Saturday, December 17, 2016

Shocker: Even Obama Lawyers Admit Birth Certificate Forged: “But Eligibility’s A Separate Matter”

Sheriff Arpaio Cites Source and Expose 9 Points of Obama’s Birth Certificate as “Fake”

by:Mac Slavo
The conversation about Barack Obama’s birth certificate has been off the table for a while now – but the true heart of the matter has never been resolved.
Has anything in his administration been valid or legal? Oddly enough, it seems that a clever legal strategy may make the question of a forged document somehow irrelevant to Obama’s eligibility to hold office.
Coincidentally or not, it was none other than President-elect Donald Trump who, arguably, called off the hounds, got the Obama Admin to produce a document, and then called the whole thing square in the lead up to 2012.

More recently, Trump dismissed his previous ties to the “birther movement” during the last few weeks of his presidential campaign, brushing off the topic very hurriedly by stating: “President Barack Obama was born in the United States, period.”
However, the question isn’t settled for investigators who have been conducting a five-year probe of the birth certificate they claim is a forgery – complete with photoshop layers!
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, headed by the outgoing Sheriff Joe Arpaio, found, via WND:

A years-long forensics investigation into the computer image of the long-form Hawaiian birth certificate image that Barack Obama released during a White House news conference during his first term and presented to the American people as an official government document concluded it is “fake.” 

The sheriff’s video said there were nine images on the Obama birth certificate that appear to be identical to, and copied from, another birth certificate issued in Hawaii just days after his birth. That certificate belongs to Johanna Ah’nee.
“The inescapable conclusion is that the Hawaii Department of Health has not shown the American public the original 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, if they actually exist,” he said.
Clearly, the mainstream media will continue to cast doubt and ridicule on these claims.
But it isn’t for lack of substance, but for fear that these dangerous issues could be raised. A Republican controlled Congress, however, could revive the issue again. That much remains to be seen.

So what does it all mean? According to Jerome Corsi, WND writer and author of Where’s the Birth Certificate?:
“That President Obama’s birth certificate is fake, as proven now by a legitimate law enforcement examination raises serious questions that high crimes and misdemeanors have been committed at the highest level of government. The clear conclusion is that the Obama presidency may have been illegitimate, having violated Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution. Impeachment procedures may be required, even if those procedures are conducted after Obama leaves office.”

Sheriff Arpaio indicated his intent to raise Congressional hearings and put forward a law requiring presidential vetting (obviously a good idea):
“I plan on turning over this investigation this month to the federal government. And Congress. And hope Congress No. 1 will pass a law, the president should be vetted. Common sense.
Meanwhile, the powers that be are claiming that the Arpaio posse investigation doesn’t matter.
What makes these matters even more interesting is that Obama lawyers have apparently admitted that the document is a fake – and went so far as to argue that the fake document, therefore, was not sufficient to disprove Obama’s eligibility for the highest office.

Back in 2012, Dan Crosby wrote about the bizarre case being made in New Jersey over whether or not Obama qualified for the 2012 ballot:
After a Maricopa County law enforcement agency conducted a six-month forensic examination … arguments from an Obama eligibility lawyer during a recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing reveals the image was not only a fabrication, but that it was likely part of a contrived plot by counterfeiters to endow Obama with mere political support while simultaneously making the image intentionally appear absurd and, therefore, invalid as evidence toward proving Obama’s ineligibility in a court of law. 

Taking an audacious and shocking angle against the constitutional eligibility mandate, Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.
Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate.
“Sadly, regardless of her moral deficiency, Hill is legally justified,” says TDP Editor, Penbrook Johannson, “Obama’s eligibility is a separate matter than the charges of forgery and fraud. Of course, we have evidence that he is not eligible. But, evidence of forgery by as yet unidentified counterfeiters working on behalf of Obama is not what legally excludes Obama from appearing on a ballot, by itself, until some authority is willing to consider this as evidence of forgery on its merit as an indication of actual ineligibility in a court of legal authority.

These bizarre statements are actually on video… skip ahead to 34-40 minutes in this second part for many of the relevant statements about how the alleged forgery never was relevant to whether or not Obama appeared on the ballot in 2012 – though, in theory and in merit, it should have been.

In hindsight, there may have been a masterful strategy of evasion at work.
a) Barack Obama satisfied the public scrutiny over his birth certificate by outwardly bending to pressure from Donald Trump’s “show me” routine
b) The Obama team (individuals not clearly identified) produced the document in question by leaking it to the press, and putting it online.
c) However, no birth certificate document was ever legally produced or turned in to anyone (including the State Dept.) in order to appear on the ballot, etc.
d) Therefore, legal questions concerning “forgery” of the document produced do not legally link up to anything about Obama’s candidacy or presidency
e) Any questions or criminal allegations are posed towards “as yet unknown” conspirators – meaning that, while the document may indeed be a proven forgery, no one is currently identified as having created the document. Unless Obama is personally implicated in creating and producing this document, it would have no bearing on his eligibility – in retrospect or otherwise. At this point, it isn’t even clear if a legitimate birth certificate exists for Obama, and if so, where it is located or being held.
f) Public perception is an entirely different beast. If it ever came to a head, the entire reign of Obama could be put into question. But luckily for the outgoing president, those making accusations and raising questions have been labeled and marginalized. Until the campaign of Donald Trump, the question had been largely dropped – even in many right wing circles.
Who can pin the tail on this donkey?
Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan

Breaking glass ceilings...Hillary Clinton vs Kellyanne Conway

Kellyanne Conway

Gonna be blunt here Hillary Clinton et al the looney left so called progressive feminists never ever have helped crack much less break any female ceilings... they keep women in the proverbial closets while they rant and rave about being the leader of the pack.... laughable to say the least!

I put Kellyanne in company with Jeannie C Reilly who through her music cracked many barriers for women's equality! late 1960's through her retirement!

Three examples of how:   Enjoy

In memory of John Glenn...Grandfather extraordinaire

John Glenn

Dedication: Cherokee memorial song:  I am sure John is above with all the Grandfathers who went before keeping an eye on us all!

Democrats Believe Russia Influence Election by Telling the Truth?

by:Jerry Johnson 

I, for one, was never going to vote for Hillary Clinton.  The innumerable lies, plethora of scandals, the over-the-shark duplicity on behalf of the Democrat’s nominee, coupled with the fact that I loathe socialism made sure of that.

Not to mention, Hillary had few, if any, accomplishments she could point to during her brief time as an elected or appointed official.

Yes, she was the wife of a Governor who later became President — making her the First Lady of the United States. But she never held elected office until her husband completed his term.
She then moved to New York, not her home state, just to run for an open Senate seat.  Regrettably, the foolish leftists in that state gave her the election over a more qualified candidate.
After her humiliating defeat at the hands of Barack Hussein Obama in the 2008 Democrat Presidential primary, she positioned herself to get the nod in his administration as Secretary of State hoping to add to her resume’.
Again, I ask, what accomplishments could Hillary point to in her life as First Lady or as a Jr. Senator from New York that prepared her to receive this nomination as Secretary of State?

Wife of a Governor?  Wife of the President?  Her failed legal career?  Her failure to keep her husband’s attention?  Her failed books?  A one and a half term Senator?  Not to mention her utter and complete failures during her time as Secretary of States which are well documented?
The pinnacle being turning over and going back to sleep when that all important life or death phone called woke her up at 2 AM?  Remember Benghazi? Seriously!  I could go on!
But these facts meant little to the leftwing-fake-news-media who seemed to believe this was not an election, but a coronation.  The lost to billionaire real estate mogul Donald Trump was never supposed to happen.
Since November 8, 2016, a date which will live infamy for Democrats, Hillary and her allies have been trying to answer the question “how could this happen?”  During the angst discourse, they have floated numerous possibilities; all of which have failed to take root.

The latest mantra to spew off their lying lips is Russia is to blame.
Russia and Vladimir Putin interfered and tried to influence the election by hacking the emails accounts of the DNC, Hillary Clinton (who, by the way, opened herself up to the cyber-attack) and John Podesta.
Well, I have a question.  Can a single Democrat or the leftwing-fake-news-media like CNN point to one email leaked during the general election that revealed information which cost Hillary her Presidential dream?
I have racked my brain trying to figure out which scandal was uncovered as a result of the email dumps by WikiLeaks.  I don’t remember any.
Further, the DNC, Hillary, nor Podesta ever disavowed any email as being untrue or fabricated, and this would seem to indicate the content of the emails was true.
The only person who attempted to claim the emails were fabricated was second string DNC chair Donna Brazile, who, as a matter of fact, was later proved to be lying.

So what does all this mean?  Well, if Russia did try to influence the election, and if they tried to discredit Hillary Clinton by dumping her emails and those of her compatriots on the internet for everyone to read, then they achieved this goal by spreading THE TRUTH!
Democrats and the leftwing-fake-news-organizations can cry foul all they want.  But the reality of the situation is closer to home then they might want to admit.
I believe it is true that the revelation of emails cost Hillary Clinton the election.  Only they weren’t emails on the WikiLeaks website supplied by Russian hackers.
The emails I am speaking of were 30,000 deleted from and others found on an illegal server she had set up in her basement to skirt public scrutiny while she served as Secretary of State!

Has an Investigation Finally Proven Obama’s Birth Certificate is a Forgery?

by: Dave Jolly 

Why would anyone spend $3 million to hide personal background information if they had nothing to hide? That’s been a lingering question ever since Barack Obama first ran for the White House.
Dr. Jerome Corsi wrote the bestseller Where’s the Birth Certificate in which he questioned where Barack Obama was really born and if he was legally qualified to be president. Not long after the book’s publication and a meeting with Corsi, over 200 residents of Maricopa County, Arizona, signed a petition asking County Sheriff Joe Arpaio to investigate Obama’s birth certificate. Arpaio turned the investigation over to his Cold Case Posse composed mostly of unpaid volunteers.
Some of the evidence mentioned by Corsi and others involved a literary catalog published by Acton and Dystel which identified one of their new authors as:

“Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.”
In 2006, prior to his presidential run for office, Obama’s home village in Kenya had a sign declaring it to be his birthplace. Early in Obama’s political career, there was a video in which he mentioned his Kenyan birth and Michelle Obama did the same in another video, but those videos have been wiped from the cyber world.
There is also evidence that when Barack Obama attended Occidental College that he was registered as a Muslim student and a citizen of Indonesia.
By March of 2012, many media outlets around the world picked up the story of Sheriff Joe’s investigation. Among them was Lord Christopher Monckton in Great Britain. He is a former policy adviser to former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. However, the only press coverage here in the US was small and mostly negative, which is no surprise knowing the liberal agenda of America’s mainstream media.

Prior to the 2012 elections, Hugh McInnish of Alabama filed a lawsuit against the Alabama Secretary of State challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to have his name on the November 2012 ballot for President of the United States. One of the stipulations in the case was a request to obtain an original copy of Obama’s birth certificate.
In a decision written on March 6, 2012, the Alabama State Supreme Court denied McInnish’s demand of obtaining the birth certificate copy before allowing Obama’s name to be placed on the ballot. The denial was not based on the merit of the evidence of forgery of the birth certificate, rather it was denied because they did not believe that the state supreme court had legal jurisdiction of the matter. To quote Alabama Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker:

“The language of the foregoing provision of the Alabama Constitution implies that this Court is without jurisdiction over Mcinnish’s original petition for a writ of mandamus. It is not our appellate jurisdiction that is being invoked, and this matter is not within original jurisdiction of this Court ‘to issue such remedial writs or orders as may be necessary to give it general supervision and control of courts of inferior jurisdiction.’ Ala. Const. 1901, Art. VI, § 140. The office of the Secretary of State of Alabama is not a ‘court of inferior jurisdiction; that this Court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a petition first filed in this Court…”

However, Justice Parker wrote that the evidence McInnish provided along with the findings of the Cold Case Posse make Obama’s birth certificate to be highly suspect and questions if it would be able to stand up in a court of law.
Maricopa Sheriff Deputy Mike Zullo led the investigation. In his investigations, Zullo found that the officials in Hawaii have been intentionally hiding the supposed original birth certificate so much so that anyone else born around the same time cannot even access their own birth records because they have been sealed up with Obama’s.  In fact, Zullo points out that Obama refuses to release any of the following in addition to his real birth certificate:

“The marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.”
In July 2012, Arpaio and Zullo held a press conference where they revealed their findings to date. WND reported those results:
“Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo said the new information confirms the document presented to the American public in April 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent.”

Once it became known that the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse was formally investigating Obama’s birth certificate, Obama’s Justice Department began harassing Sheriff Joe and his department. They attacked Arpaio personally and charged him and the Sheriff’s Department with racial profiling for doing their job in trying to fight the trafficking of illegal aliens (mostly Hispanic) and illegal drugs (mostly Hispanic). The DOJ stripped the sheriff and his department of their federal immigration enforcement credentials. Then they took to the court with the charges of racial profiling and established a monitor to watch everything the department did.
In early 2014, the birther issue somewhat died down until Donald Trump reportedly offered to pay Barack Obama $50 million if he produced his real birth records and another $5 million if Obama produced his college transcripts.
In a recent update to the investigation into Obama’s birth certificate, WND reported:

“A years-long forensics investigation into the computer image of the long-form Hawaiian birth certificate image that Barack Obama released during a White House news conference during his first term and presented to the American people as an official government document concluded it is ‘fake.’”
If the evidence of a forgery is verified, the question now is what can happen? If Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery and there is no evidence that he really is a ‘natural born citizen,’ what can be done at this stage? Could his entire presidency be nullified along with every bill, executive order, memo, etc.? Could he be sent to prison for pulling off the biggest hoax in American history?
Chances are nothing legally will happen and Obama will live on receiving an undeserved pension from the American people that he doesn’t deserve. If it were up to me, he would receive nothing except an 8×8 cell until such time as he could be publicly executed for his heinous crime. 

President Obama says Hillary Clinton wasn't ‘treated fairly’ during election

During President Obama’s year-end press conference, a reporter asked if Hillary Clinton lost the election because of the Russian hacking. Obama said he doesn’t think Clinton was “treated fairly” and that the coverage of her and the issues were “troubling.”

I do believe Barry Barack Obama is losing it...his rants and raves along with Michelle Obama's on Russian influence on the election as well as tethering themselves to Hillary Clinton shows he and she are definetly worried about his legacy coming apart at the seams. And so should they be...come January 2017 DJT's pen and phone will undue all his illegal executive orders.

Thursday, December 15, 2016

One Indiana town is facing a massively disturbing situation, after their entire police force resigned simultaneously due to the corruption at City Hall.

The officers, who compromised the entire police force of Bunker Hill, Indiana, had had enough of the conditions in which they were being forced to work, and took umbrage to some of the things that higher-ups within the city’s government were asking them to do…much of it immoral if not outright illegal.
“’We have had issues with the town board and there are some activities there where I felt like they were serving their own agenda,’ said former Bunker Hill Town Marshal Michael Thomison.
“Thomison served as town marshal for four years until Monday night when he and four other officers handed over resignation letters to the council, telling them they have had enough.
“’They would not communicate with us or the officers and they kept scaling back,’ said Thomison.
“In their resignation letters, the officers accuse council members of asking them to ‘do illegal, unethical, and immoral things.’ They cited examples like asking police to run background checks on other town councilors to find their criminal history. The officers also claim they were threatened when they said no.
“Another issue they brought up in the letter was their safety. The officers say they were all forced to share one set of body armor, putting their lives on the line while they were out making arrests and serving warrants.”
The year 2016 will go down in history as one of the most despicable in terms of the treatment of police in our great nation.  We certainly hope that Bunker Hill can remain safe during this time of transition.
You can read more here.

A Few Words On Our New Ministry Of Truth

Join Oath Keepers

The Senate quietly passed the “Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act”, recently, following in the path of the House. The Act was slipped into this years NDAA authorization.
From Zero Hedge:
Also called the Countering Information Warfare Act of 2016 (S. 2692), when introduced in March by Sen. Rob Portman, the legislation represents a dramatic return to Cold War-era government propaganda battles. “These countries spend vast sums of money on advanced broadcast and digital media capabilities, targeted campaigns, funding of foreign political movements, and other efforts to influence key audiences and populations,” Portman explained, adding that while the U.S. spends a relatively small amount on its Voice of America, the Kremlin provides enormous funding for its news organization, RT.“Surprisingly,”
Portman continued, “there is currently no single U.S. governmental agency or department charged with the national level development, integration and synchronization of whole-of-government strategies to counter foreign propaganda and disinformation.”
Rob Portman is a Republican Senator from Ohio; for those who might think this was solely a Democrat Party creation.
This Act, assuming it is signed by President Obama, (as I’m sure it will be, as it is included in the NDAA), means a group of individuals within the Government will be tasked with deciding what is truth and what is disinformation, and acting upon those decisions. George Orwell would be proud.
After years of being fed lies by the Government and Mainstream Media, the new Ministry of Truth will be assigned the task of censoring the Alternative Media for telling some truths. Governments always seek to control public perception, but the Alternative Media has given them competition, hence the need for this new Act.

Government is adept at choosing names for the laws they pass, which are usually opposite the true intent; such as the Patriot Act and the Affordable Care Act. You get the picture, no doubt. When they give a new law a fancy name, its real intent is probably the opposite of the given name. So, in the case of  “Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act”, the intent can be assumed to be the fostering of disinformation and the use of propaganda.
I don’t know about you, but I prefer to decide for myself what is truth and what is propaganda. When a Government takes on this task, it always ends up badly.
Some will think that it is high time the Government rooted out the “fake news” that is destroying our Country, thinking that incoming President Trump will use the new power wisely. Keep in mind, that once the law is in place, that any future President, or Congress, can avail itself of the powers granted. And they will!
In 2012, again included in the NDAA, Congress passed a repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which barred the use of propaganda by the Government within the US. 

The newest version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes an amendment that would legalize the use of propaganda on the American public, reports Michael Hastings of BuzzFeed.
The amendment — proposed by Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) and Adam Smith (D-Wash.) and passed in the House last Friday afternoon — would effectively nullify the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which explicitly forbids information and psychological operations aimed at influencing U.S. public opinion.
So, first Congress passes a law allowing the Government to use propaganda on its citizens, then secondly, it passes a law which lets the Government decide what is Truth or Propaganda. Forgive me for thinking we are living in the Brave New World Aldous Huxley wrote about.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Obama Confesses Illegal Presidency Cost Dems Election

Email Template
by:Andrew Hodges, M.D. 

One of his most faithful worshippers—The Washington Post—posed the perfect question for The Perfect President shortly after his Democratic Party went down to a crushing defeat in the 2016 presidential election. Was this a referendum on the preceding eight years of his presidency?
How do you think Barack Obama answered?
Millions of Americans had voted with their heart and soul praying to be delivered from Obama’s disastrous administration. As much as they disliked Hillary Clinton, this pro-Trump turnout was motivated more by Obama than by Hillary. The word on the street and in the conservative press was “Please, dear God, no Obama third term.” 

Of course, since his narcissistic personality had suffered an unmistakably negative referendum, Obama would certainly engage in denial.
For Obama it was a time for a deeper super intelligence, soul-searching moment of true confession of his deepest, darkest secret—if you know how to decode projections, you will hear it. Simply take the topic he’s talking about and apply it to him.
To truly understand the often-irrational mind of Barack Obama—to put it clinically-- we must grasp that Obama possesses an unconscious super intelligence that quick-reads him instantaneously and projects in specific imagery his huge flaws—proverbial logs in his eye—onto others.
But the projection also represents great wisdom and a model of correction if applied to himself (his super-intel’s goal). This monumental paradigm shift in psychology allows us to understand unconscious communication and the human mind’s startling super-intel awareness of conflicts and ideal resolution. 

This new knowledge about the human mind allows us to fully grasp a man’s meaning.
And voters also possess an unconscious super-intel that secretly reads Obama’s projections and his contradictory behavior. This is the reason why people often say trust the voters—because voters pick up on the deeper truth, with exceptions such as the 2008 and 2012 elections.
Those exceptions were the result of the mistaken notion that America had to anoint its ‘first black president” to prove its national self-righteousness. 

Back to the great question for Obama—“was the loss to Trump a referendum on you, sir?” Without the slightest hesitation in his Washington Post interview Obama descended into massive denial and then delivered a treatise on unconscious awareness and projection of exactly who he is. Listen up. 

Illegal presidency imagery
In projection code—talking of Republicans but really of himself—he reveals in key imagery he’s an illegal president. He continues to admit how devastating that has been for the United States. Unconsciously he offers this as a central explanation why the Democrats lost the election. Secretly he sees that the people knew.  
He strings together repeated imagery symbolic of his illegal presidency, together forming the thoughtprint pattern that confirms his unconscious symbology—the encoded central message.
First he warns that Republicans must “guard against a crude nationalism” taking root in the U.S. Think of it this way: as an illegal president Obama crudely claimed American citizenship outside the rule of law. Indeed, over the course of his administration he has continually violated one law after another.
He warns Republicans to guard against an exclusive “ethnic identity,” pointing to his exclusive role as “first black president” which allowed him to escape any vetting of his illegal presidency. Anyone who questioned his citizenship was immediately labeled racist. The media followed in lockstep labeling those who wanted him vetted as wacky birther conspiricists

Obama further warned Republicans of “tribalism built around us and them,” again alluding to his tribal Kenyan birth. He divided the country into “us and them,” his supporters versus those who questioned his legality.
No discussion of an illegal presidency was allowed. It was “don’t question me” or “you’re involved in the birther conspiracy.” Could he really get away with hiding his complete records all the way to the White House? Indeed he did, before finally producing a phony birth certificate in 2011 as determined by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse in Arizona’s Maricopa County. Of course the media ignored the finding.

Arpaio’s team has a new report due to be released on December 15 which should further substantiate Obama’s federal law violation with crucial new information. Of course the media will ignore the findings—ever the Obama legacy makers

‘Mismatch’ indeed
Obama continues projecting. He said there was a “mismatch” between his 56 percent approval rating before the election and the Democrats losing the White House. He insisted, “people think I did a pretty good job.” Except he forgot about the far larger unconscious mind of voters and his own. First he confesses that, as an illegal president, he was a “mismatch” for the presidency.

He fails to understand that approval polls are conscious votes, but in a highly charged politically correct racial environment many will speak politely of him but vote differently. The groundswell for Trump reflected just how passionately people opposed Obama. Millions of Americans are understandably incensed at his treatment of them and their beloved country.
Deep down Obama’s super-intel sees that the people picked up on his great secret, his unconstitutional presidency. He explains how this was a major underlying factor in Trump’s election.
Obama recognized a common theme in populist movements her and in Europe—specifically referring to his illegal presidency. He declared that people had been disrupted “in very concrete ways” by “globalization.” In other words, his illegal global presidency resulted after he came to us secretly as a citizen from another part of the globe. No wonder he often showed more interest in other countries than America. That was a very concrete way of being a “global” president. 

Obama’s super-intel imagery clarifies how citizens saw through his illegitimate presidency—either consciously or unconsciously. He sets up his punch line—the clearest image of his illegal presidency—when he commented, “psychologically people are less certain of their [his] national identities or their [his] place in the world. It starts looking different and disorienting.”
In other words, people caught on psychologically to his foreign national identity and his lack of place in America. Increasingly his decisions looked different—un-American. His illegal presidency was disorienting to citizens who had never seen anything like it.
Many Americans consciously realized he was an illegal president, but many others picked up on it in their intuitive far-seeing subconscious.
In another interview on December 8 with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, Obama again confessed unconsciously that his presidency was illegal. He overtly mentioned the subject in a classic “thou protests too much” denial confession. He blamed opposition to his presidency on racism by prejudiced birthers—again linking it to Trump’s election. It’s as though he’s saying, “I must incessantly mention that I’m not an illegal president to secretly confess I am one. I cannot let the subject go—continually projecting my blame onto birthers. Secretly I know voters spotted this admission.” 

The gospel of distorted thinking
Why is it crucial to grasp Obama’s subconscious confessions of his illegal presidency now? His guilt is fueling his distorted thinking as he tries to achieve his legacy goal of reshaping the opinion of millions of citizens.
Secretly he has every intention of carrying out an intellectual bloodbath, disorienting the people’s thinking—persuading from within, Alinsky-style—to embrace virtual lawlessness by calling it normal.
Convinced they are entitled to make up their own laws, millions have already  swallowed the mind-altering Kool-Aid. Everything goes, whatever I say is right, and if people learn to group-think like this—we will conquer the world as we destroy it and ourselves.
In another projection Obama confesses precisely how he gains a following by enabling others to violate the rule of law and in turn support his illegal presidency and irrational thinking. He notes how Republicans “dangerously discriminate” against minority groups and “prevent blacks, Latinos, or gays or women from participating in rebuilding America.”
But secretly he’s talking about himself, how he creates various groups of minority victims to discriminate against law-abiding citizens to divide the country. 

In The Washington Post interview he continued to attack our culture, insisting conservatives lack character and values. He implemented his new moral compass with familiar propaganda buzz words such as fair, inclusive, non-discriminatory and uniting. But secretly he’s divisive, subverting the truth, subverting natural law.
The truth is whatever Obama wants to make it—because deep down like all rule violators he fears accountability to The One to whom our deeper moral compass points. But his all-seeing super-intel possesses a God-given natural law moral compass that compels him to tell the truth. Making up his own rules unknowingly violates his very essence.
Obama is not done doing his damage.
Obama’s the great divider because he himself has been deeply divided since birth. During his horrific childhood he was programmed to assault America as an unconscious Stockholm Syndrome victim to radical Islam. (See my book, The Stockholm Syndrome President: How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession.) He truly remains a secret prisoner to destruction. Deep down he subconsciously confesses because he wants to be freed. Yet his shadow side continues to self-destruct.

Trouble in Foxland? Staffers Hope to See the Last of Me-AGyn Kelly

by: Michael Walsh 
She really is this tiresome:
A source at the Fox News Channel tells Breitbart News that staff at the network hope Megyn Kelly will leave soon. “Everybody in the building is sick of it. We absolutely can’t stand it anymore,” the source said. “This ‘all me, all the time’ tour, ‘I’m the victim,’ ‘I’m going to be poisoned,’ is getting really old.”(The “poisoned” remark refers to rumors that Kelly had been poisoned before the first presidential debate in 2015 — a rumor she appears to deny in her new memoir, Settle for More.)
The source added: “Go. We don’t care. Leave. You want to be friends with Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon? Go to CNN. Have fun.”
There are rumors that Kelly may leave for CNN — and Vanity Fairreported Thursday that Kelly is also considering a move to ABC. In both cases, she is rumored to be considering salary offers less than the $20 million that Fox has reportedly offered her to stay, in exchange for more advantageous working conditions.

Why anyone would pay her anything but scale to snark and preen into the camera is beyond me.

Megyn Kelly's Feminist Bias 

Having failed in her primary mission to take down Donald Trump in an early debate, Kelly has been an albatross around Fox's neck ever since. They should just cut her loose and see what the market offers.
There are also worries at Fox about Kelly’s book sales, according to the source. After debuting at #1 on the New York Times bestseller list in mid-November, Kelly’s memoir has fallen to #4 in just a few weeks, and sold fewer than 150,000 units through its first three weeks, according to the most recent figures available from Publishers Weekly. HarperCollins — which, like Fox News, is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation — paid Kelly a reported $6 million advance.
Six million bucks, for what? There's no way the book earns out at that rate. The sooner real publishers like HarperCollins stop throwing advance money at talking heads and return to the real business of publishing, the better off this country will be. No need to encourage tireless self-promoters when there are real writers to support.
UPDATE: This just in: a Megyn-Ailes movie?

Megyn Kelly, 'You Are Fascinated by Sex'


Department of Energy Refuses to Tell Trump Team Who's Working on Climate Change


 by:Stephen Kruiser
The president-elect has signaled that he may be interested in reeling in some of the current president's climate change obsession, which is expressing itself in a variety of federal arenas. A recent questionnaire sent to the Department of Energy by Trump's transition team was designed to ascertain exactly which employees were wasting everybody's time and money working on climate change-related projects. Apparently unaware of the chain of command, the DoE is refusing to cooperate:
The Department of Energy is refusing the Trump transition team's request to name those who have worked on climate change within the department, because of concerns about what the incoming administration will do with the names. President-elect Donald Trump has denied climate change is real.NPR's Jennifer Ludden tells our Newscast unit the request of such names was included in a 74-question document distributed to the agency's workforce. Jennifer says, "The Trump team wants the names of career employees and contractors who have attended U.N. climate talks over the past five years. It also wants emails about those meetings."

The full list of questions can be found here.
On Tuesday, the department released a statement saying the questionnaire had "unsettled" many in its workforce, that it would "be forthcoming with all [publicly] available information" but it would withhold "any individual names."
"We are going to respect the professional and scientific integrity and independence of our employees at our labs and across our department," said spokesman Eben Burnham-Snyder.

Few things fight more fiercely than a bureaucrat who is in fear of losing his or her cushy taxpayer-leeching gig. Charlie Sheen's cocaine dealer selection process circa 2012 was more integrity-laden than what is going on here.

Inhofe: Climate Change a 'Hollywood Problem' 

Few things would be nicer than seeing the new administration begin to gut some of the federal bloat, especially as it pertains to the unchecked climate hysteria agenda of the past eight years. Sadly, Trump has already met with Al Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio to discuss the climate lunacy, so that's hardly an indicator that a wholesale purge is forthcoming.
If the work being done by these people is truly important, what are they afraid of? Bureaucrats aren't entitled to their jobs for life, despite what they might think.
Federal employees and contractors are also not entitled to be insubordinate to the president, especially one whose famous catch phrase is "You're fired!"

DiCaprio Urges Public to Monitor Commercial Fishermen

General Eisenhower’s Final Warning

Dear Reader,
General Eisenhower was the most powerful American general in history, leading the Allied forces to a decisive victory over the Nazi-led Axis Powers in World War II.
"Ike" grew so popular that he won the 1952 presidential election in a stunning landslide, taking almost five times as many electoral votes as his competitor, Adlai Stevenson. 
But Eisenhower’s final act as public servant came 16 years after the end of WWII, and yet almost no Americans know about it.
He issued a stinging rebuke to a secret group of powerful players buried deep within the U.S. government. 
The dark force he warned of sought to control the money and banking systems, restrict core citizen freedoms and to pull the strings of every branch of government.  

General Eisenhower’s final warning was a clarion call for the common American taxpaying citizen: a call to every man to protect himself and his family from the encroaching secret power of this underground government.
His message has never been more important because the shadowy force he warned of has only grown in power to this day. And so has the threat they pose to your freedoms, money, and financial independence.
My dad, Bill Bonner, recently unearthed Eisenhower’s videotaped warning and added some controversial analysis of his own. You’ll want to see it because Eisenhower’s warning has never been more urgent. Here’s the whole video.
Will Bonner
P.S. Don’t let the post-election circus distract you from the threat Eisenhower revealed in his final warning. Here’s the entire story, along with my dad’s thoughts, so you can decide what to do for yourself...

Today, December 14, 1863: President Pardons Sister-in-Law


By Dave Jolly 

On June 25, 1788, Virginia became the 10th state admitted to the United States of America. At the time, Virginia’s western border extended all the way to the Mississippi River.
On June 1, 1792, the western half of Virginia split away and was admitted as the 15th state in the United States. The name of the new state (actually a commonwealth) was Kentucky. Kentucky was considered a ‘free state’ although slavery did exist in the state.

In 1831, Kentucky State Representative John Helm and his wife Lucinda welcomed a son to the family and named him Benjamin Hardin Helm, after his mom’s father Benjamin Hardin. At the time, the Helm family lived Bardstown, Kentucky, located about 35 miles south southeast of Louisville and about 45 miles west southwest of the capital city of Frankfort.

Benjamin Helm attended West Point and the went on to study law. After receiving a law degree from Harvard University, Helm joined his father’s law practice.
In 1850, John Helm became the 18th Governor of Kentucky.
In 1855, Benjamin Helm was elected to the Kentucky State House of Representatives, representing Hardin County.
In 1856, Benjamin Helm married Emilie Todd, the half-sister of Mary Todd Lincoln. In the same year, Helm became the State Attorney for the 3rd District of Kentucky.
In 1860, Helm’s brother-in-law, Abraham Lincoln, was elected President of the United States.

In 1861, upon the breakout of the Civil War, knowing that Kentucky was a neutral state, Lincoln offered his brother-in-law, Benjamin Helm, the position of paymaster for the Union Army. However, Helm was more sympathetic to the southern cause and declined the offer.
On October 19, 1861, Benjamin Helm received a commission of Colonel in the Confederate Army. He initially was assigned to the command of Brigadier General Simon Buckner who at that time was located in Bowling Green, Kentucky near the southern border.

On March 14, 1862, Helm was promoted to Brigadier General and assigned to the command of General Braxton Bragg.
In April 1862, Helm was tasked with creating a new military group, the Kentucky Brigade, also known as the Orphan Brigade. This new Orphan Brigade was assigned to the Army of Tennessee.
On September 20, 1863, Helm and his Orphan Brigade were under the command of Confederate General Braxton Bragg. They were part of the Confederate effort at the Battle of Chickamauga. The Orphan Brigade were given orders to advance on the Union line and nearly an hour later, over 30% of the Orphan Brigade lay dead or wounded on the battleground. As the rest of the Orphan Brigade continued to fight, a Union sharpshooter, also from Kentucky, shot Helm in the chest and he died several hours later.

When Abraham Lincoln and his wife Mary Todd Lincoln received news of Helm’s death, they went into a time of mourning in private. Mary reportedly knew that if anyone saw Lincoln shedding a tear or mourning for a fallen Confederate soldier that he would be subject to intense scorn and ridicule, she they mourned the death of Mary’s brother-in-law in private in the White House.
In December, 1863, Emilie Todd Helm, General Benjamin Helm’s widow was secretly admitted to the White House to stay a few days with Mary and the President. When Union General Daniel Sickles discovered that Emilie Helm was at the White House, he told the President that she should not be there. Reportedly, Lincoln replied:

“General Sickles, my wife and I are in the habit of choosing our own guests. We do not need from our friends either advice or assistance in the matter.”
On December 8, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued his Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction. This was a plan to pave the way for reconciliation and reunification for the South. Part of that plan was offer amnesty to anyone associated with the South would be granted amnesty if they left the Confederacy and came to the North.
On this day, December 14, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued a full pardon for his sister-in-law, Emilie Todd Helm under his Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction plan. A few days later, Emilie returned to her home in Kentucky without any fear of retribution for being the widow of a Confederate general.

Sources for the above includes: Lincoln Pardons His Sister-in-Law; Relatives and Residents: Emilie (Emily) Todd Helm; Emilie Todd Helm; The Death of Benjamin Hardin Helm; The Orphan Brigade; History of the Orphan Brigade; Today, September 20, 1863: Confederate Victory at Battle of Chickamauga: Lincoln Issues Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction

White House Avoids Following Another Law – Lawmakers Demand Answers!

Same old story… The White House hasn’t followed through with a budget law that requires them to detail all its global warming expenditures, and lawmakers are demanding answers. Transparency at its finest.
House lawmakers sent a letter to the White House Monday demanding an up-to-date list of how much federal agencies spend on global warming-related programs.
The budget law, passed in late 2015, required the Obama administration to detail all its global warming expenditures, but so far, the White House hasn't handed anything over to lawmakers.
A 2013 White House report detailed more than $20 billion in global warming-related spending and was supposed to deliver such information to Congress by June, but that didn't happen.

"We believe it is important that there be transparency and accountability with regard to the climate change related expenditures across the federal government, and that Congress and the public should know how much is spent by federal agencies, and for what purpose," lawmakers wrote.
The chairmen of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the House Committee on Appropriations sent the letter to Shaun Donovan, director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Congress included a provision in the last-minute budget deal that was hashed out in December, 2015, requiring OMB to submit "a comprehensive report … describing in detail all Federal agency funding, domestic and international, for climate change programs, projects, and activities in fiscal years 2015 and 2016."

The budget provision was included after President Obama pledged billions of dollars to global warming-related programs.
Obama pledged $3 billion to the United Nations Green Climate Fund and said he'd spend $10 billion on green energy research. So far, Obama's only been able to spend $500 million of his Green Climate Fund pledge.
The White House reported to Congress in 2013 that it spent $22.2 billion on global warming programs that year. That number included scientific research, international climate assistance and green energy technology subsidies.
For perspective, the $22.2 billion in global warming spending was nearly twice as much as the government said it would spend on customs and border enforcement.

Obama's 2014 budget request only asked for $12 billion to fund the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency. The White House projected it would spend $21.4 billion on global warming in 2014.
Lawmakers' request comes as President-elect Donald Trump gets ready to take office in January. Trump has said he'd deal with the U.S. national debt by growing the economy and getting rid of government waste.
Could this be a list of places to cut?
It's not clear, but the Congressional Research Service reported in 2013 the federal government spent $77 billion on global warming programs over the previous five years.
Three-quarters of that came from funding green energy production though the Department of Energy. Trump's reported Energy Secretary pick, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, said DOE was one of the agencies he'd cut when running for president in 2012.

Michael Bastasch
Posted with permission from Daily Caller News Foundation

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Lt. Col. Allen West Destroys Obama’s VA Administration, Meets with Trump for 2nd Time

We at are big fans of Lt. Col. Allen West (R-FL). He has a long and storied history of defending our nation and defending those under his care – even to his own detriment. He is exactly the kind of man that we should seek to press into public office, because he always puts his constituents before himself.
Last week, on the same day that Al Gore made an appearance at Trump Tower, West was also in New York meeting with Vice President-elect Mike Pence and the presidential transition team. The scuttlebutt emanating from the meeting (though no one there would confirm) was that the team might be discussing foreign policy and national defense with the former Florida Congressman. When pressed for a comment, West simply said he was happy to be of service in any way he could be. “Nothing was offered. I mean, they know my reputation very well. I’m just a simple soldier and I’m the third of four generations that served this country going back to my father in World War II, and we still have a relative of ours that is continuing to serve in the Army now.” He added that he was “just considering how I can best serve this country and through this administration.” 

Interestingly, Col. West was back in New York on Monday, again involved in high-level meetings at Trump Tower. When asked about the current media frenzy over a possible Trump-Russia connection, West advised the President-elect to ignore the commotion and to “focus on what’s most important. What’s happening with Syria right now, Allepo is about to fall… I think there are more important things. We’re about to see a collapse in Syria, Iraq is falling apart, the Iran nuclear deal is horrific, China and Russia are expanding.” However when it came to discussing what he was at Trump Tower to discuss, West was reticent to divulge what had been said in their meetings, joking that he’d only come back to Trump Tower to pick up an umbrella he’d left “the last time” he was there.

While West wouldn’t elaborate on what the meetings were about, I thought it might be fun to venture a guess or two.
I don’t think Lt. Col. West is being considered for any of the major defense or foreign policy positions; those Cabinet level jobs are likely to go to more experienced politicos who already have greater influence in these areas. However, there is one Cabinet-level job that West may be perfectly suited for, and it could lend immediate goodwill to President-elect Trump from our nation’s veterans. I think that Lt. Col. West is being seriously considered for the role of Secretary for the Department of Veterans Affairs.
West has been a vocal and consistent advocate for our veterans, and he has loudly denounced their mistreatment by a cold and unhelpful bureaucracy. In fact, on the very day he was holding his second meeting with the Trump transition team, West also published an open letter excoriating the Veterans Affairs administration for the terrible job they’ve done protecting, defending, and assisting our needy veterans.

Mr. President, what kind of cold hearted, callous, uncaring, obtuse person are you? You expect us to just accept this horrific treatment of our veterans under your purview? And to Robert McDonald, current VA secretary, you should be ashamed, sir! You are the ignorant individual who compared our veterans waiting for proper care to being at a damn amusement park — and the pathetic Obama claimed you’ve done a fantastic job and have his complete confidence. Both of you should be made to go into every VA hospital in America and apologize. However, we know that won’t happen because the essence of liberal progressive socialists is that you don’t care about our veterans. Heck, you jerks believe a deserter serves with honor and distinction.
Who is running the show at the VA? I can tell you one thing for certain: this is about to end.
And you government union bureaucracies which protect the VA jackasses that allow things such as this to happen, beware. There is a day of reckoning coming for y’all. 

This is personal for me. My own dad worked in the Atlanta VA Hospital next to Emory University as a nursing assistant. And it was there my dad breathed his last. He was cared for with the dignity and the honor he deserved as an American combat veteran. 

Sadly, something has gone very wrong in our VA system and our veterans are no longer the prized and precious group, held in utmost regard, as before. All of this falls at the feet of one Barack Obama…who it truly appears, based on truth, fact and anecdotal evidence — not fake news — couldn’t care less.
Read the rest of his heartfelt piece at his website.
It sure sounds like Lt. Col. West is working up to something with this latest post, and to be honest, he’s 100% correct. Something needs to be done about the callous inefficient way that the VA is being run, and West may be just the man to right the sinking ship.

Could Trump Change His Mind on Key Cabinet Appointment

Exxon's Rex Tillerson: 5 Things to Know About Trump's Likely Secretary of State
oped: This would be a wise decision being that EXXON Rex Tillerson supported global emissions-cutting Paris agreement forged in 2015 ... acknowledged the threat of climate change and the company he heads endorsed a carbon tax ... 
See argument against such actions:

There's new buzz that President-elect Donald Trump could be eyeing Carly Fiorina as his pick for secretary of state.

Trump could be moving toward the former Hewlett-Packard CEO as talk of a Senate confirmation battle loomed over Trump's reported pick of Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson as secretary of state.

Fiorina was scheduled to meet with Trump in New York on Monday. Add to that talk of her as a potential secretary of state was overheard at the annual Pennsylvania State Society (PSS) meeting at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel, near the Trump Tower.

“Carly would like a position in the Trump administration,” a longtime GOP strategist attending the PSS meeting, told me under a promise of anonymity. “And she is much more than a CEO.”
 Source: Newsmax

Monday, December 12, 2016

Al Gore’s Making a Sequel to His Global Warming Documentary – Seriously, He is!

10 Beautiful Videos of Planet Earth From Space 
oped: Enough of this Tax Scam nonsense...Climate Change/Global Warming has absolutely zero to do with saving humanity from the dreaded whatever...Once again people need to do the diligent homework on the subject... 

This sums up the following links :


If a tree falls in the forest is it because of global warming? We’re about to find out. According to the Associated Press via Columbia, S.C. Fox affiliate WACH, Al Gore is coming out with a sequel to his fact-challenged climate change documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.”
Paramount Pictures said Friday the follow-up to the Oscar-winning original will premiere at next January’s Sundance Film Festival.
Excited to share the news of this project! Today’s announcement from @ParamountPics and @Participant:

— Al Gore (@algore) December 10, 2016
In a statement, Gore called for a re-dedication to solving what he called the climate crisis and said there are reasons to be hopeful.
So what’s wrong with this (motion) picture? For one thing, there is President-elect Donald Trump’s nomination of Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, a climate-change skeptic, to head his Environmental Protection Agency. (Yes, Gore met with Trump — actually Trump’s daughter Ivanka — last week, but what of it?)
Read More: