Saturday, September 12, 2015

Justice Department Rejected Criminal Probe of Hillary Aide's Overpayment

Image: Justice Department Rejected Criminal Probe of Hillary Aide's Overpayment
Federal investigators opened a criminal investigation into whether top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin improperly took maternity and vacation time while working at the State Department, but the Justice Department declined to follow through on its findings, according to documents unveiled in the case.

The FBI opened its criminal investigation into allegations of theft in 2013, reports Politico, after Abedin and her husband, former Rep. Anthony Weiner, traveled to Europe in 2011 for a "babymoon" before their child was born.

According to reports, Abedin filed timesheets that charged the government for overtime, vacation pay, and maternity leave after she became a State Department contractor. When she left the department, she received a $33,000 lump-sum payment, but almost $11,000 of that was deemed improper by investigators.

She has admitted that she likely did not fill a required form when she went on the two-week vacation, resulting in the vacation time being cashed out to her in the lump-sum payment.

It is not clear why the Justice Department's public integrity unit didn't take up the investigation, reports Politico, but the case is now being handled through a claim process, with State asking Abedin to repay the vacation time pay.

Clinton campaign spokesman Nick Merrill said the news that the matter is being handled as an administrative claim exonerates Abedin.

"This is someone who has spent nearly two decades in public service, and is widely known for her integrity and tireless work ethic,” said Merrill in a statement for this story. “After the birth of her son, she took maternity leave. The IG had questions about the details of her leave, Huma answered. There is a review ongoing. Anything beyond that is the product of partisan leaks with a clear agenda.”

Abedin's attorneys say they're trying to fight the overpayment issue, as they can prove she was working during the maternity leave and vacation time in question, even though she did not log it in properly to the State Department system.

Meanwhile, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has been trying to determine if State's watchdog has been trying to elevate the disagreement into a criminal inquiry. He claims the denials don't match up with the State Department's investigative general's notice, and has written to Abedin's legal team to seek further information.

One of Abedin's attorneys, Miguel Rodriguez said the case has never been a criminal investigation, as the Inspector General cannot prosecute criminal allegations.

"That is the province of the Department of Justice, which rightly declined to pursue this matter involving the State Department's miscalculation of a new mother's maternity leave and personal leave," said Rodriguez.

The IG report has not yet been made public, but Grassley said the watchdog also found Abedin billed State for more than she was permitted and also exceeded the government's time limit for contractors by more than 100 days.

Abedin, in her last months at State, also received paychecks from the Clinton Foundation and a private-sector consulting firm, leading Grassley to question if she was guilty of a conflict of interest.

The Invasion of the West Has Begun

It is often said that we never want to get into a ground war with China. They simply have too many people and their rulers care little about them. If pressed, the Chinese could literally overwhelm any foe with sheer numbers.
Regardless of enemy firepower, the Chinese would send wave after wave of soldiers, multiple millions of them – eventually overrunning any opposition.
Heck, that’s how the Russians defeated the Nazis at the battle of Stalingrad. They suffered over 1.1 million casualties during that one battle, but they won.
This time it’s not an organized military invasion, but make no mistake, it is an invasion. The difference is that one side doesn’t seem to realize it’s being invaded, and that side is the West – Europe and America.
European nations are inviting the invaders in, and thanks to the Obama administration, we will soon be following suit. They and we appear to be woefully, or willfully ignorant to what is happening.
Back in February, ISIS threatened to “flood Europe with a half a million migrants from Libya in a psychological attack against the West. The jihadists hope to flood the North African state [of Libya] with militiamen from Syria and Iraq, who will then sail across the Mediterranean posing as migrants on people trafficking vessels, according to plans seen by Quilliam, the British anti-extremist group.”

Well, it’s taken a bit of time, but the invasion is happening. Many reports are that these “migrants” are all families just trying to escape war-torn areas, but that is not what is happening. Many are young men, posing as refugees.
And it’s impossible to vet them – to weed out those deemed as threats. Fake Syrian passports have become a cottage industry, and Muslims are claiming to have converted to Christianity in order to be able to hasten their escape and infiltration into the West. Many have said that if any Muslim does this, they will never be accepted back into Muslim society, and they will be targeted.

But Taqiyya states that a Muslim can lie to infidels to further the case of Islam. Taqiyya or al Taqiyya is the Muslims’ license to lie to infidels in order to camouflage Islam’s holy war strategy (jihad) to conquer the world. The strategy mentioned through orders and solicitations in the Quran (3:28) and other Islamic writings and reference applies to all Western countries and against all infidels who are not Islamic and therefore seen as a constant threat to Islam.
And then there are the other Muslim nations, like Saudi Arabia, who have, out of benevolence (I’m sure) offered to build 200 mosques in Germany. How nice – what I wonder why?
This is why. Turkey’s current Muslim president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan  wrote: “The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers.”
Mosques are not merely churches. They are symbols of Islamic supremacy. This is the reason mosques tend to be much larger than they have to be. The land the mosque occupies becomes the land of Islam. The mosque then becomes part of jihad against the West. The more mosques there are, the more of the infidels land is conquered “without a sword for Islam.” In other words, without a shot fired.
Read More:

Friday, September 11, 2015

Hey Donald Trump...sorry ya don't impress me much!

You come on scene ranting and the inuendo you are the new David and ya gonna slay Goliath..!
News flash ya ain't no David...just a real estate flipper who made mucho bucks...sorry money does not impress me...Navy Seals,Green Berets and Army Rangers impress me...they be broke ass in money but rich in spirit,patriotism and real accomplishments.

All we hear from you is "I am really rich"... like that helps us? we the lil people...and "I will make America great again"...then a cut or two on your far we have heard no specifics on just how you will accomplish all these hollow promises...I see no difference from any other politician....promises~promises~promises...talkin' smack and having a party...I will give you credit for stirring the proverbial pot...but thats where it ends...stop the BS and show us how you will make America great again!

Oh and may I suggest a little humility to God and ask forgiveness for your grievous of the deadly sins friend! 6'3" 270 lbs of dynomite with a two inch fuse...hello Mr false Pride. What God gives he can take away at the blink of the eye!

Shania Twain says it best about y'all bloviators...hit it Shania 


WWI, WWII, 2015 refugees, Germany allied with Islam Once Again!

Ok I am growing weary sounding the alarm to stupid people who lack the initiative to research history...'those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat' and yes we are definetly in a repeat performance...News flash both Russia and China hate Islam they are taking zip/zero/nada Islam're probably saying... then why are they assisting Iran and Syria if thats the case?...hello they are using them to destroy the West from within ...after they have been used no doubt in my mind Russia and China will totally destroy the Middle East Islamic movement take their oil etc ...think people... stupid Germany will take 800,000 and France a few more they raised their collective hands saying we will take the Muslim refugees...Obama chimes in we will take 10,000 by my executive order after all Barry Barack Hussein Obama loves the sound of call to prayer...oh and no mention of Christian refugees mind ya just Islamist un vetted! 

Fact: WWI: Germany allied to the Muslim Ottoman Empire against Western Democracies (bleeds Europe to death)

WWII: Muslim countries that were not F/Brit colonies sided with Hitler against Western Democracies (all European colonies fall)

2015: Merkel opens the gates of Vienna to Syrian Islam refugees.Third Reich revisited? (Third try of Germany at killing Democracy in Europe succeeds?)
PS: decision taken on Sept 4th, one week too early to mark the anniversary of the victory brought by Jan Sobieski

Migrants Can Enter Austria and Germany, Official Says
SEPT. 4, 2015

BUDAPEST — Thousands of refugees who have been bottled up in Hungary, demanding passage to the West, will be allowed into Austria and Germany, the Austrian chancellor said late Friday.

After several days of chaos and civil disobedience by the migrants, Hungarian officials threw in the towel and allowed the people living in a squalid encampment in a below-ground plaza outside the city’s main train station onto more than 40 buses headed for the Austrian border, as they had been demanding.

“On the basis of the current situation of need, Austria and Germany agree to allow in this case the onward journey of these refugees into their countries,” {800,000 more]Chancellor Werner Faymann of Austria wrote on his Facebook page. ... -news&_r=0 

Oh and let's not forget your history reading assignment..Wake the F' up people..or relive the horrendous past Again!

Muftism and Nazism: World War II Collaboration. Documents


Fox News Continues its Attacks on Christian County Clerk Kim Davis

Reilly, Tantaros Spar over Whether CDC Head Should Go: ‘Let Him ...
FOX News needs some people who actually have read the Constitution and know what it says. They also need some people who actually know what they are talking about. Andrea Tantaros is the latest FOX personality to demonstrate the news outlet is controlled opposition as she blasted Kim Davis for setting a "dangerous precedent" for doing what the law commands.
Appearing on The O'Reilly Factor on Wednesday evening, Tantaros told host Bill O'Reilly, "The problem is she's essential rewriting the laws of that county by not issuing [licenses]. As a Christian I do feel sorry for her and I'm sympathetic to her beliefs, however she doesn't have a legal leg to stand on." 

She claimed that Davis cannot decide to not enforce law simply because she believes it's wrong.
"It sets a dangerous precedent," Tantaros continued. "A woman with Sharia not issuing drivers licenses to women, because she doesn't believe she can drive, or say somebody who says, 'I don't believe in the Second Amendment so I'm not going to give gun permits.'"
Wow! She just pulled a Shepard Smith and brought Sharia into the picture! Amazing! It's not even a good contrast since Davis actually upheld law and the Muslim woman was not doing that.
Well, let's see, Andrea is using the same kind of ridiculous arguments that the Nazis employed at Nuremberg. She wants Kim Davis to follow unlawful orders from a Bush-appointed, sodomite endorsing judge rather than follow the law. How many times do these people fail to cite the law? They claim law and claim Davis is breaking it and that she is attempting to rewrite it, but is she? Absolutely not!
I've cited Kentucky law, which is the only law that matters. It is the mantra that attorney Michael Peroutka chanted at the rally on Saturday, "Show me the law or free Kim Davis." So far, no one has cited a law she has violated. Andrea Tantaros would do well to read it and actually educate herself on what the law is. She, like sodomite Shepard Smith and others, wrongly thinks a Supreme Court's decision is law. It is not.

All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. (emphasis mine)
Kim Davis KentuckyNow, Ms. Tantaros, if all legislative powers are granted to Congress, how much is left for the Supreme Court? How much for any federal court? How much for the Executive Branch? None, zero, zip, nada! They have no legislative power and it's amazing to me that some of these people lose their minds over Obama's executive orders pointing out quite often that they are not law and he doesn't have a right to write law. They will also talk about "legislating from the bench." Well, Tantaros, what do you think the Supreme Court did? They legislated from the bench, which is unconstitutional and illegal and frankly, every judge who ruled against the states in the marriage case should be impeached and then brought up on charges.

Tantaros professed to be a Christian and as a Christian, she should know that God's law is what man's law should be based upon. William Blackstone wrote:
No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the law of God.
Sadly, too many End-times "prophets" and Christians are running around proclaiming to be on the lookout for an electronic "Mark of the Beast" and have failed to realize that symbolism of the mark being on the forehead or the hand was tied directly to the observance of God's Law found in Deuteronomy 6. The Mark of the Beast (Rev. 13:16-18) is following tyrants and their usurped laws instead of God's laws. These people further fail to understand how it is contrasted with those who are redeemed who are also sealed in their foreheads (Rev. 7:3). They are the ones who do what? Keep the commandments of Jesus (The Law of God) (rev. 12:17; 14:12).
As a side note, I'm not saying get an electronic implant. I think we should be wary of any command of government that would make such a requirement law and we should openly reject it, but that is not the point that is being communicated in Revelation 13. It is an issue of who you are bowing to, God or the State, and which one is the Lawgiver. That determines who you are worshipping.

Tantaros is advocating the true Mark of the Beast, not the Law of God.
Beyond that, Tantaros should know that the Constitution did not give authority to the federal government concerning marriage and since it did not do so, those rights are reserved to the states and the people (Tenth Amendment) 
It is this stupidity and ignorance that is destroying America. As a Christian, perhaps Tantaros needs to understand what Romans 13 teaches and then tell us why the Nazis were wrong for following their pretended laws and unlawful orders based on those pretended laws. I'll bet she will side with me on that issue, but is completely inconsistent when it comes to Kim Davis, who actually followed the law, but rejected unlawful orders. 

from Freedom Outpost

Thursday, September 10, 2015

Who is running the USA? Answer: two bit drunks,pervs,liars and thieves!

Ok folk's  let's get real here :
Barry Barack Hussein Soetoro Davis Obama or whatever his real name is...being that he was certified by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid as being qualified to run for POTUS without being properly vetted!
Barry never held a real job his entire life...he is a by-sexual,pot head,with a definite narcistic personality disorder... who lost his law license under suspicious conditions!

Nancy Pelosi..a two bit narcistic drunk who also has a weak background for a work history...her whole adult career has been representing perverted Northern Kawlifornia as a congress person! Thanks to her wealthy spouse who supported her political agenda which in fact was his! They became quite wealthy during the process!

Harry Reid a two bit back alley attorney who is also a drunk and pervert who made a career in politics lying,cheating, stealing his way to wealth! Back room deals galore!

Mitch McConnell another career drunken politician who also does backroom deals to fatten his personal bank account!

John 'Cry baby' Boehner another drunken career politician not as wealthy as the rest but goes along to get along...doesn't give a rats ass about his electorate after the proverbial election long as he keeps getting sent back to DC and his drunken parties he is a happy camper!

Ok pictures are always worth 1000 words: y'all be the judge...the  drunken 5  pervs break bread and party hearty as we the electorate struggle to make ends meet !
Funny 4/20: If Marijuana Ruled

Time for the military to remove the trash...? I think so how about y'all?  

by The Dirty Turtle » Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:13 am
Index of /wp-content/uploads/2012/12

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell ...
[Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell John Boehner or be removed!]

... RINO Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is looking for his balls   ... obama, obama # inauguration # john boehner # michelle obama # obama
... mitch mcconnell just led the gop capitulation to obama reid and pelosi Ape No. 1 and wendybar are both in second place , each with one #1 ... ...
Bottom Line y'all be the Judge!

One-In-Three Would Support Military Takeover Of Anti-Constitutional Civilian Federal Government

funny, Military Coups picture, Military Coups pictures, Military Coups ...

One of the hallmarks of our country is civilian control over the military.
But should that civilian control – the leadership in Washington – become so corrupt and anti-Constitutional, many Americans would have no problem in a military –led coup.
An enlightening new YouGov poll shows that 29 percent – almost one in three – Americans can imagine a situation where they would support the military seizing control of the federal government.
Republicans – at 43 percent – are more than twice as likely as Demcorats, 20 percent, to say they could support such a measure.

When asked if – hypothetically – they could support the military taking over when the civilian government begins to violate the constitution, the percentage jumps to 32 percent.
Also in the poll: The older you are, the more likely you are to support military intervention in an Extra-Constitutional civilian government. While only 28 percent of those 18-29 would support a military coup, almost half of those over 65 would support the coup.
The poll shows that military officers are much more well regarded than Congress or the President. Seven in ten Americans believe the military officers generally want what is best for the country, while 70 percent of Americans believe Congress want what is best for themselves. 

military-military_coup-florist-flower-flower_shop-flower_store-bwhn523 ...
Obama Fired Military Officers Because He ‘Fears a Coup ...
[Obama Fired Military Officers Because He ‘Fears a Coup ...]
Just last week, a West Point law professor was forced to resign when an article was discovered where he advocated attacking other legal scholars who defend the rights of suspected terrorists and the media who seemingly sympathize with terrorists.

Fox News’ Geraldo Rivera says Ben Carson Only Gets Support because He’s Black

[Air Brush]
Geraldo Rivera Explains Selfie: He Was Drinking And Feeling Confident
[Reality... Geraldo Rivera Explains Selfie: He Was Drinking And Feeling Confident] 


Another case of liberals projecting their own racist attitudes onto conservatives. Donald Trump is still leading the pack in the GOP race for the White House, but Dr. Ben Carson has slowly been clawing his way ever closer to the GOP frontrunner. Each new poll seems to show Carson inching toward that top spot, and the media is beginning to take note.
Recently on CNN, political correspondent Dana Bash pointed out that in the most recent Monmouth poll Dr. Carson finished in a strong 2nd place, outpacing his nearest competitors (Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz) by 10%.

But Carson, a neurosurgeon, posted the biggest gain in support since August, jumping 13 points to second place. He is holding down 18% support now among Republicans. That continues a trend of recent polls that show him moving up the list.
It's also Carson's highest recorded number in a national poll, topping a 13% mark in a Fox news poll this spring.
Trump's lead also evaporates when the field is narrowed to just him and Carson. Asked about a head-to-head match-up between those two, Republican voters picked Carson over Trump, 55% to 36%.
Carson was the only candidate to beat Trump in a head-to-head, the poll found

Well, on Fox News, Geraldo Rivera just isn’t buying the Carson hype. During an episode of The Five from this past week, Geraldo argued that racism and white guilt were the reasons Carson was doing so well in the race.
“I’m reminded of David Dinkins, the first black mayor of New York City who, when people were polled, was killing Rudy Giuliani in their second matchup. And then, when Election Day came, it came, obviously, Giuliani beat Dinkins.” Then Geraldo went on to compare the NYC mayoral election to the 2016 GOP primary, saying “a lot of Republicans polled by Monmouth are giving the politically correct answer.”
But wait, it gets worse. When fellow host Greg Gutfeld asked Geraldo if he thought that President Obama was elected because of his race, Geraldo said that the President was “the least black guy you could possibly have.” 

Um. What? Also, Ouch.
senior military official said Rivera was expelled because he ...
[Senior military official said Rivera was expelled as CNN Iraq embed because he gave away military's location]
Geraldo Rivera Takes a Spill!(Blooper covering Hurricane Ike)
I’m not sure Geraldo fully fleshed out this whole line of thinking on either Ben Carson or Barack Obama. I am, however, surer than ever that liberals are more racist than conservatives and that those proclivities to racism and race-consideration are a part of every day life for liberals.
I would be willing to bet that a tiny fraction of GOP voters care about the color of Dr. Carson’s skin and that the vast majority of GOP voters think the content of his character and the substance of his ideas are far more important.
Geraldo needs to stop projecting his racism on to the GOP. He’s got some serious issues and he should work them out for himself, without involving the rest of us.

Facebook Ok’s Posts To Kill Jews, But Remove Anti-Muslim, Anti-Homosexual Pages

Re: Instagram. how does it work? - 12-19-2012, 05:27 PM
If you want your Facebook page to remain published, then be careful what you post. You’re safe if you keep your posts to family matters. It seems you’re even safe if your posts bash Christians, Jews, Republicans and conservatives.
However, if you post anything that is anti-Muslim, anti-homosexual or anti-liberal anything, including blasting leading Democrats, don’t be surprised if Facebook unpublishes your page. It could even happen if someone responds to something you post with any of the anti-items listed above; your page could be banned and removed. 
I just learned that last week, one of my colleagues was banned from running any more Facebook ads because of his conservative posts. Likewise, the Facebook page for Patriot Nation, with 689,000 likes, was just unpublished by Facebook without any prior notice. Here is what Matt Duncan of Patriot Nation posted about the Facebook ban: 

“Well folks, it has happened and in the middle of the night. I awoke this morning to find the following notification from Facebook:  

FB Notification 


“As you can see at the bottom of the image, I appealed the decision so that should take care of the problem, right? If only it were that easy then it would be no big deal but unfortunately, it’s impossible to correct the problem when we have no idea why the page was unpublished to begin with. None of the articles or memes are a violation of the Facebook Terms or Community Standards and never at anytime have we ‘bullied’ someone so therein lies the problem.
You can’t fix the problem unless the problem is clearly identified and anyone who’s had any dealings with the Facebook moderators knows they ban people whenever they choose, even when the content doesn’t violate anything in their terms and guidelines. In fact, it has happened to me many times before and each time I received a ban I would check to see if the Facebook Terms or Community Standards had changed, always noticing they hadn’t, which clearly indicates that Facebook moderators play by their own rules regardless of what the Facebook Terms or Community Standards say. 

On multiple occasions I and others have reported pages that outright call for the killing of Jews and other people, only to receive a reply from Facebook that it doesn’t violate anything. So, let me get this straight…calling for the death of someone is ‘OK’ by Facebook but an internet meme or article that calls out the hypocrisy of an individual or group is off limits? 

The biggest problem with Facebook is that it isn’t consistent across the board because two people or pages may post the same image and whereas one may be ‘punished’ by Facebook, the other is allowed to continue unscathed. This has been the case in times past when we’ve posted an image or article that’s been posted by another page and we received a reprimand from Facebook but the page that it originated from received no such reprimand.
For example, I was banned 30 days on two separate occasions for posting the following images, neither of which violate ANYTHING in the Facebook Terms or Community Standards

muslim mms

This was posted to create discussion, and resulted in a 30 day ban. Had the image mentioned something about Christians or white people, the image likely wouldn’t have been taken down.
So where do we go from here, what do we do now that the page has been unpublished? The appeal has been submitted so now we wait but we aren’t optimistic about the outcome of the appeal. Our page has been the bane of liberal’s existence since it was created and it’s well known that Facebook is a haven for liberals and breeding ground for liberalism so the likelihood of our appeal being successful is slim. 

Home internet Facebook e l’identità di genere
[MarkZuckerberg SF gay pride parade]
In any case, we will keep you posted on the outcome.”
Facebook is not just a social media website, but an agenda driven social media website and it’s clear what their agenda is. They are anti-American, Anti-Christian, anti-Jewish and anti-conservative. Determine for yourself if you wish to continue to use Facebook and if you do, be careful what you post or you may not be posting anything else.

Nazis Used Romans 13 to Neutralize Christians

<br /><b>Warning</b>:  Illegal string offset 'alt' in <b>/home/godfatherpolitic/public_html/wp-content/themes/godfatherpolitics/gp-responsive-email-template.php</b> on line <b>217</b><br />h


Recent events have called into question the issue of obeying the government in all ways---even in all circumstances. 

In the 13th chapter of Romans, Paul says that God has given us the government as a minister of righteousness. It is our duty to obey it. But we also see in Scripture that on occasion, when the government calls for one to disobey God, then civil disobedience is in order.
There’s a great lesson to learn from one aspect of World War II related to distortions of Romans 13. I’m not calling anybody a Nazi, but consider this lengthy lesson, wherein the Nazis quoted Scripture in order to demand unquestioning obedience.

On April 9, 1940, without any warning or provocation, the Germans invaded Norway. It was an unexpected battle and an unfair fight with 400,000 German Wehrmacht versus a nation not expecting it. This nightmare lasted until May 1945.

There were, of course, Norwegian collaborators -- Norwegians who sold their soul to get ahead during the reign of the Nazis. Foremost amongst them was Vidkun Quisling. His name has been adopted into the dictionary: A quisling is a traitor. When the Nazis took over Norway, a country full of “pure Aryans,” they expected the Norwegians to fully participate in their attempts to glorify the "master race" and purge the “undesirables” from humanity, such as Jews, Gypsies, and Slavs.

The Norwegians would have nothing to do with this. So they resisted, usually in every peaceful way they could. Much of the battle was fought over distributing accurate information.
In Oslo, there is a museum (Norges Hjemmefront Resistance Museum) dedicated to the resistance movement in World War II. They have a plaque there in English: “In Norway, Nazi ideology was defeated by the democratic forces rooted in a national, Christian culture.”
While the Nazis won militarily (until the end of the war), they never came close to winning the hearts and minds of the people.
Normally, in those days, the churches were full. But during the war, something happened to cause the churches to go empty. The Norwegian bishops and priests, desiring to be faithful to God and the Scriptures, resisted the Nazi efforts to control the churches and the content of sermons. The clergy reasoned that if they all resisted together as one, nothing could happen to them. They were all arrested and sent to concentration camps. Most of them never returned.

Many Norwegian Christians met in private homes secretly for worship and avoided the churches during the war.
The same thing happened with the school teachers. The Nazis took over the curriculum of the schools. The teachers resisted as one group. They too were arrested and sent to concentration camps. Most never returned.
The museum contains a 1941 book, Life and Doctrine: Christian Teaching with Study Questions by Sigmund Feyling, written in Norwegian and used in the schools by the Nazis. In it, Scripture is quoted:

“What are those called in Romans 13:1 who God has set over us? Have you considered that your parents, your school teachers (your principal), policemen, police chief, judges, the priest, the bishop, the county commission, the state government, are the authorities who are installed by God, and that you owe them obedience?”

Then it says: “Overall, we owe the Fuhrer and the government obedience. If you set yourself up against the authorities and against the state, you are standing against God’s structure and are subject to punishment.”
Talk about the devil quoting Scripture. In reality, the Fuhrer was hostile toward Christianity. Hitler once declared, "The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew." But he was happy to have his minions twist the Christian Scriptures for his own ends.

God's Word is pure and right. But that doesn't mean it can't be distorted sometimes by evil people intent on achieving goals that are contrary to the message of Scripture. There’s a time and a place for everything under the sun, including (on occasion) civil disobedience.
Recently I came across an unpublished letter by D. James Kennedy in 1988, in which he addressed this issue: “The basic Bible principles, I believe, are these: (1) All authority is from God. (2) All human authority is delegated from God. (3) No human authority can countermand the authority of God. (4) If such anti-biblical laws are passed, Christians must in conscience disobey them. (5) They must be prepared to suffer the consequences of their actions.”
Then he solidifies the whole point: “The very existence of Christianity depends upon Christians obeying these principles. Had they not done so, Christianity, which was outlawed first in Israel and then in the Roman Empire, would have ceased to exist many centuries ago.”

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Federal Judge Upholds Arizona “Show Your Papers” Immigration Law

Lets bring our immigration judges out of the shadows. Immigration ...

After seeing that Barack Obama was going to do absolutely nothing to protect Arizona citizens from the flood of illegals crossing into the state from Mexico, the Arizona legislature passed SB-1070 in 2010. The law contained a number of tough immigration policies that gave law enforcement more legal authority to identify and arrest illegal aliens because the feds were not. 
Just like any other worthwhile law designed to protect US citizens, the liberal minority screamed, hollered and kicked their feet all the way to the courts with their lawsuits. Liberal judges began slicing and dicing the tough immigration law, eviscerating much of it and rendering law enforcement more impotent to protect citizens from illegals than before the law was passed.

One of the provisions that managed to evade the pairing knives of the liberal judicators was the ‘show your papers’ provision which allows law enforcement officers to immigration status when making any normal arrest or traffic stop. But liberals who hate America were determined to prevent law enforcement officers from enforcing any immigration related laws and continued to challenge the provision in court claiming it is discriminatory.
I still have family and friends in Arizona and follow local law enforcement and the vast majority of crimes in Maricopa County, home to nearly 4 million people, are committed by illegal aliens and drug traffickers, which are largely Hispanic. It only makes sense that law enforcement target Hispanics that look questionable or suspicious. They would be derelict of duty if they focused their attention on Orientals, blacks, American Indians or whites when over 75% of the crimes are being committed by illegal Hispanics.
Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to ...
Surprisingly, US District Judge Susan Bolton upheld the ‘show your papers’ provision in her ruling this last Friday. She said that the immigration rights activists failed to prove that the law provision was discriminatory.
Former Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce who sponsored the bill responded to Bolton’s ruling, saying:
"She made it very clear the law was written very carefully not to be a race issue. It's not a racial law."
Immigration rights activists who challenged the law have not said whether or not they are going to appeal Bolton’s decision to a higher court or not, but I suspect they will. They won’t give up until they give illegals more rights than citizens, which Obama has been assisting in doing. 

Funny: This Obama Meme Sums Up Immigration Policy Perfectly

Shepard Smith Pulls the ‘Sharia Law’ Card to Defend Homosexuality

The following is from
“During Fox News’ live coverage of Kentucky clerk Kim Davis’ release from prison, anchor Shepard Smith suddenly spoke over the press conference to chastise Davis and those who supported her decision to refuse to issue gay marriage licenses.
“‘They set this up as a religious play again,’ he said. ‘This is the same crowd that says, “We don’t want Sharia law, don’t let them tell us what to do, keep their religion out of our lives and out of our government.” Well, here we go again.’” 

There’s the race card, the war on women card, and now the Sharia Law card. when you can't argue the facts, history, logic, and moral absolutes, all you have left is a stacked debt of clichés.
Opposing same-sex sexuality is hardly unique to Sharia Law. Prior to just a few years ago, opposition to same-sex sexuality was almost universal. Even President Obama was against same-sex sexuality and nobody ever equated his stance as equivalent to Sharia law.
If we follow Shepard Smith’s logic, any law that is shared with Islam and advocates of Sharia law must be rejected.

Really? Christianity also teaches that murder, stealing, committing perjury, tripping blind people, moving your neighbor's boundary marker are also wrong. These are shared by most if not all religions. For example, the implications of the eighth commandment, “You shall not steal,” finds various applications. Here’s one from the state of Georgia that is applicable to property cases and surveys used to delineate boundary markers:
“Iron pins are a common and useful means of identifying property corners and they and other similar monuments serve a useful purpose. The installation and maintenance of permanent monuments identifying land corners even preserves the good order of society itself. From earliest times the law not only authorized but protected landmarks. Interference with landmarks of another was a violation of the Mosaic law. See Deuteronomy 19:14; 27:17; Job 24:2; Proverbs 22:28; 23:10. (256 Ga. 54, International Paper Realty Company v. Bethune. No. 43092. Supreme Court of Georgia, June 10, 1986).” 

So if Islam teaches that is wrong to move a neighbor's boundary markers, we in the United States must abolish the law? Should we cleanse our judicial system of this and other civilization-building laws as well?
What standard is Shepard Smith going to use? The standard of five unelected judges?

Adolf Hitler promoted the idea of a ‘Peoples Car.’ We know it as the Volkswagen.
“The Volkswagen was a centerpiece of Nazism’s claims to benefit ordinary Germans. Hitler proposed to build a cheap car that almost anyone could afford. He gave it the name ‘KdF Wagen,’ which we know as the Volkswagen. . . . As early as 1934, he had talked with the most famous German automotive engineer Dr. Porsche about carrying out his thinking, and given him the commission to undertake the construction of the German Volkswagen.” 


If you drive a Volkswagen (or a Porsche) . . . you must be a Nazi sympathizer.  Perfect logic, according to Shepard Smith
People like Shepard Smith have no moral anchor. They can’t account for what’s morally right or wrong given their hostility to Christianity. All they can do is poison the well by making a comparison to Sharia law. If he and others get their way, a poisoned society will be the result.

Shepard Smith News, Movies and Background

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Back To School: Soft Porn For 10 Year-Olds, Islam For Every Child, No Parental Rights & The Need To Opt Out

someecards - when you care enough to hit send
[Sorry folks but common core is perverted/stupid and just plain sucks?]


This new school year under expansive Common Core curriculum and standards testing, children will have data collected by the government about behavioral and mental aptitude, not their test scores. No matter what a governor or state school board might claim, if the state receives federal money in any form, it is participating in data collection without parental consent. Parents have the constitutional right to opt out their child by filling out this form.
The Exodus Mandate is encouraging and providing resources for Christian parents to do more than opt out, but to exit the public school system altogether. Two excellent videos explain why.
When it comes to “sex education,” minors are taught the benefits of anal sex, beginning in the Fifth Grade, to the normalcy of their own “sexual fluidity” in Seventh Grade and higher. Additionally, the U.S. Dept. of Education no longer defines parents as mothers or fathers, but as “Parent 1”, “Parent 2” on student forms.
In New York City, teens via a tax funded smart phone app can locate free condoms within walking distance and free clinics where they can receive prescriptions, medications, and abortions and IUD implants– without parental consent. The Plan B pill is also distributed at public schools, again without parental knowledge or consent.

Parents are protesting school board policies that require their heterosexual children to share a bathroom or locker room to accommodate another child’s experimentation with “gender fluidity.”
Incredibly disturbing, is a book on the Fourth Grade reading list, “It’s Perfectly Normal,” which illustrates in words and pictures soft-porn to 10 year olds. Parents are not told which books are on the reading list and are not given an option to reject material or pull their child out prior to being taught such perversion. 

When it comes to parental rights, educators have expressed: Children Don’t Belong to their ParentsIn response, parents are now legally fighting the government over school choice, data collection, and curriculum.
Most problematic about Common Core curriculum is its emphasis on teaching Islam, or rather a false version of it.
No Bible reading or prayer is allowed– but learning to pray in the direction of Mecca is. Children can’t say or write the name of Jesus or talk about God, but they are taught the five pillars of Islam in addition to over 120 pages on Islam in 7th grade alone. Parents have provided numerous examples-from vocabulary tests, to textbook language and pictures, to actual testimony of children feeling uncomfortable having to attend a school trip to a mosque or kneel and pray to something they reject. Once parents object and try to opt out, they are told their child would receive a failing grade and they as parents would not be allowed to enter their child’s public school at a particular time.
Most importantly, Islam is not being taught within the context of world religions, but within the context of CAIR indoctrination. The Constitution isn’t taught. The Bible isn’t taught. But Muhammad is taught as an astute businessman– and that all Christians, Jews, and Muslims believe in the same God, they just call God by a different name.

What’s essential for every parent and citizen to understand is that teaching Islam violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments and Common Core curriculum and testing was created by the UN, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, via Pearson Education & the Bill Gates Foundation as part of a global effort to indoctrinate children.
Two questions remain:
Why is American education being directed by largely Sunni Islamists and communist/marxist/fascists? And why are Americans putting up with it?
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Will Congress Awake Before Every Christian In America Is Arrested?

Francisco, CA - Mayor Gavin Newsom attended the Gap's opening night ...  
[Where did it start...hmmm with SF Kawlifornia mayor Gavin Newsom ]
One for Muni, one for me -- cash counter nabbed for alleged ...

After the arrest of Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis, the voices of those who see what is happening as a result of Obergefell V. Hodges are sending a cry and a call to action.
Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee has started a website to support Clerk Davis at
The question is, why are we waiting until the results of the last seven years of the belligerent gay activists take root? It may take years to undo the radical and immoral twisting which is tearing at the fabric of our nation.
After something like the arrest of Davis, the internet is buzzing with all the names of well-known writers and experts. Complicated articles and deep comparisons from other rulings are used to make arguments that few will read, much less understand. 

It is not so complicated; it has a beginning, and it certainly has an ending.
The liberals and brain-dead of our nation have made trends, the trend, and it seems that America’s children are not all they are willing to abort. Justice, truth and wisdom are all in danger of being subverted, killed and discarded as so much refuse.
Let me be clear: just as the life of our little ones is snuffed out in callous, Godless abortion mills, the life of our nation will drain like so much blood to the ground until what is left of our nation will only be shame and ultimately death. 
We can make up new laws as fast as we like, but it is the old law of reciprocation that will not be ignored. It is a mechanism that cannot be stopped. To wit:
“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap” (Ga 6: 7)

How did it all begin; are there any names we can cite?
We could pull names like former San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who issued same sex marriage licenses against the law, all the way up to members of the so-called ‘conservative Congress.’
The congressmen we rushed to the polls in 2014 to elect seem to be off on the potty, rather than standing up for principle on the floor of the House.
But let’s not waste time or mince words; rather, let’s shoot right to the top in our search for names.
When the changeling Barack Obama decided quite on his own, apart from any acceptable or legitimate Biblical theology, that the trusted passage in the first chapter of Romans was “obscure,” the stage was set.
It was easy to transition from being the pseudo theologian-in-chief to the evolved gay marriage activist and supporter he became, all in less than two years. The millions of political lightweights and morally starved minions that blindly follow him lined up for the Kool-Aid without so much as a murmur. DOMA was chopped to shreds; the onslaught of gay activists is what followed all the way to SCOTUS – the rest is history. Or is it the end of history for the United States – many believe it is, of which I am one.
It is all too easy to castigate and cast aspersions on our quisling president; but the fact remains that when anyone, president or citizen, takes it upon themselves to question and subsequently to openly defy God’s authority in the scripture, they have become anti-Christ. That definition is not mine, but is also biblical. 

Barack is a man cuddling up in a bed of flowers at the feet of Jesus as he preaches the beatitudes on the Sermon on the Mount.
He missed the important follow up to the Sermon on the Mount which clearly defines marriage as between one woman and one man. Much worse, he missed the delegation of Christ’s authority which was clearly passed to his Apostles – including Paul who wrote the book of Romans. To wit:
“If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.” (1 Corinthians 14:37)
“And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.” (Mt 6: 11)
It must be noted that in Christ’s day, all that was required was to “shake off the dust” – in today’s moral climate, we have to scrape off the dung.
Christ has promised that his Word will never pass into obscurity (Mt 24: 35); he has not promised that presidents will not pass into obscurity.
Where does it End? –  Will it be Hell or Healing?
We are like teenagers who think nothing bad can ever happen to us. We have not taken stock, and we are living in a heightened state of foolish presumption. For the faithful, this is known as “tempting God” (Mt 4: 7); this is flying in the face of clearly predictable consequences–it is the gamble of fools.
The cowering Congress may be aloof to the entire Obama agenda, but it is not the Congress that will pay up first – it is us.
We need legislation to protect our religious freedoms as soon as yesterday. 

How many more cake bakers and people like Kim Davis must be dragged into courts and jails? They may be willing to pay the price to stand up for what they believe, but the rest of us will not be willing to pay the price for doing nothing about it. To wit:
“When I say to a wicked person, ‘You will surely die,’ and you do not warn them or speak out to dissuade them from their evil ways in order to save their life, that wicked person will die for their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood.” (Eze 3: 18 NIV)
Do we call the Prince of Darkness to our defense–who is after all only a pawn in the full purpose of God, a powerless prince who will only stand by and watch our suffering and judgment?
Have we gone from a presidential dismissal of the authority of God’s laws, to making our own laws for evil and believing they will stand? 

God asks this question.
“Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a law?” (Psalm 94: 20)
Like it or not – we will be asked to answer this question.
You can be sure the answer is not just electing a billionaire, or yet, more passing the buck in the Congress and the Senate. Obama has done his worst – it is time for us to do our best.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

HUGE New Trump Revelation Stuns Hillary, Bernie, And Biden- Pundits Can’t Believe It..

... Donald Trump’s organization $5M for calling Miss USA pageant rigged

Screen Shot 2015-09-08 at 12.13.47 PM

The Donald trumps every major Democrat possibly running for president, according to a new nationwide poll that shows him with potentially record-breaking support among black voters.
The SurveyUSA poll showed Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump defeating Democrats Hillary Clinton, Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-VT, and former Vice President Al Gore in head-to-head matchups. According to the survey:
Trump beats Clinton 45 percent – 40 percent, with an 18 point lead among seniors.
Trump beats Sanders 44 percent – 40 percent, with a 10 percent lead among independents.

Trump beats Biden 44 percent – 42 percent, and has a 10 percent lead among the best educated voters.
Trump beats Gore 44 percent – 41 percent, with a 12 percent lead among men and an 18 percent lead among voters over 50.
Among voters who told SurveyUSA they pay a lot of attention to politics, Trump’s margins were even greater. The poll results among avid politics-watchers were:
Trump 54%, Clinton 36%.

Trump 53%, Sanders 39%.
Trump 53%, Biden 37%.
Trump 54%, Gore 36%.
Trump’s poll numbers also show that he has outstanding support among black voters. The poll showed 25 percent of black voters supported Trump in a head-to-head contest with Clinton.
“Trump would more than double the best result for a Republican in modern American history,” wrote Kyle Olsen at The American Mirror, who compared Trump’s numbers in the SurveyUSA poll with the results of Republican presidential candidates since 1996.
Using numbers from the Roper Center, he found that Bob Dole’s 12 percent share of the black vote was the highest percentage of black support given to a Republican candidate in the past 10 presidential elections. By contrast, Mitt Romney received 6 percent in 2012, according to Roper Center figures.
The poll also shows Trump winning 31 percent of the Hispanic vote in a race against Clinton.

Trump last month predicted he would win over minority voters.
“I think I’m going to win – this will surprise you – I’m going to win Hispanics, and I think I’m going to win the African-American vote,” he said on the August 4 edition of MSNC’s “Morning Joe.”.“Because I create jobs and they want jobs.”
Trump recently said race relations are tense in the U.S. and President Barack Obama has made them worse.
Race relations problems are almost at an all-time worst,” Trump said. “And President Obama — I really thought he’d be a unifier. But I thought one thing he’d be is a unifier certainly between African-American and white, and I will tell you that’s turned out not to be so. He has not been a unifier. He’s been a divider.”
h/t: SurveyUSA
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

“I AM ALL FOR THAT”: Hillary’s Ready to Tax Something Else…You’re Not Gonna Like It

Screen Shot 2015-09-08 at 12.13.47 PM
by Rad Magnum 
Hillary’s campaign is continuing to plummet, but that’s not stopping her. Bernie Sanders is continuing to siphon support from her own party, and just this week, SurveyUSA released poll numbers pegging her far below Donald Trump.
Don’t let that fool you into thinking Hillary will cave to pressure. The former first lady has a record of forging ahead in tough situations, and we can expect a repeat performance over the next year.
You should also expect a repeat performance of Hillary’s unabashedly liberal agenda. The focus has been on the Benghazi cluster so long that we’re neglecting the nuts and bolts of the Clinton campaign.

We need to talk about 1993 Hillarycare, because heaven knows our health care system doesn’t need anymore fixing from the left. We need to discuss how Hillary thinks “climate change” deserves top-priority status. But there’s something much more infuriating that we need to talk about first.
Watch this video, and you’ll know exactly what I’m referring to.

That’s right. Hillary is part of the team that wants to punish gun owners with a 25 PERCENT TAX ON GUNS.
During a 1993 Senate hearing, a Senator asked Hillary if she would support a 25 percent national sales tax on guns. Her response? A whole-hearted “I’m all for that.”
Hillary hasn’t mentioned the tax yet in her campaign, but it’s just a matter of time before she does. Last month, Hillary told a group in Iowa, “We’ve got to do something about gun violence in America, and I will take it on.”
Because if anything will stop a shooter intent on murder, it’s a tax, right?


MUSLIM ‘REFUGEES’: Abuse Cops And Throw Food & Water Away

Screen Shot 2015-09-06 at 7.08.39 PM
They are invading other countries and they are making demands – and then they wonder why people don’t want to let them in.
Footage has emerged of migrants at a Hungarian train station throwing away food and water offered to them by police.
The Youtube footage, which is embossed with the badges of the Hungarian police force, shows the migrants rejecting food packages and bottled water, throwing them onto the train tracks. Although some children appear keen to accept the food, the adults turn it down, in some cases throwing it back at police.

The migrants, described by some outlets as refugees, have been gathered at train stations in Hungary in the hope of travelling onwards to Austria and Germany. Hungarian authorities initially refused to let them through, resulting in chaotic scenes at Budapest’s main train station this week, but have now agreed to help them travel to the Austrian border.
Read more: Breitbart

Monday, September 7, 2015

Colin Powell: Iran Pact a ‘Pretty Good Deal’

Colin Powell: Iran Pact a ‘Pretty Good Deal’
(Retired General Colin Powell now) 

(Captain Colin Powell then)

oped: Alrighty then let's examine Gen Colin Powell's rise through the a young Captain Colin Powell supported Lt Calley's My Lai massacre allegations...Once promoted to field grade officer as Major he then was against Lt Calley...the old I was for before I was against syndrome (Ring a Bell Lt John Kerry ?) flash had we been PC during WWII we would now be under Nazi control and speaking German...sorry folks but war is hell and things are done that most people cringe from...but until you have faced combat and saw what goes on on both sides you have no proverbial say in the matter. Just a Fact Jack.  

Side note: 

On Jan. 17, 1963, in South Vietnam's monsoon season, U.S. Army Capt. Colin Powell jumped from a military helicopter into a densely forested combat zone of the A Shau Valley, not far from the Laotian border.
Carrying an M-2 carbine, Capt. Powell was starting his first -- and only -- combat assignment. He was the new adviser to a 400-man unit of the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN). Across jungle terrain, these South Vietnamese government troops were arrayed against a combined force of North Vietnamese regulars and local anti-government guerrillas known as the Viet Cong.
The 25-year-old Powell was arriving at a pivotal moment in the Vietnam War. To forestall a communist victory, President John F. Kennedy had dispatched teams of Green Beret advisers to assist the ARVN, a force suffering from poor discipline, ineffective tactics and bad morale.
Already, many U.S. advisers, most notably the legendary Col. John Paul Vann, were voicing concerns about the ARVN's brutality toward civilians. Vann feared that the dominant counterinsurgency strategy of destroying rural villages and forcibly relocating inhabitants while hunting down enemy forces was driving the people into the arms of the Viet Cong.
But as Colin Powell arrived, he was untainted by these worries. He was a gung-ho young Army officer with visions of glory. He brimmed with trust in the wisdom of his superiors. Capt. Powell also felt the deepest sympathy for the ARVN troops under his command, but only a cold contempt for the enemy. 

Soon after his arrival, Powell and his ARVN unit left for a protracted patrol that fought leeches as well as Viet Cong ambushes. From the soggy jungle brush, the Viet Cong would strike suddenly against the advancing government soldiers. Often invisible to Powell and his men, the VC would inflict a few casualties and slip back into the jungles.
In My American Journey, Powell recounted his reaction when he spotted his first dead Viet Cong. "He lay on his back, gazing up at us with sightless eyes," Powell wrote. "I felt nothing, certainly not sympathy. I had seen too much death and suffering on our side to care anything about what happened on theirs."
While success against the armed enemy was rare, Powell's ARVN unit punished the civilian population systematically. As the soldiers marched through mountainous jungle, they destroyed the food and the homes of the region's Montagnards, who were suspected of sympathizing with the Viet Cong. Old women would cry hysterically as their ancestral homes and worldly possessions were consumed by fire.

MAM Hunts
Powell did include, however, a troubling recollection that belied his 1968 official denial of Glen’s allegation that American soldiers “without provocation or justification shoot at the people themselves.” After mentioning the My Lai massacre in My American Journey, Powell penned a partial justification of the Americal’s brutality. In a chilling passage, Powell explained the routine practice of murdering unarmed male Vietnamese.

“I recall a phrase we used in the field, MAM, for military-age male,” Powell wrote. “If a helo spotted a peasant in black pajamas who looked remotely suspicious, a possible MAM, the pilot would circle and fire in front of him. If he moved, his movement was judged evidence of hostile intent, and the next burst was not in front, but at him. Brutal? Maybe so. But an able battalion commander with whom I had served at Gelnhausen (West Germany), Lt. Col. Walter Pritchard, was killed by enemy sniper fire while observing MAMs from a helicopter. And Pritchard was only one of many. The kill-or-be-killed nature of combat tends to dull fine perceptions of right and wrong.”

While it’s certainly true that combat is brutal, mowing down unarmed civilians is not combat.(Hello how about ISIS and the radical Islamist caliphate movement? #FightFirewithFire) It is, in fact, a war crime. (Hello WWII the fire bombing of Germany and two A-Bombs dispatched on Japan's civilian populations.. cruel yes but ended the war started by those who started it)
But returning home from Vietnam a second time in 1969, Powell had proved himself the consummate team player and continues today #TeamObama player!
Now on to the article... 

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell came out in support of President Obama’s agreement to curb Iran’s nuclear program, calling it a “pretty good deal.”
Powell, a retired general who led the State Department under GOP President George W. Bush, said he had vigorously studied the deal and listened to arguments from both supporters and opponents.
“My judgment after balancing those two sets of information is that it’s a pretty good deal,” Powell declared on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
“The great concern from the opposition is that we’re leaving open a lane for Iran to create a nuclear weapon in 10 to 15 years,” he added. “The reality is that they have been on a super highway for the last 10 years to create a nuclear weapon … with no speed limit.”
Powell’s position drew praise from Obama.
Read More:

Sunday, September 6, 2015

Ex-Congressman Allen West Explodes During Fiery and Emotional Times Square Speech

Former Florida Congressman Allen West absolutely exploded in New York City’s Times Square on Wednesday. The Republican strongly criticized President Barack Obama’s leadership calling him a “weakling” and “charlatan.” “I want President Obama to know one thing,” West said. “You may say that you have done something that no one else has done. You know why no one else has done it? Because it’s a damn stupid thing you just did.”

He continued: “If people are upset because of what I’m saying, I really don’t care. Because I had a father that stood at World War II…I gave 22 years of my life to make sure that that great beacon of liberty, freedom and democracy continues to stand. And I have a nephew, I have friends that are still serving on the front lines — and my commitment is to the oath that I took on 31, July, 1982, to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Organizers estimated roughly 10,000 people attended the rally on Wednesday, according to the Associated Press.

LTC Allen West reminds me of LTC Hal Moore:   oooh ha Cav rocks Obama not!
A speech from We Were Soldiers, right before the 7th Calvary goes into battle. I decided to remake my speech video so that it has the actual clip as well.

In closing just remember real leaders lead from the front not the rear!...Need I say more?

Statist Carly Fiorina: If You are Paid by Government, You Must Obey Their Command, Despite the Law


oped:Ooop's Carly Fiorina  is starting to stumble! 
Let me help you Carly read: 

Kim Davis is now languishing in jail for her faith.  There are many who have come out in support of the stand that she has taken against sodomite unions.  Governor Mike Huckabee has even planned a rally in support of Kim, but there are others who have taken an alternative stance.  It seems that there is an attempt to make a half-way stance.  We find this in the RINO Carly Fiorina.  

Former HP executive Carly Fiorina told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt on Tuesday, "I think that we must protect religious liberties with great passion and be willing to expend a lot of political capital to do so now because it's clear religious liberty is under assault in many, many ways."

There has been fewer truer statements made.  We have to understand that there are many different areas in which our religious liberties are being assaulted.  There is the area of sodomy and the will of people to see this perversion be given a special place.  There is the area of punishment, where we see cruel and unusual punishment administered in long prison sentences for minor offenses.  And it is our duty, as Christians, to see that these areas are dealt with properly.  But, there is a caveat to Fiorina's statement.

Fox continues:
She added: "Having said that, when you are a government employee, I think you take on a different role. When you are a government employee as opposed to say, an employee of another kind of organization, then in essence, you are agreeing to act as an arm of the government. And, while I disagree with this court's decision, their actions are clear."

Now, as I pointed out in my article concerning Kim Davis, this is the main problem that has led to this situation.  If we think that it is a good thing that Mrs. Davis stand for what she believes as long as she is not a government official, then we are saying that the government should come first in our obedience.  The problem with this is that there is nowhere that we can turn outside of our public leaders.

If we place our allegiance with the government, then if they abuse their power we have no other place to appeal.  The government would be the final place of appeal for justice in the land.  This leaves us with a totalitarian authority over us.  We obey man, or we spend our lives in jail.

Fox adds:
"Is she prepared to continue to work for the government, be paid for by the government, in which case she needs to execute the government's will … or sever her employment with the government and go seek employment elsewhere where her religious liberties would be paramount."

Though Mrs. Fiorina sounds good when discussing her faith and policy, we find that when the rubber meets the road, her statism outweighs her Christianity.  Fiorina makes a good Roman, but not a good Christian.
If our love for America and her government is too important to obey God's Law, then we are undone.