Glorifying Homosexuality

oped: Personally I could care less what consenting adults do in private~That is a  issue between them and our creator GOD!...however when they take their sexual fetish to the level of a political party...*Red Flags* sound loud and clear...smacks of the 1920's~ 1945 the world has been there done that...however, once again those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it.
Let me educate those who are lacking the education, begin your journey for the Cold Hard Truth : 
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/08/revisiting-pink-swastika.html  

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-strange-strange-story-of-gay.html 

http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2014/08/obama-breaks-from-vacation-to-kick-off.html 


by: Barry Napier 
The power homosexuals (male and female) have over the world is amazingly stupefying. Officially, they are just 2% of the whole population, yet their laws, policies and demands rule the rest of us. (In reality, this figure is about 100% inaccurate, because those called ‘homosexuals’ – in all absurd sub-branches – are less than 1%, when adjustments are made for those who leave this notorious dark end of humanity. (Homosexuals never admit people leave their abnormal sexuality, because it proves that homosexuality is a choice).
Not only is this less-than-1% ruling us all, but they harbor some of the most vile diseases known to man, from AIDS and HIV to exotic cancers caused by immoral and stupid use of the body.

67% of all new HIV cases are in homosexual men, and over 55% of cases in the USA alone are amongst the same carriers. (CDC report, August 2016). Figures globally are more. Yet, governments legislate for them and ‘protect’ their status: to protect a cause of disease in incredibly moronic. In 2005 I compiled a long report on this phenomenon, and predicted the figures would rise continuously. (Anyone interested can have a copy sent by email). And so they have. It is ordinary taxpayers who foot the bill for the treatment of these self-inflicted diseases, horrendous physical injuries caused by gross sexual activities, and awful social problems caused by something that is both abnormal and immoral.

Any genuine doctor who is unafraid of being intimidated by rampant PC views will openly say that the homosexual lifestyle is more dangerous than heterosexuality (because heterosexuality is normal). This is based not on disgust with homosexuality, but with the medical facts. It should also be said that most homosexuals do not care about getting or giving foul diseases, and most never use a condom. They bear their diseases like a badge of honour (called ‘the gift’) and some even try to get HIV during group sex sessions. This is just one indication of the mental imbalance of homosexuals; an imbalance inherent in the lifestyle.

We often read of the homosexual myth that society causes homosexuals to commit suicide or to have depression. Not so! It is now known that a continual habit of any kind changes the ‘hard wiring’ of the brain. The homosexual habit is more seriously adopted than many other habits, and it causes the brain to change, in order to accept a lifestyle that is a death cult. Much like alcoholism and extreme drug taking. That is, the mental imbalances and depressions etc., are the fault of those who choose a sexual outlet that brings disaster and mayhem. These problems get far worse when we know that most homosexuals want sex with children (because they are initially free of HIV, but quickly get it after being groomed, seduced and abused by homosexuals). This is hotly denied in public, but it is a known fact amongst researchers. Homosexuals are expert liars, and keep their foulest activities under wraps: an idea taught by homosexual activists, to allay anxiety in society.

The CDC says that if current diagnosis rates continue (which they will, just as they have risen since 2005), 1 in 6 bisexual men will get HIV in their lifetime. For black/African men this rises to a staggering 1 in 2; amongst Latino, 1 in 4.
In 2014 a staggering 83% of all cases were amongst homosexual males aged 13 or older (note the awful figure – age 13!), and 92% of new HIV cases were amongst homosexuals, with 54% diagnosed with AIDS (which follows HIV as night follows day).
The CDC says that while the overall numbers have dropped, they have risen sharply amongst homosexuals, just as I predicted would happen in my 1985 research paper (suppressed by my college). Conservative society does not cause any of this – it is all down to men and women choosing to live immorally, and, at times, choosing the most extreme and disgusting activities to satisfy sexual lust… there is no ‘love’ amongst homosexuals, as the high violence rates against each other prove.

To eradicate ANY disease, the cause must be found and removed. This happens with EVERY disease ever researched. But, there is an ideological, political and sexual blockage in the minds of governments. They refuse point blank to identify the cause of HIV, homosexuality, so the problem only gets worse year on year. But, what can we expect from leaders who are themselves immoral?
Yes, heterosexuals get HIV, but this is only because bisexuals/homosexuals passed it on to the general population in the first place. And, though homosexual activists scream blue murder, the actual first cause of HIV and AIDS is homosexual behaviour. As a researcher in the 1980s I analysed what was then a new disease (AIDS, then called ‘the gay plague’ by medics) and the data all pointed to only ONE cause – homosexuality: 100% of all cases were in homosexuals. This ONE cause continued for the first few years before it slowly crossed over into the general population, via bisexuality, use of prostitutes who then ‘serviced’ heterosexuals, contaminated blood supplies, homosexual men infecting their wives and girlfriends, and so on.

Until this is dealt with – and stigma for being immoral would certainly help – the world will see a huge increase annually in cases of HIV and AIDS, and many will be among our children, groomed, seduced and abused, by homosexuals. Pro-homosexual laws must be repealed, and public information must be given freely, and not suppressed by homosexual activists through government laws and policies. And, children must not be taught that homosexuality is normal or an ‘alternative’.
But, just as governments think Islam is a ‘good thing’ so they refuse to tackle the truth about homosexuality. If you think anything of truth and your children, get the facts and use them to stop this absurd idea that opposing homosexual wickedness is ‘homophobia’! Homosexuality kills and reduces societies to ashes.

I know the reaction to this – I am ‘homophobic’. No, I loathe homosexuality. It kills and it is an immoral stain on society. I also loathe murder. What’s the difference?

 

Grilling steaks over lava. Because we can.

by Kelly
As part of Syracuse University’s Earth Sciences Lava Project, two students wanted to see if they could cook some thick, juicy steaks using only grill and lava.
According to the website: The Syracuse University Lava Project is a collaboration between sculptor Bob Wysocki (Assistant Professor, Department of Art) and geologist Jeff Karson (Professor, Department of Earth Sciences) at Syracuse University. The goals of the project include scientific experiments, artistic creations, education, and outreach to the Syracuse University and City communities. Basaltic lava, similar to that found on the seafloor and erupted from volcanoes in Hawaii and Iceland, is melted and poured to produce natural-scale lava flows. The project supports a wide variety of scientific experiments engaging faculty and students at SU and volcanologists from other institutions. The natural beauty and particular properties of the lava are the basis for sculpture projects. In addition, lava pours are staged at the SU Comstock Art Building for classes, student groups, and the public. The SU Lava Project brings the spectacle and excitement of a volcanic eruption to Central New York.
I liked the bit at the end when they drop the meat directly onto the lava.

https://youtu.be/i5MDnkV8DZA

Nearly 80% of Gun Crimes in Pittsburgh Committed by Non-Gun Owners

By Dave Jolly 

If you listen to liberals like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Michael Bloomberg, you would think that every person who owns a gun is intent on committing some sort of violent crime involving their gun(s). According to them, everyone who walks into a gun shop and purchases a handgun or AR-15, is going to use it to shoot or threaten someone else. It doesn’t matter if you like to just target shoot, hunt or have protection in your own home, Obama and Clinton have already labeled you as a potential violent criminal that needs to be controlled by their liberal government.

In fact, Hillary Clinton has made it known that she wants to hold gun manufacturers and dealers responsible for all violence in which one of their guns was used. In other words, if someone stole a Glock handgun from someone’s home, then illegally sold it to someone else on the street and that person used the gun to commit a violent crime, Clinton believes that Glock and the gun store that sold the gun should be held responsible for the crime. That’s like holding Ford and a local Ford dealership responsible if someone bought an F-150 pickup and then used it to run over and kill someone with. Can you imagine someone going to Walmart and buying a set of Farberware cutlery and then someone uses one of those knives to stab someone and then making Walmart and Farberware responsible for the crime?

Obama and Clinton completely ignore the many instances of where someone used a gun to protect themselves or their family from intruders. They intentionally ignore incidents like what happened last November in Charleston, South Carolina. Two men tried to break into a home through the back door when the 13-year-old son of the homeowner used one of his mom’s loaded guns to prevent their entry. The boy fired once through the door, mortally wounding one of the intruders. There have been many reports similar to this one where someone has legally used a firearm to protect themselves and their family from intruders.

Obama and Clinton also willfully ignore the many reports where someone has legally used a firearm to prevent or stop a mass murder. I previously reported on at least 11 instances where a legal gun owner legally used their gun to stop a mass murder from taking place or to stop one in progress.
Clinton and Obama also ignore crime facts that support gun owners like the recent report from Pittsburgh. CNS News recently reported on a study published in the July edition of Social Medicine. The crux of the report stated that 79% of gun crimes committed in Pittsburgh in 2008 were committed by non-gun owners.
The researchers looked at all 893 of the guns recovered from Pittsburgh crime scenes in 2008 and then traced the guns back to their sources. The 893 guns were used in 762 different crimes carried out by 607 offenders.

They found that only 87 (14.2%) of the crimes were committed by the legal owner of the guns. According to the study:

“Of the 762 cases, 553 (73 percent) involved a total of 607 perpetrators. Most (n = 478, 78.7%) were carrying or linked to a firearm that did not belong to them. Eighty-six (14.2%) were owners that committed an offense while legally carrying their firearm, 10 (1.6%) were owners illegally carrying their firearm but committing no other offense, and 12 (2.0%) were owners that committed an offense while illegally carrying their firearm…”
“Given that 79% of perpetrators are connected to firearms for which they are not the legal owner, it is highly likely that a significant amount of theft or trafficking is the source of perpetrators’ firearms.”

So what good would all of Clinton and Obama’s anti-Second Amendment gun control laws do if they were passed and put in place? This study, along with many other facts clearly demonstrate that the motive behind Clinton and Obama’s gun control measures have nothing to do with reducing gun-related violence but everything to do with their ulterior motive of eventually disarming the American people.
Be assured that if Hillary Clinton is elected in November, that she will continue to ignore the facts and work to disarm the American people. If that happens, perhaps it’s time the American people finally stand up for their constitutional rights and take appropriate action to protect those rights.

CDC says: Gay Men are 2% of the Population but 55% of HIV Cases, 67% of New Cases!

By Onan Coca 
In a startling story that is sure to be overlooked by the mainstream media, the CDC’s latest report on HIV and AIDS reveals some important truths about the debate over sexuality and health in the world today. 
Some doctors, unconcerned with being politically correct and more focused on saving lives, have been arguing for years that the homosexual lifestyle is more dangerous than a heterosexual lifestyle. Their reasoning has always been based on the medical facts at hand – homosexuals are far more likely to transmit and received sexually transmitted diseases than heterosexuals. Psychologically, homosexuals are also more likely to suffer serious mental or emotional issues than heterosexuals. These things all play a role in determining that in the most medically advanced civilization the world has ever seen, being homosexual is one of the most deleterious choices one can make for their health. 

The CDC’s latest report simply underlines this fact.
Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men made up an estimated 2% of the population but 55% of people living with HIV in the United States in 2013. If current diagnosis rates continue, 1 in 6 gay and bisexual men will be diagnosed with HIV in their lifetime, including 1 in 2 black/African-American gay and bisexual men, 1 in 4 Hispanic/Latino gay and bisexual men, and 1 in 11 white gay and bisexual men. 


In 2014:

• Gay and bisexual men accounted for 83% (29,418) of the estimated new HIV diagnoses among all males aged 13 and older and 67% of the total estimated new diagnoses in the United States.
• Gay and bisexual men aged 13 to 24 accounted for an estimated 92% of new HIV diagnoses among all men in their age group and 27% of new diagnoses among all gay and bisexual men.
• Gay and bisexual men accounted for an estimated 54% (11,277) of people diagnosed with AIDS. Of those men, 39% were African American, 32% were white, and 24% were Hispanic/Latino. 

While the left would blame most of these problems on conservative “homophobia,” the truth is actually quite different. Even as homosexuality becomes an ever more acceptable societal given; the mental and physical consequences of such behavior continue to persist. In fact, the CDC notes that even as the HIV/AIDS infection rates continue to generally drop, over the last ten years they actually rose in the homosexual male community. This has nothing to do with conservative homophobia and everything to do with what we on the right have been warning about for years – the dangerous consequences of negative and immoral behavior.
We don’t revel in the facts at hand, far from it, we hope for the eradication of these horrible diseases and maladies. However, refusing to acknowledge the root causes of these problems does nothing for those affected. To end the ravages of HIV/AIDS we must openly and honestly discuss the reasons for the epidemic.

Female Canadian Mounties can wear hijabs with uniform, gov't says

oped: First and foremost under Sharia Law...women are in no way allowed to work in a position of authority over men much less allowed to have state laws over Sharia.
Second is this not a safety issue? are the hijabs break away...like ties officers wear for safety reasons ?...if not they could be pulled over the face blinding the officer or used to strangle them...if break away... oop's they no longer have a hijab on...this is one dumb policy! PC run amuck again!


OTTAWA, Aug. 24 (UPI) — Muslim female officers in Canada’s national police force can wear traditional headscarves with their uniforms, the nation’s public safety ministry said Wednesday.
A spokesman for the ministry confirmed that government leaders decided to allow the unique Islamic dress in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
“The commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police recently approved this addition to the uniform to allow ‎female members of the Muslim faith to wear a hijab if they so choose,” Public Safety Canada spokesman Scott Bardsley told Global News Wednesday. “This is intended to better reflect the diversity in our communities and encourage more Muslim women to consider the Royal Canadian Mounted Police as a career option.”
The move, officials say, is intended to welcome all cultures and encourage Muslim women to join the RCMP.

“Our police forces need to reflect the populations they serve,” National Council of Canadian Muslims spokeswoman Amira Elghawaby said. “So it’s quite natural they would try to recruit from more women, including women who decide to wear the hijab.”
About 20 percent of the RCMP’s 20,000-member force are women, the agency found in 2012.
The official uniform of the mounted police force goes back to the 19th century and features a red coat, leather boots and a wide-brimmed felt hat.
Three types of hijabs were tested last month before one was approved by the RCMP.
Police forces in Toronto and Edmonton have adopted similar policies, along with multiple departments in the United States.
—-
This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.

Wink, wink! Clinton dog whistles to racists

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s newest campaign tactic is the most disgusting yet.
It appears Clinton is giving a ‘wink’ to voters all over the country — and warning that anyone who is against her is a racist.
Clinton warns that Trump has unleashed a ‘radical fringe’ in America, including anti-Semites and white supremacist, dubbing the billionaire businessman’s campaign as one that will “make America hate again.”
By embracing such an outrageous tactic, Clinton is only proving one thing: There’s only one candidate that’s thriving through racial tensions, and it’s not her opponent Donald Trump.
Trump rejected Clinton’s allegations, defending his hard-line approach to immigration while trying to make the case to minority voters that Democrats have abandoned them.

In a tweet shortly after Clinton wrapped up her speech in the swing state of Nevada, Trump said she “is pandering to the worst instincts in our society. She should be ashamed of herself!”
Trump tried to get ahead of the Democratic nominee, addressing a crowd in Manchester, New Hampshire just minutes before Clinton.
“Hillary Clinton is going to try to accuse this campaign, and the millions of decent Americans who support this campaign, of being racists,” Trump predicted.
“To Hillary Clinton, and to her donors and advisers, pushing her to spread her smears and her lies about decent people, I have three words,” he said. “I want you to hear these words, and remember these words: Shame on you.”

Later, on Twitter, Trump released an incredible video —

"Hillary Clinton needs to address the racist undertones of her 2008 campaign." #FlashbackFriday pic.twitter.com/MJQp0rcnzH

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 26, 2016

Trump, who also met Thursday in New York with members of a new Republican Party initiative meant to train young — and largely minority — volunteers, has been working to win over blacks and Latinos and has been claiming that the Democrats have taken minority voters’ support for granted. At rallies over the past week, the Republican presidential nominee cast Democratic policies as harmful to communities of color, and in Mississippi on Wednesday he went so far as to label Clinton “a bigot.”
“They’ve been very disrespectful, as far as I’m concerned, to the African-American population in this country,” Trump said.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.

‘Standing Army’ Oath-Breakers Attack Civilian RKBA

https://www.oathkeepers.org


[Spoken like a true talking point parrot and oath-breaking tool. (Americans for Responsible Solutions/Facebook) ]

by: David Codrea 
“Veterans Are Key Allies in the Fight to Reduce Gun Violence,” retired U.S. Army Gen. Peter Chiarelli writes in Time.
“While our gun-violence crisis is complex, there is no doubt that our weak, gap-ridden gun laws help fuel the violence by making it too easy for dangerous people to access firearms,” he explains. “Right now under federal law, felons, domestic abusers and the dangerously mentally ill have the option of buying a gun without a background check and with no questions asked. Even people who are considered by the the [sic] Federal Bureau of Investigation to be a known or suspected terrorist can pass a background check and legally buy a gun.”
Chiarelli is, of course, an agenda-motivated liar, which is disgraceful. Anyone convicted of the crimes he cites is a “prohibited person,” barred by federal law from gun possession.

"Extremist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS have long urged their followers to use our country’s weak gun laws to acquire deadly weapons and commit active shooter terrorism here in America,” Chiarelli elaborates, playing the terror card to spook the herd. Why the hell such savages are in this country in the first place – not just “allowed,” but whose presence is part of a “fundamental transformation” plot by subversives in positions of power – is a question deflected by shifting public focus to guns (and calling people who question it “Islamophobes”). The “progressive” establishment media is, of course, enthusiastic to play along, and to help smear anyone who objects as an isolationist xenophobe and worse.
Besides, it’s not like anyone but us “rightwing extremist anti-government haters” is much interested in looking more closely at that “rigorous security screening” those same subversives assure us keeps such terrorists out. That’s not the kind of talk the wannabe rulers, their lackeys and their useful idiots want to hear.

What Chiarelli actually objects to is a pesky impediment to totalitarianism known as “due process.” He’s already proven disdain for the Bill of Rights with his gun nonsense, so subverting the rest of the Constitution should come as no surprise.
Naturally, he blames “the gun lobby.” The controllers find it useful to direct their “two minutes hate” at a monolith, meaning it does not serve their purposes to acknowledge that “lobby” includes every one of us who believe without apology in our right to keep and bear arms.
And Chiarelli’s “solution”?
Team up with Mark Kelly and Gungrabby Gabby to pose as supporters of “common sense” in what we’re being told is a “Veteran’s Coalition.”  There appear to be a lot of high-ranking veteran names on that “team,” many of them prominent generals and admirals, and many of them with careers that reflect achievements and distinction, making their participation all the more insidious.

We’ve talked about oath-breaking veterans before, several times, including some with distinguished service records. But it’s not what they did, in the past; it’s what they’re doing now that we need to concern ourselves with. Sadly, and in the more ambitious cases unforgivably, giving aid and comfort to domestic enemies and working against their oaths and the rights of their countrymen is what’s relevant here.
Whether motivations for supporting incremental civilian disarmament steps are sincere or self-serving hardly matters, and many would no doubt maintain they “support the second Amendment BUT.” The long game agenda of those pushing a “monopoly of violence” is exactly that, and anything that allows their efforts to move closer to that goal establishes a beachhead from which to launch the next incursion.
For now, the cards the “Veteran’s Coalition” is willing to show are meant to seem “reasonable,” at least to anyone who doesn’t inspect them too closely:

• Urging our elected leaders to close the loopholes in our background check laws that let felons, domestic abusers and the dangerously mentally ill buy guns without a criminal background check.
• Strengthening existing laws and ensuring lawmakers and stakeholders have the resources and training they need to prevent gun tragedies.
• Partnering with other groups in the veterans community on suicide prevention and mental health. 

In other words:

• Lie about what’s lawful and eliminate private sales in a scheme that the National Institute of Justice admits won’t work without gun registration, something which all convicted criminals are exempted from being required to do.
• Throw in a nebulous statement that says nothing but allows everything in order to promise something that can’t be delivered.
• Further screw over and disarm veterans while ignoring true due process that affords the same protections against rights being stripped as a jury trial.

It’s curious to note that the first goal  — the so-called “universal background check” being pushed by Bloomberg money in the states because there’s no belly for it (yet) in Congress  — is something the government and military “leaders” have totally dropped the ball on when it comes to America’s most dangerous enemies, the very ones they exist to protect against.

“Pentagon admits ‘lapses in accountability’ led to loss of hundreds of thousands of us guns in Afghanistan and Iraq,” Zero Hedge reports. “This is a stunning admission by the DoD of the lack of accountability in tracking assets that could ultimately be used by terrorists to fight our own troops.”
That would be the same Department of Defense that can’t account for $6.5 trillion, a situation that’s only grown significantly worse since $2.3 trillion was reported unaccounted for in 2001.
These are some of the people now demanding accountability for our guns?
We know the Founders feared a standing army, and that the military is supposed to be subordinate to civilian authority. We also know the attitudes of Chiarelli and some of his partners in civilian disarmament like Stanley McChrystal, David Petraeus and Wesley Clark give cause to still hold those fears.  It’s fair to ask what directives those now in charge won’t execute when so ordered by an administration sharing their disdain for an armed citizenry, and the non-optional mandate “shall not be infringed.”
It brings home the urgency of rededicating ourselves to spreading the word about “orders we will not obey.” It also stands as a stark reminder that at one time, one of our most respected military leaders was a guy named Arnold.

—–

UPDATE: The Captain’s Journal has more.

 

Criminal! Obama broke law on Iran deal

President Barack Obama’s secret, $400 million ransom payment to Iran was just the tip of the iceberg.
Turns out there was 13 other payouts made before that, according to new reports.
The ransom cash was only a part of the Obama administration payments to Iran made using an obscure Treasury Department account called the “Judgement Fund” — and if so, it represents a direct violation of the U.S. constitution.

The fund is a little-known government cash reserve set aside to pay for legal rulings that go against the government. However, using it to pay foreign governments large sums may be highly illegal.
The revelations were first reported by The New York Sun, which found 13 transfers of $99,999,999.99 the administration apparently made from the fund on January 17th — two days before the Obama administration announced to the public they’d cut a deal with the Iranian government to pay $1.7 billion to settle a legal dispute being considered in The Hague. The payment was exactly $400,000,000.13 shy of the agreed settlement total, which appears to have been wrapped up with Obama’s widely-reported ransom payment.

If proven to be true, these payments would be a direct violation of the Constitution — an offense so serious, Obama could be impeached over it. 

The Judgement Fund exists in a legal gray zone, funded so that Congress doesn’t have to approve every single small judgement against or settlement made by the U.S. government. Dozens, if not hundreds, of small cases are ruled on everyday, so approving each payout would be tedious and cumbersome.
But there’s no gray zone about what the Fund is NOT — it does not exist to make secret, backroom payouts to countries whose leaders call for the death to America.
And it’s not supposed to be a back door to go around Congress.
“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law,” the Constitution reads. It’s an important part of the checks-and-balance system, first put in place by America’s founding fathers.

In other words, the executive branch is expressly forbidden from making payments to foreign entities without the express approval of Congress.
“What makes it so galling is that the administration knows that had the Iran payments been submitted to Congress for approval, they would’ve been turned down,” The New York Post’s Seth Lipsky wrote Thursday. “Majorities in both houses were against the entire Iran nuclear deal — which is why it was treated as an executive, unilateral action and never submitted to the Senate for ratification, as a treaty would have to be.”
The State Department is being very quiet on the issue, refusing to make definite statements. But if Obama knew Congress wouldn’t approve the nearly two billion payout to Iran, and — rather than get their approval as required legally — he secretly raided a remote Treasury fund to knowingly go around their authority, that’s a clear violation of the law.
The president needs to answer for this. Now.

Do you think this is an impeachable offense? Was Barack Obama right to circumvent Congress’ authority? Comment below.

— The Horn editorial team

Prove for Yourself: ‘Feminist’ Hillary Clinton Would Rather See a Woman Raped and Killed Than Armed

https://www.oathkeepers.org



by: David Codrea
“Juanita Broaddrick says she wants to be believed,” BuzzFeed reports, referring to the woman’s longstanding accusation that Bill Clinton raped her decades ago.
Hillary Clinton also says victims of sexual assault should be believed. But as with all things Clinton, that’s qualified, and accusations that might stand in the way of her obsession with power don’t make the cut.
“You recently came out to say that all rape victims should be believed,” a voter asked Clinton in a New Hampshire Q&A event. “But would you say that about Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and Paula Jones? Should we believe them as well?”
“Well, I would say that everybody should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence,” Clinton replied. What evidence exists to lead to such conclusions in the above cases has been left unsaid, and indeed, the Clintons have refused to comment on the specifics of Broaddrick’s accusations. Instead, they have deferred to their attorney, who issued a denial on his clients’ behalf.

Amplifying the push to make doubt the default was NBC News anchor Andrea Mitchell, who with no other substantiation nonetheless referred to Broaddrick as “discredited.” That outraged Clinton victims Willey and Jones, who have demanded Mitchell issue an on-air retraction, an admission there is no evidence Broaddrick’s story is untrue, and an apology. Willey also called on her to resign.
The network has thus far only deleted the “discredited” line in Mitchell’s smear from its online report. The thing is, it’s not the first time Mitchell has run interference for the Clintons, and on this very issue. It’s pretty bad when Bernie Sanders has to call you on it.
The way I would like to see the question posed to Hillary Clinton is more direct than what was asked in New Hampshire. As such, it eliminates the ability to weasel out of a direct answer, at least without everyone seeing blatant evasion. So naturally, no “authorized journalist” will ask:

Is Juanita Broaddrick a liar? Yes or no?

Some will say Hillary could never answer because then she might get sued, but think about that – if someone falsely accused your spouse of such a heinous crime, and much of the public believed it, would you hesitate to call the person doing that a damned liar, even though you have nowhere near the resources the Clintons do? Of course not, but then again, those who keep their oath place a special emphasis on the sanctity of truth, honor, promises, and their good names.
I first asked her that question over two years ago. That was repeated over a year later, with an additional question, one that puts the lie to Hillary’s claim to care about the health and safety of women:

Should Juanita Broaddrick have had a gun to defend herself from rape?

We know, of course, how Hillary feels about that. She and every other Opposite Day “progressive feminist” (not to mention all the indignant and snarky anti-gun males) supporting citizen disarmament would rather see a woman raped and beaten and tortured and killed than armed.
Hillary Clinton and her fellow traveler gun-grabbers would rather see your wife, your daughter, your mother, your sister, savagely violated and slaughtered than equipped and capable of defending themselves. 

Don’t believe me?
Ask her.
Ask her if the women you love have a right to keep and bear arms of their choosing. Ask her if the decision to do so, including when and where, should be theirs.
Ask her.
Ask her.
Ask her.

Hey Donald Trump...How about a rally in Virginia City,Nevada ?

Today Hillary Clinton arrived in Reno,Nevada just down the hill and downwind...we had just had our air cleaned by a summer thunder storm...returning our sky blue again after dealing with all of Kawlifornia's fires over the last few weeks. Today I noticed haze returning on her arrival...must be her smoke and mirrors fouling our air!

At any rate how about having a rally in small town USA... by pass Reno and come on up...many will head up the hill from the valley's below and Tahoe to boot to see the event...guaranteed!

It's past time for those running for high office to come and visit small town America and present your message to real 'Middle America'

  

 
Please and by all means time your rally during September... lot's of cool events going on as a backdrop for your visit..
See: http://visitvirginiacitynv.com/ 

Hoping to see you soon on your 'Step back in Time Rally' and bring the whole family grandkids also..we are family friendly!

https://youtu.be/OxLCxc97hcY

Iranian navy intercepts U.S. Destroyer

 oped: IMO the US  Navy should follow the US Coast Guard's SOP...fire a warning shot over the bow of the lead ship offender...if it does not break off take it out...period EOS...I do believe under a Trump presidency the US military would have a stronger engagement policy and this would end harassment by 3rd world nut jobs!

For years, critics have warned that President Barack Obama’s weak stance on our military and foreign policy would embolden our enemies.
The recent outrageous aggression by the Iranian navy towards our naval ships proves that criticism valid.
And Obama won’t do anything about it.
Wednesday, four Iranian attack boats conducted a “high-speed intercept” of the guided missile destroyer USS Nitze on Wednesday in the Persian Gulf, coming within a dangerous 300 meters before turning back. The U.S. Navy described the incident as “unsafe and unprofessional” and said it occurred in international waters in the narrow Strait of Hormuz.
“The Iranian vessels moved at high speed toward the Nitze, which was operating in accordance with international law in international waters and ignored maritime ‘rules of the road’ as set out in the 1972 Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea,” CNN reported. “According to the Navy official, the IRGC vessels ignored multiple warnings, creating a dangerous, harassing environment that could have pushed the Nitze to take defensive measures, escalating the situation.”

https://youtu.be/pWV5QGgqnHQ



U.S. Navy video of the incident shared by Fox News shows American sailors on the Nitze firing flares and sounding the warship’s horn as the Iranian boats approached.

In January, months after the controversial nuclear deal with Obama, Iran captured and interrogated 10 U.S. Navy sailors who lost power and drifted into Iranian waters.
Last December, Iranian ships fired rockets near U.S. warship and other vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, and a month later flew an unarmed drone over the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf.

Is President Obama’s silence on the issue the right move? Or is it more of the same — weakness from the commander-in-chief? Comment below.

The Associated Press contributed to this article

See you in court! Melania Trump fights back

Melania Trump has been relatively quiet throughout her husband’s presidential campaign, but after the media started circulating insane, nasty rumors about her past, she went on a counter-attack that stunned her critics — and forced many of them to apologize.
It all started with a Daily Mail article, published August 19^th, titled, “Naked photoshoots, and troubling questions about visas that won’t go away: The VERY racy past of Donald Trump’s Slovenian wife.”
Ugly. And it gets worse.
The attack piece declares that while working as a model in New York City, Meliana was actually working as a prostitute.
Yes, you read that correctly. They are claiming that the potential First Lady was a lady of the night when she first arrived in America.
Could you imagine an article like released about a Democrats wife?
There’d be riots in the street.

The Mail quotes an article from a Slovenian magazine, Suzy, which first made the allegation that the New York modelling agency run by Paolo Zampolli operated as an escort service. The Mail went as far as following up with the article’s author, who stood by his story and claimed everything is factual.
The journalist behind the Mail article, Natalie Clark, also contacted Zampolli for a comment, who immediately dismissed the claims as rediculious. “My agency was never an escort agency… come on.”
In addition to the prostitution claims, the article also defames her by claiming she was in America on a tourist visa instead of a work visa, and therefore working illegally. It continues to suggest that Melania and her husband, Presidential candidate Donald Trump, are lying about their first meeting.

Now, Melania is fighting back.
Her lawyer, Charles Harder, has sent threats of defamation lawsuits to The Daily Mail, Politico, The Week, Inquisitr, Tarpley, Before It’s News, Liberal America, Law Newz, Winning Democrats and Bipartisan Report, for circulating the hack piece.
Harder criticized the article in an email, saying, “All such statements are 100% false, highly damaging to her reputation, and personally hurtful. She understands that news media have certain leeway in a presidential campaign, but outright lying about her in this way exceeds all bounds of appropriate news reporting and human decency.”
The notices sent by Harder serve as a threat of a lawsuit if the articles in question aren’t corrected or redacted.
Both Inquisitr and Bipartisan Report published retractions and quickly apologized to Mrs. Trump.

Trump’s lawyer Harder has success in previous defamation cases, most recently in representing Hulk Hogan in his defamation suit against Gawker Media. The suit ended with Hogan being awarded $115 million in damages, more than the $100 million he had asked for.
The Gawker founder filed for bankruptcy as a result, and the website closed its doors for good Monday night.
His previous successes should have his next victims horrified about threatening his newest client — the potential First Lady of the United States.


— The Horn editorial team

School District: Don’t Tell Parents If Transgender Males Bunk With Daughters On Field Trips

by: Alicia

In other words, the desires and privacy of the actual females, and the normal concerns of their parents don’t matter. Just go ahead and lie by omission.

Why is it that only the transgender matters? By the way, Bruce Jenner still has the hots for chicks. No doubt, bunking with a bunch of girls would please him to no end.

Stop this insanity now. 

Washington Times:
A Maryland school district is instructing teachers and administrators not to tell parents if their daughters are bunking with male transgender students on overnight field trips.
Bob Mosier, chief communications officer for the Anne Arundel County public school system, says in a training video on how to accommodate transgender students that privacy issues prevent the district from informing parents about such arrangements.

“So, many of you might be asking yourselves, ‘So I’m at an overnight field trip, and I have student who’s biologically a male, identifies as a female, and we’ve worked with that student and her family, and that student wants to sleep in the dorms, or whatever sleeping arrangements are, with the females,’” Mr. Mosier says in a video of the training session. “‘They don’t want to sleep in a room by themselves, they want to sleep with the rest of the females. So what do we do?’”
“And the answer is, they sleep with the females,” he said. “That’s not the easy answer; it’s the right answer. And in some cases, it’s going to cause issues, because … the private information piece doesn’t allow you to share that with parents of all of the other campers. Right? So that’s difficult.” More

Kellyanne Conway: Trump Will Win With 'Undercover Voters'

By Cathy Burke  
The Donald Trump campaign is counting on "undercover voters" to power the GOP nominee to a White House win in November.

In an interview with Britain's public television station Channel 4, campaign manager Kellyanne Conway explained how Trump, though lagging in recent polling, will pull off a victory because of a phenomenon that describes the willingness of some voters to tell pollsters they prefer a more socially acceptable candidate while planning to vote entirely different on election day.

"Donald Trump performs consistently better in online polling where a human being is not talking to another human being about what he or she may do in the elections … it's become socially desirable, especially if you're a college educated person in the U.S., to say that you're against Donald Trump," Conway said. 



"The hidden Trump vote in this country is a very significant proposition."

Pressed on how big that hidden vote is, Conway said she "can't discuss it."

"It's a project we're doing internally. I call it the undercover Trump voter, but it's real," she said.

A portion of her remarks were rebroadcast on MSNBC and posted by Mediaite.

"People who are supporting Donald Trump, who have not voted Republican in the past, who have not voted in quite a while, are so tired of arguing with family and friends and colleagues about their support of Donald Trump that they just decided not to discuss it," Conway further explained, The Guardian reports.

"We give people a comfortable way to express that maybe they don't want to vote this year and why that is," she added.


As a result, Conway asserts, she could reach these undercover voters "in many different ways … We go to them where they live, literally."

The Guardian notes the political phenomenon is known as "the Bradley effect," named after former Los Angeles mayor Tom Bradley, who was favored in polls in California's 1982 gubernatorial election over his white Republican opponent, George Deukmejian, before suffering a narrow shock loss on election day.

In an averaging of national polls, Hillary Clinton leads Trump by about six points.

 

Is he CRAZY? Obama wants poor criminals freed

They say crime doesn’t pay, and President Barack Obama’s administration is making sure that old saw comes true.
But not how you’d expect.
If Obama has his way, from now on anyone accused of a crime doesn’t have to pay bail!
In the latest example of political correctness run amok, the Justice Department now claims bail is unfair to low-income suspects – because it is discriminating against people with no money.
“Bail practices that incarcerate indigent individuals before trial solely because of their inability to pay for their release violate the Fourteenth Amendment,” the department said in a brief filed in federal court, according to NBC News.
As a result, anyone who can’t pay should just be allowed to waltz right out of the jailhouse … and cops are supposed to just trust that they’ll return for their court dates.

But while the suspects don’t have to pay, the rest of us could – because when the accused don’t show up for court, we have to pay overtime to overworked cops and deputies to go out looking for them.
In this specific case, a suspect accused of “pedestrian under the influence” in Calhoun, Georgia complained after being held for six days because he couldn’t pay his bail.
The case ended up in federal court, where the Justice Department didn’t take the side of our law enforcement officers.
They took the side of the suspect!
“Fixed bail schedules that allow for the pretrial release of only those who can pay, without accounting for ability to pay and alternative methods of assuring future appearance, do not provide for such individualized determinations, and therefore unlawfully discriminate based on indigence,” the agency said in its court filing.

The federal appeals court ruled for the suspect and ordered the city to release absolutely everyone accused of misdemeanors who didn’t have bail.
That ties the hands of local judges, forbidding them from treating each defendant on a case-by-base basis and allowing folks who they can trust to walk free while keeping the ones who might bolt locked up.
And in typical Obama Administration fashion, the move not only sides with criminal defendants over the legal system … it also threatens to undermine an entire industry and cost the nation thousands of jobs.
Until now, people who cannot pay – rich or poor – have been able to turn to bail bondsmen for help getting out of jail.
“Bail is a liberty-promoting institution as old as the republic,” former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement wrote to the court on behalf of both Calhoun and the American Bail Coalition, according to Reason. “In fact, the text and history of our founding charter conclusively confirm that monetary bail is constitutional.”

For a small fee, a bail agency puts up the cash for you.
It works like a charm most of the time, and for the small percentage of folks who don’t turn up there’s always Dog the Bounty Hunter and his pals.
Now, the bail bondsmen and bounty hunters could be staring at the unemployment line as an “institution as old as the republic” falls in the name of political correctness.

Share your thoughts on the Department of Justice’s plans to abolish bail for lower income suspects. Comment below.

— The Horn editorial team

Game on! Trump SURGING in national polls

After Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton jumped ahead in early August polling against rival Donald Trump, the mainstream media was unable to contain it’s glee.
Headline after headline declared the race a blow-out. Journalists and news talking heads began citing major polls as evidence to their narrative that Trump and his supporters had no chance for victory in November.
One problem — no one told Trump.
Since, poll after poll are showing the race has returned to a virtual tie — and indicate that Clinton’s early August surge was little more than a post Democratic convention bounce, which observers note Trump also enjoyed following the RNC a week prior.
The Horn News first reported on the presidential polling dead head last Thursday.

Since then, polls from Rasmussen Reports and UPI/CVoter have reported similar results — the race for the White House is back to a virtual tie.
And Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus is predicting that Trump could take the lead for good in national polls by Labor Day.
“I think what you are seeing on the campaign is a continuation of a good couple of weeks that Donald Trump has had,” he said on a conference call, noting the rapid maturation of the campaign efforts of the Trump campaign.
Priebus went on to predict Trump’s upcoming immigration speech as a noteworthy chance to convert voters to the GOP candidates side.
“I’m looking forward to those remarks, I know he is working on them and I think he is going to do what he said he’s going to do — he’s going to be fair, be tough, and be humane. Those are some pretty good principles for us to look to when dealing with this subject.”

— The Horn editorial team

Hillary State Dept. Helped Jailed Clinton Foundation Donor Get $10 Mil from U.S. for Failed Haiti Project

   

 

  

via: Judicial Watch

The new batch of emails showing that the State Department gave special access to top Clinton Foundation donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state brings to mind the case of a shady Miami businessman serving a 12-year prison sentence after scamming the government out of millions. His name is Claudio Osorio, a Clinton Foundation donor who got $10 million from the government after the Clinton State Department reportedly pulled some strings.
Osorio got the money from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), a federal agency that operates under the guidance of the State Department, to build houses in Haiti after the 2010 earthquake. The OPIC supposedly promotes U.S. government investments abroad to foster the development and growth of free markets. Osorio’s “Haiti project” was supposed to build 500 homes for displaced families in the aftermath of the earthquake. The project never broke ground and Osorio used the money to finance his lavish lifestyle and fund his illicit business ventures. He also ran a fraudulent international company with facilities in the U.S., United Arab Emirates, Germany, Angola and Tanzania that stole millions from investors. Some of the OPIC Haiti money was used to repay investors of his fraudulent company (Innovida)  according to federal prosecutors. In September 2013, Osorio was sentenced to 150 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

Not surprisingly, the Department of Justice (DOJ) never mentioned Osorio’s Clinton connections and seemed to downplay the $10 million scam of taxpayer funds by focusing on the “victims” that invested in his bogus company. Among them was a beloved professional basketball star. “Osorio offered and sold shareholder interests and joint-venture partnerships in Innovida to select individuals and groups, raising more than $40,000,000 from approximately ten (10) investors and investment groups in the United States and abroad,” a DOJ statement says. “Osorio solicited and recruited investors by making materially false representations and concealing and omitting material facts regarding, among other things, the profitability of the company, the rates of return on investment funds, the use of investors’ funds and the existence of a pending lucrative contract with a third-party entity. Osorio received moneys from investors based on these misrepresentations. Osorio used investor monies for his and his co-conspirators’ personal benefit and to maintain and further the fraud scheme.”

The bigger story is that, despite Osorio’s shady history, it appears that the Clinton State Department helped him get $10 million—which will never be repaid—because he was a Clinton Foundation donor. This connection was not made until years after Osorio got sentenced. After his 2013 sentencing in Miami, the area’s largest newspaper tied him to the Clintons and President Obama as a campaign donor who held fundraisers at his waterfront home, but the foundation was not mentioned. A Washington D.C. newspaper eventually connected the dots after obtaining a document that shows an OPIC official recommending funding for Osorio’s Haiti project. In the document, the OPIC official writes that Osorio’s company had “U.S. persons of political influence that are able to assist in advancing the company’s plans.” It continues: “For instance, former President Bill Clinton is personally in contact with the Company to organize its logistical and support needs,” the document states. “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has made available State

Department resources to assist with logistical arrangements.” Additionally, the Clinton Global Initiative had “indicated that it would be willing to contract to purchase 6,500 homes in Haiti from InnoVida within the next year.”
Less than 24 hours after the OPIC official submitted the recommendation, the news report says, OPIC approved Osorio’s $10 million loan to build homes in earthquake-ravaged Haiti. Not one was ever built and no one has been held accountable for giving the crooked businessman millions of taxpayer dollars.

Cancer Patient BRUTALLY Murdered Outside Treatment Center

Cancer patient Shannon Vincel, 46, was attacked outside a treatment center in Illinois and was taken off life support by her family.
As Reported by WMC Action News 5:
A $25,000 reward is being offered for information in the deadly attack of a cancer patient. Shannon Vincel was sitting outside a hotel owned by the Cancer Treatment Centers of America when she was attacked.
She died on Tuesday after her family took her off of life support. Now the hunt is on for her attacker.

Neighbors of the hotel in Zion learn about the fatal attack of a cancer patient. “It’s really bad that this young lady came here for treatment for something that she had and somebody had to do this to her. It’s really sad,” said Blondie Curtis, a Zion resident.
“Whoever did this, I wish they’d come forward and turn themselves in because that didn’t make no sense what they did to this woman. She come up here to get herself cleared of cancer and they took her life out,” said Valerie White, a Zion resident.
Vincel, 46, was pronounced dead on Tuesday night. Her family took her off life support after a severe head injury.

Zion police report Vincel was a patient at the center. And on Monday around 9:30 p.m. she was struck in the head outside of the Guest Quarters.
“I’m just confused. It’s like, it’s terrible, it’s terrible. I’m ready to go home,” said patient Charlie Moats.
Moats says he was outside with Vincel a half hour before the incident with his brother. He says Vincel was being treated for breast cancer and had been traveling back and forth from her Missouri home for treatment in Zion.
“She was a very nice person, very outgoing and very talkative.  And a sweet person, she was very sweet,” Moats said.
Now security is more visible around the Guest Quarters, which is a low-cost lodging option for …..

Full Story and all updates here:
Cancer patient, 46, fatally beaten outside treatment center – WMC Action News 5 – Memphis, Tennessee

Clinton Campaign Manager: GLOBAL LOSS OF LIFE if Plug Pulled on Clinton Foundation

Just when you thought that the Clinton campaign couldn’t get any more ridiculous. Clinton campaign manager says steps Clinton Global Initiative plans to take should Clinton be elected are “unprecedented” and if the foundation were to be closed  ….. “Just pulling the plug on Clinton Foundation would threaten lives AROUND THE GLOBE” 


This guy is dead serious.
What in the world is going on inside the Global Initiative that would make this campaign manager say such a thing? Whatever is going on it must be bad news if pulling the plug would cause global loss of life.
We need more than the Federal Bureau of Investigations on this … oh wait, is there ANY entity in this nation that can find out what in the world is going on inside this foundation? Julian Assange has done a good bit, as have other hackers worldwide but it’s not enough. We have got to get to the bottom of this and fast.

Think about this for a moment….. GLOBAL LOSS OF LIFE if they pulled the plug on the Clinton Foundation. No it’s not just that folks will lose jobs and starve. He is claiming there are life saving treatments in healthcare that is PROVIDED by the Clinton Global Initiative.
It’s almost like Armageddon would occur. We think there is more to it and how come it was never mentioned ONCE at the Democrat National Convention if it has had THIS great of an impact?????
Scary or do we take off our tin foil hats?

Full Story Here:
Hillary’s Campaign Manager: Closing Down Clinton Foundation Would Threaten Lives – Patriot Tribune

Wake up and smell the stench of Hillary’s corruption and questionable ethics, people.

As Written By Jennifer Burke for Politistick:
From 1996 to 2008, Hillary Clinton’s top aide and longtime confidante, Huma Abedin, was listed as assistant editor on a radical, hate-filled Muslim journal run by her Muslim Brotherhood connected mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin. Back in 2001, when Abedin was an assistant editor, the publication blamed America for the 9/11 Muslim terrorist attack which killed 3,000 Americans. Abedin’s name was removed from the publication after she went to work for Hillary Clinton at the State Department. Abedin is now the vice-chairwoman of Hillary’s presidential campaign.

The publication, Journal of Minority Muslim Affairs, is Saudi-based and funded. It backs strict Sharia law compliance and the oppression of women, as is expected under Sharia law. Hillary Clinton often refers to Huma Abedin as her second daughter so this revelation, while Hillary is simultaneously attempting to rewrite her “nuts and sluts” history to make people believe she is a champion of women, is quite damning.
Perhaps that’s why the Clinton campaign is desperately trying to explain away Huma Abedin’s 12-year involvement in an anti-American, pro-terrorism publication as, laughably, being all about nothing.
Nick Morrill, Clinton campaign spokesman, laughably argued that Huma was simply a figurehead and had no direct involvement with the journal.

“My understanding is that her name was simply listed on the masthead in that period. She did not play a role in editing at the publication.”

Full Story Continues Here:
How the Clinton Campaign Tried to Explain Away Huma’s Radical Islamic Ties is Laughable

FBI files linking Hillary to the ‘suicide’ of Vince Foster MISSING from National Archives

oped: See http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2016/06/hillary-has-buried-documents-for.html

More: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=hillary+clinton+vince+foster+FBI+files

In an EXCLUSIVE story by the DAILY MAIL ONLINE: Two former FBI agents involved in the investigation tell Daily Mail Online they issued reports linking Hillary’s tirade to Foster’s suicide. 

Ronald Kessler, a former Washington Post and Wall Street Journal investigative reporter, is the New York Times bestselling author of The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents and The Secrets of the FBI. 

FBI agents’ reports of interviews documenting that Hillary Clinton’s stinging humiliation of her friend and mentor Vince Foster in front of White House aides triggered his suicide a week later are missing from where they should be filed at the National Archives, Daily Mail Online has learned exclusively.

On two separate occasions, this author visited the National Archives and Records Service in College Park, Md., to review the reports generated by FBI agents assigned to investigate the 1993 death of Bill Clinton’s deputy White House counsel. 

On the first visit, archivist David Paynter provided the box of records that he said contained the FBI reports of interviews conducted by FBI agents on Foster’s death.

On a second visit, archivist James Mathis provided what he said were those same documents.

While the box contained dozens of FBI reports concerning Foster’s death – including interviews with the medical examiner, U.S. Park Police officers, and White House aides about the contents of Foster’s office –  the reports on Hillary Clinton’s role in his death were absent.

After filing a Freedom of Information request with the National Archives, Martha Murphy, the archives’ public liaison, reported that she directed a senior archivist to conduct a more thorough review of the relevant FBI files, including those that had not been previously made public in response to FOIA requests. 

‘He examined all eight boxes but found no interviews by any investigator that detail either a meeting between Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster or the effects of a meeting between Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster on Vince Foster’s state of mind,’ Murphy reported in an email.

‘We did not limit ourselves to interviews by the two individuals [FBI agents] you mention.’

While Murphy said the archives searched for ‘the records that would be responsive to your request’ and concluded that they could not be found, when asked for comment, John Valceanu, the archives’ director of communications and marketing, said, ‘We do not agree with your conclusion that the records you requested are missing from the National Archives simply because we were unable to locate any …. full story here 

ARTICLE USED BY PERMISSION FROM DAILY MAIL ONLINE