When
emotionally well-adjusted people with a good handle on reality get in a
disagreements, they talk their way through them with respect and
empathy. When men get in disagreements with Megyn Kelly, they treat her
like a crabby octogenarian treats the automated voice menu they get when
they call the bank. There’s shouting. There’s demanded modification to
behavior. There are threats, there are flounces. They act as though
Kelly is a piece of advanced technology fashioned to serve them and, in
failing to do so, is experiencing a critical error. Newt Gingrich’s
bizarre Tuesday exchange with the Fox News host exemplifies this curious
phenomenon. During an interview on her eponymous evening news
What else can one deduce from seeing venison sandwiches on the menu at Arby’s restaurants in rural communities of the Midwest Rust Belt?
See, while you are ordering that beet-infused hummus and pita appetizer
with your kale and quinoa salad for dinner, there are people in America
tonight barbecuing deer, elk or moose. And they know that the best steak
on those animals comes from the backstrap. Call it the filet mignon of
your five-point buck.
How you choose: Kale and quinoa, or venison and curly fries might say something about your politics.
Our cultural divide begins at the dinner table but extends through vast swaths of America. Perhaps it explains the federal court acquittal of seven armed anti-government protesters who took over a wildlife sanctuary in Oregon last winter.
The protesters, led by Ammon and Ryan
Bundy were accused of using force and threats of violence to occupy the
reserve, which is owned by the federal government. The New York Times
reported that a jury in the case “appeared swayed by the defendants’
contention that they were merely protesting government overreach and
posed no threat to the public.”
Reporters were shocked. Certainly armed men taking over federal land are guilty of something. Right?
While
that might be a powerful argument to Tesla-driving 30-somethings who
favor small-batch bourbons and artisanal Italian truffles. It won’t fly
in a place where people know how to store elk backstrap for winter — and
what combination of salt, pepper and garlic to use on the meat when
they cook it.
Let’s clear the air on something. Oregon is not what you think it is.
Aside
from Portland and a narrow ribbon of territory that extends about 10
miles from I-5 in either direction, Oregon is a blackhole. In the 1970s
Oregon’s gravitational pull on the counterculture attracted nonviolent
hippies, sex cults and psilocybin-fueled dropouts. But those folks have
moved on to the greener pastures of assisted living in sun-basked
Arizona or are weaving hemp shirts in Colorado for the tourists who come to Crater Lake every summer.
Oregon is hollow. The farmers, the
shopkeepers, the restaurant owners and just about anyone else you might
associate with small towns in rural America have gone missing.
Methamphetamine has taken a powerful toll. But even its influence is on
the wane.
“We don't have
campers driving down I-84 anymore leaking toxic chemicals out the back,"
David Westfield of Lines for Life told KGW News in April.
Opiates
are another story. Oregon has one of the highest opiate prescription
rates in the United States and its one of the few places where you can buy Narcan over the counter and administer it when you're slamming buddy is foaming at the mouth as the result of a fentanyl OD.
All this is the backdrop for an anti-government sub-state
that runs from Tulare in Central California north into Eastern Oregon,
Nevada, Idaho and Southern Washington. This is the place where cops like
Mark Furhman of to retire. A place where farmers and ranchers that
haven’t posted large “Make America Great Again” signs are in the
minority.
There is a strong
belief in this breakaway republic that the federal government has
restricted access to lands that have for centuries been open for cattle
grazing, fishing and the occasional deer hunt. This place is heart of
the Alt-Right — the place that made Donald Trump viable, and ground zero of a movement that firmly believes:
— The laws have been subverted and the rules of the game are rigged;
— The president is a felon and an imposter;
— The big banks launder drug money, and;
— The UN runs giant sex slavery rings that utilize children as young as four-years-old for prostitution.
Enter
a functioning coffee shop in Bend, Oregon and you will hear the
argument that the federal government is so corrupt it is run by foreign
banks as part of a “New World Order” that has designs on the rural west.
“The
feds are out of control they are starting fights everywhere. They are
power grabbing, they are groping our genitals at the airport,” Infowars radio host Alex Jones explained
on a recent broadcast that is an echo chamber for such beliefs.
“Globalism uses the same tactics around the world to take over a country
and when it enters the final phases of a total foreign takeover, they
will try to start a domestic civil war in a country … and sell the idea
of a war against the American people.”
It’s a belief system that is only
reinforced when federal marshals use Tasers to silence an attorney who
argued that his now-acquitted client — one of the Bundy family — should
be freed.
Maybe the shock of the Bundy case verdict and
its aftermath isn’t in the actual decision but in the slowly dawning
realization that there is a significant and historic disconnect in
American political discussion.
Our election — now less than two weeks off — will do nothing to heal the rift,
because the certain outcome will only be held up as a further false
“proof” that elites run the world and orange-haired White guys like
Donald Trump or grizzled cowboys like Cliven Bundy have no shot.
Being that Nikki Haley tendered her resignation to President Trump today Oct 9,2018 effective at the end of the year...and after the mutual praise each gave...Potus staing she will be back I have no doubt, she can have any position she wants'...and Nikki saying 'I will campaign for Potus' Well both are high energy and share many goals...the current VP Mike Pence is a nice guy and all...however he is low energy and soft spoken ...POTUS will need a high energy VP his second term akin to GW Bush's VP...and even better if a female.
Carnac predicts Trump/Haley2020
by: Barry Napier There is a delicious irony in watching vicious critics doing
somersaults in an effort to cover their tracks! And it comes hard on the
heels of yesterday’s UNESCO debacle.
UNESCO, against all logic, history, archaeology, sense and biblical
truth, said the Western Wall and the Dome belong solely to Muslims,
insisting that it has never been in Jewish hands or used as part of
Judaistic religion. They voted twice to come to their ridiculous
conclusion, after much harassment from Islamic nations.
Even so, archaeological finds continue to show just how bizarre Islamic claims are. And international outrage abounds.
But, surely the best proof (next to Biblical records) against the
Islamic claim comes from an ancient Muslim!! A Muslim inscription
clearly refers to Beit al Maqdis (or, Beit Hamikdash in Hebrew). To the
horror of Islamists, this means ‘the Jewish Temple’! (Source: Ninth
annual conference on archaeological discoveries, held at the Hebrew
University this week).
The inscription is dated in the 10th century AD, and is
found above a mihrab-prayer niche in a mosque of Nuba. So, the slap in
the face comes not only from an ancient Muslim inscriber – but it exists
in an Islamic mosque! (Jewish Press, Oct 28th).Talk about a ‘double whamee’!
Thus, from very early in the history of Islam, Muslims recognised
that the ‘Dome of the Rock’ belonged to Judaism and that it once was the
location of the Jewish Second Temple. Perhaps UNESCO and Arabs will
ignore this evidence, too?
In the early days of Islam synagogue meetings were held on the Mount
by Jews, after the fashion of Second-Temple services. These services
were performed atop the ruins of the Second Temple, starting 691AD,
using a shrine built upon the Foundation Stone by architect Yazid Ibn
Salam.
It is painfully obvious that early Muslims knew The Mount was
considered to be Jewish. Just denying it over a thousand years later is
not sufficient to erase the truth, that the Mount still belongs to
Israel..
What does it say when the Attorney General of the United States sends
one of her assistants before congress to let them know she’s not going
to comment about the administration’s attempts to secretly send $1.7
BILLION dollars to Iran? Isn’t Loretta Lynch supposed to be ensuring
that justice prevails? The Washington Free Beacon
reports – Attorney General Loretta Lynch is declining to comply with an
investigation by leading members of Congress about the Obama
administration’s secret efforts to send Iran $1.7 billion in cash
earlier this year, prompting accusations that Lynch has “pleaded the
Fifth” Amendment to avoid incriminating herself over these payments,
according to lawmakers and communications exclusively obtained by the
Washington Free Beacon.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) initially presented Lynch in October with a series of questions about how the cash payment to Iran was approved and delivered.
In an Oct. 24 response,
Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik responded on Lynch’s behalf,
refusing to answer the questions and informing the lawmakers that they
are barred from publicly disclosing any details about the cash payment,
which was bound up in a ransom deal aimed at freeing several American
hostages from Iran.
The
response from the attorney general’s office is “unacceptable” and
provides evidence that Lynch has chosen to “essentially plead the fifth
and refuse to respond to inquiries regarding [her] role in providing
cash to the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” Rubio and
Pompeo wrote on Friday in a follow-up letter to Lynch, according to a copy obtained by the Free Beacon.
oped: You guessed it – the Dems are suggesting Director Comey is
participating in a right-wing conspiracy against Hillary. Funny, I
thought it was the FBI’s job to investigate possible illegal activity. This is what is referred to as the Kettle Black Syndrome!
Hot Air reports –
That was quick! A PAC called the Democratic Coalition Against Trump
has filed a complaint with the Department of Justice against FBI
Director Comey. The complaint accuses Comey of interfering in the
election. Here’s the press release:
The Democratic Coalition Against Trump filed a complaint with the
Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility on Friday
against FBI Director James Comey for interfering in the Presidential
election, following the FBI’s decision to open up an investigation into
Secretary Clinton’s emails this close to Election Day. Federal employees
are forbidden from participating in political activities under the
Hatch Act.
“It is absolutely absurd that FBI Director Comey would support Donald
Trump like this with only 11 days to go before the election,” said Scott
Dworkin, Senior Advisor to the Democratic Coalition Against Trump. “It
is an obvious attack from a lifelong Republican who used to serve in the
Bush White House, just to undermine her campaign. Comey needs to focus
on stopping terrorists and protecting America, not investigating our
soon to be President-Elect Hillary Clinton.”
For this to be a violation of the Hatch Act it would
be necessary to prove that Comey was not performing his duties as FBI
Director but was raising this to impact the election. Obviously this
coalition doesn’t have any proof that’s the case but by making the
accusation they help the Clinton campaign controversialize the
announcement as a partisan act.
by: Tim Brown
New Wikileaks email dumps have revealed massive corruption surrounding Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.
In one email dated February 29, 2016, an article sent by Hillary
advisor Sara Solow to Podesta and Hillary's foreign policy advisor Jake
Sullivan indicates that the Clinton campaign is considering House
Speaker Paul Ryan's relative for the Supreme Court.
Ketanji Brown is the subject of the article. She is related to Paul Ryan by marriage and is a judge on the US District Court for the District of Columbia.
The email reads, "She was confirmed by without any Republican opposition
in the Senate not once, but *twice*. She was confirmed to her current
position in 2013 by unanimous consent – that is, without any stated
opposition. She was also previously confirmed unanimously to a seat on
the U.S. Sentencing Commission (where she became vice chair)."
If you claim this is merely circumstantial, then I think there is no
hope for you understanding just how corrupt DC has gotten, and this is
the very Paul Ryan I warned you about in 2012, which everyone said he
was "so conservative." Sadly, many didn't listen and voted for liberal Mitt Romney
and him. Perhaps Paul Ryan's records and emails should be leaked and
maybe we just might see that he's willing to engage Hillary in a pay-to-play scheme.
The FBI is re-opening its investigation into former Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton’s emails, according to the chairman of the House
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform committee.
In a tweet on Friday, Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz wrote: “FBI Dir just
informed me, ‘The FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear
to be pertinent to the investigation.’ Case reopened.”
FBI Dir just informed me, “The FBI has learned of
the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the
investigation.” Case reopened
Jim Hoft for the Gateway Pundit reports, SHOCKING VIDEO on the horizon.
Anonymous says there is video of Bill Clinton raping a 13 year-old girl
on Jeffrey Epstein’s “Orgy Island.” Anonymous claims the video will
plunge the presidential race into chaos.The video was released this week.
Both Barack and Michelle Obama have expressed moral outrage and
personal disgust over Donald Trump's lewd and misogynistic comments
caught in the now infamous "Access Hollywood" tape. In fact, the First
Lady went so far as to describe Trump's "grab them by the p****y" line
as something that she "can't stop thinking about " and that "has shaken me to my core in a way I could not have predicted." Anyone
paying any attention to the Obama administration, and the Democrats in
general, know faux outrage and hypocritical moral preening when we see
it, but the Obamas are particularly guilty in this case.
The Daily Wire has called out the left for their laughable double-standard regarding Trump's morality a number of times, but William A. Levinson at
the American Thinker did us all the favor of providing a particularly
devastating highlight reel of the First Couple's egregiously
hypocritical condemnation of Trump.
As Levinson notes, both of the Obamas have openly endorsed various
overtly misogynistic and crude performers and celebrities by inviting
them to events to promote their agenda. One particularly star-filled
affair came in April, when the Obamas invited a bunch of artists to
the White House to push the president's "My Brother's Keeper"
initiative. The Obamas openly praised the performers for their many
contributions to society. Here's Levinson's summary of some of the "contributions" of the artists officially endorsed by the First Couple: -Rick Ross's, "U.O.N.E.O." glorifies date rape with
the lyrics, "Put molly all in her champagne/ She ain't even know it / I
took her home and I enjoyed that/ She ain't even know it." While Ross
denies that this was his intended meaning, "molly" is slang for Ecstasy, a well-known date
rape drug, and the context of "molly" in his lyrics shows clearly that a
man put it into a woman's drink without her knowledge or consent so he
could have sex with her. Ross' "Same Hoes"
is meanwhile not about agricultural implements as shown by its lyrics,
which consist primarily of the F word, a variant of the N word, and
"hoes."
-Common,
whose "Go!" includes, "And a ooh baby she liked it raw and like rain
when she came it poured" along with a variant of the N word and even
more sexually explicit lyrics. -Jay Z, who proclaims, "I've got 99 problems and a b***h ain't one." -Michelle
Obama called out Trump's remarks with the words, "What message are our
little girls hearing about who they should look like, how they should
act?" Nicki Minaj, another rapper whom she and her husband brought to
the White House, answers that question in "Hey Mama,"
"Make sure mama crawls on her knees keep him pleased rub him down be a
lady and a freak" and also "Yes I do the cooking/ Yes I do the cleaning/
Yes I keep the nana real sweet for your eating/ Yes you be the (boss)
yes I be respecting." It doesn't take a feminist to dismiss these words
as belonging in a fundamentalist "Islamic" country, assuming that they
ever belonged anywhere at all.
In case you missed it, Rush Limbaugh
also took some time during one of his episodes to dismantle Michelle's
fake outrage over Trump's lewd comments. "You know the people that have
been to the White House?" he asked. "How about some of the rappers that
talk about their bitches and their hos have performed such lyrics in the
White House? But she doesn't know men who talk and sing about sexual
assault. It's all over hip-hop lyrics and has been for a while! So is
assault on the police a feature of some hip-hop lyrics, and it's been
performed at the White House. But she doesn't know men who talk that
way. She doesn't know decent guys who talk that way. No. She's only
invited them to the White House to perform and then bestowed great
honors on them."
Limbaugh went on to detail some of the ways
that misogyny has been conveniently ignored or even actively promoted by
the administration. One particularly unseemly moment the talk show host
referenced was the time when then-Senator Barack Obama starred in his
own lewd tape. Here's candidate Obama flaunting his erection to female reporters: https://youtu.be/dGJIB5cO0cQ
Here is the quote from Michelle that gained so much attention (which, by the way, was quickly followed up by a warning from the White House to Trump not to hit back against the First Lady):
"The
fact is that in this election we have a candidate who over the course
of his lifetime and this campaign has said things about women that are
so shocking and so demeaning, I simply will not repeat any of them here
today … Last week we saw this candidate actually bragging about sexually
assaulting women...I cannot stop thinking about this. It has shaken me
to my core in a way that I couldn't have predicted…Enough is enough,
this has got to stop right now…This wasn't just locker room banter, this
was a powerful individual speaking freely and openly about sexually
predatory behavior…This is not normal. This is not politics as usual.
This isn't about politics; it’s about basic human decency."
Donald Trump might be getting flack for not promising to accept November’s election results—but he’s not the only one.
A recent poll shows that a majority of Hillary Clinton supporters would, in fact, refuse to accept Trump as “legitimate” if he won on November 8th.
The YouGov poll, conducted on October 19-20, asked: "If Donald Trump
wins the presidential election, will you accept him as the legitimate
president, or not?"
53% of Hillary supporters said they would refuse to accept the legitimacy of Trump’s victory. A mere 31% said they would.
The numbers are more pronounced as voters get younger: 64% of Hillary
voters under 30 would refuse to accept the Republican nominee as
President of the United States.
On the other side, however, Trump’s voters are even more hostile to Hillary.
64% of Trump’s voters said they would refuse to accept Hillary Clinton
as the legitimate President—showing that, no matter who wins in
November, they face a tough road in winning over the other side and
making progress in government.
by: Tim Brown Wikileaks director
and founder of the Centre for Investigative Journalism Gavin MacFadyen,
who is also an American investigative journalist and filmmaker, died on
Saturday at age 76.
9 News reports: It is understood the American Journalist died of lung cancer surrounded by loved ones in London on Saturday.
Colleagues and fellow journalists across the world,
including WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange, have taken to social
media to pay their respects.
In
his illustrious career, MacFayden produced and directed more than 50
documentaries on a wide range of topics including neo-Nazis, child
labour, the Iraq arms trade and Frank Sinatra's ties to the mafia.
MacFadyen
seemed to be one that stood up for Whistleblowers and sought to breed a
new generation of investigative journalists. His wife Susan Benn said,
"His loyalty to those under attack from powerful forces, particularly
whistleblowers and journalistic groups like Wikileaks, will remain a
beacon for years to come."
"He was the model of what a journalist should be... He spearheaded the
creation of a journalistic landscape which has irrevocably lifted the
bar for ethical and hard-hitting reporting," she added. "Gavin worked
tirelessly to hold power to account."
"His life and how he lived it were completely in sync with the
principles that he held dear and practiced as a journalist and educator –
to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable," she concluded.
However, some have claimed that there may be a cover up involved in
the death of MacFadyen due to a tweet that was shortly posted on Twitter
and then removed.
In an opinion piece by Kristine Moore following MacFadyen's death, she writes,
"Having Julian Assange stand at his window in the Ecuadorian Embassy
might not be such a good idea after all. If a sniper is able to take him
out from nearly a mile away, I think we can all understand why Julian
stays well away from his window these days. Assange clearly fears for
his life and if he didn't, he would just saunter over to the window,
pull the curtain, and wave to everybody. He knows people are concerned
about him, but he is right not to put his life at risk just to reassure
us with a physical appearance, however fleeting it may be."
"Lest you think I am being paranoid by suggesting that there could be
a sniper lying in wait for him, just remember that Hillary Clinton once
quipped that he should be taken out by a drone,"
she added. "Even if you say that it was just 'a joke' and meant in jest
only, what Secretary of State jokes about murdering somebody in front
of other government officials? Many of us have no doubt whatsoever in
our minds that if she or someone else were able to do this and get away
with it, they would."
I can see why people might question MacFadyen's death, much like the death of Antonin Scalia was questioned,
even though both men were advanced in years. It's also understandable
why Julian Assange would want to keep out of sight as much as possible
considering the criminal in the White House.
PORTLAND,
Ore. — The leaders of an armed group that took over a national wildlife
refuge in rural Oregon have been found not guilty of conspiracy and
possession of firearms at a federal facility.
A jury on Thursday
exonerated brothers Ammon and Ryan Bundy and five others of conspiring
to impede federal workers from their jobs at the Malheur National
Wildlife Refuge.
Some of the defendants also were charged with
possession of firearms at a federal facility and were acquitted on that
count as well.
The standoff began Jan. 2 and lasted nearly six
weeks, bringing new attention to a long-running dispute over control of
federal lands in the U.S. West.
The Bundys are still facing charges in Nevada stemming from a
high-profile 2014 standoff with federal agents trying to round up their
father Cliven Bundy’s cattle.
Jurors in the trial earlier Thursday sent a note to the judge saying they’ve reached a consensus on all but one charge.
The jury also told the judge on that further deliberations would not help them agree on that charge, which wasn’t disclosed.
An
alternate juror arrived at the federal courthouse in Portland on
Thursday, allowing deliberations to resume in the trial of Ammon Bundy
and six co-defendants who took over a federal wildlife refuge.
The woman from central Oregon known as Juror No. 18 replaced a man who was dismissed after his impartiality was questioned.
U.S.
District Judge Anna Brown welcomed the new juror Thursday, and reminded
the remaining jurors to disregard past deliberations and start over.
She told them not to discuss why the alternate was needed.
The jury was in its fourth day of deliberations when Brown stopped them Wednesday.
Led
by Bundy, the defendants were part of a group that occupied the Malheur
National Wildlife Refuge last winter. They were charged with conspiring
to impede Interior Department employees from doing their jobs, through
force, threat or intimidation.
The defendants said they were
engaging in a peaceful protest, pressing their case against federal
control of Western lands and the imprisonment of two ranchers convicted
of setting fires.
The
jury is also deciding whether four of them are guilty of possessing a
firearm in a federal facility. Two defendants, Ryan Bundy and Kenneth
Medenbach, were charged with theft of government property.
Though the jury process is secret, the decision of one juror to complain about another shows conflict.
Moreover, jurors sent a note to the judge Tuesday that asked: “If we
are able to agree on a verdict for three of the defendants, but are at a
standoff for the others, does our decision for the three stand?”
That note and the days of deliberation brought optimism to the defense.
“A
very quick verdict almost always means a verdict for the government,”
said Matthew Schindler, an attorney representing Medenbach.
“The
level of deliberation that’s been undertaken in this case means we have
jurors who are very interested in applying the burden of proof and
making sure a complicated allegation of conspiracy has actually been
proved in this case. It’s not as simple as showing that people were at
the refuge.”
... Hillary Clinton Stumbles as she boards Plane, Mumbling to herself
(10-27-16) It's as if she is climbing an escaltor thats going in
reverse? This was on her way to Event in Winston Salem, North Carolina
In the words of the Homicide Hunter Joe Kenda, “Well, my, my, my!” It
would appear the Clinton Campaign had been scoping out and planning to
misquote Donald Trump’s exchange with the disgraced former Miss
Universe, Alicia Machado, for almost a year.
The truth of the hit job on Trump came as a new batch of emails from
John Podesta, Campaign chair for Hillary Clinton, were made public.
But before we get into the substance, I encourage you to watch the
video below in its entirety. This video is from the supposed press
conference in which Donald Trump “forced” Alicia Machado to work out in
front of the media which she now claims was a horrible and degrading
experience.
But contrary to Machado, the video shows something completely
different. I wonder how she would have felt if she had her title
stripped away which was the pageants right under the contract?
During the first debate, Democratic presidential nominee, Hillary
Clinton, invoked edited comments from that 1997 press conference trying
to paint Donald Trump as a monster.
Clinton said, and I quote, “And one of the worst things he said was
about a woman in a beauty contest…He loves beauty contests, supporting
them and hanging around them. And he called this woman ‘Miss Piggy.’
Then he called her ‘Miss Housekeeping,’ because she was Latina. Donald,
she has a name.”
Trump responded with “Where did you find this?”
FoxNews writes, “The answer is: in a 157-page opposition research
file that Clinton’s campaign had been using since at least Dec. 19,
2015, the day research director Tony Carrk emailed it…to Clinton
Campaign Chairman John Podesta. Podesta’s emails were subsequently
hacked and more than 25,000 of them have been released so far by
anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks.” — FoxNews.com
“In a section on Page 31 titled “Trump Has Devalued And Demeaned Women
Repeatedly Throughout His Career,” Trump’s comments to “This Morning” in
1997 are transcribed under the heading “Trump On Miss Universe Pageant
Winner.” — ibid. According to the Podesta file, Trump says “She weighed 118 pounds or
117 pounds, and she went up to 160 or 170…So this is somebody that likes
to eat.” But if you watch the video in its entirety, you know that there is
more to the story. And the alleged comments “Miss Piggy” and “Miss
Housekeeping” do not appear. Trump said, and from this video, it appears to be true, “I [Trump]
saved her job.” I guess the old adage is true, “No good deed goes
unpunished!” But the DNC, in its typical dishonest, twisted, win at all cost
behavior took one man’s attempt to help and turned it into a gotcha
moment. I am hopeful the American people will see through this façade by not casting their lot with the Clinton Crime Machine.
Bill Clinton is a sex-addicted 'monster' who mocked Hillary Clinton
by calling her 'The Warden' in front of friends and privately boasted
about his high notch count, according to his long-time mistress and
childhood friend Dolly Kyle.
Kyle,
now 68, says she had a decades-long affair with the former president
before and during his marriage and had a front-row seat to Bill's
salacious double-life in the 1970s and '80s.
Their
on-again, off-again relationship ended abruptly in the 1990s, after
Bill Clinton allegedly threatened to 'destroy' Kyle if she spoke to the
media about their relationship.
After heading to college at Yale, Bill told Dolly he had moved in with
Hillary Rodham, whom he later went on to marry. Bill and Hillary are
pictured above during their student days
Kyle's
decades of observations, shared in an interview with the DailyMail.com
as well as in her 2016 book The Other Woman, provide a unique
perspective on the Clintons' marriage and the couple's treatment of the
women who have accused the former president of infidelity or sexual
assault over the years.
Kyle,
an Arkansas native who has since befriended several of Bill Clinton's
sexual assault accusers, said she was determined to come forward with
her story after hearing Hillary Clinton say on the campaign trail that
women who have been sexually assaulted have the 'right to be believed'.
'When
[Hillary Clinton] said women who claim they are raped or sexually
assaulted should be believed, we should support them, I thought "You
lying dog hypocrite",' said Kyle.
She
said the Clintons' attacks on her reputation - and alleged attacks on
other women who had relationships with or were assaulted by Bill Clinton
- show that Hillary Clinton is not a supporter of women or victims of
sexual violence.
Kyle
said Bill Clinton threatened her over the phone in the early 1990s
after she alerted him that a reporter had been asking her questions
about their relationship.
'When
I warned him about this story, which I had no intention of cooperating
with, his threat to me was, "If you cooperate with the media, we will
destroy you",' said Kyle. 'Bam. I slammed the phone down. It rang
immediately. Kept ringing, I didn't answer it again.'
Kyle first met Clinton at a country club
in Hot Springs, Arkansas, when she was 11 and he was just shy of his
13th birthday. She described it as a 'thunderbolt' of immediate
attraction even then.
He was also in the band, earning an all-state title and also performing
as a band major during his high school years. Pictured left he smiles
with fellow all-state band members, and in his band major uniform.
The two
became good friends and dated casually throughout high school, and later
began a sexual affair in 1974 after Kyle and her first husband
divorced.
Their
relationship spanned three decades, continuing through Bill Clinton's
marriage to Hillary and Kyle's remarriage, and culminating in a dramatic
confrontation at the lovers' 35th high school reunion.
During
this time, Kyle said Clinton often indicated that he was unhappy in his
marriage - calling Hillary Clinton 'The Warden', admitting that he was a
sex addict, and complaining to Kyle that his sex life was 'over' after
he moved in with Hillary at Yale.
During
one secret rendezvous in 1979, Kyle said then-Governor Clinton confided
to her that he was desperate to have a baby for political reasons.
Kyle
initially thought Bill wanted to have a baby with her, until he
clarified that he wanted to have one with Hillary - hinting that he was
concerned about political rumors that Hillary was a lesbian.
'I
said, "Why do you want to have a baby? You don't even have time, you're
so busy",' said Kyle. 'He said [Hillary and I] have to have a baby so
that we will look like a normal couple, and we need to take attention
away from The Warden's "lifestyle".'
'Now, he did
not say Hillary is a lesbian,' she added. 'Billy didn't have to spell
out what that meant… Everybody in Little Rock knew the same rumors about
Hillary being a lesbian as they did about Billy being a lech.'
One
night in 1972 when Bill was visiting with Kyle in Arkansas, he told her
he had moved in with a girl named Hillary and sadly added that he
thought this would be the end of his sex life.
Let's get real here folks..being PC has destroyed our country...yes boys and girls alike say naughty things when they think they are in private between each other ( if they deny they are bold face liars)...talking smack is by know means equal to acting out like the Clinton's do! Enough is enough already! Boys talk smack and girls act dress the the part it's called the mating game need I say more?
Addendum: alrighty then after receiving some feed back on this posting...yes y'all are correct I should include Politicians, CEO's , COO's et al at there private parties here we go my answer ha:https://youtu.be/AXyI8zwQFyU
oped: Megan Kelly is out of the proverbial closet...she chopped her goldey locks and styled her hair akin to 'butch' Elizabeth...rants,raves and all the agenda driven progressive talking points...she has become a full fledged looney progressive from the get go! Fox News would be wise to bring back Greta who is more along the lines of a Moderate Democrat (Blue-Dog) and for the most part was fair and balanced in her reporting. Megan Kelly belongs at MSNBC and Fox News should terminate her contract before she totally destroys the Fair and Balanced moniker of Fox News!
Newt SLAMS Megyn. Who won?
Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich slammed Fox News host
Megyn Kelly over the unfair media coverage of Republican presidential
candidate Donald Trump’s sexual assault allegations compared to the
coverage of the damning information revealed in Democratic presidential
candidate Hillary Clinton’s secret speeches.
The heated exchange came Tuesday night on Kelly’s program, and began
with an argument over the legitimacy of polls. Kelly contends that
Gingrich cannot allege Trump will win when he is losing in every poll.
She cites what she calls, “non-partisan outlets trying to predict the
electoral decision board,” to which Gingrich starts shooting back.
“Non-partisan outlets!? Every outlet you just named is part of the
establishment!” Gingrich exclaimed. To back up his allegations of rigged
polls, he cites one which claims Clinton will have an African American
turnout similar to Obama, and a Wall Street Journal poll that he
alleges took out eight percent of the vote because they didn’t like the
turnout.
But what he said next really set Kelly back.
Gingrich cited the fact that the three major networks spent a total
of 23 minutes covering the leaked Trump audio tapes, and a shocking 57
seconds covering Clinton’s secret speech in Brazil in which she said her
dream is an open border.
In return, Kelly argued that Trump’s audio tapes are more news worthy
than the revelation Clinton is lying to the American people.
Kelly closed the conversation by instructing Gingrich to take his “anger issues and spend some time working on them.”
oped: *Shrugs* well hell It's a fact Jack...the Obama administration as well as the Clinton administration are progressive administrations perverted and destructive entities...people really need to wake the hell up as to who and what these people are! They have committed Sedition/Treason/Perversion against the United States of America...They are "The Pink Swastika Party" ...let me educate you: Must reads to come up to speed: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/barry-barack-obama-is-new-anthony.html
On
Monday night, unpaid Donald Trump adviser and current Fox News host
Sean Hannity broadcasted his “EXCLUSIVE” interview with Jeff Rovin,
novelist and self-identified “fixer” for Hillary and Bill Clinton. Rovin
first told his story to supermarket tabloid the National Enquirer last
week, opening up about his alleged past as a Clinton ally who would help
the powerful couple manipulate the press and (also!) set up secret,
extramarital sexual liaisons. Hannity emphasized that Fox News could not
“independently verify” Rovin’s story. He also noted that the Clinton
presidential campaign—“shockingly”—did not respond to his team’s
multiple requests seeking comment. “I was fixing [for the Clintons], I
Despite the overwhelming consensus of pollsters and pundits that
Democratic contender Hillary Clinton will win the election, one academic
with a history of correctly predicting the past five presidential
elections insisted to Fox News that Donald Trump will triumph Nov. 8.
Stony Brook University Professor Helmut Norpoth said he uses two
models for his prediction, the first of which is the Primary Model, as
"it usually turns out the candidate who does better in his party's
primaries or her party's primaries beats the other guy who does less
well."
In his website, Primary Model,
Norpoth explains he used the primary races in South Carolina and New
Hampshire, where Trump won and performed better than Clinton did in the
Democratic race, because the results in the early primaries are the best
indicators for the general election.
The second model, he explains, is called the Swing of the Pendulum,
which he told "Fox & Friends" program "is the tendency after two
terms of a White House party being in office that there is a change . . .
which gives a prediction that Republicans are favored this year."
Norpoth is so convinced by his models he has backed up his prediction by buying shares in Trump in the Iowa Electronic Markets.
However, not all are convinced by his methods. As pointed out in Quora,
the current social and economic context is quite different from earlier
elections, and it is usually unwise to rely only on one predictive
model, as opposed to synthesizing results from several different models.
The following excerpt is from an article that originally appeared on The Economic Crisis Report
By Melissa Dykes
Bill Clinton once reportedly told senior White House reporter Sarah McClendon, “Sarah, there’s a government inside the government, and I don’t control it.”
Average citizens who talk about things like that, however, are
typically referred to as “Conspiracy Theorists” as if its a pejorative
term.
Then again, how much of a conspiracy is it when the FBI’s own
documents confirm the existence of something referred to as “The Shadow
Government”?
Check out page 56 from the FBI’s files on the Clinton investigation which is making the rounds on Reddit:
A powerful group of high-ranking state officials referred to as “The Shadow Government.” Really?
It’s the kind of raw footage that would outrage the average American
voter… if only the mainstream media would do their job and cover it.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was seen on camera
personally committing election fraud in the battleground state of North
Carolina, critics say. And the video shows the kind of dirty campaign
tactics conservative opponents of the Clinton family have long warned
about.
At an early voting center in Raleigh on Sunday, Clinton showed up to greet supporters and campaign for votes.
Only one problem: It’s illegal to solicit votes at a voting center.
To do so is considered electioneering, and by ignoring this law Clinton
appears to be committing election fraud.
While there’s no clear indication how close Clinton was to the
polling booth, at the very least this video proves Clinton was in
violation of the spirit of N.C. Gen. Statute § 163-166, which states:
No person or group of persons shall hinder access, harass
others, distribute campaign literature, place political advertising,
solicit votes, or otherwise engage in election‐related activity in the
voting place or in a buffer zone which shall be prescribed by the county
board of elections around the voting place. In determining the
dimensions of that buffer zone for each voting place, the county board
of elections shall, where practical, set the limit at 50 feet from the
door of entrance to the voting place, measured when that door is closed,
but in no event shall it set the limit at more than 50 feet or at less
than 25 feet. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the
county board of elections shall also provide an area adjacent to the
buffer zone for each voting place in which persons or groups of persons
may distribute campaign literature, place political advertising, solicit
votes, or otherwise engage in election-related activity.
There is no doubt Hillary is soliciting support from the waiting
early voters in the video. And this isn’t the first time the Clinton
campaign has allegedly engaged in this sort of illegal activity.
Husband and former President Bill Clinton was accused multiple times
of illegal electioneering at voting places during the tightly contested
Democratic primary. In fact, Bill was sued for election fraud
by supporters of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for allegedly blocking
thousands of voters from accessing the polls in a tightly contested
primary district during the Massachusetts primary.
As the general election approaches, is there any doubt the Clinton campaign will continue to pull off these dirty tricks?
After all, why not? It’s not like the media is brave enough to hold them accountable. — The Horn editorial team
Yes, Virginia, there really IS a poll fairy skewing the polls in favor of Hillary Clinton.
Yesterday, I wrote about a brand new leak that had come my way. I
read through the first 5 pages, confirmed that the two entities in the
document were genuine and were really in cahoots, and quickly got out
the information that the polls we are seeing with Clinton in the lead
are fake.
But, in full disclosure, I made a mistake. I really should have read the
last 3 pages, because if I had, I wouldn’t have published the document
as a legitimate leak. It was full of outrageous Hollywood sci-fi “salvage options” for the campaign that included magnetized mind control and a fake alien invasion. It’s interesting to note that all of those options actually do exist – DARPA experiments on things like that, and things even creepier.
However, it seems far-fetched that the Clinton campaign would/could go
that far, and even more so that a business that does polls and analyzes
them would have experimented with the tactics.
So, I removed the post. There are enough lies and rumors going around the internet without me adding to them.
That isn’t the end of the story, though, because part of that document was legit.
I
began to do further research and discovered that the gist of the fake
document was accurate. The polls in the MSM that show Hillary in the
lead are being faked, and they’re being bought and paid for. We’re all
being manipulated by the collusion of Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and the
media. Their attempts at predictive programming through fake polls is so blatant that even the most oblivious people have noticed that something seems awry.
It has long been a successful method of propaganda to leave in just enough truth to make the lie seem viable. In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler wrote (emphasis mine):
All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility;
because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted
in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or
voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they
more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they
themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed
to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.
Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly
to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to
think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent
lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down,
a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
First of all, I found a copy of the disbursements from a Clinton-aligned SuperPac called Priorities USA Action on the website Red State Watcher.
This shows that the SuperPac paid the princely (or should I say,
presidential?) sum of $391,250.00 for polls that were overwhelmingly
positive to Clinton.
These documents appear to be legitimate. The website Conservative Treehouse did
a great analysis and posted links to the FEC(Federal Election
Commission) filing PDFs from the SuperPac, as well as screenshots. Here
are links to the PDF – pages 92 and 118 show that they did indeed make the payments shown above.
But…
When I did a reverse image search, I found the same thing on the
following sites. And by the same thing, I mean exactly the same. And,
these sites with conservative sounding names are all relatively new
sites. I checked on Alexa.com to see how long they’d been around. Aside
from Red State Watcher, which is definitely legit and has been around
for a long time, here’s the rundown on a few of the others.
http://usapoliticsnow.com/ – since May 2016
http://incredibleusanews.com/ not long enough for statistics to be available
http://truthfeed.com/ – since May 2016
Now, this doesn’t say for certain these sites are fake ones, put up
by the opposition, but it does cast some questions on the credibility.
These stories are all based on a video alleged to be by Anonymous, but in actuality, the YouTube channel isAnonymous Patriots. Their first video was posted 7 months ago – March 16, 2016.
Other sources concur that the polls being broadcast by the mainstream are skewed or outright fake.
A professor at SUNY has been saying all along that Donald Trump was strongly in the lead. Back in February,Fortune magazine published an article by Dr. Northrup
that showed, based on his analysis, Trump had a 97% chance of winning
the election. He still stands by this opinion. Dr. Helmut Norpoth wrote a post for The Hillexplaining how these polls published by the MSM are misleading.
To start with something basic, opinion polls are really
about “opinions,” not actions. At their best, they can tell us how
people feel about political issues and personalities. Do voters, for
instance, like or dislike candidates such as Hillary Clinton and Donald
Trump?
Yet having an opinion and acting on it are two
different things. Barely 6 in 10 voting-age American citizens turn out
for presidential elections. Ascertaining the opinions of 100 citizens is
just a start. Now you have to determine which 60 of them actually take
the time to mark a ballot. They are the “likely voters.” They are the
only ones that count. But to find them is no easy chore.
It is ingrained in all of us that voting is civic duty. So
nearly all of us say, oh yes, I’ll vote, and then many will not follow
through.
Dr. Northrup is not alone in his claims that Trump is far, far ahead of Hillary Clinton. The website Govt. Slaves reported on a polling app called Zip back in August.
Despite a majority of opinion polls showing the 2016
presidential election going to Democrat Hillary Clinton, a smartphone
app developer says his data suggests challenger Donald Trump will be the
victor.
“Based on the stats we see, he looks strong,” says Ric Militi, co-founder of San Diego-based Crazy Raccoons, maker of the Zip question and answer app.
His app poses questions and polls responses based on an average of
100,000 daily users. “I go with Trump, based on what we see.”
Speaking exclusively to Breitbart News, political polling pioneer Pat
Caddell said the Reuters news service was guilty of an unprecedented
act of professional malpractice…”This comes as close as I have ever seen
to cooking the results,” said the legendary pollster and
political consultant. “I suppose you can get away with it in polling
because there are no laws. But, if this was accounting, they would put
them in jail.”
…
“The looks to me, are far as I can indicate, they have merely decided
to go back and revise their numbers in a formula that removes voters or
allocates them–I am not sure how they are doing this–proportionately,”
he said.
Reuters has rejiggered its methods in order to get the results they want, said the man, whose
out-of-the-box interpretations of the American electorate were the
brain-work behind the insurgent presidential campaigns of Sen. George
McGovern (D.-S.D.) in 1972, Georgia Gov. James E. “Jimmy” Carter in 1976, President Carter 1980 and Sen. Gary Hart (D.-Colo.) in 1984.
Millenium Report concurs about the poll-rigging.
In view of so much fake poll data that is systematically
dumped into the public domain by the MSM, the American people being
gradually conditioned to believe that Clinton is really ahead in this
race. With each passing week the Clinton numbers increase by 5 or 10%
which should put her with 175% of the populace by now. Yes, there
contrivance of poll numbers is that ridiculous. 2016 Election Being Rigged By The Hour, Polls Fraudulent, Clinton Popularity Grossly Exaggerated
These same fraudulent tactics were utilized during the democratic
primary with much success. Bernie Sanders’ loss was the direct result
os so much fixing and rigging, manipulating and scheming. That Sanders
himself permitted all the fraud is the biggest scandal of all,
particularly after he heartily endorsed Comrade Clinton for president.
Such a transparent betrayal of his once loyal will most assuredly push
many voters over to Trump. https://youtu.be/ycsFGthkVbk
But here’s the real conspiracy.
I think there is a Clinton-based conspiracy to cast doubt on
everything coming out of the opposition, which in turn reinforces
everything coming from them.
First of all, vet your sources. Here’s how.
When you see an article from a source you don’t recognize, go over to
Alexa.com and paste in the homepage address. You’ll see a chart that
shows you how long the website has been around, and below that will be
the global and national ranking of the site. This isn’t conclusive, of
course. There are legitimate new websites popping up all the time, but I
have to think that some of these more outrageous, allegedly
“conservative” websites could be new websites started by those who want
Hillary Clinton to be in office. These sites can perpetrate all sorts of
wild rumors and fake documents and this has a two-fold effect.
Most importantly, these types of stories cast doubt on the real
leaks that are out there. What better way to discredit the massive
information being provided by Wikileaks than to mix in a bunch of fake
leaks? People without critical thinking skills will extrapolate from
this: “This leak is fake, so all the leaks must be fake. Holy cow,
they’re lying about our Queen Hillary.”
Secondly, crazy rumors being spread through conservative and
libertarian sources make us all look…well, crazy. If we are dispensing
inaccurate information from questionable sources, then everything we say
becomes subject to more doubt.
The Gateway Pundit shows an actuarial review that determined Trump could possibly be looking at a landslide victory.
With all the liberal distortions and dishonesty we
decided to have a small team of actuarial and statistics professionals
take a look at a couple of the recent polls to get their take on the
reliability of these polls. They selected the recent FOX poll from
October 14 showing Hillary up by 7 and the WSJ/NBC poll from October 16
showing Hillary with an 11 point lead.
The first observation is that both polls are heavily skewed towards
Democrats. At a high level, the FOX poll consists of 43 Dems to 36 Reps
to 21 Other while the NBC poll shows 44 Dems to 37 Reps to 19 Other.
By selecting more Dems the polls are designed to provide a Dem result.
Our experts next analyzed the data and calculated results using the
same data from the two surveys on a split of 40 Dems, 40 Reps and 20
Other. The results show that using either sets of data Trump comes out
ahead with a larger margin of victory using the FOX data.
Clearly the polls using data that is heavily weighted towards Democrat voters is incorrectly skewed.
… it is difficult to determine what the independent voters will do
but many independent voters partook in the primaries to vote for Trump.
Therefore it is more likely that Independent voters vote for Trump as
well.
If more Democratic voters vote for Trump than Republicans vote for
Hillary and more Independents vote for Trump than Hillary, both
scenarios which are highly likely, then the results of the general
election will likely be a Trump landslide.
It’s easy to see how this supports the possibility of a stolen election.
Remember during the debate when Donald Trump refused to say that he
would accept the outcome of the election if it wasn’t in his favor?
Not only has Camp Clinton been caught more than once rigging the election, they’re redoubling their efforts in social perception. Here are a few ways they’re doing it:
The discrediting of websites who are open about their dislike of Hillary Clinton.
The fake polls that assure everyone that Clinton’s victory is guaranteed.
The manipulation of public opinion through false reporting in the MSM.
Potentially putting up websites with fake conservative names in
order to spread misinformation in the hopes that other conservative
websites will make the posts go viral, then “disproving” the rumor they
started themselves.
Coincidentally (or not), I’ve spent hundreds of dollars over the past
few weeks because my websites have been hacked. I’d love to know if any
other alternative media sites are having these issues. If you have
information on this, drop me a quick private message on Facebook.
Updated to add: I’m apparently not alone in my website issues.
Reddit and Twitter have both reported they are under serious DDOS
attacks today. The popular news site What Really Happened has been tampered with almost constantly of late. Even the service I (along with many other bloggers) use to send out my newsletters is down.
Article posted with permission from Daisy Luther
*) and is now a law student, and she is related by marriage to Congressman (and Speaker of the House) Paul Ryan."
Tim Pulliam
