Does This Video Prove the Clinton Campaign is Using a Green Screen at Her Rallies?

By Jerry Johnson 
I’m not one for conspiracy theories.  In fact, they usually make me cringe.  So when I was sent a video showing a Hillary Clinton rally in Greensboro, NC, I was, needless to say, skeptical of the narrator’s observations.
Just so you are up to speed on the timeline, Hillary had her collapsing episode on Sunday during the 9/11 memorial service.  Her press did the best to cover for her but noted she would take a few days off to recover from pneumonia.
She returned to the battlefield of the campaign holding the rally mentioned above in Greensboro four days later on Thursday, September 15.
I watched the event live on my beautiful 70” HD TV.  I honestly wanted to see how Hillary behaved and looked.

The first thing I notice was the size of the crowd.  It was extremely small.  It appeared to max out the venue, which also appeared small.  To me, it looked like half of a high school gymnasium.
I’m not sure how many people were there to see and hear her triumphant return to the campaign, but I’ve read estimates of between 200 to 350.  Embarrassing, to say the least, if accurate!
So I clicked on the link my friend sent me and immediately recognized the event from two days earlier.
The narrator started out by saying that all he did was reduce the speed of the footage from the rally.  The footage was focusing in on Hillary’s entrance. 

see video: http://constitution.com/video-prove-clinton-campaign-using-green-screen-rallies/

You can clearly see a white or cream colored wall in the background draped with American flags. As Hillary comes around a corner, you can see the screens of her supporter’s cell phones which are supposedly recording her entrance.
Strangely, you cannot see a single American flag on the cell phone screens of those who are recording Hillary’s entrance.  In fact, Hillary doesn’t even appear on their screens as she is walking by and being recorded by her adoring sheeple.
Is it an anomaly?  Possibly.  Could it be an angle issue or some other rationalization?  Sure.

But as the frame continues to pan to the left following Hillary to the stage, the images on about twenty phones does not appear to reflect the background at all!
So was this staged?  Again, it is possible.  But highly unlikely.  I’ve also provided a link to the video of the C-Span coverage of the same event below.  Her entrance begins at the 4:17 mark.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?415316-1/hillary-clinton-campaigns-greensboro-north-carolina
Watch the posted link and video.  And in the words of a popular 24-hour cable news network, I report, you decide.

Whatever conclusion you reach; I have an observation which I didn’t see reported by the evening news.  The observation being the dismal numbers attending the Clinton rally in Greensboro and the nearly 2,000 who packed the Laconia Middle School gymnasium in New Hampshire on the same day to hear Donald Trump.
The low numbers for the Clinton rally are all the more fascinating when one considers the fact that since 1992, New Hampshire has only gone Republican once in the Presidential election.  And to top it off, she has already spent a large amount of time and money in North Carolina.

Obama Used Fake Name to Communicate With Hillary on Private Server

 






By: Joe Newby
Early Saturday morning, the New York Post reported that Barack Obama used a previously-unknown fake name to communicate with Hillary Clinton on her private email server.  That report, however, flies in the face of a 2015 New York Times article that said Obama didn’t know about the private server.
According to the Post, top Hillary aide Huma Abedin was “shocked” when she learned of it:

“How is that not classified?” Abedin “exclaimed” to investigators when shown a copy of the 2012 exchange between Clinton and Obama, according to a trove of 189-pages of FBI documents dumped Friday night into Clinton’s use of the private server.

After learning that the president used email with a pseudonym — apparently to try to protect his identity — Abedin asked her interrogators if she could keep a copy of the email.

The FBI documents don’t reveal if they let Abedin take a copy home with her.

“This exchange strongly suggests Clinton and the president knowingly discussed classified material in an unclassified setting and hence broke the law,” said Raj Shah, the research director at the Republican National Committee.
Read More:  http://conservativefiringline.com

WikiLeaks Bombshell: Hillary’s Brain Injury Caused By ‘Near Fatal Plane Crash’

by:Mac Slavo

>>Secretary Clinton who was reportedly unconscious and “bleeding profusely.”<<

If an unclassified email leaked by WikiLeaks is any indication, it appears that there may be much more to the story of what happened to Hillary Clinton back in 2012.
We’ve been told that she suffered a concussion… but was that just diplomatic cover for something else?
Bill Clinton himself publicly claimed that her 2012 concussion – supposedly from a simple fall –took a full six months to recover from:

Bill Clinton did more today than defend his wife, Hillary Clinton, from recent accusations leveled by GOP strategist Karl Rove that she suffered brain damage after falling in December 2012.
“They went to all this trouble to say she had staged what was a terrible concussion that required six months of very serious work to get over,” he said. “It’s something she never low-balled with the American people, never tried to pretend it didn’t happen.”

The alleged incident claimed in this story overlapped with Hillary’s admitted illness, concussion and time off from office that precipitated her resignation as Secretary of State less than two months later on February 1, 2013.
Wikileaks released this chain of emails forwarded between various ranking military officials, and eventually to State Dept. and top Hillary confidant Jake J. Sullivan who laughed it off when he forwarded it to “H” herself, citing a conspiracy story written by Sorcha Faal – whose reports are widely dismissed as disinfo – claiming that Hillary sustained serious injuries in a crash during a secret diplomatic meeting with the then-president of Iran.

If such a secret meeting did happen, it remains top secret and there is no publicly available information to confirm or deny that such a meeting even took place – let alone that there was a plane crash.
However, Capt Les Horn, USN (Ret), who was in the chain of emails, noted that “The report appears to be credible” in a message he sent to Anthony Milavic, a retired Marine major.



Presumably his assessment is based upon detailed military knowledge of the circumstances under which such a secret diplomatic mission would have taken place, including details about the aircraft and route, and possibly includes first hand knowledge of events. But that remains unclear.
According to the original story:
A new Foreign Military Intelligence (GRU) report circulating in the Kremlin today is saying that United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was injured, and a top US Navy Seal Commander killed when their C-12 Huron military passenger and transport aircraft crash landed nearly 3 weeks ago in the Iranian city of Ahvaz near the Iraqi border.
[…]





Upon the C-12 Huron landing at Ahwaz, however, this report says it encountered “extreme turbulence” causing it to leave the runway where its main landing gear then collapsed causing it to crash.
Within seconds of the C-12 Huron crashing, this report continues, Iranian emergency and security personal responded freeing the victims, including Secretary Clinton who was reportedly unconscious and “bleeding profusely.” 




The death of SEAL Team 4 Commanding Officer Job W. Price adds additional reason to think that a cover story may be at work. Price was reportedly escorting Hillary on the plane, and may have died as a result of injuries in the alleged crash.

The US Navy Seal member reported killed in this bizarre incident, this report says, was indentified as Commander Job W. Price who as a leader of this highly specialized American Special Forces unit protects high-ranking diplomats traveling in Middle Eastern and Asian combat zones.
[…]
This GRU report, however, states that US military flight logs recorded by Russian air and space forces confirm that Commander Price, and other members of US Navy Seal Team 4, left their base in Urozgan Province, Afghanistan on a flight to US Naval Support Activity Bahrain where they met up with Secretary Clinton and all of them transferred to the C-12 Huron that began a flight path to Baghdad, Iraq.

However, officially Commander Price died by suicide a.k.a. a “non-combat-related injury” on December 22, 2012 while stationed in Uruzgan Province in Afghanistan.
Was this official explanation just cover for the real cause of his death? What else don’t we know?
Here’s the full story as released by Wikileaks. The PDF can be downloaded from Wikileaks here.
Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan

How irrational fear not racism leads to police-sanctioned shootings...#Hoplophobia

First and foremost fact : way more whites are shot by police than blacks...however MSM as well as the Progressive Obama administration will not address the issue as it does not fit their agenda of racism which they push non stop for political gain! 

I will  give two examples of many that never seem to get reported on by MSM nor addressed by the Obama administrations DOJ  

 
A must read The LaVoy Finicum Bundy Ranch Files: 
http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=LaVoy%22+Finicum+

Cops gun down man for legally carrying firearm 

by: Jeff Knox   

Jeff Knox explains how irrational fear led to police-sanctioned murder

Erik Scott was a West Point graduate who went on to serve honorably in the Army, get his MBA from Duke and establish a lucrative career in real estate and as a sales rep for a medical device company. He was 38 years old when he was gunned down in 2010 in the portico of a Las Vegas area Costco store by officers from the Las Vegas Metro Police Department. While it was 7 bullets from the only people we’re supposed to trust with guns that snuffed out Erik Scott’s life, what really killed him was an irrational fear of firearms – hoplophobia.

Scott and his girlfriend had been shopping in the Costco, but had been asked to leave when an employee spotted Scott’s lawfully carried handgun. Scott had inadvertently exposed the gun when he squatted down to inspect some merchandise. He informed the employee that he was legally carrying the gun and was in possession of a valid Nevada concealed weapons permit, but was informed that Costco has a policy against carrying firearms in their stores.

A brief argument ensued, some raised voices and obvious frustration on Scott’s part, but witnesses said it didn’t seem like a big deal. They saw nothing particularly threatening about the incident or the clean-cut, good looking young man. The store manager who had spoken with Scott seemed satisfied by Scott’s reassurance that he was a legal firearm carrier and would be finished with his shopping in a few minutes. But a store Loss Prevention Officer called the police and reported that an armed man was behaving erratically in the store.
That report, based on irrational fear, and perhaps some personal envy, triggered events which quickly spiraled out of control. It seems that the fear factor was taken up a notch with each description of the story to the point that responding officers believed they were going into a violent hostage situation with a heavily armed and dangerous Green Beret.

Las Vegas MPD responded with a city-wide alert, street closures, helicopter support and deployment of a Mobile Command Center. The first officers on the scene arrived as Costco employees were following telephone instructions from the police to calmly evacuate the store.
As Scott and his girlfriend fell in with other patrons flowing out of the exit door, the Loss Prevention Officer who started the whole mess pointed toward Scott and a police officer at the door suddenly began yelling “Stop! I said Stop! Drop the gun! Get on the ground! Get on the ground!”
He fired these conflicting commands in quick succession giving Scott no opportunity to comply with any of them and then fired two rounds at Scott’s chest. As the officer began yelling and Scott realized he was the subject of the commands, he turned, lifting his hands, and apparently tried to follow the legal requirement to immediately inform an officer that he was an armed weapons permit holder, but he didn’t have time.

The officer’s frantic orders lasted for a slow count of 3 and were immediately followed by the two gunshots, a momentary pause, and a volley of several more shots. There was no pause or hesitation between the commands and the shots. The first round struck Erik Scott in the heart, the second hit his right thigh. As he collapsed to the ground, two other officers fired 5 more shots into his back. Numerous witnesses reported that they saw Scott turn and declare that he was a permit holder. Many said they could see both of his hands and that he made no threatening move. All agreed that the only gun they saw was the one in Scott’s waistband on his right hip.
Other witnesses reported that they saw Scott’s body removed by EMTs and saw nothing on the ground except blood and a cell phone, or sun glasses. EMTs reported that they removed Scott’s gun and holster from the waistband of his jeans in the ambulance and that they saw no other gun, yet, after police broke into Scott’s apartment and confiscated the firearms there, the story came out that Scott was carrying two guns that day.

A picture of the second gun, on the ground near a cell phone, after the blood on the pavement had been cleaned up, is the “proof” that Scott had two guns and pulled one on MPD officers. The store’s video surveillance system inexplicably malfunctioned for the several seconds of the shooting.
A coroner’s inquest concluded that the shooting was justified, just as a similar inquest had concluded that the gunning down of an unarmed, small-time pot dealer in his apartment a short time before the Scott shooting was ruled to be justified. Just as such coroner’s inquests have concluded that officer involved shootings were justified in 199 out of 200 incidents since 1976.
Erik Scott’s family has strongly contested the conclusions of the coroner’s inquest and the entire inquest process. They succeeded in getting some changes made to that process, but those changes have been held up by suits from the police union.
The Scotts filed a wrongful death suit in federal court, but recently dropped that effort, convinced that they had no hope of winning with the system stacked against them.

Erik Scott’s father, a former Air Force flight test engineer and writer for the prestigious aerospace magazine Aviation Week & Space Technology, has painted a sympathetic, fictionalized portrait of Erik and the events of that day as part of a new novel he is offering in serialized form at ThePermit.blogspot.com in hopes of maintaining awareness of Erik’s tragic death and bringing attention to corruption within the justice system and government of Las Vegas.
The police have a difficult job. They are put in positions and asked to do things that most of us would run away from, but authority and power must be tempered with responsibility and accountability. For decades lawmakers and courts have built up walls of protection around police and other government workers. It is critical that these public servants be protected from frivolous suits and baseless harassment, but they must be held accountable for their actions and investigations into their activities must be beyond reproach. That is not the case currently.
When one person’s irrational fear of a peacefully armed man can result in that man being gunned down by police with no consequences for anyone except the victim and his friends and family, something is terribly, terribly wrong. Hoplophobia killed Erik Scott and a corrupt system allowed his accusers and executioners get away with it.

Hillary makes MAJOR TV goof

By Stephen Dietrich 


The race to the White House in 2016 may boil down to one question: who do voters believe is the champion of women?
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s latest TV attack ad answers that question — but not the way it was intended.
It should push women voters toward GOP candidate Donald Trump.
“Is this the president we want for our daughters?”
This is the question from Clinton’s latest ad, which claims Trump is a poor advocate for women.
But by asking this question, Clinton’s campaign may reopen a can of worms Hillary can ill afford.
Because the question comes from the candidate with a history of politically attacking victims of sexual harassment and rape. It comes from the candidate that laughed about getting a convicted child rapist off with a light sentence.
That question is an insult to all Americans, because there’s one thing I know for certain: Hillary Clinton isn’t fit to be the president of my daughter.
Does the Clinton campaign really forget Hillary and Bill Clinton’s outrageous, shadowy past?
If so, allow me to remind them.

When a 12-year-old girl was sexually assaulted in 1975, Hillary “took her through hell” according to the victim. Hillary, if you remember, made sure the pedophile that attacked that poor little girl got off with an extremely light sentence — and she later was caught laughing about it on tape.
Hillary’s distasteful role in former President Bill Clinton’s alleged history of violent sexual assault and harassment of young women has been well documented as well.
Accuser Kathleen Wiley claims the Clintons together tried to intimidate her into silence. “All I felt was fear and terror” leading up to her deposition against Bill, Wiley has said.
In 2000, one of her husband’s rape accusers, Juanita Broadrick, wrote an open letter to Hillary about the underhanded intimidation tactics she used. “What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question,” Broadrick wrote.
Hillary referred to Gennifer Flowers, whom her husband is accused of sexually harassing, as “trailer trash.” Hillary devoted months of full focus to discrediting Flowers, rather than supporting her.

And according to Slate, during her husband’s 1992 presidential run Hillary tried “to persuade horrified campaign aides to bring out rumors that Poppy Bush had not always been faithful to Barbara.”
Even when there was proof of her husband’s misdeeds, Hillary was flippant. She once described the young intern, Monica Lewinsky, that her husband took advantage of sexually as nothing but a “narcissistic loony toon.”
It doesn’t end with individual women, either. Hillary’s hypocrisy is evident even in her family’s Clinton Foundation charity, which traded favors for millions of dollars from nations with atrocious records on women’s rights issues, such as the regimes in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and others.

“Even setting aside her checkered record in the Senate and the State Department, it is Mrs. Clinton’s flagrant contradictions on women’s issues that expose her true character. While many women may see through the double talk, this won’t stop her from branding herself as a champion of women,” Mercedes Schlapp wrote for The Washington Times recently.
Schlapp is right, and it’s shameful.
Is Hillary Clinton the candidate we want for our daughters?
I don’t think so.
You can see the Clinton attack ad here —  https://youtu.be/vHGPbl-werw

Sheriff Joe on Obama Eligibility: “I Don’t Care Where He’s From, We Are Looking At A Forged Document, Period”

by:Tim Brown
In recent days GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump swept under the rug the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah.  Many followed him blindly, but not this outlet and not Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio.  Arpaio continues to be unmoved that Obama’s online birth certificate is a forged document and claims that he will not abandon the facts nor the investigation.
Appearing at The Surprise Tea Party Patriots on Tuesday, Arpaio told the crowd, ““I don’t know how it’s going to turn out.  I don’t care where he’s from, we are looking at a forged document. Period.”


Arpaio then distanced himself from Trump who claims the matter is closed because Obama produced the forged document, which is still housed on WhiteHouse.org.
“I had nothing to do with Trump on the birth certificate,” Arpaio said. “We did it on our own, because of you guys.”
“I know all the politicians say, ‘Sheriff, don’t talk about it,’ ”Arpaio said.  “But how can I back down when we started it? I’m not going to just forget it.”
Arpaio was not the only one to speak to the group of patriots.  His chief investigator Mike Zullo also made several comments.

Zullo claimed that Trumps comments were a “punch in the gut, because it was unexpected.”
“It’s not going to deter us,” Zullo said. “It’s not going to stop us. I am closer than ever.”
Zullo also called Trump’s comments “strategic,” indicating that it was more about politics than actually seeking the truth.  I tend to believe that.  Why would he want to have to pursue what has been labeled a “conspiracy theory” when the facts tend to bear that out?  I mean we are talking about a man that held the highest office in the land under forged documents, and we aren’t just talking about his birth certificate, but also his selective service documents and social security numbers.

Trumps website declares, “Having successfully obtained President Obama’s birth certificate when others could not, Mr. Trump believes that President Obama was born in the United States.”
However, neither Trump nor his campaign actually obtained anything.  Obama posted a forged document on the White House website.  Will someone ask Donald Trump to produce an authentic birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah?  Wouldn’t he have to produce a paper document to claim that he “obtained” the birth certificate?  I think so.

The Arizona Republic reported on several attendees.
State Rep. Phil Lovas, a Peoria Republican and director of the Trump campaign in Arizona, said in a brief interview that the Trump statement speaks for itself.
Lovas said he, personally, believes that Obama’s birth certificate is real.
“I believe it is, but I haven’t examined it,” Lovas said before addressing meeting attendees.
Jeff Lichter, who was among the Surprise Tea Party Patriots who signed the letter asking Arpaio for the investigation, demurred when asked about Trump’s statement.
“I don’t want to say anything that hurts Trump,” Lichter said before the meeting began. “I don’t want to say anything that makes national news.”
But during a presentation to the Surprise Tea Party Patriots, Lichter said that, when he and two state lawmakers traveled to New York in April 2011 and met with Trump in Trump Tower, the businessman told them he anticipated Obama would be releasing a fake birth certificate. 


“My sources in D.C. are telling me there is going to be a fake birth certificate,” Lichter quoted Trump as saying.
Barb Heller, 59, of Glendale, who attended the meeting, said that she doesn’t see a conflict between the birth certificate investigation and Trump’s statement.
“He said he was born in the United States,” Heller said before the meeting. “He didn’t say it was a true document.”
OK, can we get verification on the claim that Trump expected a fake birth certificate and why he would then claim that Obama is an American and eligible for the office of president?  This is especially urgent to determine in light of Trump’s own questioning of Ted Cruz’s eligibility, and the fact that eligibility is a constitutional issue.
Trump’s claim that Obama is now an American comes just over a year after he claimed otherwise.  Why does no one question him on this claim and demand evidence? 


oped: I believe Donald Trump made the statement to avoid getting stalled on his message not that he dismissed Sheriff Joe's assessment /investigation.

I tend to agree with the view that the birth certificate is a fraud. Anyone who has worked in Adobe and Photoshop for more than five minutes knows it is a layered document. Forget the fact that it uses fonts that didn't exist back then and the term African American is a recent invention. Back then, Negro was used. It isn't a certified document. It was created. So where does one go from here?

Barack Obama Just Proved "Conspiracy Theorists" Right!

by:David Risselada 

I would like to give President Obama a big "thank you" from all of us “conspiracy theorists.”
For years now, we have been warning people that the United Nations was plotting to institute a global government on the pretext that human beings were not capable of self-governance and that they needed a global elite to rule their lives.
Well, President Obama just proved that we were telling the truth as he stood in front of the whole world and declared that the only way to defeat terrorism was for powerful nations like the United States to surrender some of their freedom to some type of global government.
This is the Hegelian Dialectic at play, using a crisis to institute a pre-planned solution.

https://youtu.be/AzcxT8XOKw4





Since September 11, 2001, the U.S. Government has been chipping away at our liberties in the name of keeping us safe, and now it has come to its fruition.
Barrack Obama is just another globalist selected for his smooth talking, and his abilities to pull the wool over the sheeples' eyes.

RIP America. 


Article posted with permission from Propaganda.news.

Trouble in HillaryLand: Top Pervert Turns Pedophile

by: Alana Goodman

Anthony Weiner carried on a months-long online sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl during which she claims he asked her to dress up in 'school-girl' outfits for him on a video messaging application and pressed her to engage in 'rape fantasies', DailyMail.com can exclusively report.

The girl, whose name is being withheld by DailyMail.com because she is a minor, said the online relationship began last January while she was a high school sophomore and before Weiner's wife, Hillary Clinton's aide Huma Abedin, announced she was ended their marriage. 

Weiner was aware that the girl was underage, according to DailyMail.com interviews with the girl and her father, as well as a cache of online messages.

 

 Source: Daily Mail 

EXCLUSIVE: Anthony Weiner carried on a months-long online sexual relationship with a troubled 15-year-old girl telling her she made him 'hard,' asking her to dress up in 'school-girl' outfits and pressing her to engage in 'rape fantasies'

• A high school girl, whose name is being withheld by DailyMail.com because she is a minor, reveals the online relationship began last January
• Weiner and Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton's top aide, were still together 
• He told the teen that it had been a year since he and Huma had sex 
• The girl says she told him she was 15 and a sophomore in high school; messages confirm he knew she was underage
• In one message Weiner tells the girl 'I would bust that tight p***y' 
• She claims Weiner asked her to undress and encouraged her to touch herself and say his name over video chat
• Weiner would not get fully nude, but usually shirtless and wearing boxers
• Weiner did not deny exchanging 'flirtatious' messages with the teen to DailyMail.com.  He declined to comment on the specifics

BREAKING: Obama CIA Director's Communist Past

oped: Bottom line as the old saying goes...Where there is smoke there is fire : http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/barry-barack-obama-is-new-anthony.html 
 John Brennan files:
 http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/search?q=John+Brennan+

Well, this is awkward. It looks like Barack Obama appointed a former Communist to the head of the CIA:

At his first polygraph test to enter the CIA, the future director had a secret.

John Brennan on Thursday recalled being asked a standard question for a top security clearance at his early CIA lie detector test: Have you ever worked with or for a group that was dedicated to overthrowing the US?"

I froze," Brennan said during a panel discussion about diversity in the intelligence community at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's annual conference. "This was back in 1980, and I thought back to a previous election where I voted, and I voted for the Communist Party candidate,"


Brennan was responding to a question about barriers to recruiting diverse candidates for the intelligence fields, including whether past records of activism could hurt someone applying for a clearance later in life. This isn't some dumb youthful throwaway vote. At the time, Brennan was twenty five years old, had a Bachelor's from Fordham, and had studied abroad in Cairo. The man received an M.A. in government that same year from the University of Texas, and presumably had a grasp of the global political landscape. Yet at the height of the Cold War, he still cast a vote for the Communist Party.

Lest you look at Occupy Generation and assume this is just the same as voting for Bernie Sanders, consider this: records indicate that during the Cold War, the American Communist Party was acting in concert with the Soviet Union. The Venona Cables indicate that the worst fears of Joseph McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover were extremely well founded. The organization was subsidized, into the millions of dollars, by the Soviet government. Its entire existence was a Kremlin sabotage operation meant to undermine our stability- think Radio Free America, but with shows about the joys of the gulag and the pleasures of standing in bread lines.

Credit where it's due: back in 2014, Senator Rand Paul slammed the appointment of Brennan as CIA chief's confirmation after it was revealed that Brennan explicitly lied about the CIA spying on a Senate subcommittee as it investigated torture. Paul also engaged in a 13 hour filibuster of Brennan's nomination that questioned Brennan's total disregard for the due process rights of Americans. That Brennan engaged in the sort of behavior that's more associated with the KGB than the Constitution should no longer come as a surprise.
 

• EdWatts • 3 hours ago

  Our entire Federal government is full of communists. Some call themselves communists, some, socialists, others use the term "progressive" (Progressing toward what? Why, communism, of course!), but most of them are known, simply, as "Democrats".
  Today's Republican Party is far to the left of where the Democrats were in the 1960's, pushed along by "bipartisanship" with, well, you know...
  Joseph McCarthy was right.
  

  • tpalya EdWatts • an hour ago

    McCarthy was right, that's why they attacked him so hard.
    
• EdWatts • 3 hours ago

  Our entire Federal government is full of communists. Some call themselves communists, some, socialists, others use the term "progressive" (Progressing toward what? Why, communism, of course!), but most of them are known, simply, as "Democrats".
  Today's Republican Party is far to the left of where the Democrats were in the 1960's, pushed along by "bipartisanship" with, well, you know...
  Joseph McCarthy was right.
  

  • tpalya EdWatts • an hour ago

    McCarthy was right, that's why they attacked him so hard.
    

• NannyB EdWatts • an hour ago

  I think you are right...but right now I am watching what is happening in Charlotte NC. I am wondering how many of these rioters...no...they are no longer "protesting"...were sent by Soros and are getting paid. We cannot afford to have America behave like this for ANY reason. We need a voice of reason to establish some sanity in these areas. I am so sad to see these poor people thinking this is how they are going to get ahead. A few have spoken to a reporter there and they make you want to cry...they are desperate. They are human just like those they protest against. And to think that America's first black president could have guided groups like this and helped them make something of their lives...and he just sat back making the situation worse. May he rot in hell and take his wife with him.
  

 Source: AAN

Charity: Clinton Foundation Distributed “Watered-Down” AIDS Drugs to Sub-Saharan Africa

by eaglerising 
From the Daily Caller News Foundation:
Former President Bill Clinton and his Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) distributed “watered-down” HIV/AIDs drugs to patients in sub-Saharan Africa, and “likely increased” the risks of morbidity and mortality, according to a draft congressional report obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.
The congressional report, titled,“The Clinton Foundation and The India Success Story,” was initiated by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican and vice-chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
The CHAI program to help AIDS victims is considered one of the Clinton Foundation’s most important contributions and is probably its best known initiative.
The congressional report focused on Clinton’s decade-long relationship with a controversial Indian drug manufacturer called Ranbaxy, which CHAI used as one of its main distributors of HIV/AIDS drugs to Third World countries.

It also highlighted the work of Dinesh Thakur, a former Ranbaxy employee who became a star whistleblower and permitted the U.S. government to launch a landmark lawsuit against the Indian firm. The company was vulnerable to U.S. prosecution because it also sold its generic drugs on the U.S. market.
Ranbaxy ultimately pleaded guilty in 2013 to seven criminal counts with intent to defraud and the introduction of adulterated drugs into interstate commerce.

The Department of Justice further levied a $500 million fine and forfeiture on the company.
“This is the largest false claims case ever prosecuted in the District of Maryland, and the nation’s largest financial penalty paid by a generic pharmaceutical company,” said U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein when Ranbaxy pleaded guilty.
“When companies sell adulterated drugs, they undermine the integrity of the FDA’s approval process and may cause patients to take drugs that are substandard, ineffective, or unsafe,” said Stuart F. Delery, acting assistant attorney general for the civil division of the Department of Justice, when the government announced its action against the Indian company.
The Department of Justice stated in its final settlement, “alleged due to the company’s diluted drugs, it ‘subjected patients to increased risks of morbidity and mortality,’” according to the report.

“The question becomes, ‘how many people lost their lives, how many people found it was a false promise,’” asked Blackburn in an interview with TheDCNF.
The possibility that CHAI distributed adulterated and diluted AIDS drugs to Third World victims could shake the foundations of the Clinton charity and spark a new round of scrutiny in the final weeks of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
Blackburn said she delivered the report to the inspector generals at the Department of Health and Human Services and to the Department of State, where Hillary served as secretary of state during President Barack Obama’s first term.

The congressional study also highlighted the unseemly ties between Bill and two controversial Indian-Americans who have been investigated and sanctioned by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The most troubling revelations concern the Clinton Foundation’s vigorous promotion of Ranbaxy despite mounting evidence the Indian firm had persistently poor quality control and attempted to cover it up through either faulty or fraudulent reporting to the FDA.
It is unclear at this juncture how many AIDS patients received the “watered-down” drugs.

ProPublica estimated that in 2007 alone, the U.S. Agency for International Development allocated $9 million to Ranbaxy and delivered “more than $1.8 million packages.”
“Substandard HIV medicines cause health problems for patients, perhaps even accelerating death from HIV-related infections,” Roger Bate, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute who researches substandard and counterfeit medicines, told TheDCNF.
Thakur told TheDCNF that many of the company’s anti-retroviral drugs were used to stabilize platelet and white blood cell counts in AIDS patients.
“These drugs allow it to stabilize and essentially provide immunity to patients. If the content of the medicine is not what is listed on the label, you will not see the platelet levels or the WBC levels stabilize,” he said.

Ranbaxy’s first public hint of problems occurred in August 2004, one year after CHAI began working with the firm. The World Health Organization reported irregularities involving three Ranbaxy drugs in South Africa, according to the report.
The FDA sent a public “warning letter” to Ranbaxy in 2006 about reported irregularities in the company’s quality control efforts. It concluded that the drugs, which included anti-retroviral HIV/AIDs medications, “show much lower potencies in these batches.”
Although Ranbaxy’s generic drugs are now barred from being sold in the U.S., CHAI and the former president continue to praise Ranbaxy and distribute the company’s HIV/AID drugs to patients abroad.
Bill heaped praise on Ranbaxy in 2013 during a speech in Mumbai, saying, the drugs saved millions of lives.

Neither CHAI nor the Clinton Foundation have announced they severed ties with Ranbaxy.
Thakur said he’s now a public health activist who tries to get global health charities to focus on the quality of drugs rather than simply on “access” to patients.
The whistleblower tried to meet with CHAI and Clinton Foundation officials, but was only met with silence. “I have tried to reach out to them,” he told TheDCNF. “But I haven’t had a great amount of success with the Clinton Foundation.”
CHAI was a part of the Clinton Foundation until 2010, when it spun off into a separate entity. The groups still have some overlapping board members and staff, and they continue to operate in close coordination. Bill Clinton, for example, is deeply involved with both organizations.

Charles Ortel, a Wall Street analyst who has been an outspoken critic of the legal missteps by the Clinton Foundation, claims their separation was “deeply suspect.”
“In the application, trustees of the new entity, including Bill Clinton, falsely claim the entity is not a successor to previous efforts. This is not true. They purposefully obscure the fact that a similar operation called ‘CHAI’ was by far the largest piece of the original Foundation,” Ortel told TheDCNF.
The congressional study suggests Bill may have relaxed quality standards in a 2000 executive order.
He signed an executive order that, “relaxed intellectual property policy standards,” promising the U.S. government “would not revoke or revise the intellectual property laws of any ‘Sub-Saharan country’ relating to HIV/AIDS medicines or technologies,” the report states.

CHAI announced in October 2003 it was going to distribute generic, low-cost HIV drugs from four foreign drug manufacturers:  Ranbaxy; Cipla of Mumbai, India; Matrix Labs of Hydrabad, India; Aspen Pharmacare of Johannesburg, South Africa.
CHAI’s endorsement also allowed Ranbaxy to manufacture HIV drugs that would be bought by the U.S. government under the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS relief — a $15 billion initiative proposed by former President George W. Bush.
The flow of U.S. funds combined with Clinton’s endorsement allowed the four foreign drug manufactures to become “good acquisition targets,” according to the study.
Ranbaxy filed 10 abbreviated new drug applications, three of which were approved by the FDA, according to the congressional study. Eventually, the firm would produce 13 generic HIV drugs.

The companies enjoyed great financial profits and they “exploded as they partnered with the Foundation for several years,” the report states.
The study also examined the key players in the Clinton-CHAI orbit, the potential for corruption and how the program ultimately benefited the Clinton Foundation in terms of donor contributions.
One relationship unearthed by the report was the American Indian Foundation, which Clinton co-founded with Indian-American businessmen Rajat Gupta and Vinod Gupta in 2001.
Rajat was convicted of insider trading in 2012 in a sensational trial.
Vinod eventually was forced to resign as CEO and chairman of the company InfoGroup and was fined $9 million in a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation. One of the charges stated Vinod had awarded Bill $3.3 million without board approval.

Blackburn says the worst part of the story were the “false hopes” offered by the Clinton Foundation.
“You think about the emotional state of health care workers as they are dealing with these individuals and the emotional state of the patients. To me it’s disturbing and very sad,” she said.

BREAKING: FBI Director James Comey – SUBPOENAED By Congress For Letting Hillary Off The Hook!

 oped: Being a former now retired Federal as well as Local LE officer...I am now placing James Comey on my S***List along with GWBush who said: "Hillary is like a Sister in Law"...seems James feels the same way!


by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton 
It looks like FBI Director James Comey is sitting in a pot of hot water and the temperature is steadily being increased. He let Hillary Clinton skate completely on the email scandal. He even said she was lying and was guilty, but let her off anyway. No one can figure out why either.
Comey released highly redacted notes of his interview with Hillary Clinton. They were practically useless. Attorney General Loretta Lynch is just as complicit for meeting with Bill Clinton just before Hillary testified to the FBI. Obviously, briefing him on what Hillary should and should not say.
Congress has repeatedly requested that Comey provide certain documents on Clinton’s email scandal and he has repeatedly failed to provide them. In a further attempt to get Comey to comply, Lamar Smith of Texas has slapped Comey with a subpoena compelling him to cough up the documents.

From the Independent Journal Review:
The FBI Director’s recommendation to the Attorney General not to indict Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for legal infractions with her private email server while at the State Department still has many political observers shaking their heads over the obvious legal double standard.
The decision-making of FBI Director Comey, who recently sent highly redacted notes of his interview process and investigation of Hillary Clinton, and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who had a private meeting with Bill Clinton prior to her case being dismissed, have been highly scrutinized.
After grilling Comey on the Hill, Congress requested that the director deliver certain documents so lawmakers could better understand the scope and breadth of Hillary Clinton’s extra-legal email activities. The director has reportedly failed to deliver, and now Congress is once again trying to get transparency.

The Washington Examiner reported:
House Committee on Science, Space and Technology Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, subpoenaed FBI Director James Comey on Tuesday for documents and information related to the security of the private email account and server Hillary Clinton used when she led the State Department.
Smith asked Comey for the documents in a Sept. 9 letter, but then issued the subpoena after Comey failed to comply with the request.
“The committee continues to have questions about the structure and security of the email system used by former Secretary Clinton and whether she and her staff employed cybersecurity standards required by FISMA,” the statement from the committee read. But I doubt they will ever get the answers they are seeking… they will get stonewalled by the Obama Administration, the FBI and the Clintons, just as they always do.
We seem to no longer have three functioning separate branches of government in this nation. The Executive Branch seems to rule over all now, making the Judicial Branch submissive to it and the Legislative Branch all but irrelevant. There is no better example of that than the corruption surrounding Hillary Clinton.



 

Liberals Rewriting History to make Americans Forget that We Are Exceptional

 oped: Just for the record I must stress once again that our school system including elite Universities are dumbing down our children by rewriting or skipping teaching US/World History que: http://sharlaslabyrinth.blogspot.com/2013/02/barry-barack-obama-is-new-anthony.html


By Pamela Adams 
Progressives have been poisoning the minds of our children with rewritten history. They claim America is all about power, occupation and control. The compassion of America’s military and unselfish actions of one man proves how intentionally wrong they are.
Joseph Stalin began World War II on Adolf Hitler’s side. Stalin was unaffected by Hitler’s Holocaust as he starved millions of Ukrainians himself, dumping them in mass graves. Stalin even returned Jews fleeing to the Soviet Union back to Hitler to strengthen their alliance.

Stalin’s strategy was to allow Hitler to conquer Europe and then he would conquer Hitler. Once Hitler invaded parts of the Soviet Union, Stalin started singing a different tune. He began working with the Allies to defeat Germany.
The European conflict of World War II ended on May 8, 1945, known as V-E Day. It also marked the beginning of the Cold War.
The Western Allied Forces and the Soviet Union agreed to divide control of Germany. The democratic Allies obtained the western portion. Communist Russia occupied the east. The capital, Berlin, was also split. This made things difficult on the Allies as it was located 100 miles in Soviet Union’s territory. Supplying West Berlin would require a cooperative East Germany.

Even after the war, Stalin was motivated by domination. He now wanted complete control of Berlin. Anticipating an American withdrawal of the area, he instituted the Berlin Blockade on June 24, 1948. This shut off all supplies coming from the Allies to West Berlin, including food and fuel. No Allied trains, trucks, cars or boats were allowed into East Germany territory.
Stalin’s tactic was to force the Allies to purchase their supplies for West Berlin from him. This would give the Soviet Union complete and ultimate control of the capital.
America was not about to allow the 2 million West Berliners to be used as pawns in Stalin’s little game. They understood Stalin was waging a humanitarian war with no regard for the German people. Within days, the Western Allied forces launched the Berlin Airlift. The United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa began military flights to West Berlin to deliver supplies to its people. Stalin could block roads and waterways, but he could not block the sky or Allied controlled airstrips.

Planes arrived around the clock every 3 minutes. Children gathered to see the aircrafts arrive. Pilot Lieutenant Gail S. “Hal” Halvorsen approached a group of children watching the planes on one of his trips in July. Seeing they were hungry and poor, Halvorsen had compassion for them. He reached into his pocket to give him whatever treats he had.
All Halvorsen could find was two pieces of gum. He gave the gum to the group knowing it would not be enough for the numerous children there. To his surprise, they responded with gratitude and enjoyment. The children took a tiny piece of the gum and passed it on to another. Several just enjoyed the aroma of the wrappers as it was a pleasure they had not experienced for years.

Halvorsen knew he needed to do something for these Germany children caught in an unconscionable circumstance. He informed them he would drop more treats on his next mission. With planes constantly arriving, a little girl asked, “How will we know your plane?” He responded, “I will wiggle my wings.”
When Halvorsen returned to base, he had already devised a plan. He gathered all the candy he could from his fellow airmen as well as handkerchiefs. Halvorsen began making little packages of chocolate, gum and other candies. The handkerchiefs were attached as parachutes. He quickly became known on base as the “Candy Bomber.” The German children lovingly named him “Uncle Wiggle Wings”.

Word reached Halvorsen’s commanding officer, Lt. General William H. Turner, who ordered “Operation Little Vittles” on September 22, 1948. This quickly sparked media attention in the states where civilians immediately jumped on board. School children began gathering and preparing candy packages and parachutes. Companies also participated by donated candies and other items.
The Berlin Airlift was so successful and so embarrassing to Stalin that he ended it on May 12, 1949. Over the 11-month blockade, the Western Allied Forces flew 270,000 missions into Berlin. They provided nearly 2.5 million tons of fuel and food to the German West Berliners.
Uncle Wiggle Wings, along with approximately 25 other crews, dropped 23 tons of chewing gum, chocolates and other candy to the children.

The United States won this war with “bombs” of food, fuel, chocolate, candy, and charity.
Following Stalin’s failed blockade, Germany became two separate states. The free capitalist Western Germany under the Allies became the Federal Republic of Germany. Eastern Germany, impacted by communist Soviet Union, became the German Democratic Republic.  The West continued to prosper under freedom and liberty with the East deteriorating almost to ruins.
This story is the perfect example of American Exceptionalism. It is also the result of capitalism, freedom, and individualism. The government didn’t force Halvorsen to start his candy bombing. Congress didn’t take the candy from his fellow soldiers to give to the children. The Supreme Court had nothing to do with the millions of Americas at home who generously offered up goodies to the German children. The President did not sign an executive order to demand companies donate candy. The military did join in but it was only after ordinary Americans already had the program going.

We are in grave danger of losing the precious traits of compassion and personal initiative that made America great. Progressives have rewritten our history so much we have all but lost these principles. Millennials proved this with their overwhelming support for Sen. Bernie Sanders. They want a leader who promises to take care of them with other people’s money. They believe they deserve everything without having to do anything. We saved West Berlin from the communists in 1949. Now we need someone to save us from the Democrats.
Progressives will always tell you who they are. It becomes obvious in what they accuse others of doing. They believe America is greedy and corrupt because that’s who they are. Just listen to any speech by Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton. They have to rewrite history so they can cover up their own despicable actions.

It is foreign to Liberal Progressives that a pilot would willfully donate his time and money for poor German children because that thought would never cross their own minds. Citizens and companies must have selfish ulterior motives in collecting and donating supplies. No one would selflessly do something like that, which is why they require the government do it. They can claim compassion for demanding it without lifting a finger.
Americans know deep in their soul that there are millions of “Uncle Wiggle Wings” in our history. We can’t let the Progressives take them away from us. If we have any hope of reclaiming the true America, we must continue to research, learn and share these stories.
Every generation must fight for the freedom our ancestors so bravely won and defended for us. We owe our children and grandchildren that much.
But that’s just my 2 cents.

Donald Trump Readies His Biggest Hammer to Drive the Last Nail in Hillary’s Coffin

By Onan Coca 
The core of the conservative wing of the #NeverTrump movement has always cited Donald Trump’s liberal tendencies as their reason for standing against him (and standing against Hillary Clinton). Over the many months of the primary and now the general campaign, Mr. Trump has proven their concerns justified again and again. Whether on healthcare, or welfare, or infrastructure – Trump is nowhere near as liberal as Hillary Clinton, but he’s far from conservative. 

Even given this tendency to lean towards the middle, Donald Trump’s plans for the economy have consistently been far to the right of his opponent’s plans. On taxation, spending, and regulation Mr. Trump’s plans would be a breath of fresh air for the economy and for the American people, which is why some Republicans wondered why Donald Trump was ignoring his built-in advantage over Clinton on the economy. 


His neglect of this issue has been a mystery. Why would he sideline an issue on which he has an enormous advantage over Hillary Clinton? Trump would provide incentives for private investment, economic growth, and job creation, a policy that worked brilliantly for Presidents Kennedy and Reagan. Hillary would provide zero incentives for growth and rely on government spending to generate jobs, a policy that has never produced a robust economy. 
The contrast, so favorable to Trump, begged for him to harp on it in speech after speech. But he held back, talking about everything from terrorism to child care and driving some of his closest allies crazy. 

Now that he’s finally taken a lead in the polling, he’s still got his best issue to fight against Clinton with!
But Trump may have known something the rest of us didn’t. Or maybe he’s just been lucky. In either case, he has soared from well behind in the race a month ago to a tie with Clinton today—without unleashing his best issue. Now he is. He’s poised to drive home his plans for the economy in the final weeks of the campaign. 


Yes, Donald Trump has turned the election around without having to turn to his best “Trump” card (forgive me, I couldn’t resist). Since September 11^th all of the national (and most of the state to state) polling data has shown a severe shift in trends towards Trump and away from Clinton. The combination of Clinton’s many, many scandals and her obviously failing health has driven the electorate towards Trump in a way none of the pundits had predicted. However, with the debates before us and the election still 7 weeks away Mr. Trump’s business acumen is coming in handy.

Mr. Trump is an accomplished businessman and one of his greatest talents has always been the ability to “close.” Without being a closer, so many of his business deals would have fallen apart before they ever had the chance to be realized. He’s now using this closing talent on the American electorate. He’s known all along that the weak economy was Hillary Clinton’s Achilles heel, and his best weapon against her. And now, in the final days of the campaign, he will use the economy to end her hopes of ever being President.
That’s closing the deal and it’s the one thing Mr. Trump does best.