Saturday, March 31, 2012

A Conservative’s Call For Palin To Run As A Third Party Candidate

After listening to a recent Rush Limbaugh segment where he reads a letter from a conservative friend who is in despair at a Romney Republican ticket, it got me thinking about the dilemma we are in.
We have been told from the beginning by both the mainstream media and Republican establishment that Romney is the “inevitable” candidate—most recently by George H. W. Bush, telling us that we should “know when to fold ‘em.”

As Rush Limbaugh’s friend states, it looks like it is inevitable that conservatives will have to back the Republican establishment that have sat on the sidelines while those of us conservatives—Tea Partiers—have been fighting in the trenches. And it looks like it is inevitable that we will have to back Romney, a candidate who laid the foundation for Obamacare. A guy who doesn’t believe what we believe. A guy who will probably shake the conservative “Etch-a-Sketch” mask if he wins.
Yes, I said if We have a President who is a radical, who runs roughshod over Congress. If the Supreme Court strikes down Obamacare, then what is to stop him from running roughshod over their ruling? He has stabbed Israel in the back several times. He is gutting our military. He routinely apologizes to and coddles our enemies.

So, the theory is that in order to stop Obama, we have to back Romney. But as Newt Gingrich has stated, and many others also, a moderate in the form of Bob Dole lost. A moderate in the form of John McCain lost. Will it be different with Romney? I don’t think so.
I have been behind Newt Gingrich from almost the beginning. Newt’s campaign has been “dead” several times per the mainstream media and Republican establishment. Newt was the first and only candidate to come out swinging against Obama’s war on religion with the HHS mandate. He was the first and only candidate to excoriate Obama’s apology to Karzai after the Koran burnings. He was the only candidate to have kept Obama on the ropes with his phony energy policy. In response to Gingrich’s “Drill Here, Drill Now/$2.50 gas” campaign (his attack of Obama’s “anti-Energy” Secretary Steven Chu and deceptive and misleading energy statistics,) Obama gave no less than six “energy” speeches.As we remember, his first and most ludicrous one was where he cited algae as the savior of high energy prices.
While Santorum was talking about the evils of contraception and Romney was talking about how much he liked lakes and trees and cars, Newt Gingrich was coming up with bold solutions.
You may now think that I’m am calling for a third party—a Tea Party ticket—in the form of Newt Gingrich.
I think he should be a part of that ticket, perhaps as Energy Secretary, or even as Vice President.
Newt is the greatest ideas guy. The greatest solutions guy. The greatest get-things-done guy. But for whatever reason, even though he has a huge support base, a large segment of the population will not back him on his own. As to why this is, I don’t know. While Santorum and Romney are playing in the sand box with their Etch-a-Sketches, Gingrich is burning rubber around the country, grinding on Obama’s nerves. Of course, the MSM routinely ignores him, which doesn’t help.

But, after listening to Rush Limbaugh’s monologue, I came to the conclusion that a Newt Gingrich ticket is not going to happen. But I also came to the conclusion that a Romney ticket will hand Obama another term—which is not merely another term but a transformation of this country that will look mild compared to what he has already done. If Obama gets another term, there will be no United States. I’m sure of it, and many other in the Tea Party movement are sure of it also.
Now we have also been told that a third party will hand Obama the election on a silver platter by splitting the vote. This theory’s basis is in the form of what happened with Ross Perot. But Ross Perot with his idiotic charts and rambling speeches was more of an aberration than a candidate.
Before I supported Gingrich, I was behind Sarah Palin. When she announced she would not run for President, like many other Palin supporters, I felt like the wind was knocked out of me. I was literally in tears, and I’m sure I was not alone. America had gathered under the shadow of Mama Grizzly, protecting us from the unjust charges of racism and extremism.
When Sarah Palin announced she was not running for President, Mama Grizzly left us. However, she was not far away, still watching over us, protecting us. We were like a cub foraging on its own for the first time, making it independent and strong.
But it is time for us to return to Mama Grizzly. Not as a cub, but as a member of the pack, co-equal, and supporting her as the leader of this pack—of this army—to save America. To get us working again. To support our soldiers and allies again.
Mama Grizzly, I want you to run on a third party—a Tea Party ticket. Fight for us once again, Mama Grizzly, not as a mother over her cub, but as members of your pack.

OORAH Katy Perry!! Libs Urge Boycott Over Video

by: Craig Andersen
There was a time, Korea…WWII…When celebrities loved this country. During those wars and in times of peace, Hollywood and the music industry stood with our troops and were seen waving our flag. It’s not that way now.
Oh sure, some still do but they are few and far between. Country music is pretty darn good at it and a small handful of Hollywood types but, that’s about it.
The ones who make the most noise these days are the Michael Moore and Sean Penn types. They embrace the entitlement society and promote socialism. They run about palling it up with dictators who regard our nation as their enemy and they run to foreign shores to spew their anti-American venom.
They tell us they will leave our country forever if conservatives get elected but, lacking the courage of their convictions, the cowards never follow through.
That’s why people, stars, like Gary Sinise and movies like “Act of Valor” are such a breath of fresh air. Today, Sinise is the exception, not the rule.
It’s also why, when someone you wouldn’t expect to do so, steps up, it’s noteworthy.
Katy Perry has stepped up.

Perry’s music is danceable, fun and let’s face it, she’s easy on the eyes.
I don’t know her politics and to a great extent, that’s also unusual these days. No matter on which side of the aisle she stands, she has stepped up with a new video for her song, “Part of Me.”
Many on the left, the liberal/socialist crowd, is now urging a boycott of Katy Perry because of her latest offering.
Screw em.
Remember Naomi Wolf? She wrote “The Beauty Myth.” She was also a proud arrestee at the Occupy movement. Wolf is one of those entitlement whiners who would rather sit in a park and demand that she be awarded what others have worked for and thinks the government should take care of her every want and need.
In Katy Perry’s video, she takes on the role of a young woman done wrong by her boyfriend and, tired of being taken advantage of, joins the United States Marines.

Army Ranger seeking vindication for killing terrorist

by: Bob Unruh
In a surprising move, the Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces has put a high-profile case of a soldier convicted of killing a terrorist in Iraq on a fast track, with oral arguments scheduled next month.
Army Ranger 1st Lt. Michael Behenna, 28, whose conviction was affirmed by an intermediate court, is serving a 15-year prison term in Ft. Leavenworth. Oral arguments before the appeals court in Washington, D.C., which are open to the public, will be heard April 23. 
The lower court ruling determined that evidence from a prosecution witness that supported Behenna’s defense could be concealed by prosecutors during the course of the trial.
The soldier’s advocates, including his parents, have assembled a support structure for him centering on the Defend Michael website. They say they continue to hold hope that the CAAF will change the outcome after the first two rounds were lost in “a corrupt and outdated military justice system that refused to guarantee one of the most basic rights that Michael and his men fought for – the right to a fair trial.”
Behenna’s legal team filed its brief with the CAAF on Feb. 28.
“We were expecting that it would be some time before oral arguments were set. To our great amazement (and the military’s great frustration) the CAAF has expedited the hearing of oral arguments,” the website said.
“This we hope is the beginning of the end of the injustice which Michael has suffered at the hands of the military justice system – an injustice that as of last week has already imprisoned him at Ft. Leavenworth for three years running.”
An intermediate military appeals court had ruled that evidence that could have changed the outcome the trial can remain unaddressed.
WND has reported on the case for several years. The dispute focuses on the fact that a prosecution witness was prepared to testify that Behenna’s description of the circumstances surrounding the death of Ali Mansur on March 20, 2009, was supported by evidence.
Prosecutors refused to allow him to testify, then refused to tell the defense counsel about the likely exculpatory evidence. Defense attorneys did not find out about it until after the conviction.
Behenna, the son of Oklahomans Scott and Vicki Behenna, was put on trial for Mansur’s death. Mansur had been questioned about an attack that killed members of Behenna’s platoon. Behenna testified he was further questioning Mansur when Mansur lunged for his weapon, and he fired twice, killing the terrorist.
The prosecution argued that Behenna simply executed Mansur while he was seated on a rock. Prosecutors later argued it didn’t matter how the shooting happened, because Behenna didn’t have a right to defend himself from the terrorist.That left his parents unable to be silent.
read more:

Friday, March 30, 2012

Video: Is Barack Obama A Soviet Spy?

This movie trailer tells the story of a secret plan, “Operation Open Mic”. Let’s hope this plan never makes it past November. I am so tired of diatribing and sounding the alarm to def ears...Those who just carry on as if nothing is wrong...hello~ wake the hell up people...Obama is a member of the CPUSA he knows exactly what the hell he is doing...y'all haven't a clue because you have been programmed and are brainwashed with pc nonsense...that is  his plan to keep you in the dark and scared to death to challenge his evil  plan  for fear of being called a racist!

Mideast officials: Obama in secret talks with Iran

by: AAron Klein
JERUSALEM – President Obama has been engaged in secret, back-channel talks with Iran in which he informed Tehran’s leaders he is completely opposed to any Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, according to informed Middle Eastern officials.
The officials told WND the behind-the-scenes talks aim to secure a guarantee from Iran that it will not retaliate against the U.S. in the event of any Israeli military strike, the officials said. 
It was unclear what, if anything, Obama offered Iran in exchange for a pledge against targeting U.S. installations, including in the Gulf.
The State Department did not immediately return a WND request seeking comment on the alleged back-door talks.
In a wide-ranging interview March 9 with Al-Monitor, an Arab website founded in the wake of the Middle East revolutions, former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel hinted that private approaches to Iran were already occurring.
Hagel is co-chairman of Obama’s Intelligence Advisory Board. While he was in the Senate he served on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Al-Monitor’s Washington correspondent, Barbara Slavin, interviewed Hagel at Georgetown University, where he teaches a weekly class.
Slavin asked Hagel: “Do you know if there any private approaches going on, or is it all through the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany?
Read about more complications for Washington, as China, Iran forming “strategic” ties. 
Hagel replied, “I know more than I can tell you; there may be. I hope. I don’t see any other way around this. Because you can’t deal with something … as explosive as this is out in the public.”
According to the Middle East officials speaking to WND, political officials at the Pentagon, coordinating with the White House, have repeatedly asked Israel not to strike Iran.
According to the officials, who are familiar with the talks, the Pentagon has made the following arguments to Israel about why a strike at this time is unnecessary:
  • An Israeli strike will not be able to totally destroy Iran’s nuclear project, which is spread out to multiple sites, thus making a successful attack more difficult.
  • Iran can rebuild its nuclear infrastructure in a matter of a few years.
  • Iran’s nuclear project is currently based on uranium and not the more weaponizable plutonium, giving Israel more time to allow sanctions to work.

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Stand with Israel Now...!


Reports today leaked by officials in the Obama Administration indicate the President’s strong aversion to an Israeli attack on Iran.  These actions by the White House gives Iran valuable intelligence on Israeli planning, while simultaneously damaging relations between Israel and its few allies in the region.  These events obviously send a strong message to Israel and its leadership that this President does NOT have Israel’s back when it comes to a military option.
The report is based on information from multiple anonymous U.S. officials saying Iran’s neighbor Azerbaijan has granted Israel access to its airbases in case of an attack on Iran.  Azerbaijan officials have of course denied this, not wanting to start any conflict with Iran, its neighbor.

According to Wednesday's report, senior U.S. officials claim that the Israel Air Force would be given access to land in Azerbaijan in the event of an Iran strike. "The Israelis have bought an airfield," a senior U.S. administration official told Foreign Policy magazine's Mark Perry, "and the airfield is called Azerbaijan."

Azerbaijan's defense ministry denied the claims, according to an AFP report.

"This information is absurd and groundless," the AFP reported a defense ministry spokesman, Teymur Abdullayev, as saying, while citing a senior official at Azerbaijan's presidential administration as saying that the allegations were "aimed at damaging relations between Azerbaijan and Iran."
ABC News

If President Obama believed that Israel should act in its own security interests and he truly agreed that all options are on the table, why would the same anonymous source say this:

"We're watching what Iran does closely," one of the U.S. sources, an intelligence officer engaged in assessing the ramifications of a prospective Israeli attack confirmed. "But we're now watching what Israel is doing in Azerbaijan. And we're not happy about it."
Foreign Policy Magazine

The Obama administration is not happy that Israel is working with its allies in the region to strengthen its security ties?

Not happy that Israel is possibly positioning itself better for a military option that the President himself says is on the table?

Why would the administration openly leak secrets to harm not only Israel, but Azerbaijan, except because they desperately want to avoid any military scenario?

Why would the administration show its hand to the Iranians, who now must know the hesitancy the President has for any military option?

Sign the Petition Now, We Stand With Israel, in opposition to a nuclear-armed Iran and for America's national security.

Former Ambassador John Bolton echoed this view to Fox News today:

Former U.S. diplomat John Bolton alleged Thursday that the Obama administration leaked a story about covert Israeli activity in order to foil potential plans by the country to attack Iran's nuclear program…"Clearly, this is an administration-orchestrated leak," Bolton told "This is not a rogue CIA guy saying I think I'll leak this out."

"It's just unprecedented to reveal this kind of information about one of your own allies."


Negotiations will start next month with Iran over its nuclear program, but Iran must be feeling better by the day knowing that this administration will do all it can, including leaks in the media, to pressure Israel not to attack.  We must Stand With Israel now more than ever. 

Newsweek/Daily Beast staffers laugh&joke about letting Cheney Die..!


Yesterday we reported about the unfairness and hatred towards Dick Cheney that has been spewing from the far-left just days after his heart transplant surgery.

The leftists have hated Vice President Cheney for years, but even now, years after he has left office, they continue to attack him, even as he lies in a hospital bed, recovering

Newsweek write Kent Sepkowitz cynically asked if Cheney jumped the line in front of a "...bunch of other worthies, people who aren’t viewed by some as war criminals and evildoers..."

In a shameful roundtable discussion, other Newsweek 'journalists' further attacked Cheney. One said, "I would never give my heart to Dick would freeze over"  Click here to see the shameful display for yourself.
Another female commentator, Allison Yarrow, said "I would never do it, I would say give me my heart back." she went on to say of Cheney, "He may be one of the most evil people in the world."

We hope our GET WELL SOON CARD will remind Mr. Cheney that despite the hate coming from those on the left, most Americans actually support him, wish him health, and are praying for his speedy recovery. Please sign it!

Our "GET WELL" card reads "We thank you for your years of service and support for our troops, and we will all keep you in our hearts and prayers for regaining your health and happiness."


Don't forget about our troops in Afghanistan! We have only 11 days until Easter, so let's make sure we wish our troops a happy holiday and show them how much we care by sponsoring some care packages from home.

Also, don't forget about our Jewish troops. Passover begins April 6, so those troops too, will be happy to receive a care package for this important Jewish holiday!

Full of goodies and helpful items, these packages also come with a special personalized greeting written by YOU! 

Obama mandate appears doomed..!

On Wednesday the Supreme Court concluded oral arguments on the constitutionality of ObamaCare, and if you’ve been following the case, you know how close we are to victory.
CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin calls the case "a train wreck for the Obama Administration" and noted that ObamaCare "is now in serious trouble, it also seems that the individual mandate is doomed."
FreedomWorks members like you have been critical in our efforts to End ObamaCare Now, both through signing our petition and donating to support our Constitution Defense Fund. We’ve received over 200,000 signatures on our petition to End ObamaCare Now, which we’ve delivered to the Supreme Court, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid.  
And clearly your constant grassroots pressure is working.
Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, the critical swing vote on the Court that will likely decide the case, was openly skeptical of ObamaCare during oral arguments:
“The government is saying that the federal government has a duty to tell the individual citizen that it must act," he said, "and that is different from what we have in previous cases, and that changes the relationship of the federal government to the individual in the very fundamental way."
Justice Kennedy also cautioned that the government has a “very high burden of justification” for ObamaCare, an indication that Justice Kennedy will likely oppose the individual mandate.
An official ruling is not expected until the end of June, but if Kennedy does join the conservative bloc represented by Chief Justice John Roberts, and Associate Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Scalia, and Clarence Thomas…we will have a historic 5-4 decision to End ObamaCare Now!
Thanks to you, we are on the verge of defeating ObamaCare and undoing the cornerstone of the Obama presidency. This is huge. And we couldn’t do it without you.
Thanks again.
In Liberty,
Matt Kibbe Signature
Matt Kibbe
President & CEO, FreedomWorks
P.S. - If you haven’t signed our End ObamaCare Now petition yet, you can sign here. And if you want to support the critical work o

What? Come on, you say — That's impossible in America. We outlawed despicable "Jim Crow" laws decades ago.

Dear Fellow Conservative:

Imagine going to the polling place on Tuesday, November 6, 2012... only to find club-wielding thugs making thinly veiled threats concerning your voting intention
What? Come on, you say — That's impossible in America. We outlawed despicable "Jim Crow" laws decades ago.

Sorry. Voter intimidation is back. And when it happened in 2008, Eric Holder, Barack Obama's Attorney General, the top law enforcement official in the land, decided this time it was NOT against any law. 
Today, the notion that a US administration would use racial intimidation to terrorize their opposition's supporters is simply unthinkable.

But to Eric Holder, Barack Obama, and the partisan ideologues working at the DOJ, racial bullying of white voters is entirely justified. In other words, it's payback.
Immediately after taking office, Obama launched a hiring blitz of 130 new lawyers. Requests for copies of their resumes were stonewalled. Only after a lawsuit did the truth come out about these hires. The Voting Section of DOJ is now under the control of radical lawyers hand-picked by Obama and Holder.

More frighteningly, these lawyers' main career experience is in subverting voting laws — and they are the officials who will be standing watch over America's voting system during the 2012 presidential election.

But who would want to take America back to the dark days of scare tactics and voter disenfranchisement because of race?

Maybe a failing President unable to win re-election on the strength of his record and who will, in desperation, play the race card.
Or maybe an Attorney General who is so embittered that he openly declares, "I am not the tall U.S. attorney. I am not the thin United States Attorney. I am the black United States Attorney."

Feds refuse to release Obama draft docs to Sheriff Joe

by: Jerome R.Corsi
The Selective Service System has declined Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s request to see the original copy of Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration form.
Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigating Obama’s eligibility announced at a March 1 press conference that it believes there is probable cause that the registration is fraudulent.
A three-sentence March 22 letter written on behalf of Selective Service Director Lawrence G. Romo, however, dismissed the request.
“This Agency has no evidence that President Obama’s 1980 registration is not authentic,” wrote Richard S. Flahavan, associate director of public & intergovernmental affairs
Apparently refusing to take seriously Arpaio’s investigation, Flahavan referred the sheriff to the FBI.
“However, if you have any credible evidence to the contrary and believe that a Federal crime has been committed, we suggest that it be turned over immediately to the Federal Bureau of Investigation to pursue,” Flahavan said.
In response, Arpaio yesterday sent a second letter to Romo, requesting clarification.
“If your office has the original, authentic Selective Service registration form for Barack Obama from July 29, 1980, please indicate whether or not you are in possession of this document,” Arpaio wrote.
“If the document is in your possession, please make it available for inspection by my Sheriff’s Office investigators. We will travel to your facility to analyze it.”
Apraio gave Romo 10 days to respond.
read More:

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Lord Monckton: Sheriff Joe, posse 'right to be worried'

After a visit to Phoenix to get a first-hand look at evidence collected by Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his investigative team, former Margaret Thatcher policy adviser Lord Christopher Monckton says he is convinced that the document presented by the White House as Barack Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent.
Monckton, known internationally for his climate-change skepticism, told WND he didn’t pay much attention to the controversy surrounding Obama’s birth certificate until he watched Arpaio and his team present their preliminary findings at a March 1 news conference. The sheriff’s Cold Case Posse has concluded there is probable cause that Obama’s birth document and his Selective Service registration are forgeries.
Monckton’s interest in Arpaio’s investigation came out in an interview last week on Dennis Miller’s nationally syndicated radio show.
Take advantage of a fantastic deal! Purchase the hardcover of “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” and get the updated e-book version of “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?” absolutely free – at the WND Superstore!
At the invitation of a mutual friend with Arpaio, Monckton came to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office on Monday to examine the evidence gathered by the team of retired law-enforcement investigators.
“My assessment is that they are right to be worried,” Monckton said in a video interview at the end of the day with WND’s Jerome Corsi. “That document is not genuine.”
The Obama birth certificate case appealed to Monckton’s instincts as a fraud detector. In his role as a policy adviser to Thatcher in the 1980s, Monckton reviewed fraud cases and developed single-page briefs with an action plan for the British prime minister.
Monckton, who has a BA and an MA from Cambridge University, is a former newspaper editor. He was a member of Thatcher’s Conservative Party but now serves as the head of the policy unit for the U.K. Independence Party.
Arpaio’s chief investigator on the eligibility case, Mike Zullo, said he thought that he and the sheriff “proved our point” to Monckton during the visit Monday.
“We went deeper today with Lord Monckton than we did in the press conference, and for him to come away comfortable with our findings, and validating our findings, is a validation for the sheriff,” he said.
Zullo affirmed that the sheriff’s office will continue to make its resources available to Monckton.
“One of the concerns of the sheriff is the media blackout that is surrounding him and this investigation, and we’re hoping that through this visit, that might change,” Zullo said.
Monckton said that he has researched some of the arguments made by people who insist that the document posted online by the White House April 27, 2011, is a valid birth certificate.
“It’s really very clear that they are unable to account for the manner in which the document, now purported to be a birth certificate, on the White House government website, has been fabricated,” he said. “They can’t replicate that fabrication by any natural or normal means.”
Monckton said it appears that the document was cobbled together in layers, pointing to evidence that three date stamps and a registrar’s stamp were superimposed on it from another document.
Why go to all that trouble, he reasoned, “if there was an original document in some form that could simply be scanned and copied as a single entity?”
“Clearly, the suspicion must be aroused as to whether or not any such document in reality exists on the file in Hawaii,” he said.
If there is no such document, he concluded, “then the implications for those who have perpetrated what appears, at least on the face of it, to be a serious fraud, are very grave, indeed.”
WND has compiled a list of the many other high-profile personalities and leaders who have raised questions about Obama’s eligibility.
Read the preliminary findings of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation after six months investigating Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president in “A Question of Eligibility,” co-authored by Jerome Corsi and Mike Zullo.

State lawmakers revive eligibility requirement

by: Jerome R.Corsi
PHOENIX – Arizona, at the forefront of last year’s effort among state legislatures to require eligibility documentation for candidates seeking office, is returning to the controversy with a proposal by Rep. Carl Seel, R-Phoenix, requiring candidates to sign an affidavit affirming they meet the legal requirements.
The plan was promoted in a news conference yesterday attended by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose Cold Case Posse earlier this month detailed how the evidence regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility documentation indicates both forgery and fraud.
In addition to requiring a signed affidavit from candidates, Seel’s proposal would authorize any citizen with legitimate concerns over a candidate’s eligibility the legal standing to challenge it in court.
The Arizona proposal is similar to a Georgia provision that requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
This year, several individuals challenged Obama’s candidacy in Georgia, introducing evidence during a two-hour hearing before an administrative law judge. However, Judge Michael Malihi threw out the evidence and ruled in favor of Obama, who, along with his attorney, snubbed the state system and refused to show up for the hearing.
That ruling now is pending before the state Supreme Court, which has yet to hear arguments in the case.
The new plan in Arizona, where Gov. Jan Brewer last year vetoed a bill to require eligibility documentation, would impose a penalty for perjury on those who sign a qualification statement but were found later to be ineligible.
The bill, HB2480, has passed the Senate Government Reform Committee.
read more:

U.S. military purging 'birthers'?

by: Jack Minor
Dr. Terry Lakin, an officer who was drummed out of the Army for questioning Obama’s eligibility, says that a veteran Marine facing discharge after he posted a comment on Facebook contending the president’s birth certificate is fake shows the need for the military and Congress to resolve the issue.
As WND reported, Marine Sgt. Gary Stein is under investigation and facing possible discharge over a Facebook page he created for military members to speak out called Armed Forces Tea Party, in which he, too, questioned Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president under the U.S. Constitution.
Lakin said there are many soldiers in the military like Stein who have questions about Obama, but they are often afraid to speak out.
“While I was in the Army there were a lot of people in the Pentagon who were concerned about this issue,” Lakin said, “but they were concerned about their career and paycheck.”
Stein is under investigation for online remarks made as an officer, but contends his page makes it plain the page is not affiliated with the U.S. military, saying, “We do not represent, and are in no way affiliated with the military, or the United States Armed Forces.”
Further, Stein says, “There is no picture of me in uniform anywhere on Facebook; there is no way anyone can say I am presenting myself as a representative of the Marine Corps.” 
Since its inception in 2010, the page has been critical of Obama and his policies. Stein said he had been warned about by superiors to be careful with what he said, but after he posted a comment about the president’s birth certificate possibly being a forgery, the Marine Corps suddenly became more interested in his postings.
Stein said he was told by officials that he was being investigated for making a “disloyal comment about the president” through his personal Facebook profile during a discussion on “NATO allowing the trial of U.S. troops for burning the Koran” on a Facebook group.
“I was responding to a hypothetical question,” Stein explained, “and I said I would not obey any illegal orders.”
A Marine Corps spokesman, however, gave WND a different reason for the investigation.
According to Maj. Mike Armistead the public affairs officer at MCRD San Diego, on March 8 the Marine Corps began a preliminary inquiry after receiving allegations that Stein had “posted political statements about the president of the United States on his Facebook web page titled ‘Armed Forces Tea Party.’” No mention was made about Stein’s post on a Facebook group.
Armistead said after reviewing the findings of the preliminary inquiry, the commander decided to address the allegations through an administrative action and that the base commander has recommended Stein be discharged.
While Armistead would not say which comments the Corps had a problem with, on March 4 – five days before the investigation began – Stein posted a link to a YouTube video about the investigation by Maricopa County Sheriff County Joe Arpaio with a statement, “Just in case you forgot … I’m sticking to my guns and saying that president, so-called President Obama’s brith [sic] certificate is a fake.”
“I think there is enough evidence that some federal agency should investigate whether the document is a fake or not,” Stein told WND. “However the real issue is, do we in the military have the right to express our opinion off-duty?”
NOTE: In case you missed the news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse,” you can view it here.
“Joe Arpaio has finally addressed this issue properly, and look at his findings. It is very apparent there is a legitimate question out there about Obama’s eligibility,” Lakin added. “I’m still waiting for our generals, admirals, congressional leaders and judges to do the right thing and address this issue properly. Arpaio has finally done this, and look what is happening: The media and officials are attempting to hide what he has found.”
Lakin was court martialed, served prison time and given a dishonorable discharge after he refused orders to deploy to Afghanistan until concerns he had about Obama’s eligibility were resolved. Prior to his refusal to obey orders, Lakin had attempted for almost two years to get his questions answered through the chain of command but was rebuffed at every turn.
He said the issues that caused him to disobey orders are still there and until they are resolved there will continue to be situations like this.
“Until the generals and admirals decide to deal with this, there are going to continue to be problems with soldiers such as Stein who have questions about the president’s birth certificate,” he said.
Stein says he intends to fight the decision to discharge him from the Marine Corps, insisting he has a right to discuss and express his opinion about the president’s policies.
The military, however, has discharged other soldiers who also questioned Obama’s eligibility.
Last year Air Force Staff Sergeant Daryn Moran was given an honorable discharge following statements he made about the president’s eligibility.
Moran told his superiors he would not obey orders until Obama proved his eligibility. Rather than attempt to resolve the issue, the Air Force quickly discharged him.
Read the preliminary results of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation.

We really need to rethink who we send to Washington...!

We keep sending career politicians...Attorneys...and Elite College graduates to represent us and lead our country...we really need to start sending those who are most like the rest of us ~Graduates of the College of Hard Knocks so to speak...those who work hard... raise families..adhere to the Constitution...praise God in all we a neighbor when in need and expect nothing in return...volunteer for military service when the need arises and puts that above personal gain! Someone who knows what the hell they are doing and says what they mean and means what they say... Those who can write a bill in simple terms so all understand... and keep it short and to the point, not writing 80,000 pages of gobbly gook to confuse everyone while hiding hidden agendas deep within!...Where are all the Jim Bridger's when we need them?

Hall of Shame...'Chicken hawks...!

Hold your horses y'all I have to be fair and balanced...and not single out one party over the other...If they care to they can clarify their stance if they feel they were unfairly listed by posting a response on this blog...!
Video Of politicians, bureaucrats and political pundits that "talk" about patriotism and support strong military action, but when they were of age to fight in Vietnam, they did everything possible to avoid the war. I do believe POTUS Obama would fall into this category for later most of his cabinet also!

Eligibility invades U.S. town-hall meetings

by: Bob Unruh
Heading into the 2012 election, members of Congress probably should expect to be grilled in their various town-hall meetings on the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president.
That circumstance has followed the announcement from Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona that there is probable cause there was forgery in the creation of Obama’s birth certificate released by the White House last year, and fraud in its presentation as a real document.  His Cold Case Posse’s investigation into Obama’s eligibility for the Arizona presidential ballot continues.
Among the latest members to be challenged on the issue was U.S. Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Calif., who was confronted by questions from a computer document expert who has examined Obama’s purported birth certificate.
The report comes from Mara Zebest, an author and editor of dozens of books on computer software, who has concluded that Obama’s document is a fraud.
Earlier, an email from Lungren’s office staff seemed to concede that there are questions about Obama’s eligibility, but the congressman said he doesn’t have those concerns. He held to that line during the questions from Zebest.
Zebest, in a report on a website questioning Obama’s eligibility, said she confronted Lungren at two recent town hall meetings, in Citrus Heights on March 13 and Rancho Cordova on March 15.
In the meetings, questions were submitted and then the congressman determined which to answer. 
“With the current rules … Lungren listens to all the comments … takes notes … everyone takes turns at the mic … and after everyone speaks … after Lungren has had time to think about what he wants to say in response … he then gives his response and there’s NO reactions allowed at this point,” Zebest said.
She said that at the first meeting she referenced the Arpaio investigation and its evidence that Obama’s Selective Service card may be fraudulent.
She asked, “When will there be a congressional investigation?”
Zebest paraphrased the congressman’s response: “On the eligibility issue … I believe the president was born in Hawaii. I had a private conversation with the governor of Hawaii in which she told me that she saw his birth certificate. And keep in mind this is a Republican governor … so I believe what she told me.”
Since the format didn’t allow a follow up, Zebest went to the next meeting, where she told Lungren, “Your response was to tell me that you talked with a governor who said she saw the document. I have several problems with that response. First, that was the previous governor, and according to Hawaiian law, it is illegal for the governor to see the document, so why would she be allowed to see it?
“The current governor said he would put the issue to rest and later confessed he could not find any document on file. But assuming Gov. Lingle at her word … that she saw the document …. is Gov. Lingle a document forensic expert? Because Arpaio is an official law enforcement agency and has had forensic experts examine the documents presented by the White House and there is no doubt for the [Cold Case] Posse investigators that the documents put forth by Obama are forgeries.”
Zebest said everyone in the room “applauded my little speech.”
“I got more applause than I did the previous town hall night and even received high fives from audience members while returning to my seat. Another person jumped up to get into line after I sat down (he later told me that when he heard me speak on the topic … I gave him courage to do the same),” she said.
“When it came time for Lungren to respond … the good news is he dropped the excuse of the ‘Hawaiian governor said so’ – LOL. He didn’t dare go there again. The bad news was his response was [paraphrasing] ‘Look… I don’t think the eligibility issue is important. Take it to court if you feel so strongly about it … and elections have consequences,’” she reported.
Zebest promised she has “no intention” of letting the topic die.
 read more:

So where is the DOJ, DHS on the Terrorists Group New Black Panthers Illegal Bounty for Zimmerman?

First, this is illegal.
“SANFORD — Members of the New Black Panther Party are offering a $10,000 reward for the “capture” of George Zimmerman, the Neighborhood Watch volunteer who shot Trayvon Martin.
New Black Panther leader Mikhail Muhammad announced the reward during a protest in Sanford Saturday. And when asked whether he was inciting violence, Muhammad replied defiantly: “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”
The bounty announcement came moments after members of the group called for the mobilization of 10,000 black men to capture Zimmerman, who shot Trayvon in a gated Sanford community on Feb. 26.
Muhammad said members of his group would search for Zimmerman themselves in Maitland — where the 28-year old worked before the shooting, employees there told the Orlando Sentinel. He declined to say when the group would begin their search.
Muhammad said the group’s national chairman, Dr. Malik Zulu Shabaz of Washington, D.C. is receiving donations from black entertainers and athletes. They hope to collect $1 million by next week, Muhammad said.
The party said they would not release the names of donors nor would they provide documentation to support the existence of donations.”
Won’t have to. Should they find and capture Zimmerman it will considered kidnapping and all “donors” considered co-conspirators. I texted a friend with the FDLE (Florida Department of Law Enforcement) and spoke with a special agent who told me that they will so consider any move to capture Zimmerman a crime and will protect Zimmerman from such capture if necessary. He hinted that Zimmerman may be placed in protective custody or relocated pending the results of the investigation.
read more:

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Russian media expose 'forged birth certificate'

by: Chelsea Schilling
While many U.S. mainstream media outlets spike news about the Obama eligibility investigation, Russia’s government radio is keeping the world abreast of the scandal that has caused “the biggest censorship and blackout in the history of journalism.”
The Voice of Russia – successor of Radio Moscow, the official station of the Soviet Union – published an exclusive interview with Sheriff Joe Arpaio March 26 titled, “Obama’s birth certificate may be forgery.” As WND reported, Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse announced there is probable cause indicating the documents released by the White House last April purported to be Obama’s original, long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration card are actually forgeries.
“Wherever I go, people commend me for doing this,” Arpaio told The Voice of Russia. “So, naturally this has been probably the biggest censorship and blackout in the history of journalism when no one from the national level will cover the story.”
He continued, “You know, when I do something, whether it is [inaudible] pink underwear or chain gangs, what I feed to inmates, that goes national. I’ve been on 4,000 international profiles, international and national, and yet this has been has been blacked out when I’m investigating this situation.”
Help Sheriff Joe blow the lid off Obama’s fraud. Join the Cold Case Posse right now!
Arpaio’s investigation into Obama’s constitutional eligibility was rated last week by Internet ranking service as one of the most-read news stories in the entire world – due almost entirely to coverage by WND and the Drudge Report – not only the establishment press, but most of the “conservative” media as well, looked the other way.
WND recently reported Russian news website Pravda published an accusation that the American media is “tame,” afraid to publish news and is “deliberately hiding the evidence published on the internet about [President Obama's] defrauding of the American public and the deliberate evisceration of the Constitution of the United States.”
However, in the recent The Voice of Russia interview, the Russian host argued that the Obama eligibility issue has been covered by “hundreds” of U.S. news outlets for years – after both Donald Trump and Arpaio brought up the question.
“Well, I wish you would tell me who they are. I’m sure it’s not national. CBS, ABC, cable?” Arpaio asked. “Just show me who has been covering it. They haven’t been covering. I’m not going to get into inside sources that say that they don’t want to cover it, that’s another issue when we are talking about the media. But where is all the news? You are calling me, you are dealing with Russia, so I have to talk to Russia to get this story out.”
See the latest demand to a member of Congress for an investigation of Obama
Arpaio explained that he is on cable news outlets regularly to talk about other issues, but producers are not calling him to ask questions about the Cold Case Posse investigation.

 Listen to Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s interview with The Voice of Russia here.  

read more:

Justice Scalia to Obamas Solicitor General: 'We're not Stupid'

by: Nicholas Ballasy
While Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, Jr. made the Obama administration’s case for the constitutionality of the individual mandate in the health-care law Tuesday, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia interrupted, telling Verrilli, “we’re not stupid.”
Justice Elena Kagan, a former solicitor general appointed by President Obama to the high court, sided with Verilli in arguing that young people should be required by the federal government to purchase health insurance because eventually, others will subsidize their health care in the future.
Scalia shot back, arguing that young people will make the decision to buy health insurance eventually and do not need to be forced by the federal government to engage in commerce.
The transcript of the exchange is below:
GENERAL VERILLI: To live in the modern world, everybody needs a telephone. And the — the same thing with respect to the — you know, the dairy price supports that — that the Court upheld in Wrightwood Dairy and Rock Royal. You can look at those as disadvantageous contracts, as forced transfers, that — you know, I suppose it’s theoretically true that you could raise your kids without milk, but the reality is you’ve got to go to the store and buy milk. And the commerce power — as a result of the exercise of the commerce power, you’re subsidizing somebody else –
JUSTICE KAGAN: And this is especially true, isn’t it, General –
GENERAL VERRILLI: — because that’s the judgment Congress has made.
JUSTICE KAGAN: — Verrilli, because in this context, the subsidizers eventually become the subsidized?
GENERAL VERRILLI: Well, that was the point I was trying to make, Justice Kagan, that you’re young and healthy one day, but you don’t stay that way. And the — the system works over time. And so I just don’t think it’s a fair characterization of it. And it does get back to, I think — a problem I think is important to understand –

JUSTICE SCALIA: We’re not stupid. They’re going to buy insurance later. They’re young and — and need the money now.
JUSTICE SCALIA: When — when they think they have a substantial risk of incurring high medical bills, they’ll buy insurance, like the rest of us. But –
GENERAL VERRILLI: That’s — that’s –
JUSTICE SCALIA: — I don’t know why you think that they’re never going to buy it.
GENERAL VERRILLI: That’s the problem, Justice Scalia. That’s — and that’s exactly the experience that the States had that made the imposition of guaranteed-issue and community rating not only be ineffectual but be highly counterproductive. Rates, for example, in New Jersey doubled or tripled, went from 180,000 people covered in this market down to 80,000 people covered in this market. In Kentucky, virtually every insurer left the market. And the reason for that is because when people have that guarantee of — that they can get insurance, they’re going to make that calculation that they won’t get it until they’re sick and they need it, and so the pool of people in the insurance market gets smaller and smaller. The rates you have to charge to cover them get higher and higher. It helps fewer and fewer — insurance covers fewer and fewer people until the system ends. This is not a situation in which you’re conscripting — you’re forcing insurance companies to cover very large numbers of unhealthy people –
JUSTICE SCALIA: You could solve that problem by simply not requiring the insurance company to sell it to somebody who has a — a condition that is going to require medical treatment, or at least not – not require them to sell it to him at — at a rate that he sells it to healthy people. But you don’t want to do that.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Obama Tells Russia He’ll Have ‘More Flexibility’ After The Election

In a conversation that was picked up Monday by live microphones, President Obama privately told Russia he will have “more flexibility” to deal with missile defense after the election.
Speaking to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev ahead of a global nuclear security summit in South Korea, Obama asked for “space” and “time” to deal with the missile defense issue.
“Yeah. I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you,” Medvedev said.
“This is my last election,” Obama said. “After my election, I have more flexibility.”
“I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” said Medvedev, who will hand the Russian presidency over to Vladimir Putin in May.  
read more:

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Tea Party activists defy rain to rip Obama health care law

Several hundred rain-soaked Tea Party activists rallied on Saturday to call
for the U.S. Supreme Court to repeal President Barack Obama’s
signature healthcare law after arguments next week.
Speaker after speaker at the two-hour protest in the shadow
of the U.S. Capitol tore up copies of the law and condemned it
as a threat to American freedoms and a violation of the
The flag-waving rally by the Tea Party movement, which
fueled a conservative Republican wave in 2010 mid-term
elections, was an early start to demonstrations by opponents and
supporters of the law around the Supreme Court arguments.
The Supreme Court has scheduled six hours over three days
for the arguments from Monday to Wednesday.