Obama’s Illegals Arrested for 7 Murders

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump created a huge stir when he characterized most illegal aliens as being criminals. The liberals were outraged at his remark. Personally, I have family and friends in Arizona who applauded Trump for being the first influential person in America to speak what they consider to be the truth.  

by:Lynn Jolly  

There is no doubt that the illegal immigration policies of Barack Obama over the past 8-years have been devastating in many ways to America and the American people. Instead of enforcing federal immigration laws and deporting millions of foreigners who came to our country illegally, he welcomed them with open arms and gave them many of the same rights and privileges reserved for US citizens and even more.

One of the results of Obama’s immigration policies was to allow illegals to obtain valid driver’s licenses. Arizona was one state that passed a law to prevent illegals from obtaining driver’s licenses and receiving other costly benefits, but Obama’s corrupt Department of Justice used their legal powers to overturn those laws and force states to provide citizen benefits to illegals.

Why did so many liberals get angry when Donald Trump talked about the many crimes committed by in the US by illegal aliens?
In 2015, Kathryn Steinle, 32, was walking along the crowded Embarcadero pier in San Francisco when she collapsed on the pier after the family heard several loud sounds they said sounded like gunfire. Her father tried to give CPR to his daughter, but to no avail.
Francisco Sanchez, 45, is an illegal from Mexico who has been deported five times. His stories about what happened remind me of Hillary Clinton’s stories concerning the attack on the US Embassy compound in Benghazi, Libya in that it has changed and still makes no sense.
To add to a growing list of examples, some of which are mentioned here, is the case of Tomas Martinez-Maldonado, a 38-year-old illegal alien from Mexico. He is currently being charged and held in jail for raping a 13-year-old girl while traveling on a Greyhound bus in Kansas.

Investigation led to the fact that Maldonado had been deported 10 times and then voluntarily removed 9 more times since 2003. Yet, he was back in the US illegally again, raping a young teenager who will carry the mental and emotional scars with her for the rest of her life.
In the latest instance of illegals committing violent crimes in the United States, is a report from Fox News:

“Thirteen members of the notorious Salvadoran gang MS-13 were charged Thursday in connection with seven murders including the 2016 killings of high school teenagers on New York’s Long Island.” 

“The gang members were charged with 41 counts which also include racketeering, attempted murder, assault and obstruction of justice, U.S. Attorney Robert L. Capers said Thursday afternoon.” 

“Four of the suspects were charged directly with the murders of Kayla Cuevas, 16 and Nisa Mickens, 15, close friends who were beaten to death on Sept. 13, 2016, in Brentwood, N.Y.”
“Four others were directly involved in the death of 18-year-old Jose Peña-Hernandez, whose body was found on the grounds of the Pilgrim Psychiatric Center in Brentwood in October, investigators said.”
“Ten of the suspects are illegal immigrants, two are U.S. citizens and one is a green card holder, Capers said.” 


How many American men, women and children have to be physically assaulted, beaten or killed by illegal aliens before our government takes action to stop them? Why are liberals so determined to protect these same illegals and place the lives of more Americans in jeopardy?
I would really like to see the liberals opposing President Trump’s desire to protect America, meet with the parents of the teenagers murdered by the illegals in New York and explain to them why those gang members were allowed to enter the country illegally and allowed to remain in the country illegally and why it was the right thing to do.

Schumer pulled visa strings for Indian athlete now accused of child sex abuse

By Brooke Singman 
A snowshoe racer from India whose entry into the U.S. to compete was made possible by Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer was being held Friday in a New York jail on a sex charge. 
The U.S. embassy in New Delhi last month rejected Tanveer Hussain’s application for a visa so he could compete in the World Snowshoe Championship in upstate. Local officials then intervened on Hussain’s behalf, appealing for help to the offices of Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y. Their offices reached out to the New Delhi embassy, which allowed Hussain to reapply for a visa and granted that visa.
“Obviously, this is a troubling matter for him — these are troubling accusations,” Brian Barrett, Hussain’s lawyer, told Fox News over the phone. “He is in good spirits and he looks forward to fighting these charges.”

Saranac Lake Police Chief Charles Potthast told Fox News that the charges, one of first-degree sexual abuse, a felony, and another of endangering the welfare of a child, a misdemeanor, stem from Hussain “engaging in a passionate kiss” with a 12-year-old girl, and accusations of the athlete touching her over her clothing in an “intimate area.”
Barrett, who has entered a not guilty plea for his client, said the girl “had been following him around all week. But that’s really all I can say on that.”

Expand / Contract

The arrest made headlines in upstate New York. (Adirondack Daily Enterprise)

Hussain was arrested Wednesday after Saranac Lake Village police received a report of the alleged incident, which was reported to have happened on Monday.
 
The village’s police chief said that coming into contact with the athletes at the championship would not be difficult, as spectators moved from different venues to watch the games, so the word “following” did not apply. He did confirm, however, that the underage girl and Hussain had been in contact via text message.
Hussain, who was being held Friday on a $5,000 cash bail or $10,000 bond, has a preliminary hearing Tuesday at St. Armand Town Court in St. Armand, New York.

Schumer’s office told Fox News he often intervenes to facilitate international competition.
“As we often do when local communities ask for help, at the request of Saranac Lake we helped to navigate the visa process so these athletes could compete at a local competition. The charges against one member of the group, who is accused of a serious crime and abusing our visa program, are extremely troubling. If he’s found guilty, he should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.”
Gillibrand’s office had a similar response, adding that the charges are “extremely serious.”
Barrett told Fox News that he is under the impression that Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., was involved in helping speed the process as well. “Our office simply inquired with the embassy as to why his visa was originally denied,” a spokesman for Stefanik told Fox News.

“We were told it was because he could not prove substantial ties to his country and we took no further action,” the Stefanik spokesman said.

7 Reasons to Ignore the Manufactured Witch Hunt

The Democrats and their alt-left media have manufactured a witch hunt to bring down Attorney General Jeff Sessions for a fake news charge of lying to Congress and colluding with the Russians. Nothing could be further from the truth, but they have spun the facts and reported a story that carries their narrative. The double standard of behavior is also on display in this article. 

As Written By John Hayward for Breitbart:
The Democrats and their media are making a big push to portray Attorney General Jeff Sessions as a Russian agent, or at least catch him in a perjury trap, because they had to talk about something other than President Trump’s address to Congress until the weekend news cycle kicks in.

One cannot overstate how bothered POTUS will be by this Sessions story (with GOPers now calling for recusal) stepping on his good news cycle — Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) March 2, 2017 

One cannot overstate how obviously that is the point of all this, Mr. Tapper.
Here are some reasons the Sessions witch hunt is ridiculous:
1. Democrats thought misleading Congress was no big deal until today: Call it an example of  “whataboutism” if you will, but it bears noting for the record that Democrats were quick to dismiss blatantly false statements to Congress from such individuals as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, and Sessions’ predecessor Attorney General Eric Holder as trivial errors. And, of course, Democrats launched an all-out jihad against the very concept of perjury to keep Bill Clinton in power in the Nineties.

In each case, congressional Democrats showed the maximum possible indulgence to Obama administration officials, blithely accepting every claim of imperfect memory, misunderstanding of questions, and even rank incompetence as acceptable excuses. Holder’s defense against perjury charges amounted to a confession that he did not read his email and had no idea what anyone connected to the horrifying Operation Fast and Furious scandal was doing. Clinton’s evasions in her use of a secret email server are legendary.

The server itself was essentially a mechanism for misleading Congress about her activities on a constant basis.This is not merely a double standard, although it is always worth pointing those out when they appear because the DNC Media refuses to do so. Democrats made a sustained argument over the course of President Obama’s eight years in office that one should make every possible allowance for imperfect memory, flawed record-keeping, and honest misunderstandings. They claimed Republicans used their investigatory powers to make mountains out molehills. Now they want to take all that back because they think they can inflict some damage on the Trump administration, and keep their “Russia stole the election!” narrative alive, by parsing Jeff Sessions’ words with an electron microscope.

2. Sessions did not commit perjury: Robert Barnes at LawNewz reviews the relevant statutes, and hammers the point that Democrats were quick to sweep them aside when there was far stronger evidence their own officials lied to Congress:

The criminal law only prohibits lying to Congress under two statutes — 18 USC 1621 ands 18 USC 1001. Section 1621 requires a person “willfully and contrary” to a sworn oath “subscribe a material matter” which is both false and the person knows to be false. Section 1001 is basically the same, without certain tribunal prerequisites: it also……

FULL STORY HERE:
7 Reasons the Jeff Sessions Witch Hunt Is Ridiculous – Breitbart

 

Pelosi’s Newest Claims are as WHACKED as She Is

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi continues to astound reasonable people with her outrageous charges against the Trump administration. Working off of fake news from The New York Times, a not so trustworthy piece of media, she has charged Reince Priebus with pressuring the FBI. She also sees a Russian agent behind every Trump staff member.  

As Written by Gregg Jarrett for Fox News:
Nancy Pelosi is nothing, if not inane.
She is, of course, the former Speaker of the House who infamously said of ObamaCare, “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what’s in it.”
And who can forget the time she claimed that “500 million people will lose their jobs each month until we have an economic package” ?  Which is a pretty neat trick since there are roughly 300 million people living in the U.S.

So, it is understandable that Pelosi’s latest statement was met with the usual eye-rolling. She all but accused the Trump White House of obstructing justice when she described Chief of Staff Reince Priebus’s conversation with a senior FBI official as “a grave abuse of power…which may also be illegal.”
Some background is helpful. Priebus says he was approached by FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe who described as inaccurate a New York Times article about repeated contacts between Russia and the Trump campaign. Priebus allegedly asked the FBI to correct the record by disabusing the story with the truth. Since Justice Department guidelines prohibit the FBI from speaking about an ongoing investigation, the agency declined to comment.

(Of course, FBI Director James Comey, seemed to ignore those same guidelines when he chose to disclose details of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, but there is no shortage of hypocrisy in Washington.)
Pelosi, who is prone to batty remarks, promptly denounced Priebus and convicted the president for his “explosive ties… to Russian intelligence….
KEEP READING HERE!!!
Gregg Jarrett: Pelosi’s crazy claims about Priebus’ contact with the FBI don’t add up | Fox News
 

Hillary Employee received $35 million from “Putin-connected Russian govt fund”

Apparently, there is a John Podesta money trail to follow that leads back to the Russians. There is also a direct tie-in to Hillary Clinton and her dealings with Russian technology. This is all revealed in a 56-page report released late Sunday titled “From Russia with Money: Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset, and Cronyism.” How involved Bill and Hillary were remains to be seen. Don’t miss the serious concerns of the FBI and the U S Army, either. 


As Written by STEPHEN K. BANNON & PETER SCHWEIZER for Breitbart:
Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta sat on the board of a small energy company alongside Russian officials that received $35 million from a Putin-connected Russian government fund, a relationship Podesta failed to fully disclose on his federal financial disclosures as required by law.
That’s one of the many revelations from a 56-page report released late Sunday titled “From Russia with Money: Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset, and Cronyism” by the non-partisan government watchdog group, the Government Accountability Institute (GAI). Breitbart Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon holds the same title in GAI and Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer serves as GAI’s president.

Both the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal ran stories on the newly released report late Sunday evening.
As part of her duties during the so-called Russian reset, then-Sec. of State Hillary Clinton led the way on U.S. involvement in a Russian government technology initiative that was intended to be the Russian equivalent of America’s Silicon Valley known as Skolkovo. The “innovation city,” located outside Moscow, has some 30,000 workers in state-of-the-art facilities under strict government control. As Slate described it in 2013, “In some ways, Skolkovo is eerily reminiscent of Soviet utopian city-building projects.”
According to the GAI report, Clinton’s State Dept. recruited U.S. tech giants like Google, Cisco, Intel. Indeed, out of 28 U.S., European, and Russian companies that participated in Skolkovo, 17 of them were Clinton Foundation donors or paid for speeches by Bill Clinton.

However, as involvement in Skolkovo by Clinton cronies increased, so, too, did the danger for the technology coming out of the Russian tech mecca to be used for Russian military purposes.
In 2014, the FBI issued what it called “an extraordinary warning” to several technology companies involved with Skolkovo. “The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation’s sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application,” warned Lucia Ziobro, the assistant special agent at the FBI’s Boston office. She added: “The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by the government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies.”


Still, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta sat on the executive board of a small energy company called Joule Unlimited. Joule, too, received the FBI letter warning about Skolkovo. Other Joule board members included senior Russian officials. According to the GAI report: “Two months after Podesta joined the board, Vladimir Putin’s Rusnano announced that it would invest up to one billion rubles into Joule Unlimited, which amounts to $35 million. That represents one-fifth of the entire amount of investment dollars Joule collected from 2007 to 2013.”

Rusnano, which former Russian education and science minister and current science advisor to Vladmir Putin Andrei Fursenko describes as “Putin’s child,” was founded by Putin in 2007.
The GAI investigative report says it’s unclear how much, if any, money Podesta made. The reason: Podesta was on the board of three Joule entities, but only listed two on his disclosure; the most important entity, Joule Stichting, he did not list. “Podesta’s compensation by Joule cannot be fully determined,” reads the report. “In his 2014 federal government disclosure filing, Podesta lists that he divested stock options from Joule. However, the disclosure does not cover the years 2011-2012.”
Why Podesta failed to reveal, as required by law on his federal financial disclosures, his membership on the board of this offshore company is presently unknown.
“But the flows of funds from Russia during the ‘reset’ to Podesta-connected entities apparently didn’t end with Joule Energy,” the report states. According to the GAI report, Podesta’s far-left think tank, Center for American Progress (CAP), took in $5.25 million from the Sea Change Foundation between 2010-2013.

Who was funding Sea Change Foundation? According to tax records, Sea Change Foundation at the time was receiving a large infusion of funds from a mysterious Bermuda-based entity called ‘Klein, Ltd.’…Who owns Klein? It is impossible to say exactly, given corporate secrecy laws in Bermuda. But the registered agent and lawyers who set up the offshore entity are tied to a handful of Russian business entities including Troika Dialog, Ltd. Leadership includes Ruben Vardanyan, an ethnic Armenian who is a mega oligarch in Putin’s Russia. Vardanyan also served on the board of Joule Energy with John Podesta.

The FBI and U.S. Army sounded the alarm bells about Skolkovo being a threatening pathway for Russia to accelerate its military technological capabilities. Why Hillary Clinton’s State Dept and her campaign manager were tied up in this raises serious questions that demand answers and transparency. 

Listen to Bannon and Schweizer discuss of this article on Breitbart News Daily on SiriusXM: 

HERE: BREITBART

The Extramarital Biden Affair the Mainstream Media Avoided

by: True Daily Staff 

The widow of Joe Biden’s late son Beau Biden has started a romantic relationship with Beau’s brother Hunter Biden, the former vice president’s younger son.
Hallie was devastated when her husband, Beau, died after suffering from brain cancer in May 2015. But she has since struck up a romance with Beau’s brother Hunter, 47, who has separated from his wife, Kathleen. We’re told Hallie and Hunter are now officially a couple.
The astonishing family drama caps a difficult period for the Bidens following the death of Beau at age 46. The former vice president cited the death of his elder son as one of the reasons he decided in October 2015 against running for president.
Originally published by Page Six.

Critical Security Advice for March 4 Trump Event Organizers and Participants

https://www.oathkeepers.org


by:Stewart Rhodes
We are posting the below security advice now because of the many “March 4 Trump” events across the country tomorrow.  Please pass this on to anyone who will be attending those events.   However, this advice will also prove useful for future events.  Oath Keepers will have members and teams from local chapters at many of these March 4 Trump rallies and marches tomorrow to help keep people safe (our members and chapters have full discretion to help anywhere they can, and also have full discretion to do so covertly, overtly, or in a mix of overt/covert, as we did in Washington DC on January 19-20 for the Inauguration and surrounding events).   Organizers and participants in the March 4 Trump events need to understand that we can’t be at all of them, and we can’t guarantee their safety even at the ones we will be attending.   Your safety is ultimately up to you, as the below advice makes clear.

American patriots have got to come to terms with the reality that the far left is becoming increasingly unhinged and prone to violent terrorism, and you will need to expect the worst and prepare for it.    And that means you need to be your own “bodyguard” and guardian over your family and friends, as the Founders expected us to be, as members of a true citizens militia.   Do NOT rely on the police to protect you, or anyone else.   They cannot be everywhere, even when they are allowed to do their job to their best ability (which is sadly not always the case, as is explained below).
The following threat assessment and advice was written up by NavyJack and John Karriman.

PROVIDED BY NAVYJACK:

Most organizations that are involved in protests against the policies of the current administration are non-violent. The organizations that have used violence in recent protests include the following:

1. Antifa (short for Antifascist Action)
2. Anarchist Black Cross
3. Refuse Fascism (closely related to the Revolutionary Communist Party USA)
4. La Raza and affiliates
5. BAMN (By Any Means Necessary)

The Antifa, Anarchist Black Cross and BAMN organizations normally rely on the presence of protesters from other organizations to mask their activity in a larger group. The percentage of actual violent protesters, when one of the groups listed above intercedes, can be lower than 10%. This presents a significant issue for law enforcement personnel attempting to stop or contain violent activity. There are numerous ways to identify the violent protesters, including:

1.  They cover their faces with balaclavas or bandannas to mask their identity.
2. La Raza and affiliates carry the flag of Mexico and/or Aztlan.
   
3. Antifa carry battle flags with their group affiliation.
   
4. Anarchist Black Cross carry square black flags.
   
5. Refuse Fascism carry “NO” signs, flags and posters.
   
6. BAMN carry red signs with their logo.
   
7. Antifa and Anarchist Black Cross like to dress in all black. The Antifa and the Anarchist Black Cross see themselves as the vanguard of the protest movement against the current administration. They actively train in self-defense and hand-to-hand combat. They carry weapons, although usually not firearms unless in an open-carry State. They wear backpacks and normally bring the following items to a protest:
   
   1. Firecrackers, including M80s and bottle rockets.
   2. Hammers (to break glass)
   3. Long metal pipes with end-cap fittings (to assault people)
   4. Heavy wooden poles (used to display flags and assault people)
   5. Lighter fluid containers (to start fires, burn hats/flags, create micro-molotov cocktails)
   6. Lighters
   7. Spears (made from PVC and used as weapons)
   8. Gas masks
   9. Eye protection 
      La Raza and Refuse Fascism have not been noted to bring incendiaries or other weapons to their protests at this time. It should be noted that the Revolutionary Communist “Red Guard” are frequently integrated with the Refuse Fascism protests and can be a source of violence.  Red Guard members, like the Antifa wear distinctive face coverings and clothing.
      
      All of the violent groups communicate via twitter using localized accounts and spur-of-the-moment “hashtags”.  Large events are normally posted on Facebook or emails are sent to the members of these organizations via list services (Google, Spokes, WordPress).  They have learned to not post their activities more than 24 hours in advance to avoid law enforcement detection.
      Refuse Fascism, La Raza and BAMN tend to have large numbers of protesters that are reluctant to initiate violence. If they are stopped from achieving their goals (blocking a road, blocking access to a venue, shutting down a government office or place of business, etc.) they escalate until they achieve their goal or are suppressed.
      
      The Antifa and the Anarchist Black Cross are by far the most violent of these organizations. They tend to infiltrate protests already in motion and immediately escalate to violence once integrated. Previously non-violent protesters get caught up in the melees and join in.
      While there are many other protest organizations, including Black Lives Matter, the Huey P. Newton Gun Club and the New Black Panthers; their involvement to date in the violent anti-administration protests has been minimal.
      
      

      PROVIDED BY JOHN KARRIMAN (Missouri State Police Academy Instructor):

      Should you plan to attend an event that might be the target of one of the above listed groups; we offer the following suggestions:
      1) Take your physical health and mobility into account. If you are in poor health or cannot break into a sprint for thirty paces, consider avoiding the event. More and more, less is being done to ensure the safety of attendees. From stand-down orders from globalist-minded administrators to Law Enforcement personnel to poor planning on the part of event coordinators, more and serious injuries are being seen. Weigh the exercise of your 1st Amendment against your safety and well-being.
      
      2) Travel to and from the event is when the greatest danger exists. If you have identifying markings or stickers on your vehicle, you may be targeted before ever arriving at your destination. Bad guys are headed to the same event. You are in traffic with them. Once in the area; are you wearing identifying hats or shirts that are observable from a distance? Nothing wrong with identifying with a particular sentiment/ideology unless you are travelling through a sea of hate to get to your appointed destination. Drawing attention to yourself without superior numbers is suicidal. Don’t think you will become the exception to the rule. Rioters who have assaulted people have been released without charges, given letters of APOLOGY and been PAID for their trouble. Welcome to Opposite Day.
      
      3) Do not expect help from law enforcement, even if you can make it to their position. The very group tasked with protecting and serving has been routinely dropping the ball when it comes to the safety of the public. Recently in Berkeley, a young woman who had been maced and beaten by the crowd was not allowed in to the very venue she had come to attend! Police would not respond to her beating on the door despite her obvious distress. She had left her husband for dead in the street when they were surrounded. She saw him go down from having been struck in the head with a metal pole. She and her husband wore NO identifying clothing, but were singled out because they were seen in the area of an event the crowd disagreed with. Both wore kevlar under their clothes. Although he survived his attack; he suffered a concussion and several broken ribs… through the kevlar vest.
      Lack of crowd control is a decision made on high and has happened repeatedly in cities sympathetic to unAmerican causes or where dissenting opinions are not tolerated (funny coming from the same group preaching tolerance).Take the demographics of your particular area into consideration when planning to attend an event.
      
      4) Do not get involved in debate outside (or inside, for that matter) with dissenters. It is a common tactic to distract while another ambushes from the side or rear. Liquids and objects are often thrown. Consider bringing an umbrella to keep paint, urine, blood, feces, acid… from making contact with your eyes or skin.
      
      5) Avoid hot spots. Where you have people masked-up and being whipped into a frenzy by someone with a bullhorn; you have a volatile situation. Attempting to walk through their midst without looking like and acting like the crowd is a recipe for disaster.
      
      6) Strength in numbers. Coordinate your coming and going with a larger group. Pairs are as vulnerable as singles. Link up with other smaller groups and move together. Put your smaller people inside of your pod or away from the crowd. This NO place for children. We have seen children and the elderly attacked by these animals.

SF Police Withdraw from FBI anti-terrorism taskforce to deny information to Trump

 via:GOPUSA Staff 


San Francisco has taken its defiance of the feds to a new level, ending its cooperation with the FBI in an anti-terror initiative begun after 9/11 – a move crtitics say could get innocent people killed.
Critics say the sanctuary city by the bay’s latest decision to forego cooperation with Washington, by dropping out of the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, could put lives at risk. The JTTF has been credited with foiling 93 Islamist terrorist attacks and plots against the U.S. since 2001, including 12 this year, according to the Washington, D.C.-based Heritage Foundation. There are another 1,000 investigations into suspected terror activity nationwide.
These staggering statistics make the recent decision by the San Francisco police department to end the city’s partnership with the JTTF, at the behest of local activist groups that alleged Arabs and Muslims are wrongly targeted by the FBI and will be more so under the Trump administration, all the more concerning, said retired federal law enforcement officials.

Click the link to read more of this story at Fox News

The San Francisco Police Department has suspended its nearly decade-long cooperation with the FBI’s anti-terrorism task force, the department announced Wednesday night after months of negotiations with civil liberty groups.
The announcement comes after civil liberties groups raised alarms that such cooperation under a Donald Trump administration was troublesome since the president has publicly stated a disregard for constitutional protections.
“I’m proud of San Francisco,” said former ACLU lawyer John Crew, who explicitly called the move an act of resistance.
Click the link to read more at the San Francisco Examiner

Anyone can be queen with ‘gender inclusivity’ According to the #LGBTQ community

oped: First and foremost...personally I for one could care less what consenting adults do in private...the problem I have with the LGBTQ community as well as the looney left progressive judges is their insistence that we all must adhere to their sexual preferences and give carte blanche' preference to their rights as guaranteed under the US Constitution/Bill of Rights. {note: there is absolutely no evidence of a LGBTQ gene expressed through the DNA physiology ...if born with female parts one is female if born with male parts one is male...the only exception would be a hermaphrodite born with both parts and very rare in nature and the only ones who can actually claim whichever sex they relate to! 
Therefore it becomes a sexual fetish of what one prefers to have sex with and or a mental issue not a physiological one!

This is so wrong and illegal in so many ways...Judges have zero authority to legislate from the bench..they have no right to take away ones rights in preference to another's as guaranteed under the US Constitution/Bill of Rights...this applies to all of the Amendments to the US Constitution/Bill of Rights. 
Example ie: if one states they have religious values as to what they will produce in their bakery...they are covered under the Bill of Rights...how many times have you seen the little signs in stores stating "We have the right to refuse service to anyone" ? This is guaranteed under the Bill of Rights 

If the LGBTQ community does not like the service at a particular store they can go to a store that agrees with and accepts their ideology/preferences or open their own store! They have zero rights to take away another's in favor of their preferences in life...hello the Right to pursue happiness guaranteed under the US Constitution applies to all not just a favored in the proverbial moment group! 

To take this a step further do the homework on what this is really all about start here and continue your own search for the truth..click on all the links provided within the post to see all issues within: 
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/barry-barack-obama-is-new-anthony.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The University of Minnesota is shedding its “king” and “queen” titles for homecoming, organizers said Monday. Instead “royalty” will be the term of choice.
The Student Unions and Activities office said in its announcement that the change come this fall is “an effort toward gender inclusivity.”
“We wish to promote a spirit of inclusion at the University of Minnesota,” the announcement continued. “This change allows the University to select the best student representatives for the U based on campus and community involvement — regardless of gender.”
Organizers said they “can be any combination of any gender identity.”
The move away from gender-specific labels has been going on for several years on campuses around the country.


Last fall, the University of Wisconsin-Stout’s annual homecoming for the first time in nearly 80 years did not crown a homecoming king and queen. Instead, several students were selected Friday for the Stout Ambassadors Spirit Award. At the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, the titles of king and queen were dropped last year in favor of royalty, ending the requirement that the two be of the opposite sex.
The U’s Twin Cities campus has celebrated homecoming since 1914 and includes activities such as community service opportunities, concerts and the Homecoming parade and football game.
Homecoming royalty represent the university on campus and at various events such as the Minnesota State Fair. Also, the two students who win the royalty title will be awarded a scholarship.
The two who are now the U’s final king and queen are 2016 selections Ethan Dado, of Amery, Wis., and Priyanka Shah, of Eden Prairie.
___
(c)2017 the Star Tribune (Minneapolis)
Visit the Star Tribune (Minneapolis) at www.startribune.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

EXCLUSIVE: Kellyanne Conway Speaks Out After Congressman Said She Looked ‘Familiar’ On Her Knees

by:Peter Hasson

Kellyanne Conway believes the news media would be more outraged about a Democratic congressman’s crude joke that the White House staffer looks “familiar” with being on her knees if she were a pro-abortion woman, she told The Daily Caller, adding that she believed the joke was sexist. 



Asked over text if she thought there would be more media outrage about the comment if she were a liberal woman, Conway told The Daily Caller, “Yes.” She added: “And it is not just if I were a liberal woman, but if I were a pro-abortion one.”
“I really just want to know what was going on there, because, you know, I won’t tell anybody. And you can just explain to me that circumstance, because she really looked kind of familiar in that position there. But, don’t answer, and I don’t want you to refer back to the 1990s,” Democratic Louisiana Rep. Cedric Richmond said at a Washington Press Club Foundation Dinner on Wednesday.

“Since some people have interpreted my joke to mean something that it didn’t I think it is important to clarify what I meant. Last night was a night of levity. Where I grew up saying that someone is looking or acting ‘familiar’ simply means that they are behaving too comfortably,” Richmond told TheDC in a statement.

Conway said Richmond has not apologized to her for the crude comment. “I notice he did not apologize, he tried to clarify,” Conway said of Richmond’s claim that the joke wasn’t meant to be sexual.


GOP Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel also fired back at Richmond, calling the remark “disgusting and offensive.”
“A snarky joke for you is just a reminder of the demeaning comments women hear every single day. And trust me, it happens to all women,” McDaniel said, adding: “I’d suggest using Women’s History Month to lift us up instead of knocking us down.”
Conway also pushed back against the idea that there was anything disrespectful about the photo of her kneeling on the couch while taking a picture of President Trump with the presidents of historically black colleges.

“I helped usher in those 60+ HBCU Presidents after speaking with them in The Roosevelt room. I was taking pics and texting the pics to [the college presidents],” Conway told TheDC. “MANY of them have defended me on radio and social media.”

Continue Reading: http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/02/kellyanne-cedric-richmonds-joke-was-sexist-but-the-media-doesnt-care-because-im-pro-life/

Media Beware of Your War On Sebastian Gorka

In their desperation to bag another National Security Adviser, Sebastian Gorka, the media has stooped to new lows of false news manufacturing. They will use such tools as guilt by association, or just outright lies. Instead of destroying Mr. Gorka, they seem to be hell-bent on self-destruction. This will not turn out well for them. 

As Written By Richard Miniter for FORBES: 

Tomahawk in hand, reporters have been hunting Sebastian Gorka, a national-security advisor to President Trump, for more than a week. They are scalping themselves instead.

Media attacks on Gorka are wide-ranging and, seemingly, coordinated. Some are straight-up character assassination, such as trying to tie Gorka to anti-Semites by playing six-degrees-of-separation with Hungarian populists. Others contend that Gorka has an “extreme” view on Islam and seeks a war with its more than one billion followers—ignoring that he writes in his 2016 book Defeating Jihad: “We are not at war with Islam.” Then, there is the major media’s respectful coverage of a weird Twitter storm touched off by a self-described “terrorism expert,” who has virtually no credentials, who nevertheless contends that Gorka is “unqualified.” Finally, there are the attacks on Gorka’s 2007 dissertation for having too few footnotes, among other trifles.

All of these accusations are treated as news and amplified by TheWashington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times and other major outlets. The aim? Bring down another Trump national-security advisor, after National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and would-be National Security Council spokeswoman ……

KEEP READING HERE:
Journalists Beware: Your War On Sebastian Gorka Is Only Hurting You
  

Pakistani Brothers Hired By Some House Dems Are About to Cause Them Some Serious Trouble

Some of the House Democrats, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz, got a bargain in IT maintenance from some Pakistani brothers. It turned out to be a bad bargain. The Awan brothers, Imran, Abid and Jamal, and two of their wives, Hina Alvi and Natalia Sova are suspects in a criminal theft and cyber security probe. How much has been compromised by this? No one knows yet. 

As Written By Luke Rosiak for the Daily Caller:
Five members of a Pakistani family under criminal investigation for allegedly misusing their positions as computer administrators for dozens of Democrats in the House of Representatives were paid at least $4 million from July 2009 to the present, The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group has learned.
Evidence suggests some of the dozens of House Democrats — many of whom serve on the intelligence, homeland security and foreign affairs committees — who employed the suspects were inexplicably paying people they rarely or never saw. See the interactive graphic at the end of this story for the names of the employing representatives.

The suspects had full access to the emails and office computer files of the members for whom they worked.  A focus of the investigation by the U.S. Capitol Police is an off-site server on which congressional data was allegedly loaded without the knowledge of authorities.
Even before Capitol Police told chiefs of staff for the employing Democrats Feb. 2 that the Awans — including brothers Imran, Abid and Jamal, and two of their wives, Hina Alvi and Natalia Sova — were suspects in a criminal theft and cybersecurity probe, there were multiple signs that something was amiss.

For example, four of the 500 highest-paid House staffers are suspects, according to TheDCNF’s analysis of payroll records. There are more than 15,000 congressional staff employees with an average age of 31, according to Legistorm.
Top slots on Capitol Hill are subject to fierce competition, and for most employees, the hours are long and job security is nonexistent. The median salary for legislative assistants is $43,000 annually, according to InsideGov.com.
Imran Awan has collected $1.2 million in salary since 2010, and his brother Abid and wife Hina Alvi were each paid more than $1 million.

Imran first came to Capitol Hill in the early 2000s and Abid joined him in 2005. Imran’s wife Hina Alvi was added to the payroll in 2007, while Abid’s wife, Natalia Sova, appeared in 2011. Finally, in 2014 the youngest sibling, Jamal, joined the payroll in 2014 at the age of 20 with a salary of $160,000.
“In Imran’s wife’s offices, she didn’t show up or rarely showed up and Imran would handle it,” a former House staffer with direct knowledge of the brothers told TheDCNF. “Once in a while he would take her around to the offices but after a while he stopped even putting up the illusion and did all that stuff himself.”
The former staffer said “Jamal was always there,” but Imran would only work “odd hours.”

Since 2003, the family has collected $5 million overall, with Imran making $2 million and Abid making $1.5 million, according to Legistorm.com, which tracks congressional staff data. Of some 25,000 people who have worked in the House since 2010, only 100 have taken home more than Imran.
As “shared” employees, their salaries were cobbled together with part-time payments from multiple members, with a result that the Awans appeared at one time or another on an estimated 80 House Democrats’ payrolls.

Yet the brothers spent significant time in Pakistan, TheDCNF was told. They even had time beginning in 2009 to operate a Northern Virginia car dealership, with Abid as its day-to-day manager. The dealership received a $100,000 loan that was never repaid from Dr. Ali Al-Attar, a onetime Iraqi politician who fled the U.S. on tax charges and who reportedly has links to the terrorist group Hezbollah.
Among the House Democrats employing the Awans was Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the former Democratic National Committee Chairman whose tenure there was marked by a disastrous email hack that she blamed on the Russians.

Some of the House Democrats terminated the suspects on their payrolls following the meeting with investigators, but it’s uncertain how many have done so.
Court documents show that Imran was flush with enough cash to loan $30,000 to a friend. Yet Abid declared bankruptcy in 2012, discharging debts to others while keeping retaining ownership of two houses.
The interactive graphic below shows the sources of the Awans’ congressional income.


 

Soros Group BUSTED Astroturfing Trump

An organization partnered with far-left groups that calls itself the Revolutionary Love Project distributed an actual script with anti-Trump talking points for citizens to use when meeting with constituents in town halls, including during last week’s Congressional recess.
The script provides word-for-word language suggestions that accuse the Trump administration of “xenophobia, racism, and Islamophobia.”  It asks activists to use the descriptors to petition their representatives to “forcefully condemn” and support legislation opposing President Trump’s immigration and border security agendas.
The script is entitled, “#NoBanNoWallNoRaids Talking Points for Congressional Townhalls.”

Originally published by Breitbart.

Fraudster, Obamacare & Anti-Trump Rally Organizer is a Convicted Terrorist

by:KaraLee Vandenberg-Matsui

A Palestinian woman named Rasmea Yousef Odeh who spent 10 years in prison for participating in two terrorist bombings is a lead organizer for the Anti-Trump women’s march to beheld later this month. The New York Post has the scoop:

Odeh, a Palestinian, was convicted in Israel in 1970 for her part in two terrorist bombings, one of which killed two students while they were shopping for groceries. She spent 10 years in prison for her crimes. She then managed to become a US citizen in 2004 by lying about her past (great detective work, INS: Next time, use Google) but was subsequently convicted, in 2014, of immigration fraud for the falsehoods. However, she won the right to a new trial (set for this spring) by claiming she had been suffering from PTSD at the time she lied on her application. Oh, and in her time as a citizen, she worked for a while as an ObamaCare navigator.

Why has Governor Jerry Brown Abandoned California?

by:Lyle Rapacki 

Liberals and progressives enjoy emotionally charged rhetoric, they love mixing it up with protests of all kinds (remember the Dems in Congress who staged a sit-in just a short while back?), liberal progressive dreams and visions of a utopian society freely flows from their lips, but when it comes to actually governing and tending to the true needs of people, these same progressive dreamers cannot be found, and surely will not be proactively managing the affairs of state.  Below is such an example.

Governor Jerry Brown of California fits the need for a large segment of California residents who enjoy dreaming of and pontificating about the utopian all inconclusive all are equal ideology Dems are not at all ashamed to dribble about year in and year out.  But when a moment of reality arrives forcing Democrat ideology out of its’ self-made all absorbing bubble, Dems are like the little man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz movie who pulled the levers to make the “Great OZ” appear in huffs and puffs and smoke and fire.  In all reality the GREAT OZ is but a caricature functioning by pullies, handles, levers, smoke and fire to create fear and awe.  In essence, Democrats have evolved into mere bullies the kind you may have had to contend with on the Junior High playground.   But once they are soundly confronted, once they are made accountable for their speech and behaviors, they become like the little man behind the curtain who manufactured the HUGE and GREAT OZ; naked and exposed for their con – void of explanation, pathetic.

Compounding the sadness of this sordid political theater is the reality that people’s lives and fortunes are directly and adversely impacted by these sophomoric morons who cannot leave their talking points even a moment to care for the very people they claim to care about.  California Governor Jerry Brown should be a real embarrassment for the citizens of California.  Unfortunately, Jerry Brown is allowed to continue his preaching and march toward creating a socialist society along the lines of Venezuela, Honduras, and Cuba.
Jerry Brown’s former girlfriend hit the mark directly with her song “You’re No Good, You’re No Good, I am over you!”  You may listen to her words here:



Investigative Journalist, Katy Grimes, who also happens to be a California girl, has written a powerful and insightful commentary, you can read it here.  WAKE UP dear California Dreamers!  The tide is going out, and soon, very soon the view from your once pristine beaches will not be very attractive at all.  Many, many businesses and industry have already figured this out, and they have packed-up and move out of your once Golden State.

Dutch Leader: the Koran is Anti-Semitic, and Islam is Totalitarian

By Onan Coca 

“I am sure that the last days of the European Union – it’s like the old Roman Empire – are coming. It’s just a matter of time.” — Geert Wilders
Dutch politician and the odds-on next leader of the Netherlands, Geert Wilders, recently made some stunning comments about Islam that are sure to make life more dangerous for him than it already is.
Wilders has long been a firebrand in Dutch politics, defending free speech, renouncing the works of Islam, and calling for the Netherlands to cut ties with the tyrannical European Union (EU). He’s been arrested and forced to endure show trials for his decision to speak out against the scourge of Islam on Dutch culture. He’s survived several attempts on his life, and yet he continues to speak out in defense of the Dutch people and Western Civilization.

In fact, you probably remember that in 2015 two Muslim men attacked a free speech conference in Garland, Texas injuring an officer before being killed by local police. Wilders was one of the targets of their attack, which explains why he is forced to travel with security wherever he goes.
In January, Wilders may have made himself even more of a target with an interview he gave to Europa Magazin, where he continued to decry radical Islam and he praised the American people for bravely electing President Trump.
Specifically, Wilders argued that Islam is NOT a religion but actually an ideology that is incompatible with freedom and Western culture.

“I believe that Islam and freedom are incompatible. I’m not talking about people… But I believe that the Islamic ideology is very dangerous…
Islam as an ideology does not allow freedom. Look at almost all the countries in the world where Islam is dominant – you see a total lack of civil society, of rule of law, of freedom for journalists, women, Christians, or even somebody who wants to leave Islam, an apostate…
Not only is the Quran more full of anti-Semitism than Mein Kampf – another terrible book – ever was, but one token of proof of totalitarianism is that you are not allowed to leave. That’s the proof of totalitarianism… 


You are allowed to leave Christianity or Judaism and become an atheist or the follower of another religion; you are not allowed to leave fascism, you are not allowed to leave Communism. And still today in Holland, in Germany, in the Arab and Islamic world, the penalty is death if you want to leave Islam…
That kind of thinking, that kind of violence within an ideology is something that we should not import…” 


Over and over again Wilders attempts to make the same point that many conservatives in America are making. This is not about individual people, or about ethnicity, or race… this is about culture. Islam is unable to assimilate into Western culture because the Koran and other religious teachings in Islam forbid it. Islam is incompatible with Western culture because it refuses to abide by the rules, traditions, and philosophies advanced by our culture. It’s about saving our culture, not about discriminating against another people group.
Here’s the entire interview in English:

To hear more from Wilders, enjoy this interview he just gave with Canada’s Rebel Media.



And here below you can see the important speech he delivered in Garland, Texas:

President Trump Calls Nancy Pelosi Incompetent

By Lynn Jolly 

Over the past 8 years, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has demonstrated time and again that she is either totally incompetent or suffering from senile dementia. It’s comforting to know that others like President Donald Trump agrees.

Let’s review of some of Pelosi’s famous utterings:
In 2009, Pelosi revealed her partisan stupidity when referring to the Affordable Care Act, and she told the nation:

“We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”

In other words, she was admitting that she had no idea what the Affordable Care Act said or did but wanted to just blindly pass it because it was what Barack Obama wanted. Why would any politician ever admit to wanting to pass a piece of legislation without first knowing what it said?
That wasn’t her only absurd comment about the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. She also stated:

“The Affordable Care Act is bringing the cost of healthcare in our country down in both the public and private sector and that is what is largely responsible for the deficit coming down.”

Oh really? In some parts of California, the cost of healthcare did take a dip, but nationwide, it has steadily climbed and in many areas skyrocketed out of being affordable for millions of Americans. Additionally, under Barack Obama, the deficit never came down. He increased the deficit to nearly double what it was when he took office. He increased the deficit more than any president in history.
Remember when Pelosi told everyone:
“And everybody will have lower rates, better quality care and better access.” 


There are countless reports of people receiving worse care and reduced access to what medical care there is. Our daughter is a prime example. Although she had a tumor that was secreting excess hormones which were causing a myriad of health issues, most doctors said they couldn’t do anything with the tumor because it was too small under Obamacare guideline. In order for the insurance to pay and the doctors to get paid, the new guidelines said her type of tumor had to be at least 10mm in size and since her’s was only 9mm, they wouldn’t touch it. Thank you Pelosi for that better quality care you promised.

However, Pelosi also stated:

“I don’t remember saying that everybody in the country would have a lower premium.”

All she had to do was check out her list of quotes and she would easily have found it. If she truly didn’t remember saying it, then it demonstrates that she’s definitely not qualified to be in the US House of Representatives, let alone holding the position of House Minority Leader.
This is another one of Pelosi’s whoppers, when speaking about Barack Obama, she stated:

“I don’t think he’s ever done anything for political reasons.”

Obama never doing anything for political reasons is like saying the Pope never says prayers for religious reasons.

Pelosi has no concept the nation’s population or workforce when she stated:

“Every month that we do not have an economic recovery package 500 million Americans lose their jobs.”

As of the time of this writing, the US Census Bureau listed the total US population, including children and everyone not working at only 324.6 million. That’s 175 million short of Pelosi’s 500 million losing job every month.
Over this past weekend, Pelosi appeared on ABC’s This Week when she described the Trump administration as having:

“…done nothing except put Wall Street first, make America sick again, instill fear in our immigration population in our country and make sure Russia maintains its grip on our foreign policy.”
 

Again, her dementia and political blindness came shining through. President Trump appeared in an interview with Fox & Friends and admitting that he saw the tape of Pelosi and her comments, said that the House Minority Leader is incompetent, and added:

“Well, I’ve been watching Nancy’s tape, and so I think she’s incompetent, actually. You know, if you look at what’s going on with the Democrats and the party, it’s getting smaller and smaller.”
“You know, in a certain way, I hate to see it, because I like a two-party system, and we’re soon going to have a one-party system. I actually think a two-party system is healthy and good.”
“But she’s done a terrible job.”

One can only hope and pray that this will be Pelosi’s last term in office and then she will be free to get on her broom and fly back to California where she will fit in with all the other liberal nuts the state is known for.
 

 

Chicago Reveals How Evil the Democrat Party Has Become

by:Warner Todd Huston 

Two separate incidents concerning memorial street signs in Chicago encapsulates perfectly how warped, truly immoral, and evil the Democrat Party in the U.S.A. has become. 

The City of Chicago is one of the most dangerous cities in America, there is simply no doubt. Last year there were a shocking 4,379 citizens shot and 716 shot and killed — and another 84 murdered by other means — in the city run by former Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Upon its conclusion, it was found that 2016 was the city’s bloodiest year in 60 years. 

If that wasn’t bad enough, 2017 is already shaping up to be worse than last year. In the first two months of the year the city has already seen 512 total shootings with 98 killed plus an additional 5 murdered by other means. But according to the Chicago Sun-Times, February of 2016 ended with 187 shootings and only 43 murders.
Chicago isn’t just dangerous in the city’s worst areas, either. The Windy City’s trains are fraught with violence, there are roving gangs of teens attacking shoppers in the city’s shopping districts, there are attacks on joggers on the lake front, children being murdered, dismembered, and thrown in a city lagoon — all these incidents occurred outside the so-called “dangerous” areas of the city.
So, yes, Chicago is a terrible place for people to live. The Chicago Police and especially the city government have proven to be utterly worthless allowing citizens to be murdered and maimed by the thousands every year.

And the numbers of those leaving the city shows that at least some of Chicago’s residents know it. As 2016 came to an end, the Chicago Tribune reported that Illinois lost more residents in 2016 than any other state. And more to the point, Chicago lost more population than any other U.S. city.
But all this didn’t happen by accident. It happened because the city’s government is destroying the city and are doing so because the Democrat Party is evil.
And while it may at first seem trivial, two recent street sign decisions makes the evil of Democrats explicit.
The first street sign decision occurred in October of last year when the city council led by Mayor Emanuel began the process of removing the honorary street signs re-naming a portion of Wabash Avenue for Donald J. Trump. The signs were erected after Trump built his tremendous Trump Tower in Chicago.

But as the last election campaign neared its end, the city council felt that during that campaign Donald Trump was too mean to deserve the honor of having a street sign named after him.
“His divisive comments about various segments of Chicago society, whether you’re Latino or another minority, an immigrant, a woman, that in and of itself is offensive,” 42nd Ward Alderman Brendan Reilly said last year. “But his decision to drag us into this campaign and mischaracterize and paint a very distorted caricature of Chicago is a mistake and we reserve these honorary street signs for special Chicagoans who have lifted up this city and move us forward.”

Some city fathers even tried to claim that Trump was a terrorist.

By December, only a month before Donald Trump took the oath of office to become our 45th president, the Chicago City Council removed the last of the Trump street signs. 

This move to dump the Trump street signs may just seem like typical, petty, liberals acting like petulant children. But what the city did only two months later in contrast proves that liberals aren’t merely petty — which they are, of course — but are evil.
So, Trump’s signs were removed because Trump is a terrorist, he’s mean, he’s loud, and he’s a bad guy. OK, fine. There is much reason to feel negatively concerning Trump’s behavior. “Evil,” is an idiotic overstatement, granted, but Trump has done and said things that are easily disliked. Maybe he doesn’t deserve a street even though he is president of the United States.
But even as Trump’s signs were removed, early in February of this year the city decided to bestow an honorary street sign upon one Oscar Lopez Rivera.

Who is this Rivera fellow? Why, no less than a real terrorist. That’s right, Oscar Lopez Rivera is the man who founded the domestic terror group FALN.
The Puerto Rican separatist FALN terror group is responsible for killing six people and perpetrating some 130 bombings and terror attacks on U.S. soil between 1974 and 1983 all in an effort to get Puerto Rico to become an autonomous nation free of control by the United States.
Rivera was jailed for his terrorist activities but had his sentence commuted as President Obama prepared to leave office early this year. Since the commutation, twenty-sixth Ward Alderman Robert Maldonado decided to propose that a three-block stretch of North Luis Munoz Marin Drive be named after the terrorist. Naturally, the City Council moved quickly to approve the proposal.

Shockingly, the city approved the sign despite the plea from the son of one of Rivera’s victims.

Joe Connor, the son of Frank Connor who was killed by a FALN bombing in 1975, was disgusted by the city’s move and published an op-ed int the Chicago Sun-Times to plead for the city to deny the honor to the terrorist.
“He is a sworn terrorist,” Joe Connor said. “He was convicted of bombings in Chicago that did injure people. He tried to escape from prison with machine guns and plastic explosives where he was gonna kill the guards. … And Chicago is gonna put up a sign in his honor?”
“The idea that people will walk by and see this street sign and think that Oscar Lopez was some sort of great person — it’s diabolical,” Connor said. “The world is upside down here. What’s next for Chicago, bin Laden Boulevard? Charles Manson Court? This is worse than a disgrace. It is sinister. It’s a direct insult to my father’s life.”

Worse, Rivera has never once renounced his past terrorist actions. But the city named the street after him anyway.
So, let’s recap: Rahm Emanuel and his quislings removed a street sign honoring the president of the United States because he’s a bad guy, but raised a street sign to a real, unrepentant domestic terrorist who is responsible for the death of Americans and the injury of dozens more because… wait? He’s a good guy?

This proves decisively that Democrats are immoral monsters. They are celebrating a real, unrepentant terrorist while calling a man whom they merely disagree with politically a terrorist.

This is the modern Democrat Party writ large. 

Finally, I have to note that the suburbs surrounding Chicago are no better. In the lily white, rich northern suburb of New Trier Township, the local high school is holding a civil rights seminar day where all the white kids will be told they are bad people merely because they are white and will be exposed to radical “speakers” who will teach them that the U.S. is and always has been an evil country. And even after a special school board meeting to discuss this “civil rights day” which was called after the controversial ideas were made public, the seminars are still set to continue.

This is all due to the unethical, corrupt, and moral bankruptcy of the Democrat Party.

 

Report: Only a Fraction of Subway's Oven Roasted Chicken is Actually Chicken

Subway is fighting back against a claim that the chicken it serves up isn't all real chicken. A Canadian Broadcasting Corporation investigation backed by Trent University researchers says a DNA test showed the oven roasted chicken is just over half chicken. The rest was made up of soy.

The same test found other fast food chains had about 85 to 90 percent chicken as opposed to Subway's 50 percent. With such a different result, the researchers tested five more oven roasted chicken pieces and five orders of chicken strips: the roasted averaged 53.6 percent chicken DNA and the strips 42.8.

Subway said it can't confirm any of the testing methods used, but admits it uses about 1 percent of soy protein for texture and moisture.

"We will look into this again with our supplier to ensure that the chicken is meeting the high standard we set for all of our menu items and ingredients," the chain said in a statement.

 Source: WMUR

Senate to investigate Soros taxpayer funded meddling in elections

by:D.E 

SIGN THE PETITION TO DEPORT GEORGE SOROS!
Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee is pressing the State Department for answers regarding alleged meddling by creepy billionaire George Soros in Macedonia.  Specifically, Lee would like to know why Soros’ “Open Society Foundation” was given millions in US taxpayer dollars to “strengthen democratic practices and institutions” there.

“I have received credible reports that, over the past few years, the US Mission to Macedonia has actively intervened in the party politics of Macedonia, as well as the shaping of its media environment and civil society, often favoring groups of one political persuasion over another,” Lee wrote in a letter to Obama-appointed U.S. Ambassador to Macedonia Jess Baily.
Soros’ group was given the cash after being awarded a contract by the U.S. Agency for International Development.  The State Department then met with Macedonian leaders to schedule and plan their parliamentary elections.

Macedonian’s current government is center-right.  During their 2014 elections, with Soros’ group actively involved and funded by the Obama administration, President Gjorge Ivanov was forced into a runoff election before finally emerging victorious.
Ivanov is a Euroskeptic, which clashes fiercly with the Open Society Foundation’s stated goal of a stronger European Union.  That means the Obama administration gave millions of dollars in taxpayer funds to monitor and run elections to a group with a stated position and agenda in the matter.
Lee isn’t the only member of Congress demanding answers.
“[I]t seems that the U.S. government funded organizations that have taken sides, specifically, the side of the socialists, which is absolutely unacceptable. I think this is illegal and we will examine this case to the fullest extent.” New Jersey Republican Congressman Chris Smith tells a Macedonian TV network.

The Solution to Our Looming Farm Crash: Less Government Everywhere

by:Kelly

America’s farmers are having a serious problem maintaining solvency.  And have been teetering on that brink for decades.  Remember Farm Aid?  This was a charity project launched with a concert by the likes of Willie Nelson, John Mellencamp (professionally ne Cougar) and Canada’s Neil Young, to assist America’s struggling farmers – in 1985.  Thirty-plus years later – Farm Aid is still going.
Because the American farmer’s problem is still ongoing.  We have watched globalism gut our nation’s manufacturing.  Our food manufacturing has suffered similar devastation.  Farmers are victimized by the same terrible global government conditions and awful trade deals that have been undercutting our factories and mills.
The Next American Farm Bust Is Upon Us: “The Farm Belt is hurtling toward a milestone: Soon there will be fewer than two million farms in America for the first time since pioneers moved westward after the Louisiana Purchase.”

Let us pause here to note the trajectory of our Department of Agriculture spending – as our nation’s agriculture sector shrank: “The department will spend $154 billion in 2016, or $1,230 for every U.S. household. After adjusting for inflation, spending has increased 45 percent since 2000.”
That is at once ridiculous – and telling.  The private agriculture sector has imploded – yet the government agriculture department has, bizarrely, grown exponentially.  How very DC.
And therein lies the problem.  Not just here – but all around the globalized world.  We are allegedly engaged in international “free trade” – but the reality is anything but free.  It is an omni-directional, multi-governments nightmare mess of mandates, tariffs and subsidies.

For instance, Brazil: “Brazil’s (government) farm budget for the upcoming 2015/16 crop year will be 20% bigger than last year’s… (to) BRL187.7 billion (US Dollars $59 billion).”
Get that?  The U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is roughly $18 trillion – Brazil’s is $1.8 trillion.  And Brazil’s farm subsidy budget – all by itself – is about 40% of our entire bloated Ag Department budget.
And yet Brazil has audacity enough for this: Brazil Takes Aim at U.S. Farm Subsidies.
Then there’s China: “Gordon Chang…author of the tome “The Coming Collapse of China”…was on CNBC on March 10, 2016 – stating the very obvious: “‘People say [President Donald Trump] would start a trade war. Well, no matter what The Donald does he can’t start a trade war because we’re already in a trade war with China. But only they are waging it,’ Chang told CNBC. ‘The question is how do we end it on terms not only advantageous to the United States but also to the international community.’”

Chang says China’s clinging to its big government ways – are leading to a crash of its very own: “Beijing’s cautious reforms have left the country stuck midway between communism and capitalism…which will shake the country to its foundations. Economic failure will be followed by government collapse.”
Similar to the one our farmers face.
Think all of that government nonsense won’t warp the global market?  Think all of that represents actually free trade?
Our farmers are taking hits – on all fronts: “Across the heartland, a multiyear slump in prices for corn, wheat and other farm commodities brought on by a glut of grain world-wide is pushing many farmers further into debt.”

And why is there a crop glut?  Because nations all over the world are subsidizing the daylight out of crops.  Government pays someone to do X – and people will line up for miles to do X.  Common Core has teachers teaching to the test – government has farmers growing to the subsidies.
And our subsidies are but a tiny fraction of other nations’ – so we are getting crushed: “The U.S. share of the global grain market is less than half what it was in the 1970s. American farmers’ incomes will drop 9% in 2017….”
So getting rid of our minuscule subsidies – unilaterally disarming in Chang’s global trade war – would score some tiny ideological purity points.  While doing huge damage to our farm sector.

Instead, how about a fully-formed Mr Potato Head free market solution?  Mr Potato Head is the children’s toy where you can remove each facial feature unilaterally.  When your Head has a mouth, a nose…and no eyes – the resulting visage is quite bizarre.  Just as bizarre as unilaterally disarming in the global trade government arms race.
What we should do – on ALL things trade – is what Florida Republican Congressman Ted Yoho wants to do with sugar: “Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla., reintroduced a bill Friday that encourages the administration to target foreign sugar subsidies. Under the ‘Zero-for-Zero’ plan, U.S. sugar policy would also be rolled back in exchange for the elimination of foreign programs, which Yoho says are distorting world prices and inhibiting a free market.”

We less government types get the warping effect of government – domestically.  Government’s damage doesn’t stop at our shores.  Free marketeers should also acknowledge that to make better our farms, our markets and our economy, we need less government here – and everywhere else.

This first appeared in Red State. Seton Motley is the founder and president of Less Government.  Please feel free to follow him on Twitter (@SetonMotley) and Facebook.  It’s his kind of stalking.