Saturday, March 17, 2012

S/Sgt Robert Bales Aghanistan Tragedy

First and foremost I am not condoning the action taken by S/Sgt Robert Bales{Not within the rules of engagement)...however let's examine the facts before we jump to conclusions...The media is not reporting the ages on the so called 'Children' were they toddlers or teenager's capable of fighting with the Taliban...what did S/Sgt Bales know about the family he 'targeted'...were they Taliban fighters connected to placing IED's and attacks on the US Military?

As it appears from the surface... as information is released about S/Sgt Bales...he appears to have just 'snapped' under duress from multiple deployments...for those who never fought in combat and were never subjected/ required to kill the will never know what goes through a soldiers mind to alienate oneself in order to pull a trigger and take a can become a blurred line between right and wrong!

During the Vietnam era women and children were used in suicide attacks on US Bases...Women &Children were  strapped with grenades and sent to the line smiling and waving...if allowed into the perimeter they would detonate the grenades...soldiers had to learn the hard lesson of having to take them out before they breached the perimeter...I am pretty sure this is going on in the ME war zones of today

During the Vietnam era only one deployment (13 months)was required during service some chose to deploy for more 'In Country' assignments! The reason being is that combat assignments takes a toll on ones mind...some can adjust..others only one deployment was required...maybe we should return to this policy!

Let's wait and see... what a hopefully fair and just investigation of all the facts shows... before we pass judgement on S/Sgt Bales!

Energy Debate: Gingrich Responds to Obama

Newt takes Barry to the proverbial woodshed...

Obama Invites Palin-Obsessed Lunatic To Dine At White House

Andrew Sullivan SC Obama Invites Palin Obsessed Lunatic To Dine At White House

According to the Washington Post, the Obama White House invited 362 people to its state dinner for the United Kingdom. One familiar face will be gracing the red carpet: Andrew Sullivan of The Daily Beast.
For those who don’t remember, Andrew Sullivan is the once-conservative columnist who shifted dramatically to the left over the past few years – and reserved a special hatred in his heart for Sarah Palin and her special needs son Trig.
Early on in the campaign, Sullivan suggested that Trig was not actually Sarah Palin’s son – he was Bristol’s son, and Sarah had claimed him as her own to cover up Bristol’s pregnancy. Her oft-recounted labor drama, said Sullivan, was possibly nonsense; it was more likely that she had made it up. As Sullivan wrote in August 2008, “the noise around this story is now deafening, and the weirdness of the chronology sufficient to rise to the level of good faith questions.” Actually, the noise wasn’t deafening – it was just that Sullivan was tone-deaf.
But Sullivan didn’t drop his crusade against Palin and Trig.
Read more at By Toro520.

Friday, March 16, 2012

High Gas price Myth...busted..!

[op ed] by Sharlas Labrinth
Time to get real and address the issue at hand...It cost approximately .26 cents to produce one gallon of gas from oil...add approximately .20 cents for finding/drilling and transportation... then add .10 cents for road maintenance tax...this adds up to .56 cents per gallon...even if those who produce and sell the gas add a 100% mark-up for profit ...gas should be no more than $1.12 per gallon...and thats a pretty good profit margin!
Now why are we paying so much for gas?...well Speculators with pure greed on their minds cause' the price to sky-rocket along with  excessive hidden Federal taxes..
Gas prices could drop to $1.12 tomorrow if rules for speculators included they must pay up front and take immediate delivery of their so called speculation bids(I would bet not so many would speculate) well as having Congress repeal all excessive hidden taxes...gas/fuel is a necessity as compared to should not be taxed!

See I solved the problem without diatribing 80,000 pages of gobbely confuse the reader!


Newt 2012

Newt's senior adviser Randy Evans was on CNN this week explaining the delegate math that he outlined in his recent strategy memo . The bottom line is that halftime of the Republican nomination process is the Louisiana primary on March 24. Despite what the Romney campaign, the Washington Establishment, and the elite media want you to believe, this race is far from over.
With no candidate remotely close to 1,144 delegates, the magic number needed to secure the nomination, the nomination will not be decided until the fourth quarter.
That's why Mike Huckabee and others are saying it would be foolish for Newt to drop out. Here's what Governor Huckabee said on Laura Ingraham's show yesterday:
Gingrich should stay in the race simply because any one of the candidates could have a moment where they slip up and the opening will be created.
Political Scientist Jamie Hunter agrees, writing that Newt brings enthusiasm to the race and a focus on issues that the other candidates are ignoring.
Gingrich's continued presence also helps the democratic process. Primaries are all about choice, but a shrinking field denies that. Gingrich brings attention to some issues that Romney and Santorum have glossed over, such as energy policy, science, and innovation. Voters should have the broadest understanding of how the GOP will address the critical issues so that they can make the most informed vote choice. Big states like New York, California, Texas, and Pennsylvania also deserve to a multi-candidate pool. These states have a huge share of the national population, and their primaries will indicate where the larger electorate stands on the candidates. This was one of the main reasons why Republicans revamped their 2012 primary rules.
The Tampa Bay Times editorial page is also urging Newt stay in the race, editorializing yesterday that Newt has campaigned hard and the RNC Convention in August might be "hotter than we expected."This race is going to be decided by a big debate - a big choice - among GOP primary voters about the future of the Republican Party; what it stands for, and which candidate has the most compelling vision and most credibility to carry forward a conservative governing agenda.
That is the debate Newt is going to win, and with your generous support today, the nomination and the election.
Thank you,
Michael Krull
Campaign Manager
Newt 2012

Newt 2012

'Gay' activism dealt blow in progressive Europe

by Bob Unruh
“Gay” activism and its demand for “marriage” rights, adoption rights and spousal benefits has taken a hit in a normally progressive forum with the rejection by the European Court of Human Rights of a lesbian’s attempt to adopt her partner’s child.
The case came out of France, where the lesbian had demanded the right to adopt her partner’s daughter, only to be refused by French courts. The courts ruled that only married couples are allowed the privilege.
The European court then rejected a claim that the discrimination was based on the woman’s sexual lifestyle, pointing out that all unmarried couples in France face the same ban.
Gregor Puppinck of the European Center for Law and Justice said the ruling “provides important specifications on the issue of adoption and artificial procreation for homosexual partners.”
The ruling, 6-1, is a “severe defeat for the LGBT rights advocates,” he said.
The case was Gas at DeBois v. France.
read more:

Thursday, March 15, 2012

'Gay hate list': Farah, Perkins, Colson, more

Ok before I post the article I must do a op ed..I for one am so tired of the Gay Mafia known as GLAAD and LGBT attempting to force their lifestyle down the throats of those who oppose and disagree with their agenda..
I do believe it is time to start a counter alliance hummm what to call it *snap* ...SAD 'Straight and Determined'
I/we are  determined to not be intimidated into agreeing that homosexuality is normal and acceptable behavior...quite the contrary ...Let's be honest and call it for what it is... nothing more than a fetish and to be  quite frank 'sexual immaturity'...not worthy of 'Marital Rights' by any standard...I do not want it taught as acceptable behavior in our school system...what Gays do in private is between them and our maker...I have no hatred of them nor do I wish harm upon them.
Thus I am not "Homophobic" I have no fear of them I just disagree with the 'Marital Rights' issue they are trying to force upon us as well as trying to brainwash children born to hetrosexuals in our school systems... Sorry marriage for the most part is a union between a man and women for the purpose of creating off spring...since homosexuals cannot procreate by mating with each other the point is a moot one!

Now on to the article...wmd exclusive
WASHINGTON – The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation has created an enemies list of 36 commentators – including pastors, authors, radio talk-show hosts, pro-family activists and researchers – in an effort to limit the effectiveness of their media outreach.

The list includes Chuck Colson, Joseph Farah, Tony Perkins, Don Wildmon, David Barton, Bill Donohue and Gary Bauer.
The formulation of the list is the work of GLAAD’s “Commentator Accountability Project” that aims to “educate the media about the extreme rhetoric of over three dozen activists who are often given a platform to speak in opposition to LGBT people and the issues that affect their lives.” 

“Hate is not an expert opinion,” said GLAAD’s Herndon Graddick. “In most cases, news outlets invite reputable experts to speak on the subject at hand, but when talking about LGBT issues, open hostility and anti-LGBT bias seems to be all the credibility required. This project holds these so-called ‘pundits’ accountable for the extreme anti-LGBT rhetoric they continue to spread.”

GLAAD encourages individuals to alert the organization when those on the enemies list appear on local or national news.
In response, Farah said he has never spoken a hateful or defamatory word about homosexuals in his life.
“The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation should more accurately be called the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Criticism,” said Farah. “These people actually believe that if you have a different viewpoint and a different value system from them you are a hate-filled, bigoted monster.
read more:

Libyan Mob Desecrates Christian and Jewish WWII Tombstones Apparently Over Koran Burning

Golly gee it's ok for Muslims to desecrate Christian and Jewish religious symbols...but theirs are sacred? Time to outlaw the 7th Century Theocracy of intolerance and mayhem!

by Sharon Schwartz
In the eyes of radical Islamists, it seems attacking the living was not sufficient retaliation for U.S. troops inadvertently burning copies of the Koran in Afghanistan. Now, protesters in Libya have released their wrath on the dead.
A group of Libyan men – apparently angry at the Afghanistan incident – desecrated the graves of British World War II fighters in a cemetery near Benghazi, Libya. During the Second World War, British Commonwealth forces fought Italian Axis forces in this theater for control of Libya and Egypt. In the video below, one can see the Libyans destroying tombstones, while a ladder is erected which a man climbs and begins hammering a large cross overlooking the cemetery.

According to Ynet, one of the men says, “Come see, there’s Israeli writing, Hebrew, on the tombstone.”
Libyan Mob Desecrates Christian and Jewish WWII Tombstones Apparently Over Koran Burning
Al Jazeera reports that one man can be heard saying in Arabic: “This is a grave of a Christian,” as he uproots a headstone. Others repeatedly say, “They are dogs, they are dogs.”

Britain’s Daily Mail is calling the ransacking an “insult to WWII heroes.” The paper points out the irony considering Britain’s key role in aiding Libyan rebels just one year ago:
A year ago they begged for Britain’s help when Colonel Gaddafi’s tanks encircled their city, threatening annihilation.
Now former Libyan rebels in Benghazi – liberated with the aid of the RAF last March – have systematically desecrated the graves of more than 150 British servicemen killed in North Africa 70 years ago.

Koran Burning...!

Obamas gun ban...please sign the survey..!

Dear fellow Patriot,

Nearly 1 million American rifles.

Banned by a stroke of Barack Obama’s pen.

In a move unprecedented in American history, the Obama Administration quietly banned the re-importation of nearly one million American made M1 Garand and Carbine rifles.

The M1 Garand, developed in the late 1930’s, carried the United States through World War II seeing action in every major battle.

General Patton at the time called the M1 Garand “the greatest battle implement ever devised.”

The rifle is largely credited with giving American soldiers the advantage and securing victory for the allies.

During the Korean War, nearly one million of these rifles were brought to South Korea and left with the South Korean government afterward.

Now, South Korea wants to give American gun collectors the chance to get their hands on this unique piece of history.

A piece of American history that Barack Obama would like to see go down the memory hole.

That’s why I want as many Americans as possible to put themselves on record opposing this gun ban by signing the Official Firearms Freedom Survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you.

Will you please join me?

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Breaking News..a new pill for Racism...!

Here we go folks the loons on the left have moved the clock back...this was predicted in 1969...sing the song !

Marines, Afghans Disarmed Before Panetta Appearance

PHOTO: U.S. Marines were asked to lay down their weapons today before entering a tent where Defense Secretary Leon Panetta was scheduled to speak. 
By: Muhammad Lila 
In a sign of possible frayed nerves in the military, U.S. Marines were asked to lay down their weapons today before entering a tent where Defense Secretary Leon Panetta was scheduled to speak.
It happened in Helmand province, after Panetta had met with tribal elders in nearby villages, assuring them that the U.S. mission was on track. The unusual order comes within days of an attack by a U.S. staff sergeant on unarmed Afghan civilians that left 16 dead and enraged Afghans.
The 200 Marines were inside a tent at Camp Leatherneck along with Afghan guards and troops from other countries waiting for Panetta to arrive when they were told abruptly by Sgt. Major Brandon Hall to exit the tent, leave their weapons elsewhere, and return unarmed.
It's an unusual break from protocol since Marines are expected to be armed at all times.
Afghan guards in the room, along with other foreign troops, were also unarmed during Panetta's address. A defense official told reporters there was no heightened threat, but that the order to disarm was done to be "consistent" so that Americans troops wouldn't be the only ones carrying weapons. The request reportedly did not come from Panetta or his team.
The order for the Marines to put down their weapons came from Major Gen. Mark Gurganus, according to a press pool report.
Gurganus said that since the Afghan soldiers were unarmed, he did not want them treated differently, but said it was not because of the shooting this weekend.
"You've got one of the most important people in the world in the room," he said. "This is not a big deal."
This is Panetta's third trip to Afghanistan, and arguably, his most important. The visit was planned months in advance, but carries additional significance. It comes at a time of deeply strained U.S.-Afghan relations, and just days after a U.S. Army staff sergeant went off base and allegedly killed 16 Afghan civilians in their homes.
Addressing NATO troops at Camp Leatherneck, Panetta addressed the massacre directly, which included nine children and three women, some of whose bodies were found with deep burn marks.

"We will not allow individual incidents to undermine our resolve," he said. "We will be tested, we will be challenged by the enemy, by ourselves, and by the hell of war itself," he said.
He added, "Our strategy is working."
The visit comes with many Afghans calling for a public trial for the soldier accused of the weekend's massacre. The U.S. military has launched an investigation with the highest levels of the administration, including President Obama himself, promising a swift and thorough response. Many Afghans continue to believe that more than one soldier was involved, citing eyewitness reports that multiple soldiers were seen in the area at the time of the shootings. But today, an Afghan official with access to surveillance video taken from a blimp overhead said the footage clearly shows a lone U.S. soldier walking up to the base, laying down his weapon, and raising his arms to surrender.
The soldier, a staff sergeant and father of two based at Ft. Lewis, Wash., was a three-time veteran of the Iraq war on his first assignment to Afghanistan. The U.S. military hasn't released his name.
The Taliban quickly vowed revenge for the slayings. In a strongly worded statement posted on their website, the insurgent group threatened to kill and behead the "sadistic murderous soldiers" behind the attack.

Stunner! Balanced CBS report on Arpaio probe

A stunning challenge has been issued in the argument over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, and it comes from a lead investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Ariz.

Arpaio’s team of volunteer professional law enforcement officers and attorneys concluded after a six-month investigation that there is probable cause that forgery and fraud were committed in the process through which Obama released a “Certificate of Live Birth” image at the White House last year.
Arpaio has assured those interested that the investigation is continuing and earlier suggested that the appropriate avenue might be for Congress to begin an investigation.
The challenge came from lead investigator Mike Zullo, who was interviewed by the CBS Channel 5 affiliate in Phoenix. Reporter Heather Moore pointed out that it was Zullo’s name and face that was being attached to the investigative report, and she asked how comfortable was he making the allegations.
“Very comfortable,” he said, citing experts the investigators consulted during their 2,200 hours of work. “You can build the document. You can’t do that if you scan [a document],”
read more: 

Permit to Kill Bald Eagles Granted by Obama Administration

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has taken the unusual step of issuing a permit allowing an American Indian tribe in Wyoming to kill two bald eagles for religious purposes.
The agency’s decision comes after the Northern Arapaho Tribe filed a federal lawsuit last year contending the refusal to issue such permits violates tribal members’ religious freedom. Although thousands of American Indians apply for eagle feathers and carcasses from a federal repository, permits allowing the killing of bald eagles are exceedingly rare, according to both tribal and legal experts on the matter.
“I’ve not heard of a take permit for a bald eagle,” Steve Moore, lawyer with the Native American Rights Fund, or NARF, in Boulder, Colo., said Tuesday. “I see it and NARF would see it as a legitimate expression of sovereignty by the tribe, and respect for that sovereignty by the Fish and Wildlife Service.”
Federal law prohibits the killing of bald eagles in almost all cases. The government keeps eagle feathers and body parts in a federal repository and tribal members can apply for them for use in religious ceremonies.
I am 1/8th Apache/Comanche And I think this is a bad idea...! Seems the Obama admin even wants to kill off our National symbol now..!

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Video: Marine Calls President Obama The ‘Enemy’

A controversial anti-Obama Facebook post from a U.S. Marine is now under Pentagon review.
The Facebook page in question is here:

Sheriff Joe's Lead Investigator Responds To Bill O'Reilly's Obama Newspaper Birth Announcement Claim

All I can say is Bill is 6'5" 250lbs of self stated Dynomite...right uh huh with a 2" fuse he is such a coward refuses to Vet Obama... now even the squirrels can't find his 'Nuts'..What else can one say???

Monday, March 12, 2012

Judge Richard Niess violates his oath of Office..!

A liberal judge in Wisconsin has now issued a PERMANENT injunction, throwing out Wisconsin's Voter ID law, and allowing the Democrat Party to engage in voter fraud in the upcoming RECALL election.
Judge Richard Niess stated that voter fraud was less serious of an issue than "voter suppression."  His name should sound familiar to you, as we told you about several days ago, Judge Niess is the same judge who said RECALL opponents would NOT be given enough time to verify the signatures on RECALL petitions.
This is all shameless and shows just how desperate the liberals are in this battle over the RECALL, since polls show that voters are embracing Gov. Scott Walker's conservative reform agenda. Obama's allies can't afford to have people see how well shrinking government really works, and for their own purposes, they can't afford to lose in Wisconsin.
The Attorney General of Wisconsin has announced he will file an appeal to this ruling, and now it's time for us to fight back against the Democrats' despicable and shameful voter fraud antics.

When the Left lowers their standards, we must heighten our resolve! Fight back by supporting our
Money Bomb to DEFEAT the RECALL by making a contribution whether it's for $10, $25, $100, $500, $1,000 or more.  You can contribute online by - CLICKING HERE.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Obama Birth Certificate Fraud Is 10 Times Worse Than Watergate

Sheriff Joe Arpaio, in an interview with Mark Gillar of the Tea Party Power Hour radio show, says that the Birth Certificate Fraud that is being perpetrated is “10 times worse than Watergate.” Sheriff Joe continues, calling it the “Worst media blackout in history.”
Sheriff Joe recently unveiled the results of an investigation into Barack Obama’s birth certificate released online last year and stated that after investigation the document is likely forged. If you would like to watch the entire press conference, click here.

Obama'a secret plan to soar gas prices..!

by Chuck Norris
Just two weeks ago, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke also confessed to Congress in his semi-annual report that the job market was “far from normal” and that rising gasoline prices will likely push up inflation and reduce consumers’ purchasing power.
According to Carl Riccadonna, a senior economist at Deutsche Bank, “the rule of thumb among economists is that a 25 cent increase in gas knocks $25 billion to $30 billion off consumer spending in a year and lowers economic growth by 0.2 percentage points.”
The fact is, rising gas prices are actually a win-win for Obama. When gas prices go up, more fuel-efficient cars are purchased, and that means Obama takes the credit (your credit) for the boost in the automotive industry by doting over the success of his stimulus monies. In addition, when gas prices go up, Obama will take the credit (again, your credit) for the increase in renewable energy industries. All at your expense, literally.
This is what Obama meant two weeks ago when he repackaged and re-pitched his “new energy policy” from a gas station in Indianapolis, with the words on his podium: “Investing in Energy Independence.” (Notice he didn’t say who was doing the investing or with whose monies he was investing? It might seem like spending – I mean investing – your money is Obama’s forte, but to me it smells like more capitalistic-crushing
In February 2011, Secretary Chu again embraced the strategy to raise gas prices in order to increase green alternatives to Chris Wallace, host of Fox News Sunday, when he said, “The price of gasoline over the long haul should be expected to go up just because of supply and demand issues. And so we see this in the buying habits of Americans as they make choices for the next car they buy.”
Increasing gas prices to wean us off gasoline to green alternatives is a ruse – a deceptive strategy laid on the backs of American citizens.
Read More:

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Obama: US soldier’s reported shooting rampage in Afghanistan ‘tragic and shocking’

I also am saddened as to what is transpiring in Afghanistan...where do I put the blame...hello directly on the POSER CIC  POTUS...he consistently apologizes to the enemy as he increases the stress on our soldiers in a combat zone...I hate to be the bearer of bad news...but I feel the pain and anxiety of our troops...they are being picked off one by one by the so called allies Afghanistan troops...and what does our CIC do...well he apologizes to the Afghanistan President and asks for no return apology or investigation into who in the Afghanistan military is to blame...truth be told the troops are cracking under stress...I blame President Obama for what is transpiring! [Op ed by Jack]

By Olivier Knox 
President Barack Obama on Sunday condemned the alleged slaughter of 16 Afghan civilians by an American soldier as "tragic and shocking" and assured Afghan President Hamid Karzai by telephone that the United States will "hold fully accountable anyone responsible" as the bloody incident plunged already deteriorating ties into a fresh crisis.
Obama called Karzai, who denounced the reported shooting rampage as an unforgivable "assassination," to make clear "his Administration's commitment to establish the facts as quickly as possible and to hold fully accountable anyone responsible," the White House said in a statement.
Obama expressed "his shock and sadness" to Karzai at the incident, which news reports said left mostly women and children among the dead, and "reaffirmed our deep respect for the Afghan people and the bonds between our two countries," the White House said.
Ahead of the call, Obama received a briefing on the incident from top aides including National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, Deputy National Security Advisor Denis McDonough, and Special Assistant to the President for Afghanistan and Pakistan Doug Lute, according to National Security Council deputy spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden.
Obama also issued a public statement saying he was "deeply saddened" by the reports and throwing his full support behind promises from Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and General John Allen, who commands NATO-led forces in Afghanistan, for a full investigation. Allen said in a statement that the US service member alleged to have carried out the attack was in custody. The Associated Press reported that the suspect was from Fort Lewis, Wash.
"This incident is tragic and shocking, and does not represent the exceptional character of our military and the respect that the United States has for the people of Afghanistan. I fully support Secretary Panetta's and General Allen's commitment to get the facts as quickly as possible and to hold accountable anyone responsible," Obama said.
read more:

WTH why is everyone so afraid of Obama...?

I surely am not..he has not even proven who the hell he really is whats the big issue anywhoo?...maybe we should forget #Congress MSM & @foxnews and call the Ghost for me...:)

Congressmen Walter Jones Starts Impeachment Process on Barack Obama 3/9/12

We can only pray enough in Congress and the Senate have the will and Cahunas to get on board and follow thru on all issues related to the Impeachment of the Poser POTUS!