Saturday, February 4, 2017

When the USA returns to the days when music had harmony....

...and a positive message....and totally rejects the negative condecending.... if it feels good~ do it message of the progressive artists as well as politicians...then and only then will we be a great and moral nation once again as visioned by our founders! 

Prime example of when talent was real....not a flash in the proverbial hit wonders 
of today! 

Enjoy let it sink in and make your choice now before it it too late to recover! 

This beautiful clip of the Everly Brothers was filmed on their UK tour in 1960 with Buddy Holly's Crickets as the backup band, less than a year and half after the plane crash that took Holly's life

(Reelin' In The Years Archives) 


Bundy Case Attorney Takes Aim After IG Probe Finds BLM Agent Guilty of Misconduct
by:Tim Brown
I've been covering the Bundy Ranch now going on three years.  As trials of political prisoners on trumped up charges by the central government loom, charges that have either been dismissed or they have been acquitted of in Oregon, the Bureau of Land Management agent in charge has now allegedly been found guilty of misconduct by the Inspector General; and a Bundy case attorney is going after him.
Guerilla Media Network reports
On Wednesday Attorney Chris Rasmussen  filed a Motion For Review of BLM Personnel Records after a scathing report released by the Office Of The Inspector General, said  a Special Agent In Charge of the BLM was found to have committed Ethical Violations and Misconduct during an event in 2015 called “Burning Man” held in Black Rock Desert, Nevada.
The report contained points of interest for attorneys fighting an uphill battle in the Bundy Ranch case, especially the part about the Special Agent trying to intimidate and influence witnesses in his ethics investigation.

Daniel P. Love, who is believed to be the Special Agent in Charge the report is referring to, was also the Special Agent In Charge of the Bundy Ranch Cattle Impoundment of 2014.  Complaint after complaint was filed against Dan Love before, during, and after the protest, but failed to catch the eye of the Inspector Generals Office. This time the complaints came from within the BLM staff itself and it looks as though the “Super-Agent” will finally be held accountable.
This revelation came as no surprise to the people who live in States in which the BLM has taken on the role of Law Enforcement under the direction of Special Agent Daniel P. Love. Locals say they can attest that misconduct is an almost daily routine for the agency.

Chris Rasmussen, the Attorney of record for Pete Santilli, the journalist being held without bond after being swept up in a series of arrest stemming from the 2014 protest, wasted no time in demanding the court release the unredacted document filed by the Inspector Generals Office on January 30th, because he believes Dan Love may be the agent that was investigated and the Governments star witness in their case against Cliven Bundy and co-defendants.

Mr. Rasmussen says that if  Daniel P. Love is the agent being charged in the Inspector General’s report,  his client and other co-defendants have a right to know and be allowed to impeach his testimony, if he takes the stand.
Just two weeks ago, I met with Santilli at the Souther Nevada Detention Center and we discussed some of Love's misconduct, as well as the evidence that would exonerate every single person the central government is holding without bail.  Santilli called out the misconduct after prosecutors in the case filed a motion to protect the BLM from any scrutiny during the trial.  In essence, they were seeking to cover up the criminal actions and lawless conduct of armed BLM agents that surrounded Bundy Ranch.
According to Santilli's co-host, Deb Jordan, though Love was abandoned by the FBI, the Clarke County Sheriff's Department and the Las Vegas Metro Police, Daniel P. Love threatened reporter Pete Santilli, who sought to reason with Love, just as he did with the FBI in Oregon for a peaceful resolution to the matter.  His attempts were in vain.

One protester believed lives to be in danger and commented, "There was never ever any talk of invading the 1 million dollar compound Daniel P. Love erected on the Gold Butte or forcefully taking back any cattle; it was always the plan to protest until the release occurred naturally, said one witness who has asked to remain anonymous.  We went down into the wash under the assumption the BLM had left the area and that is where we were met by 200 armed agents who said they were ready to use lethal force. It was very frightening and confusing, we said a prayer and moved forward to face a BLM, we thought had left hours before. "
Former Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore also stood at Bundy Ranch alongside fellow citizens of Nevada and Americans.
"You know what?" Fiore said.  "I am just pissed off that this dirty SOB has been protected from being prosecuted for his outrageous behavior at Bundy Ranch – Scoring a few tickets and having sex with his girlfriend in a BLM trailer at “Burning Man” is the least of his offensives."

"This man is the same guy who threatened to use lethal force against American Citizens and Elected Officials – myself included – during the protest at Bundy Ranch," she added.  "How the hell did he ever get by with that?  And now it’s just disgusting that the Nevada BLM has the audacity to speak poorly of  our elected, President Donald Trump while never saying one thing about this mad-man being permitted to threaten protestors without any repercussion?"
"This guy actually disobeyed the direct order of our State Attorney General and beat people up and arrested them when he had no authority to do so," she continued.  "In the wash that day the BLM made fun of our Metro Las Vegas Police and County Sheriff Tom Roberts instead of obeying a direct order to put away their Long Guns.  I’m telling you all right now, Daniel P. Love disrespected the authority of our Nevada State Attorney General and  Local Law Enforcement, and almost caused a terrible tragedy.  There was no damn conspiracy – We all went down into that wash to set cattle free because the Sheriff said the “operation” had ceased and the BLM was leaving – We were almost killed by that raging lunatic;  It’s just that simple." 

Fiore then offered a solution to the problem at hand.  "At this point I think the right thing to do in this situation is, to let our men who have been wrongfully accused of threatening the BLM, out of jail and put Daniel P. Love, the real criminal, in jail for a very, very long time."
She also mentioned the fact of Love's misconduct in another area.  "While they’re at it I think they should also look into the allegations of misconduct during the 2012 Winter Olympics when an on duty Dan Love was presumably observed by his men in a dark corner of a bar getting up close and personal with a woman he had had drinks with instead of providing security for the diplomats he was charged to protect."
And she threw in his previous involvement in a story that I reported on in 2016.  "Maybe they should take another look at the operation Dan Love conducted in Utah that lead to the suicide of three people including Dr. James Redd in Blanding, Utah."

"I think it’s high-time somebody say enough is enough and tell us the truth; That Daniel P. Love was demoted – not promoted this year – because he can’t handle the overwhelming responsibility of picking up the trash on our Public Lands without threatening to kill someone, and has finally been relegated to a desk job where he can’t hurt people," Fiore said. 

If this was not enough, a retired BLM agent also spoke out against the BLM in January 2016.
In 2012, Steve Martin sat in a briefing room at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Artesia, New Mexico, listening to the details of a clandestine operation his agency was planning in the Nevada desert. The goal seemed commendable — to round up rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle, which had been grazing illegally on public land for decades — but the means seemed off to the Arizona-based special agent for the federal Bureau of Land Management. It was full of optimistic bravado, he recalls, and it was missing a key ingredient: cooperation with the county sheriff. Says Martin: “I remember thinking, ‘Is this still the BLM?’ 
GMN also added regarding the comments of Ryan Bundy at his pre-trial hearing this past Tuesday,
During his pre-trial release hearing on Tuesday, Ryan Bundy revealed that at least 200 gunmen (BLM Agents and or Parks and Services) were involved in the April 12th protest, and that many of them could be heard  laughing while choosing the protestors they wanted to kill, including horses and dogs.
Ryan Bundy also stated for the record, an agreement had been made between the Sheriff’s Department and the Bureau Of Land Management on April 11th, 2014 – that said the impoundment operation would cease immediately   – a full day before the final protest on April 12th.  Mr. Bundy quickly pointed out the flaw in the indictment by asking the question, “If there were no operation on the 12th, and if the cattle were already being released — how is that impeding?”

The BLM is out of control.  They believe their authority supercedes the Constitution.  However, they are an illegal agency, as the Constitution does not provide for them to uphold the laws of the Constitution.  Rather, it is the citizen militia that is to do so.
I would encourage you to read what Lynette Warren says are the "OIG’s worst findings" concerning Love on the last two pages of the 15-page report.  You can read that report by clicking here.  Don't forget to support Santilli in his defense, helping wives and children of political prisoners and getting the story out on what is really taking place in Nevada by clicking here.

Flurry of Motions Filed In Bundy Ranch Case Following Report of Govt's Star BLM Witness' Guilt of Misconduct

Strategic De-escalation

In January, political prisoner Pete Santilli called out the misconduct of the Bureau of Land Management under the direction of Daniel P. Love at Bundy Ranch in 2014.  That came just one day after government prosecutors sought to cover up the behavior of BLM agents and the unconstitutionality of the BLM in the Bundy Ranch trials.  Following the release of a report from the Inspector General, which documents the misconduct of what is probably the government's star witness in the case, BLM agent Daniel P. Love, a flurry of motions were filed by the defendants on Thursday.

Guerilla Media Network's Deb Jordan posted to her Facebook on the events that took place in Nevada on Thursday.
Within the past hour or so, Cliven filed a motion in limine regarding 'Longbow Productions' with declaration by Brand Thornton, and a response to the government's motion in limine filed last week.
Also, Steven Stewart just filed a motion to dismiss on grounds that the government has just been caught covering up info regarding its star wione tness Dan Love.
Finally, a few minutes ago, Ryan Payne filed another motion to dismiss regarding the Dan Love revelations.
If something doesn't derail soon, the trials will begin and quite possibly this could be the biggest exposure of the overreach of the central government in history in a court of law.  Keep in mind too that many families are traveling to Nevada and a house has been set up to care for them and their children during the trials.  If you can help, here's the information to do so.  Thank you in advance.
Send donations by mail to:
4731 Brushfire Street
North Las Vegas, Nevada
To send a check or money order, please mail to: MSMH 

Here are the motions that were filed by each of the men.
Steven Stewart 


SEE more:;postID=4508984341444516913 

If you can help these men with defense expenses or would like to help provide funds so they can make phones calls and other things while in jail,  click here to see how you can help.

February 3, 1959: The Day The Music Died

oped: Buddy Holly was way ahead of his time..he was the bridge between Swing,Jaz,Pop,Country,Soul music to Rock and Roll.
My fav Buddy Holly song was "Mona" one of his little known... but was covered by the Rolling Stones: 

Some accidents are burned into memory even decades after they happened, the assassination of JFK, the Challenger explosion, 9/11/01 are all those type of events. For those who were alive February 3, 1959, the event that day is singed in memory and will always be known as “The Day The Music Died.”
Killed in an airplane crash that night were rock and roll icons Buddy Holly, 22, of Lubbock, Tex.; Ritchie Valens, 17, of Los Angeles; J.P. (Big Bopper) Richardson, 24, of Beaumont, Tex., also killed was the pilot, Roger Peterson, 21, of Clear Lake, Iowa. Three of Rock and Roll’s most promising performers were gone. The three were together on a concert tour. Buddy Holly was fed up with the chartered bus with its faulty heater, so before the performance he asked the tour manager Carroll Anderson about renting a chartered plane to fly him to his next destination in Moorhead, Minnesota. Anderson knew the owner of Dwyer Flying Service in nearby Mason City whom he contacted to arrange the flight. Anderson was not able to get hold of the owner so he called one of the pilots, Roger Peterson, who agreed to take Buddy plus two others to Moorhead. But the plane never made it home.

Ever since that horrible plane crash, February 3 has been known as “the day the music died.”
“The Winter Dance Party Tour” was planned to cover 24 cities in a short 3-week time frame (January 23 – February 15), they were traveling by bus. But, the tour bus developed heating problems. It was so cold on board that reportedly one of the drummers developed frostbite riding in it. When they arrived at the Surf Ballroom in Clear Lake, Iowa, they were sick and tired of the cold bus. So Buddy Holly chartered a plane for himself and his guys, which turned out to be a tragic mistake. The press said the concert was magical as the fans went wild over the performers.

The plane took off a little after 1 A.M. from Clear Lake and never got far from the airport before it crashed, killing all onboard. According to reports, one wing hit the ground and the small plane corkscrewed over and over. The three young stars were thrown clear of the plane, leaving only pilot inside.

Ritchie Valens had just released “LA Bamba.” He was only 17 years old. Valens recently finished his first motion picture, “Go Johnny! Go.” His first recording six months ago, “Donna,” sold more than a million copies. Jimmy Page once said, “Valens was my first guitar hero and I played that bridge to ‘La Bamba’ a thousand times.” 

His last release and a bridge between the Mexican Culture and Rock and Roll: 

Continue Reading

Friday, February 3, 2017

Senator Joe McCarthy was correct about Hollywood 1950's

Joseph McCarthy, Republican Senator from Wisconsin, fueled fears ...
For all the nay sayers who wring their proverbial hands holding on tight to the dreaded words "McCarthyism" 'BlackLists"...we have come full circle and Old Joe has been vindicated...yes indeed Hollywood has been in bed with the ACLU and the CPUSA since the 1920's.  See:
The following articles on Hollywood's latest rantings and desperate attempt to complete the Marxist takeover of the USA is in a suicidal tail spin...they have awoken the sleeping giant of  "Middle America" being led by DJT and panic has set they all are aware they can be prosecuted for Seditious Conspiracy under the . Smith Act (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2385, 2387), which outlawed sedition and seditious conspiracy.

The conspiracy players...George Soros, Barack and Michelle(Michael) Obama, Hollywood Progressives et al, Bill and Hillary Clinton with Chelsea in tow, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, 60+ Marxist Congressional Reps! and many many more hiding in the proverbial wings!

On with the damning articles...y'all be the Judge I am but the messenger:

[Exposed] Celebs secret code causing BLOODSHED

Listen closely, and you can hear it – secret “dog whistles” are being increasingly used by high-profile liberals.
And their coded word usage is calling for violence.
Democratic lawmakers and left-wing celebrities alike are communicating to millions of Americans every day… and what they’re hinting at is shocking.
Listen closely, and you’ll notice they’ve stopped asking for peaceful protest. Now they’re asking for bloodshed — and people are listening.
It sounds far-fetched, but it’s very real. Recently, comedian Sarah Silverman took to Twitter to demand a military overthrow of the U.S. government, and was predictably bashed by conservatives for it.

But there’s a problem that’s being ignored. Silverman is not alone.
Whether intentional or not, the rhetoric being employed by the left is becoming increasingly militant by the day.
At the Screen Actors Guild ceremony Sunday, broadcast to millions of viewers, actor David Harbour issued a “call to arms” for viewers to “hunt monsters” and “punch people in the face” who are not deemed inclusive enough.
Whoopi Goldberg equated President Donald Trump and his supporters to Islamic terrorists this week in the middle of her popular talk show. And in front of a massive television audience on January 21st, aging pop star Madonna called for people to “blow up” the White House and assassinate Trump.

Even worse, it’s not just celebrities that are guilty of using these reckless dog whistles, either. On Tuesday, Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine called on liberals to “fight in the streets” against Trump and his supporters during an appearance on MSNBC.
On Wednesday at a House committee meeting, Florida Rep. Val Demings called the violence in Berkley, California this week “a beautiful site” and asked about the rioters, “what direction and instructions and how can we have a more organized effort so that they can be a major tool in moving our agenda forward?”
And people are listening.
Just look at the language written on rioter’s signs and Tweets during the aforementioned unrest —
That’s the “beautiful sight” to Demings?
The reality is this: the language being used by liberals recently isn’t just biased and uninformed.
It has become dangerously violent and very specific.

High-profile liberals are demanding violence and revolution and assassinations at an alarming rate.
Like them or not, these are famous people whose words have power.
They’re using these words to encourage radicalization – and people are obeying.
Don’t believe it? Watch this shocking video compilation of unprovoked, vicious attacks against Trump supporters from the past year. Warning: This is very upsetting. 

The first amendment is a wonderful thing, but it’s time we recognized that calls for bloodshed is NOT protected speech.
This is hateful, violent rhetoric.
It’s escalating.
And it’s going to get people killed.
— The Horn editorial team

Liberals Leaders now Openly Calling for Rebellion and Overthrow of Government

Screen Shot 2017-02-02 at 6.11.40 PM
by: Onan Coca  

I’m not sure when it happened, but our country has taken a severely dangerous turn. In years past, conservatives, Tea Party supporters, and other shades of America’s right wing have complained about the growth of government, the Democrat trend toward socialism, and the attack on our natural rights. The right wing has at times used harsh terms, but none but the most fringe have ever argued for the overthrow of government or the upending of a lawfully elected administration.

Sadly, the same cannot now be said for liberals.
Finding themselves in a minority party role for the first time in almost 15 years, it seems that the Democrat left has completely lost control of their senses. Just two weeks in to the Trump administration’s tenure and once “mainstream” voices on the left have actually begun to call for a physical coup, or overthrow, of the duly elected Trump administration.
In a post for Foreign Policy magazine, former Obama administration official Rosa Brooks outlined four ways to “get rid” of President Trump, her last suggestion being the most outrageous (though they were all ridiculous),  “The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.” 

This was someone who had actually worked in the Obama administration, folks! They’re not playing around. It wasn’t just Ms. Brooks though, as countless of celebrities have also thrown their hats into the insane and treasonous ring.
Judd Apatow:
Screen Shot 2017-02-02 at 6.12.25 PM
Debra Messing:
Screen Shot 2017-02-02 at 6.13.48 PM
Lexi Alexander apparently believes all conservatives are also Nazis who deserve to be physically assaulted. She also fails to realize the irony of her own tweets. Here she incites people to violence, but in her next tweet says that the people she was calling for violence upon were the real inciters.
Screen Shot 2017-02-02 at 6.14.29 PM
Screen Shot 2017-02-02 at 6.15.08 PM

It seems to me that the Berkeley PD should be putting out an arrest warrant for Lexi Alexander. She pushed rioters to violence, or “incited” them to violence. That is a crime… but I won’t hold my breath to see if justice is done.
I guess we shouldn’t be surprised though. I mean they did try to warn us. Liberals whined that if the American people elected Donald Trump as President, the left would get violent. Here’s just one of those warning from back in July.
Shaun King tweet
Apparently, democratic principles only matter if you’re side wins every election. If you’re not an identity politics embracing, godless, pansexual liberal… you’re opinion does not matter. Folks, I hope we are all prepared for the onslaught of hate that will continue to pour out from the left in the coming days, weeks, and months. These disgusting provocateurs will continue to inundate us with vitriol and disdain until we either give in to their demands or we stand up and prove to them that their hatemongering will not work. Stand together friends, stay strong, and keep fighting the good fight. Love really DOES trump hate, and we can prove it by defeating the liberal hate with our tried and true conservative principles.

Big Brother George Soros’ Web Is Unraveling


Unholy alliance: Soros and British Petroleum’s princes and sheikhs
The disinformation campaign about the so-called Muslim ban by the Trump administration has been orchestrated in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe by most mainstream media outlets, fake-left pseudo-independent news outlets, the leading social media platforms worldwide, as well as the search engines. What the Trump administration did by issuing an executive order restricting visas for nationals of specific countries was not a random anti-Muslim racist measure but instead a security precaution to prevent terrorist attacks funded by a still very active globalist cabal spearheaded by the puppet master George Soros, his countless associates in politics, finance and media, as well as the ruling royal family of Saudi Arabia. This incredibly powerful global network, which some have called the New World Order shadow government, is unraveling from top to bottom. Perhaps the time has come to drag the giant globalist Hydra to the shore, and watch it die, cooked by the harsh rays of the sun.

Failure of globalist info-war: President Trump is wining hearts and minds in Muslim countries
The Trump administration’s executive order has apparently already paid off, by more than likely preventing a major terrorist attack on the stadium hosting the upcoming Super Bowl, which is the biggest yearly sporting event in the US. Several days ago, Rasheed Muhammad, a non-Arab ISIS commander was arrested at New York’s John F. Kennedy Airport. Hopefully a thorough questioning by the FBI, and perhaps other agencies, will produce the names of his associates in or still outside of the US, and most importantly the persons of interest who ordered and financed potential attacks. Overall, this amounts to good old-fashioned police work, and not any sort of anti-Muslim inclination of the Trump administration. Muslims all over the world are fully aware that the Obama administration was never their friend.

Axis of amorality: Soros, Saudi Arabia’s rulers, and the Zionist network    
A large majority of the public in Muslim countries does not buy the notion that President Donald Trump is anti-Muslim, and the US public opinion is quickly catching up with the very same notion. Most Muslims worldwide already know about what I called a few years ago the unholy alliance of Saudi-Arabia and the Zionists. Islam is a religion of peace unless, of course, it follows Wahhabist or Salafist precepts of Sharia law. Those two brands of fundamentalist Islam have been generously sponsored by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and spread worldwide, including in the largely secular countries of Western Europe. This was done by building larges mosques and hiring Imans to preach, indoctrinate, and often recruit European citizens with North-African, Turkish or Pakistani roots. Idle young men, with little work prospects in France, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Bosnia, Kosovo and elsewhere have been the prime targets to become Jihadists. Very few of them are actually motivated to fight a so-called holy war in the name of Allah. What they become instead is a mercenary force: a well-trained and battle-hardened foreign legion that spreads chaos for the benefit of Saudi and Qatari princes and sheikhs. This has involved the support and active participation of all US administrations since 1980, or what I have called the 36-year era of the Bush-Clinton crime syndicate, which of course includes Clintonite extraordinaire, former President Barack Hussein Obama.

Nobel Peace prize winner Obama oversaw the dropping of 26,172 bombs in 2016
While the West’s pseudo-leftists, working mainly as propagandists for the globalist agenda, paint President Trump as an anti-Muslim racist aspiring to be Adolf Hitler — which is complete nonsense, since facts tell a different story — in an article published by the Council on Foreign Relations, Micah Zenko exposes the 2016 track record of the Obama administration’s bombing activities in seven Muslim countries. In total, the US military dropped 26,172 bombs in seven countries. The list has to be mentioned in full: in Syria 12,192 bombs were dropped; in Iraq 12,095; in Afghanistan 1,337; in Libya 496; in Yemen 35; in Somalia 14; and in Pakistan 3. These are all the bombs used by the US military through various delivery systems, including drones which was the Nobel Peace prize laureate’s weapon of predilection. I don’t think the bleeding-heart liberals can still call their darling Obama a friend of Muslims and peace anymore, and vilify Mr. Trump.

Soros: Spider in chief  of the current Orwellian construct
George Soros, through his Open Society Foundation, which is a network of more than 100 foundations with offices in countless countries including Afghanistan, has his fingerprints all over the pseudo-spontaneous anti-Trump protests, not only in the US but also worldwide. Mr. Soros has operated for decades like an fastidious giant spider with toxic Messiah aspirations. His portfolio includes political assets in many countries as well as globalist organizations like the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank. Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy was a major Soros asset; the same goes for President Francois Hollande as well as IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde. Canada’s current Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, has embraced, on behalf of Soros, the anti-Trump and pseudo pro-Muslim protests. The globalist network of Soros and associates is still alive, but it has been under demolition since the defeat of one of George Soros’ pawns in the US election. Of course, the one who aspired to become the empress of Big Brother Soros’ Orwellian construct was the one and only Hillary Clinton.

Soros assets and fake-left galore
The problem for Soros, his associates, and their media and NGO affiliates is that he is bleeding money, and his global empire is crumbling like a castle made of sand. Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now! has long been fingered as a media Soros asset, the same goes for this fake left outlet’s usual guests, including Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, Naomi Klein, Glenn Greenwald, Jeremy Scahill, and Cornel West. Democracy Now! is hardly alone. The laundry list of Soros media and NGO assets is so long that it is hard to make it comprehensive. Worthy of mention, but in no particular order of importance, are NPR News, BBC News, The Guardian, Le Monde, and Huffington Post. Those with a veneer of real-independent left are harder to identify positively: examples are Alternet, CEPR, and TruthOut. They start out well enough, but they change their editorial line once Mr. Soros begins to finance them through his foundations or to insert some of his own people in them.

Soros has also invested heavily in human rights groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch. Petitions to impeach President Trump are being circulated worldwide by yet another organization controlled by Soros., together with Answer Coalition and are the coordinators of the fake protests by women and against the supposed Muslim ban. Answer Coalition is so disconnected from reality that I am currently on its mailing list! Like most other petitions, these petitions from Soros-funded organizations are data fishing expeditions whose main purpose is to collect names and addresses.

For someone like Soros and his Saudi friends — who were able to finance the fake revolutions in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine, and come up with the ISIS project — it is quite trivial to engineer women’s marches worldwide, hire former gang members to be the muscle of Black Lives Matter, and get the agreement of a few key shareholders of social medial companies and search-engine companies to make “Muslim ban” a trending topic. It is unfortunate, but as the expression goes — in the lowest-common-denominator empire under the directive of its Minister of Truth — money talks, and it has a bullhorn. Without it, George Soros and his associates would not have controlled the Western news agenda, as they have, nearly every day for decades.

Time for justice and a coup de grace to the globalist Hydra
As far as the heads of the Bush-Clinton syndicate: judging by their body language at President Trump’s inauguration, it seems they are fully aware that they are looking at a losing hand. They appeared as though they were at a funeral, and possibly their only reason for being there was that they could not refuse to be present. In one particular photograph of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama, who was sitting in front of her, their facial expressions were grim, but what I noticed was the unusual position of their Secret Service security detail. Typically, agents look behind, in front, and to the sides of those they protect, and not directly at their charges. Might this represent some sort of soft house arrest? In my opinion, the possibility of a soft or violent coup against the Trump administration is completely ludicrous. Unfortunately for George Soros’ wimpy foot soldiers, the American people, that is, the majority who elected Mr. Trump and support him, care more about their Second-Amendment rights than their next latte or cappuccino.
Editor’s Notes: Gilbert Mercier is the author of The Orwellian Empire. Photograph four from the archive of US Department of State; photograph five World Economic Forum archive; photograph six and seven by Thomas Leuthard; and photograph nine by Dennis van Zuijlekom.

Magnatone CEO Comforts Facebook Followers, “Rest Easy People, it’ll Take Only 100 Days Till Trump Gets a Bullet in the Head!”

Leftists speak of assassinating President Trump as though it is OK to do that. Creeps like Ted Kornhole are entitled to threatening murder of the President. When are the feds going to start throwing these classless morons into prison?
The founder and CEO of guitar amplifier maker Magnatone has apologized for a Facebook message about the potential assassination of President Donald Trump, according to Inquisitr.
In his Facebook post yesterday, Ted Kornblum apparently wrote the following: “Rest easy people, it’ll take only 100 days till Trump gets a bullet in the head!”

Kornhole then added fuel to the fire by posting an image (above) of Travis Bickle, the political assassin portrayed by Robert De Niro in the movie Taxi Driver, with Trump in the foreground.
Magnatone CEO, Ted Kornblum calls for the assassination of President Trump. This disturbing rhetoric has been largely ignored by the media.
— Truth Bombers (@Truth_Bombers) January 30, 2017

Emotions are still running high almost three months after Donald Trump’s victory in the 2016 presidential election, an outcome that most media organizations and political pollsters and pundits insisted never would happen. Some political observers maintain that, in general, the media echo chamber or groupthink that Trump rival Hillary Clinton was a lock for the presidency might be partially responsible for at least some of the post-election incivility by those on the left of the ideological spectrum.
Continue Reading

Thursday, February 2, 2017

Prosecute Soros for Sedition

oped: I totally concur...see: 

by: Erik Rush
The recent protests against President Donald Trump and his policies pertaining to Muslim-nation émigrés present a valuable object lesson regarding contrived popular misrepresentations of First Amendment liberties. Here, we are able to see examples of individuals and organizations engaging in seditious behavior that is commonly tolerated due to fallacious interpretations of the First Amendment advanced by American socialists.
Aspects of these interpretations have become conventional wisdom among our citizenry; disingenuously ignoring the error of such versions of constitutional law has been the job of agenda-driven legal experts and the press. Such things as court cases that successfully argued for the right to burn the American flag as a form of protected political expression legitimized the “America Sucks” culture, thereby paving the way for open sedition as an acceptable activity.

Peaceful protests on a large scale were employed to give rise to certain changes that needed to come about during the civil rights movement. Since then, leftists have attempted to use them in their attempts to bring about all manner of malignant social and political change, hoping in each case to capture the same flavor of the 1960s protests and ascribe legitimacy to their causes. This is precisely what we are seeing at present, although the protests seldom remain peaceful.
We have learned that organizations tied to uber-socialist billionaire activist George Soros have had a hand in driving anti-Trump protests since his election, as have certain Islamist groups. The latter is certainly no surprise, since it reflects the 1,400-year-old Islamic tradition of insidiously ingratiating Islam to host nations with one hand whilst preparing to slide the scimitar in with the other. All we need do is look to Europe to see how this develops just a little further down the road we’re on, with riots, no-go zones, mass rapes and demands for conversion to Islam having become commonplace.

Recently, the terrorism-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), helped launch demonstrations protesting Trump’s recent executive orders concerning the entry of refugees from some Islamic nations into the United States. Leftists and the press have supported these efforts in their hyperbolic criticism of Trump’s “Muslim ban,” despite the fact that the president has only temporarily suspended unfettered access to the U.S. for citizens from seven highly destabilized Islamic nations.
During the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama, Islamists had the most powerful friends in Washington and made great headway in their efforts to establish policy and insinuate their operatives within our political infrastructure. In cases such as this, our tradition of religious tolerance has worked against us. Because Islam is considered a religion, it has enjoyed the benefits of a religion under the Constitution despite being diametrically opposed to the Constitution, as well as being at odds with Western civilization in general.
Factor in the fallacious belief held by some of our leaders that Islam is inherently peaceful, and we have the situation at hand. Prominent opponents of Trump’s measures (Sen. Chuck Schumer and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright spring to mind) are currently proffering the same pro-Islam propaganda as did Barack Obama and his collaborators during the last administration. 

As we have seen, this mass brainwashing can prove quite effective. There are Britons, Scandinavians and European natives who continue to defend Islam in the manner of its American supporters despite the fact that Muslims have already transformed their nations into manifestly dangerous places.
It is highly unlikely that a real ban on Islam will become a reality anytime soon, but considering history and the empirical evidence at hand, President Trump could get away with criminalizing organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR (as some prudent nations have done), pointing to their actions and such phenomena as the jihadi training camps on our soil, which the federal government has chosen to ignore to date, and of which the left and the establishment press simply deny existence.

In the case of George Soros, there are ample devices under the law that could be used to neutralize him if we moved away from the paradigm of tolerating the “America Sucks” culture. He has used his billions to institutionalize sedition on a variety of fronts, was instrumental in getting Obama elected to the presidency and tried his level best to do the same for Hillary Clinton.
Soros became an American citizen in December of 1961, but the Hungarian-born former World War II Nazi collaborator could easily be stripped of his citizenship on any number of grounds and unceremoniously deposited back on Hungarian soil if our leaders found sufficient vertebral fortitude to initiate the requisite proceedings. Tying up his financial holdings and confounding the efforts of his shell organizations would put a stop to many detrimental processes Soros has in place.
Rather than consciously engaging in sedition, a certain number of the protesters currently being engaged in these Islamophilic rallies are simply well-intentioned if profoundly ignorant and unaware of their own exploitation. Many more have been bought and paid for by the organizers, however, who can and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Article reposted with permission from Erik Rush

‘Adversarial Journalist’ Fails to ‘Intercept’ Truth about Oath Keepers

Join Oath Keepers

What does any of this have to do with Oath Keepers? If you listen to SPLC, DT Analytics, Democrat DHS apparatchiks and The Intercept, they’re practically inseparable. If you actually cherish the truth, not a thing, and membership there would disqualify from membership here. [Library of Congress Public Domain/CC-0] 

“The FBI has quietly investigated white supremacist infiltration of law enforcement,” VICE News, Al Jazeera America, and New York Times contributor and all-around social justice warrior Alice Speri “reports” in The Intercept.
Self-described as “dedicated to producing fearless, adversarial journalism,” The Intercept gives Speri a platform to demonstrate exactly how provincial and insulated from her “flyover country” subject matter an Italian-born Bronx resident can be. Still, that’s no excuse for sloppy, one-sided agitprop masked as “real reporting,” although why she should be any different from her peers in the “mainstream” is a fair question to ask.
Eager to advance a meme developed and honed in the Obama administration, that the greatest threat to U.S. domestic tranquility originates from evil “conservatives,” Speri continues the successful practice of conflating Constitutionalists with “white supremacists” and haters, and nowhere is that more demonstrably disprovable than in her all-too-familiar smear job on Oath Keepers.
A primary source for raising the “extremism” flag? A 2009 report from Janet Napolitano’s Department of Homeland Security, specifically identifying those opposed to illegal immigration and “disgruntled military veterans” as groups meriting special scrutiny over domestic terror concerns. That would be the same DHS that relied on the Southern Poverty Law Center in a subsequent “intelligence assessment” exercise in politically-inspired conflation.

“Mark Potok’s armed DHS sock puppet parrots SPLC lines — again,” friend and colleague, the late Mike Vanderboegh observed at the time, dismissing the report with the jaded candor of someone who has seen the con before. “It looks to me like all these high-paid tax feeders did was regurgitate Potok’s latest lies…”
While admitting that Napolitano subsequently backed off the 2009 report due to flak, that tradition appears to be continuing unabated at The Intercept. Not only did Speri rely on SPLC as a primary go-to source, but also parroted without challenge the report’s lead researcher, Daryl Johnson (now head of DT Analytics, a consulting firm pinning its fortunes on continued demand for the SPLC narrative:
Johnson singled out the Oath Keepers and the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association for their anti-government attitudes and efforts to recruit active as well as retired law enforcement officers. “That’s the biggest issue and it’s greater now than it’s ever been, in my opinion.”

Oh, really?
“Anti-government”? This is a group that at its core exists to encourage current and retired military, police and first responders to keep their oath to “support and defend the Constitution [and] bear true faith and allegiance to the same,” and that restricts membership in its Bylaws with this requirement:
No person who advocates, or has been or is a member, or associated with, any organization, formal or informal, that advocates the overthrow of the government of the United States or the violation of the Constitution thereof, shall be entitled to be a member or associate member.
And as for being in any way affiliated with “white supremacists,” again, one need only check the Bylaws:
No person who advocates, or has been or is a member, or associated with, any organization, formal or informal, that advocates discrimination, violence, or hatred toward any person based upon their race, nationality, creed, or color, shall be entitled to be a member or associate member.

Perhaps with Hillary Clinton’s loss in November, DT Analytics is in desperate search of a public/private partnership from which to feed (especially if Johnson’s YouTube viewership is any indication of interest). Presumably, sales aren’t exactly brisk for his “Right-Wing Resurgence: How a Domestic Terrorist Threat is Being Ignored” (with a Foreword, unsurprisingly, by SPLC’s Mark Potok!), but at least Amazon’s “Look inside” function gives us a chance to see just how badly they want to include Oath Keepers in that threat, and how accurate what he’s saying about them is.
For instance, right there in Chapter One, page 4, we’re told:
“On April 11, 2009, the day on which the DHS assessment was leaked, the Oath Keepers had not yet announced their existence publicly.”

What is this? And this? And…
Back in March, 2009, I’d blogged that Oath Keepers was featured on the G.Gordon Liddy Show (and on an Arkansas radio program). And they’d posted a video announcing themselves on YouTube. I actually first blogged on Oath Keepers here.

If the head of DT Analytics totally blows the basics like this, what else can’t we trust, and what should that say to anyone thinking about retaining his consultancy “services”? And if Oath Keepers actually were a threat, what does it say about so many of us knowing about them while our “Homeland Security professionals” remained blisssfuly oblivious, awaiting SPLC agenda instructions?
And what does it say of the journalistic standards of The Intercept, parroting that agenda while the truth about Oath Keepers lay a couple minutes of internet checking and a bias and presumption-free introductory phone call away? Assuming truth was ever the objective…?
If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work.   You can donate HERE.

Not Dumb. Sally Yates Know’s the Exact Reason She Was Fired

Let there be no mistake about it, Acting Attorney General Sally Yates fired herself. She knew exactly what she was doing when she defied an Executive Order from President Donald Trump. Do not feel sorry for her as she was just making a political statement before her job expired anyway. Insubordination is grounds for firing almost everywhere. 

As Written By The Editors of the National Review:
It is a very simple proposition. Our Constitution vests all executive power — not some of it, all of it — in the president of the United States. Executive-branch officials do not have their own power. They are delegated by the president to execute his power. If they object to the president’s policies, their choice is clear: salute and enforce the president’s directives, or honorably resign. There is no third way.
No one knows this better than high-ranking officials of the Department of Justice. That is why President Trump was right to fire Acting Attorney General Sally Yates.
Over the weekend, President Trump issued an executive order temporarily restricting the admission into the United States of aliens from various Muslim-majority countries, as well as aliens from Syria and elsewhere who are claiming refugee status. Naturally, this has triggered protests by Democrats and the Left. They erroneously claim that Trump’s executive order violates the Constitution, statutory law, American tradition, and human decency.

For inexplicable reasons, the new president left Yates in place to run the Justice Department in anticipation of the confirmation of Senator Jeff Sessions. A faithful Obama-appointed progressive, Yates obviously knew which way the political wind was blowing in her ….
Why Sally Yates Was Fired: Insubordination | National Review

There is no Constitutional ‘RIGHT’ to immigrate to America

Let’s end the argument of a RIGHT to immigrate to the United States to rest once and for all. That right does NOT exist. There is no requirement for us to open our borders to anyone and that IS in the Constitution. Groups and nations have been excluded from entering this nation since its founding. Many modern era Presidents have exercised this option. There is NO comparison to any other immigrant event in recorded history. Did you know that Islam is a political system, not a religion? 
oped: Yes indeed...The Myth of is a Theocracy masked as a let me help the dumbed down ones: 

As Written By Bruce Walker for American Thinker:
There is no right to immigrate to America, and there is no duty America owes the world to accept refugees.  The pathos of leftism on this phony moral obligation invariably reverts back to the tragic efforts of German Jews to leave a Nazi world in which they were horribly mistreated.  The connection to the Holocaust, however, is utterly phony.  The overwhelming majority of German Jews did successfully leave Germany and find new homes in other lands.
Almost all the victims of the Holocaust were East European Jews – Polish, Ukrainian, Hungarian, Romanian, Russian, and Lithuanian – and the most open borders imaginable to these wretched victims would hardly have made a dent in the six million murdered by the Nazis and their allies.  The only help for these people was to conquer and occupy the lands they lived in as quickly as possible and then to impose relentlessly the superior values of America and Britain in these conquered lands.

That is, of course, always the only true answer to problems of refugees.  The first mass immigration to America was from persecuted German Catholics and Jews.  The “No Knowing Party” was formed to stop this influx, but what actually did the trick was the unification of Germany into a confederation (misnamed an “empire”) that granted completed social policy to the individual states.  Those German Catholics and Jews whose fathers thought about fleeing instead became patriotic and loyal Germans.
Irish immigration stopped when Ireland gained independence, and Italian immigration stopped when Italy was finally united.  Indeed, in both cases, as their homelands became safe, free, and relatively prosperous, there was a reverse migration of the children and grandchildren of …..
Articles: Refugees and the Right to Immigrate

Pelosi Goes on ANOTHER Unhinged Rant

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi may be suffering from too little oxygen to her brain, bad food, and her drinking water is tainted with alt-left liberal Koolaid. She is known to be hostile to anything that resembles conservatism. That may explain the attack on Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch. They say that the things you are guilty of, you accuse other people of being guilty of. 

During a town hall with CNN on Tuesday, House Minority Leader Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) argued that Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch is a “hostile” pick that President Trump named to change the subject from his immigration order, and “if you breathe air, drink water, eat food, take medicine, or in any other way, interact with the courts, this is a very bad decision.”

Pelosi stated, “[E]lections have ramifications, and here is a living, breathing example of it. The president and his first appointment to the court, and hopefully his only appointment to the court, has appointed someone who has come down on the side of corporate America versus class action suits on securities fraud. He’s come down against employer’s — employee’s rights. Clean air, clean water, food safety, safety in medicine, and the rest, if you care about that for your children, he’s not your guy. [Former Representative] Gabby Giffords’ (D-AZ) group…said that he comes down on the side of felons, over gun safety. Hostile to women’s reproductive rights, Hobby Lobby case for example. The list goes on and on, criticized progressives for bringing cases that relate to LGBT progress, taking those cases to the courts. What saddens me the most, as a mom and a grandmother though, is his hostility towards children in school, children with autism. He has ruled that….
Pelosi: Gorsuch Is Bad If You ‘Breathe Air, Drink Water, Eat Food, Take Medicine,’ Trump Picked Him to Distract from EO – Breitbart

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

FIGHTING JIHADIS: This UNUSED Legal Tool Is ALREADY On The Books… Leftists Will HATE It!


In the midst of the debate over the Donald’s Executive Order banning visitors from seven Muslim countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen), there are a couple of factors one should take into consideration. The first factor would be that legislation with similar language was passed during the Obama Administration. Such legislation (as part of an omnibus spending bill) was the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act. Such legislation restricted access to the Visa Waiver Program, which allows people from 38 nations who come to the United States for a period of less than 90 days to enter without a visa. The bill was signed into law in December 2015, and applied to the same seven countries.
There was hardly any fuss over this law, but that was because there was a Democrat in the White House. Thus, the Left has again demonstrated its hypocrisy. I should add that in addition to keeping jihadists out of America, this law will also bar any advocates of Sharia Law from entering America.

Which brings me to the second factor- the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (a.k.a. the McCarran-Walter Act). This law had several provisions, which consisted of the following: eliminating racial restrictions from previous immigration laws by means of a quota system for various nationalities and regions, defining three types of immigrants (which in turn consist of immigrants with special skills or relatives of American citizens exempt from quotas and thus were to be admitted without restrictions, average immigrants whose numbers were not allowed to exceed 270,000 each year, and refugees), and expanded the definition of what the United States was, i.e. providing American citizenship at birth to those living in Guam (for individuals born on or after December 24, 1952 to be exact).

In addition to these provisions, the McCarran-Walter Act authorizes the government to deport immigrants or naturalized citizens engaged in subversive activities as well as banning suspected subversives from entering America. Although intended to target Communist subversives (e.g. prohibiting Communists, former Communists, and the Communist Party’s fellow travelers from entering the United States), the McCarran-Walter Act apparently applies to all immigrants, which would include terrorists and those of other ideologies who seek to overthrow the government of the United States. Thus, it applies to jihadists and those who want to introduce Sharia Law (and hence turn America into an Islamic State).
So the next time you hear someone mentioning the Islamization of America, tell them about the McCarran-Walter Act (especially if that individual is an advocate of Sharia Law).

FLASHBACK: 26 Islamic Terrorist Attacks Plotted By Immigrants, Refugees In US

We’ll use words small enough that even Chuck Schumer can understand.
We need better screening.

We can prove it.
In Senator Jeff Session’s words (2015): ‘Our track record on screening is very poor.’

Back in 2015, we saw at TWENTY SIX people of foreign birth who were either charged with — or convicted of — terrorism.
Of course, people KILLED DURING their terrorist attacks are neither charged nor convicted. So this list will be incomplete. (San Bernardino, for example.)
Sessions said the terrorist attacks highlight the need for greater scrutiny of those coming into the U.S.

“The barbaric attacks in Paris – an assault on civilization itself – add immense new urgency,” Sessions said.
Sessions said U.S. officials have no access to Syrian government data to vet refugees and no capacity to predict whether those seeking refuge are likely to join militant groups. As proof of that, the Immigration Subcommittee, which Sessions chairs, provided a partial list of apprehended foreign-born terrorists or terror suspects since 2013:
-A Kazakhstani immigrant with lawful permanent resident status allegedly conspired to purchase a machine gun to shoot FBI and other law enforcement agents if they prevented him from traveling to Syria to join ISIS.
-An immigrant from Saudi Arabia, who applied for and received U.S. citizenship, swore allegiance to ISIS and pledged to explode a propane tank bomb on U.S. soil, prosecutors said.

-A Uzbek man in Brooklyn encouraged other Uzbeki nationals to wage jihad on behalf of ISIS, and raised $1,600 for the terror organization.
-The Boston Bombers, who killed three and injured more than 250, were invited in as refugees. The younger brother applied for citizenship and was naturalized on September 11th, 2012. The older brother had a pending application for citizenship.
-A Moroccan national who came to the U.S. on a student visa was arrested for plotting to blow up a university and a federal court house.
-6 Members of Minnesota’s Somali-American refugee community have recently been charged with trying to join ISIS. The Washington Times reported that “the effort [to resettle large groups of Somali refugees in Minnesota] is having the unintended consequence of creating an enclave of immigrants with high unemployment that is both stressing the state’s safety net and creating a rich pool of potential recruiting targets for Islamist terror groups.”

-An Uzbek refugee living in Idaho was arrested and charged with providing support to a terrorist organization, in the form of teaching terror recruits how to build bombs. He was later convicted three terrorism-related charges.
-An American citizen whose family is from Syria was sentenced to up to five years in a juvenile prison for plotting to support ISIS and rob a gun store to kill members of the American military.
-An immigrant from Syria, who later applied for and received U.S. citizenship, was accused by federal prosecutors of planning to “go to a military base in Texas and kill three or four American soldiers execution style.”
-A college student and Somali immigrant, who later applied for and received U.S. citizenship, attempted to blow up a Christmas tree lighting ceremony in Oregon. He is serving a 30 year prison sentence.

-An immigrant from Afghanistan, who later applied for and received U.S. citizenship, and a legal permanent resident from the Philippines, were convicted for “join Al Qaeda and the Taliban in order to kill Americans.”
-An Iraqi immigrant, who later applied for and received U.S. citizenship, was arrested for lying to federal agents about pledging allegiance to ISIS and his travels to Syria. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott referenced the case when announcing his state would fight against accepting Syrian refugees.
-Two immigrants from Pakistan, who later applied for and received U.S citizenship, were sentenced to decades-long prison sentences for plotting to detonate a bomb in New York City.

-An immigrant from Yemen, who later applied for and received U.S. citizenship, was arrested for trying to join ISIS. He was also charged with attempting to illegally buy firearms to try to shoot American military personnel. He is currently awaiting trial. He faces additional charges related to assaulting deputies while in custody.
-An immigrant brought here by his family from Kuwait at a young age, and who was later approved for U.S. citizenship, carried out the Islamist attack that recently killed 5 military personnel in Chattanooga. The gunman was killed by police. —

In case Chuck hasn’t finished his ‘public weeping’… (The weeping we DIDN’T see when Obama did the same thing)… maybe one of our good readers could pass this helpful information along so that Chuck can have a little context.
Remember, the Executive Order is pretty straightforward. You have to work really hard to misunderstand it.
Stop Visas from dangerous countries (‘dangerous’ as defined by that horrible Xenophobe, Barack Hussein Obama)… review and improve our screening process… resume normal visa relations with foreign countries.
Help set straight the media BS about ‘Muslim bans’… share this far and wide!

The Return of NUMBNUTS! Obama Attacks Travel Ban — His Comments Are RIDICULOUS

via: ClashDaily 

From a golf course somewhere, Barry keeps his word and is speaking out on President Tump’s Executive Order.
Well, that certainly didn’t take long.
With the Media (D) pushing the ‘Muslim ban’ narrative and George Soros funding the ‘protests’, Obama releases a statement.
President Obama is heartened by the level of engagement taking place in communities around the country,‘ according to a statement released by his post-presidential office.
Citizens exercising their Constitutional right to assemble, organize and have their voices heard by their elected officials is exactly what we expect to see when American values are at stake,’ Obama said…

…Obama, who has reserved the right to jump into the political fray when ‘core issues’ are at stake, invoked ‘comparisons to President Obama’s foreign policy decisions.’
‘With regard to comparisons to President Obama’s foreign policy decisions, as we’ve heard before, the president fundamentally disagrees with the notion of discriminating against individuals because of their faith or religion,’ according to the statement…

…Obama criticized any immigration policy that discriminates by religion in mid-November after Democrats lost the White House.
‘And so we have to, each of us, do our part. And the United States has to step up and do its part. And when I hear folks say that, well, maybe we should just admit the Christians but not the Muslims; when I hear political leaders suggesting that there would be a religious test for which a person who’s fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted, when some of those folks themselves come from families who benefitted from protection when they were fleeing political persecution – that’s shameful,’ he said.
‘That’s not American. That’s not who we are. We don’t have religious tests to our compassion.’
Read more: Daily Mail

No, BHO wouldn’t approve of religious tests!
But perhaps ideological ones…
(Take that Cuban Floridians that dared vote Republican! You should have loved your Communism!)
And fortunately, Barry, this isn’t a ‘religious test’.
This is about borders and security — two things that didn’t seem to matter for the past 8 years.
These were countries that the previous administration had identified as ‘countries of concern’.
If it’s ‘Muslim ban’, and that’s Islamophobic, then why did the previous administration list these countries as ones of ‘concern’? Isn’t that also Islamophobic?
What about when the Iraqi refugee ban was put in place, was that Islamophobic?
Or dropping tens of thousands of bombs on countries that are predominantly Muslim?

There was a guy who said something about ‘one President at a time’

Ah, but that was 8 years ago!
And now it doesn’t fit his purpose to ‘community organize’ the entire United States.
How does he expect to run a ‘shadow government’ if he’s not trying to undermine the sitting President.

ClashDaily readers were happy to not hear or see the Obamas.
Oh to return to those heady days of last week.
Because, Barry, your Presidency is
Share if you think that Obama shouldn’t be pushing the ‘religious test’ lie

Monday, January 30, 2017

Trump Sends Stern Warning to Socialist Run United Nations
By Lynn Jolly 

For decades, American presidents have been letting the United Nations walk all over the United States. Sadly, that even includes Republican presidents. In fact, it seems the United Nations has been walking over and somewhat controlling America ever since its inception on October 24, 1945. 

American forces fought in Korea in the early 1950s under UN control. American forces fought and lost in Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s, under UN control. As a matter fact, over 50,000 Americans were killed and many more wounded in Vietnam because of the United Nations controlling the war efforts.
Since the 1960s and 1970s, the United Nations has become more and more of a socialist organization with the sole purpose of establishing a one-world government with them in control. Every US action in Vietnam had to be approved by the UN Security Council on which sat 2 communist nations, 1 of which was aiding our enemies. How smart is it to send our men and women into battle when the enemy already knows everything you are going to do? We lost Vietnam before it ever got started, all because of the United Nations.

During the past eight years, the United Nations has exerted more influence and muscle in their efforts to gain control of America. They passed a number of resolutions that would have placed parts of American government, law and way of life under direct or indirect UN control. The ONLY thing that saved us was that there were enough Republicans in the US Senate to block ratification of these un-American resolutions.
Among those un-American resolutions is gun control, gun bans, and taking away more parental rights over their minor children. The United Nations pushed to legalize prostitution for girls as young as 12-years of age and give them rights that should belong to their parents. Some of the UN resolutions signed by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would have basically banned all handguns and most hunting, target and sport rifles and shotguns.

When Al Gore represented the United States at the first Earth Summit meeting in Rio de Janeiro, he whole heartedly agreed with all of the climate scares issues at the conference. He also signed all of the accords for the US that were presented at the summit including giving the UN complete ownership and jurisdiction of land in the US and the rest of the world. He also signed accords that would forcibly distribute much of America’s wealth and technology to third world countries. Fortunately, not enough other nations signed on to those particular accords and they were never ratified and put into place.

The United Nations is America’s Number One Enemy and needs to be expelled from US soil and treated as an enemy. Think about it! The current UN Secretary General is Antonio Guterres, former leader of the Socialist Party in Portugal and former President of Socialist International.
One of the main governing bodies in the United Nations is the Security Council. It is made up of 5 permanent and 10 non-permanent members. Among the five permanent members are China and the Russian Federation, both communist and enemies of the United States. Other than the US, the other two permanent members are France and the United Kingdom. Currently, the President of France is François Hollande, a member of France’s Socialist Party. That basically gives the communists and socialists a 3-2 advantage over the US.

The ten non-permanent member nations of the UN Security Council are:
  • Bolivia (President Morales) – Movement of Socialism
  • Egypt (President el-Sisi) – Independent Party, Muslim
  • Ethiopia (President Teshome) – Ethiopian People’s Democratic Organization (socialist)
  • Italy (President Mattarella) – Changed Party 5 times, currently listed as Independent but most of career as socialist)
  • Japan (Prime Minister Abe) – appointed by Emperor Akihito (hereditary monarch)
  • Kazakhstan (President Nazarbayev) – Communist Party
  • Senegal (President Sall) – Alliance for the Republic (former socialist)
  • Sweden (Prime Minister Löfven) – Social Democrats (socialist)
  • Ukraine (President Poroshenko) – Petro-Poroshenko Bloc (socialist)
  • Uruguay (President Vázquez) – Socialist Party 
Eight of the ten non-permanent nations on the UN Security Council are run by a socialist, 1 run by a Muslim and the other is Japan run by a monarchy. Combined with the 5 permanent members, that places 11 socialist/communist to 2 free, 1 Muslim and historic monarchy in control of many of the military decisions made by the United Nations. If you break it down to allies versus hostile nations to the US, it is 12-2 against us.
Perhaps that’s why President Donald Trump sent newly appointed American Ambassador to the United Nations Mikki Haley (former GOP Governor of South Carolina) with a stern warning message to the entire UN assembly. Haley told the assembly:

“You’re going to see a change in the way we do business. Our goal with the administration is to show value at the U.N., and the way we’ll show value is to show our strength, show our voice, have the backs of our allies and make sure our allies have our back as well.”
“For those who don’t have our back, we’re taking names; we will make points to respond to that accordingly.”
As much as I like Nikki Haley, I would love to see President Trump kick the UN out of the US and withdraw our membership from the one-world socialist organization. It would save America hundreds of millions of dollars each year and would also save the lives of many US military personnel. It would also be a huge step in preventing the UN from gaining any more control of the United States and the American people.