last weeks and months have shown that social media companies need to live up to their important role and take up their share of responsibility when it comes to phenomena like online radicalisation, illegal hate speech or fake news," she added.


In an interview with Breitbart London in May, UKIP's former Justice and Home Affairs spokeswoman and (briefly) leader Diane James MEP said, "This legislation is so vague that it is the thin end of the wedge not just to curb hate speech but free speech as well."
"Different people and cultures across Europe have different ways of communicating," she added. "The Liberal tradition in Britain for instance is more open and very different from that of dictatorial former Communist countries in the East."
Melissa Dykes comments on exactly what this is all about.
And of course "hate speech" is very loosely defined here, so it can basically be used to censor free speech online. We all know what the phrase "fake news" has come to denote — and nearly the entire alternative media is encompassed within it.

It should be no surprise that the same "fake news" the EU wants to censor has been blamed for Brexit and the potential for other countries like Italy deciding to leave the EU as well.

Now that these companies have signed on willingly for the censorship, and President Obama has given up control of the Internet just like George Soros wanted him to, it's pretty clear where all of this is headed. 


"They are shutting down freedom of speech on the Internet," she concludes. "Keep speaking the truth online… while you still can."
Facebook has already been attacking voices in opposition to Islam, the current administration, and Hillary Clinton. Google, Microsoft and other outfits are joining in that same campaign, which is to silence your voice in the online marketplace.
Censoring free speech is not a part of government's job.
Speak out!

Revealed! Obama’s Pentagon covered-up $125 BILLION in waste

oped: During Barack Obama's tenure, the gov't took cash straight out of your wallet -- and pocketed it themselves! Get the details on this outrageous Obama cash grab cover-up he DOESN’T want you to know about. Warning: This is upsetting  

President Barack Obama’s administration promised transparency from the beginning. But a recently discovered study, hidden from the public by the Pentagon, proves his administration is not only secretive but also more fiscally irresponsible than most administrations before him.
Recent interviews and memos obtained by The Washington Post reveal an internal investigation at the Pentagon that discovered $125 billion of the defense budget is going to waste. Instead of logically cutting the budget and reallocating the funds to a department in need, the Pentagon buried the study in order to maintain the outlandishly large budget it currently receives.
The purpose of the study, which was produced by the Defense Business Board and completed in January 2015, was to discover ways to make the administrative side of the Pentagon work more efficiently, and to then apply any savings that amounted to combat power.
A great idea in theory, but when the investigation turned up more potential savings that anticipated, Pentagon officials quickly moved to discredit the results. These high ranking officials feared that if the massive waste was revealed, Congress would cut their budget even more.

The study outlined how the Defense Department could easily save the wasted funds, referring to the overwhelming amount of individuals employed to fill administrative duties.
“The plan would not have required layoffs of civil servants or reductions in military personnel. Instead, it would have streamlined the bureaucracy through attrition and early retirements, curtailed high-priced contractors and made better use of information technology,” The Washington Post reported.
The Pentagon back-office bureaucracy employs 1,014,000 people to support 1.3 million troops on active duty. This department is eating up 23% of the total defense budget.
That’s an astounding portion of the money intended to defend our nation that’s funding desk jobs.
Multiple Pentagon leaders reportedly feared the study would devalue their claims that previous budget cuts resulted in a lack of funds for the military. To protect the integrity of their complaints, they gutlessly imposed security restrictions on information from the study and removed it from the Pentagon website.

President-Elect Donald Trump has reiterated his goal to cut spending and improve our economy, and the revelation of the Pentagon waste could be a great place to start.
He has promised to build the United States military, and this study shows the funds he needs could already be within the defense department budget.
Had Pentagon officials followed through with the suggestions of the study, the $125 billion in waste could have been reallocated for troops, weapons, and rebuilding the nuclear arsenal.
Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work, who ordered the study, told the post that the plan laid out by the report was “unrealistic.”
The military faces the sad truth of never receiving these funds, due to the 2011 Budget Control Act. The act outlines $113 billion in budget cuts for the Pentagon over the next four years, unless Trump and Congress step in and agree to a long-term spending deal by October.
This would place a lot of monetary responsibility in the hands of Trump’s nominee for defense secretary, retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, according to the Post.
This shady cover up is going to create more work for the incoming administration, further proving that Obama’s administration never followed through on their promise of transparency, and are failing to support a successful transition of power.
–The Horn Editorial team

[Exposed] Hillary fed “fake news” to liberal media

by Stephen Dietrich

Hillary Clinton's campaign tried to lie and cheat their way to the White House -- and we have proof. See how her team bragged about feeding misinformation to celebrities, comedians, and the media talking heads

The mainstream media is dying — and they’re really, really angry about it.
American consumers are finding the old mainstream media increasingly untrustworthy, and are ditching the ancient business model in droves.
Should there be any doubt left in your mind that the mainstream media is bought and paid for, look no further than this —
While the corporate media was publishing unfounded and slanderous articles attacking conservative websites as “fake news”, they conveniently ignored the fact that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s campaign was caught actively feeding “fake news” stories to Americans.
That’s according to an email from former Clinton campaign manager John Podesta, revealed by WikiLeaks, in which a top executive of the Clinton Global Initiative brags about directing Comedy Central’s “fake news” satire show, “The Colbert Report”, to run prepackaged stories.

See for yourself —



Here’s why this is dangerous: In 2014, 1-in-10 American adults admitted they get their news primarily from these liberal “fake news” sources, according to Pew Research.
In fact, 11% of all American adults admitted in 2015 they trust “The Colbert Report” and her sister show, “The Daily Show,” the most among any news source.
And among young adults, it’s even worse — almost three-in-ten say that they trusted these two “fake news” satire programs as the most reliable source of political news.
And the Clinton campaign was just caught admitting they manipulate these shows behind the scenes.
So, where’s the outrage about “fake news” being fed entire stories by the Clinton campaign among the mainstream media?
There is none.
The silence is deafening.
And that’s the kind of bias pushing more and more readers to leave.

This isn’t an isolated incident, of course. During the election, Democrat insiders were caught writing the questions for interviews and doing newspaper research for newspapers like The Washington Post. Clinton had CNN insiders secretly working for her campaign to help fabricate debates and spin television appearances, while so-called “fact checkers” were actively fabricating stories.
Simultaneously, during the lead up to the election a “top-down” order was issued by the Clinton campaign to “destroy Trump” at three major networks that, according to Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly.
The major news networks smartly responded, and were caught multiple times lying about Trump supporters – sometimes going as far as to mute their mics. Meanwhile, magazines slandered Trump’s wife, Melania Trump and lied about the president-elect, while celebrities hounded his 10-year-old son.
These weren’t just biased suggestions, either. In at least one instance that we have undeniable proof of, the Clinton campaign scripted in painstaking detail the questions, responses, and timeline of events at a television interview.
Despite their protests, the liberal media can’t avoid the inevitable.
Because of their bias, these huge corporate conglomerate media outlets are dying.
Even the post-election bump in subscriptions to newspapers like The Washington Post and The New York Times won’t save them — the traditional model has been shedding readers for decades.
After years of conservatives loudly complaining about the shameful liberal media bias, they have started fighting back. Readers like you are heading to places like The Horn News, where our opinions aren’t hidden, but instead are proudly on display.
Welcome.
And to the bias, untrustworthy media: Good riddance.

LTC Allen West Meets with Mike Pence on National Security and Al Gore Meets with Donald Trump to Talk Climate Change

 
I’m not sure that Trump Tower in New York City has ever had a day with more diverse visitors than it saw on Monday.
On Monday morning Col. Allen West (R-FL) was spotted entering Trump Tower to meet with Vice President-elect Mike Pence, Trump’s chosen National Security Adviser retired Lt. General Michael Flynn, and Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland to discuss national security issues. West made it clear that he was not offered a position within the administration but was simply being consulted about the future of American foreign policy.

“Nothing was offered. I mean, they know my reputation very well. I’m just a simple soldier and I’m the third of four generations that served this country going back to my father in World War II, and we still have a relative of ours that is continuing to serve in the Army now.”

Reporters also asked West for his thoughts about the competition to be the next Secretary of State, but West didn’t take the bait. He told the reporters that President-Elect Trump should choose whomever he’s most comfortable with, and that he himself is “just considering how I can best serve this country and through this administration.”
However, the conservative stalwart from Florida wasn’t the only high profile guest visiting the Trump team on Monday.
Former Vice President and Climate Change Crusader Al Gore was also a guest at Trump Tower on Monday. Gore had a scheduled conversation with the President-elect’s daughter, Ivanka, but he spent most of his time speaking with Mr. Trump himself.

“I had a lengthy and very productive session with the president-elect. It was a sincere search for areas of common ground. I had a meeting beforehand with Ivanka Trump. The bulk of the time was with the president-elect, Donald Trump. I found it an extremely interesting conversation, and to be continued, and I’m just going to leave it at that,” Gore told reporters afterwards.
Continue Reading

General Michael Flynn Blamed for ‘PizzaGate’ Gunman

by Philip Hodges 


It started with a tweet from Trump’s pick for national security advisor retired General Michael Flynn, way back before the election in early November. He referenced a story about how the NYPD had apparently uncovered massive amounts of evidence pertaining to Anthony Weiner’s emails and files retrieved from his laptop. The article from True Pundit had this headline: “NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play, Perjury.”

U decide – NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes w Children, etc…MUST READ! https://t.co/O0bVJT3QDr

— General Flynn (@GenFlynn) November 3, 2016

Somehow, the “pizzagate” scandal got tied in with his tweet, even though neither his tweet nor the article he links to ever mentions anything about pizzagate or Comet Ping Pong, the pizza establishment believed to be part of an underground D.C. child sex trafficking ring.
After a 28-year-old North Carolina man Edgar Maddison Welch had barged into Comet Ping Pong on Sunday with a semi-automatic rifle allegedly to “investigate” pizzagate, even firing a shot, the media went berserk pointing to the dire consequences of latching onto “fake news” “conspiracy theories.” It was the perfect opportunity that the media could not let pass them by.

But people started going back to the tweet by General Michael Flynn, as if he was partially to blame for what this guy did.

1. Gen Flynn tweets about Fake HRC Comet Pizza conspiracy. 2. Comet gets threats. 3. Gunman enters Comet today. https://t.co/vS3cv2F6ui

— John Aravosis (@aravosis) December 4, 2016

Just to reiterate, the over-a-month-old tweet from Flynn had nothing to do with “pizzagate,” but these people are trying to tie it to him anyway.
In response to their overreaction, Flynn’s son Michael Flynn, Jr. defended his dad, perhaps not realizing that his dad didn’t even tweet about it.

Until #Pizzagate proven to be false, it’ll remain a story. The left seems to forget #PodestaEmails and the many “coincidences” tied to it. https://t.co/8HA9y30Yfp

— Michael G Flynn🇺🇸 (@mflynnJR) December 5, 2016
 

Flynn, Jr. had unwittingly fell for the “real” news accusations that his dad had tweeted about pizzagate when in fact he hadn’t.
Here’s CNN discussing the dangers of not listening to mainstream media for truth. Count how many times they use the terms “conspiracy theory” – and variants of the term – and “fake news”:



Just to be totally accurate, Flynn, Jr. didn’t say that unless pizzagate can be proven false, it must be true. That’s not what he said. He said that until it’s proven false, it will remain a story. 
It’s a theory with a lot of circumstantial evidence, but no hard evidence. That’s usually how these deep, dark scandals are. The people involved cover their tracks well and speak in code. At this point, there’s really no way to prove the pizzagate scandal. But until it’s proven false (somehow), it will remain a story. That doesn’t mean it must be true. It might be true – and eventually proven to be true if there is ever going to be an investigation – or it might be completely untrue.
And what did Stelter do? He immediately tied the theory to UFOs and aliens. So, if you believe that American politicians are so evil that they’d be involved with an underground child sex trafficking network, you probably also believe in aliens and UFOs.

Oh, and to another of Stelter’s statements mocking the “conspiracy theory” about the guy being an actor, apparently he is an actor.
 

Shot Fired at Conspiratorial Pizzeria - Pretext To “Shut Down Websites Spreading Hateful Material”

by: Mac Slavo 
The battle for free speech on the Internet is reaching the main stage.
Curiously, authority over the world wide web has concentrated into fewer hands than ever, and has traded hands in ways that we little understand. Right now, words are being twisted, and used against us.
There are cyber bombardments underway right now. The big campaign is being sold under “fake news,” in the hopes that dissent can be stifled and propaganda can once again by scripted and authoritative. This new narrative is working as well as they had hoped, but it is getting the point across – the the kind of websites that bucked the system during the campaign season aren’t going to be tolerated much longer.
Some of the websites that have been smeared are now suing for defamation and a retraction maligning their work as foreign propaganda.

According to the Daily Caller:
One of the websites The Washington Post labeled “fake news” in a November story demanded a retraction and threatened the paper with a defamation lawsuit in a demand letter Sunday.
A lawyer for Naked Capitalism accuses WaPo of running a debunked list of “fake news” sites in the “sensational” story compiled by a dubious team of researchers, without substantiating their claims or giving Naked Capitalism a chance to respond to the allegation. The Washington Post’s actions constitute defamation, the lawyer writes in the letter published Monday.

Meanwhile, a psyop is in the making to smear online investigators and citizen journalists who are attempting to uncover a very dark web of illicit and damning activities connected to Democratic operatives and the Clinton campaign – much of it exposed by Wikileaks dumps of email from John Podesta, Anthony Wiener and other sources close to the Clintons.

But instead of exposing the culpability of the political figures connected to “Pizzagate” and prompted a serious official inquiry into what would be very serious criminal allegations, activists are getting a blowback of guilt by association for daring to report on the subject at all – after a man walked into the notorious Comet Ping Pong pizza restaurant in D.C. at the center of the scandal, and fired a gun while patrons were inside.

via NY Daily News:
Cops arrested a 28-year-old man from North Carolina after he opened fire inside Comet Ping Pong, a Washington D.C. pizza restaurant named in a Hillary Clinton fringe theory.
Edgar Maddison Welch, of Salisbury, told police on Sunday afternoon he decided to “self-investigate” whether the so-called “Pizza Gate” conspiracy theory was true— that Clinton and her campaign chief were operating a child sex ring in the restaurant’s back room.
He stormed the restaurant — going straight for the maligned back room — while brandishing an assault rifle along Connecticut Ave NW near Fessenden St. NW around 3 p.m., police said. He pointed the gun at an employee at some point, cops said, and then fired at least one shot after patrons with children and employees scattered for safety. No one was injured during the incident.

He now faces an assault charge in the brazen stunt inspired by the fictitious conspiracy theory spawned on Reddit.
While making a clear association with this individual’s criminal act, the story also summarily rejects any validity that the evidence surrounding the conspiracy may hold. They are instantly certain that the claims – despite a rabbit hole trail of telling emails, images and social media posts – are “fictitious,” “false” and untrue.
That’s some unadulterated propaganda – weaponized under the “fake news” meme to target anti-establishment reporters, researchers and opinion makers who are undermining their ability to set the agenda and frame reality with their inconvenient truths.

Restaurant owner James Alefantis [at the center of these claims] thanked police for capturing the suspect after a frantic 911 call and then condemned “certain people” for trying to “spread malicious and utterly false accusations about Comet Ping Pong.”
“What happened today demonstrates that promoting false and reckless conspiracy theories comes with consequences,” Alefantis wrote.

This, too, may play out as an offensive campaign to ban websites and set new boundaries for reporting.

Right now, there is a very real attempt to silence the first amendment-protected reporting in order to keep this bizarre and disturbing story under wraps and out of the news. While violence is not justified, there is an attempt to tie this act to the reporting itself rather than acknowledge the allegations at hand – odd, indeed, since the documents point to the worst kinds of unlawful activity.
via RT:
Despite the story being entirely unfounded, it has resulted in death threats against the owner of the restaurant, its employees, and its patrons. The owner was forced to contact the FBI, local police, Facebook, and other social media platforms in an effort to have the fake story removed from the internet.
[…]
“This was our worst fear,” Carr said, “that someone would read all this and come to the block with a gun. And today it happened.” 


Nearby bookshop Politics and Prose has also received threats, with the store’s co-owner Bradley Graham telling The Washington Post that management was planning to meet with police on Monday over fears that verbal attacks might escalate… He said he also hopes authorities will work to shut down websites where such “hateful material” is being spread.
It seems that they would much rather kill the messenger and eliminate online sites and forums, rather than deal with the story itself – probably because it points towards things that are institutionalized in the power structure. If any of these allegations are true, they are taking place above the law, and are unofficially sanctioned and protected activities.
There is no doubt that this story is being scripted around some very biased talking points – with the focus entirely on the activities of “online thugs.”
“Fake news can have real victims,” – so says the corporate news talking point. The epitome of the pot calling the kettle black. Check it out: http://freedomoutpost.com/shot-fired-at-conspiratorial-pizzeria-pretext-to-shut-down-websites-spreading-hateful-material/


This site, SHTFplan, is just one of the many sites that are falsely listed as ‘Russian propaganda,’ along with many others have experienced very real disturbances in website performance after reporting on this issue. The Daily Sheeple and SGTReport.com are only a couple of the many sites that have been shutdown altogether under copyright claims, or attacked anonymously via DDoS to take the site offline.

While the NY Times tries to soft peddle #PizzaGate, Reddit tries to kill the Sub-Reddit investigation and Twitter attempts to censor breaking news on the global pedophile ring – it’s too late. The genie is out of the bottle. We will not be stopped. Truth will be revealed. Because #PizzaGate is a WORLDWIDE CITIZEN INVESTIGATION NOW. And the pedos are running scared.

One startling and clearly wrong-headed individual, likely a provocateur, that will now be used to brand website after website covering the details of this perplexing network of evils as participants in a campaign of hate, intimidation and cyber bullying.
In other words, the revenge of Hillary against all the opponents that “made her lose.”
Or perhaps that’s merely the just deserts that compliment that handy work of cutting down the weeds of the Internet. Curtailing speech, and the especially worrisome online blogosphere, so that it can’t hurt feelings – or expose political misdeeds – any longer with any teeth at all without being summarily shut down.
It remains to be seen what may actually be done, but are some of the things being discussed for Internet control.
Telling the truth can be a dangerous act.
Article posted with permission from SHTFPlan

MSM and Social Media Discredit #PizzaGate as a “Fake News Conspiracy Theory”

by:Daisy Luther 

I’m getting pretty used to the things I write being scorned as “fake news” by the people who just wish I’d shut up and go away. I understand that cognitive dissonance runs deep and that you can’t reach everyone. I tend to ignore them and carry on with what I’m doing.
But
FauxFox News got my attention with today’s headline:

Man with rifle arrested at DC restaurant targeted by fake news conspiracy theories

Seriously?
After everything that has been uncovered by Wikileaks and citizen journalists about the pedophile ring lurking around Washington DC, they’re calling this “fake news conspiracy theories?”
I suppose when your bread is buttered by the government and when you are nothing but a mouthpiece for those in charge, you say whatever they want you to say.
I suppose that when the lies you’ve been espousing for decades all begin to unravel, you’ll say anything to cover your own behind.
I suppose that for some it seems okay to you’ll publish garbage like this:

Comet Ping Pong’s owner and several employees were deluged by threats from social media users after several fake news stories claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and her campaign chief John Podesta ran a pedophilia ring out of the restaurant. The story was spread using the Twitter hashtag “Pizzagate.”

D.C. police said Welch told officers in a post-arrest interview he went to Comet to “self-investigate ‘Pizza Gate[sic].'”
Last month, D.C. police told Fox 5 that they were not investigating Comet and were keeping an eye on those who were threatening the restaurant and its employees.
Restaurant general manager Bryce Reh told the station that some conspiracy theorists were using photos of actual children from the establishment’s website to push the false stories…
…James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong, released a statement late Sunday night that denied what he called the “malicious and utterly false accusations” and said the company hoped to resume normal operations within a few days.
“I hope that those involved in fanning these flames will take a moment to contemplate what happened here today, and stop promoting these falsehoods right away,” Alefantis said in the statement.

I’ll bet he does.
Despite the efforts to silence all talk of #PizzaGate, it has become the subject of a worldwide citizen investigation. Officials are doing nothing, but independent media and citizen investigators are refusing to be silenced.



When the media is this frantic to deny that they’re covering something up, you can bet your bottom dollar that what they’re covering up is probably even worse than what we’ve already come to suspect.

Or are we just getting played?

But now, after the man with a gun walked into Comet Ping Pong, the pizzeria at the center of this whole mess, some independent media folks are starting to wonder if we’re being played in a giant psyop.
Yes, there’s a lot of horrifying, suspicious stuff going on.
Yes, there’s plenty of evidence of a cover up.
There probably are pedophiles running amok who have the power and means to cover up their dirty secrets. In fact, there are  even some shady links between George Soros and James Alefantis, the owner of Comet Pizza.
Is this is a tool that will be used to silence dissenters? Are the people involved in #PizzaGate co-opting the investigation and turning it around to discredit the people reporting on it? Was it a set-up from the very beginning?

Piper McGowan of The Daily Sheeple wrote an in-depth article on the topic. She concluded:

Does all of this mean the allegations in the Pizzagate conspiracy are real or fake?
The answer is neither. All of this information ultimately proves nothing either way. Pizzagate is still an unconfirmed conspiracy theory.
BUT now, that isn’t even the point. The point is how this story will be used against the alternative media reporting on it. Lots of alt sites have already been attacked and many shut down for reporting on it, ours included. No doubt this will continue.

Now what if I told you that George Soros has indirectly funded Comet Ping Pong and Mr. Alefantis? Would you just consider for a moment the totality of what I’m suggesting here?
The point is that psyops can still have grains of truth. Lots of them. In fact, a psyop can be overflowing with truth… and still completely misdirect people.
Are these people creepy? A whole lot of people the globe over think they are, me included. Are there pedophile references here? Yes. Does that mean Pizzagate is proof of a pedophile ring? None of this information is hard proof of anything.
Will this whole situation be used to shut down the alternative media or at least kill anonymity online?
They are certainly going to try, and Pizzagate gives them a ton of ammunition with which to do so.

The silencing has already begun.
Public forums are beginning to crack down. Twitter has reportedly squashed the #PizzaGate hashtag to keep it out of the trending subjects. The topic has been banned on Reddit.
One independent media website has been hit with DMCA violations for investigating and reporting on PizzaGate. Here’s what happened to The Daily Sheeple.



Dresden James, a British novelist, wrote, “When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.”
I can hardly think of anything more applicable to this tangled skein of lies, plots, and cover-ups.
Article reposted with permission from DaisyLuther.com