Saturday, November 7, 2015

2 police officers charged in Marksville shooting that killed 6-year-old boy, wounded his father
[Lt. Derrick Stafford, 32 ]
[ Norris Greenhouse Jr., 23 ]

oped: Two black police officers shoot and severely wound a white father and killed his 6 year old riots, no calling for the death of police officers, no screaming white lives matter ,no Obama on the boob tube calling for a investigation nor the DOJ /FBI announcing the opening of a hate crime investigation...Whats wrong with this picture...oh wait the officers were not white and the victims black!  Just thought it fitting to point out the hypocrisy of the Obama administration as well as  the  'Black Lives Matter' group!

By Jonathan Bullington, | The Times-Picayune 

Two police officers in Marksville face second-degree murder and attempted second-degree murder charges in connection with a shooting Tuesday night (Nov. 3) that killed a 6-year-old boy and wounded his father, the Louisiana State Police announced Friday night.
Norris Greenhouse Jr., 23, and Lt. Derrick Stafford, 32, were booked Friday night, State Police Col. Mike Edmonson said in a news conference from the central-Louisiana town streamed live on
Four city marshals, including Greenhouse and Stafford, were chasing a vehicle driven by Chris Few when they opened fire on the vehicle, authorities said. Few's 6-year-old son, Jeremy Mardis, was in the front passenger seat at the time, and was fatally struck in the head and chest.
"That little boy was buckled in the front seat of that vehicle," Edmonson told reporters. "That is how he died."

Edmonson said earlier that no weapon was found in the vehicle.
Greenhouse is a full-time marshal in Alexandria and Stafford is an officer with the Marksville Police Department. At the time of the shooting, both were working in their secondary jobs as Marksville city marshals, who work for the city courts and serve warrants, carry firearms and have police powers.
Two other officers were involved in the incident. When Edmonson was asked whether he anticipated any more arrests, he said: "We'll see where it takes us."
It's still unclear what led police to pursue Few and what triggered the shooting. The parish coroner said earlier this week that the officers were serving a warrant on Few when he fled, but Edmonson later said he had no information about a warrant.
The Avoyelles Parish District Attorney's Office is expected to recuse itself from the case, handing it over to the state's Attorney General for prosecution.

Edmonson declined to discuss specifics of the State Police investigation, which he reiterated was both "complex" and ongoing. Detectives are still working to sort out how many shots were fired, and from which guns. Edmonson said authorities were able to review body camera footage from the shooting.
"It is the most disturbing thing I've seen," Edmonson said. "And I will leave it at that."
Few's 57-year-old stepfather, Morris German, has accused the marshals of indiscriminately opening fire on the vehicle. German said Few was heavily sedated, unable to talk and has bullet fragments lodged in his brain and lung. He described Few as a loving father and added the man's son "was his whole life."
German added that the 6-year-old had been diagnosed with autism, describing him as a delightful child who "loved everything, everybody." German said the boy had no siblings and the family had recently moved to Marksville from Hattiesburg, Mississippi.
"I know a 6-year-old should not have been shot," German said.
The Associated Press contributed to this story. 


I'm all Army but hey... Go Navy... football & Midshipmen Naptown Funk who knew!

Even Army and Air Force folks are going to be impressed with this video. A bunch of officers-in-training took to the streets of Annapolis to make a rollicking version of Mark Ronson and Bruno Mars' number one hit "Uptown Funk." Get ready for "Naptown Funk"! 

Addendum: Ok Army WestPoint Cadets...Navy always seems to kick yo butts in football...let's not let em' kick yo butts in music about a parody on Old Time Rock and Roll..Bob Seger...this old Army vet old school no likee funky,hip hop Navy stuff..Go Army put on yo tightee

Oh and a after thought Army, remember *Army Strong* one squad doesn't take a village to raise a real team leader...ha Navy seems to subscribe to the Hillary Clinton philosophy..."It takes a village"

Que: 'In The Navy'  Need I say more?  Yes just remember the silly Navy movie ..."Down Periscope" 

Do Muslim lives matter most?


This is the second installment of a two-part series on America’s unspoken war with Islam. Read the first installment, “American lives matter.” 
“[W]e have reaffirmed again and again that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam” — President Barack Obama 
Last week, I wrote of the growing racial divide in America typified by the latest protest cry from African-Americans: “Black lives matter.”
Over the past seven years, President Barack Obama and other progressives inside the Democratic Party, like Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), have deflected blame away from the president’s failed economic programs, which have left millions of blacks poorer. They focused anger instead on white racism in America. There has been a deliberate policy by the president and Democrats to blame Republicans for race inequality in America. This has left the nation more divided than at any point since the Vietnam War.

Traitor kings

Obama and Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton are willfully ignorant to the growing global struggle between Islam and the West. They and other liberals have acquiesced to a future America with the rule of law, decency and morality that may originate more from Mecca rather than from the Magna Carta.
The British story spun in 1936, which persisted until recently, was that King Edward VIII (aka the Traitor King) abdicated the British throne for his undying love of Wallis Simpson, an American divorcee. The truth unveiled from documents that are no longer classified is that Edward spied for the Third Reich and was in collusion with Adolf Hitler to regain the throne. This would explain why as ruling king, Edward was such an apologist for the Nazis.

In much the same way, Obama is the leading apologist for Islam. Islam has been so praised by Obama that I wonder if his loyalties lie more with Islam than with the United States.
Consistently, Obama has disassociated terrorist groups from Islam — as if inside the ranks of ISIS are Buddhists, Jews or Mormons. Muslims alone are at the center of global terrorism.
In the Sept. 15, 2012 issue of RenewAmerica, Kevin Fobbs wrote:
Do you remember where you were the day that America’s Dream was assaulted, stripped bare, and left to endure a slow and lingering death? That day began on June 4th, 2009, when President Obama traveled to Cairo, Egypt and bowed his head to the Muslim World in a speech. He let the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic extremists, know that they had a fellow traveler and friend in the White House [emphasis in the original].

The president was clear, convincing and concise. The values and principles of the nation which has guided America’s founders, the defenders, and its citizens for over 233 years, by 2009, was laid upon the altar of Islam, like yesterday’s refuse. The new American dream of apology first, neutrality second and attack from behind third, was the new legal, moral and presidential construct.
Certainly, Obama has consistently argued that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. This is borderline criminal when you consider that America is engaged in a war against fundamental values of Western society that date back to the Renaissance 400 years ago.

Obama is not alone in this. A great many liberals in America and Western Europe refuse to acknowledge the truth. This is startling when millions of Muslims believe that either a religious conversion to Islam or death for those who refuse is a victory for Allah. It is all the more worrisome because most moderate Muslims will not refute the radicals. Even more disturbing is that millions of other Muslims in Western society do not object to the murder of Christians and Jews.
Last week, I reported that millions of Muslims worldwide give tacit approval of terrorist attacks. A poll from Pew in the summer of 2011 said 30 percent of U.S. Muslims view al-Qaida, “very favorably.” Separately 35 percent of U.S. Muslims said there is a great deal of extremism in America.
In raw numbers these are worrisome percentages. This is pointed out in the 2008 documentary “The Third Jihad: Radical Islam’s Vision For America.”

In the film is a Fox News broadcast regarding a 2007 Pew poll that stated 200,000 American Muslims embrace suicide bombers.
The argument by left-leaning Republicans such as Michael Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York, that Muslims are wealthy contributors to American society is bogus. In 2011, only 22 percent of U.S. Muslims made $75,000 or more per year; 45 percent of Muslims made less than $30,000 per year. It is ironic, but the multitudes of Muslims living off the government’s teat are the same people who want to see its demise.
Could it be that Obama and other progressives really don’t see the conflict between Islam and the West? No. It could be, however, that liberal Western leaders have become a gaggle of appeasers on par with Neville Chamberlain.

Mark Steyn indicates in his controversial book “America Alone: The End of the World As We Know It” that he certainly believes this to be the case. Just one shard of evidence he presented is a 2008 BBC interview with then-Archbishop of Canterbury. Rowan Williams said it is dangerous to have one law for everyone and that, therefore, the introduction of Sharia law in Britain was “inevitable.”
What seems inevitable is that liberals as high-ranking as the president of the United States believe it is OK for the West to turn over like some sick dog that exposes his underbelly in an act of submission. Taken to its extremes, it sometimes seems Muslim lives matter most.

Friday, November 6, 2015

Judge: Hillary Clinton’s Name Won’t Appear on Any Ballot

Hillary clinton funny pictures - Hillary Clinton Jokes Cartoons - very ...

In much the same manner as we hoped would happen in 2012, concerning Barack Hussein Obama's name not being on a ballot due to multiple court cases involving his fraudulent identification, now a judge has spoken out and says that the current political and legal issues that Hillary Rodham Clinton has been embroiled in will ultimately see her name not on the ballot in 2016. 

I've always appreciate much of what Judge Andrew Napolitano has written and said with a few exceptions. Even in what I'm about to write, I agree with his legal opinion, but am skeptical that the people will even bat an eyebrow, considering they have not so yet knowing all they know about Hillary Clinton. Yet, I do find his observations worthy of print.
Napolitano pointed out in a recent column that Hillary's political problem is one of "credibility."

"We know from her emails that she informed her daughter Chelsea and the then-prime minister of Egypt within 12 hours of the murder of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, that he had been killed in Benghazi by al-Qaida," he wrote. "We know from the public record that the Obama administration's narrative blamed the killings of the ambassador and his guards on an anonymous crowd's spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muhammad video."
Though her own embassy staff in Tripoli said the video was not an issue, Hillary marched right out, alongside Hussein Obama and Susan Rice to declare that the video was the reason for the Benghazi attacks. Her State Department even spent $70,000 of your tax dollars America to apologize for it!
Even after receiving the bodies of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others who died attempting to fight off Islamic jihadists, Clinton, along with Rice and Obama, continued to promote the lie that Benghazi was about a video.

However, Napolitano doesn't point to that as the reason that Clinton's name will not be on the ballot in 2016.
"That's because each time she addresses these issues – her involvement in Benghazi and her emails – her legal problems get worse," Napolitano continues. "We already know that the FBI has been investigating her for espionage (the failure to secure state secrets), destruction of government property and obstruction of justice (wiping her computer server clean of governmental emails that were and are the property of the federal government) and perjury (lying to a federal judge about whether she returned all governmental emails to the State Department)."

"Now, she has added new potential perjury and misleading Congress issues because of her deceptive testimony to the House Benghazi committee," the Judge added. "In 2011, when President Obama persuaded NATO to enact and enforce a no-fly zone over Libya, he sent American intelligence agents on the ground. Since they were not military and were not shooting at Libyan government forces, he could plausibly argue that he had not put "boots" on the ground. Clinton, however, decided that she could accelerate the departure of the Libyan strongman, Col. Moammar Gadhafi, by arming some of the Libyan rebel groups that were attempting to oppose him and thus helping them to shoot at government forces."   

He then concludes, "So, in violation of federal law and the U.N. arms embargo on Libya she authorized the shipment of American arms to Qatar, knowing they'd be passed off to Libyan rebels, some of whom were al-Qaida, a few of whom killed Ambassador Stevens using American-made weapons. When asked about this, she said she knew nothing of it. The emails underlying this are in the public domain. Clinton not only knew of the arms-to-Libyan-rebels deal, she authored and authorized it. She lied about this under oath." 

"After surveying the damage done to his regime and his family by NATO bombings, Col. Gadhafi made known his wish to negotiate a peaceful departure from Libya," added the judge. "When his wish was presented to Clinton, a source in the room with Clinton has revealed that she silently made the "off with his head" hand motion by moving her hand quickly across her neck. She could do that because she knew the rebels were well equipped with American arms with which to kill him. She didn't care that many of the rebels were al-Qaida or that arming them was a felony. She lied about this under oath."
While many have come to the same conclusion, Napolitano adds that both Catherin Herridge and Pamela Browne scrutinized Clinton's testimony and point out that Obama vetoed Sidney Blumentahl's hiring at the State Department, which she then had the Clinton Foundation pay him a larger salary to work at the State Department to be her, in the words of Napolitano, "silent de facto adviser."

Though Clinton called Blumenthal just a "friend" during testimony, nothing could be further from the truth. Both engaged in emails back and forth over intelligence issues, some of which she acted on, including a Libyan no-fly zone.
Napolitano then concludes, "It is difficult to believe that the federal prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Clinton will not recommend that she be indicted. Inexplicably, she seems to have forgotten that they were monitoring what she said under oath to the Benghazi committee. By lying under oath, and by misleading Congress, she gave that team additional areas to investigate and on which to recommend indictments."
While I agree with the judge's assessments, I wonder if he has taken into consideration the amount of corruption in the government that has allowed a known usurper, Barack Hussein Obama, to stay in office for seven years.

Funny hillary clinton pictures | Funny and jokes pictures 
{I just told a lil white lie...well maybe a little bit bigger...but what difference does it matter? Then again they were some pretty damn big what I am too big to Obama!]

Bernie Sanders Trashes “Unregulated” Uber; Uses Uber All the Time Anyway

Bernie Sanders Attacks Uber – Even Liberals Turn On Him… - Wounded ...

Philip Hodges 
Self-proclaimed pinko communist Bernie Sanders trashed Uber a few months ago as being “unregulated” and having all the “serious problems” that come with it.
They are, after all, an “illegitimate” taxi service that doesn’t pay all the fees that other “legitimate” taxi services have to pay. It’s not fair that ride-sharing programs like Uber and Lyft are proving themselves to be a more affordable alternative to the heavily regulated taxi industry. They’re only more affordable because they don’t have to do all the stuff that the government requires of everyone else. They should, but they “get away” with cheating the system. And as a result, taxicab unions are losing power, and the politicians that they own stand to lose. As the Daily Caller reported back in August:

Standing against companies like Uber is not too surprising for Sanders. He has made labor policy and union rights a fundamental aspect of his campaign. He has even been able to gain support from many union leaders who have been upset with Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton.
As it turns out, Sanders is only paying lip service to the union lobby. He knows that since he’s using other people’s money to run his campaign, he’s got to scrimp and cut corners when he can. If he’s got to get around a city, he’s not going to want to pay a taxicab. He’ll want to use a cheaper and faster alternative:

According to research done by National Journal, 100 percent of Sanders’ spending on taxi and ride-sharing services was spent on Uber. Among 2016 presidential contenders, that’s a distinction Sanders shares with only Bobby Jindal, Martin O’Malley, and the defunct Scott Walker and Rick Perry campaigns.
It also puts him way ahead of Hillary Clinton, who only had 41 percent of her taxi costs go to Uber. Only Clinton and Mike Huckabee spent more than half of their taxi spending on traditional taxis rather than modern ride-sharing apps.
Lindsey Graham was the least Uber-happy candidate, with only 25 percent of his taxi expenses going to the company. Graham was also the only candidate to use Uber’s rival Lyft, with the company absorbing some 31 percent of his taxi spending. 

Sanders might claim to hate Uber, but he’s still an ΓΌber-socialist.
Full disclosure, I’ve never used Uber. I rode in a taxicab once years ago when I was in New York for my brother’s wedding. That’s the only experience I have using any kind of taxi service, whether “legitimate” or not.
I have a cousin who hates Uber, but not for any reason having to do with its being an unfair, unregulated competitor to traditional taxicabs. He just doesn’t like how the company is run. He much prefers Lyft.
And that’s what a free market is all about. Personal preferences. I get why the taxicab industry doesn’t like companies like Uber and Lyft. Their disdain for those companies has absolutely nothing to do with wanting to provide the best service at the best price. It has everything to do with wanting to maintain their power and monopoly in the market.
But the solution shouldn’t be to stifle competition by forcing all companies under hefty government regulations, so that taxis remain at the top. The solution is to get the government out of the industry altogether. But that’s easier said than done, since there’s so much money and power, and politics at stake.

Obama Admin Sued For Citizenship-Push Records

Rachel Stoltzfoos 
Judicial Watch is suing the Obama administration for records related to a current U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services push to get as many immigrants as possible to apply for citizenship.
USCIS acknowledged it received a Freedom of Information Act request from Judicial Watch in May for the records, but did not produce the records or intent to withhold the records in a timely manner, so Judicial Watch has filed suit.
The FOIA requested records related to a letter USCIS sent to green card holders asking them to become naturalized citizens before the 2016 election, and for records of instructions given to USCIS staff regarding funding for the project. “After exhausting all administrative remedies, Judicial Watch filed suit,” the group announced.
Illegal Aliens Voter Fraud Ignored by vile Obama Justice Department ...

[Illegal Aliens Voter Fraud Ignored by vile Obama Justice Department ..]

“Judicial Watch is looking to uncover the Obama administration’s political prioritization of our immigration system in order to receive votes,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement Thursday. “This shouldn’t come as a surprise to most Americans but the blatant manipulation of our immigration system – at the expense of others – for political gain needs to be exposed for everyone to see.”
The Obama administration is in the middle of a massive push to market citizenship to immigrants and refugees ahead of the 2016 election. The White House Task Force on New Americans, created by executive order in 2014, is behind a series of new initiatives aimed at ensuring they have the tools, support and encouragement they need to apply for citizenship. (RELATED: USCIS Is Marketing Citizenship To Fight Terror) 

The agency also recently partnered with a number of major cities, including New York and Boston, to promote citizenship. USCIS will provide training about the naturalization process to librarians and city officials, so they can help immigrants apply. Boston Public Library branches established “Citizenshp Corners” to ensure easy access to preparation materials.
Obama launched a multilingual public awareness campaign in September to encourage immigrants and refugees to sign up for citizenship and to build a volunteer support team by partnering with local communities.
“If you’re eligible, commit to becoming a citizen today,” Obama said in a video kicking off the campaign.

... Pistachio: DHS Sets Up ‘Amnesty’ Complaint Line For Illegal Aliens

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Donald~Donald~Donald #TheTrump Just SMH at yuz!

Donald Trump Questions President Obama Mental Health And Calls Him A ...
[Needs to lose the Sesame Street..grouchy face for a start]

Ok Donald I'm growing weary to say the least...Let's get a few things straight here...yes you are a billionaire...that don't Impress me much...and by the way you claim your Daddy just gave you a small loan of 1mil way back when... to start you out... that would be about 10mil in todays market...and then he left you millions more when he passed away! Well dude I and many more people who are intelligent, but were raised in a blue collar working class environment , weren't blessed with such luck of the draw...had we been we also could have parlayed a mil or two into billions over the decades like you...You aren't special...albeit you do pat yourself on the back to bring it to our attention! ( I am no genius my IQ is just 137 but I can think and do and I chose my own path in regrets)

Here is my bottom line...I never aspired to be rich and a matter of fact had I been born to a wealthy family I would have still taken the course I serve...I worked my own way through college no grants no loans no scholarships although I did receive my VA benefits for giving blood,sweat and tears and it took a lot longer to complete but was appreciated more:)...I served in the military as well as LE public service most of my adult life and I have no regrets.

What annoys me most about you is your self serving arrogance...'I'm rich,I'm famous.I can make this country great again...blah~blah~blah on and on you go like a Merry go Round! Really now...ok maybe ya can maybe ya can't who really knows for sure...all you do is keep telling us how great you are...very little specifics on just how you will accomplish this great feat!

And when you attacked Marco Rubio on his use of CC's and college debts...well it  made you appear to be  the elite you really have no clue whatsoever the struggles the working class goes through day to day pay check to paycheck...their hopes and dreams...blood sweat and are the prime example of the proverbial 'Silver Spoon' syndrome.!

I'm tellin you this for your own good if you really want to make this country great again as you rant over and over again!...stop attacking Middle America and attack the far left progressive loons who are destroying our country...not those just running against you in the GOP are helping the opposition...wtfu unless your real intention is to help them...Dunno #FoodForThought ! 

Once again see:

As Shania Twain sang it best..."That don't Impress Me Much"...well Donald you damn sure don't Impress Middle America with your 'Silver Spoon' attitude...get a clue dude!

SPLAT: Watch Sniper Take Out This Muslim Who Thinks He’s Being Sneaky


Watch Video at Military.Com

This is what happens to terrorists who get caught in the sight of a sniper.
An FSA rebel aims in with his RPG, but is stopped dead in his tracks when a sniper takes him down with a headshot. (

Share if you think he had it coming

SMOKE AND MIRRORS: What Obama’s Doing To Hamper Hillary’s Benghazi Investigation

kouri obama

oped: Rep. Elijah Cummings is Barry Obama's (Anthony Johnson~reborn) plantation overseer as is Hillary Clinton,Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi ...This is one corrupt administration as dirty as any third world dictatorship! They also have the progressive universities as well as MSM in their proverbial back pockets

by Jim Kouri 

The White House is conducting a full-court press to stop the releasing of emails between President Barack Obama and his former Secretary of State , and now the Democratic Party’s presidential heir apparent, Hillary Clinton. According to reports in Washington, D.C., news outlets, the White House is claiming they are required to keep presidential communications confidential at least until a president exits the White House at the end of his or her term.
The White House is conducting a full-court press to stop the releasing of emails between President Barack Obama and his former Secretary of State , and now the Democratic Party’s presidential heir apparent, Hillary Clinton. According to reports in Washington, D.C., news outlets, the White House is claiming they are required to keep presidential communications confidential at least until a president exits the White House at the end of his or her term.

While the majority of print and broadcast news media all but ignore the information emanating from the drip-by-drip release of Clinton emails, on Friday the State Department released another batch of Hillary Clinton’s emails from her tenure as top diplomat. However, the White House will not allow the release of emails between Obama and Clinton even if some are communications between the two regarding the Benghazi terrorist attack in 2012.

The White House told reporters — many of whom forget to ask follow-up questions — that the emails will be released after the new president is sworn in and President Obama and his family vacate the White House. “Another way to look at it is: the emails will be released after Election Day 2016,” noted a political strategist.
More than a few critics of Clinton’s and Obama’s handling of the Benghazi terrorist attack and other international issues are accusing the White House and its sycophants, such as Rep. Elijah Cummings who sits on the select committee — and spends his time complaining about sitting on the committee — of stonewalling investigations into Clinton and Benghazi and then the Democrats and the news media resume their complaints about the length of time and the amount of money devoted to those investigations. 

“The news media knows exactly what they’re doing, but because reporters today behave as if they are part of the Democratic Party’s Super Pac, as pointed out by Sen. Marco Rubio during the recent GOP presidential debate, they help Cummings and the Democrats convince voters there are no scandals,” said political strategist Michael Barker.
While the email already released have repeatedly shown Clinton either deceived the American people or she deceived her own staff members and the President. For example, she has always claimed that the murdered Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens was her “close friend”, yet there are no emails between the two. In fact, the House Select Committee on Benghazi discovered that Hollywood movie star Ben Affleck had Hillary Clinton’s private email address but Ambassador Christopher Stevens didn’t.

In August 2015, the U.S. intelligence community inspector general reported that at least two of the Clinton emails reviewed by his office contained material were classified as Top Secret, which cannot be sent to non-secure email accounts. The Clinton presidential campaign disagreed with the initial review findings. In fact, the Clinton team has targeted anyone or any organization’s officials who reveal information that verifies Clinton deceived her superiors, her own staff and the American people.
In May, a U.S. District Court judge ordered the State Department to make public all of the some 55,000 e-mails that were retained on Clinton’s server by the middle of January 2016. In a compromise, the State Department agreed to release a “batch” of emails each month to lawmakers on Rep. Trey Gowdy’s committee.

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

Leftist, Ivy-League Professor Rewrites History to Favor Nazis

Image - Gay hitler.jpg - Liberapedia

oped: Yes indeed a member of the Pink Swastika Party See: 

And while we are at it may I educate the Professor (used loosely) on the true cause of slavery in the USA:


Oh and not to forget the Myth of Islam"

 So your dream is to send your son or daughter off to an esteemed Ivy League School, where they may receive a superior education and be imparted the knowledge that other colleges just can’t offer.
Well, maybe you should twice about that. Especially if they decide to take a history class taught by professor Jan Gross at Princeton University.
He is a well established Polish-American educator who has also taught at Yale, NYU and in Paris. He also received the Order of Merit from the Polish Government in 1996.
But he may be stripped of that title due a an angry article he wrote in a German Newspaper, Die Welt, where he claimed that the Poles killed more Jews during WWII than did the Nazis.

And why would he claim such a thing? It’s because Poland refuses thus far to swing open its doors to Middle Eastern “refugees” the way Germany has. So the professor has determined to make them pay for that decision – even going so far as to say the “hideous face of Poles had roots in the past.”
So let’s just see who killed all those Poles during World War II.
Approximately 6 million Poles were killed in World War II by the Nazis and Stalin’s Soviet Union. That was about 20% of their entire pre-war population – 3 million Polish Jews and about the same amount of Christians. To put it in perspective, that’s approximately 64 million present day Americans.
Most were civilian and most occurred during the occupation. Recall that in 1939 Poland was virtually bisected, with the western half controlled by Nazi Germany and the eastern by the Soviets under their non-aggression pact.

The Germans had no love for the Poles. Heinrich Himmler even wrote that, “All Poles will disappear from the world… It is essential that the great German people should consider it as its major task to destroy all Poles.” This animosity, at least in part, may have been due to a deep seated resentment that a lot of Germans who supported Hitler had over the post-World War I Treaty of Versailles, where Poland received the former German provinces of West Prussia, Poznan, and Upper Silesia.
In an effort to Germanize the Polish population, Himmler used the areas around Krakow and Warsaw, in the center of the nation, as a “dumping ground” for unwanted or unworthy non-Jewish Poles. The Nazis would go house by house, burst in from all sides, ransack the place, confiscate any and all valuables, and force the homeowners out. Then hundreds of thousands of these unwanted people were stuffed into train boxcars, where they were transported west and south to remote areas and dumped in open fields. They were given no food or water and no means of survival. The zone, controlled by Germany, between Nazi annexed Poland and the Soviet territory was known as the “General Government.”
Read More:

Bill Gates rant on Climate Change...akin to Win10

Bill Gates Calls For Global Government

Bill Gates is a progressive Limo Liberal Marxist who hasn't a clue about the cause of climate change...however if he really wants to go down the road of Carbon Footprints/Man Made Climate change being the cause...let's entertain the fool...ok Bill you use more carbon in one day than the average Middle American blue collar worker uses in a year! How about you give up your limos and private jets for a start...also give up your numerous mansions that use up natural gas and electricity on a rediculous/obnoxious level... just one of your mansions use more natural fuel than 100 single family sir (used loosely) are a glutton which is one of the deadly sins!

And while we are at it give up your armed private security since you also think people should not have guns to protect themselves...ya know what Bill are akin to a Union Boss of the Garbage Collectors Union order them on strike with a clause 'Except in my Neighborhood'!
As for your admiration for China well Bill they are the worlds biggest polluters...and they produce junk which is 80% of WalMart's stock which is forced on the working class since they can't afford quality products like you and yours...kinda/sorta akin to your Win10 no one wants it, it is pure junk! #PERIOD MicroSoft hasn't produced a good product in the last 12 years!
Bottom Line go F' yourself Bill no one is listening to your diatribes...retire and head off into the sunset never to be seen or heard from again! 

Now onto the article: 

Bill Gates: Only Socialism Can Save Us From Climate Change

“Representative democracy” has failed; the private sector is “inept”; and only bigger government – led by China and the US – has the power to save the world from climate change.
So says Bill Gates in a dogmatic but somewhat confused interview with The Atlantic in which he simultaneously pours scorn on green tech solutions but insists that more of them are needed – on a scale bigger than the Manhattan Project – if we are to deal successfully with a problem whose nature he admits may well have been exaggerated by environmentalists.
Confused? You should be:
Here are some of things we learn about the mysteries of Gates’s mind.
Gates has no patience for climate change deniers – Republican politicians in particular – but is far too grand to explain why they’re wrong.
Read More:

Terrifying! Muslim Refugees Disappearing from Migrant Camps by the Hundreds!

Austria: Town of 1,600 Drowns in Muslim Migrant Excrement and Garbage ...
Austria: Town of 1,600 Drowns in Muslim Migrant Excrement and Garbage ...  

[Austria: Town of 1,600 Drowns in Muslim Migrant Excrement and Garbage ...]
[The illegal migrants leave their trash as they move through the area ...]


As we watch the invasion of Europe by alleged Muslim migrants, who are really Muslim invaders, the stories have gone from Islamic gangs raping women and children and plundering churches and schools in Germany to the fact that many of those Muslims the Germans were tracking have now begun to disappear from some of the migrant camps.

WND reports:
According to German press reports, keeping track of all the Muhammads and Alis pouring across borders is proving ever so tricky for European countries being flooded with people on the move from the Middle East and Africa.

Now, the United Nations is partnering with a private company to offer a solution – a new "universal" identification system that will comply with the United Nations' sustainability goal of getting "legal" biometric IDs that include iris scans, photographs and fingerprints, "into the hands of everyone in the world by the year 2030."

It offers hope for the UN's Sustainable Development Goal of getting legal ID into the hands of everyone in the world by the year 2030 with its Identification for Development (ID4D) initiative 

WND isn't the only one pointing out the problem Germany is facing. Contributor Pamela Geller also has cited reports from the German press that indicates that one in two regugees from one camp have gone missing and are considered "on the run."
Geller is referring to Camp Shelterschlefe where at least 580 of the refugees there have reportedly disappeared.
obama and refugees"It's become an epidemic," Geller said. "7,000 migrants have left the Brandenburg shelters. Where are they going? Who is sheltering these illegals, many with ties to ISIS?"
"Where are they hiding? Could they be connecting with sleeper cells?" Geller writes. "Is it any wonder that Europeans are scrambling for guns?"
Geller is referring to reports last week that Europeans are scrambling for weapons. Among those Europeans are the Austrians, who are arming themselves against Muslim invaders.

Die Welt is also reporting:
But on Wednesday were more than 600 people departed from first admissions, reported the deputy ministry spokeswoman Susann Fischer. According to official figures of the provincial government more than 17,000 new arrivals have come into the country since the beginning of September. Around 7800 have been accommodated in cities and communities, nearly 2,700 people are still in the first recordings. It follows that at least 7,000 people have left their own.

Furthermore, German news outlet reported, "From Lower Saxony shelters some 700 refugees have disappeared - many are not registered."
The reason these reports should be concerning not only to those in Germany and other European countries, but also to Americans is that the current administration is talking about bringing these people into our culture without assimilation into the culture. We also know that our enemies have told us that they will embed their people in these "refugees."

Personally, I think it is high time the American militia step up and start keeping an eye on where the Obama administration is bussing in these invaders and stop them in their tracks as is our constitutional duty. May God grant us grace to defend our country from this Islamic invasion.

from Freedom Outpost

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

The Delusional Conceit of Harwoodian Liberal Journos

The Delusional Conceit of Harwoodian Liberal Journos
by:David Limbaugh
So CNBC’s John Harwood is not only unashamed of his disgracefully biased moderating of the GOP debate, he’s doubling down — entrenched as a five-year-old boy guarding his Halloween candy.
After the debate he tweeted, “GOP debate in 2015 enriched my understanding of challenges @SpeakerBoehner has faced and @RepPaulRyan will face.” I assume he was not speaking complimentarily of these “challenges.”

In an interview, Harwood insisted he was justified in asking Donald Trump if his campaign was a comic-book version of a presidential campaign. “There is no one on that stage,” said Harwood, “who actually believes you can send those 11 million people out of the country. There is no economist who believes that you can cut taxes 10 trillion dollars without increasing the deficit. It is simply a set of discussions that is not connected to the real world we live in.”
Silly me, I thought Harwood was talking about Trump’s legendary bombast, not his policy proposals. Is it the moderator’s place to show contempt for a candidate’s policies and depict them as fantastical? Besides, when did debt reduction become the liberals’ concern, much less their priority, and even less their acid test for assessing the merits of an economic policy?

You really want to talk about the deficit? How about Harwoodian liberals’ surreal defense of President Obama’s reckless stimulus and other spending, his unconscionable waste on uber-fantastical green projects, his intransigence on entitlement reform and his demonstrable lies on Obamacare?
You want to cite your vaunted economists, Mr. Harwood? How many of them accurately predicted the budgetary effects and premium increases of Obamacare? How many of their predecessors believed that John F. Kennedy’s or Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts would increase revenues while keeping inflation in check? And while we’re on the subject of your allegiance to reality and your commitment to debunking fantasies, Mr. Harwood, why don’t you explain to us why you haven’t assailed President Obama and Hillary Clinton for their manufactured lie that the Benghazi attacks were prompted by a video? For calling the terrorist attack at Fort Hood “workplace violence”? For playing semantic games with “boots on the ground” in Syria? Who is it that has trouble with reality?

Here’s a dose of reality: Obama has doubled the national debt during his tenure and he would have spent substantially more but for tea party pressure on the GOP to rein him in. If we don’t restructure our major entitlements they will — not might — go belly up, which will have devastating consequences on real people’s lives.
Cloistered beltway liberals obviously have no idea what Americans outside their bubble think — or are so contemptuous of it as to dismiss it as insane. They believe that anyone who rejects the apocalyptic theology of the man-made-global-warming cult is a science-denying knuckle-dragger. It couldn’t possibly be that the “science” they cite is bought and paid for, tainted by peer pressure, based on questionable models and often steeped in corruption. Leftists are the ones bastardizing and politicizing science to advance their agenda.

Why else would they have predicted doom in the ’60s from global cooling, switched to global warming to conceal the egg on their faces, and then recently have descended into the shameless ambiguity of “climate change”? Have these fear mongers ever answered the charge that even if we implement all the socialistic, Luddite, Draconian measures they and their fellow traveling globalists advocate, it won’t make an appreciable difference in reducing the global temperature in a century’s time? Their hubris is as stunning as their avoidance of reality.
Have pseudoscience-deifying leftists ever apologized for the flagrant failures of their doomsday predictions of the last half-century? Have they apologized for the embarrassing predictions of Paul Ehrlich in his “The Population Bomb”? Or for Ted Danson, who predicted more than 25 years ago we had 10 years to save the oceans?

Don’t be ridiculous; being a liberal means never having to say you’re sorry. These men are more likely to be sainted by the Global Warming Church than ridiculed by their enablers.
Many mainstream liberal reporters are so ensconced in their echo chamber that they are convinced their subjective political views are self-evidently and objectively true and everyone else is extreme, delusional, reality-challenged, science-illiterate or just plain evil. That’s how they delude themselves into believing they’re journalists and not glorified partisan cheerleaders. 

Even with their limited contact with the outside world, how can they be so devoid of self-awareness and blind to the legitimacy of contrary opinions?
I fully acknowledge my own conservative bias and make no apology for it — but admitting it doesn’t relieve me of my duty to state the facts correctly. To me, there are conservatives and liberals and all kinds of shades in between. To them (not every liberal, but the smug journo types), there is the reality-based culture, and there’s the rest of the world — you know, conservative talk radio; Fox News; the Republican Party; the tea party; patriots; most of the South; and people who believe in American exceptionalism, the United States Constitution, limited government, traditional morality and God.

PROFESSOR’S ‘LEAVE AMERICA’ RANT: Will Make You Scream Like An Eagle

Screen Shot 2015-11-02 at 6.31.50 PM
Mike Adams, a professor at UNC-Wilmington, likes to start for his students to know exactly how he feels about any anti-American sentiments that they might have when walking into his classroom on the first day of the semester.
Author’s Note: The following column is comprised of excerpts taken from my first lectures on the first day of classes this semester at UNC-Wilmington. I reproduced these remarks with the hope that they would be useful to other professors teaching at public universities all across America. Feel free to use this material if you already have tenure. 

Welcome back to class, students! I am Mike Adams your criminology professor here at UNC-Wilmington. Before we get started with the course I need to address an issue that is causing problems here at UNCW and in higher education all across the country. I am talking about the growing minority of students who believe they have a right to be free from being offended. If we don’t reverse this dangerous trend in our society there will soon be a majority of young people who will need to walk around in plastic bubble suits to protect them in the event that they come into contact with a dissenting viewpoint. That mentality is unworthy of an American. It’s hardly worthy of a Frenchman.

Let’s get something straight right now. You have no right to be unoffended. You have a right to be offended with regularity. It is the price you pay for living in a free society. If you don’t understand that you are confused and dangerously so. In part, I blame your high school teachers for failing to teach you basic civics before you got your diploma. Most of you went to the public high schools, which are a disaster. Don’t tell me that offended you. I went to a public high school.
Of course, your high school might not be the problem. It is entirely possible that the main reason why so many of you are confused about free speech is that piece of paper hanging on the wall right over there. Please turn your attention to that ridiculous document that is framed and hanging by the door. In fact, take a few minutes to read it before you leave class today. It is our campus speech code. It specifically says that there is a requirement that everyone must only engage in discourse that is “respectful.” That assertion is as ludicrous as it is illegal. I plan to have that thing ripped down from every classroom on campus before I retire.

Finally, if this doesn’t work then I would simply ask you to get the hell out of the country. The ever-growing thinned-skinned minority you have joined is simply ruining life in this once-great nation. Please move to some place like Cuba where you can enjoy the company of communists and get excellent health care. Just hop on a leaky boat and start paddling your way towards utopia. You will not be missed.
Read more: Townhall
Share if you love this introduction


This University of North Texas professor accused these officers of stopping her for ‘walking while black’ but the dash cam video and the officers have a different story.
Dorothy Bland, dean of the journalism school at the University of North Texas, is used to taking a walk at daybreak. But rain delayed her exercise regimen until later Saturday morning when she began traversing the streets of her well-to-do Corinth neighborhood.
But soon “flashing lights and sirens from a police vehicle” paused her walk, she wrote in a column for the Dallas Morning News.

Bland was wearing a hooded sweatshirt, and she’s black.
“Like most African-Americans, I am familiar with the phrase ‘driving while black,’ but was I really being stopped for walking on the street in my own neighborhood?” she asked.

Bland added that she stopped by the mayor’s house and asked him, “Do I look like a criminal?” She continued, “Mayor Bill Heidemann said no and shook his head in disbelief. I appreciate the mayor being a good neighbor, but why should he need to verify that I am not a menace to society?”
But after Corinth Police Chief Debra Walthall caught wind of the incident, she wrote a response, which was in the second part of the Dallas Morning News piece, and said that the encounter was about Bland’s safety, not race — and that dashcam video from the officer’s patrol car proves it.
Walthall said the officers saw Bland walking in the street with earbuds and “unaware that there was a pickup truck directly behind her that had to almost come to a complete stop to avoid hitting her.”

“The driver of the truck looked at the officers as they passed and held his hands in the air, which implied ‘aren’t you going to do something about this?’” the chief wrote. “The officers turned around and drove behind Ms. Bland.”
Walthall noted that while the patrol car’s emergency lights were activated, no sirens were used, contrary to Bland’s claim — and the officers “immediately” told Bland about their concern for her safety and the pickup truck and that she should walk against traffic instead.
Read more: The Blaze

GERMAN KIDS: Trick-or-Treated at Muslim’s House, What He Forced Them to Do Is SICK

Germany has dug themselves their own personal grave by letting in hundreds of thousands of Muslims. Parents of German kids better be prepared to expect this from now on.
The children are trick or treating for Halloween. Why is this Muslim forcing them to recite the shahada? To convert them to Islam? That’s all it takes to convert — say the shahada (“there is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger.”) It’s the same message on the black flag of Islam. (Pamela Geller)
Share if you think this is messed up

Monday, November 2, 2015

State Declares Christian Judge “Unfit” because of Opposition to Gay Marriage!

Judge Vance Day

The state of Oregon has been the leading edge of the liberal and gay lobby’s assault on Christians in America. The latest example of this war on Christianity is the case of Judge Vance Day. Judge Day is a Christian whose religious beliefs dictate that he not approve or participate in homosexual marriages/weddings. While other problems have come up in regards to Judge Day’s judgment, the evidence clearly shows that his stance on gay marriage is the main reason that he is now being investigated by Oregon’s Commission on Judicial Fitness. An article in the Oregonian last month seemed to agree. 
 Last week, word filtered out that Marion County Circuit Judge Vance Day was under investigation by the Oregon Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability. The primary reason given at the time, according to Day's spokesman, was his refusal to perform marriages out of concern that he would be asked to officiate over same-sex unions. That would conflict with Day's deeply-held religious beliefs, according to Patrick Korten, Day's spokesman.

It's more than that, as we now know…
But Day still may have a point when he questions whether provisions of the judicial code of conduct infringe on his free-speech rights or are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. 
While Judge Day’s detractors point to a few other issues, the core problem for him seems to be his stance on gay marriage.
Most of the accusations range from insignificant to trivial. Among the things that the Judicial Fitness Commission considers violations of state ethics rules include handing his business card to a soccer referee who had asked for it; hanging displays of memorabilia honoring the service of American military veterans on the walls outside his office; and even hanging pictures of former presidents of the United States.  

His fellow Oregon Judge, Thomas Kohl, faced a similar investigation for not performing marriages as well. Now the commission has found Judge Day unfit. He doesn’t plan on taking their ruling lying down. Judge Day is fighting back.
The unmistakable message in the Commission’s complaint is that anyone who has a personal religiously-based objection to same-sex marriage are to be forced to make a public display of approval or else suffer public condemnation and official sanction.
We hope you’ll agree that such a policy turns fundamental constitutional rights on their head, and that you’ll help Judge Day defeat this effort to overturn those rights. It will be an expensive battle and could potentially go to the U.S. Supreme Court. That will be possible only if people who share Judge Day’s desire to vindicate the rights of religious conscience will help support the legal battle to prevent the evisceration of these rights. 

Now, Judge Day is asking for your help in his fight.
According to an email from Judge Day’s wife:
You know my husband, Vance. He has been a Circuit Court Judge here in Oregon for 4 years. In that short time, he has specially trained to identify and deal with domestic violence. He was asked to join national faculty to train other judges in this prevalent issue. He started the second and largest Veterans Treatment Court in Oregon. He has been asked to mentor the judiciary in other counties for establishing vets courts. He established the “Hall of Heroes” gallery at the Courthouse commemorating our local veterans in leadership positions to inspire his treatment court participants and bring awareness to vets issues. 

Vance is now under attack by the Oregon Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability because they say he is unfit to be a judge – he won’t perform same-sex marriage because of his faith and quietly decided to stop performing all marriages. The fact is that performing marriages is an optional part of his job – there is no requirement that Oregon judges perform marriages. (Please see for more detailed information on the allegations)
The Commission has piled on other charges that have nothing to do with ethical conduct, perhaps to distract attention from the fact that the marriage issue is at the heart of their effort to discredit him in the public eye. These other charges are simply window dressing, in the hope that somehow quantity will make up for their lack of quality. 

Their strategy seems to be to throw every thing possible at Judge Day, hoping something sticks. And, not incidentally, to make it very difficult and expensive to defend himself.
Vance’s task of mounting an effective defense is complicated by the fact that the Commission has an unusual amount of power in its investigation. They are prosecutor, judge and jury all rolled into one, and they have the very substantial financial advantages and other resources of the state government to draw upon. We, on the other hand, have to hire our own attorneys.
The politics of personal destruction is not a new idea. In Rules for Radicals, Saul Alinsky said: 

“Denigrate your opponent, then box him in, so that he must defend the accusations, rather than be able to debate the issues.”
This state-sponsored power play against Vance will have a result of damaging “judicial independence” and creating a culture of politically correct “behavior and thought police” to monitor all judges. It appears the Commission intends to destroy him, but they don’t know my husband. Vance is a congenial, humorous fellow who is not afraid to be a fighter when it comes to things that matter! To Vance’s opponents, he is just a former Chairman of the Oregon Republican Party who was unfortunately appointed to the bench by a Democrat governor. What feels even worse to them is that he is a Christian believer who is an enthusiastic patriot that they think is biased and, therefore, he cannot be trusted. 

To the Commission and certain far-left groups, Judge Day’s personal decision to respectfully and quietly remove himself from performing same-sex marriages cannot be tolerated – he must be branded a bigot and found to be unfit for public service. There is a “no tolerance” policy for people with traditional values regarding the institution of marriage.
Undoubtedly, there are many judges in this nation who will face the same type of ferocious attack. Vance appears to be the first judicial target since the Supreme Court decision on gay marriage. The goal appears to be: make him an example so that other judges will not dare to push back on politically correct elites. However, they don’t know that Vance is a warrior who will not leave this battle until he wins or is expelled from office. 

We need your help! In one month, my husband’s two week “ethics trial” will start: November 9 – November 20. We have competent and generous lawyers who have given many free hours to this case and reduced their rates because they believe in Vance. Nevertheless, we are discovering a case like this costs a fortune just to prepare considering numerous day-long depositions, hiring of experts, delivering subpoenas, and hiring investigators, let alone covering the copy charges. 
Gay mafia
To take this case through the end of the year we must raise $300,000. We have put in our savings and will sell our home, but we must have donations to finance this case in the next three weeks. Our friends at the James Madison Center for Free Speech have raised just over $50,000, bringing the total needed by November 1st down to $250,000. We need a whole bunch of people who will give $25, $50, or $100. We need to raise as much as possible in the next three weeks.
Will you please help?? Any amount really does make a difference. Please go to: and make a commitment to raise $250 through your friends and family. There is a donation link on the website, which is really easy and secure. It will only take a few minutes. We must have $100k by Friday, October 16th, with a total of $250k by November 1. 

Please stand with Vance. Please help him push back those who want to run people of faith out of public service. We all have First Amendment rights designed to protect us from this type of assault. If they win, who is next?
Mattie Day 

Make no mistake, religious liberty in America is under assault, and if we don’t stand now, we may not get another opportunity. We must remind America that religious liberty, for everyone, is one of the most important principles of our nation. Without religious freedom, we do not have freedom. The right of a man or woman to express his religious convictions in a way that does not hurt or infringe on the rights of others should always be protected. Punishing a judge, or a baker, or a photographer or a wedding planner or a florist for choosing to not participate in a gay wedding is tyranny; it is slavery and it is un-American. If forcing one perceived “right” onto a group of people means eliminating another enumerated, long-established and God-given right… then obviously something has gone terribly wrong.
Stand up with Judge Day, stand up for religious liberty, stand up for your children and for America.


Justice Scalia Says Supreme Court Responsible for ‘Destruction of Our Democratic System’

... SCOTUS deciding vote..the TIE breaker...BASED on EMOTION - Kennedy's
[Yes indeed...Justice Kennedy a closet homosexual...member of the Pink Swastika Party : ]
oped: It appears as if Justice Kennedy is a closet Homosexual/Bi-Sexual akin to Barack Obama and Adlof Hitler et al: 


When our Founding Fathers wrote the US Constitution and established the three separate branches of government, they believed it would insure the survival of the newly formed republic. Most of the power of the federal government was placed in the hands of Congress which was supposed to represent and do the will of the people. Second in power was the executive branch where the office of president would have limited powers to prevent the formation of a dictatorship. The least powerful of the three branches was the judicial branch whose sole purpose was to make sure that the Constitution was legally observed. 

In today’s America, Congress no longer represents and does the will of the people and has become the least in power. The executive and judicial branches have both assumed far more power than the Constitution allows and in many ways both have become dictatorial. The judiciary in America, including the Supreme Court, no longer base their rulings on the Constitution. Many of the decisions handed down these days are based more on their personal agendas rather than on actual law. 

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia agrees. Last week, he was speaking to law students at Santa Clara University in the San Jose suburb. He shared his criticism of the Supreme Court stating that the court has been a liberal court ever since he was sworn in.
Scalia told the law students that the Supreme does not look at the Constitution as a black and white governing document. They consider our founding document to be a ‘living Constitution’ and have done so since the 1920s. A living Constitution is one that changes and evolves over time based upon the liberal opinions by the members of the Supreme Court.
Those liberal decisions, according to Scalia are leading the nation down a slippery slope, explaining
“At the bottom of that slope, I can’t imagine how you can go any further, is the right to same-sex marriage.”
“Do you think the American people would ever have ratified the Constitution if they had been told the meaning of this document shall be whatever a majority of the Supreme Court says it is. They vote on the basis of what they feel.”
“It’s the destruction of our democratic system. I cannot imagine the system can continue with more and more of the basic rules made by the Supreme Court.”
Scalia also told the law students that the Supreme Court is granting rights to citizens that are not spelled out in the Constitution. Among those wrongfully granted rights is the legalization of homosexual marriages and federally subsidized healthcare insurance. Speaking about the legality of same-sex marriage, Scalia stated:
"To allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation."
Scalia is often considered to be the leader of the conservative members of the high court. He was appointed to the court in 1986 by President Ronald Reagan. Many list the composition of the current Supreme Court to be 4 liberals, 4 conservatives and 1 moderate conservative. However, Chief Justice John Roberts has been voting more liberal than conservative in recent years, giving liberals the 5-4 edge.

The 2016 election could well decide the future balance of the Supreme Court. The average age of retirement of justices is 78 and including Scalia there are 3 justices over that retirement age. Scalia and Kennedy are 80, Ginsberg is 83 and Breyer is close at 77. Justice Kennedy has been a weak conservative known to tip over the line on some liberal issues. Ginsberg is as liberal as they come and should have recused herself from the same-sex marriage case due to the fact that she has personally performed same-sex marriage ceremonies. She did not recuse herself because she wanted to make sure the court legalized homosexual unions. Breyer started out as a moderate conservative but has drifted over to the dark side of liberalism soon after his appointment to the bench.
It’s quite possible that the next president could appoint 3-4 new members to the high court. Following Scalia’s words, the outcome of the 2016 election could determine whether the high court continues down the slippery slope or if it can start to correct some of the wrongs made by the current court and bring America closer to the country we knew and loved.

 The Funniest Prop 8 Protest Signs (PHOTOS)
[Pretty much shows the mentality of LGBTQ  eh'? ]

FBI Agent Confirms “Beings Are Visiting Us From Other Dimensions”

Giant 'translucent figures' are visiting Planet Earth - according to the FBI

oped: Hmmmm not sure about this...however it is a interesting/entertaining read...will need more facts and evidence to come to a logical conclusion!

There has been much talk nowadays about inter-dimensional worlds, especially what with the Large Hadron Collider in CERN officially being fired back up recently to go hunting for them.  Whilst we are all considering where the Aliens could be coming from and IF other Dimensions are actually a fact rather than Fiction, along comes this VERY important piece of evidence courtesy of the F.B.I!
And this is a very true story people, the FBI admitted that we have been visited by“beings from other dimensions” and the official link from the FBI vault can be found here:
To be fair it is very surprising that the FBI have shown such a vast amount of interest in the whole study of the UFO phenomena?! But is it really that surprising when people have been reporting UFO sightings pretty much since the beginning of time, no not really!  I guess it could even be possible that there are a lot of science fiction movies that are actually based on real events, or as some may even call them “leaks” to the general public, given by the government in order to deliberately raise awareness among the population? Subconsciously planting that seed into all of our brains that the Aliens truly are with us!

Please see below a transcript of some of the most important details of the report that you all need to know about:
1. Part of the disks carry crews, others are under remote control
2. Their mission is peaceful. The visitors contemplate settling on this plane
3. These visitors are human-like but much larger in size
4. They are not excarnate Earth people, but come from their own world
5. They do NOT come from a planet as we use the word, but from an etheric planet which interpenetrates with our own and is not perceptible to us
6. The bodies of the visitors, and the craft, automatically materialize on entering the vibratory rate of our dense matter
7. The disks posses a type of radiant energy or a ray, which will easily disintegrate any attacking ship. They reenter the etheric at will, and so simply disappear from our vision, without trace
8. The region from which they come is not the “astral plane”, but corresponds to the Lokas or Talas. Students of osoteric matters will understand these terms.
9. They probably can not be reached by radio, but probably can be by radar. if a signal system can be devised for that (apparatus)

Addendum: The Lokas are oval shape, fluted length oval with a heat-resistaning metal or alloy not yet known the front cage contains the controls, the middle portion a laboratory; the rear contains armament, which consists essentially of a powerful energy apparatus, perhaps a ray.
Part of the FBI evidence


According to some of these exciting yet slightly bizarre unexpected reports and“Declassified” documents, we have been visited by numerous extra-terrestrial beings, some of whom, are not only from other planets beyond our own, but also from other dimensions. Apparently some of these Alien beings originate from an ‘ethereal plane coexistent’ within our physical universe. These incredible “entities”, that apparently can “materialize” on our very own planet appeared as huge ‘translucent figures’.